Author: The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

  • How to Build Wealth — with Codie Sanchez

    AI transcript
    0:00:05 Support for this episode comes from The Current. The Current podcast is back with an exciting
    0:00:09 new season featuring marketing executives from the world’s most influential brands.
    0:00:13 Tune in to hear what’s driving conversation in the fast-moving world of digital advertising,
    0:00:17 with unique insights from brands as diverse as Hilton, Instacart, Moderna, Major League
    0:00:22 Soccer, and more. And in this presidential election season, The Current explores when
    0:00:26 a national political advertiser like the National Republican Senatorial Committee and
    0:00:33 a major CPG brand like Hershey can learn from each other. Listen in and subscribe to The
    0:00:40 Current at TheCurrent.com or wherever you get your podcasts.
    0:00:45 Support for this show comes from Constant Contact. If you struggle just to get your customers
    0:00:50 to notice you, Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention. Constant Contact’s
    0:00:55 award-winning marketing platform offers all the automation, integration, and reporting
    0:01:01 tools that get your marketing running seamlessly, all backed by their expert live customer support.
    0:01:11 It’s time to get going and growing with Constant Contact today. Ready, set, grow. Go to ConstantContact.ca
    0:01:20 and start your free trial today. Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial. ConstantContact.ca
    0:01:26 Support for this show comes from Seven Rooms. For the restaurant operators out there who
    0:01:32 want to create more regulars on the regular, check out Seven Rooms. Seven Rooms is an all-in-one
    0:01:37 CRM marketing and operations platform that helps you make more money and more magic for
    0:01:41 your guests. It gives your staff the tools to deliver service that keeps your guests
    0:01:47 coming back for more, from direct reservations to smart table management to targeted text
    0:01:52 and email marketing. Seven Rooms helps you grow your brand and your covers and not your
    0:01:59 workload. Learn more at SevenRooms.com. Seven Rooms. Make magic. Make money.
    0:02:06 Episode 327. 327 is the area code serving Arkansas. 1927, the first solo nonstop transatlantic
    0:02:13 flight was completed from New York to Paris. I love the new British Airways tagline, Breakfast
    0:02:30 in London, Dinner in New York, luggage in Tokyo. Welcome to the 327th episode of The
    0:02:34 Prop G-Pod. In today’s episode, we speak with Cody Sanchez, a former Wall Street investor
    0:02:39 and the founder and CEO of Contrarian Thinking, a digital education company with over seven
    0:02:44 million followers. We discuss with Cody her new book, Main Street Millionaire, How to Make
    0:02:48 Extraordinary Wealth Buying Ordinary Businesses. We get into how to build wealth by buying
    0:02:52 small businesses, including what to look out when buying, ways to finance a purchase and
    0:02:56 which sectors have the most potential right now. I really enjoy this conversation. She’s
    0:03:02 a unique woman and I love kind of this financial literacy or investing approach and that is
    0:03:07 instead of talking about Nvidia or AI all the time, what happens when you buy a dry cleaner
    0:03:11 or a carpet cleaning company. And I think there’s a ton of potential and if you think
    0:03:16 about, I won’t talk more about this, but in some there’s this tidal wave of retirements
    0:03:21 from the boomers who have small businesses and their kids all want to be baristas or
    0:03:24 go to work for Google. And so there’s going to be a lot of small businesses up for sale.
    0:03:27 It’s just, it’s an interesting overlooked part of the economy, a great way to build
    0:03:31 wealth and kind of the millionaire next door probably owns car washes and doesn’t work,
    0:03:35 you know, doesn’t work at Salesforce. Or maybe she does. Maybe she does anyways, but I really
    0:03:39 enjoyed this conversation. She’s an impressive woman. All right, what’s happening? Some news
    0:03:46 about the luxury auto space Jaguar unveiled it’s all electric type 00. Hmm. Concept in
    0:03:50 Miami art week, marking the official start of the brand’s new era Miami art week. Does
    0:03:53 that mean basil? I used to go to basil. I have no interest in art. By the way, I think
    0:03:57 people who order expensive wine or expensive art are basically insecure people trying to
    0:04:01 flaunt their wealth. I have done neither about a great, the only piece of art I own is a
    0:04:05 Grayson Perry. I think he’s, I love that guy. I think he’s super interesting. He talks,
    0:04:09 makes political art, lives half his year as a woman, half as a man, did that before it
    0:04:14 was cool. And I just think he’s such an interesting cat. And I love he does cover these politically
    0:04:18 charged pieces of art. That’s the only piece of art I own. Someone who means a great deal
    0:04:22 to me took me to the exhibition of his in Istanbul, found something I liked and then
    0:04:27 bought it for me and it’s, it hangs in my living room. And I just absolutely love it.
    0:04:32 Back to Jaguar. They released their type 00. The reveal follows week of controversy after
    0:04:37 Jaguar’s rebrand campaign went viral. Critics including Elon Musk. Oh, fuck. I agree with
    0:04:43 Elon Musk. All right. So anyways, we’re clicked to kind of slam the avant-garde 32nd and which
    0:04:47 featured models and a futuristic landscape but failed to show a single car. Remember,
    0:04:52 this happened before. Infinity did this. This was the era of brand in the eighties. Let me
    0:04:56 get like kind of a brief history of economic history and brands. Brands didn’t mean a whole
    0:04:59 hell of a lot. The strongest brand up until World War II was the Catholic Church. Name
    0:05:05 anything that engages in corruption, leveraging or exploiting the masses and just institutionalized
    0:05:08 pedophilia and manages to be the most powerful institution in the world. They are the most
    0:05:12 powerful brand in the world and they are in fact the best brand builders. They understand
    0:05:17 distribution and place-based marketing. Let’s build the most beautiful venues in the world
    0:05:21 bringing the most talented artisans in the world because we want to fool people in the
    0:05:24 middle of believing that, yeah, there’s a decent job that God hangs out here and then
    0:05:30 we’ll have robes and clothes and candles and music and it’s highly orchestrated and ruled.
    0:05:35 I mean, these folks, these folks understood the Apple store before Apple understood the
    0:05:40 Apple store. Best branders in the world. World War II comes along and then you have American
    0:05:46 caterpillars left overseas rebuilding America. So yellow started to mean capitalism and rebuilding.
    0:05:52 The US dollar, the strongest currency in history, that green hope, optimism, capitalism, winners,
    0:05:59 losers, all of a sudden America caught on to the ability to take a shitty product, inject
    0:06:05 it with emotion and get unnatural margins. So the primary algorithm for building shareholder
    0:06:11 value in 1945 to 1995 was a mediocre shoe, salty snack or car and then wrapped these
    0:06:18 amazing brand codes around it. Individualism, toughness, tough like a rock, European elegance,
    0:06:22 30 cents a peanut butter paste gets turned into $3 a peanut butter. Why? Because choosing
    0:06:28 mom’s choose Jeff, maternal love, right? So in addition, we could, after developing
    0:06:34 these brand codes to inject into peanut butter paste, we could hammer these codes into people’s
    0:06:38 brains using the most unbelievably inexpensive cheap, didn’t realize what a great bargain
    0:06:43 it was called broadcast advertising where 60, 80% of America every night tuned into one
    0:06:48 of three channels and you could raise awareness around a brand in a week. And if you want
    0:06:52 to talk about efficiency, the Academy Awards, a 30 second spot costs five times as much as
    0:06:55 it did 40 years ago and it reaches 130 the audience. So in some, the ROI has gone down
    0:07:01 by 15 fold. You’re literally getting 6% of the ROI you used to get 30 or 40 years ago
    0:07:05 on advertising. So that was the way to make money. That was the way to print money. And
    0:07:10 then, and then came along the end of the brand era in the 80s and 90s was the introduction
    0:07:15 of Google. And that is weapons of mass diligence said, well, you don’t know, you don’t need
    0:07:20 to buy a Neralco or Gillette hair clipper to shave your head because we now have blogs
    0:07:24 that if you type in best hair clipper in the world or best beard trimmer, they’ll take
    0:07:30 you to this blog on shaving your head. And there’s some former factory in East Germany
    0:07:34 out of East Germany that makes the best clip from the world. There’s just, oh, okay, four
    0:07:37 seasons of Mandarin Oriental. Data used to always defer to those brands and stay there.
    0:07:40 Why? One, cause someone else was paying, did a lot of consulting around the world, a lot
    0:07:44 of speaking. And two, they were always a seven or an eight. And then I realized, oh, what
    0:07:48 do you know? What do you know? The hotel du Cap is the best hotel in France and Greeks
    0:07:53 have old European elegance. Oh, what do you know? The Soho House in Berlin has an incredible
    0:07:58 gym. Oh, what do you know? Daddy likes to roll at the polo lounge. That’s where all,
    0:08:02 that’s where all the celebs are. Daddy likes to hang out with the younger cool people, maybe
    0:08:06 have some people over for a $54 Cobb salad at the brand of the Patty, whatever it’s called
    0:08:12 next. I no longer need to defer to the brand. A brand is shorthand or due diligence when
    0:08:17 you don’t have time, but now it’s very easy to do your own diligence. And the shorthand
    0:08:22 or the automatic differential nod to a brand is no longer as obvious, meaning that brand
    0:08:28 equity on top of a shitty product is no longer the algorithm to build shareholder value.
    0:08:34 It’s brands that are built based on superior innovation, operations, distribution. Amazon
    0:08:37 is one of the strongest brands in the world. Google is one of the strongest brands in the
    0:08:41 world. What do these things have in common? What does any company have in common that
    0:08:46 has added over $100 billion in value in any single year? They spend almost no money on
    0:08:51 traditional branding. They spent it all on supply chain and innovation and actual 10x
    0:08:56 better product. Instagram is a 10x better product as is or was Google. I’m not sure
    0:09:00 it’s a 10x better product anymore. It hasn’t changed in 10 years, but the stuff that breaks
    0:09:04 through is in fact either delivered differently through distribution, has better customer
    0:09:09 support, has more interesting people talking about the product is scrappier around building
    0:09:16 awareness and first and foremost uses digital technologies to unlock some type of innovation.
    0:09:21 What are some of the assets you want in a brand? What are some of the things that really provide
    0:09:27 sustainable advantage? One of those things is visual metaphors. We have been learning
    0:09:31 from images or interpreting images for thousands of years. Thousands of years ago, people decided
    0:09:37 to educate their kids by painting stories on cave walls. Don’t go over here. They will
    0:09:42 kill you or plant the crops at this time of the year such that as a species, we could leverage
    0:09:47 our core confidence as a species or our advantage and that is communication and cooperation until
    0:09:52 the next generation helped them learn such that communication and storytelling basically
    0:10:00 takes instinct. If you are blessed with a visual metaphor, oh my God, oh my God. Literally
    0:10:08 Darth Vader or Goofy or the Matterhorn or Snow White or the Seven Dwarves, that shit,
    0:10:14 those are really, really powerful metaphors. Visual metaphors, objects, symbols, the color
    0:10:18 brown. If I’m driving and I see a big brown thing next to me, I’m like, oh, it’s UPS.
    0:10:21 Oh, they’re nice people. They make good money. They work really hard. They’re handsome, dreamy
    0:10:25 men. Sometimes they wear shorts, but they always wear brown and their trucks are always
    0:10:30 really, really clean. Boom. I like that. I see a swoosh. I see a swoosh. I think you
    0:10:35 didn’t win silver. You lost gold. I think of competitiveness. I think of Michael Jordan.
    0:10:40 These things are just so powerful when you own one. What is probably the greatest visual
    0:10:49 metaphor in the history of automobiles, at least until a few years ago, was the Jaguar.
    0:10:56 I mean, look at this bitch of a … Oh, I mean, he’s out. He’s hunting. He’s graceful.
    0:11:00 He’s out there. He’s got his partner, his spouse, and his cubs at home. They’re safe
    0:11:04 for a time being, but it’s up to him to go out into the wilderness and he’s so strong.
    0:11:10 He’s so sleek. He’s so agile. He kills. He hunts. He brings back the meat. Why? He’s
    0:11:17 a jungle cat. That thing is so fucking beautiful. So beautiful on the front of a hood. I mean,
    0:11:21 it also helped that they built some of the most beautiful cars in the world, but that
    0:11:28 logo, elegant, sleekness, strength, yet a certain feminine agility and gracefulness
    0:11:33 to it. Jesus Christ. And what do they do? What do they do? They went to fucking mid-journey
    0:11:38 or some generative AI bullshit and said, “Give us a logo that feels like an AI software
    0:11:45 company.” Oh my God. I can’t imagine anyone more deserving of being fired right now than
    0:11:50 whoever’s in charge of design or marketing at Jaguar or Tata Motors. Oh my God. Come
    0:11:56 on. What the fuck are you thinking? And it feels as if every CEO or CMO should do something
    0:11:59 or take something that doctors have to take, and that is a Hippocratic oath. And the first
    0:12:05 thing I say, and it’s actually, it sounds simple, but it’s really strong, do no harm.
    0:12:09 And that is if you go in, if you change your doctors, if you’re having cancer treatment,
    0:12:13 it’s sort of tempting for the new oncologists to say, “Well, thank God I’m here. You should
    0:12:18 be starting this chemo.” But their commitment is do no harm. And so if you’re on a current
    0:12:22 chemo and it seems to be working, they resist the temptation to pretend that they’re here
    0:12:27 to save everything, and they say, “Okay, what is the easiest way to do no harm? What do
    0:12:31 I do here first off to make sure that I’m not harming the patient?” I think every CEO
    0:12:36 and CMO should take that oath. Because what I have found in my experience, consulting
    0:12:41 to probably 34 of the 100 biggest companies in the world over the last 20 years, the CEO
    0:12:46 of the CMO, is that there’s such a huge temptation when you’re the new guy or gal to change everything.
    0:12:50 Thank God I’m here and fire the ad agency or change the strategy or whatever to put
    0:12:55 your mark on something and take credit for it. And oftentimes, the guy or gal before
    0:12:58 you was doing a pretty admirable job, and there’s a lot of good that you should hold
    0:13:04 on to. So why are they doing this? The Type 00 of Man in Jaguar’s 90-year history, Jaguar’s
    0:13:07 chief creative officer said in a statement, “You will feel uncomfortable, and that’s
    0:13:13 okay. I’ll smell you. You will feel uncomfortable, and that’s okay.” Why the pivot? Jaguar is
    0:13:17 betting on a complete brand to survive in the luxury EV market. Beyond that, Jaguar
    0:13:21 wants a new identity. According to the company’s managing director, the target market isn’t
    0:13:24 the traditional middle-aged banker anymore. It’s a younger, more affluent, urban and independently
    0:13:29 minded demographic. Yeah, that’s your target from an aspirational standpoint. The majority
    0:13:35 of people still buying luxury cars are primarily old white people. The Type 00 is just a design
    0:13:39 vision for Jaguar’s upcoming electric lineup. Does that mean it’s not actually a car? The
    0:13:44 first production model will be a four-door Grand Tour with a 478-mile range and a $127,000
    0:13:49 price tag. It’s supposed to hit the market in 2026. I’m looking at some pictures. I
    0:13:54 think it looks pretty cool, but I still like to see a big fucking jungle cat on the front
    0:13:58 of the hood. Anyways, the big question is, will Jaguar succeed in building a luxury
    0:14:04 EV brand? Oh God, this is a tough one. This is such a crowded market. And quite frankly,
    0:14:08 I think the best-run company in the world right now, automobile companies, Toyota, who
    0:14:13 bet big on hybrids. It appears that the charging infrastructure isn’t where it needs to be.
    0:14:17 People are still insecure about range, the cost. There’s a bunch of things that have
    0:14:21 appeared to be greater headwinds. Growth in the EV market has dramatically slowed. And
    0:14:26 what has worked? Hybrids, which give you a little bit of this, a little bit of some
    0:14:30 chip and some salsa, right? Some peanut butter and some chocolate. There you go. One plus
    0:14:37 one equals three, some nitro and some glycerin. And Toyota’s sales have bumped up pretty well.
    0:14:41 Tesla’s seem to be kind of flatlining. Is that fair? Probably still up. But it appears
    0:14:47 that a lot of people have overinvested in the EV market and that the more measured Toyota
    0:14:53 Smart to bet on hybrid and hybrid sales are booming. So I need to see this car. I’m looking
    0:15:00 at it. It looks pretty cool. But I don’t know. How do we turn lemons and turn them into lemonade?
    0:15:03 How do we chicken salad this chicken shit? Basically, they should come out and say the
    0:15:08 overwhelming affection and pushback we receive from customers, design experts, and academics
    0:15:14 and podcasters around the value of the logo has told us that we should not, we were abrupt
    0:15:18 in our change. And while we have a fantastic new car, we’re going to maintain this unbelievable
    0:15:22 metaphor that you’ve all expressed such incredible affection for. And here it is, and you plant
    0:15:29 it on the fucking hood, right? They could turn a loss into a win here, but be clear.
    0:15:37 Thus far, this is snatching defeat from the jaws of the jungle cat. We’ll be right back
    0:15:47 for our conversation with Cody Sanchez support for property comes from mint mobile. Missing
    0:15:50 out on something big can really hurt. Maybe your flag got canceled and you could make it
    0:15:54 to your friend’s wedding where your phone was on silent and you lost your chance at
    0:15:58 landing a new job. Missing out on a great deal on your wireless coverage isn’t exactly
    0:16:03 like that, but hey, it’s close enough. And mint mobile’s latest offer is one you really
    0:16:07 won’t want to miss right now. When you purchase a new three month phone plan with mint mobile,
    0:16:12 you’ll pay just $15 a month. That’s it. No strings attached. No sneaky fine print.
    0:16:16 Just a great deal. All men mobile plans come with high speed data and unlimited talk and
    0:16:21 text delivered on the nation’s largest 5g network. You can even keep your phone, your
    0:16:25 contacts and your number. You can get this new customer offer and a three month premium
    0:16:30 wireless plan for just $15 a month by going to mintmobile.com/propg. That’s mintmobile.com/propg.
    0:16:38 You can cut your wireless bill to $15 a month at mintmobile.com/propg. $45 up front payment
    0:16:42 required equivalent to $15 a month. New customers on first three month plan only speed slower
    0:16:48 above 30 gigabytes and unlimited plan additional taxes fees and restrictions apply. See Mint
    0:16:52 Mobile for details.
    0:16:55 Support for this show comes from Seven Rooms. What’s the recipe for taking your restaurant
    0:17:00 to the next level? While restaurant operators know a key part of it is making more money
    0:17:05 and making sure it keeps coming in. That’s why you want to bring Seven Rooms to the table.
    0:17:10 Seven Rooms is an all in one CRM marketing and operations platform that helps you make
    0:17:15 more money for your operation and more magic for your guests. It equips your staff with
    0:17:20 the tools you need to deliver service that keeps your guests coming back for more. You
    0:17:25 can wow diners with a host of tools that let you create personalized experiences, organize
    0:17:32 unforgettable events and deepen patron loyalty. From direct reservations to smart table management
    0:17:37 and targeted email marketing. Seven Rooms helps you grow your brand and your covers and not
    0:17:45 your workload. Learn more at SevenRooms.com. Seven Rooms, make magic, make money.
    0:17:52 Amazon Q Business is the new generative A.I. assistant from AWS because many tasks can
    0:18:00 make business slow, like wading through the mud. Luckily there’s a faster, easier, less
    0:18:05 messy choice. Amazon Q can securely understand your business data and use that knowledge
    0:18:10 to streamline tasks. Now you can summarize quarterly results or do complex analyses in
    0:18:19 no time. Q got this. Learn what Amazon Q Business can do for you at AWS.com/learnmore.
    0:18:38 That’s aws.com/learnmore.
    0:18:41 Welcome back. Here’s our conversation with Cody Sanchez, a former Wall Street investor
    0:18:48 and the founder and CEO of Contrarian Thinking. Cody, where does this podcast find you?
    0:18:53 Austin, Texas, actually. Nice. Let’s bust right into it. You have a book coming out
    0:18:58 in early December titled Main Street Millionaire, How to Make Extraordinary Wealth Buying Ordinary
    0:19:03 Businesses. In your book, you share your journey to building a nine-figure portfolio. So first,
    0:19:09 what is your definition of rich? Well, I think mostly rich, I think of as freedom.
    0:19:14 So it’s can you push back on the world and live the life you want to live? You know this
    0:19:17 all too well, but as you start making money, there’s always a bigger number that sounds
    0:19:21 more interesting. But I think the biggest thing is that you kind of get to do what you want
    0:19:26 to do to some degree, and life still sucks, and it’s hard in many ways. But it sucks a
    0:19:29 lot less when you have a bank account that allows you to kind of work where you want,
    0:19:34 live where you want to, and build what you want to. And so I kind of have the words “rich”
    0:19:40 and “more free” as synonymous. Yeah, you introduced this something called
    0:19:44 the rich method. Can you break it down for us? Yeah. Well, the idea is basically four
    0:19:49 segments of the book. So first thing is research. So a lot of people, when they think about
    0:19:52 buying a business, they hear the idea, then they go think, “Well, I’ll go buy a business.”
    0:19:57 And I’m like, “Eesh, you could actually really lose money buying a business or doing deals
    0:20:01 or investing if you do it wrong.” And so the first part is, can you spend a little bit
    0:20:04 of time actually breaking down what it takes to buy a business? We think there are like
    0:20:09 10 steps to buying a business. So that first rich is a big component of doing your due
    0:20:13 diligence and understanding what that even means, to figuring out what a deal might be
    0:20:20 good for you, not just a good deal overall. And then next, we like to break into the eye,
    0:20:25 which is invest. So now that you kind of understand what you’re doing, how can you start allocating
    0:20:31 a little bit of either risk, so like your time, maybe your expertise, or capital, money
    0:20:35 in order to do a deal. So I also don’t think you can spell rich without risk in some way,
    0:20:41 shape, or form, whether it’s your time or somebody else’s. And then C is for command.
    0:20:45 So the idea is that your first deal probably will not be your best deal in the same way
    0:20:48 that your first job is hopefully not your last job. You’re going to get better at it.
    0:20:52 You’re going to do bigger ones. You’re going to understand what investing is good for you
    0:20:56 one way or the other. And then finally, we want to take it to the next level, which is
    0:21:01 how can you actually scale in a significant way? Maybe that looks like a holding company.
    0:21:05 Maybe that looks like you doing additional deals inside of your main business. I saw
    0:21:10 when I was on Wall Street, most of the money made by financial professionals is not actually
    0:21:15 coming up with brilliant startup ideas. They’re sold too well. 90% of them fail, but I think
    0:21:19 the other part we don’t talk about is that the average income of an entrepreneur that
    0:21:25 did a startup is like $47,000 to $67,000 a year, three to four years in. So it’s like
    0:21:30 you lose money. You pay for the right to lose money multiple years in a startup. And then
    0:21:35 most people don’t really make more than you would if you were in a corporate job, and
    0:21:42 the very, very few make an absurd amount of money. But it’s actually quite hard. And so
    0:21:47 I kind of obsess on this idea of what if we just focused on profitable businesses instead?
    0:21:52 And what if when we had our brilliant business idea, instead of just going out and starting
    0:21:56 it, unless we want to start the next Facebook, we can’t sleep for the want of the company
    0:22:00 being in the world, then I think instead we should probably start with a nice little
    0:22:05 profitable business and then maybe acquire a few others on top of it. And so we can actually
    0:22:10 buy other people’s 10,000 hours as opposed to having to slay away for them for decades
    0:22:11 ourselves.
    0:22:17 Just a lot of it. So I’m that person that started a bunch of businesses because I didn’t
    0:22:20 know how to buy a business. So I started a bunch and you’re right. It’s just riskier.
    0:22:25 The upside, I think the few times, or the couple of times I got it right, I probably
    0:22:31 made more than someone who bought a similar business. But I also just took more risk and
    0:22:35 I had some zeros and it’s unlikely I would have gotten, you know, had zeros if I just
    0:22:39 come into companies that were already working and bought them. Doesn’t it come down to similar
    0:22:44 to the housing market? It’s all about the price you buy at. And that is buying a good
    0:22:49 business at a decent price to make money. But if you at some price, if the market gets
    0:22:55 crazy and everyone reads your book and starts crawling all over the country for small businesses,
    0:23:00 as some private equity firms are doing, that it becomes too expensive, don’t you really
    0:23:04 need to kind of figure out, and this is, I guess, part of your art research, what you
    0:23:07 should be paying for this type of business?
    0:23:12 Yeah. I mean, I had a mentor of mine that told me a line I really liked that I’ve remembered
    0:23:16 for years, which is you can have my price in your terms or your terms in my price, but
    0:23:22 you can’t have both. And that pros want to actually control the terms, want the price.
    0:23:28 And so I think you’re right at the base level, which is it’s really hard to work your way
    0:23:33 out of a bad deal done upfront. But more than obsessing on price, I would obsess on the
    0:23:38 terms. Like, I could give you a million bucks for a business that only does $10,000 in annual
    0:23:43 revenue if I got to pay it over the next 40 years out of future profits, as long as I
    0:23:49 got to keep, I don’t know, $5,000 a month. So one of the things I’m hoping that we can
    0:23:54 teach people is like, real estate’s funny because it’s been so commoditized now, you
    0:23:59 can’t do a lot of term changes to it, right? You’re not like stellar finance me that house.
    0:24:02 That’s pretty hard to talk to somebody into. You’re not going to ask them to change the
    0:24:07 mortgage terms to go out a crazy different amount. You’re not going to say, well, if
    0:24:11 I find X, can I have a little bit of capital I can hold back in case we did the valuation
    0:24:15 wrong upfront? You can’t really do any of that real estate anymore. I’m sure eventually
    0:24:21 businesses will be able to do less of it. But businesses just have so many levers that
    0:24:27 I think the real goal here is can you control the terms so that what you think you’re buying,
    0:24:32 like base level, yes, you need to know what a business valuation should be. But I think
    0:24:36 the real problem is you get into a business, you’re like, hey, this guy’s been running
    0:24:41 it for 30 years. I’m going to buy it for a million bucks. And I think the business makes
    0:24:45 enough money in order for it to be worth a million bucks. And you quickly realize you’ve
    0:24:49 never run a business before. And so you’re probably not going to do as well as the guy
    0:24:54 immediately out the gate, and then you run out of cash. And so my biggest protection
    0:24:59 is always how can we even pay a little bit more for something? I’m okay with a premium
    0:25:04 as long as it’s over time and we decrease our risk by how we structure the deal.
    0:25:07 One of the things we really enjoyed about your book is your focus on investing in what
    0:25:11 you call mainstream businesses, industries, including plumbing, construction, cleaning
    0:25:16 and electrical services. This is something we talk about a lot on the pod, how the skilled
    0:25:21 trades are often overlooked. What makes these unsexy businesses so reliable for wealth
    0:25:22 building?
    0:25:27 Yeah. Well, that’s when I really like wanted to reach out to you originally was because
    0:25:31 you have seen all sides of the trade. You’ve been a public market guy forever. You’ve also
    0:25:36 been inside the university system. You know, you’ve also seen inside of even private entities
    0:25:39 or some companies, maybe you want to take private from public, you’ve kind of seen the
    0:25:43 full gamut of what a company can do. And I’ve been sort of yelling at the internet for the
    0:25:51 past four years about the fact that during the 1800s, American ownership was 80%. Most
    0:25:58 Americans owned their own business. This time around, we’re happy if 10% of Americans own
    0:26:03 their own business. In fact, it’s about 6% of Americans own their own business. And you
    0:26:06 know how we know we’re losing is that the Canadians have more ownership than we do.
    0:26:13 They have like 7.8% ownership. And so, my theory here is that ownership leads to wealth
    0:26:18 most often if that ownership is sustainable. And I think we have this like crisis where
    0:26:24 we have a bunch of young people today having 452 LLCs that make no money. And so we have
    0:26:29 a lot of like quote unquote company creation, especially since 2020, but they don’t make
    0:26:35 any money, you know, 60% of all small businesses listed are single proprietorships with no
    0:26:41 properties. And so why I like Main Street businesses are if you’ve been a landscaping
    0:26:46 company for 10 years, you’ve been in existence, you never got funding from somebody to run
    0:26:51 your business. You never got VC capital. That thing had to make money by itself year after
    0:26:56 year in order for you to fund your salary. And so these Main Street businesses never
    0:27:01 benefited from this huge glut of capital that came from venture capital and even private
    0:27:07 equity firms, they take the company entirely. So if they value a company incorrectly, it
    0:27:11 doesn’t hurt like the individual. It hurts their investors. And I think they’ve gotten
    0:27:16 a bad rap, but they also are the thing that builds local communities. And I’d way rather
    0:27:23 some corner coffee shops and local landscaping than a Starbucks or a PE owned roll up.
    0:27:28 On the diary of a CEO, you listed three businesses that you really like right now. Senior care
    0:27:33 centers, businesses that are services-based that don’t require a lot of upfront capital,
    0:27:37 including window cleaning, pressure washing and painting businesses. And the third being
    0:27:41 what you call gateway drug businesses. What did you mean by that?
    0:27:46 Yeah. So gateway drug businesses are the business that allows you to get a little taste of what
    0:27:51 the addictive game of business is, which is running a PNL, making money, being your own
    0:27:56 boss. It’s awful, but it’s also amazing once you’ve done it. And so gateway drug business
    0:28:00 would be a thing like what is typically called like a self-serve car wash. So they’re not
    0:28:06 super expensive. You don’t have a ton of employees. It’s not a complex business to understand.
    0:28:09 And thus you might be able to start with something like that. Mine famously was a laundromat.
    0:28:13 That was my idea when I first started buying businesses. I was like, man, I’ve been a
    0:28:17 corporate junkie for so long. I don’t know if I could run a business by myself. This
    0:28:21 one’s pretty simple. I could probably run this one. It’s like dirty clothes, go into
    0:28:25 a machine, get clean. I take a quarter, I make money on it. That makes sense to me. There’s
    0:28:30 not that many levers to the business. And so a lot of these are called people light
    0:28:36 or capital light businesses. So not that many employees, not that much operating expense.
    0:28:40 These are the type of businesses that I think are interesting for people to get their hands
    0:28:44 a little bit dirty on the game of business to start. And the only caveat there is we’ve
    0:28:49 seen a huge increase in the multiple cost of these business since we’ve started talking
    0:28:53 about that, both laundromats and car washes. So keep your eye on the prize that you do pay
    0:28:58 the right price in terms. Yeah, that makes sense. And then also, you
    0:29:03 talk about, or I think it’s in your book, but we talk a lot about here, about this silver
    0:29:08 tsunami in that with so many baby boomers retiring, there’s a huge opportunity for younger
    0:29:13 generations to acquire these businesses. What are some signs that a small business is ideal
    0:29:19 for acquisition? What are some rules of the road for what feels like a good business in
    0:29:22 your view? I have two methodologies. If you’re going
    0:29:28 to buy a business, first thing is we buy realities and profits. We don’t buy hopes and dreams.
    0:29:31 So I think where you can go really wrong in buying a small business is that you go and
    0:29:36 buy a business that’s losing money today and you go, the thing is I can fix it. And I always
    0:29:41 compare this to real estate. Like how many times have you redone a house and it’s under
    0:29:45 budget and done quicker than you thought it was? The answer is like never. It’s just physics
    0:29:49 or something. And so just make sure that you don’t buy turnaround businesses. I think that’s
    0:29:53 for pros. If you’re a pro, you could do a turnaround, but you’ve done some of those publicly.
    0:29:58 Man, they’re brutal and litigious and so stay away from that. The second thing that makes
    0:30:03 a business really interesting to me, I think, is that you have an owner of the business
    0:30:08 who’s been around for a long time. It has a managerial layer. So it’s not just a job,
    0:30:13 it’s a business. There are other people running varying divisions of the business. It’s profitable.
    0:30:18 The business is usually in a recession resistant sector. Like for instance, it doesn’t mean
    0:30:22 that it can’t go down, but you might have a plumbing business. You might have a roofing
    0:30:27 business. You might have a landscaping business. These aren’t so luxurious of items that you’re
    0:30:33 going to die during the recession as opposed to a custom framing business, which maybe
    0:30:36 is not the best business to get into with volatility.
    0:30:39 And then the last thing that I think is interesting for these small businesses is you really got
    0:30:44 to make sure that you don’t get in over your head. I say so simple grandma could do it.
    0:30:48 And if grandma doesn’t understand your business model, then maybe that’s not the right business
    0:30:49 for you.
    0:30:54 People have been talking about this for a while, that there are a lot of mainstream businesses
    0:30:58 coming up for sale and there’s a bit of an asymmetric or dislocation. What do I mean
    0:31:03 by that? That young people find these businesses not sexy and there’s a lot of baby boomers
    0:31:07 whose kids don’t want to inherit the business. If a dad has a carpet cleaning business and
    0:31:13 makes good money, he wants to retire and he can’t find anyone. And there’s not a real liquid
    0:31:18 market here. Is this market getting more liquid? Have you seen, you reference evaluations
    0:31:21 have gone up, but you still feel there’s a lot of opportunity.
    0:31:26 Yeah. Well, now we have some unique data on this market. So we bought a website called
    0:31:30 BizScout, which is a marketplace for buying and selling small businesses. Now we have
    0:31:36 68,000 listings on that website. We’ve connected about 3,000 buyers and sellers over the past
    0:31:41 four weeks. And we’re starting to get sort of our first realm of proprietary data, which
    0:31:45 is it’s a real bitch to get data in the small business space. You can go to the SBA. They
    0:31:48 won’t really release any information from you. There’s a couple of behemoths in the
    0:31:50 industry. They don’t really share third party data.
    0:31:56 And so what we found from the 58,000 businesses listed is most of them are highly incomplete.
    0:32:01 So we have this marketplace where it’s the opposite of Zillow and Redfin. There’s no
    0:32:08 historical listings of pricing. There’s no uploaded QuickBooks or tax documentation to
    0:32:14 confirm what the listings have located there. Very little usage of data room. They say that
    0:32:20 less than 10% of all small businesses that are listed for sale run through a broker.
    0:32:27 So most of the businesses are kind of a carefully concealed series of disasters. And they don’t
    0:32:33 have a roadmap for you to actually see what you’re buying. And so because of that, I could
    0:32:37 scream about this from the rooftops. But if people don’t actually know how to get inside
    0:32:41 of a business, hold the hand of a business owner that’s done paper invoices for seven
    0:32:47 years and move them into 21st century tech, they’re probably not going to close that sale.
    0:32:53 And so I think we still have a lot of runway to go there. Plus, this is the perfect fragmented
    0:32:59 market. I mean, most of these small businesses are probably jobs. But guess who wants a job?
    0:33:02 Your 30-year-olds who are making less than their parents were at 30 as you’ve talked
    0:33:07 about before, they’d be thrilled with a business where they could raise their prices more than
    0:33:10 inflation each year, where they could be their own boss and where they might actually be
    0:33:17 able to grow the business overall. And so businesses that are sub $10 million in revenue
    0:33:21 are numerous. I mean, that would be businesses sub $10 million, but above $5 million or about
    0:33:28 20% of the marketplace. And the rest is below $5 million in annual revenue, which is a very,
    0:33:30 very small business.
    0:33:35 Talk a little bit about financing. There’s different ways to finance a small business.
    0:33:40 I would think a lot of people don’t consider us because I think I’ve got $20, $30,000 to
    0:33:45 my name or no capital. What are different means of financing the acquisition of a small
    0:33:46 business?
    0:33:50 Yeah. Without trying to sound like a used car salesman saying that you could buy a car
    0:33:56 with $0 down and no credit, the interesting part about the business landscape is the credit
    0:33:59 is not your own. I think a lot of people don’t realize this. When you go to buy a house,
    0:34:05 you go, “Okay, I got $200,000 in earned income. They’ll loan me whatever based on my earned
    0:34:10 income, and I can’t buy a house that’s more than that. It’s all based on how much I earn.”
    0:34:14 You go to buy a small business, the small business is what the loan is on. Now, they
    0:34:19 also want to make sure that you are not going to fail and you’re not going to sit as a liability
    0:34:22 on their balance sheet because you can’t run the business, but they’re really analyzing
    0:34:27 the business. So your earned income is whatever the earned income of the business makes, which
    0:34:30 is like a huge mindset for people to have to think about.
    0:34:37 Now, we know the SBA will do loans up to 90% of the purchase price of a small business.
    0:34:43 So that means you’re on the hook for probably 10% to 20% down for a small business. And
    0:34:47 then you want to have float. You want to have enough cash on hand to make sure you can handle
    0:34:51 operating costs for the business overall. But there’s three ways that we buy businesses
    0:34:56 that people don’t think about. One, Uncle Sam, SBA gives you money to buy the business.
    0:35:00 This is just getting expanded. For the first time ever, they’re allowing diversified investors.
    0:35:04 So you don’t have to be the only one. You don’t even have to put up the 10 or 20% now.
    0:35:08 You can have other people invest alongside you, put up the capital and be on the loan
    0:35:10 with you. That’s just enacted this year.
    0:35:15 The second way is seller financing or creative financing. I don’t really like to say seller
    0:35:18 financing because it kind of sounds weird if you go to the owner of business and say
    0:35:24 like, “You sell me your business using your future profits,” which is what it is. I might
    0:35:28 say instead creative financing. In the book, we have like a couple of graphs that I think
    0:35:33 help make this more reasonable as to why a seller would do this. But 60% of all small
    0:35:38 businesses are sold with some component of seller financing, which is a wild number.
    0:35:44 Now, not 80%, but 30% at least. And then the third way that we see small businesses getting
    0:35:48 sold, and we’re seeing it like crazy in Japan, I think it’s going to start happening more
    0:35:53 here in the US, is basically we’re seeing apprenticeship begin again. A small business
    0:35:58 owner knows that they want to retire in the next five years. And because they want to
    0:36:02 retire in the next five years, they are starting to look for somebody to take over for their
    0:36:07 small business for them. And so it just happened with Jade, a member of our community. She
    0:36:11 went to her boss, this is a military contracting company, and said, “I want to eventually take
    0:36:16 over your business. Would you be open to selling to me?” And instead he said, “Why don’t we
    0:36:22 start transitioning from the business from me to you, and I’ll continue to take up glorified
    0:36:28 salary, really like a royalty payment on what you make over the next five, 10, or 15 years,
    0:36:32 but I don’t even need you to actually buy the business from me.” And so if we don’t
    0:36:36 do this, my thought is that a bunch of these businesses go away and they die, and we’ve
    0:36:42 seen that happen. And so that is why I’m pushing people to say, “Yes, be careful of risk, but
    0:36:47 these businesses are available all around you to purchase, and baby boomers simply will
    0:36:51 not live forever. And if we don’t buy them, then those businesses will go away entirely.”
    0:36:57 So say you’re sold on this, what’s the best way to try and cast a wide net and identify
    0:37:01 these businesses? I wouldn’t even know where to start to try and find these businesses.
    0:37:07 Well, I think the first thing you got to do is we call it deal clarity. So you got to
    0:37:11 really make sure you know what you want in a business. I think a lot of reasons why people
    0:37:14 get overwhelmed in searching is because they’re like, “Okay, I’m going to buy a business. I
    0:37:17 guess Cody talked about laundromats, so I’m going to buy a laundromat.” And that’s not
    0:37:23 actually right. If we call it a perfect fit business, so imagine three circles of N diagram
    0:37:27 in the middle is the business that’s perfect for you. What I usually tell people today
    0:37:32 is like, “Everybody listening has some sort of skill set that is unique to them. If you’re
    0:37:36 an accountant, yes, you could go buy a landscaping company, and accountants actually are great
    0:37:40 for buying businesses because you know how to analyze the P&L, but you might be better
    0:37:45 off buying and counting from. You might be better off actually looking at your competitors
    0:37:49 and some of the others in your same or similar industry.” So that’s more strategic. I always
    0:37:55 think first, what is your satellite acquisition strategy where either you already have a skill,
    0:37:59 you’re an employee in that business, you just go buy a business that is similar. Number
    0:38:04 two would be what if you are an accountant, but you don’t want to stay an accountant.
    0:38:07 You want to do something else. Well, then you might want to run around and look for a
    0:38:13 business that necessitates somebody who has a strong financial acumen. And then third,
    0:38:17 we kind of go through this, it’s called the deal box, this from investing, but we have
    0:38:22 our investment thesis categorized by 15 different components that says how much money do you
    0:38:26 want to make? Where does the business located? Do you want to run the business or do you
    0:38:31 want to be an investor in the business? Do you want the business in which sectors? And
    0:38:37 once you fill out this deal box, I think bumper lanes actually make it easier to hit the pins.
    0:38:44 And so then you can start narrowing down your deal search. And we talk about the 100 to
    0:38:48 50 to 10 to 1 rule, which is basically you’re going to look at 100 different companies,
    0:38:53 just like you’d look at 100 different houses, high level on business sites, high level publicly.
    0:38:58 And then you’re probably going to, you know, after you’re perusing your Zillow of business,
    0:39:01 you’re going to narrow down to like 50 that you might reach out. Most of them are never
    0:39:05 going to get back to you. Then you’re going to go down to 10 that you get kind of serious
    0:39:08 with and you might go visit them. You might get to know the owner. Maybe it’s people
    0:39:12 you already know you’re going to get into their financials. And then you get down to
    0:39:16 one business that you actually buy. And I’m not saying that’s the right way to do it always,
    0:39:19 but it’s a good rule of thumb.
    0:39:24 We’ll be right back.
    0:39:29 Support for Prop G comes from Aura. Sharing pictures is a great way to keep up with family,
    0:39:32 whether you’re sending photos of that remote camping trip or just a series of drained selfies.
    0:39:36 There’s nothing like offering a glimpse of your world to the people you love. And that’s
    0:39:40 never been easy. Thanks to Aura’s digital picture frames. Name the number one digital
    0:39:44 photo frame by Wirecutter. Aura frames makes it easy to share unlimited photos and videos
    0:39:47 directly from your phone to the frame. And when you give an Aura frame as a gift, you
    0:39:51 can personalize and preload it with thoughtful messages and photos using the Aura app, making
    0:39:56 it an ideal present for long distance loved ones. I actually tried Aura frame for myself.
    0:40:01 I purchased one for my in-laws. They absolutely love it. I think it’s a wonderful experience.
    0:40:05 Or I should say it’s a wonderful gift. You can save on the perfect gift by visiting Aura
    0:40:11 Frames.com to get $35 off Aura’s best-selling Carver Mat frames with promo code “PROPG”
    0:40:17 at checkout. That’s A-U-R-A, Frames.com. Promo code “PROPG.” This deal is exclusive
    0:40:28 to listeners and available just in time for the holidays. Terms and conditions apply.
    0:40:32 All for “PROPG” comes from Grammarly. AI is making its way into many workplaces and
    0:40:36 there’s a lot of talk about improving efficiency and streaming workflow. And a big piece of
    0:40:41 efficiency? Clear communication. Grammarly delivers a consistent communication experience
    0:40:46 across your organization’s ecosystem so roadblocks at work get unblocked. Best of all, that only
    0:40:51 takes days to implement. No IT overhead required. So you can unify your team and see results
    0:40:55 right away. Grammarly unifies your team’s voice across platforms by seamlessly working
    0:41:00 across more than 500,000 web and desktop apps. Grammarly reports that teams that use their
    0:41:07 technology are 25% faster to resolve support tickets and spend 52% less time writing sales
    0:41:12 emails. We here at “PROPG” were able to try out Grammarly and I have to say it was a very
    0:41:18 productive experience. It got us kind of unified, if you will, made our voice more consistent
    0:41:22 and quite frankly made sort of wrote emails just easier to write. Join 70,000 team members
    0:41:27 and 30 million people who trust Grammarly to work faster everywhere they communicate.
    0:41:36 Go to grammarly.com/enterprise to learn more. Grammarly, Enterprise Ready AI.
    0:41:40 Support for “PROPG” comes from the Life360 Tile Tracker. Okay, take a deep breath because
    0:41:44 I’m going to talk to you about the holidays. Now, maybe you still have some fond memories
    0:41:47 from when you were younger but these days the holidays usually mean travel, running around,
    0:41:52 grabbing gifts, seeing relatives and dealing with snow and all of those logistics plus leaving
    0:41:56 your things at home unattended can always cause anxiety. So, during this holiday season
    0:42:01 you can let Life360’s tile trackers help you eliminate some of that stress. If anything
    0:42:05 gets lost or stolen just ring your tile and you can track down its location on the map.
    0:42:10 That’s peace of mind all season long. The Tile Tracker is the first and only tile tracker
    0:42:14 with an SOS button which means you can triple press the button in the center of the tile
    0:42:18 device to discreetly send an SOS alert to everyone in your Life360 circle. And unlike
    0:42:22 competitors, Tile won’t alert thieves to its presence via notifications. So, take the
    0:42:27 stress out of your holidays and keep your family’s most prized possessions safe. Family
    0:42:32 proof your family with Life360’s Tile Tracker. Visit Tile.com today and use code “PROPG”
    0:42:43 to get 15% off. That’s Tile.com code “PROPG.”
    0:42:47 Can I ask what you think about the MBA and college degrees right now?
    0:42:52 I’m not the biggest proponent. Here’s what I can say. I have an MBA from Georgetown.
    0:42:59 I went all credentials down the way. I started off at ASU, Harvard of the West, and didn’t
    0:43:04 apply anywhere else. It was just where I got in for free. But then I was a Goldman in
    0:43:09 State Street in Vanguard in first trust. So, I thought that in order to progress you had
    0:43:14 to get an MBA. That was my idea. So, I went and I spent whatever $100,000 plus getting
    0:43:20 the Georgetown MBA and added on a PhD to it. If I could go back right now and instead
    0:43:26 take those two years back from my MBA and that $100,000 and instead buy a couple of
    0:43:32 these businesses, I would. And to be perfectly frank, I learned nothing related to running
    0:43:38 a business at my Georgetown MBA. I learned a lot about international business, which
    0:43:41 is interesting at the time. And I learned a lot about how to make sure the government
    0:43:45 doesn’t fuck with your business too much because I ran a pretty big international finance business
    0:43:49 at the time. I also am not in touch with anybody that I went to Georgetown with. Like, they
    0:43:53 say, “Well, if you don’t go for the knowledge, you go for the network.” I don’t know. I have
    0:44:00 a better network from YPO and EO, which cost me like 4K a year and maybe like 10K a year
    0:44:06 for YPO. So, I have a little bit of a jaded view about MBAs in particular. I think it’s
    0:44:09 awesome when you’re like me, you want to climb a corporate ladder and you want a virtue
    0:44:14 signal. Or if you don’t really know what you want out of life yet and so you just want
    0:44:18 to see the full spectrum of jobs or opportunities available, then I like it. But if you want
    0:44:25 to be a business owner, the best business school is business and it pays you.
    0:44:29 You said you’d wish you had that $100,000 back to buy one or two businesses. What kind
    0:44:33 of business? Give us an example of a business that you or someone you know has been able
    0:44:38 to buy for $100,000. The type of business, the cash flows where it ultimately ends up
    0:44:39 in three or five years.
    0:44:44 Well, one of the first businesses I bought was a laundromat for $100,000. And it did
    0:44:52 about $67,000 a year in “profit,” but that was also the operator’s payment. And that
    0:44:56 business was perfect kind of because I had a guy who knew how to run a laundromat. He
    0:44:59 was a real estate guy. Real estate guys are interesting to partner on some of these businesses
    0:45:04 because they have to fix a lot of stuff. They have a handyman. They usually know like local
    0:45:09 geography. And so he knew that this area was pretty good. We also ended up buying the property
    0:45:11 that it was in.
    0:45:16 So that business didn’t make me much money. Like I was in finance, $67,000 a year plus
    0:45:21 split with the guy plus whatever extra expenses we have was basically not very much. But what
    0:45:24 we realized from doing that first deal is we could add three or four more to those. And
    0:45:29 that business ended up getting pretty healthy, $300,000, $400,000 a year in both of our
    0:45:35 pockets, split between the two of us in our pockets. And that’s when I realized, oh, there’s
    0:45:41 not that much difference between a smaller deal and a bigger deal, just confidence at
    0:45:45 some degree. And then also once we did a couple of those, then we were like, huh, we would
    0:45:49 need to add wash and fold to this. So then one of our laundromats, actually one located
    0:45:54 here in Texas, ended up doing $3 million a year in total revenue and then more like
    0:46:00 a 25% margin on just that one laundromat from a wash and fold add-on. And so even a laundromat
    0:46:04 can scale up to a business that does a couple of million dollars a year if you have a few
    0:46:08 of them, one individually know, and that’s a laundromat is probably the worst business
    0:46:14 from a total return standpoint out there because you cannot scale it very high. And all these
    0:46:18 VC companies have died at the altar of trying to spend a bunch of money on laundromats and
    0:46:19 scale them up.
    0:46:23 But for a new person who didn’t understand much, you know, that’s how I made my first
    0:46:26 couple of hundred K outside of my nine to five.
    0:46:30 There’s a lot of research showing restaurants where the owner is there just do tangibly
    0:46:36 better. I mean, isn’t this about being really on top of your business and if you want to
    0:46:40 scale, it’s about finding and retaining really talented managers. What kind of people do
    0:46:44 you look for in your business to bring on to manage these different businesses?
    0:46:49 Well, one good thing about a lot of these businesses is the word talent is so different
    0:46:54 here than it is for a media company. Like the talent at my media company, they’re expensive.
    0:47:02 They leave all the time. They don’t want to do all of the work. They have a lot of optionality.
    0:47:07 And you know, I’m lucky in that we screen for kind of the right culture fit for us.
    0:47:12 But that talent is really hard to manage. VC talent really hard to manage, really hard
    0:47:16 to keep, really expensive. When I run these small businesses, I mean, God, Laura, one
    0:47:24 of my operators has been with me for years and is incredible, like never asked for anything,
    0:47:30 can run a business that does, let’s call it almost just seven figures a year and probably
    0:47:36 will do it for decades for me and doesn’t require this really sophisticated product
    0:47:42 knowledge or sophisticated talent set. I think, you know, we owned a mobile home park, for
    0:47:47 instance. And like, do you know what the operator of a mobile home park makes a year?
    0:47:52 It’s funny, my father actually, his fourth wife owned mobile home parks. So I know a
    0:47:57 little bit about this. This is 20 years ago, but they made $28,000 plus they had their
    0:48:00 rent paid for it. But that was 10 or 20 years ago.
    0:48:04 Well, that’s, yeah. So I first learned this, I was shocked. I was like, wait a second, we
    0:48:12 paid in my mobile home park, we paid like 300 or maybe 400 bucks a month to this to the
    0:48:17 operator of the mobile home park, plus they got their rent for free, plus they got to
    0:48:23 screen everybody that came in. So they ended up picking their friends and like family members
    0:48:28 in order for them to come in as well. And that was the entire pay. And I remember when
    0:48:32 I asked originally to the guy about the mobile home park, I’m like, why would somebody do
    0:48:37 this job for so little? And, and he said a couple different reasons. He said, one, give
    0:48:42 them the friends and family perk. They really like, they like self-selection their own community.
    0:48:47 You know, to upgrade them, do whatever they want to their actual mobile home, like take
    0:48:52 care of everything for them. And then, and then three, like, that’s it, just make sure
    0:48:56 that they’re sort of taken care of from that perspective. And so, you know, she’s like
    0:49:03 in her sixties, loved the job and ran a mobile home park that did, you know, God, I mean,
    0:49:09 one and a half, $1.7 million a year. I think we underestimate how much we have to pay people
    0:49:12 when we’ve been in these fancy industries. And then, you know, we ended up selling the
    0:49:16 mobile home park and then she got a little piece of it, which was kind of cool at the
    0:49:17 end.
    0:49:21 The thing that always pops out to me about something like this is that return on investment
    0:49:27 has inversely correlated to how sexy businesses, these are not sexy businesses. And, but what
    0:49:32 is sexy as you get older is being able to take care of your kids and your parents. And
    0:49:37 like you said, be rich, do it, do whatever you want. Is there anyone sector right now
    0:49:42 that’s propping up that you think represents more opportunity than others?
    0:49:47 I think rehab, individual rehab homes right now, we’re analyzing a bunch of them. I mean,
    0:49:51 we have an addiction crisis here in the US, the likes of which really no country has ever
    0:49:59 seen before. And that’s not going to get better in the near future. And we do not have enough
    0:50:04 beds. We do not have enough resources for these individuals. And originally when I looked
    0:50:08 at the sector, I thought, well, who has the money to like spend up a $10 million or $50
    0:50:13 million rehab center that must be very aggressive. But actually there are all these grants for
    0:50:19 you to do it with single family homes. And so there are these small little rehab, I don’t
    0:50:23 even know if you would call it centers houses all around the country that are popping up,
    0:50:28 but you get subsidized by the federal government. You also get a bunch of tax breaks on top
    0:50:34 of it. You get to do something good for individuals. You also get some unique tax consequences
    0:50:39 because it’s largely real estate driven. You get a landhold on the real estate overall,
    0:50:45 and they’re not cheap to stay in. And so this one is, there’s not very many home services
    0:50:50 businesses that I think can have like a real positive impact too besides the clean communities
    0:50:54 I think are good for society. But this is one where I think you could make a real impact.
    0:50:59 You can make some money, and it’s probably going to expand crazily. And then we’re going
    0:51:02 to eventually see a bunch of PE guys buying it out.
    0:51:06 Cody Sanchez is a former Wall Street investor and the founder and CEO of Contrarian Thinking,
    0:51:12 a digital education company with over 7 million followers. She’s also the founder of Main Street
    0:51:16 Holdco, a small business holding company focused on bringing Main Street businesses back to
    0:51:20 the limelight and Contrarian Thinking capital, affirm that invest money back into the companies
    0:51:25 that support small business growth. Cody, I think what you’re doing is really important.
    0:51:29 Not only because it’s growing the economy and you’re creating jobs, but I think there’s
    0:51:34 an unfortunate zeitgeist that if a kid doesn’t go to Dartmouth and end up at Google, that
    0:51:39 he or she has failed. And there’s other pathways into the middle class and maybe even to the
    0:51:43 upper income home. And I think you’re sort of destigmatizing it. I think you’re actually
    0:51:48 playing them, not only an economically important role, but kind of an emotionally and psychologically
    0:51:54 important role. Really, really appreciate your good work. And, you know, right on sister.
    0:51:55 Well done.
    0:51:59 Thank you so much. I appreciate it. It’s fun. I wish more people realized garbage men have
    0:52:00 good times.
    0:52:03 There you go. Sanitation engineers. Thanks, Cody.
    0:52:20 I was very happy. My friend Adam gave me a piece of advice that always sort of resonated
    0:52:25 with me. He has two boys, you know, both doing well, both wonderful boys, but they’ve had
    0:52:30 like every other boy, they’ve had their issues at different times. And he said that the only
    0:52:36 thing that worked consistently was time. And that is eventually things worked out or got
    0:52:40 better. And it struck me. And even though I don’t act this way, I know it’s right, but
    0:52:46 I don’t always act on it. My son is doing really well at school. Kind of, I don’t want
    0:52:52 to say all of a sudden he’s always done okay, even good, but all of a sudden he’s just doing
    0:52:58 incredibly well. And when I try to reverse engineer it to our environment or what we’ve
    0:53:04 done for him, here’s the answer. Here’s what we did. Absolutely nothing. There’s nothing
    0:53:10 we did. As a matter of fact, he wanted to take sports science. And our friends who are
    0:53:14 all, you know, Ivy League or die in America said, no, don’t do that. And he’d say economics
    0:53:19 or businesses, colleges don’t take sports science seriously. And so we had this big
    0:53:24 intervention, tried to talk him out of it. And he pushed back on us, which I’m really
    0:53:29 proud of him for. And he kept sports science and he’s getting commendations or whatever
    0:53:35 they call as the one at the top in his class in it. And it just struck me that so much
    0:53:41 of our stress around our kids is such unproductive stress. You know what you need to do? You need
    0:53:44 to love them unconditionally. You need to spend a lot of time with them. You need to
    0:53:49 try and instill a set of values in them. You need to model, right? You give your kids
    0:53:54 the basics. And then you realize that the only thing that’s works over the long term or
    0:54:01 doesn’t is time. And you forgive yourself, you do your best, you work out, you learn
    0:54:07 about baseball. But once you’ve thrown the pitch, you know, it’s up to the batter, your
    0:54:12 kid and God and the humidity in the air and the environment. So yeah, do you want to be
    0:54:16 a little bit stressed out? Sure. But at the end of the day, when you look back, you’re
    0:54:19 not going to be angry or upset about the bad things that happen to you or your kids. You’re
    0:54:24 going to be angry and upset and how much pressure you placed on yourself and then inject it
    0:54:30 into the relationship with your kid. The only thing that reliably works out over time, built
    0:54:36 on a base of love and support and time is time.
    0:54:40 This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez and Caroline Shagren. Drew Burroughs is our
    0:54:43 technical director. Thank you for listening to the Prop G-Pod from the Box Me at podcast
    0:54:48 network. We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy, No Malice as read by George Hahn.
    0:54:52 And please follow our Prop G-Markets Pod wherever you get your pods for new episodes
    0:54:54 every Monday and Thursday.
    0:55:15 Amazon
    0:55:21 Q Business is the generative A.I. assistant from AWS because business can be slow like
    0:55:29 wading through the mud. But Amazon Q helps streamline work so tests like summarizing
    0:55:38 monthly results can be done in no time. Learn what Amazon Q business can do for you at AWS.com/learnmore.
    0:55:44 That’s AWS.com/learnmore.
    0:55:48 Support for this show comes from Polestar. Polestar is an electric performance car brand
    0:55:53 that is focused on innovation for both cutting-edge technology and design. And their all-electric
    0:55:58 SUV, Polestar 3, is for those unwilling to compromise. For those who believe they shouldn’t
    0:56:02 have to choose between the spacious comfort of an SUV and the agile handling of a sports
    0:56:07 car. For those who need an intuitive infotainment system and a dashboard designed with minimalism
    0:56:12 in mind, Polestar 3 is for drivers who won’t settle for anything less. Book a test drive
    0:56:14 for Polestar 3 at Polestar.com
    0:56:17 (upbeat music)

    Codie Sanchez, a former Wall Street investor and the founder and CEO of Contrarian Thinking, joins Scott to discuss her new book, MAIN STREET MILLIONAIRE: How to Make Extraordinary Wealth Buying Ordinary Businesses.

    They get into how to build wealth by buying small businesses, including what to look for when buying, ways to finance a purchase, and which sectors have the most potential right now.

    Follow Codie, @codiesanchez.

    Scott opens with his thoughts on Jaguar’s rebrand. 

    Algebra of happiness: the only thing that works consistently is time. 

    Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice

    Buy “The Algebra of Wealth,” out now.

    Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • How AI Is Shaping the Future of Retail, Las Vegas and Its Strong Brand, and How Do You Help Your Kid Pick the Right College?

