0:00:05 Support for Prop G comes from Viori. High-quality gym clothes make you look and feel good, and 0:00:10 that bit of extra motivation can go a long way. Viori’s clothes are made to be versatile 0:00:14 and stand the test of time. Whether you’re running a mile or running errands, Viori pieces 0:00:19 will let you do it comfortably. Not only will you receive 20% off your first purchase, but 0:00:27 enjoy free shipping on any U.S. orders over $75 and free returns. Go to viori.com/propg 0:00:35 and discover the versatility of Viori clothing, spelled V-U-O-R-I.com/propg. Exclusions apply. 0:00:40 Visit the website for full terms and conditions. What is a dog wearing? Is he wearing a collar? 0:00:49 No, he’s wearing Viori. I love this stuff. I love it. 0:00:54 Support for this show comes from Constant Contact. If you struggle just to get your customers 0:01:00 to notice you, Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention. Constant Contact’s 0:01:05 award-winning marketing platform offers all the automation, integration, and reporting 0:01:12 tools that get your marketing running seamlessly, all backed by their expert live customer support. 0:01:21 It’s time to get going and growing with Constant Contact today. Ready? Set. Grow. Go to constantcontact.ca 0:01:32 and start your free trial today. Go to constantcontact.ca for your free trial. Constant Contact.ca 0:01:37 Explaining football to the friend who’s just there for the nachos? Hard. Tailgating from 0:01:42 home like a pro with snacks and drinks everyone will love, an easy win. And with Instacart 0:01:46 helping deliver the snack time MVPs to your door, you’re ready for the game in as fast 0:01:51 as 30 minutes. So you never have to miss a play or lose your seat on the couch or have 0:01:56 to go head to head for the last chicken wing. Shop Game Day faves on Instacart and enjoy 0:02:01 $0 delivery fees on your first three grocery orders. Offer valid for a limited time. Other 0:02:06 fees and terms apply. Episode 323 chose the area code serving the 0:02:11 state of Minnesota in 1920, Babe Ruth was sold to the New York Yankees from the Boston 0:02:18 Red Sox and the NFL was founded. My two favorite forms of media, the NFL and the Boutsler. 0:02:25 I just love watching people fight over balls in a ring. 0:02:36 Go, go, go! 0:02:41 Welcome to the 320th episode of the Prop G Pod. In today’s episode we speak with Dr. 0:02:47 Marty McCary, a renowned surgeon and Professor Johns Hopkins, public health expert and leading 0:02:53 advocate for healthcare transparency and a two-time New York Times bestselling author. 0:02:57 We discussed with Marty his latest book, Blind Spots, when medicine gets it wrong and what 0:03:02 it means for our health. We get into what modern medicine gets wrong, we’re gonna need 0:03:07 a bigger boat and the issues of over medication and his thoughts on weight loss drugs, which 0:03:13 we talk a lot about here. Okay, what’s happening? The dog is in L.A. for a week. Hello ladies, 0:03:21 angeles los, los angeles. But I’m trying to be a little bit more healthy this week, 0:03:26 hanging out, working out, saying a bunch of friends. I met with two very charming Netflix 0:03:33 executives last night from the prestige group. Super talented woman from AMC and HBO working 0:03:38 on my, I don’t know if you’ve heard, but I’m working on an original scripted series based 0:03:45 on big tech that’s been purchased by Netflix for a full season. Just something I do. Just 0:03:49 something I’m doing. I’m kind of that guy. I’m kind of that Hollywood guy. By the way, 0:03:54 the best thing about me being in the industry, quote, unquote, this has been seven years 0:03:58 in the making. I wrote a book called The Four about seven years ago. It was essentially 0:04:02 a love letter to big tech companies. It’s called the Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook 0:04:06 and Google. And it started out as a love letter. I really do like these companies. I’ve made 0:04:09 a lot of money from them. I think they’re interesting. I think they’re fascinating. I’m 0:04:13 fascinated by the leaders. And as I was doing research for this book, I got increasingly 0:04:17 uncomfortable and slowly but surely by the end of the book, it was a cautionary tale. 0:04:22 And I have been pitching this as an original scripted drama. I think, well, what succession 0:04:27 is to family controlled media or billions is to the alternative investments community. 0:04:31 We’re trying to do the same thing for big tech. A story of the companies and the personalities 0:04:36 behind them. It’s a, it’s a drama. So it’s inspired by some of the people in it, but 0:04:40 it’s not a biopic. It’s not about, or it’s not a documentary. So I’m super excited about 0:04:44 that. But the best thing about this is that I’m entering from a point of where I already 0:04:51 have, I already have economic security. I don’t need this industry for my living. I cannot 0:04:56 imagine a more stressful place. Probably, probably being a, you know, in the Marines 0:05:01 is pretty stressful. But I can’t imagine a more stressful place to try and make a living 0:05:06 in LA right now in terms of the entertainment industry. It isn’t, it’s not a structural 0:05:10 decline. Content budgets are actually up 2% this year, which is nothing for the first 0:05:16 time. Netflix kind of the 10 ton grill in the space is spending more money on global 0:05:21 production. For the first time, they are more than 50% of the content budget is being allocated 0:05:27 overseas. Why? This is a business. And the basic, the basic premise here, the basic ratio 0:05:32 kicking the shit out of LA is that some of the most popular series relative to ROI or 0:05:36 the series that had the greatest ROI, it was the movie Parasite, which was filmed, I believe 0:05:42 in South Korea, didn’t cost a lot to make, but made good money. So they’ve recognized 0:05:47 that we can produce a lot more films and the hurdle rate is much lower. So we can take 0:05:53 much greater risks in terms of artistic expression by filming things overseas. And there’s this 0:05:58 entire middle layer that soaks up a lot of margin. And essentially YouTube decided, all 0:06:03 right, we’re going to create this sort of Netflix like competitor, and you can upload 0:06:07 a film or a television. And just based on the numbers of viewers, we will promote it 0:06:12 or not promote it. So there’s a sense of kind of a direct to consumer dispersion of creative, 0:06:16 similar to what TikTok’s doing that will continue to each share. By the way, what’s the most 0:06:22 popular streamer in the world? Is it Netflix at 7% of all viewing time? No, it’s YouTube 0:06:26 at 10%. YouTube is the number one streamer. We really don’t talk about it, but you have 0:06:31 dispersion, content moving to creators all over the world. When you have a crazy set, 0:06:36 there’s 1.7 billion people on TikTok. Half of them are creators. There’s a half a million 0:06:42 people making their money from streaming. So 850 million creators on TikTok, they are 0:06:47 not as good as the half a million creators working in the streaming industry. But say 0:06:52 1% of them are as good. That’s 8.5 million people. Well, still, well, it’s not 1% of 0:07:00 them. It’s 0.1% of them are really outstanding talent. That’s 850,000 additional creators, 0:07:05 human capital that the existing streaming ecosystem has to compete with. I think LA is always 0:07:10 going to do fine because of the lifestyle is so incredible. But at some point when so 0:07:16 many people leave because they don’t find they can make a living here because of taxation, 0:07:20 because of the high cost of living, I wonder if it becomes a little bit like London might 0:07:24 be the analogy where wealthy people have a home here, but there’s not that much money 0:07:29 being made here. And it turns into sort of a hospitality city where it’s about real estate 0:07:32 and servicing people who have made their money elsewhere. I would move back to LA if it wasn’t 0:07:37 so fucking far from everything. Do you forget how far it is? One of the things that’s really 0:07:41 messing with me is the jet lag I got here. I’m having trouble just sort of thinking clearly 0:07:45 as evidenced by this rant that has nothing to do with the script. Let’s get back to the script. 0:07:51 All right, what’s happening? Google Stranglehold on the $300 billion search and ad market is 0:07:55 starting to weaken. According to the research firm eMarketer, Google share of US search ad 0:08:01 market is expected to fall below 50% next year for the first time in over a decade. Wow. Wow, 0:08:09 that’s from 60% as recently as 2018 and it’s going down. And who’s taking share from them? 0:08:16 Amazon and also AI. I don’t know about you, but I found I’m starting to type search queries 0:08:21 into chat GPT and Claude. I’m not sure if I generally like Claude more. I think it’s actually 0:08:26 better with writing, but I like to think of myself as alternative. I mean, look, I’m an edge. 0:08:32 There’s a little salsa on the dog chip. That’s right. So I use Claude. Everyone’s like chat GPT, 0:08:37 and I’m like, I use Claude like I’m in the, in the know. And that is eating into what is probably 0:08:42 the most lucrative market ever. That is the $300 billion search business. The analogy I would use 0:08:48 for search and I’ve used it before, but it’s worth repeating is retail. And that is the retailers 0:08:54 that added the most shareholder value in the 50s, 60s, 70s and arguably right into the 80s was big 0:09:00 box, massive selection, everything there. You want peanut butter? No problem. We have 45 marans, 0:09:06 right? And it comes in big vats and it’s inexpensive. Everything for less. That’s Google. It gives you 0:09:11 7000 search returns and 0.0055 seconds. The problem is you have to sort through all those returns. 0:09:17 And increasingly, those returns are a lot of bullshit. And that is it doesn’t take you to the 0:09:23 best place. It takes you to another place that it can further monetize. As a shareholder value, 0:09:28 its shareholders continue to want 20 and 30% annual shareholder growth. Now along came in 0:09:33 retail, specialty retail, actually in the 80s, circuit city was the number one stock performer. 0:09:38 Remember them? We’re services state of the art and they brought together every piece of electronics. 0:09:43 And then in the 90s and the 2000s, the greatest market capitalization retail was created by 0:09:47 specialty retail. Special retail is the following. It recognizes what is 0:09:54 the most overlooked truth in marketing. And that is choice is not a feature. It’s a bug. 0:09:59 And that’s it. Consumers want someone with better taste in them to tell them what to buy. 0:10:05 And that’s what AI is. AI is the specialty retail to traditional searches, Walmart. 0:10:09 And that is we’re not going to give you 5000 answers and then ask you to sort through them 0:10:13 and figure it out. We have someone who has better taste than you, essentially GPU chips, 0:10:17 that’s going to attempt to give you the best toaster. It’s going to give you the best one 0:10:21 answer. And if you don’t like that toaster, you can say, well, what about a toaster that can do 0:10:26 four slices? You can ask query, follow on questions or you can ask AI, follow on questions. And it 0:10:31 comes back with the right answer. Does that mean Google is going to go away? No. It’s the Walmart. 0:10:38 It’s the Costco. It’s the Best Buy. These companies will still do well. But the major 0:10:43 shareholder growth, the major growth of market capitalization is going to be in the specialty 0:10:47 retail component of search. And that is going to be AI. And we’re already starting to see with 0:10:55 perplexity and open AI. That’s a good analogy. That’s a good analogy here from Los Angeles. 0:10:59 Amazon, get this, is expected to account for 22.3% of the market this year, 0:11:07 up 17.6% compared to Google’s 50.5% share and 7.6% growth. I mean, think about Amazon, 0:11:11 50 cents on the dollar in e-commerce, if you take out gross or in gasoline. And 0:11:17 this blows me away, 22% of share, a quarter of the search market goes to Amazon. If people 0:11:23 want stuff, they use Amazon as a search engine. What people also don’t recognize is that Amazon is 0:11:29 one of the five or 10 largest media companies in the world, AWS that suggests different products. 0:11:35 If you’re searching for huggies, they go to Pampers or PNG and they say, “Would you like 0:11:39 to run an ad for Pampers?” And they say, “Yes, especially if someone’s looking for diapers 0:11:44 from a competitor.” And then they start essentially being like the mob with protection money saying 0:11:47 that if you have the best product or the best price, that’s not enough. If you want to be in 0:11:52 the golden buy box, you want to come up, I in search, you have to use our fulfillment and 0:11:56 our advertising. And we’re basically going to starch all of the margin from your product, whereas 0:12:02 brands and products on the third-party marketplace used to pay about 22 or 25% 0:12:09 of their top line to Amazon. Now it’s 45%. There’s a term for this, monopoly. Oh, wait, 0:12:14 no, that’s not true, monopoly abuse. Okay, TikTok plays an interesting role in search, 0:12:20 especially for Gen Z. Axios reported that 21% of 18 to 24-year-olds start their search journey with 0:12:24 TikTok. The platform has started allowing brands to target ads based on search queries and move 0:12:30 that directly challenges Google’s core business. And then there’s perplexity, the AI-powered search 0:12:35 startup backed by Jeff Bezos, which is introducing ads in their AI-generated answers and letting 0:12:41 advertisers sponsor follow-up questions. You know, it’s nice to see Jeff finally starting to make 0:12:47 some money. And I hope he finds somebody. And Jeff, don’t be so shy. Live out your midlife crisis. 0:12:53 Really, enjoy yourself. Buy a canary yellow T-top Corvette and crash it into a hairplugs clinic. 0:12:57 Jesus Christ, could this guy be having more of a midlife crisis right now? And I just want to say, 0:13:03 Jeff, I’m here for it. When you’re in LA, call me, we’ll roll together, be totally pathetic, 0:13:06 but we don’t care. We’re at the point where we recognize we’re going to die soon. Let’s just go 0:13:13 for it, buddy. Let’s just go for it. I’m in. Anyways, the big tech stock for 2024, during my 0:13:18 predictions, by the way, we were reviewing my predictions for 2024. I get more right than I 0:13:22 get wrong almost every year. And occasionally I kind of nail it. But in 2024, I would best describe 0:13:28 my predictions. Reviewing them is what’s the term? Shitting the bet. I literally got everything wrong. 0:13:34 One of my picks was alphabet because I think it’s going to be revenge of the nerds. I do think their 0:13:39 AI is going to be pretty powerful. I wonder if it’s too late. If CzechGPT is kind of pulling away 0:13:45 with it. Anyways, alphabet’s performed relatively well, but Amazon has performed much better. 0:13:52 Think about Amazon. Best cloud provider, number two in search, number one in e-commerce. I mean, 0:13:58 these guys are just like kind of killing it. I would say other than their video, it’s kind of a 0:14:02 distance, three or four. Many advertisers are cautious about shifting their budgets from Google 0:14:07 to TikTok due to lower search volume. While TikTok has massive appeal among younger audiences, 0:14:13 it still can’t match Google’s overall search traffic, which handles about two trillion searches 0:14:19 per year. Two trillion. Wow. The big picture, this is happening as Google faces legal challenges, 0:14:23 including antitrust case. It lost the summer, which heightened attention around its search 0:14:30 ad dominance. What’s the future of search? Like I said, it’s bifurcating. I do think there’s plenty 0:14:34 to go around. I do think AI, you want to learn about, you understand it, you want to start 0:14:38 thinking about, and it’ll come naturally just playing with it, how it impacts your industry. 0:14:47 In sum, AI is not going to take your job. Somebody who understands AI is going to take your job. 0:14:52 We’ll be right back for our conversation with Dr. Marty Ikari. 0:15:01 Do you feel like your leads never lead anywhere, and you’re making content that no one sees, 0:15:06 and it takes forever to build a campaign? Well, that’s why we built HubSpot. 0:15:10 It’s an AI-powered customer platform that builds campaigns for you, 0:15:15 tells you which leads are worth knowing, and makes writing blogs, creating videos, 0:15:20 and posting on social a breeze. So now, it’s easier than ever to be a marketer. 0:15:27 Get started at HubSpot.com/Marketers. There’s over 500,000 small businesses 0:15:33 in BC, and no two are alike. I’m a carpenter. I’m a graphic designer. I sell dog socks online. 0:15:39 That’s why BCAA created one-size-doesn’t-fit-all insurance. It’s customizable, based on your 0:15:43 unique needs. So whether you manage rental properties or paint pet portraits, 0:15:48 you can protect your small business with BC’s most trusted insurance brand. 0:15:54 Visit bcaa.com/smallbusiness and use promo code radio to receive $50 off. Conditions apply. 0:15:59 Support for PropG comes from Grammarly. No one knows how much time you spend doing busy work 0:16:03 more than you do. Your time is valuable, and you don’t want to spend nearly half your working 0:16:07 hours on emails and written communication. But finding a way to offload some of those 0:16:13 redundant tasks, you might want to try Grammarly. Grammarly is your AI writing partner. With 0:16:16 Grammarly, you can stay focused and spend more time getting through your higher 0:16:21 level to-do lists and less time sending the same emails over and over again. 0:16:24 Grammarly can give you real-time relevant suggestions for whatever you write, and it’s 0:16:30 not just for emails. Grammarly works across more than 500,000 apps and websites and can help you 0:16:34 brainstorm ideas or suggest edits that’ll make you sound more confident and persuasive at work. 0:16:40 We use Grammarly here at PropG and simply put, it makes us more productive. For 15 years, 0:16:44 Grammarly has helped professionals do more with their writing. Get more done with Grammarly. 0:17:02 Download Grammarly for free at Grammarly.com/podcast. That’s Grammarly.com/podcast. 0:17:09 Welcome back. Here’s our conversation with Dr. Marty MacCary, a renowned surgeon and 0:17:13 Professor Johns Hopkins, a leading advocate for healthcare transparency and a two-time 0:17:17 New York Times bestselling author. Dr., where does this podcast find you? 0:17:22 I’m in New York today. Let’s best write into it. Your new book, “Blind Spots,” when medicine 0:17:28 gets it wrong and what it means for our health, is an eye-opening book about the latest scientific 0:17:32 research on the biggest health topics of our day, including hormone replacement therapy, 0:17:36 peanut allergies, cholesterol, gut health, and rising levels of cancer in young people. 0:17:44 Let’s start there. What does modern medicine get wrong? What are the biggest blind spots? 0:17:49 Well, modern medicine is so busy billing and coding and seeing patients in short visits that 0:17:55 we’ve not been talking about the root causes of so many of these diseases that are on the rise 0:18:01 and with cancer on the rise in young people. We’ve got to talk about our poison food supply 0:18:07 and the chemical ingredients that are engineered and added to our food that are banned in Europe 0:18:11 and Canada. Now, we’ve got to talk about environmental exposures that cause cancer, 0:18:15 not just the chemo to treat it. And we’ve got to talk about school lunch programs, 0:18:18 not just putting every kid on ozempic when they get overweight. 0:18:24 We’ve seen this massive explosion of chronic diseases in our lifetime. It didn’t exist two 0:18:28 generations ago. It doesn’t exist in many parts of the Amish community that still 0:18:35 use good farming and eat food from the soil. And it doesn’t exist in many parts of the world. 0:18:39 So, we’ve got to look at what we’re doing differently. Those root causes have been in our 0:18:45 blind spots. What you say really resonates. The first thing I noticed, we moved to the UK 0:18:49 two years ago, and I’m not exaggerating. The first thing I noticed was that everything in a 0:18:57 refrigerator went bad or spoiled in two or three days. And what I recognize is that’s a feature, 0:19:03 not a bug. It’s because you’re not putting all the preservatives and shit in it. Is that part 0:19:09 of the problem that in order to increase economics and decrease the perishability, 0:19:12 we just put too many things in our foods that aren’t healthy? 0:19:17 I’ve got patients that have chronic pain and nothing works. We try everything in modern medicine, 0:19:22 but then they come back and say, “I spent a summer in Italy and for the first time I felt healthy.” 0:19:29 And what’s going on is they’re eating healthy foods, foods that are designed to go bad after 0:19:33 some time. They don’t have these chemicals designed to increase the shelf life. So, 0:19:39 that’s a part of it, along with pesticides that are killing insects in the crops, but 0:19:45 they’re also killing our gut microbiome, the bacteria that line our gut. So, there’s so many 0:19:50 factors, but that’s exactly the sort of thing right now that we need to take a hard look at. 0:19:54 If you thought, “Okay, I don’t have the money or I don’t have the energy to totally reconfigure 0:20:00 my diet,” what are two or three things you could do right away that would take out, say, a disproportionate 0:20:04 amount of the risk factors in your diet? Well, I hear that a lot. I hear organic food, 0:20:10 which is food without pesticides, costs too much. And I tell people, “Try the cost of insulin,” 0:20:15 because a lot of these things going on today are the direct result of our poison food supply. 0:20:22 How else do you have 40% of our nation’s children that are overweight or obese and just 5% in Japan? 0:20:29 Our kids in America are not more disobedient or more addicted as a part of their personality. 0:20:33 Now, we’ve poisoned the food supply and created highly addictive foods 0:20:41 that have things like food dyes. So, food dyes, for example, are mostly banned in Europe and Canada. 0:20:48 So, Kellogg’s makes two types of fruit loops. One with the banned ingredients for the American kids 0:20:54 that makes the food look all colorful and shiny, and one without the banned ingredients that they 0:20:59 ship to Canada. So, don’t American kids deserve the healthier version of food made by an American 0:21:06 company? California just banned seven food dyes. Ten other states have some bans on these dyes. 0:21:11 But I would say, read the ingredients. Simple messages I tell patients. Drink water. Avoid 0:21:17 these sugary drinks. Avoid processed food with lots of ingredients. And watch out for seed oils. 0:21:25 They sound natural, like vegetable oil and canola and soybean oil, but they’re not. They’re denatured 0:21:30 at high temperatures and then a chemical solvent needs use to change the structure. So, these are 0:21:37 really chemicals. And when they hit the GI tract, guess what? Your body’s immune system reacts to 0:21:43 them. These are things that do not occur in nature and your body is reacting with an inflammation. 0:21:50 It’s not a big inflammatory storm. It’s a constant low-grade inflammation and it makes people feel 0:21:55 sick. And we need to address these root causes, not just medicate everybody that comes in with 0:22:01 these sicknesses. I want to put forward a thesis and get your response to it. I’ve always thought that, 0:22:06 unfortunately, in areas that are especially important to the well-being of our society, 0:22:11 when you inject the profit element, there’s some good components to it, but there’s a lot of bad 0:22:18 components. And I’ve always thought that essentially the industrial food complex has a profit incentive 0:22:24 to get you addicted to terribly addictive sugary, terrible food such that they can hand you over 0:22:27 to the industrial diabetes complex where there’s a ton of money. Your thoughts? 0:22:36 Well, I think you’re right. The food industry started off with a charge to address food insecurity 0:22:42 and world hunger. And so they started creating techniques, genetically modifying food, adding 0:22:49 pesticides after it was discovered in the days after Asian orange that it would kill insects, 0:22:56 but it also killed the crops. So they genetically modified the crops to be so-called roundup ready. 0:23:01 That’s where they can tolerate the pesticides. Well, that’s our modern-day food supply, 0:23:07 but the problem is, human beings are not made roundup ready. So it’s poisoning the human body 0:23:13 as well. So look, I see the best in people, and I think the food industry started off with this 0:23:19 commission, this charge to mass produce food. Now we have to educate people about the unintended 0:23:26 consequences of all these chemical ingredients in ultra-processed foods and food slays with 0:23:32 pesticides. For example, pesticides have hormone-like binding properties. Food dyes are hormone 0:23:38 disruptors. Is it a surprise that the average age of puberty goes down by a week and a half 0:23:44 every year for the last 30-plus years? It’s now years sooner than it was a generation ago. 0:23:50 That sperm counts are down 50% in the last five decades. That rates of GI cancers are increasing. 0:23:55 So these are things we don’t talk about in medicine. I got zero of this stuff in medical school, 0:24:02 but now that I’ve taken the effort to learn about it, research it, and summarize it for folks, 0:24:07 I’m going directly to the public, as a bunch of doctors are now, to try to educate people 0:24:14 about what’s happened to our food supply. Describe your diet. What do you try and dial up 0:24:18 and what do you dial down? Well, I think one of the biggest pieces of misinformation spread by 0:24:23 the United States government, and they’ve spread a lot of it. But one of the biggest pieces has been 0:24:29 demonizing natural fats, saturated fats. I’m not saying everyone needs to eat it, 0:24:34 but it’s a good source of protein. And when you’re eating meats that are well-sourced, 0:24:43 that is a good source of nutrition. The government food pyramid demonized natural fats, 0:24:49 moved the entire food industry to ultra-processed foods, and created these refined carbohydrate 0:24:55 addictions that have drove our obesity epidemic. I like nuts. I like fruits that are not coated 0:25:00 with pesticides. It’s especially important to buy organic when you’re eating the surface 0:25:05 of a fruit or vegetable. Strawberry, for example, has been sprayed over a dozen times 0:25:14 with 7.8 different pesticides on average. The average school lunch program may have 38 different 0:25:19 types of pesticides detectable. You can detect these things now in the urine of children in 0:25:27 the umbilical cord blood of mothers. So I’d like to eat, these are almost biblical principles, 0:25:33 right? Things that grow out of good soil, clean meats, and I do a little bit of intermittent fasting 0:25:41 when I can. Talk about intermittent fasting. Why is that helpful? Well, I think in general, 0:25:47 people are not getting enough protein. So I’d warn people about just starting to skip meals, 0:25:53 because you really want to get a good amount of protein in your meal, in your day. But I just try 0:26:01 it because I think it helps manage through a bit of willpower some of the appetite urges that I sense. 0:26:06 I’ll tell you what had a big impact is when I got rid of artificial sweeteners. The debate 0:26:12 about artificial sweeteners got really hijacked by the do or do they not cause cancer argument. 0:26:18 But I don’t think they do. They’ve been around for a long time, but what they do is they trick 0:26:24 your pancreas into thinking that a big sugar load is coming and it doesn’t come. So the pancreas is 0:26:30 waiting for that sugar load and it creates a craving and often results in binge eating of 0:26:35 carbohydrates later in the day. So by getting rid of those artificial sweeteners, I think it helped 0:26:41 manage my appetite. So which of these topics do you think the public is most informed about? 0:26:47 What are the biggest myths in healthcare? Well, I think for perimenopausal women, there’s a myth 0:26:54 that hormone replacement therapy, that is taking estrogen or estrogen plus progesterone when your 0:27:00 body doesn’t produce it anymore around the time of menopause, causes cancer. It’s one of the greatest 0:27:06 dogmas that’s still alive and well, both in the medical establishment. And it turns out the study 0:27:12 that was cited where people say, aha, here’s the study where we show it caused cancer did not 0:27:18 show a statistically significant increase in cancer. But the announcement was so magnificent 0:27:25 and so broad by researchers at the NIH, the media ran with the story before they ever looked at the 0:27:33 data. The data were released later, over a week later. And by that time, the world had already 0:27:37 been convinced of this dogma. Now, the reason I’m mentioning hormone replacement therapy when you 0:27:43 asked, what is, you know, what’s one of the biggest misconceptions? Here’s a medication that not only 0:27:48 alleviates the symptoms of menopause, the hot flashes, mood swings, weight gain, night sweats, 0:27:55 but also has long term health benefits because the blood vessels are healthier, 0:28:01 nitric oxide levels are higher. And so heart attack rates in some studies are half, 0:28:07 are they’re cut in half because women who start hormone therapy within 10 years of the onset 0:28:13 of menopause, the rate of cognitive decline goes down by 50 to 60%. The rate of Alzheimer’s goes 0:28:19 down by 35%. And a woman has stronger bones and is far less likely to break a bone or have a 0:28:25 hip fracture. So the overall long term health benefits are overwhelming. Women live longer 0:28:31 and feel better. But tragically, 50 million women have been denied hormone therapy 0:28:35 since the time of this dogma announcement that it causes breast cancer. 0:28:39 Do you feel the same way about testosterone replacement therapy? 0:28:44 I don’t. It’s very different with men and testosterone. Both men and women have testosterone 0:28:51 and estrogen. Now some of the dogma is parallel. For example, the dogma that testosterone therapy 0:28:57 causes prostate cancer. Another dogma like the dogma that hormone therapy and women causes 0:29:03 breast cancer is not supported by the data. Now there are benefits and I do recommend people 0:29:07 who are symptomatic get tested for their testosterone levels. And I do see people who 0:29:13 benefit, men who benefit from testosterone replacement, but the long term health benefits 0:29:16 are not as dramatic as we see with hormone therapy and women. 0:29:22 But if you go on testosterone replacement therapy at 57 and you find you’re stronger, 0:29:28 your skin’s a little more youthful, your sex is a little, your erections are a little bit longer, 0:29:34 do the benefits outweigh the drawbacks? Asking for a friend. 0:29:42 Look, yes, most of the time the benefits outweigh any potential downsides. People just need to 0:29:48 recognize that if you’re still making some testosterone on your own, you’re probably 0:29:52 going to shut that down by taking it exogenous. You’re out of the rest of your life. That’s what 0:29:59 they told me. And you talk a little bit about the chronic disease problem. What do you mean by that? 0:30:07 And how serious is it for society? Autism has increased 14% every year for the last 23 years. 0:30:12 What’s going on? Who’s looking into this? We just keep medicating kids when they come in. 0:30:18 It’s now one in 22 kids in California born today will be diagnosed with autism. 0:30:24 I mean, it barely existed. It was rare just two generations ago. It’s still rare in the Amish 0:30:29 community in other parts of the world that have not adopted the Western diet. And I think the 0:30:38 autism cause discussion has also been hijacked by the is it or is it not vaccines after a fraudulent 0:30:46 study suggested it was due to vaccines? But we got to put that aside and talk about the microbiome, 0:30:52 the lining of the GI tract, the garden of bacteria that normally live in harmony, millions of 0:30:59 different bacteria that we alter. We throw it off. We carpet bomb it with ultra processed foods, 0:31:05 antibiotics, even C-sections. Antibiotics and C-sections can save lives, but they’re massively 0:31:11 overused, especially antibiotics. And a study just found that kids who take antibiotics in the 0:31:19 first couple of years compared to kids who do not have higher rates of learning disabilities 0:31:25 and obesity and celiac and asthma. And you may wonder, how could altering the microbiome 0:31:31 affect mental illness? Well, some of those bacteria make serotonin. And if you look at the diets of 0:31:39 people in Europe, it’s very different. They have far less chemicals. They have lower rates of mental 0:31:47 illness, of autism, of obesity, of autoimmune diseases. Autoimmune diseases now affect one 0:31:54 in five women. What’s going on here? My field is pancreatic cancer. As a surgeon at Johns Hopkins, 0:32:00 it specializes in the pancreas. Pancreatic cancer rates are going up. And no one is asking why. 0:32:04 We do more pancreatic cancer work than any hospital, more pancreatic cancer research 0:32:12 than any center in the country. Nobody is asking why. We’ve got to ask these big questions and talk 0:32:19 about root causes. It’s interesting, because I think of pancreatic cancer as a death sentence. 0:32:26 I just think it’s game over. Is that not true? So of those who get to surgery, which is a subgroup, 0:32:32 maybe 20 to 30% of people can have the option of having surgery, the five-year survival rates 0:32:41 about 20%. So it’s pretty bleak. And we have not made a lot of progress in the last 30 to 40 years. 0:32:48 So I think we’ve got to talk about root causes. Same thing with Alzheimer’s. Alzheimer’s is 0:32:55 skyrocketing. And we spend billions of dollars on these expensive new medications that get a lot 0:33:00 of excitement that, honestly, they barely work. And they have high side effects. And we’re not 0:33:07 talking about the study that the Mediterranean diet was found to reduce Alzheimer’s significantly. 0:33:13 Hormone therapy and peri mesoponels, causal women reduce Alzheimer’s by 35%. And Alzheimer’s is 0:33:20 associated with poor quality sleep on a chronic basis. So we could do a better job talking about 0:33:27 these underlying root issues. I mean, it sounds like in common sense is obviously where the inside 0:33:34 is. I’ve had doctors Atia and Hubertman on my podcasts. I’m always amazed how much shit they get. 0:33:40 Because what they say to me feels pretty common sense. Get good sleep, eat better, eat out less, 0:33:47 eat at home more and more grains, more vegetables, less processed food, and make sure you get some 0:33:52 exercise. I mean, I’m not saying these things are easy, but aren’t they pretty basic? And what 0:33:58 you’re talking about is preventive offensive health care as opposed to defensive health care 0:34:03 after something’s gone wrong. Is that accurate? Look, I can tell you, Peter Atia was with us 0:34:09 at Johns Hopkins. And he is as superb as they get. Evidence-driven, science-based, logical, 0:34:15 common sense, and lives what he says. And so a bunch of us now are going directly to the public 0:34:21 to try to educate them about these issues. So yes, it is common sense, but you’d be amazed. 0:34:28 90 plus percent of our food supply is sprayed by pesticides and multiple times. You just saw the 0:34:35 court case now open up the window to removing fluoride from drinking water, or at least not 0:34:40 adding it. This was a dogma for decades that we had to have fluoride in drinking water 0:34:47 because it supposedly reduced risks of cavities. Well, how about stop drinking sugary drinks if 0:34:53 we want to reduce cavities? And if the fluoride is killing the bacteria in the mouth, reducing 0:34:58 cavities, what do you think it’s doing to the microbiome bacteria in the gut? So these are 0:35:03 the big questions we’ve not been asking that we need to ask. We’ll be right back. 0:35:12 Support for Prop G comes from Nerd Wallet. If you’re a listener of the show, you know business, 0:35:16 and if you’re looking for a resource to find financial products that can help you make smart 0:35:21 financial decisions, turn to the nerds at Nerd Wallet. Not only have they spent thousands of 0:35:25 hours researching and reviewing over 1,300 financial products, but they have the tools 0:35:30 you need to make smarter decisions. Looking for a credit card? At Nerd Wallet, you can go beyond 0:35:34 the basic comparisons, filter for the features that matter to you, and read in-depth reviews. 0:35:39 Ready to choose a high-yield savings account? Get access to exclusive deals and compare rates, 0:35:43 bonuses, and more. House hunting? View today’s top mortgage rates for your home sweet home. 0:35:49 Make the Nerds your go-to resource for smart financial decisions. Head to nerdwallet.com/learnmore. 0:35:58 Nerd Wallet. Finance. Smarter. Nerd Wallet Compare Incorporated NMLS 1617539. 0:36:09 Support for the show comes from Mercury. It’s time banking did more. Now, it can. Your bank 0:36:13 account is no longer just a place to hold your money. With Mercury, your account powers all your 0:36:18 critical financial operations, giving you greater control, precision, and speed. Pay bills the moment 0:36:23 you need to maximize your cash flow. Close the books faster by categorizing and syncing transactions 0:36:29 effortlessly. Send invoices and track what you’re owed. Share the spending power while keeping 0:36:34 spend and check with corporate cards and get complete and accurate visibility into it all. 0:36:39 All from one powerful account. Apply in minutes at mercury.com to experience 0:36:44 how Mercury is transforming banking. Mercury is a financial technology company, not a bank. 0:36:49 Banking services provided by Choice Financial Group and Evolve Bank & Trust members FDIC. 0:36:56 Support for Prop G comes from Anthropic. If you’re not using AI to help your business run more 0:37:00 efficiently, you might be falling behind still. It’s a lot easier to talk about incorporating 0:37:05 AI into your workflow than it is to actually get started. The landscape is cluttered and 0:37:09 technical and a lot of us are fatigued by the options. If you’re looking for a place to get 0:37:14 started, Claude from Anthropic may be the answer. Claude is a next generation AI assistant built 0:37:19 to help you work more efficiently without sacrificing safety or reliability. Anthropic’s 0:37:24 latest model, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, can help you organize thoughts, solve tricky problems, analyze 0:37:29 data and more. Whether you’re brainstorming alone or working on a team with thousands of people, 0:37:33 all at a price that works for just about any use case. If you’re trying to crack a problem 0:37:38 involving advanced reasoning, need to distill the essence of complex images or graphs or generate 0:37:43 heaps of secure code, Claude is a great way to save time and money. Plus, the Anthropic leadership 0:37:49 team was founded in AI research and built Claude with an emphasis on safety. To learn more, visit 0:37:54 anthropic.com/claude. That’s anthropic.com/claude. 0:38:07 Curious what you think. I’m in LA and whenever I’m in LA, I have a buddy here who’s what I’ll 0:38:10 call going through a midlife crisis that he’s going to grow out of in about 30 or 40 years. 0:38:17 And he always takes me to these kind of fabulous parties with a lot of very young, very fabulous, 0:38:23 very attractive LA people. And the thing I’ve noticed that’s changed among a younger generation 0:38:28 is they have substantially reduced the amount of alcohol intake and they’ve replaced it with 0:38:40 drugs, ketamine, MDMA, edibles. Give me your thoughts on the health impacts of alcohol versus 0:38:45 psilocybin versus some of these designer drugs for lack of a better reason. 0:38:51 And I recognize that ideally you don’t do any of these things. Well, and I’ll cut to the chase. 0:38:57 I drink way too much. It’s where my health falls down. Imagine you’re someone who is always probably 0:39:00 going to have a certain level of substances in their life because correctly or incorrectly, 0:39:05 they’ve identified and enhances their life. What substances would you stay away from? 0:39:12 And how do you feel about the impacts of some of these more trendy designer drugs? 0:39:19 Well, I can tell you about alcohol. So as a doctor who has dealt with liver 0:39:26 and pancreatic issues for a long time, if there ever were any tiny benefits to the heart from 0:39:32 drinking a glass or two of wine a day, they are far eclipsed by the damage done to the liver. 0:39:42 Look, I understand people have their rituals and if they want to drink a glass of alcohol, 0:39:49 I think it’s safer than cocaine, but more people die of alcohol abuse than opioids and fentanyl. 0:39:54 And so I think we don’t talk enough about the abuse potential as people need just to be 0:39:59 mindful of that because it’s one of these things that it’s in our blind spots in medicine. We just 0:40:09 sort of ignore the fact that we have up to 170,000 deaths a year from alcohol. We don’t need to be 0:40:15 celebrating and glorifying abuse of alcohol and can promote more responsible drinking. 0:40:20 And for those who choose not to drink or drink rarely, which is what I do, 0:40:25 you can probably sleep a little better and sometimes have a healthier liver. 0:40:33 What do you think of ketamine, MDMA? I was shocked how many young people would either not drink, 0:40:42 nurse a drink, but they were on ketamine or MDMA. Well, it’s a mixed story because 0:40:47 sure, while we don’t see the same deaths as we do from heroin with some of those 0:40:56 external exogenous drugs, there is the potential for abuse. You just saw the Star of Friends 0:41:02 suffer with ketamine overdosing. It can be addictive. In the past, we used to use lower 0:41:09 doses now that it’s more available and people are trying it. There’s an abuse potential people 0:41:15 may not be aware of when they first try it. So, I mean, I’m probably not the best expert to 0:41:21 answer those questions, but certainly we see an abuse potential pretty broad. 0:41:26 Marijuana is one that I know more about. I wrote about in the book Blind Spots. 0:41:31 There’s a dogma that it’s totally safe. And I try to dispel some of that because 0:41:38 sure, it’s safer than cocaine, but the idea that, oh, it’s not a gateway drug. We may want to believe 0:41:46 that, but that’s not really what’s supported by the data. Say you use it once or twice a week to 0:41:50 help sleep and wind down instead of alcohol, and it has them in a gateway drug. Again, 0:41:55 asking for a friend, what are your thoughts on edibles? Marijuana today is not the marijuana 0:42:00 of Woodstock. It’s about 10 to 20 times more potent, so you want to watch those doses. 0:42:07 You want to be aware of the fact that it acts differently in an adult than it does in an 0:42:13 adolescent, where a developing mind may be more susceptible to the risks of future psychoses. 0:42:20 In one study, 25% people who use it regularly as a teenager will go on to have some psychosis-related 0:42:26 diagnosis in the future. So, it may be more dangerous in the developing mind in adolescence. 0:42:31 You said in an interview with PragerU that there’s no reason anyone should ever sign a 0:42:39 financial document in an emergency. You suggested, right, did not read or this is not a contract 0:42:45 instead. What did you mean by that? Yes, so by law, hospitals are required to take care of you for any 0:42:50 urgent or emergent situation. And what hospitals increasingly have been doing is putting this 0:42:57 financial contract telling you, almost manipulating you to sign your life, home, mortgage, retirement, 0:43:04 savings away under penalty of law, just to be treated. And that is, if it doesn’t violate the 0:43:08 letter of the law, it violates the spirit of the law. You don’t have to sign your forms away. 0:43:15 My team has done a lot of work on hospital price gouging and predatory billing. And we found that 0:43:20 hospitals sometimes sue patients in court to garnish their wages. This violates everything 0:43:27 sacred in our profession. Hospitals are there as a safe haven to take care of somebody and 0:43:33 manipulate them to sign their life away financially, I think is predatory. I don’t think anyone should 0:43:38 ever sign a financial document in an emergency room. So, I’ll put forward another thesis and I 0:43:43 want to get your response. The majority of advanced nations have nationalized health care, spend about 0:43:49 $6500 per citizen on health care. We spend 12 to 13,000, yet we have worse outcomes, higher 0:43:56 infant mortality, lower age expectancy. And yet the insurance industry who has inserted themselves 0:44:01 in the middle here, 45 cents on the dollar goes to administration and profits, which as far as I 0:44:06 can tell in terms of math, is responsible for the difference between what other nations spend on 0:44:12 health care and what we spend. It hasn’t basically the industrial health complex, weaponized government, 0:44:16 inserted profit institutions to the expense of American citizens. 0:44:21 I think there’s a lot of truth in what you’re saying. The question is, what’s the solution? 0:44:31 And I’ve spent a lot of time in my tenure as sort of as a health policy expert in our Johns Hopkins, 0:44:35 talking about different health care systems. And I’m convinced there’s a better model than 0:44:41 what we have now. At the same time, while there’s an attractiveness to moving to a single-payer 0:44:46 system, you cut a lot of the waste in the short term, a lot of the middlemen and the 0:44:55 people profiteering off of, say, our billing and coding system. Ultimately, governments cannot resist 0:45:02 10, 20 years down the road doing across-the-board tightnings of the belt. And what it ends up 0:45:08 doing is resulting in an underfunding of the health care system. And we’ve seen that even 0:45:13 with our own government system Medicare, it’s massively underfunded. And it just becomes a 0:45:19 declining priority after the initial enthusiasm to have some government. So it’s a mixed picture. 0:45:25 I tend to focus on what’s feasible. And right now, my concern is we can have the most gold-plated 0:45:31 health insurance for every American. We can fix our broken health care financing. But if we are 0:45:37 still recommending bad practices and not addressing our poison food supply, we’re going to keep watching 0:45:44 these chronic diseases extend. So it feels as if many of these roads lead back to preventive 0:45:50 health care, specifically around our food supply system. How do we fix that? Is it taxing these 0:45:57 foods to their… I mean, my understanding is if you just priced water at its real cost, beef 0:46:03 would be $20 or $30 a pound. If you, you know, Bloomberg wanted to tax big gulps, is it taxing 0:46:10 these companies? How do you address the externalities and fix? Is it more regulation, more pricing 0:46:16 that reflects the damage or the externalities here? How do we create a healthier food supply system? 0:46:23 So, Scott, you’re talking to a guy who’s studied a lot of the unintended consequences of well-intended 0:46:29 government policies. So I’m a little leery of things like strong government interventions. 0:46:35 And so what I would suggest is the government needs to stop spreading misinformation about food 0:46:42 and nutrition. They need to stop purchasing with U.S. tax dollars dangerous foods. We do this in 0:46:47 almost every school lunch program in the United States. Heck, we strip the fiber out of the food 0:46:53 and feed it to kids like sugar and call it bread, even though it’s really not bread. And we’ve got 0:46:59 to sometimes help support these school lunch programs with subsidies to buy healthier foods. 0:47:02 I’m curious to get your thoughts on GLP-1 drugs. 0:47:08 We’re clearly seeing a reduction in short-term health complications when people lose weight. 0:47:14 But just like you’re losing excess body fat, you’re also losing muscle mass. So everyone who 0:47:20 prescribes these drugs is supposed to technically be saying that you’re supposed to exercise like 0:47:26 crazy and eat a high protein diet. But in the real world, people are not necessarily doing that. 0:47:32 And we don’t know what the long-term consequences are of losing all that excess muscle mass. 0:47:37 Here’s one little fact people may not be aware of. The number one predictor of how long you live 0:47:44 is your muscle mass. So we may be accelerating frailty and even shortening lifespan despite 0:47:52 the reduction in health complications in the short term. God, that’s wild. So everything I read about 0:48:00 Ozympic, every year I do a prediction seminar on technologies. And I said that in 2024, 0:48:05 the most seminal technology breakthrough was GLP-1 drugs. The stuff I’ve read reduces alcohol 0:48:10 consumption, biting nails. They’re talking about giving it to people with gambling and 0:48:15 social media addictions. Am I overestimating the impact this might have on our society? 0:48:21 I’m a little cautious about the premature celebration that we may now have a drug to 0:48:26 treat addiction. And it may be a secondary effect because you probably feel better about yourself 0:48:31 when you lose weight and may just have a more positive outlook and better willpower. 0:48:37 So I’m a little cautious when Pharma says we have a solution for everything. But I will tell you this, 0:48:45 Scott. We are seeing now a new generation of GLP-1 drugs like Ozympic that are about to come 0:48:50 to market. There’s an estimated to be 29 that are going to come to market in the next 20 years or so. 0:48:54 And some of these now are designed to block that receptor on the muscle. 0:49:00 So it may not reduce muscle mass, as is our concern with Ozympic and Mugovian, some of the others. 0:49:06 So we’ll have to see. But here’s a question I posed to most doctors when I talked to them about 0:49:13 this topic. Have you seen anybody come off of Ozympic and keep the weight off just from diet 0:49:19 and exercise? I’d like to see that be a nice population of people before I recommended too 0:49:26 broadly. And final question, just something personal. Someone at a high-pressure job, 0:49:30 you’re obviously very ambitious. Any thoughts on being a good partner when you’re trying to 0:49:33 have the kind of impact you’re having, the demands of places on your professional life? 0:49:41 Yeah. I think what we’ve seen is that the happiest communities in America are those with 0:49:51 strong social networks. And when you look at the Maslach work at Berkeley on workplace satisfaction, 0:49:57 one of the greatest drivers of happiness at the workplace is the amount of positive feedback you 0:50:04 get directly as a result of your time in services. And we’re learning now in an amazing study that 0:50:12 blew me away as a doctor, that when you energetically and enthusiastically compliment someone else, 0:50:19 then you actually increase your own endorphin levels at a level higher than that of an anti-depressant. 0:50:25 Love that. Be generous. That’s the best medicine doctor. Marty McCary is a renowned surgeon and 0:50:30 professor at Johns Hopkins Public Health Expert and leading advocate for healthcare transparency 0:50:36 and a two-time New York Times bestselling author. His latest book, Blind Spots, when medicine gets 0:50:42 it wrong and what it means for our health is out now, he joins us from New York City. Doctor, 0:50:46 I really enjoyed this conversation. Thanks for your good work. I think it’s having a real impact. 0:50:48 Thanks so much, Scott. Good talking with you. I appreciate it. 0:51:02 As a river of happiness, you need to find your tribe. I went to this birthday party this weekend 0:51:08 for some friends from college. About eight of us met when we pledged ZBT fraternity 0:51:15 Alpha Root chapter at UCLA. And I think if you’re a young person or even an older person that wakes 0:51:19 up and realizes you’re one of the men, one of the one in seven men that doesn’t have a single friend 0:51:25 or one in the four men that can’t have a best friend, you have to find your posse. And I don’t 0:51:34 care if it’s a church group, a sports league, a non-profit, whatever it is, temple, a fraternity, 0:51:43 a sorority, a club at work that gets together on a regular basis, seek out a group of virtuous men 0:51:48 who are intelligent and express friendship, try and get together with them. I don’t care, 0:51:56 it’s poker and start finding your tribe because here’s the thing. By the time you get to my age, 0:52:03 all you have literally is love and camaraderie for these people. And I went to this party Saturday 0:52:10 night, I met all other kids and all other wives and it’s literally this tide pool, this epicenter, 0:52:19 this volcano of achievement, prosperity, love, and friendship. And all the bullshit just sort 0:52:26 of melts away and you feel loved and you get so much reward from these friendships and we’ve 0:52:30 done a really good job. We go every year to Las Vegas for the last or every other year, I should 0:52:37 say for the last 40 years, we know each other all so well. And there’s something about investing 0:52:42 in relationships when you’re young, it’s like compound interest and that is you wake up one day 0:52:48 and you just have a mess of great friends that bring you enormous reward, enormous comfort, 0:52:54 but it starts with a tribe and especially young men, I worry that we’re developing into a different 0:52:59 species where we’re comfortable being alone, sequestering from society, becoming much more 0:53:04 prone to nationalists or misogynist content, we start blaming immigrants, start blaming women, 0:53:09 start getting angry, start being susceptible to the manosphere, which is nothing but thinly veiled 0:53:16 weirdness. It’s effort, it’s work, find that group, lean into it, be generous, be open to 0:53:23 friendships, you are part of a tribe, start building yours. This episode was produced by 0:53:27 Jennifer Sanchez and Caroline Shagren and Drew Burroughs as our technical director. 0:53:31 Thank you for listening to The Prof. G Pod from the Vox Media Podcast Network. We will catch you on 0:53:37 Saturday for No Mercy, No Mouse as read by George Hawn and please follow our Prof. G Markets pod 0:54:02 wherever you get your pods for new episodes every Monday and Thursday.
Dr. Marty Makary, a renowned surgeon and professor at Johns Hopkins, public health expert, and a two-time New York Times bestselling author, joins Scott to discuss his latest book, Blind Spots: When Medicine Gets It Wrong, and What It Means for Our Health. They go over topics including the issue of overmedication, weight loss drugs, and the food industrial complex.
Follow Marty, @MartyMakary.
Scott opens with his thoughts on the film and TV industry in Los Angeles. He then gets into the future of the search industry, specifically how Google’s stranglehold on the $300 billion search ad market is starting to weaken.
0:00:04 We can do better when it comes to cloud operations. 0:00:08 Cloud services, as we know them now, are characterized by out-of-control costs, 0:00:12 disruptive outages, and unacceptable vendor concentration. 0:00:15 Sovereign D-Bass can help with that. 0:00:21 Pioneered by several lines, Sovereign D-Bass gives enterprises the ability to deploy and 0:00:26 orchestrate databases in public, private, and hybrid environments, removing lock-in risks, 0:00:33 and giving IT ops teams the orchestration benefits at scale that they usually get from traditional D-Bass, 0:00:37 but without its workload portability and access trade-offs. 0:00:41 Learn more at severalnines.com/vox. 0:00:48 Do you want to be a more empowered citizen, but don’t know where to start? 0:00:53 It’s time to sharpen your civic vision and ignite the spark for a brighter future. 0:00:57 I’m Mila Atmos and on my weekly podcast, Future Hindsight, 0:01:01 I bring you conversations to translate today’s most urgent issues 0:01:05 into clear, actionable ways to make impact. 0:01:12 With so much at stake in our democracy, join us at futurehindsight.com or wherever you listen to podcasts. 0:01:17 Explaining football to the friend who’s just there for the nachos? 0:01:18 Hard. 0:01:22 Tailgating from home like a pro with snacks and drinks everyone will love? 0:01:23 An easy win. 0:01:27 And with Instacart helping deliver the snack time MVPs to your door, 0:01:30 you’re ready for the game in as fast as 30 minutes. 0:01:33 So you never have to miss a play or lose your seat on the couch, 0:01:35 or have to go head-to-head for the last chicken wing. 0:01:41 Shop Game Day faves on Instacart and enjoy $0 delivery fees on your first three grocery orders. 0:01:44 Offer valid for a limited time, other fees and terms apply. 0:01:47 Welcome to the PropG Pods Office Hours. 0:01:49 This is the part of the show where we answer questions about business, 0:01:53 big tech, entrepreneurship, and whatever else is on your mind. 0:01:58 If you’d like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to officehours@propgmedia.com. 0:02:01 Again, that’s officehours@propgmedia.com. 0:02:02 So with that, first question. 0:02:08 Hey Professor, Jack from Austin, Texas here with a question about professional sports and cable cutting. 0:02:13 I can tell you that someone in their mid-20s is going to speak for my whole generation here. 0:02:17 TV and the NFL Sunday ticket and everything cost over $1,000 a year just to watch the games 0:02:20 that we want to watch, and none of us have cable. 0:02:25 It’s all subsidized by our parents and has our parents age out and cut the cord themselves, 0:02:27 or unfortunately pass on. 0:02:30 Do you think that these leagues are in for a rude awakening, 0:02:34 especially when I can tell you right now that tech savvy of us in our 20s, 0:02:39 there’s lots of free alternatives out there on the internet, and I hope no one from the FTC 0:02:43 is going to come for me for that one, but what do you think that these leagues are going to do? 0:02:44 Thanks. 0:02:46 It’s a really thoughtful question, Jack from Austin, Texas. 0:02:50 First off, congratulations being in Austin, probably the hottest city in the world right now, 0:02:53 and I don’t mean weather-wise, I mean just everybody’s there, everyone’s moving there. 0:02:55 By the way, it’s the podcast epicenter. 0:02:55 I didn’t know that. 0:02:57 Isn’t that strange? 0:02:58 I love going to Austin. 0:03:00 Amazing how I can turn everything to me. 0:03:03 Is that the cable industry is in full throttle structural decline. 0:03:08 A Pew Research Center survey shows that fewer Americans are watching TV through cable or satellite, 0:03:12 dropping from 76 in 2015 to just 56% in 2021. 0:03:13 Think about that. 0:03:15 Just in six years, it’s declined by 26%. 0:03:20 According to New York Times, now around 5 million people abandon cable TV every year. 0:03:20 Think about that. 0:03:25 Leaving about 75 million Americans still in the traditional TV world, but it’s losing. 0:03:26 What is that? 0:03:27 It’s declining. 0:03:28 What is that? 0:03:30 About 7% of its base every year? 0:03:34 I mean, that is a business in serious structural decline. 0:03:36 Here’s the joke. 0:03:41 The cable person doesn’t want to let the advertiser know who they’re reaching or not reaching. 0:03:47 Their job is to keep you purposely stupid, such that you will advertise to 200,000 people 0:03:53 on Fareed Zakharian GPS 360, which in my opinion is the best show in politics. 0:03:56 I think Fareed is probably the clearest blue flame thinker on geopolitics. 0:04:01 Anyways, because they want you to pay for the 200,000 people, even if maybe only about 0:04:05 1,000 are really interested in opioid-induced constipation medication. 0:04:08 So they had an incentive to keep you in the dark. 0:04:13 Meanwhile, commercials also kill it because they interrupt the storytelling. 0:04:18 In addition, the clock kills broadcast or cable because some days, 0:04:22 A.C.’s 360 with Anderson Cooper should be three hours. 0:04:23 Some days, it should be one hour. 0:04:26 And instead, it’s got to be exactly two hours. 0:04:30 You have these big folks have moved in and said, “Okay, we have deeper pockets.” 0:04:33 And slowly but surely, we’re going to take over original script of television 0:04:36 and we’re going to have storytelling that’s uninterrupted and really high production 0:04:38 volumes and just sheer tonnage. 0:04:40 There is something always to watch on Netflix. 0:04:45 Anyways, and also the only people watching TV are ridiculously fucking old. 0:04:47 You want to know something crazy? 0:04:53 The median age of TV viewers on MSNBC is 70. 0:04:58 The median age on CNN is 65. 0:05:00 I mean, that’s fucking crazy. 0:05:05 On MTV, that hip young place, it’s 52 years old. 0:05:09 And I have here, my producer said, “Do you watch live television?” 0:05:10 I don’t. 0:05:13 I watch so little of it and I love CNN. 0:05:14 Now, what’s happening here? 0:05:15 Back to your question. 0:05:22 Effectively, by offering free distribution, which is effectively what net neutrality does, 0:05:28 it says to Netflix, “You might be taking a billions of dollars of infrastructure investment, 0:05:31 but we’re going to offer it to you effectively for free. 0:05:36 Whereas the cable companies invested billions of dollars to put a cable or a wire, 0:05:41 a fiber optic wire into your house, and then they got rights to basically command higher 0:05:43 and higher fees through the cable bundle. 0:05:46 We woke up and realized you were paying $200. 0:05:52 So you could have Bravo 5, Bravo 6, and whatever it was, Home and Cooking Channel 5, 0:05:55 and they had the best business ever. 0:06:01 And then in comes the internet and laws that say you’ve got to offer internet over that cable. 0:06:06 And any content producer has access to the full stack and can pump as much through as they want. 0:06:11 Essentially, they can now spend more money on content and they have deeper pockets. 0:06:16 So just as they conquered original scripted television with just massive investments, 0:06:21 I bet Netflix this year will spend more money on original scripted programming than all of cable 0:06:23 and all of TV did in the entire decade of the ’80s. 0:06:28 You have, now they’re going after the next thing, they’re going after sports. 0:06:31 So the price is going to come down for the consumer. 0:06:35 You’re not going to have this NFL ticket bullshit where you end up paying $100 or $200 0:06:37 for 12 games or whatever it is. 0:06:39 The price is going to come down for the consumer. 0:06:41 I mean, think about the model here. 0:06:45 I’m charging every household $200 such that I can pelt them with ads that I’m also charging for. 0:06:47 I mean, there’s no business like the cable business. 0:06:51 I think the big losers here are going to, again, be ad-supported cable 0:06:55 who spent a ton of money to buy these franchise live events 0:06:59 and are no longer going to be able to justify those payments 0:07:01 because more and more people are watching it for free. 0:07:05 I think HBO is going to start running CNN clips. 0:07:06 I don’t see why they wouldn’t. 0:07:09 Just a little bug that says CNN or you see a thing that says 0:07:11 Israel goes into Lebanon. 0:07:15 Click here for seven minutes and you’ll get the best seven minutes from 0:07:18 Anderson Cooper instead of having to wade through all the bullshit and the ads. 0:07:21 I think the leagues still have enough bidders 0:07:24 that they will register an increase in value. 0:07:30 And the guys who just get killed are the ones that were just printing money, 0:07:35 charging a lot of money to watch NBA games or the Super Bowl 0:07:36 and also running Pepsi ads all day. 0:07:38 Really thoughtful question. 0:07:39 I need to think this through. 0:07:41 Anyways, thanks, Jack, from Austin. 0:07:42 Question number two. 0:07:44 Hi, PropG. 0:07:48 This is Robin Collien from Land Down Under from Melbourne, Australia. 0:07:51 Big fan of the show and your crew jokes remain a central part of my daily routine. 0:07:55 As a part of the PropG tradition, let’s talk about me. 0:07:58 I’ve recently graduated from an English degree with honors 0:08:03 and alongside my coursework, I’ve built a media business around teaching literature/philosophy 0:08:08 on YouTube and through my newsletter, which is now sitting at over half a million followers. 0:08:12 And along the way, I’ve noticed that this is not how the humanities are traditionally marketed. 0:08:17 In the English faculty, it seems to be the case that most people are having a hard time 0:08:21 defining their value, leaving graduates with the same question. 0:08:25 How are the skills acquired in the humanities transferable after graduation? 0:08:29 More specifically, as an academic yourself, what do you think the future of a humanities 0:08:34 degree is and how should humanities graduates market themselves after graduation? 0:08:36 Thank you for all you do. 0:08:38 If you’re ever in Melbourne, drop me a line. 0:08:41 First off, congratulations on living in Melbourne. 0:08:47 You have clearly the core competence I would want to bestow on any person. 0:08:49 What I hope my boys can do, and I’m trying to figure out ways to do this, 0:08:54 in that core competence that survives, is directly reverse engineered to our competitive 0:08:56 advantages of species, which is cooperation. 0:08:59 But how do we cooperate by looking at each other and winking? 0:09:01 No, we cooperate through communication. 0:09:05 So storytellers are key to the species survival. 0:09:09 And by the way, the reason Mick Jagger at the age of 80 gets to sleep with 30-year-old 0:09:11 ballerinas is because he’s an amazing storyteller. 0:09:14 And we’re really drawn to great storytellers. 0:09:19 By the way, the greatest or the easiest example of how powerful storytelling is, 0:09:23 if you’re in the mating market, especially as a dude, and you can make someone laugh, 0:09:24 you’re going to procreate. 0:09:25 Here’s my impression of all women. 0:09:28 I’m laughing, I’m laughing, I’m naked. 0:09:30 That is storytelling. 0:09:34 If you can make someone laugh, you can get a job with them, you can be their friend, 0:09:35 or you can kiss them. 0:09:38 Storytelling is the core competence. 0:09:42 Jeff Bezos, Maya Angelou, Alex Karp at Palantir. 0:09:43 What is their core competence? 0:09:44 Is it technology? 0:09:45 Is it vision? 0:09:46 No, it’s fucking storytelling. 0:09:50 Read the 1997 letter, investor letter from Jeff Bezos. 0:09:51 And you just want to buy shares. 0:09:54 Watch Alex Karp on Bill Maher. 0:09:57 And you think, oh, I’ll buy shares, even though it’s trading at 227 times earnings. 0:09:58 Makes no fucking sense. 0:10:00 That company’s overvalued. 0:10:02 Storytelling is the core competence. 0:10:08 And your ability to weaponize and understand new mediums, and obviously you have a good 0:10:10 gift to gab, is just incredibly powerful. 0:10:13 So what would I hope for anyone in humanities? 0:10:19 Look at a sector that you think has some sort of relevance to relationships, or the markets, 0:10:23 or personal or family dynamics, and become a great storyteller. 0:10:27 And more importantly, once you figure out how to become a great communicator. 0:10:28 And by the way, there’s a ton of mediums. 0:10:30 I teach this in my class. 0:10:33 Pick a medium and commit to being the top 1% on that medium. 0:10:39 Texting, speaking to large crowds, PowerPoint, TikTok, X, whatever the fuck it is. 0:10:43 Find a medium that means posts on medium for God’s sakes. 0:10:45 Writing books, writing short stories, writing articles. 0:10:50 You have to learn how to be a great communicator if you want a disproportionate amount of 0:10:53 opportunity, or be able to produce it, if you will. 0:10:54 Shape it. 0:10:55 That’s what my producers do. 0:10:57 That’s what the people behind the camera here are doing, is they’re great storytellers, 0:10:59 and they know how to craft the story. 0:11:04 I’m just the person like, I’m just a quote unquote, I don’t know, puppet, the marionette here. 0:11:07 But that is the core competence, and you have learned how to do it. 0:11:08 So what do you want to do? 0:11:11 You want to figure out something you’re super interested in that you’re great at. 0:11:15 Do you understand evolutionary biology better than anyone else in the world? 0:11:18 Do you understand the intersection between human capital and the workplace? 0:11:21 Do you understand organizational behavior or whatever it is? 0:11:26 Do you understand the correlation or the relevance of the gods or Greece or ancient 0:11:28 Greece or the Stoics? 0:11:33 Also, also, I do think academia is underrated as a career. 0:11:37 Going, if you’re a really good student and you want to be kind of the best in the world at a 0:11:42 very narrow thing, and also you’re a bit of a lone wolf, I think academics are generally 0:11:44 speaking, not very social, and they like to do research. 0:11:49 I think academia is a fantastic profession, a ton of flexibility. 0:11:51 You get to be on campus, which is a wonderful place. 0:11:54 You get to be around young people, which is inspiring. 0:11:58 And your job is just to damage the muscle in between the ears of a young person, 0:11:59 such that it grows back stronger. 0:12:00 I think it is a noble mission. 0:12:03 It can also be quite good money if you’re really good at it. 0:12:06 Now, the business school is a little bit different, but I bet the top 10% 0:12:11 faculty at the business school make seven figures plus a year. 0:12:13 If they’re not, they shouldn’t be at a business school, in my view. 0:12:16 If you can’t make a shit ton of money at an elite business school outside of the business 0:12:19 school, it probably means you shouldn’t be teaching. 0:12:22 Can’t wait for the feedback I get on that one. 0:12:28 But anyways, I do think that professional relevance outside of the classroom is key 0:12:30 to being a great professor. 0:12:31 Is that fair? 0:12:32 Probably not. 0:12:37 Anyways, the humanities, there’s always a way to make money on storytelling. 0:12:38 You got to figure out your medium. 0:12:40 Academia is a great career. 0:12:43 I wouldn’t be scared off by the humanities. 0:12:48 And you are a fantastic role model for your colleagues, whatever they go into. 0:12:51 If you don’t have the ability to communicate it in a compelling fashion, 0:12:55 whether it’s to your students, to your readers, to subscribers of magazines, 0:12:59 to book buyers, to people on TikTok, you’re not going to get very far, 0:13:01 regardless of how knowledgeable you are. 0:13:02 It’s about storytelling. 0:13:04 Really appreciate the question. 0:13:07 We have one quick break before our final question. 0:13:08 Stay with us. 0:13:14 Support for property comes from Mint Mobile. 0:13:18 There are times when you discover something so incredible, so game-changingly great, 0:13:20 you can’t believe you ever lived without it. 0:13:24 Maybe it’s a specific pair of house slippers or noise-canceling headphones 0:13:26 or an actual full night’s sleep. 0:13:29 Well, Mint Mobile’s phone plans are sort of like that. 0:13:31 Once you hear about them, it’s hard to imagine ever going back. 0:13:32 Here’s why. 0:13:37 When you purchase a three-month plan with Mint Mobile, you pay just $15 a month. 0:13:40 All Mint Mobile plans come with high-speed data and unlimited talk and text delivered 0:13:43 on the nation’s largest 5G network. 0:13:46 You can even keep your phone, your contacts, and your number. 0:13:48 It doesn’t get much easier than that. 0:13:51 To get this new customer offer and your new three-month premium wireless plan 0:13:55 for just $15 a month, you can go to mintmobile.com/propg. 0:13:57 That’s mintmobile.com/propg. 0:14:02 You can cut your wireless bill to $15 a month at mintmobile.com/propg. 0:14:05 $45 upfront payment required equivalent to $15 a month. 0:14:08 New customers on first three-month plan only. 0:14:11 Speed slower above 40 gigabytes on unlimited plan. 0:14:13 Additional taxes, fees, and restrictions apply. 0:14:15 See Mint Mobile for details. 0:14:24 Support for the show comes from Betterment. 0:14:26 Do you want your money to be motivated? 0:14:28 Do you want your money to rise and grind? 0:14:30 Do you think your money should get up and work? 0:14:33 Don’t worry, Betterment is here to help. 0:14:35 Betterment is the automated investing and savings app 0:14:37 that makes your money hustle. 0:14:40 Their automated technology is built to help maximize returns. 0:14:41 Meaning when you invest with Betterment, 0:14:44 your money can auto-adjust as you get closer to your goal. 0:14:47 Rebalance if your portfolio gets too far out of line 0:14:50 and your dividends are automatically reinvested. 0:14:52 That can increase the potential for compound returns. 0:14:55 In other words, your money is working like a dog 0:14:59 while you can be sleeping like one and snoring like one too. 0:15:02 You’ll never picture your money this same way again. 0:15:04 Betterment, the automated investing and savings app 0:15:06 that makes your money hustle. 0:15:08 Visit Betterment.com to get started. 0:15:09 Investing involves risk. 0:15:11 Performance is not guaranteed. 0:15:19 Support for Prop G comes from Vanta. 0:15:21 Whether you’re starting or scaling your company’s security program, 0:15:23 demonstrating top-notch security practices 0:15:26 and establishing trust is more important than ever. 0:15:30 Vanta automates compliance for SOC2, ISO 27001, 0:15:32 and more, saving you time and money 0:15:33 while helping you build customer trust. 0:15:36 Plus, you can streamline security reviews 0:15:37 by automating questionnaires 0:15:39 and demonstrating your security posture 0:15:43 with a customer-facing trust center all powered by Vanta AI. 0:15:46 Over 8,000 global companies like Atlassian, FlowHealth, 0:15:50 and Quora use Vanta to manage risk and prove security in real time. 0:15:53 Get $1,000 off Vanta when you go to vanta.com/propg. 0:15:58 That’s vanta.com/p-r-o-f-g for $1,000 off. 0:16:07 Welcome back, question number three. 0:16:09 Hi, Scott. Thomas here from Belgium. 0:16:11 Long time listener of the podcast. 0:16:14 I think you’re a great role model for young men, 0:16:16 and I love your views on politics and business. 0:16:18 Here’s my question. 0:16:21 My wife and I, both from Europe, 0:16:23 moved to the United States four years ago. 0:16:27 It turned out to be the best financial decision of our lives. 0:16:31 We moved almost with no savings, starting in Austin, Texas. 0:16:35 We built a better world, bought a home, 0:16:38 and we went from a visa to a Greek art. 0:16:41 Now we’re living in New York City, 0:16:44 enjoying everything this big city has to offer. 0:16:47 While we’re planning to move to Europe, 0:16:49 at some point, to be closer to our family, 0:16:53 we now have the option to potentially become U.S. citizens. 0:16:57 I’m curious, giving the tax implications 0:16:59 and the potential lifelong impact, 0:17:03 do you think it’s worth pursuing U.S. citizenship 0:17:05 as a hedge for world economy 0:17:07 and the benefits of a second passport? 0:17:09 Thank you for the question. 0:17:12 Thomas from Belgium. 0:17:13 First off, congratulations, 0:17:16 and what makes America great 0:17:17 is the really impressive people 0:17:18 who are willing to take risks 0:17:19 continue to come to the United States. 0:17:22 That is the secret sauce, 0:17:24 and I’m glad that it’s paying off for you. 0:17:24 I’ve always said, 0:17:26 “I’ve basically been molesting the Earth 0:17:27 for the last 30 years.” 0:17:28 What does that mean? 0:17:30 I was always in the services business, 0:17:31 meaning that if the CMO of Samsung 0:17:35 wanted me to come present to management, 0:17:36 I’d be like, “Sure, I can do that.” 0:17:38 And I’d be on a plane the next day for Seoul, 0:17:39 or Audi was my biggest client 0:17:42 when I started a strategy from the age of 26 0:17:43 in my secondary business school. 0:17:44 And when Audi would call and say, 0:17:46 “Hey, would you like to come talk to me?” 0:17:47 Of course I do, so I get on a plane 0:17:49 for fucking Ingolstadt, Germany. 0:17:52 By the way, Ingolstadt should not be on your list of cities 0:17:53 to see before you die. 0:17:56 And it took a huge toll on me personally, professionally. 0:17:57 Anyway, I don’t know why I’m going there, 0:18:02 but I feel as if I have a decent sense of different cities 0:18:03 in different countries around the world. 0:18:05 And my reductive analysis, 0:18:06 what it all distills down to, 0:18:08 my assessment of the world, 0:18:12 the US is the best place to make money, 0:18:14 Europe is the best place to spend it. 0:18:17 So while you’re still trying to make progress, 0:18:18 you’re in your earning years, 0:18:21 you’re in your making years, 0:18:22 not your spending years, 0:18:24 I say don’t leave the US. 0:18:25 Now as it relates to being a citizen, 0:18:26 there’s some real benefits. 0:18:29 And I immediately want to have my chest and say, 0:18:32 “Congratulations,” and having US citizenship 0:18:34 is an unbelievable asset, go for it. 0:18:36 There are some benefits, 0:18:37 voting rights and political participation, 0:18:38 according to Pew Research, 0:18:41 naturalized citizens make up about 10% of the US electorate. 0:18:44 Unrestricted right to live and work in the US, 0:18:45 you can’t underestimate that. 0:18:46 I know so many people. 0:18:49 The INS, our immigration department, 0:18:52 quite frankly, is just exceptionally crude and aggressive 0:18:54 and makes a lot of people’s lives 0:18:56 who are trying to do it legally miserable. 0:18:58 It does not do a good job 0:19:00 of rewarding the people trying to play by the rules 0:19:02 and does a totally ineffective job 0:19:03 of undocumented workers 0:19:06 who, by the way, are the most profitable part of immigration, 0:19:08 but that’s a longer talk show. 0:19:12 I wrote my entire post on Omar Sinomalis last week on immigration. 0:19:13 Why don’t we solve the immigration problem? 0:19:16 Because it’s too goddamn profitable. 0:19:18 Anyways, what would I do? 0:19:20 Look, I’m not going to tell you 0:19:22 not to become an American citizen. 0:19:23 What I would suggest though, 0:19:25 there’s one big asterisk here, 0:19:27 and that is the thing about the US 0:19:30 is that US taxes will follow you everywhere 0:19:31 for the rest of your life. 0:19:32 What do I mean by that? 0:19:35 Say your wife is German 0:19:36 and you become a US citizen, 0:19:37 but she does not, 0:19:39 or say you managed to figure out a way to stay 0:19:44 on resident non-dom visas or whatever in the US 0:19:46 and you decide to move to Dubai one day 0:19:47 where there are no taxes. 0:19:49 If I move to Dubai, 0:19:52 I continue to pay US federal income tax. 0:19:55 You might not as bells and citizens. 0:19:56 So what am I suggesting? 0:19:58 You are the secret sauce to our success. 0:20:00 I’m not going to get in the way 0:20:02 or discourage you from becoming an American citizen. 0:20:03 The only thing I will say 0:20:06 is that there are sometimes some benefits 0:20:08 to not being a US citizen 0:20:11 should you decide to move to a Hong Kong or a Dubai 0:20:14 that has 0% tax rate to take advantage 0:20:16 of those types of low tax rates. 0:20:18 Because once you’re a US citizen, 0:20:21 in exchange for the unbelievable prosperity rule of law 0:20:24 and great nightlife that the US offers, 0:20:26 US taxes are going to follow you everywhere. 0:20:28 I feel really shitty pointing this out 0:20:31 because the US needs a strong tax base, 0:20:34 but I would probably just check in 0:20:37 with a talented tax person before 0:20:41 both of you hit the bid and become citizens. 0:20:43 Having said that, there is no passport. 0:20:46 There is no citizenship that is more powerful 0:20:48 and is more noble and does more for the world 0:20:50 than American citizenship. 0:20:52 That’s all for this episode. 0:20:54 If you’d like to submit a question, 0:20:55 please email a voice recording 0:20:57 to OfficeHours@ProptingMedia.com. 0:21:00 Again, that’s OfficeHours@ProptingMedia.com. 0:21:13 This episode was produced by Caroline Shagrin. 0:21:16 Jennifer Sanchez is our Associate Producer 0:21:18 and Drew Burroughs is our Technical Director. 0:21:19 Thank you for listening to the Prop G Pod 0:21:21 from the Vox Media Podcast Network. 0:21:24 We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy, No Mouse, 0:21:25 as read by George Hahn. 0:21:28 And please follow our Prop G Markets Pod 0:21:30 wherever you get your pods for new episodes 0:21:31 every Monday and Thursday.
Scott discusses the cable TV industry, specifically what has led to its structural decline and what that means for major sports leagues and the consumer. He then shares how to market a humanities degree, explaining why storytelling is the core competence. He wraps up with advice to a listener considering U.S. citizenship.
0:00:01 (upbeat music) 0:00:03 Support for the show comes from Virgin Atlantic. 0:00:04 Let’s talk about flying. 0:00:06 I do it, you do it, we all do it, 0:00:09 but it really comes down to how we do it. 0:00:10 When you fly Virgin Atlantic, 0:00:11 then make it a memorable trip 0:00:13 right from the moment you check in. 0:00:15 On board, you’ll find everything you need to relax, 0:00:17 recharge, or carry on working. 0:00:18 Live flat, private suites, 0:00:21 fast Wi-Fi, hours of entertainment, 0:00:24 delicious dining and warm, welcoming service 0:00:25 that’s designed around you. 0:00:27 Check out virginatlantic.com 0:00:29 for your next trip to London and beyond, 0:00:31 and see for yourself how traveling for business 0:00:33 can always be a pleasure. 0:00:38 Will the VP debate move the needle 0:00:40 in what’s shaping up to be a neck and neck election? 0:00:42 You never know in advance what will be the thing 0:00:44 that matters and the thing that doesn’t matter, 0:00:48 but Donald Trump will be almost 80, 0:00:52 and J.D. Vance will be one cheeseburger away 0:00:54 from the presidency should they win. 0:00:57 I’m Preet Bharara, and this week, 0:00:58 the Atlantic magazine’s David Frum 0:01:01 joins me on my podcast, Stay Tuned with Preet, 0:01:04 to break down what happened at the debate. 0:01:05 The episode is out now. 0:01:07 Search and follow Stay Tuned with Preet 0:01:09 wherever you get your podcasts. 0:01:14 – Hi everyone, I’m Brene Brown, 0:01:16 and I’d love to tell you about a new series 0:01:18 that’s launching on Unlocking Us. 0:01:21 I’m calling it the On My Heart and Mind podcast series. 0:01:23 It’s gonna include conversations 0:01:24 with some of my favorite writers 0:01:26 on topics ranging from revolutionary love 0:01:30 and gun ownership to menopause and finding joy and grief. 0:01:31 The first episode is available now, 0:01:33 and I can’t wait for you to hear it. 0:01:35 All new episodes will drop on Wednesdays, 0:01:36 and you can get them as soon as they’re out 0:01:38 by following Unlocking Us on Apple 0:01:40 or wherever you listen to your podcasts. 0:01:45 – Welcome to Raging Moderates, I’m Scott Galloway. 0:01:47 – And I’m Jessica Tarlove. 0:01:48 – Jessica, how was your weekend? 0:01:50 – It was glorious. 0:01:52 Weather was amazing in New York. 0:01:53 – Really? – So, you know how, 0:01:55 like in London, like the city comes alive, 0:01:57 especially when you’re not supposed to get good weather 0:02:00 at this point, it was like 70 and sunny. 0:02:03 And how was your, you’re not home? 0:02:05 – No, I’m in– – Clearly looks like. 0:02:08 – Yeah, I’m in Los Angeles at my favorite hotel, 0:02:09 the Bear Leaves Hotel. 0:02:11 I just took off my pink robe for you. 0:02:13 – Oh. – And, yeah, 0:02:15 I had a really nice, I have a nice weekend. 0:02:18 I went to two of my closest friends, 0:02:21 my roommates, my sophomore year in the room of the ’80s, 0:02:23 which we branded one of the rooms, 0:02:25 and our fraternity had their 60th 0:02:29 and like tons of kids and grown kids. 0:02:31 It was really, really nice. 0:02:33 And then I went and saw my dad, 0:02:34 which is my dad’s at that point where that’s, 0:02:37 that’s kind of rough, but I did that. 0:02:42 And now I’m back and I’m gonna do this at Oh Dark 100 Hours. 0:02:43 And then at one o’clock, I’m gonna go down 0:02:46 and I’m gonna order a club sandwich, 0:02:48 put on big, big dark sunglasses, 0:02:50 put an unlit cigarette in my mouth, 0:02:51 and every woman that walks by me, 0:02:53 I’m gonna scream, “Jackie, marry me. 0:02:54 “I make you very happy woman.” 0:02:59 That’s a jacket, that’s a Aristotle Onassis reference. 0:03:01 Jessica, it’s one of my go-to lines. 0:03:03 – Oh, I hadn’t heard it before, 0:03:05 so the spark is still alive here. 0:03:06 – Very much. – Since we’re new 0:03:07 to each other, yeah. 0:03:09 – Very much, and it’s kind of sad they recognize me. 0:03:12 I’m turning into a much less wealthy version 0:03:13 of Howard Hughes here. 0:03:15 They’re like, “Hello, Mr. Galloway, and how are you?” 0:03:18 And they talk to me like I’m a very old man. 0:03:23 Anyways, today we are talking about the final stretch 0:03:25 of the campaign, Liz Cheney campaigns for Harris 0:03:27 and Elon Musk rallies for Trump. 0:03:32 Melania’s book tour, that’s a snoozer. 0:03:34 And finally, we reflect on the year it’s been 0:03:37 since the October 7th Hamas attack. 0:03:39 All right, we’re less than a month out from election day, 0:03:41 and the October surprises are rolling in. 0:03:44 Last week, special counsel, Jack Smith, 0:03:47 dropped a 165-page filing detailing Trump’s 0:03:51 alleged desperate efforts to overturn the 2020 election. 0:03:54 According to the document, Trump told a family member 0:03:57 just days before January 6th that it doesn’t matter 0:04:01 if you win or lost, you still have to fight like hell. 0:04:03 The filing also claims Trump knew his core claims 0:04:05 wouldn’t hold up, but pressed on anyways. 0:04:07 Jess, what do you make of this? 0:04:09 Could this really, could this have an impact, 0:04:13 or is it just, I don’t know, is it a lot of jazz hands here? 0:04:16 – Well, I think that there’s something more important 0:04:19 afoot than whether it has an impact or not. 0:04:22 And that’s that there’s 165 pages 0:04:25 of available information now about how Donald Trump 0:04:27 as a private citizen, so that’s what Jack Smith 0:04:32 had to do with this post-Supreme Court immunity decision. 0:04:35 He had to show that this was a criminal plot 0:04:39 to overturn the election by a private citizen 0:04:42 acting as such, using private lawyers, 0:04:45 using private money, et cetera. 0:04:50 And that’s meaningful for the American public, 0:04:53 even if it just goes in a time capsule for all of this 0:04:57 to really understand the breadth and depth 0:05:01 of the effort to overturn the election. 0:05:04 We’re all political animals, some of us more than others. 0:05:07 So yes, could it have an electoral effect? 0:05:10 I think that that is linked to, you know, 0:05:12 when we start talking about Liz Cheney being out there 0:05:14 and campaigning in the Adam Kinzinger’s of the world. 0:05:18 And this undecided voter or potential swing voter 0:05:22 where protecting democracy is their number one priority. 0:05:25 You know, these primarily women, suburban women 0:05:27 that are being interviewed saying, you know, 0:05:30 I don’t agree with Kamala Harris’s policy positions, 0:05:35 but I want to be on the side of protecting the constitution. 0:05:36 So I think it matters in that sense. 0:05:39 But this is, it feels so much larger than what happens 0:05:41 on November 5th to me. 0:05:44 And when you look at this filing 0:05:47 and some of my colleagues said, you know, 0:05:48 well, we already knew all of this. 0:05:52 And then I started rattling off all of this new information 0:05:53 that was in this filing. 0:05:55 And they said, oh, well, it’s connected 0:05:57 to the spirit of what I knew. 0:05:59 Well, that’s really different, right? 0:06:01 People don’t remember the spirit of things. 0:06:03 They remember the anecdotes, 0:06:07 like the Michigan GOP official who Rhonda McDaniel called 0:06:10 for Trump to try to get him to do the fake election scheme. 0:06:13 And he said, that’s fucking nuts. 0:06:15 People are gonna remember that. 0:06:17 Or that Donald Trump said about, you know, 0:06:19 that they wanted to hang Mike Pence. 0:06:22 That he said, so what? 0:06:25 And I feel like that is going to stick 0:06:29 in the national consciousness for a lot longer 0:06:31 than the outcome of this election. 0:06:33 What’d you make of it? 0:06:35 – I’m of two minds on it because I agree with you 0:06:39 that reminding, just saying, just FYI folks, 0:06:43 just remember as you head into the voting booth, 0:06:45 this is the guy who tried to obstruct 0:06:47 the peaceful transfer of power, 0:06:48 which is kind of job one. 0:06:50 If you’re trying to hold up our democracy, 0:06:52 every other president, even when it’s been close 0:06:56 with Gore or Clinton, they did concede 0:06:58 and they showed up at the inaugurations 0:06:59 and they facilitated. 0:07:01 This was like, there were certain things we thought 0:07:05 were just always gonna happen that we took for granted. 0:07:08 And he still has yet to concede the election. 0:07:11 And I think that it’s important to remind people 0:07:14 that remember this, this should not be normalized. 0:07:17 This was outrageous, unprecedented behavior. 0:07:19 And some of the stuff is really shocking. 0:07:22 At the same time, I was pissed off. 0:07:27 I mean, physically angry at Comey when he decided, 0:07:31 hey, look at me a few weeks before the election 0:07:32 and said that he was, you know, 0:07:35 going after Hillary’s emails or indicting her. 0:07:38 To me, that just said, I need to be in the news 0:07:40 and I have some weird perverted version 0:07:41 of what it means to be a leader 0:07:45 and it means doing stuff without any care for the political. 0:07:47 I mean, there’s just no way around it. 0:07:50 If you do something right now, it’s political. 0:07:54 The political calculation has to come into the calculation. 0:07:57 So I think the criticism from Republicans 0:07:59 that this seems very politically motivated 0:08:00 given the timing, I think that’s fair, 0:08:03 which also leads to another level of anger. 0:08:05 There’s a lot of floors on the elevator stop 0:08:06 of the anger for Scott. 0:08:09 – Is that an LA feature or you always have them in the floor? 0:08:10 – No, that follows me everywhere. 0:08:13 That’s carry-on luggage that’s somewhere in my brain 0:08:15 that comes with me everywhere. 0:08:16 I think I inherited that from my father. 0:08:19 Anyways, I have a tough one with this. 0:08:21 I think that, you know, people say it was different 0:08:23 with Comey, there was nothing there, 0:08:25 there’s a there there here. 0:08:26 The other thing I’m fucking angry about, Jess, 0:08:29 is how on earth did they wait three years 0:08:31 to do all this shit? 0:08:33 He was able to delay all the cases. 0:08:36 He was able to claim political, you know, 0:08:40 prosecution that no one else has been subject to 0:08:42 because, you know, our guys, if you will, 0:08:45 if you think of the people that are trying to highlight 0:08:47 some of Trump’s shortcomings, 0:08:49 they didn’t bring these cases to three years. 0:08:52 It strikes me as just incredibly democratic 0:08:54 in the sense that the Democrats have a habit 0:08:57 of being right and ineffective. 0:08:58 What do you think about the timing of all of this? 0:08:59 And do you think that Trump, 0:09:01 do you think Trump’s people are just gonna say 0:09:03 another example of how they are trying 0:09:04 to steal the election again? 0:09:09 – Well, definitely, ’cause they only have one thing to say, 0:09:12 and it’s, this is lawfare, and I’m a victim. 0:09:15 And that works for a lot of people. 0:09:17 But I do think that this is different. 0:09:21 So I wanna be in like 50% agreement with you 0:09:23 about Merrick Garland, 0:09:26 and that this should have been all gas, no breaks. 0:09:30 The second that Joe Biden was in the White House, 0:09:34 everyone was confirmed, this process should have begun. 0:09:37 And it started a couple of years too late. 0:09:39 So, and, you know, it has taken a while 0:09:41 and there are a lot of cases involved. 0:09:43 And it looks like the Clarice Cud case, 0:09:46 the Mar-a-Lago case, who knows when that moves forward 0:09:49 because, you know, Trump got his bestie 0:09:53 when they drew straws on that one in Eileen Cannon 0:09:54 down in Florida. 0:09:59 But I see this as amazingly distinct 0:10:02 from what happened with Jim Comey 0:10:05 and coming out 11 days before the election 0:10:08 with nothing to say, 0:10:12 besides we considered something and decided against it. 0:10:15 And Jim Comey has revealed himself, 0:10:19 and I think a lot of these now-never Trump Republicans 0:10:21 suffer from the self-absorption 0:10:24 that goes so beyond what they purport to be about, right? 0:10:28 They say, “I value country over party, 0:10:30 but really I just want to hear myself talk 0:10:32 or I’ve got a bunch of books coming.” 0:10:35 And Liz Cheney doesn’t do it like that. 0:10:39 She actually seems like the one who is completely dedicated 0:10:41 to making sure that we preserve our democracy. 0:10:45 And who knows if Kamala wins in 2024, 0:10:47 I don’t know where Liz Cheney will be in 2028 0:10:50 if there’s a normie Republican on the other side. 0:10:52 She’ll probably go back to her roots 0:10:54 because she actually believes in things 0:10:56 that the Republican party used to be about, 0:10:59 like small government and fiscal responsibility, 0:11:02 which is not a feature of the Trump agenda. 0:11:06 So Jim Comey did that for himself 0:11:07 and he had nothing to say, 0:11:11 but to just publicly crap on Hillary, 0:11:14 who was already running a deeply flawed campaign, 0:11:18 which we all know and have accepted at this point. 0:11:22 What’s different about the Jack Smith filing is, A, 0:11:24 it’s the continuation of something 0:11:27 that has been in the ether for over a year. 0:11:30 So it doesn’t violate the 60 day rule. 0:11:31 Not these are formal rules, 0:11:34 but the kind of code of conduct. 0:11:39 And Jack Smith has taken the hit from the Supreme Court, 0:11:41 waited out through this. 0:11:42 They slow rolled out that the Supreme Court 0:11:44 did everything that they could to make sure 0:11:46 that Trump would not have to deal with this 0:11:47 before the election. 0:11:50 Jack Smith, abided by all of that, 0:11:53 had to judge Chutkin to make sure 0:11:55 that she was still going on schedule, 0:11:56 no matter what, 0:11:59 that she wasn’t going to fall by the wayside 0:12:01 for some stupid reason. 0:12:02 Because the truth is, 0:12:04 this obviously isn’t going to trial in advance of this, 0:12:06 but there’s no reason that the wheels of justice 0:12:08 should stop turning 0:12:11 because people are going to vote on November 5th 0:12:14 for a case that was already open. 0:12:17 That has now been through two grand juries to boot. 0:12:22 So I think that people who are actually receptive 0:12:26 to hearing the facts about Donald Trump 0:12:27 and his legal cases, 0:12:29 and there is a whole subsection of people 0:12:30 who are not receptive to it. 0:12:32 So this doesn’t even matter. 0:12:36 But those who still have that little light on 0:12:37 where they can hear things, 0:12:41 deserve to know who it is 0:12:44 that is standing for election on November 5th, 0:12:47 the totality of that person. 0:12:51 And I don’t think that that counts as election interference. 0:12:53 I think that that counts again, 0:12:55 as justice doing its thing 0:12:58 and giving people the fullest picture 0:13:01 of an incredibly important decision. 0:13:04 And I don’t know if that satisfies your anger about it, 0:13:07 but I’ve given it a lot of thought 0:13:11 and tried to be as non-partisan as I can. 0:13:14 And I also, to your point about Democrats being losers 0:13:17 or ineffective, as you put it more nicely, 0:13:21 like this is actually us not being those kinds of losers. 0:13:25 This is not letting Merrick Garland get a hearing 0:13:27 before the election, like Mitch McConnell did, 0:13:31 just saying, no, we’re not gonna stand by 0:13:33 and not talk about this because of a norm 0:13:35 that you first of all invented 0:13:36 and is not being violated 0:13:39 because this was already an indictment that was out there. 0:13:40 – I think that’s well said. 0:13:43 The Harris campaign has already released an ad 0:13:44 using the story to their advantage. 0:13:45 Let’s have a listen. 0:13:47 – We fight like hell. 0:13:49 And if you don’t fight like hell, 0:13:51 you’re not gonna have a country anymore. 0:13:52 – New evidence about Donald Trump’s efforts 0:13:54 to overturn the 2020 election. 0:13:58 – This is bombshell after bombshell after bombshell. 0:14:01 – Trump was pressuring Pence to take action. 0:14:03 – Merrick Pence has betrayed 0:14:06 the United States of America. 0:14:08 – Trump looked at him and said only, so what? 0:14:13 Wow, that’s pretty dark, what do you think? 0:14:16 – I mean, it’s like a movie trailer, right? 0:14:17 Like when we used to go to movies 0:14:20 and you’d be like, oh, I wanna see that. 0:14:24 Which is the best that you could do for a filing, right? 0:14:27 To make something as exciting as that sounds. 0:14:29 I think that’s exactly the right thing. 0:14:30 And I mean, two things that play with this. 0:14:33 One, the Harris campaign has so much money 0:14:37 that they can make an ad about toilet paper if they want. 0:14:39 And it’s not gonna put a dent in the bank. 0:14:41 So why wouldn’t you cut ads on this? 0:14:45 And then add to that, the ad that they did 0:14:48 right after the debate when Walls asked J.D. Vance 0:14:51 if Donald Trump lost the 2020 election, 0:14:52 and he couldn’t answer. 0:14:55 So all of this is part of that bubble, 0:14:58 and I think it’s totally worth the dollars. 0:14:59 And I wanna put something to you 0:15:01 that I have been workshopping, 0:15:04 and this is my first public go of it. 0:15:08 The Trump campaign is not seemingly 0:15:11 making a real effort to win the election 0:15:13 when it comes to the mechanics of it, 0:15:16 like the get out the vote operation. 0:15:18 And people have been publicly decrying this. 0:15:20 Ronald McDaniels talked about it. 0:15:22 Other Republican officials, 0:15:23 Republicans have said in swing districts, 0:15:25 no one has canvassed. 0:15:27 I haven’t seen anyone knock on my doors. 0:15:29 They have Charlie Kirk in charge of it, 0:15:32 who’s a grifter of the highest order. 0:15:37 And marrying that up with what we know from this filing, 0:15:41 part of me feels like they don’t even really intend 0:15:44 to win in the genuine way. 0:15:47 That he’s going to say again, I won, 0:15:49 knowing full well that the recounts are gonna have to happen, 0:15:52 George is gonna have to hand count, et cetera. 0:15:54 And that was just kind of like this red flag 0:15:56 that went off to me this weekend 0:15:58 after looking at the Jack Smith filing, 0:16:01 and thinking, are these people actually playing to win, 0:16:03 or they’re playing to say they won? 0:16:07 – Wow, ’cause I actually think he is very, 0:16:09 well, he personally, there’s him, 0:16:11 there’s the campaign and how they’re going about it. 0:16:14 I would imagine that he desperately wants to win, 0:16:17 ’cause in my view, there’s a very decent chance 0:16:18 that one of these courts, 0:16:20 I mean, he has, I think, four juries 0:16:22 at some point coming for him. 0:16:23 And those, I looked at those jurisdictions 0:16:26 they have between, depending on the jurisdiction, 0:16:30 between a 70 and 90% conviction rate. 0:16:31 And the majority of the crimes, 0:16:32 except for the one in New York, 0:16:35 probably typically the sentencing guidelines 0:16:38 would probably offer up some sort of jail term. 0:16:39 Now, a guy that age, the president, 0:16:41 they might say, just stay out of politics, 0:16:42 we’re gonna put an ankle in on you, 0:16:45 hang out at your golf course, 0:16:47 have Melania and porn star swing by, 0:16:49 he still could, he still will probably, 0:16:50 could probably figure out a way 0:16:52 to come to some sort of accommodation M and I’s life, 0:16:53 but that’s not gonna be pleasant. 0:16:58 And if a 78-year-old man, obese man is sentenced to prison, 0:17:01 any time at all, is probably a death sentence. 0:17:02 He’s not gonna come out, 0:17:04 he may never leave, he may leave feet first. 0:17:05 And when he comes out, 0:17:08 I think he’d be a dramatically changed person. 0:17:10 So I would think he’s exceptionally, 0:17:13 genuinely all in on winning. 0:17:14 I wonder if the campaign, 0:17:16 what you’re describing to me, 0:17:18 quite frankly, is a little bit of incompetence. 0:17:19 They don’t have the ground game 0:17:21 that previous campaigns have had. 0:17:22 The other question, or the question I would have for you 0:17:24 is I think you brought up something that’s kind of interesting 0:17:25 and that is money. 0:17:28 Vice President Harris has raised so much money. 0:17:30 Where does that come in? 0:17:32 Is it just ads, or is it a get out? 0:17:33 Is it get out the vote? 0:17:35 Is it turnout? 0:17:36 Other than just more ads, 0:17:38 I would have thought that basically every news station 0:17:41 that has people who are 95 watching it 0:17:43 has already sold out all their ads. 0:17:44 Where else does the money help? 0:17:46 – Yeah, it’s definitely the ground game. 0:17:50 And she is supporting down ballot races 0:17:52 at unprecedented levels, 0:17:55 transferring things like $25 million to the DNC 0:17:58 to make sure that we can retake the house. 0:17:59 Everyone is even sharing. 0:18:01 You have Gavin Newsom writing to you. 0:18:05 Like, can you chip in for Bob Casey? 0:18:08 So it’s going to all sorts of down ballot races. 0:18:09 Get out the vote. 0:18:13 Legal teams that are going to have to deal with recounts, 0:18:17 making sure everything is free and fair in the aftermath, 0:18:19 you know, paying people. 0:18:21 And they have a huge apparatus. 0:18:25 I mean, this is massive what they have going. 0:18:28 And I think you’re probably right 0:18:31 that it is more incompetence than anything. 0:18:34 But they do have smart people like a Suzy Wiles, 0:18:39 who’s one of his, I guess, co-chair of the campaign, 0:18:40 who knows how to win elections. 0:18:42 – It’s supposed to be very smart. 0:18:43 – Very smart. 0:18:46 And she’s not screaming about this. 0:18:50 But I think in a deadlocked election 0:18:53 where no one reasonable is saying 0:18:55 it’s going to be a landslide in either direction, 0:18:58 odds are we’re going to go back down to the margins 0:19:01 that we had in 2020 or less. 0:19:06 Why wouldn’t you be preparing at the highest levels for that? 0:19:11 Which we know includes canvassing, door knocking, 0:19:14 texting, calling, all the things. 0:19:16 – We’ll be right back. 0:19:22 – Support for Prop G comes from Fetch Pet Insurance. 0:19:24 I love doing ads for Fetch. 0:19:26 I am a huge dog person. 0:19:28 I think you know this, both Leia and Gangster, 0:19:30 my great dang, and my Puerto Rican rescue ham. 0:19:32 We think he’s a dog. 0:19:35 And by the way, Leia, Leia is big and scary looking. 0:19:37 You can go up and literally like poke Leia in the eye 0:19:40 or take her food from her and she’s not going to do anything 0:19:43 except maybe rear up her hind quarters against you. 0:19:46 Whereas the little one will snap your finger off, 0:19:47 the little cute one. 0:19:48 Anyways, pet parents know better than anyone 0:19:51 how much joy and whimsy an animal can bring to a family. 0:19:53 But they also know that it’s only a matter of time 0:19:55 before the unexpected happens. 0:19:58 And the unexpected is also unfortunately usually expensive. 0:19:59 So unless you happen to have thousands of dollars 0:20:01 lying around to drop at the vet, 0:20:04 you might want to try Fetch Pet Insurance. 0:20:06 Fetch is the most comprehensive pet insurance covering 0:20:09 what other providers charge extra for or don’t cover at all. 0:20:11 Fetch even covers acupuncture. 0:20:12 Get that, acupuncture for dogs. 0:20:15 Fetch covers up to 90% of unexpected vet bills. 0:20:18 And with Fetch, you can use any vet in the U.S. or Canada. 0:20:19 Fetch covers more. 0:20:21 More protection, more savings, more love. 0:20:23 With Fetch, more is more. 0:20:27 Get your free quote today at fetchpet.com/propg. 0:20:32 That’s fetchpet.com/propg, fetchpet.com/propg. 0:20:37 Support for PropG comes from Life360. 0:20:39 Your kids are getting a little older 0:20:40 and I know that might be a little scary. 0:20:42 Jesus, don’t I know it? 0:20:45 But they might be ready for some new responsibilities, 0:20:46 like getting themselves to school 0:20:48 or even carpooling to practice. 0:20:49 And while it can be a scary time, 0:20:51 it can also be a wonderful moment 0:20:52 for them to stretch their wings. 0:20:55 But of course, you wanna make sure they stay safe. 0:20:57 For that, you might wanna try Life360, 0:20:59 a family connection and safety app 0:21:00 that makes it easy to keep track 0:21:02 of your family members’ locations in real time. 0:21:05 Life360 notifications let you know when your kids arrive 0:21:07 or leave a location like school, 0:21:10 practice a friend’s house or the bus stop. 0:21:12 And with a tile from Life360, 0:21:14 you can easily attach and track items, 0:21:17 including backpack, stuffy bags, or even a pet’s collar. 0:21:19 All to help alleviate the mental load 0:21:21 of managing a busy family. 0:21:24 Family proof your family with Life360’s tile trackers. 0:21:29 Visit tile.com today and use code PROVG to get 15% off. 0:21:31 That’s tile.com code PROVG. 0:21:40 Vice President Harris also made 0:21:42 some major media appearances this week, 0:21:44 including Caller Daddy, 60 Minutes to View, 0:21:47 Howard Stern, Stephen Colbert. 0:21:49 She’s clearly kind of got the message about getting out. 0:21:52 These aren’t exactly hard charging interviews. 0:21:54 60 Minutes asked some pretty good questions. 0:21:56 I thought she handled it pretty well. 0:21:59 What did you make of this media tour? 0:22:00 – Well, it’s not done yet. 0:22:04 So I’m interested in seeing all of it. 0:22:06 It’s weird, being a liberal that works 0:22:10 in conservative media, I’m wired a little bit differently. 0:22:14 So I want things or have an expectation for Democrats 0:22:15 that I think is a little bit unfair 0:22:17 because I work with people 0:22:20 who are like Fox interviewer bust. 0:22:23 And we should say Tim Walls went on Fox News Sunday 0:22:25 with Shannon Bream on Sunday and he did a pretty good job. 0:22:26 I thought Shannon did a great job too. 0:22:29 It was one of those where everybody got something, 0:22:33 which I feel like is the best case scenario for an interview. 0:22:38 But I feel like what the Harris campaign is doing 0:22:43 is rewriting how presidential campaigns are fought 0:22:45 and hopefully won with the media. 0:22:47 And they’re trying to set a precedent 0:22:48 for the future of this. 0:22:50 And I think that they’re doing it, A, 0:22:52 because this is the way that media is shifting 0:22:55 and B, because they have a candidate 0:22:58 that can’t do as well in the normal formats 0:23:01 that presidential candidates usually do. 0:23:04 I think that if she was like Biden was in 2020 0:23:07 or certainly in Obama or a Hillary 0:23:11 and snappy and concise and very sure of herself 0:23:15 in interviews, they’d be doing all the normal stuff, 0:23:18 plus as many of these podcasts as possible. 0:23:21 But they are making lemonade with the lemons 0:23:23 that they have and lemon is too harsh, 0:23:26 but you know, that’s how the phrase works 0:23:27 and doing something different. 0:23:30 And I listened to the Caller Daddy interview 0:23:31 with great interest. 0:23:34 I thought that the host, Alex Cooper, did a fantastic job. 0:23:38 And if you haven’t listened to it yet, at the beginning, 0:23:40 she gives a very thoughtful introduction 0:23:43 where she talks about how she has never wanted politics 0:23:45 to be part of Caller Daddy, 0:23:48 that the daddy gang is not interested in it. 0:23:52 She has five million downloads for each episode. 0:23:55 She’s the number one podcast for women 18 to 34, 0:23:58 the number two podcast in the world behind Joe Rogan. 0:24:01 So this is a massive audience that she doesn’t wanna tick off. 0:24:04 And she had actually turned down the presidential candidates 0:24:07 when it was Biden and Harris wanted to come on 0:24:09 in January, I think she said no. 0:24:12 And then as we got closer to the election, 0:24:14 and she realized also how many of the issues 0:24:16 that they talk about a lot, like mental health, 0:24:18 like women’s reproductive rights, 0:24:23 like sex and dating, abuse were themes of the election 0:24:27 that she should open her proverbial doors to the candidates. 0:24:29 And she also invited Donald Trump to join her 0:24:34 and he has not replied at this point. 0:24:37 Scott, what do you think about this new media tour? 0:24:39 – Well, it bodes well for Jessica Tarluff 0:24:42 and Scott Galloway and that podcasting is- 0:24:44 – You think we’re gonna be the next stop for Kamala? 0:24:45 – It won’t be this time 0:24:48 ’cause we didn’t get our shit together until like October 0:24:49 and launch this thing. 0:24:54 But I think we’re gonna be huge in the midterm, Jess. 0:24:56 Look, it really speaks to the medium. 0:25:00 And that is when you go on, when you look at 60 minutes, 0:25:01 you know, it’s highly produced. 0:25:03 You don’t really get a sense for them. 0:25:06 And podcasts, there’s just more nuance. 0:25:08 And they run longer 0:25:11 and it feels like you’re actually in the room 0:25:12 with them a bit. 0:25:14 And I think people really like the medium 0:25:16 for a long form interview. 0:25:18 Also, the medium has had a chance to kind of settle 0:25:22 and mature and you have a podcast like “Colored Daddy” 0:25:24 which just wouldn’t work in any other medium 0:25:27 where it begins from a place of kind of feminism 0:25:29 and female strength talking about issues 0:25:31 that women weren’t supposed to talk about 0:25:34 and has aggregated an enormous audience. 0:25:36 I mean, Alex Cooper, I think she just signed 0:25:38 a hundred or 125 million dollar contract 0:25:40 and she deserves every dollar. 0:25:42 And at the end of the day, what it really says 0:25:44 is this medium podcasting. 0:25:47 It’s growing faster than any other medium. 0:25:49 I think Joe Rogan reaches more people 0:25:52 than literally any TV show exponentially. 0:25:56 And the other thing about podcasting, I’ve noticed, 0:25:58 it really moves book sales. 0:26:02 So if we have an author come on ProveG or Markets, 0:26:03 it tangibly moves book sales. 0:26:05 And I would imagine people who buy books 0:26:08 also over index in terms of people who vote. 0:26:10 And some, this is, I think you’re just gonna see 0:26:12 more and more candidates on podcasts. 0:26:13 What do you think, Jess? 0:26:16 – Absolutely, I think that they are 0:26:19 for the sheer reach numbers also for the ability 0:26:21 to be able to frame their answers 0:26:26 in a way that they think is positive to their campaign. 0:26:30 I mean, the problem with quote, mainstream interviews 0:26:33 is you’re gonna have to deal with the framing of a question 0:26:34 in the way that you might not like. 0:26:37 And then you have one minute to respond 0:26:39 and you have to spend 30 seconds talking your way back 0:26:43 into the approach that you wanted to take. 0:26:46 And I think that’s why you see people 0:26:47 moving to other spaces. 0:26:48 And it’s not just Kamala doing it. 0:26:51 Obviously, Trump has been doing this, 0:26:53 Theo Vaughn, Lex Friedman. 0:26:55 I’m sure if Rogan said, come on here, 0:26:56 he would be there in a second. 0:26:58 I think Kamala should do Rogan. 0:27:01 He was gushing about how great her debate performance was. 0:27:03 Tell Rogan, I’ll give you half an hour. 0:27:05 Don’t try anything funny. 0:27:07 And I bet he would play by the rules, 0:27:10 understanding how important that moment is. 0:27:12 I mean, the Howard Stern interview, 0:27:16 his audience might not be as big as it used to be. 0:27:18 It’s still pretty large, 0:27:21 but there was the Hillary Clinton regretted 0:27:24 not going on before the election in 2016. 0:27:26 He gave her, it was the best interview 0:27:29 that anyone had ever heard Hillary do. 0:27:32 And she was able to do that because it was long form like that. 0:27:36 And I think one thing that they can do with these podcasts 0:27:38 is it doesn’t lend itself to clip culture in the same way, 0:27:40 which I think is so damaging. 0:27:42 And I realized that a lot of people consume me 0:27:44 from the five through clip culture. 0:27:47 And I am thankful for everyone who has found me that way. 0:27:49 – The clip culture has made Jessica Tarleff just so you know. 0:27:51 – I am just a clip. – You literally fill up there. 0:27:53 Yeah, but you’re all, that’s how I know. 0:27:55 You’re all over TikTok. 0:27:57 You are literally, you’re the clipster. 0:28:02 I mean, you are everywhere on social. 0:28:05 So back to the TV thing in terms of how mediums are changing. 0:28:06 I’m a narcissist. 0:28:10 I love seeing myself on the big screen. 0:28:13 And this week I was asked to go on Anderson Cooper 360. 0:28:15 And I love Anderson. 0:28:17 I think he’s a huge talent. 0:28:18 And I’m out here on the West coast. 0:28:21 They wanted me to come on and talk about Musk and Trump. 0:28:23 And that’s kind of in my wheelhouse a little bit. 0:28:25 And I thought, you know what? 0:28:29 I’m not gonna do it because I find TV so difficult. 0:28:33 It’s basically make a point that has a twist of phrase 0:28:36 or some sort of insight on something everyone else 0:28:38 has been covering for the last 48 hours. 0:28:40 Make it emphatically, make it crisply 0:28:42 and then shut the fuck up 0:28:44 ’cause we gotta go somewhere opioid-induced 0:28:46 constipation medication. 0:28:48 There’s just nothing thoughtful about it. 0:28:50 It’s so constricted by time. 0:28:54 And then if you look at the numbers, the reality is 0:28:56 very few people are watching television. 0:28:59 I mean, I used to jump at every attempt 10 or 15 years ago 0:29:02 when I was asked to do TV no matter where I was. 0:29:04 I’ve been like scrambling to figure out a way. 0:29:07 Now I’m, you know, I’d rather just hang by the pool. 0:29:09 I’d rather hang by the pool, Jess. 0:29:12 – Okay, well, counterpoints to that. 0:29:15 – Says a TV star. – 60 Minutes of 10 Million Viewers. 0:29:17 Says a TV Clipster. 0:29:21 But I would be willing to bet, I don’t know how much, 0:29:24 that you have a devout fan base 0:29:27 that came for your Morning Joe interview. 0:29:28 – Go on. 0:29:31 – Your Morning Joe interview about October 7th 0:29:33 and the Israeli response. 0:29:35 And you gave all the numbers 0:29:38 of how many fewer casualties there were 0:29:41 with the way that Netanyahu was executing this 0:29:44 versus what happened during World War II. 0:29:47 And I know, I had friends who were in Scott Galloway 0:29:49 people before that who saw it and said, 0:29:51 oh, I really like this guy. 0:29:54 So you have benefited from the television greatly 0:29:55 in the last year. 0:29:58 – So, first off, thank you for being generous. 0:30:02 The, there are a few shows. 0:30:03 It’s, everything comes down 0:30:05 to some form of genie coefficient or income inequality. 0:30:07 I don’t care if it’s actual income inequality 0:30:10 or mating on Tinder. 0:30:13 Everything’s becoming kind of a win or take most atmosphere. 0:30:14 There’s a small number of podcasts 0:30:16 making all of the money. 0:30:18 And it’s absolutely happening everywhere. 0:30:20 It’s also happening in TV. 0:30:25 Morning Joe, The View, Your Show, The Five. 0:30:30 There’s like a handful of numbers or a handful of shows 0:30:33 that are just kind of mopping up the entire audience 0:30:36 and everything else is in the long tail. 0:30:38 And it’s true in podcasting too. 0:30:40 Anyways, Jess, I hate to move on 0:30:44 ’cause I love talking about my favorite subject, me. 0:30:45 But let’s move on. 0:30:48 You had referenced earlier that Liz Cheney 0:30:50 is out there campaigning for. 0:30:51 Let’s, we have a clip for that. 0:30:52 Let’s take a listen. 0:30:56 – I tell you, I have never voted for a Democrat. 0:31:01 But this year, I am proudly casting my vote 0:31:03 for Vice President Kamala Harris. 0:31:08 – I just can’t figure out if, I mean, I get the theme. 0:31:10 I just can’t figure out if Representative Cheney 0:31:11 and Representative Kitzinger, 0:31:13 everyone already knows how they feel. 0:31:15 And if it has no impact. 0:31:18 I do think if I were the Harris campaign though, 0:31:19 and I think it’s coming, 0:31:21 I would have this ground invasion 0:31:24 leading up to the election. 0:31:27 And I guess we’re there the 30 days out 0:31:31 of literally the world’s best team of surrogates in history. 0:31:34 I think people from all walks of life 0:31:37 are really interested, famous athletes 0:31:40 you wouldn’t expect, former Republicans. 0:31:43 I think they could just, they’re just gonna roll out. 0:31:46 Oh, by the way, this person’s also 0:31:49 a very much supporting Vice President Harris. 0:31:50 I don’t know if celebrity endorsements work. 0:31:52 Celebrities, Democrats have always gotten more celebrities 0:31:53 than the Republican. 0:31:56 And I’m not sure it’s ever been shown to be that effective. 0:31:59 But I think they’re gonna just literally overwhelm 0:32:02 the airwaves with famous high Q, 0:32:06 whether it’s Taylor Swift or Bruce Springsteen. 0:32:08 And they’re gonna have Musk and Ted Nugent. 0:32:11 I don’t know if there’s that many kind of people 0:32:14 willing to go out there and talk about Trump right now. 0:32:15 Do you think the surrogates, 0:32:16 have you heard anything about the quote-unquote 0:32:18 the surrogate strategy? 0:32:20 Yeah, and I spoke with the campaign about it 0:32:25 and they, it’s very specialized and it’s very targeted. 0:32:28 And this group of disaffected Republicans, 0:32:31 like the Nikki Haley voters from the primary, 0:32:34 I don’t wanna say it’s the number one target 0:32:36 but among swing voters that they think 0:32:38 they have a shot with, it definitely is. 0:32:42 She is doing, I wanna make sure that I get this right. 0:32:47 She’s up 18 with white voters with a college degree. 0:32:52 Biden was plus nine, it’s a huge shift. 0:32:54 So Hillary won that by five or six, 0:32:58 then up to nine with Biden and now plus 18, if this holds, 0:33:03 which makes it the biggest swing voting block in the country. 0:33:08 And those voters are Liz Cheney voters, 0:33:11 or a lot of them are, they’re white suburban women 0:33:16 who can’t believe that their daddy’s Republican party 0:33:17 looks like this. 0:33:20 They care about abortion and the right to choose, 0:33:24 but they do care about this protecting democracy argument, 0:33:26 perhaps more than anything. 0:33:30 And I think it could be one of the biggest realignments 0:33:32 in our politics that we’ve seen. 0:33:35 So yes, the effort is big, there’s a ton of money behind it. 0:33:36 It’s very targeted. 0:33:38 I agree with you about the celebrities. 0:33:41 I think that will matter a lot less. 0:33:42 It probably galvanizes young people. 0:33:46 If you see, oh, Taylor Swift or Billie Eilish, 0:33:47 what will Beyonce do? 0:33:49 I assume at some point the endorsement is coming 0:33:53 since she’s leased freedom, the song, to them. 0:33:58 But people are most affected by a personal olive branch. 0:34:00 So someone’s showing up at your door, 0:34:03 explaining why it is that they support ex-candidate. 0:34:05 They know where these voters are. 0:34:07 And all of Nikki Haley’s infrastructure, 0:34:10 I found this fascinating from her primary campaign, 0:34:12 are now for Harris. 0:34:13 – So Trump isn’t sitting still. 0:34:16 He’s been making headlines on the campaign trail as well. 0:34:19 Over the weekend, he returned to Butler, Pennsylvania, 0:34:20 the place where he narrowly escaped 0:34:22 the first assassination attempt. 0:34:25 This time he campaigned alongside Elon Musk. 0:34:28 Let’s hear what Musk had to say, oh shit, let’s not. 0:34:31 Okay, let’s go ahead, Caroline, play the clip. 0:34:35 – President Trump must win to preserve the Constitution. 0:34:38 He must win to preserve democracy in America. 0:34:41 – Yeah, there’s something like a billionaire 0:34:42 with a South African accent to lecture me 0:34:43 on the Constitution. 0:34:45 What did you think of this? 0:34:47 – I found it frightening. 0:34:50 Well, first of all, the good side of it was, 0:34:54 I do think it’s cool that he went back to Butler. 0:34:56 – It was a great move, great move. 0:34:59 – And I think that he was also giving a lot of people 0:35:02 who had come to that rally the experience 0:35:06 that they were expecting to have that day, 0:35:11 and obviously were robbed of, and a man lost his life, 0:35:14 and there was a celebration of that as well. 0:35:16 I thought Trump was funny when he started. 0:35:21 He said, as I was saying, which is a pretty good opener, 0:35:23 considering what had happened. 0:35:26 So I think that’s important in the plus column. 0:35:31 The Musk aspect of this, and you know, way better than I do, 0:35:36 he seems completely off his rocker at this point. 0:35:39 I mean, this is a guy who said he had to buy Twitter 0:35:42 to make sure that there were no politics in it, 0:35:45 because Jack Dorsey was too left leaning. 0:35:49 Someone who, I assume his politics are Democrat leading, 0:35:50 but as far as I know, 0:35:53 was just sitting around on a beach in Bali, 0:35:55 not really doing anything. 0:35:59 And now Musk is censoring accounts, 0:36:03 putting $45 million a month into a Trump PAC, 0:36:04 out there advocating for him, 0:36:07 and saying that the country will cease to exist 0:36:08 if Trump doesn’t win. 0:36:11 What is that, what happened here? 0:36:14 – What strikes me in Musk is part of it. 0:36:16 I think a larger issue in America, 0:36:19 and that is everyone always talked about character 0:36:20 as it relates to the president, 0:36:24 and I think most recently we’ve come to realize 0:36:27 that Americans really don’t give a flying fuck about character. 0:36:29 At least that’s my takeaway here. 0:36:34 Trump is just the guy you would shudder 0:36:37 if you found out your daughter was dating. 0:36:42 He doesn’t appear to, I mean, world’s worst boss, right? 0:36:48 Vice President Pence was a loyal lapdog, really obsequious. 0:36:50 I think actually Vice President Pence, 0:36:51 given the mission he was given, 0:36:54 the assignment was actually a very good vice president 0:36:59 for the president, and sent people hunting for him 0:37:02 who had nooses, but it doesn’t seem like people, 0:37:05 people don’t seem to care. 0:37:09 And then Musk, what I see on the other side is, 0:37:11 I interview all the time these people in tech, 0:37:13 in venture capitalist, and any venture capitalist 0:37:15 or banker or other person in tech, 0:37:17 they begin, they sort of do the caveat, 0:37:19 like yeah, some of his tweets aren’t like 0:37:21 when they’re talking about Musk. 0:37:24 Sometimes I think he gets a little, 0:37:26 he lets his fingers do the walking. 0:37:29 They’re constantly making excuses for a man 0:37:32 who has 12 kids by three women 0:37:33 and doesn’t live with any of them. 0:37:35 In my opinion, that’s like job one. 0:37:37 That just kind of disqualifies you as a man 0:37:39 when you’re not living in the same household 0:37:41 as your children, and you could be. 0:37:42 It’s not because of resources, 0:37:43 it’s not because of family court, 0:37:44 it’s not because he had to make a living 0:37:45 and go somewhere else. 0:37:49 He chooses not to be around for his children. 0:37:52 He accuses his employees of being sex criminals 0:37:54 when they’re not such that they actually have to move home. 0:37:56 So he refuses to pay severance, 0:38:00 legally obligated severance to employees that he fires. 0:38:02 And the absolute, the worst thing I have seen 0:38:05 across any public figure recently 0:38:08 is other than maybe what’s going on with Diddy, 0:38:12 is a father going publicly on Jordan Peterson 0:38:15 and saying that his daughter who went through transition 0:38:17 is now dead to him. 0:38:20 I mean, and then these VCs go on to talk about 0:38:22 the great things he’s doing and his genius. 0:38:24 And it’s like, do you realize what money 0:38:25 has fucking done to us? 0:38:27 Because this guy is rich, 0:38:31 we have decided that regardless of how depraved 0:38:35 his behavior acquits him with respect to being a dad, 0:38:38 being a citizen, being a boss, 0:38:39 being a friend of people, 0:38:42 that he is an awful human being, 0:38:45 but he makes a great fucking car. 0:38:47 So let’s just shove all of that to the side. 0:38:48 And there’s a chance I’ll get to invest 0:38:51 in the D round of SpaceX. 0:38:52 So I’m gonna ignore all of that. 0:38:55 And that same turning a blind eye 0:38:59 to anything resembling what we would expect of men, 0:39:02 we just decide, no, I kind of like, 0:39:04 I just kind of like the cut of his jib 0:39:06 and the policies and his brashness. 0:39:08 And he’s gonna burn everything down 0:39:09 and my life isn’t going great. 0:39:10 And Instagram is reminding me every day 0:39:13 that my life isn’t going nearly as great as everyone else. 0:39:16 So I just like this guy ’cause he’s so, 0:39:18 he’s such a fucking pyromaniac 0:39:20 and it’s gonna burn the place down. 0:39:23 There’s this element of if you’re brash, 0:39:25 you’re angry in your course, 0:39:29 that masks for, that’s a bad imitation, 0:39:31 a rich little imitation of what it means 0:39:33 to be masculine and a man and a leader. 0:39:34 And the country just appears 0:39:37 to have embraced all of this shit. 0:39:41 – I wanna ask you then about, 0:39:43 ’cause this is current events and it’s Musk 0:39:49 and how you apply your prism to the Starlink 0:39:53 and what Musk has been able to do 0:39:56 for the victims of Hurricane Helene, 0:39:58 which has been devastating. 0:40:02 And we know about Trump proliferating these lies 0:40:05 that Biden wiped out the FEMA funds 0:40:07 to give them to undocumented people 0:40:11 and all these Republicans elected officials 0:40:13 have been saying like cut it out. 0:40:15 People are not getting the services that they need 0:40:16 because you’re lying about this. 0:40:20 But one thing Musk has done is delivered satellites 0:40:25 to people in Ukraine and Estonia in North Carolina. 0:40:29 I can’t just see you through this negative prism. 0:40:34 – Well, this is the issue and that is on a net basis. 0:40:37 I actually think there’s a very decent argument 0:40:40 that Elon Musk has been a net positive for society. 0:40:43 He has inspired the race around EVs. 0:40:46 The satellite technology is really inspiring. 0:40:49 He puts things into space for less money than anyone else. 0:40:54 That will have a hugely positive impact on our society. 0:40:57 The problem is with the word net 0:41:01 and that is I don’t forgive people for being a net good 0:41:03 when they have that sort of blessing 0:41:06 and it wouldn’t be hard not to accuse your employees 0:41:07 of being a sex criminal. 0:41:10 It wouldn’t be difficult to have a baseline level 0:41:12 of fatherhood running through your veins 0:41:16 and not say that your daughter is dead to you. 0:41:18 I think pesticides are a net good 0:41:21 but we still have an FDA. 0:41:24 I think fossil fuels are actually a net good 0:41:25 but we still have emission standards 0:41:28 and are trying to deal with climate change. 0:41:31 And what I hate about kind of our societies, 0:41:34 the rubric as you put it is that we look at technology 0:41:37 and if you have innovated around technology, 0:41:40 you get 10 times the affinity, the goodwill, 0:41:42 the forgiveness to get out of jail cards 0:41:45 than if you innovate around agriculture 0:41:47 or you innovate around public policy. 0:41:50 That’s like who he or she is a smart person 0:41:52 but if you can figure out a way to put satellites 0:41:54 into space or have a really cool electric car 0:41:58 or even a photo sharing app, you’re Jesus Christ 0:42:00 and should be forgiven for all of your sins. 0:42:04 So yes, is Musk a net good for society? 0:42:04 I think he is. 0:42:06 The problem is with the word net 0:42:09 and he should absolutely be held accountable 0:42:12 for these really vile things he does. 0:42:15 I find the whole thing very unsettling. 0:42:17 I think there are a few people 0:42:19 that could be worse role models for young men 0:42:21 than Donald Trump or Elon Musk. 0:42:23 And I keep hoping that young men 0:42:24 and I’m curious at what you think here, 0:42:27 I’m keep hoping that young men 0:42:29 who are kind of leaving the Democratic party 0:42:32 because they don’t feel seen towards the end 0:42:35 will break for, you know, gender equality 0:42:37 which they, in a bodily autonomy, 0:42:39 which actually young men support at some 0:42:41 of the same levels as young women. 0:42:43 And then someone just kind of reminds me to say, 0:42:44 Scott, they’re not going to vote. 0:42:46 They’re not going to be important here either way. 0:42:47 They’re not going to vote. 0:42:49 What are your thoughts? 0:42:50 I don’t think they’re going to vote 0:42:52 in the same kind of numbers obviously, 0:42:56 but I think there’s a strong chance that they will vote. 0:43:00 And if the referendums post jobs have been any indication, 0:43:03 young men are showing up for that as well. 0:43:08 And that’s a hyper excited segment of the population. 0:43:12 But I wouldn’t completely write them off for it. 0:43:14 I think there’s a reason Trump is doing a lot 0:43:17 of this low propensity voter media, 0:43:20 like the theovons of the world. 0:43:23 But it will be interesting to see 0:43:26 because I imagine, you know, 0:43:30 people have found a way to consensus usually. 0:43:32 I’m not saying that it’s even, 0:43:36 but we’ve found a way to some degree of agreement. 0:43:41 And if it continues like this or what it is projected to be, 0:43:43 this feels like it’ll be the first time 0:43:45 where that won’t be happening. 0:43:48 And maybe I just believe too much in human nature 0:43:51 or in the good of people that we will come back 0:43:55 to a little bit less of such a stark gender gap. 0:43:57 And I think to push that forward 0:43:59 or to get us closer to that result, 0:44:01 obviously there’s a lot of work 0:44:04 that Democrats need to do around messaging, 0:44:08 around policy, around opportunities for men. 0:44:10 But I am hopeful that we’re not gonna have 0:44:13 like a 20 point gender gap. 0:44:15 Frankly, it shouldn’t be in either direction. 0:44:16 Looks like the female one 0:44:19 because of reproductive choice will probably be that way. 0:44:22 But that men will hue closer to it 0:44:26 because some things will be more important than Machismo 0:44:28 or how they’re being spoken to 0:44:29 or just a feeling of inclusivity. 0:44:33 Actually don’t wanna demean it down to be some macho thing. 0:44:35 You know, it doesn’t, you wanna go somewhere 0:44:38 where you feel included and spoken to. 0:44:42 And we haven’t been fostering that environment for a while. 0:44:47 – Okay, we’ll be right back after a quick break 0:44:49 to discuss Melania Trump’s press tour 0:44:51 for her new book, Stay With Us. 0:44:55 – Fox Creative. 0:44:59 This is “Apertizer Content” from Virgin Atlantic. 0:44:59 (beeping) 0:45:00 – Hey, Kara, it’s Scott. 0:45:03 Remember me, the guy, Tina Fade, your Alec Baldwin 0:45:05 sort of rejuvenated your career. 0:45:06 And he was, I’m at the lounge at Heathrow. 0:45:08 I’m at the Leathrow, the Virgin Lounge, 0:45:10 the Virgin Atlantic Clubhouse Lounge. 0:45:13 And I’m about to have the chicken tikka masala. 0:45:14 I love it here. 0:45:15 You should check it out. 0:45:17 It’s where the cool kids hang out. 0:45:18 Anyways, hope you’re all safe travels. 0:45:19 (beeping) 0:45:20 – Scott, frankly, it’s a miracle 0:45:22 that Virgin Atlantic let you into the clubhouse 0:45:24 and their incredible business class. 0:45:25 But I guess they did. 0:45:27 Tell me how it was. 0:45:29 – So, Kara, I’m an original gangster 0:45:31 when it comes to Virgin. 0:45:35 I’ve been flying Virgin for 20 plus years. 0:45:36 And I do the same thing. 0:45:38 And they get it right every time. 0:45:40 They always have the financial times for me. 0:45:42 And I order the chicken tikka masala. 0:45:43 – Oh. 0:45:46 – That is my Virgin experience. 0:45:48 If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. 0:45:50 – And your drink was, what is your drink? 0:45:52 – Well, I used to drink a Bloody Mary 0:45:54 or a beer in the clubhouse. 0:45:57 I started, I don’t drink alcohol when I travel anymore. 0:45:58 So I just do mineral water, 0:46:00 but they have this kind of cool cocktail 0:46:02 that’s like a lemongrass 0:46:04 or some sort of cool margarita thing. 0:46:06 And I get it, I get a Virgin one. 0:46:07 – What is your pre-flight routine? 0:46:10 What is your actual, besides your chicken tikka masala, 0:46:11 the Virgin clubhouse? 0:46:14 – My pre-flight routine is, 0:46:15 well, I always do the same thing the morning when I travel. 0:46:16 I try and work out. 0:46:17 I take the dogs for a walk. 0:46:19 And I always make time for the clubhouse 0:46:22 ’cause I do enjoy the Virgin clubhouse at Heathrow. 0:46:24 So check out virginatlantic.com for your next trip 0:46:26 and see the world differently. 0:46:28 Certain amenities are only available 0:46:29 in selected cabins and aircraft. 0:46:35 – All right, Jess, Melania Trump is making headlines 0:46:36 while promoting her new memoir 0:46:39 and taking a stance on a key election issue, 0:46:41 one that actually puts her at odds with her husband. 0:46:42 Let’s take a listen. 0:46:46 – Individual freedom is a fundamental principle 0:46:47 that I safeguard. 0:46:51 Without a doubt, there is no room for compromise 0:46:54 when it comes to this essential right 0:46:57 that all women possess from birth. 0:46:59 Individual freedom. 0:47:03 What does my body, my choice, really mean? 0:47:08 – I’m sorry, it’s like an “SNL” sketch. 0:47:10 Whenever I hear this shit, I’m like, is this really real? 0:47:13 What do you think is going on here? 0:47:15 – Oh, I think it’s a completely cynical play 0:47:19 set up by her husband to make them seem less radical. 0:47:19 – Softer, yeah. 0:47:24 Yeah, like J.D. Vance got the ball rolling at the debate 0:47:29 with a very fact-free answer to put it politely 0:47:33 about being pro-family and steering away 0:47:36 from any talk of national abortion bans, 0:47:41 which he, it was on his website until it wasn’t. 0:47:44 But I don’t believe anything that comes out 0:47:45 of Melania’s mouth. 0:47:50 And it seems pretty nakedly fake. 0:47:54 – It really does seem, I mean, Melania’s been pretty absent 0:47:55 from the campaign until now. 0:47:57 And then here she is delivering a message 0:47:59 that undercuts Trump’s stance. 0:48:01 I’m curious if it has any impact, 0:48:05 but I do get some joy from the fact that she can’t, 0:48:07 my impression is she can’t stand him. 0:48:10 Like she just doesn’t want to spend time with him. 0:48:12 Is that, am I, as a woman– 0:48:14 – Well, they’re always separate. 0:48:16 – Yeah, they’re never together. 0:48:19 – So I grew up in New York City 0:48:21 and the Trump kids grew up here. 0:48:24 And I had friends who, I mean, Baron is much younger 0:48:27 than us, but went to the school that Baron went to 0:48:32 and said that she was an incredibly hands-on mom, 0:48:35 like doing pickup and drop off, had friends, 0:48:39 seemed remarkably normal for the circumstances. 0:48:42 And if the rumors are true about it, 0:48:45 that she got a new prenup when he ran, 0:48:47 then she got a new one when he ran again. 0:48:51 And again, I guess hats off to her as a businesswoman, 0:48:55 but this does not seem like what she bargained for. 0:48:58 I think she just wanted to marry an older rich guy 0:49:00 and have a nice life in New York City. 0:49:03 And she’s ended up with what this is. 0:49:06 And is Melania probably pro-choice? 0:49:08 Yeah, I would expect so. 0:49:11 I mean, most women are anyway, 0:49:14 especially most women who grew up in a European context, 0:49:16 who think it’s absolutely insane 0:49:18 that we would be regulating something like this 0:49:20 at least at the six-week level. 0:49:22 I know the European standard is usually 15 weeks, 0:49:26 but I can’t pity her anymore. 0:49:29 You know, one time, okay, 0:49:32 maybe you didn’t know that it was gonna be Muslim bands. 0:49:34 Second time, you did know. 0:49:37 And the third time, you really did know. 0:49:39 And covering for him like this, 0:49:41 I think is a pretty gross move. 0:49:42 And it doesn’t have any crossover appeal. 0:49:45 Like I don’t know anyone who doesn’t like Trump, 0:49:49 who thinks that Melania is a messenger of anything 0:49:52 besides her husband’s bidding. 0:49:54 – Before we wrap up, this year marks one year 0:49:57 since the October 7th attack on Israel. 0:49:58 And now there are growing concerns 0:50:01 about a broader conflict in the Middle East. 0:50:04 Just last week, Iran launched its largest missile attack 0:50:05 ever against Israel. 0:50:07 I wanna point out, this is the largest 0:50:10 or the biggest missile barrage in history. 0:50:13 And over the weekend, and by the way, it failed. 0:50:15 Both American and Israeli forces 0:50:18 were able to basically neuter this entire attack. 0:50:20 It was totally ineffectual. 0:50:22 Prime Minister Netanyahu warned that the country 0:50:24 is now fighting on seven different fronts, 0:50:27 referring to them as the enemies of civilization. 0:50:29 Heavy Israeli airstrikes hit Southern Beirut 0:50:31 overnight, targeting Hezbollah. 0:50:34 Meanwhile, the Biden administration has made it clear 0:50:38 that U.S. support for Israel remains unwavering. 0:50:43 Just any thoughts on, I wonder if one of these 0:50:46 three October surprises, the Longshoremen strike, 0:50:49 what’s happening in the Middle East, 0:50:51 or potentially something around the hurricane, 0:50:54 might in fact swing the election one way or the other. 0:50:56 What are your thoughts about some of these 0:50:58 potential October surprises that are sort of 0:51:00 out of either campaign’s control? 0:51:06 – So far, Longshoremen strike handled. 0:51:08 I don’t think anyone will remember that that happened. 0:51:09 – And you don’t think the Biden administration 0:51:11 or Harris gets any credit for that? 0:51:12 – I think they get minimal credit, 0:51:16 but frankly, if you want the pro-union argument, 0:51:17 you’re going with the auto workers, 0:51:19 with them on the picket line, 0:51:23 which was revolutionary in American politics. 0:51:25 And also the Longshoremen union boss, 0:51:28 it seems like such a corrupt criminal. 0:51:31 I mean, the stories about the RICO charges 0:51:33 that got dropped because the guy, 0:51:35 the guy ended up in the back of a car, 0:51:36 the trunk of a car. 0:51:40 So I think that’s off the table. 0:51:42 I think the Middle East definitely could 0:51:43 matter in this. 0:51:48 And I was struck, I spent this morning, 0:51:51 we’re recording on October 7th, 0:51:56 reviewing old missives from the date of the attack. 0:52:01 And I was particularly upset by there was a, 0:52:04 someone had put together all of these text messages, 0:52:07 like the last texts that some of these Israelis 0:52:09 who were murdered were sending to their loved ones. 0:52:11 And it made me think of 9/11. 0:52:12 – Heartbreaking. 0:52:14 – Completely got wrenching. 0:52:18 And what kept coming up over and over again 0:52:21 was this feeling on behalf of the Israelis 0:52:25 that the army was coming and they didn’t come. 0:52:29 They were hours and hours and hours too late for this. 0:52:34 And the sense of let down that this people 0:52:37 that put so much stock in the IDF 0:52:39 and the importance of serving your country, 0:52:44 and they do it with such pride and such magic 0:52:47 were left alone. 0:52:51 And the feeling has, I feel like shifted so much, 0:52:55 so much more goodwill towards what Nanyahu is doing 0:52:57 to the point that Benny Gantz wrote an op-ed 0:52:59 in the New York Times over the weekend, 0:53:02 which basically signaled we’re all aligned at this point. 0:53:04 We have to finish the job with Iran. 0:53:07 And it feels like they are weakened at this moment 0:53:10 and that this is the time to do it, 0:53:12 which is such a scary thing to say 0:53:15 because that means a much broader conflict, 0:53:19 but that you almost can’t say no at this point. 0:53:20 I don’t know if you felt that as well, 0:53:22 but it was stark for me. 0:53:25 – Well, look, we’re both Jews. 0:53:30 So I think this impacts us, not more, 0:53:32 ’cause then there’s a lot of people that are concerned, 0:53:34 but in a different way. 0:53:37 This year for me politically more than anything 0:53:40 has rattled me because as of October 6th, 2023, 0:53:44 if someone had asked me what the state of anti-Semitism was, 0:53:49 I felt that America had sort of grown past anti-Semitism. 0:53:51 And some of my older Jewish friends would say, 0:53:54 “Scott, you don’t realize that this exists 0:53:54 and it’s always there.” 0:53:56 And I’d be like, “Oh, you’re being paranoid. 0:53:58 I understand your concern, what you saw, 0:54:00 what you experienced.” 0:54:01 And I could not have been more wrong. 0:54:03 I think that is the most surprising thing 0:54:05 that has happened to me over the last year 0:54:09 was that that adage that two thirds of an iceberg’s flow 0:54:11 is below the surface line. 0:54:15 And what I’ve come to believe is that 99.9% of anti-Semitism 0:54:18 was lying below the surface and it just erupted. 0:54:20 I think Biden has handled this terribly 0:54:24 in the sense that I think he’s actually been quite supportive 0:54:26 of Israel on the ground and there was no other leader 0:54:30 that immediately deployed to aircraft carrier strike forces. 0:54:34 So I think, and yet he comes across his milk toast, 0:54:35 says, “We’re handling this. 0:54:35 We’re putting pressure. 0:54:37 I’m disappointed.” 0:54:40 So he gets no credit for the immense support he’s provided 0:54:43 and yet gets blamed for looking weak in the face of Netanyahu 0:54:44 who’s like, “Oh, thanks. 0:54:46 Thanks very much for your advice. 0:54:47 Now hold my beer.” 0:54:52 So, and I’m shocked at how much support Netanyahu, 0:54:56 how his fortunes have changed over the last 30 days. 0:54:58 I guess it will wrap up here. 0:55:01 Do you think this will have any real tangible impact 0:55:02 on the election? 0:55:05 ‘Cause I have quite a few friends who were center left 0:55:06 who are now gonna vote for Trump 0:55:08 because they’ve become single issue voters. 0:55:13 And they just want a total resolute view on this. 0:55:15 And correctly or incorrectly, 0:55:18 they see Trump as being less wavering 0:55:19 than Vice President Harris. 0:55:23 Do you think this has any impact on actual voter 0:55:25 on any of these swing stats? 0:55:29 – Potentially in a Pennsylvania or a Michigan, 0:55:32 I guess Arizona, but really on the margins. 0:55:35 And we’re a small but mighty group, 0:55:38 but we are really small. 0:55:43 And it takes a lot for someone who is typically center left 0:55:47 to move over to voting for Donald Trump. 0:55:49 That doesn’t mean it isn’t happening, 0:55:54 but like I have a friend, a couple where the wife, 0:55:58 it sounds like is going to probably vote for Donald Trump, 0:56:02 even though she’s pro-choice, et cetera. 0:56:05 But the husband will stay home. 0:56:07 And I think it could be more stay home 0:56:11 than it would be voting for Trump. 0:56:15 And that a lot of these people also are in New York or California, 0:56:18 where that isn’t going to make a massive amount of difference. 0:56:21 But I think it’s something and it’s also emblematic 0:56:26 of a foreign policy that people could look to and say, 0:56:29 okay, well, we have a war in Ukraine, 0:56:32 which we didn’t have when Donald Trump was in office. 0:56:35 Now we have this war in the Middle East 0:56:37 that we didn’t have when Donald Trump was in office. 0:56:38 And we had the Abraham Accords 0:56:40 and we moved the embassy to Jerusalem. 0:56:43 Now, I don’t believe in that argument. 0:56:45 I think that you have a very strong counter-argument to that, 0:56:49 but that’s persuasive for a lot of people. 0:56:51 – Yeah, I think Harris and Biden 0:56:54 have handled it really poorly, not on the ground, 0:56:55 but because they haven’t been able to figure out a way 0:56:57 to take credit for it. 0:56:58 – Well, Harris’s answer on “60 Minutes” 0:57:00 I thought was very interesting. 0:57:01 When she was asked if Bebe was an ally 0:57:03 and she said the American people 0:57:05 and the Israeli people are allies. 0:57:06 – Yeah, she handled it well. 0:57:07 – And I think that that’s spot on. 0:57:10 But that’s a tough one as well at this moment. 0:57:12 I saw a lot of Jews outraged. 0:57:15 Like this is the moment to kick Bebe. 0:57:18 You know, he’s the one that’s actually going out there 0:57:20 and winning this for us. 0:57:24 But I think long-term that that is a very smart place 0:57:26 for the American government to be, 0:57:30 that we are a united people, Israelis and Americans. 0:57:32 – Yeah, 100% agree. 0:57:34 All right, that’s all for this episode, Jess. 0:57:36 Thank you for listening to “Raging Moderates.” 0:57:38 Our producers are Caroline Shagren and David Toledo. 0:57:40 Our technical director is Drew Burrows. 0:57:42 You can find “Raging Moderates” 0:57:43 on the project called Every Tuesday 0:57:46 and on YouTube every Wednesday. 0:57:48 Just have a great rest of the week. 0:57:49 – You too. 0:57:51 (upbeat music) 0:57:54 (upbeat music) 0:58:03 [BLANK_AUDIO]
Jessica Tarlov and Scott Galloway discuss Jack Smith’s filing and what it means for the Trump Campaign. They also give their thoughts on Harris’s media tour, recent endorsements for both the candidates, Melania Trump and her memoir, and the year it’s been since the October 7th Hamas attack.
0:00:04 There’s over 500,000 small businesses in B.C. and no two are alike. 0:00:05 I’m a carpenter. 0:00:06 I’m a graphic designer. 0:00:09 I sell dog socks online. 0:00:12 That’s why B.C.A.A. created one size doesn’t fit all insurance. 0:00:15 It’s customizable, based on your unique needs. 0:00:19 So whether you manage rental properties or paint pet portraits, 0:00:23 you can protect your small business with B.C.’s most trusted insurance brand. 0:00:29 Visit bcaa.com/smallbusiness and use promo code radio to receive $50 off. 0:00:30 Conditions apply. 0:00:33 Today’s number, $762,000. 0:00:37 That’s how much Republican PACs have spent at the Capitol Grill Steakhouse, 0:00:38 this election cycle. 0:00:41 Ed, how do you bring a Republican to his knees? 0:00:43 You’ll paint your dick orange. 0:00:55 Hello, Ed. 0:00:56 How are you? 0:01:00 I’m good. I’m more excited by that number than I am by the joke. 0:01:07 750k to the Capitol Grill is one of the greatest statistics we’ve had on this podcast so far. 0:01:12 Yeah, but it’s nothing compared to the amount of revenue that Grindr recognized in Milwaukee the weekend of the convention. 0:01:14 That’s a good point. I’m sure they’re correlated. 0:01:16 I’m sure they both had spikes at the same time. 0:01:23 So the most interesting thing about that stat is that that is 13 times the amount of money that the Democrats spent. 0:01:24 It’s crazy, no? 0:01:25 It’s unbelievable. 0:01:28 What do you think is the Capitol Grill equivalent for the Democrats? 0:01:30 Epstein’s Island. 0:01:33 That was good. 0:01:33 That is good. 0:01:34 Do you like the Capitol Grill? 0:01:36 What’s your favorite restaurant these days? 0:01:37 I’m sort of a creature of habit. 0:01:41 My favorite restaurant in London is Granger & Co. 0:01:44 I started going there when I spent a summer here and it’s in Marlborough. 0:01:50 My favorite restaurant period is in Inalburger, but in New York, my new favorite is Sartianos. 0:01:52 Because I know Scott Sartiano and I like him and it’s cool. 0:01:57 And I see celebs there and I kind of feel like I’m going to go high and they treat me nice because I know Scott. 0:01:58 And I feel big time there. 0:01:59 What’s your favorite restaurant? 0:02:00 Where do young cool people eat? 0:02:03 Isodi in the West Village is pretty great. 0:02:04 Pretty good pasta. 0:02:05 I haven’t been to Sartianos. 0:02:07 I’d like to try it out. 0:02:11 Granger is great and the ricotta pancakes are sort of a staple there. 0:02:11 Have you tried those? 0:02:13 Yeah, of course. 0:02:18 Although I had all this bloodwork done and I’m used to walking into the room like I just won. 0:02:22 Like I’m Simone Biles and I’ve just stuck the landing whenever I have bloodwork done. 0:02:24 And she’s like, “Well, this is a bit of an issue. 0:02:25 We need to talk about this.” 0:02:26 I’m like, “Huh? 0:02:27 What? 0:02:28 Wait, no, I’m me. 0:02:30 I’m like crazy healthy. 0:02:32 I’m getting old, Ed.” 0:02:36 And I kept asking her to take my blood pressure until it was fine. 0:02:38 I’m like, “No, take it again. 0:02:39 Take it again.” 0:02:40 And why are we talking about this? 0:02:42 Do you think your diet has something to do with this? 0:02:43 Why are we on bloodwork now? 0:02:45 I have no idea how I got here. 0:02:48 I had, maybe that’s part of the problem. 0:02:56 So I’ve spent the last two mornings for two to three hours getting NADs, do you know what 0:02:57 these are? 0:03:00 They supposedly, it’s basically biohacking. 0:03:02 I’m convinced it’s biohacking for rich people. 0:03:05 Rich people like to think they can live longer than other people, so they do all this stupid 0:03:07 shit and I think I’ve fallen into this trap. 0:03:13 So it stands for some nuclear atomic diaclide or something. 0:03:17 And supposedly it activates cell growth and I don’t know, you’re not going to recognize 0:03:19 me on Next Week’s Pod. 0:03:20 I’m just going to be … 0:03:21 You’re going to be ripped. 0:03:22 I don’t even need to be ripped anymore. 0:03:25 I just want to be this adorable little Jewish … I want to look like Barbara Streisand 0:03:26 and Yental. 0:03:30 I just want to look young and feminine. 0:03:33 Wait, is this my way of coming out? 0:03:35 You want to look like Timothy Chalamet, I think is what you’re describing. 0:03:39 I don’t know if it’s his NADs, but my brain is just firing in a billion different directions 0:03:40 right now. 0:03:41 Okay. 0:03:44 Well, let’s take all this energy and point it towards the markets now. 0:03:45 Let’s do it. 0:03:53 Here’s a weekly review of market vitals. 0:03:58 The S&P 500 declined, the dollar rose, Bitcoin fell, and the yield on 10-year treasuries 0:04:01 increased, shifting to the headlines. 0:04:05 Tesla’s quarterly deliveries rose for the first time this year, up more than 6% from 0:04:06 a year earlier. 0:04:11 However, that metric still came in below analyst expectations and the stock fell 3% 0:04:12 on the news. 0:04:17 The S is considering breaking up its pharmacy and insurance businesses as it looks to improve 0:04:18 operations. 0:04:22 The company is also pursuing cost-cutting initiatives, including cutting nearly 3,000 0:04:23 jobs. 0:04:28 And finally, venture capital firm CRV is returning more than half of the money from its $500 0:04:31 million select fund to investors. 0:04:36 The firm decided to cut the select fund, which invested in mature startups, after consistently 0:04:40 seeing valuations that were too high to get a decent return. 0:04:45 Scott, your thoughts starting with Tesla’s quarterly delivery update? 0:04:50 The biggest trend I think in auto is that while everyone wanted to follow Musk because 0:04:55 he’s got a three-quarter of a trillion-dollar market cap and it was all about EVs, it ends 0:04:56 up that may have been wrong. 0:04:58 And Ford and General Motors went all in. 0:05:02 In Toyota, which in my view is the best managed automobile company in the world, said, “No, 0:05:08 we’re not going to go after the NFT of EVs,” and they made a big bet on hybrids. 0:05:11 And the consumer is actually moving towards hybrids. 0:05:16 And hybrids basically offer a lot of the upside of electric. 0:05:21 It’s more efficient, less carbon or less shit into the air, and it doesn’t rely on the 0:05:22 grid. 0:05:26 So you have more range, less insecurity about being caught somewhere without a charging 0:05:27 station. 0:05:32 They’re actually less expensive, and Toyota is kind of killing it right now. 0:05:37 And despite the fact that Toyota is killing it and growing faster than Tesla, really well 0:05:42 positioned and made a huge investment on the right horse, and that is hybrids as opposed 0:05:50 to EVs, it trades at 0.8 times revenues, whereas Tesla trades at eight to nine times revenues. 0:05:55 So one of these things is either vastly overvalued or one of them is vastly undervalued. 0:06:01 But we’re so obsessed with Tesla because of the individual at the head of that company 0:06:05 that we don’t talk about general trends in the industry, and I think it’s all about hybrids. 0:06:10 Yeah, it is interesting how the EV used to be sort of the sexiest two letters in the 0:06:15 auto industry, and it’s kind of just so ubiquitous now, it doesn’t have that level of hype and 0:06:17 sex appeal that it used to. 0:06:20 And so Tesla has to rely on different hype stories now. 0:06:25 And I think that’s why I believe that these quarterly delivery updates are becoming less 0:06:27 and less important. 0:06:32 You know, essentially the story is they pretty much met expectations. 0:06:37 They remain just ahead of BYD in terms of overall EV deliveries. 0:06:41 The overall message, and we’ll get a fuller picture at earnings in a couple of weeks, 0:06:45 but the overall message is things are going fine-ish for Tesla. 0:06:51 But more importantly for Tesla, this Thursday is their big robotaxi event. 0:06:54 And I think that’s more important than the numbers because as we’ve talked about with 0:06:58 Tesla before, the valuation is all about the narrative. 0:07:04 This is the big moment where people will ask the question, is the robotaxi actually legit? 0:07:08 My prediction is that that robotaxi event will be a giant letdown. 0:07:11 Two tells for me why that’s going to happen. 0:07:13 One is the narrative leading up to it. 0:07:18 Elon has a habit of over-promising and under-delivering, but he isn’t even over-promising about this 0:07:19 event. 0:07:20 He’s barely talking about it. 0:07:25 He’s spending most of his time ship-hosting about politics, which makes me think that 0:07:28 he believes that this robotaxi is going to underwhelm. 0:07:30 And the second tell for me is the location of the event. 0:07:36 They’re doing it at the Warner Brothers Studio in Burbank, which to me says this is going 0:07:38 to be a cinematic event. 0:07:41 This isn’t actually going to be a sort of technological showcase. 0:07:46 This is just going to be a big production, sexy commercial about what the robotaxi could 0:07:51 look like as opposed to a tangible demonstration of what it actually looks like right now. 0:07:56 So my prediction would be that this robotaxi event that’s happening end of this week will 0:07:57 be highly underwhelming. 0:08:02 And I think the stock is going to suffer as all of the hype and the excitement around 0:08:05 Tesla continues to deflate. 0:08:12 Your thoughts on CVS evaluating, spinning out their insurance and their healthcare businesses 0:08:14 separate from their consumer business? 0:08:16 There’s a lot here. 0:08:18 Essentially they’re deconglomerating. 0:08:23 They saw Amazon coming and they felt like they needed to bulk up and take advantage 0:08:27 of the user interface or the customer interface they had and thought we can upsell you upstream 0:08:32 to insurance, we can upsell you, or downsell you downstream to one minute clinics. 0:08:37 I’ve actually used those clinics a couple of times for vaccines and I thought they were 0:08:39 really, really good. 0:08:44 But what happens with a conglomerate is you end up paying a conglomerate tax. 0:08:49 And that is when the New York Times CEO thinks newspapers are a shitty business and I don’t 0:08:52 want to just answer for one company, I want to diversify. 0:08:55 So they go and buy a bunch of other newspapers and they buy the building, their headquarters 0:08:57 at one point. 0:09:00 The New York Times building was worth more than the entire company, so it had become 0:09:01 a reed accidentally. 0:09:05 They owned 70% of the Boston Red Sox, makes no fucking sense. 0:09:08 I remember when I asked the CEO, I don’t know if you know this or not, but I was on the 0:09:09 board of the New York Times. 0:09:10 I need a bell. 0:09:12 Where’s my bell? 0:09:16 In the boarding they said, “Sky Galloway Director, what do you think we’re talking 0:09:17 about? 0:09:18 Capital strategy?” 0:09:19 I’m like, “Why do we have the Boston Red Sox?” 0:09:22 And Janet Robinson, the CEO of the Times said, “Because we get special insight into 0:09:23 Boston athletics.” 0:09:24 I’m like, “Oh yeah.” 0:09:28 I know about this story, but that’s a very interesting detail I have not heard before. 0:09:29 Well, it’s called bullshit. 0:09:33 She was trying to justify an asset they owned for no real reason and I’m like, “Oh yeah, 0:09:35 we’re known for our coverage of the Celtics.” 0:09:38 It just, it made no sense. 0:09:43 But what happens is, is CEOs love to get, their incentive is to get bigger. 0:09:45 Now, why do they want to get bigger? 0:09:48 Because their compensation is based on the following. 0:09:49 Directors don’t like to do any work. 0:09:54 The compensation committee hires a firm called Towers Parent to come in and look at compensation. 0:09:57 They say, “Okay, Janet Robinson, the CEO of the New York Times. 0:10:01 It’s a media company that is doing $5 billion in revenue.” 0:10:02 That’s the thing. 0:10:03 What kind of sector it’s in? 0:10:04 The size of the company. 0:10:09 The average person running a $5 billion media company gets this much in compensation and 0:10:11 this much in stock options. 0:10:18 So the incentive of the CEO is to diversify such that their life is just less anxious. 0:10:19 Right? 0:10:23 If one brand isn’t doing well, the other’s usually doing a bit better, it kind of smooths 0:10:24 out the earnings. 0:10:27 And two, the bigger the company, you typically the higher the compensation. 0:10:32 So there are a lot of incentives to try and have a game-changing acquisition and two-thirds 0:10:35 of acquisitions do not work. 0:10:38 People overpay for them because they get excited. 0:10:41 They don’t realize this business is hard. 0:10:44 Integration problems, you have to pay a premium to take out the other shareholders. 0:10:46 So they very rarely work. 0:10:48 When they work, they can work usually. 0:10:50 Meta is probably the best acquirer in history. 0:10:54 Instagram, which they purchased for a billion, is probably worth a couple hundred billion. 0:10:56 But the vast majority of the time, they’re not. 0:11:02 Now on the flip side, what almost always works is the disposition of assets or spends. 0:11:08 Because in a conglomerate where investors think, “You know, I don’t need you to diversify 0:11:09 for me. 0:11:11 I can go buy an insurance company all on my own. 0:11:16 So I don’t like this kind of milk toast amorphous Frankenstein of a company.” 0:11:21 So they end up, typically the market says, “Let’s find the shittiest business and assign 0:11:23 that multiple to the entire thing.” 0:11:29 You end up with this company that despite perhaps having good assets, trades at the multiple 0:11:31 of a shitty retailer and decline. 0:11:36 So this insurance company that they own would probably trade at a much higher multiple for 0:11:37 an independent company. 0:11:41 So the disposition of assets becomes accretive to shareholder. 0:11:44 Spins almost always work. 0:11:46 So I think this is a good idea. 0:11:52 Our final headline is CRV, returning their money to investors, something you basically 0:11:57 never see venture capitalists doing. 0:11:58 What is your read on this? 0:12:03 Why have they done this and what does it say about the VC industry right now? 0:12:09 All of the returns are kind of aggregating to a small number of funds that are essentially 0:12:13 getting the best deal flow and they’re looking for companies that they can put hundreds of 0:12:17 millions or billions into because they’ve raised so much capital. 0:12:22 And I think what you’re seeing is this enormous shakeout in the VC community where you’re 0:12:26 either one of these mega funds that before the returns on fund nine come in, you’re already 0:12:28 raising fund 10. 0:12:35 And because you get amazing deal flow, your institutional investors get good money or 0:12:43 really niche focused VC firms that bring a very specific knowledge like Lux Capital, 0:12:48 Josh Wolf’s company that’s kind of this deep, serious, you know, forward-looking technologies 0:12:53 like brain scans, brain implants or nuclear power, whatever it is. 0:12:57 But just a smaller, medium-sized VC that’s trying to invest in tech, you’re kind of 0:12:58 fucked. 0:12:59 You have no advantage. 0:13:00 You don’t have the capital. 0:13:03 You’re not getting good deal flow. 0:13:07 And so I think there’s just going to be, I mean, there already is kind of a pretty serious 0:13:08 shakeout. 0:13:13 And I think these guys have probably said we can’t find good deals and the few deals 0:13:19 we find are just so expensive that the market has taken startups, I mean, it’s sort of tempting 0:13:25 right after I sold L2, I merely went to, well, I’m going to go raise, start another company 0:13:30 because the amount of money you can raise at a valuation, it really has gotten kind 0:13:31 of bad shit crazy. 0:13:37 But at that point, my attitude was as a quote unquote proven entrepreneur, there was maybe 0:13:41 two or three investors I would raise money for or I just wasn’t going to raise. 0:13:47 And so to be a tier two here, it is really, really tough. 0:13:50 And as a whole, I just think it’s a shitty asset class. 0:13:56 More specific to this CRV headline, it’s really all about late stage VC. 0:14:01 They’re still operating an, an early stage fund, which, you know, they didn’t return 0:14:02 the money there. 0:14:06 I assume it’s doing okay slash fine. 0:14:10 But their concern is late stage VC and just some statistics here. 0:14:17 Last year, late stage deal volume fell 53% and late stage funding, the amount of actual 0:14:22 actual capital going into these late stage companies fell 60%. 0:14:26 And in addition, we’re seeing this giant drop off in IPO activity. 0:14:30 We’ve only had 150 new listings in the US this year. 0:14:34 You compare that to 2021, where we had more than a thousand new IPOs. 0:14:38 And so the general theme that we’re seeing within VC is that we’re seeing far fewer 0:14:44 series D rounds, far fewer series E rounds, far fewer companies are sort of breaching 0:14:51 the surface of growth stage and, you know, picking up steam and entering into the public 0:14:53 capital markets. 0:14:55 My question to you would be, why is that happening? 0:15:00 I would speculate that that’s a function of the fact that the IPO market has yet to emerge 0:15:03 from this sort of deep freeze it’s been in for the last several years. 0:15:08 It’s typically late stage investment is, all right, we need to short the balance sheet, 0:15:14 we make a few tuck in acquisitions, but we’re basically getting cleaned up for an IPO. 0:15:17 And it’s sort of right now the worst of both worlds and that is, it’s expensive because 0:15:22 these companies still have a, you know, the market is still fairly hot for companies in 0:15:27 the ride sector, but the IPO market is all but shut to just a few players. 0:15:33 So it’s sort of like, okay, I’m paying a lot hoping to get into liquidity in a market where 0:15:36 fewer companies are getting, are getting out. 0:15:42 It feels like deal flow is very downstream and what I mean by that, we’re seeing far 0:15:44 fewer IPOs recently. 0:15:49 And now we’re seeing that also late stage deal flow is falling off the cliff and funding. 0:15:57 And I wonder if that means that this is going to continue to trickle down into early stage 0:15:58 startups. 0:16:04 And I wonder if the general theme is that we’re seeing the ramifications of a world 0:16:10 where simply fewer successful companies are being created in general. 0:16:13 And you know, we’re just beginning to see the after effects of that. 0:16:19 We’re seeing the impacts where the market is becoming more and more dominated by these 0:16:24 mega, mega giant companies, the Magnificent Seven, Big Tech, the companies that we constantly 0:16:26 talk about on this podcast. 0:16:32 And in the meanwhile, actual successful company formation has been slowly dying. 0:16:36 And we’re beginning to see the ramifications of that in the public markets and then in 0:16:37 late stage. 0:16:42 And I wonder if that will continue to the point where suddenly maybe venture as an industry 0:16:44 is not a thing anymore. 0:16:47 Well, you just made the argument for Cher Khan. 0:16:48 That’s her whole wrap. 0:16:53 Is it effectively what we have here is an ecosystem that says find the monopoly or find the future 0:16:55 monopoly. 0:16:59 And then once that company starts, a company starts to show market leadership in a hot 0:17:05 sector, you just try and out raise everybody and just literally sweep the competition off 0:17:10 the deck with brute force with more and more capital. 0:17:13 And it’s not a very healthy ecosystem. 0:17:19 What you have is a small number of apex predators where they introduce a reticulated anaconda 0:17:24 to an ecosystem and there’s just no other species that can fight back. 0:17:27 So what you’re saying is accurate. 0:17:31 And for me, it all kind of forward engineers to the fact that we just need dramatically 0:17:32 more antitrust. 0:17:33 Yeah. 0:17:40 I think the other alternative for VCs is you either try to get a 10, 20, 30 X return on 0:17:45 the company that you bet on that becomes a monopoly, or you’re going for a one and a 0:17:50 half to two X return where the company will be aqua hired by a big tech company. 0:17:53 I can just speak from experience. 0:17:58 No catalyst invested in my company L2 27 months later, they got three times their money back 0:18:00 and they were disappointed. 0:18:03 Their attitude is you’re either 10 X or you’re zero. 0:18:09 Which means so many VCs are going to get crushed now because there are fewer and fewer winners. 0:18:10 100%. 0:18:14 That’s why I’m really not cut out for venture capital and I probably should never raise 0:18:15 money from venture capitalists again. 0:18:18 And plus at the age of 50, I probably shouldn’t. 0:18:27 And that is my skill has been taking a company from A to DRE and selling it for a really 0:18:28 good valuation. 0:18:35 I build companies, you know, I built my first company, I started a strategy firm and sold 0:18:42 it for $33 million when it was doing 10 million in revenue when I was I don’t know, 33 or 34. 0:18:47 And then L2 built it, got it to 20 million revenues sold for 160 million. 0:18:49 That’s what I’m good at. 0:18:51 My investors were sort of non plus by that. 0:18:55 I mean, they were happy, they made money, they were willing to invest with me again. 0:19:01 But they’re in the venture business, they’re like, go baby, go swing for the fucking fence. 0:19:05 And if you, if you herniate a disc, okay, that’s fine. 0:19:08 But we’re not, we’re not here for singles and doubles folks. 0:19:13 The difference, the reason why I like working with private equity is you’re in companies 0:19:17 and the private equity guys say, all right, we’re going to give management 8% of the company. 0:19:21 We’re all on the same page, we’re going to try and be in this thing three to seven years 0:19:24 and then sell for two to three X what we invested. 0:19:31 I find that’s much healthier than a bunch of young guys from Stanford saying, 50X baby, 0:19:32 50X. 0:19:34 It’s just sort of, okay. 0:19:35 Wish me luck. 0:19:36 I’m going to try real hard. 0:19:37 Yeah, exactly. 0:19:44 We’ll be right back after the break with a look at a new AI IPO. 0:20:01 If you’re enjoying the show, hit follow and leave us a review on profg markets. 0:20:04 We’re back with profg markets. 0:20:09 California based chip maker cerebrus systems filed for an IPO that could raise up to $1 0:20:10 billion. 0:20:14 With an offering of that size, the Nvidia challenger could be valued at around seven 0:20:16 to $8 billion. 0:20:21 Cerebrus showed strong, albeit early stage growth for the first six months of 2024, 0:20:24 with revenue increasing more than 15 fold from a year earlier. 0:20:29 The trouble is 87% of those sales came from just one company. 0:20:34 That company is G42, the top AI firm in the United Arab Emirates. 0:20:38 Should the US give Cerebrus any trouble with its export licenses, most of the company’s 0:20:40 revenue could be at risk. 0:20:47 Scott, what do you make of this IPO filing from Cerebrus, perhaps the new Nvidia? 0:20:51 This has never underestimate the market’s ability to come up with a product when consumers 0:20:53 have cash in hand. 0:20:58 You have a small number of companies that have soaked up the majority of the capital 0:20:59 in the retail markets. 0:21:05 That is, the SPAC market emerged because there were a lot of dentists and lawyers and retail 0:21:09 investors that thought, “I would really like to be part of the Pepsi generation and I’m 0:21:13 willing to buy a cool little company, even if Goldman Sachs doesn’t think it’s ready 0:21:15 for prime time.” 0:21:19 The demand was there amongst retail investors and SPACs went out and then they were largely 0:21:23 shitty companies and a lot of retail investors lost a lot of money. 0:21:28 The demand from retail, if you’re a retail investor that wants exposure to AI, where 0:21:29 do you invest right now? 0:21:31 It’s basically Microsoft or Nvidia. 0:21:32 What else do you invest in? 0:21:33 That’s it. 0:21:41 Much demand for an Nvidia-like competitor, even if it’s a distant, distant, distant number 0:21:46 of five, that there’s a market for it. 0:21:51 The first sign is that Barclays and Citi are not tier one. 0:21:54 Barclays and Citi are the underwriters of this IPO. 0:21:55 Yeah, they’re the underwriters. 0:22:01 What that says is Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, and Goldman Sachs said no, otherwise one of 0:22:04 those guys would be on the cover, which isn’t to say it isn’t a good company, which isn’t 0:22:07 to say that it won’t get a good reception in the marketplace, but that’s sort of the 0:22:11 first, I don’t want to call it a red flag, but the first indicator here. 0:22:19 The red flag that is the size of Kansas here is that 87% of its revenues come from a company 0:22:26 backed by, I think, the UAE that is building its own LLM that also owns or has the opportunity 0:22:27 to buy shares in the company. 0:22:32 I mean, it’s kind of a related party conflict, overly concentrated customer base that is 0:22:35 the stuff of nightmares. 0:22:40 Having said that, I would like to invest, whoever, I mean, there’s a couple of reasons 0:22:46 I’d like to invest, I like the idea of bringing attention, sunlight, and capital to anything 0:22:50 in this space that is not NVIDIA or open AI. 0:22:54 It would be great for other competitors to emerge. 0:22:57 So I would love to be supportive of this company, I want to follow it, I want to talk 0:22:58 about it. 0:23:03 I want to water as many new companies in this space as possible such that it just doesn’t 0:23:07 develop into the wind tail only, only much more concentrated. 0:23:12 The second is, I just think this, I think there’s a decent chance this company gets 0:23:19 an enormous pop because, oh, it’s AI, oh, it’s a competitor to NVIDIA, sure, I’ll throw 0:23:22 some money at it, and it’s going to go out at a $7 billion market cap. 0:23:29 Say there’s a one in 50 chance, it becomes a quarter of NVIDIA, well, that would be 0:23:36 $750 billion, that would be, I mean, do the math, that’s still an okay investment. 0:23:43 So this is a lottery ticket, but it’s a lottery ticket on, you know, the super, whatever’s 0:23:47 called the super jackpot, or the powerball that all of a sudden we woke up and it’s 0:23:49 like it’s $1.1 billion. 0:23:54 The prize here is so enormous for anybody that establishes momentum and traction. 0:24:01 So it’s not the ilk, it’s not the pedigree you’d want in a company like this right now. 0:24:04 I wouldn’t be surprised if the thing doubles on its first trade. 0:24:08 Well, I find it interesting that they’re almost borrowing marketing tactics from the 0:24:17 fast food industry, and that is, you know, when Burger King sales start slowing, a very 0:24:23 surefire way to stoke demand and interest in the company is to come out with a triple 0:24:29 whopper or a double king Excel, basically just create a fun size item of the product 0:24:31 that you’re already selling. 0:24:36 So having said that, I’m just going to read you some of the main details from the S1. 0:24:43 The first page in gigantic font, it takes up the entire page says, “Bigger chips are 0:24:47 faster and more efficient for AI.” 0:24:52 In the prospectus summary, quote, “The third generation Cerebrus wafer scale engine is 0:24:55 the largest chip ever sold. 0:24:59 It is 57 times larger than the leading commercially available GPU. 0:25:06 It has 52 times more compute cores, 880 times more on chip memory and 7,000 times more memory 0:25:07 bandwidth. 0:25:14 The sheer size of the wafer scale chip allows us to keep more work on silicon and minimize 0:25:17 the time consuming power hungry movement of data.” 0:25:22 In other words, the sales pitch is that size matters. 0:25:23 That’s basically it. 0:25:28 But then again, they also say that it’s 20 times faster than Nvidia’s chips. 0:25:34 And to your point, you know, if it’s a good marketing tactic, maybe that’s all that matters. 0:25:39 Maybe people read that, they hear how big this chip is, and they think, “This is great. 0:25:40 We want to get involved.” 0:25:46 So I’m sort of finding it a little bit ridiculous, parts of this. 0:25:52 I’m certainly concerned about that 87% number going to one company. 0:25:56 But there is an argument to be made that this kind of stuff could work, and coming out with 0:26:01 font sized AI could generate the momentum they need to actually do well in the stock 0:26:02 market. 0:26:08 But anything, if it ends up at any of their IP, any of their niches, if defense contractors 0:26:14 or pharmaceutical firms find that this monster super sized chip works for them, it’s going 0:26:17 to be worth a lot more than 7 billion. 0:26:22 So this is highly volatile, but the upside here is asymmetric. 0:26:24 Yeah, it’s like a mean stop play. 0:26:25 Yeah. 0:26:30 I could easily see this thing on any signs of life going to 30, 40, or 50 billion, 7X 0:26:32 versus assume the downside is zero. 0:26:35 But we should be clear, this is not at all value investing. 0:26:39 This is not based on the fundamentals, and I do want to get your take on the fundamentals. 0:26:43 So they did 136 million in the first half of this year. 0:26:46 That number is up 15 fold from the previous year. 0:26:52 However, as we pointed out, 87% of that revenue is coming from one company, and that is G42. 0:26:56 And just I want to get your take a little bit on G42. 0:27:00 So this is an AI holding company that is based in Abu Dhabi. 0:27:02 They do AI everything. 0:27:08 I mean, the website, it says AI research, AI cloud computing, data centers, AI health 0:27:14 care, investing, et cetera, et cetera, and they are largely controlled by the royal family 0:27:21 of Abu Dhabi and largely funded by the UAE sovereign wealth fund. 0:27:30 My instinct when I see these kinds of companies is that this is very rich people who don’t 0:27:31 really know what they’re doing. 0:27:39 Another word for that is another term for that is dumb money. 0:27:41 People who have more money than they even know what to do with. 0:27:43 That is my instinct. 0:27:49 Having said that though, Microsoft is also a significant investor in G42. 0:27:54 They have partnerships going on with OpenAI and Dell and IBM and Microsoft. 0:27:59 They could be legit, but my question to you would be, is the fact that their biggest client, 0:28:06 a Middle Eastern royalty backed holding company, is that good, bad, or does it not matter? 0:28:07 Okay. 0:28:08 So there’s some good and there’s some bad. 0:28:09 So let’s talk about the bad. 0:28:16 Related party transactions in 1999 and 2007, when I was starting my tech companies, what 0:28:21 we found is that basically it was, if you had a software company or even brand strategy, 0:28:28 my firm profit in ’99, we were killing it because there were all of these startups who 0:28:33 needed a brand identity and a logo and a strategy and a positioning and a website. 0:28:36 So it was just champagne and cocaine. 0:28:41 When the market collapsed in 2000, just all of our new clients dried up because all of 0:28:42 the new guys were gone. 0:28:45 They just got swept off the decks. 0:28:49 And a lot of times you found that all these new software startups, Broadcom and all this 0:28:53 e-commerce shit we were buying, they were selling to all these hundreds or thousands 0:28:57 of e-commerce startups and then overnight, 60% of them were gone. 0:29:01 We were kind of all selling software and shit to each other in the kind of the new brave 0:29:03 world of the ecosystem. 0:29:09 There are so many new AI startups that the fear is, okay, if there’s a chill here, these 0:29:12 guys get swept off the deck first. 0:29:17 The scariest thing here is the concentration of one client, right? 0:29:22 Now, having said that, you can imagine that the gulf in the entire world looks at the amount, 0:29:26 it looks at the sector and says, “This is going to be probably the sector that creates 0:29:30 the most shareholder value the quickest in a long, long time.” 0:29:35 And it really bums us out that 97% of it is in one nation and 80% of it or 70% of it 0:29:38 isn’t with a seven mile radius of SFO International Airport. 0:29:44 And as we try and transition, weeding the gulf states or the UAE in this case from a fossil 0:29:51 fuel based economy to a services tech, hospitality, education, and in this instance, technology 0:29:56 based economy, we would like to have a presence in AI. 0:30:00 So the related party transaction here is really uncomfortable. 0:30:05 Having said that, when your related party has the deepest pockets in the world, it’s kind 0:30:06 of a good related party. 0:30:09 And they’ll be very supportive of the company moving forward because they would like to 0:30:14 see the center of gravity, at least a little bit around AI move into that region. 0:30:19 So red flags, red flags everywhere, I’m a buyer. 0:30:25 Yeah, just one final comment from me on these sovereign wealth funds, the public investment 0:30:33 fund, which is Saudi Arabia, Mubadala, which is UAE, these funds, in my view, are the most 0:30:35 susceptible to bullshit. 0:30:39 They are not disciples of the boring, the sexy argument which you have made. 0:30:45 These are people who invest hundreds of billions of dollars into whatever is the technology 0:30:46 du jour. 0:30:51 They’ll invest billions into buying Premier League teams, they’re building cities that 0:30:52 have artificial moons. 0:30:56 I mean, these people love sexy stuff. 0:31:05 And so the idea that there is a company that is pitching the world’s biggest GPU cluster, 0:31:10 I’m just not at all surprised that the biggest backer is someone in the Gulf with a shit ton 0:31:11 of oil money. 0:31:15 What I have found, the worst thing they could have done for their brand was this brand called 0:31:17 Masayoshi-san. 0:31:24 And that is the whole WeWork fiasco soft bank got this reputation for coming in and just 0:31:27 overfunding stupid fucking ideas. 0:31:32 And it’s tightly linked to this, what you would describe as dumb money in the Gulf. 0:31:36 If you spend any time in the Gulf and you spend any time with these guys, I would argue 0:31:42 on average, they are more professionally managed than the majority of VC hedge funds in the 0:31:43 West. 0:31:44 Yeah. 0:31:48 I mean, a rookie move is if you meet a new VC or fund and they think they’re going to 0:31:52 fly into Riyadh and just like hold out a hat and that billions of dollars is going to drop 0:31:55 into their fund, they’re in for a rude awakening. 0:31:56 That’s what’s happening. 0:31:57 No? 0:31:58 No. 0:32:01 I feel like those are the head, fair enough, I don’t experience it personally. 0:32:07 But what I certainly see in the headlines is that you take a flight, you have your brand, 0:32:10 you hold your hat out and they dump billions of dollars in. 0:32:12 Oh, no, no, no. 0:32:18 For every fund that’s raising money there, there are a hundred going there and going 0:32:21 to a cool resort in the desert and going to the Superfund conference and then coming 0:32:22 back with no money. 0:32:26 As a matter of fact, they’ve switched their objective to no longer letting money leave 0:32:27 the region. 0:32:29 But what they want is what’s in it for us. 0:32:35 We need to get, we want to create jobs, we want to, we know we’re running out of oil. 0:32:38 We don’t know if it’s 40 years or 70 years, but we know we’re running out of it. 0:32:39 So we need to make this transition. 0:32:44 The transition is not only making money abroad, but it’s building sustainable industry here. 0:32:50 They’re trying to build a huge industry and even a city focusing on gaming, video games. 0:32:55 They’re building huge universities and NYU has a huge presence in Abu Dhabi. 0:33:04 I think it’s a little bit reductive and, I don’t know, I think you’re falling into the 0:33:10 trap of believing that you’ve seen the headlines and the stories and the… 0:33:11 They’ve made bad investments. 0:33:12 Oh, no doubt. 0:33:15 But I also think they’ve made good investments. 0:33:21 And my experience with them has been that they are just as if not more sophisticated 0:33:23 than any other alternative investments investor. 0:33:25 Anyways. 0:33:26 Come to Riyadh. 0:33:27 You and I are going to Riyadh. 0:33:28 Yeah, exactly. 0:33:30 I think that’s why we’re headed here. 0:33:35 I think either MBS is in the room with you with a gun to your head, or we’re going to 0:33:36 get them on the podcast. 0:33:39 One of those two things is going to happen. 0:33:43 Neither of those is true, and I want to be clear, I have no investments or vested interests 0:33:45 in the Gulf right now. 0:33:47 Just to be clear. 0:33:48 Just to be clear. 0:33:49 We’ll look into that. 0:33:53 We’ll be right back after the break with a look at the path forward for Nike. 0:34:11 We’re back with Prof2Markets. 0:34:15 Nike withdrew its full year sales guidance ahead of its new CEO’s arrival later this 0:34:16 month. 0:34:20 The company also postponed its investor day, signalling that a meaningful turnaround will 0:34:23 take some time and the stock fell 7%. 0:34:28 As we discussed previously, Nike tapped company veteran Elliot Hill to take the helm amid 0:34:30 declining sales. 0:34:34 Revenue for the most recent quarter dropped 10% year over year. 0:34:38 CFO Matthew Friend said pulling the guidance would give Hill, quote, “much needed flexibility 0:34:42 to evaluate Nike’s strategies and business trends.” 0:34:48 Scott, based on your experience, one, what do you make of these Nike earnings revenue 0:34:53 down 10% and two, what do you think the new CEO, Elliot Hill, needs to do here to stage 0:34:55 a comeback for Nike? 0:34:57 I like this company so much. 0:34:58 I have a bias. 0:34:59 I want you to go first, Ed. 0:35:07 I think you’d probably have, I mean, unlike your exceptionally bias bordering on racist 0:35:13 views of the Gulf, I’d like your views on Nike on the swish. 0:35:15 And by the way, they’re really nice white people. 0:35:16 Go ahead. 0:35:19 No one’s going to buy this. 0:35:24 No one’s going to buy the reason, I believe, that they’re investing in this company because 0:35:25 I’m racist. 0:35:26 Anyways, go ahead. 0:35:27 What do you think of Nike? 0:35:33 Well, I think what’s interesting is that there’s not one part of the business here that 0:35:36 is working. 0:35:38 It’s basically bad across the board. 0:35:43 So you’re seeing revenue declines in direct revenue, in brand revenue, in wholesale revenue. 0:35:46 You’re also seeing revenue declines across every region. 0:35:50 So it’s down 11% in North America, it’s down 13% in Europe. 0:35:55 The slowest decrease was in China, which is down 4%, but that’s sort of the rising tide 0:35:56 with all boats. 0:36:03 As we’re seeing, China is somewhat improving, or at least it’s falling less fast than it 0:36:04 was before. 0:36:07 So the financial picture for Nike is very simple. 0:36:10 Things are just bad across the board. 0:36:14 The only other interesting detail is the fact that they decided to withdraw their full-year 0:36:19 guidance, i.e. their financial forecast for the next 12 months. 0:36:22 And instead, they’re only offering quarterly forecasting. 0:36:26 And their explanation for that is that we have a management shakeup, we’ve got a new 0:36:29 CEO, we’re in a transition period. 0:36:34 I can’t tell if that is an appropriate excuse or not. 0:36:37 So I would like to get your take on that. 0:36:41 What do you make of a company like Nike as big as Nike saying we actually don’t know 0:36:46 what the next 12 months looks like because we’ve got a new CEO coming in? 0:36:48 Is that a valid excuse or is it a little bit bullshit? 0:36:49 I think it’s a ladder. 0:36:53 I think when you’re a company like Nike, you should have such a deep bench, you should 0:36:58 have such a talented CFO, you should be able to draw on such an incredibly talented CEO, 0:37:06 which I think the new CEO is that you should be able to handle learnings calls and forward-looking 0:37:07 projections. 0:37:14 So if you really feel that way that you need to free up the excuse they gave that it would 0:37:18 essentially, well, what was it said that it would much need a flexibility to evaluate 0:37:20 Nike’s strategy and business trends. 0:37:24 That’s why companies are taken private because when you have a public company, you’re sort 0:37:27 of promising that you’re going to give a certain level of transparency, especially when you’re 0:37:30 an S&P company like Nike. 0:37:35 So that is yet another signal that these guys really don’t have their shit together. 0:37:38 And even if you were to come on and say, “I’m new, this is what I’m thinking,” and have 0:37:43 the CFO report in a very no mercy, no malice way, this is what’s going on, I think analysts 0:37:44 would be fine. 0:37:49 But to kind of go back into, we don’t know what’s going on, we want the freedom to figure 0:37:50 this out. 0:37:54 Come on, you’re fucking Nike for God’s sakes, you should have that. 0:37:58 You should have five people sitting around the table that could probably be the CEO in 0:38:02 the earnings call for in the next two or three quarters that are just very good at what they 0:38:03 do. 0:38:09 And the fact that they don’t have that, it reflects poorly on the board and the bench, 0:38:10 if you will. 0:38:17 Now, down 10% on a company this size is no doubt, that is nearly a meltdown for a company 0:38:20 like this that is so diversified around the globe. 0:38:23 I wonder if this was a bit of a kitchen sink quarter, if they kind of threw all their bad 0:38:26 news in here. 0:38:27 What do they need to do? 0:38:30 I’d be very curious to know, and you never like to say this out loud, I’d be very curious 0:38:32 to know what the revenue per employee is. 0:38:36 It feels to me like a pretty significant layoff is coming. 0:38:43 But what they need to show is some momentum around shrinking the product development time 0:38:47 and getting kind of, if you will, I don’t want to say cool again, but on trend again, 0:38:50 getting out there and getting much more in touch at a ground level with some of their 0:38:54 cooler, smaller retailers being more on trend. 0:39:00 And then once they discover trends, getting stuff from design or concept to shelf much 0:39:01 faster. 0:39:04 And I think they should be able to figure that out. 0:39:09 Also, they’ve just left these niches and these doors wide open for Hoka and for on. 0:39:15 At the end of the day, I agree with you, they shouldn’t be saying, oh, we’re in such disarray 0:39:22 that we’re not going to be able to do it, basically every public company, man, 97% of 0:39:26 public companies managed to do this and none of them have the, or very few of them have 0:39:30 the resources and the depth of the bench of a Nike. 0:39:34 So I just think this brand is just, I don’t care where you go. 0:39:43 I don’t care if you go to Cape Town or Seoul or, you know, Cambodia, 11 year olds playing 0:39:50 football in the yard are wearing Nike and the brand is always reinvented itself. 0:39:54 They have such powerful marketing routes are not even needed to reinvent itself. 0:39:58 It just resonates so deeply that I like this company a lot. 0:40:03 I think at these price levels, I mean, I’d be prepared for it to go down more, but this 0:40:06 is, you know, I’m thinking about setting up a trust for my kids. 0:40:09 And this is one of those stocks that I would put in there and just say, okay, I’d look 0:40:11 at it in 20 years. 0:40:13 Two things I find quite interesting. 0:40:19 One is, I think you’re right that the CFO kind of did a shitty job here and the rest 0:40:24 of the management team, while the previous CEO, John Donahoe is out and it sort of reminds 0:40:31 me of like the Gareth Southgate problem where we have this tendency to just assume that 0:40:35 everything’s going bad because the head honcho sucks. 0:40:39 And now the head honcho is out and we’re seeing that maybe actually the rest of the management 0:40:40 team sucks too. 0:40:45 Maybe the players on the field are not performing as well as they should. 0:40:49 But we’re so obsessed with blaming the manager in this case, the England manager in this 0:40:54 case, the Nike CEO, that we just get so caught up with that. 0:40:59 And then when they leave, we’re like, oh, maybe it’s an us problem that we didn’t realise. 0:41:02 The second thing that I find kind of interesting, what you’re saying about the brand and how 0:41:11 strong it is, we often hear this idea of brand as moat, that if you have a strong brand, 0:41:18 it can act as a really strong moat to prevent competition from your competitors. 0:41:22 And 10 years ago, I feel like we would have used Nike as the shining example of this. 0:41:28 We have said Nike is far away the winner, it has a huge moat because it has such a 0:41:29 strong brand. 0:41:34 But I look at what’s happened to Nike here and I look at what’s happened to a lot of 0:41:37 other iconic brands recently that you have been talking about and that you’ve written 0:41:44 about in your blog, Starbucks, for example, Disney, down more than 25% in the past five 0:41:50 years, Estee Lauder, basically cut in half over the past five years, and it feels like 0:41:55 at this point, you could maybe make the opposite case, which is that a strong brand, when it’s 0:42:00 strong, looks like a moat until eventually it isn’t. 0:42:06 Because what looks like might be happening is that these companies have become so reliant 0:42:10 and so dependent on their brand that it ends up being their downfall. 0:42:15 They think that they’re invincible because we’re Nike, because we’re Estee Lauder. 0:42:16 Who could come after us? 0:42:18 It’s an interesting observation. 0:42:23 And that is, so the algorithm for printing money from the end of World War II to the 0:42:28 introduction of Google has come up with a mediocre product, a mediocre car, salty snack, 0:42:35 mediocre shoe, mediocre carbonated drink, and then wrap it in these amazing brand codes 0:42:41 of youth, masculinity, European elegance, sex appeal, and use this incredibly cheap medium. 0:42:45 We didn’t realize how cheap it was called broadcast media, where all of America was 0:42:50 watching one of three channels and just pound away at these associations, and people would 0:42:53 pay two bucks for 20 cents a peanut butter paste because it meant that you loved your 0:42:57 kids more because Tuesday Moms chose Jif. 0:43:02 Or that I was a more competitive, strong, masculine, individual American person if I 0:43:05 bought $210 Air Jordans. 0:43:07 It’s the interaction of Google. 0:43:11 The rise of quality and innovation has just been dramatic. 0:43:14 And the example I use is hotels. 0:43:19 Whenever I traveled, and I’ve been traveling 180 to 220 days a year for the last 30 years, 0:43:23 I would stay at the Four Seasons where the man in Oriental, one, because someone else 0:43:25 was paying, and two, they were always an eight. 0:43:27 On a scale of one to 10, they were always an eight. 0:43:32 And if I was in Madrid, I didn’t have the time or the insight to figure out, is there 0:43:36 a better hotel than the Madrid Four Seasons, which I know is going to be lovely. 0:43:41 Now with the introduction of Google, Trip Advisor, your social graph, Instagram, within 0:43:45 about five minutes, I can figure out the Rosewood Villa Magna is absolutely where I want to 0:43:47 stay in Madrid. 0:43:49 I mean, that’s just it. 0:43:52 Or when I’m in Sao Paulo, yeah, the Four Seasons would be great. 0:43:56 But again, actually, the Rosewood there is probably, in my opinion, the best hotel in 0:43:57 the world. 0:44:01 It’s the Faena in South Beach, and people can figure it out now. 0:44:07 So it sounds passé, but all of a sudden, product and innovation are the new bomb. 0:44:10 And the notion that you’re putting forward that they got too reliant on the mode of the 0:44:17 Nike brand and not focused on enough on new product, new innovation, new marketing channels, 0:44:22 I think that’s a worthwhile or a fair criticism. 0:44:27 But having said that, there are certain brands and certain items where brand plays a bigger 0:44:28 role. 0:44:29 You are a Panerai. 0:44:30 It means you’re having a midlife crisis. 0:44:35 You’re having a little bit of erectile dysfunction, have a little bit of money. 0:44:43 But if you have sex with me, if we have kids, your kids are more likely to survive than 0:44:44 if you… 0:44:47 Yeah, that’s what everyone thinks, exactly. 0:44:48 Then if you have… 0:44:49 Just go with it. 0:44:52 Then if you have sex with Ed, who’s wearing a fucking swatch watch. 0:44:59 So your watch, your watch, the degree you got from college, the only reason your girlfriend’s 0:45:03 with you is ’cause she heard you went to Princeton at, I’ve already spoken to her about this. 0:45:10 Your car and also your shoes are really powerful forms of self-expressive benefit. 0:45:15 And the self-expressive benefit of Nike, the registers across two, three, probably four 0:45:22 million consumers around the world is still unbelievable, translates unbelievable margin. 0:45:26 But the brand era, I agree with you, the brand era is officially over. 0:45:31 I don’t know if you’d call it the supply chain era or the innovation era, but the way you 0:45:35 communicate a better supply chain or the vessel for communication for supply chain or innovation 0:45:39 is still the brand and the logo. 0:45:41 Anything that’s on HBO, I’ll try it. 0:45:46 A big thing, a big show coming from HBO, I’m like, “Oh, I’ll watch it because they just 0:45:49 have a finer filter. 0:45:54 Any hotel from Rosewood, I will try because it does have, in my opinion, a finer filter.” 0:45:57 Now, does that mean brand is as big a mot? 0:46:01 Absolutely not ’cause I have Instagram, I have my social graph. 0:46:04 So what you’re saying holds true. 0:46:09 A company like Nike can, if it’s not careful, fall further faster, but just based on that 0:46:15 base of awareness and aspirational value and self-expressive benefit, they have just tons 0:46:16 of permission. 0:46:22 If they come out with a decent product line, I think you’re gonna see those revenues start 0:46:24 to start to pop again. 0:46:25 Yeah, I think that’s right. 0:46:28 Let’s take a look at the week ahead. 0:46:32 We’ll see the consumer price and producer price indices for September and third quarter 0:46:38 earning season kicks off with JV Morgan, Wells Fargo and BlackRock all reporting. 0:46:40 Scott, do you have any predictions for us? 0:46:45 Well, just based on what you said, I think churn is really important and I’d like to 0:46:48 think there’s some churn going on right now. 0:46:56 Companies like Starbucks, Intel, Disney, Nike, Estee Lauder, Warner Brothers, these 0:47:01 companies are, as they should be, getting kicked in the nuts. 0:47:03 And that makes room for new competitors. 0:47:07 I’d like to think, unfortunately, they’ve mostly been kicked in the butt by TikTok, 0:47:12 but anyways, and a weak Chinese consumer, but you are seeing a changing of the guard. 0:47:16 Too many old people running these companies. 0:47:22 Too many old people who are getting paid too much fucking money for lackluster performance. 0:47:26 So all super talented executives. 0:47:32 But I would speculate that Bob Iger and David Zaslaw are gonna announce or at least put 0:47:36 in place some sort of succession plan in the next year or two. 0:47:41 These are people who are both great executives, especially Bob Iger. 0:47:48 Zaslaw has made a third of a billion dollars to lose 60, 70% of his shareholders’ valuation. 0:47:53 And then the final one is, I think, Fabrizio Freida, the CEO at Estee Lauder. 0:47:56 That company has shit the bed the last five years. 0:47:58 They’re probably due. 0:47:59 He’s had a great career, a storied career. 0:48:00 He’s made a lot of money. 0:48:02 He deserves it. 0:48:06 But I wouldn’t be surprised if in the next three, six, 12 months, I usually get the 0:48:07 timing right. 0:48:11 We see succession strategies announced at Warner Brothers and Disney, and we see a 0:48:16 new CEO at Estee Lauder Company. 0:48:19 This episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. 0:48:22 Our associate producer is Alison Weiss, our executive producer is Catherine Dillon, Mia 0:48:27 Silverio is our research lead, and Drew Burroughs is our technical director. 0:48:30 Thank you for listening to ProfG Markets from the Vox Media Podcast Network. 0:48:35 Join us on Thursday for a conversation with Mark Zandi only on ProfG Markets. 0:48:45 [MUSIC] 0:48:55 [MUSIC] 0:49:21 Nike withdrew its full year sales guidance ahead of its new CEO’s award. 0:49:22 Fucking Gingo-esque. 0:49:23 I’m sorry. 0:49:24 Go ahead. 0:49:29 Nike withdrew its full year sales guidance ahead of its new CEO’s award. 0:49:32 If they were white, would you think they’re smarter? 0:49:34 Their kids got a Princeton, does that help? 0:49:36 (laughs)
Scott and Ed open the show by discussing Tesla’s quarterly deliveries, a potential CVS breakup, and a venture capital firm’s decision to return money to investors. Then Scott explains the biggest red flag he sees in chipmaker Cerebras Systems as it prepares to go public, but breaks down why he would still invest in the company. Scott and Ed debate about sovereign wealth funds in the Gulf and whether or not the funds make smart investments. Finally, they examine Nike’s earnings and break down why Nike’s dependence on its brand might have led to its downfall.
0:00:06 Will the VP debate move the needle in what’s shaping up to be a neck-and-neck election? 0:00:09 You never know in advance what will be the thing that matters and the thing that doesn’t 0:00:10 matter. 0:00:18 But Donald Trump will be almost 80, and J.D. Vance will be one cheeseburger away from 0:00:20 the presidency should they win. 0:00:25 I’m Preet Bharara, and this week, The Atlantic magazine’s David Frum joins me on my podcast 0:00:29 Stay Tuned with Preet to break down what happened at the debate. 0:00:31 The episode is out now. 0:00:35 Search and follow Stay Tuned with Preet wherever you get your podcasts. 0:00:36 Hi, everyone. 0:00:43 I’m Brené Brown, and I’d love to tell you about a new series that’s launching on Unlocking 0:00:44 Us. 0:00:47 I’m calling it the On My Heart and Mind Podcast series. 0:00:50 It’s going to include conversations with some of my favorite writers on topics ranging 0:00:55 from revolutionary love and gun ownership to menopause and finding joy and grief. 0:00:58 The first episode is available now, and I can’t wait for you to hear it. 0:01:01 All new episodes will drop on Wednesdays, and you can get them as soon as they’re out 0:01:06 by following Unlocking Us on Apple or wherever you listen to your podcasts. 0:01:10 Scott, how much time do you think you spend on TikTok every day? 0:01:16 I spend probably 10 minutes a day, maybe 15 on TikTok, 10 or 15. 0:01:19 I’m spending more time on Reels. 0:01:23 I think Reels has done a really good job. 0:01:25 There’s a lot that worries me about TikTok, but I really enjoyed it. 0:01:26 I think it’s amazing. 0:01:33 I would say I spend 15 minutes a day arguing with my son to get off his phone where he’s 0:01:36 on TikTok. 0:01:39 My son will go into the bathroom, and then I’ll look around 20 minutes later, and he’s 0:01:43 still in the bathroom, and I know he’s on TikTok, and I’ll bang on the door, and I’ll 0:01:49 be like, “Privacy,” and I’m like, “No, start masturbating, but put down the TikTok.” 0:01:52 So my kids go into the bathroom so they can go on TikTok. 0:01:56 I wish that, you know, anyways, not like a good teenage boy should be doing, not like 0:01:58 a healthy teenage boy. 0:01:59 Anyways. 0:02:00 How much time do you think they’re spending? 0:02:06 Too much. 0:02:11 Welcome to First Time Founders, 1.6 billion. 0:02:18 That’s how many people use TikTok today, with an average daily viewing time of 90 minutes. 0:02:23 TikTok has become one of the most powerful platforms in entertainment, and with the rise 0:02:29 of short form content has come the decline of the traditional film and TV industry since 0:02:34 the pandemic, one in five moviegoers has disappeared. 0:02:39 My next guest decided to take advantage of this shift by creating a production studio 0:02:43 that makes television on TikTok. 0:02:49 After launching in 2023, this founder raised venture funding at a $7.5 million valuation, 0:02:56 and with over 400 million views across multiple successful TikTok shows, he is well on his 0:03:00 way to changing how and where we watch television. 0:03:07 This is my conversation with Adam Faiz, the head coach and co-founder of Gymnasium. 0:03:11 Adam, thank you for joining me. 0:03:12 Thank you for having me. 0:03:16 Let’s start with a couple of stats, and I’m just going to get your reaction to it. 0:03:22 Since 2022, film and TV production in the US has fallen 40%. 0:03:28 In the past decade, ticket sales for movies have fallen 40%. 0:03:34 The unemployment rate in Hollywood is currently three times the national average, it’s 12.5%. 0:03:38 And I’m going to give you a few different stats, which is that the average TikTok user 0:03:42 spends over an hour on TikTok every day. 0:03:50 The TikTok user base since 2018 has six Xs, and crucially 70% of Gen Z say that if given 0:03:55 the choice, they would choose TikTok over any other streaming platform. 0:04:00 So my first question to you is, is TikTok killing Hollywood? 0:04:06 Yes, but I would also say that Hollywood’s killing Hollywood, and I say that as someone 0:04:10 that worked in it for eight years, the reality is I’m one of those people in the last stat 0:04:11 you mentioned. 0:04:14 I would choose TikTok over any streaming platform I just would. 0:04:18 I worked in traditional Hollywood studios my whole life, I worked for producers my whole 0:04:24 life, and the reality is it’s too big, too bloated, and too slow to ever make an impact 0:04:25 in this generation. 0:04:28 And when any kid out there with an iPhone and a microphone in their pocket can create 0:04:32 something on a whim and post it within a matter of hours, you’re just not going to compete 0:04:36 with that speed, and that’s what we’re trying to do with Gymnasium. 0:04:38 So give us the story on Gymnasium. 0:04:39 What is it actually doing? 0:04:46 And just a little highlight here, you have accumulated over 400 million views on TikTok 0:04:50 just from creating your own content, from basically treating TikTok like TV. 0:04:52 Tell us about Gymnasium. 0:04:53 What does the business do? 0:04:57 We really think that Shoreform content is the closest thing we have to the TV that you 0:04:58 and I grew up watching. 0:05:03 And so in our minds, Gymnasium is going to create the next generation of TV show hits. 0:05:06 We create things that look and feel like TV. 0:05:10 These are mostly unscripted formats that are mostly comedic, usually with rising talent. 0:05:14 Our biggest show is called Boy Room, and it’s where this girl investigates how disgusting 0:05:17 men’s bedrooms are and then gives advice on how to make them better. 0:05:21 Levi seems to care about having a nice room, but then leaves piles of dirty laundry and 0:05:23 like seven dirty dishes. 0:05:27 The coolest part about all of this is you can hear an idea that you think is really 0:05:28 good. 0:05:29 You can go and shoot a pilot within a week. 0:05:31 Let’s say it’s good enough to go shoot a few more episodes. 0:05:35 You’ll know pretty quickly, usually within the first four or five episodes, if the audience 0:05:37 actually wants this show or not. 0:05:41 And so the time it takes for us to know if we should, you know, continue on with the 0:05:45 show or cancel it is probably the same amount of time it takes for Hollywood to set a pitch 0:05:46 meeting. 0:05:49 And this all kind of started because of the feelings I had in traditional. 0:05:52 I was really frustrated with not being able to sell any formats. 0:05:56 I was frustrated with the development timelines, even when I was just working on the other 0:05:57 side of the aisle at a studio. 0:06:01 And at the same time, during the pandemic, I became addicted to TikTok. 0:06:03 I just did. 0:06:06 And I saw that the more I was using TikTok, the less I was watching TV. 0:06:10 And so there was like that light bulb moment of like, if that’s me, and I grew up being 0:06:14 the most obsessed with movies and TV shows kid, you could possibly find. 0:06:16 And I’m in my mid-20s at that point. 0:06:18 Anyone younger than me, this is just TV and we’re cooked. 0:06:23 And I remember going into my boss the next day and just being like, he was like, what’s 0:06:24 wrong? 0:06:25 Respectfully you are cooked. 0:06:26 So we sit down. 0:06:27 He’s like, what’s wrong? 0:06:28 And I’m like, I don’t know what we’re doing here. 0:06:29 He’s like, what do you mean? 0:06:33 I’m like, we’re arguing over what $100 million movie we should make that will come out five 0:06:38 years from now if we’re lucky that maybe 20 people on Brentwood think is like riveting. 0:06:40 But at the end of the day, like it is not the center of culture that made us go in this 0:06:41 industry in the first place. 0:06:44 Like that center of culture is now this thing right here. 0:06:46 And at that point, it was also a scary feeling for me. 0:06:48 I had never made digital content before. 0:06:50 I’d never even posted a TikTok myself. 0:06:53 And so all I had was there was an opportunity to move to New York to work for this Web 0:06:55 3 startup. 0:07:00 And they had enough sort of VC capital to take a bet on me believing that like, let’s 0:07:02 go see what happens if you go make TV shows for TikTok. 0:07:05 So they gave me like a modest budget of 25 grand. 0:07:06 Let me get that. 0:07:07 I didn’t know this. 0:07:09 So you go to work for a crypto company. 0:07:10 I did. 0:07:11 Unfortunately. 0:07:12 They have too much money. 0:07:13 And they say, and you want to make movies. 0:07:16 So you use the crypto money to make movies. 0:07:17 I’ll back up in further. 0:07:18 So this company. 0:07:19 This is what the crypto industry comes in. 0:07:20 I know. 0:07:21 I know. 0:07:22 And by the way, I will say I was never a crypto person. 0:07:23 I’m still not a crypto person. 0:07:26 But there was a time where I thought maybe I was the dumb one in the room. 0:07:31 And then I realized now I was actually had some sanity, but this company had essentially 0:07:34 sold a half a million dollars worth of NFTs to come make a dating show. 0:07:36 And they had never made a show before in their entire lives. 0:07:39 And so somehow I get connected with them and they’re like, Hey, would you want to come 0:07:42 to move to New York for a few months and come like produce this dating show? 0:07:46 The idea was if you owned an NFT, you could like vote in the bachelor, bachelor in each 0:07:47 episode. 0:07:48 Right. 0:07:49 And we go and make the show. 0:07:50 We spend half a million dollars making it. 0:07:56 And parts of it were so unsuccessful, which was like online, I think in its entire run 0:08:00 we had something like 15,000 views on YouTube, like literally nothing. 0:08:04 But we did do these like fun in-person premieres every Sunday where we’d have like a live audience. 0:08:07 They’d watch the episode and we’d go straight into a live talk show afterwards with like 0:08:10 all the guests from that episode and like celebrity guest judges, whatever. 0:08:14 That part grew from like 200 people the first week to selling out Webster Hall five weeks 0:08:16 later with a thousand people in the audience. 0:08:20 And so there was clearly like something like, okay, like this is reminding people of like 0:08:25 the old days of TRL or SNL and like it’s messy, but maybe people liked the mess. 0:08:29 But my biggest frustration was like, I just came to digital and blew half a million dollars 0:08:33 through, you know, I think that 15,000 people watching, that’s not what I came to the space 0:08:34 to do. 0:08:39 And so at that point I sat down with the founders of the company and just said, look, it’s TikTok. 0:08:41 This is the thing that I use every single day. 0:08:44 This is the thing that I think we can generate IP from scratch on. 0:08:48 Just give me a budget of like 25 grand and let’s just go see what happens. 0:08:52 And so they said, yes, and I started sitting down with the people that I thought were really 0:08:57 great talent at that point, the first of which being Karim Rama, who now hosts Subway takes. 0:08:58 Yeah. 0:09:01 He’s like, I have this one idea that I pitched to every network and streamer for five years 0:09:02 and no one’s wanted it. 0:09:03 I was like, what is it? 0:09:06 He’s like, I want to hail a cab in New York and I want to tell the driver to take me to 0:09:09 their favorite place in the city and keep the meter running. 0:09:12 I was like, that’s a phenomenal fucking idea for a show. 0:09:15 Two days later, we’re standing on Delancey, we’re like trying to hail a cab. 0:09:19 Each cab is just passing by, they’re like freaked out from the cameras until this one 0:09:22 guy pulls up and he’s like, you want to pay me $300, I’ll be in your show. 0:09:26 And he takes us to Jackson Heights, we eat Pakistani food with him. 0:09:28 And you could tell when you’re filming it, you’re like, this is like a magical moment. 0:09:30 This feels like Bourdain. 0:09:31 We end up cutting it down. 0:09:35 We post it on account with zero followers three days later. 0:09:37 Taxi. 0:09:40 Take me to your favorite place and keep the meter running. 0:09:42 Where do you want to go? 0:09:43 Wherever you want to go. 0:09:47 Next morning, Kareem walks into a Bourdain guy and someone comes up to him and is like, 0:09:48 I fucking love your show, man. 0:09:51 And he’s like, wait, who are you talking to? 0:09:52 Who are you talking to? 0:09:56 And Kareem pulls out his phone and that one episode that was posted on account with zero 0:09:58 followers had over a million and a half views. 0:09:59 Unbelievable. 0:10:02 And what we saw in the back end was 98% of that audience at that point was in New York 0:10:03 City. 0:10:08 So it’s like overnight, he had become a celebrity in the city with a basically local television 0:10:09 show that we had produced. 0:10:12 That show went on to have over a hundred million views on its own. 0:10:13 It traveled to London. 0:10:14 It traveled to Miami. 0:10:16 It traveled to Egypt. 0:10:21 And I think that really set the stage for what we saw as like this much bigger vision. 0:10:26 And so based on the success of that show, I was sort of sitting there being like, look, 0:10:28 my passion is being a producer. 0:10:29 It’s not working for a crypto company. 0:10:33 And at the end of the day, I do think there’s a world where the next great television studio 0:10:36 is going to be made right here on this platform. 0:10:38 The biggest question is just, how are you going to make money doing that? 0:10:40 Because this platform will not pay you. 0:10:41 Are you making money? 0:10:42 That’s my question. 0:10:43 Yes. 0:10:46 And what I would say is like, it still is the wild, wild West, but we’re trying to be 0:10:50 a lot smarter about the shows we produce to sort of like make sure that we can make money 0:10:52 off of these things. 0:10:56 The reality of the situation is like, I think Hollywood is going to start facing a lesson 0:10:59 that the music industry learned 20 years ago, which is that the content itself is not 0:11:01 going to be the thing that makes money anymore. 0:11:05 And so for us, assuming that we’re going to make zero dollars from any platform that 0:11:08 we’re on, we focus on sort of like two angles. 0:11:10 One is brand integration into our content. 0:11:13 And the other is seeing if the show that we’re producing might actually generate a brand 0:11:14 to come out of. 0:11:19 And so what I mean by that is like, on Boy Room, our biggest show right now, the reason 0:11:23 we love that idea so much wasn’t just because Rachel Coster is the funniest person we never 0:11:28 met, but we really thought if we can make this a viral show, there’s a home renovation 0:11:29 component to this. 0:11:33 And maybe we can convince like an e-commerce giant to come in and partner with us in the 0:11:36 next season of the show to start renovating men’s bedrooms. 0:11:40 That show blew up in a way that we had never experienced before. 0:11:43 It got more press attention than any show we’ve ever worked on. 0:11:47 And again, Rachel was someone who had 3,000 followers on Instagram when we found her and 0:11:52 now cannot walk down the street in New York anymore without being accosted for photos. 0:11:56 We started talking to these e-commerce giants pretty quickly as the press started picking 0:12:00 up being like, “Guys, we have this bigger vision for the show and can we convince you 0:12:03 to buy into this thing that no one’s really ever done before?” 0:12:07 And after months of negotiating with a few of these companies, we just closed a massive 0:12:11 deal around the next season of the show where we are going to be able to actually start renovating 0:12:17 these men’s bedrooms in New York and LA with furniture from this platform. 0:12:19 And so that’s like a first of its kind thing. 0:12:23 And I think there will be trials and errors as we continue to go here, but I will say 0:12:28 in talking with these brands, they’re for the first time realizing like we’re pulling 0:12:30 spending on TV. 0:12:34 We like sponsoring influencers, but it’s not that great of a business for us. 0:12:39 And so like we need to find more of a mainstay home for where we can put our brand. 0:12:41 And the reality is like shows are a safer bet. 0:12:44 Presumably, you’re taking 100% of the advertising dollars, right? 0:12:48 If you’re creating those direct relationships, which is great. 0:12:53 How does it compare to YouTube because, you know, YouTube, you can make money. 0:12:54 YouTube pays you. 0:12:56 TikTok doesn’t pay, there’s no pay. 0:13:00 Of those 400 million views we’ve gotten, I think we’ve probably been paid maybe like 0:13:02 $15,000 from TikTok. 0:13:03 So like it’s just not even. 0:13:06 So TikTok is paying you, but they’re just paying you a terrible, wow, okay, I didn’t realize 0:13:07 that. 0:13:09 So how are all these TikTokers, like how are the… 0:13:10 It’s all brand sponsorship. 0:13:15 I mean, I think I just read a stat today that said something like influencers made $1 billion 0:13:19 off of platform revenue this year, but they made $8 billion from sponsorship. 0:13:22 So like clearly there’s just a lot more money from sponsorship. 0:13:23 Yeah. 0:13:25 Exactly the way you should be doing it, right? 0:13:29 So let’s just talk a little bit more about TikTok versus Hollywood. 0:13:34 One thing that I find interesting is this idea of decision fatigue. 0:13:41 Netflix watches, people who watch Netflix spend 78 hours per year deciding what to watch. 0:13:47 So talk to us about how your view on decision fatigue, how does decision fatigue play into 0:13:48 the rise of TikTok today? 0:13:52 I mean, the reality is like, I think that’s where original TV was better in some ways. 0:13:55 You could just scroll the channels and like you’re eventually going to find something 0:13:56 that you want. 0:13:58 And I think that is what TikTok is tapping into. 0:14:03 If I have an hour to spare and I am on my couch, I’m going to go on TikTok. 0:14:06 I’m not going to open Netflix and do the 78 hours per year of scrolling. 0:14:09 It’s just, I know I’m not going to find the thing that I want to watch. 0:14:12 And so I think that that’s the thing, like these platforms are so personalized to what 0:14:16 your interests are at this point that you’re more likely to be entertained. 0:14:20 And that is where at the end of the day, like, look, our content is on every platform. 0:14:24 We want to be wherever you are because we don’t know what platform you’re on. 0:14:28 But I do think TikTok is the best player in the space only because the consumer habit 0:14:30 that makes you open it is I want to watch entertainment. 0:14:32 It’s not, I want to watch things from my friends. 0:14:34 It’s not, I want to talk to my friends. 0:14:35 It’s literally, I want to be entertained. 0:14:36 And that is what TV is. 0:14:37 Yeah. 0:14:41 There’s this other great start, which is that 43% of TikTok users say that they use TikTok 0:14:44 for quote, mindless entertainment. 0:14:50 How do you as a TikTok production company grapple with that? 0:14:54 How do you grapple with the fact that you want to create content that is ultimately supposed 0:14:56 to be mindless or is it supposed to be something else? 0:15:01 I mean, the thing that I think about the most is like for every person that goes on TikTok, 0:15:04 you’re probably consuming about 200 videos in that session. 0:15:10 And that includes everything from like a funny meme to some horrifying news around the world 0:15:13 to, you know, someone doing a dance to a music video. 0:15:14 Like it’s just like, it’s so different. 0:15:18 And so it’s like, how do you create that concept that sticks out so much? 0:15:21 And then you watch that one episode and you’re like, give me 500 more of these. 0:15:23 And that is kind of what we strive for. 0:15:27 So like everything we’ve ever made is very much like a format where you can kind of plug 0:15:32 and play every episode is a little bit different of the same thing just so that you can go 0:15:33 and binge. 0:15:36 And what we’ve heard from our fans is like, even on a show like keep the meter running, 0:15:40 I have friends who found that show after episode 50 and they end up spending two hours in bed 0:15:43 binging every episode, but in backwards. 0:15:46 And so I think like that is what we strive for in any show that we make. 0:15:51 And it does just mean looking back a little bit to like the early 2000s of cable TV formats 0:15:52 for inspiration. 0:15:54 So what do you think is the secret source then? 0:15:59 I kind of think of you as like the king of virality when it comes to TikTok and short 0:16:00 form content. 0:16:02 What makes a show great? 0:16:08 Why when Rachel said, I want to look at boys discussing rooms, what was so compelling about 0:16:09 that as an idea? 0:16:10 I mean, it’s really, it’s simple. 0:16:11 It’s two things. 0:16:13 You have to have the best talent. 0:16:15 You really just have to have a star. 0:16:19 And they’re not easy to find, but when you find them, that’s what makes this thing perform 0:16:20 the best. 0:16:22 The other is you have to have a format that you can’t look away from. 0:16:27 When you’re watching the opening frame of Boy Room and it’s some disgusting men’s bedrooms 0:16:30 and Philly without a door, you’re going to keep watching. 0:16:34 And thankfully Rachel can carry it to the end because like you now love her as a host. 0:16:38 When Kareem gets in a cab and he tells the driver, take me to a fair place and keep the 0:16:40 meter running, you’re not going to stop watching. 0:16:43 Like there’s a party that’s like, I want to ask that question to a cab driver. 0:16:46 And so it really is those two factors. 0:16:51 And the reality is like we try so many different pilots internally and kill so many shows because 0:16:53 it doesn’t get to that point. 0:16:57 We even just made a show called Bodega Run that we only did, I think the 10 or 11 episodes 0:17:02 of and we canceled it because look, the first three episodes actually got a combined like 0:17:06 30 million views across YouTube and TikTok combined. 0:17:08 We didn’t want to watch it. 0:17:12 Like it would come on my feet and I would scroll and the last six episodes, I think 0:17:15 we were representative of that because it had to combine like 200,000 views and it’s 0:17:17 like clearly there’s not a consistency here. 0:17:19 You don’t want to watch a hundred episodes. 0:17:20 And what was the premise of Bodega Run? 0:17:23 It’s kind of like our version of supermarket sweep. 0:17:27 It was like we would go to real life Bodegas, we’d find someone outside, we’d say you have 0:17:31 60 seconds, go find these three items and check out and if you do, we’ll give you $100. 0:17:33 And they had these like GoPros attached to their heads. 0:17:37 It was like very much like 360 camera looking at what they’re looking at and we had cameras 0:17:39 that would go into the Bodegas. 0:17:46 And it was funny. 0:17:47 But it wasn’t a hit show. 0:17:51 It just didn’t have that quality of a really amazing format. 0:17:55 And so I think game shows are the space that we’d like to be in, but it’s a little tougher 0:17:58 to crack and have that thing that’s like perfect. 0:18:03 Whereas diving into a certain world and crafting a format around that is always going to be 0:18:06 more fun for us. 0:18:23 We’ll be right back. 0:18:25 Support for property comes from Nerd Wallet. 0:18:28 If you’re a listener of the show, you know business and if you’re looking for a resource 0:18:32 to find financial products that can help you make smart financial decisions, turn to the 0:18:35 nerds at Nerd Wallet. 0:18:39 Not only have they spent thousands of hours researching and reviewing over 1300 financial 0:18:42 products, but they have the tools you need to make smarter decisions. 0:18:46 Looking for a credit card at Nerd Wallet and go beyond the basic comparisons filter for 0:18:50 the features that matter to you and read in depth reviews, ready to choose a high yield 0:18:55 savings account, get access to exclusive deals and compare rates, bonuses and more. 0:18:56 House hunting. 0:18:59 View today’s top mortgage rates for your home sweet home. 0:19:03 Make the nerds your go to resource for smart financial decisions. 0:19:05 Head to nerdwallet.com/learnmore. 0:19:07 Nerd Wallet. 0:19:08 Finance smarter. 0:19:18 Nerd Wallet compare incorporated NMLS 1617539. 0:19:20 Support for property comes from NetSuite. 0:19:23 If you could see into the future and know for sure what inflation, interest rates and market 0:19:27 swings would look like, you probably wouldn’t be listening to this podcast. 0:19:31 You’d be running about 200 different businesses and amassing a fortune that would make Jeff 0:19:33 Bezos weep with envy. 0:19:35 But that’s just not in the cards. 0:19:39 The world is an endless string of unknowns and predicting the future is a pipe dream. 0:19:44 That’s why so many smart businesses have gotten themselves future ready with NetSuite by Oracle. 0:19:49 NetSuite is the go to business management suite for almost 40,000 companies offering everything 0:19:52 you need to stay on track no matter what tomorrow brings. 0:19:57 NetSuite combines accounting, financial management, inventory, HR and more into one simple platform 0:19:59 offering a single source of truth. 0:20:04 In real time insights and data, you can use to make the right decisions faster than ever 0:20:05 before. 0:20:09 Don’t get caught looking backwards, get ahead of the curve and stay focused on what’s 0:20:14 coming next with NetSuite by Oracle speaking of opportunity. 0:20:19 You can download the CFO’s guide to AI and machine learning at netsuite.com/prof. 0:20:23 The guide is free to you at netsuite.com/prof. 0:20:25 That’s netsuite.com/prof. 0:20:38 We’re back with First Time Founders. 0:20:40 You worked in Hollywood. 0:20:44 You were a fan of TV shows and movies and it kind of feels like what’s sort of happening 0:20:53 with the entertainment space is the virtues of long form, which is basically the virtues 0:20:54 of narrative. 0:20:58 It feels like narrative has basically been thrown away that someone who can write a great 0:21:02 story with a beginning, middle and an end actually isn’t useful anymore. 0:21:06 What matters most is basically just the premise. 0:21:11 It’s like, can your first sentence be interesting and that’s all that matters. 0:21:13 Do you feel like that’s kind of what’s happening to entertainment? 0:21:18 Yes, and to correct one thing just because I don’t want to be destroyed by the people 0:21:20 I do look up to in Hollywood still. 0:21:23 I don’t think movies and TV shows are going away forever. 0:21:25 I think that we’re going to watch far fewer of them. 0:21:29 I do think that means that the ones you do watch become that much more impactful. 0:21:34 By the way, that’s what the market is telling us because the top movies are taking all of 0:21:35 the revenue now. 0:21:38 And when you do have a moment like Barbier, Oppenheimer, it’s like, yeah, everyone around 0:21:39 the world watched that movie. 0:21:42 That is a huge impact on society. 0:21:45 And so I’m not dooming and glooming in that sense, but I am saying that like the old days 0:21:49 of spending three hours flipping channels your TV are completely gone. 0:21:52 You’re going to watch TV for sports, you’re going to watch it for like the big hyped up 0:21:55 Netflix show that everyone’s talking about, but otherwise you’re going to be on your 0:21:56 phone. 0:22:00 And so on the like first three seconds at all, it is super important. 0:22:02 You do need to have a really interesting premise. 0:22:05 I think there’s people that have different interpretations of what that means. 0:22:08 I think there’s the side of Mr. Beast that’s like, don’t stop watching. 0:22:13 We’re going to blow up a school bus and like, okay, I’ll watch fine, but I think we’re trying 0:22:16 to do something completely different, which is just like, what’s a really fun idea of 0:22:20 just again, a world that you want to be in while you’re in bed? 0:22:23 Only I’ve noted, I mean, you mentioned that most of your shows are unscripted, all of 0:22:24 them are unscripted. 0:22:25 All of them are unscripted. 0:22:26 All of them. 0:22:32 It feels like the TikTok YouTube sort of creator economy trend is in the unscripted 0:22:33 direction. 0:22:39 I can’t really think of anyone on these platforms who’s creating really popular scripted content. 0:22:40 Why do you think that is? 0:22:43 Why, why are the winners here doing unscripted? 0:22:46 Look, there’s two sides where scripted comes into play. 0:22:49 There’s sketch comedy and some of these sketch comedy groups like please don’t destroy and 0:22:51 it becoming sort of the stars of SNL. 0:22:55 The other side is there’s actually a really amazing generation of young horror filmmakers 0:22:59 who I think are like, are generations James Wands, who every single day are putting out 0:23:03 some of the scariest fucking things I’ve ever seen in my entire life. 0:23:06 Those people will be using these platforms to become the next generation of filmmakers. 0:23:11 I think why you don’t see more like dramas or sort of another side of the scripted narrative 0:23:13 part, is it just more expensive? 0:23:16 Like as soon as you have a script, you need actors, as soon as you have actors, you need 0:23:19 makeup, then you need props, you need a set, you need lighting, and then you need a grip 0:23:23 and a gaffer, and then you kind of end up being stuck in the same situation. 0:23:28 And so I think it is the low budget formats that are going to thrive the most on these 0:23:29 platforms. 0:23:33 And if you look at just traditional Hollywood, the low budget genres have always been unscripted 0:23:34 in horror. 0:23:38 It sounds like we don’t care that much about quality anymore because the experience is 0:23:41 only going to last 30 seconds and you can just scroll. 0:23:44 And that’s where I think I was always taught as a young person who made a bunch of short 0:23:49 films is like, don’t think that you need an Ari Alexa, think that you need a good script 0:23:53 and that you do need good audio, that’s the one thing you really do need. 0:23:56 But otherwise, like no one cares what camera you film this thing on. 0:24:00 And the other thing is we’re dealing with a generation of kids who have consumed advertisements 0:24:02 since the day they were born. 0:24:05 And so I actually think at this point, when they see an Ari Alexa filmed piece of content 0:24:09 on their feed, they think it’s an ad and they want to scroll immediately. 0:24:13 We shoot everything we do on Sony FX3s, it’s like the perfect balance of looking like it 0:24:17 was made for you while still feeling professional. 0:24:19 And so like when you do scroll up on one of our shows. 0:24:24 But what do you mean by looking like it was made for you, like sort of looking at casual? 0:24:27 It still feels like it fits on the platform. 0:24:30 It doesn’t feel like, oh, this person spent a million dollars and is trying to fit in. 0:24:34 It’s like, okay, this was like just low-fi enough where it still makes sense here, but 0:24:37 it’s high-fi enough where it’s not just like an iPhone video. 0:24:41 And I think that’s probably the camera we’re going to continue to film our content on forever 0:24:43 in the short film space. 0:24:44 Why is that important? 0:24:48 This is something I’ve been finding really interesting about our generation where we 0:24:58 have sort of this weird obsession with authenticity and we’re extremely sensitive to bullshit. 0:25:02 I think because we’ve consumed so many ads, I mean, the number is we consume 300 ads per 0:25:06 hour, which is up tenfold from what our parents were experiencing. 0:25:12 So it does feel that we are extremely sensitive or we can just sort of sniff ads out out of 0:25:14 nowhere. 0:25:18 But what you’re describing is interesting because you’re kind of saying we are intentionally 0:25:23 making it low production to make it sort of look more authentic, perhaps, than it actually 0:25:24 is. 0:25:25 Take us through what you’re… 0:25:28 What I would also say, it’s a cost thing too. 0:25:33 Shooting on these Sony FX3 is like, my sets have never been more than three people, you 0:25:36 know, and so you have two people both holding the cameras that also have the microphones 0:25:37 on them. 0:25:38 And you have a host and a producer. 0:25:39 Like, that’s what our crew looks like. 0:25:43 And if I had an Ari Alexa, I would need a DP, I would need lighting, I would need a 0:25:44 grip and a gaffer. 0:25:48 And like, the reality is spending all that money is not going to make a better piece 0:25:49 of content on these platforms. 0:25:53 So it’s both something that I think performs better on the platform, but it’s also what 0:25:54 allows our business model to work. 0:25:59 Like, to put it simply, Season 1 and Boy Room, we produced 22 episodes, only 14 of which 0:26:00 came out. 0:26:04 Some of the guys just either weren’t messy enough or like were pretending to be messy 0:26:05 and we threw those episodes out. 0:26:10 But of those 22 episodes that we shot, the entire thing cost us $48,000. 0:26:11 That’s impossible. 0:26:14 That’s a coffee budget on an HBO show. 0:26:20 And so like, again, it’s like, but then we found the market fit, right? 0:26:23 Like we know now that Boy Room is a hit show and there’s a world where that does turn into 0:26:24 a TV show at some point. 0:26:28 And like, this kind of turns into the comic book model where it’s like, we can go generate 0:26:32 IP at a fraction of the cost of Hollywood and then decide what we want to do with it. 0:26:35 I think there’s a version where some of our shows turn into just 18 to 20 minute YouTube 0:26:36 shows. 0:26:38 I think there’s another world where some of them turn into TV shows. 0:26:42 But at the end of the day, it is creating IP at a fraction of the cost. 0:26:46 One of your investors is kind of peak Hollywood. 0:26:51 That is Jeremy Zimmer, who’s the CEO of UTA, which is basically one of the biggest entertainment 0:26:55 talented agencies in the world. 0:26:56 What does he think of you? 0:26:58 But more generally, what does Hollywood think? 0:26:59 Have people come up to you? 0:27:00 Do they like you? 0:27:01 Are they scared of you? 0:27:04 It’s a combination of all of them. 0:27:08 And I was so honored that Jeremy wanted to be in the round. 0:27:12 He’s become a close friend and it’s been really nice to be able to call on him and take his 0:27:13 brain. 0:27:18 I think the older generation of entertainment sees the rising tide and knows to start looking 0:27:20 at where things are going. 0:27:24 I also think the older generation have kids old enough to recognize their viewing habits 0:27:27 have changed and can actually be a witness to the fact of like, oh, we’re fucked. 0:27:29 They have to experience it themselves. 0:27:33 Whereas like the 30-something-year-old creative executive who grew up in a different industry 0:27:38 who’s hoping to still have their big Oscar moment, they hate me and they hate TikTok 0:27:39 and they hate the platform. 0:27:43 And you can see it anytime there’s any article in anything we produce, all the comments are 0:27:45 like, can we just ban this thing already? 0:27:46 I hate this thing. 0:27:49 And it’s like, I wish they would just download TikTok because I know they would have actually 0:27:53 the greatest time of all time and then they would start agreeing with it. 0:27:56 The other thing is like, we’re not supposed to be competition. 0:27:57 Come on in. 0:27:58 The water is warm. 0:28:01 The history of television can be recreated on this platform and it’s not going to be 0:28:03 done by just one studio. 0:28:06 You mentioned, can we ban this thing already? 0:28:07 TikTok might get banned. 0:28:09 What do you think of that? 0:28:11 It’s a touchy subject. 0:28:16 What I will say is I think you can’t put the short form content thing back in the hat. 0:28:19 I think we love consuming content this way. 0:28:23 And so if it were to go away tomorrow, I think some of that viewership would go to Instagram 0:28:24 Reels. 0:28:27 I think some would go to YouTube Shorts, although I think YouTube is afraid of shorts 0:28:31 a little bit because it cannibalizes what’s an amazing business for them, which is longer 0:28:32 form content. 0:28:37 I think there’s probably space for a new app to come in only because of what I said earlier, 0:28:42 which is like that consumer habit about TikTok of just opening it to consume content is not 0:28:43 the same on Instagram. 0:28:48 Instagram, I’m going on first to see my DMs, look at my stories, see things from my friends. 0:28:52 And then maybe I’ll get stuck in like a brain rot, you know, Reels feed. 0:28:54 But it’s not the thing that I’m going on Instagram for. 0:28:57 So I just think you can’t put this thing back in the bag. 0:29:00 And for us, like we’re going to continue to be on every single platform that’s available 0:29:03 because we think that we’re going to forever have the best content on that platform. 0:29:10 I’d like to get into Instagram Reels, 730 million active users on Instagram Reels. 0:29:14 So it’s sort of, it’s still behind TikTok, which is at 1.6 billion, but it’s definitely 0:29:15 catching up. 0:29:20 Breakdown for us, why you think that’s an important distinction that Instagram Reels 0:29:26 is a component of the Instagram experience versus the entire product. 0:29:31 Why do you think that makes it so substantially different from TikTok? 0:29:35 It’s almost too social, you know, and I think the thing that’s so magical at TikTok is like, 0:29:38 again, I actually don’t want to see content from my friends because they probably don’t 0:29:39 make good videos. 0:29:40 Right. 0:29:43 And when I’m like watching a funny video on TikTok from a stranger, the first thing I 0:29:46 do is open the comments and like I read other funny comments and like that’s my experience. 0:29:49 Like I don’t need to have my friends be on that platform. 0:29:51 With Instagram, it’s tricky. 0:29:54 I think there’s so many distractions on the platform because you have incoming DMs and 0:29:59 you want to see posts from your friends that longer form content, like just kind of suffers 0:30:00 on the platform. 0:30:03 I will say like Boy Room does pretty amazingly on Reels. 0:30:07 We get anywhere from half a million to a million viewers an episode on the platform. 0:30:09 So like, still really happy with it. 0:30:13 But I think like when I open my Reels tab, the average length of the video that I would 0:30:17 say it shows me is probably around 20 seconds long and almost all of them are memes. 0:30:22 And that works really well for the platform because the entire point of Reels on Instagram 0:30:25 is they want to show you content that you’re going to send to your friends because that 0:30:28 makes them watch the content and like you’re more likely to send a meme to your friend 0:30:30 than maybe an episode of a show. 0:30:32 So I’m excited to see how they change that. 0:30:36 I’ve heard rumors that they want to do longer form content and start prioritizing that in 0:30:37 the algorithm. 0:30:39 I hope they do. 0:30:42 And we’re just going to continue posting there until that happens. 0:30:46 But the only difference for us as well is like on Instagram Reels, in order to be in 0:30:49 the algorithm, your content has to be under 90 seconds long. 0:30:53 Sometimes our TikTok content will be two and a half, three, three and a half minutes long. 0:30:58 And so we end up cutting our content differently based on the platform we’re posting it to. 0:31:02 How have you found sort of grappling with the algorithm? 0:31:08 I feel like that’s another huge part of this because in Hollywood, it used to be that the 0:31:11 barrier to entry was could you get past the executives? 0:31:14 Did the guy in the room like you? 0:31:18 And it’s now at a point where it’s does the algorithm like you? 0:31:23 And in a lot of ways that makes things easier because it means that you can just sort of 0:31:28 pull yourself up by your bootstraps and just get involved immediately at very low costs. 0:31:30 But also you don’t even know what they want. 0:31:32 We don’t know how the algorithm works. 0:31:35 It’s this sort of mythical beast that we can’t truly understand. 0:31:37 You’ve kind of cracked it though. 0:31:39 What is the algorithm want? 0:31:40 Good shit. 0:31:46 I’ve never disagreed with what it has made perform for us and what it hasn’t like literally 0:31:47 as a company. 0:31:50 Anytime we’ve posted something that hasn’t performed the next we’ve all been like, yeah, 0:31:52 it kind of sucked. 0:31:53 That was good. 0:31:54 That was pretty shitty. 0:31:56 And I think like bodega run was part of that like by the end of it. 0:32:00 It was just like we didn’t have any heart in the show whatsoever. 0:32:01 And so I don’t know. 0:32:05 That might be my famous last words and the algorithm shifts and all of a sudden I’m fucked. 0:32:08 But I haven’t seen that to be the case yet. 0:32:12 You know, I think it’s really good about testing content in front of an audience until it finds 0:32:14 the audience that will like your content. 0:32:17 You know, I’ll say like a story from Boyd Room. 0:32:22 We posted the first episode on Instagram, gets like 250k views, we’re like, that’s sick. 0:32:25 Posted on TikTok gets 147 views, you’re like, okay. 0:32:29 Post the second episode on Instagram gets 300,000 views. 0:32:31 On TikTok gets like 205 views. 0:32:32 We’re like, what is happening? 0:32:34 This is an amazing show. 0:32:36 Maybe it’s not showing it to people. 0:32:39 I’m starting to have conspiracy theories, I have 18 accounts in my phone, maybe it’s 0:32:40 shadow banning me. 0:32:41 That’s the best. 0:32:43 Everyone thinks that’s shadow ban when their content doesn’t perform. 0:32:46 Yeah, your content just sucks. 0:32:49 But I look in the back end and it’s like, no, it is showing it on the for you page and 0:32:51 I can see when people are dropping off and it’s in the first three seconds. 0:32:53 I’m like, okay, what’s happening in the first three seconds? 0:32:56 And it’s this like loud TV show intro. 0:32:59 Welcome to Boyd Room, the show where we investigate boys’ rooms. 0:33:00 We’re like, okay. 0:33:01 Episode three, no intro. 0:33:04 We’re just going to drop into the show. 0:33:09 That one difference was enough to get 4 million views in 24 hours and over 30,000 followers 0:33:10 on that account. 0:33:11 It’s good. 0:33:12 It knows what it’s doing. 0:33:15 And that change was the right creative call on that show. 0:33:18 And so I think like, again, people think that they have to cater to the algorithm in the 0:33:22 Mr. Beast way and we’re trying to prove that you don’t. 0:33:24 We’ll be right back. 0:33:37 Support for Prop G comes from Fiverr. 0:33:40 In today’s market, your competitive edge isn’t just your product. 0:33:42 It’s also the people who help you make it. 0:33:46 But finding top tier talent can be expensive, time consuming and often a gamble. 0:33:50 That’s why Fiverr has developed solutions for business to make outsourcing talent simple, 0:33:53 quick and effective with Fiverr Pro. 0:33:57 You get access to curated talent through a catalog rigorously vetted, professional freelancers 0:34:00 organized by skill and experience. 0:34:04 You can also connect with dedicated hiring experts who will help you find the perfect 0:34:05 match. 0:34:09 Plus, you get seamless collaboration tools and flexible hiring options by project or 0:34:10 hourly. 0:34:14 And for anyone seeking more support, Fiverr Pro’s business partners can manage multiple 0:34:16 freelancer engagements for you. 0:34:20 They’ll outline project management, assemble a roster of freelancers and manage a schedule 0:34:23 to make sure your deliverables are completed on time. 0:34:26 It lets you flex your budget without any headcount constraints. 0:34:31 Fiverr Pro is designed to handle projects of any size and empowers you to build faster, 0:34:34 scale smarter and turn today’s projects into tomorrow’s growth. 0:34:44 Visit pro.fiverr.com to sign up and use code “PROFG” for 15% off any service. 0:34:47 Support for the show comes from OnePassword. 0:34:50 How do you make a password that’s strong enough so no one will guess it and impossible to 0:34:51 forget? 0:34:56 And now, how can you do it for over 100 different sites and make it so everyone in your company 0:34:59 can do the exact same thing without ever needing to reset them? 0:35:00 It’s not impossible. 0:35:02 OnePassword makes it simple. 0:35:06 OnePassword combines industry-leading security with award-winning design to bring private 0:35:09 secure and user-friendly password management to everyone. 0:35:13 OnePassword makes strong security easy for your people and gives you the visibility you 0:35:15 need to take action when you need to. 0:35:19 A single data breach can cost millions of dollars, while OnePassword secures every sign-in 0:35:22 to save you time and money. 0:35:26 And it lets you securely switch between iPhone, Android, Mac and PC. 0:35:29 All you have to remember is the one strong account password that protects everything 0:35:30 else. 0:35:33 Your logins, your credit cards, secure notes, or the Office Wi-Fi password. 0:35:40 Right now, our listeners get a free two-week trial at OnePassword.com/PROF for your growing 0:35:41 business. 0:35:44 That’s two weeks free at OnePassword.com/PROF. 0:35:55 Now let’s security slow your business down, go to OnePassword.com/PROF. 0:35:57 We’re back with First Time Founders. 0:36:00 You recently went to the DNC. 0:36:01 Why did you do that? 0:36:05 I actually always say that you can track the changes in consumption media through politics 0:36:07 faster than anything else. 0:36:13 I think about Obama going on between two firms in 2011, I want to say, to talk about Obamacare. 0:36:18 I can even remember in 2016 when Trump won, the still remaining importance of the late 0:36:23 night hosts kind of like shedding a tear on stage for America of like, oh my God, Trump 0:36:25 is president. 0:36:30 And you look at it now, and it’s like Trump is going on Aidan Ross, Kamala is giving more 0:36:34 access to creators and influencers than to, you know, the press. 0:36:38 And I think that’s reflective of like where everything’s going because they need the people, 0:36:39 they need the votes. 0:36:41 So they’re going to go where the people are. 0:36:44 And so politics just turns in a much faster rate. 0:36:48 We were at the DNC because we brought city council member, Chio, say, from Bed-San Crown 0:36:53 Heights over there, who is someone that we’ve worked really closely with out of passion. 0:36:57 Really believe in him being a future voice of the Democratic Party. 0:37:03 And we started working with him because last summer, New York’s rent guidelines board was 0:37:06 going to decide how much to increase rent stabilized rents. 0:37:09 And they were debating whether or not to raise it by 16%. 0:37:12 Because post-pandemic, people are struggling, a lot of people are going to be put on the 0:37:14 streets if something like that passes. 0:37:19 And she comes to me and my friend, Peter McIndoo, who started Birds Aren’t Real. 0:37:24 And he says, “I need to get people to this hearing because the people that this policy 0:37:29 will affect don’t know that there’s a hearing on Thursday where they are waiting to hear 0:37:30 testimonies.” 0:37:33 And he’s like, “I have 2,000 followers, I have no idea how to engage, like the greater 0:37:34 New York area. 0:37:35 I think I’m fucked.” 0:37:38 And we’re like, “Don’t worry, we go to his office with just an iPhone. 0:37:43 We script this video that kind of gets that message out in just a perfect, quick, 60-second 0:37:44 way.” 0:37:48 That video gets a million views in 24 hours from New Yorkers. 0:37:55 Three days later, for a room that had a capacity of 250 people, over 1,000 people showed up. 0:37:59 And every single person in line, I have the video, shakes cheese hand and says, “I’m 0:38:01 only here because of your video.” 0:38:06 New York ends up only raising rent stabilized rent by 3%. 0:38:11 So that for us was our first foray ever into politics and figuring out how can we use what 0:38:15 we know about these platforms to help push policy, to help make change around the country 0:38:16 and maybe the world. 0:38:21 And so I think for us, we have a huge interest in just kind of continuing that conversation 0:38:24 and seeing what else we can do in this space. 0:38:28 So do you think politicians are underusing this platform and was that sort of the idea 0:38:32 that you wanted to get the word out to these politicians you need to be on TikTok? 0:38:34 I think there are two politicians that are amazing at TikTok. 0:38:39 I think it’s Congressman Jeff Jackson out of North Carolina and I think it’s GSA. 0:38:40 That’s it. 0:38:42 I think AOC is incredible at using Instagram. 0:38:45 I wish he would call us for TikTok. 0:38:51 It is crazy to me how much every politician is still being led by like social marketing 0:38:55 teams who want them to do these dumb trends and silly sounds and it treats young audiences 0:38:58 specifically as idiots. 0:39:02 People want to be talked to like adults, they want to hear what’s going on in the world. 0:39:05 Congressman Jeff Jackson was a freshman term congressman who just started talking to the 0:39:09 camera as like America’s dad about here’s what’s going on in Congress right now. 0:39:11 He gets an average of like four or five million views a video. 0:39:15 That’s impossible that no freshman congressman has ever had to reach that big. 0:39:16 And so it’s frustrating. 0:39:20 I think it’s like people really think they need to dumb themselves down for people to 0:39:22 like them and the reality is like they just need to be themselves. 0:39:28 What do you think of Brat specifically in his relation to Kamala? 0:39:33 I mean, the reason I bring that up is because it feels very kind of adjacent to the trend 0:39:39 you’re talking about where the social media account of Kamala Harris, it was handed over 0:39:46 to I guess a young person who was a fan of Charlie XCX and sort of associated Brat and 0:39:52 all of that teen meme culture with the Harris campaign and it has exploded. 0:39:58 But it feels in my view very similar to what you have described where it’s kind of these 0:40:04 politicians don’t really understand these meme cultures, but they’re being told by their 0:40:05 younger employees. 0:40:09 You should just do it because people will like it and it’s resonated in a really big 0:40:10 way. 0:40:15 But I don’t think in my view at least it doesn’t seem that genuine to Kamala, but maybe that 0:40:16 doesn’t matter. 0:40:17 What is your view on that whole? 0:40:23 Look, it gets millions of views, it gets millions of likes, it makes everyone on Twitter love 0:40:25 it that lives in New York City and LA. 0:40:30 The reality is this election is 50/50, it’s likely to be decided by a few thousand votes. 0:40:33 Young men have abandoned the Democratic Party. 0:40:36 So it’s all fun and games, but we’re missing the point. 0:40:41 And I think the Democratic Party specifically likes to usually blame this on so many different 0:40:42 factors. 0:40:47 It’s their fault and they are not speaking on the issues that they care about, the people 0:40:48 that matter most. 0:40:53 And so like I cringe the more that we talk about Brat Summer, it was fun for a day and 0:40:57 I loved the meme and I loved all the new excitement when Biden dropped out of the race, but this 0:41:00 is not speaking to those 5,000 votes that will decide this election. 0:41:04 I just want to talk about news as well, similar to what we’re talking about, but 40% of Gen 0:41:11 Z today regularly gets their news from TikTok and that number is up from 9% in 2020. 0:41:14 So TikTok is fast becoming a news platform. 0:41:16 I mean, it is the new TV. 0:41:20 So what are your thoughts on the fact that we’re getting on news from TikTok? 0:41:21 Is that a good thing? 0:41:22 Is it a bad thing? 0:41:23 Where do you stand on this? 0:41:25 I think it can be an amazing thing. 0:41:30 I think again, this is a space that needs more trusted voices, that needs more serious 0:41:34 shows that have like the checks and balances that like ensure the right information is 0:41:35 being said. 0:41:40 My only fear about 40% of people getting their news from TikTok is there’s very little fact 0:41:42 checking on this platform. 0:41:46 And I will see a video that is literal fake news come up in my feed. 0:41:49 And no one leaves the platform when they’re on it. 0:41:53 It’s not like, okay, I saw this video, now let me go on Google and see if this is actually 0:41:54 real or not. 0:41:55 No one’s doing that. 0:41:57 What they do is they click on the comments and the comments likely validate that belief 0:42:01 system because all of a sudden the comments are, I can’t believe this is true. 0:42:02 And it’s like, I guess it’s true. 0:42:03 It’s like, no, this isn’t fucking true. 0:42:04 No part of this is true. 0:42:08 But now this person’s going to repeat it in person as if it is. 0:42:12 And the other thing, which is the sad part of these platforms is like, you are likely 0:42:17 being radicalized by an algorithm that really knows what you like and what you want to see 0:42:19 and you’re not seeing what’s on the other side. 0:42:24 Do you think the algorithm is being engineered by the Chinese government? 0:42:31 All I will say is, I don’t know what to say there, in between a rock and a hard place. 0:42:34 What I will say is I think we are our own worst enemy. 0:42:39 And I think the issue with these algorithms is they actually understand human nature. 0:42:43 And the reality is we like these things. 0:42:45 It’s like Trump didn’t cause any of this. 0:42:48 He was the effect of all of this. 0:42:54 We are in very divisive times because we are really upset with each other. 0:42:56 We’re not really wanting to look at each other in the eyes anymore. 0:43:00 I think that’s the area that I’d like to focus most of my time on. 0:43:01 I love this country. 0:43:03 I think it’s the greatest country on earth. 0:43:08 And I want to get us to a place where we can be across the aisle from each other and still 0:43:11 shake hands and realize we still want the same things. 0:43:13 We just have different approaches. 0:43:17 As we wrap up here, I do want to get a sense of how things work for you. 0:43:21 What does your production process look like? 0:43:25 If someone wants to go out there and produce a TikTok show, what do they do? 0:43:28 I’ll give the boy room example because I think it’s a really fun one. 0:43:32 Rachel came into our office on a Tuesday, she pitched boy room. 0:43:35 That Friday we shot a pilot with my friend Peter that will never see the light of day 0:43:37 because he was very upset with me. 0:43:39 That was enough for us to realize we wanted to go make the show. 0:43:41 The following week we shot three episodes. 0:43:43 The week after that we posted the first two. 0:43:45 So it’s a matter of weeks. 0:43:50 And that for us is significantly longer than the average TikTok user. 0:43:54 Us spending 50K on a season is a fraction of Hollywood. 0:43:56 It’s still more than anyone is spending on this platform. 0:43:59 So you don’t need anything. 0:44:02 All you need is a really good idea and just know how to address your audience a little 0:44:04 bit faster than usual. 0:44:05 And you’ll have a hit. 0:44:08 And I think the thing that I’m really surprised by is I feel like I’ve sort of been shouting 0:44:12 from the rooftops for two years about like this being television, this being the space 0:44:14 to create the next generation of formats. 0:44:17 And I’m kind of shocked at how few people have taken the base. 0:44:18 Yes, exactly. 0:44:21 I was going to ask, are there any competitors that you’re seeing? 0:44:26 There’s a few companies in this space who make really fun, you know, content. 0:44:28 A lot of man on the street stuff. 0:44:32 What I haven’t seen in this space that I think we’re really good at is creating like real 0:44:34 traditional TV show formats. 0:44:40 I think when people start seeing the business that is here, it might be a space that’s flushed 0:44:43 with capital again and having people start these companies. 0:44:47 I welcome it because I think the thing that will help most is having other things to point 0:44:49 at as successes. 0:44:52 Because you have these conversations with brands who you do need to help make this content. 0:44:55 And so I want there to be more people in this space. 0:44:58 I’m looking forward to a time that there’s four or five other great studios. 0:45:02 And until then, we’re just going to try to figure out what show you want next. 0:45:07 I think a part of it, and I’m just going to speak from personal experience here. 0:45:11 It seems kind of easy because of how short TikToks are. 0:45:16 And you just, you know, it’s such a fleeting experience and it’s a throwaway experience. 0:45:19 And the fact that you can just scroll past it, it’s like, what was the point of that? 0:45:26 And I feel that from, you know, I also believe in the importance of short form, but I found 0:45:32 that it’s actually very difficult to mobilize that effort because it’s a lot more effort 0:45:38 and time than you think for a payoff that feels just a lot less satisfying. 0:45:42 And you know, if you release your hit movie and you do the red carpet and you get an Emmy 0:45:43 and all this stuff. 0:45:47 And it’s like, it feels like a lot of the reason I would imagine just from my experience 0:45:52 why people are not doing it is because it’s like, this is just fucking pain to have to 0:45:54 do this over and over again. 0:45:56 It is the least sexy business on earth. 0:46:00 And I think like again, a part of the reason why a lot of people from traditional haven’t 0:46:03 entered this space is like, you’re not going to get a deadline Hollywood article. 0:46:06 Chanted, our shows have been in every major publication on earth. 0:46:09 But the behind the scenes of that isn’t really reported on. 0:46:12 So there is no red carpet. 0:46:13 It’s a micro budget. 0:46:16 And the interesting thing now is like, because we’ve had so many hits, we are being approached 0:46:21 by all the agencies and management companies offering up like pretty big talent, whether 0:46:25 it’s athletes or A-list actors who basically are upset that they don’t have a digital presence 0:46:26 of their own. 0:46:29 Maybe they want to build a brand long term and a space that they’ve never really talked 0:46:33 about before and they’re positioning their talent is like, can they host a show? 0:46:36 And the only thing that I say to them is basically what you’re saying. 0:46:39 It’s like, if they want a Starwagon on set and they think they’re going to be pampered, 0:46:41 it’s just not the right opportunity. 0:46:45 If they’re really wanting to get their hands dirty and like get in the thick of this thing, 0:46:46 we will make a hit show together. 0:46:50 And you know, that scares certain people away, but it does attract the right crowd. 0:46:53 So did people say, no, not good enough for me? 0:46:56 I think managers know their talent best. 0:46:59 And so they know which of their talent could be open to this idea and not. 0:47:03 I also think that like the other scary thing about TikTok is viewership is public. 0:47:09 And I think a lot of people don’t want people to know how few people listen to their podcast 0:47:13 or watch, you know, watch their show. 0:47:14 Yeah. 0:47:15 It’s so interesting. 0:47:19 Well, I feel like we could go on for hours, but I think I’m going to start to wrap it 0:47:21 up here. 0:47:25 We’ve talked a lot about people working in Hollywood, writers, producers, on a recent 0:47:28 episode on Grofty Markets. 0:47:31 We talked about, you know, what’s going to happen to costume designers and what’s going 0:47:36 to happen to makeup artists, et cetera, and Lionsgate just partnered with an AI company 0:47:37 that’s going to do their storyboarding. 0:47:40 AI is coming. 0:47:46 Do you have any advice to people working in Hollywood who are concerned about their job 0:47:50 security, concerned about the future of entertainment? 0:47:52 What would be your advice to someone in that position? 0:47:54 It’s really hard. 0:47:57 And I say this as a born and raised Angelino. 0:48:02 When I go back home, you can feel the despair. 0:48:06 You know, I don’t think people realize the below the line workers that make every movie 0:48:07 and TV show possible. 0:48:12 They’re not thinking about the costume designers and the set designers and the PAs and the grips 0:48:13 and the gaffers and the truck drivers. 0:48:19 Like it is a industry that is built off the back of middle class workers and you feel that 0:48:23 in LA because restaurants are closing, stores are closing, people aren’t going out the 0:48:26 way that they used to because they have less money in their pocket. 0:48:30 And I don’t think that we can hope that Hollywood’s going to come back. 0:48:32 This might be what it looks like for a very long time. 0:48:38 And so that’s not the most uplifting answer, but it is a reality check that I think a lot 0:48:40 of people need to start having with themselves. 0:48:44 Do you think that they need to just pivot to something else? 0:48:46 They might need to. 0:48:48 Adam is the head coach and co-founder of Gymnasium. 0:48:54 Adam, this was epic and I just agree with all of your texts. 0:48:57 I hate to end it on such a grim note. 0:48:58 It’s good. 0:48:59 Maybe that’s the kick that we need. 0:49:00 I know. 0:49:01 It’s important. 0:49:02 Appreciate your time. 0:49:03 Thank you. 0:49:04 Sorry. 0:49:08 Our producer is Claire Miller. 0:49:12 Our associate producer is Alison Weiss and our engineer is Benjamin Spencer. 0:49:15 Catherine Dillon is our executive producer. 0:49:18 Thank you for listening to First Time Founders from the Vox Media Podcast Network. 0:49:20 Tune in tomorrow for Prodigy Markets. 0:49:30 [Music] 0:49:33 (upbeat music) 0:49:42 [BLANK_AUDIO]
Ed speaks with Adam Faze from Gymnasium, a production company that makes television shows for social media. They discuss the future of television, how to monetize viral videos, and using TikTok to effect policy change.
0:00:04 There’s over 500,000 small businesses in B.C. and no two are alike. 0:00:05 I’m a carpenter. 0:00:06 I’m a graphic designer. 0:00:09 I sell dog socks online. 0:00:12 That’s why B.C.A.A. created one size doesn’t fit all insurance. 0:00:15 It’s customizable, based on your unique needs. 0:00:19 So whether you manage rental properties or paint pet portraits, 0:00:23 you can protect your small business with B.C.’s most trusted insurance brand. 0:00:29 Visit bcaa.com/smallbusiness and use promo code radio to receive $50 off. 0:00:31 Conditions applied. 0:00:33 Support for Prop G is brought to you by Viori. 0:00:35 Are you sick and tired of traditional old workout gear? 0:00:38 Viori wants to provide you with a new perspective on performance apparel. 0:00:43 Everything is designed to work out in, but also look and feel great outside the gym as well. 0:00:45 Viori’s products are incredibly versatile. 0:00:49 You can wear them running, training, stretching, or just lounging around. 0:00:53 Viori sent me the Elevate Core Shorts and Stratotec tee. 0:00:55 And I like the way they feel that form-fitting. 0:00:55 I feel strong in them. 0:00:56 I feel sleek in them. 0:00:58 I feel like a jungle cat. 0:01:01 Viori is an investment in your happiness. 0:01:04 For our listeners, they are offering 20% off your first purchase. 0:01:09 Get yourself some of the most comfortable and versatile clothing on the planet at viori.com/PropG. 0:01:13 That’s V-U-O-R-I.com/Prop G. 0:01:19 An experimental procedure that is giving hope to… 0:01:23 To get a heart transplant from a genetically modified pig. 0:01:27 There’s over 100,000 people on the organ transplant weight list. 0:01:31 And some scientists think the answer might be pigs. 0:01:37 Nobody in the world knew how a human would react to a pig heart, right? 0:01:39 The next day when we asked him, you know, “How are you feeling?” 0:01:41 He said, “Oink, oink.” 0:01:47 This week on Unexplainable, are pig hearts really the answer? 0:01:50 Follow Unexplainable for new episodes every Wednesday. 0:01:56 I’m Scott Galloway, and this is No Mercy, No Malice. 0:02:03 Some of the most iconic brands in history have seen their businesses crash. 0:02:06 Fallen Angels, as read by George Hahn. 0:02:24 The stock market is touching highs, but some corporate icons have seen valuations crash. 0:02:28 I believe dispersion, China, and a changing of the guard 0:02:31 are key to understanding these Fallen Angels. 0:02:36 In 1996, at the height of the brand era, 0:02:42 I was asked to address the board of Levi Strausen Company on the future of brands and retail. 0:02:46 The title of my presentation was The Death of Distance. 0:02:53 The rap was that brands need to establish direct relationships with consumers, 0:02:58 e-commerce, as digital technology would disperse products and services 0:03:01 without regard for existing distribution channels. 0:03:02 This happened. 0:03:07 Amazon dispersed retail to desktop, to mobile, to voice. 0:03:15 Netflix dispersed DVDs to the mailbox, then to every screen as net neutrality enabled them 0:03:20 to replicate tens of billions in cable infrastructure at near zero cost, 0:03:24 freeing up billions that resulted in a content price ratio 0:03:26 traditional players could not match. 0:03:30 The pandemic accelerated dispersion of the office, 0:03:36 remote work, healthcare, telemedicine, and education, online learning. 0:03:43 What I didn’t see, however, is that AI would be steroids for dispersion, 0:03:47 enabling anyone to leapfrog everyone. 0:03:49 Intel. 0:03:55 Moore’s Law, named for Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, 0:04:01 is an observation that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles every two years. 0:04:07 It’s a meme that encapsulates the relentless pace of technological progress. 0:04:10 When I graduated from the Haas School of Business, 0:04:16 Intel was the job everyone wanted, as the firm was surfing Moore’s Wave, 0:04:19 which was doubling in size every two years. 0:04:27 The Intel phenomenon could now be described as the ability to shed the majority of your value 0:04:30 despite being the leader in a booming industry. 0:04:36 Few firms have fallen so far, so steadily, as Intel. 0:04:42 At its peak in 2000, Intel’s market cap was $500 billion. 0:04:50 Since then, the S&P is up 243% and Intel down 80%. 0:04:58 If Intel had kept pace with the S&P, the firm would be worth 16 times what it’s worth today. 0:05:07 A stark reminder of this fall from grace, Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA, is worth more than Intel. 0:05:15 The firm is at risk of being dropped from the Dow. Many icons disappear as everything 0:05:23 everywhere ends. However, this fall is extraordinary, as leading firms usually experience this type of 0:05:27 value destruction when they are helpless in the face of a sector’s decline. 0:05:36 This is on Intel as its market has boomed, with semiconductor sales increasing 18% globally year 0:05:46 over year and 21% in China. Intel’s brand and enduring legacy of Andy Grove mask what is arguably 0:05:55 the worst managed firm of the last 20 years. At the beginning of 2021, Intel and NVIDIA commanded 0:06:04 the same market capitalization. Today, the wizard behind the AI curtain is worth 30 Intel’s. 0:06:12 Intel missed dispersion, i.e. failed to capitalize on mobile and AI. While it remains the biggest 0:06:18 maker of processors for PCs and laptops, Intel no longer has the power to predict the future 0:06:25 by making it. The future belongs to NVIDIA. Five years ago, NVIDIA was a second tier 0:06:31 semiconductor firm best known for giving call of duty better resolution. Today, it’s the third 0:06:41 most valuable company on earth, with between 70% and 95% of the AI chip market. With a P/E ratio of 0:06:50 99, Intel is still likely overvalued, but the game’s not over. Intel is shifting its business 0:06:56 model to serve as a manufacturer for other chip companies, including NVIDIA and Apple, 0:07:00 that outsource the part of the supply chain that was supposed to be the ultimate moat 0:07:08 manufacturing. It ends up there are a lot of moats, slack supply, that can be rented. 0:07:16 In some, Intel aspires to become the picks and shovels of a market they once dominated. 0:07:26 TSMC, which has 60% of the foundry market, reported gross margins of 53%, 0:07:32 compared with NVIDIA, the leading pure play chip maker, which reported margins of 75%. 0:07:41 The front end branded chip has higher margins and is a much better business. However, at $100 0:07:49 billion in a market where CapEx rivals nations, Intel just needs to show a pulse to substantially 0:07:55 increase its valuation. Their key advantage is not their brand or IP, but that they have lost 0:08:03 so much value that they have much less to lose. Leveraging their brand and IP to be the best 0:08:10 house in a bad neighborhood could result in a dramatic increase in value. From here, Disney. 0:08:19 Hollywood is becoming a fair-weather Detroit. Less than 50% of all TV usage is attributed 0:08:26 to linear as streaming now dominates. Domestic film and TV production is down 40%. 0:08:34 The year before GM and Chrysler declared bankruptcy, their auto sales were off 23% 0:08:42 and 30% respectively. It would be convenient and more dramatic to claim this is because of AI. 0:08:49 It isn’t. The root cause is more pedestrian. Content budgets are up 3% this year, 0:08:59 but studios can find people to do the same thing for less money elsewhere. Half of Netflix’s $15 0:09:07 billion annual content budget is now spent overseas. Note, Los Angeles will not register 0:09:16 similar urban blight as, you know, weather. Disney, unlike Intel, can blame the weather, 0:09:24 or at least the atmospherics. Despite having 10,000 screens, AMC is not known as the largest 0:09:29 theatrical distributor, but a meme stock. In the past three years, Paramount Global 0:09:37 market cap dropped from $43 billion to $7.5 billion. Warner Brothers Discovery lost 0:09:45 two-thirds of its value in two years. YouTube, which spends zero on content as it splits revenue 0:09:55 with creators, accounts for 10% of TV viewership. Netflix is second, with 7.6%. But even the 0:10:00 streamers that leapfrog legacy media should worry about TikTok, which provides quick, 0:10:05 perfectly calibrated Dopa hits for two plus hours per day. 0:10:12 Amid all the wreckage of Hollywood is the once seemingly impenetrable Disney castle, 0:10:21 which has shed half its value as its P/E ratio dropped from 283 to 36 over the past three years. 0:10:29 If Hollywood is Detroit, Disney is Ford. Theatrical is in structural decline, 0:10:37 but Disney accounted for 42% of the global box office with only three films, Deadpool and Wolverine, 0:10:47 Inside Out 2 and Alien Romulus. Cable is dying, but Disney owns so much content, Hulu, ABC, FX, 0:10:54 ESPN, Marvel Studios, Lucasfilm, Pixar, 20th Century Studios, and National Geographic, 0:11:01 that its streaming services are becoming the new cable bundle. But even with price hikes, 0:11:10 access to the entire Disney streaming ecosystem without ads costs $159.99 annually. 0:11:22 A mid-tier cable package costs $1,380 per year. At the parks, operating profit dropped 3% 0:11:29 as attendance slowed industry-wide. Disney and Comcast, which owns Universal Studios, 0:11:35 blamed competition with international travel. At the low end, a three-night Disney World 0:11:45 vacation for a family of four costs $2,783. According to a recent survey, 45% of parents 0:11:53 take on debt for a Disney vacation. My take? Disney parks, similar to a Santa Monica producer of 0:12:02 reality TV content, cost too much for not enough. Disney recognizes this and announced a $60 billion 0:12:10 investment to improve the value prop. Pro tip? Deadpool ride. Nike. 0:12:19 Wearing Nike makes me feel stronger. I love Nike, especially the unapologetic brand positioning. 0:12:28 You don’t win silver, you lose gold. But after losing 50% of its value in three years, 0:12:34 Nike is nowhere near the metal podium. During the pandemic, running clubs boomed. 0:12:40 This should have been great news for Nike. Instead, it was a shot of adrenaline for Nike 0:12:49 competitors. Hoka sales were up 27% last quarter, while Q3 sales for on were up 46%. 0:12:55 Meanwhile, Nike’s former CEO, John Donahoe, blamed remote work for the firm’s innovation slowdown. 0:13:03 Donahoe represented a pivot to digital and direct to consumer. When Nike was my client, 0:13:08 I advocated for this strategy as dispersion would neutralize Nike’s best weapon, 0:13:14 broadcast advertising. But the fuel band never gained traction. 0:13:21 DTC revenue was down 13% last quarter, and ultimately Donahoe confirmed that Nike leaned 0:13:29 into digital and DTC at the expense of retail partners. A decision that hurt Nike as retail 0:13:35 returned stronger than expected post pandemic, and Nike lost touch with cutting edge smaller 0:13:45 retailers. And then China sneezed, and Nike caught full blown pneumonia. Fourth quarter 0:13:54 sales in China dropped 19%, and Nike warned investors to expect more bad news. This quarter, 0:14:00 Nike sales were down 10% year over year, and down 4% in China. 0:14:06 Still, there’s nothing wrong with Nike that can’t be fixed by what’s right with Nike. 0:14:11 Their new CEO, Elliot Hill, represents a return to the brand’s roots. 0:14:18 The stock popped 7% on news of his hiring, and then gave it back, see above sales down 10%. 0:14:27 And while this is an investment advice, Nike’s PE ratio has dropped from a 2020 high of 73 0:14:36 to 23, suggesting that the stock is undervalued. It’s going to take time, as this may be a board 0:14:41 problem. Nike, after shitting the bed on its earnings call this week, announced they would 0:14:48 no longer be providing guidance. This is just plain stupid and a rookie move from a great company. 0:14:55 When things are bad, you over communicate, and if Nike’s management team is so thin, 0:15:02 the board lets them punt on key information flows to investors, then they shouldn’t be in the S&P 500. 0:15:10 Estee Lauder At first blush, it’s easy to blame China for Estee Lauder’s 0:15:19 75% drop in market cap over three years. But Estee Lauder used that explanation pre-pandemic, 0:15:26 during lockdowns, and post-pandemic. Meanwhile, the global beauty market has been relatively strong, 0:15:35 growing 10% from 2022 to 2023, while China’s beauty market lagged, growing by only 3% amid 0:15:42 heavy price discounting. Estee Lauder, L’Oreal, and Shiseido have all struggled in China recently, 0:15:49 although Estee Lauder has struggled the most. But a bad economy isn’t automatically bad news 0:15:55 for luxury brands. The lipstick effect is a theory that says during economic downturns, 0:16:01 consumers on tight budgets still splurge on small, affordable luxuries, as such purchases give people 0:16:08 a sense of indulgence without breaking the bank. The question isn’t whether budget conscious Chinese 0:16:14 consumers have soured on luxury, but whether they’ve soured on Estee Lauder. According to Vogue, 0:16:22 it’s the latter. Proya is set to become the first Chinese beauty brand to hit $1 billion in revenue. 0:16:30 Chinese beauty brand Florasses will open its first counter in Paris. Direct to consumer brand 0:16:39 Uniskin launched its first brick-and-mortar store in Shanghai. The HBO show’s succession 0:16:45 was a modern-day Shakespearean drama that captured the essence of power, wealth, and family dysfunction. 0:16:51 Ostensibly, it was about Rupert Murdoch, but it also could have been about Sumner Redstone, 0:16:58 or the Estee Lauder family, which owns 35% of the company and controls 80% of the voting power. 0:17:05 Ultimately, this isn’t about China or navigating dispersion. It’s about the frailty of family 0:17:13 dynasties. Such dynamics make for good TV drama, but they’re lousy for shareholder value. 0:17:21 Similar to Nike, Estee has missed key trends and finds long-tail brands nipping at every appendage. 0:17:31 Dispersion and the rise of China both began in the 1990s. Three decades later, China is the world’s 0:17:37 second-largest economy, and it has more middle-class households than the U.S. 0:17:44 Dispersion is no longer coming. It’s here, and AI will take it in new directions. 0:17:50 Similar to Congress, there are just too many old people in corporate America clinging to power. 0:17:57 One of the key problems in America is lack of churn. Politicians, CEOs, 0:18:03 and tenured faculty refuse to leave, creating a stasis that is bad for the economy, 0:18:08 as our country is run by people who are out of touch, and reduces opportunity for young people. 0:18:16 If that sounds agist, trust your instincts. I am an agist, and so is biology. 0:18:24 At 73, Bob Iger is the oldest CEO of the Fallen Angels I discussed here. 0:18:30 His first, second, and third priorities need to be picking a successor. 0:18:38 At 60, Nike CEO Elliot Hill is the youngest Fallen Angel boss, and like Iger, 0:18:41 he came out of retirement to turn an iconic company around. 0:18:50 Pat Gelsinger, 63, started his career at Intel at 18. His mentor was Andy Grove, 0:18:58 a leading gangster CEO of the last century. Estee Lauder CEO Fabrizio Freida is 67. 0:19:04 He’s retiring after 16 years at the helm. Maybe it’s a vibe, as my kids say, 0:19:07 but a changing of the guard is upon us. 0:19:14 In January of 2011, Netflix was worth $11 billion. 0:19:22 By November, the company’s market cap was just over $3 billion. The reason? 0:19:27 As Netflix pivoted to streaming, it tried to spin off its DVD business. 0:19:34 The quickster backlash cost Netflix one million subscribers. As it turned out, 0:19:40 Netflix was right but early, as they ultimately closed their DVD business in 2023. 0:19:48 In 2012, Best Buy was on the brink of bankruptcy, and the big box sector looked doomed. 0:19:57 A year later, Best Buy’s market cap increased 3x as a new CEO led one of the biggest turnarounds 0:20:03 in retail history. And then there’s the turnaround story everyone knows. Apple. 0:20:12 We’re wired to overestimate the impact of negative events, a phenomenon known as the 0:20:19 negativity bias. It’s a cognitive distortion that makes us believe that failures have a greater 0:20:26 impact than they actually do. At some point, every business experiences a crisis, i.e., 0:20:35 an opportunity. As a professor of brand strategy, I can’t help but wax nostalgic and believe these 0:20:43 firms are ripe for a comeback. They all boast global brands, talented workforces, and robust 0:20:51 supply chains. However, the most attractive thing about these firms is just how badly they’ve been 0:20:59 beaten down. In the first four weeks of 2024, Nvidia added the value of all four of these firms. 0:21:06 And that’s the bull case, as at some point every stock, unless it’s going to zero, 0:21:15 is just too expensive or cheap. These angels have fallen so far, redemption is overdue. 0:21:30 Life is so rich. 0:21:39 [BLANK_AUDIO]
0:00:04 There’s over 500,000 small businesses in B.C. and no two are alike. 0:00:05 I’m a carpenter. 0:00:06 I’m a graphic designer. 0:00:09 I sell dog socks online. 0:00:12 That’s why B.C.A.A. created one size doesn’t fit all insurance. 0:00:15 It’s customizable, based on your unique needs. 0:00:19 So whether you manage rental properties or paint pet portraits, 0:00:23 you can protect your small business with B.C.’s most trusted insurance brand. 0:00:29 Visit bcaa.com/smallbusiness and use promo code radio to receive $50 off. 0:00:31 Conditions applied. 0:00:35 Support for the show comes from ServiceNow, the AI platform for business transformation. 0:00:37 You’ve heard the big hype around AI. 0:00:41 The truth is, AI is only as powerful as the platform it’s built into. 0:00:45 ServiceNow is the platform that puts AI to work for people across your business, 0:00:48 removing friction and frustration for your employees, 0:00:50 supercharging productivity for your developers, 0:00:54 providing intelligent tools for your service agents to make customers happier. 0:00:57 All built into a single platform you can use right now. 0:00:59 That’s why the world works with ServiceNow. 0:01:03 Visit servicenow.com/aiforpeople to learn more. 0:01:11 Will the VP debate move the needle in what’s shaping up to be a neck-and-neck election? 0:01:14 You never know in advance what will be the thing that matters 0:01:15 and the thing that doesn’t matter. 0:01:19 But Donald Trump will be almost 80, 0:01:25 and J.D. Vance will be one cheeseburger away from the presidency should they win. 0:01:30 I’m Preet Bharara, and this week, the Atlantic magazine’s David Frum 0:01:32 joins me on my podcast, Stay Tuned with Preet, 0:01:35 to break down what happened at the debate. 0:01:36 The episode is out now. 0:01:40 Search and follow Stay Tuned with Preet wherever you get your podcasts. 0:01:46 Episode 319. 0:01:47 Through and under is Erica in covering parts of Iowa. 0:01:51 1919, the U.S. ratified the 18th Amendment, 0:01:55 leading to the prohibition of alcohol, three guys walking to a bar, 0:01:59 an alcoholic, a priest, and a child molester. 0:02:02 And that’s just the first guy. 0:02:04 Go! Go! Go! 0:02:16 Welcome to the 319th episode of The Prop G Pod. 0:02:18 In today’s episode, we speak with Rory Stewart, 0:02:21 the former UK Secretary of State for International Development, 0:02:24 and co-host of the popular podcast, The Rest is Politics. 0:02:28 We discussed with Rory Geopolitics, the state of politics in the U.S. and the UK, 0:02:31 and his recent TED talk where he advocates for a radical way 0:02:35 to address extreme poverty worldwide. 0:02:40 This guy just kind of bleeds, I don’t know, the Union Jack. 0:02:43 He just struck me as so British, but kind of the good parts of Britain. 0:02:46 He’s super smart, super polite, 0:02:49 and I really enjoyed the conversation. 0:02:53 I’m trying to get down, I’m trying to be a little bit more English. 0:02:55 I’m sitting here with tea. 0:02:58 Honey, that’s great tea, tea and biscuits. 0:03:02 Anyways, enjoy our conversation with Consummit Britt, 0:03:04 center of the universe, epicenter of intellect. 0:03:08 Okay, what’s happening? Let’s get to the news. 0:03:14 The dog is home in London after drinking beer and eating sausage in Munich. 0:03:18 And I went to the Activist meeting or conference, 0:03:20 whatever it is, a friend of mine, Steve Cericino, runs the fund, 0:03:23 and I committed to speaking there. 0:03:24 By the way, just a quick trick. 0:03:27 If you ever need someone to commit to something you’re worried about them committing to, 0:03:29 ask them like six months out. 0:03:31 I pretty much commit to anything if it’s six or nine months out, 0:03:33 because it doesn’t seem real to me. 0:03:36 I think there’s a lesson for young people there, 0:03:39 and that is the present value of your emotions is incredibly higher. 0:03:40 It’s discounted at a huge rate, 0:03:44 and that is when you go out about 10 years, 0:03:47 you’re going to look back on the shit that you were really upset about right now, 0:03:50 and you’ll be able to discount it back to the reality of the situation, 0:03:54 and it’s going to seem very small or put another way. 0:03:57 This too shall pass. Don’t be too upset about things. 0:03:58 I don’t know how I got there. 0:04:00 Anyways, what else is going on? 0:04:05 Some big news from my home state of California, Governor Newsom, so handsome, so handsome. 0:04:06 He should be president. 0:04:11 Just anyone that good looking who’s not a village idiot should be president. 0:04:13 I just think it helps to have tall, good-looking people. 0:04:14 I think people take him more seriously. 0:04:19 Anyways, he vetoed SB 1047, an AI safety bill, 0:04:24 aimed to regulate the computing power used to train large artificial intelligence models. 0:04:28 Hollywood and others, including Elon Musk and Jeffrey Hinton, 0:04:31 the godfather of AI, were all for this bill. 0:04:33 So why were they for it? Simple. 0:04:38 So Jeffrey Hinton is very smart, and I think he sees and is justifiably concerned 0:04:42 about the progress of AI and thinks there should be more oversight and regulation. 0:04:48 In addition, California has a habit of leading the nation and the world on thoughtful regulation. 0:04:52 Why do I think it was good for the governor to veto this bill? 0:04:58 Okay, as far as I can tell, this bill essentially was not a bill to regulate AI. 0:05:00 It was a bill to kneecap open AI. 0:05:04 Specifically, it was legislation meant to slow down one company in particular, 0:05:08 and that’s why, quite frankly, Elon Musk was in favor of Mr. Don’t Regulate, 0:05:12 Mr. Tech Libertarian, Get Out of the Way, We’re Smarter Than Government. 0:05:17 Like this, why? Because he’s got his own AI company that is fucking nowhere so far, 0:05:21 and he wants to slow down the leader such that he can catch up. 0:05:23 I just think it’s very disingenuous. 0:05:26 Let’s break down SB 1047, the recently vetoed bill. 0:05:31 This legislation wants to mandate safety testing of AI models that require a certain level of computing power 0:05:33 and cost about $100 million to train. 0:05:36 Okay, the first part of that, there’s nothing wrong with that. 0:05:38 The second part of it, nothing wrong with it. 0:05:42 The bill required companies to add a kill switch to shut down rogue systems 0:05:47 and gave the state the power to sue AI companies if their technology caused harm. 0:05:50 All right, a kill switch makes a lot of sense to me, right? 0:05:52 I’ve never bought that this is sent in. 0:05:55 I think there is always a kill switch, and if there isn’t, they’re lying to you 0:06:00 so they can throw up their arms and say, “No, we want to continue to take ads from Nissan, 0:06:02 and we can’t stop it. Bullshit.” 0:06:05 Notice how all of a sudden Instagram has figured out a way to agegate? 0:06:09 Supposedly it was too complex. They couldn’t figure it out. 0:06:13 And then on the eve of the Kids Online Safety Act, COSA, they figured it out. 0:06:17 It’s pretty easy. They use AI to say, “Okay, clearly, this is a 13-year-old.” 0:06:20 And then when they ask you to verify your age, and it sounds like you’re lying, 0:06:23 they ask you to upload a federal ID, and boom, they have agegated. 0:06:24 What do you know they figured it out? 0:06:28 Isn’t that impressive on the eve of legislation? 0:06:29 There’s a lot of problems with this. 0:06:35 First, the language. If AI companies, if their technology causes harm, okay. 0:06:37 What does that mean, girlfriend? What does that mean? 0:06:41 Like, that’s a pretty wide truck to run shit through. 0:06:43 And I’m definitely a fan of regulating these companies, 0:06:48 but that sounds like just all sorts of class action suits right out of the gates. 0:06:51 In addition, the other thing that was a bit of a tell here 0:06:55 was that they wanted this legislation or this new law to apply to companies 0:06:58 that train over $100 million to train their LLM. 0:07:02 This sounds to me like 98% of the venture capital community 0:07:07 that has funded startups that aren’t open AI 0:07:10 to say, “We want to catch up to open AI and chat to you.” 0:07:12 That is basically running away with it, and they are running away with it. 0:07:15 They have about 70% share of an emerging market. 0:07:18 What’s interesting is just as new technologies that resonate 0:07:20 have faster kind of zero to 60 adoption time, 0:07:23 meaning they get ubiquitous adoption across the general public. 0:07:25 It’s getting shorter and shorter. 0:07:29 It took 10 years for faxes to catch on, 15 years for VCRs to catch on. 0:07:33 It took about two or three years for social media for Instagram to catch on. 0:07:36 And it gets shorter and shorter and shorter. 0:07:40 AI kind of is zero to whatever it was, 10 million users was like, 0:07:42 I don’t know, six or nine months, something crazy. 0:07:46 But just as the emergence or the adoption of these technologies 0:07:47 is happening faster and faster, 0:07:51 so is the emergence of the ultimate duopolys and monopolies that emerge. 0:07:54 Because one company jumps out ahead, has more access to cheap capital, 0:07:57 weaponizes government, soaks up the best human capital, 0:07:59 and kind of runs away with it. 0:08:01 And I think we have a duopoly emerging right now. 0:08:06 And just as Wintel was a source of huge regulatory concern 0:08:10 and probably suppressed a lot of innovation in the ’80s and ’90s, 0:08:12 I think you’re seeing a similar duopoly emerge. 0:08:14 And I’m going to call it open video. 0:08:20 And that is open AI and NVIDIA essentially control 70 and 92% 0:08:25 of the AI market and the AI processor market, respectively. 0:08:26 They’re effectively running away with it. 0:08:29 And if you look at their market capitalizations, 0:08:33 I think they’re just going to have access to a certain level of financial and human capital 0:08:37 that’ll make it hard for them or hard for anyone else to emerge and compete. 0:08:39 There’ll be niche applications, there’ll be all sorts of deals. 0:08:42 The ecosystem itself is going to make a lot of money. 0:08:45 But these guys, in my view, are running away with it. 0:08:49 And so I believe in a progressive tax structure. 0:08:51 And that is, as companies get bigger and make more money, 0:08:52 they should pay more taxes. 0:08:57 By the way, fun fact, corporations are paying their lowest tax rate since 1939 0:09:01 as a percentage of GDP, or is it just basically their tax rates? 0:09:03 Anyways, they’re not paying a lot of taxes right now. 0:09:05 So I think there should be a progressive tax structure. 0:09:09 You should make more money, your marginal tax rate should go up. 0:09:11 But I don’t believe in progressive legislation. 0:09:12 I don’t like selective legislation 0:09:16 that basically harms a certain sector within a sector and not the others. 0:09:17 I think that’s bullshit. 0:09:21 And this to me feels like that we’d like to catch up legislation. 0:09:22 So I’m glad he vetoed it. 0:09:24 He also probably had a lot of political pressure on him. 0:09:27 I did a little bit of back of the envelope math, which I like to do. 0:09:31 Let’s talk about the state budget for California. 0:09:35 The state budget, which is effectively kind of the fifth biggest nation in the world, 0:09:37 is somewhere around a quarter of a trillion dollars. 0:09:39 So what does that mean? 0:09:46 It means that 10%, 10% of California’s budget is or comes from, 0:09:53 I should say 10% of the revenues, comes from the wealth created by two companies in AI, 0:09:54 comes from the AI duopoly. 0:09:58 So you can bet the governor Newsom wakes up in the middle of the night sweating 0:10:01 and his wife turns over and says, “Gov, what’s the problem?” 0:10:03 He said, “I just had this nightmare.” 0:10:05 And she says, “All right, what’s the nightmare?” 0:10:08 And he says, “Well, I had this nightmare that Jensen Huang called me and said, 0:10:13 “I’m going to go be Elon Musk’s roommate in Austin,” or wherever the fuck is in Texas, 0:10:18 because if these companies leave California, you’re talking about a budget hole being blown 0:10:23 the size of a very big hole in the California budget. 0:10:28 The governor noted that 32 of the world’s top 50 AI companies are located in the great 0:10:29 state of California. 0:10:30 Can you believe that? 0:10:35 California has a 64% share of AI companies, and I bet by market capitalization, 0:10:39 it’s 80 or 90%, maybe not that much, because Microsoft’s in Seattle. 0:10:39 I don’t know. 0:10:40 I need to think that through. 0:10:42 I need to think that through. 0:10:46 According to the legislative analyst’s office in 2023, just four major tech companies, 0:10:52 Apple, Google, Metta, and NVIDIA accounted for more than 6% of the state’s total income tax 0:10:53 revenue. 0:10:53 I don’t know what is it. 0:10:54 Cap gains. 0:10:55 I just did that math. 0:11:02 Anyways, this is, in my opinion, incredibly important that we think about getting this 0:11:08 right and trying to balance growth and tax revenue and innovation and jobs with some 0:11:14 sense or some recognition or nod to the fact that not regulating social media and technology 0:11:17 has turned basically an entire generation into addicts. 0:11:18 What do I mean by that? 0:11:22 Just as they’re going through puberty and their brain is getting wired, we are teaching 0:11:24 them to constantly need dopa. 0:11:30 Once they get to a certain age, they’re going to find means of that constant dopa hit through 0:11:32 other means that’ll be pretty unhealthy. 0:11:37 I think you’re going to see addiction, absolutely skyrocket, and it’s going to be reverse engineered 0:11:43 to who are the drug dealers sitting outside of junior high school selling snacks, specifically 0:11:48 Satchinadella, specifically Cinderpichai, and Tim Cook, and Mark Zuckerberg. 0:11:49 Yeah, I said it. 0:11:51 Tim Cook sitting outside of junior high school selling fucking smack. 0:11:53 That is what’s going on here. 0:11:55 These companies need to agegate their devices. 0:12:00 There’s no reason a 16-year-old should have a smartphone or much less be on social 0:12:00 media. 0:12:05 Moving on, California is also in the news for banning legacy and donor admissions at private 0:12:08 universities, including Stanford University, USC, and others. 0:12:11 This ban will take effect in the fall of 2025. 0:12:12 What are legacy admissions? 0:12:15 It’s a practice where certain applicants are given special consideration 0:12:18 because of family or other connections to the school. 0:12:22 Public universities, including the University of California and California State Universities, 0:12:24 have long banned legacy admissions. 0:12:27 So as usual, UC is way out in front of everybody. 0:12:31 By the way, the University of California did away with race-based affirmative action in 1997, 0:12:37 26 years ago, 27 years ago, and went to an adversity score saying, “All right, 0:12:40 if you’re the daughter of an Indian private equity billionaire, you don’t need any help. 0:12:45 But if you’re a white kid from Appalachia from a single parent family and your 0:12:48 mom’s incarcerated, maybe we take that into account.” 0:12:52 And that is absolutely the right way to implement affirmative action. 0:12:54 I’m a beneficiary of affirmative action. 0:12:55 I got Pell Grants. 0:12:56 My mother was a secretary. 0:12:58 She never made more than $40,000 a year. 0:13:03 And that financial aid, that unfair advantage, that discrimination in my favor, 0:13:07 paid off for everybody, which takes me back to legacy admissions. 0:13:09 Legacy admissions actually do have an upside. 0:13:14 And that is they create more affinity, more affection, and greater donors for that school. 0:13:18 And I believe, if you were to say, “Okay, on legacy admissions, we’ll give your kid a leg up.” 0:13:22 But, but we’re going to charge him or her more. 0:13:23 I think you just go straight capitalist here. 0:13:26 The problem, remember Varsity Blues where all those people got stuck in jail, 0:13:31 where Aunt Becky got stuck in jail for paying someone half a million bucks to get her kids 0:13:33 in to pretend that she was a rower? 0:13:34 By the way, I did it entirely wrong. 0:13:36 I went to UCLA and then started rowing. 0:13:37 That made no sense. 0:13:40 Anyways, my attitude is let’s go full capitalist. 0:13:43 These universities, my friends, we’re whores. 0:13:44 Let’s be clear. 0:13:47 But we’re expensive whores that like to think that we’re not whores. 0:13:48 What do I mean by that? 0:13:53 Aunt Becky didn’t go to jail for giving a half a million dollars to get her kid into school. 0:13:56 She went to jail for not giving five million. 0:13:59 In other words, if Aunt Becky had called and said, “Hi, USC. 0:14:01 I’ll give you not even five million. 0:14:02 I’ll give you two million dollars.” 0:14:05 They put Becky’s name. 0:14:08 They’d be like growing pains or whatever the fuck that show was called on the side of a building. 0:14:11 The growing pain center for media and her kid would have got in. 0:14:16 But because she cheaped out and paid someone outside the university half a million dollars, 0:14:20 they called the FBI and the FBI got involved in trying to send a message to a lot of rich 0:14:21 people that this is not cool. 0:14:25 And I get why people think this is wrong. 0:14:26 I get it. 0:14:26 I get it. 0:14:28 But be clear, folks. 0:14:30 We’re still letting in the children of rich people. 0:14:31 They got tutors. 0:14:34 They have access to the industrial tutoring complex. 0:14:35 They have friends on the board. 0:14:36 They get the better recs. 0:14:37 So what do we do? 0:14:39 We take some of that money. 0:14:39 Sure, charge them more. 0:14:41 Your legacy, fine. 0:14:43 We need you to give money and we need you to pay more. 0:14:49 And then we’re going to use that money to offer more seats such that we can let in more kids. 0:14:56 If you had a pill, then when someone took it, made them less likely to be depressed, 0:15:00 less likely to kill themselves, less likely to kill other people, more likely to run for 0:15:04 president, more likely to vote, more likely to get married, more likely to pay a shit ton 0:15:08 of taxes, more likely to be millionaires, less likely to be obese, less likely to be 0:15:11 diabetic, less likely to be incarcerated. 0:15:15 Would you say, I’m not going to give that pill to 91% of the people who want it? 0:15:17 That’s what UCLA does. 0:15:23 Higher ed is the pill, is the treatment, is the ointment, is the pharmaceutical that makes 0:15:24 people’s lives better. 0:15:27 Case in point, the guy on this fucking podcast. 0:15:29 Why are we hoarding it? 0:15:36 So I can feel good about myself and the dean of NYU Stern stands up and says we rejected 85% 0:15:37 of our applicants. 0:15:42 That is tantamount to the head of a homeless shelter bragging that he or she turned away 0:15:44 nine in people that showed up last night. 0:15:48 We are, we are public servants, not fucking Chanel bags. 0:15:52 We’ll be right back for our conversation with Rory Stewart. 0:15:57 Support for Prop 3 comes from Mint Mobile. 0:16:01 There are times when you discover something so incredible, so game-changingly great, 0:16:03 you can’t believe you ever lived without it. 0:16:08 Maybe it’s a specific pair of house slippers or noise-canceling headphones or an actual 0:16:09 full night’s sleep. 0:16:12 Well, Mint Mobile’s phone plans are sort of like that. 0:16:14 Once you hear about them, it’s hard to imagine ever going back. 0:16:15 Here’s why. 0:16:20 When you purchase a three-month plan with Mint Mobile, you pay just $15 a month. 0:16:23 All Mint Mobile plans come with high-speed data and unlimited talk and text delivered 0:16:26 on the nation’s largest 5G network. 0:16:29 You can even keep your phone, your contacts, and your number. 0:16:31 It doesn’t get much easier than that. 0:16:35 To get this new customer offer and your new three-month premium wireless plan for just 0:16:38 15 bucks a month, you can go to mintmobile.com/propg. 0:16:40 That’s mintmobile.com/propg. 0:16:45 You can cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com/propg. 0:16:49 $45 upfront payment required, equivalent to $15 a month. 0:16:51 New customers on first three-month plan only. 0:16:54 Speed slower above 40 gigabytes on unlimited plan. 0:16:57 Additional taxes, fees, and restrictions apply. 0:16:58 See Mint Mobile for details. 0:17:06 Support for PropG comes from Nerd Wallet. 0:17:10 If you’re a listener of the show, you know business, and if you’re looking for a resource 0:17:13 to find financial products that can help you make smart financial decisions, 0:17:15 turn to the Nerds at Nerd Wallet. 0:17:20 Not only have they spent thousands of hours researching and reviewing over 1300 financial 0:17:23 products, but they have the tools you need to make smarter decisions. 0:17:25 Looking for a credit card? 0:17:28 At Nerd Wallet, you can go beyond the basic comparisons, filter for the features that 0:17:31 matter to you, and read in-depth reviews. 0:17:33 Ready to choose a high-yield savings account? 0:17:36 Get access to exclusive deals and compare rates, bonuses, and more. 0:17:39 House hunting, view today’s top mortgage rates for your home sweet home. 0:17:44 Make the Nerds your go-to resource for smart financial decisions. 0:17:47 Head to nerdwallet.com/learnmore. 0:17:49 Nerd Wallet, finance smarter. 0:17:54 Nerd Wallet Compare, Incorporated, NMLS 161 7539. 0:18:01 Support for PropG comes from Fiverr. 0:18:04 In today’s market, your competitive edge isn’t just your product. 0:18:06 It’s also the people who help you make it. 0:18:10 But finding top tier talent can be expensive, time consuming, and often a gamble. 0:18:15 That’s why Fiverr has developed solutions for business to make outsourcing talent simple, 0:18:16 quick, and effective. 0:18:21 With Fiverr Pro, you get access to curated talent through a catalog rigorously vetted, 0:18:24 professional freelancers organized by skill and experience. 0:18:29 You can also connect with dedicated hiring experts who will help you find the perfect match. 0:18:35 Plus, you get seamless collaboration tools and flexible hiring options by project or hourly. 0:18:38 And for anyone seeking more support, Fiverr Pro’s business partners can manage 0:18:41 multiple freelancer engagements for you. 0:18:44 They’ll outline project management, assemble a roster of freelancers, 0:18:47 and manage a schedule to make sure your deliverables are completed on time. 0:18:50 It lets you flex your budget without any headcount constraints. 0:18:53 Fiverr Pro is designed to handle projects of any size, 0:18:58 and empowers you to build faster, scale smarter, and turn today’s projects into tomorrow’s growth. 0:19:06 Visit pro.fiverr.com to sign up and use code “PROFG” for 15% off any service. 0:19:18 Welcome back. 0:19:22 Here’s our conversation with Rory Stewart, the former U.K. Secretary of State for 0:19:26 International Development and co-host of the popular podcast, The Rest Is Politics. 0:19:28 Rory, what does this podcast find you? 0:19:30 I have just got to London. 0:19:35 So, in your recently released head talk, you advocate for a radical way to address extreme 0:19:38 poverty worldwide, giving cash directly to people in poverty. 0:19:43 Give us that pitch for why we should just be giving people in poverty just straight up cash. 0:19:47 Just before we get into the nub of it, I think the important thing is to understand that there 0:19:51 are basically two models in the world, and it’s caught up in this phrase, 0:19:56 teach someone to fish they can eat for lifetime, give them a fish they eat for a day. 0:20:01 And a lot of the fashion in international development, for very understandable reasons, 0:20:06 has been not about giving people things, but instead about giving them training, 0:20:07 knowledge, capacity building. 0:20:16 And cash is very radical because it’s an action of radical humility or essentially saying, 0:20:19 these people have a better idea about their lives and priorities than I do, 0:20:24 and I’m going to get out of the way and give them what they really want, which is cash. 0:20:28 Now, why does it work? And this, we can get into the evidence on it. 0:20:32 The evidence is very striking, hundreds of randomized control trials demonstrating the 0:20:38 impact. My guess for why it works is that firstly, it’s much more flexible. 0:20:44 I think the second thing that it does quite powerfully is it’s generally much more efficient. 0:20:49 I mean, if I give you the cash to fix your own roof in a very poor community, 0:20:53 you can probably get it done for about $150. If I bring in a non-profit, 0:20:58 we’d have to bring in engineers, we’d survey your house, we’d procure your roof, 0:21:01 we’d do all these studies, and we’d end up spending many thousands of dollars, 0:21:04 almost certainly for similar impact. 0:21:11 And then I guess somewhere at the bottom of it is the sense that in many cases, 0:21:16 people already have the knowledge. They already know what business they want to run. 0:21:18 They just lack the capital to get that business off the ground. 0:21:23 So those three things together, I think, are the ingredients that makes cash so effective. 0:21:29 Your comments, I mean, I think true insight is when you state the obvious, but you weren’t, 0:21:32 it wasn’t obvious to you before you heard it. And your comments really resonate because I 0:21:40 equated a little bit to, there’s a DEI apparatus that’s propped up or popped up across every 0:21:46 university in America. And I would argue that it was, these apparatus were apparatus, whatever 0:21:51 its term is, were desperately needed. 60 years ago, 12 black people at Harvard, Princeton, and Yale. 0:21:54 That was an issue. We needed departments to focus on the issue. 0:21:59 Now they have huge apparatus of very well-paid people, a lot of resources. 0:22:04 Harvard’s freshman class is 51% non-white. But these apparatus never go away. 0:22:10 And the way I relate it back to this is all of these non-profits represent a lot of jobs and 0:22:14 a lot of people who make good livings and feel important and feel like they’re doing good work 0:22:19 and have a vested interest in, quite frankly, obstructing a simpler 0:22:25 solution is devising it or positioning it as crass or is not that effective. And 0:22:30 do you see what I’ll call the non-profit infrastructure sort of getting in the way 0:22:34 and being intellectually dishonest about how effective this would be? 0:22:43 Yes. And I was part of that. I mean, I was the UK Secretary of State, so I was the minister 0:22:48 in charge of this $20 billion a year budget and thousands of civil servants doing international 0:22:55 development. And I remember when people first brought this idea of cash to me that I said half 0:23:00 joking, listen, what’s going to happen to all of us, right? There are thousands of us employed, 0:23:04 managing, we’ve all done master’s degrees in agricultural economics. We’re going to be experts 0:23:09 on health programs and remote parts of Liberia. If we’re just giving people cash, what about all 0:23:15 us, right? I realize that it’s a sort of strange thing when you’re inside a bureaucracy. I’m only 0:23:21 half joking. And the fact that that’s my immediate reaction suggests something quite strange about 0:23:27 the way that the mind of the bureaucrat works. So the majority of our listeners are in the U.S. 0:23:32 and for those of you who don’t know, Rory is the co-host of what is probably, I would argue, 0:23:36 the best politics podcast in the world right now called The Rest is Politics. I’m going to ask you 0:23:40 to do something that is nearly impossible, but if you were to give Americans who have 0:23:47 little or no sense of U.K. politics over the last 10 years, can you give us the cliff notes 0:23:52 on what has happened in the U.K. and what you think it represents and what have been the major 0:23:58 sort of shifts around leadership and what the populace has decided and where you think the U.K. 0:24:08 is headed politically, if you will. So I think the first really big date is 2005, when 2005 the 0:24:14 British economy is still bigger than the Chinese economy, not very long ago. That’s crazy. That’s 0:24:20 a great start. It’s amazing. 19 years ago, the U.K. had a bigger economy in China. Yeah. And now the 0:24:26 Chinese economy is about seven times as. So that’s the first big fact. Our relative power in the 0:24:31 world has changed very dramatically. And it’s concealed from us because we’ve gone from being 0:24:35 the fourth largest economy in the world to being the fifth largest economy in the world. But in 0:24:42 relative terms, the shift has been off the scale. Second date, I think is 2010, when a conservative 0:24:47 government was elected, which has been in for the last 14 years and was only finally kicked out by a 0:24:53 more left-wing labor government that came in just in an election just under 100 days ago. And they 0:25:00 came in off the financial crisis, and their watchword was austerity. So they tried to reduce the 0:25:07 debt and deficit. They cut government spending very dramatically. And there’s, as you can imagine, 0:25:12 a huge argument between conservatives and people on the other side about whether that was the right 0:25:19 thing to do for the economy or not. Next date, 2016, Britain votes to leave the European Union. 0:25:26 And that removes us from being part of a single marketer customs union with our 0:25:34 largest trading partner. Next date, I guess, that matters is 2020, when we get into one of the most 0:25:40 aggressive COVID lockdowns in the world, far more so than the US. I mean, people were kind 0:25:44 of shopping their neighbors for gathering in groups and more than three at a barbecue outdoors. 0:25:51 And we’re still calculating the cost of that, but it probably costs the British government 0:25:57 about £400 million, which is a significant, sorry, £400 billion. I’m sorry, I got a thousand, 0:26:04 a thousand off that £400 billion. So a really significant chunk of government expenditure 0:26:09 annually is about a trillion. So about 40% of annual government expenditure was spent on the COVID 0:26:18 response. And then the final thing has been demography. So when we set up our welfare state 0:26:22 before the First World War, there were 20 working people for every one retired person. Today, there 0:26:28 are just under three working people for every one retired person. We’re living longer and longer. 0:26:33 We have a cradle to grave healthcare system that’s getting more and more expensive. In fact, 0:26:39 about 3% more expensive every year than inflation because of aging and the cost of drugs. 0:26:45 And our economic growth has been anemic. Our productivity has been flat since the financial 0:26:52 crisis. And you can imagine as a result of all of that, you have a pretty cross population 0:26:56 and a new government that’s come in feeling it doesn’t have many options because unlike the US, 0:26:59 it’s not the world’s reserve currency. It can’t go and borrow a huge amount. 0:27:05 Describe what you think will be the biggest changes of this new administration relative to the 0:27:10 conservatives over the last 14 years. Well, it’s very difficult to see that at the moment. 0:27:17 I mean, it’s very cosmetic. They’re closer to the unions and they’ve given significant public 0:27:21 sector pay rises as soon as they came in, which of course has made the conservatives 0:27:26 sort of delighted because it plays into their kind of cliches about left-wing governments. 0:27:32 They have however stuck with most of the spending reductions. They’ve promised not to increase 0:27:37 taxes. They’ve promised not to increase borrowing. How do they do that? If they’re going to increase 0:27:42 wages, how do they not increase the deficit of taxes? They’ve cut investment and that again 0:27:46 is pretty troubling. I mean, they’ve stopped most of the rail and road investment. They’ve just 0:27:50 canceled a big supercomputer that was being built in Edinburgh. They’ve announced they’re not going 0:27:56 ahead with big programs to rebuild hospitals. So I think they’re in trouble. I mean, this is a 0:28:02 left-wing government that’s come in after 14 years in which the British public are fed up with 0:28:07 austerity and want more investment in public services. It’s a government that is trying to 0:28:11 reassure the financial markets and felt that the only way of winning the election was to promise 0:28:16 it would never put taxes up, but now finds itself having won a big majority with its hands tied 0:28:23 behind its back by this promise. So what I’d like to do is I want to give you some observations 0:28:29 of a bystander and that as an American who’s lived in London for two years and as a means of 0:28:34 contrasting or using it as a jumping out point for contrasting the US and the little I understand 0:28:39 about the UK, but I’ll give you some observations and I want you to respond to them. The first is 0:28:43 to the upside. As an American here, as someone who’s concerned themselves are progressive, 0:28:49 I find all the dumb arguments in the UK have been put in the past. Assault weapons, well, 0:28:53 of course we don’t have assault weapons, bodily autonomy for women. Well, it’s not even a 0:28:59 conversation or of course women in bodily autonomy. Trans rights, okay, fine. It’s not a big issue 0:29:02 for us. We’re not going to spend a ton of political capital worrying about a second or a third 0:29:09 bathroom. So I really appreciate that about the UK. My observation is that, and this is a question, 0:29:14 I’m genuinely flummoxed by the amount of intellectual property here, the amount of 0:29:20 intellectual capital, the unbelievable quality of the education system. The thing I love most 0:29:24 about the UK is my kids’ schools. I just think they’re fantastic. And I think the universities 0:29:29 here are incredible. I’ve had the good privilege or the good fortune to speak at a bunch of them, 0:29:37 just such incredibly bright people. An amazing culture, a rule of fair play, smart, funny, 0:29:44 and appreciation for the arts, a global culture that appreciates other cultures. And yet they 0:29:51 can’t get out of their own goddamn way. And when I look at London, I think there’s no organic value 0:29:58 creation. The only people I know making money here are serving money made elsewhere. Do you agree 0:30:05 with this? That Britain, the UK still has all the pillars to be just a robust high growth 0:30:13 leadership economy and manages to steal victory from the jaws of defeat. I don’t know why 0:30:19 your thoughts. It’s obviously the central question of British politics. And there’s a lot 0:30:29 of different ideology goes into trying to answer that question. Some of it is cultural. So we have 0:30:35 a big problem with developing technology and ideas and then struggling to finance it. And that seems 0:30:42 to be partly about the risk capital in the UK. I think another thing is that we have really 0:30:49 struggled to unlock the potential of anything outside London and the Southeast. We’ve created a 0:30:53 very unequal economy and some of that is about infrastructure investment. If we had decent 0:30:59 rail and road infrastructure connecting Leeds and Manchester, we would create pretty impressive 0:31:04 urban conurbation and we might be able to generate some serious productivity. Productivity in London 0:31:09 and the Southeast is so far ahead of the rest of the country. And then we get into ideology. I think 0:31:18 we’re too centralized. We should decentralize more. I think we’ve got really in our way when it 0:31:23 comes to planning and building things. I mean, one kilometer a road, one mile a road costs twice 0:31:29 as much to build as what it does in France. We’re struggling to build housing and a lot of that is 0:31:36 because we have this very, very consensual planning system where people discuss everything for years 0:31:43 and every newt and argument good and bad for why houses shouldn’t be built ahead and very little 0:31:50 gets off the ground. So now do the US. You’re a very thoughtful guy. Give us your no mercy, 0:31:57 no malice view of the situation in America. I’m married to an American. I have been teaching at 0:32:05 Yale. So what does the European notice looking at the US? I think one thing is you have a really 0:32:10 magical economy. I mean, there’s something astonishing about what’s happened in the 0:32:15 last 14 years in terms of the divergence from the eurozone. We were almost level pegging in GDP 0:32:24 per capita 14, 15 years ago and US growth rates have shot off. And you’re doing it in a way that 0:32:30 doesn’t really make sense to us. If I was being rude about the US, your state education system 0:32:35 is terrible. I mean, I’ve just been in Chicago. The statistics from Cook County are beyond 0:32:40 belief. The majority of people graduating high school who should not be in any position to 0:32:45 graduate high school in terms of their literacy and numeracy rates. And theoretically, when we 0:32:50 model these things, smart people like you tell us that the way to create productivity is to have a 0:32:56 great education system and all these people coming through. But my goodness, apart from the top, 0:33:01 apart from the kind of the cream of America, these incredible Ivy League universities, 0:33:08 the mass of people are not receiving good education. And you know, God, we’re also completely puzzled 0:33:14 by healthcare and welfare. We’re very puzzled by the fact that it just seems so rich, but also so 0:33:19 poor. I mean, go up and down the Connecticut shoreline, there are just boats everywhere. 0:33:24 I mean, you have tens of millions of people who are astonishingly wealthy, and then 0:33:29 you have people living in Flint, Michigan or in Georgia in conditions that we couldn’t imagine 0:33:33 in Europe. So those are the kinds of things that puzzle us. And I think one of the things 0:33:40 that puzzles us most probably is that an election in Europe, in the UK or Europe, would be talking 0:33:47 about the state education system. It would be talking about public health and health delivery. 0:33:54 That doesn’t seem to be what’s dominating the election between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris 0:33:59 at all. Do you have kids, Rory? Yeah, I’ve got two boys. Two boys, how old? Nine and seven. 0:34:05 You’re in the golden decade, four to 14 are wonderful. Zero to four, we pretend to like it, 0:34:10 we don’t. Once they turn 14, they stop, you know, they no longer look up to you, you become just 0:34:16 this awful person that just warrants eye rolls about 12 times a day. You’re in the golden decade. 0:34:29 My question is where, if they said dad aged 18 to 38, kind of the years starting my career, 0:34:32 getting going, would you want them to live in the US or the UK and why? 0:34:38 At the moment, I’d probably be tempted by them living in the US, I’m afraid. And it’s a terrible 0:34:43 thing to say because I’ve dedicated my whole life to Britain. I was a British politician. I 0:34:50 love this country. I have huge emotional investment in it. But it feels to me as though we are really 0:34:59 lost at the moment. And that’s an awful thing to say. But I’m afraid I understand why so many 0:35:03 people around the world want their children to move to the US. I mean, it just feels as though 0:35:08 there’s more space to come back to the old cliche that there’s more opportunity. 0:35:16 But I hope I’m proved wrong. I hope we can find our way through this malaise and that over the 0:35:22 next decade, we can get the UK back into a situation where I can say this is where our ancestors 0:35:27 are buried. This is where my house is. This is where our roots are and let’s make a go of it. 0:35:32 You described democracy as increasingly fragile. What do you believe are the key 0:35:38 threats to democracy today? I think the first fundamental threat is that liberal democracies 0:35:45 haven’t been delivering well enough for people. I mean, that for about 200 years from the early 0:35:51 1800s, we could tell a story where we convinced ourselves that democracies were naturally more 0:35:57 prosperous. And as people became more prosperous, they became more democratic. And partly because of 0:36:03 the rise of China, but partly because the success of other authoritarian regimes, we’ve broken the 0:36:09 link in which democracies are not necessarily delivering for people. And in certain years, 0:36:13 it feels as though non-democratic states are delivering quite effectively. So that’s one problem. 0:36:19 I think the second, and that is a big problem because I think the reason why people buy into 0:36:24 democracy is not only because they believe in human rights and liberal values, it’s also because 0:36:32 it was making them wealthier. I think the second threat is I’m afraid social media. I think it’s 0:36:38 not a coincidence that the rise of social media from 2003, 2004 onwards and its explosion with 0:36:44 the Arab Spring in 2010, 2011 is part of the story of the rise of populism and the rise of 0:36:51 authoritarianism because I think those are algorithms that drive people into polarized states. And I 0:36:58 think they have been extremely bad for the key bits of democratic discourse in particular, 0:37:03 compromise, meeting in the middle, explaining, having a shared frame of reference. 0:37:09 What in your view is the impact on the UK and Europe of a Trump or a Harris presidency? 0:37:16 Harris presidency, I think, doesn’t trouble people too much. It feels like a continuity 0:37:21 of what went before Biden. And we feel we sort of got a measure of where Joe Biden was coming from. 0:37:28 Trump presidency, I think, is going to be more troubling for people because it will encourage 0:37:36 populists like Viktor Orban in Hungary or Marine Le Pen, who’s this far-right politician running to 0:37:41 be the president of France to feel that they’re entering a new age of strong men or strong women. 0:37:48 We would be worried that he would pretty quickly compromise with Putin in a way that would 0:37:54 effectively give Putin power over Kiev. We would be concerned that 0:38:00 understandable American tendencies towards isolationism and protectionism would accelerate. 0:38:08 And we’d find ourselves facing significant trade barriers and that the world, as a result, 0:38:13 would get less stable and less prosperous. We’ll be right back. 0:38:20 Support for Prop G comes from Anthropic. If you’re not using AI to help your business 0:38:24 run more efficiently, you might be falling behind still. It’s a lot easier to talk about 0:38:29 incorporating AI into your workflow than it is to actually get started. The landscape is cluttered 0:38:33 and technical, and a lot of us are fatigued by the options. If you’re looking for a place to get 0:38:39 started, Claude from Anthropic may be the answer. Claude is a next-generation AI assistant built to 0:38:44 help you work more efficiently without sacrificing safety or reliability. Anthropic’s latest model, 0:38:50 Claude 3.5 Sonnet, can help you organize thoughts, solve tricky problems, analyze data, and more, 0:38:53 whether you’re brainstorming alone or working on a team with thousands of people, 0:38:58 all at a price that works for just about any use case. If you’re trying to crack a problem 0:39:02 involving advanced reasoning, you need to distill the essence of complex images or graphs, 0:39:07 or generate heaps of secure code, Claude is a great way to save time and money. Plus, 0:39:11 the Anthropic leadership team was founded in AI research and built Claude with an emphasis on 0:39:18 safety. To learn more, visit anthropic.com/claude. That’s anthropic.com/claude. 0:39:29 So you brought up some geopolitics. I apologize for skipping around so much here, 0:39:32 but while you’re here, I want to take advantage of this. I’d love to just get your quick thoughts 0:39:42 on the war in Britain’s role or non-role in the Ukraine-Russia war. Ukraine-Russia 0:39:52 has flipped on its head in three very dramatic ways. Initially, nobody expected Russia to go 0:39:57 into Ukraine, and they thought Russia was going to definitely take Kiev. Then they got optimistic 0:40:02 about a counteroffensive, and now we’re in a situation where the Russian economy is growing 0:40:06 fast. They seem to be able to mobilize a lot of people, and they seem to have a lot of missiles. 0:40:16 Ukraine’s survival is dependent on the UK, Europe, but above all the US, putting in tens of 0:40:22 billions of dollars a year, and being prepared to do that again next year. It’s also dependent 0:40:28 on our willingness to take risk in terms of allowing Ukraine to use weapons against Russian 0:40:34 territory and making the very difficult calculation of how Putin’s going to respond to that, 0:40:38 right the way through to whether he’s going to launch tactical nuclear weapons as part of a 0:40:51 response that. So I think we were right to fight. I think had we allowed Putin to simply walk into 0:40:56 Ukraine, a world that was already getting more and more dangerous would get significantly more 0:41:02 dangerous. In fact, I think the failure to respond in 2014 in Crimea, the failure to hold out red 0:41:08 lines in Syria as part of the reason we’re in this trouble. But equally, it’s obvious to all of us 0:41:15 that there needs to be a peace deal, that it’s not credible that Ukraine is going to be able to 0:41:20 achieve all the objectives that its supporters have, and I’m a huge supporter of Ukraine, 0:41:25 but that there needs to be some kind of negotiation. The only hope is that they can 0:41:29 do that negotiation from positional strength and momentum rather than from positional weakness. 0:41:31 The war on the Middle East? 0:41:39 War on the Middle East. Well, I think that too much of what Israel is doing is driven by Netanyahu’s 0:41:47 attempt to hold his coalition together and in particular hold Smotrych and Ben Kavir on the 0:41:54 far right of his coalition on side rather than actual calculation about what is likely to lead 0:41:59 to a more peaceful, stable situation for Israel. What would that be? Let me just press pause there. 0:42:05 What if you felt there was a more thoughtful administration? What do you think, what does 0:42:12 that look like? Well, it has to move very, very quickly towards reconstructing Gaza, 0:42:19 and it has to move very quickly towards some sort of path for political autonomy for Palestine. 0:42:26 It has to balance that with Israel’s security. Now, that’s not easy to do, but we had recipes 0:42:32 for what that might look like in the mid-1990s. We still had those recipes in the mid-2000s and 0:42:42 killing 40,000 people in Gaza and levelling that place. I mean, it’s destroyed and now 0:42:48 launching these attacks into Lebanon don’t seem to me to be part of a long-term plan. 0:42:52 I don’t see where that goes in five or 10 years’ time. I don’t see how that 0:43:01 gets anybody to a situation of stability. I’m afraid with the critics of Netanyahu on this, 0:43:07 I don’t think his objectives, his strategic objectives are achievable. I don’t think he can 0:43:13 eliminate Hamas. I definitely don’t think he can eliminate Hezbollah. If he can’t, 0:43:19 he needs to find a path towards coexistence, however difficult that is. 0:43:28 So just to play a kind of steel man this, so with respect to launching this offensive, 0:43:33 I forget the words used against Lebanon, what would you say to people who say, “Well, 0:43:37 Lebanon has fired 8,500 missiles into Israel over the last 10 years. This war has been going on a 0:43:43 while and that the only way to have some sort of stable peace is to quite frankly terrorize the 0:43:47 terrorists and have a preemptive strike.” Because it’s not as if, I mean, I’m thinking about the 0:43:52 pager detonations, it’s not as if these folks were trying, hoping to give peace a chance and seem 0:43:58 to be really open and biased towards a peace deal. I feel like it’s a very American thing that, 0:44:04 okay, we need peace, we need a ceasefire, versus recognizing throughout history the only way you 0:44:10 kind of get, in my opinion, a stable peace through a war is to win it. And that a lot of what Israel 0:44:16 is doing right now is, in my view, I think Netanyahu’s been diabolical in a disaster for Israel. 0:44:27 But at the same time, I think the response in Gaza has been fully warranted and that the collateral 0:44:36 damage there is horrific, but is on a civilian to combatant ratio more humane or less inhumane 0:44:43 than any recent war that the West has prosecuted. And it strikes me that when the media says that 0:44:49 Israel has escalated the war in Lebanon, I see them as trying to de-escalate future conflict by 0:44:56 going after an incredibly precise anti-terrorist operation, in my view, trying to preempt a 0:44:59 future war that threatens their very existence. Your thoughts? 0:45:07 Well, that’s definitely the view of the people who back it. I just don’t think it works. I don’t 0:45:15 understand how they think this is going to deal with 20,000 armed and highly experienced 0:45:23 Hezbollah veterans who have formed up over 40 years, who fought in Syria, who have 10 times the 0:45:29 number of weapons they had in 2004, including precision-guided munitions, short of a ground 0:45:36 assault into Lebanon, they’re never going to be able to tackle that. And I think a ground assault 0:45:42 into Lebanon is beyond them. I think it’s beyond Israeli capacity, because Hezbollah is a much 0:45:49 more formidable enemy than Hamas and their positions in Lebanon are incomparably more 0:45:57 difficult to attack. So they can blow up pages and they can destroy some missiles. But 0:46:09 the idea that that is going to win a victory, in a way, the logic of your argument would require 0:46:16 them to win a victory so decisive that there’s no coming back. But they can’t do that. They don’t have 0:46:21 those resources. They don’t have the manpower to do that. They don’t have an option of wiping 0:46:24 Hezbollah off the face of the map. 0:46:29 But let’s talk about what are the options to just sit and take it and hope that the 0:46:35 Americans of the West come in with some sort of diplomacy. I agree this is a much more 0:46:40 formidable fighting force. I guess what are the options here? 0:46:47 The options from the very beginning of the State of Israel have been very difficult. This 0:46:55 is a situation in which Israel was created out of conflict and war and has existed through 0:47:04 conflicts and war ever since. That has been the situation since the 1930s. And I guess, 0:47:09 do I think that there is a military end to that? No. 0:47:18 No. I think the situation was best in the mid 1990s when they were getting towards an 0:47:23 accommodation and when they were trying to be serious about what a two-state solution would be. 0:47:29 But I think this path of backing the settlers, backing people and the… 0:47:38 I mean, remember, Smotrych and Ben Gavir don’t want the existing boundaries of Israel. 0:47:41 They don’t even want the existing boundaries of Israel plus the settlements. 0:47:49 They have a vision of a historic Israel from the Bible which involves displacing and occupying 0:47:56 much, much more territory. So there’s no path there. 0:48:02 I feel like it’s unfair to say that without acknowledging that they’re surrounded by people 0:48:05 whose only constitutional amendment is the extermination of Jews. 0:48:11 So it’s one thing to have… I think there’s some outright, far-right bigots on the Knesset. 0:48:16 I think it’s been a disaster for Israel. Oversettlements. 100% I’m with you. 0:48:21 But meanwhile, the only thing I can see resembling a constitution or a mission or a purpose statement 0:48:27 about the Houthis and Hamas is the elimination of Israel and the extermination of Jews. 0:48:35 So that to me, one is awful practices on the part of a government or society. 0:48:41 Another is a genocidal death cult. And it strikes me that this piece we’re talking about that we’d 0:48:47 like, it takes two to tango. My sense is that Israel and the West have come to the table with 0:48:51 some semblance of an offer that Hamas has said they’re not interested in. 0:49:00 Well, there’s many things to unpack there. One is Netanyahu who’s not been serious about any offer. 0:49:06 He has no interest in these peace deals. The more fundamental thing, this is a horrible 0:49:09 thing to talk about, and it’s very difficult to talk about sensitively. 0:49:19 But I guess the question is, what is it exactly that Israel is worried about that they’re trying 0:49:25 to deal with here? There was an extreme barbaric horrifying atrocity in October. 0:49:33 But what actually happened there? What actually happened there was a pretty low tech assault 0:49:39 across a very poorly defended border with the Israeli army and security intelligence services, 0:49:45 I’m afraid, not competently defending that border. If you’re trying to fix that problem, 0:49:50 there is a hell of a lot that you could have done to prevent that assault happening. 0:49:58 And for the last 30 years, there’s been no evidence that Hamas and Hisbollah 0:50:04 posed an existential threat to the survival of Israel, nor what happened horrifying though it was, 0:50:11 was not an existential threat to the survival of Israel. What happened was a brutal horrifying 0:50:16 terrorist assault with all that went with it. And that’s something that could have been dealt with 0:50:21 I’m afraid, by reasonable military security intelligence procedures at a border. 0:50:28 This is also where I disagree with the US’s approach to 9/11. I don’t think 9/11 was an 0:50:34 existential threat to the United States. And I think the way to deal with it is to improve your 0:50:41 intelligence security procedures, not to think that you can somehow solve the problem once and 0:50:46 for all by invading someone else’s country. So you are being intellectually honest. I would 0:50:50 argue that you’re sort of blaming the victim and the second worst day in Jewish history since 0:50:57 the Holocaust does warrant a response. And to your point, when 2800 Americans were killed, 0:51:03 we went on to kill 400,000 Iraqis and Afghanis. And I would argue that in some ways that conflict 0:51:08 set the stage for what’s going on now. And that is an unchecked Iran, because we’ve taken out the 0:51:14 buffer of Iraq. So I agree with you to have the viewpoint you have on Israel would need to require 0:51:20 a similar response on what you feel is probably an over-response from the US. 0:51:24 A crazy response after 9/11. It made no response. I mean, the problem is, 0:51:31 this is too emotionally charged for people on every side. I mean, people have lost relatives, 0:51:35 they’ve seen images of rape and murder and there are hostages being kept. 0:51:42 So nobody’s going to want to think about this in objective terms. Nobody wants to think about 0:51:47 the long term. Nobody, people want revenge. And they want to believe the fantasy that there is 0:51:51 something that you can do that can guarantee this can never happen again. But the world 0:51:57 isn’t like that. And that region isn’t like that. And the same will be true on the Palestinian side. 0:52:04 What they see is 40,000 people killed and women and children dead. And they’re not interested 0:52:08 in having any conversation around this either, because everybody is too traumatized. 0:52:16 I want to move to something lighter. I don’t want to end on that. So I don’t know how to segue 0:52:21 out of this. I’m going to ask you two very, very trivial questions. The first is we’re going back 0:52:25 to our sons. We have a lot of young men who listen to this podcast, a lot of new dads. 0:52:32 What are your observations around parenting being a good partner and being a good father? 0:52:39 I think it’s very easy to say that you acknowledge that your children 0:52:45 are different to you. But in practice, it’s very difficult to lift that out. I mean, the great 0:52:51 wisdom is that these are very different human beings with very different characters and minds, 0:52:59 and they’re going to find their own paths. But there is so much in our parenting, which is about 0:53:04 trying to model the parenting that we received or repeat the parenting we received or 0:53:11 to try to make kids do things which we enjoyed or read books which we like reading or become the 0:53:16 kind of people that we either were or even worse trying to become the kind of people we wished 0:53:24 we were. So getting out of their way and getting the balance between really testing them, challenging 0:53:32 them, pushing them, but also accepting when they’re not going to be very good at something, 0:53:35 acknowledge when they’re not going to enjoy something. I mean, I’m struggling with this 0:53:39 in my seven-year-old at the moment. I’m obsessed with reading books. I read books all the time. 0:53:43 He tells me he doesn’t really like reading books. So we’re in a continual 0:53:49 standoff where I, of course, say to myself, “Oh, he just says that, and I just need to find the 0:53:54 right book for him.” So the poor boy is now buried under 200 different books that I’ve 0:53:59 tried to produce in the hope that I can. And I come up with every kind of bribe and trick 0:54:03 and story to try to get him to do these things. Maybe at some point, I have to acknowledge that 0:54:06 he actually, when he says he wants to play football instead of reading a book, he genuinely does 0:54:10 want to play football instead of reading a book. Let me just say it gets worse. 0:54:19 I have the same issue around, I would really like to inspire my kids to get their face out of 0:54:23 other phones and to read more. And for me, it was in junior high school, this great book series 0:54:27 called “The Great Brain” about a young kid who is smart and funny. Do you know this? 0:54:29 Oh, I’m going to write that down. 0:54:34 That was wonderful. It was just really fun. It was about a kid in, I think, 19th century 0:54:39 middle America, and just his adventures and how he was always kind of, I know, 0:54:45 was kind of very mark twain like. And then as I got into high school, I started reading John Irving, 0:54:50 and I just thought that was so wonderful. Anyways, your turn. What, if I were to try 0:54:55 and put a book in front of my 17 or 14 year old that might inspire them or reignite them, 0:54:57 their interest in reading, what are two or three titles you would recommend? 0:55:06 Well, I think getting people into really good short detective and spy fiction is a great way 0:55:13 of developing people’s literary tastes and skills while having fun. So I think Michael Connolly, 0:55:17 who writes these amazing Los Angeles police detective procedural novels, is great. 0:55:24 The Harry Bosch series, I think, John Le Carré’s spy stories, I mean, it’s a little bit more adult, 0:55:31 but he is an extraordinary pro stylist. There’s a great French detective writer, George Cimanon, 0:55:36 but it’s very short books and may great novels. But I also think nonfiction is fantastic. 0:55:42 There’s some great stuff for us recently about, well, I think that you’ve all know Harari’s 0:55:50 Sapiens is a great thing for a young adult to get into. There’s an American academic at Edinburgh 0:55:53 called Steve Bruce. He’s written a great book called The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs, 0:56:00 which I’d recommend. It’s a lovely book because he’s explaining some pretty complex stuff about 0:56:08 paleontology through stories of his friends in Poland and his adventures. So I’d be trying to 0:56:14 ship that at them. I think historical novels can also be a great way through. 0:56:19 I don’t know how young your youngest son is, maybe a little old now, but there’s a series 0:56:24 called the Young Samurai series set in Tokugawa, Japan for about 1600. 0:56:26 Do you see Shogun? 0:56:29 Yeah, exactly. It’s very much Shogun for children. 0:56:29 Wonderful. 0:56:31 I read Shogun when I was 15 and loved it. 0:56:37 Yeah, James Clavel. I remember that. I like all of those. Rory Stewart is the former UK 0:56:41 Secretary of State for International Development and co-host of the popular podcast The Rest is 0:56:47 Politics. He serves as a senior advisor to give directly a notable direct cash charity and his 0:56:52 professor in the practice of grand strategy at the Yale Jackson School of Global Affairs. 0:56:55 Rory is also the author of several books, including The Places in Between, How Not to 0:57:01 Be a Politician and Politics on the Edge. I could go on forever, but the thing I found so interesting 0:57:07 here is that he walked on foot for two years across Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, India, 0:57:15 and Nepal in 2002. Rory, I could not disagree with you more on Israel, but I find you are so 0:57:22 sober and thoughtful and reserved and intellectually honest about your comments, 0:57:27 that it softens the beach for me, and while I haven’t changed my view, I do learn. 0:57:32 And I hope that more people are exposed to you and your views, because even if they don’t change 0:57:37 their mind, it just helps us all move forward and think, all right, there’s got to be a way 0:57:41 we can find common ground here. Thank you for your good work. I really enjoyed this conversation. 0:57:43 Thank you, Scott. Really appreciate it. 0:58:01 Out of happiness, I was really moved by a TikTok I saw of a young woman who was talking, 0:58:07 she had left her house for the first time without a wig. She suffers from alopecia, 0:58:12 has some baldness, hair loss, whatever you want to call it. And she said it was the first time 0:58:17 she’d left her house without a wig, and it was a very trying and emotional moment for her, 0:58:22 and that she wasn’t going to let alopecia rule her life. And I really related to it in the sense 0:58:30 that I think as young people, we’re just so focused, we’re so insecure, we’re insecure beings, 0:58:35 and we’re insecure for a reason. You’re meant to be worried about shit, because that’s a survival 0:58:40 instinct. You’re meant to worry about what others think about you, because being shaming and kicked 0:58:46 out of the tribe meant certain death. So shame and also your attractiveness to mates wanting to be 0:58:53 attractive such that the species propagate. I think that men are especially susceptible to 0:59:00 shaming around their economic viability, and women are unfairly judged based on their aesthetics. 0:59:03 So I think there can be especially insecure around their looks, especially young people. 0:59:10 And it kind of took me back to when I lost my hair. Believe it or not, my hair used to be one 0:59:14 of my best features. I had a ponytail in graduate school, which is an image, isn’t it? And then 0:59:19 when I started losing my hair, it was just sort of devastating is the wrong word, but it was really 0:59:23 upsetting. And the worst thing about losing your hair is the losing part. It’s great to have a full 0:59:29 head of hair. It’s great, in my opinion, to be bald. I love having a shaved head. But the in-between 0:59:33 is what sucked. And it used to be a huge source of insecurity and upset for me that I was losing 0:59:37 what I thought was my best feature. And obviously it represents the loss of masculinity and youth and 0:59:43 all those good things. But what I would say to anyone who’s struggling with one thing about their 0:59:49 physical appearance, keep in mind that people just look at you and they make an assessment 0:59:55 on the whole you. And I was looking at this woman, she had really cool nails and beautiful skin and 1:00:01 a nice smile. And I remember thinking that people who look at her or men that look at her think, 1:00:05 oh, there’s a nice looking woman. And they might think, if they look closely, oh, she has hair loss, 1:00:10 but they don’t, it’s not that what they zero in on. They zero in on how the whole person, 1:00:15 your personality, your intellect, your character, your smile, your clothes, the way you dress. 1:00:20 So my advice to young people is to lean into your strengths. I started working out such that 1:00:28 I could take advantage of some of my strengths. And I tried to take some pride in the way I dress, 1:00:33 despite the fact that losing your hair in your 20s is not a very good look. I also had terrible 1:00:38 acne when I was younger. And I started getting scarring on my face, which I was really self-conscious 1:00:43 about. And then I remember telling my ex-wife that I was so self-conscious about my acne scars. 1:00:48 And she looked at me and she said, where do you have acne scars? And I thought, wow, people really 1:00:54 don’t notice what you think they’re noticing. And so what you’re going to be upset about when you get 1:01:02 older is not that you had acne, not that you had hair loss, not that you’re a little bit overweight, 1:01:07 whatever it might be, you’re going to be upset at how upset you were. Don’t focus on the little 1:01:11 things. Don’t focus on what’s wrong with you. The thing you’re going to be upset about is looking 1:01:15 back. You’re going to wish you’d been kinder to yourself. You’re going to realize that you were 1:01:22 better looking than you thought. This episode was produced by Caroline Shagren. Jennifer Sanchez 1:01:27 is our associate producer. And Drew Burroughs is our technical director. Thank you for listening 1:01:31 to the Prop G Pod from the Vox Media Podcast Network. We will catch you on Saturday for No 1:01:37 Mercy, No Mouse, as read by George Hahn. And please follow our Prop G Markets Pod wherever you 1:01:40 get your pods for new episodes every Monday and Thursday. 1:01:51 Whew. I got a zit coming out of my face. I’ve not a zit in a while. 1:02:02 Makes me feel 18 again, actually makes me feel 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 again. Oh my god.
Rory Stewart, the former UK Secretary of State for International Development and cohost of the popular podcast, The Rest is Politics, joins Scott to discuss geopolitics, the state of politics in the US and the UK, and his recent TEDTalk where he advocates for a radical way to address extreme poverty worldwide.
Follow Rory, @RoryStewartUK.
Scott opens with his thoughts on Governor Newsom vetoing SB 1047, an AI safety bill. He then gets into more news out of California, specifically the banning of legacy and donor admissions at private universities.
0:00:06 Will the VP debate move the needle in what’s shaping up to be a neck-and-neck election? 0:00:09 You never know in advance what will be the thing that matters and the thing that doesn’t 0:00:10 matter. 0:00:18 But Donald Trump will be almost 80, and J.D. Vance will be one cheeseburger away from 0:00:20 the presidency should they win. 0:00:25 I’m Preet Bharara, and this week, The Atlantic magazine’s David Frum joins me on my podcast 0:00:29 Stay Tuned with Preet to break down what happened at the debate. 0:00:31 The episode is out now. 0:00:35 Search and follow Stay Tuned with Preet wherever you get your podcasts. 0:00:36 Hi, everyone. 0:00:43 I’m Brené Brown, and I’d love to tell you about a new series that’s launching on Unlocking 0:00:44 Us. 0:00:47 I’m calling it the On My Heart and Mind Podcast series. 0:00:50 It’s going to include conversations with some of my favorite writers on topics ranging 0:00:55 from revolutionary love and gun ownership to menopause and finding joy and grief. 0:00:58 The first episode is available now, and I can’t wait for you to hear it. 0:01:01 All new episodes will drop on Wednesdays, and you can get them as soon as they’re out 0:01:08 by following Unlocking Us on Apple or wherever you listen to your podcasts. 0:01:09 Welcome to Raging Moderates. 0:01:11 I’m Scott Galloway. 0:01:13 And I’m Jessica Tarliff. 0:01:18 Jess, so I’m trying to think, something happened, what’s happened recently? 0:01:19 What’s gone on here? 0:01:20 Can’t put my finger on it. 0:01:21 Can’t put your finger on it? 0:01:22 Let’s remind everybody. 0:01:24 Let’s play our greatest hits. 0:01:26 Roll tape. 0:01:31 One or just to follow up on that, the question was can you explain the discrepancy? 0:01:35 All I said on this was, is I got there that summer and misspoke on this. 0:01:39 So I will just, that’s what I’ve said. 0:01:45 So I was in Hong Kong and China during the democracy protest went in. 0:01:50 And from that, I learned a lot of what needed to be in governance. 0:01:52 He is still saying he didn’t lose the election. 0:01:55 I would just ask that, did he lose the 2020 election? 0:01:57 Tim, I’m focused on the future. 0:02:03 Did Kamala Harris censor Americans from speaking their mind in the wake of the 2020 COVID situation? 0:02:07 That is a damning, that is a damning non-answer. 0:02:09 It’s a damning non-answer for you to not talk about censorship. 0:02:13 Obviously, Donald Trump and I think that there were problems in 2020. 0:02:14 We’ve talked about it. 0:02:15 I’m happy to talk about it further. 0:02:19 But you guys attack us for not believing in democracy. 0:02:24 The most sacred right under the United States democracy is the First Amendment. 0:02:25 Thank you, Governor. 0:02:30 And just to clarify, for our viewers, Springfield, Ohio does have a large number of Haitian 0:02:35 migrants who have legal status, temporary protected status. 0:02:36 Thank you. 0:02:38 Senator, we have so much to get to. 0:02:44 I think it’s important because the rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact check. 0:02:47 And since you’re fact checking me, I think it’s important to say what’s actually going 0:02:48 on. 0:02:51 Those laws have been on the book since 1990. 0:02:52 Thank you, gentlemen. 0:02:56 The CBB One app has not been on the books. 0:03:02 Gentlemen, the audience can’t hear you because your mics are cut. 0:03:04 We have so much we want to get to. 0:03:06 Thank you for explaining the legal process. 0:03:07 Wow. 0:03:10 Jess, your thoughts? 0:03:17 I was on such an extreme emotional roller coaster last night watching this debate. 0:03:24 I was at Fox watching it with Kellyanne Conway, which is an incredible way to watch a debate 0:03:29 because she understands politics at a level far beyond me. 0:03:34 She’s obviously very close to the Trump side of things, but also can be very objective 0:03:35 about things. 0:03:38 So I always kind of love to be able to bounce things off of her. 0:03:45 But for the first few minutes, when it seemed like Tim Walls was going to lose his cookies 0:03:49 live on stage, I thought it was going to be catastrophic. 0:03:53 I just switched to praying, like, these things don’t matter, right? 0:03:54 We’re going to be fine. 0:03:57 This is about Trump and this is about Kamala. 0:04:02 And I was that way for about 10 minutes or so and was getting text messages from people 0:04:07 who even work on the campaign, very, very, very concerned. 0:04:12 And then I kind of leveled out to this was fine. 0:04:16 And that’s where I ended and it’s where most people seem to end and we can go into the 0:04:18 snap holes of it. 0:04:23 But the roller coaster of emotions, the feeling that JD Vance was everything that we thought 0:04:30 he would be, that he would present really well, that there wouldn’t be a misused word. 0:04:36 There was a lot of lying, but it all sounded excellent, which was the expectation. 0:04:41 And one thing and other people have commented on this and huge majorities of people who watched 0:04:43 the debate did as well. 0:04:49 It was so nice to have a substantive exchange of ideas that wasn’t petty. 0:04:51 There wasn’t name calling to it. 0:04:57 They were pretty polite, civil to each other when they agreed, they said, I’m an agreement 0:04:58 this way. 0:05:00 I guess it’s the epitome of Minnesota nice. 0:05:04 Since we know what walls thinks of Vance and we know what Vance thinks of walls. 0:05:07 But I think that that elevated this debate. 0:05:10 And there were a lot of people saying online, like, this is how the presidential debate 0:05:12 should have been. 0:05:16 It would have been, we would have been much better served if it had this kind of tone. 0:05:21 Yeah, I think that’s a good summary. 0:05:26 I thought to myself, I thought coming out of it, I’ve thought all along people underestimated 0:05:27 Vance. 0:05:30 I think she’s very, very intelligent. 0:05:35 And this darkness, this weirdness has the media’s run with it. 0:05:39 And that is just blatant, I don’t know how to put it any other way, misogyny. 0:05:43 There’s just a weirdness there to the guy and the media’s run with that and positioned 0:05:45 him as weird. 0:05:47 He is very intelligent. 0:05:52 He went to Yale Law School, which is three years in debate training, basically. 0:05:56 And I think on a balanced scorecard, you’d have to give the debate to him. 0:06:04 I don’t think, I mean, his ability to sort of bob and weave, you know, did Donald Trump 0:06:07 win the election or did Joe Biden win the election, that straight up question. 0:06:14 He managed to go to, well, Hillary refused to acknowledge the election, at least initially. 0:06:16 And even worse, you guys are engaging in censorship. 0:06:18 Now, that’s all bullshit. 0:06:21 Hillary did show up to the inauguration. 0:06:23 She did say, she did concede. 0:06:29 The notion that conservatives are somehow being censored is just so ridiculous. 0:06:35 It’s like, a decent tell is if someone screams censorship, it means they will not shut the 0:06:39 fuck up and that they’re everywhere, everywhere. 0:06:43 If you look at the people who are the biggest promoters of this myth around censorship in 0:06:51 America, they generally have one of the 10 most downloaded podcasts in the world. 0:06:59 So I kind of had a gag reflex around the lies, but he told them well. 0:07:01 He was very agile. 0:07:06 When I’m on boards, one of the first things I recognize, the key attributes of a successful 0:07:12 CEO of a big company is that they have to be a bit sociopathic. 0:07:16 And that is, I’ve been in all hands, or I’ve gone to in all hands as a director where the 0:07:20 CEO stands up and talks about the great future of the company, knowing that at 6 a.m. the 0:07:25 next morning, 15% of the staff of the workforce or 3,000 people are going to have their emails 0:07:30 shut off, their phones turned off, and they’re gone. 0:07:33 They’ll get an email from HR saying please call us. 0:07:35 You are no longer working in this firm. 0:07:40 And you’d think the guy was addressing his family at Thanksgiving dinner. 0:07:42 There’s just a sociopathy there. 0:07:47 And I was thinking about to go into a situation like this with so much pressure. 0:07:51 You’re plucked out of Minnesota governorship. 0:07:53 So much is riding on this. 0:07:59 I think that any human is going to have the same reaction, at least initially, that Governor 0:08:00 Wallace had. 0:08:02 And that is, he was a little bit nervous. 0:08:08 I thought he was better as the night went on, but Vance looked calm, cool, collected. 0:08:14 He was able to do all sorts of, he was very agile on his feet, came across as incredibly 0:08:15 bright. 0:08:23 The big winner, in my view, is America because this is how our elected representatives are 0:08:25 supposed to equip themselves. 0:08:27 They’re supposed to occasionally find common ground. 0:08:33 They interrupted each other, but only occasionally they were polite. 0:08:34 They acted like men. 0:08:36 I mean, they acted like grown fucking men. 0:08:41 And I thought, well, hopefully what this does is it shows that when you put Donald Trump 0:08:45 on stage or in any environment, it’s just chaos and bullshit. 0:08:48 But I’m not sure people will do that second order thinking. 0:08:50 So in some, I think America was the winner. 0:08:54 I think in terms of the race itself, I think it was probably a nothing burger. 0:08:58 VP debates have rarely been more than just sort of media fodder. 0:09:03 On a balanced, on a scorecard, I’d probably give the win to Vance. 0:09:04 Okay. 0:09:11 So a couple of things from that, I mean, we’re largely in agreement, but on the, the win 0:09:15 for Vance, because that was my feeling too. 0:09:20 And it was kind of like the elites vibe, you know, those of us who are now sitting with 0:09:23 podcasting equipment the day after this. 0:09:27 But when they were talking to undecided voters in these focus groups or doing these snap 0:09:31 polls, that wasn’t people’s overwhelming view of it. 0:09:33 So in general, it was a bit of a wash. 0:09:36 Vance and a couple had like a two point advantage. 0:09:38 Walls did it and a couple of them. 0:09:40 Most of it, it was like, this was a tie. 0:09:43 And it did not feel like a tie to me. 0:09:48 Even walls is going back and listening to the clips of where walls really succeeded didn’t 0:09:52 even hit me that, that well when it was happening. 0:09:57 And I don’t know if that was my protective crouch that I was in through the entire thing. 0:09:59 But there was more to the story. 0:10:04 So putting aside like who won or, or who lost, you know, it wasn’t like Kamala versus Trump 0:10:11 in that sense, but the favorability numbers are staggering from the CNN snap poll. 0:10:14 Walls was plus 14, went up to plus 37. 0:10:18 And Vance improved as well, but negative 22 to negative three. 0:10:22 So it’s like, we really hated you and now we just kind of dislike you. 0:10:24 That makes a difference. 0:10:28 Walls did better on who came across as reasonable versus extreme. 0:10:32 I’m sure we’re going to talk about the abortion issue, but that was one where JD Vance, even 0:10:36 though he, he said a lot of things that I think helped the Republican cause, like actually 0:10:41 talking about supporting women and being pro family and acknowledging that Republicans 0:10:43 have been terrible on this issue. 0:10:48 But people heard him loud and clear, which is if you live in a state that essentially 0:10:51 has an abortion ban, you live in a state that has an abortion ban and that really teed 0:10:52 up walls. 0:10:56 One of my favorite lines was that the right to control your own body shouldn’t depend 0:10:58 on geography. 0:11:01 That really stuck with me. 0:11:04 So reasonable versus extreme prepared to be president. 0:11:08 He had an edge on obviously the favorability and an abortion and healthcare and Vance’s 0:11:13 lead on the economy and immigration was like a couple points. 0:11:18 And those need to be blowout issues for Trump to win. 0:11:24 Now again, Vance is not top of the ticket and that was very clear from all of this. 0:11:31 But taken together, you obviously want to succeed in every opportunity that you have. 0:11:38 And it does feel like walls was able to accomplish even becoming or being part of the ban on 0:11:40 the divine side of this. 0:11:49 So if Trump is viewed as a cancer by a lot of people, Vance did not make it easier for 0:11:53 people to go to the Trump side of things. 0:11:57 Walls increasing his favorability, coming off as moderate and also so experienced. 0:11:58 I wanted to talk to you about this. 0:12:04 I was blown away by how much he relied on his background experience. 0:12:06 I mean, he talked about what he did as a congressman. 0:12:10 He talked about what they’re doing in Minnesota as governor, all the affordable housing units 0:12:11 he built. 0:12:14 Why they are the medical corridor, I think is what it’s called. 0:12:18 Why 3M is there, why all the health insurance companies are there. 0:12:21 Why it’s good to be a Minnesotan and what he’s done to do that. 0:12:26 And if you were watching the debate and you didn’t know that JD Vance was the senator 0:12:30 from Ohio and I told you he was the senator of Alaska, you could believe it. 0:12:31 If I said, “Oh, that guy? 0:12:32 He’s from Tennessee.” 0:12:34 And he just doesn’t have the accent. 0:12:35 You could believe it. 0:12:36 He said he’s from California. 0:12:40 I mean, he’s wearing a pink tie, which I thought was so lame. 0:12:43 You want women to like you, so you’re wearing a pink tie. 0:12:45 But he had no identity. 0:12:48 I have no idea who JD Vance is from that. 0:12:51 And like it or not, I know exactly who Tim Walls is. 0:12:57 We’ll be right back. 0:13:01 So everything you’re saying I find myself agreeing with, but I do think there’s a little 0:13:04 bit of bias there. 0:13:05 Call me out. 0:13:06 Yeah. 0:13:12 I think Walls, I think Walls’ best line was, and the reason Minnesota has the best healthcare 0:13:15 rating or whatever it is in the United States is simple. 0:13:17 We trust women and we trust doctors. 0:13:20 I thought that was very powerful. 0:13:24 But Vance was able to, I mean, here’s the bottom line. 0:13:29 Vance did more while having less to work with. 0:13:33 I mean, he’s literally at this point, the circus clown behind the elephant scooping 0:13:35 up Trump’s shit. 0:13:42 He’s the one that has to take the weirdness and somehow starch it, manicure it, shape-shift 0:13:47 it into something sort of reasonable on bodily autonomy. 0:13:48 We’ve pushed it back to the state. 0:13:51 They position it as freedom somehow. 0:13:55 And that is, it’s freedom in the sense that states should be able to decide that the federal 0:14:00 government should get out of, he almost positions it as we’re the one that cares about bodily 0:14:06 autonomy because we’re giving the states the autonomy to make their own decision. 0:14:12 He framed things that I find vile as almost kind of acceptable or understandable. 0:14:14 That was not easy. 0:14:17 I think Walls has a lot to work with. 0:14:21 Walls could, I mean, the bottom line is he’s facing, they’re not really debating each other. 0:14:24 They’re debating the top of the ticket. 0:14:29 And Walls has on the other side a guy who’s an insurrectionist and has been found liable 0:14:33 of sexual abuse, which in any other language is rape. 0:14:36 Walls had more to work with. 0:14:41 Vance given what he has, the cart, you know, the hand he’s been dealt came out, I thought 0:14:42 pretty good. 0:14:47 The bottom line though is I think this is a split decision and a nothing burger as it 0:14:49 relates to the race. 0:14:52 They both, I would say they both cemented their brand. 0:14:56 I think Walls is likable, and Vance is intelligent. 0:14:59 And that’s what I kind of came away, that that is their core brand. 0:15:03 But as it relates to the race, I don’t see this having any impact. 0:15:04 What are your thoughts? 0:15:10 In a tide race, which is where we are, there were new polls out this morning from the Cook 0:15:16 Political Report, you know, we’re in a margin of error race, and I doubt that that is going 0:15:17 to change. 0:15:21 Like maybe a couple states might move in X direction, or we know that Dems would be 0:15:26 favored in the blue wall states versus the Sun Belt for Trump. 0:15:32 And maybe I’m being liberal optimistic, liberal in my political sense, not liberal in how 0:15:41 I’m viewing this, but I think every moment counts, there’s 34 days to go, there’s already 0:15:48 an add up about the January 6th answer, and you know, not being able to say that Trump 0:15:56 lost in 2020, Harris camp already has it going, where it says the past will be the future. 0:16:01 And for the Republicans that are considering voting for Harris, people who came over in 0:16:06 2020, or maybe didn’t, maybe then saw January 6th, and were like, oh my God, we got to get 0:16:07 out of here. 0:16:11 This is like a burning building when it comes to preserving democracy. 0:16:12 Those kinds of things hit. 0:16:20 So even if this is just something that adds fodder to campaigns, or the campaigning, 0:16:22 I think it does matter. 0:16:27 And Walls is now, it seems like from his schedule going to be freed a bit more, we were talking 0:16:33 about it yesterday on the first podcast of the week, that Walls was so good at doing 0:16:35 media and then was kind of hidden away. 0:16:39 And you could see from last night that he really would have benefited from doing a few 0:16:40 Sunday shows. 0:16:45 JD Vance is out there, and he will say anything to anybody, you know, that interview with 0:16:49 Dana Bash was completely humiliating, good on him, that he’s going to go and do it. 0:16:54 And I think that Walls coming out of the gate suffered for not having those kinds of 0:16:56 reps. 0:17:01 And I hope that it is just, you know, what is it, balls to the Walls spelled like his 0:17:05 last name, that he’s just everywhere now, because he does have that charm, even for 0:17:10 something that is egregious and damaging. 0:17:14 You can’t think the guy is rotten to his core. 0:17:18 And JD Vance, you can think is slick and intelligent and all these things. 0:17:22 But a lot of people clearly are deeply suspicious of the character of the man. 0:17:26 And that was not abated by what happened last night. 0:17:30 We played in the montage the question, the response about Tiananmen Square and like where 0:17:32 he was. 0:17:37 And those little embellishments, they obviously haven’t heard him in dramatic fashion, like 0:17:39 in his favorability. 0:17:44 But I was very disappointed that there wasn’t a clear good answer, because the answer is 0:17:45 what he got to eventually. 0:17:46 I misspoke. 0:17:51 I was still there during the democracy protest, you’re talking about an eight-week differential 0:17:53 decades ago. 0:17:55 It doesn’t define who I am. 0:18:00 What defines who I am is that I celebrate democracy, and I created this humanitarian 0:18:01 exchange with China, et cetera. 0:18:06 I mean, do you think that stuff matters, or it’s just I’m being irritated as someone 0:18:08 too deep in politics? 0:18:11 The low point of the debate for either of them was that moment for walls. 0:18:15 Because he just said, I got carried away, I misspoke, I screwed up. 0:18:19 I’ve been to China, and I misspoke, and I apologize if I was wrong. 0:18:21 I just think he could have ended it there. 0:18:26 Instead it was sort of like asking your eight-year-old if they spelled their coke, and it was a little 0:18:30 bit of like awkwardness and feels like he’s not being totally fourth. 0:18:34 It was just the awkward moment of the debate, and it didn’t need to be awkward. 0:18:37 I agree with you that every moment counts. 0:18:40 The question is, was this moment consequential? 0:18:41 I don’t think it is. 0:18:47 I would argue that over the next 48 hours, how either campaign responds and/or leverages 0:18:53 and seizes a moment around Haleen and Israel is going to be much more consequential. 0:18:58 I think if either camp has seen as much more powerful, strong, deft at handling, either 0:19:04 exploiting Haleen and showing up in a jacket that says FEMA and being attentive to people’s 0:19:10 needs or being seen as strong on what’s happening in the Middle East. 0:19:16 There’s always an unintended foul ball out of nowhere that might change the game or whatever 0:19:18 the term is. 0:19:19 I don’t think this was that. 0:19:23 I think at 48 hours, if not 24 hours, I don’t even think we’re going to be talking about 0:19:24 this, Jess. 0:19:25 I just don’t. 0:19:27 It was a split decision. 0:19:28 Some people would go for walls. 0:19:32 I like what Jim Barksdale did, the former CEO of Netscape and AT&T said, and that is 0:19:36 if we’re going with opinions, let’s go with mine, otherwise let’s look at the data. 0:19:41 You brought some data, and it does look as if walls did better than I thought. 0:19:46 Having said that, I think we’re going to be talking about, I think this is going to shit 0:19:48 through a goose in the media cycle. 0:19:52 I think we’re going to be talking about some pretty consequential things that happen here. 0:19:56 I think either Israel or Haleen are going to have much more impact on this race and 0:19:57 what happened last night. 0:20:01 I was disappointed actually in the conversation around those two central issues. 0:20:03 The first question out of the gate. 0:20:05 Ukraine never came up. 0:20:07 Ukraine never came up. 0:20:13 An adjacent point going in vans for his isolationist stance, vans voted against Israel aid and 0:20:14 Ukraine aid. 0:20:17 That’s a layup for people. 0:20:22 People support helping our democratic partners and allies, especially when there’s an authority 0:20:25 in breathing down their necks. 0:20:27 I thought that was a missed opportunity. 0:20:29 We knew it was coming. 0:20:36 First question, and JD DeVance, I think has a very bad view on this and didn’t get held 0:20:40 to account on it, and walls went a little meandering about it. 0:20:45 He got out the right words about standing with Israel, but I thought he could have done 0:20:49 much better on that as well, because it has turned out to be more of a strong suit for 0:20:56 Kamala Harris than people expected, starting with the DNC speech and then moving on to 0:20:57 now. 0:21:04 JD Vance in his plus column, and this might be why you felt that he had the edge and that 0:21:10 I was sweating so bad about this, but he nailed all the lines Trump was supposed to nail. 0:21:14 You’ve had three and a half years to be able to fix this. 0:21:18 Don’t tell me what you’re going to do when you are essentially the incumbent, and we 0:21:22 know Vice President doesn’t have much power, but that is something that resonates with 0:21:23 people. 0:21:25 I thought that he nailed that. 0:21:26 Yeah. 0:21:32 Also, just a quick shout out to the raging moderators, Margaret Brandon and Norah Donald. 0:21:33 I thought they did a great job. 0:21:36 I get the sense that two of us should have brunch with them. 0:21:40 I think they’d love to have brunch with one of us, and it’s not the tall bald guy in 0:21:45 the UK right now, but I know Margaret a little bit because I’ve been on Face the Nation 0:21:46 a few times. 0:21:47 I don’t know if you’ve heard that. 0:21:48 No, I haven’t. 0:21:49 No, I haven’t. 0:21:50 I haven’t heard of it. 0:21:51 Girl can dream. 0:21:54 Long-winded way of saying, I thought the moderators are great. 0:21:58 I thought the whole thing was well done, made me feel good. 0:22:05 I really hope that all people up and down the ballot take a note from a patroness playbook 0:22:11 on this is how debates and candidates are supposed to handle themselves, and I really 0:22:16 do think that Margaret Brandon and Norah Donald were the clear winners. 0:22:23 I mean, this also might just be a lady thing that I was feeling at this level, but I loved 0:22:26 seeing two badass women doing it. 0:22:28 They looked perfect. 0:22:30 They were unflappable. 0:22:32 They were ready for everything. 0:22:36 I did not find the fact-checking to actually be fact-checking. 0:22:38 It was just like, and a note to our audience. 0:22:41 These people are here illegally, or a note to our audience. 0:22:42 Climate change is real. 0:22:43 That is fact-checking. 0:22:44 Come on. 0:22:47 They’re like interrupting someone and saying, don’t you tell that lie? 0:22:49 What are they supposed to do? 0:22:50 Are you supposed to leave it? 0:22:52 No, I think they’re supposed to fact-check. 0:22:57 I thought it was ridiculous for them to even say that we’re not going to fact-check. 0:23:00 Then why not just have a computer read the questions and shut off their mics after 90 0:23:01 seconds? 0:23:04 The whole point of a moderator is you’re supposed to moderate, and I think that when 0:23:08 someone says something outrageous and blatantly false, you should weigh in and say, there’s 0:23:10 no evidence that there’s aliens. 0:23:13 I mean, I don’t think they should have ever. 0:23:16 I think it was a mistake out of the gates to say that we’re not going to fact-check, 0:23:20 because one of Vance’s strongest moments was he just got back in their face and said, 0:23:24 the rules were you weren’t going to fact-check, so if we’re going to, let me fact-check him. 0:23:27 That was a powerful moment. 0:23:28 He wasn’t taking it. 0:23:29 He wasn’t taking it. 0:23:32 Anyways, what’s the next big thing here? 0:23:33 What do you think is the next? 0:23:36 Do we have anything else on the calendar that we need to be thoughtful around in terms of 0:23:37 this race, Jessica? 0:23:42 Well, there’s the question of whether there’ll be another debate. 0:23:45 Kamala has re-upped the, I’m going to show up. 0:23:46 I hope that you do too. 0:23:51 I feel like there’s a chance that Trump feels emboldened by this and he thinks that he could 0:23:52 do better. 0:23:56 Whether that’s in part being competitive with JD Van, so everyone says is fantastic. 0:24:00 I don’t know if you saw this, but he tweeted our truth socialed in the middle of the debate. 0:24:03 Pete Rose just died, which wasn’t true. 0:24:08 Pete Rose died the day before, but while you’re doing that, while your VP is standing 0:24:12 on stage is beyond me, though it’s not beyond me. 0:24:13 I thought it was a parody account. 0:24:15 No, it’s just dumb. 0:24:18 I mean, it’s like the guy just can’t control himself. 0:24:19 He literally can’t control himself. 0:24:25 Right, so I have like another debate, but you saw Trump pulled out of the CBS 60 Minutes 0:24:26 interview. 0:24:27 Not going to happen. 0:24:28 Kamala is doing it. 0:24:29 He thinks he’s going to win. 0:24:33 He thinks he’s going to win and anyone with an IQ above 90 is saying to him, “No, don’t 0:24:35 do whatever you can. 0:24:36 Try and put the phone down. 0:24:41 Try and put your thumbs down and do not speak to the public as much as you can.” 0:24:43 Any other observations, Jess? 0:24:46 A couple of things that I think were important. 0:24:52 The number one search political term across the entire country was abortion, and you know 0:24:54 what side that benefits. 0:25:01 JD Vanstead, his best attempt to sugarcoat a lot of this, talked about how sad it was 0:25:06 that Amber Thurman, the young mother in Georgia who passed away from sepsis, leaving a six-year-old 0:25:11 son behind because she couldn’t get medical care was, and then Amber Thurman’s family 0:25:20 released a statement thanking Governor Walz for his support and bringing those issues 0:25:21 to light. 0:25:22 Then what was the other thing that I said? 0:25:27 Well, we had said that the future of the Republican Party is less opaque because Vanstead looked 0:25:30 somewhat presidential given his age. 0:25:35 In 2028, I would think as of last night, he’s probably in Vegas, one of the top one 0:25:37 or two contenders for 2028 for the GOP nomination. 0:25:38 Totally. 0:25:39 I think that that’s right. 0:25:45 I think that his ability to cut through, like you said, to polish up the turd or whatever 0:25:51 that Donald Trump is, is something that will resonate with people. 0:25:56 If you didn’t watch him intently the last few months, you’d almost kind of like the 0:26:02 guy and think that his heart was in the right place and something, we’re not going to launch 0:26:07 into it, but that I did think he did well is, too, on immigration, he said, “I’m thinking 0:26:13 about Americans,” and that matters a lot to people who feel like they’re kind of being 0:26:14 left behind. 0:26:19 By the way, the country is moving, so yeah, I think that the Republican future is a lot 0:26:24 clearer than it was before the debate, which is a big forward-looking takeaway. 0:26:28 Well, it sounds like the police are coming for you, so that’s a signal we should wrap 0:26:29 it up here. 0:26:30 They are. 0:26:31 I gotta go. 0:26:33 Thank you for watching this episode. 0:26:34 Thank you for listening to Raging Moderates. 0:26:37 Our producers are Caroline Shagrin and David Toledo. 0:26:39 Our technical director is Drew Burroughs. 0:26:43 You can find Raging Moderates on the ProfG pod every Tuesday. 0:26:44 Please download and subscribe. 0:26:46 We’re after a huge start here. 0:26:47 We appreciate your listenership. 0:26:49 [music] 0:26:52 (upbeat music) 0:27:02 [BLANK_AUDIO]
Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov discuss their takeaways from the vice president debate between Senator JD Vance and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.
0:00:01 [MUSIC PLAYING] 0:00:03 Support for the show comes from Mercury. 0:00:05 The simplest solution is often the smartest. 0:00:08 That’s where Mercury simplifies all your financial workflows 0:00:11 by powering them from one thing every business needs– 0:00:12 a bank account. 0:00:14 Now you can exit out of those endless tabs 0:00:17 and manage your banking, plus pay bills, send invoices, 0:00:20 and control spend all in one place. 0:00:22 Powerful banking, simplified finances. 0:00:24 Apply at mercury.com. 0:00:29 Support for Prop G comes from Anthropic. 0:00:32 It’s not always easy to harness the power potential of AI. 0:00:34 For all the talk about its revolutionary potential, 0:00:35 a lot of AI systems feel as if they’re 0:00:37 designed for specific tasks that are only 0:00:39 performed by select few. 0:00:42 Well, Cloud by Anthropic is AI for everyone. 0:00:45 The latest model, Cloud 3.5 Sonnet, 0:00:48 offers groundbreaking intelligence at an everyday price. 0:00:50 Cloud Sonnet can generate code, help with writing, 0:00:53 and reason through hard problems better than any model before. 0:00:55 You can discover how Cloud can transform your business 0:00:57 at Anthropic.com/Cloud. 0:01:00 [MUSIC PLAYING] 0:01:05 There’s over 500,000 small businesses in BC 0:01:07 and no two are alike. 0:01:08 I’m a carpenter. 0:01:09 I’m a graphic designer. 0:01:11 I sell dog socks online. 0:01:15 That’s why BCAA created one size doesn’t fit all insurance. 0:01:18 It’s customizable based on your unique needs. 0:01:20 So whether you manage rental properties or paint pet 0:01:24 portraits, you can protect your small business with BC’s most 0:01:26 trusted insurance brand. 0:01:29 Visit bcaa.com/smallbusiness and use promo code radio 0:01:31 to receive $50 off. 0:01:32 Conditions apply. 0:01:34 Welcome to the PropGPOD’s Office Hours. 0:01:36 This is the part of the show where we answer your questions 0:01:37 about business, big tech, entrepreneurship, 0:01:39 and whatever else is on your mind. 0:01:41 If you’d like to submit a question, 0:01:45 please email a voice recording to officehours@propgmedia.com. 0:01:49 Again, that’s officehours@propgmedia.com. 0:01:51 So with that, first question. 0:01:52 Hey, PropG. 0:01:54 This is Steve from Denver. 0:01:55 You’ve commented a number of times recently 0:01:58 on how the economy is doing better than people 0:02:00 are giving it credit for, including the episode with 0:02:02 Kyla Scanlon about the vibe session. 0:02:04 However, there are countless headlines just today 0:02:07 about the latest revision to the jobs report, which 0:02:10 is nearly 820,000 jobs downward. 0:02:13 My question is, do these seemingly constant downward 0:02:14 revisions give you any pause? 0:02:17 Thanks for your time and stop being so nice to Ed. 0:02:20 100% I’ll stop being less nice to Ed. 0:02:23 It’s just I feel bad for him. 0:02:24 He’s a lonely young man. 0:02:26 Back to your question. 0:02:28 I think a lot of it is AI. 0:02:30 I think, essentially, AI is sort of the perfect landing 0:02:31 lines for a soft landing. 0:02:33 What is a soft landing, you might ask? 0:02:36 It’s trying to cool the economy because you have inflation 0:02:40 while not pushing it into recession, which is not easy to do. 0:02:41 It’s like landing an air, I don’t know. 0:02:45 It’s like landing a propeller plane on an aircraft carrier. 0:02:46 It’s really fucking hard. 0:02:48 In high seas, if you will, what does AI do? 0:02:52 It reduces costs while increasing productivity. 0:02:53 Who was it, William Gibson? 0:02:56 Who was it that said, the future is here? 0:02:59 It’s just not evenly distributed. 0:03:01 I think the same is true of our economy. 0:03:02 And that is great. 0:03:04 Everyone’s saying the economy is up. 0:03:07 Better GDP growth and the rest of the G7, lower inflation 0:03:10 than the rest of the G7, which is a Goldilocks economy. 0:03:11 That’s great. 0:03:14 But my life just seems to be getting harder and harder. 0:03:16 And there was this fascinating study I read the other day 0:03:19 that said, if you look at France, which we don’t kind of look 0:03:22 to as a model for economic growth, 0:03:26 if you were to take out the top 1% of income earners 0:03:30 over the last several years, the bottom 99 in France 0:03:32 have done better than the bottom 99 in the US. 0:03:34 And that’s exactly what we have is we have an economy 0:03:38 that’s pretty prosperous, but it’s not evenly distributed. 0:03:40 And this is impacting every country. 0:03:42 I saw another stat that just blew my mind. 0:03:44 I’m here in the United Kingdom. 0:03:46 If you take out London out of the equation, 0:03:49 if you lifted London and all of its prosperity 0:03:52 in very, very wealthy households in London 0:03:55 out of the UK mix, the average household income 0:03:58 in the United Kingdom would be equivalent to Mississippi, 0:04:00 which has, I think the greatest levels of poverty 0:04:01 in the United States. 0:04:06 So essentially the UK is not a very prosperous nation 0:04:10 surrounding this Uber concentration of wealth 0:04:12 called one of the greatest concentrations of wealth 0:04:14 in history called London. 0:04:19 So I would argue that the economy’s actually doing fairly well. 0:04:23 Our fiscal policy, our tax policy makes the same mistake 0:04:26 over and over and that is people on the far right 0:04:28 and economists or some economists who are these free market 0:04:31 weirdos will claim that the middle class 0:04:33 is a naturally occurring organism. 0:04:33 No, it isn’t. 0:04:37 Anyone who’s done anything resembling any sort 0:04:38 of study of economic history says 0:04:40 that the middle class is an anomaly. 0:04:43 And typically what happens is there’s a group of people 0:04:45 who are very smart, very well connected, 0:04:47 very hardworking, very lucky, they get rich 0:04:48 and they start weaponizing government. 0:04:50 And people right now, wealthy people in America 0:04:52 don’t think they’re weaponizing government, 0:04:54 but they just happen to like, okay, just make sure 0:04:57 that when it comes to soybeans, if I’m a soybean farmer 0:05:01 that we continue to tax the shit out of foreign soybeans 0:05:02 and subsidize my industry. 0:05:05 And they aggregate so much power and so much money 0:05:07 that at some point the bottom 99% decide, 0:05:10 you know, the fastest way to double our income 0:05:13 would be to kill these 1% or to tell them 0:05:15 to leave the nation to pack their bags 0:05:17 and they’re out of here and then they nationalize 0:05:19 their business, that doesn’t work very well 0:05:21 and the whole cycle kind of starts over and over again. 0:05:23 And the question is, are we getting to that point 0:05:26 in the United States when six people control more wealth 0:05:28 in the bottom 50% of America? 0:05:30 And I think you’re seeing some populist movement, 0:05:33 you might call it populist or you might call it recalibration, 0:05:36 but unless we consistently invest or reinvest, 0:05:38 redistribute whatever the fuck you wanna call it, 0:05:41 money capital into the middle class, 0:05:43 we’re gonna have lower birth rates, 0:05:45 you have to have a middle class of men 0:05:47 that are attractive to women and men 0:05:50 who are not economically viable are not attractive to women. 0:05:53 Yeah, I said it and there’s a lot of evidence that shows that. 0:05:55 And we need a middle class that is thriving, 0:05:58 they fight our wars, they buy our products, 0:06:00 they are the citizens we need, 0:06:03 they generally we need them to be supportive of programs 0:06:06 that provide civil rights, women’s rights, 0:06:09 you know, to basically make a society great. 0:06:10 Certainly back to your question, 0:06:12 our economy in aggregate is killing it. 0:06:15 The problem is the future and prosperity 0:06:17 are in fact here in America. 0:06:19 It’s just not evenly distributed. 0:06:20 Thanks for the question. 0:06:23 Question number two. 0:06:26 – Hey Scott, it’s Greg calling from Nova Scotia, Canada. 0:06:29 I’m a father of three boys, a husband and a business owner. 0:06:31 I would really appreciate your thoughts 0:06:35 on Brian Chesky’s comments that he made recently 0:06:37 around founder mode. 0:06:41 I’m curious as you grew and scaled your businesses, 0:06:43 you talk openly about having a key person 0:06:47 that was the operator for you, but how did you negotiate 0:06:51 and manage your structure? 0:06:52 Was it a stovepipe? 0:06:53 Was it fairly flat? 0:06:55 Did you do skip level meetings? 0:06:58 Or did you really stay out of the day-to-day operations 0:07:02 of the business and leave it to your ops manager? 0:07:04 I would appreciate your thoughts on this 0:07:06 and I appreciate all that you do. 0:07:07 Thank you. 0:07:09 – What do you know, Greg’s from Canada. 0:07:11 The nicest, most intelligent, 0:07:14 how do you get 100 drunk fraternity brothers out of your pool? 0:07:16 Hey guys, would you please get out of the pool? 0:07:20 Boom, that never gets old, eh? 0:07:22 Anyways, this founder mode thing, I found it fascinating. 0:07:25 So founder mode is the idea that I think 0:07:26 what Brian was trying to say is that 0:07:28 he brought in all this professional management 0:07:29 that the company got off track 0:07:31 and he needs to kind of take the reins 0:07:34 and get more obsessed about the product. 0:07:36 And there are, and the, quote unquote, 0:07:38 professional management doesn’t work out. 0:07:40 That’s actually, there needs to be some nuance there. 0:07:43 By the way, I’m a huge fan of Brian Chesky. 0:07:45 Airbnb is one of my biggest stock holdings. 0:07:49 Look, there is a life cycle to companies. 0:07:50 And as they go through that life cycle, 0:07:55 as they go from start-up to venture-backed to growth, 0:07:58 to public company, to mature companies, 0:08:01 to declining companies, to distressed companies, right? 0:08:02 They require different management 0:08:04 across those parts of your life. 0:08:07 There are some people that are so talented 0:08:11 that they can traverse all of those ages, if you will, 0:08:13 or all of those components of the life cycle. 0:08:18 Most CEOs cannot, because back in my day, 0:08:20 in the ’90s, when I was starting companies, 0:08:22 founders were seen as a necessary evil. 0:08:23 And once the company was real, 0:08:26 you brought in some guy with gray hair from IBM 0:08:29 or Oracle or something and the VCs basically kicked out 0:08:30 the founder and the founder was lucky 0:08:33 he or she could stay chairman. 0:08:36 Then came Steve Jobs and they brought in John Scully, 0:08:38 who was hugely ineffective, the guy from Pepsi, 0:08:41 and then they brought back the crazy fucking founder 0:08:42 and he took the company 0:08:44 to be the most valuable company in the world. 0:08:45 Or actually, that’s not true. 0:08:46 He took it at 300 billion. 0:08:48 Tim Cook has actually taken it to 3 trillion. 0:08:49 Isn’t that weird? 0:08:52 Tim Cook has actually overseen a 10 or a 9x increase 0:08:53 in market capitalization, 0:08:55 but Steve Jobs is our Jesus Christ. 0:08:58 By the way, a guy who denied his blood under oaths, 0:09:00 such that he could avoid child support payments 0:09:02 when he was worth a quarter of a billion dollars. 0:09:05 Hey, that’s the guy I want my boys to role model after, 0:09:07 but oh, okay, he made a great fucking phone, 0:09:08 so let’s pretend he’s Jesus Christ. 0:09:11 Anyway, what you have is the pendulum 0:09:12 is swung the other way. 0:09:15 And that is VCs and the community has basically decided 0:09:18 that founders are the new Jesus Christ 0:09:19 and that you need that DNA. 0:09:22 And I’ve experienced it on boards where we put up 0:09:24 with so much bullshit from founders 0:09:27 because he or she was employee zero. 0:09:29 I think it has swung back way too far. 0:09:31 Probably peaked in terms of it swinging back 0:09:33 with Adam Newman where his board just listened 0:09:36 to this ridiculous bullshit where he was crashing 0:09:38 the equivalent of two Bombardier global expresses 0:09:39 into a mountain every week. 0:09:41 He was losing $100 million. 0:09:43 Anyway, it’s great from Nova Scotia. 0:09:46 That’s not your issue or that’s not your question. 0:09:47 So his notion is you go founder mode, 0:09:49 you’re kind of all over everything 0:09:50 and professional management comes in 0:09:51 and screws up companies. 0:09:52 No, they don’t. 0:09:54 The best companies, typically speaking, 0:09:57 have brought in professional managers, 0:09:59 Satya Nadella, Tim Cook. 0:10:00 They’ve all added more market cap 0:10:01 than the original founders. 0:10:03 Now, it’s probably harder to go from zero 0:10:05 to a billion market cap than it is to go from one 0:10:07 to 10 billion or 10 to 100 billion. 0:10:08 Or in the case of Tim Cook, 0:10:11 300 billion to 3 trillion. 0:10:12 Or in the case of Satya Nadella, 0:10:14 I think he’s taken it from, I don’t know, 0:10:17 800 billion to 3 trillion, whatever it is. 0:10:21 So I was on this panel of CEOs and it was a CEO, 0:10:22 I think from a way or rent the runway, 0:10:24 this digital firm and me. 0:10:26 And they said, they asked us, 0:10:29 what is your approach to management as a CEO? 0:10:30 And one person said, well, for me, 0:10:33 it’s all about creating a culture that empowers people. 0:10:35 Another person said, I think it’s really important 0:10:39 to identify what the roles and responsibilities are 0:10:41 and constant measurement and feedback, 0:10:43 but feedback that’s empathetic. 0:10:44 And then they turned to me and said, 0:10:47 my management strategy is I am all fucking over 0:10:49 everyone all the fucking time. 0:10:51 That is what founder mode meant for me. 0:10:52 I was involved in everything. 0:10:54 And I just don’t think there’s any getting around it. 0:10:56 I think if you’re serious about being an effective founder 0:10:58 and growing a profitable company 0:11:01 or a company worth the great shareholder value, 0:11:02 I just think you gotta be all over everyone 0:11:03 all the time, including yourself. 0:11:06 I think you gotta show that you came to play, 0:11:07 be obsessive about the product. 0:11:10 When I was running L2 for the first, 0:11:12 maybe even for eight years of the company, 0:11:15 nothing was allowed to leave and go to a client 0:11:16 unless I proved it first. 0:11:18 I felt like I had the voice. 0:11:19 I had an attention to detail. 0:11:21 I liked to write, I’m good at it. 0:11:23 I’m like, I wanna see everything before it goes out. 0:11:25 I find that this whole founder mode, 0:11:27 Zeitgeist coming out of the valley 0:11:30 is more basically more idolatry of innovators 0:11:32 that founder mode is somehow, 0:11:33 they’re not talking about the founders 0:11:35 of auto supply parts companies. 0:11:37 They’re talking about the founders of tech companies 0:11:40 that somehow they are smarter and no better 0:11:41 than the rest of management, 0:11:42 than the rest of companies, 0:11:43 than the rest of America, 0:11:44 than the rest of the world. 0:11:46 And it falls into this bullshit notion 0:11:48 that somehow these people have more insight 0:11:49 into the happenings of the world 0:11:52 and have more ability to fix problems. 0:11:53 As a matter of fact, 0:11:55 I would argue they’ve done more to fuck up the world 0:11:56 and actually help it. 0:11:57 Is that true? 0:11:58 Is that fair? 0:11:59 Maybe that’s not fair. 0:12:01 Definitely meta, definitely meta. 0:12:04 By the way, my dog is asleep here next to my desk 0:12:06 because we went founder mode on a walk this morning. 0:12:08 Oh my God, we chased some squirrels. 0:12:09 We said, hide a lot of people, 0:12:10 hide to a lot of people, 0:12:11 which freaks everybody out 0:12:13 ’cause the Great Dane, 0:12:14 which looks mildly like a cross 0:12:16 between a horse and an elephant, 0:12:18 just got beautiful elephant-like coloring, 0:12:21 is just great things are so funny though, 0:12:23 like shove their hind quarters into you 0:12:25 as a means of affection. 0:12:27 Whereas the little one looks really cute and innocent, 0:12:28 it’ll take your fucking thumb off. 0:12:30 They’d be like, “Hello.” 0:12:32 And like, you know, 0:12:33 and then I’m following the dog around at night 0:12:34 trying to pick up a shit 0:12:36 to see if I can find the neighbor’s thumb. 0:12:39 Not true, funny though, funny. 0:12:41 Anyways, don’t know where I was headed with that 0:12:43 other than to say thank you for the question. 0:12:47 We have one quick break before our final question. 0:12:48 Stay with us. 0:12:54 Support for Prop G comes from Vanta. 0:12:55 Whether you’re starting or scaling 0:12:56 your company’s security program, 0:12:58 demonstrating top-notch security practices 0:13:01 and establishing trust is more important than ever. 0:13:05 Vanta automates compliance for SOC2, ISO 27001, 0:13:06 and more, saving you time and money 0:13:08 while helping you build customer trust. 0:13:10 Plus, you can streamline security reviews 0:13:12 by automating questionnaires 0:13:14 and demonstrating your security posture 0:13:16 with a customer-facing trust center 0:13:18 all powered by Vanta AI. 0:13:20 Over 8,000 global companies 0:13:22 like Atlassian, FlowHealth, and Quora 0:13:25 use Vanta to manage risk and prove security in real-time. 0:13:26 Get $1,000 off Vanta 0:13:28 when you go to vanta.com/profg. 0:13:33 That’s vanta.com/profg for $1,000 off. 0:13:41 Support for Prop G comes from Fundrise. 0:13:43 It’s no secret that the AI industry 0:13:44 is growing through the roof right now. 0:13:46 You know it, your friends know it, 0:13:47 your dad even knows it, 0:13:48 but that doesn’t make it any easier 0:13:50 to start investing in the technology 0:13:52 of tomorrow, because most of the AI revolution 0:13:55 is being built and funded in private markets. 0:13:56 That means the vast majority of AI startups 0:13:58 are going to be backed and owned 0:14:00 by venture capitalists, not public investors. 0:14:01 The Fundrise Innovation Fund 0:14:04 is trying to change the landscape for regular investors. 0:14:06 The Innovation Fund pairs a $100 million 0:14:08 plus venture portfolio of some of the biggest names in AI 0:14:10 with one of the lowest investment minimums 0:14:11 in the venture industry. 0:14:13 AI is already changing the world, 0:14:15 but this time, you can get in early 0:14:16 with the Fundrise Innovation Fund. 0:14:20 You can get in early at fundrise.com/proppg. 0:14:21 Carefully consider the investment material 0:14:23 before investing, including objectives, 0:14:25 risks, charges, and expenses. 0:14:26 This and other information can be found 0:14:28 in the Innovation Fund’s prospectus 0:14:30 at fundrise.com/innovation. 0:14:32 This is a paid advertisement. 0:14:39 – Vox Creative. 0:14:42 – This is Advertiser Content from Virgin Atlantic. 0:14:44 – Hey, Carat Scott. 0:14:47 Remember me, the guy, Tina Fade, your Alec Baldwin, 0:14:49 sort of rejuvenated your career. 0:14:50 And he was, I’m at the lounge at Heathrow. 0:14:52 I’m at the Leathrow, the Virgin Lounge, 0:14:54 the Virgin Atlantic Clubhouse Lounge. 0:14:57 And I’m about to have the chicken tikka masala. 0:14:58 I love it here. 0:14:59 You should check it out. 0:15:00 It’s where the cool kids hang out. 0:15:03 Anyways, hope you’re all safe travels. 0:15:05 – Scott, frankly, it’s a miracle that Virgin Atlantic 0:15:06 let you into the clubhouse 0:15:08 and their incredible business class. 0:15:09 But I guess they did. 0:15:11 Tell me how it was. 0:15:13 – So, Carat, I’m an original gangster 0:15:14 when it comes to Virgin. 0:15:19 I’ve been flying Virgin for 20 plus years. 0:15:20 And I do the same thing. 0:15:22 And they get it right every time. 0:15:24 They always have the financial times for me. 0:15:26 And I order the chicken tikka masala. 0:15:30 And that is my Virgin experience. 0:15:31 If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. 0:15:34 – And your drink was, what is your drink? 0:15:36 – Well, I used to drink a Bloody Mary 0:15:38 or a beer in the clubhouse. 0:15:41 I started, I don’t drink alcohol when I travel anymore. 0:15:42 So I just do mineral water, 0:15:44 but they have this kind of cool cocktail 0:15:46 that’s like a lemongrass 0:15:48 or some sort of cool margarita thing. 0:15:49 And I get a Virgin one. 0:15:51 – What is your pre-flight routine? 0:15:54 What is your actual, besides your chicken tikka masala, 0:15:55 the Virgin clubhouse? 0:15:58 – My pre-flight routine is, 0:15:59 well, I always do the same thing the morning when I travel. 0:16:00 I try and work out. 0:16:01 I take the dogs for a walk. 0:16:03 And I always make time for the clubhouse 0:16:05 ’cause I do enjoy the Virgin clubhouse at Heathrow. 0:16:08 So check out virginatlantic.com for your next trip 0:16:10 and see the world differently. 0:16:12 – Certain amenities are only available 0:16:13 in selected cabins and aircraft. 0:16:20 Welcome back, question number three. 0:16:22 – Hey, Prop G, this is Natalie. 0:16:25 I’m calling in from Northern Virginia. 0:16:26 Appreciate you taking my question 0:16:29 and for all the work you do on the pod. 0:16:30 I am in my early 20s 0:16:33 and I just graduated college with an econ degree. 0:16:35 I am a financial analyst 0:16:37 at a pretty big government contracting firm 0:16:40 and I love my job. 0:16:42 My boyfriend also just graduated college. 0:16:44 He commissioned as an officer in the Marine Corps 0:16:47 and we’ve been together almost four years. 0:16:50 We both come from military families. 0:16:52 So I’m pretty familiar with the lifestyle 0:16:56 I’m about to enter into as a future military spouse. 0:17:00 So I’m not sure if you’re familiar with the term BAH 0:17:02 but I am gonna have to explain it for my question. 0:17:05 So I’ll give a short overview. 0:17:07 BAH is basic allowance for housing 0:17:09 and it’s essentially a housing supplement 0:17:12 for a soldier who lives off base. 0:17:14 It can be used for whatever the soldier wants 0:17:16 because it’s just added into their paycheck 0:17:17 with their normal pay. 0:17:21 The other part of this is if a soldier is married 0:17:24 or has a kid, they get even more added 0:17:26 to that BAH payment, every paycheck. 0:17:29 An 18 year old out of college 0:17:31 or I’m sorry, an 18 year old 0:17:32 enlisting right out of high school 0:17:35 has huge incentives to marry the first person 0:17:37 who shows a remote interest in them 0:17:39 because the benefit to them 0:17:42 is between six and 12 grand a year. 0:17:46 Do you agree with me that this is an outdated policy 0:17:49 that incentivizes soldiers to get married too young 0:17:52 and contributes to the high divorce rate in the military? 0:17:54 I’d love to hear your take on this 0:17:56 and thanks for everything you do. 0:17:58 – So first off, Natalie, 0:18:00 it just makes me feel really good about America. 0:18:03 We have people in the early 20s 0:18:06 who are as impressive and as articulate as you, 0:18:11 degree in economics and are connecting and marrying 0:18:13 someone who’s going into the Marines as an officer. 0:18:16 I just kind of want to wrap myself in a flag right now. 0:18:18 So back to your question. 0:18:20 According to data from the US Census Bureau, 0:18:21 those who have served in the military 0:18:22 tend to have higher divorce rates. 0:18:24 In 2022, the rate for divorce 0:18:26 among all active duty members was 3%. 0:18:29 So that’s higher than the actually the, 0:18:31 I think that’s annually every 3%. 0:18:32 I don’t know. 0:18:33 Anyways, it’s higher. 0:18:35 I think you would need data to support 0:18:40 that thesis because is it the fact they get married young? 0:18:41 You would need to control it for things. 0:18:44 In other words, compare enlisted people 0:18:45 or compare people in the service 0:18:47 who get married at 25 or 30 0:18:49 versus those who get married at 18. 0:18:51 I’m remiss to get in the way of any program 0:18:53 that puts more money in the pockets of young people 0:18:56 and especially young people starting families. 0:18:59 I think the family unit, I’ve kind of come 180 on this. 0:19:00 When I was your age, I’m like, 0:19:02 I’m never getting married and I’m never having kids. 0:19:03 I’m a selfish person. 0:19:04 I like to work. 0:19:05 I’m fine on my own. 0:19:09 I do my own thing and I’ll have relationships 0:19:13 but I’m not interested in this construct called marriage. 0:19:17 It was invented by a bunch of gay dudes in a church 0:19:19 who wanted to make sure that women didn’t struggle 0:19:21 with poverty, women are doing fine on their own. 0:19:21 They don’t need marriage. 0:19:22 I don’t need marriage. 0:19:24 I had this kind of what I thought was involved, 0:19:26 hip, cool, vision of marriage. 0:19:28 I wouldn’t have gotten married had I not had kids 0:19:31 and raising kids was a competent partner 0:19:33 is the most rewarding thing in my life. 0:19:35 So I was all wrong about it. 0:19:37 Kids are becoming a luxury item. 0:19:39 So I just don’t like the idea of doing anything 0:19:42 that would get in the way of supporting young families. 0:19:46 And I would imagine, and this is just per speculation, 0:19:49 that the stresses placed on a military family, 0:19:52 specifically with the person serving being gone all the time 0:19:54 would be that is what it would be really difficult 0:19:56 on marriages that it’s not economics 0:19:58 or it’s not getting married too young. 0:19:59 Although I agree, that’s not a great idea. 0:20:02 The idea of getting married at 18 seems just strange 0:20:05 and I kind of, I don’t call it bound for failure 0:20:07 ’cause a lot of them stay married the rest of their lives. 0:20:10 But God, I mean, at the age of 23, 0:20:11 I was different than I was at 18, 0:20:14 much less 33 versus 18, you really are, 0:20:18 especially men at 18, they really are boys. 0:20:22 But this is a long way of saying, I don’t really know, 0:20:24 but I think the problem, quite frankly, 0:20:25 is not putting enough money. 0:20:27 I think if we wanted to lower divorce rates, 0:20:30 we’d actually put more money in the pockets of young people. 0:20:31 Thanks so much. 0:20:33 And again, you just make me, 0:20:34 hearing about you and your fiance, 0:20:36 it just makes me proud to be American. 0:20:38 Thanks for the question. 0:20:39 That’s all for this episode. 0:20:40 If you’d like to submit a question, 0:20:41 please email a voice recording 0:20:43 to officehours@propertymedia.com. 0:20:46 Again, that’s officehours@propertymedia.com. 0:20:58 This episode was produced by Caroline Shagren. 0:21:00 Jennifer Sanchez is our associate producer 0:21:02 and Drew Burroughs is our technical director. 0:21:04 Thank you for listening to the Prop G Pod 0:21:05 from the Vox Media Podcast Network. 0:21:07 We will catch you on Saturday 0:21:10 for No Mercy, No Malice, as read by George Hahn. 0:21:12 And please follow our Prop G Markets Pod 0:21:14 wherever you get your pods for new episodes 0:21:16 every Monday and Thursday.
Scott discusses the state of the U.S. economy, specifically how it is both prosperous and unevenly distributed. He then speaks about ‘Founder Mode’ and the evolution of how founders are seen in Silicon Valley. He wraps up with a conversation on the high divorce rate in the military and whether benefits such as Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) contribute to that.