How Milei’s Surprise Win in Argentina Defied the Market

0:00:05 When you support Movember, you’re not just fundraising, you’re showing up for the men you love.
0:00:08 Your dad, your brother, your partner, your friends.
0:00:11 It isn’t just a men’s issue, it’s a human one.
0:00:15 That’s why Movember exists, to change the face of men’s health.
0:00:21 From mental health and suicide prevention, to prostate and testicular cancer research and early detection,
0:00:25 Movember is tackling the biggest health issues facing men today.
0:00:28 Join the movement and donate now at Movember.com.
0:00:31 Paramount Wolf.
0:00:37 Check out the big stars, big series and blockbuster movies, streaming on Paramount Plus.
0:00:41 Cue the music, like NCIS, Tony and Ziva.
0:00:42 We’d like to make up our own rules.
0:00:44 Tulsa King.
0:00:46 We want to take out the competition.
0:00:48 The Substance.
0:00:50 This balance is not working.
0:00:52 And the Naked Gun.
0:00:54 That was awesome.
0:00:56 Now that’s a mountain of entertainment.
0:00:59 Paramount Wolf.
0:01:02 You know what’s better than the one big thing?
0:01:04 Two big things.
0:01:04 Exactly.
0:01:09 The new iPhone 17 Pro on TELUS’ five-year rate plan price lock.
0:01:12 Yep, it’s the most powerful iPhone ever.
0:01:15 Plus, more peace of mind with your bill over five years.
0:01:16 This is big.
0:01:22 Get the new iPhone 17 Pro at TELUS.com slash iPhone 17 Pro on select plans.
0:01:23 Conditions and exclusions apply.
0:01:28 Today’s number, 1,100.
0:01:33 That’s how many chairs were recently stolen from restaurants in Madrid.
0:01:40 The heist took place over two months and targeted the patios of 18 different restaurants.
0:01:43 Damages are estimated at nearly $70,000.
0:01:48 And authorities are calling it the lowest margin crime since Joker Part 2.
0:01:53 Money markets matter.
0:01:55 If money is evil, then that building is hell.
0:01:56 The show goes on!
0:02:00 The folks in there are watching show, show!
0:02:02 Welcome to Prof G Markets.
0:02:03 I’m Ed Elson.
0:02:05 It is October 28th.
0:02:07 Let’s check in on yesterday’s market vitals.
0:02:13 The major indices closed at record highs on hopes of a US-China trade deal.
0:02:18 The S&P ended the day above $6,800 for the first time ever.
0:02:20 Meanwhile, gold dipped below $4,000.
0:02:28 And finally, Qualcomm shares popped 11% after the company announced new AI chips that will compete
0:02:29 with NVIDIA.
0:02:33 Okay, what else is happening?
0:02:39 Argentina President Javier Millet led his party to victory in Sunday’s midterm elections.
0:02:44 His party doubled their representation in Congress and won nearly 41% of the national vote.
0:02:48 President Trump congratulated Millet on social media, saying, quote,
0:02:50 he’s making us all look good.
0:02:57 The peso surged 9% against the US dollar, its biggest one-day gain in over 20 years.
0:03:00 Argentinian stocks and bonds also rallied.
0:03:04 This win should help Millet push through his economic agenda.
0:03:09 Over his first two years in office, Millet has slashed spending, unified exchange rates,
0:03:13 cut energy subsidies, and laid off tens of thousands of public sector workers.
0:03:19 And that will all likely continue because the recent $40 billion bailout from the US
0:03:23 is tied to the condition that he makes further progress on those reforms.
0:03:26 Still, Millet has his work cut out for him.
0:03:30 Inflation, though down, remains above 130%.
0:03:37 Unemployment is rising, and real wages have fallen over 20% since 2023.
0:03:41 The election turnout was 68%, the lowest in a national election in decades.
0:03:46 And even after the win, his party does lack a full majority.
0:03:49 Here to explain what this all means for Argentina,
0:03:55 we are speaking with Oliver Stunkel, associate professor at FGV’s School of International Relations
0:03:56 in Brazil.
0:03:58 Oliver, thank you very much for joining us on the show.
0:03:59 Thanks for having me.
0:04:01 So we want to hear about this election.
0:04:06 Just at a very basic level, walk us through the election results.
0:04:11 What does this mean for Javier Millet, and what does this mean for Argentina going forward?
0:04:14 So those were the midterms.
0:04:22 Half of the House of Representatives and a third of the Senate were up for voting and renewal.
0:04:30 And it has been a surprisingly good result for Javier Millet, the self-declared anarcho-capitalist
0:04:32 who’s been in power for two years.
0:04:38 And the elections were sort of a referendum on his policies.
0:04:47 He’s a libertarian, so his key argument has been that it’s necessary to radically reduce
0:04:55 public spending, to reduce inflation, to finally stabilize Argentina after decades of instability.
0:04:58 And he did bring down inflation.
0:05:06 However, the economy is still reeling from his policies of dramatically reducing public spending.
0:05:07 So the economy is not growing.
0:05:14 But he is saying that he still needs some time for the economy to finally recover, that this
0:05:21 is the medicine which initially has a negative impact, but which will eventually put Argentina’s
0:05:22 economy on a stable footing.
0:05:29 And the voters have, despite the negative short-term impacts, given him a vote of confidence and
0:05:36 said that basically signaled that they would like him to continue the liberalizing reforms.
0:05:45 Over the next two years, he now has enough votes to override vetoes in Congress, which were
0:05:52 employed during the past years against his decrees when he tried to liberalize the economy.
0:05:55 So I think we can expect him to continue like that for now.
0:05:58 Now, he still needs to deliver.
0:06:05 So basically, voters have given him a lifeline, and we’ll now see how this experiment will unfold.
0:06:07 Yeah, help us with the context there.
0:06:11 I mean, from my understanding, Argentina’s been in the news a lot recently.
0:06:21 We had this other election, this local election in Buenos Aires, which, again, us, we Americans
0:06:23 weren’t very aware of what was happening.
0:06:25 But what we know is that it wasn’t good for Millay.
0:06:33 You saw this implosion in the bond markets, massive collapse in the peso, which was what
0:06:37 led the U.S. to come in and intervene and give them that $20 billion.
0:06:39 So this is quite a reversal.
0:06:44 As just an observer, it seemed as though Millay was in trouble.
0:06:46 Now, apparently, he isn’t.
0:06:47 Help us with the context there.
0:06:48 Absolutely.
0:06:55 So he had a pretty bad result in municipal elections in the province of Buenos Aires, which was
0:07:01 traditionally more Peronist, so which has been supportive of the traditionally more populist,
0:07:03 economically populist policies.
0:07:07 And it was seen as a bellwether election for yesterday’s election.
0:07:09 So expectations were low.
0:07:12 And the Trump administration made a big bet.
0:07:18 I mean, they basically, you know, the U.S. government promised a rescue package, a lot
0:07:25 of financial support, seemed to somehow condition that on a good result for Millay.
0:07:25 Yes.
0:07:30 And that good result now came to pass.
0:07:38 I think that the U.S. certainly did have a role in that because a lot of voters are aware
0:07:44 of the fact that the Millay’s policies haven’t yet stabilized the Argentine economy.
0:07:47 A lot of investors are still very concerned about the capacity to pay its debt.
0:07:52 Argentina is one of the countries that has most frequently defaulted on its debt.
0:07:57 So that lifeline, obviously, from the world-largest economy does play a role.
0:07:58 So it’s a vote of confidence.
0:08:07 And in that sense, it’s also a geopolitical win for Trump because a lot of countries in
0:08:13 Latin America are moving closer to China or are sort of multi-aligning, preserving ties
0:08:17 to the United States, but also seeking strong ties to China.
0:08:18 And Millay kind of stands out.
0:08:22 He actually has actively sought to move closer to the United States.
0:08:29 And in that sense, the U.S. government has now kind of offered a reward, so to say, for
0:08:30 that strategy.
0:08:37 And I think in many ways, a successful government in Argentina will certainly inspire similar figures
0:08:40 in other electoral cycles in the coming months.
0:08:47 So basically, Millay has now gained another two years to reform Argentina’s economy.
0:08:51 But I think, I mean, were markets overly pessimistic?
0:08:52 Perhaps a bit.
0:08:59 I mean, last week, I, you know, did speak to several investors and everybody expected Millay to
0:09:02 not gain sufficient votes.
0:09:06 So there was a sense of, you know, maybe investors will abandon Argentina.
0:09:10 And I think that may have influenced voter behavior because they said, you know, they’re actually
0:09:13 concerned about Millay loss.
0:09:13 Right.
0:09:20 And said, you know, let’s give him that vote of confidence in order to help stabilize the
0:09:20 economy.
0:09:27 I’d also like to get your reactions to the $20 billion, which may become $40 billion bailout.
0:09:31 I call it a bailout because I think it is a bailout.
0:09:37 They were in trouble and the U.S. came in and they intervened to try to help Argentina.
0:09:41 There are debates over whether it was to help Argentina or whether it was to help Treasury
0:09:44 Secretary Scott Besson’s buddies who are invested in Argentina.
0:09:46 We don’t need to have that debate.
0:09:52 But what does it say about the Millay agenda and the libertarian agenda, which was supposed
0:10:01 to be about reducing spending, shock therapy, let’s get rid of our addiction to spending in
0:10:04 the short term to fix our problems.
0:10:06 Let’s figure out long-term solutions.
0:10:09 Let’s get this inflation thing under control.
0:10:18 And then suddenly, they actually need an emergency wire transfer of $40 billion to prevent financial
0:10:19 ruin, essentially.
0:10:20 Right.
0:10:21 Yeah.
0:10:26 So, I mean, the first part of the question is, some progress has been made in reducing
0:10:27 public spending.
0:10:30 I mean, you had a massive reduction of, let’s say, ministries, for example.
0:10:30 Yeah.
0:10:37 You did have, you know, tens of thousands of public workers which have been let go.
0:10:42 But at the same time, these kinds of adjustments are inherently painful.
0:10:49 And, you know, Argentina’s economy has had low indices of productivity for a long time.
0:10:52 I mean, you need initially at least investor confidence.
0:10:59 And, of course, Argentina’s history, you know, generates a lot of caution among investors.
0:11:00 A lot of people got their fingers burned.
0:11:04 You know, they got burned over the past decades betting on Argentina.
0:11:07 And then Argentina defaulted.
0:11:11 It’s still, there’s no other country in the world that owes more money to the International
0:11:13 Monetary Fund than Argentina.
0:11:18 So, in that sense, it continues to be sort of a high-risk investment.
0:11:20 And it may still very well fail.
0:11:28 So, the current, this recent result is, so good news from a lay, he can continue to implement
0:11:28 his reforms.
0:11:33 He’d actually, I think, even accelerate reforms because he didn’t have a governing coalition
0:11:34 in Congress.
0:11:40 He still needs a party which is sort of center-right, tied to former President Macri.
0:11:47 So, I expect him to advance faster now than during the past two years.
0:11:48 But there’s no guarantee.
0:11:57 I mean, the country has had for a long time a very bloated public sector, which attracted a
0:11:58 lot of talent.
0:12:05 This is a problem in several Latin American countries where the smartest people seek to enter government
0:12:11 where not necessarily, you know, they make the greatest contribution to economic growth.
0:12:15 So, these are, you know, structural issues, of course.
0:12:24 There’s, you know, a problem of still excessive bureaucracy and excessive dependence on exporting
0:12:28 commodities, issues with education, with infrastructure.
0:12:31 So, you know, these things take time.
0:12:39 And it’s a big question mark, particularly now that, you know, we sort of see increasing
0:12:43 state intervention in the economy around the world.
0:12:44 You know, the United States, actually.
0:12:50 You know, you have the U.S. government, you know, purchasing stakes of strategic companies.
0:12:53 You see protectionist trends.
0:12:56 You see sort of a geopoliticization of the world economy.
0:13:02 So, it’s going to be really interesting to see whether this kind of libertarian approach
0:13:09 is still viable in this age of great power competition where everything seems to be politicized,
0:13:10 right?
0:13:16 I mean, it’s not like Trump promotes free trade or China or any other major power.
0:13:24 We’re kind of in this completely different age where very few political leaders embrace
0:13:26 the kind of ideology we’re seeing in Argentina.
0:13:27 All right.
0:13:32 Oliver Stunkel, Associate Professor at FGV’s School of International Relations in Brazil.
0:13:34 Oliver, we really appreciate your time.
0:13:37 It’ll be very interesting to see how this all unfolds in Argentina.
0:13:38 Thank you.
0:13:39 Thank you very much.
0:13:43 After the break, a look at the latest inflation report.
0:13:46 If you’re enjoying the show, give Prof G Markets a follow.
0:13:54 Hi, this is Bella Freud.
0:14:00 Each week on Fashion Neurosis, I invite guests from the world of fashion, art, sport, music
0:14:06 and literature to lie on my couch and explore the connection between fashion and identity.
0:14:11 This week on the show, I welcome the actor, Tessa Thompson.
0:14:16 Sometimes while I’m tidying, I’ll just put on one of the heels that I’ve left behind.
0:14:21 And the idea of sort of like clomping around my house, sort of tidying in a heel.
0:14:21 Yeah.
0:14:22 I love.
0:14:27 Find Fashion Neurosis on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts.
0:14:31 Hi, everyone.
0:14:32 This is Kara Swisher.
0:14:36 This week on my podcast, On with Kara Swisher, I interview Bernie Sanders.
0:14:40 The senator from Vermont is fiery and pugnacious, just like you’d expect.
0:14:45 And we talk about everything from his fight against Trumpism to tech billionaires, the shutdown,
0:14:49 artificial intelligence and the future of the progressive populist movement.
0:14:50 Have a listen.
0:14:53 I think Trump has his mental issues.
0:14:53 I think he’s unstable.
0:14:56 I think his agenda for America is horrific.
0:14:59 But he understands the system is broken.
0:15:02 And what are the Democratic establishment says?
0:15:09 Well, you know, I think if you make $48,392, we will be able to provide you with a program
0:15:12 that gets you 14% help on your health care.
0:15:14 That’s not what the American people want to hear.
0:15:15 So Trump is tough.
0:15:17 Democrats got to be tough, too.
0:15:20 They got to take on the goddamn oligarchy.
0:15:21 That’s what they got to do.
0:15:23 The full conversation is now out.
0:15:27 So go listen to On with Kara Swisher wherever you get your podcasts.
0:15:34 If it seems like AI is touching just about every part of your life these days, you aren’t
0:15:35 imagining things.
0:15:37 It’s all up in your streaming services.
0:15:39 It’s all up in your job search.
0:15:42 And now it’s even in your doctor’s office.
0:15:47 They can perform exceptionally well, kind of almost in a superhuman way, on these specific,
0:15:50 very challenging, complex clinical cases.
0:15:53 This week on Explain It to Me, when AI meets medicine.
0:15:58 And I think it can be potentially revolutionary and transformative for people if they use it
0:15:59 in the right way.
0:16:01 And when it doesn’t compute.
0:16:06 One in five, around 20% of Americans said that they had turned to a chatbot for advice
0:16:09 that later turned out to be incorrect.
0:16:12 New episodes, Sundays, wherever you get your podcasts.
0:16:25 We’re back with ProfG Markets.
0:16:30 After a 10-day shutdown delay, the Consumer Price Index is in.
0:16:34 Prices rose 3% from a year earlier, the highest since January.
0:16:41 Still, the result was under the 3.1% estimate and was up 0.1% from August.
0:16:44 Major stock indices rose to record highs on the news.
0:16:49 And the report all but seals the deal for a rate cut at the Fed’s meeting, which takes place
0:16:50 tomorrow.
0:16:55 Here to explain this report and what it means for the economy, we are speaking with Robert
0:17:01 Armstrong, US financial commentator for the Financial Times and author of the Unhedged newsletter.
0:17:04 Rob, great to have you back on ProfG Markets.
0:17:05 Great to be back.
0:17:09 So we want to get your reactions to this inflation print, this CPI.
0:17:10 We’re up to 3%.
0:17:14 We were at 2.3% earlier in the year.
0:17:16 Now we’re at 3%.
0:17:20 All that’s on my mind is the tariffs and the fact that this is a reflection of tariff impact.
0:17:23 But I want to get your angle, your initial reactions.
0:17:31 Well, better is what I would say, but better with an asterisk next to it.
0:17:38 So both on the good side, the series I like to look at are durable goods, which tends to
0:17:43 be a series, as you mentioned, that’s very much affected by import tariffs.
0:17:52 So, you know, cars, refrigerators, everything but kind of clothes and food, and then at core
0:17:54 services, services without energy.
0:17:57 And both of those dip down a little bit.
0:17:58 And that’s welcome news.
0:18:04 We’re still about a percentage point above the Fed’s target, but at least we’re trending in
0:18:08 the last month or two slowly in the right direction.
0:18:10 But I haven’t gotten you to the asterisk yet.
0:18:12 Yeah, let’s say the asterisk.
0:18:21 The asterisk is there were two very big items that went down a lot, sharply down in this
0:18:22 in September.
0:18:25 And that was on the services side.
0:18:29 That was housing, rent, and owner’s equivalent rent.
0:18:33 And on the good side, it was new and used cars.
0:18:40 And these are big series that have a lot of weighting in the index, but they’re lumpy and
0:18:42 they move around a lot month to month.
0:18:45 And also on the housing side, it’s a very lagging number.
0:18:49 It tells you a little bit more about the world six months ago than it tells you about the world
0:18:49 today.
0:18:52 But both of those were low.
0:19:01 And so it could be that we sort of rolled the dice and got a lumpy month to the low side on those two things.
0:19:07 And if you take those two out, we’re still pretty warm.
0:19:10 We’re still well above 3% if you take out those two.
0:19:13 Now, it’s not fair to just take out whatever you want.
0:19:18 You can’t, you know, go month by month and say, well, this month we’re not going to count housing.
0:19:19 This month we’re not going to count autos.
0:19:23 What this is just telling you is that the numbers are lumpy and we have to be a little
0:19:27 bit careful about reading too much into September.
0:19:33 There are some items that are tariff sensitive that we are seeing rising in price.
0:19:39 I think that probably the best example would be coffee, which is up almost 20% year over
0:19:39 year.
0:19:47 I look at what’s happening with inflation, the fact that we went from 2.3 the month of Liberation
0:19:54 Day, it went up to 2.4, it kept going up, it went up to 2.7, then it went up to 2.9.
0:19:56 Now we’re up to 3%.
0:20:02 Is it in doubt at all that tariffs are passing through?
0:20:03 I don’t think so.
0:20:10 I mean, we know that tariffs are being charged at the border to the tune of many tens of billions
0:20:11 every month.
0:20:15 And we know who’s paying those tariffs as of right now.
0:20:22 It’s mostly the importers and the wholesalers who are doing the importing.
0:20:28 But we know they’re passing a little bit, maybe a third or a quarter of the tariffs onto the
0:20:28 consumer.
0:20:30 So that’s what shows up in this report.
0:20:36 Not the full impact of tariffs, but just the bit that the companies aren’t eating.
0:20:43 So one of the big questions for the next six months or so is, are companies going to stop
0:20:45 eating as much of the tariffs as they’re going to eat?
0:20:52 In which case, you could see goods inflation, which is not even half of the picture, but it’s
0:20:55 a significant amount of the picture, total inflation.
0:20:59 You could see goods inflation heat up in the next month, six months, year.
0:21:02 And that’s something I’m going to be watching really closely.
0:21:05 We have no September jobs report.
0:21:07 We’ll have no October jobs report.
0:21:13 This is obviously all very important in terms of the Fed’s interest rate decision, which is
0:21:15 happening, going to be happening tomorrow.
0:21:22 I mean, the whole picture, I’ll tell you, Ed, I think the whole picture is one where I think
0:21:28 market commentary and the market itself has gotten a bit ahead of itself in terms of how
0:21:29 many rate cuts we’re going to get.
0:21:34 We’re, you know, we’re a solid percentage point above the Fed’s target on inflation.
0:21:40 If you look at things like the Goldman Sachs index of financial conditions, financial conditions
0:21:42 are very loose.
0:21:44 Markets are extremely hot.
0:21:52 And indeed, the economy, with the very important exception of the jobs reports, and we’ve talked
0:21:56 a little bit about those on the show in the past, looks pretty hot too.
0:22:03 So, you know, I don’t think any rational person would look carefully at the numbers we’re seeing
0:22:10 right now and say, inflation is beaten, the economy is slowing down, we have a percentage
0:22:12 point or more of cuts coming.
0:22:13 I just don’t see the case.
0:22:19 And yet, we’re looking at a, I think, near 100% certainty of a rate cut.
0:22:23 And the market appears to be unanimous.
0:22:28 And in a lot of the reporting, I was seeing, which surprised me, I agree.
0:22:34 I think the commentary is a little, got itself in a bit of a spin because the commentary says,
0:22:40 this seals the deal now that we’re at 3% inflation, hooray, now we’re going to get a rate cut.
0:22:43 It’s like, hold on, we were at 2.3.
0:22:45 I thought we were trying to get to two.
0:22:46 We’re at three now.
0:22:52 And there, that is something that is sort of in the background on everyone’s mind, I think,
0:22:58 which is, does 2% now mean the number starts with a two?
0:22:58 Right.
0:22:59 Do you know what I mean?
0:23:00 Right.
0:23:03 It’s not 2%, like 2.7% counts as two now.
0:23:04 Round up a number.
0:23:07 And I don’t really know.
0:23:11 I don’t really know what the Fed’s position on that is.
0:23:18 And look, I sympathize with the people on the Monetary Policy Committee or the Federal Open
0:23:26 Market Committee who are more dovish because the job situation is a little weird.
0:23:30 You know, you’re looking at a very low level of job creation every month.
0:23:39 You’re reading a lot of announcements about layoffs and the fact that the rest of the
0:23:45 indicators we have of the economy look pretty strong other than that jobs number, that’s
0:23:46 only so reassuring.
0:23:49 I mean, the Fed’s mandate is employment, right?
0:23:52 The Fed’s mandate is not economic growth, it’s employment.
0:23:56 So they’ve got to take the jobs numbers, which are a little spooky.
0:23:58 They have to take them seriously.
0:24:05 But everything else that I can see is saying the economy’s warm, financial conditions are
0:24:08 loose, and inflation is too hot for comfort.
0:24:13 What would be your predictions for the next several months or so when it comes to inflation?
0:24:16 I mean, I can just tell you where I stand on this.
0:24:22 Prices are going up, tariffs are beginning to pass through, we’re starting to see it in the
0:24:24 data, and we’re cutting rates.
0:24:25 I think it’s only going to get worse from here.
0:24:27 I just want to sit here if you agree.
0:24:29 I agree with you on the good side.
0:24:36 I think there’s good reasons to think that there will be more tariff pass through to consumer
0:24:37 inflation.
0:24:41 We’re already seeing it in producer inflation.
0:24:44 It’s going to move towards consumer inflation.
0:24:47 The services side is the real question.
0:24:50 Wage growth is still pretty good.
0:25:02 But again, if you take housing out, services inflation, you know, haircuts, legal services, health insurance, all that kind of stuff, that stuff’s pretty hot too.
0:25:04 So I think, but I just don’t know.
0:25:06 I feel less confident about what that’s going to do.
0:25:23 If the jobs number are telling us something about underlying weakness in the economy and we continue to see very low job creation, it makes sense that service inflation would come in a little bit.
0:25:28 Because that’s where that stuff is really driven by wages and wages is driven by how tight the job market is.
0:25:32 We’re also seeing a lot of sentiment reports coming out.
0:25:36 You, Michigan sentiment down 22% from a year earlier.
0:25:44 Trump is just increasingly polling badly when it comes to his handling of tariffs on the economy.
0:25:51 I mean, I know that I struggle with these sentiment reports because I find them so political just by nature.
0:25:55 But are you looking at these sentiment reports?
0:25:57 Are they playing into your view of the economy?
0:25:58 I look at them.
0:26:07 The problem is, and I’ve written about this a little bit in recent weeks, is they’re less and less predictive.
0:26:21 That sentiment has been bad for a long time, and in the last couple of years, it just hasn’t been a great guide to what markets are going to do, what employers are going to do.
0:26:31 I think there is no question that the Liberation Day fiasco put employers in a mood to wait and see.
0:26:40 I don’t think there’s any question that people like to hire when the future looks predictable.
0:26:44 And we haven’t had a lot of that in policymaking.
0:26:47 But I think we might be getting over that a little bit.
0:26:54 The shock and horror of that absolutely bizarre news conference is receding a little bit into the past.
0:27:03 And hopefully there’s been some lessons learned there, and sentiment will slowly recover.
0:27:03 Okay.
0:27:07 Just while we have you, we only get to speak every so often.
0:27:09 What else is on your mind?
0:27:15 Anything happening in the markets right now that you’re paying particular attention to that you’re finding quite significant?
0:27:19 It’s fun watching gold wobble here.
0:27:27 Because gold was an interesting case where it started out as a fundamentally backed story.
0:27:37 So a year or two ago, it was like central banks were buying more gold as a kind of way to diversify their portfolios.
0:27:39 Gold was cheap.
0:27:41 The dollar weakened a little bit.
0:27:44 You know, all of this stuff was getting behind gold.
0:27:52 But then the trade kind of took on a life of its own and became a kind of FOMO momentum retail trade.
0:27:59 And in the last couple of days, it’s kind of been like, whoa, let’s slow down here a little bit.
0:28:02 And I’ll be fascinated to see what that does.
0:28:09 And, you know, it’s been a great case of when you have a price that’s going up, the narratives will fall in place.
0:28:13 Like, you know, gold went past $3,000, up to $4,000.
0:28:17 It was like, let’s just make up stories about what’s driving the gold price.
0:28:20 But what was driving the gold price was the gold price.
0:28:21 Exactly.
0:28:23 There’s nothing else to it.
0:28:23 Yeah.
0:28:25 It’s a classic case of FOMO.
0:28:29 And it’s so interesting how the price increases in gold.
0:28:33 We did see in the reporting, oh, it’s because the central banks are buying gold.
0:28:37 But that only explained a fraction of the price increase.
0:28:40 And explained it like two years ago.
0:28:43 The banks have actually backed off now, right?
0:28:43 Yes.
0:28:47 Because if you’re a central bank, you have an allocation to gold.
0:28:50 And it’s a percentage allocation of your portfolio.
0:28:52 Price of gold goes up 50%.
0:28:54 Suddenly you’re over your allocation.
0:28:55 You have too much gold.
0:28:56 Yes.
0:28:56 Right?
0:28:57 Exactly.
0:29:00 So, this is a very funny story.
0:29:01 And of course, we have 10.
0:29:05 The other thing I would mention is just, you know, we have big tech earnings rolling in this
0:29:05 week.
0:29:06 Absolutely.
0:29:08 Oh, we always kind of hold our breath.
0:29:13 Because, you know, this is a third of the market by value or whatever it is now.
0:29:16 And we have five of the big ones reporting this week.
0:29:20 And we’re going to be waiting, of course, with a bated breath for all of that.
0:29:24 Any thoughts on what you think we can expect the next week or so?
0:29:34 I mean, any time I’ve been skeptical of these businesses’ ability to just keep growing despite
0:29:37 their incredible size, I’ve been wrong.
0:29:41 So, I’m just not going to step in front of that steamroller again.
0:29:44 I mean, these businesses are just their ability to grow.
0:29:46 And of course, everyone’s worried about their spending right now.
0:29:48 But the fact is, they’ve got the money.
0:29:51 Sales are growing.
0:29:54 So, I mean, these things are an incredible story.
0:29:58 And I think chances are good, they’ll just report another good quarter.
0:30:02 It’s the tail risk you worry about.
0:30:05 The small percentage chance that one of these guys says,
0:30:10 ah, we’ve been doing some thinking and maybe we have to change our strategy with regard to
0:30:11 these data centers a little bit.
0:30:13 And then it’s going to be game on.
0:30:14 But I think the probability of that is low.
0:30:19 But it’s just going to be a high consequence event if it does, if the dice come up that way.
0:30:20 All right.
0:30:23 Robert Armstrong, U.S. financial commentator for the Financial Times,
0:30:29 author of the Unhedged newsletter, which, as everyone knows, is my favorite newsletter.
0:30:31 Rob, great to have you on the show.
0:30:31 Thank you.
0:30:32 Pleasure to be back.
0:30:33 Invite me anytime.
0:30:38 So, the data is in.
0:30:41 Inflation is up again.
0:30:43 Last week, we predicted that this would happen.
0:30:47 We said that inflation would rise again and that it would continue to rise.
0:30:52 Indeed, prices in America are now up 3% from a year ago.
0:30:55 That’s up from 2.3% inflation just a few months ago.
0:30:57 Now, why did we predict this?
0:30:59 Well, quite simple.
0:31:07 Our thesis is, one, that tariffs raise prices, and two, that it takes some time for tariffs
0:31:08 to raise prices.
0:31:15 That’s why we weren’t surprised when inflation was only 2.4% in May, because the tariff impact
0:31:16 hadn’t taken effect.
0:31:22 And it’s also why we were so angry when we saw Treasury Secretary Scott Besson going around
0:31:28 parading that number to the media as his evidence that tariffs don’t raise prices.
0:31:35 No, tariffs do raise prices, but it takes time, and that’s exactly what we’re seeing now.
0:31:39 We had 2.3% in April, the month of Liberation Day.
0:31:41 Then it went up to 2.4%.
0:31:43 Then it went up to 2.7%.
0:31:45 Then to 2.9%.
0:31:48 And now we are up to 3% inflation.
0:31:52 There is absolutely no question tariffs are raising prices.
0:31:56 That’s also why the tariff-sensitive items are exploding in price.
0:31:59 Audio equipment prices up 14%.
0:32:02 Beef prices up 15%.
0:32:05 Coffee prices up 19%.
0:32:07 This is the tariff impact.
0:32:08 This is what we’re seeing.
0:32:12 Now, for those of you who say, hey, you’re wrong.
0:32:18 Economists had expected 3.1%, and we got 3%, so this is actually good.
0:32:21 All I can say to you is that you are missing the point.
0:32:31 Just because a group of economists were 0.1% off on how large the tariff impact would be in this specific month, that doesn’t mean there is no tariff impact.
0:32:34 And it certainly doesn’t mean the experts were wrong.
0:32:41 The debate that we were having back in April was whether or not tariffs would reignite inflation.
0:32:44 Many people said they wouldn’t, including people in the administration.
0:32:46 Well, we were at 2.3%.
0:32:47 Now we’re at 3%.
0:32:49 So there is no debate.
0:32:52 Tariffs have reignited inflation.
0:32:55 Tariffs have made America more expensive.
0:33:01 And so long as the tariffs remain in place, prices will continue to rise.
0:33:08 Our prediction, next month, when we get the next CPI report, inflation will be even higher.
0:33:12 Okay, that’s it for today.
0:33:17 This episode was produced by Claire Miller, edited by Joel Patterson, and engineered by Benjamin Spencer.
0:33:19 Our associate producer is Alison Weiss.
0:33:24 Our research team is Dan Chillon, Isabella Kinsel, Kristen O’Donoghue, and Mia Silverio.
0:33:26 And our technical director is Drew Burrows.
0:33:29 Thank you for listening to Prof. G. Markets from Prof. G. Media.
0:33:31 If you liked what you heard, give us a follow.
0:33:32 I’m Ed Elson.
0:33:34 I will see you tomorrow.