a16z Podcast: A Podcast About Podcasting

AI transcript
0:00:04 >> Hi, everyone. Welcome to the A6NZ Podcast. I’m Sonal.
0:00:06 So I’m super-duper excited today,
0:00:07 even way more than usual,
0:00:10 because this episode is all about podcasting.
0:00:12 For newer listeners, we actually did an episode
0:00:15 called “A Podcast About Podcasts” about four years ago,
0:00:18 which you can find on our website, A6NZ.com.
0:00:21 But today, we’re focusing this podcast about podcasting,
0:00:23 since the podcasting ecosystem has
0:00:25 evolved and changed quite a bit since then.
0:00:26 By the way, I had hoped that Roman Mars,
0:00:27 who was on that episode,
0:00:29 would join us again, but he lost his voice,
0:00:30 so couldn’t.
0:00:33 Our special guest today is Nick Kwa, who writes “Hot Pod,”
0:00:35 a newsletter that I’ve been following since very early on
0:00:37 and has grown to be a go-to source
0:00:39 all about the podcasting industry,
0:00:41 with analysis insights and more.
0:00:45 He also publishes and contributes to Vulture on similar topics.
0:00:46 Also joining us for this episode
0:00:49 is A6NZ General Partner Connie Chan,
0:00:51 who covers consumer, the future of media,
0:00:54 and Gen Z social, as well as trends from China,
0:00:56 and has observed the podcasting phenomenon there
0:00:59 and shares ideas on what more platforms can do here,
0:01:01 and the three of us do a hallway-style jam,
0:01:04 taking a longer pulse check on where we are right now
0:01:06 in the podcasting industry.
0:01:08 Speaking of, since we do mention some companies,
0:01:09 please note that the content here
0:01:11 is for informational purposes only,
0:01:14 should not be taken as legal business tax
0:01:15 or investment advice,
0:01:18 or be used to evaluate any investment or security,
0:01:20 and is not directed at any investors
0:01:23 or potential investors in any A6NZ fund.
0:01:27 For more details, please also see a6nz.com/disclosures.
0:01:29 So we begin with the latest stats on the industry,
0:01:31 touching on structural factors and more
0:01:33 for about the first 15 minutes.
0:01:35 Then we do a bunch of lightning round style takes
0:01:38 on how other content and entertainment models
0:01:40 may or may not apply to podcasting
0:01:41 for about the next 30 minutes.
0:01:44 And finally, we go into monetization platforms,
0:01:45 analytics, and more,
0:01:47 which we also touch on throughout the episode,
0:01:49 including impacts on creators.
0:01:52 And we end on recent news and moves in the space,
0:01:54 such as Spotify, Gimlet,
0:01:56 how to think about terrestrial radio, and more.
0:01:59 But we begin by defining a podcast,
0:02:01 which seems obvious, but isn’t,
0:02:03 and is a rather existential question.
0:02:05 So guys, what is a podcast?
0:02:07 – So, I mean, the real interesting thing here is,
0:02:10 we’re in the midst of a really interesting moment of change,
0:02:11 and there is internal conflict
0:02:14 within the podcast community about that question.
0:02:17 So historically, it’s been largely tethered
0:02:18 to the notion of the RSS feed.
0:02:23 It’s basically an audio file or a medium of distribution
0:02:26 that largely happens through the technology
0:02:28 that was carried over from blogging.
0:02:31 And now with the entrance of Spotify
0:02:33 and Pandora stepping up,
0:02:36 and Google beginning to do whatever they’re going to do
0:02:37 on the search engine side.
0:02:39 – And Apple already is an entrenched player as well.
0:02:41 – Yeah, absolutely, I heard media.
0:02:46 And Luminary just announced their big 100 million fundraise
0:02:49 and the fact that it gonna launch in July a couple days ago.
0:02:50 – With a lot of exclusive content, right?
0:02:53 So how does exclusive podcasts fit in
0:02:54 with the old definition?
0:02:56 – Especially with the Luminary announcement
0:02:57 that was like a strong pushback
0:03:00 from parts of the community that’s been around for a while
0:03:04 and generally folks who really believe in the open ecosystem.
0:03:06 And so we have a situation in which like,
0:03:08 the technical definition is not
0:03:10 the popular definition anymore.
0:03:11 And if we go from the perspective
0:03:15 of what the ordinary consumer thinks of a podcast,
0:03:17 that is, it becomes a cultural question,
0:03:18 not a technical question.
0:03:20 – Which by the way, I wanna say parallels
0:03:22 the history of the web,
0:03:24 because this to me reminds me very much of early blogging.
0:03:25 – Absolutely.
0:03:27 – And debates about what is a blog,
0:03:29 what is an article, what is a website.
0:03:32 And there was this almost religious existential debate
0:03:33 between the early kind of,
0:03:35 in fact, some of the same people,
0:03:36 because Dave Weiner,
0:03:36 one of the people who invented–
0:03:39 – Who also was important to the development podcast thing.
0:03:40 – Right, he’s exactly.
0:03:42 He’s, but I think he was technically the first person
0:03:45 to do a podcast like in 2003 or something,
0:03:47 or one of the early people.
0:03:49 And he’s also been to specify the RSS feed,
0:03:51 which drives the pipes
0:03:53 and plumbing and ecosystem of podcasting.
0:03:56 But today, users don’t even think of podcasts that way.
0:03:59 It’s like, if it’s just recorded audio of people talking,
0:04:01 oftentimes we’ll just call that a podcast.
0:04:03 – Yeah, one of my favorite things
0:04:05 when people always call our videos podcasts.
0:04:06 – I mean, that’s a holdover, right?
0:04:08 Like Joe Rogan still does that.
0:04:11 There’s a lot of people who still do all video, audio,
0:04:12 and still call it a podcast.
0:04:14 I mean, the way I see it is that the tension
0:04:17 has always been between people who see podcasting
0:04:19 as the future of blogging
0:04:22 and people who see the podcasting as the future of radio.
0:04:25 And we’ve seen that tension cross many, many times.
0:04:28 And I think we’re in a place where that no longer matters
0:04:31 because ultimately the mass consumer will lead
0:04:32 as where do you want to go?
0:04:34 – Yes, and like the web, the analogy that I would draw
0:04:38 is to the advent of the graphical user interface
0:04:41 and how browsing, computing, et cetera.
0:04:42 There’s always a phase in every technology
0:04:44 where there’s a gooey phase
0:04:45 where once you have an interface
0:04:47 that’s user friendly and easy to navigate.
0:04:50 And what’s interesting about this is that we’re in the phase
0:04:53 where the listening has become easy to navigate.
0:04:54 – And more accessible.
0:04:55 – More accessible.
0:04:57 – Through various kinds of hardware too.
0:04:59 For example, listening to podcasts on their drive to work
0:05:02 because the cars are enabled with podcasts.
0:05:04 – Right, like the smartphone connected cars essentially.
0:05:06 – Or AirPods making it so easy
0:05:08 to listen to something while multitasking.
0:05:10 – And in that sense, podcasts are different
0:05:12 than audio books obviously just for the sake of definition.
0:05:15 – But I would say like you can argue over time
0:05:16 that even that definition may blur.
0:05:18 – Of audio books and podcasts.
0:05:20 – Right, like one day a podcast might just be thought of
0:05:22 as like a self-published audio book.
0:05:24 – I have long believed that audio books
0:05:26 should be central to the conversation as well,
0:05:27 especially a couple of years ago
0:05:30 when Audible built sort of an original programming team
0:05:33 that took after podcasts out programming.
0:05:35 And in fact, the matter is that these are all distributors
0:05:37 and platforms of the same kind of good.
0:05:40 It’s just that we think of them and we class them differently
0:05:41 and they also sort of are products
0:05:43 of different economic systems.
0:05:44 – I do want to add to this mix though
0:05:46 that I would not confuse music into this.
0:05:49 And the reason is first of all, from a creator perspective,
0:05:53 every tool until now has been very music creator centric
0:05:55 for podcast editing, creation, et cetera.
0:05:59 And so there’s a really bad structural legacy effect
0:06:00 of equating podcasting.
0:06:01 I mean, we’re essentially bootstrapping tools
0:06:03 tailored for music for podcasting.
0:06:07 So the new wave of podcast native tools is really important.
0:06:09 Full disclosure, we’re investors in Descript
0:06:11 and it democratizes the editing of podcasting
0:06:14 because you can essentially edit audio like a word doc.
0:06:15 But the main point here is that
0:06:18 I do think music should be treated very differently
0:06:19 than podcasting. – I completely agree.
0:06:21 I got to me like it’s audio with spoken word.
0:06:23 – Yep, versus sunk.
0:06:26 So I guess what we’re agreeing on
0:06:28 just to recap the definition of podcasting.
0:06:32 It is audio, it could potentially blur into including books
0:06:35 if not in a content perspective, then to Nick’s point,
0:06:40 then even in a distribution and business model perspective.
0:06:42 But we agree that music should be treated differently.
0:06:45 – And the common denominator here is spoken word.
0:06:47 – That was actually the infinite dial study
0:06:49 which is sort of an annual survey
0:06:51 conducted by Edison Research.
0:06:53 They just announced their latest results
0:06:54 earlier this afternoon.
0:06:56 The most interesting thing is that there were increases
0:06:58 in both audiobooks and podcasting.
0:07:02 So podcasting had a significantly like large leap this year,
0:07:05 but on audiobooks, like after a couple of years
0:07:09 of largely being flat, it’s been increased again.
0:07:11 And I think that’s a sort of really interesting question
0:07:13 because I can’t quite think of a structural reason
0:07:14 why that would be the case,
0:07:16 other than sort of like tethered effect.
0:07:17 – In addition to that,
0:07:19 you have all kinds of really easy to set up
0:07:20 wireless speakers at home.
0:07:24 They also make it more easy to consume this kind of content.
0:07:26 – It reminds me of like what people say
0:07:28 about the Kindle and romance novels.
0:07:30 It helped sales increase
0:07:33 because it made people like more willing to buy it
0:07:35 and consume it because then nobody would judge them.
0:07:37 – Oh, the judgment side, interesting.
0:07:38 For me, it’s actually ease of access
0:07:40 because I used to be really embarrassed
0:07:42 and admit this publicly.
0:07:46 I used to subscribe to the Harlequin Romance on Demand service
0:07:48 where you’d get like the books a month
0:07:51 and you’d pay like $11 or I can’t remember what it was.
0:07:54 ‘Cause I’ve always been a huge reader of romance novels
0:07:56 as a very nice lightweight thing to do.
0:07:58 But what’s the analogy to podcasting?
0:07:59 What’s the connection?
0:08:00 – To me, I think it’s more ease of access
0:08:02 around better hardware.
0:08:03 – On demand, get it quickly.
0:08:04 So speaking of the data and you mentioned
0:08:07 that the Edison research study came out today
0:08:08 and that’s sort of the definitive
0:08:10 and longest running survey of digital media
0:08:12 consumer behavior in America at least.
0:08:15 But I hear a lot of mixed messages.
0:08:16 I see like people cite this stat
0:08:18 and that stat out of context.
0:08:20 So why don’t we just do a quick pulse check
0:08:21 on what are the key stats?
0:08:22 And Nick, maybe you could recap for us
0:08:25 what the key stats or big trends to know are here.
0:08:27 – So I think there are a couple of big takeaways here.
0:08:29 One is when it comes to the familiarity
0:08:30 of the notion of podcasting
0:08:33 and this doesn’t mean people who heard the word
0:08:34 actually know what it is.
0:08:38 It’s officially hit 70% of all Americans.
0:08:40 And when it comes to the number of people
0:08:42 who’ve actually tried out podcasting,
0:08:43 maybe they didn’t stick around a bit
0:08:44 but they just tried it at least.
0:08:46 It’s gone over 50%.
0:08:49 So about an estimate of 144 million Americans.
0:08:51 Retention rates are sort of like really interesting.
0:08:53 Like monthly podcast listening has also went up.
0:08:56 It’s now 32% of all Americans up from 26 from last year.
0:08:57 That’s a pretty big leap.
0:08:58 – I mean, just that’s one third.
0:08:59 That’s a lot.
0:09:00 – Yeah.
0:09:01 And there’s also a really interesting slide in here
0:09:04 attributing some of the increase to Spotify.
0:09:06 There is a stat here that shows
0:09:09 amongst Spotify listeners between the ages of 12 to 24,
0:09:12 monthly podcast listening went up to 53%.
0:09:15 And so there’s a lot going on.
0:09:17 I think currently it’s such a moment of flux.
0:09:21 It’s a little unclear what the structural pillars are anymore.
0:09:22 And I think there’s one of those things
0:09:24 where we’re just gonna have to like look back
0:09:25 at this moment and figure out where we turn.
0:09:28 – So what’s a high level recap on that summary of the stats?
0:09:30 – The high level is that this past year
0:09:31 has seen an unprecedented growth.
0:09:33 For the longest time podcast growth
0:09:35 has been steadily and slow.
0:09:37 And now it feels like it’s taken some sort of a leap.
0:09:40 And so I feel like this past year has been the moment
0:09:44 where it’s tipped into some form of mainstream.
0:09:45 – That’s fantastic.
0:09:47 So potentially a quote inflection point
0:09:49 as people like to say in the business.
0:09:51 – The usage of podcasts and the consumption of it
0:09:55 has risen dramatically in the last year or two.
0:09:57 But what always shocks me is that the revenue
0:10:01 that podcasts generate is still such a small amount
0:10:04 given how many hours people are spending
0:10:05 consuming this kind of content.
0:10:08 – So there is a study out there from the IAB
0:10:11 that caveat being it was funded and financed
0:10:13 by a constellation of podcast companies
0:10:17 that puts the number at around 600 million plus plus
0:10:18 this past last year.
0:10:20 And it’s projected to keep growing of course.
0:10:22 Monetization is a serious issue.
0:10:24 And it largely has to do with the fact
0:10:26 that podcasting is a technology
0:10:29 hasn’t quite caught up to how the rest of the internet
0:10:31 kind of works in terms of dynamic insertion.
0:10:33 And it doesn’t allow like heavy increases
0:10:36 in inventory and swap outs in inventory
0:10:38 in a way that a lot of advertisers are now accustomed
0:10:41 to getting from marketplaces like Facebook.
0:10:44 – And then even that like from an advertiser standpoint
0:10:46 you’re paying per download
0:10:50 ’cause you aren’t getting like these per listen metrics back.
0:10:52 So from the advertising standpoint
0:10:55 it’s still really hard for them to measure the ROI
0:10:57 from sponsoring a podcast.
0:10:59 – Yeah, and that’s why historically we’ve seen
0:11:01 a bunch of the activity among advertising
0:11:03 from direct response advertisers
0:11:06 because they have a secondary metric of conversions
0:11:08 under promo codes and whatnot.
0:11:10 And what they’re able to find is that
0:11:12 the conversion rates are good.
0:11:13 But when it comes to something like a brand advertiser
0:11:16 or an advertiser that needs to lay an impression
0:11:19 on a consumer over a five, 10 year period
0:11:20 they need to know that they’re hitting
0:11:22 the people that they’re hitting.
0:11:23 There are a lot of movements right now
0:11:26 towards standardizing what even a listen means.
0:11:28 And this will become increasingly complicated
0:11:30 as Spotify and Pandora.
0:11:31 – Everywhere.
0:11:32 I mean, right now you don’t know if it’s a,
0:11:33 is it a download?
0:11:34 Is it a click?
0:11:35 Is it open?
0:11:36 Is it a fee?
0:11:37 I mean, who the fuck knows.
0:11:38 – Or like how long did you listen to it, right?
0:11:39 – Right, the engagement I care very,
0:11:41 so that’s actually what I care most about as a creator.
0:11:42 ‘Cause when I was at Wired,
0:11:44 Chartbeat changed me as an editor
0:11:47 and I need to know where people drop off.
0:11:48 That is a number one thing.
0:11:50 So I don’t know if you even know this, Nick.
0:11:52 We were in the launch set for when Spotify launched
0:11:55 their first move into podcasting in 2015.
0:11:58 They selected us as part of one of their media outlets
0:12:00 because our podcast was one of the very few
0:12:02 that covered tech in a thoughtful way.
0:12:05 And the reason I was so excited about Spotify,
0:12:07 because Spotify didn’t really have much
0:12:09 of a podcasting audience back then,
0:12:12 was they showed me this really beautiful dashboard
0:12:15 that showed you the potential and where people drop off.
0:12:18 – But you don’t get that from all the other places
0:12:19 our podcasts are distributed.
0:12:21 – It’s still limited because not all of our listeners
0:12:22 are listening on Spotify.
0:12:23 They’re on SoundCloud, they’re on iTunes.
0:12:24 They’re in a bunch of different apps.
0:12:25 And iTunes, by the way, also announced this,
0:12:27 I think, what last year, James Boggs,
0:12:30 announced that you can actually have drop off.
0:12:33 – Yeah, they rolled out a more granular
0:12:34 in episode analytics.
0:12:35 – Another thing I’d push back on though is like,
0:12:38 I don’t actually think advertisements
0:12:40 are the only way you can monetize podcasts.
0:12:41 – Yes, I agree wholeheartedly.
0:12:43 – I feel really, really strongly about that
0:12:46 because even as someone who consumes podcasts,
0:12:48 ads are extremely annoying to listen to.
0:12:51 And this is where I look at other business models
0:12:53 that are working in Asia for podcasts
0:12:56 that I think could very much translate here.
0:12:58 – Yeah, so a couple of points on that.
0:13:01 It’s a situation in which there are behaviors
0:13:05 in internet usage, in gaming, in media consumption,
0:13:10 in China, Japan, Korea, Australia, Malaysia, Singapore,
0:13:12 that doesn’t occur here,
0:13:14 maybe through a path dependency reasons,
0:13:17 maybe through sort of technical habituation reasons.
0:13:20 And yes, we’ve already seen like a really healthy growth
0:13:23 of the number of podcasts using Patreon as maybe not a primary,
0:13:26 but a strong supplementary business model.
0:13:28 Chatbot, ChatPos is an example of this.
0:13:30 There are a bunch of podcast collectives
0:13:32 that rely on Patreon for this.
0:13:35 And there’s also like Slate Plus being sort of a central model
0:13:38 to Slate as a digital media publisher
0:13:40 that also heavily indexes on podcasting.
0:13:43 But I think I’ve always found this lack of data conversation
0:13:47 a little interesting because whether or not advertisers
0:13:50 feel confident in the measurement
0:13:52 and what the data is sort of trying to reflect
0:13:55 in terms of reality, the world continues to spin
0:13:59 and people do end up converting as a promo code.
0:14:02 And so there is a strong sense that podcasting
0:14:05 is a very powerful driver of consumers
0:14:07 and it’s a powerful advertising driver,
0:14:09 even though we’re not able to tell specifically
0:14:11 how many people that gets hit
0:14:13 in terms of just the analytics of it.
0:14:16 And so there’s this fear among a lot of people
0:14:19 that the analytics side will end up driving
0:14:20 way too much of the conversation
0:14:24 and ends up dictating the behavior of creators and publishers
0:14:26 in a way that might end up being unhealthy
0:14:29 or counterintuitive to the relationship
0:14:31 between a listener and a creator.
0:14:33 – The problem with that I think is like,
0:14:36 yes, analytics may skew what kinds of content they put out
0:14:37 and how they engage with their audience.
0:14:41 But like really analytics is just a nicer way
0:14:45 of saying revenue because at the end of the day
0:14:46 your analytics are a reflection
0:14:48 of how many listeners you’re getting, right?
0:14:51 – I don’t agree actually completely.
0:14:53 I agree with you from a business perspective,
0:14:57 but as a creator the analytics tell me about community.
0:14:59 And one of my favorite talks on the early days
0:15:02 of resurgence of podcasting was Marco Arment gave a talk,
0:15:04 I was at XOXO in 2013.
0:15:08 And it was basically about the resurgence of podcasting,
0:15:13 the early signaling of that and podcasts as a movement.
0:15:14 Because what’s really unique for the first time
0:15:16 when you think about the first wave of podcasting
0:15:18 with all the indie bloggers,
0:15:20 we now have brands podcasting.
0:15:22 And sometimes they’re not actually looking
0:15:23 for direct revenue through that.
0:15:26 It’s a way to really connect intimately with your audience.
0:15:28 I mean, it’s essentially a movement
0:15:29 brought live in audio form.
0:15:31 – So I mean, there are types of content
0:15:34 where it’s not about monetization.
0:15:35 But for a lot of creators,
0:15:37 I do think revenue is one kind of proxy
0:15:39 for how much value they’re providing their listeners.
0:15:44 And I also think that we’re in such, such baby phases
0:15:47 of how podcasters should be able to monetize.
0:15:48 Like honestly, they shouldn’t be having
0:15:51 to ask their listeners to go to other sites
0:15:52 to pay them like a monthly fee.
0:15:54 – You can’t do it in app.
0:15:55 – I mean, this is where the platforms
0:15:57 are gonna start rolling out subscriptions.
0:16:00 I think some are gonna roll out like other ways
0:16:02 of paying for packages or bundles of content.
0:16:04 And I think that’s when you’re gonna see creators
0:16:08 really unleash like much better content
0:16:11 where they don’t have to focus on mainstream audiences,
0:16:13 but they might focus on smaller audiences
0:16:14 that are willing to pay for that.
0:16:15 – So actually, I’m like really fascinating
0:16:17 in terms of the concept of analytics
0:16:20 is being the sort of like proxy for revenue here.
0:16:22 It’s strange because I’ve always sort of viewed analytics
0:16:26 as a certain kind of representation of reality.
0:16:28 And it just so happens that advertisers
0:16:31 at this point in time are really reliant
0:16:34 on a certain expectation of a kind of analytics
0:16:36 in order to discern whether a media product
0:16:38 is effective in a way that they want it to be.
0:16:40 And there’s this larger conversation
0:16:43 about platforms in general, switching metrics
0:16:47 or tweaking metrics or in some cases ballooning them
0:16:49 in order to control and manage that narrative
0:16:51 and relationship with the advertiser.
0:16:52 – No, I completely agree.
0:16:55 Analytics matters for an advertising model.
0:16:57 But what I’m saying is like the advertising model
0:17:01 is actually not a good model to monetize podcasts.
0:17:03 – No, that we could be agree with.
0:17:08 But it’s a situation in which like it is the revenue
0:17:10 that a lot of people, a lot of publishers
0:17:11 and creators feel most comfortable with
0:17:14 because that’s all they know right now.
0:17:16 – I think it’s actually also a legacy.
0:17:17 This is where I think we need to think again,
0:17:19 very native and a new medium.
0:17:21 This is where we make, we do ourselves a huge disservice.
0:17:24 Like the early days of the web
0:17:27 when media outlets would put like a fricking,
0:17:29 you know, homepage analog on the website.
0:17:31 Right, exactly.
0:17:34 Like we need to think very natively in this medium.
0:17:36 And we have a huge opportunity for the first time
0:17:39 because we have such an intimacy, a slipperiness,
0:17:42 a connection with podcasting that’s visceral.
0:17:43 That’s, I mean, personally,
0:17:45 I think it’s unlike any other medium I’ve ever seen.
0:17:47 I feel like I found my voice on this medium quite honestly.
0:17:49 But so I do think that we have an opportunity here
0:17:51 because we’re so stuck on the legacy.
0:17:53 And in fact, this goes back to something we started with,
0:17:54 which is what is the definition of a podcast?
0:17:56 So I think the thing to revisit here
0:17:59 is that the underlying pipes and infrastructure.
0:18:00 And I know people don’t expect this
0:18:02 when we’re talking about an episode about podcasts.
0:18:03 But I think it’s really important
0:18:04 because it informs this conversation.
0:18:06 It is RSS feeds.
0:18:07 It is literally an ecosystem
0:18:09 of pipes that are connected by feeds,
0:18:11 talking to feeds, talking to feeds.
0:18:14 This is both a structural, huge limitation,
0:18:17 causing major fragmentation in the industry,
0:18:19 major limitations on what’s possible
0:18:22 with what creators can do to even connect the dots.
0:18:23 Because the unit of analysis is limit
0:18:26 to what you can actually send in a feed.
0:18:27 And that has certain trade-offs to it.
0:18:29 And this actually reminds me of container ships,
0:18:32 like physical, large shipping ships,
0:18:34 like Merck, et cetera, that you see in the ocean.
0:18:36 And one of the novel things about container ships
0:18:39 is about what they did to creating trade across the world.
0:18:41 And because they’re multimodal,
0:18:45 they go from airplane to ship to truck to yard.
0:18:47 They allowed so much collaboration
0:18:49 and connection around the world.
0:18:52 That’s what feeds are doing for the podcast ecosystem.
0:18:55 What’s missing, however, is just like a container ship.
0:18:57 Containers are rectangular boxes
0:19:00 that are very limited in what you can actually fit into them.
0:19:03 And people therefore need to fit the shape of their goods
0:19:05 to fit in those boxes.
0:19:07 And the entire ecosystem for physical container ships
0:19:10 is architected around being able to lift things out and in.
0:19:11 That is the same thing
0:19:13 that’s happening in podcasting right now.
0:19:15 The containers are connecting all of us
0:19:16 in this feed ecosystem,
0:19:19 but they’re also dictating what information
0:19:21 travels where and in what form.
0:19:22 And I just want to point this out,
0:19:23 no matter how wonky it seems,
0:19:25 because that structure both dictate so much
0:19:28 of what the current batch of tools can and can’t do
0:19:30 when it comes to analytics, to discovery,
0:19:31 and more, all across the board.
0:19:34 And it’s where platforms and tool builders
0:19:36 have a huge opportunity to cleverly address
0:19:39 or even bypass those containers
0:19:40 once we get past this phase
0:19:44 of where the podcasting industry is structurally right now.
0:19:46 – Yeah, I just think like we are in such
0:19:48 early, early, early innings of what podcasts can be.
0:19:50 Because if you think about it,
0:19:52 again, this is not using the technical definition
0:19:54 of a podcast, but using this cultural definition
0:19:57 of like audio recorded content, right?
0:19:59 Most of the time you’re consuming that kind of content
0:20:01 on an internet enabled device.
0:20:04 It’s not like you’re downloading it onto your computer
0:20:05 and then like using a USB stick
0:20:07 to transfer it to your phone, right?
0:20:11 And so therefore, like we are not monetizing this stuff
0:20:12 or even creating features on top of it
0:20:14 that are internet native.
0:20:16 There’s just so much stuff we’re not even tapping into.
0:20:19 And it’s such a shame because we’re consuming these things
0:20:20 on internet enabled devices.
0:20:22 And yet we’re using the same business model
0:20:24 as televisions.
0:20:25 – Where you can’t even do anything.
0:20:28 – Which is not meant to be interactive.
0:20:30 And there’s like right now very little interaction
0:20:32 with the podcast, which I think is such a shame.
0:20:35 – So I want to ask you guys kind of lightning round style
0:20:37 on a couple of neat things that are artifacts
0:20:39 of the existing world of content
0:20:41 and how we think they’re going to play out with podcasting.
0:20:42 So let’s just–
0:20:43 – And I think you should give your take too
0:20:45 ’cause you have more expertise on podcasts
0:20:46 than anyone in the software.
0:20:47 – Right, I forget to do that as a host sometimes.
0:20:48 – Okay.
0:20:50 – So I want to ask you guys about seasonality.
0:20:52 Like what do you guys think of this trend
0:20:54 of people dropping podcast seasons?
0:20:56 – So I love seasonality.
0:20:58 It gives, like it gives me a feeling of momentum
0:21:00 and also we’re currently living in a moment
0:21:02 where there’s all things happening all the time.
0:21:04 So many things to consume.
0:21:06 I would like things to have definite ends.
0:21:09 And I’m a big fan of seasonality personally.
0:21:11 – I think it also makes it easier for bundling
0:21:13 and different pricing down the line.
0:21:14 – Absolutely.
0:21:15 – Oh, fascinating.
0:21:16 So for me, seasonality is,
0:21:19 so when I think of the long tail of content
0:21:21 and Chris Anderson wrote the fundamental piece
0:21:24 and book on this, it’s this idea of an infinite shelf space.
0:21:26 And to me, things being in software and being digital,
0:21:30 it’s unbounded to the point of being pointlessly infinite.
0:21:33 And forcing a false scarcity is my favorite thing
0:21:36 that like box in a month companies do,
0:21:38 like stitch fix and makeup, whatever.
0:21:42 It’s a way of curating and creating a scarcity
0:21:43 in a world of abundance.
0:21:45 And I think that’s a really interesting packaging thing
0:21:47 for any kind of content across the board.
0:21:49 And especially for podcasting because there is no,
0:21:51 you’re essentially in an infinite scroll
0:21:52 in the audible world.
0:21:54 You don’t know where you are.
0:21:55 You have no context.
0:21:57 You’re not plugged into a specific thing
0:22:00 ’cause you’re living in this weird ecosystem of voice
0:22:02 and show or episode, depending on how you’re listening.
0:22:04 So that’s my quick take on seasonality.
0:22:05 – Love it.
0:22:05 – Okay.
0:22:08 So binge watching, this is related to seasonality.
0:22:09 One of the most fascinating things
0:22:14 about Netflix phenomenon in the space of visual content
0:22:16 is they realize like, wait a minute,
0:22:18 we don’t have to do weekly things.
0:22:20 We can drop everything at once,
0:22:22 not release it as a season that spreads out once a week
0:22:24 or whatever the pace is.
0:22:26 And allow binge watching.
0:22:27 – I think binge watching is great
0:22:30 and it’s natural human behavior for any kind of content.
0:22:32 I suffer from it myself.
0:22:33 Like I was the kind of person,
0:22:34 I would watch the series 24.
0:22:38 I would watch a season in like 30 hours.
0:22:38 – I did that too.
0:22:39 It’s stranger things and everything.
0:22:40 – Yeah, yeah.
0:22:42 And it’s just natural human behavior.
0:22:43 And so I think it’s great.
0:22:44 – That we wanna just be addicted
0:22:46 and go deep all at once and we can’t stop ourselves.
0:22:49 – And actually in terms of, for the creator,
0:22:49 I think it’s a good thing
0:22:52 because you don’t want that listener
0:22:53 to kind of forget about it.
0:22:54 – Yep.
0:22:55 – I binge watch all the time.
0:22:57 So I’m just gonna take “Devil’s Advocate”
0:23:00 that I only like believe about 80% of.
0:23:03 One is I actually think that binge watching
0:23:05 or binge dropping has actually caused attention
0:23:08 to a given show to deteriorate, right?
0:23:11 It used to be the case where when a TV show drops weekly,
0:23:13 there’s sort of a pulse of conversation
0:23:14 that is drawn out over a longer period of time
0:23:16 if that show has hit.
0:23:17 I thought about–
0:23:18 – You mean like the water cooler conversation?
0:23:19 – Absolutely.
0:23:21 Like true detective, game of thrones,
0:23:23 same thing, basically everything that HBO,
0:23:25 like that sort of structure of it,
0:23:27 I really like that water cooler conversation
0:23:29 and I like to be on the same sort of page
0:23:31 as other people when I’m having that conversation
0:23:34 and that’s something that I’ve never gotten with a binge show.
0:23:36 I loved “Russian Doll”.
0:23:38 I can’t find a single person to talk to about it
0:23:39 who falls in love at the same time
0:23:42 and I can guarantee in about a month
0:23:43 I’m gonna forget about that show.
0:23:45 To use a torture metaphor,
0:23:48 the thing about binge TV that I enjoy really doing
0:23:51 but I feel a little bit sick of doing afterwards,
0:23:53 it reminds me of that thing when parents say
0:23:54 that they do to certain kids
0:23:56 where if they catch that kid smoking one cigarette,
0:23:59 they make that kid smoke the entire pack of one cigarette.
0:24:02 That’s kind of how I feel after when I binge a season.
0:24:04 I feel like I don’t wanna watch TV for like a month.
0:24:05 – But it’s like inevitable.
0:24:08 I feel like this is a behavior you count.
0:24:09 – Well, there is a lot of,
0:24:10 so my whole thesis about this
0:24:12 which is similar to screen time and kids
0:24:13 ’cause people always have these stupid religious debates
0:24:15 over it, it’s not so much the act of doing it
0:24:17 or not doing it, it’s why you do it.
0:24:18 So if you’re someone who’s binge watching
0:24:20 ’cause you’re depressed, that’s not good.
0:24:21 But if you’re someone who’s binge watching
0:24:23 ’cause you just can’t stop watching the show, that’s great.
0:24:24 I will say to push back on your point, Nick,
0:24:26 ’cause I know you’re taking the devil’s advocate,
0:24:28 but I think that what you’re describing this problem
0:24:31 of the water cooler thing that Connie that you labeled,
0:24:33 it’s actually an artifact of technology,
0:24:36 not quite being there because there is a movement
0:24:39 of second screen technologies that are allowing more,
0:24:42 there’s forums online like Reddit that aggregate.
0:24:43 To give you a perfect example of this,
0:24:45 when I finished the Ubrati problem,
0:24:47 the first thing I did was go trawl the web
0:24:49 to find all the forums and all the people talking about it
0:24:51 so I could find my people and talk about it
0:24:53 and find other people who loved it.
0:24:55 And so there are tools that are emerging
0:24:58 that allow conversations to then to your point,
0:25:02 the water cooler to be aggregated asynchronously.
0:25:05 And there will be, I think, a second screen phenomenon
0:25:09 happening with pod listening and binge listening
0:25:11 as we start having the technology ecosystem grow.
0:25:15 – I can see how you don’t want to spoil the ending.
0:25:16 So you won’t actually go to that forum
0:25:17 until you finish your book.
0:25:18 – You’re absolutely right.
0:25:20 And actually, I like that you can have a choice
0:25:21 because in spoiler alert culture,
0:25:23 which Nick is slightly hinting that he misses,
0:25:24 at least on the devil advocate.
0:25:25 – I do.
0:25:27 – There is sort of like a thing
0:25:29 where you can actually choose to check out of things.
0:25:31 Luckily, so you’re not like stuck in a room
0:25:33 with everyone talking and then you are screwed
0:25:35 ’cause you missed like the closing season of Dallas
0:25:36 or whatever show it was.
0:25:38 The other point I want to make about binge listening
0:25:41 in this context is with binge watching,
0:25:43 new types of narratives are happening.
0:25:45 I’m very curious about what will happen
0:25:48 as we start seeing binge listening of podcast seasons
0:25:50 or podcast episodes to narrative
0:25:52 and how that’s gonna change that category of podcasts
0:25:56 where a serial change the way it tells stories
0:25:57 because people are binging it.
0:25:58 – Well, then it becomes an audio book.
0:25:59 – Oh, interesting.
0:26:00 Then it becomes an audio book.
0:26:01 Oh my God, I would have argued
0:26:02 to almost the opposite item in the spectrum
0:26:05 because it’s sort of going through a book very quickly.
0:26:06 But the flip side of it is
0:26:08 when I’m thinking the analog with binge watching
0:26:10 is that you can watch an entire season
0:26:13 and it changes the way you don’t have to have a cliffhanger
0:26:14 at the end of every episode.
0:26:15 Whereas even in a chapter,
0:26:17 people still have a little bit of these things.
0:26:18 – Right, narrative.
0:26:20 – I will say, I think serial would have made a lot more money
0:26:22 if it allowed people to pay.
0:26:26 I think on the margin, binge listening helps creators
0:26:28 because if you can make someone pay
0:26:29 for like a whole season at once
0:26:32 and maybe give them like one or two episodes for free,
0:26:33 it’s better than hoping
0:26:35 that they’re gonna come back every week, right?
0:26:37 – The serial example is actually really, really interesting.
0:26:40 Serial itself was an innovation of the form
0:26:42 because it stuck to what podcasting
0:26:44 was able to do at that time.
0:26:45 Prior to the existence of serial,
0:26:48 it was incredibly difficult to tell a serialized story
0:26:50 over the radio in the form that they did it.
0:26:52 And secondarily to that,
0:26:55 they told that story in real, in semi-real time.
0:26:56 And that’s something that they sort of looked
0:26:59 at the structure of what the distribution format was
0:27:00 and they go, we’re gonna try that out,
0:27:01 we’ll see what happens.
0:27:03 And so this is a little bit
0:27:06 of like them playing perfectly to the form there.
0:27:07 And I wanna sort of go back a little bit
0:27:10 to the point about like the second screen experience
0:27:13 and the sort of the death of the water cooler.
0:27:14 So I love second screen experiences.
0:27:17 I live for NBA Twitter, I live for Bachelor Twitter,
0:27:21 but I gotta say, I do like that experience
0:27:25 with physical people and that I miss hanging out
0:27:26 and watching TV with my friends sometimes
0:27:28 at the same pace, that’s all I got to say.
0:27:30 – I just think like ever since DVR arrived,
0:27:32 like we kind of lost it already.
0:27:34 – I think you guys are both being very falsely nostalgic
0:27:37 for a past that never was because I actually think,
0:27:40 I mean, yes, there’s a reality to be physically present.
0:27:43 But again, we’re in the early innings with all of this.
0:27:45 We’re investors in a company called Big Screen
0:27:48 where you can essentially share in this ambient intimacy,
0:27:51 like hang out in VR, like when there is a digital overlay
0:27:54 over the physical world, just like people connect on Twitter
0:27:57 for ambient intimacy, the cocktail party of the web,
0:27:59 there will be a physical like experience
0:28:01 that you have similar level of satisfaction
0:28:03 and hanging out in real time with your friends.
0:28:04 And it’s just an artifact of technology
0:28:05 that we’re not 100% there yet.
0:28:06 That’s what I would argue at least.
0:28:08 But back to the binge watching thing,
0:28:11 I was gonna add that when a season drops all at once,
0:28:12 I add it to my playlist, but I never watch it
0:28:14 because what’s also missing in this space,
0:28:16 and this is again why I love the idea of binge watching
0:28:20 slash listening for podcasting, is the concept of virality.
0:28:22 The viral hits don’t happen instantly
0:28:23 unless you’re like a Joe Rogan experience
0:28:25 and Elon Musk smoking pot on air.
0:28:27 Like it’s sort of a cult of personality show,
0:28:29 it’s slow burn type of virality.
0:28:30 And so seeing what people are talking about
0:28:34 and what resonates is hugely important for creators,
0:28:35 not because you freaking want to crowdsource
0:28:37 what you want to say, but you do want to know
0:28:38 it doesn’t go in a black hole.
0:28:40 – I would love a world where in the future
0:28:42 you’ll know which parts of the podcast
0:28:44 the audience like the most.
0:28:45 – My proxy for that, by the way,
0:28:47 is I do Twitter searches all the time for the commentary.
0:28:49 So it’s a very skewed sample, but it’s helpful.
0:28:52 And I push the editors to do this to close this loop,
0:28:53 even if they’re not active on Twitter,
0:28:56 because there was no other way to see what resonated.
0:28:59 – But can’t you see like a platform just like saying,
0:29:01 tap your screen if you like this part?
0:29:01 – Oh, totally.
0:29:02 Well, I don’t know if this is public.
0:29:03 Do you know this, Nick?
0:29:07 But is doing screen shot, audio shots of podcasting?
0:29:09 – Yeah, I love this, yeah.
0:29:10 – Is it public, do you know?
0:29:12 Okay, but there will be sort of podcasts,
0:29:14 sort of screen shotting and sort of audio clips.
0:29:17 And I’m curious to see with or without
0:29:18 the transcript, Connie, to your point
0:29:19 about the importance of that,
0:29:21 whether those will go viral.
0:29:23 – It’s crazy to me that these things
0:29:27 don’t have automatic transcription on the top hits.
0:29:29 Like that’s such an easy technical thing to do.
0:29:31 And for a listener, that would mean
0:29:33 that I don’t have to just pause and say like,
0:29:34 oh yes, remember, like go back
0:29:37 to the one minute 30 mark later on and take notes.
0:29:38 – Well, I actually love that too,
0:29:40 because one of the biggest limitations of podcasting
0:29:42 is the lack of a quote screenshot equivalent.
0:29:44 – But that exists in China already.
0:29:46 Not only can I see the transcript,
0:29:48 I can then comment on it and I can make it
0:29:50 so only my friends can see it
0:29:51 or I can make it so the entire public can see it.
0:29:52 And then there’s a discourse.
0:29:53 – That’s amazing.
0:29:54 Right now we have to manually upload transcripts.
0:29:56 – And you basically have redded conversations
0:29:58 around parts of your podcast.
0:30:00 And so it’s okay if the listener doesn’t even get to the end
0:30:01 ’cause you can have a highlight speed,
0:30:05 all kinds of stuff right now that we just are not doing.
0:30:07 And so I think this is like where the platforms
0:30:09 can get much better at creating.
0:30:12 Like even if they just chunked up the best clips, right?
0:30:13 Or maybe you as the creator,
0:30:15 you can like throw out which clips you think are the best.
0:30:19 Make it easy for them to repost on other social mediums
0:30:21 or make us like background music to whatever.
0:30:23 – You can do that actually now on some of these tools,
0:30:25 but to your point, it’s fragmented.
0:30:26 It’s not central on a single user experience.
0:30:28 – Fragmented and I think like the main platforms
0:30:29 don’t allow that, right?
0:30:33 – Currently no, Spotify and iTunes and others don’t.
0:30:35 In fact, this is again where the ecosystem is so fragmented
0:30:36 ’cause the side players are,
0:30:38 there’s a whole budding ecosystem of tools
0:30:39 that are doing this kind of thing.
0:30:41 – So again, like it goes back to like,
0:30:43 you know, like likes and comments and payments,
0:30:46 like on tips like that’s just like a form
0:30:48 of showing how much you like something.
0:30:51 Creators don’t know which pieces of their podcasts
0:30:52 were the best parts of the episode.
0:30:53 They don’t know where that ends for it.
0:30:54 – They don’t know any of it, it’s a black hole.
0:30:57 But on the metrics, I do wanna say that one of my favorite
0:30:59 analytics for podcast success,
0:31:01 ’cause I do think that we need to think about
0:31:03 what you’re measuring for, for the type of show you are.
0:31:06 And in our case, what I care about as editor for the show
0:31:09 is insights per minute.
0:31:10 And this is the same thing as insights per inch
0:31:14 in terms of like going down a verbal post.
0:31:16 Because when you have a brand collective
0:31:19 and not a cult of personality driven show,
0:31:21 this is again where the metrics for the type of show
0:31:23 need to vary as well in my view.
0:31:24 For our kind of show,
0:31:26 if you’re not like a famous personality,
0:31:28 then the insights per minute matter a lot
0:31:31 to get people to stick and stay.
0:31:34 And then secondly, when you think of audience discovery,
0:31:36 audience and movements of people and fans
0:31:39 aggregating around a piece of content,
0:31:44 then I care about if a show has say a drop off halfway,
0:31:45 as a drop off point,
0:31:48 if the first half are people who are mainstream interested
0:31:50 in learning about quantum computing,
0:31:52 and then they drop off 50%,
0:31:54 I consider that a huge metric of success.
0:31:56 And if the remaining 50% that stick around,
0:31:59 a much smaller subset of people who are developers
0:32:01 in quantum computing are interested in building
0:32:03 quantum computing are physicists,
0:32:05 then that’s a huge metric of success.
0:32:07 So for me, again, this is again another granular way
0:32:09 of thinking about the type of show,
0:32:11 the type of content, et cetera.
0:32:12 Now we can’t do any of this right now,
0:32:13 but as we introduce new storytelling
0:32:15 and forums and podcasting,
0:32:16 I think we’ll be thinking a lot more differently
0:32:18 than the obvious on those fronts too,
0:32:20 and about podcast engagement.
0:32:22 Which by the way, one quick factoid for you guys,
0:32:24 the number one thing I hear from all of the publisher network,
0:32:26 ’cause one of the things that I did when I came here
0:32:28 was reach out to various people to beg them
0:32:29 to put their authors on the podcast.
0:32:31 So before authors became,
0:32:33 like going on podcasts became the thing to do.
0:32:36 And yeah, there’s nothing that moves books
0:32:37 the way podcasts do.
0:32:40 I’ve heard this over and over and over again
0:32:42 from all of my publishing industry friends.
0:32:43 – I heard the exact same thing.
0:32:45 The way that the podcast experience
0:32:48 is currently constructed, it drives sales.
0:32:51 But the question is, is that when other platforms
0:32:53 or when the experience changes
0:32:57 due to technical innovations or new features added,
0:32:59 would it fundamentally change that relationship?
0:33:02 Will there be the same kind of sales push
0:33:04 that we experience right now?
0:33:05 I think it’s an open question.
0:33:07 – I think it’s a totally work.
0:33:09 I mean, like to me, it’s like the same way QVC
0:33:10 is a great way to sell stuff.
0:33:12 Like podcasts is a great way to sell content,
0:33:14 written content that people don’t want to read.
0:33:16 But I think this is a bigger problem
0:33:18 with the book publishing industry.
0:33:20 Meaning that they’re not selling books
0:33:21 in an internet native way.
0:33:24 There’s no great way to figure out the highlights of a book.
0:33:26 There’s no way for me to read the first chapter for free.
0:33:28 There’s no way for me to like get a sense of,
0:33:31 do I want to pay for this entire book?
0:33:33 – I do that all in a bookstore.
0:33:34 We’re just skimming though.
0:33:35 I mean like–
0:33:37 – In a physical bookstore, yes.
0:33:39 In a physical bookstore, you can do all these things,
0:33:41 but on Amazon, you still can’t.
0:33:42 – Right, this is another way where I think
0:33:44 we’re not thinking of the native medium
0:33:47 because it’s crazy to me that books,
0:33:49 which are self-contained with no context,
0:33:51 are still decoupled in audio book form.
0:33:53 And it’s equally crazy to me that podcasting
0:33:56 because of the structural limitation of the feed pipes
0:33:59 don’t actually have context built into them
0:34:00 where you can actually tie a podcast
0:34:02 into the context of a broader show,
0:34:04 more by this author, more on the topic,
0:34:06 to your point about PDFs and show notes
0:34:07 and related materials.
0:34:09 It’s crazy to me that there isn’t a web link ecosystem
0:34:10 for podcasting yet.
0:34:12 – Because none of this stuff is being sold
0:34:14 in an internet native way.
0:34:16 I just think like right now, the way we sell books,
0:34:18 it’s like if you had no movie trailer
0:34:21 and you only had the movie poster, right?
0:34:23 – It depends on the movie poster.
0:34:25 You’re like buying the book based off the cover
0:34:28 and maybe some quotes by people who’ve read it,
0:34:31 but you don’t get to even see the trailer.
0:34:34 And this totally actually skews the creator’s incentive
0:34:35 for what kind of content to create.
0:34:38 So like for a book, like are you gonna pay $20
0:34:40 for like a 20 page book?
0:34:42 Or will you feel better about paying $20
0:34:44 for like a 170 page book?
0:34:46 And then authors might have to write extra words
0:34:48 for the sake of selling a, you know–
0:34:50 – Well, that reminds me of the early days
0:34:52 of Charles Dickens where he was paid by the word
0:34:53 and that was like a funny artifact
0:34:55 of the way the monetization was happening.
0:34:57 But I would argue on the flip side of that,
0:34:59 on the creator side, I think it’s more important
0:35:01 to find your community because a beautiful thing about,
0:35:03 again, podcasts are movements.
0:35:05 Groups of people following either a show
0:35:08 or an episode or a topic, serial fans, whatever it is.
0:35:11 And so when you have thousand true fans
0:35:13 in the Kevin Kelly phrase that are following
0:35:16 a particular book author or a particular topic
0:35:19 or a particular podcast, in our case,
0:35:21 what we’re doing is we’re mobilizing the fan base,
0:35:22 not because of that author,
0:35:25 but because of the way that we do our take with that author.
0:35:27 Like it’s sort of the A6 and Z take on it.
0:35:29 So when we did Yuval Harari, it was me and Kyle
0:35:31 talking to him about all kinds of random stuff
0:35:33 that was probably not even related to his book.
0:35:35 The point is that it’s a way to mobilize your movement,
0:35:36 your fan base.
0:35:37 And this goes to Nick’s earlier point about Patreon
0:35:40 and fan bases or Mark Orman’s point
0:35:41 about brand as intimate connection.
0:35:44 – So my theory on this whole,
0:35:46 this sort of notion of like what people will pay for it,
0:35:48 people will pay as much for a thing
0:35:51 based on how valuable they think the thing is.
0:35:53 And so it’s equally plausible that a person looks
0:35:56 at a 20-page book and thinks it’s worth $20
0:35:58 as it is that a person looks at a 170-page book
0:36:00 and thinks that they will pay $20 for that.
0:36:02 It really depends on how that person
0:36:05 or how it’s messaged to this consumer what value is, right?
0:36:08 And so this ties back a little bit to the notion
0:36:10 of advertisers and analytics.
0:36:12 Analytics, as constructed by a technology company,
0:36:14 by a platform, by a data team,
0:36:16 is an effort to tell the advertiser
0:36:19 this is how valuable you should think this is.
0:36:20 And in the art world,
0:36:23 value is constructed in a whole different amorphous way.
0:36:26 And so I think it’s not a one-to-one objectivity
0:36:27 of what is the right metric
0:36:30 or how do we find the truth of the value of a certain thing.
0:36:32 These are socially constructed things.
0:36:35 And so I think that should be a consideration
0:36:36 when it comes to when we think about it,
0:36:37 even the book publishing industry.
0:36:39 I should argue that celebrity books
0:36:40 should be priced a lot higher than it is,
0:36:42 but that’s just me.
0:36:44 – Books is just one example, though.
0:36:46 Like if you think about like a YouTube video,
0:36:49 like the creator is incented to make it long enough
0:36:50 so you don’t put just what pre-roll ad,
0:36:52 but also put like another ad in the middle,
0:36:54 which means the video has to be long enough
0:36:57 to have enough gap time between the ads, right?
0:36:59 – Really, because the most popular videos on YouTube
0:37:01 that do really well are the short, quick takes,
0:37:03 or tutorials, or like in those cases,
0:37:05 it’s another example of,
0:37:05 I mean, I think that’s the reason why
0:37:07 tutorial culture is taken off
0:37:08 because people are self-selected
0:37:09 into like learning about X, Y, or Z.
0:37:12 – But like some creators will lengthen their videos
0:37:14 so they can put in a second ad.
0:37:17 – Yeah, I think those to me are the more old-school creators
0:37:19 that are doing that to monetize in that way.
0:37:21 They’re not the ones who are the influencer creators
0:37:23 because the influencer creators have their eye
0:37:24 in a much bigger ballgame.
0:37:27 They’re looking at moving their own freaking makeup lines.
0:37:29 Or like, you know what I mean?
0:37:30 Or like other things, but yes,
0:37:33 that is sort of like the early phase of every platform
0:37:36 and medium is that you have a quick way
0:37:38 to kind of game it to get what you need.
0:37:41 But I don’t know if that works for the long-lasting players.
0:37:44 – YouTube in that situation is the arbiter of like
0:37:47 how, of the data that tells advertisers what to value,
0:37:49 but it’s also the arbiter of the data that tells creators
0:37:52 how to value the way that they’re creating something.
0:37:54 It also becomes a situation where YouTube
0:37:57 is the thing that interprets human behavior
0:38:00 and makes assumptions based on those interpretations
0:38:01 as to what people are valuing.
0:38:04 And so this is like YouTube sort of defining that reality
0:38:06 and pulling levers in a bunch of different ways.
0:38:10 And they may be correct, they may not be correct.
0:38:12 In any case, it’s all a proxy of reality
0:38:13 that may or may not be aligned.
0:38:14 We don’t know necessarily.
0:38:14 – I agree.
0:38:16 I agree it’s socially constructed and value is created
0:38:19 and a lot of it is limited by the tools people have
0:38:21 for thinking about pricing and they have heuristics
0:38:22 for doing that based on those directors.
0:38:24 I would also say that there’s a really interesting
0:38:25 opportunity, especially with podcasts,
0:38:28 to flip the model where fans get paid.
0:38:31 And in fact, Kevin Kelly made this really interesting
0:38:33 argument in his book, Inevitable,
0:38:34 about how when you swap your paradigm
0:38:39 for thinking about attention in an abundant software world,
0:38:40 which is what we’re talking about here,
0:38:42 abundant digital world bits are infinite.
0:38:44 There’s no limit on airwaves in this context.
0:38:47 You can actually flip the model where fans
0:38:48 can monetize their attention.
0:38:50 So you actually reorient,
0:38:52 and this is actually the premise of crypto, right?
0:38:53 Or one of the premises of crypto,
0:38:54 at least in the notion of crypto networks,
0:38:58 where right now the locus of data controls the platforms.
0:38:59 With crypto, you can actually invert that
0:39:02 where you are the user is a container of the data.
0:39:03 So if you think about this in the context
0:39:06 of media creation and podcasting,
0:39:08 how interesting to think about a fan monetizing
0:39:09 their attention because if a fan is a sum
0:39:11 of all the shows they watch,
0:39:13 maybe an advertiser wants to buy that fan
0:39:14 and the fan directly monetizes.
0:39:15 That’s that attention.
0:39:16 I know that sounds crazy,
0:39:18 but I don’t think that’s impossible in a world like this.
0:39:19 You guys are looking me like that.
0:39:21 – I just think if platforms can do that,
0:39:24 like there’s all the stuff they need to experiment with
0:39:26 before they even can get to something like that.
0:39:26 – Yeah, yeah.
0:39:28 That is if you believe it has to go stepwise
0:39:29 ’cause sometimes technologies can leap.
0:39:30 I agree with you.
0:39:31 I think it’ll be in the middle.
0:39:33 – I’m like, if we can’t even get subscriptions or tips up.
0:39:35 – We can’t even get downloads for fuck’s sake.
0:39:36 – All right, I’m gonna do another quick,
0:39:38 I wanna hear your quick lightning round take
0:39:39 on interstitials and podcasting.
0:39:40 Any thoughts on that?
0:39:42 The idea of like, you know, title slides or breaks
0:39:44 or segmentation, et cetera.
0:39:46 – I’m pro interstitials.
0:39:48 Like, you know, it’s really important
0:39:51 to orient your audience to teach them
0:39:52 how to listen to a thing.
0:39:53 It’s an important creative tool.
0:39:55 That’s a my view on it.
0:39:57 – Connie, I feel like you have a lot of thoughts on this
0:39:59 ’cause it feels so China native what people do and–
0:40:00 – Describe more what you mean by interstitials.
0:40:01 – I mean, more just like,
0:40:03 it’s kind of to your point about there being granularity.
0:40:06 Like you can actually break up a show into sub parts
0:40:07 by having little breaks or–
0:40:09 – I think interstitials is great because again,
0:40:12 it allows me to show you which parts of your episode
0:40:14 I value the most and which ones I’m willing to pay for.
0:40:15 – Yeah, for me, I will say that’s,
0:40:18 we tried some early experiments with segmentation
0:40:20 because I got this funny feedback from people
0:40:23 that they’re like, I listen to the podcast on the road
0:40:24 and my commute’s 10 minutes.
0:40:26 I wish they were 10 minutes long.
0:40:27 And then someone else was like, my commute’s 20 minutes.
0:40:28 I wish you were 20 minutes long.
0:40:30 And then someone else was like, my commute’s 30 minutes
0:40:32 or 40 minutes and they have this ideal time.
0:40:35 For us, at least 30 minutes has been a sweet spot
0:40:37 in terms of like the ideal podcast size.
0:40:38 But I don’t think there’s a rule of thumb
0:40:41 because some of our most popular episodes are an hour.
0:40:43 And also 20 minutes so I don’t know.
0:40:45 But I did because of that.
0:40:47 I wanted kids on campuses like at Stanford or wherever
0:40:49 to have a way of listening to an episode
0:40:51 and kind of have like a nice natural stop-off point
0:40:53 ’cause when you’re watching a show,
0:40:54 the ability to kind of pause.
0:40:56 So to me, interstitials are a way of creating
0:40:58 a little bit of those moments and breaks.
0:40:59 But then what I realized is that
0:41:01 as an artifact of this industry,
0:41:03 all the tools save your spot
0:41:05 in where you were playing last in your player.
0:41:07 Yeah, and so it kind of became a moot point.
0:41:09 So that experiment didn’t really work.
0:41:11 But the driver for it is this thesis
0:41:15 that Dixon says the internet’s made for snacking.
0:41:17 And podcasts can be beautifully long form,
0:41:19 but I also think that there’s a consumption mode
0:41:21 and very short micro-awaiting moments
0:41:24 to use a term from a park paper on this concept
0:41:25 that when you’re waiting in line,
0:41:27 can you listen to a quick bite of content?
0:41:29 Not just watch something on your thing,
0:41:31 not just listen to it.
0:41:32 Super interesting.
0:41:35 Yeah, and I wonder if we can fill micro-awaiting moments.
0:41:36 And so I wonder if interstitials
0:41:37 would play an interesting role
0:41:38 as a micro-awaiting moment.
0:41:40 To do that, I feel like you need really good discovery.
0:41:42 Oh yeah, because the likelihood of me
0:41:44 finding something, like hitting something
0:41:47 that I don’t like causes this fear in the listener.
0:41:48 Of course, unless you are then,
0:41:50 which currently is a model,
0:41:52 following a show or a personality.
0:41:54 You just have to have so much trust
0:41:56 that it’s gonna spin up the right thing.
0:41:57 Because right, ’cause in the cult of personality model,
0:41:58 people are following the person,
0:42:00 not necessarily the guests.
0:42:02 I’ll just say that the notion of short form audio
0:42:04 is one that’s constantly talked about.
0:42:06 It’s also, this is another reminder,
0:42:09 like what anchor essentially attempted to do
0:42:10 at the very beginning of the journey
0:42:12 and what audio tried to do.
0:42:16 And it’s one of those things where it didn’t,
0:42:17 both for those iterations, didn’t quite work.
0:42:20 We don’t know if it has anything to do with what people want
0:42:23 or if it’s the case that people were not ready for that yet.
0:42:24 I would argue the last one,
0:42:26 because we have seen over and over with technology,
0:42:28 there’s like five Facebooks
0:42:29 before there’s a Facebook that works.
0:42:31 I subscribe to the view of the world
0:42:33 in which human beings are generally plastic.
0:42:35 And so you could force a human being
0:42:36 to accept just about anything.
0:42:39 And so it’s a question of whether they are,
0:42:42 whether the right startup or the right platform
0:42:43 executes the right experiment
0:42:45 at the right time with the right group of people.
0:42:45 That’s just kind of how these things work.
0:42:48 – Yeah, human beings are creators of emergent behaviors
0:42:49 because this is where you can never predict
0:42:51 the second order effects of new mediums, right?
0:42:53 Like Twitter spawned all kinds of interesting
0:42:55 emergent behaviors and that is the fundamental truth
0:42:57 of the evolution of all kinds of technologies.
0:42:58 – But it’s all technically,
0:43:01 I mean, this is not like cutting edge science
0:43:03 or technology that doesn’t exist yet.
0:43:06 It’s just a platform hasn’t put all of these things in place.
0:43:10 But the fact of the matter is that stuff like social audio,
0:43:14 stuff like Anchor’s initial bit to be the Twitter of audio,
0:43:17 the stuff like audio, which is what Twitter was
0:43:18 before Twitter became Twitter,
0:43:20 which is essentially for audio,
0:43:25 is that we need proof that the consumer side
0:43:28 will lead the way that it will stick with them.
0:43:29 – But I think that’s the problem, right?
0:43:31 If we’re waiting to have like survey data
0:43:32 to see if this works,
0:43:34 then no platform is gonna experiment on it.
0:43:38 And this is why like new startups and new platforms
0:43:40 need to experiment with how to engage with podcasts.
0:43:43 I think it’s like a given that everyone would prefer
0:43:45 to have no ads in their podcasts.
0:43:48 And that’s why it’s up to all the platforms
0:43:50 to figure out how to create the tools
0:43:52 so creators can still make money
0:43:54 and make better money than I think what they’re making now.
0:43:57 I actually think creators are vastly underpaid in podcasts
0:43:59 and it’s up to the platforms to figure out
0:44:00 how to help them monetize
0:44:03 so we can get ads out of the podcast itself.
0:44:05 – I don’t think we’re disagreeing.
0:44:06 I think we’re sort of like coming at it
0:44:07 from opposite directions here
0:44:08 because my number one principle
0:44:09 when I’m thinking through these things
0:44:11 is that no matter what happens
0:44:13 in terms of feature development,
0:44:14 and no matter what happens to those
0:44:16 of whether certain platforms or tools
0:44:18 ends up innovating on these fronts
0:44:20 is whether creators themselves end up controlling
0:44:21 their destinies in this situation
0:44:24 and whether they control the means of distribution.
0:44:26 Like the entire wave,
0:44:28 the entire learnings of what happened of YouTube
0:44:30 and YouTube creators really haunts a lot of the people
0:44:33 that I speak to when I report week in week out.
0:44:36 That is the nature of the platform being capricious
0:44:38 and altering the way that they expect
0:44:40 their certain revenue projections over time.
0:44:44 And so I’m personally all for the ability
0:44:46 to create better tipping structures
0:44:50 to streamline Patreon and direct revenue sort of pathways
0:44:52 straight into the listening point.
0:44:55 But the fact of the matter is that all these pieces
0:44:58 connecting the listener to the creator
0:45:00 are all gonna be controlled by other people.
0:45:02 And I think this is the nature of things
0:45:06 that brings the most anxiety to the creator class right now.
0:45:07 Of course, the creator class would change over time
0:45:10 with changing expectations of how these things should work.
0:45:11 – Connie, I’m hearing you say
0:45:12 that there’s huge experimentation
0:45:14 that’s already happening in China
0:45:16 that we’re not even remotely seeing here.
0:45:18 That is also a case, however, where we have platforms
0:45:21 because to the point of tipping as an example,
0:45:23 Nick also mentioned Patreon is a good thing,
0:45:26 but clearly one of the big structural limitations in the US
0:45:28 is that people don’t obviously always
0:45:30 have their credit cards linked
0:45:31 and the way that you have in WeChat
0:45:33 or like that we’ve talked a lot about on the podcast.
0:45:34 – But like Apple Pay, right?
0:45:36 Or like in app payments.
0:45:37 – Right.
0:45:39 – Like people oftentimes will say like,
0:45:40 oh, our payment infrastructure
0:45:41 is why none of this stuff would work in the US.
0:45:42 – But you’re saying that’s not true.
0:45:43 – And I don’t agree with that.
0:45:44 – You’re saying that’s a cop out.
0:45:45 Okay, that’s fair.
0:45:47 So then maybe tipping needs to be done
0:45:47 at a more micro level.
0:45:49 – It’s not even just the money.
0:45:54 It’s also helping creators see who their real fans are.
0:45:56 – You want the 1,000 true fans.
0:45:58 – And right now it’s like a one-way conversation.
0:45:59 Like why can’t the platforms
0:46:01 that allow you to listen to podcasts
0:46:04 also allow me to record a quick message back to you.
0:46:06 And then also like use algorithms
0:46:08 to figure out which comments are valuable or not.
0:46:10 – Yeah, I think we agree in that sense.
0:46:11 Like platforms should basically do more
0:46:12 for their users and experiment.
0:46:14 I also agree with Nick though
0:46:16 on the point that he’s raising.
0:46:18 I don’t like the assumption going right to platforms
0:46:20 as the default owners of this
0:46:22 and the default aggregators of this.
0:46:24 And this kind of goes to Ben Thompson
0:46:26 who writes about aggregation theory a lot,
0:46:28 which is just a fancy name for network effects
0:46:29 in a lot of ways.
0:46:30 I mean, he’s very much more nuanced,
0:46:31 but it is at the end of the day,
0:46:33 the tension between centralization,
0:46:35 between bundling and unbundling,
0:46:37 and these cycles that constantly go back and forth
0:46:38 and waves.
0:46:40 – Yeah, especially with the YouTube platform.
0:46:42 Like you look at how the influencers
0:46:44 who started YouTube channels 10 years ago,
0:46:46 they have massive followings now.
0:46:48 – Yeah, and they’re dependent on YouTube,
0:46:48 which is Nick’s point.
0:46:50 – Yes, but also it makes it really hard
0:46:53 for a newcomer to come in and create a YouTube channel
0:46:55 and get to that one million subscriber count, right?
0:46:57 And in the similar way, like even now,
0:46:59 I hear about so many friends even starting podcasts.
0:47:02 – Oh yeah, it’s very competitive.
0:47:04 Like there are people who barely get
0:47:07 to 10,000 listens per episode and that’s insane.
0:47:09 – And it can get more competitive, right?
0:47:10 – Yes, very crowded.
0:47:12 – And so that’s why I think all these new platforms
0:47:14 are kind of interesting because as they try
0:47:16 and pick off creators to have them exclusive
0:47:19 to their platform, this dynamic may change.
0:47:20 But it’s really interesting ’cause like for video,
0:47:22 it was like winner-take-all.
0:47:23 – Which is not true in podcasting.
0:47:25 So I’m curious then for your guys’ take,
0:47:27 because back to the point of centralization
0:47:29 is to give people a better user experience
0:47:33 and choice and variety and ease of use.
0:47:36 What do we think about the moves of Spotify
0:47:39 and Apple in this space, especially given Spotify’s news
0:47:41 a few weeks ago of acquiring Gimlet?
0:47:43 – So I think the necessary background here
0:47:45 is that for the longest time,
0:47:47 Apple has been a primary distributor of podcasting.
0:47:51 It used to be somewhere upwards of like 80%.
0:47:55 We believe it’s now somewhere between like 60 to 75 maybe.
0:47:58 But with today’s infinite dial, so studies,
0:48:01 it suggests that Spotify has grown their particular share,
0:48:04 but we’re nowhere seeing like 50/50 parity or something.
0:48:06 We’re just not seeing that just yet.
0:48:09 And so Spotify, the business case for Spotify
0:48:12 going to podcasting or spoken audio at large
0:48:13 is pulling their business model away
0:48:16 for being completely tethered to the dynamics
0:48:18 of the music industry.
0:48:20 Which is to say a music industry that’s very,
0:48:22 that’s been very costly for them to play in
0:48:25 and it’s been very costly for a lot of music platforms
0:48:29 to try to come in and take over essentially distribution power
0:48:30 from the music labels.
0:48:33 And so Spotify looked in the situation and go,
0:48:36 we see a category of content here
0:48:39 that is significantly cheaper, that is still unwieldy
0:48:40 and it’s still untamed.
0:48:42 And we can try to figure out our place in that world
0:48:45 and sort of push us off the narrative
0:48:46 of just being a music company
0:48:48 and giving ourselves other avenues of growth.
0:48:50 – And that impacts like the company’s branding
0:48:51 and positioning, right?
0:48:53 It’s no longer seen as just a music company
0:48:56 but like an audio destination for all kinds of audio.
0:48:57 – Absolutely.
0:49:00 – And in that same way that Spotify was also known
0:49:02 for helping you discover stuff you like.
0:49:04 I think this is also a reflection they’re realizing
0:49:06 like podcasting has gotten so large
0:49:08 in terms of how many new creators are jumping in.
0:49:12 – Can you guys address the exclusive shows angle?
0:49:14 – I actually see both models working really well.
0:49:16 I think if you have a platform
0:49:18 where anyone can submit a podcast, that can be great.
0:49:19 You can have long tail creators.
0:49:21 But I also think a podcast that says,
0:49:24 “Hey, I’m going to curate the top two, 300 podcasts,”
0:49:25 can also work really well too.
0:49:27 Both have great monetization potential
0:49:30 if they want to be niche or just long tail.
0:49:31 – Yeah.
0:49:34 And so, I mean, we have a couple of situations
0:49:36 that’s probably, that’s pretty interesting right now.
0:49:39 So there’s been a paid podcasting attempt
0:49:41 for quite some time called Stitcher Premium.
0:49:42 It’s a sort of exclusive layer
0:49:46 on top of a fairly popular third party podcast
0:49:48 I have called Stitcher, which is part of Mintroll.
0:49:49 And earlier this week,
0:49:51 I saw the formal announcement of a company called Luminary
0:49:53 that’s attempting to be,
0:49:57 they literally use the tagline sort of Netflix for podcasts,
0:49:58 which is going to be difficult
0:50:00 because the primary challenge there
0:50:03 is that they’re trying to build a catalog of things
0:50:06 that you could argue has free alternatives
0:50:07 almost everywhere else.
0:50:11 But I have made this argument a couple of times before
0:50:13 and I don’t think it’s stuck yet,
0:50:15 but I think we should be looking at Headspace
0:50:17 as a really interesting comp here.
0:50:18 – What do you mean by that?
0:50:21 – So Headspace essentially is an on-demand audio app
0:50:23 that performs a very specific function
0:50:25 that provides a very specific genre
0:50:27 of on-demand audio content.
0:50:30 It fits into one’s life in a very, very specific way.
0:50:32 You know exactly what you’re paying for it
0:50:35 and you can’t find quality alternatives elsewhere
0:50:37 of that platform generally speaking.
0:50:40 And so we’re in a situation where we,
0:50:45 there is some lane here to build a paid podcasting platform.
0:50:46 The question is like,
0:50:48 will there be a really, really big one
0:50:50 or will it be a series of smaller ones
0:50:52 that ends up being bundled over the long run?
0:50:53 And I think we are at the very beginning
0:50:55 of beginning to answer that question.
0:50:56 – Yeah, I agree.
0:50:59 I would also say it does work for people in the know
0:51:00 in terms of the history of podcasting
0:51:02 in the recent past five years.
0:51:05 I think I’ve seen versions of Netflix for podcasts
0:51:06 and one of them I remember,
0:51:09 I don’t even know if you remember this, Nick, is 60DB.
0:51:11 – I do, acquired by Google.
0:51:12 – Right, they got acquired by Google
0:51:14 and I don’t know what Google’s doing inside.
0:51:16 But the problem is like, it’s still a subscription, right?
0:51:17 – Why is that a problem?
0:51:18 I would love a subscription service.
0:51:21 – But I think I would rather pay for a specific podcast.
0:51:23 – Oh my God, yes!
0:51:25 So my number one complaint.
0:51:27 So everyone at A6 has either heard my whole thesis
0:51:29 on this a million times, which is first of all,
0:51:32 podcasting is such a homogenous word.
0:51:35 We’ve defined it technically and in user experience,
0:51:38 but when I think of the content side of podcasting,
0:51:41 I like to split it into a simple taxonomy
0:51:42 of three types of shows.
0:51:43 There are personality based,
0:51:46 what I call cultur personality based shows.
0:51:48 You know, like the Azure Klein show, the Tim Ferriss show,
0:51:49 and my God, by the way,
0:51:51 most of them are named after male names.
0:51:53 Let’s just go off on that one.
0:51:56 Then the next category besides cultur personality shows
0:51:58 is what I call like more collectives
0:52:00 or like brands or voices of groups of people,
0:52:02 which is what I would consider the A6 and Z podcast.
0:52:05 And then the third show is a much more produced serialized
0:52:07 like serial or narrative type of podcasting show.
0:52:09 That’s a very loose broad taxonomy.
0:52:11 But if you think of these three categories,
0:52:13 discovery for each of them,
0:52:15 it is so frustrating to me,
0:52:17 again, going back to this containerization model,
0:52:20 that discovery is limited at a show level.
0:52:22 Again, structurally, it’s terrible.
0:52:23 I keep bringing up structure
0:52:25 because while everyone is so caught up
0:52:27 in talking about discovery and monetization,
0:52:29 they’re missing the big opportunity here,
0:52:29 the bigger thing,
0:52:32 which is defining a new unit of analysis
0:52:34 of episodes versus shows
0:52:36 and possibly even more granular units within that.
0:52:37 I hate that we’re still stuck
0:52:39 in the legacy ways of thinking about this.
0:52:41 When we can bypass things with software,
0:52:43 we don’t have to have the CD stage first
0:52:45 to get to the individual song stage.
0:52:47 And I also talk to analytics people all the time
0:52:49 about how feeds limit what tools
0:52:51 outside the big platforms can do,
0:52:53 like not being able to tag podcasts by topic.
0:52:55 Because I believe we all need the ability
0:52:58 to find episodes, not entire shows.
0:52:59 I like Berks and Birdwatching.
0:53:01 I should be able to find any episodes on those topics
0:53:02 regardless of show.
0:53:05 Connie, you like real estate and crafts.
0:53:07 You should be able to fucking find those topics
0:53:09 and discover every single episode on those.
0:53:11 But see, this is where a transcription and tagging
0:53:14 and just a much smarter internet native way
0:53:19 of displaying podcasts makes all of that automatic.
0:53:21 There is no technical reason
0:53:24 why we cannot automatically transcribe all the top podcasts.
0:53:27 And again, I think subscription for an entire platform
0:53:29 doesn’t necessarily make sense for podcasts.
0:53:31 Like maybe it’s a good starting point.
0:53:31 – It makes sense.
0:53:33 – It’s a decent starting point.
0:53:35 But hey, maybe you’re a podcaster
0:53:37 and you’re only gonna create a couple episodes,
0:53:39 but it’s really, really good content.
0:53:41 Like why can’t you let people pay for that?
0:53:42 And again, I think it’s not just about
0:53:44 the money that’s getting transferred.
0:53:46 The problem right now is like,
0:53:48 there’s certain podcasts that I would happily pay for
0:53:50 and a bunch that I would not pay for.
0:53:51 – Yeah, exactly.
0:53:53 – And right now these platforms don’t give you that option
0:53:56 to say, hey, these are the ones that I ascribe more value to,
0:53:58 much less even to say I like this one or a comment
0:53:59 or anything.
0:54:01 – I mean, right, well, you’re also looting at the,
0:54:02 when you talk about the transcription of shows though,
0:54:05 is like, and this is obviously another key point of discovery
0:54:07 is it goes again parallel to the web.
0:54:08 There was a curated links phase
0:54:10 that preceded the portal phase
0:54:11 that preceded the search phase.
0:54:12 – Give it a couple of months
0:54:13 ’cause Google is working on that
0:54:16 and they are beginning to beta test all of that
0:54:17 in terms of transcriptions,
0:54:19 in terms of whether a podcast shows that
0:54:22 or audio at large shows up in the search engines.
0:54:25 – But they’re not even gonna have all the podcasts, right?
0:54:26 The exclusive podcast on Luminary,
0:54:28 Google’s not gonna have.
0:54:29 – Well, then that’s Luminary’s problem
0:54:31 at the end of the day.
0:54:34 Like, I think Google’s situation is
0:54:36 that they’re gonna pull in the RSS feeds
0:54:39 or they’re gonna pull in podcasts
0:54:42 that exist on the open sort of ecosystem
0:54:43 and they’re gonna transcribe it
0:54:45 and they’re gonna index it within the search engine.
0:54:45 – I guess what I’m saying, like,
0:54:49 rather than rely on Google as the search engine to do it,
0:54:52 at least very basic transcription and search,
0:54:55 all the platforms should be able to do it themselves.
0:54:57 And like, imagine all the other stuff
0:54:57 you’d like to talk on to it.
0:54:59 Like, hey, maybe in addition to the podcast
0:55:02 on podcast today, you have like five links
0:55:04 that the listener can go in and click on.
0:55:05 – Click while you’re playing.
0:55:08 I would love the ability to embed a link natively
0:55:10 instead of in the show notes.
0:55:12 – Or a PDF that you can then charge more money for, right?
0:55:13 Like, hey, to read more.
0:55:16 Or maybe like all the like parts that you cut out.
0:55:18 Like those special clips.
0:55:22 Maybe someone pays like a dollar to untap it, right?
0:55:25 – I agree, I would love to pay for stuff
0:55:27 that I want, but it’s a situation.
0:55:29 I mean, look, I’m just a normal person
0:55:31 that has like normal finances.
0:55:32 I don’t think I’m going to spend
0:55:35 more than X amount of money per month on entertainment goods.
0:55:37 – I agree that people aren’t going to spend
0:55:40 like tons and tons of money on podcasts.
0:55:43 But I think the better creators would get more rewarded
0:55:45 for their content, which means new creators
0:55:49 that don’t have, you know, crazy followings to begin with
0:55:50 can still get paid.
0:55:51 – No, I agree.
0:55:54 But the question is like, I’ve heard the line of argument
0:55:57 that it’s really hard to become a Patreon supporter
0:56:00 or find a way to give you money to a creator
0:56:01 that you really support.
0:56:04 And I do wonder the nature of that assumption.
0:56:06 There’s only so much frictionless,
0:56:08 so much attacking off the friction
0:56:10 that we can introduce to that layer
0:56:13 that we find what the maximum most efficient point of,
0:56:16 you know, listener supporting creators ends up becoming.
0:56:19 – Okay, but that is assuming that I want to support
0:56:21 that specific creator.
0:56:24 Maybe I only want a tip for that specific episode.
0:56:26 Maybe I don’t actually want to give the tip to Sonal,
0:56:29 but I want to give it to Connie and Nick, right?
0:56:30 – That’s fucked up, but okay.
0:56:31 – I mean, like, no, seriously,
0:56:35 like the way that we are thinking about paying,
0:56:37 it’s not necessarily the same person
0:56:40 who’s speaking even on every podcast.
0:56:44 And the fact that we aren’t able to more directly indicate
0:56:46 and tie our money to the products
0:56:48 that we truly, truly value,
0:56:50 I just think that’s really lost opportunity.
0:56:52 – Well, so let me push back on that a little bit, right?
0:56:57 So the assumption here is that the show is made up of,
0:57:00 that this show is made up of you, me,
0:57:03 and, you know, and let’s say a producer,
0:57:06 and let’s say, you know, a couple of people behind the scenes.
0:57:10 But I think the reality is that most of the production
0:57:13 structures constitutes a lot more people
0:57:15 than the listener can ordinarily see.
0:57:18 So what a listener, who a listener is moved to tip,
0:57:19 doesn’t necessarily translate
0:57:21 to who’s actually creating the content,
0:57:23 because that’s a, there’s an entire,
0:57:24 there’s an entire sort of conversation over here
0:57:27 in terms of like, how listeners value the creators,
0:57:29 how they sort of make assumptions
0:57:30 about what they want to support,
0:57:32 how they want to support, why they want to support.
0:57:34 There’s a, there’s a huge, there’s a sort of,
0:57:36 there’s a, there are a lot of gaps in information there
0:57:39 to give all that power to listeners, I think.
0:57:42 There still should be some middle point there
0:57:43 in terms of how support works.
0:57:45 – I’m not saying it can’t go to a show,
0:57:48 but a show is, even then supporting a show
0:57:50 is different than supporting a person.
0:57:51 – I’m hearing both of you guys.
0:57:53 I also hear that there is a lot more granularity you can do
0:57:55 because we have an infinite web.
0:57:57 And the fact that we define things as containers
0:58:01 of a feed or a podcast or a show or an episode,
0:58:03 these are all things we can redefine in this new era.
0:58:05 And I agree it’s very early innings.
0:58:07 I also agree so wholeheartedly
0:58:10 that a thriving content ecosystem
0:58:12 has to support its creators.
0:58:13 And I know you’re arguing for that too,
0:58:14 ’cause you’re arguing in this framework
0:58:16 that people have more comments,
0:58:18 they have more ability to interact with their top fans.
0:58:20 You’re saying the same thing from a different angle,
0:58:23 but from a pure business perspective
0:58:25 in terms of being able to run a business
0:58:26 that is based on podcasting,
0:58:28 there does need to be a middle layer
0:58:31 where creators can get the value they need.
0:58:33 And for me, the open question, quite honestly,
0:58:35 is whether the assumption or thesis
0:58:36 that happened with blogging,
0:58:39 and this is actually the initial premise of Anchor as well,
0:58:41 which Spotify also acquired,
0:58:43 is whether there will be now a new wave
0:58:47 of mobile podcast creators who don’t have tools.
0:58:48 And again, with tools like Descript,
0:58:49 which democratize editing,
0:58:52 with tools like just being able to record a podcast
0:58:54 in your phone without having to have like a fancy
0:58:56 Zoom recorder or mics.
0:58:58 Like that is an open question to me.
0:58:59 And I don’t know if people are really gonna listen to that
0:59:02 because we have this discovery problem in the ecosystem.
0:59:04 And yet there are a few centralized choke points
0:59:05 that are coming up now,
0:59:08 particularly iTunes, Spotify, Pandora, et cetera.
0:59:11 By the way, on this notion of growing the podcast ecosystem
0:59:13 and the total addressable market size,
0:59:15 what do you guys make of radio here?
0:59:17 ‘Cause that has its own set of structural and policy
0:59:19 and regulatory considerations.
0:59:21 I’m curious for your guys’ take on that aspect of it.
0:59:24 – Well, I think the market size for podcasts
0:59:27 is multiples larger than what it is today.
0:59:30 And I do think it’s tapping into radio,
0:59:32 but it’s also tapping into other things
0:59:34 that do really well in the audio format.
0:59:36 So like audio books that are self-published,
0:59:39 for example, things that are related
0:59:41 to the knowledge sharing market for adult learning,
0:59:44 I think really, really work well for audio formats.
0:59:46 There’s a lot of stuff where I don’t need to watch someone
0:59:49 talking on YouTube with like a whiteboard,
0:59:50 ’cause usually they don’t even really need
0:59:52 a whiteboard, honestly.
0:59:54 – Although there is a funny argument to be made,
0:59:56 which is that people also listen to audio on YouTube.
0:59:58 And in fact, Chris Anderson was telling me his son
1:00:01 watches entire movies on YouTube in audio mode only,
1:00:03 which I think is freaking fascinating.
1:00:06 – I also just listen to movies on YouTube all the time.
1:00:08 – I mean, yes, YouTube also works for audio.
1:00:11 But I mean, just imagine topics around business,
1:00:14 topics around finance, topics around parenting,
1:00:19 even like meditation and how to like improve your life.
1:00:21 All of that stuff works really well in the audio format
1:00:24 and doesn’t necessarily always require video.
1:00:26 So anyways, those kinds of podcasts,
1:00:28 at least today, are not the mainstream podcast, right?
1:00:31 ‘Cause today, mainstream podcasts are again around shows
1:00:33 versus individual pieces.
1:00:35 Instead of being like a TV show,
1:00:38 why can’t you be like a movie?
1:00:40 And it’s like this one-time thing that goes really deep,
1:00:42 which is really valuable content.
1:00:43 And I think if you take that kind of definition
1:00:46 for a podcast, it is so massive.
1:00:48 – So let’s begin the whole notion of treasure radio, right?
1:00:53 Like we, it is an industry completely utterly defined
1:00:55 by the nature of the distribution point.
1:00:57 It is antennas going out, it hits you in the car,
1:00:59 it hits you in the radio,
1:01:01 and it commands billions and billions of dollars.
1:01:03 My interpretation of that industry
1:01:06 and its sort of strange persistence
1:01:08 has a lot to do with advertising relationships.
1:01:13 It is still the medium that has the most easy reach
1:01:16 for, and that hits the most Americans,
1:01:19 and has the most like history behind it.
1:01:21 And so if you’re an advertiser,
1:01:23 you feel significantly more comfortable
1:01:26 because that is your default industry to fight into.
1:01:29 And I feel like that feeling of safety and confidence
1:01:31 is something that should not be understated.
1:01:34 And it’s something that all digital media sort of sectors,
1:01:36 including podcasting and beyond it,
1:01:37 should sort of be cognizant of like,
1:01:41 that’s one of the primary things driving that situation.
1:01:44 – And I think another reason why ads work so well on radio,
1:01:46 and it works well on podcasts too.
1:01:49 Sometimes it comes in the voice of the creator
1:01:51 versus the voice of the brand
1:01:53 or like some other random voice.
1:01:54 – 100%, yep.
1:01:56 The sort of buzzword that podcast industry executives
1:01:58 use all the time is intimacy, right?
1:02:02 And that’s why we sort of hear the host rat ad being
1:02:05 the pinnacle of the podcast advertising experience.
1:02:10 And it’s also its most valuable ad slot, ad type.
1:02:14 And so, that’s why like a lot of the genres
1:02:16 that you pointed out when you sought to build
1:02:18 the taxonomy of a podcast is very personality driven.
1:02:20 It’s very people driven.
1:02:22 That’s why there’s a little bit of trickiness
1:02:24 when we talk about something like fiction podcasts
1:02:26 or non-narrated podcasts and how you monetize that,
1:02:27 how you build that relationship.
1:02:29 – Yep, I agree.
1:02:31 It’s very much native to the content of the storytelling
1:02:32 and the medium in that context.
1:02:33 – Absolutely.
1:02:35 And at some point we will see innovations in business models,
1:02:37 innovation in distribution in the structure,
1:02:41 in the sort of like container of it
1:02:45 that will alter the advertising assumptions here
1:02:47 or the monetization assumptions here.
1:02:48 But I just want to go back to,
1:02:50 to tie it back to the very first thing we talked about.
1:02:52 The definition of it, what we think about it,
1:02:53 how we think about it,
1:02:55 our assumptions of it being personality driven
1:02:57 or show driven or episode driven,
1:02:59 it needs to fragment at some point.
1:03:00 It kind of needs to break up
1:03:04 because it needs to be a universe that can hold
1:03:06 a bunch of different kinds of experiences
1:03:08 in the same way that when we think about television,
1:03:10 we’re not just talking about breaking bad.
1:03:12 We’re talking about real fortune.
1:03:15 We’re talking about like so many different kinds of styles.
1:03:17 – We’re talking about like American Idol,
1:03:19 which is such an important movement around the world
1:03:21 when you think of the future of content.
1:03:24 And TikTok and challenge-based things, right?
1:03:26 But the point is that there is a whole,
1:03:28 that was a huge fun reality TV, like–
1:03:30 – Or things around holidays.
1:03:31 – Right. – Like the Super Bowl.
1:03:33 Once a year type events, right?
1:03:35 Like this is again, like we have to break away
1:03:36 from the show concept.
1:03:37 – Exactly, I agree.
1:03:39 And to your point, just on a terminology thing, Nick,
1:03:41 I would say the word fragmented,
1:03:44 we’ve used that in the context of industry fragmentation.
1:03:46 To me, it’s more how to make a homogenous term
1:03:49 more heterogeneous and have more diversity
1:03:50 embodied within it.
1:03:53 – Yeah, and so I think the question here is sort of like,
1:03:56 do we think about the spread as on the one hand,
1:03:58 you have prestige TV, and on the other hand,
1:03:59 you have reality TV?
1:04:01 Or do we think about the spread more like,
1:04:02 on the one hand, you have Netflix,
1:04:04 on the other hand, you have Twitch?
1:04:06 Like, is that the way we’re gonna think
1:04:08 about the ecosystem at large?
1:04:09 Or are we gonna be a bit more specific
1:04:11 when we use the term, when we do our coverage?
1:04:13 I think that’s also, you know,
1:04:15 what we talk about is this important
1:04:16 about how we talk about it, so.
1:04:17 – Do you wanna say one more thing?
1:04:19 – No, I wanna ask you questions,
1:04:20 ’cause there’s so many of my friends today
1:04:22 who want to create podcasts.
1:04:25 And you created the A16Z podcast from scratch
1:04:25 to what it is today.
1:04:28 – To full credit, it was actually created before I joined,
1:04:30 and I took over at three months in the production
1:04:31 and then I’m hosting it a year later.
1:04:33 – Okay, but I know like the user base massively,
1:04:36 the listenership massively grew under your care.
1:04:37 So I think you should talk about, you know,
1:04:39 what are your tips for someone
1:04:40 who just wants to get started on podcasts?
1:04:42 – Oh my God, that could be its own episode,
1:04:43 and I’d love to do that someday.
1:04:45 So I guess maybe on the spirit of creation,
1:04:46 which is a theme of this episode,
1:04:48 I’ll just say some very quick, high-level takeaways,
1:04:50 which is one, and I do this when I give a lot of talks
1:04:52 and talk to founders about how to start their own things
1:04:53 for their company.
1:04:54 – Yes.
1:04:55 – I think the fundamental thing people need to ask
1:04:58 is where they are in the taxonomy of shows that I outlined,
1:04:59 because that is sort of a flow chart
1:05:00 for what your next step is,
1:05:01 for either how to hire, build,
1:05:03 or just what tools to use.
1:05:05 If you’re a cult of personality show,
1:05:07 the things you can do are very different
1:05:08 than if you’re doing a brand show,
1:05:10 than if you’re doing a serialized narrative show.
1:05:11 So the first thing I always ask people is,
1:05:13 what is your goal and what kind of show you want?
1:05:14 ‘Cause it’s a very crowded environment.
1:05:17 So then the next thing is, attention is scarce.
1:05:18 With podcasting, maybe less so
1:05:19 because you have a bit of a captive audience
1:05:23 in a phone or commute or workout or a, you know,
1:05:26 a situation where they are on a hike or a walk
1:05:27 where they’re only gonna listen,
1:05:29 but even then you are competing with other shows.
1:05:31 So the number one thing is how you differentiate your show.
1:05:34 And one of the number one ways to get a lot of listeners
1:05:37 is to have a lot of episodes, a variety of episodes.
1:05:39 And so the other way to do it then is to enforce seasonality
1:05:40 where you drop a season of episodes
1:05:42 and then just like drop them in like, you know,
1:05:43 record 10 and drop them.
1:05:43 – So basically if you wanna do it,
1:05:45 it’s like a long-term commitment?
1:05:47 – I don’t think it has to be
1:05:48 because as you’ve also talked about,
1:05:53 there’s a lot more tools emerging and startups emerging
1:05:55 that will allow like experimentation and sharing.
1:05:57 – But for now, it has to be a long-term commitment.
1:05:59 – I think Ben Thompson said this.
1:06:00 Headcount is the biggest predictor
1:06:01 of how much people invest in something.
1:06:05 And I think if a company has people dedicated to podcasting,
1:06:06 then you know they’re serious about podcasting,
1:06:07 I would say it’s as simple as that.
1:06:09 So you do have to invest in it to make it happen.
1:06:10 – Yeah, but on the simple mechanics,
1:06:11 one of the most beautiful things is the thing
1:06:12 that I complained about,
1:06:14 which is the very thing that also is the best thing
1:06:16 about podcasting is the feed ecosystem
1:06:20 makes it so easy to simply record an episode,
1:06:21 distribute wherever you want.
1:06:23 And then it’s about using the feed ecosystem
1:06:25 to then freely put your feed out all into the world
1:06:26 because it’s as simple.
1:06:28 All iTunes is doing is taking a bunch of feeds.
1:06:30 All we had to do when we got on Spotify
1:06:31 was like feed them our feet.
1:06:34 And people can self-select the feeds into different apps.
1:06:35 So you can use that to your advantage.
1:06:37 And there’s a ton more about the content side,
1:06:39 but the one thing I do wanna say is that
1:06:42 the editing process is now becoming democratized
1:06:43 because there’s a huge gap.
1:06:45 I would often put it as the analogy
1:06:46 between design and manufacturing
1:06:48 where there is a design phase and a manufacturing phase
1:06:50 and you need to close and tighten that feedback loop
1:06:52 to get the best content out.
1:06:54 And what’s happening with tools like Descript,
1:06:55 you tighten this feedback loop
1:06:56 between design and manufacturing
1:06:59 where you no longer have to separate creators and writers
1:07:02 from the technical skills of actually editing a podcast.
1:07:03 So that’s really important
1:07:05 because there’s a whole bunch of tools now
1:07:07 that are on the analytic side that will,
1:07:08 and there are a new bunch of distribution tools
1:07:10 that are now connecting all these pieces
1:07:11 and supporting creators.
1:07:12 So it’s a very quick answer.
1:07:14 There’s so much more you could say on this.
1:07:15 – I think we need to do another podcast
1:07:17 on how to create podcasts.
1:07:18 – Well, that would be fun.
1:07:20 Thank you for joining the ASICS NC Podcast.
1:07:21 – Thank you so much for having me.
1:07:22 I really enjoyed this talk.
1:07:23 – Thank you.

with Nick Quah (@nwquah), Connie Chan (@conniechan), and Sonal Chokshi (@smc90)

It’s a podcast about podcasting! About the state of the industry, that is. Because a lot has changed since we recorded ”a podcast about podcasts” about four years ago: podcasts, and interest in podcasting — listening, making, building — is growing. But by how much, exactly? (since various stats are constantly floating around and often out of context); and what do we even know (given that no one really knows what a download is)?And in fact, how do we define ”podcasts”: Should the definition include audio books… why not music, too, then? So much of the podcasting ecosystem — from editing tools to the notion of a ”CD phase” to music companies like Spotify doing more audio deals — stems from the legacy of the music industry. But other analogies — like that of the web and of blogging! — may be more useful for understanding the podcasting ecosystem, too. Heck, we even throw in an analogy of container ships (yes, the ocean kind!) to help out there.If we really think medium-native — and borrow from other mediums and entertainment models, like TV and streaming and even terrestrial radio — what may or may not apply to podcasting as experiments evolve? In this hallway-style jam of an episode, Nick Quah (writer and publisher of Hot Pod) joins a16z general partner Connie Chan (who covers consumer startups among other things) in conversation with Sonal Chokshi (who is also showrunner of the a16z Podcast) to talk about all this and more. We also discuss the obvious and the not-so-obvious aspects of monetization, discovery, search, platforms… and where are we in the cycles of industry fragmentation vs. consolidation, bundling vs. unbundling, more? And where might opportunities for entrepreneurs, toolmakers, and creators lie?


The views expressed here are those of the individual AH Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) personnel quoted and are not the views of a16z or its affiliates.This content is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as legal, business, investment, or tax advice. You should consult your own advisers as to those matters. References to any securities or digital assets are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Furthermore, this content is not directed at nor intended for use by any investor or prospective investor, and may not under any circumstances be relied upon when making a decision to invest in any fund managed by a16z. (An offering to invest in an a16z fund will be made only by the private placement memorandum, subscription agreement, and other relevant documentation of any such fund which should be read in their entirety.)Past performance is not indicative of future results. Any charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Please see https://a16z.com/disclosures for additional important information.

Leave a Comment