AI transcript
0:00:03 Support for property comes from better help.
0:00:05 Social media has made it really easy to peer
0:00:06 into other people’s lives,
0:00:08 but when you start comparing yourself, that’s a trap.
0:00:10 Therapy can help you zero in on what you want
0:00:12 instead of what others have
0:00:14 so you can start living your best life.
0:00:16 Better Help Online Therapy offers a safe place
0:00:18 to figure out what’s really important to you.
0:00:21 It’s entirely online and flexible enough
0:00:22 to fit into any schedule.
0:00:23 You can fill out a brief questionnaire
0:00:26 to get matched with a licensed therapist fast.
0:00:29 Stop comparing and start focusing with better help
0:00:32 visit betterhelp.com/prophg today
0:00:34 to get 10% off your first month.
0:00:38 That’s betterhelp, H-E-L-P.com/prophg.
0:00:41 – McCrispy fans, there is a new jar
0:00:43 dropping McCrispy at McDonald’s.
0:00:46 It’s called the Fire Cracker McCrispy.
0:00:51 It has the crispy, juicy tender chicken you love,
0:00:54 topped with crispy jalapenos
0:00:56 and a super tasty sweet and spicy sauce.
0:01:01 You wish the spectacle of flavor never ended.
0:01:04 Try the new Fire Cracker McCrispy today
0:01:07 and participate in McDonald’s restaurants.
0:01:10 – Today’s number $10.
0:01:13 That’s the value of the Uber Eats gift card
0:01:16 that CrowdStrike offered customers as an apology
0:01:18 for its worldwide outage.
0:01:20 Ed, I just can’t take much anymore.
0:01:22 I’m divorcing my wife.
0:01:23 First it was some guy in a drunk party.
0:01:26 Then it was her ex-boyfriend, her boss, my best friend,
0:01:29 even an Uber driver.
0:01:32 I just can’t stop sucking other men’s cocks, Ed.
0:01:44 – That was bad, even for me.
0:01:45 Here we are, Ed.
0:01:49 Proph-G, our producer just went off camera.
0:01:50 She’s calling her lawyer.
0:01:56 – Hello.
0:01:58 – Hey Dina, it’s Claire again.
0:02:00 – What’s going on, Ed?
0:02:02 – I’m doing very well.
0:02:04 By the way, I saw a nice headline in the news this week,
0:02:08 which is that you’re donating $12 million to UCLA
0:02:09 and UC Berkeley.
0:02:10 – Oh, that’s an interesting segue
0:02:12 for me giving random oral sex to men.
0:02:15 Yes, I am, Ed.
0:02:17 – I’m trying to portray you in a better light here.
0:02:19 – We definitely changed altitudes pretty quickly there.
0:02:21 – Do you want to stay on sucking dick?
0:02:24 Do you want to remain there for a little bit longer?
0:02:26 – Let’s try and pivot out of that.
0:02:28 Even I’m feeling a bit cringed out right now.
0:02:31 Even I’m feeling a bit cringed out.
0:02:32 Back to me in my virtue signaling,
0:02:33 what would you like to know, Ed?
0:02:37 You know me, I don’t like to talk much about myself.
0:02:38 What’s on your mind?
0:02:40 – Well, you just talk about it.
0:02:43 I shared it on Twitter, which you’re not on,
0:02:44 so you didn’t see this,
0:02:46 but I just sort of gave you a little shout out
0:02:48 for putting your money where your mouth is.
0:02:49 – That’s nice, that makes me feel good.
0:02:51 – And people just loved it.
0:02:54 I mean, it’s gone, I wouldn’t say viral,
0:02:56 but semi-viral.
0:02:59 I think people are just very impressed with that donation.
0:03:02 So maybe explain what it’s for, what you’re doing.
0:03:06 I just like when you follow through with your ideas,
0:03:07 and that’s what you’ve done here.
0:03:09 – Okay, well, first off, thanks for asking.
0:03:11 So it’s a lot of things.
0:03:13 It’s a culmination of a lot of things.
0:03:15 One, it’s an overdue nod to the generosity
0:03:18 of California taxpayers that gave me a shot.
0:03:20 The reason I’m here with you today
0:03:22 is the generosity of California taxpayers
0:03:26 and the visions of the Regents of the University of California.
0:03:27 I’m not being humble.
0:03:29 I’m a remarkably talented person,
0:03:31 but without the certification contacts
0:03:34 and job opportunities that I got
0:03:37 from the University of California, I just wouldn’t be here.
0:03:40 And the thing about UC back in the ’80s
0:03:43 was that it was not only affordable, it was accessible.
0:03:46 Yeah, 76% admissions rate, $1,200 per year.
0:03:48 And I feel that people who are successful
0:03:51 and have gathered some wealth have an obligation,
0:03:54 especially UC grads, to try and return it
0:03:56 to that level of affordability and accessibility.
0:03:58 In addition, I saw an opportunity,
0:04:02 and that is we have this incredible infrastructure
0:04:03 across the UC campuses.
0:04:05 We don’t take advantage of the facilities at night
0:04:07 or during the summer.
0:04:08 And also our product doesn’t evolve.
0:04:09 Not everyone should be shoved
0:04:13 through a traditional four-year liberal arts degree.
0:04:16 And because five people are leaving the trades
0:04:18 for every two that are going in over the next 10 years,
0:04:20 we’ve seen a dramatic escalation
0:04:22 in the salaries and compensation
0:04:26 of plumbers, electricians, cybersecurity professionals,
0:04:28 specialty nursing, specialty construction.
0:04:31 So I approached the chancellors at UCLA and Berkeley
0:04:34 and said, if I funded a program,
0:04:36 that was more vocational in nature.
0:04:38 They gave maybe young adults and adults
0:04:40 a chance to take courses, very specialized courses
0:04:42 over the course of a year.
0:04:46 They gave them access to this incredible up swell
0:04:48 and compensation and job opportunities
0:04:49 in the main street economy.
0:04:50 Would you be interested?
0:04:51 – They were interested and they were very generous with me,
0:04:54 even though they hate using the term vocational.
0:04:56 So we talk about non-traditional students.
0:04:58 – Why do you think they hate the term?
0:05:00 Does it just sound not elite enough or something?
0:05:01 – Yeah, I think they see themselves
0:05:04 as wanting to higher education
0:05:07 as about giving a kid a chance to explore different disciplines
0:05:10 such that it rounds out the kind of the brain is a muscle,
0:05:12 whether it’s history or philosophy,
0:05:14 and that maybe our junior colleges
0:05:16 or other trade schools are really for that,
0:05:18 that that erodes kind of the mission
0:05:21 and somewhat of the elite status of higher ed.
0:05:23 So they are very, they have been,
0:05:24 that was the hardest part about this gift
0:05:28 was getting them to somehow move to the notion
0:05:32 that we need to offer an opportunity here
0:05:35 over one or two years that would help kids
0:05:37 have the skills that foot to the main street economy
0:05:38 right now.
0:05:41 And my vision is I want it to be free
0:05:43 and I don’t want there to be an admissions process.
0:05:46 I want it to be if you’re smart, not that I’m smart.
0:05:49 You’re a good person who wants to be a part of our economy,
0:05:52 wants to be in the middle class, wants to, or higher,
0:05:54 wants to pay taxes,
0:05:56 but isn’t cut out like two thirds of Americans
0:05:58 for traditional four year liberal arts degree
0:06:03 that you have opportunities and free and accessible.
0:06:05 Those are my two call signs here,
0:06:08 but this is, I’m super excited about it.
0:06:12 Both UCLA and Berkeley were really supportive of the idea.
0:06:14 And also for me, it’s not even philanthropy,
0:06:17 it’s consumption, it makes me feel really fucking awesome.
0:06:19 I feel like a baller doing it.
0:06:20 – I think it accomplished another goal,
0:06:24 which is that many of the comments I saw on Twitter were,
0:06:26 I didn’t know Scott had $12 million.
0:06:30 – I have 12 million and one, it’s all gone now.
0:06:31 – That’s what I said.
0:06:32 Someone said, how much does he have?
0:06:33 I said, more than 12 million.
0:06:36 – It’s super exciting.
0:06:39 I’m happy to be, you know, I don’t know, dad.
0:06:42 It’s like you get to a point in your life
0:06:46 and what I wanna do is,
0:06:48 I love the difference between an opinion
0:06:50 and a principle or a value.
0:06:51 And the difference between an opinion
0:06:53 of which I vomit out to everybody on this
0:06:56 and other podcasts is that, okay,
0:06:58 are you really passionate about struggling young men?
0:06:59 I think I am.
0:07:00 Well, is it an opinion or is it a value?
0:07:02 I’m really passionate about higher ed
0:07:04 and making it more affordable and accessible.
0:07:07 Well, is that just an opinion or isn’t a value?
0:07:08 And the way you show it’s a value
0:07:10 is that you sacrifice for it.
0:07:13 And so I’m sort of overdue closing the gap
0:07:15 between everything I say and everything I do.
0:07:18 I need to, you know, I definitely talk the talk.
0:07:20 I need to walk the walk more.
0:07:22 And this is an attempt to do that.
0:07:24 – And with that, let’s share our opinions on the news.
0:07:26 Let’s start with a clear review of market vitals.
0:07:29 (upbeat music)
0:07:36 The S&P 500 had its worst stay since 2022.
0:07:39 The dollar was flat, Bitcoin declined,
0:07:40 and the yield on tenure treasuries fell,
0:07:42 shifting to the headlines.
0:07:44 Google reported second quarter earnings
0:07:47 beating analyst expectations on the top and bottom lines.
0:07:50 Operating profit crossed $1 billion for the first time ever.
0:07:53 However, the stock still fell 5%
0:07:54 due to concerns over heavy AI spending
0:07:57 and slowing YouTube ad sales.
0:07:59 Louis Vuitton and Dior owner LVMH
0:08:03 reported only a 1% increase in sales for the second quarter.
0:08:06 That is its lowest growth rate since 2009,
0:08:07 excluding the pandemic,
0:08:10 sales for fashion and leather goods also only rose 1%.
0:08:12 Nearly half of what analysts expected,
0:08:15 the stock fell more than 4% following that news.
0:08:19 And finally, Spotify hit 246 million premium subscribers
0:08:20 in the second quarter.
0:08:23 That’s up 12% from a year earlier.
0:08:25 Those subscriber numbers helped deliver a record profit
0:08:28 of just under $300 million.
0:08:31 Spotify stock rose as much as 16%.
0:08:34 Scott, your thoughts starting with Google earnings.
0:08:35 – I’ve been thinking a lot about Alphabet,
0:08:39 and I wonder if they’re still sort of semi stuck
0:08:40 in the innovators dilemma.
0:08:43 And that is the company’s LLM Gemini
0:08:47 gets about an eighth of the traffic of chat GPT.
0:08:49 When you think about the captive audience they have
0:08:52 between Android and search,
0:08:54 and the fact that a lot of the IP for AI
0:08:58 was actually developed at Alphabet,
0:09:01 are they really, have they really turned the fire hose
0:09:06 of their 3 billion captive consumer base to Gemini?
0:09:08 Or do they wanna have their cake and eat it too?
0:09:10 And that is the majority of the AI efforts
0:09:12 I have seen from Alphabet have been in the context
0:09:15 of a Google search and it has that kind of summary at the top.
0:09:18 But I don’t feel like I’ve had that much marketing
0:09:21 or that much incentive to use Gemini.
0:09:24 And I wonder if they’re still sort of protecting
0:09:25 or not going full force.
0:09:30 They haven’t burned the boats, so to speak.
0:09:34 And they’re busy sending out $23 billion offers to whiz
0:09:36 and buying back shares and issuing dividends, yeah.
0:09:38 – Their catbacks got hit hard this quarter
0:09:40 and what struck me immediately thought of Apple
0:09:42 that’s so smart not getting into this arms race.
0:09:45 They’re just gonna make sure they own access
0:09:46 to the billion wealthiest consumers
0:09:48 and then they’re gonna charge someone
0:09:50 like Alphabet or open AI ridiculous amount of money
0:09:53 to be the AI of iOS.
0:09:57 But their catbacks was hit 13 billion up 91%
0:09:59 from a year earlier.
0:10:01 Their total catbacks this year could be around 50 billion
0:10:04 which would be 84% higher than when the company
0:10:06 has averaged annually over the past five years.
0:10:09 I gotta think most of that was on AI
0:10:13 which was mentioned, get this 89 times on the earnings call.
0:10:17 YouTube, you know, Ad revenue still climbed 13%
0:10:19 so I think it’s pretty striking.
0:10:22 The thing we have to remember here is that Alphabet
0:10:25 and this is our big tech stock pick of 2024
0:10:26 so I’ve been tracking it.
0:10:28 Microsoft year to date is up 16%
0:10:30 for all of the excitement about that stock.
0:10:34 Amazon’s up 21% but Alphabet ad is up 25%.
0:10:37 So they’re doing really well
0:10:39 and it just strikes me when the analysts,
0:10:42 the analysts zero in on the negatives here
0:10:44 but the company is still doing really well.
0:10:45 What are your thoughts?
0:10:46 – I completely agree with you.
0:10:48 I think people are so obsessed with this idea
0:10:52 that they’re behind on AI which is probably true
0:10:54 when you compare it to Microsoft.
0:10:56 But as with anything, you have to look at the big picture
0:11:00 here and the big picture for Google is extremely compelling.
0:11:02 Search revenue is up 14%.
0:11:05 People thought that chat, GBT and AI
0:11:07 would be eating into that revenue.
0:11:08 It hasn’t hurt it at all.
0:11:12 In fact, you know, search is chugging along just fine,
0:11:13 better than fine.
0:11:16 Cloud revenue up 29%.
0:11:18 I think that was expected.
0:11:20 And as you mentioned the YouTube revenue,
0:11:24 people didn’t like the 13% jump in YouTube revenue.
0:11:27 It’s coming off an insanely high base.
0:11:28 And I think they’re just comparing it
0:11:29 to the previous quarters
0:11:33 where they were getting 20 plus percent growth
0:11:34 which is already insane.
0:11:36 I just wanna point this start out.
0:11:39 YouTube ads, just the ads alone,
0:11:42 they are now bringing in on an annualized basis,
0:11:45 $35 billion per year,
0:11:50 which is higher than Netflix’s total revenue last year.
0:11:52 And it doesn’t even include all the paid subscriptions
0:11:56 they get from YouTube premium and YouTube TV.
0:12:00 So I just think it’s remarkable what YouTube has done.
0:12:02 We have been saying this for a while.
0:12:04 I continue to believe that YouTube
0:12:07 is the most underrated media asset in the world.
0:12:10 And I think if you just stack all those things up,
0:12:14 there’s so much reason to be optimistic about Google.
0:12:14 – Well, the market agrees with you.
0:12:17 And I’ve always, the thing I’ve said about Alphabet
0:12:20 for a long time is that it has the greatest concentration
0:12:22 of IQ since NASA.
0:12:24 And the team of the best players wins
0:12:28 and Alphabet consistently finds the tracks
0:12:31 and retains some of the best players.
0:12:32 It’s an incredible company.
0:12:36 I think it’s, you have to admire their management
0:12:38 and what they built there.
0:12:41 – As we went to LVMH, thoughts on these earnings
0:12:42 that were a disappointment.
0:12:47 – LVMH is sort of the quote unquote bellwether for luxury.
0:12:51 And what’s ailing them is kind of what’s ailing
0:12:52 every luxury firm.
0:12:55 And that is that Asia or specifically China
0:12:58 is no longer the gift that keeps on giving.
0:13:00 And if you were overexposed to China,
0:13:05 it was champagne and cocaine from like 2000 to 2018.
0:13:08 And Estee Lauder went through the roof and, you know,
0:13:11 North Face, it took North Face, I think 20 years
0:13:12 or 30 years to get to a billion in sales.
0:13:14 It took him 18 months in China.
0:13:18 I mean, the shit was just selling before it even got
0:13:20 offloaded from ships, right?
0:13:24 And last year, it’s about one in six purchases globally
0:13:27 of luxury happened in China.
0:13:30 But the Chinese economy is showing signs of weakness.
0:13:32 High net worth families in China reduced their annual
0:13:34 spending by 11% last year.
0:13:37 And you want to talk about just an incredible shift
0:13:39 in fortunes, Chinese stocks have lost 6 trillion
0:13:40 over the past three years.
0:13:43 That’s twice the GDP of the United Kingdom.
0:13:45 The S&P over the last five years has doubled.
0:13:46 It’s up 100%.
0:13:49 India 65, Japan 25, Europe 24.
0:13:52 China is down 30%.
0:13:56 So if, I don’t know what it was, if China was 10 trillion
0:14:00 and we were 25 trillion, we went to 50 and they went to seven.
0:14:03 I mean, LVMH gets about a third of its revenues from China.
0:14:06 So if that’s down 15%, that means of our revenues
0:14:08 are going to be down 5%.
0:14:09 I wonder if it’s a buying opportunity.
0:14:11 It’s such a well-run company.
0:14:13 They have such incredible brands.
0:14:15 But this is just simply put, their biggest customer,
0:14:18 it doesn’t have as much money as they used to.
0:14:20 I’ll also add, it’s very interesting.
0:14:25 I think this is another nice example of these ripple effects
0:14:27 that we often talk about in the markets,
0:14:32 where what started out as basically a real estate crisis
0:14:34 in China that began with Everground
0:14:37 has morphed into a larger issue in China.
0:14:40 It has reverberated throughout the world.
0:14:44 And it’s now worming its way onto the income statement
0:14:49 of a French luxury fashion house, which is LVMH.
0:14:51 And so it’s a very interesting dynamic going on here.
0:14:54 Having said all that, I think your point
0:14:56 that it could be a buy is a good one,
0:14:58 because this company is not in crisis.
0:15:01 I mean, the stock is down this year,
0:15:05 down 10% year to date, coming off some crazy highs
0:15:08 where you saw or know becoming the wealthiest man
0:15:09 in the world.
0:15:11 So yeah, I don’t think this is an organizational issue
0:15:13 with LVMH.
0:15:14 This is a regional issue.
0:15:15 It’s a problem with China.
0:15:17 – So, but let’s just look at the stock.
0:15:21 Over the last five years, the stock’s up 66%.
0:15:24 I mean, it’s just, and then the one
0:15:28 that just absolutely flummoxes me as Hermes
0:15:32 has a market cap of 213 billion euros,
0:15:34 which is about 240 billion.
0:15:35 – Unbelievable.
0:15:37 – So I think luxury is gonna continue.
0:15:39 I think it’s ridiculous.
0:15:41 This notion that young people aren’t as fascinated
0:15:43 by luxury as my generation,
0:15:44 and their ability to command margins
0:15:46 once they get to sort of that iconic status.
0:15:48 And they also, and I’ll wrap up here,
0:15:49 they have an incredible mode
0:15:53 ’cause the majority of luxury brands have heritage.
0:15:55 You just can’t spin up heritage.
0:15:56 You can have a brand like Supreme
0:15:59 that becomes aspirational for a while.
0:16:03 But these brands, Panerai was initially crafted
0:16:07 for Italian submariners.
0:16:09 I mean, this shit is just Louis Vuitton
0:16:12 trekked into Paris on barefoot and said,
0:16:16 “Okay, it makes no sense that these carriages
0:16:18 “are carrying suitcases that are rounded at the top
0:16:21 “and have leather that attracts moisture and mold.”
0:16:24 So luxury is really rooted in innovation.
0:16:27 I think it was at L’Oreal or was it,
0:16:31 I forget who, initially, it was a German chemist
0:16:35 who went to the fields of the South of France
0:16:37 and found a way to crush these flowers
0:16:39 and turn them into a fragrance.
0:16:40 I mean, this shit, it really is rooted.
0:16:43 It was innovation before there was innovation
0:16:46 as we saw it in terms of technology wasn’t fact luxury.
0:16:47 Anyways, that’s my rant on luxury.
0:16:50 – Coco Chanel defined luxury as the following.
0:16:54 Luxury is a necessity that begins when necessity ends.
0:16:57 I thought that was sort of the perfect encapsulation
0:17:00 and a great explanation of why, yes,
0:17:03 we will always worship luxury no matter what we say.
0:17:07 We’ll find a way to find necessities when necessity ends.
0:17:11 – Yeah, she also said the opposite of luxury is not poverty,
0:17:14 it’s vulgarity, which I love.
0:17:16 And she also said, “I love that Nazi dick.”
0:17:20 She said that too, and she said that too.
0:17:21 – Oh, okay.
0:17:22 – Is that fair?
0:17:23 Is that fair?
0:17:25 It’s pretty easy to tell I’m no longer working
0:17:27 for a company that caters to luxury brands.
0:17:29 By the way, Chanel’s an amazing company
0:17:31 with amazing people, sorry about that.
0:17:33 – Yeah, that’s why you’re getting sent clothes
0:17:35 from Nike and not Louis Vuitton.
0:17:37 – I’ve used Chanel moisturizer.
0:17:38 I use Chanel blue.
0:17:39 It’s what I bought actually
0:17:41 when my son was headed back to boarding school.
0:17:44 I always do a little bit of a shopping ritual for him.
0:17:46 And I’m like, this shit is gangster.
0:17:48 You gotta put a little of this on.
0:17:52 And I use Chanel blue moisturizer.
0:17:53 Anyway, it sells lovely.
0:17:55 Masculine, yet feminine at the same time.
0:17:56 – It’s fascinating.
0:17:59 I’m glad everyone’s getting to hear this.
0:18:03 Let’s move on to Spotify, who had a great quarter.
0:18:06 Monthly active uses up 14%, revenue up 20%,
0:18:09 profits up 45%, record profits for the company,
0:18:11 your thoughts on Spotify.
0:18:13 – If you think about what Spotify has accomplished,
0:18:14 it’s singular.
0:18:16 They’ve taken an entire medium
0:18:20 and distilled it to a single icon on your phone
0:18:22 that is searchable and very user friendly.
0:18:23 No one’s done that on TV.
0:18:26 No one’s done that in books.
0:18:27 I think it’s a great value.
0:18:29 I think they do a fantastic job.
0:18:30 In sum, I think it’s a great company.
0:18:31 And they were also pretty bold.
0:18:34 They went all in and gave the artists and labels
0:18:35 a disproportionate amount of the revenues.
0:18:36 They basically lost money.
0:18:39 They were more like a collective or cooperative,
0:18:40 just taking money and distributing it
0:18:42 to the record labels and the artists.
0:18:43 But once they got scale,
0:18:45 and once they kind of not consolidated the industry,
0:18:47 but had a large enough share where they could start,
0:18:51 they had the pricing power to improve or increase prices
0:18:52 and their subscribers can go down.
0:18:55 And basically, essentially what they have figured out
0:18:58 is that they have more pricing power than they thought.
0:19:00 And despite increasing prices,
0:19:03 they have increased their revenue.
0:19:07 So revenue from premium users increased 21%.
0:19:09 And premium subscribers accounted for 95%
0:19:12 of Spotify’s gross profit over the last 12 months.
0:19:13 The thing that doesn’t work
0:19:16 or the thing I saw in this earnings call
0:19:20 or in these numbers is I think both Netflix and Spotify,
0:19:23 I think the advertising does not work for them.
0:19:27 And I remember being like in 2000,
0:19:30 like the early 2000s, I think I was on a date or whatever.
0:19:32 I had some people over
0:19:33 and I was trying to impress these people
0:19:36 and I was at my loft.
0:19:39 I know it’s horrifying to think of me as single.
0:19:41 And I remember I had music on
0:19:43 and things were going really well.
0:19:46 And all of a sudden it dawned on me
0:19:50 like some really bad ad for like pets.com or something
0:19:50 that came up. – Oh no.
0:19:51 – And I’m like, oh my God,
0:19:53 no one’s ever gonna have sex
0:19:55 with the ad supported Pandora guy.
0:19:58 And I literally thought having ad supported Pandora
0:20:01 was just gonna ruin no matter
0:20:04 how many Panoras I had or how I was trying.
0:20:09 When the pets.com ad comes on on Pandora radio, it’s over.
0:20:13 Everyone’s like, well, it’s getting late, it’s getting late.
0:20:16 But what I saw in the Netflix earnings call
0:20:21 and in this one is that it’s just the ad supported ecosystem
0:20:24 is having a really difficult time.
0:20:26 I think it gets in the way of storytelling.
0:20:28 And I think this earnings show is just that
0:20:31 basically it’s subscribers that are
0:20:34 what 95% of Spotify’s gross profit.
0:20:36 – One other thing I found really interesting
0:20:39 was how the CEO, this guy Daniel Eck,
0:20:40 announced these earnings.
0:20:43 And that is before the official earnings call,
0:20:46 he posted on Twitter and on Instagram
0:20:48 what was essentially like a TikTok video.
0:20:50 It was like a two minute selfie video
0:20:53 where he just spoke directly at the camera
0:20:55 and ran through all of the headline numbers
0:20:57 in the earnings report.
0:21:00 I think he started doing this around Q4 of last year.
0:21:03 This is kind of his calm strategy.
0:21:04 I’d like to get your take.
0:21:07 I will just say, I think it’s such a good idea
0:21:09 because in a weird way,
0:21:13 the way most people consume earnings news,
0:21:16 it isn’t actually from the company earnings calls.
0:21:17 It’s from media companies.
0:21:20 It’s from like CNBC or the Wall Street Journal
0:21:23 or even you might get it from listening to this podcast.
0:21:25 You’re rarely hearing from the CEO.
0:21:27 But this strategy is such an obvious one.
0:21:29 Just post directly to social media.
0:21:31 That sort of fixes it.
0:21:35 It’s a small detail, it’s a small innovation.
0:21:38 But I would predict that this is gonna become the norm.
0:21:40 I think you’re gonna see lots more CEOs
0:21:42 posting on social media these selfie videos
0:21:44 about their earnings in the next few months.
0:21:45 – I think that’s really interesting.
0:21:46 I didn’t know that.
0:21:49 You can see them bypassing kind of the
0:21:50 analyst industrial complex
0:21:52 with the CNBC industrial complex
0:21:57 and doing a video kind of timed well, choreograph tweets.
0:21:59 And then maybe doing like Instagram live
0:22:01 to do their analyst calls, right?
0:22:04 To say, all right, I’m going live to answer your questions.
0:22:06 There’s some choreography around SEC
0:22:11 and when you release non-public material information
0:22:12 that they gotta be careful of.
0:22:13 But I think you’re right.
0:22:15 I think that that might be,
0:22:18 ’cause what you want is you wanna get more people
0:22:21 just as you wanna garner more consumers,
0:22:23 so a consumer brand wants to get new consumers
0:22:26 into the franchise, get new customers.
0:22:28 The company wants to get new investors.
0:22:31 And they also, what never goes out of style
0:22:32 is they all want to be known for having
0:22:34 an innovative product that’s differentiated
0:22:36 and that they’re good at what they do
0:22:37 and they’re competent.
0:22:39 But what they really want more than anything
0:22:41 is they want some of that innovative pixie dust
0:22:42 poured all over them.
0:22:45 So communicating your earnings via a video
0:22:48 that’s posted to YouTube and then spliced up
0:22:51 for TikTok or what have you.
0:22:52 And then doing some of this live stuff
0:22:53 on some of these platforms
0:22:55 that just sort of screams of innovation.
0:22:59 – Yeah, I can’t understand how PR firms or PR teams,
0:23:00 I should say, at these public companies
0:23:01 haven’t gotten on this.
0:23:02 – It’s weird to think this,
0:23:07 but I would bet within five years, 10 years max,
0:23:10 a key component of your, of boards deciding
0:23:12 whether they’re making someone CEO
0:23:15 is how strong is their following.
0:23:17 Basically as the CEO, your job is to attract
0:23:18 and retain the best talent
0:23:20 and set a vision for the company.
0:23:22 But as much or more than anything now,
0:23:25 it’s your ability to tell a story or craft a narrative.
0:23:28 The results and access to cheaper capitals
0:23:30 such that you can invest at a greater rate
0:23:32 than your competitors and pull away from them.
0:23:35 Anyways, I’m 100% with you
0:23:39 and I would bet your, the next generation of CEOs
0:23:40 are ones that come armed
0:23:43 with pretty decent followings on social media.
0:23:46 – We’ll be right back after the break
0:23:47 with a look at Tesla.
0:23:50 (upbeat music)
0:23:59 Support for property markets comes from Fundrise.
0:24:00 Venture Capital is widely seen
0:24:03 as one of the most lucrative asset classes in the world.
0:24:04 Go look at the S&P 500,
0:24:07 nearly every major tech company on that list
0:24:09 was once funded by venture capital firms
0:24:13 producing billions of dollars in profits in the process.
0:24:14 The hard truth, however,
0:24:15 is that the biggest venture funds
0:24:18 are almost entirely funded by institutional investors
0:24:20 like endowments and sovereign wealth funds.
0:24:22 So unless you knew a guy who knew a guy,
0:24:25 you and 99.9% of individual investors
0:24:28 did not get to participate in the pre IPO growth
0:24:31 of any of those blue chip companies.
0:24:32 And it’s happening again.
0:24:34 AI is making waves everywhere right now,
0:24:36 except your portfolio.
0:24:38 Some of the biggest names in AI
0:24:40 are locked behind private markets.
0:24:42 The Fundrise Innovation Fund is changing that.
0:24:44 It’s a more than $125 million fund
0:24:46 that holds some of the most exciting
0:24:48 pre IPO tech companies in the world.
0:24:50 And it’s designed for individual investors
0:24:53 so you can get in early on the AI revolution.
0:24:56 Go to fundrise.com/markets to learn more.
0:24:58 Carefully consider the investment material
0:25:00 before investing, including objectives, risks,
0:25:01 charges and expenses.
0:25:03 This and other information can be found
0:25:05 in the Innovation Funds Prospectus
0:25:07 at fundrise.com/innovation.
0:25:09 This is a paid advertisement.
0:25:15 Support for the show comes from Mercury.
0:25:17 Mercury knows your financial operations are complex.
0:25:19 Founders and finance teams have to pull together
0:25:21 different tools, reconcile transactions
0:25:23 from different sources and struggle
0:25:25 to get accurate answers.
0:25:27 With Mercury, you can simplify your operations
0:25:28 with banking and software that power
0:25:30 your critical financial workflows,
0:25:33 all within the one thing every business needs,
0:25:34 a bank account.
0:25:36 And with new bill pay and accounting capabilities,
0:25:39 you can pay bills faster, stay in control of company spend
0:25:41 and speed up reconciliation.
0:25:45 Apply in minutes at mercury.com and join over 200,000
0:25:47 ambitious startups that trust Mercury to provide
0:25:49 the precision control and focus they need
0:25:51 to transform their financial workflows
0:25:53 so they can perform at their best.
0:25:57 Mercury, the art of simplified finances.
0:26:00 Mercury is a financial technology company in Audubank,
0:26:02 banking services provided by Choice Financial Group
0:26:05 and Evolve Bank & Trust, members FDIC.
0:26:08 (upbeat music)
0:26:14 Support for this podcast comes from Huntress.
0:26:15 Keeping your data safe is important,
0:26:17 however, if you’re a small business owner,
0:26:20 then protecting the information of yourself,
0:26:22 your company and your workers is vital.
0:26:24 In comes Huntress.
0:26:26 Huntress is where fully managed cybersecurity
0:26:28 meets human expertise.
0:26:30 They offer a revolutionary approach to manage security
0:26:31 that isn’t all about tech.
0:26:34 It’s about real people providing real defense.
0:26:36 When threats arise or issues occur,
0:26:38 their team of seasoned cyber experts
0:26:42 is ready 24 hours a day, 365 days a year for support.
0:26:46 Visit huntress.com/profg to start a free trial or learn more.
0:26:55 – We’re back with ProfG Markets.
0:26:58 Tesla’s second quarter profits fell 45% year-over-year,
0:27:01 declining for the second quarter in a row.
0:27:02 The company also posted its lowest
0:27:05 quarterly profit margin in five years
0:27:07 and its second consecutive sales decline.
0:27:10 Tesla did not offer a fresh sales target for the year,
0:27:13 but it did warn that its vehicle volume growth rate
0:27:16 would be, quote, “notably lower than 2023.”
0:27:20 The stock fell 12% after the earnings call,
0:27:22 Scott reaction to Tesla’s earnings.
0:27:26 – I think the analogy here is this market feels very similar
0:27:29 in some ways and not in others to the streaming market.
0:27:32 And that is Tesla basically had the market
0:27:33 to themselves similar to Netflix
0:27:37 through the odds in the 2010s.
0:27:39 And that is, if you were gonna buy an EV,
0:27:40 you were really gonna buy a Tesla.
0:27:42 It was kind of like Tesla in the ’70s.
0:27:44 No one was gonna buy a Pontiac Leaf
0:27:46 or whatever the heck it was called, right?
0:27:48 And so they sort of owned it.
0:27:51 And then the stock market just reacted so positively
0:27:56 to Tesla and gave them sass-like, tech-like multiples
0:27:59 that everyone in the auto industry said,
0:28:01 “Okay, we gotta get into this.”
0:28:03 And they announced, you know, Mary Barra announced
0:28:07 that half the cars sold from GM were gonna be electric
0:28:11 within a certain time, Rivian spin up, you know,
0:28:14 Fisker, all these startups kind of spun up.
0:28:18 And there was essentially what happened in the EV race
0:28:19 is what happened in streaming.
0:28:22 That is, it would became over-invested.
0:28:25 And the manifestation of that over-investment
0:28:29 is that a year ago, an EV, an electric-powered vehicle,
0:28:31 was $8,500 more expensive
0:28:33 than its internal combustion equivalent.
0:28:37 As of today, it’s only $1,500 more expensive.
0:28:39 And in some instances, it’s less expensive.
0:28:43 So the F-150 Lightning, that is now $10,000.
0:28:46 The electric version is $10,000 less
0:28:48 than its internal combustion brother.
0:28:49 And I will say brother,
0:28:51 that’s a pretty much a fucking car.
0:28:52 That shit has real balls, Ed.
0:28:54 That shit has balls.
0:28:57 Bottom line is this is classic economics.
0:28:59 Over-investment, because of the market
0:29:01 giving an above market multiples,
0:29:04 that over-investment results in a price war.
0:29:06 And then I think you combine that with,
0:29:09 Tesla’s products feel a little bit dusty right now.
0:29:10 They don’t feel that.
0:29:14 I mean, by the way, I drove in a matte black Cybertruck.
0:29:15 – No way.
0:29:17 – Yeah, a friend of mine is this total master,
0:29:19 the universe baller hedge fund guy,
0:29:20 and he invited me out to his house.
0:29:24 I went out there last weekend and his house manager
0:29:27 picked me up in a matte black Cybertruck.
0:29:28 – No way.
0:29:29 – And I’m like, I am literally
0:29:32 the douchiest douche in Douchville right now.
0:29:33 – How did it feel on the inside?
0:29:34 ‘Cause I kind of agree with you.
0:29:38 I think Tesla’s feel very cheap on the inside.
0:29:41 Did it feel cheap on the inside or did it feel cool?
0:29:42 – No, I felt modern and very techy,
0:29:46 but on the way back, we drove in his Range Rover
0:29:48 and I thought that was just much nicer.
0:29:50 I think the car, quite frankly,
0:29:51 I think the Cybertruck is fucking ridiculous.
0:29:54 I think it looks like something Homer Simpson
0:29:55 would have designed after watching
0:29:58 Battlestar Galactica for 48 hours straight.
0:30:02 I think it’s just so stupid looking and weird looking.
0:30:05 And the inside was very,
0:30:08 it felt like you’re on a set of a movie about the future,
0:30:12 but you would never fucking actually own this car.
0:30:15 And people were coming up and stopping and talking to us
0:30:18 because they were so interested.
0:30:20 It looked like the Batmobile,
0:30:23 but I don’t, I think that thing is a giant thought,
0:30:25 although I guess, have you heard anything
0:30:26 about the sales of this thing?
0:30:29 – I don’t think they’ve broken out the sales
0:30:30 for the Cybertruck yet,
0:30:34 but I think the consensus is that orders are underwhelming
0:30:36 and they’re sort of struggling to keep up.
0:30:39 – The other thing that strikes me about Tesla is that,
0:30:41 if you think about pure meme stocks,
0:30:43 like the memiest of meme stocks,
0:30:45 a meme stock is a stock who’s, in my opinion,
0:30:48 is stock is totally disassociated
0:30:50 from the underlying fundamentals of a company.
0:30:53 It’s like the ketamine of the market, if you will.
0:30:56 And the ultimate meme stock is, hands down,
0:30:58 Donald Trump media.
0:31:01 It’s got a $6 billion market cap,
0:31:04 even after declining 30% in the last week,
0:31:07 and it’s like 7 million in revenues and 300 million.
0:31:08 The company makes no fucking sense.
0:31:11 It’s basically people have decided it’s a proxy
0:31:14 for your support of or your belief
0:31:18 or the probability that Trump is elected president.
0:31:20 And it trades on kind of sentiment and emotion
0:31:22 as nothing to do with the underlying business.
0:31:24 Halfway between a stock that trades
0:31:25 on its underlying fundamentals,
0:31:28 like an alphabet or 99% of stocks,
0:31:30 and Trump, which is a Trump media,
0:31:32 which is a total meme stock,
0:31:35 I think in near meme stocks would be like AMC and GameStop.
0:31:36 They’re shitty businesses,
0:31:38 and they trade much greater multiples than they should
0:31:40 ’cause people think there’s a chance they’ll go crazy again
0:31:43 because of Roaring Kitty or whatever.
0:31:46 I think perfectly in the middle of that continuum
0:31:50 is Tesla, because to be fair, it’s an amazing company.
0:31:54 It inspired the EV race, they do have great products.
0:31:57 Their energy unit is making money.
0:32:00 The idea of a robotex is compelling,
0:32:01 we’ll come back to that.
0:32:05 But Tesla trades at 99 times forward earnings.
0:32:08 This is in contrast to Ferrari,
0:32:10 an amazing brand that a lot of people want
0:32:12 to kind of singular in terms of prestige
0:32:13 and self-expressive benefit.
0:32:16 That trades at 50 times.
0:32:18 Ford trades at seven times and GM get this ad,
0:32:20 trades at five times forward earnings.
0:32:24 So great company, but should it trade
0:32:26 at double the multiple of Ferrari
0:32:29 and 20 times the multiple of General Motors?
0:32:33 So this is sort of the term I would use,
0:32:35 is it as it relates to meme stocks
0:32:37 that Tesla is a hybrid?
0:32:38 – To Prius.
0:32:38 – Yeah, it’s a great company,
0:32:42 but it can’t really justify the multiple it’s at.
0:32:43 And then what I’ll end up with,
0:32:45 and this will come back to our prediction,
0:32:49 is that just as Donald J. Trump media became
0:32:52 an index for whether or not Trump got reelected,
0:32:55 I think these guys, these techno-libertarian weirdos,
0:32:57 really fucked up by coming out
0:33:00 so forcefully in favor of Trump.
0:33:01 Because what they’ve done is,
0:33:04 is they’ve tied themselves and their businesses
0:33:07 to the re-election of Donald Trump.
0:33:11 And as the likelihood of a vice president,
0:33:15 a Kamala Harris becomes more likely,
0:33:16 and it’s become much more likely
0:33:18 just in the last five days,
0:33:19 I think people are gonna go,
0:33:21 well, who is this gonna hurt?
0:33:22 And I think one,
0:33:24 it’ll put pressure on Bitcoin prices,
0:33:25 because they’ll say, okay, maybe Bitcoin
0:33:27 isn’t gonna be totally deregulated
0:33:29 and become the ultimate stablecoin,
0:33:33 or whatever the right term would be good for Bitcoin.
0:33:35 But also I think people are gonna soon learn
0:33:37 or soon figure out,
0:33:38 if it’s a Harris administration,
0:33:43 they may not be inclined to put tariffs on BYD.
0:33:47 They may not be as inclined to give subsidies
0:33:49 that would include Tesla,
0:33:51 or give subsidies that might exclude
0:33:52 some of the Tesla models.
0:33:55 I just, I think people are gonna start connecting the dots
0:33:58 that when you go all MAGA Musk,
0:34:00 there’s some risks there.
0:34:02 And I think that risk will start to show up
0:34:04 in some pressure on the stock
0:34:06 as a little bit of a meme stock
0:34:10 tracking Trump’s election or lack thereup to the White House.
0:34:12 – You mentioned the RoboTaxi,
0:34:13 which we should definitely talk about.
0:34:15 It was supposed to come out,
0:34:19 or the RoboTaxi model was supposed to be unveiled in August.
0:34:21 And then on this earnings call,
0:34:23 Elon delayed it to October.
0:34:28 And that’s, I think, a big reason why the stock fell.
0:34:31 He’s been saying that full self-driving
0:34:35 is coming next year for literally a decade.
0:34:39 So, he’s delayed the unveiling again.
0:34:41 Supposedly it’s coming out in October now.
0:34:43 One sort of tangential point
0:34:46 I’d like to get your reaction to in terms of this,
0:34:50 when will this RoboTaxi ever arrive discussion?
0:34:53 I was speaking with an AI founder recently,
0:34:55 and he actually started his career
0:34:57 as an engineer at an autonomous vehicle company.
0:35:01 And that episode will be coming out in first time founders.
0:35:03 And he made a really interesting point,
0:35:07 which is that we tend to think of self-driving cars
0:35:11 as its own sort of separate, very specific technology.
0:35:13 But in reality, as he pointed out,
0:35:16 self-driving cars is just AI.
0:35:18 And his point is that, you know,
0:35:23 right now is the big AI moment, 2024 is the year of AI.
0:35:24 And so logically speaking,
0:35:26 you would think that if we’re in the AI moment,
0:35:30 we’re about to witness the self-driving moment too.
0:35:32 I think it’s a strong case for why
0:35:35 the Tesla RoboTaxi might actually,
0:35:37 it actually will arrive this year,
0:35:38 despite all of Elon’s bullshit.
0:35:40 And I’m wondering if you agree.
0:35:42 I have no idea.
0:35:43 I just know that it’s the thing
0:35:45 that’s supposed to be around the corner.
0:35:47 And then you look around the corner and it’s not there.
0:35:48 And you also have Waymo,
0:35:51 you also have a lot of competitors in the space
0:35:54 in order to really, I’m taking this through,
0:35:58 in order to capture incremental margin
0:36:01 that results in this type of increase in earnings,
0:36:06 you would have to have Teslas that were more AI enabled,
0:36:09 or had more automated driving technology
0:36:10 than any other car.
0:36:14 Is Tesla that far ahead of the other self-driving technology
0:36:16 such that they could capture that innovation
0:36:17 just for Teslas?
0:36:19 I don’t, there’s two things here.
0:36:20 When does this happen?
0:36:23 And also, what would Tesla’s ability be
0:36:26 to capture the economics of that innovation
0:36:29 versus any other company?
0:36:31 Just before we wrap up on this,
0:36:33 we spend all this time ragging on Tesla.
0:36:36 Let’s try to think a bit more positively.
0:36:39 Say you were on the board of Tesla.
0:36:42 And let’s be clear, the business is struggling.
0:36:45 Revenue rose, but it only rose 2%
0:36:47 and profits fell 45%.
0:36:49 It’s dealing with a lot of issues.
0:36:52 You know, it’s market share in the EV space in America
0:36:54 is down to 50%.
0:36:56 Four years ago, that number was 80%.
0:36:59 So we’re not being biased by saying that Tesla’s,
0:37:02 Tesla as a business is struggling.
0:37:04 What would you be focusing on
0:37:06 if you were trying to improve this business
0:37:07 and you were on the board?
0:37:08 Okay, so if we’re gonna imagine we’re on the board,
0:37:10 I’m gonna imagine that I’m dating Tom Brady
0:37:13 and he runs his hands through my share like thick hair.
0:37:15 I mean, if we’re really gonna imagine,
0:37:17 if we’re really gonna hallucinate, let’s go full.
0:37:20 Let’s go full psilocybin and with a kicker
0:37:22 of like nine shots of something.
0:37:25 Okay, I’m on the board of Tesla.
0:37:28 Oh, that’s a good one.
0:37:29 Where would I be focused?
0:37:32 I think I’d be, I mean, this sounds boring,
0:37:35 but I think their energy stuff is pretty cool.
0:37:37 Totally, by the way, that business doubled.
0:37:39 Yeah, doing pretty well there.
0:37:42 I mean, it sounds really base.
0:37:44 I guess I don’t have anything creative here.
0:37:47 I’d be focused on freshening the model lineup
0:37:49 and then I would probably,
0:37:52 I would probably, for the robotaxi stuff,
0:37:55 I would have probably acquired Lyft
0:37:56 and have a built-in base and user base
0:37:58 of people who are comfortable with ride hailing.
0:38:00 They should acquire pellets all in there.
0:38:01 Yeah, there you go.
0:38:03 That’s right, that was my favorite for a while.
0:38:06 They’re definitely being acquired, says ProcG.
0:38:09 We’ll be right back after the break
0:38:12 with a look at a tobacco company’s recent success.
0:38:24 Your team requested a ride, but this time, not from you.
0:38:26 It’s through their Uber Teen account.
0:38:28 It’s an Uber account that allows your team
0:38:30 to request a ride under your supervision
0:38:34 with live trip tracking and highly rated drivers.
0:38:36 Add your team to your Uber account today.
0:38:39 (upbeat music)
0:38:41 Go back to school with Rogers
0:38:44 and get Canada’s fastest and most reliable internet,
0:38:46 perfect for streaming lectures all day
0:38:48 or binging TV shows all night.
0:38:51 Save up to $20 per month on Rogers internet.
0:38:53 Visit rogers.com for details.
0:38:55 We got you, Rogers.
0:38:58 – Your mom hates it when you leave six half full glasses
0:38:59 on your nightstand.
0:39:02 It’s a good thing mom lives on the other side of the country
0:39:03 and it’s an even better thing
0:39:08 that you can get six Ikea 365 plus glasses for just $9.99.
0:39:10 So go ahead, you can afford to hoard
0:39:12 because Ikea is priced for student life.
0:39:15 Shop everything you need for back to school at Ikea today.
0:39:23 – We’re back with ProcG Markets.
0:39:25 Shares of Philip Morris International
0:39:27 hit their highest level in more than two years
0:39:30 after a red hot product propelled the tobacco company
0:39:32 to a better than expected earnings report.
0:39:34 That product is ZIN.
0:39:37 ZIN is a nicotine pouch that you absorb through your gums
0:39:39 and they’re so popular that there’s been
0:39:41 a nationwide shortage of them this summer.
0:39:44 Philip Morris, which acquired ZIN in 2022,
0:39:47 said sales of the pouches rose 50% year over year.
0:39:51 Overall sales in its smoke-free category rose 24%
0:39:54 and total revenue for the company rose 10%.
0:39:58 Scott, what do you make of this new ZIN trend
0:40:00 that Philip Morris has managed to capture
0:40:02 and that is benefiting this company?
0:40:02 – I think it’s really interesting.
0:40:06 I think all the ZIN guys are trying to figure out a way
0:40:09 to go sort of near ZIN and that is,
0:40:11 my understanding of ZIN is that I want to be clear,
0:40:13 this shit is not good for you.
0:40:18 Don’t pick it up if you don’t have an addiction to nicotine,
0:40:23 but it’s a much less damaging means of delivering nicotine
0:40:26 than chewing tobacco.
0:40:29 And just full disclosure, I have some background here.
0:40:31 I invested in a company being pulled out of bankruptcy
0:40:35 called EnJoy, which is an electronic nicotine delivery
0:40:37 system better known as vaping.
0:40:42 And I think I did it in 2015 or ’16, a long time ago.
0:40:45 And one of the reasons I invested was my mother died
0:40:48 of a smoking-related illness and I’d had two friends
0:40:50 who’d quit smoking using EnJoy.
0:40:53 And just as combustibles are going away,
0:40:55 every year they’re down like five or eight percent.
0:40:57 One in three people who buy a pack of cigarettes,
0:41:00 let’s get this, says this is their last pack
0:41:02 they’re ever gonna buy, one in three.
0:41:04 It’s the largest source of preventable death
0:41:06 in the United States and it’s going away.
0:41:08 People are getting the memo here.
0:41:11 Long story short, we pulled this company out of bankruptcy.
0:41:13 I think we bought it for 60 or 70 million,
0:41:14 put a bunch of money into it.
0:41:16 It was basically a regulatory play.
0:41:18 I think we invested another 100 million in it
0:41:20 to try and get FDA approval and show that
0:41:22 we’re good players, we’re not jewel,
0:41:23 we don’t have a youth problem.
0:41:27 Anyways, seven, what it was, seven, nine years later,
0:41:31 we got acquired for 2.8 billion by Philip Morris.
0:41:34 – Sorry, was it, ’cause there’s Altria,
0:41:36 which used to be Philip Morris,
0:41:38 and then there’s Philip Morris International,
0:41:41 which is the international segment
0:41:44 that was spun out of Altria several years ago.
0:41:47 So that’s just one little wrinkle in this story.
0:41:49 Do you know if it was Altria or Philip Morris International
0:41:50 that acquired you?
0:41:51 – It was Altria, so you’re right,
0:41:53 it’s technically a different group,
0:41:54 ’cause there’s different dynamics
0:41:56 and I guess they figured they could get more money.
0:41:58 – Yeah, and they’re totally separate companies now,
0:41:59 but at one point it was–
0:42:01 – They were the same people.
0:42:02 My favorite though is they changed the name to Altria,
0:42:04 thinking that people would like them more.
0:42:05 They would forget about all the death disease
0:42:07 and disability that they’d spread around the world.
0:42:08 – You don’t think it worked?
0:42:11 – I don’t like name changes
0:42:13 when you’re trying to escape from something.
0:42:16 I don’t think it made any sense.
0:42:19 Anyways, but the thing that really struck me,
0:42:21 I think I told you this, I went to Summit at Sea
0:42:23 with all these young and up-and-coming,
0:42:28 vertical farming, it’s like, I call it learning man,
0:42:29 it was TED Talks during the day
0:42:31 and then at night everyone did their drugs
0:42:33 with a DJ and pretended they were interesting
0:42:35 and thoughtful people, ’cause they’d gone to a talk
0:42:40 during the day on like AI and fashion.
0:42:41 That’ll be riveting.
0:42:46 Anyways, so, but the thing that struck me
0:42:48 was it was on this Virgin cruise ship
0:42:50 and I went up in order to make her some ginger at the bar
0:42:52 and he was like, “Oh my God, finally someone’s drinking.”
0:42:53 And I said, “What do you mean?”
0:42:55 None of these kids drank, they’re all doing drugs.
0:42:57 And I noticed that everybody,
0:43:00 the drug of choice was mushroom chocolates
0:43:01 and then everyone buys one drink
0:43:03 and just nurses it all night
0:43:05 and that alcohol is really,
0:43:08 well, Axel, I’ll turn this question back to you.
0:43:12 You’re young and now for a young person,
0:43:15 what is going on with the trend of substance abuse,
0:43:18 both tobacco and alcohol and drugs
0:43:21 and I won’t ask you to say what you do,
0:43:22 but what do your friends do?
0:43:24 – Yeah, that’s exactly right.
0:43:25 Everyone stopped drinking.
0:43:27 I mean, here are the statistics.
0:43:32 Non-alcoholic beer sales increased 28% last year
0:43:33 and then two, probably more importantly,
0:43:38 Gen Z drinks 20% less alcohol per capita
0:43:39 than millennials did at their age.
0:43:41 I’d love to see the difference between the millennials
0:43:44 and the boomers, probably like 100% less.
0:43:46 But the thing that, you know,
0:43:48 what we should be talking about with this story
0:43:50 is this new obsession with Zinn.
0:43:52 And yeah, it’s a nicotine pouch.
0:43:55 It’s similar to chewing tobacco, but without the tobacco.
0:43:58 Supposedly it doesn’t cause cancer,
0:44:01 but like the vapes, we just don’t have enough data
0:44:04 to say it causes or doesn’t cause it,
0:44:07 but it’s extremely popular everywhere.
0:44:09 Zinn sales are up 80% earlier this year.
0:44:11 It’s now around 50%.
0:44:15 An expected 580 million cans will be sold this year.
0:44:18 And as I mentioned, there is a Zinn shortage in the US.
0:44:21 So now Philip Morris is spending $600 million
0:44:24 on a manufacturing facility in Colorado
0:44:26 just to keep up with demand.
0:44:28 Final anecdotal evidence I will offer,
0:44:30 most of my friends use Zinn.
0:44:31 – Really?
0:44:35 – Yes, none of the women, all the men,
0:44:38 especially the tech bros and especially the bankers.
0:44:43 This is sort of a phenomenon in the world of nicotine.
0:44:48 So it’s massively popular.
0:44:51 I think the question is, do you wanna get in on it
0:44:52 as an investment?
0:44:54 I mean, Philip Morris International is trading
0:44:58 at 20 times earnings, which is pretty high.
0:45:01 It’s double alters PE ratio at the moment.
0:45:03 I think the market is correctly recognizing
0:45:08 that Zinn is an absolute rocket in the nicotine industry.
0:45:10 But I will throw this back to you.
0:45:12 One, do you like this as an investment?
0:45:15 Two, do you have any ethical concerns
0:45:17 about investing in a company
0:45:20 that sure offers tobacco alternatives,
0:45:22 that also sells tobacco?
0:45:23 – I think it’s easy to be a purist
0:45:26 and lecture other people after you’re already rich.
0:45:28 I think people have an obligation
0:45:31 to develop economic security for themselves.
0:45:32 Like I used to own Facebook stock
0:45:34 and I got so much shit for it
0:45:35 ’cause I’m constantly saying, you know,
0:45:38 Mark and Cheryl have done more damage to the world
0:45:40 or teens and anyone like, but you own the stock.
0:45:41 So I sold the stock.
0:45:43 But I don’t have a problem with owning Zinn stocks.
0:45:47 I don’t, my attitude is, you know,
0:45:49 if you really have a moral,
0:45:53 if you really are against it, then fine, do what you want.
0:45:57 But my observation is that the companies
0:45:58 that are, quote unquote, ruining the world
0:46:00 generally have the nicest people
0:46:02 and are the best run companies.
0:46:04 So I did work for fossil fuel companies
0:46:07 and my first company, Profit, the people at Chevron,
0:46:12 the people at Exxon, so nice, such a well run company.
0:46:14 I’ve worked with people at gaming companies,
0:46:16 you know, the casino guys,
0:46:19 incredibly professional, incredibly well run.
0:46:21 Walk into Altria, do work at Altria
0:46:23 and you’re gonna see some of the most talented,
0:46:25 disciplined managers.
0:46:28 They massively invest in their human capital.
0:46:31 – I think it’s got some of the happiest employees
0:46:32 in the world based on service.
0:46:36 – They invest a tremendous amount of money and training.
0:46:39 They have great employee profit sharing.
0:46:41 These are just really well run companies
0:46:43 and they’re typically, in terms of evaluation,
0:46:45 somewhat depressed relative to peers
0:46:47 ’cause there’s a large segment of the population
0:46:48 that won’t invest in them.
0:46:52 So long term, just, I’m not gonna make a moral argument
0:46:53 for or against them.
0:46:56 I mean, you know, I’m a capitalist and, you know,
0:46:59 have at it, it’s your capital, do what you want.
0:47:01 But I would invest in it.
0:47:03 I’m an investor in a,
0:47:04 am I an investor in a fossil fuel company?
0:47:07 I’m an investor actually in a small fossil fuel company
0:47:09 in Switzerland, but let me put it this way.
0:47:10 I think it’s a personal choice,
0:47:13 but I don’t look down on people who invest in this stuff.
0:47:16 I think economic security is really the thing
0:47:17 you should be pursuing
0:47:19 and I think we should be voting for people
0:47:20 that put in place regulations
0:47:25 that think about the well-being of people.
0:47:27 – Let’s take a look at the week ahead.
0:47:29 We’ll hear the Fed’s interest rate decision for July
0:47:31 and we’ll also see earnings from Microsoft,
0:47:33 Meta, Apple and Amazon.
0:47:33 Big earnings week.
0:47:35 Do you have any predictions, Scott?
0:47:38 – Tesla’s about to become a bit of a meme sock
0:47:40 that is an updraft or a downward draft
0:47:43 based on Vice President Harris’s likelihood
0:47:46 or where she is in the polls.
0:47:49 And I think these guys a couple of weeks ago,
0:47:52 this big list of tech bros that again,
0:47:56 seem like literally the lamest club in San Jose,
0:47:59 thought that they were smart to go all in on Trump
0:48:01 and that it would pay off for them.
0:48:03 They didn’t do the math on what’s gonna happen
0:48:06 if all of a sudden a Harris presidency
0:48:07 becomes more and more likely
0:48:09 that I do think it’s gonna actually impact
0:48:11 the companies they’re involved in
0:48:14 and Musk has turned Tesla red pill
0:48:18 and it appears as if he’s gone all in on Trump.
0:48:19 He said he was giving $45 million a month
0:48:21 now he’s backtracked on that.
0:48:22 – Well, he argues that it was made up
0:48:24 and I don’t think there’s any way that we’ll know.
0:48:26 – Well, okay, it was the Wall Street Journal reporting it.
0:48:27 So who do you trust more,
0:48:30 the Wall Street Journal or Elon Musk?
0:48:35 Anyways, this is about to become another,
0:48:36 not as much as Donald Trump media
0:48:38 but it’s about to become a tracking stock
0:48:40 and it become inversely correlated
0:48:42 to Harris’s poll numbers.
0:48:45 – This episode was produced by Claire Miller
0:48:46 and engineered by Benjamin Spencer.
0:48:48 Our associate producer is Alison Weiss
0:48:49 our executive producer is Jason Stavars
0:48:50 and Catherine Dillon.
0:48:52 Mia Silverio is our research lead
0:48:54 and Drew Burroughs is our technical director.
0:48:55 Thank you for listening to Prof.G Markets
0:48:57 from the Vox Media Podcast Network.
0:49:00 Join us on Thursday for a conversation with Dan Ives
0:49:02 only on Prof.G Markets.
0:49:08 ♪ Lifetimes ♪
0:49:16 ♪ You help me ♪
0:49:21 ♪ In kind reunion ♪
0:49:28 ♪ As the world turns ♪
0:49:32 ♪ And the dark lights ♪
0:49:35 ♪ In love, love, love ♪
0:49:39 ♪ Love, love, love ♪
0:49:48 [BLANK_AUDIO]
0:00:05 Social media has made it really easy to peer
0:00:06 into other people’s lives,
0:00:08 but when you start comparing yourself, that’s a trap.
0:00:10 Therapy can help you zero in on what you want
0:00:12 instead of what others have
0:00:14 so you can start living your best life.
0:00:16 Better Help Online Therapy offers a safe place
0:00:18 to figure out what’s really important to you.
0:00:21 It’s entirely online and flexible enough
0:00:22 to fit into any schedule.
0:00:23 You can fill out a brief questionnaire
0:00:26 to get matched with a licensed therapist fast.
0:00:29 Stop comparing and start focusing with better help
0:00:32 visit betterhelp.com/prophg today
0:00:34 to get 10% off your first month.
0:00:38 That’s betterhelp, H-E-L-P.com/prophg.
0:00:41 – McCrispy fans, there is a new jar
0:00:43 dropping McCrispy at McDonald’s.
0:00:46 It’s called the Fire Cracker McCrispy.
0:00:51 It has the crispy, juicy tender chicken you love,
0:00:54 topped with crispy jalapenos
0:00:56 and a super tasty sweet and spicy sauce.
0:01:01 You wish the spectacle of flavor never ended.
0:01:04 Try the new Fire Cracker McCrispy today
0:01:07 and participate in McDonald’s restaurants.
0:01:10 – Today’s number $10.
0:01:13 That’s the value of the Uber Eats gift card
0:01:16 that CrowdStrike offered customers as an apology
0:01:18 for its worldwide outage.
0:01:20 Ed, I just can’t take much anymore.
0:01:22 I’m divorcing my wife.
0:01:23 First it was some guy in a drunk party.
0:01:26 Then it was her ex-boyfriend, her boss, my best friend,
0:01:29 even an Uber driver.
0:01:32 I just can’t stop sucking other men’s cocks, Ed.
0:01:44 – That was bad, even for me.
0:01:45 Here we are, Ed.
0:01:49 Proph-G, our producer just went off camera.
0:01:50 She’s calling her lawyer.
0:01:56 – Hello.
0:01:58 – Hey Dina, it’s Claire again.
0:02:00 – What’s going on, Ed?
0:02:02 – I’m doing very well.
0:02:04 By the way, I saw a nice headline in the news this week,
0:02:08 which is that you’re donating $12 million to UCLA
0:02:09 and UC Berkeley.
0:02:10 – Oh, that’s an interesting segue
0:02:12 for me giving random oral sex to men.
0:02:15 Yes, I am, Ed.
0:02:17 – I’m trying to portray you in a better light here.
0:02:19 – We definitely changed altitudes pretty quickly there.
0:02:21 – Do you want to stay on sucking dick?
0:02:24 Do you want to remain there for a little bit longer?
0:02:26 – Let’s try and pivot out of that.
0:02:28 Even I’m feeling a bit cringed out right now.
0:02:31 Even I’m feeling a bit cringed out.
0:02:32 Back to me in my virtue signaling,
0:02:33 what would you like to know, Ed?
0:02:37 You know me, I don’t like to talk much about myself.
0:02:38 What’s on your mind?
0:02:40 – Well, you just talk about it.
0:02:43 I shared it on Twitter, which you’re not on,
0:02:44 so you didn’t see this,
0:02:46 but I just sort of gave you a little shout out
0:02:48 for putting your money where your mouth is.
0:02:49 – That’s nice, that makes me feel good.
0:02:51 – And people just loved it.
0:02:54 I mean, it’s gone, I wouldn’t say viral,
0:02:56 but semi-viral.
0:02:59 I think people are just very impressed with that donation.
0:03:02 So maybe explain what it’s for, what you’re doing.
0:03:06 I just like when you follow through with your ideas,
0:03:07 and that’s what you’ve done here.
0:03:09 – Okay, well, first off, thanks for asking.
0:03:11 So it’s a lot of things.
0:03:13 It’s a culmination of a lot of things.
0:03:15 One, it’s an overdue nod to the generosity
0:03:18 of California taxpayers that gave me a shot.
0:03:20 The reason I’m here with you today
0:03:22 is the generosity of California taxpayers
0:03:26 and the visions of the Regents of the University of California.
0:03:27 I’m not being humble.
0:03:29 I’m a remarkably talented person,
0:03:31 but without the certification contacts
0:03:34 and job opportunities that I got
0:03:37 from the University of California, I just wouldn’t be here.
0:03:40 And the thing about UC back in the ’80s
0:03:43 was that it was not only affordable, it was accessible.
0:03:46 Yeah, 76% admissions rate, $1,200 per year.
0:03:48 And I feel that people who are successful
0:03:51 and have gathered some wealth have an obligation,
0:03:54 especially UC grads, to try and return it
0:03:56 to that level of affordability and accessibility.
0:03:58 In addition, I saw an opportunity,
0:04:02 and that is we have this incredible infrastructure
0:04:03 across the UC campuses.
0:04:05 We don’t take advantage of the facilities at night
0:04:07 or during the summer.
0:04:08 And also our product doesn’t evolve.
0:04:09 Not everyone should be shoved
0:04:13 through a traditional four-year liberal arts degree.
0:04:16 And because five people are leaving the trades
0:04:18 for every two that are going in over the next 10 years,
0:04:20 we’ve seen a dramatic escalation
0:04:22 in the salaries and compensation
0:04:26 of plumbers, electricians, cybersecurity professionals,
0:04:28 specialty nursing, specialty construction.
0:04:31 So I approached the chancellors at UCLA and Berkeley
0:04:34 and said, if I funded a program,
0:04:36 that was more vocational in nature.
0:04:38 They gave maybe young adults and adults
0:04:40 a chance to take courses, very specialized courses
0:04:42 over the course of a year.
0:04:46 They gave them access to this incredible up swell
0:04:48 and compensation and job opportunities
0:04:49 in the main street economy.
0:04:50 Would you be interested?
0:04:51 – They were interested and they were very generous with me,
0:04:54 even though they hate using the term vocational.
0:04:56 So we talk about non-traditional students.
0:04:58 – Why do you think they hate the term?
0:05:00 Does it just sound not elite enough or something?
0:05:01 – Yeah, I think they see themselves
0:05:04 as wanting to higher education
0:05:07 as about giving a kid a chance to explore different disciplines
0:05:10 such that it rounds out the kind of the brain is a muscle,
0:05:12 whether it’s history or philosophy,
0:05:14 and that maybe our junior colleges
0:05:16 or other trade schools are really for that,
0:05:18 that that erodes kind of the mission
0:05:21 and somewhat of the elite status of higher ed.
0:05:23 So they are very, they have been,
0:05:24 that was the hardest part about this gift
0:05:28 was getting them to somehow move to the notion
0:05:32 that we need to offer an opportunity here
0:05:35 over one or two years that would help kids
0:05:37 have the skills that foot to the main street economy
0:05:38 right now.
0:05:41 And my vision is I want it to be free
0:05:43 and I don’t want there to be an admissions process.
0:05:46 I want it to be if you’re smart, not that I’m smart.
0:05:49 You’re a good person who wants to be a part of our economy,
0:05:52 wants to be in the middle class, wants to, or higher,
0:05:54 wants to pay taxes,
0:05:56 but isn’t cut out like two thirds of Americans
0:05:58 for traditional four year liberal arts degree
0:06:03 that you have opportunities and free and accessible.
0:06:05 Those are my two call signs here,
0:06:08 but this is, I’m super excited about it.
0:06:12 Both UCLA and Berkeley were really supportive of the idea.
0:06:14 And also for me, it’s not even philanthropy,
0:06:17 it’s consumption, it makes me feel really fucking awesome.
0:06:19 I feel like a baller doing it.
0:06:20 – I think it accomplished another goal,
0:06:24 which is that many of the comments I saw on Twitter were,
0:06:26 I didn’t know Scott had $12 million.
0:06:30 – I have 12 million and one, it’s all gone now.
0:06:31 – That’s what I said.
0:06:32 Someone said, how much does he have?
0:06:33 I said, more than 12 million.
0:06:36 – It’s super exciting.
0:06:39 I’m happy to be, you know, I don’t know, dad.
0:06:42 It’s like you get to a point in your life
0:06:46 and what I wanna do is,
0:06:48 I love the difference between an opinion
0:06:50 and a principle or a value.
0:06:51 And the difference between an opinion
0:06:53 of which I vomit out to everybody on this
0:06:56 and other podcasts is that, okay,
0:06:58 are you really passionate about struggling young men?
0:06:59 I think I am.
0:07:00 Well, is it an opinion or is it a value?
0:07:02 I’m really passionate about higher ed
0:07:04 and making it more affordable and accessible.
0:07:07 Well, is that just an opinion or isn’t a value?
0:07:08 And the way you show it’s a value
0:07:10 is that you sacrifice for it.
0:07:13 And so I’m sort of overdue closing the gap
0:07:15 between everything I say and everything I do.
0:07:18 I need to, you know, I definitely talk the talk.
0:07:20 I need to walk the walk more.
0:07:22 And this is an attempt to do that.
0:07:24 – And with that, let’s share our opinions on the news.
0:07:26 Let’s start with a clear review of market vitals.
0:07:29 (upbeat music)
0:07:36 The S&P 500 had its worst stay since 2022.
0:07:39 The dollar was flat, Bitcoin declined,
0:07:40 and the yield on tenure treasuries fell,
0:07:42 shifting to the headlines.
0:07:44 Google reported second quarter earnings
0:07:47 beating analyst expectations on the top and bottom lines.
0:07:50 Operating profit crossed $1 billion for the first time ever.
0:07:53 However, the stock still fell 5%
0:07:54 due to concerns over heavy AI spending
0:07:57 and slowing YouTube ad sales.
0:07:59 Louis Vuitton and Dior owner LVMH
0:08:03 reported only a 1% increase in sales for the second quarter.
0:08:06 That is its lowest growth rate since 2009,
0:08:07 excluding the pandemic,
0:08:10 sales for fashion and leather goods also only rose 1%.
0:08:12 Nearly half of what analysts expected,
0:08:15 the stock fell more than 4% following that news.
0:08:19 And finally, Spotify hit 246 million premium subscribers
0:08:20 in the second quarter.
0:08:23 That’s up 12% from a year earlier.
0:08:25 Those subscriber numbers helped deliver a record profit
0:08:28 of just under $300 million.
0:08:31 Spotify stock rose as much as 16%.
0:08:34 Scott, your thoughts starting with Google earnings.
0:08:35 – I’ve been thinking a lot about Alphabet,
0:08:39 and I wonder if they’re still sort of semi stuck
0:08:40 in the innovators dilemma.
0:08:43 And that is the company’s LLM Gemini
0:08:47 gets about an eighth of the traffic of chat GPT.
0:08:49 When you think about the captive audience they have
0:08:52 between Android and search,
0:08:54 and the fact that a lot of the IP for AI
0:08:58 was actually developed at Alphabet,
0:09:01 are they really, have they really turned the fire hose
0:09:06 of their 3 billion captive consumer base to Gemini?
0:09:08 Or do they wanna have their cake and eat it too?
0:09:10 And that is the majority of the AI efforts
0:09:12 I have seen from Alphabet have been in the context
0:09:15 of a Google search and it has that kind of summary at the top.
0:09:18 But I don’t feel like I’ve had that much marketing
0:09:21 or that much incentive to use Gemini.
0:09:24 And I wonder if they’re still sort of protecting
0:09:25 or not going full force.
0:09:30 They haven’t burned the boats, so to speak.
0:09:34 And they’re busy sending out $23 billion offers to whiz
0:09:36 and buying back shares and issuing dividends, yeah.
0:09:38 – Their catbacks got hit hard this quarter
0:09:40 and what struck me immediately thought of Apple
0:09:42 that’s so smart not getting into this arms race.
0:09:45 They’re just gonna make sure they own access
0:09:46 to the billion wealthiest consumers
0:09:48 and then they’re gonna charge someone
0:09:50 like Alphabet or open AI ridiculous amount of money
0:09:53 to be the AI of iOS.
0:09:57 But their catbacks was hit 13 billion up 91%
0:09:59 from a year earlier.
0:10:01 Their total catbacks this year could be around 50 billion
0:10:04 which would be 84% higher than when the company
0:10:06 has averaged annually over the past five years.
0:10:09 I gotta think most of that was on AI
0:10:13 which was mentioned, get this 89 times on the earnings call.
0:10:17 YouTube, you know, Ad revenue still climbed 13%
0:10:19 so I think it’s pretty striking.
0:10:22 The thing we have to remember here is that Alphabet
0:10:25 and this is our big tech stock pick of 2024
0:10:26 so I’ve been tracking it.
0:10:28 Microsoft year to date is up 16%
0:10:30 for all of the excitement about that stock.
0:10:34 Amazon’s up 21% but Alphabet ad is up 25%.
0:10:37 So they’re doing really well
0:10:39 and it just strikes me when the analysts,
0:10:42 the analysts zero in on the negatives here
0:10:44 but the company is still doing really well.
0:10:45 What are your thoughts?
0:10:46 – I completely agree with you.
0:10:48 I think people are so obsessed with this idea
0:10:52 that they’re behind on AI which is probably true
0:10:54 when you compare it to Microsoft.
0:10:56 But as with anything, you have to look at the big picture
0:11:00 here and the big picture for Google is extremely compelling.
0:11:02 Search revenue is up 14%.
0:11:05 People thought that chat, GBT and AI
0:11:07 would be eating into that revenue.
0:11:08 It hasn’t hurt it at all.
0:11:12 In fact, you know, search is chugging along just fine,
0:11:13 better than fine.
0:11:16 Cloud revenue up 29%.
0:11:18 I think that was expected.
0:11:20 And as you mentioned the YouTube revenue,
0:11:24 people didn’t like the 13% jump in YouTube revenue.
0:11:27 It’s coming off an insanely high base.
0:11:28 And I think they’re just comparing it
0:11:29 to the previous quarters
0:11:33 where they were getting 20 plus percent growth
0:11:34 which is already insane.
0:11:36 I just wanna point this start out.
0:11:39 YouTube ads, just the ads alone,
0:11:42 they are now bringing in on an annualized basis,
0:11:45 $35 billion per year,
0:11:50 which is higher than Netflix’s total revenue last year.
0:11:52 And it doesn’t even include all the paid subscriptions
0:11:56 they get from YouTube premium and YouTube TV.
0:12:00 So I just think it’s remarkable what YouTube has done.
0:12:02 We have been saying this for a while.
0:12:04 I continue to believe that YouTube
0:12:07 is the most underrated media asset in the world.
0:12:10 And I think if you just stack all those things up,
0:12:14 there’s so much reason to be optimistic about Google.
0:12:14 – Well, the market agrees with you.
0:12:17 And I’ve always, the thing I’ve said about Alphabet
0:12:20 for a long time is that it has the greatest concentration
0:12:22 of IQ since NASA.
0:12:24 And the team of the best players wins
0:12:28 and Alphabet consistently finds the tracks
0:12:31 and retains some of the best players.
0:12:32 It’s an incredible company.