    AI transcript
    0:00:02 Support for the show comes from Farragamo.
    0:00:05 It’s the holidays and gift giving is top of mind.
    0:00:08 And now you can give the season a taste of luxury
    0:00:10 with Farragamo’s innovative wrapping service
    0:00:12 where every present is wrapped like delicious candy.
    0:00:15 Each carefully wrapped gift tells a story.
    0:00:16 And under that wrapping,
    0:00:19 you can find some truly iconic signature Farragamo items.
    0:00:21 Join Farragamo in celebrating the spirit of the holidays
    0:00:23 with a collection that promises to evoke wonder
    0:00:24 in every recipient.
    0:00:27 From small leather goods to the iconic hug handbag
    0:00:29 or Farragamo loafers and belts,
    0:00:32 visit Farragamo.com to discover the best holiday gifts
    0:00:34 for the entire family.
    0:00:43 Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
    0:00:46 If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you,
    0:00:49 Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention.
    0:00:52 Constant Contact’s award-winning marketing platform
    0:00:55 offers all the automation, integration,
    0:00:57 and reporting tools that get your marketing running
    0:00:59 seamlessly.
    0:01:02 All backed by their expert live customer support.
    0:01:04 It’s time to get going and growing
    0:01:07 with Constant Contact today.
    0:01:09 Ready, set, grow.
    0:01:13 Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
    0:01:17 Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial.
    0:01:20 ConstantContact.ca.
    0:01:24 Support for this show comes from Seven Rooms.
    0:01:26 For the restaurant operators out there
    0:01:28 who want to create more regulars on the regular,
    0:01:30 check out Seven Rooms.
    0:01:33 Seven Rooms is an all-in-one CRM marketing
    0:01:36 and operations platform that helps you make more money
    0:01:38 and more magic for your guests.
    0:01:40 It gives your staff the tools to deliver service
    0:01:43 that keeps your guests coming back for more,
    0:01:46 from direct reservations to smart table management
    0:01:48 to targeted text and email marketing.
    0:01:51 Seven Rooms helps you grow your brand and your covers
    0:01:53 and not your workload.
    0:01:55 Learn more at SevenRooms.com.
    0:01:58 Seven Rooms, make magic, make money.
    0:02:01 – Welcome to the Propgy Pods Office Hours.
    0:02:03 This is the part of the show where we answer questions
    0:02:05 about business, big tech, entrepreneurship
    0:02:06 and whatever else is on your mind.
    0:02:07 If you’d like to submit a question,
    0:02:09 please email a voice recording
    0:02:10 to OfficeHours@PropgyMedia.com.
    0:02:12 Again, that’s OfficeHours@PropgyMedia.com.
    0:02:13 Just a little bit of background,
    0:02:15 a little bit of texture on the dog.
    0:02:19 I’m in Brazil, in Sao Paulo.
    0:02:20 I took an overnight here.
    0:02:21 I couldn’t sleep this morning.
    0:02:23 I took a Xanax, which made me sleep very hard
    0:02:25 for about three and a half hours.
    0:02:28 And I have been podcasting for five and a half hours straight.
    0:02:31 I am so cooked right now.
    0:02:33 So with that, let’s throw a bunch of meaningful,
    0:02:36 deep life lessons at me or questions.
    0:02:38 And I don’t know, this is either gonna go very well
    0:02:39 or very poorly.
    0:02:40 First question.
    0:02:43 – Hi, Prof. G.
    0:02:45 I’m Sarah from New York.
    0:02:47 I run a startup in the retail marketing space
    0:02:49 and I’m super curious to hear your thoughts
    0:02:52 on Perplexity’s new Buy With Pro feature.
    0:02:54 What does this mean for the retail industry?
    0:02:56 – Thanks.
    0:02:58 – We had to come in hot with a hard question.
    0:03:00 Buy With Pro is a way to shop online with AI.
    0:03:04 The platform now allows its paid users
    0:03:07 to search, compare, and buy products all in one place.
    0:03:09 It’s a chat-based assistant that includes visual search,
    0:03:10 similar to Google Lens.
    0:03:12 So, okay, a couple of things here.
    0:03:13 I say this a lot.
    0:03:15 The biggest mistake we’ve made in marketing
    0:03:17 is that consumers don’t want choice.
    0:03:19 They want fewer choices presented,
    0:03:22 but want to be more confident in those choices
    0:03:23 served up to them.
    0:03:24 That’s the whole basis, especially retail.
    0:03:26 Not 32 toasters at Walmart, the right two
    0:03:28 from William Snow, but from a woman
    0:03:31 who has better taste in kitchen electronics than you do.
    0:03:33 Perplexity isn’t alone here.
    0:03:34 Google, Amazon, eBay, and Klarna
    0:03:36 are all getting into the shopping game.
    0:03:38 How could this affect the industry?
    0:03:40 It’s already challenging traditional affiliate
    0:03:41 marketing models.
    0:03:42 Platforms, including Perplexity,
    0:03:45 are partnering with publishers to share ad revenue,
    0:03:47 but it’s unclear how much these relationships
    0:03:49 will shift the balance of power.
    0:03:52 So, alongside the launch of these tools,
    0:03:55 I think Perplexity is rolling out a merchant program,
    0:03:58 and that is retailers who enroll have a better chance
    0:04:00 of being featured in recommendations
    0:04:05 and get free API access to power search on their own sides.
    0:04:07 When asked if Perplexity makes any money
    0:04:09 from sales through the buy with pro button,
    0:04:11 spokesperson there said not at the moment,
    0:04:13 but I think if they create enough traffic and attention,
    0:04:16 they will be able to monetize it.
    0:04:20 Look, I like this, and we’re talking about the balance of power.
    0:04:22 The balance of power is just shifting from the analog
    0:04:24 or from capital to IP.
    0:04:25 What do I mean by that?
    0:04:26 You don’t want to manufacture cars.
    0:04:29 You want to create a layer of software on top of them
    0:04:29 to sell them.
    0:04:31 You don’t want to be in the business of fast fashion.
    0:04:33 You want to be in the business, that’s Airbnb.
    0:04:35 You want to be in the business of having software
    0:04:37 that observes the traffic on your site
    0:04:39 and then sends out orders to whatever factory
    0:04:41 can do this most elegantly,
    0:04:44 and then put in place a transportation system.
    0:04:45 You don’t want to own any assets,
    0:04:48 and this to me feels like, again,
    0:04:50 more assets and shareholder value
    0:04:53 are transferring from the people who own stores,
    0:04:56 the people who insert themselves in between them.
    0:04:59 If I could invest in any AI property right now,
    0:05:02 hand-to-hand CEO, please call me, I’d like to invest.
    0:05:05 It would be perplexity because I like the positioning.
    0:05:06 I like perplexity.
    0:05:08 This is whether this application works or not,
    0:05:10 it’s already worked ’cause we’re talking about it.
    0:05:11 It signals innovation.
    0:05:14 Yet another person getting in between the consumer
    0:05:17 and the retailer, and if they build enough traffic,
    0:05:20 this is a model, overspend, no one can compete with you.
    0:05:23 Don’t charge anything, start getting big traffic.
    0:05:24 And then slowly but surely,
    0:05:27 once you have one, 10, 50% of traffic,
    0:05:31 start implementing real fees and onerous fees.
    0:05:33 Anyway, thanks for the question.
    0:05:35 Question number two.
    0:05:38 – Hi Scott, this is Noah in Nevada.
    0:05:40 As a branding expert and visitor,
    0:05:44 do you think any city or product has marketed itself
    0:05:49 as effectively as Vegas, turning a hot, gray,
    0:05:52 isolated desert crossroads into the global hub
    0:05:55 of entertainment, opulence, and networking?
    0:05:58 Appears to be a contender for number one masterclass
    0:05:59 in branding.
    0:06:01 How do you see Las Vegas adapting and faring
    0:06:03 over the next decade or so?
    0:06:04 Thank you for your consideration
    0:06:07 and enjoy your time in the desert.
    0:06:09 – Noah, that’s such an interesting point.
    0:06:13 Hands down, best managed brand in municipal cities
    0:06:17 or in metros or whatever the term is for a city.
    0:06:18 Hands down, what is brand?
    0:06:20 Brand means differentiation, right?
    0:06:21 You got 10 brands of cereal,
    0:06:22 which one do you pull off the shelf?
    0:06:24 You got 10 super cities.
    0:06:26 Actually, two thirds of all economic growth
    0:06:27 is gonna take place in about 25 super cities.
    0:06:31 I don’t think Las Vegas qualifies as a super city.
    0:06:34 But I think LA is a little bit like Sydney.
    0:06:37 I think that New York is a little bit like London.
    0:06:39 They’re kind of analogs to almost every city.
    0:06:42 I would argue that Orange County or Southern California
    0:06:43 is a little bit like Cape Town.
    0:06:44 Cape Town is on my brain
    0:06:45 ’cause I’m going there later in the month.
    0:06:48 Reminds me of what I think California was like in the ’60s.
    0:06:52 There’s always sort of an analog, except for Vegas.
    0:06:54 Vegas is singular.
    0:06:55 In addition, the brand positioning
    0:06:57 of what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.
    0:06:59 I just think it’s fucking genius.
    0:07:00 I know this firsthand.
    0:07:03 I was in Vegas 15 hours ago.
    0:07:04 And what am I doing in Vegas?
    0:07:05 I’m gambling.
    0:07:06 I’m yelling when I get blackjack.
    0:07:10 I’m getting way too fucked up and it’s okay.
    0:07:12 I thought about going to a strip club last night.
    0:07:14 I haven’t been to a strip club in 10 years.
    0:07:17 That’s just not my vibe.
    0:07:18 But it felt natural.
    0:07:21 It felt like, oh, wait, we just gambled.
    0:07:23 We made some money, we’re fucked up.
    0:07:24 Oh, we should definitely go to a strip club.
    0:07:25 No, I shouldn’t.
    0:07:27 Why on earth would I go to a strip club?
    0:07:30 But you have license to just go kind of,
    0:07:34 just to just sin a little bit and it’s legal.
    0:07:35 But you would never do,
    0:07:37 I would never go to a strip club in any city I live in.
    0:07:38 By the way, general rules,
    0:07:39 general decent rules for life.
    0:07:41 Don’t go to strip clubs or eat fast food
    0:07:42 in the cities you live in.
    0:07:45 I do eat fast food, but only when I’m traveling.
    0:07:46 And I’m trying to screen that out of my life
    0:07:48 ’cause I’m getting older and that’s just shitty food.
    0:07:52 Anyways, the branding around Vegas is singular.
    0:07:53 These people are very smart.
    0:07:55 And it’s amazing how it survived.
    0:07:58 And granted, it’s down a little bit from post COVID
    0:08:01 because gambling is so ubiquitous now.
    0:08:03 But they have done an amazing job.
    0:08:05 So a singular brand, high margin revenue
    0:08:07 because it taps into an addiction.
    0:08:10 And the result is just an incredible offering.
    0:08:13 By the way, let’s talk a little bit about Vegas hotels.
    0:08:14 I used to get 40 bucks from ready teller
    0:08:16 when I was in college and we get ridiculously stoned
    0:08:18 and they go, I know, let’s go to Vegas.
    0:08:21 And I get in my friend’s red Jetta.
    0:08:22 Of course, he did not drink hand drive.
    0:08:24 We’d go to Vegas for the night.
    0:08:27 Golden Nugget, Steven Wynn, 999 best buffet.
    0:08:28 So we’d have 30 bucks.
    0:08:31 I’d play blackjack at a $1 table.
    0:08:33 Boom, I remember because I used to wear
    0:08:34 my mom’s boyfriend’s cardigan
    0:08:36 ’cause he was rich and had good taste.
    0:08:38 And he gave me a cardigan that I always used to wear.
    0:08:41 And then I upgraded to the Tropicana
    0:08:44 with the toucans with those birds, 19 bucks a night.
    0:08:46 And then I got really fucking crazy
    0:08:48 and started going to the, oh my God,
    0:08:50 what was the one with the tigers?
    0:08:51 Treasure Island?
    0:08:52 No, wait, I don’t know where.
    0:08:55 And then when I started to make some money, hello ladies.
    0:08:57 And I started going to the Rio.
    0:08:58 Do you remember the Rio hotel?
    0:09:01 The hook, I love a cab driver.
    0:09:02 So I would say I’m going to the Rio and then go.
    0:09:05 The Rio where it’s hooker friendly.
    0:09:06 Anyways, love the Rio for a while.
    0:09:08 Then I was at the palms for like a hot minute.
    0:09:09 And then when I started making some money,
    0:09:11 I started staying at the Cosmo.
    0:09:13 Say to the Bellagio, too high end for me.
    0:09:15 Felt like I was in a Frank Sinatra film.
    0:09:17 I was waiting for the ass cancer from all the meat.
    0:09:19 I’m partying with Angie Dickinson later tonight.
    0:09:21 By the way, did I tell you I did Xanax last night anyway?
    0:09:23 So then when I started making real money,
    0:09:26 I went to the Cosmo with your older and have some money
    0:09:28 and you want to hang out with younger people.
    0:09:29 Really interesting concept.
    0:09:32 Take the coolest brands, Beauty and Essex, Milosh,
    0:09:34 license it, bring in there.
    0:09:37 Then I went to the Aria, newer, higher end,
    0:09:40 kind of like a Lexus sort of feel, more modern,
    0:09:41 was a fucking disaster for the developers,
    0:09:42 but they finished it.
    0:09:43 It was nice.
    0:09:46 And now, now I stay at the win because even though it’s
    0:09:49 a bunch of rich people from Texas and not my vibe,
    0:09:51 I just like good service and they do the best job.
    0:09:54 The win in the encore and my impression are hands down.
    0:09:55 The best casino.
    0:09:56 There you go.
    0:09:57 There’s a story of my hotels in Vegas,
    0:10:02 but see above a singular city resulting in unearned margin.
    0:10:03 Thanks for the question.
    0:10:06 We have one quick break before our final question.
    0:10:07 Stay with us.
    0:10:15 Support for the show comes from Betterment.
    0:10:17 Do you want your money to be motivated?
    0:10:19 Do you want your money to rise and grind?
    0:10:22 Do you think your money should get up and work?
    0:10:24 Don’t worry, Betterment is here to help.
    0:10:26 Betterment is the automated investing and savings app
    0:10:28 that makes your money hustle.
    0:10:29 Their automated technology is built
    0:10:31 to help maximize returns.
    0:10:32 Meaning when you invest with Betterment,
    0:10:35 your money can auto adjust as you get close to your goal.
    0:10:38 Rebalance if your portfolio gets too far out of line
    0:10:41 and your dividends are automatically reinvested.
    0:10:43 That can increase the potential for compound returns.
    0:10:46 In other words, your money is working like a dog
    0:10:50 while you can be sleeping like one and snoring like one too.
    0:10:53 You’ll never picture your money the same way again.
    0:10:55 Betterment, the automated investing and savings app
    0:10:57 that makes your money hustle.
    0:10:59 Visit betterment.com to get started.
    0:11:00 Investing involves risk.
    0:11:02 Performance is not guaranteed.
    0:11:05 Support for PropG comes from Vanta.
    0:11:06 If you’re a startup founder,
    0:11:09 finding product market fit is probably your number one priority.
    0:11:11 But to land bigger customers,
    0:11:13 you also need security compliance.
    0:11:17 And obtaining your SOC2 ISO 2701 certification
    0:11:19 can take a valuable time and energy,
    0:11:21 pulling you away from building and shipping.
    0:11:23 That’s where Vanta comes in.
    0:11:25 Vanta is the all-in-one compliance solution
    0:11:27 helping startups like yours get audit ready
    0:11:29 and build a strong security system.
    0:11:31 Helping startups like yours get audit ready
    0:11:33 and build a strong security foundation
    0:11:35 quickly and painlessly.
    0:11:37 Vanta automates the manual security tasks
    0:11:39 that slow you down, helping you streamline your audit.
    0:11:42 And the platform connects you with trusted VC SOEs
    0:11:43 to build your program auditors
    0:11:45 to get you through audits quickly
    0:11:48 and a marketplace for essentials like pen testing.
    0:11:50 So whether you’re closing your first deal
    0:11:53 or gearing up for growth, Vanta makes compliance easy.
    0:11:54 You can join over 8,000 companies,
    0:11:57 including many Y Combinator and Techstar startups
    0:11:59 who trust Vanta.
    0:12:01 If you want to simplify compliance and get $1,000 off,
    0:12:05 you can visit vanta.com/profg.
    0:12:09 That’s V-A-N-T-A.com/profg.
    0:12:15 Support for this show comes from Seven Rooms.
    0:12:16 What’s the recipe for taking your restaurant
    0:12:18 to the next level?
    0:12:20 Well, restaurant operators know a key part of it
    0:12:23 is making more money and making sure it keeps coming in.
    0:12:26 That’s why you want to bring Seven Rooms to the table.
    0:12:29 Seven Rooms is an all-in-one CRM marketing
    0:12:31 and operations platform that helps you make more money
    0:12:35 for your operation and more magic for your guests.
    0:12:37 It equips your staff with the tools you need
    0:12:39 to deliver service that keeps your guests
    0:12:40 coming back for more.
    0:12:43 You can wow diners with a host of tools
    0:12:45 that let you create personalized experiences,
    0:12:50 organize unforgettable events, and deepen patron loyalty.
    0:12:53 From direct reservations to smart table management
    0:12:54 and targeted email marketing,
    0:12:57 Seven Rooms helps you grow your brand and your covers
    0:12:59 and not your workload.
    0:13:02 Learn more at SevenRooms.com.
    0:13:05 Seven Rooms, make magic, make money.
    0:13:09 Welcome back, question number three.
    0:13:10 Hi, Prof. G.
    0:13:12 I’d appreciate some parenting advice.
    0:13:14 I have an ambitious high school senior
    0:13:17 who has been accepted to a high-status university,
    0:13:21 Michigan, and a lower-status university, Montana State.
    0:13:25 He plans to double major in mathematics and computer science.
    0:13:27 My son fell in love with the lower-status campus
    0:13:31 and its outdoor recreation, skiing, fishing, mountain biking,
    0:13:33 all of which he loves.
    0:13:36 My instinct screams take the higher-status option,
    0:13:39 but compelling him away from his first choice
    0:13:43 runs the risk of resentment, burnout, or dropout.
    0:13:45 Look, I hate this bullshit of,
    0:13:47 just where he’s gonna go where he’s gonna be happy.
    0:13:48 This is a bottom line.
    0:13:50 College is just fucking amazing, all right?
    0:13:53 He’s gonna have four amazing years.
    0:13:56 And there’s just no getting around it.
    0:13:58 We tell ourselves this myth
    0:13:59 that it doesn’t matter where you go to school,
    0:14:01 as long as you get a good education.
    0:14:02 It’s not true.
    0:14:05 We have a caste system in our society.
    0:14:06 In Europe, it’s your family name.
    0:14:08 In the US, it’s the college you went to.
    0:14:10 And then the first few firms you work for,
    0:14:12 your economic trajectory in your 20s
    0:14:14 largely sets the economic trajectory for the rest of your life.
    0:14:17 And the thing that sets your economic trajectory right out
    0:14:19 at 22 is the university you went to.
    0:14:22 The big name brand state school you’re talking about
    0:14:24 is just gonna offer more opportunity.
    0:14:26 There’s very few brands that stick with you
    0:14:29 the rest of your life and say something about you.
    0:14:32 And unfortunately, that’s your university.
    0:14:35 My son, I had a similar situation with my son.
    0:14:39 My son applied to a bunch of boarding schools in the UK.
    0:14:40 One was lesser prestigious.
    0:14:42 He got in and he got into another one
    0:14:44 that was kind of like iconic.
    0:14:47 And I think he was a bit intimidated by the iconic one.
    0:14:49 And we said, “Look, you have agency here.
    0:14:50 “What do you want to do?”
    0:14:53 And he said, “I wanna go to the kind of the second tier,
    0:14:54 “but good one.”
    0:14:55 And I took him on a long walk
    0:14:56 and this is what I said to him.
    0:14:59 I said, “You know I’m smart, right?”
    0:15:01 I literally said that and he’s like, “Yeah.”
    0:15:03 And I said, “And you know I love you, right?
    0:15:04 “Yeah.”
    0:15:06 I wanna make really good,
    0:15:08 I wanna help you make really good decisions.
    0:15:11 And I want you to trust me on this one.
    0:15:13 I think you’d be better off here.
    0:15:14 I think this will set you up
    0:15:17 for a better education and more opportunities.
    0:15:19 And I was really lucky.
    0:15:21 He was silent for a second and he said, “Okay.”
    0:15:24 And I don’t know if you have that kind of relationship
    0:15:26 with your son, but I wanna be clear.
    0:15:29 I think you’re more doors.
    0:15:32 I just talked to a kid who got into a mediocre university
    0:15:33 where he could play basketball.
    0:15:36 And to MIT where he wasn’t gonna play basketball.
    0:15:38 And he chose the mediocre school.
    0:15:40 And my advice was dude,
    0:15:43 go to MIT and buy a fucking basketball team in 20 years.
    0:15:45 Would you like to own a basketball team someday?
    0:15:47 I mean, you’re not going to be an NBA player.
    0:15:48 There’s just no getting around it.
    0:15:51 Your son would be better in terms of prospects.
    0:15:52 I mean, if he hates it
    0:15:54 and he’s gonna be depressed, fine.
    0:15:56 But the school you’re talking about
    0:15:58 is an amazing school.
    0:16:01 He’s got a great time for turning sororities, football games.
    0:16:03 So I hate to say this,
    0:16:05 but I would just happen and say,
    0:16:08 “Look boss, I love you, I’m smart.
    0:16:10 “Can you defer to me on this?
    0:16:11 “Can you trust me on this?
    0:16:12 “And if you don’t like it,
    0:16:16 “you can easily transfer from this school to this one.
    0:16:18 “You know, on this one, can I cash in some chips?
    0:16:20 “Let me finish with the following.
    0:16:23 “You and your partner have clearly done a great job.
    0:16:24 “This is what you call a great problem.
    0:16:26 “If your son is into both these schools,
    0:16:31 “it means you have raised a thoughtful, disciplined young man.
    0:16:33 “And at the end of the day, that’s the headline news.
    0:16:34 “Well done.”
    0:16:37 That’s all for this episode.
    0:16:38 If you’d like to submit a question,
    0:16:39 please email a voice recording
    0:16:41 to officehours@proppgmedia.com.
    0:16:44 Again, that’s officehours@proppgmedia.com.
    0:16:46 (upbeat music)
    0:16:53 (upbeat music)
    0:16:55 – This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez
    0:16:56 and Caroline Shagren.
    0:16:58 Drew Burroughs is our technical director.
    0:16:59 Thank you for listening to the Prop G Pod
    0:17:01 from the Box Media Podcast Network.
    0:17:04 We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercenial Mellis,
    0:17:05 as read by George Hawn.
    0:17:07 And please follow our Prop G Markets Pod
    0:17:10 wherever you get your pods for new episodes
    0:17:11 every Monday and Thursday.
    0:17:16 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:17:19 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools
    0:17:20 to power your business forward
    0:17:22 with the security and speed
    0:17:24 of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:17:28 (upbeat music)
    0:17:30 – Autograph collection hotels offer
    0:17:34 over 300 independent hotels around the world,
    0:17:37 each exactly like nothing else.
    0:17:39 Hand selected for their inherent craft,
    0:17:41 each hotel tells its own unique story
    0:17:44 through distinctive design and immersive experiences
    0:17:48 from medieval falconry to volcanic wine tasting.
    0:17:51 Autograph collection is part of the Marriott Bonvoy portfolio
    0:17:54 of over 30 hotel brands around the world.
    0:17:58 Find the unforgettable at AutographCollection.com.
    0:18:00 (upbeat music)

    Scott discusses Perplexity’s new ‘Buy With Pro’ feature, specifically what it means for the future of the retail industry. He then speaks about Las Vegas and its singular brand positioning. He wraps up with advice to a parent who is struggling with his kid’s college decision. 

    Music: https://www.davidcuttermusic.com / @dcuttermusic

    Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice

    Buy “The Algebra of Wealth,” out now.

    Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Biden Pardons Hunter, Trump’s Tariff Proposals, Kash Patel’s Appointment to Lead the FBI

    AI transcript
    0:00:04 Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
    0:00:07 If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you,
    0:00:10 Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention.
    0:00:15 Constant Contact’s award-winning marketing platform offers all the automation,
    0:00:20 integration, and reporting tools that get your marketing running seamlessly,
    0:00:23 all backed by their expert live customer support.
    0:00:27 It’s time to get going and growing with Constant Contact today.
    0:00:30 Ready, set, grow.
    0:00:34 Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
    0:00:43 Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial, ConstantContact.ca.
    0:00:45 Support for this show comes from Seven Rooms.
    0:00:49 For the restaurant operators out there who want to create more regulars on the regular,
    0:00:51 check out Seven Rooms.
    0:00:55 Seven Rooms is an all-in-one CRM marketing and operations platform
    0:00:59 that helps you make more money and more magic for your guests.
    0:01:04 It gives your staff the tools to deliver service that keeps your guests coming back for more,
    0:01:09 from direct reservations to smart table management to targeted text and email marketing.
    0:01:14 Seven Rooms helps you grow your brand and your covers and not your workload.
    0:01:17 Learn more at SevenRooms.com.
    0:01:20 Seven Rooms. Make magic. Make money.
    0:01:23 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:01:28 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools to power your business forward
    0:01:31 with the security and speed of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:01:37 Welcome to Raging Moderates. I’m Scott Galloway.
    0:01:39 And I’m Jessica Tarleff.
    0:01:40 Jessica, it’s time for banter.
    0:01:42 Don’t do it.
    0:01:44 It’s time for banter.
    0:01:46 What were you worried I was going to do so I can do it?
    0:01:48 I was going to say, where do I find you today?
    0:01:50 And then I would say, in the same place, I always am.
    0:01:52 But where are you?
    0:01:54 I do not recognize this room.
    0:01:56 I’m at home in London and we’re moving.
    0:01:59 So I’ve been charged with, I am so good at purging.
    0:02:02 I won’t even show it, but I’m literally throwing out like 200 pounds of clothing
    0:02:05 and all sorts of stuff.
    0:02:06 But I’m back in London.
    0:02:07 I’ve been here two days.
    0:02:10 Already can’t wait to get out.
    0:02:14 The weather, I don’t know if you’ve heard the weather here is awful, Jess.
    0:02:15 The weather here is awful.
    0:02:16 I lived there six years.
    0:02:20 I actually started using happy bulbs after like three.
    0:02:23 I gave in and said, oh, this is legit depressing.
    0:02:25 I need a lift at home.
    0:02:26 So people don’t know this.
    0:02:27 I don’t think people know.
    0:02:29 You got a PhD at the London School of Economics.
    0:02:30 Is that right?
    0:02:31 It is right.
    0:02:33 And what did you get your PhD in?
    0:02:34 It was in the government department.
    0:02:38 I guess it was like technically political economy, but yeah.
    0:02:39 So impressive.
    0:02:41 And did you enjoy living here?
    0:02:42 Would you ever move back?
    0:02:43 Yeah, we would love to do.
    0:02:46 I mean, we never lived there together, me and my husband,
    0:02:49 but he has an office there, which is appealing.
    0:02:51 But I, as of now, couldn’t work there.
    0:02:54 But once all of this pans out for us,
    0:02:56 I’m sure I’ll be able to work anywhere in the world.
    0:02:57 There you go.
    0:02:59 So all right, our producer’s getting angry at me.
    0:03:00 Let’s move on.
    0:03:04 In today’s show, we’re discussing Biden’s pardon for a sunhunter,
    0:03:08 Trump’s tariff proposals, and appointment of cash Patel,
    0:03:11 and why companies are rolling back DEI initiatives.
    0:03:12 All right, let’s do it.
    0:03:16 On Sunday night, President Biden pardoned his sunhunter,
    0:03:18 wiping out convictions for gun and tax crimes
    0:03:22 and covering potential federal offenses from 2014 to 2024,
    0:03:25 including his barisma dealings.
    0:03:29 This reverses Biden’s earlier promise not to pardon hunter.
    0:03:31 The clemency council sentencing emblocks
    0:03:33 any future prosecution with courts expected
    0:03:35 to dismiss all charges.
    0:03:37 Reactions, as you might have guessed, have been mixed,
    0:03:38 even among Democrats.
    0:03:40 With Colorado’s governor, Jared Polis, tweeting,
    0:03:43 while as a father, I certainly understand President Joe Biden’s
    0:03:45 natural desire to help his son by pardoning him,
    0:03:48 I am disappointed that he put his family ahead of the country.
    0:03:52 Trump posted on Truth Social, does the pardon given by Joe
    0:03:55 to Hunter, including the January 6th hostages who have now
    0:03:57 been in prison for years, such an abuse
    0:03:59 and miscarriage of justice?
    0:04:02 J6’s referring to January 6th insurrection.
    0:04:06 Jess, did you see this coming, and what are your thoughts here?
    0:04:08 I guess I always thought it was feasible,
    0:04:10 though we talked about it on air, and I said,
    0:04:11 he said he’s not going to do it.
    0:04:14 And you have to take him at his word.
    0:04:16 I think that he thought he was going to win the election,
    0:04:19 or that Kamala Harris was going to win the election,
    0:04:21 and then maybe things were going to be different.
    0:04:24 But back against the wall, the sentencing, I think,
    0:04:26 is coming up this week.
    0:04:30 And apparently, at NBC, I think, is reporting
    0:04:35 that they decided in June to say that he was never
    0:04:38 going to pardon Hunter, even though it was still on the table,
    0:04:39 which feels definitely deceitful.
    0:04:40 So there’s a lie, right?
    0:04:43 There is a lie in this, in him saying that.
    0:04:47 But I think with the timing that he saw Trump make
    0:04:50 Charles Kushner, who–
    0:04:54 Jared Kushner’s dad, who did one of the more insane things.
    0:04:57 You know this story about how his brother-in-law was
    0:04:59 cooperating with the feds against him,
    0:05:01 so he sent a prostitute to seduce him,
    0:05:04 and then sent the tape of it to his sister.
    0:05:08 He exposed that her husband was cheating with a prostitute,
    0:05:11 because he was cooperating on other crimes
    0:05:13 that he actually didn’t end up being convicted of.
    0:05:15 So I think he saw that Charles Kushner is going
    0:05:17 to be the ambassador to France.
    0:05:19 Trump’s pardoned everyone and their mother.
    0:05:25 And he’s also appointing people to his cabinet,
    0:05:31 who openly want to put Hunter away to avenge enemies
    0:05:33 from the press, people who went after him
    0:05:37 for the “Russia hoax,” “Russia collusion hoax.”
    0:05:40 And so I think he just said, like, eff it.
    0:05:44 Like, I have a few more months with power,
    0:05:46 and I’m going to protect my kid.
    0:05:48 I think you nailed it.
    0:05:53 You know, on the downside here, we are kind of devolving
    0:05:55 into that place, right?
    0:05:58 I remember when Speaker McCarthy got so upset
    0:06:02 about some of the holdouts, he kind of stormed up
    0:06:05 the aisle of the rotunda, and it felt like we might
    0:06:07 become that nation or South Korea that every 18 months,
    0:06:11 the Congress breaks into fisticuffs.
    0:06:13 And I feel like we become that nation.
    0:06:18 And that is we now have people in power abusing their power.
    0:06:20 This is an abuse of power.
    0:06:22 And I don’t believe– I believe if Harris had won,
    0:06:24 he wouldn’t have done it.
    0:06:28 I think the expectations now have become so low,
    0:06:33 and you get so little reward for trying to live up
    0:06:36 to the expectations and acquit yourself
    0:06:37 as past presidents have.
    0:06:39 You actually get dinged for it.
    0:06:41 It’s not even like no reward.
    0:06:45 I feel like you’re penalized for being ethical.
    0:06:47 Well, that’s a fair point.
    0:06:50 And I just want to be clear.
    0:06:53 If I were President Biden, I would do the exact same thing.
    0:06:56 If I’m– I mean, the guy’s not going to be around,
    0:07:00 I doubt, much longer, or he’s definitely on the back nine.
    0:07:03 And my sense of his son, pure speculation,
    0:07:06 struggled with addiction, loves his dad immensely,
    0:07:09 trying to get his life together, I think.
    0:07:10 A total fuck-up.
    0:07:14 You know, one of his kids killed in an auto accident.
    0:07:17 His other son died of a brain tumor.
    0:07:20 His one son loves him immensely.
    0:07:23 And then he sees, as you said, OK, let me get this.
    0:07:27 The president’s son-in-law’s dad gets pardoned
    0:07:30 and then becomes the ambassador to France.
    0:07:31 Fuck it.
    0:07:33 I mean, that’s exactly right.
    0:07:35 I would have done the exact same thing.
    0:07:39 And the problem is it’s become a race to the bottom
    0:07:43 where no behavior now seems off limits or shocking.
    0:07:47 So this is a weird analogy, but I’m aggressive on my taxes.
    0:07:49 I don’t do anything illegal.
    0:07:52 And for a long time, I’m like, no, it’s good to pay taxes.
    0:07:55 And I thought, why am I disarming unilaterally?
    0:07:58 You know, no one’s going to say at your funeral
    0:08:00 that he was great, he paid more taxes
    0:08:02 than he really needed to.
    0:08:04 And it’s the same thing here.
    0:08:05 It’s like, let me get this.
    0:08:08 These guys, this guy’s going to pardon
    0:08:11 the Duck Dynasty insurrectionists.
    0:08:13 I’m going to potentially pardon people
    0:08:15 who have been campaign donors.
    0:08:16 You mentioned the Kushner.
    0:08:18 By the way, that’s got to be–
    0:08:22 I would love a Thanksgiving with the Kushners.
    0:08:28 I know the kid, Jared, I like him, he was my student.
    0:08:31 His brother seems like a total baller.
    0:08:33 His brother’s also married to a supermodel.
    0:08:35 I’ve always liked Ivanka, I’ve met her once or twice.
    0:08:37 She’s always been nice to me.
    0:08:44 But I definitely want the father, his wife, the prostitute.
    0:08:46 I just think it would make for such an interesting Thanksgiving.
    0:08:48 I got to think their Thanksgiving
    0:08:50 is one of the more interesting Thanksgiving.
    0:08:52 And we should do it at the US Ambassador’s Ship in Paris,
    0:08:56 which, by the way, is literally the coolest
    0:08:58 Ambassador residence in the world.
    0:09:00 But back to our central theme here.
    0:09:03 This is the problem with an administration
    0:09:06 that is descended into essentially a kleptocracy
    0:09:09 that has absolutely no moral standards.
    0:09:13 Is the other side goes, well, why the fuck are we
    0:09:17 trying to pretend to be ethical when there’s no payoff?
    0:09:20 When the market and the public doesn’t seem to mind?
    0:09:24 If I’m an 82-year-old father, yeah, I’m pardoning my son.
    0:09:26 I would have done the exact same thing.
    0:09:29 Yeah, that seems to be the overwhelming response,
    0:09:32 putting aside Governor Polis, who also
    0:09:35 had quite the hot take on RFK Jr.
    0:09:39 that he got destroyed over when that nomination came out.
    0:09:42 But generally speaking, hardcore Dems
    0:09:44 seemed to be like, yeah, OK.
    0:09:46 And it was also time to have some backbone.
    0:09:50 And one of the main complaints that I feel like rank and file
    0:09:53 Dems have is that we have no Mitch McConnells amongst us,
    0:09:58 no one who’s ruthless enough to not give Garland a hearing.
    0:10:03 And that they’re mad at Merrick Garland once he became AG,
    0:10:06 that he took two years to appoint Jack Smith to look
    0:10:10 into all of these crimes that Trump has alleged–
    0:10:12 we’re supposed to say alleged, though everything’s
    0:10:13 been dismissed now–
    0:10:14 committed.
    0:10:16 We just sat around for too long.
    0:10:17 And now all of it is gone.
    0:10:18 Poof.
    0:10:20 The Republicans never would have done that.
    0:10:22 They take every swing.
    0:10:24 And if they miss, so what?
    0:10:25 I’ll put someone in.
    0:10:26 You swing with Matt Gaetz.
    0:10:27 Guess what?
    0:10:31 You got Pam Bondi, who’s kind of like Matt Gaetz in a dress
    0:10:34 and a bit more confident, which I guess is a good thing.
    0:10:36 We’ll see how that bears out.
    0:10:40 But one point that Dave Weigel, friend of the pod,
    0:10:41 if we can say that–
    0:10:42 I always like that term–
    0:10:48 made was that if you read the text of what Biden said,
    0:10:51 his point was that he still believes in the rule of law,
    0:10:55 but that this was an abuse of the law for political reasons.
    0:10:59 And Weigel harkened back to the defense that Bill Clinton gave
    0:11:01 in the ’90s, why he was pardoning people,
    0:11:03 and he thought that all of it was just junk.
    0:11:05 He’s like, this is all just politically motivated.
    0:11:07 If you get me on something that’s actually a crime,
    0:11:10 and he perjured himself, and that is bad,
    0:11:11 and you shouldn’t have done that.
    0:11:16 But the point is, no one cares about who I’m having sex with,
    0:11:20 except for Ken Starr and rabid Republicans.
    0:11:21 And so this doesn’t actually have anything
    0:11:23 to do with my competency.
    0:11:26 It doesn’t have anything to do with how I do my job.
    0:11:29 And so I’m not going to treat this as the real world,
    0:11:31 and I’m going to pardon people that are associated with it,
    0:11:34 and I’m going to move on with my life, and frankly,
    0:11:36 think pretty highly of myself still.
    0:11:39 And that’s clearly the tack that Joe Biden was taking.
    0:11:42 I thought that was a really interesting and smart take on this.
    0:11:44 I don’t know if you have a ’90s reflection, but–
    0:11:47 But don’t you think Republicans could claim the same thing
    0:11:51 that the New York case, the Albenberg case against Donald
    0:11:55 Trump, again, it was about sex, that that was also purely
    0:12:01 politically motivated, and if so, should warrant a pardon?
    0:12:03 Well, yeah, I don’t know.
    0:12:07 I shouldn’t– that, yeah, sounded too enthusiastic for me.
    0:12:14 I was always the weakest case, and I think part of living
    0:12:17 in the conservative media world that I do because of work
    0:12:22 is that I can see that it’s glaring at me, because I’m like,
    0:12:24 OK, this is one that they can so easily take apart,
    0:12:27 but they struggle more with the Mar-a-Lago documents, right?
    0:12:29 Or I guess you could kind of tit for tat
    0:12:31 wasn’t an insurrection or not, but there’s
    0:12:34 so much testimony surrounding January 6
    0:12:37 and how this was planned, that Trump was like,
    0:12:38 this is how we’re going to do it.
    0:12:40 We’re just going to overturn the elections.
    0:12:42 We’re going to fan the lawyers out all the swing states,
    0:12:43 et cetera.
    0:12:45 So yeah, you could make that argument.
    0:12:47 And Tish James hasn’t helped anyone
    0:12:50 by giving 50 press conferences where she just says,
    0:12:54 I will stop at nothing, right, until Donald Trump is behind bars.
    0:12:57 So you could totally make that argument.
    0:12:59 But I don’t know, there’s so much other stuff
    0:13:04 that he was indicted on, and that juries found him guilty of,
    0:13:06 that I think he goes beyond it.
    0:13:09 But the Stormy Daniels case was always the weakest,
    0:13:12 and it was annoying, frankly, that it happened,
    0:13:13 and that it went first.
    0:13:16 You brought up a really interesting point,
    0:13:19 and that is we suffer from a lack of mendacious fucks.
    0:13:23 And that is McConnell was always playing us,
    0:13:27 and everyone was just so disgusted and disappointed.
    0:13:29 I’m like, well, where are our Senator McConnells?
    0:13:32 Is it Representative Nadler?
    0:13:35 Quite frankly, and I hope this election does it.
    0:13:37 I hope they just clean house the Democratic leadership.
    0:13:39 I want to see Jeremy Raskin.
    0:13:43 I think Speaker Pelosi has a touch of Machiavelli to her.
    0:13:45 I think she’s outstanding.
    0:13:48 Senator Schumer, I think is incredibly weak.
    0:13:49 I think he’s weak.
    0:13:51 I don’t think he has nearly the strategy or the sack
    0:13:53 that McConnell has demonstrated.
    0:13:57 And we need just some ruthless motherfuckers in there.
    0:14:01 And it’ll be interesting to see if Representative Jeffries
    0:14:04 brings that kind of Machiavellian strategy.
    0:14:07 Everything against Hunter Biden was a function
    0:14:10 of who they were or who they are, not of the crimes.
    0:14:13 No one, had it not been Donald Trump,
    0:14:16 if he paid off a mistress, a porn star,
    0:14:18 I just don’t think that would have ended up in court.
    0:14:22 I think that that is a misuse of prosecutorial resources.
    0:14:24 Hunter Biden, that was bullshit.
    0:14:26 He would have gotten some charges fine.
    0:14:28 He would have been on probation.
    0:14:30 This is the idea I like,
    0:14:32 and I think you’re gonna like this.
    0:14:34 All right, gun charge.
    0:14:35 He’s handsome.
    0:14:36 He’s made porn films.
    0:14:37 He’s been pardoned.
    0:14:39 I think he’s our answer.
    0:14:40 I think he has,
    0:14:41 I think he’s now the number three
    0:14:43 or number four most likely Democratic nominee
    0:14:45 for president in 2028.
    0:14:48 I think Hunter Biden is the Democrat we need right now,
    0:14:49 Jess.
    0:14:50 What do you think?
    0:14:51 I mean, I’m not against it.
    0:14:54 Think of all the bumper stickers we have that we can use.
    0:14:56 Biden, Biden for president, yeah.
    0:15:00 Yeah, I mean, we have weirder things happen.
    0:15:02 Maybe Donald Trump, yeah.
    0:15:04 Right, all right, we need to move on.
    0:15:07 All right, last week, Elon Musk celebrated Thanksgiving
    0:15:08 with Trump at Mar-a-Lago,
    0:15:11 as he gears up for his new dojo role
    0:15:13 and meets with House Republicans this week.
    0:15:15 Just before the holiday, President-elect Trump proposed
    0:15:17 25% tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada,
    0:15:21 raising serious concerns among business and world leaders.
    0:15:22 Mexico has warned that such a move
    0:15:24 could cost nearly half a million U.S. jobs
    0:15:27 while a company spirit will drive up prices for consumers.
    0:15:29 President Biden is urging Trump to reconsider,
    0:15:31 warning that tariffs could strain relationships
    0:15:34 with key allies, have inflationary effects at home,
    0:15:36 and result in higher prices across the board.
    0:15:38 Jess, what do you think is gonna happen here?
    0:15:40 Do you think it’ll fall through on this?
    0:15:43 To some degree, I don’t think it’ll be a 25% tariff,
    0:15:46 but I’m sure that he’ll sprinkle them around
    0:15:49 and Scott Besen, who will be the Treasury Secretary,
    0:15:52 is naturally not a tariff guy.
    0:15:55 I think that was one of the kind of final sticking points
    0:15:57 to make sure that he was gonna be on board
    0:16:02 with this approach of using it as a way to cultivate results.
    0:16:04 And I don’t think that that’s insane.
    0:16:06 And we should, you gotta be honest about the fact
    0:16:08 that Biden kept nearly all of the tariffs
    0:16:10 that Trump had put on China.
    0:16:13 He’s done things, I think a little bit smarter.
    0:16:16 Like he put tariffs on things that we don’t get as much of,
    0:16:18 like EVs, for instance.
    0:16:20 We don’t get a ton of them from China.
    0:16:22 So like it makes sense to kind of hike that up
    0:16:25 so it doesn’t really hurt the American consumer base.
    0:16:29 But tariffs aren’t unilaterally a stupid idea.
    0:16:31 It’s stupid to say I’m gonna put 100% tariff on this
    0:16:33 or I’m gonna put 25% on Canada and Mexico.
    0:16:36 He doesn’t talk about, what is it like something insane?
    0:16:39 Like 60% of our vegetables come from Mexico.
    0:16:42 Our construction supplies that come from Canada.
    0:16:45 But what I think is the interesting corollary
    0:16:48 to Trump doing all this bluster
    0:16:51 is what will the world leaders’ responses be?
    0:16:53 Because we have two different prototypes now.
    0:16:56 So Claudia Scheinbaum, the president of Mexico
    0:16:57 had a very different response
    0:16:59 than Justin Trudeau from Canada.
    0:17:00 So Justin Trudeau is like,
    0:17:02 “Hey, Donald, I’m coming to Mar-a-Lago for dinner.
    0:17:04 “Let’s do the photo op, I’ll meet your people.
    0:17:05 “This’ll be great.”
    0:17:08 And Claudia Scheinbaum released a pretty scathing statement
    0:17:09 that essentially said, like,
    0:17:11 “You don’t know what you’re talking about.”
    0:17:14 Because Trump said, “I’m gonna put this tariff on
    0:17:17 “if you don’t stop sending migrants and drugs here.”
    0:17:19 And she first of all said, “By the way,
    0:17:22 “all of the guns that are here are from your country.”
    0:17:23 So maybe you could figure that out.
    0:17:26 And second of all, we have been stopping the migrants.
    0:17:29 And according to your own CPV numbers,
    0:17:32 it’s down, crossings are down 75% in the last year
    0:17:35 because of a program that we put in.
    0:17:38 Now, is anyone paying attention to the fact
    0:17:39 that that’s what she said?
    0:17:41 No, because Trump went and said,
    0:17:44 “See, presto chango, it happened right away, right?
    0:17:46 “Like I said jump and she said how high
    0:17:48 “and now everything’s fine.”
    0:17:50 As if he stopped migrants from crossing the border,
    0:17:52 it happened under Biden.
    0:17:54 But those are the two different models.
    0:17:57 And I’m curious to see where other world leaders fall on that.
    0:17:59 Like who will be going to kiss the ring
    0:18:01 and who will be issuing sassy statements?
    0:18:02 It will be the Jewish woman
    0:18:04 that is issuing the sassy statement.
    0:18:07 The Jewish climate scientist, that’s right.
    0:18:09 Yeah, I love, it tickles my sensors
    0:18:12 to see her saying this and she’s right.
    0:18:13 Trudeau’s probably smarter.
    0:18:16 My understanding is among world leaders
    0:18:19 is just go kiss this guy’s ass, pull a Tim Cook.
    0:18:23 Tim Cook goes there, shows him the new iPhone,
    0:18:25 it tells him he’s handsome, complements him.
    0:18:26 Love your playlist.
    0:18:27 Love your playlist.
    0:18:28 And what do you know?
    0:18:30 Somehow the tariffs on China,
    0:18:33 Apple manages to sequester the majority
    0:18:36 of their components from those tariffs.
    0:18:41 This sycophantry, this obvious pandering, it works.
    0:18:43 And to be fair, some of the tariffs
    0:18:47 that Trump increased on China, Biden kept in place.
    0:18:49 While China is no longer our biggest trading partner,
    0:18:53 it’s now a tossup between Mexico and Canada.
    0:18:55 There’s just so many wrinkles here.
    0:18:59 Most US cars have parts from Mexico or Canada.
    0:19:02 And the way this all ends, in my view,
    0:19:05 is he implements anything resembling these tariffs,
    0:19:07 which any of these,
    0:19:09 one of the most heartening things about these appointments
    0:19:12 is it almost seems like I’m gonna fuck
    0:19:14 with the American people, I’m just gonna reward loyalists.
    0:19:16 I don’t care about the DOJ,
    0:19:18 I don’t care about the education.
    0:19:20 But when it comes to the economy,
    0:19:23 it feels like he becomes remarkably adult.
    0:19:26 And he wants adults in the room around the key,
    0:19:27 key appointments around the economy.
    0:19:29 I think the majority of those candidates
    0:19:31 all seem like adults, all seem qualified.
    0:19:33 I don’t think many of them are gonna go
    0:19:34 for this tariff thing, at least nothing.
    0:19:36 I think they’ll throw them a bone and say,
    0:19:38 okay, we’ll increase tariffs here, here and here.
    0:19:41 But the first quarter, or even the first month,
    0:19:44 where it looks like there’s a spike,
    0:19:47 a re-spike in inflation, or a reigniting of inflation,
    0:19:50 and it’s reverse engineered to tariffs,
    0:19:52 oh, there’s trouble in Mudville.
    0:19:56 Because the thing that brings down nations
    0:19:58 is not usually that they get invaded,
    0:20:01 it’s they either go broke or there’s inflation.
    0:20:03 Because you wanna talk about rage,
    0:20:06 when you have to go from meat to chicken, chicken to rice,
    0:20:08 and then you can’t pay for your kid’s summer camp,
    0:20:10 you don’t care who’s in office.
    0:20:11 When they realize 88% of gifts
    0:20:14 under the Christmas tree are from China,
    0:20:17 and that their prices might go up 10, 20, 50%,
    0:20:19 and that to a certain extent,
    0:20:23 Trump becomes a lame duck president sooner rather than later,
    0:20:26 I think they find their backbone and say,
    0:20:29 no, I am not down with these tariffs at all.
    0:20:33 And the moment, the moment inflation starts to spike back,
    0:20:36 which we’re already seeing some evidence of,
    0:20:39 in someone reverse engineers it to tariffs, boom,
    0:20:40 that dog won’t hunt.
    0:20:43 I think this is much more,
    0:20:45 much more hat than cattle, what’s the term?
    0:20:47 That’s a Brian Williams term, hat and cattle.
    0:20:49 All hat, no cattle.
    0:20:50 All chip, no salsa.
    0:20:51 – Sounds very Yellowstone.
    0:20:53 – There you go.
    0:20:54 By the way, I could never get into Yellowstone.
    0:20:55 Did you like it?
    0:20:56 – Really?
    0:20:57 I did the first couple of years,
    0:20:59 and then I just thought it was ridiculous, but.
    0:21:01 – I just didn’t buy it, I just didn’t buy it.
    0:21:04 I thought it was succession for Republicans.
    0:21:05 I didn’t buy it.
    0:21:07 – Well, they deserve to have joy too.
    0:21:09 – Yeah, I don’t know, I don’t get it.
    0:21:10 – Just to add to that,
    0:21:13 it was interesting to see when Scott Besant
    0:21:17 was the treasury pick, the market bumped up.
    0:21:19 Was very excited with the news.
    0:21:22 The next day, this was after his truth social post
    0:21:24 about the tariffs coming, market goes down, right?
    0:21:26 It was the same thing with RFK Junior, right?
    0:21:30 Then all of the pharmaceutical stocks tanked.
    0:21:33 So Trump is going to have to figure out
    0:21:36 where his levers are, like how much he can push things,
    0:21:41 how much he can pull things in order to keep us making 30%,
    0:21:44 or whatever crazy amount the market has been going up,
    0:21:47 because that is the only thing
    0:21:49 that people are grading these administrations on.
    0:21:51 It’s crazy, because all this other stuff
    0:21:53 that went on during the Trump administration,
    0:21:54 no one remembers it.
    0:21:56 They only remember this feeling of,
    0:21:59 this is what my gas costs, this is how much toilet paper was,
    0:22:01 this is how before COVID came,
    0:22:03 when obviously everything became terrible
    0:22:03 and super expensive,
    0:22:05 and people didn’t even blame him for that,
    0:22:07 which is very annoying to me as a partisan,
    0:22:11 but he just wants to leave with a good economic record
    0:22:14 and probably put away some enemies if he can,
    0:22:17 Hunter Biden included, definitely was gonna be on the list.
    0:22:21 So I think he’ll just be watching those numbers closely.
    0:22:23 And I remember when we first started
    0:22:24 talking about the potential picks,
    0:22:28 and you said, why not bring back Steve Mnuchin?
    0:22:31 And Steve Mnuchin left completely unscathed, right?
    0:22:33 His wife was this incredible viral meme
    0:22:35 that I enjoyed all the time.
    0:22:37 And it seems like he did a pretty good job,
    0:22:39 and I imagine Scott Bassant will be similar.
    0:22:41 Yeah. – He’s an adult.
    0:22:43 And by the way, just you were right,
    0:22:45 Mexico is now our biggest trading partner.
    0:22:46 In the last seven years,
    0:22:50 China’s gone from 22% of US imports,
    0:22:53 it’s dropped to 14, that’s a dramatic decrease.
    0:22:56 And Mexico has gone up from approximately 13
    0:22:58 to now close to 16,
    0:23:03 and Canada has gone from about 12 and a half to about 14.
    0:23:08 So Mexico and Canada, it’s so interesting.
    0:23:11 Trade is still largely a function of proximity.
    0:23:14 Almost every country’s biggest trading partners usually,
    0:23:15 they usually share a border with.
    0:23:17 Anyways, some more fascinating insight
    0:23:19 from the Northwestern School of Business.
    0:23:22 All right, Jess, let’s take a quick break, stay with us.
    0:23:29 Support for Prop G comes from Quintz.
    0:23:32 Let’s be honest, not every gift we pick is a home run.
    0:23:33 But what if I told you,
    0:23:35 there was a secret reliable way
    0:23:36 to get everyone on your list,
    0:23:38 something they’ll actually enjoy,
    0:23:39 one that doesn’t cost a fortune.
    0:23:43 Okay, it’s not a secret actually, it’s just Quintz.
    0:23:45 Quintz makes it easy to treat everyone in your life
    0:23:48 to luxury quality clothing at frankly,
    0:23:50 ridiculously affordable prices,
    0:23:53 pieces including their iconic Mongolian cashmere sweaters,
    0:23:54 which started just 50 bucks,
    0:23:56 are guaranteed crowd pleasers.
    0:23:58 They’re warm, stylish, and best of all, affordable.
    0:24:01 In fact, all of Quintz’s luxury items are priced
    0:24:03 50 to 80% less than similar brands.
    0:24:06 Plus, Quintz says they only work with factories
    0:24:07 that use safe, ethical,
    0:24:10 and responsible manufacturing practices.
    0:24:12 Our own Caroline Shagerin got to try out Quintz,
    0:24:14 and she says she loves it.
    0:24:16 Caroline loves her sage green Quintz sheets.
    0:24:19 They’re comfortable and well made.
    0:24:20 Gift luxury this holiday season
    0:24:22 without the luxury price tag,
    0:24:26 go to quintz.com/propg for 365 day returns,
    0:24:28 plus free shipping on your order.
    0:24:31 That’s Q-U-I-N-C-E.com/propg
    0:24:34 to get free shipping and 365 day returns.
    0:24:36 Quintz.com/propg.
    0:24:42 Support for PropG comes from GiveDirectly.
    0:24:43 The holidays are a great time
    0:24:45 to make a charitable donation to a cause you care about.
    0:24:46 But how do you know if your money
    0:24:48 is actually helping the people who need it most?
    0:24:51 Well, if you want to get cash directly to people in need,
    0:24:54 consider donate to GiveDirectly.
    0:24:56 GiveDirectly believes that cash allows people
    0:24:58 the dignity and freedom to make their own decisions
    0:25:00 about how they can improve their lives.
    0:25:01 That’s because every person,
    0:25:03 regardless of their financial status,
    0:25:06 has their own specific needs, preferences, and aspirations.
    0:25:09 And people living in poverty deserve to have a say
    0:25:11 in how to best invest in their future,
    0:25:14 whether that’s housing, education, business support,
    0:25:14 and more.
    0:25:18 In fact, many academic studies show that cash transfers
    0:25:20 can improve earnings, health, education, and much more.
    0:25:24 That’s why GiveDirectly lets you do exactly that.
    0:25:25 GiveDirectly to those who need it.
    0:25:27 Your donation this holiday season has the power
    0:25:30 to lift families and entire communities
    0:25:31 out of extreme poverty.
    0:25:34 To learn more and send money directly to people
    0:25:35 living in extreme poverty,
    0:25:38 visit GiveDirectly.org/profty.
    0:25:43 Support for Profty comes from open phone.
    0:25:46 Running a small business means you’re wearing a lot of hats.
    0:25:48 Your personal phone becomes your business phone,
    0:25:49 and before you know it,
    0:25:51 your juggling customer calls day and night.
    0:25:53 As your team grows, it becomes impossible
    0:25:54 to manage with your personal number.
    0:25:56 That’s where open phone comes in.
    0:25:59 Open phone is the business phone system
    0:26:00 that can help you separate your personal life
    0:26:03 from your growing business for just $15 a month.
    0:26:06 Open phone works through an app on your phone or computer
    0:26:09 and integrates with HubSpot and hundreds of other systems.
    0:26:11 Their AI-powered transcription feature
    0:26:13 can even summarize your phone calls
    0:26:15 with action items as soon as you hang up.
    0:26:16 And if you miss a call,
    0:26:19 automated messages are sent directly to your customer,
    0:26:20 meaning you’ll never miss an opportunity
    0:26:22 to engage with them.
    0:26:24 Right now, open phone is offering 20% off
    0:26:28 your first six months when you go to openphone.com/profty.
    0:26:31 That’s O-P-E-N-P-H-O-N-E.
    0:26:35 .com/profty for 20% off six months.
    0:26:37 Open phone.com/profty.
    0:26:40 And if you have existing numbers with another service,
    0:26:43 open phone will port them over at no extra charge.
    0:26:49 – Welcome back on Saturday.
    0:26:51 Trump shook things up.
    0:26:52 That’s another statement.
    0:26:55 By picking Cash Patel, a controversial maga loyalist
    0:26:58 and deep state conspiracy theorist to lead the FBI.
    0:27:00 This is an unusual move because FBI directors
    0:27:03 typically serve 10-year terms to stay above politics.
    0:27:06 This all comes as Trump considers firing Christopher Wray,
    0:27:08 his own appointee with three years left on his term,
    0:27:10 all while doubling down on promises
    0:27:12 to prosecute political opponents.
    0:27:14 What’s your take on this, Josh?
    0:27:16 – Same as every week.
    0:27:17 This is bad, no bueno.
    0:27:18 This is very bad.
    0:27:20 I mean, there’s so much to go through
    0:27:23 in the craziness of Cash Patel.
    0:27:26 But something that does stick out to me
    0:27:31 is that other Trump loyalists have a worldview
    0:27:34 that they come to the table with.
    0:27:36 Like Steve Bannon wasn’t born the day
    0:27:38 that Trump came down the golden staircase, right?
    0:27:42 And Stephen Miller has had his views for a very long time.
    0:27:46 Cash Patel is like a blank slate
    0:27:49 that was created in Trump’s ideological likeness.
    0:27:53 Like he has nothing seemingly that he believes in
    0:27:56 that existed before Donald Trump.
    0:28:00 And that’s what makes him uniquely frightening to me
    0:28:03 because he just lives to please this guy.
    0:28:06 I mean, he even wrote a children’s book about him.
    0:28:09 Like he mimics everything he has.
    0:28:14 He like hawks clothes.
    0:28:15 He has a clothing line.
    0:28:18 He works his business.
    0:28:19 I think it’s the Cash Foundation,
    0:28:21 which gives to people affected
    0:28:24 by the terrible atrocities of January 6th,
    0:28:27 like families of January 6thers, J6ers,
    0:28:29 I think we’re supposed to call them.
    0:28:31 He produced Justice for All,
    0:28:32 which is a version of the national anthem
    0:28:35 that the January 6th defendants
    0:28:36 that Trump played at his first campaign rally.
    0:28:40 Like he is so enmeshed in this world.
    0:28:45 He feels like a Trump child more than the others do.
    0:28:46 To me.
    0:28:48 – Yeah, this guy is a little bit,
    0:28:51 during his time where I believe he was,
    0:28:52 what did he do?
    0:28:54 He was a prosecutor.
    0:28:54 – Yeah, he was a prosecutor.
    0:28:56 He worked for Devin Nunes.
    0:28:58 You remember him, who was crazy.
    0:28:59 – Okay.
    0:29:01 – And he did have some high level intel jobs.
    0:29:04 He was the deputy to acting DNI, Rick Grinnell.
    0:29:07 – He supposedly also fed Trump back channel information
    0:29:09 on Ukraine that contributed to Trump’s plot
    0:29:11 to push that nation to help him smear
    0:29:14 his political opponents during his time.
    0:29:17 Patel also authored a memo arguing that it was disloyal
    0:29:19 for then defense secretary, Mark Esper,
    0:29:20 who I’ve met and strikes me
    0:29:22 as a world-class high character person,
    0:29:25 to oppose a request by Trump to deploy military troops
    0:29:26 against American citizens,
    0:29:30 protesting police violence against black people.
    0:29:32 After Trump lost to President Biden in 2020,
    0:29:35 Patel pushed lies about the election being stolen
    0:29:37 and argued that reporters debunking Trump’s election lies
    0:29:39 should be targeted by the government.
    0:29:42 He said, open quote, yes,
    0:29:44 we’re going to come after the people in the media
    0:29:46 who lied about American citizens
    0:29:48 who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections.
    0:29:52 We’re going to come after you, close quote.
    0:29:53 I mean, I don’t know.
    0:29:56 And he’s also authored three children’s books
    0:29:58 that are pro-Trump fan fiction.
    0:30:01 So going after your political enemies
    0:30:03 and finding time to write children’s books,
    0:30:04 you gotta give it to the guy.
    0:30:06 He’s at least a little,
    0:30:08 he’s sort of a Renaissance man in hell, so to speak.
    0:30:13 He’s just sort of this, he’s a bit of an odd duck.
    0:30:14 And also I’ve always found that,
    0:30:19 I thought Christopher Wray, it’s exactly what you want
    0:30:22 as an appointee because when he sat in front of Congress,
    0:30:24 I couldn’t tell if he was a Democrat or a Republican.
    0:30:26 I just thought he was, you know,
    0:30:29 like Joe Friday from “Dragonate”, just a fax, ma’am.
    0:30:32 And he was, I just thought he was so good
    0:30:33 and landed so much credibility
    0:30:35 to the Trump administration that, okay,
    0:30:37 in these important roles,
    0:30:40 you have someone like this, you see above partisanship,
    0:30:42 but, you know, the same way,
    0:30:46 I do think he’s acting that way on the economics appointments.
    0:30:47 And he used to act that way,
    0:30:49 at least a little bit on security appointments
    0:30:50 and defense appointments.
    0:30:53 He seems to have totally lost that now.
    0:30:57 And it’s so, just culturally,
    0:30:59 it’s gotta be so demoralizing.
    0:31:01 There are FBI agents.
    0:31:04 I mean, first off, Tulsi Gabbard to me is by far,
    0:31:06 other than gets as the most outrageous,
    0:31:10 I actually think the most dangerous
    0:31:11 is Representative Gabbard,
    0:31:15 ’cause there are people that spend their entire lives,
    0:31:16 the majority of their professional lives,
    0:31:18 putting themselves in harm’s way,
    0:31:19 knowing that if they caught,
    0:31:20 they’re not just gonna be killed,
    0:31:22 they’re gonna be tortured and killed,
    0:31:24 implanting themselves in high-level positions
    0:31:27 with a lot of access within our adversaries.
    0:31:30 And there are only two people who know who they are.
    0:31:34 There are Case Handler and the head of, you know,
    0:31:37 the CIA or the head of the security services.
    0:31:40 And I just gotta think, if I’m that person,
    0:31:43 I do not want Representative Gabbard knowing who I am.
    0:31:45 This is someone who met with Assad,
    0:31:47 who’s been an apologist for the Kremlin.
    0:31:49 There’s no evidence he’s an actual asset,
    0:31:51 but I can see here, like,
    0:31:55 if I’m an undercover agent or officer with the CIA,
    0:31:57 and I think this individual might decide
    0:32:01 it’s good for America to out all undercover assets
    0:32:03 in the Kremlin, I’m out.
    0:32:07 I’m not risking my life in limb and staying away
    0:32:11 from my family when this person who doesn’t seem,
    0:32:14 who seems to be more fond of Putin than of Democrats,
    0:32:15 I’m out.
    0:32:18 And the one thing that the majority of, I think,
    0:32:21 our presidents and our directors of national security
    0:32:23 and the heads of CIA have had,
    0:32:26 I think George Bush was the head of the CIA and president.
    0:32:27 I believe most case officers of the CIA
    0:32:29 probably thought George Bush would die for me.
    0:32:32 This is someone who would die for his country.
    0:32:34 And I think these people are like,
    0:32:37 no, they would let me die under some fucked up notion
    0:32:41 of what they think is some sort of conspiracy theory.
    0:32:43 This is, she is a dangerous appointment
    0:32:46 and having this guy as head of the FBI,
    0:32:51 I just gotta think that is so incredibly damaging
    0:32:53 to morale ’cause I’ve always thought of the FBI
    0:32:57 is there’s just a few places where they really,
    0:32:59 they put country above politics.
    0:33:02 They say, presidents are gonna come and go,
    0:33:05 political parties are gonna come and go,
    0:33:07 I am about our country, fidelity to the country
    0:33:10 and finding bad guys.
    0:33:14 And now this place has been weaponized politically
    0:33:17 and I don’t know if I can trust these people.
    0:33:18 – But there are millions of people who think
    0:33:21 that it was the Democrats that weaponized the FBI
    0:33:24 who look at Andy McCabe and his text messages
    0:33:28 with Lisa Page, they go back to Jim Comey.
    0:33:31 I mean, listen, the firing of Jim Comey,
    0:33:34 I will never understand since I think he was
    0:33:37 the key ingredient in Trump being able to win,
    0:33:39 actually him coming out 11 days before the election
    0:33:43 and saying, we looked at Anthony Wiener’s laptop again,
    0:33:44 like no biggie though.
    0:33:46 And then everyone thought that,
    0:33:49 she had done something unbelievably evil.
    0:33:54 But this is, Cash Patel is part of the wrecking ball approach
    0:33:56 to all of these institutions.
    0:34:01 And I don’t think that he would be able to get confirmed,
    0:34:05 but it seems like that’s not even necessarily the approach
    0:34:07 that Trump feels like he needs to go.
    0:34:10 So Christopher Wray has a 10 year term,
    0:34:11 so he’s three years left on his term,
    0:34:12 but he can be fired.
    0:34:16 So let’s say that happens January 21st, right, 2025.
    0:34:19 And then using the federal vacancies reform act,
    0:34:23 Patel can be there, I think 210 days without being confirmed.
    0:34:28 So we might just again have a cabinet full of acting ex job.
    0:34:32 And that’s how he’ll be able to do it.
    0:34:36 The standard of luminaries within our party,
    0:34:38 you know, lifelong Republicans,
    0:34:40 people who have served, you know,
    0:34:44 great Republican presidents like the Bill Bars of the world,
    0:34:47 they just, it doesn’t matter anymore.
    0:34:51 The general populace doesn’t believe in these institutions.
    0:34:52 I mean, these quotes are crazy.
    0:34:54 Like from Bill Bars book,
    0:34:56 he said that Patel would be the deputy director
    0:34:58 of the FBI over my dead body.
    0:35:02 You have Mark Milley, who told him life looks really shitty
    0:35:04 from behind bars.
    0:35:06 Gina Haspel, who was the head of the CIA,
    0:35:09 threatened to resign when Trump was gonna make him
    0:35:11 the deputy director of the CIA.
    0:35:13 Like these are all people that you,
    0:35:15 you know, whether you like their politics or not,
    0:35:18 and I certainly don’t like Bill Bars politics,
    0:35:22 but I never felt like he couldn’t do the job.
    0:35:24 I thought he, what he did around the Mueller report,
    0:35:27 writing that little four page summary
    0:35:29 was extremely deceptive,
    0:35:33 but I never thought that he couldn’t do it.
    0:35:34 You know what I mean?
    0:35:35 Like I didn’t like that decision,
    0:35:39 but it wasn’t someone that I would fear like a Cache Patel
    0:35:42 who’s just there honestly to pay no reverence
    0:35:45 to the institution at all.
    0:35:46 He’s just there to break it
    0:35:48 and that he will destroy, like you said,
    0:35:51 the morale of the rank and file agents
    0:35:54 who are what make it great and that our allies
    0:35:58 and our enemies just will laugh at us for four years
    0:36:00 and our allies won’t be sharing with us,
    0:36:03 which is the big Tulsi Gabbard problem there for sure,
    0:36:05 that everyone will just go about their business
    0:36:07 and kind of cut us out.
    0:36:10 Patel is concerning on a whole host of issues,
    0:36:12 but that’s really it.
    0:36:13 I just, I don’t want to,
    0:36:15 I understand the argument for America first.
    0:36:18 I understand how that resonated with voters
    0:36:23 who didn’t feel like American lives were being prioritized,
    0:36:27 whether it comes to the economy, national security, immigration,
    0:36:30 but to me, this just doesn’t feel like the answer,
    0:36:32 that you can find competent people
    0:36:36 that have a little bit of your emphasis
    0:36:38 on rooting out corruption within institutions
    0:36:42 without having Cache Patel as the head of the FBI.
    0:36:43 – What you mentioned,
    0:36:44 which I think is really one of the,
    0:36:47 probably the key drawback is that no one nation
    0:36:49 is big enough or strong enough
    0:36:51 to effectively monitor the world
    0:36:53 or secure itself from all threats.
    0:36:55 And one of the most powerful things we have
    0:36:59 and with NATO and some of these alliances is that,
    0:37:04 MI6, the Mossad, the CIA, our security services,
    0:37:08 their security services, we share information.
    0:37:11 And whether it’s Israel coordinating with Jordan
    0:37:12 and the kingdom of South America
    0:37:14 around incoming missile barrage, Moran,
    0:37:18 the whole is greater than some of its parts,
    0:37:20 and around intelligence and information,
    0:37:23 identifying threats, whether it’s terrorist activity
    0:37:26 or IP theft of key chip technology,
    0:37:30 if all of a sudden our allies are much more remiss
    0:37:33 to share information with us because they don’t trust us
    0:37:35 and they think this guy has no business
    0:37:37 and they don’t wanna compromise their own assets
    0:37:39 or their own intelligence,
    0:37:42 then we lose what is supposed to be,
    0:37:44 largely what has kept the peace
    0:37:47 is that in general democracies have said, all right,
    0:37:48 we’re gonna create something,
    0:37:52 we’re gonna create a unified military structure called NATO,
    0:37:54 and we’re gonna cooperate with each other,
    0:37:57 not only economically but around intelligence and militarily
    0:38:00 because if we do in fact present a united front
    0:38:01 and cooperate with each other,
    0:38:03 we’re just much harder to fuck with.
    0:38:07 And that has largely created unprecedented peace
    0:38:10 and prosperity over the last since World War II,
    0:38:13 over the last, what is that now, 80 years.
    0:38:15 And if that goes away under this notion of America first
    0:38:17 and some arrogance, I really do think we suffer
    0:38:20 from too much prosperity and this delusion
    0:38:23 that we can go it alone, we can’t.
    0:38:26 There, you know, the European economy is as big
    0:38:29 as the US economy, which largely indicates
    0:38:32 their security services and their access to information
    0:38:35 and their intelligence units are just as valuable
    0:38:37 and have a diversity of thought,
    0:38:40 a diversity of information, a diversity of sources.
    0:38:42 And when we share information with each other,
    0:38:44 you can bet there are a lot of bad things
    0:38:46 that never happened that we can’t be grateful for
    0:38:49 because they didn’t happen.
    0:38:50 And this notion that our allies
    0:38:52 might no longer share information with us
    0:38:55 and we might no longer share information with them
    0:38:58 is how you defeat an enemy and that as you atomize them,
    0:39:00 you get them fighting with each other
    0:39:01 and that is happening here.
    0:39:04 – Okay, we have one more quick break, stay with us.
    0:39:12 – Support for this show comes from Amazon Prime.
    0:39:14 The feeling that makes the holidays so special
    0:39:16 is made up of countless elements,
    0:39:19 a classic dish here, a piece of decor there,
    0:39:22 a song or movie you always go back to.
    0:39:24 Amazon Prime can help you get the most
    0:39:26 out of that holiday feeling.
    0:39:28 Find everything you need to warm up your home
    0:39:30 for the cold days ahead.
    0:39:32 Maybe you just need a few more stocking stuffers,
    0:39:34 one more set of string lights
    0:39:36 and some candles to tie the room together.
    0:39:39 With Prime, you can get fast delivery
    0:39:42 on all your last minute supplies, gifts and decor.
    0:39:45 And when it comes to gifts, you can even get creative
    0:39:48 and curate a playlist for someone on Amazon Music.
    0:39:50 And when you’re ready to curl up on the couch
    0:39:51 for your holiday movie marathon,
    0:39:54 pull up the classics on Prime Video.
    0:39:56 Whatever you’re into this holiday season
    0:39:58 from streaming to shopping, it’s on Prime.
    0:40:00 Visit amazon.com/prime
    0:40:02 to get more out of whatever you’re into.
    0:40:06 – Support for this show comes from Seven Rooms.
    0:40:08 What’s the recipe for taking your restaurant
    0:40:09 to the next level?
    0:40:11 Well, restaurant operators know a key part of it
    0:40:15 is making more money and making sure it keeps coming in.
    0:40:17 That’s why you wanna bring Seven Rooms to the table.
    0:40:20 Seven Rooms is an all-in-one CRM marketing
    0:40:23 and operations platform that helps you make more money
    0:40:26 for your operation and more magic for your guests.
    0:40:28 It equips your staff with the tools you need
    0:40:30 to deliver service that keeps your guests
    0:40:32 coming back for more.
    0:40:34 You can wow diners with a host of tools
    0:40:37 that let you create personalized experiences,
    0:40:39 organize unforgettable events,
    0:40:41 and deepen patron loyalty.
    0:40:44 From direct reservations to smart table management
    0:40:46 and targeted email marketing,
    0:40:49 Seven Rooms helps you grow your brand and your covers
    0:40:51 and not your workload.
    0:40:53 Learn more at SevenRooms.com.
    0:40:57 Seven Rooms, make magic, make money.
    0:41:00 – Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:41:02 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools
    0:41:05 to power your business forward with the security
    0:41:08 and speed of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:41:12 – Welcome back.
    0:41:15 Walmart announced its scaling back its diversity, equity,
    0:41:17 and inclusion DEI efforts.
    0:41:19 This includes ending racial equity training for employees,
    0:41:22 reevaluating programs supporting minority-owned suppliers,
    0:41:25 and winding down its center for racial equity and nonprofit
    0:41:28 it created to address systemic racism.
    0:41:29 Walmart isn’t alone.
    0:41:33 Other major companies, including Lowe’s, Ford, Harley-Davidson,
    0:41:36 and John Deere are also pulling back on DEI initiatives
    0:41:38 as well as reducing their support for Pride marches
    0:41:40 and LGBTQ events.
    0:41:42 Many had embraced DEI programs in response
    0:41:44 to the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests
    0:41:47 and the murder of George Floyd.
    0:41:49 Jess, do you think these changes are happening
    0:41:51 because Trump won the election?
    0:41:53 What do you think is inspiring
    0:41:55 this kind of pullback or rollback?
    0:41:58 – Well, it’s been going on for a while
    0:41:59 for the last couple of years.
    0:42:02 I think that it’s getting more intense
    0:42:06 because of what life will be like under a Trump presidency
    0:42:09 and the kind of folks that he’s associated with,
    0:42:12 but also who are just kind of in the ecosystem,
    0:42:15 like activists like Christopher Rufo,
    0:42:19 who was the principal kind of attack hound
    0:42:22 over Claudine Gay, the president of Harvard,
    0:42:25 who was pushed out for a multitude of reasons,
    0:42:28 including the response to the anti-Semitism issues
    0:42:30 on campus, but also the plagiarism scandal
    0:42:34 which came from Chris Rufo originally.
    0:42:38 But the numbers on the DEI roles going down
    0:42:40 are pretty astronomical.
    0:42:43 So there was a 29% uptick after George Floyd was murdered
    0:42:47 between November, 2020 and November, 2021.
    0:42:50 Then there was a 23% decline in the amount of jobs posting
    0:42:55 with DEI in the title between November, 2022 and 2023.
    0:42:58 And it’s down as much as 43% as of this summer.
    0:43:02 So that’s obviously the trend line and where we’re going.
    0:43:04 And that’s in part, I think that a lot of these roles
    0:43:08 were invented for self-soothing to make people feel better
    0:43:12 about it, also to communicate to consumers
    0:43:14 and internal stakeholders.
    0:43:16 We really care about these issues
    0:43:18 without having a thoughtful plan of how to do it
    0:43:20 or what you actually need.
    0:43:23 Like, do you need there to be 100 roles like this?
    0:43:25 Or do you need 10 really good people
    0:43:28 that are gonna come in and make important changes
    0:43:31 and help you reflect your values?
    0:43:34 Which is what you hear over and over from organizations
    0:43:36 that they need help being able to communicate
    0:43:38 what their values are to internal
    0:43:40 and external stakeholders.
    0:43:42 So I think it’s the combination of everything coupled
    0:43:45 with as well the affirmative action decision
    0:43:49 from the Supreme Court, which has changed the way
    0:43:52 a lot of people think about admissions to college
    0:43:56 and beyond meritocracy in terms of getting your jobs.
    0:44:00 And I know the UC system doesn’t do race-based admissions,
    0:44:00 right?
    0:44:03 – I think this is what often happens
    0:44:07 with democratic initiatives or an orthodoxy
    0:44:10 and that is it’s a good idea and then the world chains
    0:44:12 they don’t change with it or it goes too far.
    0:44:17 I still think there’s a need to focus on diversity
    0:44:21 or ensuring that if you have a company
    0:44:23 where the majority of your consumers
    0:44:26 and endorsed athletes are non-white, i.e. Nike,
    0:44:28 and pretty much your entire board is white dude
    0:44:31 so you have a problem and you should be called out for it.
    0:44:34 So there’s still work to be done here.
    0:44:37 I have generally found that any company
    0:44:41 or any university with a DEI officer or department
    0:44:43 is already one of the most diverse
    0:44:45 and inclusive places on the planet.
    0:44:50 And what I have generally found at universities
    0:44:54 is DEI is filled with a lot of virtue signaling
    0:44:56 and they become impervious.
    0:44:58 These jobs are impossible to do away with
    0:45:01 because you’re kind of called implicitly
    0:45:02 although what’s happening now are racist
    0:45:05 if you’re in any way question them.
    0:45:07 And they’re generally very expensive.
    0:45:08 They never go away.
    0:45:10 It’s resulted this among other things
    0:45:12 whether it’s ethics or leadership, that’s my favorite.
    0:45:13 We teach ethics at Stern.
    0:45:15 Give me a fucking break.
    0:45:18 I can’t give my 14 year old to make us bed
    0:45:21 and I’m gonna teach a 28 year old to be more ethical.
    0:45:22 These departments never go away.
    0:45:25 We bring in formerly important people.
    0:45:26 We pay them a lot of money
    0:45:28 so they can talk about war stories,
    0:45:30 teach them leadership or anything
    0:45:32 with the term studies on it means that
    0:45:34 if you take this course you might get four stars
    0:45:37 instead of three as an Uber driver or barista.
    0:45:40 We have totally lost the mission in my opinion in the script.
    0:45:43 There are now 16 employees at MIT
    0:45:46 for everyone who actually teaches.
    0:45:48 And we invent these departments.
    0:45:52 Sustainability, leadership, ethics, DEI
    0:45:56 and all of this translates to student debt.
    0:45:58 And where we’ve lost the script around DEI
    0:46:02 is we’ve decided okay, essentially the easiest way
    0:46:06 to identify or put forward an orthodoxy around DEI
    0:46:10 is it oppressors over here, oppressed over here.
    0:46:13 Oh and by the way, if you’re white and wealthy
    0:46:14 you’re probably an oppressor
    0:46:19 and whose ground zero for white and wealthy, Jews.
    0:46:22 And what you have seen on campus is a level of bigotry
    0:46:23 that I don’t think you’ve seen
    0:46:26 in other American institutions in a long time.
    0:46:29 And a lot of it started and was inspired
    0:46:31 by this weird virtue signaling
    0:46:33 and everyone barking up the same tree,
    0:46:38 largely inspired or somewhat inspired by these DEI initiatives.
    0:46:40 I can’t wait to see these things go on campus.
    0:46:44 We, the whole DEI initiative on campus
    0:46:46 has been nothing but a misdirect.
    0:46:50 And that is Harvard obsesses over quote unquote diversity.
    0:46:52 Meanwhile, they sit on an endowment
    0:46:55 that’s the GDP of Costa Rica, $54 billion
    0:46:58 and they refuse to expand their freshman class.
    0:47:00 They’ve grown their endowment 4,000%.
    0:47:03 They’ve grown their freshman class in 40 years, 4%.
    0:47:07 So they create a misdirect around who gets in.
    0:47:09 The conversation shouldn’t be around who gets in.
    0:47:11 It should be around how many get in.
    0:47:14 Let in more trans kids, let in more black kids,
    0:47:17 let in more gay kids, let in more white kids
    0:47:19 from rural states.
    0:47:20 The question shouldn’t be who gets in.
    0:47:21 It should be how many.
    0:47:24 You know who doesn’t have a DEI problem?
    0:47:26 Junior colleges.
    0:47:28 Because they say if you show up and you want to better yourself
    0:47:31 and you can pay a couple hundred bucks per credit, you’re in.
    0:47:33 And the reason all this bullshit agita,
    0:47:37 it also ends up creating more racism than it solves on campus
    0:47:40 because the kid next to you who might not be non-white,
    0:47:42 you wonder if he or she deserves to be there.
    0:47:44 And it creates all of this resentment
    0:47:47 among good kids who don’t get into school
    0:47:48 because they don’t have a story of adversity.
    0:47:50 And you brought up the University of California,
    0:47:54 one of the great gifts to American society.
    0:47:57 In 1990, was either four or seven, they said,
    0:48:00 we’re no longer about race-based affirmative action.
    0:48:03 We’re about an adversity score.
    0:48:05 And I’m a beneficiary of affirmative action
    0:48:07 because my household income was less than $40,000.
    0:48:10 I got free Pell Grants or I got Pell Grants
    0:48:12 or aren’t even loans.
    0:48:13 So the DEI apparatus,
    0:48:17 I hope it is disassembled immediately across campuses.
    0:48:20 I still think there’s work to be done in corporations
    0:48:22 as someone who serves on boards,
    0:48:24 who knows a lot of senior management.
    0:48:27 There’s still too many people with outdoor plumbing
    0:48:28 running these companies.
    0:48:30 And I don’t think it’s ever gonna be 50/50
    0:48:31 ’cause I think more women will decide
    0:48:34 to exit the workforce for a variety of reasons.
    0:48:36 Anyways, that was my TED Talk.
    0:48:37 Any thoughts?
    0:48:38 – I think I actually have heard that
    0:48:39 as one of your TED Talks.
    0:48:41 And I enjoyed it then and I enjoyed it this time as well.
    0:48:42 – Oh!
    0:48:45 – No, I generally agree with it.
    0:48:48 And I also, I thought that Harvard’s response
    0:48:51 after the Supreme Court decision made a lot of sense
    0:48:53 where they said, okay, well, we’re going to find a way
    0:48:55 to ensure that we have a diverse class
    0:48:57 no matter how you say we need to do it.
    0:49:00 And there are other things that you can look at
    0:49:02 in terms of an application or a background of a student
    0:49:06 to make sure that you have the widest swath
    0:49:09 of students represented.
    0:49:11 And increasingly, this is a conversation
    0:49:12 that I’m having with my friends
    0:49:14 even down to the preschool level
    0:49:15 where people aren’t as concerned anymore
    0:49:18 about racial diversity because knock on wood,
    0:49:22 thank God we have generally become less racist, right?
    0:49:25 Like the Cheerios commercial with the biracial couple
    0:49:27 that kind of broke all testing standards
    0:49:29 where little kids, they showed it to a five-year-old
    0:49:32 and to their parents and all the parents noticed
    0:49:35 that it was a biracial couple and none of the kids did
    0:49:38 because that’s life for them now, that they see mixed race,
    0:49:41 everything is getting more of a melting pot
    0:49:42 and that is a good thing.
    0:49:46 But what is not happening is we are just hanging out
    0:49:48 with people from our same socioeconomic background.
    0:49:51 And that’s really what people are hunting
    0:49:52 in terms of diversity.
    0:49:53 Like I think about that all the time.
    0:49:56 Will Cleo, my daughter have friends
    0:49:59 who don’t have every toy that they want, right?
    0:50:00 Will she go to someone’s house
    0:50:03 who doesn’t have a playroom in the building?
    0:50:07 You know, those kinds of things are much more top of mind
    0:50:10 for us than worrying about whether she’s going to think
    0:50:14 that a kid who is black or brown is less than.
    0:50:16 And it was so important, I think for the evolution
    0:50:19 of this discussion, that it was Asian Americans
    0:50:22 that brought that lawsuit about being discriminated against
    0:50:24 versus making it, we always think of it
    0:50:27 as a black, brown issue or a person of color issue.
    0:50:31 And we don’t tend to lump in Asians in that bucket,
    0:50:33 which is something that they’ve had to be up against.
    0:50:35 And I’ve had a lot of difficulty with that.
    0:50:38 And it made me think about the change in New York City
    0:50:39 as I’ve grown up.
    0:50:43 So when I went and took the test to get into Stuyvesant,
    0:50:46 which is a premier public school here in New York,
    0:50:48 one of the main filters to Harvard,
    0:50:51 it was predominantly white kids that were getting in.
    0:50:53 And now, and I live in the neighborhood,
    0:50:55 I rarely see a kid coming out of Stuyvesant
    0:50:57 who is an Asian, right?
    0:50:59 It is totally meritocratic.
    0:51:02 However, you do on the test is whether you get in or not.
    0:51:06 And the fact that they were then going on to be discriminated
    0:51:09 against in terms of getting into these top universities,
    0:51:10 which we should note as well as something
    0:51:12 that happened to Jewish students at a certain point,
    0:51:13 like a couple of decades ago,
    0:51:15 then it started being pushed back against Jews,
    0:51:17 there were too many of them getting in
    0:51:19 as a proportion of the population,
    0:51:20 then it moved on to Asians.
    0:51:22 And I think that it allowed us
    0:51:25 to actually have a more honest conversation
    0:51:28 about these admission systems and how society is structured
    0:51:31 because it wasn’t a black versus white issue
    0:51:33 because everyone just tunes out then and just says,
    0:51:37 well, of course I’m for equal opportunity.
    0:51:40 And the reframing has led to more discussions like this,
    0:51:43 which I think are important for people to have
    0:51:45 and then to also integrate into it
    0:51:47 the socioeconomic aspect of it,
    0:51:50 which is the real dividing line in all of this.
    0:51:54 Like there aren’t enough opportunities for poor white kids
    0:51:56 to be able to get on the ladder,
    0:51:57 whether it’s about going to school
    0:51:59 or getting the jobs that they want,
    0:52:01 the same way that we would have discussions
    0:52:05 about poor black kids or poor Latino kids.
    0:52:06 Anyway, that was my TED talk.
    0:52:08 I don’t know if I would have gotten it though.
    0:52:09 It was good, all right.
    0:52:11 – In the United States today,
    0:52:16 you would rather be born non-white or gay than poor.
    0:52:20 54% of gay men will get a college degree,
    0:52:22 it’s 34% for straight men,
    0:52:25 and that goes into a variety of issues.
    0:52:27 But affirmative action is a wonderful thing.
    0:52:28 We should lift people up.
    0:52:29 There’s just some people,
    0:52:31 and I even think a majority of Republicans feel that,
    0:52:34 okay, there’s some people with so much wind in their face,
    0:52:37 let’s widen their aperture, let’s widen the perspective,
    0:52:38 let’s give some people a hand up.
    0:52:39 I just think,
    0:52:41 I gotta think most people believe that, that okay,
    0:52:42 it’s easy to talk about.
    0:52:44 – And they’ve been beneficiaries of it to some degree,
    0:52:46 however it has manifested.
    0:52:47 Yeah.
    0:52:50 – Case in point, Pell Grants for a straight white male,
    0:52:52 but it should be based on color.
    0:52:55 And that color is the following, green.
    0:52:57 We should help poor kids.
    0:52:58 They’re the ones,
    0:52:59 they’re the ones,
    0:53:01 the biggest forward-looking indicator of your success,
    0:53:03 unfortunately in our nation,
    0:53:05 has become how rich your parents are.
    0:53:07 Basically your zip code and your parents’ income.
    0:53:10 And we need something that helps kids
    0:53:11 brought up in low-income neighborhoods,
    0:53:13 regardless of the color of their skin,
    0:53:15 regardless of their sexual orientation,
    0:53:18 regardless of their gender.
    0:53:20 All right, you have grown up
    0:53:21 in what is in a capitalist society,
    0:53:23 the biggest headwind in your face,
    0:53:25 and that is you don’t have money.
    0:53:29 And I think it would solve so many problems
    0:53:31 and move away from this identity politics
    0:53:34 where unfortunately the Democratic Party
    0:53:36 has become totally obsessed.
    0:53:39 So we’re gonna save the easy stuff for the end here, Jess.
    0:53:41 – Can I say before we do the end?
    0:53:41 – Of course.
    0:53:45 – But in the dissent and the SCOTUS opinion,
    0:53:49 Justice Jackson essentially accuses Clarence Thomas
    0:53:51 of turning his back on the system
    0:53:53 that got Clarence Thomas where he was going.
    0:53:56 And I don’t know if I’m ready to fully throw the baby out
    0:53:59 with the bathwater and say that there should be no,
    0:54:01 race should not be considered at all.
    0:54:03 Because I think there are systemic challenges
    0:54:06 that face people of color that are different
    0:54:09 than the socioeconomic challenges that are out there.
    0:54:13 I just, I’m like 75% there.
    0:54:18 And I thought that there was some compelling arguments
    0:54:21 made by the liberal justices to maintain it.
    0:54:22 – But wouldn’t most of that,
    0:54:24 so the reason, one of the reasons I love economic based
    0:54:27 affirmative action is that it would actually
    0:54:30 impact 70% of the same people.
    0:54:32 ‘Cause we do still have, you could argue,
    0:54:34 an economic apartheid in the United States.
    0:54:37 If you’re the daughter of a private equity billionaire
    0:54:39 from Taiwan, that’s not diversity.
    0:54:41 You don’t need our help, right?
    0:54:46 And a lot of kids or a lot of non-whites, like I said,
    0:54:50 if you have money, most of those problems
    0:54:52 can be addressed and handled.
    0:54:54 Anyways, point taken.
    0:54:56 This week is a big moment for transgender rights
    0:54:59 as the Supreme Court takes on its biggest case yet.
    0:55:02 The issue at hand is a Tennessee law banning puberty blockers
    0:55:05 and hormone treatments for transgender minors
    0:55:07 with over two dozen states having similar laws.
    0:55:10 The case is sparking tensions among conservatives
    0:55:12 even challenging their usual stance on parental rights.
    0:55:16 Jess, what do you think might happen here?
    0:55:17 – I mean, it’s a conservative court.
    0:55:22 So I imagine it’ll go as many things have now
    0:55:23 and they’ll go six, three.
    0:55:27 But 26 states now have laws restricting treatments
    0:55:28 like puberty blocking drugs.
    0:55:30 And what’s interesting about this case,
    0:55:32 and it’ll be used as the model.
    0:55:36 So it’s the ACLU plus the Biden administration, the DOJ,
    0:55:38 I should say, not the Biden administration bringing this.
    0:55:41 The problem or what they’re identifying or using
    0:55:43 is the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment
    0:55:46 that essentially these drugs are being authorized
    0:55:48 for non-transgender youths.
    0:55:51 So all of the kids that are bringing this case
    0:55:53 have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria.
    0:55:56 So there are doctors that have said you have this
    0:55:58 and they are not getting access to these medications
    0:56:02 that kids who do not have gender dysphoria have access to.
    0:56:04 So they’re saying it’s discrimination on the basis
    0:56:07 of Equal Protection because they’re transgender.
    0:56:10 Again, I imagine it’ll get shot down by the court.
    0:56:12 I like that they’re taking it at least
    0:56:14 and so that we can have this discussion.
    0:56:16 It’s when you think that this is going on in 206 states
    0:56:18 and even how prominent of a role it played
    0:56:22 in our election, conversations around trans issues
    0:56:25 and people believing that kids go to school
    0:56:27 and come home a different gender.
    0:56:29 It’s obviously top of mind for people,
    0:56:32 but I’m not optimistic that they’re going to rule
    0:56:35 in favor of as one transgender girl
    0:56:38 and two transgender boys that have brought the case.
    0:56:40 – Yeah, I thought that was great
    0:56:42 and I’m gonna plead the fifth on this.
    0:56:45 This is something we talk a lot about on Pivot
    0:56:47 and I finally come to the conclusion
    0:56:49 that I have no fucking idea what I’m talking about
    0:56:54 and this issue is so sensitive, so complicated
    0:56:59 that I can just see all sides of this issue
    0:57:01 or not all sides.
    0:57:04 I empathize with so many different viewpoints
    0:57:07 and I think this is really another instance
    0:57:10 of where government should kind of be out of people’s lives
    0:57:15 and let the family and the doctor and the right professionals
    0:57:17 and the American Pediatric Association
    0:57:19 decide the best solution here.
    0:57:21 I think it’s government outreach.
    0:57:23 I think the Democratic party has become too obsessed
    0:57:26 with this issue and it’s cost us dearly.
    0:57:29 At the same time, I’m just absolutely horrified
    0:57:31 by the demonization of this group.
    0:57:34 At this one, I really do think this is government.
    0:57:39 I understand cases that get elevated to the Supreme Court.
    0:57:41 This does feel, it’s just so weird.
    0:57:44 I feel like Republicans talk such a big game
    0:57:46 about staying out of people’s lives and small government
    0:57:51 and on the most sensitive, complex, nuanced decisions
    0:57:56 they wanna weigh in and it just feels like law enforcement,
    0:58:01 the courts should not be in the business of this.
    0:58:03 – To that point, the Dobs decision is referenced
    0:58:08 over 10 times in this suit for that exact reason.
    0:58:13 So small government no more when it comes to sex,
    0:58:18 reproduction, trans issues, yeah.
    0:58:20 – Yeah, when the left and the right agree on something
    0:58:22 it’s usually reckless spending.
    0:58:24 All right, that’s all for this episode.
    0:58:26 Thank you for listening to Raging Moderates.
    0:58:28 Our producers are Caroline Shagren and David Toledo.
    0:58:30 Our technical director is Drew Burroughs.
    0:58:33 You can find Raging Moderates on its own feed every Tuesday.
    0:58:37 That’s right, please if you’re enjoying this episode,
    0:58:40 please subscribe to Raging Moderates on its own feed.
    0:58:42 Do it right now, follow it up.
    0:58:45 Please follow us wherever you get your podcasts.
    0:58:47 Just have a great rest of the week.
    0:58:48 I’m glad you’re doing it.
    0:58:49 – You too, have a great move.
    0:58:50 – Yeah.
    0:58:58 – Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:59:01 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools
    0:59:03 to power your business forward
    0:59:04 with the security and speed
    0:59:06 of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:59:10 (upbeat music)
    0:59:14 Autograph Collection Hotels offer over 300
    0:59:16 independent hotels around the world,
    0:59:19 each exactly like nothing else.
    0:59:21 Hands selected for their inherent craft,
    0:59:24 each hotel tells its own unique story
    0:59:26 through distinctive design and immersive experiences
    0:59:30 from medieval falconry to volcanic wine tasting.
    0:59:33 Autograph Collection is part of the Marriott Bonvoy
    0:59:37 portfolio of over 30 hotel brands around the world.
    0:59:40 Find the unforgettable at AutographCollection.com.
    0:59:42 you

    Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov discuss the implications of President Biden’s pardon for his son, Hunter. Then, they get into Trump’s tariff proposals, whether Kash Patel is fit to run the FBI, and why companies are eliminating their DEI initiatives.  

    Follow Jessica Tarlov, @JessicaTarlov

    Follow Prof G, @profgalloway.

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Prof G Markets: The Art of Spending Money

    AI transcript
    0:00:04 Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
    0:00:07 If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you,
    0:00:10 Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention.
    0:00:15 Constant Contact’s award-winning marketing platform offers all the automation,
    0:00:20 integration, and reporting tools that get your marketing running seamlessly,
    0:00:23 all backed by their expert live customer support.
    0:00:27 It’s time to get going and growing with Constant Contact today.
    0:00:30 Ready? Set. Grow.
    0:00:34 Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
    0:00:43 Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial, ConstantContact.ca.
    0:00:45 Support for this show comes from Seven Rooms.
    0:00:49 For the restaurant operators out there who want to create more regulars on the regular,
    0:00:51 check out Seven Rooms.
    0:00:55 Seven Rooms is an all-in-one CRM marketing and operations platform
    0:00:59 that helps you make more money and more magic for your guests.
    0:01:04 It gives your staff the tools to deliver service that keeps your guests coming back for more,
    0:01:09 from direct reservations to smart table management to targeted text and email marketing.
    0:01:14 Seven Rooms helps you grow your brand and your covers and not your workload.
    0:01:17 Learn more at SevenRooms.com.
    0:01:20 Seven Rooms. Make magic. Make money.
    0:01:23 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:01:28 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools to power your business forward
    0:01:33 with the security and speed of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:01:35 Today’s number, $91 million.
    0:01:40 That’s how much King Charles III coronation cost British taxpayers last year.
    0:01:44 Ed, what does Burger King and Vaginos have in common?
    0:01:45 What’s that?
    0:01:49 It’s generally considered bad form to eat them in the middle of a McDonald’s.
    0:02:00 ♪ Have it your way, have it your way, have it your way at Burger King. ♪
    0:02:06 ♪ 1977, no me diga no, no lo crecia. ♪
    0:02:11 ♪ Todo lo que cambia lo hará diferente en el año que nace la CPH. ♪
    0:02:18 That wasn’t easy to bring Burger King and the King into something this profane had.
    0:02:22 You’re pretending not to laugh for fear that you’ll be named in a lawsuit.
    0:02:23 I don’t get you can laugh out loud.
    0:02:24 That’s right.
    0:02:26 Even Claire is laughing.
    0:02:29 Claire is literally the general consulate of Locustan.
    0:02:32 I always laugh at your pussy jokes. Come on.
    0:02:35 She does. Claire is down with me.
    0:02:38 We’re both looking for the same thing, if you know what I mean.
    0:02:39 That’s right. That’s right.
    0:02:42 We’re both on the same team.
    0:02:44 We both point out the same akushama.
    0:02:46 We’re looking at the same.
    0:02:49 We’re seeing the same sights together on the road.
    0:02:50 All right, I need to get out of this.
    0:02:53 Ed, what are we talking about today?
    0:02:55 We’re talking about what are we doing today?
    0:02:56 We’re doing something different today.
    0:02:58 Here, you take this.
    0:03:01 Gladly. We’ve got a special episode today, Scott.
    0:03:04 We are diving into one of our favorite topics.
    0:03:07 We’re not going to be talking about saving money or even investing money.
    0:03:10 We’re going to be talking about spending money.
    0:03:14 We’re going to be answering questions like what are the best ways to spend money?
    0:03:16 How should we think about spending?
    0:03:19 And most importantly, how do you spend your money?
    0:03:24 So I’ll walk us through a series of questions about spending.
    0:03:26 You’ll give me your honest answers, I hope.
    0:03:29 And then hopefully we’ll learn something along the way.
    0:03:32 This doesn’t fit my opening joke.
    0:03:33 I think we might have to re-record.
    0:03:35 This sounds very thoughtful and responsible.
    0:03:38 Anyways, but yes, please continue.
    0:03:39 It is going to be very doable.
    0:03:42 It’s practically going to be a therapy session.
    0:03:44 Nah. I’m in. I’m in.
    0:03:47 Alright, well, we’ll start with a pretty easy question.
    0:03:50 And that is, what is the worst purchase you have ever made?
    0:03:57 Oh, when I was, I grew up in California and I grew up in this era that you don’t relate to.
    0:04:01 It was kind of California dreamin’, American graffiti.
    0:04:07 The only thing you had to express any sort of coolness or wealth or aspiration or macho was your car.
    0:04:10 In addition, living in Los Angeles,
    0:04:14 you had literally no aspect of a social life unless you had a car.
    0:04:16 There was no public transportation.
    0:04:18 There was the RTD, but it wasn’t really efficient.
    0:04:20 So if you wanted to go on a Friday night,
    0:04:25 go and crash a party that someone was having you were invited to see above Scott Galloway,
    0:04:27 you needed a car.
    0:04:32 And so from the age of about 13, I saved pretty much everything for a car.
    0:04:38 And I got, my dad gave me an old Volkswagen Rabbit from his old home in Phoenix.
    0:04:42 On the way back from Arizona with a friend, the tire blew out and there was no spare tire.
    0:04:49 Gives you a bit of a sense for the protective instincts my father did not have but a Renault car.
    0:04:55 And finally, I think the Renault got towed my freshman year in the fraternity and I didn’t even go get it.
    0:04:56 I think I just let it be sold for scrap.
    0:05:02 So buying a car, my first cars were the worst purchases hands down I ever made.
    0:05:05 They literally took all of my disposable income and more.
    0:05:12 It was like $2,500 to buy insurance when you were 16, which on a inflation-adjusted basis probably meant $10,000 a year.
    0:05:15 I did not have that kind of money and yet I found it.
    0:05:18 So hands down the worst purchase I ever made was a car.
    0:05:24 What about the BMW you got after you got your bonus from Morgan Stanley?
    0:05:27 I’m always kind of blown away by the fact that that’s how you spent your bonus.
    0:05:30 I respect it to be clear, but…
    0:05:30 Oh yeah.
    0:05:36 And now that I think I told you, I bought a 325i Navy Blue and bought it out of the recycler.
    0:05:39 I think I spent, I don’t know what it was, my first bonus was like $25,000.
    0:05:42 I spent $28,000 on a car.
    0:05:48 But I think of that, I mean, this sounds dumb, but a bad car that you don’t need in college and high school,
    0:05:51 I kind of needed it, but I just couldn’t afford it.
    0:05:52 You know, that’s a dumb purchase.
    0:05:58 I would argue that when you’re 23 working a Morgan Stanley and you’re in your mating years,
    0:06:02 that buying a BMW and hanging swim goggles from the rearview mirror, it makes a lot of sense.
    0:06:07 You’re trying to say, you’re trying to signal to women that if you have kids with me,
    0:06:14 your kids are more likely to survive than if you date someone who is driving a Hyundai and does, you know, does water aerobics.
    0:06:19 So I sort of, I empathize with what I’ll call smart signaling purchases.
    0:06:24 I think it’s difficult to lecture someone your age on to not occasionally buy cool shit and do cool things.
    0:06:28 Your 20s come and go, you want to signal attractiveness.
    0:06:30 I get sort of the irrational purchases.
    0:06:32 To me, the BMW kind of made sense.
    0:06:36 And also I sold it and it paid for my European trip, so it was worth it.
    0:06:38 And I don’t think I lost that much value on it.
    0:06:45 Yeah, my follow-up was going to be, was there ever an item that you splurged on that seemed pretty irresponsible at the time?
    0:06:48 But ultimately, as you reflect, turned out to be completely worth it.
    0:06:51 Perhaps the BMW, perhaps something else.
    0:06:59 No, and I’ll turn this back to you, but I wish I’d learned earlier, and I did learn it accidentally, but it was more organic than anything I read.
    0:07:01 You remember experiences, you don’t remember stuff.
    0:07:07 People overestimate the joy they’re going to get from things and they underestimate the joy they’re going to get from experiences.
    0:07:16 When I left Morgan Stanley, I initially, towards the end of Morgan Stanley, I thought about trying to do a third year and maybe making the jump to associate or interviewing with another firm.
    0:07:22 Because everyone had convinced me that if you have your foot in the door in investment banking, you never want to leave because you’ll never get a job that good.
    0:07:25 Even despite the fact I hated it and they hated me, I wasn’t very good at it.
    0:07:28 I was trying to figure out a way to maybe stand it.
    0:07:34 And then the only time I’ve ever been in the hospital was I got an arrhythmia towards the end of my second year.
    0:07:35 In a what?
    0:07:35 An arrhythmia.
    0:07:39 It’s something called ventricular tachycardia, which is an irregular heartbeat.
    0:07:40 Okay.
    0:07:47 And the timing was really unfortunate because the week before this guy named, was it Hank Gathers?
    0:08:00 The best high school or the best college basketball player got a rebound, went down for a monster jam in front of a national audience and then turned back to run up the court and drop dead on the court.
    0:08:08 And he was diagnosed with VTAC and an enlarged heart, which is quite regular for people who your heart is a muscle.
    0:08:16 And if you work out a lot, which I was doing in crew, your heart actually can get too big for your chest cavity and it can create an electrical imbalance.
    0:08:17 I was overinsured.
    0:08:22 I was having this irregular heartbeat Hank Gathers the week before they stuck me in the hospital.
    0:08:27 So while I was in the hospital, this woman, I was at St. John’s, I think it was.
    0:08:33 And she said, why are you, she’s looked at me and I’m 23 said, you’re in the ICU unit of the cardiology unit.
    0:08:36 She’s just looked at me, not a doctor and said, you shouldn’t be here.
    0:08:38 What’s going on with your life?
    0:08:39 And it hit me so hard.
    0:08:46 I was, I was, I became very emotional because I’d obviously tried to push down all these emotions about a fucking freaked out.
    0:08:51 I was that I was in the, the, you know, ICU unit of the cardiology unit, St. John’s.
    0:08:57 And basically net net that afternoon, I decided I was going to leave investment banking and do something different.
    0:09:04 I moved back in with my mom and I sold my car and I went to Europe with that money and with my friendly Lotus.
    0:09:10 And we got a backpack, a URail pass and that still remains as evidenced by anyone who watches this podcast.
    0:09:12 I do amazing travel.
    0:09:14 I travel to the best places.
    0:09:17 I have an extraordinary life with respect to travel.
    0:09:29 The best trip I’ve ever taken was when I was 24, right out of Morgan Stanley with the URail pass, sleeping in hostels with my good friends, Lee Lotus and then David Kingsdale joined us.
    0:09:36 And I connected with a woman I was dating at the time and to being, you know, making us on no money, but with someone you were into.
    0:09:39 That was just the best expenditure I’ve ever made.
    0:09:46 And I, I spent everything and more, I think I had to call my mom and ask her to wire me some money, but it was hands down the best expenditure I’ve ever made.
    0:09:47 So I’ll put it back to you.
    0:09:55 The dumbest and best purchases you’ve made today, other than like a big wheel and that glass dildo I saw you had on your shelf.
    0:09:58 Turn off the camera, Jesus Christ.
    0:09:59 I’m sorry, go ahead.
    0:10:01 Now that almost worth it.
    0:10:03 Yeah, I think it’s experiences for me too.
    0:10:08 It’s, it’s funny, I, I, the first thing that comes to mind for me is also Mekanos.
    0:10:16 There was one night in Mekanos, I went last summer with a bunch of friends and there was one night was probably the most amount I’ve ever spent in a
    0:10:17 single night and it was ridiculous.
    0:10:24 We decided that, you know, we had picked out what the best club on the island was and that club is Alamogu.
    0:10:30 And we decided, okay, me and my boys got to, okay, we’re going to pay for this whole thing.
    0:10:33 We’re going to, we’re going to get all the girls and they’re not going to pay a penny.
    0:10:38 And we’re going to just spend like crazy on this one night.
    0:10:40 On Thursday night, we’re going really, really hard.
    0:10:43 And so we got the best table at the club.
    0:10:48 We got one of the biggest bottles that they have on offer.
    0:10:52 And we kind of just decided like, this is, this is our big night.
    0:10:55 And, you know, I turned, we’re having a great time.
    0:11:10 I turned to my left and we’re in the VIP section sitting next to the table that is occupied by Paul George, Carl Anthony Towns and basically just all of the biggest NBA stars in the world right now.
    0:11:16 And that was a moment where it’s like, okay, this is, this is an amount of money that I don’t have clearly.
    0:11:19 But I’ve made a very intentional choice and an intentional decision.
    0:11:22 Like this is something that I know I’m going to enjoy.
    0:11:23 I know it’s going to be special.
    0:11:25 We had, we stayed up till sunrise.
    0:11:27 It was like the greatest night ever.
    0:11:33 And that to me is like a moment where it was very irresponsible when you think about it numerically.
    0:11:40 But in terms of like the intention and the purpose behind it, where I was like, I know that I’m spending a lot right now.
    0:11:45 And I’m going to be very, you know, responsible when I get home to New York.
    0:11:47 That was probably my number one.
    0:11:51 It’s funny, it reminds me of my dad occasionally would say something that, you know, was close to insight.
    0:11:54 And he was said to me, doing nothing is fine as long as it’s planned.
    0:11:59 And I remember another saying that anger is anger is actually productive emotion as long as it’s planned.
    0:12:04 And I think what you’re saying is you made a responsible decision to be irresponsible.
    0:12:06 And I think that’s okay.
    0:12:08 You know, occasionally it’s fun to splurge.
    0:12:17 And, you know, I would argue the splurges when you’re young are, I think you remember them more, especially if they’re around experiences.
    0:12:24 Anyways, I, my advice to young people, you know, Andrew Huberman and Peter Atia will say, you know, don’t drink alcohol.
    0:12:25 I don’t see drunkenness.
    0:12:33 I see togetherness and I just love the image of you and your, your homies and Mick and us doing your thing.
    0:12:39 And then at late at night, getting shut down by every woman in the club still was worth it.
    0:12:41 That was definitely worth it.
    0:12:45 Okay, what about the best purchase you’ve ever made?
    0:12:51 Probably the best purchases, both financially and emotionally for me were homes.
    0:12:53 And that is right out of business school.
    0:13:01 I was very much in love and we bought a home together and it just represented like a commitment to each other.
    0:13:18 And we got a dog and it just, at the age of 27, it just felt really nice to, to have some of that, like, feeling that, that domestic bliss to be committed to someone, to be making a mortgage payment and owning a home.
    0:13:22 And, and the home was just a vehicle, I think, for kind of that commitment to each other.
    0:13:25 And it felt really, it was emotionally very rewarding.
    0:13:33 And then going back to the, probably the last house purchase I made, when I sold L2, I had, you know, a big windfall.
    0:13:38 And my partner said, we should buy this, you know, beautiful home, I mean, it is a beautiful home on the beach.
    0:13:44 And one of my flaws, many flaws as investors, I think nothing is ever cheap enough.
    0:13:46 And the home was, they were asking 15 million.
    0:13:48 She said, trust me, we can get it for a lot less.
    0:13:51 And I’m like, she offered, ended up getting it for nine and a half.
    0:13:52 And I’m like, I didn’t want to buy it.
    0:13:54 I’m like, no, it’ll be worth six and two years.
    0:13:55 We’re going into recession.
    0:14:00 This is 2019, I’m sorry, 2017.
    0:14:04 And it took three years to renovate, shit ton of money.
    0:14:09 And then COVID comes and we have, you know, a really nice home on the beach.
    0:14:12 And then again, above, see above better to be lucky than good.
    0:14:16 This mass migration of people to Florida from COVID.
    0:14:21 All these masters in the universe who all want to live in the same, same area and be on the sand.
    0:14:25 And that home has probably doubled or tripled in value and more important than that.
    0:14:32 In an environment where people had to sequester and isolate with their families.
    0:14:38 I was in a beautiful home, more time with Netflix, more time with my boys and my stocks were skyrocketing.
    0:14:50 And COVID was, in my opinion, the most unfair, pornographic, gross transfer of wealth and health
    0:14:57 from the already wealthy and the incumbents from people who were unhealthy or poor.
    0:14:59 And I was, I was on the right side of that.
    0:15:06 And it just strikes me, it just feels so uncomfortable to say COVID was the best two years of my life.
    0:15:10 But this is a long-winded way of saying the best purchases I have made.
    0:15:14 And I’m not suggesting that it’s right for everybody because a lot of it is timing.
    0:15:19 But emotionally and financially, the best purchases I have made were my first in my last home.
    0:15:28 Are there any categories of spending that you kind of refuse to skimp on or that you pretty consistently go all out on?
    0:15:35 Something where you look at the price tag and you say, doesn’t matter, I’m going to buy this, no matter what.
    0:15:39 I’m sitting in a room that costs $5,000 a night.
    0:15:44 I mean, enough said, I don’t own a car.
    0:15:46 I don’t spend a lot of money on clothes.
    0:15:49 I spend a crazy amount of money on travel.
    0:15:53 The next door in the next room is my friend Augusto.
    0:15:57 And Augusto is like this greatest guy, easygoing, super nice.
    0:16:03 And when I’m doing a lot of traveling and I’m lonely and my partner can’t come with me or my kids can’t be with me,
    0:16:06 I call one of many friends and I say, come join me.
    0:16:12 And if it’s not easy for them, logistically or financially, I make it easy for them.
    0:16:14 And we go out and we go to the best place.
    0:16:16 I mean, and I feel self-conscious.
    0:16:17 It’s so funny.
    0:16:22 I’ve always, I’ve had this weird shame around money up until the age of 30 or 35.
    0:16:25 I was ashamed that I didn’t have more money.
    0:16:27 I was always, I was broke because I was in school.
    0:16:28 I had student loans.
    0:16:36 I was really self-conscious about how much, how little money my mom and I had made me feel very insecure.
    0:16:42 And then student loans, starting businesses, never had enough money, even when my friends were starting to make money.
    0:16:43 So I didn’t have enough money.
    0:16:45 I was embarrassed by that.
    0:16:49 I think from about the age of 30 to kind of 45, I had just the right amount of money.
    0:16:52 I had enough money to do nice things, but I wasn’t self-conscious.
    0:16:54 Then I got exceptionally lucky.
    0:16:56 And by the way, I’m not humble.
    0:16:57 I think I’m a fucking monster.
    0:17:00 I think I’m exceptionally talented, but I also got really lucky.
    0:17:03 There are a lot of exceptionally talented people out there.
    0:17:08 And now I’m not embarrassed, but a little self-conscious by how much money I do have.
    0:17:09 And you’re not supposed to talk about it.
    0:17:18 And I think that is nothing but a bullshit construct to keep poor people poor because when you speak a different language, rich people talk to other rich people about money all the time.
    0:17:22 They talk about taxes, they talk about investments, and they get more literate.
    0:17:39 And then we’re told not to talk about money in case you decide to share your salary with someone else or you figure out how much money I have and decide to fucking, you know, show up with a guillotine or actually vote for people who have a progressive tax structure or maybe demand more compensation.
    0:17:45 Because you realize the person down the desk from you is making 30% more because they’ve been there 10 years or they’re different sexual orientation.
    0:17:57 I mean, basically the asymmetry of information and this inclination that you’re not supposed to talk about money keeps the financially illiterate illiterate and also keeps rich people richer.
    0:18:12 So other than bragging, it is, I think, important to talk about money, even when you have it, but hands down where I go ape shit with money now that I have it and spend more than I should is on travel.
    0:18:16 I’m going to Africa, I’m taking my sister and her family, and they didn’t want to go.
    0:18:17 They have responsibilities.
    0:18:22 They’re kids in choir, they’re working hard, and I’m called or I’m like, you’re going to be dead soon.
    0:18:25 When are you next going to Africa like you’re going to go with me?
    0:18:27 When are you going to roll into Africa like you’re going to roll with me?
    0:18:29 What the fuck are you thinking?
    0:18:33 And that was the right lecture for me to get my sister.
    0:18:39 These experiences, if there’s anything the research shows you around spending money, it’s the following.
    0:18:42 Drive a Hyundai and take your husband to Africa.
    0:18:44 I don’t really buy a lot of things.
    0:18:45 I’m just not into that.
    0:18:47 I don’t buy stuff.
    0:18:50 Do you look at the price tag much when you buy things?
    0:18:55 So if you walk into a nice clothing store, are you thinking about how much it costs?
    0:18:58 I do because I can’t get out of that habit.
    0:19:02 I was in, I forget where I was, but there was just an insane price on something.
    0:19:04 And I’m just like, this is offensive.
    0:19:09 I can’t bring myself to spend money on this thing.
    0:19:14 It’s just ridiculous that you would even try and charge this amount of money.
    0:19:14 I can’t buy it.
    0:19:15 I really need it.
    0:19:17 I really like it.
    0:19:20 It doesn’t make any difference to me, but there’s that part of you.
    0:19:21 You just can’t do it.
    0:19:27 You just, you remember back when you didn’t have enough money and you established a value system and you’re like, I just can’t do it.
    0:19:32 I can’t, you know, I can’t spend this kind of money.
    0:19:33 What do you think is the difference then?
    0:19:38 What do you think make justifies like a good purchase versus a bad purchase?
    0:19:43 Like this is the majority of people, 99.9% of the planet doesn’t have these problems.
    0:19:50 They, they have a much bigger problem and that is they’re constantly trading off needs versus wants.
    0:19:52 And that is the majority of our planet.
    0:19:55 I think only about one third of the planet are consumers.
    0:19:55 What does that mean?
    0:20:01 It means that they have enough money to buy things beyond basic food, shelter and education.
    0:20:04 So only a third of us even get to make these decisions.
    0:20:10 So do I want a scarf or do I want to go to Mykonos or do I want to take my spouse out for a nice dinner?
    0:20:14 Yeah, it’s, I think you’re in a unique position because you have experienced
    0:20:20 pretty much every economic class there is to experience in a way.
    0:20:25 I mean, you haven’t experienced real poverty, but you did not grow up wealthy and now
    0:20:26 you’re extremely wealthy.
    0:20:30 And the way I kind of think about like, and you talked about there are certain people that,
    0:20:33 that can’t make those trade-offs that we’re describing.
    0:20:35 It feels like there’s a progression when it comes to spending.
    0:20:41 It’s like in a certain economic weight class, you can’t make trade-offs because
    0:20:43 you have to survive and you have to get by.
    0:20:49 And then you, there’s another class, which is you start being able to make trade-offs.
    0:20:53 And then there’s another one where I feel like you are, where it’s like,
    0:20:57 you don’t even really need to be making trade-offs that much.
    0:21:03 I mean, it sounds like you can generally speaking have your cake and eat it too.
    0:21:05 In most situations, I would say.
    0:21:12 So what I would be interested to know is like, how has the psychology of spending money
    0:21:19 changed for you as you have breached each of those economic weight classes?
    0:21:28 Like, did spending money take on a different gravitas to you as you got richer or as you got poorer?
    0:21:32 So I think it’s important that everyone have a certain code or values that they want on their
    0:21:36 tombstone and then try and live their life across those two or three values.
    0:21:40 And one of my values is I pride myself on being generous.
    0:21:42 And I’m generous with everything but my time.
    0:21:43 I like spending money.
    0:21:44 I like treating people.
    0:21:47 I like buying things for people.
    0:21:49 I know that’s virtue signaling, but anyone who knows me knows that is true.
    0:21:54 And the reason why is not because I’m, I have this inner nobility.
    0:21:57 It was because I was deeply traumatized by my father’s relationship with money.
    0:22:03 My father was born and raised in Depression era Scotland where you could literally starve
    0:22:04 if you didn’t have enough money.
    0:22:07 And so he was painfully cheap.
    0:22:12 He was the guy when my parents were divorced and he came and took me
    0:22:15 and my friend best friend Adam to see “Grease.”
    0:22:17 Amazing movie in 1976.
    0:22:22 After the movie, he collected two bucks from my friend Adam because he had bought the tickets.
    0:22:25 And I had to sit there and watch this go down.
    0:22:30 I went to Hawaii once with him on a big golf vacation or he was the crown circled
    0:22:32 ITT salesman of the year.
    0:22:34 And he got to go on this golf trip and take his family.
    0:22:37 And we went to Baskin and Robbins.
    0:22:38 They got ice cream.
    0:22:39 I ordered a shake.
    0:22:42 And then for two days, my dad didn’t speak to me.
    0:22:46 And you’re 13 years old and you’re a guy and you’re looking up to your father and you’re like,
    0:22:48 why is my dad not speaking to me?
    0:22:49 Like just ignoring me.
    0:22:53 And finally I asked Linda, his third wife, my stepmother, wonderful woman.
    0:22:54 I’m like, what’s going on?
    0:22:55 Why is dad mad at me?
    0:22:58 It’s like, he’s upset you ordered a shake at Baskin and Robbins.
    0:23:00 They cost $3 and you didn’t ask him.
    0:23:02 My dad didn’t speak to me for two days.
    0:23:07 And so when my parents got divorced, he immediately went to the upper middle class.
    0:23:09 We immediately went to the lower middle class.
    0:23:11 He was so awful to us financially.
    0:23:13 He could have made our lives so much easier.
    0:23:15 We’re just a little bit of money.
    0:23:18 I really struggled in college and I’m like, oh, Bill grit, bullshit.
    0:23:23 It was really fucking stressful not knowing if you were going back to college every summer.
    0:23:26 And he could have made my life so much easier.
    0:23:32 And so I remember just explicitly and implicitly deciding, if I ever have money,
    0:23:34 I am not going to be this guy.
    0:23:37 I mean, and I can’t stand it now.
    0:23:42 I can’t stand, I have friends who are really wealthy who always find reasons not to pick
    0:23:44 up the bill or what.
    0:23:47 And I just find it’s such a grotesque attribute.
    0:23:50 And some of it is, they’re just responsible.
    0:23:51 They would just raise that way.
    0:23:57 I find being cheap one of the grossest attributes, especially for men.
    0:23:58 I’m sexist this way.
    0:24:01 I can’t even be around these people.
    0:24:06 If every one of my friends isn’t fighting over the bill, we’re not friends.
    0:24:12 But my spending right now in large part or some of it is, I’m just,
    0:24:15 God, I just don’t want to be my dad.
    0:24:17 He was awful with money, just awful.
    0:24:20 And I always thought, if I ever have money, I’m not only going to enjoy it,
    0:24:22 I’m going to share it.
    0:24:28 Yeah, I feel like people don’t seem to understand how good it feels to be generous.
    0:24:36 I think I started, only started to realize this recently, that it does actually feel
    0:24:41 really, really good to get the check and give someone a nice experience.
    0:24:46 I mean, I did that recently with my dad for the first time.
    0:24:53 And it was kind of like a, it felt like this sort of exciting, important moment where it’s like,
    0:24:57 no, I can get this, like I can give to you.
    0:25:04 And yeah, I mean, it sounds so trite when you say it, but the reality is just as you say it’s like,
    0:25:06 it actually just makes you feel really good.
    0:25:09 And it’s almost the same as getting something for yourself.
    0:25:13 It’s all, as you say, it’s all, it’s selfishly motivated.
    0:25:14 It makes you feel good.
    0:25:21 But it seems like I’ve just found, I’m surprised by how many people don’t realize that, that like,
    0:25:26 it’s really enhances your life and your own personal experience to be generous.
    0:25:33 There’s all sorts of different ways to garner emotional reward for money if you handle it well.
    0:25:37 You know, money is, money is nothing but the transfer of time and work.
    0:25:42 And there’s few things you can do that are more generous than give someone time and work.
    0:25:46 I was a services, I was, I used to park cars.
    0:25:47 I was a waiter.
    0:25:52 I remember I was a waiter in the Montana hotel and this lovely old lady was a character actress.
    0:25:53 I forget her name.
    0:25:57 Every time she was there, every time I would walk by,
    0:25:59 she’d put five or 10 bucks in my pocket.
    0:26:00 Like literally every time I walked by her table,
    0:26:03 she’d come over and she’d like slip five or 10 bucks in my pocket.
    0:26:07 And you’re going to UCLA and you can barely afford your books.
    0:26:09 It like changes your fucking day.
    0:26:11 It’s like nice old lady gives you 30 or 40 bucks.
    0:26:17 I mean, it’s the difference between being able to go on a date or buy lecture notes or whatever it is.
    0:26:22 It is wealthy people who do not tip big.
    0:26:24 That makes just apps of fucking literally no sense.
    0:26:30 It is so easy to give in a liquid economy time and work to people by giving them money.
    0:26:34 And it has nothing to do with nobility or ethics.
    0:26:37 It just like you said, it just feels really good.
    0:26:41 The other thing that you inspired is that I think even more,
    0:26:42 I love spending money.
    0:26:44 I am really good at it.
    0:26:45 It’s one of my core competence.
    0:26:47 I’m outstanding at spending money.
    0:26:51 I always say I’m spending money like a gangster in the 50s just diagnosed with ass cancer.
    0:26:56 I am just going large and I’m loving every minute of it.
    0:26:59 I’m really good at it and it creates a lot of joy and happiness for people
    0:27:02 near me and around me and for me myself.
    0:27:08 I do think though that even more rewarding than spending it or having it was making it.
    0:27:14 Specifically, making it with someone else, both professional and personal partners.
    0:27:18 My ex-wife and I, we were working so hard.
    0:27:20 We were trying so hard.
    0:27:21 We were making good money.
    0:27:24 We had setbacks and then I had businesses fail.
    0:27:25 I had businesses work.
    0:27:26 She got promoted.
    0:27:27 She didn’t get promoted.
    0:27:32 But we were saving money and we bought a house together and we started saving money together.
    0:27:35 And we really built economic security together.
    0:27:39 And it was just so rewarding to do it with someone.
    0:27:44 And then where you also get a lot of that reward is let me be clear.
    0:27:49 The businesses I’ve started and sold, my first obligation was for me to make the most money.
    0:27:49 And I always have.
    0:27:54 That felt better than anything, but it also just felt fucking awesome to bring in really
    0:27:58 good people who’d worked really hard with you alongside of you and go,
    0:28:04 “Hey, I know you’re 27, but you’re going to make $550,000 next week when this
    0:28:05 transaction closes.”
    0:28:08 And them just looking at you like they couldn’t believe it.
    0:28:11 You know, like I get huge reward out of underpaying you.
    0:28:16 No, but look, no one ever feels overcompensated.
    0:28:19 But for the last 10 or 15 years of my life since I’ve gotten wealthy,
    0:28:23 I’ve made an objective to say, “Okay, what is this person’s market rate?
    0:28:27 And how do I pay them 20, 30, 50% more than market?”
    0:28:29 And it just feels good.
    0:28:33 So spending it is great, but I found actually the making it,
    0:28:37 specifically the making it with other people was actually the most rewarding part.
    0:28:40 Yeah. Wow. I 100% agree with that.
    0:28:44 I think that’s one of the things that makes relationships so fun is that you’re building
    0:28:49 something together. It’s just so much more exciting than doing it on your own.
    0:28:54 Well, by the way, it just dawned on me that it’s no accident that you’ve asked me to do all this
    0:29:00 virtue signaling around generosity right before bonus season. It’s clear that everyone has figured
    0:29:05 this out. And there’s like eight people on this line taking notes that, yeah, reviews are about to
    0:29:13 come out. You know, I find it’s all about grit and helping people realize their inner child
    0:29:16 and save by not by underpaying them. That’s how you build character.
    0:29:18 I’m planning to build everyone’s character here.
    0:29:21 We’ve got more after the break. And by the way,
    0:29:25 we’ll be recording and ask me anything episode very soon. So please send in your questions
    0:29:31 for me and Scott to officeours@profgmedia.com or leave a comment on our YouTube channel.
    0:29:32 We’ll be right back.
    0:29:46 Support for Profg Markets comes from Funrise. Venture Capital is widely seen as one of the most
    0:29:51 lucrative asset classes in the world. Go look at the S&P 500, nearly every major tech company
    0:29:56 on that list was once funded by venture capital firms, producing billions of dollars in profits
    0:30:01 in the process. The hard truth, however, is that the biggest venture funds are almost entirely
    0:30:06 funded by institutional investors like endowments and sovereign wealth funds. So unless you knew
    0:30:11 a guy who knew a guy, you and 99.9% of individual investors did not get to participate in the
    0:30:16 pre IPO growth of any of those blue chip companies. The Fundrise Innovation Fund is finally changing
    0:30:21 that. It’s a more than $125 million fund. It holds some of the most exciting pre IPO companies in
    0:30:25 the world and it’s designed specifically for individual investors. This time you can get
    0:30:30 an early at fundrise.com/markets. Carefully consider the investment material before investing,
    0:30:35 including objectives, risk, charges and expenses. This and other information can be found in the
    0:30:40 innovation funds prospectus at fundrise.com/innovation. This is a paid advertisement.
    0:30:47 Support for the show comes from Zbiotics. Nothing like cocktails with friends to help
    0:30:52 you unwind, but now you don’t have to choose between a great night or a great day after thanks
    0:30:57 to Zbiotics pre-alcohol probiotic drink. Pre-alcohol is the world’s first genetically engineered
    0:31:02 probiotic. It was invented by PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking and according
    0:31:07 to Zbiotics, here’s how it works. When you drink, alcohol gets converted into a toxic
    0:31:12 byproduct in the gut. It’s this byproduct, not dehydration, that’s to blame for your rough next
    0:31:17 day. Pre-alcohol produces an enzyme to break this byproduct down. Just remember to take Zbiotics
    0:31:21 before your first drink of the night. Drink responsibly and you’ll feel your best tomorrow.
    0:31:26 So I tried this because daddy loves to drink. I like Winston Churchill, believe I’ve gotten more
    0:31:31 out of alcohol than it’s gotten out of me. Anyways, took this thing. I had two, maybe three drinks
    0:31:36 and the next day I did feel fine. And I think the key here is that I’m no longer drinking six to
    0:31:41 eight, two to three, but I also think Zbiotics is likely helping. Go to Zbiotics.com/PROVG
    0:31:47 to learn more and get 15% off your first order when you use PROVG at checkout. Zbiotics is back
    0:31:51 with 100% money back guarantee. So if you’re unsatisfied for any reason, they’ll refund your
    0:31:58 money, no questions asked. Again, that Zbiotics.com/PROVG and use the code PROVG at checkout for 15% off.
    0:32:04 Support for this show comes from Seven Rooms. What’s the recipe for taking your restaurant
    0:32:08 to the next level? Well, restaurant operators know a key part of it is making more money
    0:32:13 and making sure it keeps coming in. That’s why you want to bring Seven Rooms to the table.
    0:32:19 Seven Rooms is an all-in-one CRM marketing and operations platform that helps you make more
    0:32:24 money for your operation and more magic for your guests. It equips your staff with the tools you
    0:32:29 need to deliver service that keeps your guests coming back for more. You can wow diners with a
    0:32:35 host of tools that let you create personalized experiences, organize unforgettable events and
    0:32:42 deepen patron loyalty. From direct reservations to smart table management and targeted email marketing,
    0:32:46 Seven Rooms helps you grow your brand and your covers and not your workload.
    0:32:52 Learn more at SevenRooms.com. Seven Rooms. Make magic. Make money.
    0:33:01 We’re back with ProfG Markets. I’m going to go through some
    0:33:06 individual situations where spending is very important and I just want to get your reaction
    0:33:12 on how you would deal with these little situations I’ve come up with. So the first one is restaurants.
    0:33:18 You’re out to dinner with friends and let’s imagine you’re not as wealthy as you are right now for
    0:33:25 these. One of your friends orders a really expensive bottle of wine. They order like a bunch of plates
    0:33:30 for the table and then when the check arrives, it’s way more expensive than you thought. It’s
    0:33:34 one of those checks where you see it and you start to feel kind of anxious and uncomfortable. You
    0:33:40 don’t really know what to do. So what would you do? Would you still offer to get the check? Would you
    0:33:45 split it equally? How would you handle that? Is this a group of guys or just friends?
    0:33:49 Group of guys, friends. I mean, I roll with a different crew. I just don’t, we were, I never
    0:33:53 had friends that were into fancy wine until I got rich and now I have friends who are trying to like
    0:33:59 inject class or some air of prestige into their life by ordering stupidly expensive
    0:34:03 bottles of wine and buying art. If you want to talk about, you know, if you want to signal for
    0:34:08 someone with a little dick, find someone who’s all of a sudden really into art and or, you know,
    0:34:13 orders, orders, anything above a hundred bucks a bottle of bottle of wine, unless you’re really,
    0:34:16 I mean, if you’re really into art and you’re really into wine, fine. My friend Adam is really
    0:34:21 into cars. He buys expensive cars because he’s always been really into cars. Fine. Fine, I get it.
    0:34:24 But if someone ordered an expensive bottle of wine and I was with a group of guys and we didn’t
    0:34:31 have a lot of money, I mean, okay, if he’s a baller and he’s paying for it, general form is the
    0:34:36 following. In general, like manners, if you order an expensive bottle of wine, it means you’re paying
    0:34:42 for dinner. You’re basically signaling, I am going to pay for dinner. You can’t be generous with
    0:34:48 other people’s money. And then when the check comes, if it’s a group of guys, your age, you’re all
    0:34:53 friends, you all split the bill unless someone went crazy in. What about if you’re in your 30s?
    0:35:00 Like it’s not as absurd to be in your late 30s. Everyone’s making good money. Maybe everyone’s
    0:35:07 with their partners. Like, what do you do in that situation? I personally feel like with friends,
    0:35:13 I mean, young people split the check or whatever they send me or send me a request. I get it,
    0:35:17 right? I think if you’re in your 30s and you’re blessed with some reasonable economic security,
    0:35:23 general format should be the following. We get this one. Oh, the next one, they get it. And if
    0:35:29 people aren’t, if things aren’t kind of evening out over time, you have to decide whether you want
    0:35:35 to stay friends with these people because generally what I have found is that you’re out with couples,
    0:35:40 I can’t stand splitting the check. I’m at a point now where people say, “Oh, you did this.” I’m like,
    0:35:44 boss, either pay for it or I’m paying for it. We’re not splitting the check. We’re fucking grown men.
    0:35:50 And I’ll get this one. You get the next one, whatever it is. And especially when you’re out
    0:35:56 with couples, I think you’re mindful of each other. But for the most part, I think one couple gets
    0:36:03 the check and then the other couple gets the next one. I think the moment, I think it’s always that
    0:36:08 strange moment when the bill comes. I think it’s awkward. It’s very awkward. But it should all come
    0:36:11 out on the wash. If you have good friends, they’re not going to be stupid in terms of
    0:36:17 overordering and you’ll realize that you trade off two or three couples, two or friends. And if
    0:36:22 they, if their turn never seems to come around, you call them out on their bullshit and be like,
    0:36:28 “Hey, how come you never see, how come you always seem to find a way not to pay?”
    0:36:32 Okay, this one’s particularly relevant right now. Christmas is around the corner.
    0:36:39 Let’s say, again, you’re in your late 30s, you’ve got two children, a partner, two parents,
    0:36:45 you’ve got aunts, you’ve got uncles, you’ve got friends, godchildren, etc. Who gets presents
    0:36:51 and how much do you think you should be spending on those presents? And do you spend more on one
    0:36:57 person? Do you spend less on another person? How do you think about presents and Christmas
    0:37:00 as it relates to spending? I think about Hanukkah, you anti-semite.
    0:37:05 Hanukkah, sorry. Okay. Actually, the holidays. That’s not true. I think about Christmas. I don’t
    0:37:10 know what the, I don’t know what Hanukkah is. This is personal, how you approach the
    0:37:13 spending on the holidays. When the kids were little, it was fun to just buy them a ton of
    0:37:19 shit and have this consumer orgy that morning with a wrapping shit and then playing with it
    0:37:25 for two minutes. And that was fun. As we’ve gotten older, what I do with my boys is they
    0:37:30 make a list of stuff. We try and connect it to George or something or something and we pull
    0:37:34 stuff off their list and maybe we wrap one or two gifts. We just don’t, I don’t want that kind of
    0:37:40 consumer lolapalooza in the morning. And then with my partner, I ask her to, you know,
    0:37:46 occasionally, we don’t buy each other stuff around the holidays or for birthdays. I buy her stuff
    0:37:53 randomly because I think it’s just more fun that I think she’ll love and she drops hints
    0:37:58 every once in a while. That she wants something? Oh yeah. I was saying, I’ve been looking at this
    0:38:04 or it’s like, you haven’t given me a present in a while. No, she’ll send me a photo of a
    0:38:09 Birkenbeck with the exact color and be like, “Hey, what do you think of this?” I’m like,
    0:38:13 “Okay, message received.” And what I try and do is wait just long enough
    0:38:18 such that she forgets about it and it’s a surprise. But yeah, I’m not a big gift giver.
    0:38:23 I don’t want gifts. The gifts I like, you know, for me, I want meaningful gifts. I want,
    0:38:28 you know, my sons will write me a note or they’ll get me a book that was meaningful to me. All
    0:38:32 that gets a picture of us framed. That’s the shit I want. I can buy anything I want personally and
    0:38:37 I’m not into stuff. You know, the gifts that, I mean, it sounds like a Hallmark commercial,
    0:38:42 but I don’t want stuff. I don’t want an automatic tie rack or a cream shave heater.
    0:38:48 That’s what we got my dad. Ooh, is he thrilled? Back in the ’70s, you put shaving cream in a heater.
    0:38:53 I love that. And you’d have the delight and the supple feeling of warm lather on your beard.
    0:38:55 That’s a great idea. I’m probably going to get that.
    0:39:00 Or a rotating tie rack. I have so many ties and I need to see them electronically whiz by me.
    0:39:04 I love that too. Yeah, we’re not big gifters.
    0:39:10 So who gets presents then? This is a question I’ve been thinking about. I can’t tell,
    0:39:14 or it’s not totally clear to me who I’m supposed to be getting presents for
    0:39:18 during the holidays and also how much we’re supposed to be spending.
    0:39:19 First and foremost, your boss.
    0:39:24 Okay. Because I will say, by the way, you get presents for us at the end of the holidays.
    0:39:28 I don’t know if you know what you’re getting us, but we have received Christmas gifts from you
    0:39:34 and I would assume that that’s sort of part of, you know, you build that into the budget.
    0:39:38 Okay. Over the holidays, I need to put aside this amount of money
    0:39:40 to get my employees some gifts and to get these people gifts.
    0:39:45 Like, I feel like it’s an important part of the income statement, if you will.
    0:39:50 But it’s strategic and it’s selfish. So employee gifts and it’s the following.
    0:39:53 First off, I don’t buy anything. I don’t know what it’s going to be in that fucking bag.
    0:39:55 MJ, who has much better taste than me.
    0:39:55 She does a great job.
    0:40:00 She’ll say, I’m going to spend 500 or 1,000 bucks on employee gifts per person, like fine.
    0:40:05 And she’ll figure out the latest cool thing and she’ll do a great job and merchandise it.
    0:40:07 And I just give her my credit card number.
    0:40:12 And the reason it’s strategic is that if I spend $1,000 on a gift or gifts for employees,
    0:40:17 it’s worth more than $1,000. If I gave them $1,000 in compensation,
    0:40:20 one, they’d have to pay 30, 34% taxes on it.
    0:40:23 Whereas if I give you $1,000 or whatever, AirPods and a scarf or something,
    0:40:28 it’s pre-tax income. And also it’s more meaningful.
    0:40:34 The psychological benefit is greater than if I’d just given you $1,000 cash.
    0:40:36 My first business partner said, would always be like, he was totally gruff and like,
    0:40:40 just give them cash. And I’m like, no, they like gifts. The kids like gifts.
    0:40:44 You know, for me, the holidays, I don’t, I can’t stay on the holidays.
    0:40:48 They were not an enjoyable time for me growing up. So I literally loathed them.
    0:40:53 It’s so personal though. You might find, I mean, so for example,
    0:40:57 I think gifts are more important for women. Cocaine, jewelry.
    0:40:59 Cocaine and jewelry, women have a special relationship with Ed.
    0:41:05 And maybe you don’t like cocaine. Maybe you don’t like jewelry.
    0:41:12 But if you don’t, in your 20s, offer that to women and in your 30s and 40s offer jewelry to women,
    0:41:18 you are not a good person. And mostly the jewelry.
    0:41:22 Like I can’t ever imagine spending, oh, I guess I buy watches now.
    0:41:26 I never used to buy watches, but I can’t imagine people spending this money on jewelry.
    0:41:31 But you’ve got to determine what’s important to the people in your life.
    0:41:34 That’s what it means to be generous is you’re doing something for someone else
    0:41:37 you wouldn’t do for yourself. It makes no sense to you, but it makes,
    0:41:39 but it’s important to them. So you do it for them.
    0:41:43 Do you think that people don’t value gifts enough?
    0:41:49 What I have found is that, and I wish I’d figured this out earlier,
    0:41:55 writing somebody and complimenting them and recognizing them or telling them you were
    0:42:03 thinking about them or telling them how impressive you are with them or taking the time to say,
    0:42:08 you know, you handled the situation so well, or congratulations, this is just such a,
    0:42:10 this is such a nice achievement for you.
    0:42:17 Or taking the time just to recognize their achievement in a very thoughtful, explicit way,
    0:42:21 especially men to men. I think that’s the best gift you can give another man.
    0:42:30 My best friend, Lee, on a regular basis, he will text me when he, I get choked up thinking about it.
    0:42:41 He’ll literally text me. He’ll say, me and my parents saw you on Bill Maher,
    0:42:42 and we’re just so proud of you.
    0:42:44 Yeah, that is so nice.
    0:42:51 Those are the gifts. Like, and everyone’s different, maybe people like stuff.
    0:42:56 Like, that’s this, you know, that’s the shit I remember. And wouldn’t you know,
    0:43:00 my friend Lee is gay. And I think gay men have an easier time expressing their emotions and straight
    0:43:06 men. And, and, and just registering how important and meaningful that stuff has been for me
    0:43:14 has helped, helped me be much more generous with my emotions. But that, in my opinion, that’s true
    0:43:23 giving. We’ll be right back after the break. If you’re enjoying the show so far, hit follow,
    0:43:27 and leave us a review on Prodigy Markets, wherever you get your podcasts.
    0:43:43 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:43:47 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools to power your business forward
    0:43:50 with the security and speed of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:43:56 Thumbtack presents the ins and outs of caring for your home.
    0:44:02 Out, procrastination, putting it off, kicking the can down the road.
    0:44:07 In, plans and guides that make it easy to get home projects done.
    0:44:12 Out, carpet in the bathroom, like why.
    0:44:18 In, knowing what to do, when to do it, and who to hire.
    0:44:23 Start caring for your home with confidence. Download Thumbtack today.
    0:44:32 Why do we like sports? Is it for the jerseys the players wear, the food you grab at the ballpark?
    0:44:39 No. It’s that feeling you get in your gut, that drive to compete. But competition isn’t just
    0:44:44 on the sports field. It can breed innovation, and XPRIZE wants to use that competitive drive
    0:44:50 and motivation to tackle some of the world’s biggest problems. What sort of problems?
    0:44:54 Climate change, accessible clean water, and healthy aging.
    0:45:00 These existential challenges affect our planet, and we urgently need to find solutions for them.
    0:45:06 XPRIZE is a non-profit organization that designs and hosts global incentivized competitions that
    0:45:12 drive scientific discovery, cutting edge innovation, and groundbreaking solutions for the benefit of
    0:45:18 humanity. XPRIZE has launched 30 prizes in 30 years. In doing so, they’ve driven the improvement of
    0:45:26 oil capture technology, catalyzed tools to detect Alzheimer’s, influenza, and RSV, helped educate
    0:45:33 10 million children in 74 countries, accelerated carbon removal technology, and kickstarted the
    0:45:40 commercial space industry. And XPRIZE is just getting started. The future is still ours to create.
    0:45:49 Head to XPRIZE.org to learn how you could help architect a brighter future for everyone.
    0:45:59 We’re back with Prof. G. Markets. I want to move on to some things around what is essential
    0:46:05 to spending, what kind of things in your life you find essential. I mean, we talk a lot about
    0:46:14 like discretionary versus non-discretionary, and the technical definition of non-discretionary is
    0:46:20 like the stuff you can’t live without. So, you know, food and housing costs and health insurance,
    0:46:29 et cetera. But I could imagine that as you get richer, that category sort of starts to expand.
    0:46:33 Like, you know, I sort of feel like I can’t live without an iPhone at this point. Like,
    0:46:39 that’s sort of the way I think about it. So, I guess my question for you is like, what stuff
    0:46:45 can you not live without at this point? What do you have to spend on? And what is your approach
    0:46:52 to spending on those items? This is going to sound under the title of infinite douchebag.
    0:46:57 It would be really hard to lose my plane. I’ve gotten very used to having a plane. So,
    0:47:03 I mean, there’s something around ramping your spending behind making sure you’re spending
    0:47:10 lags, your economics, because it’s the joy you get from having something isn’t as great as a
    0:47:15 disappointment if you lose it and can no longer do it. You get used to this shit really fast.
    0:47:21 So, when I bought a plane seven years ago, the best piece of advice I got
    0:47:27 was a friend of mine who said, “Just make sure you have way more money than you need for this,
    0:47:32 because you do not want to give it back.” He’s like, “Don’t buy it until you know you can keep it.”
    0:47:40 And that was what’s been so rattling about being rich and then poor and then 2000,
    0:47:45 being rich and then poor again in 2007 and 2008, because to kind of step backwards,
    0:47:50 and I didn’t really actually, I didn’t step back materially, because I’d never,
    0:47:56 I always live below my means, but you step back from an emotional security standpoint,
    0:48:00 that is really frightening. Yeah, I was going to ask like, have you ever
    0:48:04 sort of downsized your lifestyle because you just couldn’t afford it anymore?
    0:48:11 Yeah, I did. After the great financial recession hit in 2008, I had a loft in New York. I had to
    0:48:17 sell that. I just didn’t have any money. I wasn’t making any money and all of a sudden I was had
    0:48:20 negative net worth, so I had to sell my loft. That was very disappointing. I loved,
    0:48:26 it was kind of just humiliating to be whatever I was 43 and have to sell my house to pay my bills.
    0:48:30 I was never in debt. Were you with a partner at that point?
    0:48:33 No, I was single at that point, but I still felt really fucking humiliating.
    0:48:39 So, yeah, I’ve had to step back, and I think most people have to step back at some point.
    0:48:44 Maybe, I mean, if you’re really responsible, hopefully not, but I got crushed.
    0:48:51 Yeah, I feel like that’s a really, that’s a big one for me, just the prospect of downsizing it.
    0:48:58 The way I have it in my head right now is like, you know, I have, I’m doing forced saving,
    0:49:00 so I’m good. I’m being responsible.
    0:49:02 How are you doing that? How are you doing forced savings?
    0:49:07 I have the automatic 5% that goes into the 401k, and then you match that,
    0:49:11 and then I’m also just immediately, when I get at the beginning of the year,
    0:49:15 I just take a chunk of cash and just put it in the IRA, and that’s the end of it.
    0:49:19 I just want to say you’re like light years ahead of where I was when I was 25.
    0:49:21 I just, I wasn’t even thinking that way.
    0:49:28 And part of the reason I do that is like, I want to spend a lot, and this might sound dumb,
    0:49:35 but I like nice things, and I like nice restaurants, and I like going out to cool places,
    0:49:38 and I spend a lot of money on all of those experiences.
    0:49:46 And part of it for me is that I want to kind of surround myself in that world and get myself
    0:49:51 deep in that position, such that I have no choice but to go on and make a lot of money.
    0:50:00 And I think the scary thing for me is the idea that at some point, this podcast stops
    0:50:04 being successful, and I sort of find myself at a crossroads, and suddenly I can’t do all of
    0:50:13 this anymore. I can’t live this cool life in New York. And that’s the thing that I’m gambling with.
    0:50:19 I need to make sure that I’m working so hard that I can keep up, and I can sort of see how
    0:50:25 this is going to be a potential slippery slope in the future when it gets bigger and bigger,
    0:50:29 when you start dealing with kids. And I’m going to start thinking, oh, they need to go to the
    0:50:35 best school, and I need to have a house in this area where all the cool people are,
    0:50:41 and I can feel that sort of like treadmill feeling. But I almost don’t want to get off,
    0:50:48 because I don’t want to give myself permission to stop working really hard in a way.
    0:50:52 I wouldn’t look at it that way. You go to the playbook you played. When I was your age,
    0:50:56 I didn’t appreciate nor had access to nice things or nice restaurants. I just didn’t.
    0:51:02 You know, you’re at a point, Ed, where you shouldn’t be saving 5%. You should be saving 10%,
    0:51:09 and then the 5%, 15%, because if you just do the math, it’s like what Brian Chesky from Airbnb says.
    0:51:13 You can have it all. You just can’t have it all at once. And the reason why I have so much balance
    0:51:17 in my life and so much opulence was because I had a lack of it when I was your age.
    0:51:22 And that is I was very disciplined. I worked a lot. I didn’t spend a lot of money.
    0:51:28 Occasionally went out to dinner or whatever, went to Club Med in Mexico. That was my big
    0:51:35 vacation when I was your age. But you just got to recognize that some of that indulgence now,
    0:51:40 and I’m not going to tell you not to do it, it’s just a trade-off. If you can find a way,
    0:51:48 I mean, my out-of-control opulence now is a function of the fact that I didn’t have it
    0:51:53 when I was young. I could have had more of it, but I wouldn’t have been able to, you know,
    0:51:58 for the most part, I was constantly investing, reinvesting in startups, reinvesting in the
    0:52:03 stock market. And then sometimes I’d lose it all, which hurt. But I was always putting myself in
    0:52:07 a position that if the winds kicked up and my sales were up, I was going to make a lot of money
    0:52:12 because I was constantly reinvesting and my own company’s constantly reinvesting in the markets
    0:52:17 and not consuming a lot. I think it is very difficult when you’re a guy your age, especially,
    0:52:21 I know you have a girlfriend, but you guys don’t live together, right?
    0:52:21 We do.
    0:52:25 You do live together. Jesus Christ. Okay, so you’re on your way.
    0:52:30 By the way, that’s been a big, that’s helpful in terms of just creating a more responsible
    0:52:31 lifestyle for sure. Yeah.
    0:52:35 You know, we always say greatness in the age of others. Wealth is in the age of others. One,
    0:52:39 your ability to attract and retain really talented people, especially if you’re an
    0:52:43 entrepreneur or just find them, go to a place where you’re working with other talented people.
    0:52:48 You want to be able to where you, if you look left and right and think these people are talented,
    0:52:49 you’re going to make more money.
    0:52:55 That’s sort of what I mean, right? Like I kind of, I feel like I need to spend to be there,
    0:53:01 you know? I need to go out with my friends and go to these social events. Like one of the questions
    0:53:08 I had on this list here of like situations. I’m not going to be specific about who this
    0:53:13 is, but you know, here’s the situation. Your friend is getting married and has planned a
    0:53:17 very big bachelor party and you look at the agenda and you realize you’re going to have
    0:53:22 to spend a lot of money on flights, a lot of money on meals, on alcohol, on going out,
    0:53:25 and it’s all beginning to get a very, a lot, pretty uncomfortable.
    0:53:31 But this is a really good friend and you don’t want to just not show up and let them down.
    0:53:38 So in a way, it’s sort of like you need to, you need to be spending in order to maintain
    0:53:44 relationships at a certain point in life, I feel like. So I guess how do you think about that?
    0:53:48 If he’s a really close friend, you should be able to say to him, “Poss, this is a strain for us.
    0:53:51 I make really good money and it’s a strain for me. I can’t imagine what it’s like for some of the
    0:53:55 other guys.” And quite frankly, you’re being a little bit selfish here. You’re putting us
    0:54:00 in a difficult position because nobody wants to say no. Is there any way you can ratchet this back
    0:54:04 a bit? So I don’t think that’s unreasonable. You’re at that age where you’re just going to spend a
    0:54:09 disproportionate amount of money on the wedding industrial complex. That’s just going to happen.
    0:54:13 And it’s going to be worse for your partner because she’s going to have to buy bridesmaid
    0:54:19 dresses and- Way worse for women, for sure. And then go to hotels that are overpriced because,
    0:54:23 you know, unless they bought out the hotel. But yeah, that’s just part of, that’s just a tax
    0:54:28 that you paid at William Sonoma. The William Sonoma tax. I love that. That’s right.
    0:54:33 It’s just part of it. Yeah. I guess it’s just, I bring it up because I find it interesting how
    0:54:45 as you age, it’s like just the financial burdens just accumulate in ways that you didn’t really
    0:54:52 expect. Like the wedding tax that you just described is a very real tax and planning for those things.
    0:54:57 I’d like to do it as best I can, but I think it is very difficult because costs just sort of
    0:55:03 come up out of nowhere. And the one I’m going to bring up now, which is probably the biggest one,
    0:55:12 is children. Like children are a huge cost. So my question for you is, were you surprised
    0:55:21 by how much kids cost? And two, do you, to what extent do you sort of budget in the cost of your
    0:55:27 children? Like, how do you think of your kids as that line item on your income statement?
    0:55:31 Well, this is not financial advice, but my experience with kids was that when I had them later
    0:55:36 in life, so I was a little bit more economically secure. You know, I had my son when I was 40,
    0:55:46 41, 42. And for me, it was actually, I think part of the reason I’m as wealthy as I am now is because
    0:55:50 I had kids. And the reason why is because I had just scared the shit out of me and got me very
    0:55:55 focused. I think having kids when you’re younger, if you don’t have dual income would be really
    0:56:02 financially stressful. Also, something I did once I had kids was, and what I would recommend is
    0:56:07 ask yourself, can you make a lifestyle arbitrage? And this was my partner’s idea. She said, let’s
    0:56:13 move to Florida. We’re going to be able to cut our rent in half, if not by 60%. We’re going to cut our
    0:56:21 private school tuition for our two boys by 2/3. Grace Church wanted $58,000 a year. And for me
    0:56:25 to bring that lady muffins. And then they asked you, are you philanthropic? Like, are you going to
    0:56:33 give us more money? Anyways, so we immediately cut our burn. And that was her idea. And she was
    0:56:37 smart. She’s like, no, we’re going to love Florida. It’s nice. Stop being such a snob. I’m like,
    0:56:41 I’m not going to Florida. They’re all yehas down there driving F-150s and shooting at each other
    0:56:44 with their guns and everything. And she’s like, don’t be an idiot. You love that stuff anyway.
    0:56:48 Yeah, all those better things life. But what I did do was smart. I took all of the money that we
    0:56:54 saved and I put it into the market. And so immediately, I think combined, we were probably
    0:56:59 making, you know, I was probably making between, I don’t know, 400,000 and 700,000 a year between
    0:57:04 the two of us. And then we took that 14% swing and savings and all the other savings. We took about
    0:57:12 150,200 grand a year. And we put it into stocks for 10 years from 2010 to 2020.
    0:57:20 Yeah. I mean, the thing that really shocks me is that, I mean, just how crazy it’s gone. 400 to
    0:57:27 $700,000 a year and you got priced out of New York. Like, it’s unbelievable. That’s the part that I
    0:57:32 can’t really wrap my head around in especially living in New York. And that’s sort of what this
    0:57:39 treadmill feeling is. It’s like, in order to just get some basics done in New York, you need crazy
    0:57:44 amounts. There’s a reason why people are moving into Texas. And there’s a reason why the South is
    0:57:49 economically booming. A lifestyle arbitrage is you should always be thinking about a lifestyle
    0:57:53 arbitrage, especially in a world of remote work. Where could I move? Don’t be a snob. A lot of
    0:58:01 people are really happy in Atlanta. And economic security is an enormous ointment for stress and
    0:58:06 anxiety. And if you are blessed with mobility, you want to take advantage of it.
    0:58:12 Just going to start wrapping us up here. I know you’ve gotten a lot into philanthropy recently.
    0:58:19 We were talking about what is essential in life. Is philanthropy essential to you at this point?
    0:58:26 Is it something that you budget for? And are you trying to make more room for giving?
    0:58:34 You know, I’ve always said that one of my biggest onlocks is my atheism, because I really think
    0:58:39 having a strong sense of the finite nature of life creates a lot of courage and a lot of boldness to
    0:58:45 share your emotions, to take risks, to tell people you care about them, to seize the moment, to embrace
    0:58:53 now. And one of the things I decided, when I sold my company in 2017, I sold it for 160 million bucks.
    0:58:58 I was worth somewhere between 50 and 100 million, depending on how you would calculate my private
    0:59:03 investments. And I thought, all right, I’m going to put in 25 million dollars. I’m going to go raise
    0:59:07 another 250 or 300, start a private equity fund, because I thought I need to be a billionaire
    0:59:12 by the time I’m 65. That was my goal. And I thought the only way I’m going to do that is through a
    0:59:16 private equity fund. I have the credibility, the contacts. I’m going to raise the fund. I got the
    0:59:20 first, I think I got about 50 million dollars in commitments just from three calls. I was going to
    0:59:26 start a consumer private equity fund right after I sold L2. And then I thought a friend of mine got
    0:59:32 sick, passed away, and I thought, okay, this is going really fast. I have enough money to live
    0:59:35 really well. I didn’t have enough money for a plane, but I had enough money for everything else at that
    0:59:41 point. I thought, okay, why do I need to be a billionaire? Well, all right, would I have more
    0:59:44 influence? Maybe not much more. Would I be able to do anything else? No, I can pretty much do
    0:59:50 anything I want right now. So I made a conscious decision that would change my approach to money.
    0:59:55 And it was the following. Once I hit my number, which I was about to, anything above that,
    0:59:59 I would do one or two things. I would either spend it or I would give it away. I love spending
    1:00:05 money. I’m selfish. I like nice things, nice experiences. But every year I look at my net worth
    1:00:15 and if it’s up $7 million and I’ve spent four, I’ll give three away. I do not need to increase
    1:00:20 my net worth. Hoarding is a disease that infects a lot of Americans. There’s just no reason.
    1:00:25 I don’t begrudge billionaires. I don’t think they’re as happy as me. I don’t think there’s
    1:00:31 any reason to hoard money, spend it in a capitalist society. There’s so many amazing things to spend
    1:00:37 it on. And then if you still have more money than what you need to spend to have an amazing life,
    1:00:43 for God’s sakes, why wouldn’t you find if you believe young men are struggling and it freaks
    1:00:48 you out that four and five people in a morgue have died from suicide or men, why wouldn’t you
    1:00:55 give money to an amazing charity with really talented people focusing on mental health?
    1:01:00 The Jet Foundation, why wouldn’t you, if you are constantly lecturing at people about
    1:01:05 the misgivings or the moral corruption of the university system and how we need more
    1:01:08 vocational training, well, if you have the money to start a vocational problem, why the
    1:01:12 fuck wouldn’t you? And you know what? It feels really good. It makes me feel strong. It makes
    1:01:17 me feel nice. I don’t, it’s not, it’s not even an ethical thing. It makes me feel like a baller.
    1:01:22 And also just some of it is an overdue nod to California taxpayers. I give a lot of money
    1:01:27 back to UCLA and Berkeley because they spent so much money on me despite the fact I was such a fuck
    1:01:34 up. You know, California taxpayers kept giving me another chance. So this is a great position to
    1:01:41 be in. But once you hit your number, why on earth would you not do one or two things, spend it or
    1:01:51 give it away? Well, this has been great. Final thought for me. So I feel like spending is kind
    1:01:56 of like the truest, most accurate reflection of ourselves. Like, you know, we tell ourselves
    1:02:00 these stories, but oh, this is who I am. And this is what I like. And then we take these
    1:02:06 personality tests to sort of like figure out, oh yeah, I’m kind of like a EQZ or whatever
    1:02:14 the fuck that test is. But it’s like, if you just look at how you spend, it’s like this data set
    1:02:19 testimony that says with no biases, like this is who you are. This is what you care about. This is
    1:02:23 what you want to achieve. And these are the people who you want to impress. Like, I feel like if you
    1:02:29 want to understand who you are, you just look at, look at your bank statement. So we’ve been talking
    1:02:34 about your spending. We’ve been discussing it on this podcast. So I’m wondering, what do you think
    1:02:42 your spending says about who you are as a person? I’m an atheist. I’m generous. And I’m a father.
    1:02:48 I recognize the finite nature of life. I’m spending a lot of money on experiences.
    1:02:55 I think I’m a generous person. I give away a lot of money. I’m generous with my friends.
    1:03:04 And I’m very focused on being a really generous provider for my kids and my partner. Those are
    1:03:11 the things I aspire to. It also says, quite frankly, I’m indulgent. I’m selfish. I spend a
    1:03:19 lot of money on my own comfort and my own joy and my own, you know, I do frivolous things that make
    1:03:23 me feel important and good. I spend money on things, you know, I spend money on dumb shit
    1:03:27 because I’m a bit of a narcissist. I mean, that’s an interesting way to look at things.
    1:03:32 So there’s some very good things about my spending. There’s some things I’m also probably not that
    1:03:36 proud of in terms of how I spend too much money on nightlife and alcohol.
    1:03:45 That’s not good at my age. I have nice things, quite frankly, to probably impress other people
    1:03:51 that I shouldn’t need to impress. How do you know I’m building a house in Aspen? I tell you.
    1:03:57 That’s sort of fucking pathetic, isn’t it? So you’re right. It does say a lot of things about
    1:04:01 me. It says a lot of good things, a lot of bad things, you know, I’m human.
    1:04:08 This episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered by Benjamin Spencer.
    1:04:13 Our associate producer is Allison Weiss. Mia Silverio is our research lead. Jessica Lang is
    1:04:18 our research associate. Drew Burroughs is our technical director. And Katherine Dillon is our
    1:04:23 executive producer. Thank you for listening to ProfG Markets from the Vox Media podcast network.
    1:04:29 Join us on Thursday for our conversation with Michael Saylor only on the ProfG Markets feed.
    1:04:34 “Lifetimes”
    1:04:50 “You help me in kind reunion”
    1:04:59 “As the waters and the dark flies”
    1:05:05 “And I love you”
    1:05:15 What you’re saying is you were irresponsible, but it was planned. You made a conscious decision to
    1:05:21 be responsible. That’s my room service. Speaking of irresponsible, I just ordered a shit ton of
    1:05:35 beef. It probably cost a little $1,000,000. You can leave it there because I’m on a podcast,
    1:05:44 so you can leave it in there. I’ll bring it out. Thank you, sir. So what you’re saying is you made
    1:05:49 a responsible decision to be irresponsible. And I think that’s okay. You know, occasionally it’s
    1:05:57 fun to splurge. I would argue the splurges when you’re young are, I think you remember them more.
    1:06:09 It is clearly bonus time. You guys plan this. You guys so plan this. Scott, do you think it’s
    1:06:13 important to be generous with your employees who don’t have as much money as you? Where does that
    1:06:18 rank in your priorities? Scott, how do you think your employees get by? And what could you do to
    1:06:29 make their lives easier? Yeah, something to think on. Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    1:06:35 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools to power your business forward with the security and speed
    1:06:45 of the world’s most experienced cloud. Autograph collection hotels offer over 300 independent
    1:06:52 hotels around the world, each exactly like nothing else. Hand selected for their inherent craft,
    1:06:57 each hotel tells its own unique story through distinctive design and immersive experiences
    1:07:02 from medieval falconry to volcanic wine tasting. Autograph collection is part of the
    1:07:09 Marriott Bonvoy portfolio of over 30 hotel brands around the world. Find the unforgettable at
    1:07:11 at autographcollection.com.

    Follow Prof G Markets:

    Scott breaks down the best and worst purchases he’s ever made, and why he prefers spending money on experiences rather than things. He also shares how his childhood still impacts the way he thinks about spending. Scott and Ed then discuss how to navigate spending in common situations such as dinners with friends, weddings, and the holidays. Ed asks for advice about how to prepare for the cost of having children. And Scott also explains why it’s important to make sure your spending lags behind your income.

    Order “The Algebra of Wealth,” out now

    Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice

    Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:

    Follow Scott on Instagram

    Follow Ed on Instagram and X

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • First Time Founders with Ed Elson – Reed Hastings: Life After Netflix

    AI transcript
    0:00:00 (upbeat music)
    0:00:04 Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
    0:00:07 If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you,
    0:00:10 Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention.
    0:00:14 Constant Contact’s award-winning marketing platform
    0:00:17 offers all the automation, integration, and reporting tools
    0:00:20 that get your marketing running seamlessly,
    0:00:23 all backed by their expert live customer support.
    0:00:25 It’s time to get going and growing
    0:00:28 with Constant Contact today.
    0:00:30 Ready, set, grow.
    0:00:34 Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
    0:00:39 Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial,
    0:00:41 ConstantContact.ca.
    0:00:46 Support for this show comes from Seven Rooms.
    0:00:47 For the restaurant operators out there
    0:00:49 who wanna create more regulars on the regular,
    0:00:51 check out Seven Rooms.
    0:00:54 Seven Rooms is an all-in-one CRM marketing
    0:00:57 and operations platform that helps you make more money
    0:00:59 and more magic for your guests.
    0:01:02 It gives your staff the tools to deliver service
    0:01:04 that keeps your guests coming back for more,
    0:01:07 from direct reservations to smart table management,
    0:01:09 to targeted text and email marketing.
    0:01:12 Seven Rooms helps you grow your brand and your covers
    0:01:14 and not your workload.
    0:01:17 Learn more at SevenRooms.com.
    0:01:19 Seven Rooms, make magic, make money.
    0:01:24 Join Capital Group CEO, Mike Gitlin,
    0:01:26 on the Capital Ideas Podcast.
    0:01:29 In unscripted conversations with investment professionals,
    0:01:31 you’ll hear real stories about successes
    0:01:35 and lessons learned, informed by decades of experience.
    0:01:38 It’s your look inside one of the world’s most experienced
    0:01:40 active investment managers.
    0:01:42 Invest 30 minutes in an episode today.
    0:01:44 Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
    0:01:47 Published by Capital Client Group, Inc.
    0:01:53 – Scott, imagine you’d built one of the most successful
    0:01:54 companies in American history.
    0:01:57 What would retirement look like?
    0:01:58 – Checks.
    0:02:06 – What would it look like?
    0:02:08 It’d look like my life right now, Ed.
    0:02:12 You don’t need to build one of the most successful companies
    0:02:15 to have a wonderful back nine.
    0:02:19 I’m doing exactly what I wanna be doing.
    0:02:21 I hang out with impressive, intelligent young people,
    0:02:23 such as yourself.
    0:02:25 We make good money.
    0:02:27 We have purpose.
    0:02:31 And I get to do amazing things with my friends and family
    0:02:34 that make me feel closer to them.
    0:02:36 I can’t imagine doing anything differently.
    0:02:40 And the only lesson in this humble brag,
    0:02:41 or not so humble brag,
    0:02:45 is once you get to a certain level of economic security,
    0:02:47 you wanna use money as a means to an ends.
    0:02:49 And that ends as great experiences
    0:02:53 that make you feel closer to your friends and family
    0:02:58 and recognize that you have an increasingly
    0:03:00 finite amount of time here.
    0:03:03 (upbeat music)
    0:03:07 – Welcome to First Time Founders.
    0:03:11 27 years ago, watching movies on demand
    0:03:13 meant making a trip to the rental store.
    0:03:16 But after a frustrating experience with a lost DVD
    0:03:18 and a hefty late fee,
    0:03:21 my next guest saw an opportunity for change.
    0:03:23 He envisioned a world where people could enjoy movies
    0:03:25 from the comfort of their homes
    0:03:27 without the hassle of late fees
    0:03:29 and without making a trip to the store.
    0:03:31 So in 1997,
    0:03:33 he launched a company with a groundbreaking idea,
    0:03:36 flat rate movie rentals delivered by mail.
    0:03:39 That single innovation,
    0:03:40 followed by many more,
    0:03:42 laid the foundation for what would become
    0:03:46 the world’s leading movie and television streaming service.
    0:03:49 With nearly 283 million subscribers
    0:03:52 and over $28 billion in revenue this year,
    0:03:55 this founder’s vision has forever changed
    0:03:57 the way we consume entertainment.
    0:04:00 This is my conversation with Reed Hastings,
    0:04:03 co-founder and executive chairman of Netflix.
    0:04:08 Welcome Reed, thank you so much for joining me.
    0:04:09 – And what a treat.
    0:04:12 So excited to be called a first time founder.
    0:04:15 It’s like young again or something.
    0:04:16 – Exactly.
    0:04:18 I’m just looking at the background behind you.
    0:04:19 I know that we were in talks about
    0:04:21 maybe doing this in person
    0:04:25 and I’m already just feeling huge amounts of regret.
    0:04:27 The background looks beautiful.
    0:04:28 – It’d be lovely to have you out here.
    0:04:29 You gotta come see it.
    0:04:32 I mean, the fall colors right now are incredible.
    0:04:35 But of course we’re just waiting for the big snows to hit.
    0:04:37 – So our listeners know where are you exactly?
    0:04:40 – Powder Mountain Eden, Utah,
    0:04:42 about an hour from Salt Lake City Airport.
    0:04:45 – And that is something that we will be getting into
    0:04:48 in this interview that is sort of your newest project.
    0:04:51 But the title of this program is First Time Founders.
    0:04:54 You are not a first time founder right now
    0:04:55 but you were at one point.
    0:04:57 So we’re gonna start with that.
    0:04:59 We’re gonna start back in the 90s
    0:05:02 right after you had served in the Peace Corps
    0:05:04 and then you got your CS degree from Stanford
    0:05:06 and you decided to start a company
    0:05:08 but it wasn’t Netflix.
    0:05:10 It was actually a company called Pure Software.
    0:05:11 So let’s start there.
    0:05:13 Could you tell us the story of Pure Software?
    0:05:17 What led you to that venture and how it all came about?
    0:05:20 – You know, I would say that starting a company
    0:05:24 is like jumping out of an airplane without a parachute
    0:05:27 and you just assume a bird is gonna fly by.
    0:05:30 And so the people who start companies
    0:05:34 are unrealistically positive and optimistic.
    0:05:38 And then occasionally some of the times it works,
    0:05:40 the bird flies by.
    0:05:42 And if I think about my own experience,
    0:05:45 I was excited about a particular product.
    0:05:49 It found errors in a class of C and C++ software
    0:05:52 that no one had been able to find before these memory errors.
    0:05:55 And I was just hellbound on creating the product
    0:05:59 and I had to do a company to see the product come to light.
    0:06:02 – Was this something that you always knew you wanted to do?
    0:06:04 Did you think that you were gonna be an entrepreneur?
    0:06:08 – No, I did take one sort of business school-like class
    0:06:12 and I had to learn how to use a spreadsheet to do that.
    0:06:15 But that was like my little tiny bit.
    0:06:20 And when I was a grad student, so mid-90s,
    0:06:23 I got super excited about the foot mouse.
    0:06:26 And you know, I was often with old hand mouse
    0:06:29 and the terminal, you know,
    0:06:31 it’s just slow back and forth to the keyboard.
    0:06:33 And so, you know, of course,
    0:06:35 I thought of the obvious solution,
    0:06:36 which is you control the mouse with your foot.
    0:06:38 – This is the first I’m hearing of the foot mouse.
    0:06:39 I love it.
    0:06:42 – Yeah, well, yeah, the foot mouse was a great idea,
    0:06:46 I thought, which just shows I’m not very good
    0:06:47 in the judgment category.
    0:06:50 I’m good in the passion category, okay?
    0:06:51 So anyway, I spent six months.
    0:06:54 Luckily, I didn’t drop out of Stanford to do it.
    0:06:55 And it turns out two things.
    0:06:58 One is it’s a very dirty environment.
    0:07:01 And so after a day or two, the foot mouse was pretty gross.
    0:07:04 And then two, your leg cramps.
    0:07:08 So it’s just not used to that fine dexterity control.
    0:07:10 And those are both hard problems to solve,
    0:07:13 which is why there’s still no foot mouse 30 years later.
    0:07:17 But so I would say I’ve always had the product bug
    0:07:20 or the passion product bug.
    0:07:22 And then the first time I really did it,
    0:07:24 which was pure, it actually worked.
    0:07:27 So I spent a year at home writing the software.
    0:07:29 And then I had to figure out a company to, you know,
    0:07:32 figure out how to make it mainstream and distribute it.
    0:07:36 The company from ’91 to ’95 doubled every year.
    0:07:39 Morgan Stanley took us public in 1995.
    0:07:44 And so in many ways, it was a great success of that era.
    0:07:48 But I was pretty miserable for a lot of it
    0:07:50 because I didn’t know how to do anything
    0:07:51 in running a company.
    0:07:54 And so it was just chaos and that felt bad.
    0:07:56 – Yeah, so this is what’s so interesting to me
    0:07:58 is that you’re not known for pure software,
    0:08:01 but it was a smashing success.
    0:08:03 I mean, it was your first company.
    0:08:05 As you said, you took it public in ’95.
    0:08:07 Later, you merged it with Atria.
    0:08:11 And then in ’97, it was acquired for nearly a billion dollars.
    0:08:14 And that’s roughly two billion in today’s dollars.
    0:08:18 So this was like a hit hit success.
    0:08:22 And it’s just so funny that you view it as kind of a,
    0:08:24 one, that it’s sort of a footnote on your resume.
    0:08:27 Two, that you view it as sort of a miserable time.
    0:08:28 And so I’d love to just,
    0:08:30 as you reflect on pure software,
    0:08:33 you were a new entrepreneur as your first company.
    0:08:34 It was successful.
    0:08:37 What do you think you were getting right at that time?
    0:08:38 – A product passion.
    0:08:41 Think of one extreme, which is Elon Musk,
    0:08:45 which is like all passion and vision.
    0:08:49 And, you know, he manages quite successfully
    0:08:52 through inspiration purely, right?
    0:08:55 And then the day-to-day management of things
    0:08:58 is pretty chaotic and he’s got tons of turnover.
    0:09:00 And yet he still accomplishes amazing things.
    0:09:03 So call that one end of the spectrum.
    0:09:06 Another end of the spectrum is the really well-run,
    0:09:09 you know, retail, something, I don’t know,
    0:09:13 that, you know, not that inspiring, but very disciplined.
    0:09:16 And so you can achieve excellence through that,
    0:09:18 or you can achieve excellence at the other end.
    0:09:22 And my first end was more in the Elon style.
    0:09:26 It was all about a passion of, you know,
    0:09:29 software quality and what that can mean for the world
    0:09:31 and the problems of software errors.
    0:09:35 But the day-to-day management was pretty poor on my part.
    0:09:40 But we succeeded through kind of energy and passion,
    0:09:43 because then people forgive you a lot of things
    0:09:46 or you just make mistakes, but you, you know, you charge ahead.
    0:09:49 – So we’ll fast forward to 1997.
    0:09:52 You’ve just kind of scored pretty big on pure software.
    0:09:54 You sold the company.
    0:09:58 And I think for a lot of people at that point,
    0:10:01 you start thinking about maybe early retirement,
    0:10:03 maybe you moved to St. Barthes,
    0:10:06 you do live a life of arrested adolescents,
    0:10:10 as Scott likes to say, that’s not what you did.
    0:10:12 You decided you wanted to start another company,
    0:10:16 and this idea was for movie rental delivery.
    0:10:19 Tell us what was going on in your head at that time,
    0:10:24 and why did DVDs by mail seem like such a good idea to you?
    0:10:25 – You know, it was the time when Amazon
    0:10:26 was just going public.
    0:10:29 E-commerce was clearly gonna be a big area.
    0:10:33 And there were a lot of foolish companies just saying,
    0:10:36 okay, I’m gonna sell computers or I’m gonna sell lamps,
    0:10:40 and clearly Amazon was gonna crush them eventually.
    0:10:43 And DVD rental, or rental generally,
    0:10:46 has those two-way logistics, you had to send them back.
    0:10:50 So it was very unique city-specific logistics
    0:10:52 that we figured Amazon wouldn’t bother with.
    0:10:55 It was too small a market, didn’t leverage all their core.
    0:10:58 There weren’t five other things for them to rent.
    0:11:02 So that would give us, we could ride the E-commerce explosion
    0:11:04 and not have competition from Amazon,
    0:11:07 only have it from the incumbents being blockbuster
    0:11:09 and Hollywood video.
    0:11:11 And then if we succeeded, we said, okay,
    0:11:15 then we’ve got the pole position for converting to streaming.
    0:11:19 Thus, we named the company Netflix and not DVD by mail.com,
    0:11:21 ’cause that was always the ambition.
    0:11:25 So you mentioned that Netflix was partly inspired
    0:11:28 by Amazon, perhaps totally inspired by Amazon.
    0:11:31 I didn’t realize this, but at one point,
    0:11:35 Jeff Bezos actually offered to buy Netflix
    0:11:36 and you declined it.
    0:11:38 Could you take us through what happened there?
    0:11:39 – Let’s think about the dates.
    0:11:43 Late ’90s, and we went and talked to them.
    0:11:45 It never got to like a formal offer.
    0:11:48 It was sort of exploratory.
    0:11:52 And they were properly interested in all businesses
    0:11:54 that could show a profit.
    0:11:55 And here’s the shocker, we said no,
    0:11:58 and then we worked our ass off for 20 years.
    0:12:01 Okay, and then if you compare the stock return,
    0:12:05 if we had sold and then just ridden the Amazon stock up,
    0:12:07 then the second outcome, 20 years of work.
    0:12:10 And of course I’m happy to create Netflix
    0:12:11 and that kind of thing.
    0:12:12 – Yeah, absolutely.
    0:12:17 And my favorite detail along those lines,
    0:12:19 so Netflix is growing, it’s doing super well,
    0:12:22 it’s on pace to go public.
    0:12:23 And then the dot-com crash hits
    0:12:25 and it brings down all these companies
    0:12:28 and that includes Netflix.
    0:12:31 And you actually tried to sell the company
    0:12:36 to Blockbuster for $50 million and they rejected you.
    0:12:39 So I’d love to hear the story of how that went down.
    0:12:43 – Yeah, I mean, that one was more avoiding a big fight
    0:12:44 with Blockbuster.
    0:12:46 We realized that if we’re gonna grow really big,
    0:12:48 we’re gonna have a big fight with them
    0:12:50 and how about if we just give them 50%
    0:12:52 and then help them profit
    0:12:55 and not have that big fight with them.
    0:12:57 And so we were open to that,
    0:13:01 but they’re like a big, serious corporation.
    0:13:04 We were a bunch of scrappy Silicon Valley kids
    0:13:07 and they were like, when we wanna do online,
    0:13:08 we’ll just do it.
    0:13:12 And so they didn’t see any need or interest in buying us.
    0:13:16 And then they did compete with us like heck
    0:13:20 and luckily that didn’t start until 2004.
    0:13:23 So they waited an awfully long time
    0:13:25 ’cause they weren’t sure the market size,
    0:13:27 but then they got quite serious
    0:13:32 and it was a huge price battle in 2005 and 2006.
    0:13:36 And then they ultimately bankrupted themselves
    0:13:37 by 2007 or eight.
    0:13:42 – I feel like in the history of video,
    0:13:44 the way that Blockbuster is remembered
    0:13:46 is they sort of dropped the ball.
    0:13:48 They want focus,
    0:13:51 they want managing themselves correctly
    0:13:53 and that you came in and ate their lunch.
    0:13:56 Do you think of their strategy that way?
    0:13:59 Do you think that they sort of slacked off
    0:14:02 and that’s where you and you’ve basically picked up the slack?
    0:14:06 How do you view your takeover of Blockbuster in that story?
    0:14:09 – High respect for their leadership,
    0:14:11 very smart, thoughtful people.
    0:14:13 They rolled up the business,
    0:14:15 beat all their direct competitors
    0:14:18 through kind of careful and good execution
    0:14:20 of store-based video rental
    0:14:22 and negotiated great deals with the studios.
    0:14:26 When it came to looking forward,
    0:14:27 they were very forward-looking
    0:14:31 and they did a deal with a broadband company in 2000,
    0:14:33 long before we were streaming, okay?
    0:14:37 We didn’t start streaming till 2007, okay?
    0:14:40 So in 2000, they do a deal with a broadband company
    0:14:42 to be on the leading edge.
    0:14:44 Unfortunately for them,
    0:14:47 the name of that company was Enron, okay?
    0:14:49 And it turned out to be this, you know,
    0:14:51 billion-dollar loss that was a scam.
    0:14:54 So they kind of learned, you know,
    0:14:59 internet is a bunch of scam artists, you know?
    0:15:01 And so they were more scared off.
    0:15:05 So then we came in with DVD by mail
    0:15:06 and it seems like, you know,
    0:15:08 an interesting little business,
    0:15:13 but again, they were looking for how to go direct to consumer
    0:15:16 and they didn’t want to do this intermediate step.
    0:15:19 It’s hard when you’ve got one business model
    0:15:22 you’ve done in their case for 25, 30 years
    0:15:27 and then once in a generation change, i.e. the internet,
    0:15:30 you know, like Netflix hasn’t, yeah, I guess streaming.
    0:15:33 I mean, we were born to do streaming
    0:15:34 and thought about streaming all the time.
    0:15:39 So it wasn’t hard for us to let DVD go.
    0:15:42 But I think if DVD had been the vision,
    0:15:44 you know, it would have been a lot harder.
    0:15:45 – It was a long time
    0:15:47 before you actually started streaming.
    0:15:50 Were you constantly telling the team, you know,
    0:15:52 ultimately this is the goal,
    0:15:53 ultimately we’re gonna get into streaming.
    0:15:55 This is just phase one.
    0:15:56 – Yeah, for sure.
    0:16:01 I mean, we launched in ’97, ’98 and 2007,
    0:16:04 a decade later was our very first streaming.
    0:16:07 And that was just a Windows PCs with crappy content.
    0:16:13 Okay, so it wasn’t until 2009, 2010
    0:16:15 that we had the Xbox deal.
    0:16:17 So you could watch Netflix on your TV
    0:16:18 if you had an Xbox.
    0:16:20 And we had the stars online content,
    0:16:22 which is like a baby HBO.
    0:16:27 And so then it was like real content and on the television.
    0:16:29 And then it was like another five years
    0:16:33 before we were integrated into most televisions, you know,
    0:16:35 and then we got our button on the remote,
    0:16:36 the Netflix button.
    0:16:37 And then we started, you know,
    0:16:40 we did our original content first in 2012.
    0:16:43 So that was house of cards.
    0:16:46 So yeah, there was a lot of steps in there
    0:16:48 that took to put together.
    0:16:51 So, you know, it’s an unusual entry strategy
    0:16:54 to build a business to be the segue, you know,
    0:16:57 that is where we’re gonna build DVD rental
    0:17:00 and then be in position for internet streaming.
    0:17:03 But we were differentially confident
    0:17:07 that DVD by mail was the best solution for a decade.
    0:17:09 And then when it came in with streaming,
    0:17:11 you know, we were super hungry for it.
    0:17:14 And then of course, with that, we could expand globally.
    0:17:18 – We’ll be right back.
    0:17:20 (upbeat music)
    0:17:32 Support for Prop G comes from Aura.
    0:17:33 The holiday pushes on,
    0:17:35 and that means we all get to stress out for a month
    0:17:37 about how to find meaningful, useful gifts
    0:17:38 for the people we love.
    0:17:40 If you wanna skip the panic this year
    0:17:41 and just go straight to the gold,
    0:17:44 you may wanna check out Aura Digital Picture Frames,
    0:17:47 named the number one digital photo frame by Wire Cutter
    0:17:48 or Digital Picture Frames,
    0:17:50 make it easy to share unlimited photos and videos
    0:17:52 directly from your phone to the frame.
    0:17:54 And when you give an Aura frame as a gift,
    0:17:55 you can personalize and preload it
    0:17:58 with a thoughtful message and photos using the Aura app,
    0:18:01 making it an ideal present for long distance loved ones.
    0:18:04 I actually tried an Aura frame for myself and I love it.
    0:18:06 I gave it to my in-laws, true story,
    0:18:08 I gave it to them two Christmases in a row.
    0:18:09 Was it a good moment?
    0:18:11 But still, that’s how much I love the product.
    0:18:13 I think it’s a great product and just a very nice gift.
    0:18:15 For a limited time, you can visit AuraFrames.com
    0:18:19 to get $45 off or as best-selling carver matte frames
    0:18:22 by using promo code PROPHG to check out.
    0:18:25 That’s A-U-R-A, frames.com promo code PROPHG.
    0:18:27 This exclusive Black Friday, Cyber Monday deal
    0:18:30 is the best of the year, so don’t miss out.
    0:18:31 Terms and conditions apply.
    0:18:39 Support for PROPHG comes from Vanta.
    0:18:41 If you’re a startup founder, finding product market fit
    0:18:43 is probably your number one priority.
    0:18:44 But to land bigger customers,
    0:18:46 you also need security compliance
    0:18:50 and obtaining your SOC2 ISO 27001 certification
    0:18:52 can take a valuable time and energy,
    0:18:54 pulling you away from building and shipping.
    0:18:56 That’s where Vanta comes in.
    0:18:59 Vanta is the all-in-one compliance solution
    0:19:01 helping startups like yours get audit ready
    0:19:03 and build a strong security foundation quickly
    0:19:04 and painlessly.
    0:19:06 Vanta automates the manual security tasks
    0:19:09 that slow you down, helping you streamline your audit
    0:19:11 and the platform connects you with trusted VC SOs
    0:19:13 to build your program, auditors,
    0:19:14 to get you through audits quickly
    0:19:18 and a marketplace for essentials like pen testing.
    0:19:19 So whether you’re closing your first deal
    0:19:22 or gearing up for growth, Vanta makes compliance easy.
    0:19:24 You can join over 8,000 companies
    0:19:27 including many Y Combinator and Techstar startups
    0:19:28 who trust Vanta.
    0:19:31 If you wanna simplify compliance and get $1,000 off,
    0:19:34 you can visit vanta.com/prophg.
    0:19:38 That’s V-A-N-T-A.com/prophg.
    0:19:45 Support for the show comes from LinkedIn Ads.
    0:19:47 Let’s get real, B2B marketing can feel like shouting
    0:19:49 into a void, too much noise, not enough signal.
    0:19:51 If your message isn’t dialed in,
    0:19:54 it’s not just ineffective, it’s invisible.
    0:19:56 Enter LinkedIn Ads, it’s a platform full of the people
    0:19:59 who are most likely to find your ads relevant.
    0:20:01 LinkedIn Ads allows you to build the right relationships,
    0:20:02 drive results and reach your customers
    0:20:04 in a respectful environment.
    0:20:06 You’ll be able to drive results with targeting
    0:20:08 and measurement tools built specifically for B2B.
    0:20:11 In technology, LinkedIn generated two to five X
    0:20:14 higher return on ad spend than other social media platforms.
    0:20:17 Plus, you’ll have direct access to and be able
    0:20:19 to build relationships with over one billion members
    0:20:21 including 130 million decision makers
    0:20:23 and 10 million C level executives.
    0:20:26 You don’t need to waste dollars on the wrong eyeballs.
    0:20:28 You can start converting your B2B audience
    0:20:29 into high quality leads today.
    0:20:32 We’ll even give you $100 credit on your next campaign.
    0:20:35 Go to LinkedIn.com/Scott to claim your credit.
    0:20:38 That’s LinkedIn.com/Scott, terms and conditions apply,
    0:20:41 LinkedIn, the place to be, to be.
    0:20:51 – We’re back with First Time Founders.
    0:20:55 Was it difficult to convince your team of all of this?
    0:20:57 I mean, it sounds obvious now.
    0:20:59 Yeah, of course, people will be streaming,
    0:21:02 but I feel like back then, you’re sort of making a,
    0:21:05 you’re making a gamble, you’re making a bet.
    0:21:07 I’m just interested, you say, you know,
    0:21:08 we were confident of all of this.
    0:21:10 Was it all of you or was it just you?
    0:21:14 How did you convince everyone this was the right way to go?
    0:21:17 – It was pretty broad that,
    0:21:20 so YouTube started in 2005.
    0:21:22 We could start to use streaming.
    0:21:26 That was the first low quality but high scale streaming.
    0:21:30 So, you know, there’s like little things like should we,
    0:21:32 how much should we invest?
    0:21:36 Should we invest, you know, 30 million or 300 million
    0:21:38 in streaming in a given year?
    0:21:42 So, you know, but I’ll call those technocratic decisions.
    0:21:44 It wasn’t, nobody thought we shouldn’t invest.
    0:21:49 It was just how fast, how early, those kinds of things.
    0:21:53 – I feel like one of the things that makes Netflix so unique
    0:21:56 is that it’s basically been on the forefront
    0:22:01 of pretty much every major secular shift that we’ve seen
    0:22:02 over the past several decades.
    0:22:05 And it’s, you know, probably been on more of those
    0:22:07 than any other company in this generation.
    0:22:08 I can just go through the list.
    0:22:11 I think it’s worth just listing for people.
    0:22:14 You know, you had the VHS to DVD shift,
    0:22:17 you had brick and mortar to delivery,
    0:22:22 one time purchase to subscription based, DVDs to streaming,
    0:22:25 and then more recently licensing to original content
    0:22:28 and then even more recently domestic content
    0:22:29 to international content.
    0:22:31 – Crazy, crazy, isn’t it?
    0:22:35 So it’s basically front running every single major shift
    0:22:36 in the industry.
    0:22:41 And that to me has been the differentiator with Netflix
    0:22:42 and the trend.
    0:22:44 What do you think you have done as a leader
    0:22:49 that has enabled that level of innovation
    0:22:51 over such a long time?
    0:22:52 I mean, a lot of people innovate,
    0:22:54 a lot of people do new things,
    0:22:57 but you’ve been consistent in every single one.
    0:23:00 What do you think you’ve gotten right?
    0:23:03 – You know, I try to think through from first principles
    0:23:08 why certain companies grow and thrive
    0:23:11 and, you know, when they get left behind or when not.
    0:23:14 So I’ve always been a fan of kind of studying,
    0:23:16 you know, when I was growing up,
    0:23:18 it was in the computer business,
    0:23:22 it was son and, you know, microsystems and it was HP
    0:23:24 and they were, and digital equipment.
    0:23:27 These companies were dying right and left
    0:23:31 and they were major companies initial for a while.
    0:23:36 And so I early on got a very close study
    0:23:40 of major companies shift with the ground,
    0:23:42 shifted out from under them
    0:23:47 and how unusual it was to be Microsoft or others
    0:23:52 that, you know, continued to pivot with the new landscape.
    0:23:56 And so I think I’ve always been a fan of that
    0:24:01 strategy thinking learned mostly by watching other companies
    0:24:03 ’cause if you learn it on your own companies,
    0:24:04 that’s expensive.
    0:24:08 So it’s better to look and see when you see a company
    0:24:13 do big pivots like Microsoft has, you know, over 40 years
    0:24:15 and they miss some too, right?
    0:24:17 They’re not, they’re not perfect in it.
    0:24:18 – One of the pivots that you may,
    0:24:21 I mean, so from DVDs to streaming,
    0:24:25 I was just looking back through the, through the time machine
    0:24:31 you decided to rebrand the DVD business to Quickster.
    0:24:34 And the streaming service was gonna remain Netflix.
    0:24:38 And I just pulled some headlines from that year.
    0:24:40 Quickster is dead.
    0:24:41 Quickster goes quickly.
    0:24:43 And here’s my favorite from the Atlantic.
    0:24:47 Five reasons why Quickster is now dead star.
    0:24:51 That to me is sort of like an example of where, you know,
    0:24:53 a pivot could kind of go wrong,
    0:24:55 but ultimately it was successful.
    0:24:57 I’d love to just get your reflections
    0:25:02 on pivoting to streaming, an initial failure it seemed,
    0:25:05 and then it worked out big time.
    0:25:08 – So we, in studying other companies,
    0:25:10 we realized they’re run by good people
    0:25:13 and they still miss the transition.
    0:25:17 So the average smart and careful leadership team
    0:25:18 is too slow.
    0:25:21 And so we thought, okay, we’ve gotta go faster
    0:25:23 than we’re comfortable, okay?
    0:25:25 And the phrase internally was,
    0:25:29 we got to be so aggressive, you know,
    0:25:31 that the hair in the back of our neck, you know,
    0:25:34 is raised up, you know, it’s really scary.
    0:25:37 And that allowed us to say, okay,
    0:25:40 let’s take all of the DVD rental business
    0:25:43 and shove it to the side into Quickster.
    0:25:44 And the only thing remaining,
    0:25:46 and we knew it would be streaming.
    0:25:50 And but at that time, 2012 streaming was still not very good
    0:25:52 and still not very broad.
    0:25:55 And so we were very aggressive
    0:25:57 and it was too aggressive for the customers, okay?
    0:25:59 We didn’t, you know, they care about the hair.
    0:26:01 I mean, I’m paying you 20 bucks a month.
    0:26:05 I want, you know, what I want.
    0:26:08 And so we were ahead of the customers.
    0:26:10 And then that cost us a lot, you know,
    0:26:14 the stock shrank by a lot, customers quit us,
    0:26:15 the press thought we were idiots.
    0:26:18 And so it was too fast in hindsight, okay?
    0:26:21 But think of it as the aggressive spirit
    0:26:23 that allowed us to do all those transitions
    0:26:25 you referred to a few minutes ago,
    0:26:27 was the same aggressive spirit
    0:26:31 that makes us go a little too fast with Quickster, okay?
    0:26:33 And then ultimately, you’re right.
    0:26:36 It became dvd.com and we did the thing and, you know,
    0:26:39 and separated it in a more low key way.
    0:26:42 And then, you know, it was just last year,
    0:26:44 we finally closed dvd.com.
    0:26:48 So, you know, it’s the right idea too soon.
    0:26:50 But if you think about it,
    0:26:51 these things are uncertain.
    0:26:56 And so if you make five decisions a little bit late
    0:26:58 and one a little bit early, you know,
    0:27:00 you’re sort of in the same ring.
    0:27:02 So we didn’t beat ourselves up too much on it
    0:27:05 because we were like, look, you got to be aggressive.
    0:27:08 You got to be able to recover if it’s been too fast,
    0:27:11 but you can’t be afraid of moving too fast.
    0:27:12 – Why is that exactly?
    0:27:15 Why do you think that it’s so important to be aggressive?
    0:27:18 I think that, I mean, I agree in hindsight.
    0:27:21 I mean, I’m glad that you were aggressive,
    0:27:24 but I feel like it’s very easy in business and in life
    0:27:27 to think, well, you know, things are going well
    0:27:29 and we don’t want to disappoint our shareholders
    0:27:31 and we don’t want to disappoint the customers.
    0:27:32 And it’s just so interesting to me
    0:27:35 that you were very, very sure that no, no, no,
    0:27:38 we have to move extremely quickly.
    0:27:40 Why was that so important to you?
    0:27:42 – So some people are tall or short.
    0:27:47 Some people are risk sensitive or risk loving.
    0:27:52 Okay, honestly, I think it’s built into people’s biology.
    0:27:55 And I’ve always loved the fear and excitement
    0:27:57 of the going fast.
    0:28:00 I do think it’s helpful if you take smart risks.
    0:28:04 Obviously, if four or five of the big decisions we made
    0:28:06 were as bad as quickster, then there’s a problem.
    0:28:09 You know, you’ve tipped into being reckless.
    0:28:13 Okay, but if mostly you get it right
    0:28:16 and if you can recover when you’ve been too fast,
    0:28:18 then that’s just aggressive and not reckless.
    0:28:22 And so then, you know, you can get great returns
    0:28:23 like Netflix has been.
    0:28:26 – Cultural principles and company culture
    0:28:29 has been such an important part of what you built
    0:28:33 at Netflix and now many companies around the world
    0:28:35 have borrowed a lot of your principles.
    0:28:37 I’d love to just go over a couple of them
    0:28:40 and hear from you what they mean and why they’re important.
    0:28:43 First one I’ve got here is farming for descent.
    0:28:47 – Yeah, that’s one actually we brought in after quickster.
    0:28:50 It means that descent in a management team
    0:28:54 is not easy or natural, especially if the leader
    0:28:57 has a strong view and has often been right.
    0:29:00 And so it’s important to farm for descent
    0:29:05 and to stimulate mechanisms by which contrary views
    0:29:09 can be evaluated and heard.
    0:29:12 We’re not trying to manufacture a consent.
    0:29:16 Okay, we’re trying to stimulate descent, you know,
    0:29:18 up to a point and then you make a decision
    0:29:19 and then you want everybody on board
    0:29:21 to execute it like heck.
    0:29:23 – What is that point?
    0:29:26 You said up to a point, where do you cut it off?
    0:29:30 – So for big decisions, it’s a somewhat formalized process
    0:29:33 where we’ll have a meeting and then everyone enters
    0:29:36 their view in a Google spreadsheet, you know,
    0:29:39 that’s visible to everybody and you vote on things,
    0:29:43 negative 10 is like, it’s going to be a disaster.
    0:29:45 To zero is like, I’m not really sure.
    0:29:48 To 10 is this is the best thing we can possibly do.
    0:29:50 I’m very confident.
    0:29:54 And then whoever’s making the decision then writes up,
    0:29:56 think of it like a Supreme Court decision.
    0:29:58 I mean, it’s not as well written or formal and stuff,
    0:30:01 but you know, it’s here, what I heard,
    0:30:03 here are the different views.
    0:30:06 And ultimately, I think the balance of risk is this.
    0:30:08 And I think we should do why.
    0:30:10 And then that’s the decision and then we move forward.
    0:30:13 – The other one I have here is extraordinary candor.
    0:30:14 What does that mean?
    0:30:17 – Well, human beings, as we’ve lived in denser
    0:30:20 and denser groups, have learned to be more
    0:30:22 and more polite and indirect.
    0:30:26 So, you know, in China or in Japan where it’s very crowded,
    0:30:31 people are super polite and you know, it’s an art form.
    0:30:34 The challenge in that in business is we come
    0:30:37 from a lot of different cultures and we’re moving fast.
    0:30:41 And so it’s better to enable people to be rude
    0:30:45 by conventional standards and to be very direct,
    0:30:49 at least about the workplace, not about your clothing
    0:30:52 or you know, that you’re attracted to someone
    0:30:54 or I don’t know, you know, but again,
    0:30:57 on the work dimensions, we want high candor
    0:31:02 to get people to have more clear, effective
    0:31:04 and honest discussions about, you know,
    0:31:08 should we cut price in France or should we do this show
    0:31:11 or should we do this product feature?
    0:31:13 – Just gonna move through one more cultural principle here,
    0:31:15 which is the keeper test.
    0:31:16 What is that?
    0:31:19 – The keeper test is if someone was going to quit,
    0:31:23 would you work hard to keep them, to change their mind?
    0:31:28 And so it’s using that as the firing criteria
    0:31:30 rather than the traditional, have they screwed up
    0:31:33 so egregiously that we should fire them, okay?
    0:31:36 That’s kind of the default model.
    0:31:39 And we would say, no, we’d like to have a whole bunch
    0:31:41 of people that you would fight hard to keep.
    0:31:45 And you’re responsible to all of your direct reports
    0:31:47 are people that you would fight hard to keep.
    0:31:48 We’ll be right back.
    0:32:05 – The Capital Ideas podcast now features a series
    0:32:08 hosted by Capital Group CEO, Mike Gitlin.
    0:32:10 Through the words and experiences
    0:32:13 of investment professionals, you’ll discover
    0:32:15 what differentiates their investment approach,
    0:32:18 what learnings have shifted their career trajectories
    0:32:21 and how do they find their next great idea?
    0:32:24 Invest 30 minutes in an episode today.
    0:32:26 Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
    0:32:29 Published by Capital Client Group, Inc.
    0:32:35 Support for property markets comes from Pilot.
    0:32:36 If you’re a small business owner,
    0:32:38 you might have heard about a new requirement
    0:32:40 called the BOI filing,
    0:32:42 where companies have to report who their owners are.
    0:32:45 You might also be hearing about fines of $591 per day
    0:32:48 for non-compliance or $10,000 in jail time
    0:32:50 if you knowingly miss file.
    0:32:51 Now the goal of all of this is to help
    0:32:52 reduce money laundering,
    0:32:55 but it definitely creates extra work for you.
    0:32:57 For most businesses, the deadline to complete it
    0:33:00 is January 1st, and while you could go to the government
    0:33:03 website and read all 23,000 words to figure it out,
    0:33:07 you could also let Pilot.com file it for you for free.
    0:33:09 Pilot.com is the largest small business
    0:33:10 and startup accounting firm in the US,
    0:33:12 and their super smart team of accounting
    0:33:13 and finance experts are always looking for ways
    0:33:18 to simplify your life like this filing, which is free.
    0:33:19 Let them take care of your BOI filing
    0:33:21 so you can stay focused on growing your business
    0:33:23 and your customer satisfaction.
    0:33:25 Remember, you have to do this by the end of the year.
    0:33:28 Go to Pilot.com/PropG and it’ll take care of this
    0:33:29 for you for free.
    0:33:30 No subscription required.
    0:33:32 That’s Pilot.com/PropG.
    0:33:39 Support for this show comes from Seven Rooms.
    0:33:41 What’s the recipe for taking your restaurant
    0:33:43 to the next level?
    0:33:45 Well, restaurant operators know a key part of it
    0:33:48 is making more money and making sure it keeps coming in.
    0:33:51 That’s why you wanna bring Seven Rooms to the table.
    0:33:53 Seven Rooms is an all-in-one CRM marketing
    0:33:56 and operations platform that helps you make more money
    0:34:00 for your operation and more magic for your guests.
    0:34:02 It equips your staff with the tools you need
    0:34:04 to deliver service that keeps your guests
    0:34:05 coming back for more.
    0:34:07 You can wow diners with a host of tools
    0:34:10 that let you create personalized experiences,
    0:34:14 organize unforgettable events, and deepen patron loyalty.
    0:34:17 From direct reservations to smart table management
    0:34:19 and targeted email marketing,
    0:34:22 Seven Rooms helps you grow your brand and your covers
    0:34:24 and not your workload.
    0:34:27 Learn more at SevenRooms.com.
    0:34:29 Seven Rooms, make magic, make money.
    0:34:37 – We’re back with First Time Founders.
    0:34:40 I’m gonna move on to Leaving Netflix.
    0:34:44 In January, 2023, you stepped down as the CEO.
    0:34:47 Your co-CEO Ted Serandos stuck around.
    0:34:49 He remained at the helm.
    0:34:51 Greg Peters was promoted.
    0:34:53 And when I look at what happened here,
    0:34:56 to me, this is kind of one of the greatest
    0:35:00 succession stories of this decade.
    0:35:05 Because I look at what happens to Disney,
    0:35:07 what’s happening right now at Nike,
    0:35:09 what’s been happening at Starbucks.
    0:35:13 I even look at what’s happened in our government.
    0:35:16 And what I’m finding is that the transition of power
    0:35:18 is extremely difficult.
    0:35:20 But if you look at what’s happened with Netflix,
    0:35:21 Netflix has crushed it.
    0:35:25 The stock has, I think, roughly doubled since you left,
    0:35:27 which is actually a testament to your ability
    0:35:29 to formulate a plan.
    0:35:32 What makes a good succession plan?
    0:35:35 How does a leader, such as yourself,
    0:35:39 peacefully and successfully remove themselves from the helm?
    0:35:42 – You know, it’s something that we always have concentrated on,
    0:35:45 which is developing Ben Strength and Greg and Ted,
    0:35:48 you know, been with me for 19 years or something.
    0:35:51 So it’s like they were very ready.
    0:35:54 And very excited to have the shot, you know, to lead.
    0:35:57 But again, I think that’s, you know,
    0:36:02 again, similar to the Andy Jassy, you know, following Bezos.
    0:36:04 So I bring that up just to say, you know,
    0:36:06 there are other proof points of, I mean,
    0:36:09 Jassy’s been at Amazon for 20 years, you know,
    0:36:10 and he’s different than Bezos,
    0:36:12 but you know, he’s doing it his way.
    0:36:15 And you know, there are those companies that struggle,
    0:36:20 you know, where the board and the CEO either didn’t pick right,
    0:36:24 or it took a long time, or, you know, a range of tricky issues.
    0:36:27 – And was it hard to let go of Netflix?
    0:36:31 – Yeah, you know, I’d done it for 25 years every day,
    0:36:34 jump up early to check the metrics and be in charge.
    0:36:39 And it, you know, was a big shock at first.
    0:36:42 But, you know, I knew that this was a great time
    0:36:43 for them to take over,
    0:36:45 ’cause we had a great recovery path
    0:36:48 that they architected, you know, for the company.
    0:36:50 But on a personal basis, I missed it.
    0:36:53 I missed being the center, I missed the, you know,
    0:36:54 the influence, I missed the intensity,
    0:36:56 missed the global travel.
    0:36:58 But, you know, three months later,
    0:37:01 it took over Powder Mountain,
    0:37:03 and you know, that’s been an incredible adventure.
    0:37:06 And then, you know, do a bunch of philanthropy
    0:37:08 and, you know, more active on that side.
    0:37:11 So I’ve been, you know, really blessed
    0:37:13 to continue to feel very invigorated.
    0:37:15 – It’s so interesting to me,
    0:37:19 because who would’ve thought that the entertainment,
    0:37:24 internet, software entrepreneur would decide,
    0:37:28 you know what, I’m gonna go start a ski resort.
    0:37:30 – My wife and I had a home here, a powder already.
    0:37:32 So it’s not like I searched 50 mountains
    0:37:36 and found the right one in some great strategic play.
    0:37:38 We had a house here.
    0:37:40 We could see the mountain was struggling.
    0:37:44 The opportunity to buy out the existing owners came up.
    0:37:46 – And really, most ski mountains
    0:37:48 are real estate development projects.
    0:37:51 So that’s the, you know, skiing itself
    0:37:54 is, you know, a very tough business like restaurants,
    0:37:55 that kind of thing.
    0:38:00 And then it’s creating the real estate play
    0:38:01 that’s been so exciting.
    0:38:04 – I’d love to know if there are any similarities
    0:38:09 between operating a ski resort versus a streaming service.
    0:38:13 What are sort of the main differences in the experience?
    0:38:15 But more importantly, what are the main similarities?
    0:38:16 What’s sort of carried over?
    0:38:21 – Yeah, the similarity is really the subscription orientation,
    0:38:23 which is you’ve got a set of customers
    0:38:26 and your job, you know, is to keep them excited.
    0:38:30 And so you’re not trying to get new customers all the time,
    0:38:32 like a transactional business.
    0:38:35 So it’s really focused on, you know,
    0:38:38 those that own real estate or have season passes.
    0:38:41 And so that’s probably the biggest similarity
    0:38:43 in business model.
    0:38:46 Then there’s a lot of similarities in culture now,
    0:38:48 where we’re, you know, building up powder mountain
    0:38:52 to do keeper test and high compensation.
    0:38:56 And, you know, all of the things that we’ve learned before.
    0:38:57 And then we’ve shaken up the models.
    0:39:00 So, you know, we’ve split the mountain in half,
    0:39:02 half for private, half for public.
    0:39:03 No one had done that before.
    0:39:06 We did a thing a couple of days ago
    0:39:09 where we said on February weekends,
    0:39:11 which are the busiest times,
    0:39:13 it’s a season pass only days, you know,
    0:39:17 we’re continuing to find ways to innovate.
    0:39:19 But I would say in the ski industry,
    0:39:23 the great popularizers have been the epic and icon passes.
    0:39:26 They’re the ones that roll up, you know, 50 resorts.
    0:39:30 Think of them as the Costco or Amazon Prime.
    0:39:32 Okay, that’s like a super high scale.
    0:39:34 I mean, I would have loved to invent that business,
    0:39:38 but I didn’t, you know, it’s been going on for 10 years.
    0:39:42 And now we’re competing now in the irony of ironies,
    0:39:44 you know, on the niche provider competing
    0:39:48 with the dominant firm and trying to come up as we have
    0:39:50 with something that’s counter positioned.
    0:39:54 And epic and icon have made skiing more affordable,
    0:39:56 but they’ve made it really crowded.
    0:39:59 And so then where the counter to that were more expensive,
    0:40:03 but were like beautifully pristine and open
    0:40:06 and it’s, you know, more like a hella skiing.
    0:40:07 It sounds absolutely incredible.
    0:40:11 I mean, the real difference here is this is really
    0:40:15 about bringing yourself joy, it seems.
    0:40:17 You know, this is about spreading happiness
    0:40:19 and having a great time.
    0:40:21 It makes families happy.
    0:40:22 It makes you happy.
    0:40:25 And I think that’s significant that that is what you’ve decided
    0:40:29 to zero in on and make a whole operation out of.
    0:40:34 So I’d love to get sort of your thoughts on joy,
    0:40:38 on happiness and the extent to which that’s played a role
    0:40:41 in your career and the decisions you’ve made throughout it.
    0:40:45 – You know, I would say finding new angles
    0:40:47 on existing businesses, you know,
    0:40:51 whether that’s rental or, you know, software error detection
    0:40:55 or this one, you know, skiing is the exciting thing.
    0:40:59 Coming up with new business models that, you know,
    0:41:03 work really well in our case to have 600 families
    0:41:07 have the private skiing and then use that
    0:41:09 to anchor the mountain and the public side
    0:41:11 with, you know, thousands of season passes.
    0:41:15 And it’s got all the joy for me of Netflix,
    0:41:17 even though it’s a fraction of the scale,
    0:41:19 a fraction of the profitability,
    0:41:23 a fraction of, you know, things that are important in many ways,
    0:41:27 but it’s a fun problem to be engaged with.
    0:41:30 And yes, to create, again, but the joy we create
    0:41:32 for our members is it’s very visceral.
    0:41:34 And, you know, we get to know them.
    0:41:37 And that’s, you know, deeper than just, you know,
    0:41:40 someone writing you of how important this show was
    0:41:43 to see them, but that was fun too.
    0:41:47 – As you look back at this very wide range in career,
    0:41:50 which parts were the most rewarding in your view?
    0:41:54 – I’d have to say right now, I feel most rewarding
    0:41:58 because again, it’s my neighbors that are, you know,
    0:42:01 that we’re saving the resort for and expanding and growing
    0:42:05 and putting in, like this year, we’re putting in four new lifts.
    0:42:08 And like nobody goes that aggressive all at once,
    0:42:12 it’s crazy in a way, and yet we’re pulling it off.
    0:42:14 Even though if I’m objective,
    0:42:18 it’s not as much good in the world, you know, as say, Netflix,
    0:42:21 it feels very intense because I know the people.
    0:42:23 – As a community aspect, yeah.
    0:42:27 – Yeah, I would say the personal satisfaction is highest now,
    0:42:31 you know, probably in terms of world impact, you know,
    0:42:33 that Netflix would be the highest.
    0:42:35 – And what about your philanthropy
    0:42:37 and your ventures and education?
    0:42:40 What has that brought you on a personal level?
    0:42:43 – What I found, like the year I did the politics,
    0:42:46 is, you know, it’s good for the world
    0:42:51 and, but I wouldn’t jump out of bed to do it, you know?
    0:42:55 I jump even today with a philanthropy, I like it.
    0:42:57 It’s important in doing a bunch on charter schools,
    0:42:59 a bunch on AI learning,
    0:43:02 a bunch on lower cost mobile phone access in Africa,
    0:43:07 home solar, so I recognize it as important,
    0:43:09 but like if I have an hour,
    0:43:11 I jump into Powder Mountain stuff, you know,
    0:43:15 ’cause it’s just, it’s such a great group of people,
    0:43:18 both, you know, on the staff and then in the membership.
    0:43:20 – It’s funny hearing you talk about this because
    0:43:26 it’s so clear to me that you get hyper-hyper obsessive
    0:43:30 and focused on very specific things.
    0:43:32 And right now, you know, it’s the ski resort.
    0:43:34 This is what’s dominating.
    0:43:36 It feels like that sort of gives insight
    0:43:38 into why you’ve been so successful in all of your ventures,
    0:43:42 is that you pick a thing and that’s your thing.
    0:43:44 I guess the other word for this is focus.
    0:43:47 How has that played into your career
    0:43:49 and do you think that’s something that other people
    0:43:53 who want to be successful should be embracing more of?
    0:43:55 – Well, what I realized is there’s other ways
    0:43:56 to be successful, like my friends
    0:43:59 who are venture capitalists, they’re the opposite.
    0:44:03 You know, they’ve got 30 deals, contemplated,
    0:44:05 five deals they’re in and, you know,
    0:44:07 and they’re incredible at multitasking
    0:44:11 and, you know, the ones who are very good at it.
    0:44:15 And I realize it’s just not my personality, you know?
    0:44:18 And so I think a lot of it probably
    0:44:20 for the young entrepreneurs figuring out
    0:44:24 what really are they differentially good at.
    0:44:25 So yes, I’m a focused person,
    0:44:28 but I wouldn’t say that’s the only way to be.
    0:44:30 You know, I would say in the investor class,
    0:44:32 they can’t jump in and try to solve
    0:44:34 the problems of the company.
    0:44:36 There’s different ways to contribute
    0:44:38 in different parts of the ecosystem.
    0:44:43 – There are a lot of young men who listen to this podcast.
    0:44:46 As a businessman, as a family man,
    0:44:49 and as a philanthropy man,
    0:44:51 what would be your number one piece of advice
    0:44:55 to a young man who’s just getting started in his career?
    0:44:58 – There’s no one path to imitate.
    0:45:01 And sometimes people fall on the trap
    0:45:05 of like finding their role model and, you know,
    0:45:08 and I would say it’s staying loose and flexible
    0:45:11 in learning and trying things.
    0:45:15 And it’s always challenging yourself.
    0:45:18 If you’re growing in your skill set,
    0:45:20 then you’re gonna have lots of opportunity,
    0:45:22 but there’s no predictable path.
    0:45:27 So it’s more of an emphasis on growth
    0:45:32 and growth mindset than on preparation and having a plan.
    0:45:33 – It’s interesting.
    0:45:35 Do you feel that you embodied that
    0:45:36 through your career as well?
    0:45:40 – Yeah, no, it was being flexible and adaptable.
    0:45:45 And it was a very, very unpredictable angles
    0:45:46 and where things veered.
    0:45:51 And then I was fortunate to latch into some big problems,
    0:45:53 whether that’s software quality
    0:45:58 and or whether that’s, you know, streaming entertainment
    0:46:00 or now powder real estate.
    0:46:02 – And if there’s one piece of advice
    0:46:05 that you could have given yourself
    0:46:07 when you were a young, young entrepreneur,
    0:46:09 before you started pure software,
    0:46:12 is there something that you would have told yourself
    0:46:15 that you’d like to tell him now?
    0:46:19 – I didn’t understand how to forgive myself
    0:46:21 when I made mistakes.
    0:46:25 So, you know, I was always going fast,
    0:46:27 taking chances, doing things.
    0:46:30 But, and now I’m able to see some mistakes
    0:46:35 as part and parcel of, you know, being aggressive.
    0:46:38 But at the time, anytime I made a mistake,
    0:46:43 I would berate myself endlessly and unproductively.
    0:46:47 So I didn’t know how to forgive myself.
    0:46:50 – I mean, you said unproductively berating yourself.
    0:46:53 Is there a way to think of self criticism
    0:46:55 in a more productive way
    0:46:58 that is actually helps you move forward?
    0:47:01 – My hunch is it just comes with age
    0:47:03 and that there isn’t really a shortcut.
    0:47:07 So, I mean, you can understand the intellectual theory,
    0:47:09 but in terms of the emotional release,
    0:47:11 and, you know, when you’re younger,
    0:47:14 all those emotions are so intense,
    0:47:15 you know, about success and failure
    0:47:18 and esteem and humiliation.
    0:47:21 And, you know, our systems are keyed up for that
    0:47:24 in ways that makes people very hungry.
    0:47:27 But I would say as you get experience,
    0:47:29 learning how to forgive yourself
    0:47:31 would be the little bit
    0:47:34 that I might be able to add to your audience.
    0:47:37 ‘Cause I’m sure they’re quite good risk takers
    0:47:38 and they’re quite aggressive
    0:47:39 and they’re good about learning and growth
    0:47:40 and lots of things.
    0:47:41 – Absolutely.
    0:47:42 I love that.
    0:47:45 And I will take that moving forward for myself as well.
    0:47:47 – Ed, when are we gonna get you up skiing?
    0:47:49 – Oh my God, I’ll come tomorrow.
    0:47:51 (laughing)
    0:47:53 As soon as the ski season starts, I wanna do it.
    0:47:55 – Great to get you up this winter
    0:47:59 and we should do a little event maybe with you
    0:48:01 and Tim Ferriss who’s local to his Park City.
    0:48:04 – I would absolutely love that and I love Tim Ferriss.
    0:48:06 Reed Hastings is the co-founder
    0:48:07 and executive chairman of Netflix.
    0:48:10 He is also a majority owner in Powder Mountain
    0:48:14 and I hopefully will be skiing with him soon enough.
    0:48:14 – Awesome.
    0:48:16 – Reed, thank you so much for joining me on the podcast.
    0:48:17 – Thanks so much, Ed.
    0:48:24 – Our producer is Claire Miller,
    0:48:25 our associate producer is Alison Weiss
    0:48:28 and our engineer is Benjamin Spencer.
    0:48:29 Thank you for listening to First Time Founders
    0:48:31 from the Vox Media Podcast Network.
    0:48:33 Tune in tomorrow for Proficy Markets.
    0:48:36 (upbeat music)
    0:48:49 Support for this show comes from Seven Rooms.
    0:48:50 For the restaurant operators out there
    0:48:53 who wanna create more regulars on the regular,
    0:48:54 check out Seven Rooms.
    0:48:57 Seven Rooms is an all-in-one CRM marketing
    0:49:00 and operations platform that helps you make more money
    0:49:03 and more magic for your guests.
    0:49:05 It gives your staff the tools to deliver service
    0:49:07 that keeps your guests coming back for more,
    0:49:10 from direct reservations to smart table management,
    0:49:13 to targeted text and email marketing.
    0:49:16 Seven Rooms helps you grow your brand and your covers
    0:49:17 and not your workload.
    0:49:20 Learn more at SevenRooms.com.
    0:49:23 Seven Rooms, make magic, make money.
    0:49:27 – Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:49:29 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools
    0:49:31 to power your business forward
    0:49:34 with the security and speed of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:49:37 (upbeat music)

    Ed speaks with Reed Hastings, co-founder and executive chairman of Netflix. They discuss the company’s path from dvd rental to streaming, the importance of company culture, what it was like to leave Netflix, and the challenges and joys of Reed’s newest venture: a ski resort in Utah.

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Is a Breakup of Google Coming? Australia’s Move to Ban Young Teens From Social Media, and How to Engage Students in the Classroom

    AI transcript
    0:00:00 (upbeat music)
    0:00:04 Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
    0:00:07 If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you,
    0:00:10 Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention.
    0:00:14 Constant Contact’s award-winning marketing platform
    0:00:17 offers all the automation, integration, and reporting tools
    0:00:20 that get your marketing running seamlessly,
    0:00:23 all backed by their expert live customer support.
    0:00:25 It’s time to get going and growing
    0:00:28 with Constant Contact today.
    0:00:30 Ready, set, grow.
    0:00:34 Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
    0:00:39 Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial,
    0:00:41 ConstantContact.ca.
    0:00:46 Support for this show comes from Ferragamo.
    0:00:49 It’s the holidays and gift giving is top of mind.
    0:00:51 And now you can give this season a taste of luxury
    0:00:53 with Ferragamo’s innovative wrapping service
    0:00:56 where every present is wrapped like delicious candy.
    0:00:58 Each carefully wrapped gift tells a story.
    0:01:00 And under that wrapping, you can find some truly iconic
    0:01:02 signature Ferragamo items.
    0:01:04 Join Ferragamo in celebrating the spirit of the holidays
    0:01:06 with a collection that promises to evoke wonder
    0:01:08 in every recipient.
    0:01:11 From small leather goods to the iconic hug handbag
    0:01:14 or Ferragamo loafers and belts, visit ferragamo.com
    0:01:17 to discover the best holiday gifts for the entire family.
    0:01:25 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:01:28 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools
    0:01:30 to power your business forward
    0:01:31 with the security and speed
    0:01:33 of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:01:36 Welcome to the Property Pod’s Office Hours.
    0:01:38 This is the part of the show where we answer questions
    0:01:40 about business, big tech entrepreneurship
    0:01:41 and whatever else is on your mind.
    0:01:43 If you’d like to submit a question,
    0:01:45 please email a voice recording
    0:01:46 to officehours@propertymedia.com.
    0:01:49 Again, that’s officehours@propertymedia.com.
    0:01:52 So with that, first question I have not seen
    0:01:53 or read these questions.
    0:01:57 – Hi Scott, I’m Adam from Chicago.
    0:02:00 I’m a professor at a large public university
    0:02:01 and I’m a big fan of the pod,
    0:02:04 especially your views on higher education.
    0:02:06 I had a prediction for 2025
    0:02:08 that I wanted to share to get your perspective.
    0:02:10 I think the Google Antitrust case
    0:02:12 will lead to a breakup of Google
    0:02:14 into four separate companies.
    0:02:18 Search and AI, cloud, YouTube and Waymo.
    0:02:21 This will unlock significant value for a mega cap stock
    0:02:24 that is underperformed compared to its peers.
    0:02:28 If this happens, other mega caps may follow suit.
    0:02:29 What do you think?
    0:02:30 And thanks.
    0:02:34 – Adam from Chicago, thanks for the question professor.
    0:02:37 You’re thinking rationally and I have learned the hard way.
    0:02:39 That’s not how this market works.
    0:02:42 What’s going on with the Google Antitrust case in 2020?
    0:02:43 Trump’s Justice Department
    0:02:45 through the Antitrust Hammer at Google,
    0:02:49 claiming they had an illegal monopoly in online search.
    0:02:49 This is a big deal.
    0:02:51 It was the first antitrust case of its kind
    0:02:53 in the internet era.
    0:02:54 Since then governments have argued
    0:02:55 that Google made illegal deals
    0:02:59 to ensure its search engine is the default on most devices.
    0:03:02 Now the stakes are getting higher.
    0:03:04 A judge already ruled against Google
    0:03:06 in part of the case and a second trial is coming up in April
    0:03:08 to figure out what kind of penalty they might face.
    0:03:10 They were found guilty of monopoly maintenance
    0:03:13 mostly ’cause they pay the biggest fee to Apple
    0:03:14 to be the default search engine.
    0:03:16 And they thought no one else could compete with them.
    0:03:18 It’s anti-competitive behavior.
    0:03:19 They’re trying to figure out
    0:03:22 what the remedies of this guilty verdict would be.
    0:03:24 And they could be a regulator sitting there
    0:03:25 and telling them that you can’t do this,
    0:03:29 you can’t do this, a breakup, some sort of fine.
    0:03:30 So the question you’re asking is,
    0:03:32 could the remedy be a breakup
    0:03:34 and what would that breakup look like?
    0:03:36 I can’t see them being broke up
    0:03:37 into four distinct units.
    0:03:39 And you’re saying a deconglomeration
    0:03:40 would add more shareholder value.
    0:03:42 And I actually believe you.
    0:03:43 I think in conglomates what you tend to find
    0:03:47 is the whole is less than the sum of its parts.
    0:03:49 And the thing you didn’t mention is that
    0:03:52 I’ve done some analysis around YouTube.
    0:03:53 If you asked most people,
    0:03:54 what is the leading streaming platform?
    0:03:56 They’d say Netflix and they would be wrong.
    0:03:59 Netflix commends about 8% of total viewership time,
    0:04:01 whereas Google, excuse me while Alphabet’s YouTube
    0:04:03 gets about 10%.
    0:04:06 And if you applied the same multiple on revenues,
    0:04:08 YouTube does more revenues than Netflix.
    0:04:10 And if you applied the same multiple YouTube
    0:04:12 on its own entity as a spin,
    0:04:15 would be worth somewhere between five and $600 billion.
    0:04:16 It’d be worth more than Bank of America
    0:04:18 or LVMH or sales force.
    0:04:21 And the disposition of assets or a spin of assets
    0:04:23 and a conglomerate structure
    0:04:25 creates more value per your point.
    0:04:29 Why? Because CEOs and controlling shareholders
    0:04:30 love to have a big, fat fucking company,
    0:04:35 especially one of this power and prosperity.
    0:04:37 And they don’t like managing different ones.
    0:04:39 And CEOs love a bigger company
    0:04:41 because their compensation is based on two things,
    0:04:42 the performance of the company
    0:04:44 and how big the company is.
    0:04:46 In addition, it makes them sleep easier at night
    0:04:49 when they conglomerize because if YouTube isn’t doing well,
    0:04:52 then most likely their cloud or Waymo is doing well.
    0:04:54 And the fact of the matter is,
    0:04:58 is that investors don’t need CEOs to diversify for them.
    0:05:02 I could go buy my own video search engine called YouTube.
    0:05:03 I would like to be able to do that.
    0:05:04 I’d like to be able to specifically say
    0:05:06 I like, I don’t believe in autonomous driving,
    0:05:07 but I believe in video search.
    0:05:10 I wanna invest in YouTube and not Waymo.
    0:05:13 Or I think that search is challenged by AI
    0:05:15 or I think it’s gonna be just fine
    0:05:16 and it’s been overly punished.
    0:05:17 I wanted to go into search,
    0:05:19 but I don’t wanna be in the cloud, whatever, right?
    0:05:21 Unfortunately, they don’t do that.
    0:05:23 They conglomerize and they claim there’s efficiencies
    0:05:25 and there may be, there may be so many efficiencies here
    0:05:28 between coordinating and cooperating
    0:05:31 that they in fact make it impossible for anyone else
    0:05:33 or both the buy on the buy and the sell side
    0:05:36 and digital marketing and they make the market.
    0:05:38 Anyways, I just don’t see this happening.
    0:05:40 I wonder if there will be a breakup.
    0:05:41 I hope there is.
    0:05:43 It would probably be something around their ad tech.
    0:05:46 They probably maybe have to spin the old double click
    0:05:48 or their ad stack or their ad model
    0:05:50 or their ad technology, if you will.
    0:05:52 But the idea, you’re looking at this rationally
    0:05:55 from an investor standpoint, what would make the most sense.
    0:05:56 But here’s the thing.
    0:05:58 These companies are run by individuals
    0:06:00 and they love having sitting on the iron throne
    0:06:04 of all of the seven realms, not just Westeros.
    0:06:05 So while what you’re saying makes sense,
    0:06:07 it’s just unlikely to happen.
    0:06:08 These organizations are run by people.
    0:06:10 They have different objectives
    0:06:13 than just doing what’s right for shareholders, if you will.
    0:06:16 The biggest tax cut in the world right now
    0:06:18 would be if China and the US made up,
    0:06:20 they have manufacturing, we have consumer demand,
    0:06:22 we have debt, they have cash.
    0:06:25 I mean, for God’s sakes, it’s Fred and fucking Ginger
    0:06:26 for the global economy.
    0:06:28 That would be the biggest tax cut.
    0:06:29 The second biggest tax cut would be
    0:06:31 if we took the big guys, Amazon, Alphabet,
    0:06:35 Google and Apple and broke them up into 11 or 12 companies.
    0:06:37 That would be the best way to oxygenate the marketplace.
    0:06:39 They have such concentration of power
    0:06:41 in their specific categories
    0:06:43 that the rents they charge on consumers,
    0:06:45 whether it’s what they charge you for your iPhone
    0:06:49 or the ad fees on Amazon,
    0:06:52 which have gone from about 20%
    0:06:54 of total gross merchandise volume to like 45%.
    0:06:56 All the rents need to come down on businesses.
    0:06:59 Biggest corporate tax cut in history wouldn’t be under Trump.
    0:07:01 It would be under the FTC or DOJ
    0:07:02 breaking these companies up.
    0:07:03 Anyways, that’s my rant.
    0:07:05 We’ll see what happens here, Professor,
    0:07:08 but call me skeptical.
    0:07:09 Question number two.
    0:07:13 Hi, Prof. G. My name is Ned from Melbourne, Australia.
    0:07:15 I love your work and thank you for contributing
    0:07:19 to making our discourse less course and more informed.
    0:07:21 You’ve often spoken about the need
    0:07:23 to agegate social media.
    0:07:26 The Australian government has recently announced plans
    0:07:28 to impose a minimum age of 16 years
    0:07:31 to access social media platforms.
    0:07:34 The concept has broadly bipartisan support.
    0:07:36 However, there are some real practical issues
    0:07:38 that are unfolding, namely how to verify
    0:07:41 that someone is indeed over 16.
    0:07:44 Options discussed include biometric verification
    0:07:47 and uploading approved forms of ID.
    0:07:50 Given the well-founded security and privacy concerns,
    0:07:52 this is in danger of scuppering
    0:07:55 this otherwise worthwhile policy initiative.
    0:07:56 Would love to hear your thoughts
    0:07:59 and thanks again for all that you do.
    0:08:00 Thanks for the thoughtful question,
    0:08:01 Nidal from Australia.
    0:08:05 So the most influential scholar in the world right now
    0:08:06 is my colleague, Jonathan Hyde.
    0:08:09 And everything we’re talking about here,
    0:08:11 funds being banned in schools,
    0:08:13 social media being banned for kids under the age of 16,
    0:08:15 has largely been a function
    0:08:18 of Jonathan’s landmark book, “The Anxious Generation.”
    0:08:21 So effectively Australia is planning
    0:08:23 to make social media platforms take action
    0:08:24 to prevent online harms,
    0:08:26 including bullying, predatory behavior,
    0:08:28 and harmful content pushed by algorithms.
    0:08:31 They’re calling it the digital duty of care.
    0:08:33 Platforms including TikTok, Instagram, and X
    0:08:35 will need to actively protect users
    0:08:38 by regularly reviewing and addressing safety risks.
    0:08:40 The plan will ban kids under 16
    0:08:42 from these social media platforms.
    0:08:45 Some critics argue that banning younger users
    0:08:47 of these platforms could reduce the pressure
    0:08:50 on these platforms to improve safety features.
    0:08:51 That’s fucking ridiculous.
    0:08:54 If young people aren’t on there,
    0:08:56 that will decrease the likelihood
    0:08:59 they’ll put in safety restrictions for young people.
    0:09:00 I mean, that makes no sense.
    0:09:01 Literally these people have no shame.
    0:09:04 And my favorite is that it would squelch free speech.
    0:09:05 Yeah, my 13-year-old needs three speech
    0:09:08 more than he needs protection from this bullshit
    0:09:10 that makes him insecure and want to self-harm.
    0:09:12 Yeah, okay, free speech for 13-year-olds.
    0:09:13 That’s our top priority.
    0:09:16 The legislation covers a wide range of harms,
    0:09:18 including mental health, impacts on young people,
    0:09:20 harm for practices, and illegal activities.
    0:09:22 There will be no exemptions for children
    0:09:25 with parental consent or who already have accounts.
    0:09:26 What’s the plan now?
    0:09:30 Australia is currently trialing an age verification system
    0:09:32 that includes methods, including biometrics
    0:09:34 and government identification to help block children
    0:09:36 from accessing these social media platforms.
    0:09:39 So these companies, social media companies,
    0:09:41 or companies with a social offering,
    0:09:45 make $11 billion a year advertising to people
    0:09:48 under the age of 18.
    0:09:50 And when you take a multiple of whatever it is,
    0:09:53 10 to 15 times revenues, you’re talking about essentially
    0:09:55 somewhere between $100 billion and a quarter of a trillion
    0:09:59 dollars by their ability to continue to advertise
    0:10:01 to young people despite the harms.
    0:10:03 So they’re gonna do everything they can.
    0:10:05 They’re gonna nod or pretend to give a flying fuck
    0:10:07 about the Commonwealth and children they don’t.
    0:10:09 By the way, a majority of tech executives
    0:10:12 do not allow their kids on smartphones or on social media.
    0:10:13 Why?
    0:10:16 ‘Cause they know how mendacious this shit is.
    0:10:18 This is about money and nothing else.
    0:10:21 Do you really think they care about your kids’ free speech
    0:10:24 or ensuring that the LGBTQ community has a chance
    0:10:26 to reach out and find other kids?
    0:10:29 Yeah, this is not perfect legislation,
    0:10:32 but on the whole, on the whole stop signs have a downside.
    0:10:34 But they still make a lot of sense.
    0:10:37 I don’t doubt that there are probably three or four,
    0:10:39 I don’t know, or instances of people
    0:10:42 that had a terrible reaction to the vaccines.
    0:10:43 I don’t doubt it.
    0:10:44 And guess what?
    0:10:47 It’s still hugely worth it.
    0:10:49 This is just so unnatural that we’ve let this go on
    0:10:50 for so long.
    0:10:53 So kudos to Australia for trying to implement
    0:10:54 and do something about it.
    0:10:55 The legislation will be introduced
    0:10:57 to the Australian Parliament this year.
    0:10:59 And if approved, we’ll take effect 12 months later.
    0:11:03 And again, for those of you who are thinking about academia
    0:11:05 or don’t think a book can change the world,
    0:11:07 they are banning phones in countries
    0:11:10 because of a book called “The Anxious Generation”
    0:11:12 by Professor Jonathan Hyde.
    0:11:13 Also a lovely guy.
    0:11:14 He’s a lovely guy.
    0:11:17 Anyways, thanks for the question.
    0:11:19 We have one quick break before our final question.
    0:11:19 Stay with us.
    0:11:25 Support for Prophecy comes from Mint Mobile.
    0:11:28 You’re probably paying too much for your cell phone plan.
    0:11:29 It’s one of those budgetary line items
    0:11:31 that always looks pretty ugly.
    0:11:33 And it might feel like there’s nothing you can do about it.
    0:11:35 That’s where Mint Mobile has something to say.
    0:11:37 Mint Mobile’s latest deal might challenge your idea
    0:11:39 of what a phone plan costs.
    0:11:40 If you make the switch now,
    0:11:41 you’ll pay just $15 a month
    0:11:43 when you purchase a new three-month phone plan.
    0:11:45 All Mint Mobile plans come with high-speed data
    0:11:46 on a limited-talking text delivered
    0:11:48 on the nation’s largest 5D network.
    0:11:50 You can even keep your phone, your contacts,
    0:11:51 and your number.
    0:11:53 It doesn’t get much easier than that.
    0:11:54 To get this new customer offer
    0:11:56 and your new three-month premium wireless plan
    0:11:57 for just $15 a month,
    0:12:00 you can go to mintmobile.com/propche.
    0:12:02 That’s mintmobile.com/propche.
    0:12:04 You can cut your wireless bill to $15 a month
    0:12:06 at mintmobile.com/propche.
    0:12:08 $45 upfront payment required,
    0:12:09 equivalent to $15 a month.
    0:12:10 New customers on a first three-month plan
    0:12:12 only speeds slower by 40 gigabytes
    0:12:13 on unlimited plan, additional taxes, fees,
    0:12:15 and restrictions apply.
    0:12:17 See Mint Mobile for details.
    0:12:21 (upbeat music)
    0:12:27 Support for Propche comes from Masterclass.
    0:12:28 This holiday season, sure,
    0:12:30 you could give your loved ones some trendy junk
    0:12:31 that may be the love for a few weeks
    0:12:33 before they inevitably get bored,
    0:12:36 or you could give a gift with the potential
    0:12:39 to last a lifetime with Masterclass.
    0:12:41 Masterclass is the streaming platform
    0:12:43 that brings invaluable insights
    0:12:45 from the world’s greatest mind straight to you.
    0:12:48 According to Masterclass, 88% of members say
    0:12:50 they feel that it made a positive impact on their lives.
    0:12:53 So, with Masterclass, you and your loved ones
    0:12:55 can learn from the best to become the best.
    0:12:57 Plus, there’s no risk.
    0:12:59 Every new membership comes with a 30-day
    0:13:00 money-back guarantee.
    0:13:02 Personally, I’d be interested to check out,
    0:13:06 and I did, Bob Iger’s view on managing the creative process.
    0:13:07 I think he’s an interesting manager
    0:13:10 and wanted to learn more about managing creatives
    0:13:12 as we do here at Propche Media.
    0:13:15 Masterclass always has great offers during the holidays.
    0:13:17 Sometimes up to as much as 50% off.
    0:13:21 Head over to masterclass.com/Propche for the current offer.
    0:13:25 That’s up to 50% off at masterclass.com/Propche.
    0:13:28 Masterclass.com/Propche.
    0:13:36 Support for Propche comes from Fundrise.
    0:13:37 Artificial intelligence is poised to be
    0:13:39 one of the biggest wealth creation events in history.
    0:13:43 Some experts expect AI to add more than $15 trillion
    0:13:45 to the global economy by 2030.
    0:13:47 Unfortunately, your portfolio probably
    0:13:49 doesn’t own the biggest names in AI.
    0:13:50 That’s because most of the AI revolution
    0:13:53 is largely being built and funded in private markets.
    0:13:55 That means the vast majority of AI startups
    0:13:57 are going to be backed and owned by venture capitalists,
    0:13:58 not public investors.
    0:14:01 But with the launch of the Fundrise Innovation Fund last year,
    0:14:03 you can get in on it now.
    0:14:05 The Innovation Fund pairs a $100 million
    0:14:07 plus venture portfolio of some of the biggest names in AI
    0:14:09 with one of the lowest investment minimums
    0:14:11 the venture industry has ever seen.
    0:14:14 Get in early at fundrise.com/Propche.
    0:14:17 Carefully consider the investment material before investing,
    0:14:19 including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses.
    0:14:21 This and other information can be found
    0:14:23 at the Innovation Fund’s prospectus
    0:14:25 at fundrise.com/innovation.
    0:14:28 This is a paid advertisement.
    0:14:37 Welcome back, question number three.
    0:14:39 – Hi Scott, my name is Molly Stark-Dean.
    0:14:42 I’m a huge fan and an NYU alumni.
    0:14:44 I landed a new job at the new school,
    0:14:46 teaching journalism in the machine.
    0:14:50 I feel really comfortable talking to large groups of people,
    0:14:53 but my class will be a small group of less than 20.
    0:14:56 How do I change my mass communication styles
    0:14:59 to accommodate the class size?
    0:15:02 Are there any secrets to teaching and grading AI projects?
    0:15:04 Any advice is welcome.
    0:15:06 – I’ll take this in reverse order,
    0:15:08 and thanks for the question, Molly, and congratulations.
    0:15:10 I kind of fell into teaching.
    0:15:11 Actually, that’s not true.
    0:15:12 I knew I was the one who wanted to teach.
    0:15:13 I was thinking about getting my own PhD,
    0:15:14 and my mom got sick.
    0:15:15 I kept a state and an MBA,
    0:15:17 but I always wanted to go back to teaching,
    0:15:19 but I find it very rewarding.
    0:15:20 Basically, as a teacher at a university,
    0:15:22 you just have to be sort of the best student in the class.
    0:15:26 Some people are literally the expert in the domain.
    0:15:27 Most of us aren’t.
    0:15:30 We just do the reading and try and be very well-prepared
    0:15:35 in class, but okay, so how to grade AI projects?
    0:15:37 Shit, I don’t know.
    0:15:39 What I can tell you is that I now have an eye
    0:15:41 and can spot shit written by AI.
    0:15:44 And I’ll circle it and say AI, question mark.
    0:15:46 And when I say to my kids, my kids are,
    0:15:47 the average is 28.
    0:15:49 These are adults working at Google
    0:15:51 and Salesforce and Bridgewater.
    0:15:53 And I’m like, look, if you want to turn something in
    0:15:56 and you want to be AI and not do any work, have at it.
    0:15:59 But the whole point here is to learn some skills.
    0:16:00 And generally speaking, it’s interesting.
    0:16:03 I can actually now pick out AI-written material,
    0:16:05 or at least I think I can.
    0:16:07 What I can help you with is, all right,
    0:16:09 if you’re blessed to have, I used to have,
    0:16:12 when I first started, my classes were only 20 or 30 kids.
    0:16:15 Word got out that it was a good class
    0:16:17 and now my classes are 300.
    0:16:19 What you have, or the advantage you have with 20 kids,
    0:16:22 quite frankly, is the Socratic Method and Student Engagement.
    0:16:25 And that is, you can get to know them.
    0:16:28 And what you’re meant to do, I think the best classes are,
    0:16:30 I taught three-hour sessions, was an hour
    0:16:33 of actual content lecturing and then two hours
    0:16:35 of critical thinking and debate.
    0:16:37 And that is, I would say, okay, should Nike
    0:16:39 take money out of advertising and open stores
    0:16:40 and vertical distribution?
    0:16:43 And I would say, Alan, please make an argument for this
    0:16:46 as it relates to trends in modern day branding
    0:16:48 about vertical distribution.
    0:16:50 And then she’d get nervous and fumble over herself
    0:16:52 and try and make a comment.
    0:16:54 And then I’d say, okay, Joe, disagree with her
    0:16:57 and show why she has this wrong.
    0:16:59 And then he’d even make something less cogent,
    0:17:01 but the class would have time to absorb the issue.
    0:17:04 And I’d start calling on people and asking them not to argue,
    0:17:07 but to thoughtfully debate, really come out,
    0:17:09 come up with things, push back on them.
    0:17:11 I’m not afraid to say, look,
    0:17:13 that was really intelligent, what you said.
    0:17:14 What you need to be able to do is say it
    0:17:16 in a third of the time, ’cause it’ll be three times
    0:17:18 as powerful, I’m gonna come back to it in 30 seconds.
    0:17:21 My point is, you can really, I don’t wanna say
    0:17:23 get in their face, but really get in their heads
    0:17:26 and make it super engaged and create a little bit of tension
    0:17:30 that they know you’re gonna call on them three or four times.
    0:17:33 And that creates a level of intensity and excitement.
    0:17:34 By the way, it’s not for everyone.
    0:17:35 Some kids don’t like that.
    0:17:37 I once had a kid come to my,
    0:17:38 actually I’ve had it several times say,
    0:17:40 I get very nervous, I’d rather you didn’t call on me.
    0:17:43 And I said, I’m gonna continue to call on you,
    0:17:46 but you can say, I need a minute or I don’t know,
    0:17:48 and I’ll come back to you, and you’re in a safe place,
    0:17:50 but you have to get past this.
    0:17:53 It’s gonna be very hard to be successful economically
    0:17:55 without the ability to speak in front of a,
    0:17:57 at least a small group of people.
    0:17:58 So anyways, play to your strengths,
    0:18:01 a small group of people, really active conversation
    0:18:03 with 20 kids.
    0:18:06 If everyone hasn’t spoken at least once during the class,
    0:18:06 you have failed.
    0:18:08 You’re not as much a teacher as you are a maestro
    0:18:11 for a really robust conversation,
    0:18:13 but congratulations on your new role.
    0:18:15 I think it’s very rewarding.
    0:18:16 Thanks for the question.
    0:18:18 That’s all for this episode.
    0:18:20 If you’d like to submit a question,
    0:18:23 please email a voice recording to officehours@proptimedia.com.
    0:18:26 Again, that’s officehours@proptimedia.com.
    0:18:28 (upbeat music)
    0:18:36 This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez
    0:18:37 and Caroline Shagren.
    0:18:39 Drew Burroughs is our technical director.
    0:18:40 Thank you for listening to the Property Pod
    0:18:42 from the Vox Media Podcast Network.
    0:18:43 We will catch you on Saturday
    0:18:46 for No Mercy, No Malice, as read by George Hawn.
    0:18:48 And please follow our Property Markets Pod
    0:18:50 wherever you get your pods for new episodes
    0:18:51 every Monday and Thursday.
    0:18:56 The support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:18:59 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools
    0:19:00 to power your business forward
    0:19:02 with the security and speed
    0:19:04 of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:19:08 Food and security still affects millions
    0:19:09 of individuals around the globe.
    0:19:12 And Nestle, a global leader in nutrition,
    0:19:13 health, and wellness,
    0:19:15 understands the importance of working together
    0:19:17 to create lasting change.
    0:19:20 Nestle’s partnerships extend beyond just financial support
    0:19:22 from building urban hoop houses
    0:19:24 to producing custom seasoning for food banks.
    0:19:26 Nestle and their partners actively engage
    0:19:28 with local communities listening to their needs
    0:19:31 and working together to find innovative solutions.
    0:19:34 Nestle is committed to helping support thriving,
    0:19:37 resilient communities today and for generations to come.
    0:19:39 Together, we can help to build stronger,
    0:19:41 healthier communities.
    0:19:43 Learn more at nestle.com.
    0:19:45 you
    0:19:55 [BLANK_AUDIO]

    Scott discusses what’s at stake in the Google antitrust case, specifically whether a breakup of Google is likely to happen. He then speaks about the news that Australia is considering legislation banning social media for children under 16 years old. He wraps up with advice to a professor teaching a small group of students. 

    Music: https://www.davidcuttermusic.com / @dcuttermusic

    Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice

    Buy “The Algebra of Wealth,” out now.

    Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Trump’s Cabinet Chaos Continues

    AI transcript
    0:00:04 Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
    0:00:07 If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you,
    0:00:10 Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention.
    0:00:15 Constant Contact’s award-winning marketing platform offers all the automation,
    0:00:20 integration, and reporting tools that get your marketing running seamlessly,
    0:00:23 all backed by their expert live customer support.
    0:00:27 It’s time to get going and growing with Constant Contact today.
    0:00:30 Ready? Set. Grow.
    0:00:34 Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
    0:00:38 Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial.
    0:00:41 ConstantContact.ca.
    0:00:46 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:00:51 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools to power your business forward
    0:00:55 with the security and speed of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:01:00 Food and security still affects millions of individuals around the globe.
    0:01:04 And Nestle, a global leader in nutrition, health, and wellness,
    0:01:08 understands the importance of working together to create lasting change.
    0:01:11 Nestle’s partnerships extend beyond just financial support,
    0:01:15 from building urban hoop houses to producing custom seasoning for food banks.
    0:01:18 Nestle and their partners actively engage with local communities,
    0:01:22 listening to their needs, and working together to find innovative solutions.
    0:01:26 Nestle is committed to helping support thriving, resilient communities.
    0:01:28 Today and for generations to come.
    0:01:31 Together, we can help to build stronger, healthier communities.
    0:01:33 Learn more at nestle.com.
    0:01:42 Welcome to Raging Moderates. I’m Scott Galloway.
    0:01:43 And I’m Jessica Charlev.
    0:01:45 Jess, where are you today?
    0:01:48 At the same place I always am.
    0:01:50 I’m at home in New York.
    0:01:54 Yeah. Well, actually at the Vox studio, so I’m in the financial district.
    0:01:57 Oh, you look nice here. I go there now.
    0:01:57 Yeah, you’re a newbie.
    0:02:02 You’re excited and ambitious to actually do the right things,
    0:02:06 to haul down to what is arguably the most uninspiring part of Manhattan,
    0:02:12 to where my guess is they’re paying Vox to occupy their office space.
    0:02:16 But they are very nice studios, and it’s a lot of young people running around.
    0:02:22 Yeah, I’m like middle-aged here, like 55 on a comparative basis.
    0:02:25 Okay, you say that like it’s really old. You realize your podcast partner.
    0:02:29 You said middle-aged, and we’re all going to, I don’t, middle-aged
    0:02:31 isn’t really middle, right?
    0:02:35 Yeah, I’ll be 55 in five years.
    0:02:36 All right, so what are we going to talk about today?
    0:02:39 Today we’re talking about Matt Gitz,
    0:02:41 withdrawals from AG consideration, Gates Gitz.
    0:02:45 I’m happy he’s like going into hopefully political oblivion just for that.
    0:02:46 I can’t pronounce his name.
    0:02:48 Something terrible is brewing, but yes.
    0:02:52 That’s right. More Trump cabinet picks.
    0:02:55 Great season episode two of Dancing with the Stars,
    0:03:02 whether modern family or family guy, and the transgender bathroom ban in Capitol Hill.
    0:03:04 Can’t believe we’re talking about this.
    0:03:04 I know.
    0:03:04 I can’t.
    0:03:06 Anyways, here we are.
    0:03:09 I love legislation that is focused on one person.
    0:03:11 Yeah, it’s really fair.
    0:03:12 Yeah, it’s nice.
    0:03:14 It doesn’t get the game away.
    0:03:15 It’s a good look.
    0:03:18 But first, we want to remind you, that’s right, it’s that time in the show
    0:03:22 to please follow our Raging Moderates podcast on your preferred platform.
    0:03:23 Please follow us.
    0:03:28 If you’re listening on Apple, we know that about a quarter of you aren’t subscribed.
    0:03:29 So don’t be that person.
    0:03:32 Hit the follow button so you never miss an episode.
    0:03:36 We don’t, quite frankly, we don’t register in the rankings.
    0:03:38 We don’t register in Google search.
    0:03:41 And most importantly, we do not get paid
    0:03:44 if we don’t have people actually subscribed to our feed.
    0:03:48 So if you’re enjoying the show, please follow our Raging Moderates podcast
    0:03:50 on your preferred platform.
    0:03:51 All right, enough of that.
    0:03:52 Thank you for enduring that.
    0:03:54 What are we talking about?
    0:03:58 Last week, Matt Getz lobbied hard on Capitol Hill for his confirmation.
    0:04:00 But by Thursday morning, Trump apparently called to let him know
    0:04:02 he didn’t have the votes in the Senate.
    0:04:06 By the afternoon, Getz announced on social media this confirmation had become
    0:04:10 a distraction from having sex with minors.
    0:04:12 A few hours later, Trump announced his new pick.
    0:04:15 Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi.
    0:04:16 Is it Bondi?
    0:04:16 Bondi?
    0:04:17 Bonda?
    0:04:18 Bondi.
    0:04:18 Bondi?
    0:04:19 She’s a Bondi girl.
    0:04:20 Like a Bond girl.
    0:04:25 Trump loyalist who has ties to Susie Wiles and Boris Efstein.
    0:04:27 These people gotta get similar fucking names.
    0:04:29 Boris is no bueno.
    0:04:30 Yeah.
    0:04:31 No, no bueno.
    0:04:31 Okay, Jess.
    0:04:35 You know, as always, you’re going to have to carry this show.
    0:04:39 What does this signal that there’s, is there a limit?
    0:04:42 Is there an actual limit in the Trump administration?
    0:04:44 Would Getz actually cross the line here?
    0:04:49 I guess that that’s a peachy read of all of this.
    0:04:51 Though, I mean, we were, when we were talking about it last week,
    0:04:55 the expectation was that this one wasn’t going to get through.
    0:04:58 Especially once they’re started being like the jockeying back and forth about
    0:05:01 whether they’re going to release the ethics report.
    0:05:04 And then Trump apparently, the transition team doesn’t want
    0:05:08 anyone to undergo normal FBI checks, which is the usual procedure.
    0:05:10 They’re like, we can do it with an outside firm.
    0:05:13 So I can hire, you know, Baron to look at them.
    0:05:15 And then we’ll, we’ll see what’s going on.
    0:05:19 But I never think it’s as straightforward as it seems.
    0:05:24 I feel like the fact that Matt Gaetz said, I am not taking my seat.
    0:05:28 So he won reelection and he could still, even though he resigned from Congress,
    0:05:30 he resigned from this Congress, not the next one.
    0:05:33 So the expectation was, well, maybe he’s just going to go back to Congress,
    0:05:36 which would also help Mike Johnson out that he doesn’t have to have
    0:05:41 a few months down one further in his majority because they can only lose,
    0:05:46 you know, one to three votes per issue as it is.
    0:05:48 But then he says, I’m not going back to Congress.
    0:05:52 And that makes me think, like, what terrible thing are you going to do?
    0:05:58 You know, he said, there are already people that I know have a hardened position.
    0:06:01 No, to me, Mitch McConnell, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski,
    0:06:05 and then John Curtis, who will be the new senator from Utah, replacing Mitt Romney.
    0:06:13 And it made me think, are the other controversial picks not getting that kind of feedback?
    0:06:19 Or is Matt Gaetz the only one who doesn’t want to go through this public airing of anything?
    0:06:22 Because I imagine that there are a few that are telling Pete Hegseth,
    0:06:29 I’m not into you, or RFK Jr. So what do you think?
    0:06:34 I listened to the Daily Podcast and they were talking about Gaetz.
    0:06:37 And basically, the reporter had done some work where he had found
    0:06:42 some of the evidence that was going to be included in the ethics report that the
    0:06:46 Republicans managed to squelch, saying that it should not come out now that he’s no longer
    0:06:50 a member of Congress, which makes absolutely no sense to me.
    0:06:53 Let’s spend a bunch of time looking at a report.
    0:06:58 And if Gaetz claims or is innocent as he claims, then I would imagine that the report
    0:07:01 would state that, that he would want the report to come out.
    0:07:03 This is the thing that absolutely strikes me.
    0:07:08 He wasn’t worried about people finding out that there was evidence that he was having
    0:07:09 sex with minors.
    0:07:11 He wasn’t worried about what people would think about him.
    0:07:16 He wasn’t worried about his inability to be America’s top cop with this type of cloud.
    0:07:18 He was just worried he wasn’t going to get the votes.
    0:07:26 In my view, this really represents a new low that we have a government and we have people
    0:07:29 who would even entertain this type of nomination.
    0:07:33 I just, I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything like this.
    0:07:34 And I’m not a historian.
    0:07:40 I’m trying to think of the last time there was a nomination that was just brazenly inappropriate,
    0:07:47 stupid, and insulting to America in this general notion that when we elect people,
    0:07:54 and they have the power of putting people in power, that there is some fidelity to decency,
    0:07:59 to the constitution, to the actual goddamn job description.
    0:08:05 We just seem to be setting new lows every damn day.
    0:08:07 Anyways, that’s my ranch, yes.
    0:08:11 I think the problem is, is that the top of the ticket is what,
    0:08:16 or I should say who shattered a lot of these norms to begin with.
    0:08:19 So why wouldn’t the cabinet follow suit on that front?
    0:08:25 And there were all of these stories coming out about past nominees that hadn’t been able
    0:08:30 to get through under Bill Clinton because they had an undocumented nanny.
    0:08:36 Like those were the days, right, when you just had someone who was, yes, here illegally,
    0:08:41 but was good enough to be taking care of your child, which is probably the most important job
    0:08:43 that we have globally speaking.
    0:08:49 There’s nothing more precious than your child and who you entrust them to be with for 10 hours
    0:08:50 a day or whatever you’re doing.
    0:08:53 And that was ending nominations.
    0:08:58 And now we’re having conversations about how many minors is too many,
    0:09:03 or how many allegations of sexual assault is too many, how many brainworms,
    0:09:10 how many affairs and sex journals that ended up leading to suicides is too many.
    0:09:15 And I don’t know, it makes me think a lot about what the Democrats are going to have to do.
    0:09:21 And this is one of the cases that people have been making, not because he behaves like this,
    0:09:25 but because he has this kind of swagger for a Gavin Newsom.
    0:09:29 You know, there’s this whole part of social media that talks about him as the psychopath
    0:09:30 we need, right?
    0:09:36 Like the guy who will just show up as relentlessly on message is fast,
    0:09:39 on his feet is so good looking, is so sharp.
    0:09:42 And I think there are going to be a lot of people that feel that way,
    0:09:48 that are going to feel scared away from a kind of more normie pic, right?
    0:09:52 Like a guy who’s just standing up there with his nice wife and his two kids,
    0:09:55 and doesn’t have that kind of energy.
    0:10:02 Because it’s clear the Republican Party is feeding off of depravity at this point.
    0:10:05 Let’s talk about Pam, new AG probably.
    0:10:09 She comes across as fucking Thurgood Marshall right now.
    0:10:10 In my sense, she’s going to sell right through.
    0:10:11 What are your thoughts?
    0:10:13 I think she will as well.
    0:10:19 If there was some game of 3D chess going on to put Gates up to get someone else
    0:10:24 in and a big sense of relief, this could have been it.
    0:10:27 I think Pam Bondi is not going to have any issues,
    0:10:28 as she was a prosecutor for a long time.
    0:10:32 First female AG in Florida, very, very competent.
    0:10:37 She’s been in a lobbying firm called Ballard for the last several years.
    0:10:39 And Susie Wiles is a partner there.
    0:10:41 So she’s a very good relationship with Susie Wiles,
    0:10:44 which is obviously a big part of this.
    0:10:49 She has ingratiated herself to Trump over the last 10-plus years.
    0:10:52 So in 2016, she actually endorsed Trump over Marco Rubio,
    0:10:57 which was a big deal that the Florida AG went for Trump versus the hometown hero,
    0:10:59 though I guess Mar-a-Lago has been in Florida.
    0:11:04 The only, well, two things that I think are relevant.
    0:11:10 So she’s very into this same line of argumentation that Gates was making,
    0:11:13 which is I’m going to investigate the investigators.
    0:11:16 I’m going to weed out all of the bad guys, get rid of Jack Smith, his whole team.
    0:11:17 She’s been talking like that.
    0:11:21 She actually went for Trump’s claims of voter fraud in 2020.
    0:11:24 She even went to Philadelphia and gave a press conference
    0:11:26 about how messed up everything was going,
    0:11:29 the false claims of widespread voter fraud.
    0:11:37 The one kind of scandal, I guess, revolves around a 2013 political donation.
    0:11:41 So that’s when that huge lawsuit investigating Trump University was going on,
    0:11:44 and all the state AGs had to sign on.
    0:11:47 And there were a lot of victims from Trump University in Florida,
    0:11:51 and Pam Bondi ended up not signing on,
    0:11:56 and also got a $25,000 contribution from Trump’s charity.
    0:12:02 So that will, I think, be the kind of fireworks in terms of the scandals,
    0:12:04 I guess, in her hearings.
    0:12:07 And the more normy Republicans, I think, will want to hear,
    0:12:11 you’re not just going to come in and do everything that he wants,
    0:12:17 especially considering the Supreme Court ruling about immunity for kind of everything.
    0:12:20 But in general, this looks like it’s going to be absolutely fine.
    0:12:24 And just with going back to Gates, let’s be clear,
    0:12:28 Democrats have had their own struggles with scandal, and especially around,
    0:12:33 it used to be that Republicans stole and Democrats had affairs.
    0:12:35 Now just everybody’s doing everything it feels like.
    0:12:41 But infidelity, weirdness, scandal,
    0:12:43 that is not sequestered to the Republican Party.
    0:12:52 But I do think it’s important that we discern between scandal and real criminal activity,
    0:12:54 such as having sex with minors.
    0:12:56 And I got to believe that that report,
    0:12:59 I can’t believe it hasn’t been leaked, was pretty damning, but–
    0:13:01 It’ll get it.
    0:13:01 It’ll be out.
    0:13:02 You think so?
    0:13:02 I’m sure.
    0:13:06 Yeah, Susan Wilde, the Democrat, the ranking Democrat on the committee,
    0:13:07 has said as much.
    0:13:10 She was really upset that Republicans were leaking
    0:13:14 inside information from what was going on in the room.
    0:13:17 I think that they’re going to get it out.
    0:13:19 And I think that’s probably why Gates thought,
    0:13:23 I got to get out of here, because I’m not going to be insulated from this.
    0:13:27 One thing we haven’t talked about, which is so central to all of this,
    0:13:30 and then I do want to get to other nominees.
    0:13:34 But he’s picking everyone who’s good on TV.
    0:13:39 And Pam Bondi has spent a lot of time on our airwaves on Fox.
    0:13:44 But when you think about it, it’s actually really smart.
    0:13:48 If you can get qualified people who are all so good on TV,
    0:13:51 that they can defend themselves and that they can defend you
    0:13:54 and not look like a deer in headlights every time they give an interview.
    0:13:57 So a lot of people are dismissive of it,
    0:13:58 but I think it’s actually a very good strategy.
    0:14:02 Hmm, says one of the co-hosts of the five.
    0:14:03 Okay, yeah.
    0:14:06 Well, I’m not getting picked for anything, but I’m just saying.
    0:14:07 Are you kidding?
    0:14:11 You look like Hillary Clinton at this point.
    0:14:12 You would be the least,
    0:14:15 you would be the most qualified pick in the cabinet right now.
    0:14:21 I mean, yeah, I don’t, you would look like Lloyd Benson with better hair.
    0:14:26 Anyway, on that note, let’s take a quick break, stay with us.
    0:14:31 [MUSIC]
    0:14:34 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:14:38 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools to power your business forward
    0:14:42 with the security and speed of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:14:45 Why do we like sports?
    0:14:48 Is it for the jerseys the players wear,
    0:14:50 the food you grab at the ballpark?
    0:14:54 No, it’s that feeling you get in your gut, that drive to compete.
    0:14:57 But competition isn’t just on the sports field.
    0:14:59 It can breed innovation,
    0:15:03 and XPRIZE wants to use that competitive drive and motivation
    0:15:05 to tackle some of the world’s biggest problems.
    0:15:07 What sort of problems?
    0:15:12 Climate change, accessible clean water, and healthy aging.
    0:15:15 These existential challenges affect our planet,
    0:15:18 and we urgently need to find solutions for them.
    0:15:21 XPRIZE is a nonprofit organization that designs and hosts
    0:15:25 global incentivized competitions that drive scientific discovery,
    0:15:28 cutting edge innovation, and groundbreaking solutions
    0:15:30 for the benefit of humanity.
    0:15:34 XPRIZE has launched 30 prizes in 30 years.
    0:15:38 In doing so, they’ve driven the improvement of oil capture technology,
    0:15:42 catalyzed tools to detect Alzheimer’s, influenza, and RSV.
    0:15:47 Helped educate 10 million children in 74 countries,
    0:15:49 accelerated carbon removal technology,
    0:15:52 and kickstarted the commercial space industry.
    0:15:55 And XPRIZE is just getting started.
    0:15:57 The future is still ours to create.
    0:16:00 Head to XPRIZE.org to learn how you could help
    0:16:03 architect a brighter future for everyone.
    0:16:09 Thumbtack presents the ins and outs of caring for your home.
    0:16:15 Out, indecision, overthinking, second guessing every choice you make,
    0:16:21 in, plans and guides that make it easy to get home projects done.
    0:16:26 Out, beige, on beige, on beige.
    0:16:31 In, knowing what to do, when to do it, and who to hire.
    0:16:35 Start caring for your home with confidence.
    0:16:36 Download Thumbtack today.
    0:16:43 Okay, Jess, a few more cabinet announcements we’re discussing.
    0:16:46 Howard Letnick was tapped as Commerce Secretary,
    0:16:49 and Scott Passent was picked as Treasury Secretary,
    0:16:51 which the market’s like.
    0:16:53 Lynn McMahon, a long time ally and donor,
    0:16:54 was named to lead the Department of Education.
    0:16:57 McMahon’s background is light on education policy.
    0:16:59 Okay, as if that matters.
    0:17:04 And she also co-founded the World Wrestling Entertainment Federation
    0:17:05 with her husband.
    0:17:08 Is it world wrestling entertainment, I think?
    0:17:12 Anyways, and the most surprising pick, Dr. Oz,
    0:17:14 as the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
    0:17:17 What are your thoughts on these picks?
    0:17:19 Up and down, I guess.
    0:17:22 Linda McMahon, that’s a tough one.
    0:17:23 She was in the first administration.
    0:17:26 She was definitely going to be somewhere here.
    0:17:28 She lied about having an education degree,
    0:17:31 which I feel like is a big lie if you’re gonna go be
    0:17:35 the head of the Department of Education,
    0:17:36 essential education secretary.
    0:17:40 We should also note, there have been a number of lawsuits
    0:17:43 over the years, but there’s even an open civil suit
    0:17:47 against the WWE that these abuse scandals,
    0:17:49 involving boys as young as 12 years old,
    0:17:51 that the McMahon’s hired people,
    0:17:56 one guy in particular, who they knew allegedly was an abuser.
    0:17:59 And I didn’t do anything to stop it.
    0:18:01 They call it the “ring boy” scandal.
    0:18:05 But, you know, abolishing the Department of Education
    0:18:06 is their talking point.
    0:18:08 And one other thing I’ll be doing very early
    0:18:11 in the administration is closing up the Department of Education
    0:18:16 in Washington, D.C., and sending all education
    0:18:19 and education work and needs back to the states.
    0:18:23 We want them to run the education of our children
    0:18:25 because they’ll do a much better job of it.
    0:18:27 You can’t do worse.
    0:18:31 We spend more money per pupil by three times
    0:18:32 than any other nation.
    0:18:36 And yet, we’re absolutely at the bottom.
    0:18:37 We’re one of the worst.
    0:18:39 I’m not sure that that happens.
    0:18:42 You need 60-plus votes to be able to do it.
    0:18:46 But what I think that they are going to try to do,
    0:18:49 and it sends a really important signal across the country,
    0:18:51 and also to teachers’ unions,
    0:18:56 is to talk more about school choice and vouchers.
    0:18:59 And there are a lot of people, even on the Democratic side,
    0:19:02 who are so disappointed in the quality
    0:19:05 of our public education and for good reasons.
    0:19:07 We just keep falling further and further behind.
    0:19:10 Public schools really let American students,
    0:19:11 especially American students,
    0:19:14 who are poorer down during COVID,
    0:19:17 but not letting them back in the classroom,
    0:19:20 even though we knew that kids were not transferring,
    0:19:22 generally speaking, COVID to one another,
    0:19:23 and that it would have been safe
    0:19:25 because teachers didn’t want to come in.
    0:19:27 And you see Democrats like Josh Shapiro,
    0:19:31 the governor of Pennsylvania, has supported vouchers.
    0:19:34 I think that that is the way of the future,
    0:19:37 and that Democrats are going to really need to reckon with this.
    0:19:41 And Linda McMahon will be the face of pushing that forward.
    0:19:44 I don’t think there’s any getting around it.
    0:19:51 They need a reformer, but this whole doja over reductives
    0:19:54 thinking of let’s just get rid of the Department of Education,
    0:19:56 just burn it, burn the village to save it.
    0:20:00 There are a few investments, maybe outside of R&D
    0:20:01 or some science programs,
    0:20:04 that show that are technically investments.
    0:20:05 Social security is a cost.
    0:20:08 We’ve decided to tax young people,
    0:20:10 to transfer money to older people,
    0:20:14 to eliminate or attempt to eliminate senior poverty.
    0:20:15 And it has largely worked.
    0:20:17 I would argue it’s become too expensive,
    0:20:19 and now seniors are the wealthiest generation
    0:20:19 in the history of the planet.
    0:20:21 There should be means testing.
    0:20:22 It should be pushed back.
    0:20:25 It used to be when social security was first invented,
    0:20:26 80% of the people would never get it
    0:20:27 because they would die now.
    0:20:29 Now more than 80% get it.
    0:20:32 And it used to be 12 to one people of your age
    0:20:33 supporting people of my age.
    0:20:35 Now it’s three to one.
    0:20:38 Anyways, that is a cost.
    0:20:39 Department of Education is an investment.
    0:20:41 And you might argue that the investment
    0:20:43 is not getting the ROI it deserves
    0:20:45 because it is poorly allocated.
    0:20:47 And I agree with you around school choice,
    0:20:49 competition works.
    0:20:52 There are some teachers as someone who went through
    0:20:55 public schools all the way through graduate school.
    0:20:58 I remember certain components of my education,
    0:21:00 Emerson Junior High School.
    0:21:01 They were just warehousing us.
    0:21:04 There was 35 kids per class.
    0:21:08 I was there with the first year they integrated the school.
    0:21:11 So all of a sudden out of the school, 1,500 kids,
    0:21:13 600 black kids from Compton showed up
    0:21:15 after being on a bus for an hour.
    0:21:16 They were pissed off.
    0:21:19 And it wasn’t a Hallmark movie.
    0:21:20 We all hated each other.
    0:21:21 Get this, Jess.
    0:21:24 We used to have black against white softball games.
    0:21:25 And the faculty allowed that.
    0:21:26 Seriously?
    0:21:27 Oh yeah, we hated each other.
    0:21:28 Absolutely.
    0:21:30 It was everything integration was not supposed to be.
    0:21:31 That’s the bad news.
    0:21:34 The good news was that by high school,
    0:21:36 something wonderful happened and we were all getting along.
    0:21:39 My two best friends were one was a Mormon kid
    0:21:40 who ended up going to Stanford.
    0:21:44 And the other was a black kid who got a football scholarship
    0:21:48 to Linfield, I think a university in Oregon
    0:21:51 who lived in Baldwin Hills and his father was a minister.
    0:21:53 I mean, these two kids couldn’t have been more different
    0:21:55 except they were both really good kids.
    0:21:56 They were actually great role models for me.
    0:22:01 But anyways, my point is it was absolutely awful.
    0:22:03 And I remember the teachers were so overwhelmed
    0:22:04 just trying to keep a lid.
    0:22:10 35 kids, sometimes 38 kids per class and all my friends,
    0:22:13 my nice white friends, quote unquote, air quotes,
    0:22:15 their parents pulled them out of school immediately
    0:22:17 when integration started and stuck them
    0:22:20 in this hippie-dippy private school called Windward.
    0:22:23 And I remember it was one of the first moments where I thought,
    0:22:25 “Oh, things are different for me and my mom.”
    0:22:27 Because I went home and said, “Oh, I need to go to Windward.”
    0:22:29 And she was like, “Sit down, we don’t go to private schools.”
    0:22:30 We need to talk.
    0:22:30 Yeah.
    0:22:35 And but the Department of Education, in addition to Title I,
    0:22:37 I think it’s Title I, where they ensure that schools
    0:22:39 in rural, poor areas get the funding they need
    0:22:40 to deliver an adequate education,
    0:22:42 they also are responsible for a head start.
    0:22:46 And they also, I’m here with you now
    0:22:48 because the Department of Education
    0:22:49 is specifically Pell Grants.
    0:22:52 And that is Pell Grants, basically,
    0:22:54 if you’re in the lower third of income earning homes,
    0:22:57 you get free, you know, you get money, not even loans,
    0:22:58 which also the student loans,
    0:23:00 the Department of Education overseas,
    0:23:02 which I believe you need drastically reforming,
    0:23:03 and I’ll come back to that.
    0:23:07 But I could not have gone to UCLA without Pell Grants.
    0:23:08 And this makes my point,
    0:23:10 while also giving me the chance to do my favorite thing,
    0:23:13 and that is boast, I pay a lot of taxes.
    0:23:18 So these Pell Grants are an investment that pay off.
    0:23:21 I think if you, I think there are a few things
    0:23:23 that you could look at and think,
    0:23:25 a dollar invested in education well delivered,
    0:23:27 I’m not saying there isn’t reform that’s required.
    0:23:30 Not only gets you additional incremental income
    0:23:33 because you can occasionally produce people
    0:23:35 who do really interesting things,
    0:23:36 go into teaching themselves,
    0:23:38 start businesses, create tax revenue,
    0:23:41 but you avoid a lot of costs
    0:23:43 because without an educational system,
    0:23:47 you’re gonna end up paying for these folks one way or another,
    0:23:49 whether it’s your incarceration, mental health, homelessness,
    0:23:53 welfare, food stamps, unemployment.
    0:23:55 So the Department of Education is arguably
    0:23:59 the place where you’re gonna get the greatest return
    0:24:01 on your investment if it’s handled well.
    0:24:06 And it’s just, it’s sort of, it sort of is depressing.
    0:24:09 Although, I guess you could argue her background.
    0:24:11 She was, I believe, head of the Small Business Administration.
    0:24:15 So maybe, I mean, she strikes me as a competent woman.
    0:24:17 She’s the least or one of the least bad picks,
    0:24:20 but I wish they would stop this bullshit notion
    0:24:22 that we’re just gonna get rid of the Department of Education.
    0:24:24 And what’s interesting, or I find interesting,
    0:24:27 I interviewed a guy named Roy Stewart,
    0:24:29 who’s the co-host of The Rest’s Politics,
    0:24:31 which is, he was a former member of parliament,
    0:24:35 really bright guy, was actually the tutor,
    0:24:37 the private tutor for Princess Harry and William.
    0:24:41 And he said, when they look at America,
    0:24:42 when Brits look at America,
    0:24:44 they can’t quite figure out the following.
    0:24:47 And that is, we absolutely under-prioritize
    0:24:49 and don’t talk about K-12 education.
    0:24:52 And we have some of the worst K-12 education
    0:24:55 in the world of the G7.
    0:24:57 But at the same time, we have amazing graduate schools.
    0:24:57 And at the same time,
    0:25:00 we keep figuring out a way to grow the economy.
    0:25:03 And he acknowledged that maybe that’s the way the economy,
    0:25:05 the natural order of an economy is.
    0:25:08 You have shitty schools, and it’s like a hunger games,
    0:25:09 and then they get to go to the best universities.
    0:25:14 And that struck me as a very upsetting rubric,
    0:25:16 or lens through which to look at education.
    0:25:18 But maybe that’s, because we just,
    0:25:18 there’s no doubt about it.
    0:25:20 K-12, we’re awful,
    0:25:22 and yet our economy continues to grow like crazy.
    0:25:25 But anyways, your thoughts on the Department of Education?
    0:25:27 I think it’s important.
    0:25:32 And I hate, you know, whether doge is effective or not.
    0:25:36 The sweeping talking points about doing away with things
    0:25:39 that need help or need tender loving care
    0:25:43 is silly and reflects poorly upon you.
    0:25:45 And it’s not how people run their businesses either.
    0:25:47 You know, I understand Elon came in
    0:25:49 and ran Twitter a bit like that,
    0:25:50 but they’ve been losing a lot of money,
    0:25:53 even though now it’s a bastion for free speech slash
    0:25:55 the worst place I’ve ever hung out in my life.
    0:26:01 And it reflects a lack of seriousness about this
    0:26:05 and a lack of care and concern for your core constituency.
    0:26:06 Because guess what?
    0:26:08 A lot of people who don’t make a ton of money
    0:26:09 voted for Donald Trump.
    0:26:10 And guess what?
    0:26:12 They use the public school system.
    0:26:16 They don’t have other options to go to a private school.
    0:26:19 The lottery system for getting into charters,
    0:26:22 you know, might not get lucky and get to do that.
    0:26:26 And so I think that they would be a lot more convincing
    0:26:31 as serious folks if they took a different line of argumentation
    0:26:34 about what they’re going to do with the Department of Education,
    0:26:38 including making sure that people do have access to vouchers
    0:26:40 in more circumstances.
    0:26:41 I think that that is important
    0:26:43 and you should be able to give people those options,
    0:26:45 certainly with religious schools.
    0:26:46 Because, you know, Catholic school
    0:26:47 stayed open through the entire pandemic.
    0:26:49 That was something that they had going for them.
    0:26:51 And I understand why people want that.
    0:26:56 There’s an aspect also to what McMahon will be overseeing.
    0:26:57 And Trump’s been–
    0:26:58 he talked about this throughout the campaign.
    0:27:01 And I do think it is important.
    0:27:05 So, you know, they could essentially transfer responsibility
    0:27:08 for accrediting universities to college–
    0:27:10 for colleges to the states.
    0:27:12 And Trump has been talking about things like,
    0:27:18 if your university isn’t letting Jewish kids go to class
    0:27:21 or get into the dining hall or get to the Halal
    0:27:24 or the Habad on campus, we’re coming after you.
    0:27:28 And I don’t think that that’s necessarily a bad thing
    0:27:30 to be tinkering around with that
    0:27:32 or to at least be using it as a threat.
    0:27:34 They, you know, they’ve also said as a cudgel,
    0:27:36 you know, if you have DEI policies
    0:27:37 or if you’re using affirmative action.
    0:27:39 And the universities are smart enough
    0:27:42 that they can get to whatever form of affirmative action
    0:27:46 they think they need to without it sending up flags in that way.
    0:27:48 But what do you think about the approach
    0:27:50 of threatening these universities more
    0:27:53 if they are not treating each student as equal?
    0:27:56 Like, if they’re not treating kids from one group
    0:27:58 like they would if they were black, for instance,
    0:28:00 or if they were LGBTQ+?
    0:28:02 Well, look, I said this early on.
    0:28:08 If I went to Royce Hall or the Quad near Royce Hall, UCLA,
    0:28:13 or I went down to my universities in front of my building at NYU,
    0:28:18 and I started, I held up a Confederate flag
    0:28:20 and I passed out bans to white kids
    0:28:24 and the kids without bans couldn’t enter the university.
    0:28:27 They would have called in the fucking National Guard.
    0:28:32 But I mean, what was clear coming out of this zombie apocalypse
    0:28:35 of useful idiots on campus, free speech is never freer
    0:28:37 when it’s hate speech against Jews.
    0:28:41 And this was a really low moment for universities.
    0:28:45 And I advise the regents of the University of California
    0:28:47 and we did a couple calls over the summer and said,
    0:28:49 “Okay, they were very worried about fall.
    0:28:51 What happens if this flares up again?”
    0:28:53 And I thought the solution was pretty easy.
    0:28:57 If there are students who are protesting
    0:28:59 or putting up anything resembling an encampment
    0:29:03 and it turns to hate speech or they try and build…
    0:29:04 I mean, basically they tried to build a mini,
    0:29:08 you know, a mini city, if you will.
    0:29:09 They were trespassing.
    0:29:12 You ask them to clear the area, you get them 15 minutes,
    0:29:14 you warn them they will be punished.
    0:29:18 I mean, you expel the first six or 12 students to violate this
    0:29:21 and when word gets out that shit just got real
    0:29:22 and you may have to call your folks and say,
    0:29:25 “Hey, mom, dad, you’re spending $50,000 a year for me
    0:29:27 to get expelled for hate speech.
    0:29:29 This will stop right away.”
    0:29:32 And then the thing that didn’t get much press
    0:29:33 that I have no tolerance for
    0:29:37 is I think you cut a 19-year-old a pretty wide berth.
    0:29:39 You’re supposed to be stupid when you’re 19
    0:29:42 and sometimes that stupidity moves society forward.
    0:29:46 Whether it was the protests on campus against Vietnam or Iraq,
    0:29:48 you know, sometimes kids are meant to push the boundaries
    0:29:51 and sometimes they’re thinking more forward
    0:29:54 and more correctly than, you know, their parents.
    0:29:55 You cut them a wide berth,
    0:29:58 who I think should have absolutely been summarily fired
    0:30:01 with a faculty that showed any empathy
    0:30:03 for this genocidal death cult.
    0:30:06 And there are still faculty at the University of California
    0:30:10 who put out exceptionally vile tweets,
    0:30:14 said they were inspired by the activities of October 7th.
    0:30:17 You are still shown up at the Faculty Cafeteria
    0:30:20 and most of them, it ends up, can’t teach the way
    0:30:22 out of a paper bag and do a relevant research,
    0:30:23 but are in this ridiculous guild
    0:30:25 that is nothing but student debt called tenure.
    0:30:29 So there not only needs to be reform up and down,
    0:30:31 you know, in K-12.
    0:30:34 There needs to be reform in schools.
    0:30:36 And specifically the first place I would start
    0:30:38 is that all universities should be on the hook
    0:30:41 for a quarter or a third of student, bad student loan debt.
    0:30:44 Because what’s really mendacious about my industry
    0:30:46 is a really good kid shows up
    0:30:48 and he meets with a woman who’s in a nice pants suit
    0:30:49 who has a big college logo behind her
    0:30:51 and she says some bullshit like this.
    0:30:54 Education is an investment in yourself.
    0:30:59 Here sign this paperwork for $50, $100, $200,000 in student loans.
    0:31:01 And then the kid, like many kids, finds out
    0:31:03 that he or she is not cut out for college,
    0:31:07 leaves without a certification of college
    0:31:09 that gets to keep that debt.
    0:31:11 And it haunts this person the rest of their life.
    0:31:14 The most dischargeable form of debt in history
    0:31:16 should be student loans.
    0:31:20 And instead, because my colleagues wake up
    0:31:21 every morning and ask themselves,
    0:31:23 how do I reduce my accountability
    0:31:24 or increase my compensation?
    0:31:26 I’ll access cheap credit.
    0:31:30 And if I don’t deliver on my promise
    0:31:32 and the kid gets nothing for the money
    0:31:33 that’s been lent to them,
    0:31:34 I’m not on the hook for it.
    0:31:37 So if you put colleges on the hook
    0:31:40 for 10, 20, 30% of bad student debt,
    0:31:42 they’d stop loaning someone,
    0:31:44 getting a fucking philosophy degree
    0:31:46 from Joey Baggedon at its university
    0:31:47 to go be a barista.
    0:31:50 So my industry needs radical reform,
    0:31:51 but the notion that you’re going to get rid
    0:31:53 of the department of education
    0:31:56 is again another key theme in what appears to be
    0:31:58 both parties are guilty of it.
    0:32:00 Let’s optimize America for the top 10%
    0:32:02 at the cost of the bottom 90.
    0:32:04 The top 10%, they’re right,
    0:32:05 doesn’t need the department of education.
    0:32:07 My kids don’t need the department of education.
    0:32:08 They won’t benefit from it.
    0:32:10 It’s the other 90.
    0:32:13 And just looking at it purely economically,
    0:32:14 it’s an investment that saves money.
    0:32:17 I just wanted to really quickly,
    0:32:19 can we just talk about Dr. Oz
    0:32:22 and Dr. Jeanette Neshwat for one second?
    0:32:23 Yeah, go ahead.
    0:32:25 So Dr. Oz,
    0:32:27 as the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid,
    0:32:31 it’s laughable in the TV doctor sense
    0:32:33 and all the fad diets and all the quackery.
    0:32:34 I thought it was hilarious.
    0:32:35 There was a peer reviewed piece
    0:32:37 in a British medical journal
    0:32:39 that picked 40 random episodes of his show
    0:32:41 and found that his health recommendations
    0:32:43 were based on evidence just 46% of the time,
    0:32:45 which is pretty shitty for a doctor.
    0:32:49 But what he does plan to do that is really dangerous
    0:32:52 is to work towards privatizing Medicare,
    0:32:54 to move us towards Medicare advantage,
    0:32:57 which is what mostly people who are 80 plus are on,
    0:33:01 and the costs are enormous when you use Medicare advantage.
    0:33:05 And he has talked about bringing that to younger Medicare users,
    0:33:08 66 million people on Medicare,
    0:33:09 including my mother and my dad.
    0:33:12 It saw him through cancer, most unbelievable coverage.
    0:33:15 Do you have any Dr. Oz feelings?
    0:33:16 Yeah, so I have a bias.
    0:33:23 I’ve been friends with Mehmet and Lisa Oz for 25 years.
    0:33:25 And I find Mehmet to be-
    0:33:25 We got some bias.
    0:33:26 Yeah, it’s a huge bias.
    0:33:27 I’m gonna disclose it.
    0:33:29 In that time though, and I know him well,
    0:33:32 and I knew him before, I mean, I know him in just a variety.
    0:33:36 He was literally taking hearts out of cadavers
    0:33:37 and putting them into other people.
    0:33:39 He’s a cardiothoracic transplant surgeon.
    0:33:42 And he’s a real dude.
    0:33:45 And what I would say about Mehmet,
    0:33:47 we don’t share political views,
    0:33:49 but I’ve decided to separate the person from the politics.
    0:33:51 And this person is a really good man.
    0:33:56 And when he was contemplating positions like this,
    0:34:00 when he was running for Senate, he’s really thoughtful.
    0:34:01 And he knows we have different politics.
    0:34:03 And so he would call me and ask me for my view on things.
    0:34:06 And I say that because it makes me feel important.
    0:34:09 But also it reflects well on him.
    0:34:11 Mehmet is a high character person.
    0:34:17 And I know he got a lot of grief for not respecting the science
    0:34:19 around some of these supplements
    0:34:20 and how blueberries can save your life.
    0:34:22 He got blowback that he deserved for that.
    0:34:24 But this is a good man.
    0:34:26 And you want to talk about some of the bullshit around gets
    0:34:30 and infidelity, he’s been married for I think close to 40 years.
    0:34:31 Wonderful father.
    0:34:33 And the first thing he did when he got this,
    0:34:33 I congratulated him.
    0:34:36 And he called me and said, “Give me your views on social security.”
    0:34:40 He really wants to get to go deep here
    0:34:43 and really try and be thoughtful and helpful.
    0:34:47 So I’m a huge fan of Dr. Oz as a man.
    0:34:48 He’s a good man.
    0:34:51 Okay. I’m good with that.
    0:34:52 And then someone who you may not know,
    0:34:56 but I know personally because we have nine Fox personalities
    0:34:59 that are going to go into the administration thus far
    0:35:01 is Dr. Jeanette Neshwat.
    0:35:03 And I wanted to mention this.
    0:35:04 She’s a surgeon general.
    0:35:06 She’s a real deal doctor.
    0:35:11 And you can see that she’s being taken apart online
    0:35:15 for believing in vaccines, for participating in…
    0:35:17 You remember those like hand washing trends
    0:35:19 where doctors were like doing TikToks and stuff
    0:35:22 of how to make sure that you keep your hands clean.
    0:35:25 She has called vaccine safe and effective.
    0:35:26 It will keep you off the ventilator,
    0:35:28 keep you from passing away.
    0:35:31 And not only do I just like her personally,
    0:35:33 but I hope that this is a signal.
    0:35:36 And Dr. Marty McCary as well, who’s at Johns Hopkins,
    0:35:37 who’s coming in for the FDA,
    0:35:40 that there will be some hard science people in there.
    0:35:43 They’re calling her Dr. Fauci and heels.
    0:35:45 I am thrilled with that.
    0:35:47 It’s great that you brought that up.
    0:35:49 And also just want to use that as an excuse
    0:35:51 to recognize who I think has been
    0:35:54 the most consequential surgeon general in history.
    0:35:56 And that is surgeon general Vivek Murthy,
    0:36:00 who brought up loneliness, who brought up young men.
    0:36:02 This is someone who put out thoughtful research,
    0:36:06 elevating the awareness around some really key issues,
    0:36:08 brought up how the mental health struggles
    0:36:09 of people with parents right now,
    0:36:11 which directly relates to the fact
    0:36:14 that we keep figuring out a way to vote in more seniors
    0:36:17 who vote themselves more money such that I stay rich
    0:36:18 at the expense of people your age
    0:36:19 who are trying to get by with kids.
    0:36:23 All right, Jess, we have one more quick break.
    0:36:24 Stay with us.
    0:36:32 Autograph collection hotels
    0:36:36 offer over 300 independent hotels around the world,
    0:36:39 each exactly like nothing else.
    0:36:41 Hands selected for their inherent craft,
    0:36:43 each hotel tells its own unique story
    0:36:46 through distinctive design and immersive experiences
    0:36:50 from medieval falconry to volcanic wine tasting.
    0:36:53 Autograph collection is part of the Marriott Bonvoy
    0:36:56 portfolio of over 30 hotel brands around the world.
    0:37:00 Find the unforgettable at AutographCollection.com.
    0:37:03 The world has already convinced itself that you are evil,
    0:37:04 and I am evil for providing them
    0:37:07 the one thing they interact with every day.
    0:37:08 You’re all right, here we go.
    0:37:11 From Taylor Sheridan, executive producer of Yellowstone.
    0:37:12 Get everybody back.
    0:37:13 Go, go.
    0:37:16 You just put a giant bull’s eye on this place.
    0:37:18 We rolled the dice one last time.
    0:37:20 Landman, new series now streaming,
    0:37:22 exclusively on Fox News.
    0:37:23 We have a new series coming up.
    0:37:25 We have a new series coming out for you.
    0:37:26 We have a new series coming up.
    0:37:27 We have a new series coming up.
    0:37:28 We have a new series coming up.
    0:37:31 Now streaming, exclusively on Paramount Plus.
    0:37:34 This episode is brought to you by Canon Canada.
    0:37:37 From street interviews to vlogging or filmmaking,
    0:37:39 great content gets even better
    0:37:40 when you’re shooting with great gear.
    0:37:43 That’s what Canon’s Level Up Sales Event is all about.
    0:37:46 With awesome deals on the range of cameras and lenses,
    0:37:47 you can grab everything you need
    0:37:50 for that shot or scene you’ve been dreaming of for less.
    0:37:52 Whether you’re helping that special person
    0:37:53 take their content up a notch
    0:37:56 or adding that extra quality to your own shoots,
    0:37:57 Canon’s got you covered.
    0:38:00 Shop the Level Up Sales Event today at Canon.se.
    0:38:03 Welcome back.
    0:38:06 Over in the house, Congresswoman Nancy Mace
    0:38:08 introduced a resolution to ban trans women
    0:38:09 from using women’s restrooms
    0:38:10 and locker rooms on Capitol grounds.
    0:38:12 Thank God for Representative Mace.
    0:38:15 Thank God, specifically targeting incoming
    0:38:17 Congresswoman Sarah McBride.
    0:38:21 This is a shiffer Mace who once supported LGBTQ rights.
    0:38:23 Speaker Mike Johnson supported Mace
    0:38:25 emphasizing single sex facilities.
    0:38:28 McBride responded saying she’s focused on lowering costs
    0:38:30 for Delaware families, not bathroom debates.
    0:38:34 And she hopes colleagues will see value in her work.
    0:38:38 I didn’t run for the United States House of Representatives
    0:38:41 to talk about what bathroom I use.
    0:38:44 I didn’t run to talk about myself.
    0:38:47 I ran to deliver for Delawareans.
    0:38:53 And while Republicans in Congress seem focused on bathrooms
    0:38:55 and trans people and specifically me,
    0:38:58 I’m focused on rolling up my sleeves,
    0:39:01 diving into the details, setting up my office,
    0:39:04 and beginning the hard work of delivering for Delawareans
    0:39:07 on the issues that I know keep them up at night.
    0:39:10 So what do we think of Representative Mace?
    0:39:12 Nancy Mace sucks.
    0:39:13 She’s awful.
    0:39:19 And she had so much promise when she came into Congress.
    0:39:25 She seemed like she was part of the normie caucus.
    0:39:29 She said, I’ll stand up to Trump when that’s the right thing to do.
    0:39:32 I’ll always be on the side of South Carolinians.
    0:39:37 And now she’s just high off of getting as many likes
    0:39:39 and retweets as possible.
    0:39:43 These videos that she’s posting are embarrassing for her.
    0:39:46 And I don’t know who started saying it
    0:39:48 during the first Trump administration,
    0:39:50 but the cruelty is the point.
    0:39:52 The cruelty is the point here.
    0:39:54 You have been in Congress for a while.
    0:39:58 If you were concerned about someone being in your bathroom,
    0:39:59 you could have brought this up,
    0:40:01 because there are people who come in and out of Congress.
    0:40:02 This isn’t about there.
    0:40:05 So the members have their own private bathrooms.
    0:40:07 And I’m sure that Sarah McBride will be using that,
    0:40:09 or there are gender-neutral restrooms.
    0:40:12 But Nancy Mace showed no evidence that anyone was a threat.
    0:40:16 No one’s been attacked, God forbid.
    0:40:18 She hasn’t been made to be uncomfortable.
    0:40:20 And she is herself a rape survivor.
    0:40:22 And she talks about that regularly
    0:40:24 and the implications of being sexually assaulted.
    0:40:27 But I see no correlation to this,
    0:40:29 except that you want to rile people up
    0:40:30 and take advantage of, frankly,
    0:40:34 the level of misinformation that’s out there about trans people.
    0:40:37 And I wanted to mention this to you.
    0:40:40 So you have had new survey work out
    0:40:43 about how Americans overestimate the size of minority groups
    0:40:45 and underestimate the size of majority groups.
    0:40:49 They think there are 21 times more trans people in America
    0:40:51 than there are, 27 times more Muslims,
    0:40:56 15 times more Jews, and two more times immigrants.
    0:40:58 So there’s this fallacy out there
    0:41:00 that, you know, kids are going to school
    0:41:02 and coming home with different junk,
    0:41:04 that everyone that you pass on the street is a trans person.
    0:41:06 And that’s someone like Sarah McBride,
    0:41:09 who I think has been so magnanimous
    0:41:13 and taken the high road to a level that I never could.
    0:41:16 Is the threat in all of this?
    0:41:18 It’s the same thing, though.
    0:41:20 And it’s the same thing I would argue around gits.
    0:41:24 And that is it feels as if I’d like to see two classes
    0:41:26 that are mandatory or three.
    0:41:28 I’d like to be secretary.
    0:41:30 I’d be the most qualified secretary of education
    0:41:32 and let me think, 18 months.
    0:41:36 So effectively, there needs to be a class on adulting.
    0:41:37 My kid can do integers,
    0:41:40 but he doesn’t understand the interest rate on his credit card.
    0:41:43 I think there needs to be part of an adulting class
    0:41:45 to teach young people, especially young men,
    0:41:47 how to express romantic interest
    0:41:48 while making the other person feel safe.
    0:41:51 In basic kind of life skills,
    0:41:53 I’d like to see a class on communications
    0:41:55 where it says, all right, storytelling,
    0:41:56 you have to understand mediums
    0:41:57 and how to communicate your ideas.
    0:42:00 I’d also like a course in critical thinking
    0:42:03 because there are different levels of mendacious fuckery.
    0:42:07 Infidelity is one thing, all right?
    0:42:10 Scandal or abusing, if you will,
    0:42:13 or taking advantage of a White House intern.
    0:42:13 That’s worse.
    0:42:16 That’s worse, in my opinion,
    0:42:22 than having sex or relationships outside of your marriage.
    0:42:24 And then in an entirely different fucking universe
    0:42:26 is having sex with minors.
    0:42:28 These are not the same thing.
    0:42:30 And the problem is the populace goes,
    0:42:31 oh, it’s just scandal, it’s just scandal.
    0:42:32 No, it’s not.
    0:42:34 There is a difference.
    0:42:37 And when people correctly say, in my view,
    0:42:39 or I think it’s a point worth arguing,
    0:42:42 that people born, I was born,
    0:42:45 I didn’t have the height nor the body mass
    0:42:48 to play collegiate-level basketball or football.
    0:42:51 I was born with or without certain attributes
    0:42:54 that disqualified me from playing certain sports.
    0:42:56 I think there is a solid argument
    0:42:57 that if you are born with a penis,
    0:43:00 it disqualifies you from playing women’s sports
    0:43:01 or girls’ sports.
    0:43:05 I think that is a honest, thoughtful discussion
    0:43:06 we should have.
    0:43:10 Passing legislation that is meant to do nothing
    0:43:12 but attempt to weirdly shame
    0:43:14 or show how anti-trans you are
    0:43:18 by saying to an elected member of Congress,
    0:43:21 “You cannot use the same bathroom as me.”
    0:43:25 It’s just that’s a different level of mendacious fuckery.
    0:43:29 And my fear is there’s so many points of weirdness
    0:43:30 coming out of DC
    0:43:34 that they all get grouped into the same level of mendacious.
    0:43:34 They’re not.
    0:43:38 And kids need, and young adults and adults,
    0:43:41 need to understand that your whole point
    0:43:43 or our advantage of a species
    0:43:46 is that we see different shades of gray.
    0:43:48 And when they go, they turn very dark
    0:43:49 or when they’re worth a discussion
    0:43:53 or we should just have a gag reflex.
    0:43:54 But this is my fear.
    0:43:57 And that is we now live in an attention economy
    0:44:00 and it doesn’t matter how stupid or how mean
    0:44:03 the content is that created attention for you,
    0:44:04 it pays off.
    0:44:06 And that she is now a Republican,
    0:44:09 a rising Republican star because she’s a leader.
    0:44:13 You know, there’s parents out there
    0:44:15 worried about their daughter being run over
    0:44:18 on the field hockey field by someone born with a penis.
    0:44:22 I think that is a tangible, legitimate concern.
    0:44:25 But they’re saying, “Oh, Representative Mace,
    0:44:27 she’s our woman.”
    0:44:28 No, she’s not.
    0:44:31 She’s a mendacious, weird woman
    0:44:33 who is taking her precious capital
    0:44:36 and resources to actually do good things for her district,
    0:44:40 to just be blatantly hostile and mean towards an individual.
    0:44:41 Your thoughts?
    0:44:44 I agree with all of that.
    0:44:47 And I think that it’s the beginning of potentially
    0:44:51 having electoral consequences.
    0:44:53 And this is what Democrats want, right?
    0:44:57 They want Republicans to take the mask off essentially
    0:45:00 and to expose themselves for being people
    0:45:03 who live by the cruelty is the point.
    0:45:05 And if you remember the North Carolina
    0:45:07 bathroom bill controversy,
    0:45:09 this did not go well for Republicans.
    0:45:11 This is not their concerns.
    0:45:15 Biological men in women’s sports is their concern.
    0:45:18 That’s 70% of Americans think that Leah Thomas
    0:45:22 had no business being in that pool with those girls
    0:45:25 as a competitive swimmer.
    0:45:30 But they don’t care about using the bathroom.
    0:45:34 Now, there are some people who do.
    0:45:34 I get that.
    0:45:36 I see them in my Twitter feed.
    0:45:37 Hello, I see you.
    0:45:41 But in general, no one is concerned about Sarah McBride.
    0:45:43 And you notice it’s only Marjorie Taylor-Green
    0:45:45 that’s been running around screaming about this
    0:45:47 alongside Nancy Mace.
    0:45:50 And if that’s your wingwoman for something like this,
    0:45:53 you know that you’re probably doing something wrong.
    0:45:56 And people who worked in Nancy Mace’s office
    0:45:59 are destroying her online over this
    0:46:04 and saying there’s more to come about how terrible this woman is.
    0:46:08 But I think it’s just so ugly and good on Sarah McBride
    0:46:11 for being such a big person to be able to rise above.
    0:46:16 I do think the Democrats invited some of this bullshit
    0:46:21 by being so insane on some of these issues.
    0:46:24 I go back to the the cycling race,
    0:46:27 the women’s cycling race in North Carolina,
    0:46:31 where a transgender woman, Austin Killips, who was 27,
    0:46:36 basically finished five minutes before anyone else
    0:46:39 on a 137-mile-long race.
    0:46:41 And the woman who had been who had been born a woman
    0:46:43 who had been training her whole life came in second.
    0:46:44 She should have won it.
    0:46:47 And then immediately the far left started talking about,
    0:46:49 you know, all these very,
    0:46:53 basically was scared to come out and say,
    0:46:54 this is ridiculous.
    0:46:56 This is insane.
    0:46:59 What I didn’t get is where feminists were.
    0:46:59 Let me get this.
    0:47:01 Where does this all go?
    0:47:05 If we allow this, it means that every dollar,
    0:47:09 metal, and scholarship ends up only going to people
    0:47:10 born with penises?
    0:47:13 So where were the feminists?
    0:47:14 I just didn’t get this.
    0:47:16 Well, that was Martina Navratilova
    0:47:19 has been screaming about this for a long time.
    0:47:21 Like, and I mean, this is, there have been,
    0:47:24 and I know Cara has spoken about this before as well.
    0:47:28 I mean, there have been evolutions within the LGBTQ+
    0:47:32 movement that have shoehorned out certain groups,
    0:47:36 like OG groups, like gay men and lesbians,
    0:47:39 and, you know, moved to a different place
    0:47:41 than perhaps they didn’t think they were going.
    0:47:45 And I think that not saying things that are common sense,
    0:47:48 not reverting to the mean of,
    0:47:50 does this make sense as part of the problem?
    0:47:52 And maybe there is some truth to, you know,
    0:47:53 I have colleagues who will say,
    0:47:57 well, this is because you don’t think about competition
    0:47:58 the same way that we do,
    0:48:00 because you get participation trophies for everything
    0:48:04 at your, you know, your little liberal schools or whatever.
    0:48:07 And I think that if Kamala had come out,
    0:48:09 and again, I think it was a fundamentals election,
    0:48:11 couldn’t win against the inflation
    0:48:13 and people’s feelings about the economy.
    0:48:15 But if she had come out after that,
    0:48:17 the Charlemagne ad was cut,
    0:48:19 which was a trans ad, but also an economic ad, right?
    0:48:22 Like our money, your tax dollars are going to something
    0:48:25 that is niche and that you don’t approve of.
    0:48:26 So just come out and say,
    0:48:28 that is not the position of the Democratic party.
    0:48:30 Maybe some of those late deciders
    0:48:31 would have felt differently about us,
    0:48:33 that we weren’t out of our minds,
    0:48:34 whether that’s, you know,
    0:48:36 because some of our loudest voices,
    0:48:39 like John Oliver did a whole monologue about it
    0:48:40 last weekend or two weeks ago,
    0:48:42 and he’s gotten a lot of blowback.
    0:48:44 Jen Psaki has spoken about it and said,
    0:48:45 oh, well, what’s the big deal?
    0:48:48 The big deal is it ruins competition.
    0:48:50 And it’s not fair.
    0:48:52 Like it can’t be both things,
    0:48:55 that a man can’t be inherently scary
    0:48:57 if you run into him in a dark alley
    0:49:00 and also that it’s fine in competition
    0:49:02 against biological women.
    0:49:04 Like those two things contradict each other.
    0:49:06 It’s almost as outrageous as the last thing
    0:49:08 we’re going to start or finish with.
    0:49:09 And that is, I got to be honest,
    0:49:11 I find this really fun.
    0:49:13 What do you think of this idea?
    0:49:15 Elon Musk buying MSNBC.
    0:49:18 Oh, why does that make me happy, Jess?
    0:49:19 That makes me happy.
    0:49:20 What do you think?
    0:49:20 Really?
    0:49:21 Yeah, I think it’d be fucking hilarious
    0:49:24 to have Stephanie Ruhl and Rachel Maddow,
    0:49:26 like every night, meet each other,
    0:49:27 to smoke cigarettes and eat ice cream
    0:49:29 and talk about Elon Musk being their new boss.
    0:49:30 I find it funny.
    0:49:32 But would they still be there?
    0:49:34 Like, what are the implications of something like that?
    0:49:35 The 70-year-old white women
    0:49:37 got to find another show to listen to.
    0:49:39 I think MSNBC is quickly becoming a role model.
    0:49:39 Well, I think they’re doing that already,
    0:49:41 which is the problem.
    0:49:42 I mean, what is this spin-off,
    0:49:44 and I realize you’ve been discussing it
    0:49:47 in your other shows,
    0:49:49 but what is the spin-off of this?
    0:49:50 I mean, they’re calling it now
    0:49:52 a well-funded startup.
    0:49:55 What is the future of MSNBC?
    0:49:56 All of these things are going to be rolled up
    0:49:57 into a bad bank structure.
    0:49:59 Comcast has started it.
    0:50:00 These can be really good businesses.
    0:50:01 They’re shrinking businesses,
    0:50:03 but they spin off a ton of cash flow.
    0:50:05 What you need is a different approach
    0:50:07 where you cut costs faster than revenue growth.
    0:50:08 They can still be really good businesses,
    0:50:12 but this is the pivotal moment, in my opinion,
    0:50:14 or as it relates to the intersection
    0:50:15 between politics and media,
    0:50:18 is that you’re going to see, I mean,
    0:50:20 a really good show gets a million viewers
    0:50:23 on MSNBC average age 70, mostly white women.
    0:50:26 Those folks know what they buy,
    0:50:27 know what they don’t buy,
    0:50:28 and they know who they’re voting for
    0:50:29 and who they’re not voting for.
    0:50:31 So, advertisers and political campaigns
    0:50:33 are going to take all of that money
    0:50:35 and put it into yours truly,
    0:50:37 into podcasts where the average age is 34.
    0:50:38 It’s mostly male.
    0:50:41 Those people are up for grads
    0:50:43 because they’re more about the economy
    0:50:46 and economics are a much more dynamic situation.
    0:50:49 It kind of pings back Democrat-Republican
    0:50:52 on who they think will be better for them economically,
    0:50:55 but these companies are now distressed assets.
    0:50:56 They are melting ice cubes.
    0:50:58 I know a lot of people at MSNBC,
    0:51:01 the anchors are like pilots in the 70s.
    0:51:02 They’re hugely prestigious.
    0:51:06 People like them, they’re banging stewardesses,
    0:51:08 but they’re pilots for Pan Am.
    0:51:09 They know their numbers are limited.
    0:51:11 They know that in about 10 years,
    0:51:13 they’re going to be flying Amarillo to Dallas
    0:51:15 for Spirit Airlines at 68k a year.
    0:51:18 These are really declining assets.
    0:51:19 They can still make a lot of money.
    0:51:22 They still get incredibly talented people.
    0:51:24 But anyways, back to this.
    0:51:26 I just think it’s fucking hilarious.
    0:51:29 The IGF at Elon Musk would buy MSNBC.
    0:51:32 Everyone would leave or everyone of any talent would leave
    0:51:34 and he would try to make it into something else.
    0:51:35 I don’t know.
    0:51:36 I got to be honest.
    0:51:37 I think it would be fucking hilarious.
    0:51:38 Your thoughts?
    0:51:41 I mean, I don’t know.
    0:51:43 I feel bad because I like a lot of the people at MSNBC.
    0:51:48 I feel like having Elon Musk as your boss is the worst.
    0:51:50 And I think it’s important.
    0:51:53 I mean, listen, Fox is up.
    0:51:57 Like our viewership is through the roof since the election
    0:51:58 and they’ll lead up to the election.
    0:52:00 And I hope that that continues
    0:52:02 because I want to be able to pay for my kids
    0:52:05 to go to the Big Apple Circus as many times as possible.
    0:52:05 But–
    0:52:08 That’s called raging moderates.
    0:52:09 It’s called podcasting.
    0:52:10 Is that what it is?
    0:52:10 Yeah.
    0:52:11 Great.
    0:52:11 I’m going to call me out.
    0:52:12 You literally–
    0:52:13 Subscribe.
    0:52:16 You are the economic bellweather here.
    0:52:19 Right now, a 34-year-old, Jess Tarlov,
    0:52:23 has more options than almost any person in media right now.
    0:52:26 And you chose a podcast with the dog.
    0:52:27 That’s right.
    0:52:29 That says it all.
    0:52:31 You could have had–
    0:52:32 You could have literally been prime time.
    0:52:33 And don’t lie to me.
    0:52:36 You could have been prime time MSNBC.
    0:52:40 And you decided to do this Joy Bagadona’s podcast
    0:52:41 because here’s the thing.
    0:52:42 We’re going like this.
    0:52:44 This is me making a hand signal up.
    0:52:45 And MSNBC–
    0:52:46 I hope you’re watching the YouTube version.
    0:52:47 We’re going up.
    0:52:51 MSNBC and even your good friends at Fox.
    0:52:51 I mean, they’re the–
    0:52:53 I used to say the tallest midget.
    0:52:55 And then I found out that all Democrats think that’s hateful.
    0:52:57 You’re the fastest tortoise.
    0:52:59 That’s the more politically correct way to say it.
    0:52:59 Yeah.
    0:53:01 You’re the fastest tortoise.
    0:53:01 But anyways–
    0:53:03 I don’t mind that.
    0:53:06 But what happens–
    0:53:08 A lot of people will leave, obviously.
    0:53:14 But I do think that there is a real problem with the psyche
    0:53:17 of the average MSNBC viewer.
    0:53:21 That they’re losing their minds that Joe and Mika would even
    0:53:23 have a conversation with President-elect Donald Trump.
    0:53:24 Great point.
    0:53:26 I didn’t think it was that bad.
    0:53:27 It’s insane to me.
    0:53:31 Like, don’t you want any access also to the most powerful man
    0:53:32 in the world?
    0:53:33 I understand.
    0:53:34 They did the right thing.
    0:53:35 Like, just be craven about it.
    0:53:38 And yeah, if they don’t want to get audited, yeah, same.
    0:53:39 I don’t want to get audited.
    0:53:41 And they have probably more interesting stuff going on
    0:53:43 in their tax returns than I do.
    0:53:45 Like, you should go and kiss the ring.
    0:53:47 And that is the thing about having an entertainer
    0:53:49 as the president.
    0:53:50 He appreciates it.
    0:53:53 If you show up and you say, Donald, you’re a beautiful color
    0:53:54 today.
    0:53:56 How do you keep your hair intact?
    0:53:56 Whatever.
    0:53:59 He’s going to like you and probably leave you alone.
    0:54:01 What shade of orange is that?
    0:54:04 That’s it for this episode.
    0:54:06 Thank you for listening to Raging Moderates.
    0:54:09 Our producers are Caroline Shagren and David Toledo.
    0:54:11 Our technical director is Drew Burroughs.
    0:54:14 You can find Raging Moderates on its own feed every Tuesday.
    0:54:17 That’s right, Raging Moderates on its own feed.
    0:54:18 Please go there and subscribe.
    0:54:21 Please follow us wherever you get your podcasts.
    0:54:24 Just have a great rest of the week.
    0:54:25 You too.
    0:54:27 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:54:29 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:54:33 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools to power your business
    0:54:36 forward with the security and speed of the world’s most
    0:54:37 experienced cloud.
    0:54:39 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:54:41 the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:54:44 (upbeat music)

    Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov dive into the latest from Trump’s cabinet shuffle, including Matt Gaetz’s withdrawal and the surprising picks for Commerce, Treasury, and Education. They unpack the implications of Pam Bondi’s nomination, the GOP’s evolving stance on education, and the controversy surrounding Linda McMahon. Then they discuss Congresswoman Nancy Mace’s resolution targeting trans rights on Capitol Hill and Sarah McBride’s response.

    Follow Jessica Tarlov, @JessicaTarlov

    Follow Prof G, @profgalloway.

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Prof G Markets: Is Target a Leveraged Buyout Candidate? + Comcast Cuts the Cord

    AI transcript
    0:00:00 (upbeat music)
    0:00:04 Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
    0:00:07 If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you,
    0:00:10 Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention.
    0:00:14 Constant Contact’s award-winning marketing platform
    0:00:17 offers all the automation, integration, and reporting tools
    0:00:20 that get your marketing running seamlessly,
    0:00:23 all backed by their expert live customer support.
    0:00:25 It’s time to get going and growing
    0:00:28 with Constant Contact today.
    0:00:30 Ready, set, grow.
    0:00:34 Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
    0:00:39 Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial,
    0:00:41 ConstantContact.ca.
    0:00:47 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:00:49 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools
    0:00:51 to power your business forward
    0:00:52 with the security and speed
    0:00:55 of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:00:59 Support for the show comes from Alex Partners.
    0:01:02 In business, disruption brings not only challenges,
    0:01:03 but opportunities.
    0:01:05 At pivotal moments of change,
    0:01:07 Alex Partners is the consulting firm
    0:01:09 chief executives can rely on.
    0:01:13 With clarity, direction, and above all, implementation,
    0:01:15 Alex Partners can be a steady hand for your business
    0:01:18 when decisive leadership is vital.
    0:01:19 You can discover insights
    0:01:21 and learn how to convert digital disruption
    0:01:23 into revenue growth by reading
    0:01:26 Alex Partners’ latest technology industry insights
    0:01:30 available at www.alexpartners.com/box.
    0:01:35 That’s www.alixpartners.com/vox.
    0:01:39 In the face of disruption,
    0:01:41 businesses trust Alex Partners
    0:01:44 to get straight to the point and deliver results
    0:01:45 when it really matters.
    0:01:49 Today’s number, 243,000.
    0:01:51 That’s about how many views Jaguar’s commercial
    0:01:55 for its rebranded logo got in 24 hours on YouTube.
    0:01:59 I was trying to find a joke that would bring together
    0:02:01 necrophilia, bestiality, and masturbation,
    0:02:02 but at this point,
    0:02:05 it just feels like I’d be beating a dead horse.
    0:02:19 That’s why the people come here, Ed.
    0:02:21 What’s going on today?
    0:02:23 We’re discussing an earnings crisis at Target.
    0:02:26 Why Comcast is shedding its cable business.
    0:02:27 Good bank, bad bank.
    0:02:29 – First off, did you see the new Jaguar logo?
    0:02:30 – Jaguar, listen to you.
    0:02:32 Listen to you little saucy bitch.
    0:02:34 You were just dying to say Jaguar.
    0:02:35 – No, I wasn’t.
    0:02:36 That’s how I say it,
    0:02:37 because I’m from a different country.
    0:02:38 – If you ask for another raise,
    0:02:40 we’ll find you dead in the boot.
    0:02:44 I just made that up, it was pretty good.
    0:02:46 Have I seen, I’m sorry, have I seen what?
    0:02:48 – Have you seen Jaguar’s?
    0:02:50 That’s how it’s pronounced.
    0:02:51 Have you seen their new logo?
    0:02:53 – No, but they pasted it on our producers,
    0:02:54 pasted it in.
    0:02:55 – Okay, so please check it out,
    0:02:57 because everyone’s talking about this
    0:02:59 and you are the marketing professor.
    0:03:00 We need your reaction.
    0:03:03 – Oh no, this is the new logo?
    0:03:06 No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
    0:03:08 Come on, hold on.
    0:03:11 I actually use this logo in my class.
    0:03:13 Look at this thing, he’s out, he’s hunting,
    0:03:17 he’s bringing home the prey for his wife and his kids.
    0:03:22 He’s elegant, he’s sleek, he’s a jungle cat, Jaguar.
    0:03:24 And then they go to this fucking thing
    0:03:26 that looks like it was created by AI.
    0:03:30 We can process images 50 to 60 times faster than words.
    0:03:32 So this is going against our instincts
    0:03:33 as it relates to marketing.
    0:03:36 If you are blessed with a logo,
    0:03:37 like they used to have,
    0:03:40 that visual metaphor of that incredibly strong,
    0:03:42 yet elegant, yet powerful,
    0:03:46 Jaguar’s are the only animal that when hunted,
    0:03:48 this is a true story,
    0:03:50 the only animal that when hunted,
    0:03:51 will perceive they’re being hunted
    0:03:56 and then sprint, circle around, and then hunt the hunter.
    0:03:58 You wanna talk about snatching defeat
    0:03:59 from the jaws of victory?
    0:04:01 That is one of the greatest visual metaphors
    0:04:02 in automobile history.
    0:04:05 And instead they went to this fucking
    0:04:07 Westworld dystopic, weird.
    0:04:08 – It’s awful.
    0:04:09 – Terrible decision.
    0:04:13 – So what do you think happened in the Jaguar boardroom?
    0:04:15 Why do you think they signed off on this?
    0:04:17 What do you think is the strategy here?
    0:04:21 Like, everyone agrees this is the worst rebrand of all time.
    0:04:23 Why do you think they went ahead with it?
    0:04:24 – Because they spent a lot of money
    0:04:26 in a design agency that’s populated
    0:04:28 with very good looking young people who wear black,
    0:04:30 who seem to understand more about design
    0:04:32 and they came in and used a bunch of fancy terms
    0:04:35 like elegant and progressive.
    0:04:36 And this is more for a modern age.
    0:04:39 We need to update it and you need to pay us $30 million
    0:04:42 to redesign all the logos outside the conference rooms
    0:04:44 and all the shit and all the dealerships.
    0:04:46 By the way, I had just a quick tip
    0:04:48 when you’re shopping for a car,
    0:04:51 don’t eat the clam chowder at the Lexus September
    0:04:52 to Remember event.
    0:04:56 – I would love, but I’ve heard this joke already.
    0:04:57 – It never gets old.
    0:04:59 You gotta recycle the good stuff.
    0:05:01 You gotta recycle the good stuff.
    0:05:02 – Well, I guess I did laugh anyway, so.
    0:05:04 – I can tell you, I know what happened here
    0:05:05 without knowing what happened.
    0:05:08 It’s a new CMO who’s decided to put his or her
    0:05:10 footprint or imprint on the company
    0:05:12 and it’s convinced them they needed a new fucking logo
    0:05:16 because actual work around things like customer acquisition
    0:05:18 and figuring out digital platforms, you know,
    0:05:21 that’s real work instead I hire interbrand
    0:05:24 or my old firm profit to come in
    0:05:26 and have very compelling, very articulate,
    0:05:29 very attractive people tell you why this logo
    0:05:31 connotes something that fits to a modern age.
    0:05:33 This is a stupid fucking decision.
    0:05:36 This is the equivalent of putting shareholder money
    0:05:40 in the middle of the road and running over it
    0:05:43 in an XJS, was it the XJS or the XJR?
    0:05:46 – Just my one little comment on the Jaguar thing.
    0:05:49 Their new tagline is copy nothing.
    0:05:51 Like this is sort of their bold rebrand
    0:05:53 and they keep on saying, you know, copy nothing.
    0:05:54 This is the only thing.
    0:05:56 But I look at that logo and it’s like,
    0:06:00 you copied every single tech startup
    0:06:02 that we’ve seen over the past like five to 10 years.
    0:06:05 Like this literally is just like classic,
    0:06:08 dystopian, metaverse type 2D font
    0:06:10 where it’s all spaced out and clean looking.
    0:06:12 Like it’s just, it looks like a tech company.
    0:06:15 – This is the final nail in the coffin of British culture.
    0:06:17 – Yeah, good point.
    0:06:19 – When Americans obsession, fetish,
    0:06:23 masturbatory, fantasies of AI, bastard.
    0:06:24 I’m shocked they don’t have,
    0:06:26 I’m shocked it’s not jaguar.ai
    0:06:29 and they’re trying to pretend to be a tech company.
    0:06:32 But this is a scent.
    0:06:35 Look at how beautiful their old logo is.
    0:06:38 I wanna be that guy out in the jungle.
    0:06:39 Just sleek and strong.
    0:06:41 Don’t fuck with me.
    0:06:42 Don’t fuck with me.
    0:06:46 Oh God, that shit is, that shit is money.
    0:06:49 The next like, if I see a super attractive Gara Gallat F1,
    0:06:52 I’m gonna come up after a few cocktails,
    0:06:53 a lot of cocktails and I’m gonna be like,
    0:07:01 dude that’s how you lose your virginity at 19, boom.
    0:07:03 – And that’s how we open the show.
    0:07:06 Let’s start with our weekly review of market vitals.
    0:07:08 (upbeat music)
    0:07:11 (upbeat music)
    0:07:15 The S&P 500 was volatile, the dollar climbed.
    0:07:18 Bitcoin hit a fresh record above $98,000.
    0:07:22 I wouldn’t be surprised if it hits 100 by the time this airs
    0:07:25 and the yield on 10 year treasuries slumped.
    0:07:26 Shifting to the headlines.
    0:07:29 The Justice Department proposed a forced sale of Chrome
    0:07:31 as a potential remedy in the Google antitrust case.
    0:07:33 The browser, which has approximately
    0:07:35 three billion monthly active users
    0:07:38 could be valued at up to $20 billion.
    0:07:42 MicroStrategy sold $2.6 billion worth of convertible bonds
    0:07:45 to fund its Bitcoin buying spree.
    0:07:47 The business intelligence firm already owns
    0:07:49 nearly $31 billion worth of the cryptocurrency
    0:07:52 and plans to buy more over the next three years.
    0:07:54 The stock rose to a record high after the sale
    0:07:57 and it’s up more than six fold year to date.
    0:07:59 And finally, Nvidia’s third quarter earnings
    0:08:01 beat analyst expectations with revenue
    0:08:06 topping $35 billion, that is up 94% from a year earlier.
    0:08:09 The company also projected revenue for the current quarter
    0:08:12 will jump to $37.5 billion.
    0:08:14 While that forecast was slightly above
    0:08:17 analysts expectations, the stock still fell
    0:08:18 more than 2% after hours.
    0:08:21 Scott, your thoughts, starting with the DOJ’s
    0:08:24 proposed forced sale of Google Chrome.
    0:08:25 – Look, I love this.
    0:08:27 If you go back in economic history,
    0:08:30 it would be very difficult to find an instance
    0:08:33 where the breakup was not good for the economy,
    0:08:37 was not good for the tax base, was not good for shareholders,
    0:08:39 was not good for the employees who now have more companies
    0:08:41 bidding to rent their labor.
    0:08:45 The only stakeholder that loses in a breakup
    0:08:47 throughout economic history is the individual
    0:08:49 who wants to sit on the iron throne of all realms,
    0:08:51 not just Westeros.
    0:08:53 I mean, search is essentially,
    0:08:55 I think it’s the biggest gross margin dollar business
    0:08:58 in the world and there’s one company that dominates it.
    0:09:02 And if you gave, if you took away the data set
    0:09:05 in the interface of two thirds or three and a half
    0:09:10 million people who use Chrome and it was now a competitor
    0:09:12 that could offer data and opportunities
    0:09:14 for other potential search engines,
    0:09:16 I think that would be good for everybody.
    0:09:17 I mean, who knows?
    0:09:20 Someone might come up with a search engine
    0:09:22 that is not trying to target young people
    0:09:24 or that screens out misinformation
    0:09:28 or doesn’t bring sunlight to conspiracy theory
    0:09:30 greater than its organic reach.
    0:09:33 I had a really interesting conversation with Eric Schmidt
    0:09:35 or we did, I don’t know if it’s on this pot
    0:09:38 or one of my other 45 Joey Bagadona’s podcasts.
    0:09:39 I was not there for it.
    0:09:40 There you go.
    0:09:42 Well, actually, you know, it’s funny,
    0:09:43 you did an outstanding job.
    0:09:45 (laughing)
    0:09:47 Anyways, but Eric, the former CEO,
    0:09:49 not of Alphabet, but of Google,
    0:09:51 he said something really that really struck me.
    0:09:53 He said that individuals should have
    0:09:55 almost limitless free speech,
    0:09:59 but computers should not have free speech.
    0:10:01 And that really struck me as an elegant way
    0:10:02 to approach the problem.
    0:10:05 Because when I look at the majority of really vile shit
    0:10:07 that’s trying to polarize people
    0:10:09 or spread conspiracy theory,
    0:10:10 whenever I’ve kind of clicked on it
    0:10:13 and tried to figure out who this person is,
    0:10:14 I find out it’s not a person.
    0:10:18 It’s clearly a bot that’s used and being used
    0:10:20 to amplify either conspiracy theory
    0:10:23 or a certain ideology or simply put,
    0:10:25 it’s a bad actor trying to get a shitposting
    0:10:28 each other and arguing with each other.
    0:10:30 So more competition,
    0:10:31 you might find people say,
    0:10:34 “Well, I want a family safe search company.
    0:10:36 “I want a search company that doesn’t have,
    0:10:39 “doesn’t add supported such that it takes you
    0:10:41 “to the best answer, not to the answer
    0:10:43 “they can further monetize.”
    0:10:45 – Well, I’m gonna disagree with you on your take here.
    0:10:48 I think you’ve brought up a lot of important issues,
    0:10:51 but they’re all kind of disparate issues
    0:10:52 that you’re talking about here.
    0:10:53 Like there’s the monopoly issue,
    0:10:56 and then there’s, you know, the free speech issue,
    0:10:57 and there’s the conspiracies issue.
    0:11:00 Like there are just all these things that we dislike
    0:11:03 about big tech and about Google.
    0:11:05 But I mean, let’s just focus on
    0:11:08 what did Google actually do wrong here?
    0:11:10 And if you read through the judge’s case,
    0:11:13 the big thing that the judge identified
    0:11:15 was the fact that Google was paying billions of dollars
    0:11:18 to other companies, particularly Apple,
    0:11:21 to be the default search engine on those devices.
    0:11:23 There’s a very easy way to address that.
    0:11:25 And that’s just break up their relationship with Apple.
    0:11:28 Just tell them you’re not allowed to keep paying Apple
    0:11:30 to be your default browser.
    0:11:32 And now that is something that DOJ
    0:11:35 is supposedly going to recommend as a remedy.
    0:11:39 But to add on top of that, the forced sale of this asset
    0:11:44 that is in many ways integral to Google’s business,
    0:11:45 it just doesn’t feel like a remedy.
    0:11:47 To me, it feels more like a punishment.
    0:11:51 And in my view, if you’re gonna focus on punishing Google,
    0:11:52 I personally think punishments
    0:11:54 should come in the form of fines.
    0:11:57 But the idea of forcing them to sell Chrome,
    0:11:59 which would just dramatically transform
    0:12:01 one of the most important businesses in America,
    0:12:03 the online search market,
    0:12:06 that to me just feels like a step too far from government.
    0:12:07 – I just had this horrific image
    0:12:10 that I finally get the call from the White House
    0:12:12 asking me to be Secretary of Education
    0:12:14 or Commerce Secretary.
    0:12:15 And the call’s actually for you
    0:12:17 and they’re just trying to get your name.
    0:12:19 I think that’s a really solid take.
    0:12:24 I would argue though that the data around traffic patterns
    0:12:27 and behavior captured on the front end
    0:12:31 of the true access point to the digital world
    0:12:33 is the browser.
    0:12:35 And so the amount of data they get
    0:12:37 around where people are going, their trends,
    0:12:40 that they can then feed into their search algorithms
    0:12:42 to better provide better targeting
    0:12:45 for clients who advertise on Google.
    0:12:47 I would think that gives them almost an unassailable
    0:12:52 advantage that results in a 90 plus percent share of search.
    0:12:53 – It’s huge.
    0:12:56 But it’s also why the product is so good, right?
    0:12:58 I mean, the data is all part of the business.
    0:13:01 – What you don’t realize with a monopoly
    0:13:02 is you don’t know what you’re missing.
    0:13:04 So for example, do you think Google search
    0:13:06 has really innovated in the last decade?
    0:13:07 – No.
    0:13:10 – All of the innovation has been how to turn advertisers
    0:13:12 up by their heels and shake more money from them.
    0:13:14 It hasn’t been around consumer innovation.
    0:13:18 So I would push back and say the monopoly power here,
    0:13:21 we don’t know the innovation we’re missing.
    0:13:24 I just don’t buy it as a means to breaking them up.
    0:13:27 And my reaction would be that this won’t hold off in court.
    0:13:29 But I agree with you that, you know,
    0:13:31 perhaps the world would be a better place
    0:13:32 if Google were broken up.
    0:13:34 So we move on to MicroStrategy,
    0:13:37 which is absolutely tearing right now.
    0:13:41 And you’re actually friends with the founder and CEO,
    0:13:44 Michael Saylor, who’s been on this podcast before.
    0:13:46 What are your initial reactions to MicroStrategy,
    0:13:50 which is performing even better than Bitcoin right now somehow?
    0:13:53 – So I’ve known Michael for the better part of 20 years.
    0:13:55 The guy’s like crazy fucking smart.
    0:13:56 And every time I meet with him,
    0:13:59 I think I really should buy MicroStrategy stock or Bitcoin.
    0:14:02 And I have bought none of either.
    0:14:05 And so I want to find a time machine, go back,
    0:14:07 find me, kill me and then kill myself.
    0:14:10 I mean, I knew this guy was so bright,
    0:14:13 but the thing that got in the way for me was,
    0:14:15 you know, I’m an old dog, I believe in corporate governance.
    0:14:18 And the idea of a CEO taking a publicly traded company
    0:14:20 that does business intelligence
    0:14:24 and borrowing, levering up like crazy to buy another.
    0:14:26 It would be like Tim Cook saying,
    0:14:28 I just believe in gold.
    0:14:31 And I’m going to put $100 billion in debt on this company
    0:14:33 and go buy, become the largest single owner
    0:14:34 of gold in the world.
    0:14:39 And it just felt so strange to me,
    0:14:40 but there’s just no getting around it.
    0:14:43 The guy is a fucking visionary.
    0:14:46 When I had him on the pod two, three years ago,
    0:14:50 Bitcoin was at 18,000 and it had spiked from 5,000.
    0:14:51 I’m like, gonna go wait till it goes down to five again.
    0:14:53 He’s like, trust me on this, just buy a little bit.
    0:14:57 This thing is bulletproof over the long term.
    0:14:59 You know, that’s up, what, five-fold since then?
    0:15:00 And what is MicroStrategy?
    0:15:01 Since then, I’m not sure.
    0:15:04 It’s up six-fold in the past year.
    0:15:07 It’s up by 123% in the last 30 days.
    0:15:09 And because he takes debt,
    0:15:12 it’s basically MicroStrategy has become
    0:15:14 a levered bet on Bitcoin.
    0:15:18 It’s like buying an ETF on China that’s 3x, it’s levered up.
    0:15:20 So look, there’s just no getting around it.
    0:15:23 Even crypto skeptics like myself have to acknowledge
    0:15:25 that I believe that Bitcoin
    0:15:29 has become a credible, tangible store value.
    0:15:31 You know, it’s a speculative asset, no doubt about it,
    0:15:35 but Michael is, you know, from an IQ standpoint,
    0:15:39 he’s flying at a different altitude and he saw this.
    0:15:42 And my gosh, you wanna talk about balls
    0:15:45 the size of really big balls?
    0:15:50 I mean, this guy basically said,
    0:15:52 business intelligence, missionless intelligence,
    0:15:55 we’re levering up and we’re buying Bitcoin.
    0:15:57 – I think the question a lot of people are asking is like,
    0:16:01 why is MicroStrategy up so much more than Bitcoin?
    0:16:03 I think part of it is what you said,
    0:16:07 which is this is like a levered up Bitcoin play
    0:16:08 because they’re borrowing money
    0:16:10 and then using that money to buy more Bitcoin.
    0:16:12 So it’s just gonna be a more volatile version
    0:16:14 of Bitcoin right now.
    0:16:17 But I think there is a second story here,
    0:16:19 a second reason why people are so obsessed
    0:16:21 with MicroStrategy right now.
    0:16:25 And that is the Bitcoin holdings are worth a quarter
    0:16:27 of the company’s entire market cap.
    0:16:28 And they don’t have cash,
    0:16:30 which is why they’re borrowing money
    0:16:32 to just go buy more Bitcoin.
    0:16:34 And if you look at their earnings reports,
    0:16:38 they now identify not as a business intelligence firm,
    0:16:40 which is what this company has always been,
    0:16:44 they call themselves a quote Bitcoin treasury company.
    0:16:47 And that is the through line of the entire earnings report.
    0:16:50 It’s like, here’s our plan to buy more Bitcoin.
    0:16:54 Here’s our plan to build out a Bitcoin ID network.
    0:16:56 Here are the list of conferences,
    0:16:58 these Bitcoin conferences that we will be hosting
    0:16:59 and attending.
    0:17:03 Meanwhile, the actual business, the way they make money
    0:17:04 is practically treated like a footnote.
    0:17:07 Like it doesn’t seem to matter that much to them.
    0:17:10 So when I look at what’s happening here,
    0:17:11 I think there are two people buying this stock.
    0:17:14 It’s one, the people making the lever play,
    0:17:17 but then it’s two, the people who believe that,
    0:17:20 you know, if Bitcoin is the future,
    0:17:23 MicroStrategy is the leader of that future.
    0:17:26 This is gonna be the official Bitcoin company.
    0:17:29 They believe that MicroStrategy is somehow
    0:17:31 gonna pioneer this new space.
    0:17:34 My only question would be in what way
    0:17:35 will they pioneer the Bitcoin space?
    0:17:38 What does that actually look like?
    0:17:39 It’s not very clear to me.
    0:17:42 The strategy is very vague, it’s very hand-wavy,
    0:17:44 which is why personally, I don’t really buy it.
    0:17:48 – If I had been on his board five years ago
    0:17:50 and he said, “We’re levering up to buy Bitcoin.”
    0:17:52 – You would have been a nightmare.
    0:17:54 – I know, very simple.
    0:17:55 I would have either been kicked off the board
    0:17:56 or I would have resigned
    0:17:59 because everything I know about corporate governance,
    0:18:01 I would have said, “Michael, you’re a billionaire.
    0:18:03 “If you wanna sell your stock
    0:18:06 “and go start a Bitcoin company, have at it.
    0:18:10 “But don’t take your fiduciary for our shareholders.
    0:18:11 “They think they’re investing
    0:18:14 “in a business intelligence company.”
    0:18:15 And I would have been wrong.
    0:18:18 His shareholders have done extraordinarily well.
    0:18:19 – We’ll see, we’ll see.
    0:18:22 I’m still with you on that take.
    0:18:26 I think this could end very badly personally.
    0:18:29 And by the way, our producer is messaging me,
    0:18:31 “Sitron research just shorted the stock
    0:18:33 “and the shares are off around 9%
    0:18:34 “as we are speaking right now.
    0:18:36 “So clearly I am not the only one
    0:18:38 “who’s skeptical about this company.”
    0:18:39 – I’m with you.
    0:18:44 And the things I don’t like about Bitcoin are,
    0:18:45 I actually believe in transparency.
    0:18:48 And I understand that people feel like they should have
    0:18:50 privacy as it relates to their money.
    0:18:55 But this asset class has been used
    0:18:57 in some pretty frightening ways.
    0:19:01 And maybe you could argue that’s the government’s job
    0:19:02 and people have a right to privacy.
    0:19:05 And this is a longer conversation,
    0:19:08 but the reality is he’s winning.
    0:19:10 And they’re just not getting around it.
    0:19:12 The guy is a visionary.
    0:19:14 I keep waiting for it to come down
    0:19:15 so I can buy a little bit of Bitcoin,
    0:19:17 but it’s not cooperating with me.
    0:19:19 And then every time I see it go up every day,
    0:19:21 I’m like, “Oh, Jesus, here we go.”
    0:19:23 – It’s gonna be a big day when ProfG finally buys
    0:19:24 some Bitcoin.
    0:19:25 We’re gonna have to have a celebration.
    0:19:27 – Yeah, that means sell everything.
    0:19:29 – Yeah, exactly.
    0:19:31 Let’s just quickly move on to Nvidia here.
    0:19:33 I personally don’t have much to say about these earnings
    0:19:36 ’cause it’s kind of the same story we’ve seen,
    0:19:39 quarter after quarter, I mean, revenue doubled,
    0:19:42 profits grew, estimates were beat,
    0:19:47 and then the stock kind of stumbled but then hummed along.
    0:19:49 And this is what we’ve come to expect.
    0:19:51 I mean, every single quarter,
    0:19:55 Nvidia just absolutely destroys and the market says,
    0:19:57 “Okay, that’s sort of what we expected.”
    0:20:00 The only thing that I would say that struck me,
    0:20:02 and this is more of a media observation
    0:20:05 than an investing observation,
    0:20:08 is that last night before the earnings,
    0:20:10 I was just thinking,
    0:20:12 it actually doesn’t matter what happens
    0:20:13 in this earnings report
    0:20:16 because you and I are gonna cover this either way
    0:20:20 because this company is just so important at this point.
    0:20:23 It makes up 7% of the entire S&P.
    0:20:27 It’s in practically every American’s retirement account.
    0:20:30 It’s just gotten to this point where it’s like,
    0:20:31 it’s systemic to everything.
    0:20:32 You can’t ignore it.
    0:20:35 It has to be covered whether or not it’s interesting.
    0:20:36 And then I think the thing,
    0:20:39 Jensen Huang that really summed it up on the earnings call,
    0:20:41 he said, quote, “Every company in the world
    0:20:44 “seems to be involved in our supply chain.”
    0:20:45 And I think he’s right.
    0:20:49 This is just, the world relies on Nvidia
    0:20:50 in so many ways at this point.
    0:20:52 I think it’ll probably go down
    0:20:54 as one of the great companies of our time.
    0:20:55 – I mean, if you talk about,
    0:20:57 it’s really hard for people to get their head around
    0:20:59 the value creation here.
    0:21:02 And that is if you took the entire German stock market,
    0:21:05 every company from Daimler-Benz to Siemens,
    0:21:07 the entire German stock market,
    0:21:09 the entire French stock market,
    0:21:13 all of the best companies in these respective economies,
    0:21:16 all of them, Nvidia’s market cap is greater
    0:21:20 than the entire stock market of these countries.
    0:21:22 And if you really think about that,
    0:21:24 if you think about the amount of human capital,
    0:21:25 investment, government support,
    0:21:27 people who spend their lives at these companies,
    0:21:31 the IP, the customer bases, the global customer bases,
    0:21:32 take every one of them,
    0:21:34 every one of them and add them all together,
    0:21:36 they’re not worth as much as Nvidia.
    0:21:40 So this is a phenomena.
    0:21:42 We don’t know how long it can last.
    0:21:46 Yet another fucking amazing asset class that,
    0:21:47 I am not in.
    0:21:49 I am not in this, Ed.
    0:21:51 I keep waiting for it to get cheaper.
    0:21:54 – We’ll be right back after the break
    0:21:56 with a look at target settings.
    0:21:57 If you’re enjoying the show so far
    0:21:59 and you haven’t subscribed,
    0:22:00 be sure to give PropG Markets a follow
    0:22:02 wherever you get your podcasts.
    0:22:13 – Support for PropG Markets comes from Fundrise.
    0:22:15 Nearly every major tech company on the S&P 500
    0:22:17 was once funded by venture capital firms.
    0:22:19 The hard truth, however,
    0:22:21 is that the biggest venture funds are almost entirely funded
    0:22:22 by institutional investors.
    0:22:25 So unless you knew a guy who knew a guy,
    0:22:28 you and 99.9% of individual investors
    0:22:30 did not get to participate in the pre-IPO growth
    0:22:31 of any of those blue chip companies.
    0:22:35 And now, with the AI revolution, that’s happening again.
    0:22:37 Almost all of the biggest names in AI are still private,
    0:22:39 just out of reach of your portfolio.
    0:22:42 But the Fundrise Innovation Fund is changing that.
    0:22:45 It’s a more than $125 million fund.
    0:22:47 It holds some of the most exciting pre-IPO tech companies
    0:22:49 in the world and it’s designed specifically
    0:22:50 for individual investors.
    0:22:55 This time, you can get in early at fundrise.com/markets.
    0:22:57 Carefully consider the investment material before investing,
    0:23:00 including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses.
    0:23:02 This and other information can be found
    0:23:06 in the Innovation Funds Perspective at fundrise.com/innovation.
    0:23:08 This is a paid advertisement.
    0:23:15 Support for the show comes from Zbiotics.
    0:23:17 Nothing like cocktails with friends to help you unwind.
    0:23:20 But now, you don’t have to choose between a great night
    0:23:22 or a great day after thanks to Zbiotics
    0:23:24 pre-alcohol probiotic drink.
    0:23:26 Pre-alcohol is the world’s first genetically engineered
    0:23:28 probiotic.
    0:23:30 It was invented by PhD scientists to tackle
    0:23:31 rough mornings after drinking.
    0:23:33 And according to Zbiotics, here’s how it works.
    0:23:35 When you drink, alcohol gets converted
    0:23:37 into a toxic byproduct in the gut.
    0:23:40 It’s this byproduct, not dehydration,
    0:23:41 that’s to blame for your rough next day.
    0:23:45 Pre-alcohol produces an enzyme to break this byproduct down.
    0:23:47 Just remember to take Zbiotics before your first drink
    0:23:48 of the night, drink responsibly,
    0:23:50 and you’ll feel your best tomorrow.
    0:23:53 So I tried this ’cause daddy loves to drink.
    0:23:55 I like Winston Churchill believed I’ve gotten more
    0:23:56 out of alcohol and it’s gotten out of me.
    0:24:00 Anyways, took this thing, I had two, maybe three drinks,
    0:24:02 and the next day I did feel fine.
    0:24:04 And I think the key here is that I’m no longer
    0:24:06 drinking six to eight, two to three,
    0:24:09 but I also think Zbiotics is likely helping.
    0:24:11 Go to zbiotics.com/profg to learn more
    0:24:13 and get 15% off your first order
    0:24:15 when you use Profg at checkout.
    0:24:18 Zbiotics is backed with 100% money back guarantee,
    0:24:19 so if you’re unsatisfied for any reason,
    0:24:21 they’ll refund your money, no questions asked.
    0:24:24 Again, that’s zbiotics.com/profg and use the code
    0:24:27 Profg at checkout for 15% off.
    0:24:31 Support for Profg Markets comes from Vanta.
    0:24:33 Proving trust is more important than ever,
    0:24:35 especially when it comes to your security program.
    0:24:37 Vanta helps centralize program requirements
    0:24:39 and automates evidence collection for frameworks,
    0:24:44 including SOC2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and more,
    0:24:47 so you can save time and money and build customer trust.
    0:24:50 And with Vanta, you get continuous visibility
    0:24:52 into the state of your controls.
    0:24:54 Join more than 8,000 global companies,
    0:24:56 including Atlassian, FlowHealth, and Quora,
    0:24:58 who trust Vanta to manage risk
    0:25:00 and improve security in real time.
    0:25:03 Now that’s a new way to GRC.
    0:25:06 Learn more at Vanta.com/Markets.
    0:25:09 That’s Vanta.com/Markets.
    0:25:18 – We’re back with Profg Markets.
    0:25:21 Target and Walmart both reported third-quarter earnings
    0:25:24 and once again, it was a tale of two retailers.
    0:25:26 Walmart sales rose over 5%,
    0:25:28 solidifying a position as the top-performing retailer
    0:25:33 in the S&P 500, while targets only rose 0.3%.
    0:25:35 Walmart also raised its fiscal year guidance
    0:25:38 for the third time and target lowered its outlook.
    0:25:40 So the market’s response highlighted that contrast
    0:25:44 after the earnings call Walmart stock rose 3%.
    0:25:48 Meanwhile, target stock fell more than 21%.
    0:25:52 It’s worst day since 2022.
    0:25:53 The first thing I will note, Scott,
    0:25:57 is that we have basically told this exact same story
    0:25:58 before on this podcast.
    0:26:02 I’m pretty sure we called it the tale of two retailers.
    0:26:04 We’ve seen this before.
    0:26:08 Target slumping and Walmart doing really, really well.
    0:26:10 So what are your reactions to the fact
    0:26:13 that we’re sort of in a deja vu position
    0:26:15 in third quarter 2024?
    0:26:16 So let me start off by saying I love Target.
    0:26:19 I go to the Super Target in Boca Raton
    0:26:20 and I think they do a great job.
    0:26:22 I have not worked with senior management at Target.
    0:26:24 Actually, I had some interaction with the CMO there,
    0:26:27 but at one point I had a decent amount of interaction
    0:26:30 with everyone, including the board and the CEO at Walmart,
    0:26:33 and it’s an exceptionally well-run company.
    0:26:35 And what was interesting about this
    0:26:38 is that they are going after Target’s white meat
    0:26:40 and that is Target was always a cooler,
    0:26:42 hipper, better merchandise,
    0:26:44 more aspirational version of Walmart.
    0:26:45 That you can have value,
    0:26:49 but you can have a little bit of sizzle,
    0:26:54 a little bit of salsa on that chip, if you will.
    0:26:56 And they had their own brands,
    0:26:58 kind of a better branding campaign.
    0:27:01 It was a positioning that worked really well.
    0:27:05 But Walmart’s coming for their core.
    0:27:07 I mean, really coming for their heart and their lungs.
    0:27:09 And that is the point of differentiation.
    0:27:11 They did a lot of wealthy people
    0:27:13 who wanted value shop to Target.
    0:27:15 Now they’re just going straight to Walmart.
    0:27:17 Automation played a big role here.
    0:27:19 Walmart is now automating two times
    0:27:20 their fulfillment center volume year on year.
    0:27:23 Well, Target’s is only 25% more automated.
    0:27:26 So Walmart has the capital and the vision
    0:27:28 to make huge investments in digital.
    0:27:29 Some of them didn’t pay off.
    0:27:31 They paid, I think they overpaid for JET
    0:27:33 and they bought Bonobos,
    0:27:34 which was a stupid acquisition.
    0:27:37 Nice guys, but it was just like a cute little concept
    0:27:41 that they, anyway, those guys got incredibly lucky
    0:27:44 in my view, but about 75% of Walmart’s increase
    0:27:47 in market share this quarter came from households
    0:27:50 earning over $100,000, which is the demographic
    0:27:52 typically associated with people shopping at Target.
    0:27:57 So people want convenience and affordability.
    0:28:01 Walmart, the unlimited deliveries for $12.95 a month.
    0:28:05 And people are focused on spending smart.
    0:28:08 Groceries were 60% of Walmart’s US sales.
    0:28:10 While the category accounts for less than 25%
    0:28:11 of Target sales.
    0:28:13 And I would imagine that groceries is a,
    0:28:16 while a low margin business, it’s a more consistent business.
    0:28:18 And if you look at the two companies,
    0:28:21 Walmart’s trading at 36 times earnings.
    0:28:24 Target is trading at 12.
    0:28:27 And the analogy here that you brought up,
    0:28:29 which is a really interesting one,
    0:28:32 is the analogy between a dominant number one
    0:28:34 and a very distant two, and that is Uber and Lyft.
    0:28:35 And they’re eerily similar.
    0:28:38 Uber’s up 157% over the last five years
    0:28:40 while Lyft is down 62%.
    0:28:41 Actually, I think to see,
    0:28:43 I think both have outstanding CEOs.
    0:28:45 Dara Costa-Schei and the CEO at Lyft
    0:28:47 are both impressive people.
    0:28:49 By comparison, similarly, if you will,
    0:28:52 Walmart’s up 120% over the last five years
    0:28:55 while Target is down about 4%.
    0:28:57 So this is what I think is gonna happen.
    0:28:58 And I’ll come back to this.
    0:29:02 I think Target’s beginning to look like a juicy LBO Target
    0:29:05 or at a minimum, they’re gonna have an activist in there.
    0:29:07 This thing is now cheap enough.
    0:29:10 It still has a charm brand and a great real estate.
    0:29:13 I think if I were to try and speculate with the problem
    0:29:14 is it’s the following.
    0:29:17 When you’re dealing with a CPG company
    0:29:20 or a retailer in a duopoly, Coke Pepsi,
    0:29:24 everyone’s compensation mojo DNA is focused on one thing.
    0:29:26 And that is share.
    0:29:28 You do not give, if you’re Pepsi,
    0:29:32 you do not and you’ve got 17.8% share.
    0:29:35 If it goes to 17.6 as the brand manager,
    0:29:36 you might get fired.
    0:29:39 So you become so obsessed with share
    0:29:44 that in the market also is very focused on your share
    0:29:46 that you can’t make the hard decisions
    0:29:47 that I think you need to make.
    0:29:49 And I would argue that Target just needs to be
    0:29:52 a dramatically smaller company that’s more profitable.
    0:29:54 They have 1,900 stores.
    0:29:58 It should probably be 1,000 or 1,200 and cut costs
    0:30:01 and make this a more profitable, smaller business.
    0:30:05 And I think that would best be done outside
    0:30:06 of the scrutiny of a publicly traded company.
    0:30:08 And when you look at the fact that PE firms
    0:30:09 have a quarter of a trillion dollars
    0:30:11 on their balance sheet ready to deploy,
    0:30:15 when you look at the fact this thing is getting pretty cheap,
    0:30:17 one or two things is gonna happen.
    0:30:19 We’re either gonna see an activist
    0:30:21 or we’re gonna see a potential club deal
    0:30:22 and take private here.
    0:30:23 – Very interesting.
    0:30:26 So, Target’s market cap is 56 billion.
    0:30:29 Its enterprise value is around 72 billion
    0:30:31 if you account for the debt.
    0:30:33 Who’s got that money?
    0:30:35 – Oh, it would have to be a club deal,
    0:30:37 but you got it, like I said,
    0:30:40 PE has 250 billion dollars in dry capital
    0:30:41 and they could finance a lot of it with debt.
    0:30:45 It’s still, you know, if it’s trading at a PE of 12,
    0:30:47 that means it’s got five billion in earnings.
    0:30:50 So they could probably borrow, you know,
    0:30:52 10 to 20 billion of it and they get a club deal,
    0:30:54 get a bunch of the biggest players
    0:30:55 to each come up with 10 billion.
    0:30:57 Yeah, they could get this deal done.
    0:31:00 But I think what you’re gonna have in,
    0:31:04 I mean, the three biggest deals I think in LBO history
    0:31:08 were HCA, RGR, but none of them have happened
    0:31:10 in the last several years.
    0:31:12 But all the moons are lining up
    0:31:14 for what I think will be probably the biggest LBO
    0:31:15 in history in 2025.
    0:31:17 I think it’s either gonna be Intel
    0:31:18 or this company, Target.
    0:31:20 People say they know Walmart’s bigger,
    0:31:24 but oftentimes people will mention Target
    0:31:26 in the same breath as Walmart.
    0:31:26 – Absolutely.
    0:31:29 Target has a $56 billion market cap.
    0:31:31 Walmart’s is 700 billion.
    0:31:32 – It’s crazy.
    0:31:35 – I can tell you, a lot of PE guys are sharpening
    0:31:36 their pencils and looking at this thing
    0:31:39 and they’re calling their buddies and saying,
    0:31:40 if the CEO’s down with this
    0:31:41 and we think we can make this happen,
    0:31:44 are you in for one, five, 10 billion in equity,
    0:31:48 talking to banks, how much could we finance on this thing?
    0:31:51 This is, there’s a lot of people,
    0:31:52 I would imagine a lot of very smart people
    0:31:53 looking at this company right now.
    0:31:56 – I would like to just focus on Target
    0:31:58 and the earnings themselves.
    0:32:01 And then we’ll compare it to Walmart,
    0:32:04 but just to highlight what happened to Target.
    0:32:08 So revenue rose just 1%, which is way below expectations.
    0:32:12 Profits fell 12%, also way below expectations.
    0:32:14 And they said, Target,
    0:32:17 that there were two main issues they were dealing with.
    0:32:19 The first issue was the Longshoreman Strike,
    0:32:20 which we’ve discussed before.
    0:32:21 There were all these strikes
    0:32:25 at many of our largest ports in America back in October.
    0:32:29 And that was a problem and Target said that as a result,
    0:32:31 their freight costs and their supply chain costs
    0:32:33 were a lot higher.
    0:32:36 The second issue that they highlighted was consumer demand.
    0:32:40 So the average ticket size for Target customers
    0:32:42 was down 2%.
    0:32:45 They also saw a pretty significant decline
    0:32:47 in their discretionary spending.
    0:32:49 And the way Target positioned that problem
    0:32:52 is that there is this macro issue in America
    0:32:53 happening among consumers.
    0:32:56 Consumers in America are tight on cash.
    0:33:00 And so they’re just more cautious about spending right now.
    0:33:03 Okay, now let’s compare that to Walmart.
    0:33:06 Sales rose more than 5%.
    0:33:09 Profits higher than expected.
    0:33:13 Average ticket size grew more than 2%.
    0:33:15 And so the story over at Walmart
    0:33:17 that they are telling shareholders,
    0:33:20 and mind you, these earnings calls happen in the same week.
    0:33:22 So we’re looking at what happened to Target
    0:33:24 and then immediately following that
    0:33:26 with what happened to Walmart.
    0:33:28 The story is that customers are going to Walmart
    0:33:32 more frequently and when they do, they’re also spending more.
    0:33:37 So this macro boogie man that Target seems to be talking about
    0:33:39 when it comes to consumer demand
    0:33:41 that is supposedly hurting Target,
    0:33:43 for whatever reason, it isn’t touching Walmart.
    0:33:45 Walmart’s doing just fine.
    0:33:47 And then the Longshoreman strike,
    0:33:49 Walmart is the second largest importer
    0:33:51 of the affected ports from that strike.
    0:33:54 The only one ahead of it is LG Electronics.
    0:33:58 It should have been hit way harder by this strike than Target.
    0:34:01 But Walmart said that, yes, it was a slight issue,
    0:34:02 but they managed the inventory well.
    0:34:06 They only saw a 0.6% decline in their inventory level.
    0:34:09 So in other words, Walmart just figured it out.
    0:34:11 The consumer issue wasn’t a problem,
    0:34:13 and neither was the Longshoreman strike.
    0:34:18 So this, again, is a story we’ve told before.
    0:34:20 This is the fourth straight quarter
    0:34:23 in which Target has blamed their underperformance
    0:34:27 on something else, whether it’s inflation or demand or strikes,
    0:34:30 or in some cases, even shoplifting.
    0:34:32 And meanwhile, Walmart is overperforming.
    0:34:33 They’re doing just fine.
    0:34:38 So I think the question you have to ask Target now
    0:34:42 is at what point will you publicly recognize
    0:34:44 that maybe this is your fault?
    0:34:46 Maybe this isn’t America
    0:34:47 and the consumer’s doing something wrong.
    0:34:50 Maybe this is you doing something wrong
    0:34:53 and maybe you need a drastic change
    0:34:57 because Wall Street just isn’t buying this narrative anymore.
    0:35:00 There’s a reason the stock dropped more than 20%.
    0:35:02 They’re just done with it.
    0:35:05 So I guess my question to you would be,
    0:35:07 what does the boardroom do now?
    0:35:10 I think the activist point was a good one.
    0:35:12 It seems like I’m sure a lot of activists
    0:35:14 are coming in here and looking to shake things up.
    0:35:16 But what do you think the conversations
    0:35:19 in the boardroom of Target are looking like right now?
    0:35:21 What is probably going to happen
    0:35:23 and what the board should do is simple.
    0:35:25 They should fire the CEO.
    0:35:28 And that is your analysis is correct.
    0:35:31 At some point, it’s about you, boss.
    0:35:34 You know, all the problems you’re claiming
    0:35:36 that are these macro systemic issues,
    0:35:39 Walmart seems to have figured out.
    0:35:40 So it’s simple here.
    0:35:44 Doug McMillan gets a raise and Brian Cornell gets fired.
    0:35:46 He’s been the CEO for the last 10 years.
    0:35:49 This company has underperformed dramatically.
    0:35:50 It’s peer group.
    0:35:52 And maybe it’s not his fault,
    0:35:54 but at a minimum they need a fresh change.
    0:35:58 And the way I look with CEOs, people say, fire ’em.
    0:36:00 CEOs make so much fucking money,
    0:36:03 they should be held to a higher standard.
    0:36:04 Yeah, he’s fine.
    0:36:05 And this is what’s going to happen.
    0:36:06 The chairman of the board,
    0:36:08 I would bet in the next couple of weeks.
    0:36:08 Really?
    0:36:09 Okay.
    0:36:10 Well, I get the timing wrong.
    0:36:12 This guy’s on the green mile.
    0:36:15 He just is, he gets a call from the chairman
    0:36:17 and says, Brian, yeah, you know, love you,
    0:36:19 but we’re going to make a change.
    0:36:21 And they’re going to give them a golden parachute
    0:36:23 or they’ll give them the Ford Vesta’s options.
    0:36:26 But no, he should be, this is an easy one.
    0:36:28 He is, in my opinion,
    0:36:32 after 10 years of really mediocre performance,
    0:36:36 he absolutely deserves to be terminated in my view
    0:36:37 or let go.
    0:36:39 And I would, I’d be shocked if that didn’t happen.
    0:36:40 And if it doesn’t happen,
    0:36:43 that’ll be the first thing on an activist PowerPoint deck
    0:36:46 is that management has vastly underperformed.
    0:36:49 He hasn’t, I want to be clear, he hasn’t been a disaster,
    0:36:51 but these jobs are fairly kind of,
    0:36:53 what have you done for me lately?
    0:36:55 And the last five years have not been strong.
    0:36:56 Absolutely.
    0:36:58 Let’s just take one moment before we wrap it up here
    0:37:02 to talk about what Walmart has done, right?
    0:37:07 Because, I mean, the stock is up 120%
    0:37:08 in the past five years.
    0:37:10 And I feel like no one saw that coming.
    0:37:15 Like, Walmart has generally been viewed as kind of a dinosaur
    0:37:20 and more importantly, a shitty competitor to Amazon.
    0:37:21 I mean, I think the story that most people believe
    0:37:24 was that Amazon was gonna kick the shit out of Walmart,
    0:37:27 but they’ve done really, really well.
    0:37:28 I think the question is,
    0:37:30 what have they gotten right specifically?
    0:37:33 And just two things really jump out to me
    0:37:34 that are worth highlighting.
    0:37:38 The first is how they invested in Ecom.
    0:37:42 So they made a set more than $7 billion investment in 2022
    0:37:45 to just revitalize all of their technological infrastructure.
    0:37:49 And the business is, the E-commerce business is tearing.
    0:37:52 It’s up 27% year over year.
    0:37:54 And you compare that to Target, which is up just 10%.
    0:37:56 And you mentioned the fact
    0:37:58 that they have doubled their automated fulfillment volume.
    0:37:59 I think that’s really important.
    0:38:03 So one part of this is their embrace of technology,
    0:38:06 their embrace of the internet, which has really paid off.
    0:38:10 The second one is pricing.
    0:38:11 I don’t know if you remember,
    0:38:13 but earlier this year,
    0:38:16 Walmart came out with massive discounts
    0:38:18 when inflation was ripping.
    0:38:21 And our response was,
    0:38:22 one, we commended Walmart
    0:38:25 and two, everyone’s gonna follow suit now.
    0:38:26 And that is exactly what happened.
    0:38:29 Target eventually decided to follow up
    0:38:31 and they offered their own discounts,
    0:38:33 but it looks like it was too late.
    0:38:35 And you almost have to give credit to Walmart
    0:38:37 for being so bold on pricing
    0:38:39 and recognizing that the most important thing
    0:38:42 is the foot traffic and the trust of their customers.
    0:38:43 As they said, fuck it,
    0:38:46 we’re gonna reduce prices before anyone else does.
    0:38:50 And it seems to have really paid off in this quarter at least.
    0:38:52 So those are my two standouts
    0:38:54 in terms of Walmart’s performance.
    0:38:55 Perhaps you have some other observations
    0:38:57 on what they’ve done well.
    0:39:00 – So this guy, Bruce Buchanan, an economist at Stern,
    0:39:01 taught me a framework
    0:39:02 that has just kind of changed the way
    0:39:04 I look at shareholder value.
    0:39:05 And that is all shareholder value
    0:39:08 comes down to the relationship
    0:39:11 or the geometry between three lines.
    0:39:13 The top line is perceived value.
    0:39:15 The middle line is the price you charge
    0:39:18 and the bottom line is the cost.
    0:39:20 And there’s only two ways to create shareholder value.
    0:39:22 You either increase perceived value,
    0:39:25 better merchandising, better branding,
    0:39:26 association of innovation.
    0:39:28 And then if perceived value goes up,
    0:39:29 you can have a lot of fun.
    0:39:31 You can either raise the price you’re charging,
    0:39:32 which creates greater margins
    0:39:35 because the delta between your costs and the price go up.
    0:39:37 Or you can leave the price the same
    0:39:39 and you should expand market share
    0:39:41 ’cause the delta between the price you’re charging
    0:39:43 and the perceived value goes up,
    0:39:46 increasing the value to the consumer
    0:39:48 and your market share goes up.
    0:39:51 Now, the majority of shareholder value, I would argue,
    0:39:55 is around pushing the top line, the perceived value up, right?
    0:39:58 Great spokesperson, Tiger Williams or a great ad campaign,
    0:40:00 or we are the best, you know,
    0:40:03 we are tightly associated with this brave new future of AI,
    0:40:06 so we get a ton of traffic, open AI,
    0:40:08 and we can raise our prices.
    0:40:11 What Walmart has done is they brought in this gestalt
    0:40:15 that every day we’re trying to push down the cost line
    0:40:19 and then immediately, as soon as we’re able to pull it down,
    0:40:23 we pull down the price line that we charge consumers.
    0:40:26 We pass on those cost savings to the consumer immediately,
    0:40:29 thereby increasing the delta between our prices
    0:40:31 and our perceived value, which should expand share,
    0:40:33 which is exactly what happened here.
    0:40:35 And the problem is, I’ve always told kids
    0:40:36 coming out of business school,
    0:40:39 you wanna have a bias towards a company doing this,
    0:40:41 increasing perceived value,
    0:40:44 because when you’re in the business of pushing down the line,
    0:40:48 it’s purely a business of operations and scale.
    0:40:52 Doug McMillan can make multi-billion dollar investments
    0:40:54 in technology that may or may not pay off
    0:40:56 to try and get cost down 10 bibs.
    0:40:58 He can make staggering investments.
    0:41:01 You see the same dynamic at Uber and Lyft.
    0:41:03 The number one player has the scale
    0:41:06 where they can just make more bets.
    0:41:08 And in this instance, when you’re in the business
    0:41:10 of pushing the line down with your Dell,
    0:41:12 with your Home Depot, with your Walmart,
    0:41:15 it’s a business of scale and operations.
    0:41:18 And right now, both of those things go to the market leader.
    0:41:20 And the number two, quite frankly,
    0:41:25 is just feeling the pain of how much it hurts,
    0:41:29 one 15th of the market cap to be the number two.
    0:41:31 We’ll be right back after the break
    0:41:33 with a look at Comcast’s spin-off.
    0:41:36 If you’re enjoying the show so far, hit follow
    0:41:38 and leave us a review on Proficy Markets.
    0:41:52 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:41:55 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools
    0:41:56 to power your business forward
    0:41:58 with the security and speed
    0:42:00 of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:42:04 Support for the show comes from Alex Partners.
    0:42:07 In business, disruption brings not only challenges,
    0:42:08 but opportunities.
    0:42:11 As artificial intelligence powers pivotal moments of change,
    0:42:13 Alex Partners is the consulting firm
    0:42:15 chief executives can rely on.
    0:42:17 Alex Partners is dedicated to making sure
    0:42:21 your company knows what really matters when it comes to AI.
    0:42:23 As part of their 2024 tech sector report,
    0:42:26 Alex Partners spoke with nearly 350 tech executives
    0:42:28 from across North America and Europe
    0:42:30 to dig deeper into how tech companies
    0:42:32 are responding to these changing headwinds.
    0:42:35 And in their 2024 digital disruption report,
    0:42:38 Alex Partners found that 88% of executives
    0:42:40 report seeing potential for growth
    0:42:41 from digital disruption,
    0:42:44 with 37% seeing significant
    0:42:47 or even extremely high positive impact on revenue growth.
    0:42:49 You can read both reports
    0:42:51 and learn how to convert digital disruption
    0:42:56 into revenue growth at www.alexpartners.com/box.
    0:43:01 That’s www.alixpartners.com/vox.
    0:43:05 In the face of disruption,
    0:43:06 businesses trust Alex Partners
    0:43:09 to get straight to the point and deliver results
    0:43:10 when it really matters.
    0:43:14 Your business is ready for launch,
    0:43:16 but what’s the most important thing to do
    0:43:18 before those doors open?
    0:43:20 Is it getting more social media followers?
    0:43:22 Or is it actually legitimizing
    0:43:25 and protecting the business you’ve been busy building?
    0:43:28 Make it official with LegalZoom.
    0:43:30 LegalZoom has everything you need to launch,
    0:43:33 run and protect your business all in one place.
    0:43:35 Setting up your business properly
    0:43:36 and remaining compliant
    0:43:39 are the things you want to get right from the get-go.
    0:43:42 And LegalZoom saves you from wasting hours
    0:43:44 making sense of the legal stuff.
    0:43:46 And if you need some hands-on help,
    0:43:48 their network of experienced attorneys
    0:43:51 from around the country has your back.
    0:43:53 Launch, run and protect your business
    0:43:56 to make it official today at LegalZoom.com
    0:43:58 and use promo code VOXBiz
    0:44:02 to get 10% off any LegalZoom business formation product,
    0:44:04 excluding subscriptions and renewals.
    0:44:07 Expires December 31st, 2024.
    0:44:10 Get everything you need from setup to success
    0:44:14 at LegalZoom.com and use promo code VOXBiz.
    0:44:17 LegalZoom provides access to independent attorneys
    0:44:18 and self-service tools.
    0:44:20 LegalZoom is not a law firm
    0:44:22 and does not provide legal advice except we’re authorized
    0:44:26 through its subsidiary law firm, LZ Legal Services LLC.
    0:44:34 We’re back with Prof2Markets.
    0:44:35 It’s official.
    0:44:37 Comcast is finally cutting the cord.
    0:44:40 The company is spinning off several of its cable TV networks
    0:44:42 to make it official.
    0:44:44 The company is spinning off several of its cable TV networks
    0:44:48 into a new public entity, temporarily named Spinco.
    0:44:54 This new company will include MSNBC, CNBC, USA, Oxygen,
    0:44:56 eSci-Fi and the Gulf Channel.
    0:45:00 However, key assets like NBC, Bravo and Streaming Platform,
    0:45:04 Peacock will remain under the Comcast umbrella.
    0:45:07 So Scott, you predicted this.
    0:45:11 This is a clip from September of 2023.
    0:45:14 Let’s play it.
    0:45:16 There needs to be recognition that cable TV assets
    0:45:18 are no longer teenagers that are going to keep growing,
    0:45:21 that they’re in fact, you know, Nana and Pop-Up
    0:45:23 and need to be made comfortable.
    0:45:24 These things are dying.
    0:45:27 And they need to be managed for cash flow,
    0:45:30 not starved of investment, but stop the hallucination
    0:45:33 that these things are ever going to reignite growth again.
    0:45:37 So my prediction is you’re going to see one or more players
    0:45:39 shed their assets into a different hold code
    0:45:44 to clean up their story, and also for consolidation and scale.
    0:45:47 There needs to be a bunch of these things wrapped together.
    0:45:50 So there’s one sales rep in Chakrasavaki selling ads
    0:45:52 on the Cartoon Network or what have you.
    0:45:56 And Unmuck, or, you know, Unfuck the story that
    0:45:59 is media companies now that have growth,
    0:46:04 but also have declining assets in the same portfolio.
    0:46:07 I just want to say I can feel you smiling
    0:46:10 on the other side of the screen.
    0:46:13 I add, let’s be honest, I’m touching my nipples.
    0:46:20 This is the most turned on I have been.
    0:46:22 I mean, granted, I don’t own a single fucking coin,
    0:46:24 and I keep waiting for Nvidia to go back
    0:46:27 to 10 bucks a share, but let’s be honest,
    0:46:29 the dog is howling on this one.
    0:46:32 The dog is howling.
    0:46:36 Yeah, this was, look, this was obvious.
    0:46:40 And effectively what you have is when you mismatch families
    0:46:42 of different generations under one stock ticker,
    0:46:45 you have good assets that are growing in the market values
    0:46:49 as growth or as consumers not on cash flow.
    0:46:50 And then you have shitty businesses
    0:46:55 that are declining, but still produce cash flow.
    0:46:56 Investors in the market don’t know what to do.
    0:46:58 So what they do is they find the shittiest assets
    0:47:00 trading at the lowest multiple, and they assign
    0:47:02 that entire multiple to the whole thing.
    0:47:07 So the divestiture of assets in different sort of stages
    0:47:09 of the life cycle here creates more clarity
    0:47:11 and ultimately creates a whole that’s greater
    0:47:12 than the sum of its parts.
    0:47:16 So the disposition or clarity around a brand architecture
    0:47:18 that spins these low performing or declining,
    0:47:21 but high cash flow assets into a separate company
    0:47:22 is a very good idea.
    0:47:26 And then they will have their own currency to go buy ABC
    0:47:30 or Bravo Five or CNN because everyone,
    0:47:34 whether it’s Iger or Zaslaw is in the same position.
    0:47:36 And that is they have some amazing assets
    0:47:38 that would be valued at X and they have other assets
    0:47:40 that are valued at 0.3 X.
    0:47:44 So the market assigns that 0.3 to their entire portfolio.
    0:47:46 This is a good move.
    0:47:49 It will be used potentially as a shell company to go
    0:47:52 and acquire other declining but high cash flow assets.
    0:47:55 And I remind people that the second best investment
    0:47:58 I ever made was in a yellow pages company.
    0:48:00 And it was very simple.
    0:48:02 We knew these things were going away.
    0:48:06 They were declining at seven to 12% a year.
    0:48:08 But there’s still a lot of people
    0:48:10 that want that big fat fucking book
    0:48:13 delivered to their home and rural wherever
    0:48:14 in case they need a plumber
    0:48:16 and they still have a dial up phone.
    0:48:19 And these businesses still spend a lot of cash flow.
    0:48:22 And what we would do is go buy the biggest yellow pages
    0:48:25 company in the Southeast and say, okay, you’re fucked.
    0:48:25 We’re fucked.
    0:48:27 Let’s be fucked together.
    0:48:29 And the way we’ll do this is we’ll take
    0:48:32 your 10% of your best salespeople.
    0:48:35 We’re going to lay off your entire administrative staff.
    0:48:37 We’re going to close your headquarters now.
    0:48:40 And as long as we can cut costs faster
    0:48:42 than the revenue declines based on consolidation
    0:48:45 and the fact we can pick these assets up on the cheap
    0:48:49 every year this company increased its cash flow.
    0:48:51 And this specific company then took a lot of that cash flow
    0:48:55 and started trying to transition to a CRM software company
    0:48:57 and actually did it quite well.
    0:49:02 But consolidation of mature or declining assets
    0:49:03 can be a great business
    0:49:06 because typically these businesses don’t go away
    0:49:09 as quickly as you think they’re going to.
    0:49:11 And as long as you take sort of a private equity
    0:49:14 cost cutting approach and stop trying to inject Botox
    0:49:17 and filler into this thing such that under the illusion
    0:49:20 it’s going to look young again, it’s not going to.
    0:49:22 – So just on your point about depressed valuation.
    0:49:25 So if we look at how much revenue these assets
    0:49:27 actually generated for Comcast,
    0:49:30 it comes out to around $7 billion.
    0:49:33 Now we don’t know what the profitability is exactly.
    0:49:35 I think we can assume it’s, it is quite profitable
    0:49:38 but there are public companies out there
    0:49:40 that are quite similar to this business.
    0:49:43 And the example we could use is Fox Corporation
    0:49:46 which has a price to sales multiple of one and a half.
    0:49:48 So if we were to apply the same multiple
    0:49:51 this segment is probably worth $10 and a half billion.
    0:49:54 And you compare that to the overall market cap of Comcast
    0:49:57 which is more than 160 billion.
    0:50:01 So Wall Street hates cable in the same way
    0:50:03 that they hated Yellow Pages.
    0:50:08 My question to you though from an investing perspective,
    0:50:14 you said that Yellow Pages was one of your best investments.
    0:50:17 What made it so good?
    0:50:22 Did you sell your stake at some point at a higher price?
    0:50:25 Or was it the fact that cash flows were high
    0:50:27 and you were receiving direct income?
    0:50:29 What made it such a good investment?
    0:50:30 – So I invested in the company
    0:50:32 probably the better part of 10 years ago
    0:50:35 and you could for a dollar in cash flow,
    0:50:39 you had to spend two and a half dollars on a company.
    0:50:41 And so we knew these companies were going out of business
    0:50:43 but they weren’t going out of business in 30 months.
    0:50:47 So within three years, the company just in cash flow
    0:50:50 could return all of the initial investment to the investors.
    0:50:51 – Wow.
    0:50:52 – And this is what it comes right down to.
    0:50:54 It’s very similar, everything replicates nature
    0:50:56 or human interaction.
    0:50:59 And that is if you have the chance,
    0:51:01 I’m going to F1 because I want to hang out
    0:51:05 with hot young people or hot successful people.
    0:51:08 I am not going to, I don’t know,
    0:51:09 the Golden Girls reunion.
    0:51:11 I don’t want to hang out with old people.
    0:51:16 And we are attracted to youth and vigor and growth.
    0:51:19 And so these young vigorous growing companies
    0:51:20 get an enormous multiple
    0:51:23 ’cause we all want to hang out with them, right?
    0:51:25 So they trade a much higher multiples.
    0:51:28 And if you look at the most successful businesses
    0:51:31 in terms of likelihood of success from startup,
    0:51:35 the average is 14%, only one out of seven companies survives
    0:51:38 but 90 plus percent is senior care homes.
    0:51:40 If you’re willing to go into the business
    0:51:43 of taking care of seniors,
    0:51:45 nine out of 10 of these businesses work
    0:51:46 but there’s an absence of capital
    0:51:49 because they’re not as fun or sexy, they’re not growing.
    0:51:52 People don’t like to be around old people.
    0:51:54 It’s the same with distressed assets.
    0:51:56 Everybody wants to hang out with open AI.
    0:51:58 Everybody wants to hang out with NVIDIA.
    0:52:00 They don’t want to be in distressed assets.
    0:52:02 So if you go up and down the stack
    0:52:07 from angel, to venture, to IPO’s, to growth, to mature,
    0:52:11 to declining, to distressed, hands down,
    0:52:13 the most successful, greatest likelihood of success
    0:52:16 I found in the stack in terms of a capital
    0:52:20 or an asset around the lifestyle, it’s distressed
    0:52:24 because you can pick up shit at pennies on the dollar.
    0:52:26 – I guess it’s interesting to me.
    0:52:29 I mean, I consider, I think that I think
    0:52:32 like a value investor, I think I’m a value investor.
    0:52:34 And I guess the thing that I’ve always felt
    0:52:37 with distressed assets is it feels as though
    0:52:40 what you have to do is you’re getting a really good price
    0:52:42 and you’re buying at a really good price
    0:52:43 but then what do you do with it?
    0:52:45 You’re sitting with this pile of shit
    0:52:48 that you could make look a little bit less
    0:52:50 like a pile of shit and my assumption has always been,
    0:52:52 okay, well, you just got to flip it at some point.
    0:52:54 But what’s interesting about what you described
    0:52:56 with the yellow pages is actually
    0:52:59 it was a good long-term investment
    0:53:01 because of how profitable it was
    0:53:03 and because you could use those profits
    0:53:07 to then revitalize the company and turn it into a CRM
    0:53:10 which is far more sustainable over the long term
    0:53:12 than what it was before.
    0:53:15 And so I want to continue with this yellow pages analogy
    0:53:16 because I think it’s a good one.
    0:53:20 What do you think the makeover looks like
    0:53:25 for MSNBC and CNBC and SyFY and all of these channels?
    0:53:31 What does the CRMification of this spinco,
    0:53:33 how will that play out, do you think?
    0:53:35 – I don’t have a vision for a new business
    0:53:37 that they could pour their cash flow into
    0:53:39 to turn this to pivot this company.
    0:53:42 And also you don’t need to do that
    0:53:44 because these companies,
    0:53:47 there’s just going to be a lot of people watching CNBC
    0:53:50 and Andrew Ross Orkin who is an extraordinary journalist
    0:53:53 and Joe Kiernan who is not.
    0:53:56 They are going to be watching these things for a long time
    0:53:58 and there’s still going to be advertisers
    0:54:01 that want to reach people who are 70, right?
    0:54:05 Average age of an MSNBC viewer.
    0:54:08 The conversations, and I know this firsthand happening
    0:54:10 with all of these anchors is the following.
    0:54:14 Chris Wallace, we love you, you’re iconic.
    0:54:15 You’re fantastic.
    0:54:19 Last year, when we were trying to convince ourselves
    0:54:22 we could inject Botox and filler into our face
    0:54:25 and we had this idea for CNN Plus
    0:54:26 and we wanted to take you from Fox,
    0:54:28 we offered you a four or five year deal at eight million
    0:54:29 a year, that’s what I’ve read.
    0:54:32 I would bet they said, we love you, you’re great.
    0:54:34 We’re willing to pay you a million bucks a year.
    0:54:38 The salary cuts, the cost cutting,
    0:54:42 we did an analysis of how many people we need
    0:54:44 at this podcast.
    0:54:46 We’re getting like triple or quadruple
    0:54:48 the number of viewers per person than these big firms.
    0:54:51 These firms all roads lead to the same place.
    0:54:56 The anchors here are pilots for Pan Am in the 70s.
    0:55:00 They’re banging stewardesses, they’re high prestige,
    0:55:01 but they know the writing’s on the wall.
    0:55:03 They’re going to be making $68,000
    0:55:06 working for Spirit Airlines going from Louisiana
    0:55:08 to Asheville pretty soon.
    0:55:12 Even if they don’t find another thing,
    0:55:13 these companies, as long as they keep acquiring
    0:55:16 and consolidating and cutting costs, which they will do,
    0:55:20 they will figure out a way to return all of that capital
    0:55:21 to shareholders really quickly
    0:55:24 ’cause the share price will be low to buy in
    0:55:25 and they’ll make really good money.
    0:55:28 I would actually rather, I think I’d rather invest
    0:55:31 in this spinco than in the core Comcast
    0:55:33 because it’ll be at a lower valuation.
    0:55:35 There’s a lot of properties.
    0:55:38 Hey, Bob, are you ready to finally sell your shit to us?
    0:55:41 We’ll take it, we’ll take it off your hands.
    0:55:43 We’ll pay you an awful price,
    0:55:45 but your stock price will go up
    0:55:48 because the market will be focused on your parks
    0:55:50 and on Disney Plus, which are great businesses,
    0:55:54 instead of constantly asking you about ESPN and ABC
    0:55:57 and you having to apologize for it every three months.
    0:55:58 – I love it.
    0:56:00 Let’s put a consortium together, take a majority stake,
    0:56:01 and let’s call it–
    0:56:02 – Doggo.
    0:56:03 – Let’s call it Doggo.
    0:56:04 – Doggo.
    0:56:05 (laughing)
    0:56:06 Let’s take a look at the week ahead.
    0:56:10 We’ll see earnings from Dell, CrowdStrike, and HP.
    0:56:12 And we’ll also see the Personal Consumption
    0:56:14 Expenditures Index for October.
    0:56:16 Sounds like a fascinating week.
    0:56:17 Scott, any predictions?
    0:56:20 – The biggest LBO in history is gonna happen in 2025.
    0:56:24 And there’s a ton of capital on the sidelines.
    0:56:25 Some stuff is getting cheap.
    0:56:27 Great iconic companies is getting cheap.
    0:56:31 And my bets, two of my favorite candidates
    0:56:34 are now Intel and Tarjay.
    0:56:35 – And just before we go, we’ll be recording
    0:56:38 and ask me anything episode at the end of the year.
    0:56:40 So please send in your questions for me and Scott
    0:56:43 to officeours@profgmedia.com
    0:56:46 or you can tag us on social media @profgpod
    0:56:49 or you can leave us a comment on our YouTube channel.
    0:56:50 Anything is fair game.
    0:56:51 Send us your questions.
    0:56:55 This episode was produced by Claire Miller
    0:56:57 and engineered by Benjamin Spencer,
    0:56:59 our associate producer is Alison Weiss.
    0:57:00 Mia Silverio is our research lead,
    0:57:02 Jessica Lange is our research associate,
    0:57:04 Drew Burroughs is our technical director
    0:57:06 and Catherine Dillon is our executive producer.
    0:57:08 Thank you for listening to Prodigy Markets
    0:57:10 from the Vox Media Podcast Network.
    0:57:12 If you like what you heard, give us a follow
    0:57:15 and join us for a fresh take on markets on Monday.
    0:57:21 ♪ Lifetimes ♪
    0:57:29 ♪ You held me ♪
    0:57:34 ♪ In kind reunion ♪
    0:57:41 ♪ As the world turns ♪
    0:57:46 ♪ And the dark lies ♪
    0:57:48 ♪ In love ♪
    0:57:51 (upbeat music)
    0:57:57 And I think what’s happened with Target,
    0:58:00 hold on.
    0:58:01 Yeah.
    0:58:06 Hello, hola, hola, por favor,
    0:58:09 vende tras en una hora, por favor.
    0:58:11 Okay, gracias.
    0:58:16 Oh, a little cosmopolitan skill from El Pato.
    0:58:17 That’s right, that’s right.
    0:58:18 Anyways, okay.
    0:58:19 Where were we?
    0:58:21 Otage.
    0:58:24 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:58:26 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools
    0:58:28 to power your business forward
    0:58:29 with the security and speed
    0:58:32 of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:58:36 Food and security still affects millions of individuals
    0:58:37 around the globe.
    0:58:40 And Nestle, a global leader in nutrition, health,
    0:58:42 and wellness, understands the importance
    0:58:45 of working together to create lasting change.
    0:58:48 Nestle’s partnerships extend beyond just financial support
    0:58:49 from building urban hoop houses
    0:58:52 to producing custom seasoning for food banks.
    0:58:54 Nestle and their partners actively engage
    0:58:56 with local communities, listening to their needs,
    0:58:59 and working together to find innovative solutions.
    0:59:01 Nestle is committed to helping support thriving,
    0:59:05 resilient communities today and for generations to come.
    0:59:07 Together, we can help to build stronger,
    0:59:09 healthier communities.
    0:59:10 Learn more at Nestle.com.
    0:59:13 (upbeat music)

    Follow Prof G Markets:

    Scott and Ed open the show by discussing the Justice Department’s proposed forced sale of Google Chrome, how Microstrategy is funding its Bitcoin buying spree, and Nvidia’s earnings. Then Scott breaks down why Target is still struggling to compete with Walmart and explains why it’s a prime candidate for a leveraged buyout. He and Ed also analyze Walmart’s formula for long-term success. Finally, they discuss Comcast’s decision to spin off some of its cable tv networks and consider why distressed assets are a good investment. 

    Order “The Algebra of Wealth,” out now

    Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice

    Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:

    Follow Scott on Instagram

    Follow Ed on Instagram and X

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • No Mercy / No Malice: F1 Is at an Inflection Point

    AI transcript
    0:00:00 (upbeat music)
    0:00:04 Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
    0:00:07 If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you,
    0:00:10 Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention.
    0:00:14 Constant Contact’s award-winning marketing platform
    0:00:17 offers all the automation, integration, and reporting tools
    0:00:20 that get your marketing running seamlessly,
    0:00:23 all backed by their expert live customer support.
    0:00:25 It’s time to get going and growing
    0:00:28 with Constant Contact today.
    0:00:30 Ready, set, grow.
    0:00:34 Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
    0:00:39 Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial,
    0:00:41 ConstantContact.ca.
    0:00:47 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:00:49 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools
    0:00:51 to power your business forward
    0:00:52 with the security and speed
    0:00:55 of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:00:58 For over 30 years,
    0:01:00 XPRIZE has been the global leader
    0:01:02 in designing and executing large-scale
    0:01:04 incentivized competitions.
    0:01:06 And through these competitions,
    0:01:07 they’ve accelerated solutions
    0:01:10 to some of the world’s greatest challenges,
    0:01:13 such as climate change, water scarcity, and healthy aging,
    0:01:15 just to name a few.
    0:01:18 XPRIZE is a catalyst for radical breakthroughs
    0:01:20 that have impacted the lives of millions,
    0:01:22 and they’re just getting started.
    0:01:24 Through the power of incentivized competition,
    0:01:27 XPRIZE can drive scientific discovery,
    0:01:30 cutting-edge innovation, and groundbreaking solutions.
    0:01:33 The future is still ours to create.
    0:01:37 Head to XPRIZE.org to learn how you could help architect
    0:01:39 a future of equitable abundance.
    0:01:47 I’m Scott Galloway, and this is No Mercy, No Malice.
    0:01:51 Formula One may be the future of sports and media,
    0:01:54 but it’s not without some speed bumps.
    0:01:59 F1 is at an inflection point, as read by George Hahn.
    0:02:07 Just as my obsession with relevance
    0:02:10 and economic security have often crowded out
    0:02:13 what’s really important, relationships,
    0:02:16 I’ve let my preoccupation with the election results
    0:02:19 crowd out the blessings in my life.
    0:02:21 God, I’m so fucking sick of politics.
    0:02:26 So let’s talk about cars, fast cars.
    0:02:29 I’m in Vegas for Formula One.
    0:02:33 Actually, the truth is I’m not here for the race.
    0:02:36 It’s more a desperate attempt to avoid the inevitable melt
    0:02:39 into irrelevance, which I believe can be arrested
    0:02:40 by extending my adolescence.
    0:02:43 Also, I love Vegas.
    0:02:45 The last race I went to was the inaugural
    0:02:48 Miami Grand Prix in 2022.
    0:02:52 It was a great time, despite F1 races being boring.
    0:02:54 Here he comes, there he goes,
    0:02:58 and so on, and so on, and so on.
    0:03:02 The real fun is found far from the track.
    0:03:05 The vibe is money, tech, and glamour,
    0:03:07 a Super Bowl for the super rich.
    0:03:12 If NASCAR is Android, F1 is iOS.
    0:03:16 In Miami, I went to a dinner party on the beach
    0:03:19 hosted by Carbone, a fabulous restaurant
    0:03:24 right in the middle of a COVID flare-up, Fab U. Luss.
    0:03:29 Wyclef Jean played to 700 people crowded into a hot tent
    0:03:31 with no ventilation.
    0:03:32 I had two thoughts.
    0:03:36 I’m getting COVID tonight and it’s worth it.
    0:03:37 I was right on both counts.
    0:03:42 F1 has long had large and rabid fan bases
    0:03:44 in Europe and South America,
    0:03:49 but that enthusiasm didn’t land on U.S. shores until 2017
    0:03:52 when Liberty Media bought a controlling interest
    0:03:54 in the league.
    0:03:59 Under new boss Greg Mafay, F1 took a big swing at America.
    0:04:03 Targeting young people, Mafay and the F1 team
    0:04:07 built an iconic brand in the most competitive market
    0:04:09 in less than a decade.
    0:04:12 There were races with celebrities in attendance,
    0:04:15 Tom Cruise, LeBron James, Rihanna,
    0:04:19 new sponsorships, and an aggressive social media presence.
    0:04:22 However, Liberty’s gangster move
    0:04:27 was the Netflix docu-series Drive to Survive.
    0:04:30 Now in its sixth season,
    0:04:31 the show is rewriting the playbook
    0:04:35 regarding how sports leagues market themselves.
    0:04:38 It’s a behind-the-scenes look at a lot of young,
    0:04:42 good-looking guys, as Mafay once told CNBC,
    0:04:45 hard-charging billionaire team owners
    0:04:48 and high-tech pit crews competing in a series
    0:04:51 of UberLux international locations.
    0:04:54 F1 wasn’t the first to try this.
    0:04:58 The NFL’s Hard Knocks premiered on HBO back in 2001.
    0:05:01 By focusing on individuals
    0:05:03 and harnessing the power of storytelling,
    0:05:08 Drive to Survive used streaming to introduce U.S. viewers
    0:05:11 to drivers who were superstars overseas.
    0:05:15 Among them, Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen.
    0:05:19 It gave newbie, Reed, American fans,
    0:05:20 a compelling point of entry
    0:05:23 and became a fount of bingeable video
    0:05:27 that was easily shared, particularly on Instagram.
    0:05:30 There are accounts devoted to what Hamilton wears
    0:05:32 as he walks on red carpets.
    0:05:36 Tribal rivalries, betrayal, greed, revenge,
    0:05:39 all the stuff humans are hardwired to love
    0:05:42 in a lustrous package every week.
    0:05:46 Champions muse about having a target on my back.
    0:05:50 Young guns talk about being hungry.
    0:05:53 Everybody obsesses about forces beyond their control.
    0:05:56 Shakespeare knew this turf pretty well.
    0:05:59 Marcus Aurelius would have felt at home.
    0:06:01 The song remains the same.
    0:06:05 The actual game being played is unimportant.
    0:06:06 The results?
    0:06:11 Liberty paid $4.6 billion for F1.
    0:06:15 It now has a market cap of about $22 billion.
    0:06:21 In 2023, F1 generated about $3.2 billion in revenue,
    0:06:25 up from 2.6 the year before.
    0:06:28 Most of it from promotional deals with host cities,
    0:06:31 media rights and team sponsorships.
    0:06:35 TV viewership has doubled since Liberty took over,
    0:06:37 though the U.S. audience pales
    0:06:40 besides those of the NFL and other big team sports,
    0:06:43 and it’s only a third of NASCARs.
    0:06:47 In 2022, F1 signed a three-year deal with the SPN,
    0:06:51 up for renewal next year, worth $270 million.
    0:06:55 American TV viewership of this year’s Miami Grand Prix
    0:07:00 was 3.1 million, the largest ever for a U.S. race.
    0:07:04 Meanwhile, between 2017 and 2021,
    0:07:09 the average age of an F1 fan dropped from 36 to 32.
    0:07:15 About 40% of fans are now female.
    0:07:17 Earlier this year, Liberty announced
    0:07:20 it had bought a majority interest in MotoGP,
    0:07:24 which is to motorcycle racing what F1 is to autos.
    0:07:29 Owning a team, F1 has 10, used to be a money pit
    0:07:31 for a brand or a billionaire
    0:07:33 in the throes of a mid-life crisis.
    0:07:37 Now teams are a legitimate asset class.
    0:07:41 Oracle is paying Red Bull $100 million
    0:07:43 to put its name on their car.
    0:07:48 Mercedes paid $176 million for its team in 2010.
    0:07:53 It’s now worth $1.5 million.
    0:07:57 The Phoenix Suns and Chelsea FC were recently purchased
    0:08:02 for $4 billion and $5.3 billion, respectively.
    0:08:07 So, media, tech, increasing value, and why Clefjean?
    0:08:11 Everybody’s happy, right?
    0:08:12 Sort of.
    0:08:16 The mood in Vegas this year is subdued,
    0:08:18 a bit chastened even.
    0:08:22 For starters, the business face of all this success,
    0:08:24 Mafe, is out.
    0:08:27 His contract expires at the end of this year
    0:08:29 and Liberty announced he’ll be leaving
    0:08:34 to be replaced temporarily by Chairman John Malone.
    0:08:36 Malone is brighter than me,
    0:08:39 but that won’t stop me from making the following assertion.
    0:08:44 He retired/fired the wrong guy.
    0:08:47 Mafe has doubled Liberty’s shareholder value
    0:08:50 in the past 12 months and received comp,
    0:08:54 averaging $25 million per year.
    0:08:59 David Zaslov has been paid an average of $115 million
    0:09:02 for the last three years to destroy
    0:09:05 two-thirds of Warner Brothers Discovery’s shareholder value.
    0:09:09 Mafe says he’s ready for something new.
    0:09:11 Liberty thanked him and said 2024
    0:09:15 made a fitting capstone to his brilliant tenure.
    0:09:17 Who knows what really happened?
    0:09:20 Liberty is also restructuring assets with spin-offs
    0:09:22 to tell a cleaner story.
    0:09:24 Maybe Mafe didn’t want to drive a smaller car
    0:09:25 or didn’t want to deal with
    0:09:29 the Department of Justice’s antitrust investigation.
    0:09:32 It’s looking into F1’s rejection of a proposed new team
    0:09:35 from retired driver Michael Andretti.
    0:09:39 Maybe a sale of F1 is looming, Liberty says it’s not.
    0:09:41 Or none or all of the above.
    0:09:42 Whatever the reason,
    0:09:46 Mafe leaves a sport that, while still thriving,
    0:09:48 is at an inflection point.
    0:09:52 Last year’s much-hyped Vegas Grand Prix
    0:09:54 was something of a shit show.
    0:09:57 Race fans complained that prices were crazy
    0:09:59 and getting around the event was difficult.
    0:10:02 Drivers complained about the track.
    0:10:04 Casinos, bars, and restaurants
    0:10:05 complained about disruption.
    0:10:10 US Grand Prix sites, with a few exceptions,
    0:10:11 don’t have the infrastructure
    0:10:15 that European and South American sites do.
    0:10:18 Courses, grandstands, and other structures
    0:10:21 tend to be ad hoc affairs.
    0:10:23 Fans watching at home have complained
    0:10:27 about glitchy streams on ESPN+ and other services.
    0:10:31 Meanwhile, F1 still hasn’t completely shaken the funk
    0:10:34 of last season’s uncompetitive races,
    0:10:37 which wafted into 2024.
    0:10:40 Max Verstappen won so many,
    0:10:43 seven of the first 10 this year,
    0:10:45 that a lot of bored fans tapped out,
    0:10:48 and TV viewership and social media engagement
    0:10:50 have sagged.
    0:10:52 It all feels very 1990,
    0:10:55 when Pete Sampras was so dominant and boring
    0:10:58 that people felt he’d ruined tennis.
    0:11:02 Seasoned race fans point out that periods of dominance
    0:11:06 by a hot driver have always been part of the sport.
    0:11:08 Think Michael Schumacher.
    0:11:10 And it was just a matter of time
    0:11:13 until the other teams figured out how to take him on,
    0:11:16 which seems to have happened recently.
    0:11:19 While Verstappen is a locked-to-win driver of the year
    0:11:21 for a fourth time,
    0:11:24 competition for the team championship
    0:11:26 has gotten much livelier.
    0:11:30 The downturn, though, highlights two weaknesses.
    0:11:33 While F1’s marketing has been brilliant,
    0:11:36 it has had trouble providing, one,
    0:11:39 a consistently great product like high excitement,
    0:11:42 competitive races, and two,
    0:11:46 a consistently great experience at an affordable price
    0:11:49 for fans who aren’t wealthy.
    0:11:53 F1 must balance its luxe, aspirational vibe
    0:11:57 with a simple fact, most auto racing fans are not rich.
    0:12:02 A fan on a budget would have to spend at least $2,200
    0:12:05 for a Bare Bones Vegas Grand Prix weekend.
    0:12:07 Given last year’s fiasco,
    0:12:09 it’s not surprising that hotel prices
    0:12:11 are way off this year.
    0:12:14 The hardest things in business
    0:12:17 are pricing and compensation.
    0:12:19 F1 blew the pricing.
    0:12:24 Wimbledon’s center court has a capacity of 15,000
    0:12:27 and seats there average $200.
    0:12:32 The seating capacity at F1 Vegas last year was 100,000
    0:12:37 and grandstand tickets were $2,500.
    0:12:40 It may have set a record for the worst demand
    0:12:42 slash elasticity forecasting
    0:12:45 of any event its size in history.
    0:12:49 I am not, as I said, into racing,
    0:12:51 so I don’t know what kind of rule
    0:12:54 or organizational changes F1 needs
    0:12:56 to make it harder for another Verstappen
    0:12:58 to dominate and kill viewership.
    0:13:02 A secret to the NFL success is a draft system
    0:13:06 that helps keep all teams somewhat competitive.
    0:13:11 In the last five years, 94% of NFL teams
    0:13:13 have appeared in the playoffs.
    0:13:17 Similarly, in an attempt to maintain some level of parity,
    0:13:21 F1 has implemented spending caps.
    0:13:25 Also, F1 would be well-served to do more
    0:13:27 to foster young U.S. talent
    0:13:29 and produce a homegrown superstar.
    0:13:32 At this year’s Brazil Grand Prix,
    0:13:33 half of Argentina showed up
    0:13:37 to watch Argentine driver Franco Colapinto.
    0:13:38 American fans need someone
    0:13:40 they can get that excited about.
    0:13:44 Netflix could keep applying the drive
    0:13:47 to survive formula to new sports,
    0:13:50 going to teams and saying, pay us $100 million
    0:13:52 and we’ll do two seasons of what it means
    0:13:55 to play for the Boston Red Sox.
    0:13:58 Or take a league in a second or third tier pro sport,
    0:14:01 say pickleball or lacrosse,
    0:14:03 to the next level at a lower price point.
    0:14:06 Magazine publishers do this.
    0:14:10 Their most profitable businesses are custom jobs,
    0:14:13 like that Four Seasons magazine in your hotel room.
    0:14:17 What is definitely going to happen though,
    0:14:21 is that sports teams are going to keep increasing in value,
    0:14:25 even though they’re shitty businesses in terms of cash flow.
    0:14:28 Most of them will lose money every year.
    0:14:32 Then in a few years, they’ll sell at extraordinary multiples
    0:14:35 to the next generation of men in their 60s,
    0:14:38 still trying to impress their dads.
    0:14:44 However well or badly F1 handles the bumps it’s hitting now,
    0:14:46 what it has done with Netflix
    0:14:50 may become the default sports media model.
    0:14:52 You’re going to start to see media businesses,
    0:14:56 celebrities and streaming companies come together
    0:14:59 to build sports entertainment enterprises.
    0:15:04 Imagine Tom Cruise and Disney not buying the Anaheim Ducks,
    0:15:06 but an entire league.
    0:15:09 There’s something more here.
    0:15:15 One in seven men can’t name a single friend,
    0:15:19 and one in four can’t name a best friend.
    0:15:25 The Premier League, the NFL and F1 give men license
    0:15:30 to bond and express emotions in a safe place.
    0:15:32 In addition, these events happen
    0:15:35 in the most wonderful venues ever constructed,
    0:15:38 not on a fucking screen.
    0:15:42 We are a social and emotional species,
    0:15:46 and being part of a collective watching people with speed,
    0:15:50 strength and alien-like instincts compete,
    0:15:51 puts us in the moment.
    0:15:55 I’ll be at F1 this weekend,
    0:15:58 and for a few moments, I’ll be in that moment.
    0:16:02 Pardoned from the past where my anger and depression
    0:16:04 won’t let me forgive myself,
    0:16:06 and distracted from the future
    0:16:09 where I’m focused on garnering more relevance and money,
    0:16:13 I’ll be there, watching the collision of men,
    0:16:16 machines, technology and culture.
    0:16:22 But more than anything, I’ll just be there.
    0:16:26 Life is so rich.
    0:16:41 Support for this episode comes from AWS.
    0:16:44 AWS Generative AI gives you the tools
    0:16:46 to power your business forward
    0:16:47 with the security and speed
    0:16:49 of the world’s most experienced cloud.
    0:16:56 Autograph Collection Hotels offer
    0:16:59 over 300 independent hotels around the world,
    0:17:02 each exactly like nothing else.
    0:17:04 Hand-selected for their inherent craft,
    0:17:06 each hotel tells its own unique story
    0:17:09 through distinctive design and immersive experiences
    0:17:13 from medieval falconry to volcanic wine tasting.
    0:17:16 Autograph Collection is part of the Marriott Bonvoy Portfolio
    0:17:20 of over 30 hotel brands around the world.
    0:17:23 Find the unforgettable at AutographCollection.com.
    0:17:25 (upbeat music)

    As read by George Hahn.

    F1 Is at an Inflection Point

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • The Risks and Opportunities of an AI Future — with Eric Schmidt

    AI transcript
    0:00:03 Support for the show comes from ServiceNow,
    0:00:05 the AI platform for business transformation.
    0:00:07 You’ve heard the big hype around AI.
    0:00:09 The truth is AI is only as powerful
    0:00:11 as the platform it’s built into.
    0:00:13 ServiceNow is the platform that puts AI
    0:00:15 to work for people across your business,
    0:00:18 removing friction and frustration for your employees,
    0:00:20 supercharging productivity for your developers,
    0:00:22 providing intelligent tools for your service agents
    0:00:24 to make customers happier.
    0:00:27 All built into a single platform you can use right now.
    0:00:29 That’s why the world works with ServiceNow.
    0:00:33 Visit servicenow.com/aiforpeople to learn more.
    0:00:39 Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
    0:00:42 If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you,
    0:00:46 Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention.
    0:00:49 Constant Contact’s award-winning marketing platform
    0:00:53 offers all the automation, integration and reporting tools
    0:00:55 that get your marketing running seamlessly,
    0:00:59 all backed by their expert live customer support.
    0:01:01 It’s time to get going and growing
    0:01:03 with Constant Contact today.
    0:01:06 Ready, set, grow.
    0:01:10 Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
    0:01:14 Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial,
    0:01:17 ConstantContact.ca.
    0:01:23 Thumbtack presents the ins and outs of caring for your home.
    0:01:26 Out, procrastination,
    0:01:30 putting it off, kicking the can down the road.
    0:01:33 In, plans and guides that make it easy
    0:01:35 to get home projects done.
    0:01:39 Out, carpet in the bathroom, like why.
    0:01:45 In, knowing what to do, when to do it, and who to hire.
    0:01:49 Start caring for your home with confidence.
    0:01:50 Download Thumbtack today.
    0:01:57 Episode 326, 326 is the area code serving southwest in Ohio.
    0:02:00 In 1926, the first SATs took place.
    0:02:03 Latest exam for me, a prostate exam.
    0:02:05 My doctor told me it’s perfectly normal
    0:02:08 to become aroused and even ejaculate.
    0:02:12 That being said, I still wish he hadn’t.
    0:02:18 Go, go, go.
    0:02:21 (upbeat music)
    0:02:26 – Welcome to the 326th episode of The Prop G Bot.
    0:02:28 In today’s episode, we speak with Eric Schmidt,
    0:02:30 a technologist, entrepreneur, and philanthropist.
    0:02:32 He also previously served as Google’s
    0:02:33 chief executive officer.
    0:02:34 I don’t know if you’ve heard of him.
    0:02:35 It’s a tech company.
    0:02:37 You can actually go there and type in your own name
    0:02:39 and you see what the world thinks of you.
    0:02:42 Later, he was the executive chairman and technical advisor.
    0:02:44 We discussed with Eric the dangers
    0:02:47 and opportunities AI presents in his latest book,
    0:02:49 “Genesis, Artificial Training.”
    0:02:51 “Genesis, Artificial Intelligence,
    0:02:53 Hope in the Human Spirit.”
    0:02:55 Well, that sounds like a show
    0:02:58 on the Hallmark channel in hell.
    0:02:59 Okay, what’s happening?
    0:03:02 Off to Vegas this week, I’ve been at Summit.
    0:03:03 That’s beautiful here.
    0:03:04 It’s lovely.
    0:03:07 I love kind of the western Baja sky or light.
    0:03:09 I think I may retire here.
    0:03:11 When I retire in Mexico, I think the food’s amazing.
    0:03:13 The people are just incredibly cool.
    0:03:14 The service go, no joke,
    0:03:18 think that Mexico’s the best vacation deal in the world.
    0:03:20 Anyways, where am I headed to next?
    0:03:21 I go to Vegas tonight.
    0:03:24 Then know that you asked doing a talk there tomorrow.
    0:03:26 Vegas turned the week, not so much fun.
    0:03:27 Not so much fun.
    0:03:30 That definitely kind of an unusual vibe there.
    0:03:31 And then I go to LA for a couple of days.
    0:03:33 Daddy will be at the Beverly Hills Hotel.
    0:03:34 Swing by, stay high.
    0:03:37 I’ll be the guy alone at the bar.
    0:03:39 Oh, I love eating alone at the Polo Lounge.
    0:03:40 How do you know if I like you?
    0:03:42 I stare at your shoes and I’m mine.
    0:03:45 Anyways, then I’m back to Vegas for Formula One,
    0:03:47 which I am so excited about.
    0:03:48 I love it.
    0:03:49 The city comes alive.
    0:03:51 And then, just ’cause I know you like to keep up
    0:03:53 with my travels, I head to Sao Paulo,
    0:03:54 where the nicest hotel in the world is right now.
    0:03:56 I think the Rosewood and Sao Paulo.
    0:03:59 I think Rosewood is actually the best brand
    0:04:01 in high-end hospitality.
    0:04:02 Isn’t that good to know?
    0:04:04 A lot of insight here.
    0:04:05 A lot of insight.
    0:04:07 All right, let’s move on.
    0:04:10 Some news in the media and entertainment space.
    0:04:13 Netflix said that a record 60 million households worldwide
    0:04:14 tuned in to watch the boxing match
    0:04:15 between Jake Paul and Mike Todd.
    0:04:17 I’m sorry.
    0:04:18 I’m sorry.
    0:04:19 Just a quick announcement.
    0:04:21 This is very exciting.
    0:04:24 I just struck a deal as I told you I’m going to LA.
    0:04:26 And you’re the first to know that Hulu is announced
    0:04:28 it’ll be live streaming a fight between me and Jimmy Carter.
    0:04:29 (bell dings)
    0:04:32 By the way, if you get paid $20 million,
    0:04:33 I don’t know what Tyson was paid.
    0:04:34 I think it was $20 million.
    0:04:37 You have an obligation to either kick the shit out
    0:04:39 of someone or have the shit kicked out of you.
    0:04:42 This kind of jab snort through your nose
    0:04:43 and just stay away from the guy.
    0:04:44 I don’t buy it.
    0:04:47 I want my $12 back Netflix.
    0:04:50 Despite the disappointment in the fight,
    0:04:53 Jake Paul did in fact defeat Mike Tyson in eight rounds.
    0:04:54 Can you even call it a win?
    0:04:56 Can you?
    0:04:58 The fight was shown in over 6,000 bars and restaurants
    0:04:59 across the U.S., breaking the record
    0:05:03 for the biggest commercial distribution in the sport.
    0:05:05 But the record numbers came with a few hiccups.
    0:05:06 Viewers reported various tech issues,
    0:05:10 including slow loading times, pixelated screens,
    0:05:13 and a malfunctioning earpiece from one of the commentators.
    0:05:14 That’s a weird one.
    0:05:16 A malfunctioning earpiece from one of the commentators.
    0:05:20 Data from Down Detector revealed that user reported out
    0:05:21 it just peaked at more than 95,000
    0:05:23 around 11 p.m. Eastern time.
    0:05:25 Frustrated fans flooded social media,
    0:05:28 criticizing Netflix for the poor streaming quality.
    0:05:33 Netflix CTO Elizabeth Stone, soon to be probably former CTO,
    0:05:34 wrote to employees, “I’m sure many of you
    0:05:35 “have seen the chatter and the press
    0:05:37 “and the social media about the quality issues.
    0:05:39 “We don’t want to dismiss the poor experience
    0:05:41 “of some members and know we have room for improvement,
    0:05:43 “but still consider this event a huge success.”
    0:05:47 No, there was a pretty big fuck up for you, Ms. Stone.
    0:05:50 Specifically, Netflix tries to garner evaluation,
    0:05:52 not of a media company, but of a tech company,
    0:05:53 which means you’re actually supposed
    0:05:54 to be pretty good at this shit.
    0:05:56 And didn’t you know exactly how many people
    0:05:57 were gonna show up for this?
    0:06:00 Didn’t you kind of, weren’t you able to sort of estimate
    0:06:03 pretty accurately just exactly how many people
    0:06:05 would be dialing at exactly the same time
    0:06:06 and then test the shit out of this?
    0:06:09 You’re beginning to smell a little bit like Twitter
    0:06:10 in a presidential announcement.
    0:06:13 That just is unforgivable for a fucking tech company.
    0:06:15 Come on, guys, this is what you do.
    0:06:16 This isn’t the first time Netflix
    0:06:17 has fumbled with a live event.
    0:06:20 Last year, their Love Is Blind reunion show
    0:06:21 faced a similar situation,
    0:06:22 leaving viewers waiting over an hour
    0:06:25 before a recorded version was made available.
    0:06:27 And this brings up a bigger question.
    0:06:29 With Netflix’s pushing to live sports,
    0:06:31 including NFL game scheduled for Christmas
    0:06:34 and a major deal with WWE starting next year,
    0:06:36 can they deliver the kind of quality viewers expect
    0:06:38 that they get from broadcast cable?
    0:06:40 It looks like what’s old is new again
    0:06:41 that we have taken for granted,
    0:06:44 kind of the production quality of live TV
    0:06:45 and how difficult it is.
    0:06:49 That’s one thing I’ll say about Morning Joe or The View
    0:06:51 or even I think Fox does a great,
    0:06:53 they’re great at delivering TV live.
    0:06:56 I think CNN also does a fantastic job.
    0:06:57 Netflix isn’t alone.
    0:07:00 Other streaming platforms including Comcast’s Peacock
    0:07:02 have also been getting into live sports.
    0:07:04 Earlier this year, Peacock’s January playoff game
    0:07:06 between the Kansas City Chiefs and Miami Dolphins
    0:07:08 drew 23 million viewers,
    0:07:10 which broke records for internet usage in the US.
    0:07:14 Get this, the game was responsible for 30%
    0:07:15 of internet traffic that night.
    0:07:16 That’s like squid games.
    0:07:19 This is all proof that the market for live sports
    0:07:21 on streaming platforms is a massive opportunity
    0:07:23 and companies are willing to spend big.
    0:07:24 According to the Wall Street Journal,
    0:07:27 Netflix is paying around $75 million
    0:07:28 for NFL game this season.
    0:07:30 They also recently signed a 10 year,
    0:07:31 $5 million deal with WWE.
    0:07:35 It used to be that live in sports
    0:07:38 were sort of the last walls to be breached
    0:07:39 in broadcast cable.
    0:07:40 Like we’ll always have sports.
    0:07:42 And then the people with the cheapest capital
    0:07:43 in the deepest pockets showed up and said,
    0:07:45 “Hey, we’ll take Thursday night football.
    0:07:48 Hey, we’ll take the Logan Paul or Jake Paul,
    0:07:49 is it Jake or Logan?”
    0:07:51 And I can’t remember, anyways.
    0:07:54 I mean, literally broadcast cable television right now,
    0:07:56 it’s like Mark Twain said about going bankrupt.
    0:07:58 It was slowly then suddenly.
    0:08:01 We’re in the suddenly stage of the decline
    0:08:02 of linear ad supported TV.
    0:08:06 It has gotten really bad in the last few months.
    0:08:11 I had breakfast with the former CEO of CNN.
    0:08:12 Who’s a lovely guy?
    0:08:15 And he said that CNN’s viewership
    0:08:17 versus the last election has been cut in half.
    0:08:19 Can you imagine trying to explain to advertisers,
    0:08:22 our viewership is off 50% since the last time
    0:08:24 we were talking about election advertising.
    0:08:29 My theory is that the unnatural unearned torrent of cash
    0:08:31 at local news stations have been earning
    0:08:33 for the last 20 years is about to go away.
    0:08:34 And what are we talking about?
    0:08:35 Scott, tell us more.
    0:08:36 What are you saying?
    0:08:38 Effectively, a lot of smart companies,
    0:08:39 including I think Hearst and others
    0:08:41 have gone around and bought up these local news stations.
    0:08:42 And why?
    0:08:43 ‘Cause they’re dying, aren’t they?
    0:08:45 Well, yeah, they are.
    0:08:46 But old people watch local news,
    0:08:48 mostly to get the weather and local sports
    0:08:51 because that Jerry Dumphy is just so likable
    0:08:52 in that hot little number.
    0:08:55 They always have some old guy with good hair
    0:08:58 and broad shoulders who makes you feel comfortable and safe
    0:09:00 and some hot woman in her 30s
    0:09:04 who’s still waiting for the call up to do daytime TV.
    0:09:08 And everybody, old people love this and old people vote.
    0:09:09 Now what’s happening?
    0:09:11 Okay, so the numbers are in.
    0:09:13 A million people watch the best shows on MSNBC,
    0:09:16 the average age is 70, it’s mostly white
    0:09:17 and it’s mostly women.
    0:09:18 So a 70 year old white woman.
    0:09:20 Podcasts, 34 year old male.
    0:09:21 Think about that.
    0:09:23 Also the zeitgeist is different.
    0:09:26 People go to cable news to sanctify their religion
    0:09:27 or specifically their politics.
    0:09:29 People come to podcasts to learn.
    0:09:30 The zeitgeist is different.
    0:09:34 We try to present our guests in a more aspirational light.
    0:09:35 We’re not looking for a gotcha moment
    0:09:36 to go live on TikTok.
    0:09:38 It’s not, say a twist of phrase,
    0:09:39 dead at done in six minutes
    0:09:41 ’cause we got a break for an opioid induced constipation
    0:09:43 commercial or life alert.
    0:09:44 I’m following.
    0:09:45 We don’t do that shit.
    0:09:48 We sell zipper cruder and athletic greens
    0:09:51 and thunder eyes and different kind of modern cool stuff
    0:09:52 like that.
    0:09:53 Also, Viori.
    0:09:54 I’m wearing Viori shorts right now.
    0:09:57 By the way, I fucking love this athleisure.
    0:10:00 Oh my God, I look so good in this shit.
    0:10:02 Actually, no one really looks good.
    0:10:04 No man looks good in athleisure,
    0:10:06 but I look less bad than I look in most athleisure.
    0:10:08 I love the fabrics.
    0:10:09 Not even getting paid to say this.
    0:10:11 Wearing it right now.
    0:10:13 So let’s talk a little bit about Netflix.
    0:10:14 It’s up 81% year today.
    0:10:16 True story, I bought Netflix at 10 bucks a share.
    0:10:17 That’s a good news.
    0:10:20 The bad news is I sold it at eight bucks a share
    0:10:22 and now it’s at $840.
    0:10:23 Daddy would be live broadcasting
    0:10:25 from his own fucking Gulfstream right now.
    0:10:26 Had I not been such a shit head,
    0:10:29 I’m gonna find a time machine, get in it, go back,
    0:10:31 find me, kill me and then kill myself.
    0:10:34 Eight, Jesus, God.
    0:10:37 Anyways, Amazon is up 34%.
    0:10:38 I do own that stock.
    0:10:39 Disney is up 22%.
    0:10:40 My stock pick for 2024.
    0:10:44 Warner Brothers Discovery down 22%.
    0:10:47 Jesus Christ Malone, you fired the wrong guy, Paramount.
    0:10:49 By the way, Zazloff, the guy who was overseeing
    0:10:52 a destruction of about 60 or 70% of shareholder value
    0:10:53 since he talked to much of stupid people
    0:10:55 into why this merger made any fucking sense
    0:10:57 and took on way too much debt.
    0:11:00 He’s managed to pull out about a third of a billion dollars
    0:11:01 despite destroying a massive amount
    0:11:02 of shareholder value.
    0:11:05 Paramount is down 28% year today.
    0:11:07 Comcast is down 2.3%.
    0:11:12 Comcast I think is arguably the best run of the cable folks.
    0:11:13 Obviously not including Netflix,
    0:11:16 which is just a gangster run company.
    0:11:19 So Netflix has about 250 million users.
    0:11:21 Amazon Prime Video has 200 million.
    0:11:22 Is that fair though?
    0:11:24 ‘Cause you just automatically get it with Prime.
    0:11:27 Disney Plus 150 million.
    0:11:29 Max 95.
    0:11:33 I love Max, we sold our series into Netflix.
    0:11:34 Our big tech drama.
    0:11:38 I think most of us would have liked HBO
    0:11:40 just ’cause HBO has a certain culture
    0:11:42 that feeds kind of the water cooler.
    0:11:45 You’re talking about something in streaming media.
    0:11:47 You’re usually talking about something on Max
    0:11:49 but Netflix has also got bigger reach.
    0:11:51 These are good problems.
    0:11:54 Hulu’s Paramount is at 63 million.
    0:11:57 Hulu 49, Peacock 28.
    0:12:02 ESPN Plus at 26, Apple TV at 25.
    0:12:05 And then Stars, remember them at 16 million.
    0:12:07 Effectively these guys have cheaper capital.
    0:12:09 They’re absolutely killing linear TV.
    0:12:11 Does that mean it’s a bad business now?
    0:12:13 Someone’s gonna come in and roll up all of these assets
    0:12:18 between the old Viacom assets, CNN, Turner,
    0:12:22 all the Disney shit, ABC.
    0:12:23 They’re gonna roll them all up.
    0:12:26 Milk ’em for their cash flow, cut costs faster
    0:12:28 than the revenue declines.
    0:12:29 These businesses,
    0:12:30 while they seem to be going out of business
    0:12:33 pretty fast right now, it’ll probably level out.
    0:12:35 AOL’s still a small but great business.
    0:12:37 I think it does something like four or $500 million
    0:12:38 in EBITDA ’cause there’s still a lot of people
    0:12:40 that depend on AOL and rural areas
    0:12:42 for their dial-up for their internet.
    0:12:46 And some people will kind of hang in there, if you will.
    0:12:48 But this is gonna be a distress play.
    0:12:50 They’re gonna stop this consensual hallucination
    0:12:52 that these things are gonna ever grow again.
    0:12:54 They’ll consolidate them to start cutting costs.
    0:12:57 One of the best investments I’ve ever made, yellow pages.
    0:12:58 We bought a yellow pages company
    0:13:01 for about two or two and a half times cash flow.
    0:13:05 Yeah, it’s going down by eight to 12% a year.
    0:13:06 But if you cut costs faster than that
    0:13:09 by going and buying the other shitty yellow pages companies
    0:13:10 and then consolidating the staff,
    0:13:12 which is Latin for layoff people,
    0:13:15 and you can cut costs faster than 8%,
    0:13:17 you have an increase in EBITDA every year.
    0:13:19 I still find across the entire asset class,
    0:13:21 and this is where I’ll wrap up.
    0:13:25 In general, a basic axiom that I have found holds water
    0:13:26 through the test of time around investing,
    0:13:29 is the sexier it is, the lower the ROI.
    0:13:31 And if you look at asset classes
    0:13:33 in terms of their sex appeal,
    0:13:35 venture investing or angel investing is fun, right?
    0:13:37 It’s for what I call FIPS,
    0:13:39 formerly important people that wanna stay involved
    0:13:40 and wanna help entrepreneurs.
    0:13:42 But be clear, the only return you get is psychic.
    0:13:45 It is a terrible asset class, even if something works.
    0:13:48 And at that stage, it is very hard to predict.
    0:13:51 You’re talking about one in seven, maybe, do well.
    0:13:52 And even at one company,
    0:13:54 likely you’ll get washed out along the way
    0:13:56 at a little bump and the VCs have showed up
    0:13:56 and they’ll wash you out.
    0:13:59 It is a very tough asset class to make money.
    0:14:02 Venture does better, but the majority of the returns
    0:14:04 are not only crowded to a small number of brands
    0:14:05 that get all the deal flow,
    0:14:06 but a small number of partners
    0:14:09 within that small number of firms.
    0:14:11 And then you have growth, I think that’s better.
    0:14:14 Then you have IPOs, unfortunately IPOs.
    0:14:16 That winter is really ugly right now.
    0:14:20 The IPO market’s basically been in a pretty big deep freeze
    0:14:21 for several years now.
    0:14:22 And people keep thinking it’s gonna come back.
    0:14:25 We got excited about Reddit, but not a lot followed.
    0:14:27 And then you go into public company stocks.
    0:14:30 It’s impossible to pick stocks by an index fund.
    0:14:31 Then you get into distressed
    0:14:33 or mature companies, dividend plays.
    0:14:35 And then what I love is distressed.
    0:14:37 I find that distressed is the best asset class.
    0:14:38 Why?
    0:14:43 What business has the greatest likelihood of succeeding?
    0:14:44 Anything in senior care.
    0:14:45 Why?
    0:14:46 Against the above, the less sexy it is.
    0:14:48 People don’t wanna be around old people.
    0:14:49 It reminds them of death.
    0:14:50 They’re generally pretty boring.
    0:14:51 I know I’m supposed to say
    0:14:55 they just have so much experience and wisdom sometimes.
    0:14:56 And people wanna avoid them.
    0:14:58 People wanna hang out with hot young people, right?
    0:15:00 And people wanna hang out with hot young companies,
    0:15:03 specifically capital wants to hang out
    0:15:05 with hot young growing companies.
    0:15:06 And they don’t like the way
    0:15:09 that old companies smell, so to speak.
    0:15:10 So they avoid them.
    0:15:12 And that’s why there’s a greater return
    0:15:13 on investment in distressed.
    0:15:15 What’s the learning here?
    0:15:18 Sex appeal and ROI are inversely correlated.
    0:15:20 So yeah, if you wanna invest
    0:15:21 in a member’s club downtown
    0:15:24 for the fashion industry and the music industry have at it,
    0:15:28 but keep in mind ROI and sex appeal inversely correlated.
    0:15:33 We’ll be right back for our conversation with Eric Schmidt.
    0:15:38 Support for property comes from Mint Mobile.
    0:15:40 You’re probably paying too much for your cell phone plan.
    0:15:42 It’s one of those budgetary line items
    0:15:43 that always looks pretty ugly.
    0:15:44 And it might feel like
    0:15:46 there’s nothing you can do about it.
    0:15:48 That’s where Mint Mobile has something to say.
    0:15:49 Mint Mobile’s latest deal might challenge your idea
    0:15:51 of what a phone plan costs.
    0:15:52 If you make the switch now,
    0:15:54 you’ll pay just $15 a month
    0:15:56 when you purchase a new three-month phone plan.
    0:15:58 All Mint Mobile plans come with high-speed data
    0:15:59 on a limit-talked index delivered
    0:16:01 on the nation’s largest 5D network.
    0:16:03 You can even keep your phone, your contacts,
    0:16:04 and your number.
    0:16:06 It doesn’t get much easier than that.
    0:16:07 To get this new customer offer
    0:16:09 and your new three-month premium wireless plan
    0:16:10 for just 15 bucks a month,
    0:16:13 you can go to mintmobile.com/profg.
    0:16:15 That’s mintmobile.com/profg.
    0:16:16 You can cut your wireless bill
    0:16:18 to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com/profg.
    0:16:20 $45 upfront payment required,
    0:16:21 equivalent to $15 a month.
    0:16:23 New customers on a first three-month plan
    0:16:25 only speeds slower, about 40 gigabytes on a limited plan,
    0:16:28 additional taxes, fees, and restrictions apply.
    0:16:30 See Mint Mobile for details.
    0:16:38 Your business is ready for launch.
    0:16:40 But what’s the most important thing to do
    0:16:42 before those doors open?
    0:16:45 Is it getting more social media followers?
    0:16:47 Or is it actually legitimizing
    0:16:50 and protecting the business you’ve been busy building?
    0:16:53 Make it official with LegalZoom.
    0:16:55 LegalZoom has everything you need to launch,
    0:16:58 run, and protect your business all in one place.
    0:17:00 Setting up your business properly
    0:17:01 and remaining compliant
    0:17:04 are the things you want to get right from the get-go.
    0:17:06 And LegalZoom saves you from wasting hours
    0:17:09 making sense of the legal stuff.
    0:17:11 And if you need some hands-on help,
    0:17:12 their network of experienced attorneys
    0:17:15 from around the country has your back.
    0:17:18 Launch, run, and protect your business
    0:17:21 to make it official today at LegalZoom.com.
    0:17:24 And use promo code VOXBiz to get 10% off
    0:17:26 any LegalZoom business formation product
    0:17:29 excluding subscriptions and renewals.
    0:17:32 Expires December 31st, 2024.
    0:17:34 Get everything you need from setup to success
    0:17:36 at LegalZoom.com.
    0:17:38 And use promo code VOXBiz.
    0:17:40 LegalZoom.com.
    0:17:43 And use promo code VOXBiz.
    0:17:46 LegalZoom provides access to independent attorneys
    0:17:47 and self-service tools.
    0:17:48 LegalZoom is not a law firm
    0:17:50 and does not provide legal advice
    0:17:52 except for authorized through its subsidiary law firm
    0:17:54 LZ Legal Services LLC.
    0:17:59 Support for the show comes from one password.
    0:18:01 How do you make a password that’s strong enough
    0:18:04 so no one will guess it and impossible to forget?
    0:18:07 And now how can you do it for over 100 different sites
    0:18:08 and make it so everyone in your company
    0:18:10 can do the exact same thing
    0:18:11 without ever needing to reset them?
    0:18:13 It’s not impossible.
    0:18:15 One password makes it simple.
    0:18:17 One password combines industry-leading security
    0:18:19 with award-winning design to bring private secure
    0:18:22 and user-friendly password management to everyone.
    0:18:25 One password makes strong security easy for your people
    0:18:27 and gives you the visibility you need to take action
    0:18:28 when you need to.
    0:18:30 A single data breach can cost millions of dollars
    0:18:32 while one password secures every sign-in
    0:18:34 to save you time and money.
    0:18:36 And it lets you securely switch
    0:18:38 between iPhone, Android, Mac, and PC.
    0:18:41 All you have to remember is the one strong account password
    0:18:42 that protects everything else.
    0:18:44 Your logins, your credit cards, secure notes,
    0:18:46 or the office Wi-Fi password.
    0:18:49 Right now, our listeners get a free two-week trial
    0:18:53 at onepassword.com/prof for your growing business.
    0:18:57 That’s two weeks free at onepassword.com/prof.
    0:18:59 Don’t let security slow your business down.
    0:19:02 Go to onepassword.com/prof.
    0:19:05 (upbeat music)
    0:19:14 – Welcome back.
    0:19:15 Here’s our conversation with Eric Schmidt,
    0:19:17 a technologist, entrepreneur, philanthropist,
    0:19:19 and Google former CEO.
    0:19:24 Eric, where does this podcast find you?
    0:19:25 – I’m in Boston.
    0:19:28 I’m at Harvard and giving a speech to students later today.
    0:19:30 – Oh, nice.
    0:19:31 So let’s bust right into it.
    0:19:33 You have a new book out that you co-authored
    0:19:35 with the late Henry Kissinger titled
    0:19:37 “Genesis, Artificial Intelligence,
    0:19:40 “Hope, and the Human Spirit.”
    0:19:41 What is it about this book?
    0:19:44 Or give us what you would call the Pillars of Insight here
    0:19:48 around that’ll help people understand the evolution of AI.
    0:19:51 – Well, the world is full of stories about what AI can do.
    0:19:54 And we generally agree with those.
    0:19:58 What we believe, however, is the world is not ready for this.
    0:20:00 And there are so many examples,
    0:20:04 whether it’s trust, military power, deception,
    0:20:07 economic power, the effect on humans,
    0:20:12 the effect on children that are relatively poorly explored.
    0:20:16 So the reader of this book doesn’t need to understand AI,
    0:20:18 but they need to be worried
    0:20:20 that this stuff is going to be unmanaged.
    0:20:23 Dr. Kissinger was very concerned
    0:20:26 that the future should not be left to people like myself.
    0:20:30 He believed very strongly that these tools are so powerful
    0:20:33 in terms of their effect on human society.
    0:20:35 It was important that the decisions be made
    0:20:37 by more than just the tech people.
    0:20:40 And the book is really a discussion
    0:20:43 about what happens to the structure of organizations,
    0:20:46 the structure of jobs, the structure of power,
    0:20:49 and all the things that people worry about.
    0:20:54 I personally believe that this will happen much, much more
    0:20:57 quickly than societies are ready for,
    0:20:59 including in the United States and China.
    0:21:02 It’s happening very fast.
    0:21:04 – And what do you see as the real existential threats here?
    0:21:07 Is it that it becomes sentient?
    0:21:11 Is it misinformation, income inequality, loneliness?
    0:21:14 What do you think are the kind of first and foremost
    0:21:17 biggest concerns you have about this rapid evolution of AI?
    0:21:20 – There are many things to worry about.
    0:21:22 Before we say the bad things,
    0:21:25 let me remind you enormous improvements
    0:21:28 in drug capability for healthcare,
    0:21:31 solutions to climate change, better vehicles,
    0:21:33 huge discoveries in science,
    0:21:36 greater productivity for kind of everyone,
    0:21:38 a universal doctor, a universal educator,
    0:21:40 all of these things are coming.
    0:21:42 And those are fantastic.
    0:21:47 A long way you come with, because these are very powerful,
    0:21:49 especially in the hands of an evil person
    0:21:51 and we know evil exists,
    0:21:55 these systems can be used to harm large numbers of people.
    0:21:58 The most obvious one is their use in biology.
    0:22:00 Can these systems at some point in the future
    0:22:02 generate biological pathogens
    0:22:06 that could harm many, many, many, many humans?
    0:22:08 Today, we’re quite sure they can’t,
    0:22:09 but there’s a lot of people who think
    0:22:12 that they will be able to unless we take some action.
    0:22:15 Those actions are being worked on now.
    0:22:16 What about cyber attacks?
    0:22:18 You have a lone actor, a terrorist group,
    0:22:22 North Korea, whomever, whatever your evil person or group is,
    0:22:25 and they decide to take down the financial system
    0:22:28 using a previously unknown attack vector,
    0:22:30 so-called zero-day exploits.
    0:22:33 So the systems are so powerful
    0:22:36 that we are quite concerned
    0:22:39 that in addition to democracies using them for gains,
    0:22:42 dictators will use them to aggregate power
    0:22:45 and they’ll be used in a harmful and military context.
    0:22:49 So I’m freaked out about these AI girlfriends.
    0:22:52 I feel as if the biggest threat in the U.S. right now
    0:22:55 is loneliness that leads to extremism,
    0:22:59 and I see these AI girlfriends and AI searches popping up,
    0:23:02 and I see a lot of young men who have a lack of romantic
    0:23:06 or economic opportunities turning to AI girlfriends
    0:23:09 and begin to sequester from real relationships
    0:23:11 and they become less likely to believe in climate change,
    0:23:14 more likely to engage in misogynistic content,
    0:23:17 sequester from school, their parents’ work,
    0:23:20 and some they become really shitty citizens.
    0:23:23 And I think men, young men are having so much trouble
    0:23:28 that this low risk entry into these faux relationships
    0:23:30 is just gonna speedball loneliness
    0:23:32 and the externalities of loneliness.
    0:23:33 Your thoughts?
    0:23:35 – I completely agree.
    0:23:38 There’s lots of evidence that there’s now a problem
    0:23:39 with young men.
    0:23:42 In many cases, the path to success for young men
    0:23:46 has been, shall we say, been made more difficult
    0:23:48 because they’re not as educated as the women are now.
    0:23:50 Remember, there are more women in college than men,
    0:23:55 and many of the traditional paths are no longer as available.
    0:23:58 And so they turn to the online world
    0:24:01 for enjoyment and sustenance,
    0:24:03 but also because of the social media algorithms,
    0:24:07 they find like-minded people who ultimately radicalize them
    0:24:10 either in a horrific way like terrorism
    0:24:12 or in the kind of way that you’re describing,
    0:24:13 where they’re just maladjusted.
    0:24:18 This is a good example of an unexpected problem
    0:24:20 of existing technology.
    0:24:24 So now imagine that the AI girlfriend or boyfriend,
    0:24:26 although she was AI girlfriend as an example,
    0:24:31 is perfect, perfect visually, perfect emotionally.
    0:24:35 And the AI girlfriend in this case captures your mind
    0:24:39 as a man to the point where she or whatever it is
    0:24:41 takes over the way you thinking.
    0:24:44 You’re obsessed with her.
    0:24:46 That kind of obsession is possible,
    0:24:49 especially for people who are not fully formed.
    0:24:51 Parents are going to have to be more involved
    0:24:52 for all the obvious reasons,
    0:24:53 but at the end of the day,
    0:24:56 parents can only control what their sons and daughters
    0:24:58 are doing within reason.
    0:25:01 We’ve ended up, again, using teenagers as an example.
    0:25:05 We have all sorts of rules about age of maturity, 16, 18,
    0:25:07 what have you, 21 in some cases,
    0:25:10 and yet you put a 12 or 13 year old
    0:25:11 in front of one of these things
    0:25:13 and they have access to every evil
    0:25:14 as well as every good in the world
    0:25:16 and they’re not ready to take it.
    0:25:17 So I think the general question of,
    0:25:21 are you mature enough to handle it?
    0:25:24 Sort of the general version of your AI girlfriend example
    0:25:26 is unresolved.
    0:25:28 – So I think people, most people would agree
    0:25:30 that the pace of AI is scary
    0:25:35 and that our institutions and our ability to regulate
    0:25:37 are not keeping up with the pace of evolution here.
    0:25:40 And we see what perfectly what happened
    0:25:41 with social around this.
    0:25:43 What can be done?
    0:25:47 How, what’s an example or a construct or framework
    0:25:50 that you can point to where we get the good stuff,
    0:25:54 the drug discovery, the help with climate change,
    0:25:57 but attempt to screen out or at least put in check
    0:26:00 or put in some guardrails around the bad stuff.
    0:26:03 What’s the, what are you advocating for?
    0:26:06 – I think it starts with having an honest conversation
    0:26:08 of where the problems come from.
    0:26:11 So you have people who are absolutist on free speech,
    0:26:14 which I happen to agree with,
    0:26:17 but they confuse free speech of an individual
    0:26:19 versus free speech for a computer.
    0:26:23 I am strongly in favor of free speech for every human.
    0:26:26 I am not in favor of free speech for computers.
    0:26:30 And the algorithms are not necessarily optimizing
    0:26:32 the best thing for humanity.
    0:26:35 So as a general point, specifically,
    0:26:37 we’re going to have to have some conversations
    0:26:40 about what is, at what age are things appropriate?
    0:26:42 And we’re also going to have to change some of the laws,
    0:26:44 for example, section 230,
    0:26:48 to allow for liability in the worst possible cases.
    0:26:52 So when someone is harmed from this technology,
    0:26:54 we need to have a solution to prevent further harm.
    0:26:57 Every new invention has created harm.
    0:26:58 Think about cars, right?
    0:27:02 So cars used to hit everything and they were very unsafe.
    0:27:04 Now cars are really quite safe.
    0:27:08 Certainly by comparison to anything in history.
    0:27:10 So the history of these inventions
    0:27:13 is that you allow for the greatness
    0:27:16 and you police the guard, technically the guardrails.
    0:27:19 You put limits on what they can do.
    0:27:21 And it’s an appropriate debate,
    0:27:23 but it’s one that we have to have now for this technology.
    0:27:26 I’m particularly concerned about the issue
    0:27:28 that you mentioned earlier
    0:27:31 about the effect of on human psyche.
    0:27:34 Dr. Kissinger, who studied Kant,
    0:27:37 was very concerned, and we write in the book at some length,
    0:27:40 about what happens when your worldview
    0:27:45 is taken over by a computer as opposed to your friends, right?
    0:27:49 Isolated, the computer is feeding you stuff.
    0:27:53 It’s not optimized around human values, good or bad.
    0:27:55 God knows what it’s trying to do.
    0:27:57 It’s trying to make money or something.
    0:27:59 That’s not a good answer.
    0:28:01 – So I think most reasonable people would say,
    0:28:04 “Okay, some sort of fossil fuels are a net good.”
    0:28:06 I would argue pesticides are a net good,
    0:28:10 but we have emission standards and an FDA.
    0:28:12 Most people would, I think, loosely agree
    0:28:15 or mostly agree that some sort of regulation
    0:28:18 that keeps these things in check makes sense.
    0:28:20 Now, let’s talk about big tech,
    0:28:22 which you were an instrumental player in.
    0:28:24 You guys figured out a way, quite frankly,
    0:28:27 to overrun Washington with lobbyists
    0:28:30 and avoid all reasonable regulation.
    0:28:31 Why are things gonna be different now
    0:28:33 than what they were in your industry
    0:28:35 when you were involved in it?
    0:28:37 – Well, President Trump has indicated
    0:28:41 that he is likely to repeal the executive order
    0:28:43 that came out of President Biden,
    0:28:45 which was an attempt at this.
    0:28:49 So I think a fair prediction is that for the next four years,
    0:28:51 there’ll be very little regulation in this area
    0:28:54 as the president will be focused on the things.
    0:28:57 So what will happen in those companies
    0:29:00 is if there is real harm, there’s liability,
    0:29:02 there’s lawsuits and things.
    0:29:04 So the companies are not completely scot-free.
    0:29:07 Our companies, remember, are economic agents
    0:29:09 and they have lawyers whose jobs are to protect
    0:29:12 their intellectual property and their goals.
    0:29:14 So it’s gonna take, I’m sorry to say,
    0:29:18 it’s likely to take some kind of a calamity
    0:29:21 to cause a change in regulation.
    0:29:23 And I remember when I was in California,
    0:29:27 when I was younger, California driver’s licenses,
    0:29:30 the address on your driver’s license was public
    0:29:31 and there was a horrific crime
    0:29:33 where a woman was followed to her home
    0:29:36 and then she was murdered based on that information.
    0:29:38 And then they changed the law.
    0:29:42 And my reaction was, didn’t you foresee this, right?
    0:29:46 You put millions and millions of license information
    0:29:49 to the public and you don’t think that some idiot
    0:29:51 who’s horrific is gonna harm somebody.
    0:29:54 So my frustration is not that it will occur
    0:29:55 because I’m sure it will,
    0:29:58 but why did we not anticipate that as an example?
    0:30:03 We should anticipate, make a list of the biggest harms.
    0:30:05 I’ll give you another example.
    0:30:08 These systems should not be allowed access to weapons.
    0:30:10 Very simple.
    0:30:14 You don’t want the AI deciding when to launch a missile.
    0:30:17 You want the human to be responsible.
    0:30:20 And these kinds of sensible regulations
    0:30:22 are not complicated to state.
    0:30:25 – Are you familiar with character AI?
    0:30:26 – I am.
    0:30:30 – Really, just a horrific incident
    0:30:33 where a 14-year-old thinks he establishes a relationship
    0:30:37 with an AI agent that he thinks is a character
    0:30:38 from Game of Thrones.
    0:30:40 He’s obviously unwell,
    0:30:42 although he, my understanding is from his mother
    0:30:45 who’s taken this on as an issue, understandably.
    0:30:49 He did not qualify as someone who was mentally ill.
    0:30:52 Establishes this very deep relationship
    0:30:55 with obviously a very nuanced character.
    0:30:59 And the net effect is he contemplates suicide
    0:31:02 and she invites him to do that.
    0:31:05 And the story does not end well.
    0:31:07 And my view, Eric, is that if we’re waiting
    0:31:09 for people’s critical thinking to show up
    0:31:11 or for the better angels of CEOs of companies
    0:31:13 that are there to make a profit,
    0:31:14 that’s what they’re supposed to do.
    0:31:15 They’re doing their job.
    0:31:19 We’re just gonna have tragedy after tragedy after tragedy.
    0:31:22 My sense is someone needs to go to jail.
    0:31:23 And in order to do that,
    0:31:26 we need to pass laws showing that if you’re reckless
    0:31:29 with technology and we can reverse engineer it
    0:31:31 to the death of a 14-year-old,
    0:31:33 that you are criminally liable.
    0:31:35 But I don’t see that happening.
    0:31:37 So I would push back on the notion
    0:31:39 that people need to think more critically.
    0:31:40 That would be lovely.
    0:31:42 I don’t see that happening.
    0:31:45 I have no evidence that any CEO of a tech company
    0:31:47 is gonna do anything but increase the value
    0:31:49 of their shares, which I understand
    0:31:52 and is a key component of capitalism.
    0:31:54 It feels like we need laws
    0:31:57 that either remove this liability shield.
    0:31:58 I mean, does any of this change
    0:32:01 until someone shows up in an orange jumpsuit?
    0:32:04 – I can tell you how we dealt with this at Google.
    0:32:07 We had a rule that in the morning we would look at things.
    0:32:10 And if there was something that looked like real harm,
    0:32:12 we would resolve it by noon.
    0:32:15 And we would make the necessary adjustments.
    0:32:19 The example that you gave is horrific,
    0:32:21 but it’s all too common.
    0:32:24 And it’s gonna get worse for the following reason.
    0:32:26 So now imagine you have a two-year-old
    0:32:28 and you have the equivalent of a bear
    0:32:30 that is the two-year-old’s best friend.
    0:32:32 And every year the bear gets smarter
    0:32:34 and the two-year-old gets smarter too,
    0:32:37 becomes three, four, five, and so forth.
    0:32:40 That now 15-year-old’s best friend
    0:32:43 will not be a boy or a girl of the same age.
    0:32:45 It’ll be a digital device.
    0:32:50 And such people highlighted in your terrible example
    0:32:52 are highly suggestible.
    0:32:55 So either the people who are building
    0:32:58 the equivalent of that bear 10 years from now
    0:33:01 are gonna be smart enough to never suggest harm,
    0:33:05 or they’re gonna get regulated and criminalized.
    0:33:06 Those are the choices.
    0:33:09 The technology, I used to say that the internet
    0:33:12 is really wonderful, but it’s full of misinformation
    0:33:15 and there’s an off button for a reason, turn it off.
    0:33:17 I can’t do that anymore.
    0:33:20 The internet is so intertwined in our daily lives.
    0:33:23 All of us, every one of us, for the good and bad,
    0:33:25 that we can’t get out of the cesspool
    0:33:27 if we think it’s a cesspool and we can’t make it better
    0:33:29 ’cause it keeps coming at us.
    0:33:32 The industry, to answer your question,
    0:33:36 the industry is optimized to maximize your attention
    0:33:37 and monetize it.
    0:33:40 So that behavior is gonna continue.
    0:33:43 The question is how do you manage the extreme cases?
    0:33:46 Anything involving personal harm of the nature
    0:33:49 that you’re describing will be regulated
    0:33:50 one way or the other.
    0:33:53 – Yeah, at some point, it’s just a damage
    0:33:54 we incur until then, right?
    0:33:58 We’ve had 40 congressional hearings on child safety
    0:34:00 and social media and we’ve had zero laws.
    0:34:05 – In fairness to that, there is a very, very extensive set
    0:34:08 of laws around child sexual abuse,
    0:34:10 which is obviously horrific as well.
    0:34:14 And those laws are universally implemented
    0:34:16 and well adhered to.
    0:34:19 So we do have examples where everyone agrees
    0:34:20 what the harm is.
    0:34:22 I think all of us would agree that a suicide
    0:34:25 of a teenager is not okay.
    0:34:27 And so regulating the industry,
    0:34:29 so it doesn’t generate that message,
    0:34:31 strikes me as a brainer.
    0:34:34 The ones which will be much harder are where
    0:34:38 the system has essentially captured the emotions
    0:34:41 of the person and is feeding them back to the person
    0:34:43 as opposed to making suggestions.
    0:34:46 And that’s, and we talk about this in the book,
    0:34:48 when the system is shaping your thinking,
    0:34:50 you are being shaped by a computer,
    0:34:52 you’re not shaping it.
    0:34:54 And because these systems are so powerful,
    0:34:57 we worry and again, we talk about this in the book,
    0:35:01 of the impact on the perception of truth and of society.
    0:35:02 Who am I?
    0:35:03 What do I do?
    0:35:06 And ultimately, one of the risks here,
    0:35:08 if we don’t get this under control,
    0:35:11 is that we will be the dogs to the powerful AI
    0:35:14 as opposed to us telling the AI what to do.
    0:35:17 A simple answer to the question of when
    0:35:20 is the industry believes that within five to 10 years,
    0:35:22 these systems will be so powerful
    0:35:25 that they might be able to do self-learning.
    0:35:27 And this is a point where the system begins
    0:35:29 to have its own actions, its own religion,
    0:35:32 it’s called evolution, it’s called general intelligence,
    0:35:34 AGI as it’s called.
    0:35:37 And the arrival of AGI will need to be regulated.
    0:35:39 We’ll be right back.
    0:35:42 (upbeat music)
    0:35:44 Support for PropG comes from Miro.
    0:35:46 While a lot of CEOs believe that innovation
    0:35:48 is the lifeblood of business,
    0:35:50 very few of them actually see their team unlock
    0:35:52 the creativity needed to innovate.
    0:35:54 A lot of times that’s because once you’ve moved
    0:35:56 from discovery and ideation of product development,
    0:35:58 outdated process management tools,
    0:35:59 context switching, team alignment
    0:36:03 and constant updates massively slow, the process.
    0:36:06 But now you can take a big step to solving these problems
    0:36:09 with the innovation workspace from Miro.
    0:36:11 Miro is a workspace where teams can work together
    0:36:13 from initial stages of project or product design
    0:36:16 all the way to designing and delivering the finished product.
    0:36:18 Powered by AI, Miro can help teams increase the speed
    0:36:20 of their work by generating AI-powered summaries,
    0:36:22 product briefs and research insights
    0:36:24 in the early stages of development.
    0:36:28 Then move to prototypes, process flows and diagrams.
    0:36:30 And once there, execute those tasks with timelines
    0:36:33 and project trackers all in a single shared space.
    0:36:36 Whether you work in product design, engineering, UX, agile
    0:36:39 or marketing, bring your team together on Miro.
    0:36:40 Your first three Miro boards are free
    0:36:43 when you sign up today at Miro.com.
    0:36:46 That’s three free boards at M-I-R-O.com.
    0:36:54 (gentle music)
    0:36:57 – Autograph collection hotels offer over 300
    0:36:59 independent hotels around the world,
    0:37:02 each exactly like nothing else.
    0:37:04 Hand selected for their inherent craft,
    0:37:07 each hotel tells its own unique story
    0:37:10 through distinctive design and immersive experiences
    0:37:13 from medieval falconry to volcanic wine tasting.
    0:37:16 Autograph collection is part of the Marriott Bonvoy portfolio
    0:37:20 of over 30 hotel brands around the world.
    0:37:23 Find the unforgettable at autographcollection.com.
    0:37:28 Support for PropG comes from Fundrise.
    0:37:29 Artificial Intelligence is poised to be
    0:37:31 one of the biggest wealth creation events in history.
    0:37:34 Some experts expect AI to add more than $15 trillion
    0:37:37 to the global economy by 2030.
    0:37:38 Unfortunately, your portfolio
    0:37:40 probably doesn’t own the biggest names in AI.
    0:37:42 That’s because most of the AI revolution
    0:37:45 is largely being built and funded in private markets.
    0:37:47 That means the vast majority of AI startups
    0:37:49 are going to be backed and owned by venture capitalists,
    0:37:50 not public investors.
    0:37:53 But with the launch of the Fundrise Innovation Fund last year,
    0:37:55 you can get in on it now.
    0:37:56 The Innovation Fund pairs a $100 million
    0:37:59 plus venture portfolio of some of the biggest names in AI
    0:38:01 with one of the lowest investment minimums
    0:38:03 the venture industry has ever seen.
    0:38:06 Get in early at fundrise.com/propg.
    0:38:09 Carefully consider the investment material before investing,
    0:38:11 including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses.
    0:38:13 This and other information can be found
    0:38:15 at the Innovation Fund’s prospectus
    0:38:17 at fundrise.com/innovation.
    0:38:20 This is a paid advertisement.
    0:38:29 – We know that social media
    0:38:31 and a lot of these platforms and apps
    0:38:34 and time on phone, is this not a good idea?
    0:38:36 I’m curious what you think of my colleague’s work,
    0:38:37 Jonathan Hyde, and that is,
    0:38:40 is there any reason for anyone under the age of 14
    0:38:41 to have a smartphone?
    0:38:44 And is there any reason for anyone under the age of 16
    0:38:45 to be on social media?
    0:38:48 Shouldn’t we agegate pornography, alcohol, the military?
    0:38:52 Shouldn’t we, specifically the device makers
    0:38:55 and the operating systems, including your old firm,
    0:38:58 shouldn’t they get in the business of agegating?
    0:38:59 – They should.
    0:39:02 Indeed, Jonathan’s work is incredible.
    0:39:05 He and I wrote an article together two years ago,
    0:39:07 which called for a number of things
    0:39:09 in the area of regulating social media.
    0:39:12 And we start with changing a law called COPPA
    0:39:15 from 13 to 16.
    0:39:17 And we are quite convinced
    0:39:19 that using various techniques,
    0:39:21 we can determine the age of the person
    0:39:23 with a little bit of work.
    0:39:25 And so people say, well, you can’t implement it.
    0:39:27 Well, that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try.
    0:39:30 And so we believe that at least the pernicious effects
    0:39:34 of this technology on below 16 can be addressed.
    0:39:36 When I think about all of this,
    0:39:39 to me, we want children to be able to grow up
    0:39:42 and grow up with humans as friends.
    0:39:46 And I’m sure with the power of AI arrival,
    0:39:48 that you’re gonna see a lot of regulation
    0:39:51 about child content.
    0:39:54 What can a child below 16 see?
    0:39:56 This does not answer the question of what do you do
    0:39:58 with the 20 year old, right?
    0:40:00 Who is also still being shaped.
    0:40:03 And as we know, men develop a little bit later than women.
    0:40:05 And so let’s focus on the underdeveloped man
    0:40:08 who’s having trouble in college or what have you.
    0:40:09 What do we do with them?
    0:40:11 And that question remains open.
    0:40:16 – In terms of the idea that the genie is out of the bottle
    0:40:19 here and we face a very real issue or fulcrum retention.
    0:40:22 And that is we wanna regulate it.
    0:40:23 We wanna put in guardrails.
    0:40:28 At the same time, we wanna let our sprinters and our IP
    0:40:29 and our minds and our universities
    0:40:31 and our incredible for profit machine,
    0:40:34 we wanna let it run, right?
    0:40:37 And the fear is that if you regulate it too much,
    0:40:41 the Chinese or the Islamic Republic
    0:40:43 isn’t quite as concerned
    0:40:46 and gets ahead of us on this technology.
    0:40:48 How do you balance that tension?
    0:40:51 – So there are quite a few people in the industry,
    0:40:53 along with myself who are working on this.
    0:40:58 And the general idea is relatively light regulation
    0:41:01 looking for the extreme cases.
    0:41:03 So the worst of the extreme events
    0:41:06 would be a biological attack, a cyber attack,
    0:41:08 something that harmed a lot of people
    0:41:10 as opposed to a single individual,
    0:41:11 which is always a tragedy.
    0:41:14 Any misuse of these in war,
    0:41:17 any of those kinds of things we worry a lot about.
    0:41:19 And there’s a lot of questions here.
    0:41:24 One of them is, do you think that if we had a GI system
    0:41:30 that developed a way to kill all of the soldiers
    0:41:33 from the opposition in one day that it would be used?
    0:41:36 And I think the answer from a military general perspective
    0:41:37 would be yes.
    0:41:40 The next question is, do you think that the North Koreans,
    0:41:44 for example, or the Chinese would obey the same rules
    0:41:45 about when to apply that?
    0:41:47 And the answer is no one believes
    0:41:50 that they would do it safely and carefully
    0:41:52 under the way the US law would require.
    0:41:56 US law has a law called person in the loop
    0:41:58 or meaningful human control
    0:42:01 that tries to keep these things from going out of hand.
    0:42:06 So what I actually think is that we don’t have a theory
    0:42:09 of deterrence with these new tools.
    0:42:13 We don’t know how to deal with the spread of them.
    0:42:16 And the simple example,
    0:42:17 and sorry for the diversion for a sec,
    0:42:19 but there’s closed source and open source.
    0:42:22 Closed is like you can use it,
    0:42:25 but the software and the numbers are not available.
    0:42:27 There are other systems called open source
    0:42:29 where everything is published.
    0:42:32 China now has two of what appear to be
    0:42:35 the most powerful models ever made
    0:42:37 and they’re completely open.
    0:42:39 And we’re obviously, you and I are not in China
    0:42:42 and I don’t know why China made a decision to release them,
    0:42:45 but surely evil groups and so forth
    0:42:46 will start to use those.
    0:42:49 Now maybe they don’t speak Chinese or what have you,
    0:42:52 or maybe the Chinese just discount the risk,
    0:42:55 but there’s a real risk of proliferation of systems
    0:42:57 in the hands of terrorism.
    0:43:00 And proliferation is not gonna occur
    0:43:03 by misusing Microsoft or Google or what have you.
    0:43:05 It’s going to be by making their own servers
    0:43:06 in the dark web.
    0:43:08 And an example, a worry that we all have
    0:43:10 is exfiltration of the models.
    0:43:14 I’ll give an example, Google or Microsoft or OpenAI
    0:43:16 spends $200 million or something
    0:43:18 to build one of these models, they’re very powerful.
    0:43:22 And then some evil actor manages to exfiltrate it
    0:43:25 out of those companies and put it on the dark web.
    0:43:29 We have no theory of what to do when that occurs.
    0:43:31 Because we don’t control the dark web,
    0:43:34 we don’t know how to detect it and so forth.
    0:43:38 In the book we talk about this and say that eventually
    0:43:40 the network systems globally will have
    0:43:43 fairly sophisticated supervision systems
    0:43:45 that will watch for this.
    0:43:47 Because it’s another example of proliferation.
    0:43:51 It’s analogous to the spread of enriched uranium.
    0:43:53 If anyone tried to do that, there’s an awful lot
    0:43:55 of monitoring systems that would say
    0:43:58 you have to stop right now or we’re gonna shoot you.
    0:43:59 – So you make a really cogent argument
    0:44:02 for the kind of existential threat here,
    0:44:05 the weaponization of AI by bad actors.
    0:44:07 And we have faced similar issues before.
    0:44:09 My understanding is there are multilateral treaties
    0:44:13 around bioweapons or we have nuclear arms treaties.
    0:44:16 So is this the point in time where people such as yourself
    0:44:21 and our defense infrastructure should be thinking about
    0:44:25 or trying to figure out multilateral agreements?
    0:44:27 And again, the hard part there is my understanding
    0:44:30 is it’s very hard to monitor things like this.
    0:44:33 And should we have something along the lines of Interpol
    0:44:36 that’s basically policing this and then fighting fire
    0:44:41 with AI to go out and find scenarios
    0:44:43 where things look very ugly and move in
    0:44:44 with some sort of international force.
    0:44:46 It feels like a time for some sort
    0:44:51 of multinational cooperation is upon us, your thoughts.
    0:44:51 – We agree with you.
    0:44:54 And in the book, we specifically talk about this
    0:44:58 in a historical context of the nuclear weapons regime,
    0:45:01 which Dr. Kissinger, as you know, invented largely.
    0:45:04 What’s interesting is working with him,
    0:45:08 you realize how long it took for the full solution to occur.
    0:45:11 America used the bomb in 1945.
    0:45:15 Russia or Soviet Union demonstrated in 1949.
    0:45:17 So that’s roughly, that was a four year gap.
    0:45:20 And then there was sort of a real arms race.
    0:45:23 And once that it took roughly 15 years
    0:45:27 for an agreement to come for limitations on these things,
    0:45:30 during which time we were busy making an enormous number
    0:45:33 of weapons, which ultimately were a mistake,
    0:45:35 including, you know, these enormous bombs
    0:45:37 that were unnecessary.
    0:45:40 And so things got out of hand.
    0:45:44 In our case, I think what you’re saying is very important
    0:45:47 that we start now, and here’s where I would start.
    0:45:50 I would start with a treaty that says,
    0:45:53 we’re not going to allow anyone who’s the signature
    0:45:56 of the treaty to have automatic weapon systems.
    0:46:00 And by automatic weapons, I don’t mean automated.
    0:46:03 I mean, ones that make the decision on their own.
    0:46:07 So an agreement that any use of AI, of any kind
    0:46:11 in a conflict sense, has to be owned and authorized
    0:46:15 by a human being who is authorized to make that decision.
    0:46:17 That would be a simple example.
    0:46:20 Another thing that you could do as part of that
    0:46:23 is say that you have a duty to inform
    0:46:26 when you’re testing one of these systems
    0:46:28 in case it gets out of hand.
    0:46:31 Now, whether these treaties can be agreed to,
    0:46:34 I don’t know, remember that it was the horror
    0:46:37 of nuclear war that got people to the table
    0:46:39 and it still took 15 years.
    0:46:43 I don’t want us to go through an analogous bad incident
    0:46:45 involving an evil actor in North Korea.
    0:46:48 Again, I’m just using them as bad examples
    0:46:50 or even Russia today.
    0:46:52 We obviously don’t trust.
    0:46:54 I don’t want to run that experiment and have all that harm
    0:46:58 and then say, hey, we should have foreseen this.
    0:47:01 – Well, my sense is when we are better to technology,
    0:47:03 we’re not in a hurry for a multilateral treaty, right?
    0:47:06 When we’re under the impression that our nuclear scientists
    0:47:07 are better than your, remember,
    0:47:09 our Nazis are smarter than your Nazis kind of thing,
    0:47:11 that we like, we don’t want a multilateral treaty
    0:47:13 ’cause we see advantage.
    0:47:15 And curious if you agree with this,
    0:47:20 we have better AIs than anyone else.
    0:47:21 Does that get in the way of a treaty
    0:47:23 or should we be doing this from a position of strength?
    0:47:25 And also, if there’s a number two,
    0:47:27 and maybe you think we’re not the number one,
    0:47:30 but assuming you think that the US is number one in this,
    0:47:31 who is the number two?
    0:47:33 Who do you think poses the biggest threat?
    0:47:36 Is it their technology or their intentions or both?
    0:47:39 If you were to hear that one of these
    0:47:41 really awful things took place,
    0:47:43 who would you think most likely
    0:47:45 are the most likely actors behind it?
    0:47:46 Is it a rogue state?
    0:47:47 Is it a terrorist group?
    0:47:49 Is it a nation state?
    0:47:51 – First place, I think that the short-term threats
    0:47:54 are from rogue states and from terrorism.
    0:47:56 And because as we know, there’s plenty of groups
    0:48:01 that seek harm against the elites in any country.
    0:48:04 Today, the competitive environment is very clear
    0:48:08 that the US with a partner UK, I’ll give you an example.
    0:48:12 This week, there were two libraries from China
    0:48:14 that were released, open source.
    0:48:17 One is a problem solver that’s very powerful
    0:48:21 and another one is a large language model that’s equal.
    0:48:24 And in some cases, it exceeds the one from META
    0:48:28 which they use every day, it’s called Lama III, 400 billion.
    0:48:32 I was shocked when I read this ’cause I had assumed
    0:48:35 that are in my conversation with the Chinese
    0:48:39 that they were two to three years late.
    0:48:41 It looks to me like it’s within a year now.
    0:48:43 So it’d be fair to say it’s the US
    0:48:46 and then China within a year’s time.
    0:48:49 Everyone else is well behind.
    0:48:51 Now, I’m not suggesting that China
    0:48:54 will launch a rogue attack against us in American city.
    0:48:57 I am alleging that it’s possible
    0:49:01 that a third party could steal from China
    0:49:03 ’cause it’s open source or from the US
    0:49:05 if they’re malevolent and do that.
    0:49:09 So the threat escalation matrix goes up
    0:49:11 with every improvement.
    0:49:14 At today, the primary use of these tools
    0:49:18 is to sow misinformation, which is what you talked about.
    0:49:21 But remember that there’s a transition to agents
    0:49:23 and the agents do things.
    0:49:26 So it’s a travel agent or it’s whatever.
    0:49:29 And the agents speak English, you give them English
    0:49:33 and they respond in English so you can concatenate them.
    0:49:36 You can literally put agent one talks to agent two,
    0:49:39 talks to agent three, talks to agent four.
    0:49:43 And there’s a scheduler that makes them all work together.
    0:49:46 And so for example, you could say to these agents,
    0:49:49 design me the most beautiful building in the world,
    0:49:53 go ahead and file all the permits,
    0:49:55 negotiate the fees of the builders
    0:49:57 and tell me how much it’s gonna cost
    0:50:00 and tell my accountant that I need that amount of money.
    0:50:01 That’s the command.
    0:50:03 So think about that.
    0:50:06 Think about the agency, the ability to put
    0:50:09 an integrated solution that today takes 100 people
    0:50:13 who are very talented and you can do it by one command.
    0:50:17 So that acceleration of power could also be misused.
    0:50:19 I’ll give you another example.
    0:50:21 You were talking earlier about the impact on social media.
    0:50:26 I saw a demonstration in England, in fact.
    0:50:31 The first command was build a profile of a woman who’s 25,
    0:50:36 she has two kids and she has the following strange beliefs.
    0:50:40 And the system wrote the code and created a fake persona
    0:50:44 that existed on that particular social media case.
    0:50:47 Then the next command was take that person
    0:50:51 and modify that person to every possible stereotype,
    0:50:55 every race, sex, so forth and so on, age, demographic thing
    0:50:58 with similar views and populate that
    0:51:02 and 10,000 people popped up just like that.
    0:51:06 So if you wanted, for example, today, this is true today,
    0:51:07 if you wanted to create a community
    0:51:10 of 10,000 fake influencers to say, for example,
    0:51:12 that smoking doesn’t cause cancer,
    0:51:15 which as we know is not true, you could do it.
    0:51:17 And one person with a PC can do this.
    0:51:21 Imagine when the AI’s are far more powerful
    0:51:22 than they are today.
    0:51:26 – So one of the things that Dr. Kissinger was known for
    0:51:27 and quite frankly I appreciate
    0:51:29 was this notion of real politic.
    0:51:31 Obviously we have aspirations around
    0:51:33 the way the world should be,
    0:51:34 but as it relates to decision-making,
    0:51:37 we’re also gonna be very cognizant of the way the world is
    0:51:41 and make some, I mean, he’s credited with a lot of very
    0:51:43 controversial/difficult decisions
    0:51:46 depending on how you look at it.
    0:51:49 What I’m hearing you say leads,
    0:51:51 all these roads lead to one place
    0:51:54 in my kind of quote unquote critical thinking
    0:51:56 or lack there of a brain and that is,
    0:52:00 there’s a lot of incentive to kiss and make up with China
    0:52:02 and partner around this stuff.
    0:52:06 That if China and the US came to an agreement
    0:52:08 around what they were gonna do or not do
    0:52:11 and bilaterally created a security force
    0:52:15 and agreed not to sponsor proxy agents against the West
    0:52:18 or each other that we’d have a lot,
    0:52:20 that would be a lot of progress.
    0:52:22 That might be 50, 60, 80% of the whole shooting match
    0:52:24 as if the two of us could say,
    0:52:27 we’re gonna figure out a way to trust each other
    0:52:29 on this issue and we’re gonna fight the bad guys
    0:52:31 together on this stuff.
    0:52:32 Your thoughts?
    0:52:34 – So Dr. Kissinger of course was the world’s expert
    0:52:36 in China, he opened up China,
    0:52:38 which is one of his greatest achievements.
    0:52:42 And but he was also a proud American
    0:52:46 and he understood that China could go one way or the other.
    0:52:49 His view on China was that China,
    0:52:50 and he wrote a whole book on this,
    0:52:52 was that China wanted to be the middle kingdom
    0:52:54 as part of their history,
    0:52:57 where they’d sort of dominated all the other countries,
    0:52:58 but it’s not like America.
    0:53:02 His view was they wanted to make sure the other countries
    0:53:04 would show fealty to China,
    0:53:07 in other words, do what they wanted.
    0:53:10 And occasionally, if they didn’t do something,
    0:53:12 China would then extract some payment,
    0:53:14 such as invading the country.
    0:53:16 That’s roughly what Henry would say.
    0:53:20 So he was very much a realist about China as well.
    0:53:24 His view would be at odds today
    0:53:27 with Trump’s view and the US governments.
    0:53:30 The US government is completely organized today
    0:53:35 around decoupling, that is literally separating.
    0:53:38 And his view, which I can report accurately
    0:53:39 ’cause I went to China with him,
    0:53:43 was that we’re never going to be great friends,
    0:53:46 but we have to learn how to coexist.
    0:53:51 And that means detailed discussions on every issue
    0:53:54 at great length to make sure
    0:53:57 that we don’t alarm each other or frighten each other.
    0:54:01 His further concern was not that President Xi
    0:54:04 would wake up tomorrow and invade Taiwan,
    0:54:06 but that you would start with an accident
    0:54:08 and then there would be an escalatory ladder.
    0:54:11 And that because the emotions on both sides,
    0:54:14 you would end up just like in World War I,
    0:54:17 which started with a shooting in Sarajevo,
    0:54:20 that ultimately people found in a few months
    0:54:21 that they were in a world war
    0:54:23 that they did not want and did not expect.
    0:54:26 And once you’re in the war, you have to fight.
    0:54:30 So the concern with China would be roughly that
    0:54:35 we are codependent and we’re not best friends.
    0:54:40 Being dependent is probably better
    0:54:44 than being completely independent, that is non-dependent
    0:54:46 because it forces some level of understanding
    0:54:47 and communication.
    0:54:50 – Eric Schmidt is a technologist,
    0:54:51 entrepreneur and philanthropist.
    0:54:55 In 2021, he founded the Special Competitive Studies Project,
    0:54:57 a non-profit initiative to strengthen America’s
    0:55:00 long-term competitiveness in AI
    0:55:01 and technology more broadly.
    0:55:03 Before that, Eric served as Google’s
    0:55:05 chief executive officer and chairman,
    0:55:08 and later as executive chairman and technical advisor.
    0:55:10 He joins us from Boston, Eric.
    0:55:12 In addition to your intelligence,
    0:55:14 I get to sense your heart’s in the right place
    0:55:17 and you’re using your human and financial capital
    0:55:18 to try and make the world a better place.
    0:55:20 Really appreciate you and your work.
    0:55:26 (upbeat music)
    0:55:29 (upbeat music)
    0:55:32 – I was a bit of a happiness.
    0:55:36 I’m at this gathering called Summit
    0:55:39 and I’ve been struck by how many people are successful
    0:55:41 or at least the appearance of being successful.
    0:55:44 So as I know the rich kids, but they do seem to be,
    0:55:48 I don’t know, economically secure or overeducated.
    0:55:50 Interesting, some of them started sold businesses,
    0:55:53 but what I see is a lot of people searching
    0:55:54 and they’ll say shit like,
    0:55:56 well, I’m just taking a year to really focus
    0:55:57 on improving my sleep.
    0:56:02 Okay, no, sleep is supposed to be part of your arsenal.
    0:56:03 It’s not why you’re fighting this war.
    0:56:05 You need good sleep, but I don’t think
    0:56:07 you should take a year to focus on it.
    0:56:09 Anyways, does that sound boomer of me?
    0:56:11 But this notion of finding a purpose
    0:56:12 and what I have found is,
    0:56:14 and this is probably one of the accoutrements
    0:56:18 of a prosperous society, is ask yourself,
    0:56:20 do you have the wrong amount of money?
    0:56:21 Do you have just the wrong amount of money?
    0:56:22 What do I mean by that?
    0:56:24 Obviously, the worst amount of money is not enough,
    0:56:26 but a lot of my friends and a lot of people,
    0:56:28 I think at this summit,
    0:56:30 suffer from just having the wrong amount of money.
    0:56:31 What do I mean by that?
    0:56:32 They have enough money
    0:56:34 so they don’t have to do something right away,
    0:56:36 but they don’t have enough money to retire
    0:56:39 or go into philanthropy or really pursue something creative
    0:56:41 and not make money.
    0:56:42 That’s exactly the wrong amount of money.
    0:56:45 And I would say a good 50% of my friends
    0:56:47 who kind of hit a wall, got stuck,
    0:56:49 experienced their first failure,
    0:56:53 sit around and wait for the perfect thing
    0:56:55 and wake up one, two, three years later
    0:56:57 and really don’t have a professional purpose
    0:56:59 or a professional source of gravity.
    0:57:03 And you know, the kind of basic stuff, right?
    0:57:05 Do something in the agency of others,
    0:57:08 be in service to others, but more than anything,
    0:57:11 I think the call sign is just now.
    0:57:15 And that is, don’t let perfect be the enemy of good
    0:57:18 and give yourself a certain amount of time to find something.
    0:57:22 And within that amount of time, when it elapses,
    0:57:24 take the best thing that you have.
    0:57:26 And it might not be the,
    0:57:28 it might not foot to the expectations
    0:57:29 that you have for yourself
    0:57:32 or be really exciting or dramatic or really lucrative.
    0:57:33 But the thing about working
    0:57:35 is it leads to other opportunities.
    0:57:37 And what I see is a lot of people
    0:57:39 who kind of are cast into the wilderness
    0:57:41 and then come out of the wilderness with no fucking skills.
    0:57:43 And that is, you’ll be surprised
    0:57:47 how much your Rolodex and your skills atrophy.
    0:57:47 And so what is the key?
    0:57:49 Do you want to write a book?
    0:57:50 Do you want to start a podcast?
    0:57:52 Do you want to try and raise a fund?
    0:57:53 Do you want to start a company?
    0:57:54 What is the key?
    0:57:56 What is the critical success factor?
    0:57:57 Is it finding the right people?
    0:57:58 Is it finding capital?
    0:57:59 Is it thinking through?
    0:58:01 Is it positioning the concept?
    0:58:02 Is it doing more research?
    0:58:05 No, the key is now.
    0:58:06 You want to write a book,
    0:58:09 open your fucking laptop and start writing.
    0:58:10 And it’s going to be shit.
    0:58:11 But then when you go back and edit it,
    0:58:12 it’ll be less shitty.
    0:58:14 And then if you find someone to help you review it
    0:58:15 and you find some people,
    0:58:18 it’ll get dramatically even less shittier.
    0:58:20 All right, you want to start a business?
    0:58:20 Nobody knows.
    0:58:22 The only way you have a successful business
    0:58:24 is you start a bad one and you start iterating.
    0:58:26 But here’s the key, starting.
    0:58:27 You want to be in a nonprofit.
    0:58:29 You want to start helping other people.
    0:58:32 We’ll start with one person and see if in fact,
    0:58:34 your infrastructure, your skills, your expertise,
    0:58:37 tangibly change the community, the environment,
    0:58:38 or their life.
    0:58:39 What is key to all of this?
    0:58:42 Three words, first N, second O, third W.
    0:58:44 I have so many people I run across
    0:58:47 who are searching, not because they’re not talented,
    0:58:49 not because there’s not opportunity,
    0:58:51 but they’re thinking they’re going to find the perfect thing.
    0:58:56 No, find the best thing that is now and get started.
    0:58:59 (upbeat music)
    0:59:01 This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez
    0:59:02 and Caroline Shagren.
    0:59:04 Drew Burroughs is our technical director.
    0:59:05 Thank you for listening to the Property Pod
    0:59:07 from the Vox Media Podcast Network.
    0:59:08 We will catch you on Saturday
    0:59:11 for No Mercy, No Malice as read by George Hahn.
    0:59:13 And please follow our Property Markets Pod
    0:59:15 wherever you get your pods for new episodes
    0:59:16 every Monday and Thursday.
    0:59:21 – Do you feel like your leads never lead anywhere?
    0:59:24 And you’re making content that no one sees
    0:59:27 and it takes forever to build a campaign?
    0:59:29 Well, that’s why we build HubSpot.
    0:59:31 It’s an AI-powered customer platform
    0:59:33 that builds campaigns for you,
    0:59:35 tells you which leads are worth knowing,
    0:59:38 and makes writing blogs, creating videos,
    0:59:40 and posting on social a breeze.
    0:59:43 So now, it’s easier than ever to be a marketer.
    0:59:46 Get started at hubspot.com/marketers.

    Eric Schmidt, a technologist, entrepreneur, philanthropist, and Google’s former CEO, joins Scott to discuss the dangers and opportunities AI presents and his latest book, Genesis: Artificial Intelligence, Hope, and the Human Spirit

    Follow Eric, @ericschmidt.

    Scott opens with his thoughts on Netflix’s bet on live sports. 

    Algebra of happiness: don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. 

    Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice

    Buy “The Algebra of Wealth,” out now.

    Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices