AI transcript
0:00:14 “Hello everyone. I’m Guy Kawasaki and this is Remarkable People. We’re on a mission
0:00:21 to make you remarkable. Helping me in this episode is Terry Givens. She is the former
0:00:29 Vice Provost of the University of Texas at Austin and the former Provost of Menlo College.
0:00:34 Terry broke barriers as the first African American and first woman in both roles. She
0:00:40 has continued her journey at McGill University in Montreal, Canada. There she advises on
0:00:47 anti-racist initiatives and contributes to academia through her professorship. Despite
0:00:54 opportunities to ascend further in administrative ranks, Terry continues to make direct impact
0:01:00 through her teaching of students. In this episode, we dive into her new book, Radical
0:01:07 Empathy. This reflects her dedication to fostering inclusive leadership in these very troubling
0:01:14 times. I’m Guy Kawasaki. This is Remarkable People and now, here is the Remarkable Terry
0:01:25 Givens. Would you start us off by explaining the roots of racism in America?
0:01:29 Yes, because that’s a very important thing to understand and this is why I wrote my book
0:01:38 The Roots of Racism because I think we don’t understand that history is still present today.
0:01:45 And the roots of racism go back to the 1500s when you had Portuguese sailors first enslaving
0:01:51 people in Africa. But the important thing about that is how they defined Africans at
0:01:58 the time, which was they basically dehumanized them. And that dehumanization has persisted
0:02:05 since then. And so you see it in so many different ways and of course to basically say that enslavement
0:02:11 was okay, that the church was involved in defining who was human and who wasn’t. And
0:02:15 one of the important things we have to do is to trace the history. How did we get to
0:02:22 where we are today? And show, as we know, people are trying to keep us from learning
0:02:26 our history because they don’t want people to understand those connections. They want
0:02:31 to say, oh, we’re done with racism. It doesn’t matter. It’s like, no, racism is baked into
0:02:38 our systems, not just in the US, but in Europe, across the globe. So we have to understand
0:02:41 that that history is critical to where we are today.
0:02:48 I heard a theory from one of our other guests that I don’t know if it was 1600s or 1500s,
0:02:56 but racism didn’t really exist until somebody needed an intellectual argument for why we
0:03:02 want to get free labor and enslave people. So in order to justify that, they came up
0:03:08 with this theory that black people are less than human, so it’s okay to enslave them.
0:03:10 What do you think of that theory?
0:03:16 Oh, I agree with it 100%. There’s this really great book besides mine by Nell Painter called
0:03:22 basically, now I’m going to forget the exact title, but it’s how people became white. And
0:03:28 the history of white people, basically. And this book really goes through and examines
0:03:32 because it’s not just that we’re saying black people are not human. We’re also saying white
0:03:41 people are superior. So the underlying theme is that this whole history of white supremacy.
0:03:46 And so you have to understand that component as well. So yes, I agree with that. I said
0:03:51 the Catholic Church was involved in saying it’s okay to enslave Africans because they
0:03:57 are not human. And so there’s all these different factors. It really does go back to the 1500s
0:04:02 when the church was involved in saying it’s okay to enslave Africans.
0:04:10 And why has something persisted for 500 years? I mean, you think we would figure out better
0:04:12 ways to do business.
0:04:17 Well, you would think, but the reality is that we had this period of enslavement, we
0:04:24 had the Civil War, which was to end slavery. But the federal government, after a few years
0:04:30 of the whole process of moving us, theoretically moving us past slavery, just basically gave
0:04:36 up eventually and let the South and not just in the South, but they allowed the development
0:04:41 of Jim Crow voting laws, the disenfranchised black people. And so that’s one of the things
0:04:47 I want to, and I’m a researcher, this is what I do for a living. And I’m actually working
0:04:51 on a major project that is going to try to examine not just in the US, but how, what
0:05:00 is this, why does this persist? And what does race mean today? And so the bigger problem
0:05:08 it was in the United States and in other places that there was never a real acceptance of
0:05:13 black people. You had all kinds of laws and regulations and rules that kept them from
0:05:17 voting, that kept them from getting jobs. You can look in almost any developed country
0:05:24 today and black people are going to be less employed. Let’s take France, for example.
0:05:29 This is a country that was a colonizer. A lot of people who were in the colonies like
0:05:36 in Algeria have gone to France to find work. They get put into the suburbs because in France,
0:05:40 the place where the poor people go is in the suburbs. So you’ve got black people living
0:05:47 in the suburbs, their educational opportunities are less. All these different ways that, if
0:05:53 you think about redlining, that happens everywhere. Redlining is the process where banks and regulators
0:05:58 say, oh, we’re going to make sure that people who live in these, or buy these houses, don’t
0:06:03 get preferred loans, they have to pay more, et cetera, et cetera. And so there are so
0:06:08 many different mechanisms that are put in place. That’s why we call it systemic racism
0:06:12 and systemic discrimination because you have the bureaucrats involved and they’re doing
0:06:17 these things consciously initially, and then they just get perpetuated over time.
0:06:23 And do you think in this case that it’s a racist argument, like we don’t want black people
0:06:30 to have houses and competitive interest rates, or it’s a intellectual argument that, oh,
0:06:37 they’re higher risk, so we have to charge them higher interest? Is it racism or flawed
0:06:38 economics?
0:06:44 It’s both. It’s hard to separate out the two. I still have this issue today. I’ve been
0:06:50 working on hiring more black faculty at McGill University, and faculty will still come and
0:06:54 say, well, why can’t we just hire on merit? We are hiring on merit. We’re just saying
0:07:01 that we want to recruit people who look different from you. And the funny thing is, is we go
0:07:07 around and we hire people from the best universities in the world, and then they’re like, oh, I
0:07:12 didn’t know these people were out there. Oh, let’s go hire more. And it comes back to my
0:07:17 other book, Radical Empathy, where people don’t understand how they have internalized
0:07:22 bias, how they have internalized these ideas about people. And they’ll say, oh, we just
0:07:27 hire on merit. Yeah, but the only people you hire are your buddies who look just like you,
0:07:31 and you aren’t willing to look at the people. We went to Stanford around the same time.
0:07:36 Oh, no, actually, I was 10 years after you. You’re much younger. I’m going to be 60 this
0:07:43 year. But anyway, I’m going to be 70. Like I said, 10 years apart. But even in that 10
0:07:48 year difference, right, there were probably a few more blacks, dude. But anyway, the interesting
0:07:53 thing to me is that I was going to Stanford in the 80s and there were still a lot of issues
0:07:58 around hiring black faculty and they’ve gotten better. Don’t get me wrong. I love my alma
0:08:04 mater. But the problem is you look across academia and we’re still only three or 4% of the faculty
0:08:09 and we’re still struggling to hire and we’re still struggling to retain. And this whole
0:08:15 idea of merit, we forget about the belonging component, right? And I know this is something
0:08:20 you care deeply about. And this people should feel like they belong. So we’s like, okay,
0:08:25 we hire these people, but we don’t necessarily give them the opportunity to succeed in those
0:08:32 positions. One of my frustrations with this is that how can you make decisions like this
0:08:40 based on the color of skin? Okay, tell me you made a decision on height or weight or
0:08:47 color of pupil. But what’s the rationale that someone with black skin is somehow inferior
0:08:55 to you and shouldn’t get tenured away? It makes absolutely no sense to me. They attach
0:08:59 so this is the problem. We judge people, right? And I talk about it in the context of, okay,
0:09:04 you have your tribal brain that says you see somebody who looks different than you.
0:09:09 And so your brain says, oh, this person isn’t, you know, part of me. And so we have to fight
0:09:14 against that tribal brain or that very basic idea that we only want to be around people
0:09:19 who look like us. But the reality is we’re, you know, I mean, you look at there’s no one
0:09:26 kind of black person or Asian person. We all are a range of colors, right? And so they’re
0:09:33 basically in the 1800s and early 1900s, people just bent over backwards. They wanted to look
0:09:38 at things like skull size and all of that to try and say, oh, this group of people is
0:09:44 inferior because their brains are smaller kind of thing. So people have bent over backwards
0:09:50 to try and find scientific reasons why people from Africa who have different skin color
0:09:57 or people from Asia who are somehow inferior or I could get into all kinds of trouble saying
0:10:02 some of the things that people said about us. But it’s a protectiveness. I mean, you
0:10:08 see what was happening right now in places across the globe really, but particularly
0:10:14 in the US is people are trying to protect their privilege. And so they ascribe a certain
0:10:19 level of privilege to themselves if they are white. And then we don’t want to let these
0:10:24 other people have that same privilege because the problem is they see it as a pie. And if
0:10:29 they get that, then I don’t get that. Instead of saying, we all get better if we all are
0:10:35 open and accepting all boats will rise. There are so many if I need to talk to Heather McGee,
0:10:40 if you haven’t yet, because her book is amazing, the sum of us, the problem is not to get a
0:11:06 bigger slice of the pie. What you should do is bake a bigger pie. That’s the solution.
0:11:13 Is there any example of like in Africa, there’s a black nation and all the power structure
0:11:21 was black and they imported thousands of Europeans as slaves to work on plantations.
0:11:27 And now it’s 2024. And they’re trying to wipe out their history of white enslavement
0:11:33 and they’re trying to preserve systemic racism against white people. Is there any country
0:11:42 like that? No, no, no, no, no. No, you know, I wish Wakanda was there. No, I mean, you
0:11:48 know, the problem is you look at a place like South Africa or Zimbabwe and they had
0:11:54 white settlers who once the governments were taken over by black natives, South Africa
0:11:59 has bent over backwards to support things for white people living there and their land
0:12:04 and so on. And Zimbabwe maybe not as much. But that’s the only cases I can, there may
0:12:10 be other African countries. One interesting case is Algeria because Algeria they didn’t
0:12:14 enslave. Nobody’s enslaved white people in Africa as far as I know, maybe they’re somewhere
0:12:22 out there. But Algeria was part of France until they got independence in the early 60s.
0:12:27 And so once they got independence, a lot of the white French people left and moved back
0:12:32 to France and they felt like they had basically been expelled and they were unhappy. You know,
0:12:36 it’s about that. And that’s why some of those people are strongest supporters of the far
0:12:42 right National Front, which has now become the Rassemblement in France. But that’s the
0:12:47 closest I can come to is like landowners who once the country became independent, lost
0:12:51 their land or had to leave and so on. So that’s about the extent of it.
0:12:58 I read your book about radical empathy. And at the end, and this was in 2020, I would
0:13:04 say you were fairly optimistic that things could get better. Now, we’re four years later.
0:13:07 Where’s your mind at?
0:13:08 Very frustrated.
0:13:11 Things have gotten worse.
0:13:17 In some places they’ve gotten worse. Yes, not everywhere. And I’m always hopeful. It’s
0:13:21 my nature to be hopeful. And I’m actually working on a follow up to radical empathy.
0:13:26 And it’s been hard to write because there’s every day there’s bad news. But on the other
0:13:33 hand, one of the goals of both radical empathy in the book I’m working on now is like you,
0:13:37 I want to empower people. I want people to feel like they can do something. And that’s
0:13:41 when I wrote radical empathy that when I would talk to people about it, that’s the first
0:13:49 thing that came, which is what can I do? So I’m hoping that yes, things are bad. And actually
0:13:54 one of the things I’m writing about right now is the difference between apathy and empathy.
0:14:01 And apathy is you just sit back and you’re just going to let things happen versus empathy
0:14:07 and radical empathy, which as you know, is taking action. And I just keep imagining what
0:14:12 if we all, and we did in 2020, so many of us rose up and said, yes, I’m going to vote,
0:14:17 I’m going to vote for democracy. And I think that’s going to happen. I’m crossing my fingers
0:14:21 and hoping that’s going to happen again. And we don’t have interference and all of that.
0:14:29 But I think that I’m frustrated, but also still hopeful because, you know, I read your
0:14:34 book and I’m like, look at all these amazing people and these remarkable people and what
0:14:40 they’re doing. And you’re doing the work to bring these people to the forefront so people
0:14:45 can see what you can do. And that’s exactly what I want to do as well. I want people to
0:14:49 understand, I haven’t given up, I’m still working, I’m still fighting, I’m still doing
0:14:54 what I can do in my part of the world. The part of the problem is, and there’s some great
0:14:57 books that have come out talking about how black activists in particular, we tend to
0:15:02 get burnt out and so on and that we have to take care of ourselves and I’m doing that.
0:15:08 But I also know that I’m privileged. I’m in a unique position. I’m in the process of
0:15:15 changing the university system in Canada to be more open to black people. That’s huge.
0:15:20 And so I think it’s really important that we understand that the things we are doing,
0:15:23 even in our little space of the world, is creating change.
0:15:30 Yeah. Would you say that America 2024, is it an apartheid?
0:15:38 Not yet. And the reason we’re not really apartheid is because the attacks that are happening
0:15:45 now are intersectional. It’s not just on black people. When you get rid of a DEI program,
0:15:49 people forget. It’s not just black people who benefit from that. It’s women. It’s people
0:15:58 with disabilities. It’s LGBTQI. It’s everybody who is underrepresented or oppressed. If
0:16:05 it’s an apartheid, it’s an apartheid of white men versus everybody else, right? Because
0:16:10 you can’t say that, oh, we’re getting rid of DEI and people want to say we’re only going
0:16:14 after this group. No. There’s lots of research that shows one of the biggest beneficiaries
0:16:21 of the civil rights acts and so on are women. All women. Women were able to get into the
0:16:27 workforce, et cetera, et cetera. You’re saying over 50% of the population is falling under
0:16:33 the system of apartheid. I just think that there is resistance. And so no, we’re not
0:16:37 anywhere near that. Okay. I’m going to tap all your political science
0:16:50 expertise. Okay. So would you draw any similarities between America today and 1930 pre-Nazi Germany
0:16:58 or pre-Nelson Mandela, South Africa? Are we South Africa or are we Nazi Germany? Are
0:17:04 we headed in those directions? Not yet is my answer. And we have, trust me, I can’t
0:17:08 tell you how many times on social media I’ve seen my colleagues. I was like, oh, we’re
0:17:16 just like, and even I thought about this, right? Are we in Weimar Germany? And I’m worried,
0:17:20 but it’s a different thing. I think, yes, we need, so as you know, I’m a huge advocate
0:17:26 of understanding history. But on the other hand, we also have to understand the complexity
0:17:31 of our current age. And frankly, what really worries me is the inequality that you have
0:17:39 these billionaires out there who are controlling the media and so on, and are trying to push
0:17:45 certain types of agendas that is influencing people to vote particular ways and act particular
0:17:53 ways. And that is different in the sense that I don’t see the US going out and starting
0:17:58 wars. I mean, I think I see the US, if we go in that particular direction, becoming
0:18:05 more insular. But we’re in a very much a global environment. And so I think when we’ve, people
0:18:09 like in Europe, for example, have seen what’s happening in the US, I mean, Germany, they
0:18:15 have a far right party. And there have been millions of people on the streets saying no
0:18:20 , we don’t want this far right party to be in our government. And there are millions
0:18:26 of Americans. The funny thing is, it’s actually it’s not funny, it’s sad, is there are protests
0:18:31 and things going on in the US on a daily basis and the media is not covering it, right? They’re
0:18:37 happy to cover, we’re going to go talk to this Trump voter, but they won’t talk to the thousands
0:18:42 of people who are protesting in front of the Supreme Court about their latest ruling. There’s
0:18:47 a lot of things happening. I have friends who are out there writing postcards to get
0:18:53 people to vote. I have friends who are working with candidates all over the place here in
0:19:00 Canada. There’s huge groups of people who are fighting for democracy on various fronts.
0:19:07 And so I think that democracy is in danger around the globe, right? But I’m still hopeful
0:19:13 that there’s enough of us who are supporting, we both have lived in California. I always
0:19:18 tell people, yeah, I’m in Vancouver, British Columbia right now, but I think that the whole
0:19:23 West Coast, well, if it gets to that point, we’ll split away and we’ll have California
0:19:25 and Oregon and Washington.
0:19:33 Hey, Gavin Newsom for president of our country. I could live with that. So in your book, you
0:19:39 said several times, and it was certainly a surprise, but almost a shock. And listen,
0:19:47 I’m an Asian American male, right? So I don’t walk in your shoes, but you say that racism
0:19:55 manifests itself daily in your reality. So can you tell me how racism manifests itself
0:20:01 daily in someone as successful and visible and powerful and et cetera, et cetera, as
0:20:06 you were not talking about some illegal immigrant who’s like working in the back of a restaurant.
0:20:15 We’re talking about, you know, Terry Gibbons, my God. So how does racism affect your daily
0:20:16 reality?
0:20:22 Well, not everybody knows who Terry Gibbons is. They will, especially after this podcast,
0:20:28 they will. But it’s really interesting because part of it is internalized. So, you know,
0:20:32 my reality is yesterday, I was walking around and I was like, oh, I’m going to go into this
0:20:37 boutique. Every time I walk into that place where people do not know who I am, I’m like,
0:20:43 okay, how am I dressed? Are they watching me? Do I have to put a smile on my face? You
0:20:49 know, I try to be a non-threatening. And so that’s not that the people in the store,
0:20:53 I don’t know if they’re racist or not. And you’ll see, and that’s the thing, right? And
0:20:57 throughout my career, because I’ve been a trendsetter and ahead of my time in so many
0:21:04 ways in political science, I’ve been in high-level positions. And the reality is that I’m often
0:21:09 in the only black person in the room or the only woman in the room. And there’s so many
0:21:15 different ways that the racism manifests itself. And it’s not just the fact that people see
0:21:19 I’m a black woman and might be racist towards me. It’s just the things I study. I study
0:21:24 race and immigration politics in Europe. And I can’t tell you how many times people have
0:21:28 said, oh, why do you study Europe? They’re so surprised when I tell them I speak French
0:21:33 and German. And the funny thing is this could happen to anybody, but I could be a white
0:21:38 guy as an American. Why do you study French and German and so on? But they aren’t going
0:21:40 to be a surprise, right?
0:21:47 I can honestly say, Terry, I have never met a white man who had imposter syndrome.
0:21:55 You know, it’s really funny. I’m on a job search right now for an executive director
0:22:01 of an organization. And I was laughing because we didn’t get very many women and minorities
0:22:05 applying, but we had a lot of white men. And I was laughing because I was like, these white
0:22:10 guys aren’t even qualified for this position, but they apply. Whereas we know there’s research
0:22:14 shows women and minorities won’t apply for positions that they think they don’t qualify
0:22:18 for. But these white guys are like, Oh, yeah, I sort of qualify. I’m going to go ahead and
0:22:26 we didn’t keep them in the pool. But you know, the audacity, I don’t know.
0:22:32 So let me ask you something. So what’s the end goal to use your terminology so people
0:22:37 don’t get all pissed off with me when I asked this question. But is the end game like for
0:22:46 every Negro to be an exceptional Negro? Is that the goal? No, absolutely not. The goal
0:22:52 is for every person, for everybody to be who they are. So this was a struggle I went through
0:22:59 personally is how do I make sense of who I am and so on and so forth. I’m black. I used
0:23:03 to get people would give me a hard time for the way I talked because I didn’t talk black,
0:23:08 blah, blah, blah, this and that. So the reality is people try to put you into boxes. So what
0:23:13 I want for everyone, not just black people, but for everyone just to not have to live
0:23:17 in the box and to be who you are. And that’s what by the time I got to the end of my 20s,
0:23:23 early 30s, I finally figured out just be who you are. And don’t be afraid to be who you
0:23:28 are. And that means that, you know, I was going to mention this earlier when you’re
0:23:34 talking about so racism, it’s not even race and it’s like expectations. Terry Gibbons
0:23:39 is a graduate student at UCLA. Oh, she must be studying race and ethnic politics in the
0:23:48 United States. I literally had people say, I would give you a job if you studied race
0:23:53 and politics in the U.S. And like, that’s not what I study. And I don’t want your job
0:23:57 if that’s what your expectation is, right? And that’s why I’m like, first of all, start
0:24:01 with yourself. Who are you? And do you really want people putting you into boxes the way
0:24:07 that you’re doing to others? Not everybody’s going to be exceptional. We just want people
0:24:14 to be able to have access to becoming remarkable. And that’s what we’re doing here, but also
0:24:16 just being who you are.
0:24:25 When the term in your book was used as exceptional Negro, it wasn’t about being, getting the
0:24:32 best scores or anything like that. It was basically fulfilling a white man’s expectation
0:24:37 of what a black person should be. If you did that, you were, quote, an exceptional Negro,
0:24:38 right?
0:24:43 And I was applying that to myself because the problem is people look at me and say, oh,
0:24:50 you’re exceptional. And Oprah’s exceptional. And Chris Rock is exceptional. But the rest
0:24:57 of those black people, we don’t care about them. And so this is the problem. We can pick
0:25:02 out a few people and they are exceptions. So that word exception is important. They’re
0:25:09 the exception to the rule. And the rule is that black people aren’t to the level that
0:25:11 we think white people are.
0:25:12 Okay.
0:25:16 But oh, but you’re okay. I have had people. Oh, you’re, you know, I remember when it was
0:25:25 a big deal that Barack Obama was articulate. And it’s like, well, yeah, he speaks normal
0:25:26 English.
0:25:28 What’s wrong with him?
0:25:29 Any smokes?
0:25:39 Yeah, yes. That’s all other stories purely in practical terms. Are you serious? Are
0:25:46 you saying that a white male can possibly empathize with a black woman?
0:25:53 I have had so many white males who have been the ones who have propelled me along my career.
0:25:59 Yes, absolutely. Going back to high school, I remember my high school principal, who was
0:26:06 a Jesuit priest, stopped me in the hall one day. I’d recently taken the PSAT and he was
0:26:10 like, Terry, are you going to apply to Harvard or Yale or Princeton? Like, what are you talking
0:26:17 about? I don’t even know what college is, you know? And he saw me. You know, it’s not
0:26:23 just empathy. It’s actually being seen. And there are many white men who I can tell you
0:26:31 have seen me. They accepted me as a black woman who speaks French and studies European
0:26:36 politics and can be a leader. And I always say there are people who saw more in me than
0:26:39 I saw in myself. And those were mostly white men.
0:26:40 Really?
0:26:41 Absolutely, 100 percent.
0:26:45 So Terry, they were exceptional white men.
0:26:49 Oh, you got me.
0:26:57 Okay, so now you talk about just the beauty of empathy and even beyond that radical empathy.
0:27:04 But are you saying conceptually that you should have radical empathy for the Trumps? Is there
0:27:07 a limit to empathy?
0:27:11 The number one thing, and that’s going to be at the very top of the first chapter of
0:27:18 my next book, is empathy is not absolution. I do say this in the book. Look, not everybody
0:27:23 is going to listen to me or hear my message. I don’t need all these people who support
0:27:29 Trump to understand or have empathy, but there’s this huge number of people out there who are
0:27:34 open and want a better world and want to understand these things. And I can tell you, I’ve had
0:27:39 many, many interesting discussions about this over the last few years in particular. And
0:27:45 yeah, there’s some people you can’t reach. Not everybody is going to be remarkable. But
0:27:53 what we need is that core group of people, because we can move mountains. And that’s
0:27:58 the thing we have to understand is that I may not be able to convince this Trump voter
0:28:03 over here, but maybe I can convince this independent person over here, and then they’re eventually
0:28:07 going to talk to their buddy who’s a Trump voter. It’s a process. And the process is
0:28:12 working right now so that these people are being very cut off and they only watch certain
0:28:18 media. But if we can start to break through those silos, not directly necessarily, but
0:28:22 really get the word out so that people understand that there’s a different way to think about
0:28:24 things.
0:28:29 So in your book, you also expressed something which when I read that I said, how do these
0:28:37 two things relate to each other? And you made a statement that empathy requires embracing
0:28:45 vulnerability. So why does being empathetic require being vulnerable?
0:28:48 Thank you for that question. Because that’s one of my favorite things about radical empathy.
0:28:53 And you’ll see I’m vulnerable all the way through the book. I try to model vulnerability.
0:28:58 But what I figured out in my own life, and I’ve seen this with other people, you mentioned
0:29:03 imposter syndrome. So part of the problem, for me personally, was that I had a hard time
0:29:14 accepting who I am. And it was partly because I didn’t really understand who I was. And
0:29:18 I grew up in Spokane, Washington. It’s less than 1% black. And I’m just like, why did
0:29:25 my parents choose for us to grow up in Spokane, Washington of all places? But as I learned
0:29:31 that history and about the Great Migration and how black people from my parents’ era
0:29:36 wanted better than what they had experienced. And so by moving to the Northwest, my dad
0:29:41 was in the military. Spokane was the last place he was stationed. So it made sense for
0:29:46 us to just stay there. And it was like where he grew up outside of Pittsburgh. I went then
0:29:52 visit. Oh, no wonder he settled in Spokane. It’s a lot like where he grew up. But a big
0:29:58 part of that is that they wanted us to have better education, to be safe, et cetera. So
0:30:03 for them, Spokane was that place. But I didn’t grow up around a lot of other black people.
0:30:08 And so that was something that I would beat myself up about. I wasn’t in the same social
0:30:13 situations as a lot of my friends when I went to Stanford, et cetera, et cetera. But what
0:30:17 I had to learn was I had to be vulnerable to be willing to look at those stories, that
0:30:21 history, to try to understand. So the first step in vulnerability was saying, I need to
0:30:27 understand better why my parents made these choices, why I am who I am. Because I had
0:30:34 some anger towards my parents. And so by being vulnerable, and it’s hard to ask yourself
0:30:39 those tough questions, if you’re not vulnerable. And Brene Brown, she’s my model when I talk
0:30:45 about vulnerability. The biggest thing about vulnerability, first of all, we can talk about
0:30:48 it in the context of leadership, but it’s really important to be vulnerable with yourself.
0:30:52 People always say, why do I have to be vulnerable? It’s not with everybody else. You have to
0:30:57 be vulnerable with yourself so that you understand yourself better, so that you know who you
0:31:01 are, so that you’re more open to other people. It’s really hard to love others if you don’t
0:31:07 love yourself. And so you have to be vulnerable and look at the full picture and try to understand
0:31:14 why you are the way you are and say, I’m okay with that. And that makes it much more likely
0:31:19 that you’re going to be okay with other people because you see yourself and then you can
0:31:27 see others. Explain to me, well, that implies that I don’t agree or I don’t understand,
0:31:34 which is not true. But why do we need to teach the history of slavery in America? Yes, that’s
0:31:42 a great question, because it still has implications today. So we had 400 years of enslavement,
0:31:49 and we haven’t been how many years since the 1860s. Historically, we’re still not that
0:31:54 far away from it. And because you can’t understand why we had Jim Crow if you don’t understand
0:31:59 slavery. You can’t understand why the U.S. shut itself off to immigration except from
0:32:06 Northern and Western Europe if you don’t understand the history of slavery. Because
0:32:11 it was all part of a process where even though we ended enslavement, we still had the same
0:32:16 ideas about people. We still had this idea. And that’s why it’s really important to understand
0:32:23 that it wasn’t just about slavery. It was about a worldview that said certain people
0:32:27 are not human or certain people are lesser than. And that included people from Southern
0:32:32 and Eastern Europe. That’s why in the 1920s, the U.S. cut off immigration from Southern
0:32:36 and Eastern Europe and most of the rest of the world. People don’t really know that we
0:32:43 cut off immigration from most parts of the world except from the 1920s to the 1960s.
0:32:48 And after that is when you start to see more people coming from India. The first group
0:32:56 of people to have immigration control placed on them were Chinese. You had Chinese exclusion
0:33:03 in the 1870s. And so it’s not just that there was enslavement. There was a whole worldview
0:33:08 of white supremacy that said we don’t want Chinese. We don’t want the world. They couldn’t
0:33:11 get rid of the black people. There were too many of us. So they were going to put all
0:33:16 kinds of rules and regulations and for Jim Crow laws about you have to sit in the back
0:33:22 of the bus and you can’t go to good schools, etc., etc. It’s still impacting things. When
0:33:29 I got to McGill University in 2021, there were 12 black faculty out of 1700.
0:33:30 What?
0:33:32 Why is that?
0:33:35 12 out of 1700?
0:33:42 Yes. Now, because of me and many others who did a lot of work were close to 50. And it’s
0:33:49 like Canada didn’t go through slavery and they did. But it wasn’t like in the U.S.
0:33:55 So why does this happen? Because people have ideas. Those ideas don’t come from nowhere.
0:34:00 Those ideas come from 400 years of enslavement. Jim Crow, Chinese exclusion, exclusion of
0:34:05 people from Southern and Eastern Europe, Irish people can being considered black, all kinds
0:34:07 of things, right?
0:34:19 Wow. I tell you this story as an aside. I have hosted many AI panels, members of the
0:34:28 panel, including chancellors of very large schools. Okay. And unlike most AI moderators,
0:34:36 I always ask this question, which is who would you rather have designed your kids curriculum?
0:34:46 Ron DeSantis or chat GPT. Everybody says chat GPT. And I will tell you that I have gone
0:34:53 to chat GPT and asked, why should we teach the history of slavery in America? And chat
0:35:02 GPT comes up with six great bullet points about the benefits of teaching slavery in America.
0:35:08 And I tell you that story only because I think smarter than Ron DeSantis, but I mean, that’s
0:35:12 not a very high bar, but
0:35:18 So AI is a learning model. It’s pulling in information. And it’s not biased in any way
0:35:22 about that information. It’s saying, look, here’s what I have learned. I’m going to give
0:35:30 it back to you. And so it has this material that is saying these things about why we need
0:35:35 to understand this history. So that doesn’t surprise me. And frankly, there’s so much
0:35:41 research and I have colleagues all over who do this work. And what’s really interesting
0:35:47 is forget DeSantis and all that. The people who matter are students. What are they learning?
0:35:54 I mean, I taught a class a year ago. I love my students. It was just such a blessing because
0:35:58 even my students from Sweden, McGill is a very international university. So I had students
0:36:03 from all over. And it was probably one of the most diverse classrooms I have ever taught
0:36:08 80 students and a little bit of everything. I tried to really create a classroom where
0:36:13 everybody could say what they want that they wouldn’t have any fear. And so many students
0:36:17 told their stories because I would tell my stories. So they would tell me their stories
0:36:23 about their parents who were immigrants, the difficulties they had wearing the hijab, all
0:36:27 kinds of things. And Canadian students coming to me and saying, I never knew that Canada
0:36:36 excluded Chinese people and hadn’t slavery and all these things. And so to me, that is
0:36:41 just so gratifying that I have the privilege of being able to teach these students these
0:36:46 things. And they are grateful to Santa’s and all that. Oh, making white people feel bad.
0:36:51 No, we’re not. We’re helping them learn and understand their history. They don’t understand
0:36:59 why there’s so many black people living in horrible living conditions in the United States.
0:37:04 Why do we have homeless people living on the streets? All these things, they need to understand
0:37:08 that because they want to create change. They have the energy. They’re out there. So many
0:37:13 students who’ve gone into activism and working in nonprofits. And I think people like the
0:37:19 Santas are afraid they’re going to overthrow this white supremacist, white male. And I got
0:37:24 to remind myself, I always have to remember to say white male supremacy because white
0:37:30 women are being oppressed as well. But that they want this change. They are students are
0:37:36 the ones who are pushing for diversity and understanding.
0:37:45 Can you say that? Isn’t that the reason that school boards and stuff are trying to remove
0:37:51 this part of not not to be too clever, but they’re basically trying to whitewash history?
0:37:56 Yes. Absolutely. Because they’re afraid. But the funny thing is, these kids are getting
0:38:02 this news that my boys are older, but we don’t control what they read. My boys are out there
0:38:07 doing stuff that I’m just surprised they know more about so many things than I do because
0:38:13 they are consumers of what’s out there. And of course, they follow what their mom does
0:38:18 and so on. But they have chosen the things that they really care about the environment
0:38:24 is a really big thing for them. And the funny thing is, the more you try to hold tight, the
0:38:28 easier it is that things are going to slip away. And that’s what they don’t understand
0:38:31 when they’re trying to ban books and so on. It just makes kids curious. Oh, this book
0:38:55 is banned. I’m going to read it. This is another aside. But I hope that Think Remarkable is
0:39:01 banned in Florida and Texas. I know I keep waiting for radical empathy to get banned.
0:39:08 Yeah. Like we there should be some service that submit your book to Ron DeSantis and
0:39:13 Greg Abbott. Absolutely. No roots of racism, which is the politics of white supremacy in
0:39:18 the US and Europe. That’s at the top of the list. Oh my God. I mean, that and Project
0:39:27 1619. Those definitely two books that I open up Think Remarkable with a discussion of Olivia
0:39:34 Giuliana, because I’m hoping that some legislator reads this in Florida and Texas. This is holy
0:39:41 shit. He opened up with the most radical Latina we know. And we got to ban this book. But
0:39:45 it hasn’t worked yet. I’m trying. If I figure out how to get my book banned, you will be
0:39:51 the first to know Terry Givers. I guarantee you. Thank you so much. I’m always thinking
0:39:58 about you. How do we bridge the racial divide? That’s an easy question. Go ahead. I give
0:40:05 you 60 seconds. Let’s see. How do we bridge the racial divide in 60 seconds? First of
0:40:11 all, we have to recognize it. And so the first step is it’s like that whole thing of vulnerability
0:40:14 and internalizing. And that’s another reason you have to be vulnerable because you aren’t
0:40:18 willing to recognize that there is a racial divide unless you’re willing to be vulnerable
0:40:24 and say, yes, I have internalized bias. That’s a really important component. And I think
0:40:30 we can bridge racial divides if we all understand that we all have bias and that we need to
0:40:34 work past it. Because I have so many friends who, and sorry, I’m going past 60 seconds,
0:40:41 but I have so many friends who are, yes, Black Lives Matter, blah, blah, blah, but they don’t
0:40:45 understand. I have a house in Menlo Park. We have to be willing to have more than just
0:40:49 me and my friend who are Black living in Menlo Park. And what we have to figure out, what
0:40:56 do we do to get there? And that takes action. And how do we make people who aren’t currently
0:41:03 living there to feel like they belong? So anyway, that’s more than 60 seconds. But the
0:41:06 most important part is recognizing the problem.
0:41:14 Let’s suppose that you have recognized a problem and you’re not a provost or you’re not in
0:41:19 charge of a university. You’re just, I don’t know, you’re random Google or Apple employee
0:41:27 or whoever the demographics are to listen to my podcast. And now you believe and you
0:41:35 understand. And your question is, what can I do? What’s the answer? I give you 120 seconds
0:41:44 for this. Okay. Thank you. Like I said, so first step, figure out where you are and what
0:41:51 you have the capacity for. So some people, they are good at writing. So write your congressman.
0:41:56 Some people are good at hosting friends, have dinner parties and talk to your friends about
0:42:00 the issues. I think you talk about this in your book to find what are you passionate
0:42:05 about? What do you care about? I mean, if you care about the environment, I joined the
0:42:10 Peninsula Clean Energy Commission because of their citizens council because I care about
0:42:16 the environment. I support lots of nonprofits. I’m so proud of this organization foundation
0:42:20 for our college education. I was the direct board director for several years and it just
0:42:26 got a $2 million grant from Mackenzie Scott. Oh, Mackenzie Scott. Yeah. Mackenzie Scott.
0:42:31 Yes. And trust me, there were times when I didn’t think that organization was going to
0:42:36 survive and now they’re just blossoming. And I didn’t know three years ago that this
0:42:42 organization was going to do so well, but they did. And I can say I was a part of that.
0:42:46 And I can look back at every place I’ve been and I’ve done something at every one of those
0:42:53 places to create change. And it can be small. You can just convince one other person to
0:42:58 vote or it can be big. If you have the money, you can support a candidate you believe in
0:43:04 or you can help an organization. And I support lots of organizations. I’ve been on 10 different
0:43:10 nonprofit boards. Some of us do too much, but it’s who I am. I always do too much. But
0:43:20 the reality is don’t feel overwhelmed. Do something that is within your capacity and
0:43:25 then build on that. And eventually you’ll get to that place where you’re as remarkable
0:43:35 as me and God. You should aim higher than trying to be as remarkable as me. Aim higher.
0:43:41 Aim higher. For Jane Goodall and Terry Gibbons. Oh my God. You know, I have to say your Jane
0:43:48 Goodall interview was my absolute favorite. Wow. Thank you. So that was Terry Gibbons.
0:43:54 I hope you have a greater understanding of racism in America and what we need to end
0:44:02 that problem. Check out her book Radical Empathy. It’s sure to help you be a better person.
0:44:07 My name is Guy Kawasaki. This is Remarkable People. May I just remind you that Mattis
0:44:14 and Nismar and I, we have a new book out called Think Remarkable. We take the inspiration
0:44:19 and information we gained from conducting over 200 interviews and make it into a very
0:44:26 brief book. Think of it as a guide to life, a guide to how to make a difference and how
0:44:32 to be remarkable. Anyway, now let’s just thank the rest of the Remarkable People team. That
0:44:37 would be, well, you already heard, Mattis and Nismar. She’s not only my co-author. She’s
0:44:44 also the producer of the Remarkable People podcast. Tessa Nismar is our researcher. Alexis
0:44:51 Nishimura and Louise Magana are also on the Remarkable People team and last but certainly
0:45:00 not least are our amazing sound design engineers. That would be Jeff C. and Shannon Hernandez.
0:45:06 We are the Remarkable People team and we are on a mission to make you remarkable. Until
0:45:16 next time, Mahalo and Aloha.
0:00:21 to make you remarkable. Helping me in this episode is Terry Givens. She is the former
0:00:29 Vice Provost of the University of Texas at Austin and the former Provost of Menlo College.
0:00:34 Terry broke barriers as the first African American and first woman in both roles. She
0:00:40 has continued her journey at McGill University in Montreal, Canada. There she advises on
0:00:47 anti-racist initiatives and contributes to academia through her professorship. Despite
0:00:54 opportunities to ascend further in administrative ranks, Terry continues to make direct impact
0:01:00 through her teaching of students. In this episode, we dive into her new book, Radical
0:01:07 Empathy. This reflects her dedication to fostering inclusive leadership in these very troubling
0:01:14 times. I’m Guy Kawasaki. This is Remarkable People and now, here is the Remarkable Terry
0:01:25 Givens. Would you start us off by explaining the roots of racism in America?
0:01:29 Yes, because that’s a very important thing to understand and this is why I wrote my book
0:01:38 The Roots of Racism because I think we don’t understand that history is still present today.
0:01:45 And the roots of racism go back to the 1500s when you had Portuguese sailors first enslaving
0:01:51 people in Africa. But the important thing about that is how they defined Africans at
0:01:58 the time, which was they basically dehumanized them. And that dehumanization has persisted
0:02:05 since then. And so you see it in so many different ways and of course to basically say that enslavement
0:02:11 was okay, that the church was involved in defining who was human and who wasn’t. And
0:02:15 one of the important things we have to do is to trace the history. How did we get to
0:02:22 where we are today? And show, as we know, people are trying to keep us from learning
0:02:26 our history because they don’t want people to understand those connections. They want
0:02:31 to say, oh, we’re done with racism. It doesn’t matter. It’s like, no, racism is baked into
0:02:38 our systems, not just in the US, but in Europe, across the globe. So we have to understand
0:02:41 that that history is critical to where we are today.
0:02:48 I heard a theory from one of our other guests that I don’t know if it was 1600s or 1500s,
0:02:56 but racism didn’t really exist until somebody needed an intellectual argument for why we
0:03:02 want to get free labor and enslave people. So in order to justify that, they came up
0:03:08 with this theory that black people are less than human, so it’s okay to enslave them.
0:03:10 What do you think of that theory?
0:03:16 Oh, I agree with it 100%. There’s this really great book besides mine by Nell Painter called
0:03:22 basically, now I’m going to forget the exact title, but it’s how people became white. And
0:03:28 the history of white people, basically. And this book really goes through and examines
0:03:32 because it’s not just that we’re saying black people are not human. We’re also saying white
0:03:41 people are superior. So the underlying theme is that this whole history of white supremacy.
0:03:46 And so you have to understand that component as well. So yes, I agree with that. I said
0:03:51 the Catholic Church was involved in saying it’s okay to enslave Africans because they
0:03:57 are not human. And so there’s all these different factors. It really does go back to the 1500s
0:04:02 when the church was involved in saying it’s okay to enslave Africans.
0:04:10 And why has something persisted for 500 years? I mean, you think we would figure out better
0:04:12 ways to do business.
0:04:17 Well, you would think, but the reality is that we had this period of enslavement, we
0:04:24 had the Civil War, which was to end slavery. But the federal government, after a few years
0:04:30 of the whole process of moving us, theoretically moving us past slavery, just basically gave
0:04:36 up eventually and let the South and not just in the South, but they allowed the development
0:04:41 of Jim Crow voting laws, the disenfranchised black people. And so that’s one of the things
0:04:47 I want to, and I’m a researcher, this is what I do for a living. And I’m actually working
0:04:51 on a major project that is going to try to examine not just in the US, but how, what
0:05:00 is this, why does this persist? And what does race mean today? And so the bigger problem
0:05:08 it was in the United States and in other places that there was never a real acceptance of
0:05:13 black people. You had all kinds of laws and regulations and rules that kept them from
0:05:17 voting, that kept them from getting jobs. You can look in almost any developed country
0:05:24 today and black people are going to be less employed. Let’s take France, for example.
0:05:29 This is a country that was a colonizer. A lot of people who were in the colonies like
0:05:36 in Algeria have gone to France to find work. They get put into the suburbs because in France,
0:05:40 the place where the poor people go is in the suburbs. So you’ve got black people living
0:05:47 in the suburbs, their educational opportunities are less. All these different ways that, if
0:05:53 you think about redlining, that happens everywhere. Redlining is the process where banks and regulators
0:05:58 say, oh, we’re going to make sure that people who live in these, or buy these houses, don’t
0:06:03 get preferred loans, they have to pay more, et cetera, et cetera. And so there are so
0:06:08 many different mechanisms that are put in place. That’s why we call it systemic racism
0:06:12 and systemic discrimination because you have the bureaucrats involved and they’re doing
0:06:17 these things consciously initially, and then they just get perpetuated over time.
0:06:23 And do you think in this case that it’s a racist argument, like we don’t want black people
0:06:30 to have houses and competitive interest rates, or it’s a intellectual argument that, oh,
0:06:37 they’re higher risk, so we have to charge them higher interest? Is it racism or flawed
0:06:38 economics?
0:06:44 It’s both. It’s hard to separate out the two. I still have this issue today. I’ve been
0:06:50 working on hiring more black faculty at McGill University, and faculty will still come and
0:06:54 say, well, why can’t we just hire on merit? We are hiring on merit. We’re just saying
0:07:01 that we want to recruit people who look different from you. And the funny thing is, is we go
0:07:07 around and we hire people from the best universities in the world, and then they’re like, oh, I
0:07:12 didn’t know these people were out there. Oh, let’s go hire more. And it comes back to my
0:07:17 other book, Radical Empathy, where people don’t understand how they have internalized
0:07:22 bias, how they have internalized these ideas about people. And they’ll say, oh, we just
0:07:27 hire on merit. Yeah, but the only people you hire are your buddies who look just like you,
0:07:31 and you aren’t willing to look at the people. We went to Stanford around the same time.
0:07:36 Oh, no, actually, I was 10 years after you. You’re much younger. I’m going to be 60 this
0:07:43 year. But anyway, I’m going to be 70. Like I said, 10 years apart. But even in that 10
0:07:48 year difference, right, there were probably a few more blacks, dude. But anyway, the interesting
0:07:53 thing to me is that I was going to Stanford in the 80s and there were still a lot of issues
0:07:58 around hiring black faculty and they’ve gotten better. Don’t get me wrong. I love my alma
0:08:04 mater. But the problem is you look across academia and we’re still only three or 4% of the faculty
0:08:09 and we’re still struggling to hire and we’re still struggling to retain. And this whole
0:08:15 idea of merit, we forget about the belonging component, right? And I know this is something
0:08:20 you care deeply about. And this people should feel like they belong. So we’s like, okay,
0:08:25 we hire these people, but we don’t necessarily give them the opportunity to succeed in those
0:08:32 positions. One of my frustrations with this is that how can you make decisions like this
0:08:40 based on the color of skin? Okay, tell me you made a decision on height or weight or
0:08:47 color of pupil. But what’s the rationale that someone with black skin is somehow inferior
0:08:55 to you and shouldn’t get tenured away? It makes absolutely no sense to me. They attach
0:08:59 so this is the problem. We judge people, right? And I talk about it in the context of, okay,
0:09:04 you have your tribal brain that says you see somebody who looks different than you.
0:09:09 And so your brain says, oh, this person isn’t, you know, part of me. And so we have to fight
0:09:14 against that tribal brain or that very basic idea that we only want to be around people
0:09:19 who look like us. But the reality is we’re, you know, I mean, you look at there’s no one
0:09:26 kind of black person or Asian person. We all are a range of colors, right? And so they’re
0:09:33 basically in the 1800s and early 1900s, people just bent over backwards. They wanted to look
0:09:38 at things like skull size and all of that to try and say, oh, this group of people is
0:09:44 inferior because their brains are smaller kind of thing. So people have bent over backwards
0:09:50 to try and find scientific reasons why people from Africa who have different skin color
0:09:57 or people from Asia who are somehow inferior or I could get into all kinds of trouble saying
0:10:02 some of the things that people said about us. But it’s a protectiveness. I mean, you
0:10:08 see what was happening right now in places across the globe really, but particularly
0:10:14 in the US is people are trying to protect their privilege. And so they ascribe a certain
0:10:19 level of privilege to themselves if they are white. And then we don’t want to let these
0:10:24 other people have that same privilege because the problem is they see it as a pie. And if
0:10:29 they get that, then I don’t get that. Instead of saying, we all get better if we all are
0:10:35 open and accepting all boats will rise. There are so many if I need to talk to Heather McGee,
0:10:40 if you haven’t yet, because her book is amazing, the sum of us, the problem is not to get a
0:11:06 bigger slice of the pie. What you should do is bake a bigger pie. That’s the solution.
0:11:13 Is there any example of like in Africa, there’s a black nation and all the power structure
0:11:21 was black and they imported thousands of Europeans as slaves to work on plantations.
0:11:27 And now it’s 2024. And they’re trying to wipe out their history of white enslavement
0:11:33 and they’re trying to preserve systemic racism against white people. Is there any country
0:11:42 like that? No, no, no, no, no. No, you know, I wish Wakanda was there. No, I mean, you
0:11:48 know, the problem is you look at a place like South Africa or Zimbabwe and they had
0:11:54 white settlers who once the governments were taken over by black natives, South Africa
0:11:59 has bent over backwards to support things for white people living there and their land
0:12:04 and so on. And Zimbabwe maybe not as much. But that’s the only cases I can, there may
0:12:10 be other African countries. One interesting case is Algeria because Algeria they didn’t
0:12:14 enslave. Nobody’s enslaved white people in Africa as far as I know, maybe they’re somewhere
0:12:22 out there. But Algeria was part of France until they got independence in the early 60s.
0:12:27 And so once they got independence, a lot of the white French people left and moved back
0:12:32 to France and they felt like they had basically been expelled and they were unhappy. You know,
0:12:36 it’s about that. And that’s why some of those people are strongest supporters of the far
0:12:42 right National Front, which has now become the Rassemblement in France. But that’s the
0:12:47 closest I can come to is like landowners who once the country became independent, lost
0:12:51 their land or had to leave and so on. So that’s about the extent of it.
0:12:58 I read your book about radical empathy. And at the end, and this was in 2020, I would
0:13:04 say you were fairly optimistic that things could get better. Now, we’re four years later.
0:13:07 Where’s your mind at?
0:13:08 Very frustrated.
0:13:11 Things have gotten worse.
0:13:17 In some places they’ve gotten worse. Yes, not everywhere. And I’m always hopeful. It’s
0:13:21 my nature to be hopeful. And I’m actually working on a follow up to radical empathy.
0:13:26 And it’s been hard to write because there’s every day there’s bad news. But on the other
0:13:33 hand, one of the goals of both radical empathy in the book I’m working on now is like you,
0:13:37 I want to empower people. I want people to feel like they can do something. And that’s
0:13:41 when I wrote radical empathy that when I would talk to people about it, that’s the first
0:13:49 thing that came, which is what can I do? So I’m hoping that yes, things are bad. And actually
0:13:54 one of the things I’m writing about right now is the difference between apathy and empathy.
0:14:01 And apathy is you just sit back and you’re just going to let things happen versus empathy
0:14:07 and radical empathy, which as you know, is taking action. And I just keep imagining what
0:14:12 if we all, and we did in 2020, so many of us rose up and said, yes, I’m going to vote,
0:14:17 I’m going to vote for democracy. And I think that’s going to happen. I’m crossing my fingers
0:14:21 and hoping that’s going to happen again. And we don’t have interference and all of that.
0:14:29 But I think that I’m frustrated, but also still hopeful because, you know, I read your
0:14:34 book and I’m like, look at all these amazing people and these remarkable people and what
0:14:40 they’re doing. And you’re doing the work to bring these people to the forefront so people
0:14:45 can see what you can do. And that’s exactly what I want to do as well. I want people to
0:14:49 understand, I haven’t given up, I’m still working, I’m still fighting, I’m still doing
0:14:54 what I can do in my part of the world. The part of the problem is, and there’s some great
0:14:57 books that have come out talking about how black activists in particular, we tend to
0:15:02 get burnt out and so on and that we have to take care of ourselves and I’m doing that.
0:15:08 But I also know that I’m privileged. I’m in a unique position. I’m in the process of
0:15:15 changing the university system in Canada to be more open to black people. That’s huge.
0:15:20 And so I think it’s really important that we understand that the things we are doing,
0:15:23 even in our little space of the world, is creating change.
0:15:30 Yeah. Would you say that America 2024, is it an apartheid?
0:15:38 Not yet. And the reason we’re not really apartheid is because the attacks that are happening
0:15:45 now are intersectional. It’s not just on black people. When you get rid of a DEI program,
0:15:49 people forget. It’s not just black people who benefit from that. It’s women. It’s people
0:15:58 with disabilities. It’s LGBTQI. It’s everybody who is underrepresented or oppressed. If
0:16:05 it’s an apartheid, it’s an apartheid of white men versus everybody else, right? Because
0:16:10 you can’t say that, oh, we’re getting rid of DEI and people want to say we’re only going
0:16:14 after this group. No. There’s lots of research that shows one of the biggest beneficiaries
0:16:21 of the civil rights acts and so on are women. All women. Women were able to get into the
0:16:27 workforce, et cetera, et cetera. You’re saying over 50% of the population is falling under
0:16:33 the system of apartheid. I just think that there is resistance. And so no, we’re not
0:16:37 anywhere near that. Okay. I’m going to tap all your political science
0:16:50 expertise. Okay. So would you draw any similarities between America today and 1930 pre-Nazi Germany
0:16:58 or pre-Nelson Mandela, South Africa? Are we South Africa or are we Nazi Germany? Are
0:17:04 we headed in those directions? Not yet is my answer. And we have, trust me, I can’t
0:17:08 tell you how many times on social media I’ve seen my colleagues. I was like, oh, we’re
0:17:16 just like, and even I thought about this, right? Are we in Weimar Germany? And I’m worried,
0:17:20 but it’s a different thing. I think, yes, we need, so as you know, I’m a huge advocate
0:17:26 of understanding history. But on the other hand, we also have to understand the complexity
0:17:31 of our current age. And frankly, what really worries me is the inequality that you have
0:17:39 these billionaires out there who are controlling the media and so on, and are trying to push
0:17:45 certain types of agendas that is influencing people to vote particular ways and act particular
0:17:53 ways. And that is different in the sense that I don’t see the US going out and starting
0:17:58 wars. I mean, I think I see the US, if we go in that particular direction, becoming
0:18:05 more insular. But we’re in a very much a global environment. And so I think when we’ve, people
0:18:09 like in Europe, for example, have seen what’s happening in the US, I mean, Germany, they
0:18:15 have a far right party. And there have been millions of people on the streets saying no
0:18:20 , we don’t want this far right party to be in our government. And there are millions
0:18:26 of Americans. The funny thing is, it’s actually it’s not funny, it’s sad, is there are protests
0:18:31 and things going on in the US on a daily basis and the media is not covering it, right? They’re
0:18:37 happy to cover, we’re going to go talk to this Trump voter, but they won’t talk to the thousands
0:18:42 of people who are protesting in front of the Supreme Court about their latest ruling. There’s
0:18:47 a lot of things happening. I have friends who are out there writing postcards to get
0:18:53 people to vote. I have friends who are working with candidates all over the place here in
0:19:00 Canada. There’s huge groups of people who are fighting for democracy on various fronts.
0:19:07 And so I think that democracy is in danger around the globe, right? But I’m still hopeful
0:19:13 that there’s enough of us who are supporting, we both have lived in California. I always
0:19:18 tell people, yeah, I’m in Vancouver, British Columbia right now, but I think that the whole
0:19:23 West Coast, well, if it gets to that point, we’ll split away and we’ll have California
0:19:25 and Oregon and Washington.
0:19:33 Hey, Gavin Newsom for president of our country. I could live with that. So in your book, you
0:19:39 said several times, and it was certainly a surprise, but almost a shock. And listen,
0:19:47 I’m an Asian American male, right? So I don’t walk in your shoes, but you say that racism
0:19:55 manifests itself daily in your reality. So can you tell me how racism manifests itself
0:20:01 daily in someone as successful and visible and powerful and et cetera, et cetera, as
0:20:06 you were not talking about some illegal immigrant who’s like working in the back of a restaurant.
0:20:15 We’re talking about, you know, Terry Gibbons, my God. So how does racism affect your daily
0:20:16 reality?
0:20:22 Well, not everybody knows who Terry Gibbons is. They will, especially after this podcast,
0:20:28 they will. But it’s really interesting because part of it is internalized. So, you know,
0:20:32 my reality is yesterday, I was walking around and I was like, oh, I’m going to go into this
0:20:37 boutique. Every time I walk into that place where people do not know who I am, I’m like,
0:20:43 okay, how am I dressed? Are they watching me? Do I have to put a smile on my face? You
0:20:49 know, I try to be a non-threatening. And so that’s not that the people in the store,
0:20:53 I don’t know if they’re racist or not. And you’ll see, and that’s the thing, right? And
0:20:57 throughout my career, because I’ve been a trendsetter and ahead of my time in so many
0:21:04 ways in political science, I’ve been in high-level positions. And the reality is that I’m often
0:21:09 in the only black person in the room or the only woman in the room. And there’s so many
0:21:15 different ways that the racism manifests itself. And it’s not just the fact that people see
0:21:19 I’m a black woman and might be racist towards me. It’s just the things I study. I study
0:21:24 race and immigration politics in Europe. And I can’t tell you how many times people have
0:21:28 said, oh, why do you study Europe? They’re so surprised when I tell them I speak French
0:21:33 and German. And the funny thing is this could happen to anybody, but I could be a white
0:21:38 guy as an American. Why do you study French and German and so on? But they aren’t going
0:21:40 to be a surprise, right?
0:21:47 I can honestly say, Terry, I have never met a white man who had imposter syndrome.
0:21:55 You know, it’s really funny. I’m on a job search right now for an executive director
0:22:01 of an organization. And I was laughing because we didn’t get very many women and minorities
0:22:05 applying, but we had a lot of white men. And I was laughing because I was like, these white
0:22:10 guys aren’t even qualified for this position, but they apply. Whereas we know there’s research
0:22:14 shows women and minorities won’t apply for positions that they think they don’t qualify
0:22:18 for. But these white guys are like, Oh, yeah, I sort of qualify. I’m going to go ahead and
0:22:26 we didn’t keep them in the pool. But you know, the audacity, I don’t know.
0:22:32 So let me ask you something. So what’s the end goal to use your terminology so people
0:22:37 don’t get all pissed off with me when I asked this question. But is the end game like for
0:22:46 every Negro to be an exceptional Negro? Is that the goal? No, absolutely not. The goal
0:22:52 is for every person, for everybody to be who they are. So this was a struggle I went through
0:22:59 personally is how do I make sense of who I am and so on and so forth. I’m black. I used
0:23:03 to get people would give me a hard time for the way I talked because I didn’t talk black,
0:23:08 blah, blah, blah, this and that. So the reality is people try to put you into boxes. So what
0:23:13 I want for everyone, not just black people, but for everyone just to not have to live
0:23:17 in the box and to be who you are. And that’s what by the time I got to the end of my 20s,
0:23:23 early 30s, I finally figured out just be who you are. And don’t be afraid to be who you
0:23:28 are. And that means that, you know, I was going to mention this earlier when you’re
0:23:34 talking about so racism, it’s not even race and it’s like expectations. Terry Gibbons
0:23:39 is a graduate student at UCLA. Oh, she must be studying race and ethnic politics in the
0:23:48 United States. I literally had people say, I would give you a job if you studied race
0:23:53 and politics in the U.S. And like, that’s not what I study. And I don’t want your job
0:23:57 if that’s what your expectation is, right? And that’s why I’m like, first of all, start
0:24:01 with yourself. Who are you? And do you really want people putting you into boxes the way
0:24:07 that you’re doing to others? Not everybody’s going to be exceptional. We just want people
0:24:14 to be able to have access to becoming remarkable. And that’s what we’re doing here, but also
0:24:16 just being who you are.
0:24:25 When the term in your book was used as exceptional Negro, it wasn’t about being, getting the
0:24:32 best scores or anything like that. It was basically fulfilling a white man’s expectation
0:24:37 of what a black person should be. If you did that, you were, quote, an exceptional Negro,
0:24:38 right?
0:24:43 And I was applying that to myself because the problem is people look at me and say, oh,
0:24:50 you’re exceptional. And Oprah’s exceptional. And Chris Rock is exceptional. But the rest
0:24:57 of those black people, we don’t care about them. And so this is the problem. We can pick
0:25:02 out a few people and they are exceptions. So that word exception is important. They’re
0:25:09 the exception to the rule. And the rule is that black people aren’t to the level that
0:25:11 we think white people are.
0:25:12 Okay.
0:25:16 But oh, but you’re okay. I have had people. Oh, you’re, you know, I remember when it was
0:25:25 a big deal that Barack Obama was articulate. And it’s like, well, yeah, he speaks normal
0:25:26 English.
0:25:28 What’s wrong with him?
0:25:29 Any smokes?
0:25:39 Yeah, yes. That’s all other stories purely in practical terms. Are you serious? Are
0:25:46 you saying that a white male can possibly empathize with a black woman?
0:25:53 I have had so many white males who have been the ones who have propelled me along my career.
0:25:59 Yes, absolutely. Going back to high school, I remember my high school principal, who was
0:26:06 a Jesuit priest, stopped me in the hall one day. I’d recently taken the PSAT and he was
0:26:10 like, Terry, are you going to apply to Harvard or Yale or Princeton? Like, what are you talking
0:26:17 about? I don’t even know what college is, you know? And he saw me. You know, it’s not
0:26:23 just empathy. It’s actually being seen. And there are many white men who I can tell you
0:26:31 have seen me. They accepted me as a black woman who speaks French and studies European
0:26:36 politics and can be a leader. And I always say there are people who saw more in me than
0:26:39 I saw in myself. And those were mostly white men.
0:26:40 Really?
0:26:41 Absolutely, 100 percent.
0:26:45 So Terry, they were exceptional white men.
0:26:49 Oh, you got me.
0:26:57 Okay, so now you talk about just the beauty of empathy and even beyond that radical empathy.
0:27:04 But are you saying conceptually that you should have radical empathy for the Trumps? Is there
0:27:07 a limit to empathy?
0:27:11 The number one thing, and that’s going to be at the very top of the first chapter of
0:27:18 my next book, is empathy is not absolution. I do say this in the book. Look, not everybody
0:27:23 is going to listen to me or hear my message. I don’t need all these people who support
0:27:29 Trump to understand or have empathy, but there’s this huge number of people out there who are
0:27:34 open and want a better world and want to understand these things. And I can tell you, I’ve had
0:27:39 many, many interesting discussions about this over the last few years in particular. And
0:27:45 yeah, there’s some people you can’t reach. Not everybody is going to be remarkable. But
0:27:53 what we need is that core group of people, because we can move mountains. And that’s
0:27:58 the thing we have to understand is that I may not be able to convince this Trump voter
0:28:03 over here, but maybe I can convince this independent person over here, and then they’re eventually
0:28:07 going to talk to their buddy who’s a Trump voter. It’s a process. And the process is
0:28:12 working right now so that these people are being very cut off and they only watch certain
0:28:18 media. But if we can start to break through those silos, not directly necessarily, but
0:28:22 really get the word out so that people understand that there’s a different way to think about
0:28:24 things.
0:28:29 So in your book, you also expressed something which when I read that I said, how do these
0:28:37 two things relate to each other? And you made a statement that empathy requires embracing
0:28:45 vulnerability. So why does being empathetic require being vulnerable?
0:28:48 Thank you for that question. Because that’s one of my favorite things about radical empathy.
0:28:53 And you’ll see I’m vulnerable all the way through the book. I try to model vulnerability.
0:28:58 But what I figured out in my own life, and I’ve seen this with other people, you mentioned
0:29:03 imposter syndrome. So part of the problem, for me personally, was that I had a hard time
0:29:14 accepting who I am. And it was partly because I didn’t really understand who I was. And
0:29:18 I grew up in Spokane, Washington. It’s less than 1% black. And I’m just like, why did
0:29:25 my parents choose for us to grow up in Spokane, Washington of all places? But as I learned
0:29:31 that history and about the Great Migration and how black people from my parents’ era
0:29:36 wanted better than what they had experienced. And so by moving to the Northwest, my dad
0:29:41 was in the military. Spokane was the last place he was stationed. So it made sense for
0:29:46 us to just stay there. And it was like where he grew up outside of Pittsburgh. I went then
0:29:52 visit. Oh, no wonder he settled in Spokane. It’s a lot like where he grew up. But a big
0:29:58 part of that is that they wanted us to have better education, to be safe, et cetera. So
0:30:03 for them, Spokane was that place. But I didn’t grow up around a lot of other black people.
0:30:08 And so that was something that I would beat myself up about. I wasn’t in the same social
0:30:13 situations as a lot of my friends when I went to Stanford, et cetera, et cetera. But what
0:30:17 I had to learn was I had to be vulnerable to be willing to look at those stories, that
0:30:21 history, to try to understand. So the first step in vulnerability was saying, I need to
0:30:27 understand better why my parents made these choices, why I am who I am. Because I had
0:30:34 some anger towards my parents. And so by being vulnerable, and it’s hard to ask yourself
0:30:39 those tough questions, if you’re not vulnerable. And Brene Brown, she’s my model when I talk
0:30:45 about vulnerability. The biggest thing about vulnerability, first of all, we can talk about
0:30:48 it in the context of leadership, but it’s really important to be vulnerable with yourself.
0:30:52 People always say, why do I have to be vulnerable? It’s not with everybody else. You have to
0:30:57 be vulnerable with yourself so that you understand yourself better, so that you know who you
0:31:01 are, so that you’re more open to other people. It’s really hard to love others if you don’t
0:31:07 love yourself. And so you have to be vulnerable and look at the full picture and try to understand
0:31:14 why you are the way you are and say, I’m okay with that. And that makes it much more likely
0:31:19 that you’re going to be okay with other people because you see yourself and then you can
0:31:27 see others. Explain to me, well, that implies that I don’t agree or I don’t understand,
0:31:34 which is not true. But why do we need to teach the history of slavery in America? Yes, that’s
0:31:42 a great question, because it still has implications today. So we had 400 years of enslavement,
0:31:49 and we haven’t been how many years since the 1860s. Historically, we’re still not that
0:31:54 far away from it. And because you can’t understand why we had Jim Crow if you don’t understand
0:31:59 slavery. You can’t understand why the U.S. shut itself off to immigration except from
0:32:06 Northern and Western Europe if you don’t understand the history of slavery. Because
0:32:11 it was all part of a process where even though we ended enslavement, we still had the same
0:32:16 ideas about people. We still had this idea. And that’s why it’s really important to understand
0:32:23 that it wasn’t just about slavery. It was about a worldview that said certain people
0:32:27 are not human or certain people are lesser than. And that included people from Southern
0:32:32 and Eastern Europe. That’s why in the 1920s, the U.S. cut off immigration from Southern
0:32:36 and Eastern Europe and most of the rest of the world. People don’t really know that we
0:32:43 cut off immigration from most parts of the world except from the 1920s to the 1960s.
0:32:48 And after that is when you start to see more people coming from India. The first group
0:32:56 of people to have immigration control placed on them were Chinese. You had Chinese exclusion
0:33:03 in the 1870s. And so it’s not just that there was enslavement. There was a whole worldview
0:33:08 of white supremacy that said we don’t want Chinese. We don’t want the world. They couldn’t
0:33:11 get rid of the black people. There were too many of us. So they were going to put all
0:33:16 kinds of rules and regulations and for Jim Crow laws about you have to sit in the back
0:33:22 of the bus and you can’t go to good schools, etc., etc. It’s still impacting things. When
0:33:29 I got to McGill University in 2021, there were 12 black faculty out of 1700.
0:33:30 What?
0:33:32 Why is that?
0:33:35 12 out of 1700?
0:33:42 Yes. Now, because of me and many others who did a lot of work were close to 50. And it’s
0:33:49 like Canada didn’t go through slavery and they did. But it wasn’t like in the U.S.
0:33:55 So why does this happen? Because people have ideas. Those ideas don’t come from nowhere.
0:34:00 Those ideas come from 400 years of enslavement. Jim Crow, Chinese exclusion, exclusion of
0:34:05 people from Southern and Eastern Europe, Irish people can being considered black, all kinds
0:34:07 of things, right?
0:34:19 Wow. I tell you this story as an aside. I have hosted many AI panels, members of the
0:34:28 panel, including chancellors of very large schools. Okay. And unlike most AI moderators,
0:34:36 I always ask this question, which is who would you rather have designed your kids curriculum?
0:34:46 Ron DeSantis or chat GPT. Everybody says chat GPT. And I will tell you that I have gone
0:34:53 to chat GPT and asked, why should we teach the history of slavery in America? And chat
0:35:02 GPT comes up with six great bullet points about the benefits of teaching slavery in America.
0:35:08 And I tell you that story only because I think smarter than Ron DeSantis, but I mean, that’s
0:35:12 not a very high bar, but
0:35:18 So AI is a learning model. It’s pulling in information. And it’s not biased in any way
0:35:22 about that information. It’s saying, look, here’s what I have learned. I’m going to give
0:35:30 it back to you. And so it has this material that is saying these things about why we need
0:35:35 to understand this history. So that doesn’t surprise me. And frankly, there’s so much
0:35:41 research and I have colleagues all over who do this work. And what’s really interesting
0:35:47 is forget DeSantis and all that. The people who matter are students. What are they learning?
0:35:54 I mean, I taught a class a year ago. I love my students. It was just such a blessing because
0:35:58 even my students from Sweden, McGill is a very international university. So I had students
0:36:03 from all over. And it was probably one of the most diverse classrooms I have ever taught
0:36:08 80 students and a little bit of everything. I tried to really create a classroom where
0:36:13 everybody could say what they want that they wouldn’t have any fear. And so many students
0:36:17 told their stories because I would tell my stories. So they would tell me their stories
0:36:23 about their parents who were immigrants, the difficulties they had wearing the hijab, all
0:36:27 kinds of things. And Canadian students coming to me and saying, I never knew that Canada
0:36:36 excluded Chinese people and hadn’t slavery and all these things. And so to me, that is
0:36:41 just so gratifying that I have the privilege of being able to teach these students these
0:36:46 things. And they are grateful to Santa’s and all that. Oh, making white people feel bad.
0:36:51 No, we’re not. We’re helping them learn and understand their history. They don’t understand
0:36:59 why there’s so many black people living in horrible living conditions in the United States.
0:37:04 Why do we have homeless people living on the streets? All these things, they need to understand
0:37:08 that because they want to create change. They have the energy. They’re out there. So many
0:37:13 students who’ve gone into activism and working in nonprofits. And I think people like the
0:37:19 Santas are afraid they’re going to overthrow this white supremacist, white male. And I got
0:37:24 to remind myself, I always have to remember to say white male supremacy because white
0:37:30 women are being oppressed as well. But that they want this change. They are students are
0:37:36 the ones who are pushing for diversity and understanding.
0:37:45 Can you say that? Isn’t that the reason that school boards and stuff are trying to remove
0:37:51 this part of not not to be too clever, but they’re basically trying to whitewash history?
0:37:56 Yes. Absolutely. Because they’re afraid. But the funny thing is, these kids are getting
0:38:02 this news that my boys are older, but we don’t control what they read. My boys are out there
0:38:07 doing stuff that I’m just surprised they know more about so many things than I do because
0:38:13 they are consumers of what’s out there. And of course, they follow what their mom does
0:38:18 and so on. But they have chosen the things that they really care about the environment
0:38:24 is a really big thing for them. And the funny thing is, the more you try to hold tight, the
0:38:28 easier it is that things are going to slip away. And that’s what they don’t understand
0:38:31 when they’re trying to ban books and so on. It just makes kids curious. Oh, this book
0:38:55 is banned. I’m going to read it. This is another aside. But I hope that Think Remarkable is
0:39:01 banned in Florida and Texas. I know I keep waiting for radical empathy to get banned.
0:39:08 Yeah. Like we there should be some service that submit your book to Ron DeSantis and
0:39:13 Greg Abbott. Absolutely. No roots of racism, which is the politics of white supremacy in
0:39:18 the US and Europe. That’s at the top of the list. Oh my God. I mean, that and Project
0:39:27 1619. Those definitely two books that I open up Think Remarkable with a discussion of Olivia
0:39:34 Giuliana, because I’m hoping that some legislator reads this in Florida and Texas. This is holy
0:39:41 shit. He opened up with the most radical Latina we know. And we got to ban this book. But
0:39:45 it hasn’t worked yet. I’m trying. If I figure out how to get my book banned, you will be
0:39:51 the first to know Terry Givers. I guarantee you. Thank you so much. I’m always thinking
0:39:58 about you. How do we bridge the racial divide? That’s an easy question. Go ahead. I give
0:40:05 you 60 seconds. Let’s see. How do we bridge the racial divide in 60 seconds? First of
0:40:11 all, we have to recognize it. And so the first step is it’s like that whole thing of vulnerability
0:40:14 and internalizing. And that’s another reason you have to be vulnerable because you aren’t
0:40:18 willing to recognize that there is a racial divide unless you’re willing to be vulnerable
0:40:24 and say, yes, I have internalized bias. That’s a really important component. And I think
0:40:30 we can bridge racial divides if we all understand that we all have bias and that we need to
0:40:34 work past it. Because I have so many friends who, and sorry, I’m going past 60 seconds,
0:40:41 but I have so many friends who are, yes, Black Lives Matter, blah, blah, blah, but they don’t
0:40:45 understand. I have a house in Menlo Park. We have to be willing to have more than just
0:40:49 me and my friend who are Black living in Menlo Park. And what we have to figure out, what
0:40:56 do we do to get there? And that takes action. And how do we make people who aren’t currently
0:41:03 living there to feel like they belong? So anyway, that’s more than 60 seconds. But the
0:41:06 most important part is recognizing the problem.
0:41:14 Let’s suppose that you have recognized a problem and you’re not a provost or you’re not in
0:41:19 charge of a university. You’re just, I don’t know, you’re random Google or Apple employee
0:41:27 or whoever the demographics are to listen to my podcast. And now you believe and you
0:41:35 understand. And your question is, what can I do? What’s the answer? I give you 120 seconds
0:41:44 for this. Okay. Thank you. Like I said, so first step, figure out where you are and what
0:41:51 you have the capacity for. So some people, they are good at writing. So write your congressman.
0:41:56 Some people are good at hosting friends, have dinner parties and talk to your friends about
0:42:00 the issues. I think you talk about this in your book to find what are you passionate
0:42:05 about? What do you care about? I mean, if you care about the environment, I joined the
0:42:10 Peninsula Clean Energy Commission because of their citizens council because I care about
0:42:16 the environment. I support lots of nonprofits. I’m so proud of this organization foundation
0:42:20 for our college education. I was the direct board director for several years and it just
0:42:26 got a $2 million grant from Mackenzie Scott. Oh, Mackenzie Scott. Yeah. Mackenzie Scott.
0:42:31 Yes. And trust me, there were times when I didn’t think that organization was going to
0:42:36 survive and now they’re just blossoming. And I didn’t know three years ago that this
0:42:42 organization was going to do so well, but they did. And I can say I was a part of that.
0:42:46 And I can look back at every place I’ve been and I’ve done something at every one of those
0:42:53 places to create change. And it can be small. You can just convince one other person to
0:42:58 vote or it can be big. If you have the money, you can support a candidate you believe in
0:43:04 or you can help an organization. And I support lots of organizations. I’ve been on 10 different
0:43:10 nonprofit boards. Some of us do too much, but it’s who I am. I always do too much. But
0:43:20 the reality is don’t feel overwhelmed. Do something that is within your capacity and
0:43:25 then build on that. And eventually you’ll get to that place where you’re as remarkable
0:43:35 as me and God. You should aim higher than trying to be as remarkable as me. Aim higher.
0:43:41 Aim higher. For Jane Goodall and Terry Gibbons. Oh my God. You know, I have to say your Jane
0:43:48 Goodall interview was my absolute favorite. Wow. Thank you. So that was Terry Gibbons.
0:43:54 I hope you have a greater understanding of racism in America and what we need to end
0:44:02 that problem. Check out her book Radical Empathy. It’s sure to help you be a better person.
0:44:07 My name is Guy Kawasaki. This is Remarkable People. May I just remind you that Mattis
0:44:14 and Nismar and I, we have a new book out called Think Remarkable. We take the inspiration
0:44:19 and information we gained from conducting over 200 interviews and make it into a very
0:44:26 brief book. Think of it as a guide to life, a guide to how to make a difference and how
0:44:32 to be remarkable. Anyway, now let’s just thank the rest of the Remarkable People team. That
0:44:37 would be, well, you already heard, Mattis and Nismar. She’s not only my co-author. She’s
0:44:44 also the producer of the Remarkable People podcast. Tessa Nismar is our researcher. Alexis
0:44:51 Nishimura and Louise Magana are also on the Remarkable People team and last but certainly
0:45:00 not least are our amazing sound design engineers. That would be Jeff C. and Shannon Hernandez.
0:45:06 We are the Remarkable People team and we are on a mission to make you remarkable. Until
0:45:16 next time, Mahalo and Aloha.
In this episode of Remarkable People, join host Guy Kawasaki as he delves into the complex topic of racism in America with Terri Givens, a trailblazing academic and author of the groundbreaking book “Radical Empathy.” Together, they explore the roots of racism, its persistence in modern society, and the importance of understanding history to create meaningful change. Givens shares her personal experiences and insights from “Radical Empathy,” emphasizing the power of empathy in fostering inclusive leadership. Discover how you can contribute to bridging the racial divide, access valuable resources, and become an agent of positive transformation.
—
Guy Kawasaki is on a mission to make you remarkable. His Remarkable People podcast features interviews with remarkable people such as Jane Goodall, Marc Benioff, Woz, Kristi Yamaguchi, and Bob Cialdini. Every episode will make you more remarkable.
With his decades of experience in Silicon Valley as a Venture Capitalist and advisor to the top entrepreneurs in the world, Guy’s questions come from a place of curiosity and passion for technology, start-ups, entrepreneurship, and marketing. If you love society and culture, documentaries, and business podcasts, take a second to follow Remarkable People.
Listeners of the Remarkable People podcast will learn from some of the most successful people in the world with practical tips and inspiring stories that will help you be more remarkable.
Episodes of Remarkable People organized by topic: https://bit.ly/rptopology
Listen to Remarkable People here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/guy-kawasakis-remarkable-people/id1483081827
Like this show? Please leave us a review — even one sentence helps! Consider including your Twitter handle so we can thank you personally!
Thank you for your support; it helps the show!
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.