0:12:36 I think it’s, you have to admire their management
0:12:38 and what they built there.
0:12:41 – As we went to LVMH, thoughts on these earnings
0:12:42 that were a disappointment.
0:12:47 – LVMH is sort of the quote unquote bellwether for luxury.
0:12:51 And what’s ailing them is kind of what’s ailing
0:12:52 every luxury firm.
0:12:55 And that is that Asia or specifically China
0:12:58 is no longer the gift that keeps on giving.
0:13:00 And if you were overexposed to China,
0:13:05 it was champagne and cocaine from like 2000 to 2018.
0:13:08 And Estee Lauder went through the roof and, you know,
0:13:11 North Face, it took North Face, I think 20 years
0:13:12 or 30 years to get to a billion in sales.
0:13:14 It took him 18 months in China.
0:13:18 I mean, the shit was just selling before it even got
0:13:20 offloaded from ships, right?
0:13:24 And last year, it’s about one in six purchases globally
0:13:27 of luxury happened in China.
0:13:30 But the Chinese economy is showing signs of weakness.
0:13:32 High net worth families in China reduced their annual
0:13:34 spending by 11% last year.
0:13:37 And you want to talk about just an incredible shift
0:13:39 in fortunes, Chinese stocks have lost 6 trillion
0:13:40 over the past three years.
0:13:43 That’s twice the GDP of the United Kingdom.
0:13:45 The S&P over the last five years has doubled.
0:13:46 It’s up 100%.
0:13:49 India 65, Japan 25, Europe 24.
0:13:52 China is down 30%.
0:13:56 So if, I don’t know what it was, if China was 10 trillion
0:14:00 and we were 25 trillion, we went to 50 and they went to seven.
0:14:03 I mean, LVMH gets about a third of its revenues from China.
0:14:06 So if that’s down 15%, that means of our revenues
0:14:08 are going to be down 5%.
0:14:09 I wonder if it’s a buying opportunity.
0:14:11 It’s such a well-run company.
0:14:13 They have such incredible brands.
0:14:15 But this is just simply put, their biggest customer,
0:14:18 it doesn’t have as much money as they used to.
0:14:20 I’ll also add, it’s very interesting.
0:14:25 I think this is another nice example of these ripple effects
0:14:27 that we often talk about in the markets,
0:14:32 where what started out as basically a real estate crisis
0:14:34 in China that began with Everground
0:14:37 has morphed into a larger issue in China.
0:14:40 It has reverberated throughout the world.
0:14:44 And it’s now worming its way onto the income statement
0:14:49 of a French luxury fashion house, which is LVMH.
0:14:51 And so it’s a very interesting dynamic going on here.
0:14:54 Having said all that, I think your point
0:14:56 that it could be a buy is a good one,
0:14:58 because this company is not in crisis.
0:15:01 I mean, the stock is down this year,
0:15:05 down 10% year to date, coming off some crazy highs
0:15:08 where you saw or know becoming the wealthiest man
0:15:09 in the world.
0:15:11 So yeah, I don’t think this is an organizational issue
0:15:13 with LVMH.
0:15:14 This is a regional issue.
0:15:15 It’s a problem with China.
0:15:17 – So, but let’s just look at the stock.
0:15:21 Over the last five years, the stock’s up 66%.
0:15:24 I mean, it’s just, and then the one
0:15:28 that just absolutely flummoxes me as Hermes
0:15:32 has a market cap of 213 billion euros,
0:15:34 which is about 240 billion.
0:15:35 – Unbelievable.
0:15:37 – So I think luxury is gonna continue.
0:15:39 I think it’s ridiculous.
0:15:41 This notion that young people aren’t as fascinated
0:15:43 by luxury as my generation,
0:15:44 and their ability to command margins
0:15:46 once they get to sort of that iconic status.
0:15:48 And they also, and I’ll wrap up here,
0:15:49 they have an incredible mode
0:15:53 ’cause the majority of luxury brands have heritage.
0:15:55 You just can’t spin up heritage.
0:15:56 You can have a brand like Supreme
0:15:59 that becomes aspirational for a while.
0:16:03 But these brands, Panerai was initially crafted
0:16:07 for Italian submariners.
0:16:09 I mean, this shit is just Louis Vuitton
0:16:12 trekked into Paris on barefoot and said,
0:16:16 “Okay, it makes no sense that these carriages
0:16:18 “are carrying suitcases that are rounded at the top
0:16:21 “and have leather that attracts moisture and mold.”
0:16:24 So luxury is really rooted in innovation.
0:16:27 I think it was at L’Oreal or was it,
0:16:31 I forget who, initially, it was a German chemist
0:16:35 who went to the fields of the South of France
0:16:37 and found a way to crush these flowers
0:16:39 and turn them into a fragrance.
0:16:40 I mean, this shit, it really is rooted.
0:16:43 It was innovation before there was innovation
0:16:46 as we saw it in terms of technology wasn’t fact luxury.
0:16:47 Anyways, that’s my rant on luxury.
0:16:50 – Coco Chanel defined luxury as the following.
0:16:54 Luxury is a necessity that begins when necessity ends.
0:16:57 I thought that was sort of the perfect encapsulation
0:17:00 and a great explanation of why, yes,
0:17:03 we will always worship luxury no matter what we say.
0:17:07 We’ll find a way to find necessities when necessity ends.
0:17:11 – Yeah, she also said the opposite of luxury is not poverty,
0:17:14 it’s vulgarity, which I love.
0:17:16 And she also said, “I love that Nazi dick.”
0:17:20 She said that too, and she said that too.
0:17:21 – Oh, okay.
0:17:22 – Is that fair?
0:17:23 Is that fair?
0:17:25 It’s pretty easy to tell I’m no longer working
0:17:27 for a company that caters to luxury brands.
0:17:29 By the way, Chanel’s an amazing company
0:17:31 with amazing people, sorry about that.
0:17:33 – Yeah, that’s why you’re getting sent clothes
0:17:35 from Nike and not Louis Vuitton.
0:17:37 – I’ve used Chanel moisturizer.
0:17:38 I use Chanel blue.
0:17:39 It’s what I bought actually
0:17:41 when my son was headed back to boarding school.
0:17:44 I always do a little bit of a shopping ritual for him.
0:17:46 And I’m like, this shit is gangster.
0:17:48 You gotta put a little of this on.
0:17:52 And I use Chanel blue moisturizer.
0:17:53 Anyway, it sells lovely.
0:17:55 Masculine, yet feminine at the same time.
0:17:56 – It’s fascinating.
0:17:59 I’m glad everyone’s getting to hear this.
0:18:03 Let’s move on to Spotify, who had a great quarter.
0:18:06 Monthly active uses up 14%, revenue up 20%,
0:18:09 profits up 45%, record profits for the company,
0:18:11 your thoughts on Spotify.
0:18:13 – If you think about what Spotify has accomplished,
0:18:14 it’s singular.
0:18:16 They’ve taken an entire medium
0:18:20 and distilled it to a single icon on your phone
0:18:22 that is searchable and very user friendly.
0:18:23 No one’s done that on TV.
0:18:26 No one’s done that in books.
0:18:27 I think it’s a great value.
0:18:29 I think they do a fantastic job.
0:18:30 In sum, I think it’s a great company.
0:18:31 And they were also pretty bold.
0:18:34 They went all in and gave the artists and labels
0:18:35 a disproportionate amount of the revenues.
0:18:36 They basically lost money.
0:18:39 They were more like a collective or cooperative,
0:18:40 just taking money and distributing it
0:18:42 to the record labels and the artists.
0:18:43 But once they got scale,
0:18:45 and once they kind of not consolidated the industry,
0:18:47 but had a large enough share where they could start,
0:18:51 they had the pricing power to improve or increase prices
0:18:52 and their subscribers can go down.
0:18:55 And basically, essentially what they have figured out
0:18:58 is that they have more pricing power than they thought.
0:19:00 And despite increasing prices,
0:19:03 they have increased their revenue.
0:19:07 So revenue from premium users increased 21%.
0:19:09 And premium subscribers accounted for 95%
0:19:12 of Spotify’s gross profit over the last 12 months.
0:19:13 The thing that doesn’t work
0:19:16 or the thing I saw in this earnings call
0:19:20 or in these numbers is I think both Netflix and Spotify,
0:19:23 I think the advertising does not work for them.
0:19:27 And I remember being like in 2000,
0:19:30 like the early 2000s, I think I was on a date or whatever.
0:19:32 I had some people over
0:19:33 and I was trying to impress these people
0:19:36 and I was at my loft.
0:19:39 I know it’s horrifying to think of me as single.
0:19:41 And I remember I had music on
0:19:43 and things were going really well.
0:19:46 And all of a sudden it dawned on me
0:19:50 like some really bad ad for like pets.com or something
0:19:50 that came up. – Oh no.
0:19:51 – And I’m like, oh my God,
0:19:53 no one’s ever gonna have sex
0:19:55 with the ad supported Pandora guy.
0:19:58 And I literally thought having ad supported Pandora
0:20:01 was just gonna ruin no matter
0:20:04 how many Panoras I had or how I was trying.
0:20:09 When the pets.com ad comes on on Pandora radio, it’s over.
0:20:13 Everyone’s like, well, it’s getting late, it’s getting late.
0:20:16 But what I saw in the Netflix earnings call
0:20:21 and in this one is that it’s just the ad supported ecosystem
0:20:24 is having a really difficult time.
0:20:26 I think it gets in the way of storytelling.
0:20:28 And I think this earnings show is just that
0:20:31 basically it’s subscribers that are
0:20:34 what 95% of Spotify’s gross profit.
0:20:36 – One other thing I found really interesting
0:20:39 was how the CEO, this guy Daniel Eck,
0:20:40 announced these earnings.
0:20:43 And that is before the official earnings call,
0:20:46 he posted on Twitter and on Instagram
0:20:48 what was essentially like a TikTok video.
0:20:50 It was like a two minute selfie video
0:20:53 where he just spoke directly at the camera
0:20:55 and ran through all of the headline numbers
0:20:57 in the earnings report.
0:21:00 I think he started doing this around Q4 of last year.
0:21:03 This is kind of his calm strategy.
0:21:04 I’d like to get your take.
0:21:07 I will just say, I think it’s such a good idea
0:21:09 because in a weird way,
0:21:13 the way most people consume earnings news,
0:21:16 it isn’t actually from the company earnings calls.
0:21:17 It’s from media companies.
0:21:20 It’s from like CNBC or the Wall Street Journal
0:21:23 or even you might get it from listening to this podcast.
0:21:25 You’re rarely hearing from the CEO.
0:21:27 But this strategy is such an obvious one.
0:21:29 Just post directly to social media.
0:21:31 That sort of fixes it.
0:21:35 It’s a small detail, it’s a small innovation.
0:21:38 But I would predict that this is gonna become the norm.
0:21:40 I think you’re gonna see lots more CEOs
0:21:42 posting on social media these selfie videos
0:21:44 about their earnings in the next few months.
0:21:45 – I think that’s really interesting.
0:21:46 I didn’t know that.
0:21:49 You can see them bypassing kind of the
0:21:50 analyst industrial complex
0:21:52 with the CNBC industrial complex
0:21:57 and doing a video kind of timed well, choreograph tweets.
0:21:59 And then maybe doing like Instagram live
0:22:01 to do their analyst calls, right?
0:22:04 To say, all right, I’m going live to answer your questions.
0:22:06 There’s some choreography around SEC
0:22:11 and when you release non-public material information
0:22:12 that they gotta be careful of.
0:22:13 But I think you’re right.
0:22:15 I think that that might be,
0:22:18 ’cause what you want is you wanna get more people
0:22:21 just as you wanna garner more consumers,
0:22:23 so a consumer brand wants to get new consumers
0:22:26 into the franchise, get new customers.
0:22:28 The company wants to get new investors.
0:22:31 And they also, what never goes out of style
0:22:32 is they all want to be known for having
0:22:34 an innovative product that’s differentiated
0:22:36 and that they’re good at what they do
0:22:37 and they’re competent.
0:22:39 But what they really want more than anything
0:22:41 is they want some of that innovative pixie dust
0:22:42 poured all over them.
0:22:45 So communicating your earnings via a video
0:22:48 that’s posted to YouTube and then spliced up
0:22:51 for TikTok or what have you.
0:22:52 And then doing some of this live stuff
0:22:53 on some of these platforms
0:22:55 that just sort of screams of innovation.
0:22:59 – Yeah, I can’t understand how PR firms or PR teams,
0:23:00 I should say, at these public companies
0:23:01 haven’t gotten on this.
0:23:02 – It’s weird to think this,
0:23:07 but I would bet within five years, 10 years max,
0:23:10 a key component of your, of boards deciding
0:23:12 whether they’re making someone CEO
0:23:15 is how strong is their following.
0:23:17 Basically as the CEO, your job is to attract
0:23:18 and retain the best talent
0:23:20 and set a vision for the company.
0:23:22 But as much or more than anything now,
0:23:25 it’s your ability to tell a story or craft a narrative.
0:23:28 The results and access to cheaper capitals
0:23:30 such that you can invest at a greater rate
0:23:32 than your competitors and pull away from them.
0:23:35 Anyways, I’m 100% with you
0:23:39 and I would bet your, the next generation of CEOs
0:23:40 are ones that come armed
0:23:43 with pretty decent followings on social media.
0:23:46 – We’ll be right back after the break
0:23:47 with a look at Tesla.
0:23:50 (upbeat music)
0:23:59 Support for property markets comes from Fundrise.
0:24:00 Venture Capital is widely seen
0:24:03 as one of the most lucrative asset classes in the world.
0:24:04 Go look at the S&P 500,
0:24:07 nearly every major tech company on that list
0:24:09 was once funded by venture capital firms
0:24:13 producing billions of dollars in profits in the process.
0:24:14 The hard truth, however,
0:24:15 is that the biggest venture funds
0:24:18 are almost entirely funded by institutional investors
0:24:20 like endowments and sovereign wealth funds.
0:24:22 So unless you knew a guy who knew a guy,
0:24:25 you and 99.9% of individual investors
0:24:28 did not get to participate in the pre IPO growth
0:24:31 of any of those blue chip companies.
0:24:32 And it’s happening again.
0:24:34 AI is making waves everywhere right now,
0:24:36 except your portfolio.
0:24:38 Some of the biggest names in AI
0:24:40 are locked behind private markets.
0:24:42 The Fundrise Innovation Fund is changing that.
0:24:44 It’s a more than $125 million fund
0:24:46 that holds some of the most exciting
0:24:48 pre IPO tech companies in the world.
0:24:50 And it’s designed for individual investors
0:24:53 so you can get in early on the AI revolution.
0:24:56 Go to fundrise.com/markets to learn more.
0:24:58 Carefully consider the investment material
0:25:00 before investing, including objectives, risks,
0:25:01 charges and expenses.
0:25:03 This and other information can be found
0:25:05 in the Innovation Funds Prospectus
0:25:07 at fundrise.com/innovation.
0:25:09 This is a paid advertisement.
0:25:15 Support for the show comes from Mercury.
0:25:17 Mercury knows your financial operations are complex.
0:25:19 Founders and finance teams have to pull together
0:25:21 different tools, reconcile transactions
0:25:23 from different sources and struggle
0:25:25 to get accurate answers.
0:25:27 With Mercury, you can simplify your operations
0:25:28 with banking and software that power
0:25:30 your critical financial workflows,
0:25:33 all within the one thing every business needs,
0:25:34 a bank account.
0:25:36 And with new bill pay and accounting capabilities,
0:25:39 you can pay bills faster, stay in control of company spend
0:25:41 and speed up reconciliation.
0:25:45 Apply in minutes at mercury.com and join over 200,000
0:25:47 ambitious startups that trust Mercury to provide
0:25:49 the precision control and focus they need
0:25:51 to transform their financial workflows
0:25:53 so they can perform at their best.
0:25:57 Mercury, the art of simplified finances.
0:26:00 Mercury is a financial technology company in Audubank,
0:26:02 banking services provided by Choice Financial Group
0:26:05 and Evolve Bank & Trust, members FDIC.
0:26:08 (upbeat music)
0:26:14 Support for this podcast comes from Huntress.
0:26:15 Keeping your data safe is important,
0:26:17 however, if you’re a small business owner,
0:26:20 then protecting the information of yourself,
0:26:22 your company and your workers is vital.
0:26:24 In comes Huntress.
0:26:26 Huntress is where fully managed cybersecurity
0:26:28 meets human expertise.
0:26:30 They offer a revolutionary approach to manage security
0:26:31 that isn’t all about tech.
0:26:34 It’s about real people providing real defense.
0:26:36 When threats arise or issues occur,
0:26:38 their team of seasoned cyber experts
0:26:42 is ready 24 hours a day, 365 days a year for support.
0:26:46 Visit huntress.com/profg to start a free trial or learn more.
0:26:55 – We’re back with ProfG Markets.
0:26:58 Tesla’s second quarter profits fell 45% year-over-year,
0:27:01 declining for the second quarter in a row.
0:27:02 The company also posted its lowest
0:27:05 quarterly profit margin in five years
0:27:07 and its second consecutive sales decline.
0:27:10 Tesla did not offer a fresh sales target for the year,
0:27:13 but it did warn that its vehicle volume growth rate
0:27:16 would be, quote, “notably lower than 2023.”
0:27:20 The stock fell 12% after the earnings call,
0:27:22 Scott reaction to Tesla’s earnings.
0:27:26 – I think the analogy here is this market feels very similar
0:27:29 in some ways and not in others to the streaming market.
0:27:32 And that is Tesla basically had the market
0:27:33 to themselves similar to Netflix
0:27:37 through the odds in the 2010s.
0:27:39 And that is, if you were gonna buy an EV,
0:27:40 you were really gonna buy a Tesla.
0:27:42 It was kind of like Tesla in the ’70s.
0:27:44 No one was gonna buy a Pontiac Leaf
0:27:46 or whatever the heck it was called, right?
0:27:48 And so they sort of owned it.
0:27:51 And then the stock market just reacted so positively
0:27:56 to Tesla and gave them sass-like, tech-like multiples
0:27:59 that everyone in the auto industry said,
0:28:01 “Okay, we gotta get into this.”
0:28:03 And they announced, you know, Mary Barra announced
0:28:07 that half the cars sold from GM were gonna be electric
0:28:11 within a certain time, Rivian spin up, you know,
0:28:14 Fisker, all these startups kind of spun up.
0:28:18 And there was essentially what happened in the EV race
0:28:19 is what happened in streaming.
0:28:22 That is, it would became over-invested.
0:28:25 And the manifestation of that over-investment
0:28:29 is that a year ago, an EV, an electric-powered vehicle,
0:28:31 was $8,500 more expensive
0:28:33 than its internal combustion equivalent.
0:28:37 As of today, it’s only $1,500 more expensive.
0:28:39 And in some instances, it’s less expensive.
0:28:43 So the F-150 Lightning, that is now $10,000.
0:28:46 The electric version is $10,000 less
0:28:48 than its internal combustion brother.
0:28:49 And I will say brother,
0:28:51 that’s a pretty much a fucking car.
0:28:52 That shit has real balls, Ed.
0:28:54 That shit has balls.
0:28:57 Bottom line is this is classic economics.
0:28:59 Over-investment, because of the market
0:29:01 giving an above market multiples,
0:29:04 that over-investment results in a price war.
0:29:06 And then I think you combine that with,
0:29:09 Tesla’s products feel a little bit dusty right now.
0:29:10 They don’t feel that.
0:29:14 I mean, by the way, I drove in a matte black Cybertruck.
0:29:15 – No way.
0:29:17 – Yeah, a friend of mine is this total master,
0:29:19 the universe baller hedge fund guy,
0:29:20 and he invited me out to his house.
0:29:24 I went out there last weekend and his house manager
0:29:27 picked me up in a matte black Cybertruck.
0:29:28 – No way.
0:29:29 – And I’m like, I am literally
0:29:32 the douchiest douche in Douchville right now.
0:29:33 – How did it feel on the inside?
0:29:34 ‘Cause I kind of agree with you.
0:29:38 I think Tesla’s feel very cheap on the inside.
0:29:41 Did it feel cheap on the inside or did it feel cool?
0:29:42 – No, I felt modern and very techy,
0:29:46 but on the way back, we drove in his Range Rover
0:29:48 and I thought that was just much nicer.
0:29:50 I think the car, quite frankly,
0:29:51 I think the Cybertruck is fucking ridiculous.
0:29:54 I think it looks like something Homer Simpson
0:29:55 would have designed after watching
0:29:58 Battlestar Galactica for 48 hours straight.
0:30:02 I think it’s just so stupid looking and weird looking.
0:30:05 And the inside was very,
0:30:08 it felt like you’re on a set of a movie about the future,
0:30:12 but you would never fucking actually own this car.
0:30:15 And people were coming up and stopping and talking to us
0:30:18 because they were so interested.
0:30:20 It looked like the Batmobile,
0:30:23 but I don’t, I think that thing is a giant thought,
0:30:25 although I guess, have you heard anything
0:30:26 about the sales of this thing?
0:30:29 – I don’t think they’ve broken out the sales
0:30:30 for the Cybertruck yet,
0:30:34 but I think the consensus is that orders are underwhelming
0:30:36 and they’re sort of struggling to keep up.
0:30:39 – The other thing that strikes me about Tesla is that,
0:30:41 if you think about pure meme stocks,
0:30:43 like the memiest of meme stocks,
0:30:45 a meme stock is a stock who’s, in my opinion,
0:30:48 is stock is totally disassociated
0:30:50 from the underlying fundamentals of a company.
0:30:53 It’s like the ketamine of the market, if you will.
0:30:56 And the ultimate meme stock is, hands down,
0:30:58 Donald Trump media.
0:31:01 It’s got a $6 billion market cap,
0:31:04 even after declining 30% in the last week,
0:31:07 and it’s like 7 million in revenues and 300 million.
0:31:08 The company makes no fucking sense.
0:31:11 It’s basically people have decided it’s a proxy
0:31:14 for your support of or your belief
0:31:18 or the probability that Trump is elected president.
0:31:20 And it trades on kind of sentiment and emotion
0:31:22 as nothing to do with the underlying business.
0:31:24 Halfway between a stock that trades
0:31:25 on its underlying fundamentals,
0:31:28 like an alphabet or 99% of stocks,
0:31:30 and Trump, which is a Trump media,
0:31:32 which is a total meme stock,
0:31:35 I think in near meme stocks would be like AMC and GameStop.
0:31:36 They’re shitty businesses,
0:31:38 and they trade much greater multiples than they should
0:31:40 ’cause people think there’s a chance they’ll go crazy again
0:31:43 because of Roaring Kitty or whatever.
0:31:46 I think perfectly in the middle of that continuum
0:31:50 is Tesla, because to be fair, it’s an amazing company.
0:31:54 It inspired the EV race, they do have great products.
0:31:57 Their energy unit is making money.
0:32:00 The idea of a robotex is compelling,
0:32:01 we’ll come back to that.
0:32:05 But Tesla trades at 99 times forward earnings.
0:32:08 This is in contrast to Ferrari,
0:32:10 an amazing brand that a lot of people want
0:32:12 to kind of singular in terms of prestige
0:32:13 and self-expressive benefit.
0:32:16 That trades at 50 times.
0:32:18 Ford trades at seven times and GM get this ad,
0:32:20 trades at five times forward earnings.
0:32:24 So great company, but should it trade
0:32:26 at double the multiple of Ferrari
0:32:29 and 20 times the multiple of General Motors?
0:32:33 So this is sort of the term I would use,
0:32:35 is it as it relates to meme stocks
0:32:37 that Tesla is a hybrid?
0:32:38 – To Prius.
0:32:38 – Yeah, it’s a great company,
0:32:42 but it can’t really justify the multiple it’s at.
0:32:43 And then what I’ll end up with,
0:32:45 and this will come back to our prediction,
0:32:49 is that just as Donald J. Trump media became
0:32:52 an index for whether or not Trump got reelected,
0:32:55 I think these guys, these techno-libertarian weirdos,
0:32:57 really fucked up by coming out
0:33:00 so forcefully in favor of Trump.
0:33:01 Because what they’ve done is,
0:33:04 is they’ve tied themselves and their businesses
0:33:07 to the re-election of Donald Trump.
0:33:11 And as the likelihood of a vice president,
0:33:15 a Kamala Harris becomes more likely,
0:33:16 and it’s become much more likely
0:33:18 just in the last five days,
0:33:19 I think people are gonna go,
0:33:21 well, who is this gonna hurt?
0:33:22 And I think one,
0:33:24 it’ll put pressure on Bitcoin prices,
0:33:25 because they’ll say, okay, maybe Bitcoin
0:33:27 isn’t gonna be totally deregulated
0:33:29 and become the ultimate stablecoin,
0:33:33 or whatever the right term would be good for Bitcoin.
0:33:35 But also I think people are gonna soon learn
0:33:37 or soon figure out,
0:33:38 if it’s a Harris administration,
0:33:43 they may not be inclined to put tariffs on BYD.
0:33:47 They may not be as inclined to give subsidies
0:33:49 that would include Tesla,
0:33:51 or give subsidies that might exclude
0:33:52 some of the Tesla models.
0:33:55 I just, I think people are gonna start connecting the dots
0:33:58 that when you go all MAGA Musk,
0:34:00 there’s some risks there.
0:34:02 And I think that risk will start to show up
0:34:04 in some pressure on the stock
0:34:06 as a little bit of a meme stock
0:34:10 tracking Trump’s election or lack thereup to the White House.
0:34:12 – You mentioned the RoboTaxi,
0:34:13 which we should definitely talk about.
0:34:15 It was supposed to come out,
0:34:19 or the RoboTaxi model was supposed to be unveiled in August.
0:34:21 And then on this earnings call,
0:34:23 Elon delayed it to October.
0:34:28 And that’s, I think, a big reason why the stock fell.
0:34:31 He’s been saying that full self-driving
0:34:35 is coming next year for literally a decade.
0:34:39 So, he’s delayed the unveiling again.
0:34:41 Supposedly it’s coming out in October now.
0:34:43 One sort of tangential point
0:34:46 I’d like to get your reaction to in terms of this,
0:34:50 when will this RoboTaxi ever arrive discussion?
0:34:53 I was speaking with an AI founder recently,
0:34:55 and he actually started his career
0:34:57 as an engineer at an autonomous vehicle company.
0:35:01 And that episode will be coming out in first time founders.
0:35:03 And he made a really interesting point,
0:35:07 which is that we tend to think of self-driving cars
0:35:11 as its own sort of separate, very specific technology.
0:35:13 But in reality, as he pointed out,
0:35:16 self-driving cars is just AI.
0:35:18 And his point is that, you know,
0:35:23 right now is the big AI moment, 2024 is the year of AI.
0:35:24 And so logically speaking,
0:35:26 you would think that if we’re in the AI moment,
0:35:30 we’re about to witness the self-driving moment too.
0:35:32 I think it’s a strong case for why
0:35:35 the Tesla RoboTaxi might actually,
0:35:37 it actually will arrive this year,
0:35:38 despite all of Elon’s bullshit.
0:35:40 And I’m wondering if you agree.
0:35:42 I have no idea.
0:35:43 I just know that it’s the thing
0:35:45 that’s supposed to be around the corner.
0:35:47 And then you look around the corner and it’s not there.
0:35:48 And you also have Waymo,
0:35:51 you also have a lot of competitors in the space
0:35:54 in order to really, I’m taking this through,
0:35:58 in order to capture incremental margin
0:36:01 that results in this type of increase in earnings,
0:36:06 you would have to have Teslas that were more AI enabled,
0:36:09 or had more automated driving technology
0:36:10 than any other car.
0:36:14 Is Tesla that far ahead of the other self-driving technology
0:36:16 such that they could capture that innovation
0:36:17 just for Teslas?
0:36:19 I don’t, there’s two things here.
0:36:20 When does this happen?
0:36:23 And also, what would Tesla’s ability be
0:36:26 to capture the economics of that innovation
0:36:29 versus any other company?
0:36:31 Just before we wrap up on this,
0:36:33 we spend all this time ragging on Tesla.
0:36:36 Let’s try to think a bit more positively.
0:36:39 Say you were on the board of Tesla.
0:36:42 And let’s be clear, the business is struggling.
0:36:45 Revenue rose, but it only rose 2%
0:36:47 and profits fell 45%.
0:36:49 It’s dealing with a lot of issues.
0:36:52 You know, it’s market share in the EV space in America
0:36:54 is down to 50%.
0:36:56 Four years ago, that number was 80%.
0:36:59 So we’re not being biased by saying that Tesla’s,
0:37:02 Tesla as a business is struggling.
0:37:04 What would you be focusing on
0:37:06 if you were trying to improve this business
0:37:07 and you were on the board?
0:37:08 Okay, so if we’re gonna imagine we’re on the board,
0:37:10 I’m gonna imagine that I’m dating Tom Brady
0:37:13 and he runs his hands through my share like thick hair.
0:37:15 I mean, if we’re really gonna imagine,
0:37:17 if we’re really gonna hallucinate, let’s go full.
0:37:20 Let’s go full psilocybin and with a kicker
0:37:22 of like nine shots of something.
0:37:25 Okay, I’m on the board of Tesla.
0:37:28 Oh, that’s a good one.
0:37:29 Where would I be focused?
0:37:32 I think I’d be, I mean, this sounds boring,
0:37:35 but I think their energy stuff is pretty cool.
0:37:37 Totally, by the way, that business doubled.
0:37:39 Yeah, doing pretty well there.
0:37:42 I mean, it sounds really base.
0:37:44 I guess I don’t have anything creative here.
0:37:47 I’d be focused on freshening the model lineup
0:37:49 and then I would probably,
0:37:52 I would probably, for the robotaxi stuff,
0:37:55 I would have probably acquired Lyft
0:37:56 and have a built-in base and user base
0:37:58 of people who are comfortable with ride hailing.
0:38:00 They should acquire pellets all in there.
0:38:01 Yeah, there you go.
0:38:03 That’s right, that was my favorite for a while.
0:38:06 They’re definitely being acquired, says ProcG.
0:38:09 We’ll be right back after the break
0:38:12 with a look at a tobacco company’s recent success.
0:38:24 Your team requested a ride, but this time, not from you.
0:38:26 It’s through their Uber Teen account.
0:38:28 It’s an Uber account that allows your team
0:38:30 to request a ride under your supervision
0:38:34 with live trip tracking and highly rated drivers.
0:38:36 Add your team to your Uber account today.
0:38:39 (upbeat music)
0:38:41 Go back to school with Rogers
0:38:44 and get Canada’s fastest and most reliable internet,
0:38:46 perfect for streaming lectures all day
0:38:48 or binging TV shows all night.
0:38:51 Save up to $20 per month on Rogers internet.
0:38:53 Visit rogers.com for details.
0:38:55 We got you, Rogers.
0:38:58 – Your mom hates it when you leave six half full glasses
0:38:59 on your nightstand.
0:39:02 It’s a good thing mom lives on the other side of the country
0:39:03 and it’s an even better thing
0:39:08 that you can get six Ikea 365 plus glasses for just $9.99.
0:39:10 So go ahead, you can afford to hoard
0:39:12 because Ikea is priced for student life.
0:39:15 Shop everything you need for back to school at Ikea today.
0:39:23 – We’re back with ProcG Markets.
0:39:25 Shares of Philip Morris International
0:39:27 hit their highest level in more than two years
0:39:30 after a red hot product propelled the tobacco company
0:39:32 to a better than expected earnings report.
0:39:34 That product is ZIN.
0:39:37 ZIN is a nicotine pouch that you absorb through your gums
0:39:39 and they’re so popular that there’s been
0:39:41 a nationwide shortage of them this summer.
0:39:44 Philip Morris, which acquired ZIN in 2022,
0:39:47 said sales of the pouches rose 50% year over year.
0:39:51 Overall sales in its smoke-free category rose 24%
0:39:54 and total revenue for the company rose 10%.
0:39:58 Scott, what do you make of this new ZIN trend
0:40:00 that Philip Morris has managed to capture
0:40:02 and that is benefiting this company?
0:40:02 – I think it’s really interesting.
0:40:06 I think all the ZIN guys are trying to figure out a way
0:40:09 to go sort of near ZIN and that is,
0:40:11 my understanding of ZIN is that I want to be clear,
0:40:13 this shit is not good for you.
0:40:18 Don’t pick it up if you don’t have an addiction to nicotine,
0:40:23 but it’s a much less damaging means of delivering nicotine
0:40:26 than chewing tobacco.
0:40:29 And just full disclosure, I have some background here.
0:40:31 I invested in a company being pulled out of bankruptcy
0:40:35 called EnJoy, which is an electronic nicotine delivery
0:40:37 system better known as vaping.
0:40:42 And I think I did it in 2015 or ’16, a long time ago.
0:40:45 And one of the reasons I invested was my mother died
0:40:48 of a smoking-related illness and I’d had two friends
0:40:50 who’d quit smoking using EnJoy.
0:40:53 And just as combustibles are going away,
0:40:55 every year they’re down like five or eight percent.
0:40:57 One in three people who buy a pack of cigarettes,
0:41:00 let’s get this, says this is their last pack
0:41:02 they’re ever gonna buy, one in three.
0:41:04 It’s the largest source of preventable death
0:41:06 in the United States and it’s going away.
0:41:08 People are getting the memo here.
0:41:11 Long story short, we pulled this company out of bankruptcy.
0:41:13 I think we bought it for 60 or 70 million,
0:41:14 put a bunch of money into it.
0:41:16 It was basically a regulatory play.
0:41:18 I think we invested another 100 million in it
0:41:20 to try and get FDA approval and show that
0:41:22 we’re good players, we’re not jewel,
0:41:23 we don’t have a youth problem.
0:41:27 Anyways, seven, what it was, seven, nine years later,
0:41:31 we got acquired for 2.8 billion by Philip Morris.
0:41:34 – Sorry, was it, ’cause there’s Altria,
0:41:36 which used to be Philip Morris,
0:41:38 and then there’s Philip Morris International,
0:41:41 which is the international segment
0:41:44 that was spun out of Altria several years ago.
0:41:47 So that’s just one little wrinkle in this story.
0:41:49 Do you know if it was Altria or Philip Morris International
0:41:50 that acquired you?
0:41:51 – It was Altria, so you’re right,
0:41:53 it’s technically a different group,
0:41:54 ’cause there’s different dynamics
0:41:56 and I guess they figured they could get more money.
0:41:58 – Yeah, and they’re totally separate companies now,
0:41:59 but at one point it was–
0:42:01 – They were the same people.
0:42:02 My favorite though is they changed the name to Altria,
0:42:04 thinking that people would like them more.
0:42:05 They would forget about all the death disease
0:42:07 and disability that they’d spread around the world.
0:42:08 – You don’t think it worked?
0:42:11 – I don’t like name changes
0:42:13 when you’re trying to escape from something.
0:42:16 I don’t think it made any sense.
0:42:19 Anyways, but the thing that really struck me,
0:42:21 I think I told you this, I went to Summit at Sea
0:42:23 with all these young and up-and-coming,
0:42:28 vertical farming, it’s like, I call it learning man,
0:42:29 it was TED Talks during the day
0:42:31 and then at night everyone did their drugs
0:42:33 with a DJ and pretended they were interesting
0:42:35 and thoughtful people, ’cause they’d gone to a talk
0:42:40 during the day on like AI and fashion.
0:42:41 That’ll be riveting.
0:42:46 Anyways, so, but the thing that struck me
0:42:48 was it was on this Virgin cruise ship
0:42:50 and I went up in order to make her some ginger at the bar
0:42:52 and he was like, “Oh my God, finally someone’s drinking.”
0:42:53 And I said, “What do you mean?”
0:42:55 None of these kids drank, they’re all doing drugs.
0:42:57 And I noticed that everybody,
0:43:00 the drug of choice was mushroom chocolates
0:43:01 and then everyone buys one drink
0:43:03 and just nurses it all night
0:43:05 and that alcohol is really,
0:43:08 well, Axel, I’ll turn this question back to you.
0:43:12 You’re young and now for a young person,
0:43:15 what is going on with the trend of substance abuse,
0:43:18 both tobacco and alcohol and drugs
0:43:21 and I won’t ask you to say what you do,
0:43:22 but what do your friends do?
0:43:24 – Yeah, that’s exactly right.
0:43:25 Everyone stopped drinking.
0:43:27 I mean, here are the statistics.
0:43:32 Non-alcoholic beer sales increased 28% last year
0:43:33 and then two, probably more importantly,
0:43:38 Gen Z drinks 20% less alcohol per capita
0:43:39 than millennials did at their age.
0:43:41 I’d love to see the difference between the millennials
0:43:44 and the boomers, probably like 100% less.
0:43:46 But the thing that, you know,
0:43:48 what we should be talking about with this story
0:43:50 is this new obsession with Zinn.
0:43:52 And yeah, it’s a nicotine pouch.
0:43:55 It’s similar to chewing tobacco, but without the tobacco.
0:43:58 Supposedly it doesn’t cause cancer,
0:44:01 but like the vapes, we just don’t have enough data
0:44:04 to say it causes or doesn’t cause it,
0:44:07 but it’s extremely popular everywhere.
0:44:09 Zinn sales are up 80% earlier this year.
0:44:11 It’s now around 50%.
0:44:15 An expected 580 million cans will be sold this year.
0:44:18 And as I mentioned, there is a Zinn shortage in the US.
0:44:21 So now Philip Morris is spending $600 million
0:44:24 on a manufacturing facility in Colorado
0:44:26 just to keep up with demand.
0:44:28 Final anecdotal evidence I will offer,
0:44:30 most of my friends use Zinn.
0:44:31 – Really?
0:44:35 – Yes, none of the women, all the men,
0:44:38 especially the tech bros and especially the bankers.
0:44:43 This is sort of a phenomenon in the world of nicotine.
0:44:48 So it’s massively popular.
0:44:51 I think the question is, do you wanna get in on it
0:44:52 as an investment?
0:44:54 I mean, Philip Morris International is trading
0:44:58 at 20 times earnings, which is pretty high.
0:45:01 It’s double alters PE ratio at the moment.
0:45:03 I think the market is correctly recognizing
0:45:08 that Zinn is an absolute rocket in the nicotine industry.
0:45:10 But I will throw this back to you.
0:45:12 One, do you like this as an investment?
0:45:15 Two, do you have any ethical concerns
0:45:17 about investing in a company
0:45:20 that sure offers tobacco alternatives,
0:45:22 that also sells tobacco?
0:45:23 – I think it’s easy to be a purist
0:45:26 and lecture other people after you’re already rich.
0:45:28 I think people have an obligation
0:45:31 to develop economic security for themselves.
0:45:32 Like I used to own Facebook stock
0:45:34 and I got so much shit for it
0:45:35 ’cause I’m constantly saying, you know,
0:45:38 Mark and Cheryl have done more damage to the world
0:45:40 or teens and anyone like, but you own the stock.
0:45:41 So I sold the stock.
0:45:43 But I don’t have a problem with owning Zinn stocks.
0:45:47 I don’t, my attitude is, you know,
0:45:49 if you really have a moral,
0:45:53 if you really are against it, then fine, do what you want.
0:45:57 But my observation is that the companies
0:45:58 that are, quote unquote, ruining the world
0:46:00 generally have the nicest people
0:46:02 and are the best run companies.
0:46:04 So I did work for fossil fuel companies
0:46:07 and my first company, Profit, the people at Chevron,
0:46:12 the people at Exxon, so nice, such a well run company.
0:46:14 I’ve worked with people at gaming companies,
0:46:16 you know, the casino guys,
0:46:19 incredibly professional, incredibly well run.
0:46:21 Walk into Altria, do work at Altria
0:46:23 and you’re gonna see some of the most talented,
0:46:25 disciplined managers.
0:46:28 They massively invest in their human capital.
0:46:31 – I think it’s got some of the happiest employees
0:46:32 in the world based on service.
0:46:36 – They invest a tremendous amount of money and training.
0:46:39 They have great employee profit sharing.
0:46:41 These are just really well run companies
0:46:43 and they’re typically, in terms of evaluation,
0:46:45 somewhat depressed relative to peers
0:46:47 ’cause there’s a large segment of the population
0:46:48 that won’t invest in them.
0:46:52 So long term, just, I’m not gonna make a moral argument
0:46:53 for or against them.
0:46:56 I mean, you know, I’m a capitalist and, you know,
0:46:59 have at it, it’s your capital, do what you want.
0:47:01 But I would invest in it.
0:47:03 I’m an investor in a,
0:47:04 am I an investor in a fossil fuel company?
0:47:07 I’m an investor actually in a small fossil fuel company
0:47:09 in Switzerland, but let me put it this way.
0:47:10 I think it’s a personal choice,
0:47:13 but I don’t look down on people who invest in this stuff.
0:47:16 I think economic security is really the thing
0:47:17 you should be pursuing
0:47:19 and I think we should be voting for people
0:47:20 that put in place regulations
0:47:25 that think about the well-being of people.
0:47:27 – Let’s take a look at the week ahead.
0:47:29 We’ll hear the Fed’s interest rate decision for July
0:47:31 and we’ll also see earnings from Microsoft,
0:47:33 Meta, Apple and Amazon.
0:47:33 Big earnings week.
0:47:35 Do you have any predictions, Scott?
0:47:38 – Tesla’s about to become a bit of a meme sock
0:47:40 that is an updraft or a downward draft
0:47:43 based on Vice President Harris’s likelihood
0:47:46 or where she is in the polls.
0:47:49 And I think these guys a couple of weeks ago,
0:47:52 this big list of tech bros that again,
0:47:56 seem like literally the lamest club in San Jose,
0:47:59 thought that they were smart to go all in on Trump
0:48:01 and that it would pay off for them.
0:48:03 They didn’t do the math on what’s gonna happen
0:48:06 if all of a sudden a Harris presidency
0:48:07 becomes more and more likely
0:48:09 that I do think it’s gonna actually impact
0:48:11 the companies they’re involved in
0:48:14 and Musk has turned Tesla red pill
0:48:18 and it appears as if he’s gone all in on Trump.
0:48:19 He said he was giving $45 million a month
0:48:21 now he’s backtracked on that.
0:48:22 – Well, he argues that it was made up
0:48:24 and I don’t think there’s any way that we’ll know.
0:48:26 – Well, okay, it was the Wall Street Journal reporting it.
0:48:27 So who do you trust more,
0:48:30 the Wall Street Journal or Elon Musk?
0:48:35 Anyways, this is about to become another,
0:48:36 not as much as Donald Trump media
0:48:38 but it’s about to become a tracking stock
0:48:40 and it become inversely correlated
0:48:42 to Harris’s poll numbers.
0:48:45 – This episode was produced by Claire Miller
0:48:46 and engineered by Benjamin Spencer.
0:48:48 Our associate producer is Alison Weiss
0:48:49 our executive producer is Jason Stavars
0:48:50 and Catherine Dillon.
0:48:52 Mia Silverio is our research lead
0:48:54 and Drew Burroughs is our technical director.
0:48:55 Thank you for listening to Prof.G Markets
0:48:57 from the Vox Media Podcast Network.
0:49:00 Join us on Thursday for a conversation with Dan Ives
0:49:02 only on Prof.G Markets.
0:49:08 ♪ Lifetimes ♪
0:49:16 ♪ You help me ♪
0:49:21 ♪ In kind reunion ♪
0:49:28 ♪ As the world turns ♪
0:49:32 ♪ And the dark lights ♪
0:49:35 ♪ In love, love, love ♪
0:49:39 ♪ Love, love, love ♪
0:49:48 [BLANK_AUDIO]
Follow Prof G Markets:
Scott shares his thoughts on Tesla’s lackluster earnings and explains how the electric vehicle industry has suffered from overinvestment. He also breaks down why Tesla’s stock could suffer if Trump doesn’t get elected. Then, Scott and Ed discuss Zyn’s popularity among Gen Z and the dilemma that comes with investing in sin stocks.
Order “The Algebra of Wealth,” out now
Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice
Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:
Follow Scott on Instagram
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices