AI transcript
0:00:06 Support for the show comes from Ferragamo. When a product is made in Italy, chances are
0:00:11 it’s well crafted and high quality, and that’s especially true of Ferragamo footwear. For
0:00:16 almost a hundred years, the name Ferragamo has been synonymous with luxury, and all Ferragamo
0:00:20 products are made sustainably with ethically sourced materials. Ferragamo footwear is
0:00:25 designed to last so whether you’re hitting the city streets in a pair of classic loafers
0:00:31 or strolling the park in contemporary moccasins and sneakers, you can do so in chic comfort.
0:00:37 Discover Ferragamo’s timeless styles with a modern touch at ferragamo.com.
0:00:41 Support for this podcast comes from Huntress. Keeping your data safe is important, however
0:00:46 you’re a small business owner, then protecting the information of yourself, your company,
0:00:52 and your workers is vital. And comes Huntress. Huntress is where fully managed cybersecurity
0:00:56 meets human expertise. They offer a revolutionary approach to manage security that isn’t all
0:01:01 about tech. It’s about real people providing real defense. When threats or rise or issues
0:01:06 occur, their team of seasoned cyber experts is ready 24 hours a day, 365 days a year for
0:01:13 support. Visit huntress.com/propg to start a free trial or learn more.
0:01:20 Today’s number, $45 million. That’s how much Ken Griffin paid for, get this, a stegosaurus
0:01:25 skeleton. True story yet, when I was 14, me and my buddy were masturbating to some hardcore
0:01:40 dinosaur pornography. Unfortunately, my mother saw us.
0:01:47 Get it, Ed? Get it? It’s like a dad joke that’s also a little bit pornographic. Welcome to
0:01:53 PropG Markets. Today, we’re discussing Trump’s Silicon Valley backers and Supreme’s latest
0:02:01 buyer. But first, here with the news is PropG analyst Ed Elson. Ed, what is the good word?
0:02:02 What’s going on with you?
0:02:06 I’m pretty good, Skull. I want to get your honest reaction to Ken Griffin paying $45
0:02:11 million for a stegosaurus. What does that say about the state of the United States right
0:02:12 now?
0:02:17 Well, that too few people have too much fucking money. I mean, what else is to say about it?
0:02:25 There’s a hot market and dinosaur exoskeletons. I mean, good for him. Although, speaking along
0:02:31 the lines of having too much money, I actually contemplating bidding on Einstein’s letter
0:02:38 to Truman, I think, warning him about the dangers of the atomic bomb. He has a, I think
0:02:40 it’s, I don’t know if it’s a written or a type letter, but they think it’s going to
0:02:42 go for three to four million.
0:02:46 So this is how you know you’re an old person is when you start bidding millions of dollars
0:02:50 on hand written letters. That’s how you know you’re getting up.
0:02:54 The other way is for the first time in my life, someone says, “Do you want to go on
0:03:01 a cruise?” And I think, “Yeah, that sounds kind of nice.” Or I start thinking anytime someone
0:03:09 says the word P, I need to pee. It’s like, I can be walking out of a urinal. And if someone
0:03:13 says, “Did you just pee?” I’m like, “I have to stop and go back and pee again.” And you
0:03:18 find like, I took a walk, let’s get back to me. I took a walk through the Rose Garden
0:03:23 in Hyde, was it Hyde Park or Regents Park? I have no interest in roses. And I’m like,
0:03:29 this is so beautiful. And I forced my sons to sit down and take a moment to smell the
0:03:34 flowers. And I’m like, “Oh my God, I’ve become my grandmother.” Anyways, this is where you
0:03:35 have to look forward to.
0:03:37 It’s good. It’s a nice change for you.
0:03:41 What do you think of me, what it means when Ken Griffin spends that kind of money on a
0:03:42 stegosaurus skeleton?
0:03:46 Oh yeah. I just think, I think it’s a really efficient use of capital. I think it says
0:03:51 a good thing about our economy that there are people out there who have this much money
0:03:56 to buy skeletons. I just think it shows that the markets are working and I, yeah, I think
0:03:57 it’s good.
0:03:59 Do you feel good about it? You’re one of these anti-capitalists. You think we need to move
0:04:01 to a collective in communism?
0:04:02 Yeah.
0:04:05 I think it’s good he’s spending it. Let me go ahead. I think it’s better that he’s spending
0:04:10 it than hoarding it. I don’t know. Whoever owned that skeleton now has, now’s live in
0:04:11 large.
0:04:12 That’s true.
0:04:16 Dear Bob, he bought a new boat. How do you do that? Well, he had some fucking dinosaur
0:04:21 skeleton that he sold to some stupid white guy from Chicago. I like that story.
0:04:23 That’s a good point actually.
0:04:24 Yeah, why not?
0:04:25 That makes me feel better. Should we get to the headlines?
0:04:26 Yes.
0:04:35 Let’s start with our weekly review of market vitals.
0:04:40 The S&P 500 hit a new record, then dropped sharply amid a tech sell-off. The Nasdaq had
0:04:45 its worst days since 2022. The dollar declined. Bitcoin rose and the yield on 10-year treasuries
0:04:48 fell. Shifting to the headlines.
0:04:51 The Biden administration proposed a new plan for national rent control, which will force
0:04:56 landlords who own 50 or more units to either cap rent increases at 5% or give up their
0:05:00 tax credits. The proposal would apply to roughly 20 million rental units.
0:05:04 And some late breaking news. President Joe Biden has dropped out of the race. We’ll take
0:05:08 a look at how the markets are reacting on Thursday’s episode.
0:05:13 Universal Sony and Warner are suing Verizon for $2.6 billion over claims that the wireless
0:05:19 provider has ignored piracy. The lawsuit alleges that the label sent more than 340,000 infringement
0:05:23 notices to Verizon. But the company has refused to remove repeat offenders because they pay
0:05:26 for better internet service.
0:05:30 And finally, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority is investigating Microsoft over
0:05:35 its hiring of inflection employees. The agency is in the first phase of an antitrust probe
0:05:40 into the partnership and will decide in early September whether or not to launch an in-depth
0:05:44 investigation. Scott, your thoughts, let’s start from the top.
0:05:48 Rent control doesn’t work. It ends up reducing housing stock and increasing prices and it’s
0:05:54 nothing but a giveaway to essentially rich white people. When I was right out of UCLA,
0:05:59 I had a job at Morgan Stanley and my best friend, Lee, who had a job at Great Western
0:06:03 Financial, a bank and we were making good money. He said we should apply for, we should
0:06:07 run a home in Santa Monica and see if we can get rent control. I’m like, those are impossible
0:06:12 to get because everybody wants them, right? And he said, no, we’re both, you know, these
0:06:17 kind of high-income earning yuppies and those are who the landlords want. The landlords are
0:06:22 like, okay, I’m going to get 80 applications for this. I’m going to pick the person who
0:06:25 doesn’t need a rent control department. They have so much money that I have absolutely
0:06:31 no risk of non-payment. And so the result is that with rent control, you end up with
0:06:36 a dearth of housing stock because nobody wants to build because they can’t get a return
0:06:40 on in their investment because there’s going to be rent control placed on this asset they
0:06:46 build. So it decreases supply and all you end up doing is giving a gift to rich, you
0:06:51 know, mostly rich, mostly white people who the landlord, you know, picks the safest bet
0:06:56 in terms of economic security. It doesn’t work. What they should be doing is figuring
0:07:02 out legislation that makes it very difficult for local review boards to kill housing permits,
0:07:07 they should be providing if they need to economic subsidies that encourage more and more building.
0:07:13 This is straight, I mean, this is simple fucking economics. So this is all a long-winded way
0:07:15 of saying we should move on to the next story.
0:07:16 Verizon.
0:07:20 I find this really interesting. I think in general what you have is a group of people,
0:07:24 a sector that has had the shit kicked out of it, specifically the traditional creative
0:07:28 community. They have slowly but surely seen their economics get worse and worse. And in
0:07:33 addition, there’s been a genie coefficient here and that is Taylor Swift now sells more
0:07:39 albums than all of jazz or all of classical music combined. So she’s bigger than an entire
0:07:40 genres.
0:07:41 That’s a good set.
0:07:46 And everybody thought that the online music was going to create this long tail and there
0:07:51 is a little bit more discovery, a great song can bubble up even if it doesn’t get a contract
0:07:56 with Warner Music, whatever. But for the most part, it’s created a globalization of music
0:08:00 where I think Shadeh is a billionaire because in every country in the world, including Muslim
0:08:04 countries, she’s like the fourth biggest or the sixth biggest artist. She has made, I
0:08:08 think, hundreds of millions of millions of dollars. And by the way, she deserves it.
0:08:10 That shit is buttery and sexy yet.
0:08:11 I’m never even out of a…
0:08:14 When you’re fortunate enough, like every five years, when you’re fortunate enough to get
0:08:19 a lady back to your apartment, just trust me on this, it’s Shadeh and Chardonnay. Boom.
0:08:22 Let’s go time that. Anyway, it’s a little tip, a little tip.
0:08:25 So don’t know how I got there.
0:08:32 But these artists are… They’re pushing back and they’re saying, “We’re just sick of platforms
0:08:39 injecting themselves in between us and the consumer and starching most of the margin.”
0:08:45 And I think that they’re basically lowering up and saying, “Go after everybody because
0:08:51 we need a bigger piece of this pie because spending, I believe, on music has actually
0:08:59 gone up.” But I think that it’s gotten harder and harder for all but the top 1%. Supposedly,
0:09:04 the U.S. economy loses about $13 billion annually as a result of music theft and visit to music
0:09:10 piracy sites increased 13% last year to more than $17 billion. And I think they’re fed
0:09:16 up and they’re trying to find ways to restore an economic structure that helps them. I don’t
0:09:18 know much about the case itself. Do you have any thoughts here?
0:09:22 Well, yeah. Let’s just go through what they’re actually saying in this lawsuit. They’re not
0:09:28 saying that Verizon committed any copyright infringements. They’re saying that Verizon customers
0:09:32 committed copyright infringements and that Verizon didn’t do anything about it. So this
0:09:37 is quite different from the other lawsuits we’ve been seeing and that we’ve been covering
0:09:42 with all these other AI companies that were actually stealing the content. They were stealing
0:09:47 the music and those lawsuits, to me, were totally legitimate and I think they’ll win
0:09:53 those lawsuits. This, on the other hand, is kind of a stretch. Like they’re sort of,
0:09:59 as far as lawsuits go, they’re sort of scraping the barrel here. I don’t really think they’ll
0:10:04 win. Having said that, I do think it says something bigger about where the music industry
0:10:09 is headed, which is that after several years of getting pretty badly messed around with,
0:10:15 mostly by tech companies, these music labels have said, “Okay, fuck this. We’re taking
0:10:20 everyone to court.” From a shareholder perspective, I think it is the way to do it because this
0:10:25 isn’t like a normal business. This isn’t like they’re not going to make money cutting costs
0:10:30 or increasing production, all the stuff that we usually talk about, usually when we’re
0:10:35 talking about tech companies, this is an intellectual property business. The way they’re going to
0:10:42 make money is by lawyering up, just amassing an army of lawyers and winning as many cases
0:10:49 in court as possible. I don’t think this lawsuit in particular makes much sense. I don’t think
0:10:54 that they’ll win, but, directionally speaking, going to court, I think that’s a good idea.
0:10:56 Yeah, agreed. I think you said it perfectly.
0:10:57 Infliction.
0:11:01 Let’s take this ad. This has been your story and you called this early. What are your thoughts
0:11:02 here?
0:11:08 I talked about the specific arrangement with Infliction and Microsoft last week. If you
0:11:12 want my views on that, you can go listen to our previous episode. The most important
0:11:19 story in AI that I think no one is really talking about is this surreptitious consolidation
0:11:27 of power from the startup scene to Big Tech, because this one, this Infliction-Microsoft
0:11:33 deal, this one was obvious. It was right there in the headlines. Microsoft hires co-founder
0:11:38 of Infliction and takes half of the staff, which means to me that this is the tip of
0:11:45 the iceberg, because if Big Tech has gotten comfortable enough to do that right out in
0:11:51 the open and even put out a press release about it and call it an organizational update,
0:11:55 then what else are they comfortable with? What else are they doing to influence the
0:12:02 startup industry and to basically swallow all of AI whole? I do think that as we dig
0:12:07 further and as more of these investigations proceed, I think we’re going to find out just
0:12:14 how deep the collusion in AI really goes and also just how big Big Tech has gotten.
0:12:17 I think that’s exactly right, and I think we’ve said this before, you’ve been prescient
0:12:24 on this, and this is typically new technologies that go to the existing players or the new
0:12:31 ones, right? The phone kind of went to existing players, search and social went to new players.
0:12:35 This is going to the existing players in an environment where the existing players are
0:12:41 already too powerful, and they have tried to kind of do this jazz hands misdirect and
0:12:49 say, “Oh, no, it’s not Microsoft AI. It’s Open AI.” This case is really, really weird.
0:12:55 Everybody basically, they take the heart and lungs of inflection, they go over cooperatively
0:13:02 in a preplanned kind of weirdness to Microsoft, but supposedly inflection is still a company.
0:13:06 I interviewed Reid Hoffman and he said, “Oh, well, we just had a board meeting.” It’s just
0:13:07 very strange. I’ve never seen it before.
0:13:12 Yeah. What was his opinion? I know the episodes are, I haven’t listened to it, but what was
0:13:13 his opinion on all of this?
0:13:18 Well, he basically said that, “No, it’s still a company. We just had a board meeting,”
0:13:24 and that he thinks there’s going to be, I think he was worried that episode was going
0:13:28 to end up in a court as evidence, but he said, “No, I think there’s going to be,”
0:13:31 and I said, “Aren’t you worried about concentration of power?” And he said, “No, I think there’s
0:13:34 going to be a bunch of new players.” What is he going to say? My guess is they think
0:13:41 they can weight out the administration. My guess is they’re almost sort of hoping for
0:13:46 a Trump administration that may or may not. I think they’re all banking on the fact that
0:13:50 the Trump administration, and this kind of leads into our next story, I think, but will
0:13:55 choose law and regulation based on personal relationships as opposed to the actual systemic
0:14:01 law, right? So it’ll be like, “Well, I like him. Leave them alone.” And anyways, I think
0:14:02 you were right here.
0:14:16 We’ll be right back after the break with a look at Trump’s new donors in Silicon Valley.
0:14:19 Support for property markets comes from green light. As your kids get older, there are a
0:14:23 lot of things to look forward to, but one thing that might seem a bit daunting is the
0:14:28 money talk, talking to your kids about how to handle money, what to spend it on, and
0:14:32 what not to spend it on. And most importantly, how to be smart about it. Luckily, there’s
0:14:36 green light. Green light is a debit card and money I’ve made for families. Parents can
0:14:40 send money to their kids and keep an eye on kids spending and saving, while kids and teens
0:14:45 build money confidence and lifelong financial literacy skills in a fun, accessible way.
0:14:50 Millions of parents and kids are learning about money on green light. It’s the easy, convenient
0:14:55 way for parents to raise financially smart kids and families to navigate life together,
0:15:00 including the Galloway family. The best endorsement I can use here is that we were a green light
0:15:05 family before they ever advertised on Prop G or on Pivot. Sign up for green light today
0:15:12 and get your first month free when you go to greenlight.com/markets. That’s greenlight.com/markets
0:15:20 to try green light for free. Greenlight.com/markets.
0:15:25 Support for the show comes from Mercury. Mercury knows your financial operations are complex.
0:15:28 Business and finance teams have to pull together different tools, reconcile transactions from
0:15:33 different sources, and struggle to get accurate answers. With Mercury, you can simplify your
0:15:38 operations with banking and software that power your critical financial workflows, all
0:15:42 within the one thing every business needs, a bank account. And with new bill pay and
0:15:47 accounting capabilities, you can pay bills faster, stay in control of company spend,
0:15:52 and speed up reconciliation. Apply in minutes at mercury.com and join over 200,000 ambitious
0:15:56 startups that trust mercury to provide the precision control and focus they need to
0:16:02 transform their financial workflows so they can perform at their best. Mercury, the art
0:16:08 of simplified finances. Mercury is a financial technology company in Audubank. Banking service
0:16:19 is provided by Choice Financial Group and Evolve Bank & Trust, members FDIC.
0:16:24 This is an advertisement from BetterHelp. How often do you compare yourself to others?
0:16:28 It’s easy to envy people on social media, seeing only the good parts. In reality, no
0:16:33 one has it all together. Therapy can help you focus on what you want, not what others
0:16:39 have. And BetterHelp makes it easier to start. It’s online, flexible, and surprisingly affordable.
0:16:44 Connect with a credentialed therapist by phone, video, or online chat. Visit BetterHelp.com
0:16:48 to learn more. That’s BetterHELP.com
0:16:58 We’re back with ProfG Markets. It appears Silicon Valley may be turning red. Following
0:17:03 his endorsement of Donald Trump, Elon Musk announced he’ll be donating $45 million per
0:17:08 month to America Back, a pro-Trump political action committee. The Super PAC also has the
0:17:12 backing of a number of high-profile investors and venture capitalists, including a pair
0:17:18 of Sequoia Capital partners. Meanwhile, Mark Andreessen and Ben Horowitz told employees
0:17:23 at their firm that they plan to donate personal funds to pro-Trump organizations. Reportedly,
0:17:28 they told staffers they think Trump can do more to support startups than Biden. Scott,
0:17:33 initial reactions to Silicon Valley appearing to go red?
0:17:38 It’s really strange because Silicon Valley used to be kind of deep and condescent blue.
0:17:45 In 2012, 83% of the top tech firms’ contributions went to Obama’s election campaign. I mean,
0:17:55 that’s striking. 83%, the powerful were vastly over-indexing blue. But look, it appears that
0:17:59 Trump’s kind of pro-business policies appeal to the Silicon Valley elite. The scary thing
0:18:07 about an autocracy where there is not rule of law, it becomes who he likes. And so,
0:18:12 if you’re a billionaire, chances are you’re very focused on economic value, you’re very
0:18:18 excited about your companies. That’s kind of the kind of commitment and passion required
0:18:22 for your business dealings to get to that point, make you obviously very invested in
0:18:27 the success of that business. And I think they have figured out that the way we’re
0:18:34 going to be uber successful is to kiss this guy’s ass, give money to the campaign, and
0:18:40 laws be damned. I mean, Donald Trump put out a tweet about Elon Musk saying, he literally
0:18:44 said in the tweet, if I asked him to get on his knees and beg, he would have. He was incredibly
0:18:50 insulting, incredibly non-presidential, making a personal attack against Elon Musk. But Elon
0:18:56 Musk is, well, the way I go from 120 billion to a quarter of a billion in net worth and
0:19:04 get starlink and tariffs against those Chinese players or EV companies like BYD and no one
0:19:09 gets worried that I control 70, 80% of low orbit satellites is if I kiss this guy’s ass
0:19:17 and announce publicly that I am donating $45 million a month to this campaign. And I find
0:19:25 the concentration of wealth, you know, the scarier, it’s much scarier than buying an exoskeleton
0:19:33 of a dinosaur. What’s scarier is that an individual can donate $45 million a month to a presidential
0:19:38 campaign, especially when you have a guy that doesn’t have any principles or is not an ideal
0:19:43 log in any way. And it’ll just be like, all right, oh, okay, Elon wants this, he gave
0:19:50 me a quarter of a billion dollars. He can have, you know, fine, put tariffs on BYD and
0:19:56 young people won’t have access to affordable EVs or, you know, he’s in the flip is true
0:20:02 too. I think that companies that have stayed neutral or maybe have CEOs who have donated
0:20:06 to Democratic campaigns, I think he’s going to decide, oh, sorry, you’re, you don’t get
0:20:13 any, you know, Boeing, you can’t bid on government contracts. This is just becoming pure pay to
0:20:18 play. And also, I just, I find it so gross that some of the people who are the most fortunate
0:20:25 in our society don’t want to pay it forward. They just want a low tax regime with no regulation
0:20:30 that just, at the end of the day, that just gets them richer at the expense of what I
0:20:39 would argue are. I’m really, I’m really shocked is kind of one word and, you know, disappointed
0:20:47 that we’re seeing this kind of massive influx, you know, of capital across it. I’m kind of
0:20:50 flummoxed by it. I was really, really surprised. Do you have any thoughts?
0:20:54 I think the thing that’s getting to me is I feel like the thing that everyone loves
0:21:01 about Trump is his anti-establishment. You know, he’s sticking it to the media. He’s
0:21:05 sticking it to the man. He’s draining out the swamp, et cetera. But let’s just like
0:21:11 go through this list of the guys who have announced they are supporting Trump in the
0:21:16 past month or so. So it’s Elon Musk, Mark Andreessen, founder of Andreessen Horowitz,
0:21:23 Ben Horowitz, also founder of Andreessen Horowitz, Doug Leone, founder of Sequoia, Joe Lonsdale,
0:21:31 founder of Palantir, Bill Ackman, Pershing Square, David Sacks, Antonio Gracias, Valor
0:21:38 Equity, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss. The list goes on, but we should be clear. That
0:21:44 is the most establishment list of people you’ll see. I mean, these guys run the most
0:21:48 powerful venture capital firms in the world, the most powerful private equity firms in
0:21:53 the world, the most powerful tech companies in the world. It wouldn’t be hyperbole to
0:21:59 say that these guys run the country. They are the establishment. And I think the thing
0:22:06 that bugs me is how they have branded themselves as these underdogs, like they’re these Davids
0:22:13 fighting against the establishment goliath. And the thing that perplexes me even more
0:22:19 is the fact that people actually believe that crap. And, you know, again, we’re talking
0:22:24 about politics because we have to right now. And I will acknowledge that there are also
0:22:30 a lot of billionaires who donate to the Democratic Party too. I mean, we just talked about Reid
0:22:35 Hoffman. He’s one of the main guys behind that. He’s not donating $45 million a month,
0:22:41 but yes, sure, he’s on the list too. But the idea that Mark Andreessen and David Sacks
0:22:49 and Bill Ackman are out there fighting for working class people and, you know, fighting
0:22:54 against the powers that be. They’re taking on the big dogs as opposed to basically just
0:22:58 supporting the guy who’s going to make them even richer, as you have just said, and who
0:23:04 at this point will likely throw them in his cabinet because he’ll take whoever gives the
0:23:11 most amount of money. I mean, this is how the mafia works. He’s a mob boss. So I just,
0:23:16 I hope people can understand that this isn’t about free speech. This isn’t about DEI. This
0:23:23 isn’t about patriotism. This is about what it’s always been. And that is its money and
0:23:24 its power.
0:23:30 Yeah, you’re right. It becomes the mob is the right analogy. Also, on a risk-adjusted
0:23:36 basis, you go quiet on criticizing Trump because he will, you get the sense he will
0:23:42 try and levy or engage in retribution against his perceived political enemies. And he may
0:23:46 even weaponize the Department of Justice and try and put otherwise innocent people in jail,
0:23:52 at least that’s, he’s making hints at that. So the upside of shitposting Trump or the
0:23:57 downside is much greater than shitposting Biden. People who criticize Biden still feel
0:24:03 licensed to, as they should in a democratic society, criticize him. Whereas I think people
0:24:07 start feeling like they need to be more tempered in their criticism of Trump. And that’s how
0:24:12 you digress into an autocracy is that people are like, well, just don’t say anything because
0:24:18 he will in fact come for you and use the full weight of these institutions that can put you
0:24:24 in jail or make impoverish you that he’s not above. I mean, basically some of these court
0:24:29 cases have said he’s going to be essentially have a dictatorial powers. I say this as someone
0:24:35 who’s lived in London now for two years and it was starting to feel this way when I left,
0:24:40 but it’s gotten it just much more severe. I kind of don’t recognize America. I was out
0:24:45 at the end of the day. It was about the law, about a group of people passing laws and having a voice
0:24:50 in some people trying to think long term and slowly but surely money has become more important.
0:24:55 But this is now in these two parties competing on ideologies around, you know, limited government
0:25:00 and freedoms, you know, personal freedom, the Republican Party and the importance of good
0:25:05 government and civil rights. That was, it used to be actually Republicans and it was Democrats.
0:25:13 Now the Republicans have gone full. No, it’s about money and kissing Trump’s ass. That’s it.
0:25:19 That’s it. I want to just give one example of that before we move on. Going back to the conviction,
0:25:23 the Trump conviction earlier this year, you know, he was found guilty and the following day,
0:25:28 the donations went through the roof. And then there was this big announcement from the Trump
0:25:34 campaign. They’re like, we’ve raised $53 million in 24 hours. And I remember reading down, I’m like,
0:25:39 wow, like a lot of people are donating to Trump. And that was sort of the narrative. He’s just
0:25:43 rallied up the base and everyone’s going all in. They’re all donating a lot of people.
0:25:49 Turns out it actually wasn’t a lot of people. It turns out of that $53 million,
0:25:56 $50 million was given by one guy. And that guy was this guy named Timothy Mellon,
0:26:04 who was a longtime GOP donor. And he is the heir to the Mellon banking fortune. He’s like his
0:26:10 great, great grandad with some banking billionaire. That’s the story of the Trump campaign. That’s
0:26:17 how they’re raising their money. It’s all billionaires controlling the whole story on
0:26:22 the left to an extent, but certainly on the right at this point. Newsome 2024,
0:26:27 that’s all I have to say. I’m ready for the new guy or the gal. Let’s get on it.
0:26:32 We’ll be right back after the break with a look at Luxotica’s acquisition of Supreme.
0:26:45 Tim’s Maple Bacon is back,
0:26:50 featuring crispy naturally smoked bacon with a sweet and savory maple glaze and a 100% Canadian
0:26:54 fresh cracked egg all on a new cheddar croissant. Try Tim’s Maple Bacon breakfast sandwich today
0:27:01 and participating restaurants in Canada for a limited time. This episode is brought to you by
0:27:06 New Balance Running. New Balance believes if you run, you’re a runner. Whether you’re going for
0:27:12 your first ever run around the park or going for your personal best in a marathon, speed, strength,
0:27:16 stamina, whatever goal you’re working toward. New Balance has the running shoes,
0:27:21 clothes, and accessories to push your run further and help you run your way.
0:27:26 Find yours at newbalance.ca/running. New Balance, run your way.
0:27:31 Summer’s here and you can now get almost anything you need for your sunny days,
0:27:36 delivered with Uber Eats. What do we mean by almost? Well, you can’t get a well-groomed lawn
0:27:40 delivered, but you can get a chicken parmesan delivered, a cabana, that’s a no, but a banana,
0:27:47 that’s a yes. A nice tan, sorry, nope, but a box fan, happily yes. A day of sunshine, no. A box
0:27:52 of fine wines, yes. Uber Eats can definitely get you that. Get almost, almost anything delivered
0:27:56 with Uber Eats. Order now. Alcohol in select markets, product availability may vary by Regency
0:28:08 App for details. We’re back with ProcureMockets. Rayban maker SLO Luxotica is acquiring Supreme,
0:28:13 the iconic streetwear brand, for one and a half billion dollars. That’s nearly 30% lower than
0:28:20 Supreme’s last sale price in 2020. Luxotica’s stock fell 4% on the news as the deal struck analysts
0:28:26 as a bit of a mismatch. Luxotica is an eyewear company and Supreme makes limited run t-shirts
0:28:31 and hoodies. As one analyst put it, “An investment in a consumer brand with no eyewear DNA needed
0:28:36 further explanation.” Luxotica is presenting the acquisition as a means of expanding its
0:28:41 customer base, but Supreme’s current owner, VF Corporation, appears eager to offload the company
0:28:46 after finding a lack of synergy between the brand and its portfolio. By the way, VF owns the North
0:28:54 Face, Dickies and Vans. Scott, reactions to Luxotica, an eyewear company buying Supreme.
0:28:59 So first off, VF, who acquired Supreme, as a reputation as being one of the best acquirers
0:29:03 in history, they bought Vans for a song and turned it into just a global brand. It did hugely well
0:29:09 in China. I think they’ve had huge success with North Face. It’s a really well-run company and
0:29:15 they’re a great acquirer. This was a pretty unusual and public stubbed toe, if you will,
0:29:20 buying it for 2.1 billion and then selling it. What are they selling it for?
0:29:27 One and a half. Yeah. So, and then if you take an account, time, four years, this is a terrible
0:29:34 investment. The person who probably talked them into this, VF, has probably moved on and it’s no
0:29:38 longer running corporate development in VF. This is a pretty big stubbed toe, if you will.
0:29:43 I’ve never understood the brand, to be honest. I’m just not in this category, but I’ve never
0:29:49 quite understood it. The revenue growth has stagnated in 2023. It was a half a billion dollars,
0:29:55 it was down 10% year on year and Supreme’s revenues for fiscal year 2024 were not reported.
0:30:02 But the implied revenue multiple in 2020 was 4.2 and 2024 it’s 2.9. I still think they paid too
0:30:08 much and I think VF is smart to be disciplined and say, “This didn’t work. Our thesis hasn’t played
0:30:17 out and they’re going to take a $600 million ride off.” That’s not terrible and I would bet
0:30:21 that this is going to end up being like, I don’t want to call it chapter 12, but two bad acquisitions
0:30:28 in a row. I don’t think this brand is resonating and I don’t know if it has the scale at half a
0:30:33 billion dollars in revenue to kind of, I don’t know, endure, if you will. This to me feels like
0:30:38 a company that could go into just sort of a doom loop. Any thoughts? You’re young. What’s going on
0:30:42 here? Yeah, I think there’s a lot going on here. I mean, first I think it’s interesting to take a
0:30:51 look at the acquisition history of this company. It started in 1994. Kind of small cult following
0:30:58 wasn’t particularly successful until 2014, 2015. It would be lines around the block,
0:31:04 hundreds of people waiting in line to get their hands on these things. The reason that it worked
0:31:10 so well is because they were just obsessively diligent about limiting the supply. I mean,
0:31:16 you couldn’t buy anything. I remember I went to the store. I thought I was going to get myself
0:31:20 something cool and there was nothing in the store. The whole thing was sort of like an
0:31:26 economics lesson in supply and demand. What’s interesting though is who first acquired them,
0:31:34 it was the Carlisle Group. They caught on to this and in 2017, they bought 50% of supreme for half
0:31:41 a billion dollars. It was a one billion dollar valuation. Then they flipped it three years later
0:31:47 to VF for 2.1. Now VF is flipping it on for one and a half. The real winner here is actually
0:31:55 the Carlisle Group who got in at the exact right time 2017, got out at the exact right time to 2020,
0:31:59 and they doubled their money in the process. I’m just wondering if you have any insight
0:32:05 into how they nailed this one in particular. I remember Warren Hellman was one of my mentors
0:32:10 and Warren was the co-founder with Tully Freedman of Hellman Freedman, which is arguably the most
0:32:16 prestigious private equity firm in the world and one of the most successful and probably the most
0:32:21 prestigious kind of the original gangster of private equity. Warren said whenever we look
0:32:24 back over our winners and losers, it kind of came down. The distinction between the winners
0:32:30 and losers, which just came down to three things. One, did they get in at a good price? I mean,
0:32:36 at some point, almost any investment is going to be a good one if you get it cheap enough. At
0:32:40 some point, I’m on the board of a great company that’s growing like crazy. I don’t think I’m going
0:32:44 to make any money because I invested in 2021 when the market was fucking hysterical around this
0:32:48 shit. Even though the company’s performed really well, I think I’m just probably going to get my
0:32:55 money back. Two, is it growing? They only invest in growing companies, which I thought was interesting,
0:33:01 so no distress credits. It’s got to be growing. Growth kind of solves in business, almost all
0:33:05 problems. As long as you have positive margins and you’re growing, if you just keep growing,
0:33:10 eventually almost all your problems go away. Then the third thing is, did they have the
0:33:14 right guy or gal running it? Those were the three things that distinguished their winners from their
0:33:20 losers. Just focus on Luxottica’s strategy here and try to justify it. I mean, this is the first
0:33:26 time they’re going outside of Iowa. They own a bunch of fashion brands, but they’re all glosses.
0:33:34 It’s like Ray Bands, Persol, Oliver Peoples, et cetera. It feels like, to me, what they’re doing
0:33:44 is something like an LVMH strategy. LVMH was a leather goods company until it wasn’t. They
0:33:50 realized they could leverage that brand to sell a whole bunch of other stuff. They merged with
0:33:56 Moe Hennessey. They bought up a bunch of assets, and now they sell everything, and it’s a $100
0:34:02 billion per year business. I just wonder if Luxottica is looking at that. They’re looking at
0:34:09 LVMH and Hermes and Kering and all these other sort of luxury conglomerates, and they’re thinking,
0:34:15 “We want a piece of that action,” and so we’re going to start by buying up these sort of upper
0:34:21 tier to premium, not quite luxury brands, something like Supreme, and perhaps they have a lot more
0:34:24 acquisition ideas in the pipeline. Do you think that might be what they’re going for?
0:34:31 Yeah. We’re conglomerating again. CEOs love to conglomerate because their compensation is
0:34:36 determined on the performance of the company, but also the size of the company. As the company
0:34:39 gets bigger and bigger, they can say, “Well, fuck it. I’m the CEO of a $10 billion company. I should
0:34:43 be making this much,” and it’s the idea of paying for something that gives you massive
0:34:50 growth as opposed to trying to build organic growth, which is more difficult, is very intoxicated,
0:34:55 and so a lot of CEOs will talk their boards into paying, and good companies are smart. They know
0:34:58 they can only sell once, so they’re comfortable if it’s a good company holding out or saying no.
0:35:04 Two-thirds of acquisitions don’t work, meaning that that first criteria for Helman and Friedman
0:35:11 doesn’t work out. They overpaid. The imagined synergies and upside are usually not inflated,
0:35:17 but unrealistic as to how long it will take to recognize that growth in those synergies.
0:35:22 What they’re probably thinking is this is a new distribution channel for their eyeglasses, and
0:35:28 they also, I would imagine that they have the kind of relationships with some really incredible
0:35:33 up-and-coming brands that might be great brands to license for eyewear. Luxottica obviously is very
0:35:38 good. Luxottica, I think, produces not only their own operating brands, but I think they make a lot
0:35:44 of sunglasses for other — I wouldn’t be surprised if Prada does manufacture sunglasses. I would
0:35:50 imagine that Luxottica produces the branded glasses for Prada. That’s right. Luxottica does
0:35:55 manufacture for Prada. I wouldn’t be surprised if Luxottica said this company has a lot of great
0:35:59 relationships with emerging hot brands. It will give us a leg up in terms of licensing agreements,
0:36:06 be a new channel of distribution for us, so there’ll be flow. We can help them operationally.
0:36:11 A new distribution point for our existing brands, and the reverse flow of the river will be,
0:36:16 we will have access to a bunch of cool hip brands that we will produce glasses for. Luxottica,
0:36:21 it’s really interesting, Luxottica is sort of a little bit of a monopoly. It controls a huge,
0:36:25 it’s just so fucking ridiculous that you go in and you pay this kind of money for eyeglasses.
0:36:32 I remember buying Rayvans for like $30 when I was in college. Aviators, now they’re two or $300.
0:36:39 I mean, this is definitely outpaced inflation, and they have kind of a near monopoly on glasses.
0:36:44 This is a very dominant company. It’s well-run, but yeah, I don’t like this one. We should
0:36:47 check back in on this one. I don’t think this one’s going to work.
0:36:52 Just one other update on Luxottica that came in very recently. Metta is apparently in talks to
0:36:58 buy a steak in the company. As you know, Metta has a partnership with Rayvans. They have these
0:37:07 AR, VR, Rayvans that have more mobile version of the headset. Hence why this deal is probably
0:37:12 happening, but do you have any reactions to that news Metta potentially buying a steak in Luxottica?
0:37:19 I think it’s smart. Zuckerberg said that, I mean, he realizes that the oculus is a giant fucking
0:37:26 thud. But what he said, and it makes sense to me, is that they’re glasses. My son bought their
0:37:30 glasses, and he’s not using them anymore, but he used some kind of nonstop when he was skiing.
0:37:31 The Rayvans?
0:37:36 Yeah. You could say whatever it was. Metta take a picture. Metta play music. They’re actually
0:37:41 really, I tried them on. I thought this is actually pretty cool technology. In 10 years,
0:37:48 the oculus technology, the dream of oculus might be realized with micro cameras and smaller,
0:37:54 more powerful chips that can seamlessly go into a pair of glasses. And I think that’s his vision.
0:38:00 And he wants a leg up in terms of manufacturing and the style. And so I think given Metta has
0:38:04 whatever a $700, $800 billion market cap or whatever it is, or is it over a trillion? I can’t
0:38:05 keep track.
0:38:06 So it’s 1.2 trillion.
0:38:12 Okay. 1.2 trillion. So Metta’s contemplating, according to the news here at $5 million investment
0:38:16 at a valuation of $100 million. That gives them 5%. They don’t care about the financial return here.
0:38:20 They don’t want to lose money, but that’s spare change for them. That’s a couple of weeks of
0:38:25 free cash flow. And what they really want is to be one of the largest individual shareholders
0:38:31 in an agreement to be involved in the development or have access to proprietary manufacturing and
0:38:37 supply chain that helps give them an edge around producing kind of a metaverse or AR, VR-enabled
0:38:43 sunglasses or glasses. This is going to have the metaverse or what his vision of the headsets
0:38:48 going to be realized. It’s going to be realized in glasses. And when I put on my kids’ glasses,
0:38:52 and it just clicked on me, I see the potential here, and he’s stated this that the technology is
0:38:58 about a decade away. That decade will go really quickly. And I love what Bill Gates said that
0:39:01 what’s supposed to take a decade takes three years, what’s supposed to take three years takes 10.
0:39:07 This might be one of those technologies in three years. There is a pretty good glasses offering
0:39:13 70 or 80% of your VR or AR or metaverse experience. The other thing that’s sort of interesting about
0:39:18 Luxotica is because at such a monopoly, they kept raising prices faster than inflation, which
0:39:23 created opportunity for a new entrant. And that new entrant are the iconic glasses that the dog
0:39:29 wears that emphasizes his cheekbones and awkwardly shape nose that veers to the right because I got
0:39:32 kicked in the face by Bobby Henderson and my junior airplane soccer. I thought it was because
0:39:36 you got punched in the face in a boxing match. That made it worse. He couldn’t have punched the
0:39:41 other way. Literally, you think he’d have, if he was going to knock me out that he would punch
0:39:45 it and put it symmetrical again and steady, like punch it the way it was already bending. Anyway,
0:39:51 that is one of the underrated facts about you is that you took up boxing. Dude, I was bored.
0:39:57 I also took up yoga. I just didn’t have a lot going on. And I was, I was at that point in my
0:40:01 life where I like discovered creatine and working out and I was like going through an early midlife
0:40:05 crisis and I was getting ripped. And I’m like, all right, I’ll start boxing because I heard it’s
0:40:08 what you do. I went to this place called Dog Pound Gym or something. It was just fucking
0:40:17 ridiculous. Anyways, so Warby Parker came in at 99 bucks. I absolutely love it because I remember
0:40:22 specifically one experience. I went to this one of these little boutique, these little boutique
0:40:27 eyeglass places with this very attractive man who, you know, tried on all these glasses for me and,
0:40:33 you know, and then I got my prescription and I got Tom Ford glasses and it was $900 for my
0:40:37 glasses by the time I was at the door. And I literally got them, went and picked them up,
0:40:44 got it in a cab and left them in the cab. And I’m like, fuck it. So, and then Warby comes along
0:40:50 and these glasses are 80% of Tom Ford for 12% of the price. And I think they do an amazing job.
0:40:56 It’s, Luxotica has always been, I always thought Luxotica was an example of a monopoly that kind
0:41:02 of flew under the radar. Let’s take a look at the week ahead. We’ll see detail on the personal
0:41:07 consumption expenditures index for June. We’ll also see earnings from Microsoft, Google, and
0:41:15 Tesla. Do you have any predictions for us, Scott? Yeah, so Donald J. Trump media, just a ridiculous
0:41:19 fucking company that has a $7 billion market cap despite the fact that makes no money and no one’s
0:41:27 on there other than total crazies. It got a huge boost. Was it after the assassination attempt?
0:41:33 Yeah, it was right after. I think it was a 30% jump. Yeah, it had a huge jump because the stock
0:41:38 trades a little bit. It’s like a little bit of a tracking stock for the likelihood that Trump is
0:41:43 going to be reelected because I think the market’s saying, if he gets reelected, he’ll just figure
0:41:50 out a way to like have the Defense Department, you know, buy Donald Trump technology group or
0:41:55 something. Make it mandatory. Every government employee has to get on that. Yeah, has to be on,
0:42:01 has to be on true social. Yeah, or it’s just people buying the stock as a proxy of giving him
0:42:04 money or, this thing just never made any sense. It’s kind of, it’s actually kind of the ultimate
0:42:09 meme stock. Its valuation is more disconnected from the business than even an AMC, which you could
0:42:16 argue has sort of a core business at the end of the day as does GameStop. Anyways, the stock popped
0:42:23 to about 46 bucks last Monday and now it’s come back to 37, but I think you’re going to see the
0:42:28 stock go sub 30. This is not financial advice. It just seems fun to track because I think Biden
0:42:34 is going to step down and that will send a signal to the market that there’s a greater likelihood
0:42:39 that the Democrats will hold onto the White House than there is right now. And I think that the way
0:42:44 that people trade this stock is based on the likelihood that Trump is reelected. And so when
0:42:50 the likelihood of Trump being reelected goes from like 70 or 75% back down to like, I don’t know,
0:42:56 55, you’re going to see the stock go sub 30 again. This episode was produced by Claire Miller and
0:43:00 engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our associate producer is Alison Weiss. Our executive producers
0:43:04 are Jason Staffers and Catherine Dillon. Mia Silverio is our research lead and Drew Burroughs
0:43:09 is our technical director. Thank you for listening to Prof. G Markets from the Vox Media Podcast
0:43:15 Network. Join us on Thursday for a conversation with Robert Armstrong, only on Prof. G Markets.
0:43:45 Lifetimes. You help me in kind reunion as the world turns. And the dark flies.
0:43:54 And love, love, love, love.
0:44:02 [BLANK_AUDIO]
0:00:11 it’s well crafted and high quality, and that’s especially true of Ferragamo footwear. For
0:00:16 almost a hundred years, the name Ferragamo has been synonymous with luxury, and all Ferragamo
0:00:20 products are made sustainably with ethically sourced materials. Ferragamo footwear is
0:00:25 designed to last so whether you’re hitting the city streets in a pair of classic loafers
0:00:31 or strolling the park in contemporary moccasins and sneakers, you can do so in chic comfort.
0:00:37 Discover Ferragamo’s timeless styles with a modern touch at ferragamo.com.
0:00:41 Support for this podcast comes from Huntress. Keeping your data safe is important, however
0:00:46 you’re a small business owner, then protecting the information of yourself, your company,
0:00:52 and your workers is vital. And comes Huntress. Huntress is where fully managed cybersecurity
0:00:56 meets human expertise. They offer a revolutionary approach to manage security that isn’t all
0:01:01 about tech. It’s about real people providing real defense. When threats or rise or issues
0:01:06 occur, their team of seasoned cyber experts is ready 24 hours a day, 365 days a year for
0:01:13 support. Visit huntress.com/propg to start a free trial or learn more.
0:01:20 Today’s number, $45 million. That’s how much Ken Griffin paid for, get this, a stegosaurus
0:01:25 skeleton. True story yet, when I was 14, me and my buddy were masturbating to some hardcore
0:01:40 dinosaur pornography. Unfortunately, my mother saw us.
0:01:47 Get it, Ed? Get it? It’s like a dad joke that’s also a little bit pornographic. Welcome to
0:01:53 PropG Markets. Today, we’re discussing Trump’s Silicon Valley backers and Supreme’s latest
0:02:01 buyer. But first, here with the news is PropG analyst Ed Elson. Ed, what is the good word?
0:02:02 What’s going on with you?
0:02:06 I’m pretty good, Skull. I want to get your honest reaction to Ken Griffin paying $45
0:02:11 million for a stegosaurus. What does that say about the state of the United States right
0:02:12 now?
0:02:17 Well, that too few people have too much fucking money. I mean, what else is to say about it?
0:02:25 There’s a hot market and dinosaur exoskeletons. I mean, good for him. Although, speaking along
0:02:31 the lines of having too much money, I actually contemplating bidding on Einstein’s letter
0:02:38 to Truman, I think, warning him about the dangers of the atomic bomb. He has a, I think
0:02:40 it’s, I don’t know if it’s a written or a type letter, but they think it’s going to
0:02:42 go for three to four million.
0:02:46 So this is how you know you’re an old person is when you start bidding millions of dollars
0:02:50 on hand written letters. That’s how you know you’re getting up.
0:02:54 The other way is for the first time in my life, someone says, “Do you want to go on
0:03:01 a cruise?” And I think, “Yeah, that sounds kind of nice.” Or I start thinking anytime someone
0:03:09 says the word P, I need to pee. It’s like, I can be walking out of a urinal. And if someone
0:03:13 says, “Did you just pee?” I’m like, “I have to stop and go back and pee again.” And you
0:03:18 find like, I took a walk, let’s get back to me. I took a walk through the Rose Garden
0:03:23 in Hyde, was it Hyde Park or Regents Park? I have no interest in roses. And I’m like,
0:03:29 this is so beautiful. And I forced my sons to sit down and take a moment to smell the
0:03:34 flowers. And I’m like, “Oh my God, I’ve become my grandmother.” Anyways, this is where you
0:03:35 have to look forward to.
0:03:37 It’s good. It’s a nice change for you.
0:03:41 What do you think of me, what it means when Ken Griffin spends that kind of money on a
0:03:42 stegosaurus skeleton?
0:03:46 Oh yeah. I just think, I think it’s a really efficient use of capital. I think it says
0:03:51 a good thing about our economy that there are people out there who have this much money
0:03:56 to buy skeletons. I just think it shows that the markets are working and I, yeah, I think
0:03:57 it’s good.
0:03:59 Do you feel good about it? You’re one of these anti-capitalists. You think we need to move
0:04:01 to a collective in communism?
0:04:02 Yeah.
0:04:05 I think it’s good he’s spending it. Let me go ahead. I think it’s better that he’s spending
0:04:10 it than hoarding it. I don’t know. Whoever owned that skeleton now has, now’s live in
0:04:11 large.
0:04:12 That’s true.
0:04:16 Dear Bob, he bought a new boat. How do you do that? Well, he had some fucking dinosaur
0:04:21 skeleton that he sold to some stupid white guy from Chicago. I like that story.
0:04:23 That’s a good point actually.
0:04:24 Yeah, why not?
0:04:25 That makes me feel better. Should we get to the headlines?
0:04:26 Yes.
0:04:35 Let’s start with our weekly review of market vitals.
0:04:40 The S&P 500 hit a new record, then dropped sharply amid a tech sell-off. The Nasdaq had
0:04:45 its worst days since 2022. The dollar declined. Bitcoin rose and the yield on 10-year treasuries
0:04:48 fell. Shifting to the headlines.
0:04:51 The Biden administration proposed a new plan for national rent control, which will force
0:04:56 landlords who own 50 or more units to either cap rent increases at 5% or give up their
0:05:00 tax credits. The proposal would apply to roughly 20 million rental units.
0:05:04 And some late breaking news. President Joe Biden has dropped out of the race. We’ll take
0:05:08 a look at how the markets are reacting on Thursday’s episode.
0:05:13 Universal Sony and Warner are suing Verizon for $2.6 billion over claims that the wireless
0:05:19 provider has ignored piracy. The lawsuit alleges that the label sent more than 340,000 infringement
0:05:23 notices to Verizon. But the company has refused to remove repeat offenders because they pay
0:05:26 for better internet service.
0:05:30 And finally, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority is investigating Microsoft over
0:05:35 its hiring of inflection employees. The agency is in the first phase of an antitrust probe
0:05:40 into the partnership and will decide in early September whether or not to launch an in-depth
0:05:44 investigation. Scott, your thoughts, let’s start from the top.
0:05:48 Rent control doesn’t work. It ends up reducing housing stock and increasing prices and it’s
0:05:54 nothing but a giveaway to essentially rich white people. When I was right out of UCLA,
0:05:59 I had a job at Morgan Stanley and my best friend, Lee, who had a job at Great Western
0:06:03 Financial, a bank and we were making good money. He said we should apply for, we should
0:06:07 run a home in Santa Monica and see if we can get rent control. I’m like, those are impossible
0:06:12 to get because everybody wants them, right? And he said, no, we’re both, you know, these
0:06:17 kind of high-income earning yuppies and those are who the landlords want. The landlords are
0:06:22 like, okay, I’m going to get 80 applications for this. I’m going to pick the person who
0:06:25 doesn’t need a rent control department. They have so much money that I have absolutely
0:06:31 no risk of non-payment. And so the result is that with rent control, you end up with
0:06:36 a dearth of housing stock because nobody wants to build because they can’t get a return
0:06:40 on in their investment because there’s going to be rent control placed on this asset they
0:06:46 build. So it decreases supply and all you end up doing is giving a gift to rich, you
0:06:51 know, mostly rich, mostly white people who the landlord, you know, picks the safest bet
0:06:56 in terms of economic security. It doesn’t work. What they should be doing is figuring
0:07:02 out legislation that makes it very difficult for local review boards to kill housing permits,
0:07:07 they should be providing if they need to economic subsidies that encourage more and more building.
0:07:13 This is straight, I mean, this is simple fucking economics. So this is all a long-winded way
0:07:15 of saying we should move on to the next story.
0:07:16 Verizon.
0:07:20 I find this really interesting. I think in general what you have is a group of people,
0:07:24 a sector that has had the shit kicked out of it, specifically the traditional creative
0:07:28 community. They have slowly but surely seen their economics get worse and worse. And in
0:07:33 addition, there’s been a genie coefficient here and that is Taylor Swift now sells more
0:07:39 albums than all of jazz or all of classical music combined. So she’s bigger than an entire
0:07:40 genres.
0:07:41 That’s a good set.
0:07:46 And everybody thought that the online music was going to create this long tail and there
0:07:51 is a little bit more discovery, a great song can bubble up even if it doesn’t get a contract
0:07:56 with Warner Music, whatever. But for the most part, it’s created a globalization of music
0:08:00 where I think Shadeh is a billionaire because in every country in the world, including Muslim
0:08:04 countries, she’s like the fourth biggest or the sixth biggest artist. She has made, I
0:08:08 think, hundreds of millions of millions of dollars. And by the way, she deserves it.
0:08:10 That shit is buttery and sexy yet.
0:08:11 I’m never even out of a…
0:08:14 When you’re fortunate enough, like every five years, when you’re fortunate enough to get
0:08:19 a lady back to your apartment, just trust me on this, it’s Shadeh and Chardonnay. Boom.
0:08:22 Let’s go time that. Anyway, it’s a little tip, a little tip.
0:08:25 So don’t know how I got there.
0:08:32 But these artists are… They’re pushing back and they’re saying, “We’re just sick of platforms
0:08:39 injecting themselves in between us and the consumer and starching most of the margin.”
0:08:45 And I think that they’re basically lowering up and saying, “Go after everybody because
0:08:51 we need a bigger piece of this pie because spending, I believe, on music has actually
0:08:59 gone up.” But I think that it’s gotten harder and harder for all but the top 1%. Supposedly,
0:09:04 the U.S. economy loses about $13 billion annually as a result of music theft and visit to music
0:09:10 piracy sites increased 13% last year to more than $17 billion. And I think they’re fed
0:09:16 up and they’re trying to find ways to restore an economic structure that helps them. I don’t
0:09:18 know much about the case itself. Do you have any thoughts here?
0:09:22 Well, yeah. Let’s just go through what they’re actually saying in this lawsuit. They’re not
0:09:28 saying that Verizon committed any copyright infringements. They’re saying that Verizon customers
0:09:32 committed copyright infringements and that Verizon didn’t do anything about it. So this
0:09:37 is quite different from the other lawsuits we’ve been seeing and that we’ve been covering
0:09:42 with all these other AI companies that were actually stealing the content. They were stealing
0:09:47 the music and those lawsuits, to me, were totally legitimate and I think they’ll win
0:09:53 those lawsuits. This, on the other hand, is kind of a stretch. Like they’re sort of,
0:09:59 as far as lawsuits go, they’re sort of scraping the barrel here. I don’t really think they’ll
0:10:04 win. Having said that, I do think it says something bigger about where the music industry
0:10:09 is headed, which is that after several years of getting pretty badly messed around with,
0:10:15 mostly by tech companies, these music labels have said, “Okay, fuck this. We’re taking
0:10:20 everyone to court.” From a shareholder perspective, I think it is the way to do it because this
0:10:25 isn’t like a normal business. This isn’t like they’re not going to make money cutting costs
0:10:30 or increasing production, all the stuff that we usually talk about, usually when we’re
0:10:35 talking about tech companies, this is an intellectual property business. The way they’re going to
0:10:42 make money is by lawyering up, just amassing an army of lawyers and winning as many cases
0:10:49 in court as possible. I don’t think this lawsuit in particular makes much sense. I don’t think
0:10:54 that they’ll win, but, directionally speaking, going to court, I think that’s a good idea.
0:10:56 Yeah, agreed. I think you said it perfectly.
0:10:57 Infliction.
0:11:01 Let’s take this ad. This has been your story and you called this early. What are your thoughts
0:11:02 here?
0:11:08 I talked about the specific arrangement with Infliction and Microsoft last week. If you
0:11:12 want my views on that, you can go listen to our previous episode. The most important
0:11:19 story in AI that I think no one is really talking about is this surreptitious consolidation
0:11:27 of power from the startup scene to Big Tech, because this one, this Infliction-Microsoft
0:11:33 deal, this one was obvious. It was right there in the headlines. Microsoft hires co-founder
0:11:38 of Infliction and takes half of the staff, which means to me that this is the tip of
0:11:45 the iceberg, because if Big Tech has gotten comfortable enough to do that right out in
0:11:51 the open and even put out a press release about it and call it an organizational update,
0:11:55 then what else are they comfortable with? What else are they doing to influence the
0:12:02 startup industry and to basically swallow all of AI whole? I do think that as we dig
0:12:07 further and as more of these investigations proceed, I think we’re going to find out just
0:12:14 how deep the collusion in AI really goes and also just how big Big Tech has gotten.
0:12:17 I think that’s exactly right, and I think we’ve said this before, you’ve been prescient
0:12:24 on this, and this is typically new technologies that go to the existing players or the new
0:12:31 ones, right? The phone kind of went to existing players, search and social went to new players.
0:12:35 This is going to the existing players in an environment where the existing players are
0:12:41 already too powerful, and they have tried to kind of do this jazz hands misdirect and
0:12:49 say, “Oh, no, it’s not Microsoft AI. It’s Open AI.” This case is really, really weird.
0:12:55 Everybody basically, they take the heart and lungs of inflection, they go over cooperatively
0:13:02 in a preplanned kind of weirdness to Microsoft, but supposedly inflection is still a company.
0:13:06 I interviewed Reid Hoffman and he said, “Oh, well, we just had a board meeting.” It’s just
0:13:07 very strange. I’ve never seen it before.
0:13:12 Yeah. What was his opinion? I know the episodes are, I haven’t listened to it, but what was
0:13:13 his opinion on all of this?
0:13:18 Well, he basically said that, “No, it’s still a company. We just had a board meeting,”
0:13:24 and that he thinks there’s going to be, I think he was worried that episode was going
0:13:28 to end up in a court as evidence, but he said, “No, I think there’s going to be,”
0:13:31 and I said, “Aren’t you worried about concentration of power?” And he said, “No, I think there’s
0:13:34 going to be a bunch of new players.” What is he going to say? My guess is they think
0:13:41 they can weight out the administration. My guess is they’re almost sort of hoping for
0:13:46 a Trump administration that may or may not. I think they’re all banking on the fact that
0:13:50 the Trump administration, and this kind of leads into our next story, I think, but will
0:13:55 choose law and regulation based on personal relationships as opposed to the actual systemic
0:14:01 law, right? So it’ll be like, “Well, I like him. Leave them alone.” And anyways, I think
0:14:02 you were right here.
0:14:16 We’ll be right back after the break with a look at Trump’s new donors in Silicon Valley.
0:14:19 Support for property markets comes from green light. As your kids get older, there are a
0:14:23 lot of things to look forward to, but one thing that might seem a bit daunting is the
0:14:28 money talk, talking to your kids about how to handle money, what to spend it on, and
0:14:32 what not to spend it on. And most importantly, how to be smart about it. Luckily, there’s
0:14:36 green light. Green light is a debit card and money I’ve made for families. Parents can
0:14:40 send money to their kids and keep an eye on kids spending and saving, while kids and teens
0:14:45 build money confidence and lifelong financial literacy skills in a fun, accessible way.
0:14:50 Millions of parents and kids are learning about money on green light. It’s the easy, convenient
0:14:55 way for parents to raise financially smart kids and families to navigate life together,
0:15:00 including the Galloway family. The best endorsement I can use here is that we were a green light
0:15:05 family before they ever advertised on Prop G or on Pivot. Sign up for green light today
0:15:12 and get your first month free when you go to greenlight.com/markets. That’s greenlight.com/markets
0:15:20 to try green light for free. Greenlight.com/markets.
0:15:25 Support for the show comes from Mercury. Mercury knows your financial operations are complex.
0:15:28 Business and finance teams have to pull together different tools, reconcile transactions from
0:15:33 different sources, and struggle to get accurate answers. With Mercury, you can simplify your
0:15:38 operations with banking and software that power your critical financial workflows, all
0:15:42 within the one thing every business needs, a bank account. And with new bill pay and
0:15:47 accounting capabilities, you can pay bills faster, stay in control of company spend,
0:15:52 and speed up reconciliation. Apply in minutes at mercury.com and join over 200,000 ambitious
0:15:56 startups that trust mercury to provide the precision control and focus they need to
0:16:02 transform their financial workflows so they can perform at their best. Mercury, the art
0:16:08 of simplified finances. Mercury is a financial technology company in Audubank. Banking service
0:16:19 is provided by Choice Financial Group and Evolve Bank & Trust, members FDIC.
0:16:24 This is an advertisement from BetterHelp. How often do you compare yourself to others?
0:16:28 It’s easy to envy people on social media, seeing only the good parts. In reality, no
0:16:33 one has it all together. Therapy can help you focus on what you want, not what others
0:16:39 have. And BetterHelp makes it easier to start. It’s online, flexible, and surprisingly affordable.
0:16:44 Connect with a credentialed therapist by phone, video, or online chat. Visit BetterHelp.com
0:16:48 to learn more. That’s BetterHELP.com
0:16:58 We’re back with ProfG Markets. It appears Silicon Valley may be turning red. Following
0:17:03 his endorsement of Donald Trump, Elon Musk announced he’ll be donating $45 million per
0:17:08 month to America Back, a pro-Trump political action committee. The Super PAC also has the
0:17:12 backing of a number of high-profile investors and venture capitalists, including a pair
0:17:18 of Sequoia Capital partners. Meanwhile, Mark Andreessen and Ben Horowitz told employees
0:17:23 at their firm that they plan to donate personal funds to pro-Trump organizations. Reportedly,
0:17:28 they told staffers they think Trump can do more to support startups than Biden. Scott,
0:17:33 initial reactions to Silicon Valley appearing to go red?
0:17:38 It’s really strange because Silicon Valley used to be kind of deep and condescent blue.
0:17:45 In 2012, 83% of the top tech firms’ contributions went to Obama’s election campaign. I mean,
0:17:55 that’s striking. 83%, the powerful were vastly over-indexing blue. But look, it appears that
0:17:59 Trump’s kind of pro-business policies appeal to the Silicon Valley elite. The scary thing
0:18:07 about an autocracy where there is not rule of law, it becomes who he likes. And so,
0:18:12 if you’re a billionaire, chances are you’re very focused on economic value, you’re very
0:18:18 excited about your companies. That’s kind of the kind of commitment and passion required
0:18:22 for your business dealings to get to that point, make you obviously very invested in
0:18:27 the success of that business. And I think they have figured out that the way we’re
0:18:34 going to be uber successful is to kiss this guy’s ass, give money to the campaign, and
0:18:40 laws be damned. I mean, Donald Trump put out a tweet about Elon Musk saying, he literally
0:18:44 said in the tweet, if I asked him to get on his knees and beg, he would have. He was incredibly
0:18:50 insulting, incredibly non-presidential, making a personal attack against Elon Musk. But Elon
0:18:56 Musk is, well, the way I go from 120 billion to a quarter of a billion in net worth and
0:19:04 get starlink and tariffs against those Chinese players or EV companies like BYD and no one
0:19:09 gets worried that I control 70, 80% of low orbit satellites is if I kiss this guy’s ass
0:19:17 and announce publicly that I am donating $45 million a month to this campaign. And I find
0:19:25 the concentration of wealth, you know, the scarier, it’s much scarier than buying an exoskeleton
0:19:33 of a dinosaur. What’s scarier is that an individual can donate $45 million a month to a presidential
0:19:38 campaign, especially when you have a guy that doesn’t have any principles or is not an ideal
0:19:43 log in any way. And it’ll just be like, all right, oh, okay, Elon wants this, he gave
0:19:50 me a quarter of a billion dollars. He can have, you know, fine, put tariffs on BYD and
0:19:56 young people won’t have access to affordable EVs or, you know, he’s in the flip is true
0:20:02 too. I think that companies that have stayed neutral or maybe have CEOs who have donated
0:20:06 to Democratic campaigns, I think he’s going to decide, oh, sorry, you’re, you don’t get
0:20:13 any, you know, Boeing, you can’t bid on government contracts. This is just becoming pure pay to
0:20:18 play. And also, I just, I find it so gross that some of the people who are the most fortunate
0:20:25 in our society don’t want to pay it forward. They just want a low tax regime with no regulation
0:20:30 that just, at the end of the day, that just gets them richer at the expense of what I
0:20:39 would argue are. I’m really, I’m really shocked is kind of one word and, you know, disappointed
0:20:47 that we’re seeing this kind of massive influx, you know, of capital across it. I’m kind of
0:20:50 flummoxed by it. I was really, really surprised. Do you have any thoughts?
0:20:54 I think the thing that’s getting to me is I feel like the thing that everyone loves
0:21:01 about Trump is his anti-establishment. You know, he’s sticking it to the media. He’s
0:21:05 sticking it to the man. He’s draining out the swamp, et cetera. But let’s just like
0:21:11 go through this list of the guys who have announced they are supporting Trump in the
0:21:16 past month or so. So it’s Elon Musk, Mark Andreessen, founder of Andreessen Horowitz,
0:21:23 Ben Horowitz, also founder of Andreessen Horowitz, Doug Leone, founder of Sequoia, Joe Lonsdale,
0:21:31 founder of Palantir, Bill Ackman, Pershing Square, David Sacks, Antonio Gracias, Valor
0:21:38 Equity, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss. The list goes on, but we should be clear. That
0:21:44 is the most establishment list of people you’ll see. I mean, these guys run the most
0:21:48 powerful venture capital firms in the world, the most powerful private equity firms in
0:21:53 the world, the most powerful tech companies in the world. It wouldn’t be hyperbole to
0:21:59 say that these guys run the country. They are the establishment. And I think the thing
0:22:06 that bugs me is how they have branded themselves as these underdogs, like they’re these Davids
0:22:13 fighting against the establishment goliath. And the thing that perplexes me even more
0:22:19 is the fact that people actually believe that crap. And, you know, again, we’re talking
0:22:24 about politics because we have to right now. And I will acknowledge that there are also
0:22:30 a lot of billionaires who donate to the Democratic Party too. I mean, we just talked about Reid
0:22:35 Hoffman. He’s one of the main guys behind that. He’s not donating $45 million a month,
0:22:41 but yes, sure, he’s on the list too. But the idea that Mark Andreessen and David Sacks
0:22:49 and Bill Ackman are out there fighting for working class people and, you know, fighting
0:22:54 against the powers that be. They’re taking on the big dogs as opposed to basically just
0:22:58 supporting the guy who’s going to make them even richer, as you have just said, and who
0:23:04 at this point will likely throw them in his cabinet because he’ll take whoever gives the
0:23:11 most amount of money. I mean, this is how the mafia works. He’s a mob boss. So I just,
0:23:16 I hope people can understand that this isn’t about free speech. This isn’t about DEI. This
0:23:23 isn’t about patriotism. This is about what it’s always been. And that is its money and
0:23:24 its power.
0:23:30 Yeah, you’re right. It becomes the mob is the right analogy. Also, on a risk-adjusted
0:23:36 basis, you go quiet on criticizing Trump because he will, you get the sense he will
0:23:42 try and levy or engage in retribution against his perceived political enemies. And he may
0:23:46 even weaponize the Department of Justice and try and put otherwise innocent people in jail,
0:23:52 at least that’s, he’s making hints at that. So the upside of shitposting Trump or the
0:23:57 downside is much greater than shitposting Biden. People who criticize Biden still feel
0:24:03 licensed to, as they should in a democratic society, criticize him. Whereas I think people
0:24:07 start feeling like they need to be more tempered in their criticism of Trump. And that’s how
0:24:12 you digress into an autocracy is that people are like, well, just don’t say anything because
0:24:18 he will in fact come for you and use the full weight of these institutions that can put you
0:24:24 in jail or make impoverish you that he’s not above. I mean, basically some of these court
0:24:29 cases have said he’s going to be essentially have a dictatorial powers. I say this as someone
0:24:35 who’s lived in London now for two years and it was starting to feel this way when I left,
0:24:40 but it’s gotten it just much more severe. I kind of don’t recognize America. I was out
0:24:45 at the end of the day. It was about the law, about a group of people passing laws and having a voice
0:24:50 in some people trying to think long term and slowly but surely money has become more important.
0:24:55 But this is now in these two parties competing on ideologies around, you know, limited government
0:25:00 and freedoms, you know, personal freedom, the Republican Party and the importance of good
0:25:05 government and civil rights. That was, it used to be actually Republicans and it was Democrats.
0:25:13 Now the Republicans have gone full. No, it’s about money and kissing Trump’s ass. That’s it.
0:25:19 That’s it. I want to just give one example of that before we move on. Going back to the conviction,
0:25:23 the Trump conviction earlier this year, you know, he was found guilty and the following day,
0:25:28 the donations went through the roof. And then there was this big announcement from the Trump
0:25:34 campaign. They’re like, we’ve raised $53 million in 24 hours. And I remember reading down, I’m like,
0:25:39 wow, like a lot of people are donating to Trump. And that was sort of the narrative. He’s just
0:25:43 rallied up the base and everyone’s going all in. They’re all donating a lot of people.
0:25:49 Turns out it actually wasn’t a lot of people. It turns out of that $53 million,
0:25:56 $50 million was given by one guy. And that guy was this guy named Timothy Mellon,
0:26:04 who was a longtime GOP donor. And he is the heir to the Mellon banking fortune. He’s like his
0:26:10 great, great grandad with some banking billionaire. That’s the story of the Trump campaign. That’s
0:26:17 how they’re raising their money. It’s all billionaires controlling the whole story on
0:26:22 the left to an extent, but certainly on the right at this point. Newsome 2024,
0:26:27 that’s all I have to say. I’m ready for the new guy or the gal. Let’s get on it.
0:26:32 We’ll be right back after the break with a look at Luxotica’s acquisition of Supreme.
0:26:45 Tim’s Maple Bacon is back,
0:26:50 featuring crispy naturally smoked bacon with a sweet and savory maple glaze and a 100% Canadian
0:26:54 fresh cracked egg all on a new cheddar croissant. Try Tim’s Maple Bacon breakfast sandwich today
0:27:01 and participating restaurants in Canada for a limited time. This episode is brought to you by
0:27:06 New Balance Running. New Balance believes if you run, you’re a runner. Whether you’re going for
0:27:12 your first ever run around the park or going for your personal best in a marathon, speed, strength,
0:27:16 stamina, whatever goal you’re working toward. New Balance has the running shoes,
0:27:21 clothes, and accessories to push your run further and help you run your way.
0:27:26 Find yours at newbalance.ca/running. New Balance, run your way.
0:27:31 Summer’s here and you can now get almost anything you need for your sunny days,
0:27:36 delivered with Uber Eats. What do we mean by almost? Well, you can’t get a well-groomed lawn
0:27:40 delivered, but you can get a chicken parmesan delivered, a cabana, that’s a no, but a banana,
0:27:47 that’s a yes. A nice tan, sorry, nope, but a box fan, happily yes. A day of sunshine, no. A box
0:27:52 of fine wines, yes. Uber Eats can definitely get you that. Get almost, almost anything delivered
0:27:56 with Uber Eats. Order now. Alcohol in select markets, product availability may vary by Regency
0:28:08 App for details. We’re back with ProcureMockets. Rayban maker SLO Luxotica is acquiring Supreme,
0:28:13 the iconic streetwear brand, for one and a half billion dollars. That’s nearly 30% lower than
0:28:20 Supreme’s last sale price in 2020. Luxotica’s stock fell 4% on the news as the deal struck analysts
0:28:26 as a bit of a mismatch. Luxotica is an eyewear company and Supreme makes limited run t-shirts
0:28:31 and hoodies. As one analyst put it, “An investment in a consumer brand with no eyewear DNA needed
0:28:36 further explanation.” Luxotica is presenting the acquisition as a means of expanding its
0:28:41 customer base, but Supreme’s current owner, VF Corporation, appears eager to offload the company
0:28:46 after finding a lack of synergy between the brand and its portfolio. By the way, VF owns the North
0:28:54 Face, Dickies and Vans. Scott, reactions to Luxotica, an eyewear company buying Supreme.
0:28:59 So first off, VF, who acquired Supreme, as a reputation as being one of the best acquirers
0:29:03 in history, they bought Vans for a song and turned it into just a global brand. It did hugely well
0:29:09 in China. I think they’ve had huge success with North Face. It’s a really well-run company and
0:29:15 they’re a great acquirer. This was a pretty unusual and public stubbed toe, if you will,
0:29:20 buying it for 2.1 billion and then selling it. What are they selling it for?
0:29:27 One and a half. Yeah. So, and then if you take an account, time, four years, this is a terrible
0:29:34 investment. The person who probably talked them into this, VF, has probably moved on and it’s no
0:29:38 longer running corporate development in VF. This is a pretty big stubbed toe, if you will.
0:29:43 I’ve never understood the brand, to be honest. I’m just not in this category, but I’ve never
0:29:49 quite understood it. The revenue growth has stagnated in 2023. It was a half a billion dollars,
0:29:55 it was down 10% year on year and Supreme’s revenues for fiscal year 2024 were not reported.
0:30:02 But the implied revenue multiple in 2020 was 4.2 and 2024 it’s 2.9. I still think they paid too
0:30:08 much and I think VF is smart to be disciplined and say, “This didn’t work. Our thesis hasn’t played
0:30:17 out and they’re going to take a $600 million ride off.” That’s not terrible and I would bet
0:30:21 that this is going to end up being like, I don’t want to call it chapter 12, but two bad acquisitions
0:30:28 in a row. I don’t think this brand is resonating and I don’t know if it has the scale at half a
0:30:33 billion dollars in revenue to kind of, I don’t know, endure, if you will. This to me feels like
0:30:38 a company that could go into just sort of a doom loop. Any thoughts? You’re young. What’s going on
0:30:42 here? Yeah, I think there’s a lot going on here. I mean, first I think it’s interesting to take a
0:30:51 look at the acquisition history of this company. It started in 1994. Kind of small cult following
0:30:58 wasn’t particularly successful until 2014, 2015. It would be lines around the block,
0:31:04 hundreds of people waiting in line to get their hands on these things. The reason that it worked
0:31:10 so well is because they were just obsessively diligent about limiting the supply. I mean,
0:31:16 you couldn’t buy anything. I remember I went to the store. I thought I was going to get myself
0:31:20 something cool and there was nothing in the store. The whole thing was sort of like an
0:31:26 economics lesson in supply and demand. What’s interesting though is who first acquired them,
0:31:34 it was the Carlisle Group. They caught on to this and in 2017, they bought 50% of supreme for half
0:31:41 a billion dollars. It was a one billion dollar valuation. Then they flipped it three years later
0:31:47 to VF for 2.1. Now VF is flipping it on for one and a half. The real winner here is actually
0:31:55 the Carlisle Group who got in at the exact right time 2017, got out at the exact right time to 2020,
0:31:59 and they doubled their money in the process. I’m just wondering if you have any insight
0:32:05 into how they nailed this one in particular. I remember Warren Hellman was one of my mentors
0:32:10 and Warren was the co-founder with Tully Freedman of Hellman Freedman, which is arguably the most
0:32:16 prestigious private equity firm in the world and one of the most successful and probably the most
0:32:21 prestigious kind of the original gangster of private equity. Warren said whenever we look
0:32:24 back over our winners and losers, it kind of came down. The distinction between the winners
0:32:30 and losers, which just came down to three things. One, did they get in at a good price? I mean,
0:32:36 at some point, almost any investment is going to be a good one if you get it cheap enough. At
0:32:40 some point, I’m on the board of a great company that’s growing like crazy. I don’t think I’m going
0:32:44 to make any money because I invested in 2021 when the market was fucking hysterical around this
0:32:48 shit. Even though the company’s performed really well, I think I’m just probably going to get my
0:32:55 money back. Two, is it growing? They only invest in growing companies, which I thought was interesting,
0:33:01 so no distress credits. It’s got to be growing. Growth kind of solves in business, almost all
0:33:05 problems. As long as you have positive margins and you’re growing, if you just keep growing,
0:33:10 eventually almost all your problems go away. Then the third thing is, did they have the
0:33:14 right guy or gal running it? Those were the three things that distinguished their winners from their
0:33:20 losers. Just focus on Luxottica’s strategy here and try to justify it. I mean, this is the first
0:33:26 time they’re going outside of Iowa. They own a bunch of fashion brands, but they’re all glosses.
0:33:34 It’s like Ray Bands, Persol, Oliver Peoples, et cetera. It feels like, to me, what they’re doing
0:33:44 is something like an LVMH strategy. LVMH was a leather goods company until it wasn’t. They
0:33:50 realized they could leverage that brand to sell a whole bunch of other stuff. They merged with
0:33:56 Moe Hennessey. They bought up a bunch of assets, and now they sell everything, and it’s a $100
0:34:02 billion per year business. I just wonder if Luxottica is looking at that. They’re looking at
0:34:09 LVMH and Hermes and Kering and all these other sort of luxury conglomerates, and they’re thinking,
0:34:15 “We want a piece of that action,” and so we’re going to start by buying up these sort of upper
0:34:21 tier to premium, not quite luxury brands, something like Supreme, and perhaps they have a lot more
0:34:24 acquisition ideas in the pipeline. Do you think that might be what they’re going for?
0:34:31 Yeah. We’re conglomerating again. CEOs love to conglomerate because their compensation is
0:34:36 determined on the performance of the company, but also the size of the company. As the company
0:34:39 gets bigger and bigger, they can say, “Well, fuck it. I’m the CEO of a $10 billion company. I should
0:34:43 be making this much,” and it’s the idea of paying for something that gives you massive
0:34:50 growth as opposed to trying to build organic growth, which is more difficult, is very intoxicated,
0:34:55 and so a lot of CEOs will talk their boards into paying, and good companies are smart. They know
0:34:58 they can only sell once, so they’re comfortable if it’s a good company holding out or saying no.
0:35:04 Two-thirds of acquisitions don’t work, meaning that that first criteria for Helman and Friedman
0:35:11 doesn’t work out. They overpaid. The imagined synergies and upside are usually not inflated,
0:35:17 but unrealistic as to how long it will take to recognize that growth in those synergies.
0:35:22 What they’re probably thinking is this is a new distribution channel for their eyeglasses, and
0:35:28 they also, I would imagine that they have the kind of relationships with some really incredible
0:35:33 up-and-coming brands that might be great brands to license for eyewear. Luxottica obviously is very
0:35:38 good. Luxottica, I think, produces not only their own operating brands, but I think they make a lot
0:35:44 of sunglasses for other — I wouldn’t be surprised if Prada does manufacture sunglasses. I would
0:35:50 imagine that Luxottica produces the branded glasses for Prada. That’s right. Luxottica does
0:35:55 manufacture for Prada. I wouldn’t be surprised if Luxottica said this company has a lot of great
0:35:59 relationships with emerging hot brands. It will give us a leg up in terms of licensing agreements,
0:36:06 be a new channel of distribution for us, so there’ll be flow. We can help them operationally.
0:36:11 A new distribution point for our existing brands, and the reverse flow of the river will be,
0:36:16 we will have access to a bunch of cool hip brands that we will produce glasses for. Luxottica,
0:36:21 it’s really interesting, Luxottica is sort of a little bit of a monopoly. It controls a huge,
0:36:25 it’s just so fucking ridiculous that you go in and you pay this kind of money for eyeglasses.
0:36:32 I remember buying Rayvans for like $30 when I was in college. Aviators, now they’re two or $300.
0:36:39 I mean, this is definitely outpaced inflation, and they have kind of a near monopoly on glasses.
0:36:44 This is a very dominant company. It’s well-run, but yeah, I don’t like this one. We should
0:36:47 check back in on this one. I don’t think this one’s going to work.
0:36:52 Just one other update on Luxottica that came in very recently. Metta is apparently in talks to
0:36:58 buy a steak in the company. As you know, Metta has a partnership with Rayvans. They have these
0:37:07 AR, VR, Rayvans that have more mobile version of the headset. Hence why this deal is probably
0:37:12 happening, but do you have any reactions to that news Metta potentially buying a steak in Luxottica?
0:37:19 I think it’s smart. Zuckerberg said that, I mean, he realizes that the oculus is a giant fucking
0:37:26 thud. But what he said, and it makes sense to me, is that they’re glasses. My son bought their
0:37:30 glasses, and he’s not using them anymore, but he used some kind of nonstop when he was skiing.
0:37:31 The Rayvans?
0:37:36 Yeah. You could say whatever it was. Metta take a picture. Metta play music. They’re actually
0:37:41 really, I tried them on. I thought this is actually pretty cool technology. In 10 years,
0:37:48 the oculus technology, the dream of oculus might be realized with micro cameras and smaller,
0:37:54 more powerful chips that can seamlessly go into a pair of glasses. And I think that’s his vision.
0:38:00 And he wants a leg up in terms of manufacturing and the style. And so I think given Metta has
0:38:04 whatever a $700, $800 billion market cap or whatever it is, or is it over a trillion? I can’t
0:38:05 keep track.
0:38:06 So it’s 1.2 trillion.
0:38:12 Okay. 1.2 trillion. So Metta’s contemplating, according to the news here at $5 million investment
0:38:16 at a valuation of $100 million. That gives them 5%. They don’t care about the financial return here.
0:38:20 They don’t want to lose money, but that’s spare change for them. That’s a couple of weeks of
0:38:25 free cash flow. And what they really want is to be one of the largest individual shareholders
0:38:31 in an agreement to be involved in the development or have access to proprietary manufacturing and
0:38:37 supply chain that helps give them an edge around producing kind of a metaverse or AR, VR-enabled
0:38:43 sunglasses or glasses. This is going to have the metaverse or what his vision of the headsets
0:38:48 going to be realized. It’s going to be realized in glasses. And when I put on my kids’ glasses,
0:38:52 and it just clicked on me, I see the potential here, and he’s stated this that the technology is
0:38:58 about a decade away. That decade will go really quickly. And I love what Bill Gates said that
0:39:01 what’s supposed to take a decade takes three years, what’s supposed to take three years takes 10.
0:39:07 This might be one of those technologies in three years. There is a pretty good glasses offering
0:39:13 70 or 80% of your VR or AR or metaverse experience. The other thing that’s sort of interesting about
0:39:18 Luxotica is because at such a monopoly, they kept raising prices faster than inflation, which
0:39:23 created opportunity for a new entrant. And that new entrant are the iconic glasses that the dog
0:39:29 wears that emphasizes his cheekbones and awkwardly shape nose that veers to the right because I got
0:39:32 kicked in the face by Bobby Henderson and my junior airplane soccer. I thought it was because
0:39:36 you got punched in the face in a boxing match. That made it worse. He couldn’t have punched the
0:39:41 other way. Literally, you think he’d have, if he was going to knock me out that he would punch
0:39:45 it and put it symmetrical again and steady, like punch it the way it was already bending. Anyway,
0:39:51 that is one of the underrated facts about you is that you took up boxing. Dude, I was bored.
0:39:57 I also took up yoga. I just didn’t have a lot going on. And I was, I was at that point in my
0:40:01 life where I like discovered creatine and working out and I was like going through an early midlife
0:40:05 crisis and I was getting ripped. And I’m like, all right, I’ll start boxing because I heard it’s
0:40:08 what you do. I went to this place called Dog Pound Gym or something. It was just fucking
0:40:17 ridiculous. Anyways, so Warby Parker came in at 99 bucks. I absolutely love it because I remember
0:40:22 specifically one experience. I went to this one of these little boutique, these little boutique
0:40:27 eyeglass places with this very attractive man who, you know, tried on all these glasses for me and,
0:40:33 you know, and then I got my prescription and I got Tom Ford glasses and it was $900 for my
0:40:37 glasses by the time I was at the door. And I literally got them, went and picked them up,
0:40:44 got it in a cab and left them in the cab. And I’m like, fuck it. So, and then Warby comes along
0:40:50 and these glasses are 80% of Tom Ford for 12% of the price. And I think they do an amazing job.
0:40:56 It’s, Luxotica has always been, I always thought Luxotica was an example of a monopoly that kind
0:41:02 of flew under the radar. Let’s take a look at the week ahead. We’ll see detail on the personal
0:41:07 consumption expenditures index for June. We’ll also see earnings from Microsoft, Google, and
0:41:15 Tesla. Do you have any predictions for us, Scott? Yeah, so Donald J. Trump media, just a ridiculous
0:41:19 fucking company that has a $7 billion market cap despite the fact that makes no money and no one’s
0:41:27 on there other than total crazies. It got a huge boost. Was it after the assassination attempt?
0:41:33 Yeah, it was right after. I think it was a 30% jump. Yeah, it had a huge jump because the stock
0:41:38 trades a little bit. It’s like a little bit of a tracking stock for the likelihood that Trump is
0:41:43 going to be reelected because I think the market’s saying, if he gets reelected, he’ll just figure
0:41:50 out a way to like have the Defense Department, you know, buy Donald Trump technology group or
0:41:55 something. Make it mandatory. Every government employee has to get on that. Yeah, has to be on,
0:42:01 has to be on true social. Yeah, or it’s just people buying the stock as a proxy of giving him
0:42:04 money or, this thing just never made any sense. It’s kind of, it’s actually kind of the ultimate
0:42:09 meme stock. Its valuation is more disconnected from the business than even an AMC, which you could
0:42:16 argue has sort of a core business at the end of the day as does GameStop. Anyways, the stock popped
0:42:23 to about 46 bucks last Monday and now it’s come back to 37, but I think you’re going to see the
0:42:28 stock go sub 30. This is not financial advice. It just seems fun to track because I think Biden
0:42:34 is going to step down and that will send a signal to the market that there’s a greater likelihood
0:42:39 that the Democrats will hold onto the White House than there is right now. And I think that the way
0:42:44 that people trade this stock is based on the likelihood that Trump is reelected. And so when
0:42:50 the likelihood of Trump being reelected goes from like 70 or 75% back down to like, I don’t know,
0:42:56 55, you’re going to see the stock go sub 30 again. This episode was produced by Claire Miller and
0:43:00 engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our associate producer is Alison Weiss. Our executive producers
0:43:04 are Jason Staffers and Catherine Dillon. Mia Silverio is our research lead and Drew Burroughs
0:43:09 is our technical director. Thank you for listening to Prof. G Markets from the Vox Media Podcast
0:43:15 Network. Join us on Thursday for a conversation with Robert Armstrong, only on Prof. G Markets.
0:43:45 Lifetimes. You help me in kind reunion as the world turns. And the dark flies.
0:43:54 And love, love, love, love.
0:44:02 [BLANK_AUDIO]
Subscribe to Prof G Markets:
Scott shares his thoughts on why Trump has attracted some of Silicon Valley’s most powerful donors. He also explains why he doesn’t recognize America anymore, especially since his move to London. Then, Scott and Ed discuss possible motives for EssilorLuxottica acquiring Supreme and explain how the eyewear company’s monopoly on glasses has flown under the radar for so long.
Order “The Algebra of Wealth,” out now
Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice
Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:
Follow Scott on Instagram
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices