Author: The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

  • First Time Founders with Ed Elson – How This German Founder Built The Nation’s Most Valuable Startup

    AI transcript
    0:00:03 It’s winter and you can get anything you need delivered with Uber Eats.
    0:00:05 Well, almost, almost anything.
    0:00:08 So no, you can’t get snowballs on Uber Eats.
    0:00:11 But meatballs, mozzarella balls, and arancini balls?
    0:00:13 Yes, we deliver those.
    0:00:13 Moose?
    0:00:14 No.
    0:00:15 But moose head?
    0:00:16 Yes.
    0:00:18 Because that’s alcohol and we deliver that too.
    0:00:22 Along with your favorite restaurant food, groceries, and other everyday essentials.
    0:00:24 Order Uber Eats now.
    0:00:26 For alcohol, you must be legal drinking age.
    0:00:27 Please enjoy responsibly.
    0:00:28 Product availability varies by region.
    0:00:29 See out for details.
    0:00:33 This isn’t your grandpa’s finance podcast.
    0:00:37 It’s Vivian too, your rich BFF and host of the net worth and chill podcast.
    0:00:42 This is money talk that’s actually fun, actually relatable, and will actually make you money.
    0:00:45 I’m breaking down investments, side hustles, and wealth strategies.
    0:00:46 No boring spreadsheets.
    0:00:49 Just real talk that’ll have you leveling up your financial game.
    0:00:51 With amazing guests like Glenda Baker.
    0:00:54 There’s never been any house that I’ve sold in the last 32 years.
    0:00:57 That’s not worth more today than it was the day that I sold it.
    0:01:00 This is a money podcast that you’ll actually want to listen to.
    0:01:03 Follow net worth and chill wherever you listen to podcasts.
    0:01:04 Your bank account will thank you later.
    0:01:08 Scott, why are there so few unicorns in Europe?
    0:01:10 Yeah, wow, we’re going to need a bigger boat.
    0:01:12 I get asked that a lot here.
    0:01:14 One, it starts with immigrants.
    0:01:17 And that is the example I use on an asset in London
    0:01:21 is that my father in Glasgow and my mother in London,
    0:01:24 in their, you know, like when they were 19 and 23,
    0:01:27 left and took a chance to come to America.
    0:01:35 So risk taking a crazy idea that willing to kind of give up a good career
    0:01:38 or great prospects and take a chance on a crazy idea
    0:01:39 that might become crazy genius.
    0:01:42 We just have more of that secret sauce than anyone in the world.
    0:01:45 We have the best universities in the world.
    0:01:50 I’ve said often that you can’t find a $50 billion plus company in tech
    0:01:54 that isn’t a bike ride from a world-class engineering university.
    0:01:55 And we have most of them.
    0:02:01 You have more kind of hardball full-body contact competition
    0:02:06 where the government ops for a lack of regulation
    0:02:08 and capitalism over regulation.
    0:02:13 We have a much greater risk appetite.
    0:02:19 There’s $5 million in venture capital for every one startup in the United States.
    0:02:22 And there’s $1 million for every startup in Europe.
    0:02:26 And there’s five times as many entrepreneurs per capita in the United States.
    0:02:29 So we’re more risk aggressive.
    0:02:31 We have stronger IP.
    0:02:32 We have more capital.
    0:02:38 And it just kind of all adds up to what is an ecosystem
    0:02:41 where there’s been more wealth created in the last 24 months
    0:02:45 in a seven-mile radius of SFO International because of AI
    0:02:47 than in the last 10 years in Europe.
    0:02:52 These are big, big issues baked into the DNA of America.
    0:02:54 And I don’t quite frankly,
    0:02:57 I don’t see anything really changing in the short or the medium term.
    0:03:03 Welcome to First Time Founders.
    0:03:05 I’m Ed Elson.
    0:03:08 The European startup scene is struggling.
    0:03:13 Last year, Europe produced only seven new unicorns.
    0:03:16 Meanwhile, America made 71.
    0:03:20 My next guest, however, is a rare success story.
    0:03:22 Born and raised in Germany,
    0:03:26 he is one of the few Europeans who is leading the world in software and technology.
    0:03:30 His company, valued at $13 billion,
    0:03:33 is the second most valuable startup in Europe.
    0:03:35 What does the company do?
    0:03:38 Something called process mining.
    0:03:40 And we’ll get to what that actually is in a moment.
    0:03:44 This is my conversation with Alex Rinker,
    0:03:46 co-founder and co-CEO of Solonis.
    0:03:49 [Music]
    0:03:50 Welcome, Alex.
    0:03:50 Thank you for joining me.
    0:03:51 Thanks for having me.
    0:03:53 You came in from New York, right?
    0:03:54 You’re around.
    0:03:55 Came on the subway.
    0:03:56 On the subway, exactly.
    0:03:58 So we’ve got a lot to get into,
    0:04:04 but I want to just start off with what Solonis actually is and what it does.
    0:04:08 So Solonis is a process mining company.
    0:04:10 And what does that mean exactly?
    0:04:15 So basically, big companies hire you to do an x-ray,
    0:04:17 essentially, of all of their business processes.
    0:04:22 Yeah, it could be manufacturing processes or compliance processes,
    0:04:25 or financial reporting processes, et cetera.
    0:04:27 Any process that has multiple moving parts,
    0:04:33 you come in, you visualize the process, you do that with data,
    0:04:36 and you identify all of the inefficiencies in that process.
    0:04:38 Have I gotten anything wrong?
    0:04:40 Yeah, I think that’s where we started.
    0:04:44 And we’ve built a lot more around it.
    0:04:46 We call it a process intelligence platform.
    0:04:48 So it doesn’t just mine the process.
    0:04:50 It gives you real-time insights in it.
    0:04:53 It flags when things are going wrong.
    0:04:55 It helps you orchestrate and optimize processes.
    0:04:57 But you captured the essence of it, 100%.
    0:05:02 And it turns out that this is process mining or process intelligence,
    0:05:05 a highly valuable business.
    0:05:08 So you’ve worked with more than a third of the Fortune Global 500.
    0:05:12 You have unlocked more than $5 billion in value for your customers.
    0:05:15 And your company is now worth, or at least at its latest valuation,
    0:05:20 $13 billion, which makes it the second most valuable company in Europe.
    0:05:29 So my first question to you, what drew you to processes and process mining,
    0:05:34 and how did you know that this was going to be such a big business opportunity?
    0:05:39 So when we started, we really, it started, we got fascinated by the technology.
    0:05:44 You know, we were all students at university and we didn’t know much about business processes.
    0:05:49 And in some ways, when I look back, I’m happy how little we knew,
    0:05:50 because we were pretty naive.
    0:05:54 But one thing we didn’t know, so first we got fascinated with the technology.
    0:05:57 And then we talked to some prospective clients and some, you know,
    0:06:00 the university at these businesses that you could cooperate with.
    0:06:04 And there was all sorts of programs at the university to work with businesses.
    0:06:10 And we very quickly found out that processes are one of the most horizontal opportunities.
    0:06:14 Right. They really are the fabric that run every business.
    0:06:15 Yeah.
    0:06:19 Right. The way you sell, I mean, the way you produce this podcast is a process.
    0:06:22 Everything a business does can be described and expressed as a process.
    0:06:27 So when we look at a company, whether it’s a bank or an automotive company,
    0:06:29 or, you know, packaged consumer goods,
    0:06:34 we look at it as a collection of interwoven and inactive processes.
    0:06:36 I guess what I’d love to know a bit more about from you
    0:06:41 is why companies have such a hard time with their processes.
    0:06:46 Like, how is it that a company can get to a point where they,
    0:06:51 they don’t even understand their own business or how their own business works.
    0:06:55 And they need to hire someone like you to come in and tell them,
    0:06:56 this is how your business works.
    0:06:58 Like, how does a company get to that point?
    0:07:00 So I have two stories about this.
    0:07:01 Right. When is the story how it happened?
    0:07:03 And then the story how we found out about it.
    0:07:06 So the first is the story how it happened is very simple.
    0:07:09 So my grandfather, you know, he was a farmer,
    0:07:13 and he grew up as a farmer and then he had a potato trading business.
    0:07:16 He just passed away at 96 years old.
    0:07:17 So, you know, he got pretty old.
    0:07:21 So back in the day, you could see the whole process, right?
    0:07:23 You would go there, you could see how the potatoes coming,
    0:07:25 trucks coming in, everything being sorted, it’s going out.
    0:07:29 You know, and if there was an issue, you could see it and quickly fix it.
    0:07:32 But then obviously companies grew much, much bigger than that.
    0:07:35 And you had ERP systems, you know, people said,
    0:07:39 hey, we want to digitize our processes in ERP systems.
    0:07:44 In many ways, these ERP systems, our processes had to fit these systems.
    0:07:47 So we had to like fit our processes into these systems,
    0:07:49 which generated quite a bit of friction.
    0:07:52 And then you had more and more systems come along.
    0:07:55 So it doesn’t just stay with the ERP system, like SAP and Oracle.
    0:08:00 You had CIM coming along, you had the cloud revolution, you know.
    0:08:01 So you had CIM systems coming along.
    0:08:06 And you had a lot of cloud applications, HR, IT service management.
    0:08:09 So over time, we added more and more systems.
    0:08:13 This really happened from the, you know, in the last 50 years,
    0:08:16 you know, sort of from the 70s, 80s, all the way to today.
    0:08:20 And now companies have, you know, they have an ERP system.
    0:08:26 And I think on average, big companies over 250 core systems that operate
    0:08:30 the different parts of their business, supply chain, HR, finance,
    0:08:34 you know, inventory, warehouse management, you know, all sorts of processes.
    0:08:36 Banks, I mean, when I talk to our big banking clients,
    0:08:39 they have thousands, they’re even more complex.
    0:08:45 And in many ways, our processes had to sort of be stitched together
    0:08:46 across all these systems.
    0:08:48 And then you have changing products, you have globalization,
    0:08:49 you have acquisitions.
    0:08:52 So over time, these businesses tend to get quite complex
    0:08:54 and you can’t see the process anymore because it’s in systems,
    0:08:56 not like with my grandfather, we could see it.
    0:09:00 And in many ways, we also had to change our organizations,
    0:09:02 our processes to accommodate the way these systems were set up.
    0:09:05 So companies have a huge opportunity.
    0:09:08 We say that every process out there is waiting to be optimized.
    0:09:09 Yeah.
    0:09:13 And now with AI coming in, you’re going to have a huge wave
    0:09:15 of what we call process re-engineering.
    0:09:19 Because you want to reimagine your processes in the age of AI
    0:09:21 and we can talk about how we think it’s going to play out
    0:09:23 and how we see it playing out.
    0:09:26 The story of how we found out about it is also quite interesting.
    0:09:30 So when we started, we actually thought the same as you.
    0:09:33 We thought, well, process mining is kind of an interesting technology,
    0:09:35 but that’s a little bit boring.
    0:09:36 We’re excited about processes.
    0:09:40 But we said, well, but if we could simulate processes,
    0:09:41 so if we could basically take the mining
    0:09:44 and then build simulation models where people then could say,
    0:09:48 hey, if I hire like five people here, or if I automate this,
    0:09:49 you know, how does it change?
    0:09:53 And we built a simulation product that was based on process mining.
    0:09:54 We took that to market.
    0:09:57 It didn’t work because it was way ahead of its time.
    0:10:00 So we were about ready to give up until someone said,
    0:10:03 you know, we explained how technology works.
    0:10:05 And they said, well, this process visibility part,
    0:10:06 that’s really interesting, right?
    0:10:07 That’s where I would like to start.
    0:10:08 Right.
    0:10:10 And even though we do way more today, it’s like,
    0:10:12 we really found out, and there was a home run,
    0:10:15 that people need that x-ray of understanding exactly
    0:10:17 how their processes operate.
    0:10:20 What’s like the worst process you’ve ever seen?
    0:10:24 Like you go to a client and you look at how they do anything,
    0:10:26 whatever it is, and you’re like, oh my God,
    0:10:28 this is the slowest, most inefficient,
    0:10:29 most ridiculous process I’ve ever seen.
    0:10:32 You don’t have to name them by name.
    0:10:36 So often, very successful companies,
    0:10:37 it’s very high margin,
    0:10:39 actually don’t have very efficient processes, right?
    0:10:40 So you have that.
    0:10:42 I mean, we’ve seen crazy stories.
    0:10:46 One of our clients found out that they paid hundreds of millions
    0:10:48 worth of invoices twice.
    0:10:50 Okay.
    0:10:52 By the way, a lot of clients do that.
    0:10:54 Usually it’s more than millions to tens of millions,
    0:10:55 what you can save.
    0:10:57 But one, it’s in the hundreds.
    0:10:58 It happens in every company.
    0:11:02 If you don’t have a system, you get an invoice,
    0:11:04 someone gets a copy, maybe it gets into the system
    0:11:06 with slightly different data.
    0:11:09 You’re from the UK, so the date format is different in the US.
    0:11:11 So people type it the wrong way,
    0:11:12 and someone gets in the system twice,
    0:11:14 system thinks it’s two invoices, gets paid twice.
    0:11:19 So that’s just one example of a process that’s ridiculous.
    0:11:21 But it happens.
    0:11:22 We see a lot of friction,
    0:11:24 or where companies really pay attention
    0:11:26 is friction in customer-facing processes.
    0:11:30 Like, if it takes you days to book an order,
    0:11:32 we had one client once
    0:11:34 that was in a complex business to be fair,
    0:11:37 but they on average changed the date
    0:11:39 that they confirmed to the customer 13 times.
    0:11:40 Wow.
    0:11:41 So imagine that, right?
    0:11:43 I mean, they were very successful companies.
    0:11:44 So their products were so unique that customers
    0:11:46 would put up with it.
    0:11:47 We helped them fix it.
    0:11:50 But imagine on Amazon, you get on average 13 emails.
    0:11:51 It’s like, “No, we’re not coming on Monday,
    0:11:52 we’re coming Tuesday.”
    0:11:52 You sometimes get those emails,
    0:11:54 but you don’t get them 13 times on average.
    0:11:59 You know, we have lots of customers that shipped products,
    0:12:00 but never invoiced them, right?
    0:12:02 So they had revenue leakage
    0:12:04 because they shipped products that they never invoiced.
    0:12:08 We have lots of customers that negotiate contracts
    0:12:09 with their suppliers,
    0:12:12 but then they actually don’t take advantage of them.
    0:12:13 So they buy off of prices
    0:12:15 that actually higher than what they negotiated.
    0:12:16 Yeah.
    0:12:19 So it’s like, you know, it’s a really exciting space
    0:12:20 because you can see the impact.
    0:12:21 And what’s particularly exciting,
    0:12:24 you know, we do projects with Northwestern Medicine.
    0:12:26 They are looking at, you know,
    0:12:28 as patients go through the imaging,
    0:12:31 like a mammography or other imaging techniques,
    0:12:32 how long is the wait time?
    0:12:33 How can we cut that cycle time down?
    0:12:36 How can we make sure that we get it right the first time?
    0:12:38 What do the drop-off rates look like, right?
    0:12:41 How can we release patients out of the hospital
    0:12:43 faster? How can we move them through faster?
    0:12:44 So they started with in-finance and procurement,
    0:12:47 but they moved into the core medical operations.
    0:12:49 We have customers with a lot of government customers.
    0:12:51 Now we’re talking about government efficiency.
    0:12:56 So, you know, we saved the state of Oklahoma,
    0:12:59 for example, I helped them as they came in and said,
    0:13:01 “We want to really understand how are we spending money
    0:13:04 and where’s money, taxpayer money going out the door?”
    0:13:06 And they were able to save taxpayer dollars
    0:13:08 and get more transparency into that process.
    0:13:11 So we work with increasing amount of government agency
    0:13:14 and we’re excited about how we can, you know,
    0:13:17 make sure that government takes better care of taxpayer money.
    0:13:22 So there is, you know, no shortage of opportunities.
    0:13:26 Ten years ago, this is probably the most boring concept ever,
    0:13:28 but suddenly it’s very exciting to people.
    0:13:32 And I think a lot of it is because of the renewed interest
    0:13:35 in government waste and just the fact that people are so upset
    0:13:37 about the idea that we don’t have transparency
    0:13:39 into how our government really works.
    0:13:41 We don’t know where our money really goes.
    0:13:44 And now we’ve got Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy
    0:13:46 heading up the Department of Government Efficiency,
    0:13:49 which is like the biggest thing in the news right now
    0:13:51 when it comes to government.
    0:13:53 So you’re kind of at the forefront of that.
    0:13:57 Do you think you’d ever work with Doge,
    0:13:58 the Department of Government Efficiency?
    0:14:03 Is that kind of like the sort of golden use case for Salonis?
    0:14:04 Well, we hope so, right?
    0:14:05 And it’s not just Doge.
    0:14:07 Doge is really facilitating it.
    0:14:10 It’s the agencies on the federal level, the states,
    0:14:12 and it’s really governments around the world
    0:14:16 that I think have a very strong interest.
    0:14:20 I mean, with high inflation, with increasing debt,
    0:14:21 I think everybody has an interest
    0:14:24 to make sure that government money is spent transparently,
    0:14:27 efficiently, the same way businesses do.
    0:14:29 I think everybody can get more efficient.
    0:14:32 It’s the same way that humans always get better.
    0:14:35 And the starting points are different for sure,
    0:14:38 but often actually the best organizations,
    0:14:42 you know, if you want to get better,
    0:14:43 if you’re already good,
    0:14:45 you need the best and most sophisticated systems, right?
    0:14:47 So it’s not that I would say
    0:14:48 we work with inefficient companies,
    0:14:50 we work with everybody.
    0:14:53 And I think that everybody has an opportunity to get better.
    0:14:55 So you’ve seen how these processes work.
    0:14:58 You’ve probably seen more inefficiencies
    0:15:00 than basically anyone in the world.
    0:15:00 Yes.
    0:15:05 So I feel like you are well positioned to take a good guess
    0:15:09 at what is inefficient in the government right now.
    0:15:12 I know you haven’t done an x-ray of it,
    0:15:16 but if you were to do an audit of the US government,
    0:15:18 what would you think are the big problems
    0:15:20 that need to be streamlined right now?
    0:15:22 Well, I think one, you know,
    0:15:24 because you also want to drive impact quickly, right?
    0:15:25 So if you want to drive impact quickly,
    0:15:27 the first thing you focus on is where money goes out of the door.
    0:15:28 Yeah.
    0:15:29 Right? So you look at procurement,
    0:15:32 you look at invoicing, you look at the controls around that,
    0:15:34 all the money flows that go out of the door,
    0:15:37 how can we make them more transparent, right?
    0:15:43 Where do we maybe have things that we don’t intend to happen like that,
    0:15:44 where is potential fraud happening?
    0:15:46 How can we increase the accountability of that?
    0:15:48 And that’s a complex thing because, you know,
    0:15:51 on the federal level and then even on the state level,
    0:15:52 you have multiple payment systems.
    0:15:54 You have like, you know, hundreds of billions
    0:15:56 going out of the door of the government every year.
    0:15:58 So I think that’s where I would probably start.
    0:15:58 Yeah.
    0:16:00 But then you can get into everything else.
    0:16:02 I mean, you can get into labor efficiency,
    0:16:06 you can get into the efficiency of the core processes of servicing,
    0:16:11 you know, the citizens really, in every single department, right?
    0:16:16 So you can get into really the corporations of these agencies
    0:16:19 that provide these services, right?
    0:16:19 Yeah.
    0:16:23 Whether it’s you pick up your new driver’s license or you hand in your tax return or,
    0:16:27 you know, you can imagine the kind of use cases, right?
    0:16:29 As a citizen, you can really go anywhere.
    0:16:39 We’ll be right back.
    0:16:47 Why do so many of us get happiness wrong?
    0:16:49 And how can we start to get it right?
    0:16:54 I mean, I think we assume that happiness is about positive emotion on all the time,
    0:16:54 right?
    0:16:58 Often very high arousal, positive emotion, but that’s not really what we’re talking about.
    0:17:00 I’m Preet Bharara.
    0:17:03 And this week, Dr. Laurie Santos joins me on my podcast,
    0:17:07 Stay Tuned with Preet, to discuss the science behind happiness.
    0:17:11 We explore job crafting, the parenting paradox, the arrival fallacy,
    0:17:15 and why acts of kindness might be the simplest path to fulfillment.
    0:17:18 The episode is out now.
    0:17:23 Search and follow Stay Tuned with Preet wherever you get your podcasts.
    0:17:31 We’re back with First Time Founders.
    0:17:35 What would you say makes a good process?
    0:17:37 I think about this a lot in my work.
    0:17:42 I mean, I don’t have massive payment system processes,
    0:17:45 but, you know, we write scripts and we work as a team
    0:17:47 and we got to figure out how we produce this podcast.
    0:17:52 And I find that there are often just processes I just don’t like.
    0:17:56 Like they just feel awkward, slow, they irritate me,
    0:18:00 but I’m never fully sure how to address that.
    0:18:02 Like, you know, sometimes I’ll just be like,
    0:18:06 “Oh, let’s have a meeting and like figure out how to make this better.”
    0:18:09 But then even that makes it worse because then we start nitpicking everything
    0:18:11 and it takes like an hour to have the meeting.
    0:18:13 And then it’s like, it’s even worse.
    0:18:17 So I guess from your perspective, what is a reliable way
    0:18:20 to make a process within an organization better?
    0:18:23 It’s a lifestyle that you have to embed.
    0:18:30 I think what some people think, it’s like they’re too on and off about it, right?
    0:18:33 So you should point like, “Let’s get a meeting, fix this process,
    0:18:35 and then never talk about it again.”
    0:18:36 That usually doesn’t work.
    0:18:39 It’s more about how do you get 1% better every week.
    0:18:43 So, you know, one of the things I always tell our teams is,
    0:18:44 you know, we’re really selling a lifestyle
    0:18:47 and the lifestyle is called continuous operational improvement.
    0:18:50 How do you get better all the time?
    0:18:51 How do you find these increments?
    0:18:56 It’s like there’s little changes that add up to really ultimately a revolution, right?
    0:18:58 That’s really how you have to think about it.
    0:19:03 And you know, the one thing that, who really figured this out initially
    0:19:06 where the, you know, the whole culture of the Toyota Quality Management System,
    0:19:10 Kaizen, and optimizing manufacturing processes.
    0:19:14 Because manufacturing processes is like, you need perfect quality.
    0:19:15 It’s very expensive if you screw something up.
    0:19:18 Like if you have a car and you’re missing one little screw.
    0:19:21 The whole production line stops.
    0:19:28 Okay? So, you know, those companies invented this Kaizen lifestyle, right?
    0:19:31 And that’s really not from a technology standpoint,
    0:19:33 but culturally what we are evangelizing.
    0:19:38 And when you think about it, now with AI, that is exactly what companies need.
    0:19:40 Every company needs to embrace this.
    0:19:43 I’m like 100% convinced because the way AI is going to manifest,
    0:19:46 you’re not going to have this like one AI system.
    0:19:49 You’re going to have lots of agents in your processes.
    0:19:52 So a company is going to have, I don’t know,
    0:19:55 100,000 employees and 100,000 agents, right?
    0:20:01 And these agents are going to automate little processes and things and tasks
    0:20:04 so that ultimately the whole organization is much more efficient.
    0:20:07 You know, one person is going to have way, way more impact
    0:20:08 and it’s going to do way more.
    0:20:11 And in order to do this, if you think of each of this agent,
    0:20:13 it’s a small process change, right?
    0:20:16 And you’re not going to do that overnight.
    0:20:20 And you’re not going to do this with one big bang or one year sprint.
    0:20:24 You’re going to do this by implementing this tool set,
    0:20:27 educating the organization to really promoting this as a lifestyle
    0:20:30 where people are constantly automating, constantly optimizing,
    0:20:33 constantly embedding AI into what they do.
    0:20:37 And then two, three years later, they’re going to be way more efficient than before.
    0:20:38 That’s how it’s going to work.
    0:20:40 Are you doing that within your own company as well?
    0:20:45 Are you employing AI agents to automate the processes within Solonis itself?
    0:20:48 We have a big Solonis for Solonis program
    0:20:50 and that’s exactly how we approach it, right?
    0:20:53 How do we get better every day, right?
    0:20:56 Like how do we make our customer experience better?
    0:20:57 How do we make our customer onboarding better?
    0:21:00 How do we make our customer support better?
    0:21:01 How do we really embed those?
    0:21:04 Supposedly for us, it’s changing because we’re growing so fast
    0:21:08 and we have grown so fast that sometimes you take the eye of the ball
    0:21:10 even though you are the process company,
    0:21:12 you take the eye of the ball.
    0:21:14 So it’s something we constantly remind ourselves and go back to.
    0:21:17 I feel like this could be an entire sector or a department.
    0:21:21 Like I feel like we’re going to see like chief process officers or something, right?
    0:21:25 We already see this that organizations are moving from like very functional organizations.
    0:21:29 Like think about like the process of getting a lead,
    0:21:34 converting it into an opportunity, selling your product,
    0:21:38 shipping your product, maybe manufacturing it and then billing it.
    0:21:39 It’s called lead to cash, okay?
    0:21:40 It’s a very important process.
    0:21:45 So today you have like a sales development team, you have a sales team,
    0:21:49 you have an engineering team, you have a post sales team,
    0:21:51 you have deployments, you have invoicing.
    0:21:54 So it’s like seven different departments or so that are involved in this.
    0:21:59 And what we see already is that people are embedding process owners.
    0:22:02 So chief process owners or you know,
    0:22:04 call them different ways, enterprise process owners.
    0:22:06 And for end-to-end processes.
    0:22:08 So what already a lot of companies are doing
    0:22:11 is that they’re moving from a very functional structure
    0:22:13 to more of a process-centric structure of the organization.
    0:22:16 And AI can automate more of those process tasks.
    0:22:18 That makes a lot more sense, right?
    0:22:20 So that you can really look at this end-to-end
    0:22:22 and say, what’s our customer experience?
    0:22:23 End-to-end.
    0:22:27 Because if you know, I send them the wrong invoice
    0:22:29 or I provision the thing that they haven’t bought,
    0:22:32 like that’s those breakpoints really hurt the customer experience, right?
    0:22:35 Customer experience is an outcome of a process,
    0:22:36 it’s not just your product.
    0:22:40 So we see already that companies are sort of pivoting the arc charts
    0:22:42 towards more of these process-centric structures.
    0:22:47 Hearing you talk about this, you sound both your accent,
    0:22:49 but also your philosophy, very German.
    0:22:56 You do, I mean, the attention to detail,
    0:23:01 the obsession with order, process, structure,
    0:23:04 it does not feel, you’re not like an American cowboy,
    0:23:06 you’re like an attention to detailed German.
    0:23:09 And I want to talk about that,
    0:23:11 or I’d like for you to talk about that,
    0:23:13 because we’ve been talking about this a little bit on our podcast,
    0:23:18 where in Germany, there is a dearth of entrepreneurship,
    0:23:21 but that’s also true of Europe in general.
    0:23:23 And I’m just going to go through a couple of stats here.
    0:23:27 There are 760 unicorns in the US,
    0:23:30 and there are only 130 unicorns in Europe.
    0:23:32 Salonis is the second largest of all of those.
    0:23:35 On a per capita basis,
    0:23:38 the US has 13 times more unicorns than Europe.
    0:23:41 And when we look at the US stock market,
    0:23:44 the US stock market is now three times larger
    0:23:46 than the European stock market.
    0:23:49 And back in 2010, it was only one and a half times larger.
    0:23:50 So the gap is growing.
    0:23:54 Why do you think Europe is struggling so much
    0:23:59 to build new successful companies such as Salonis?
    0:24:03 I think the primary reason is the venture capital infrastructure.
    0:24:05 I think it’s gotten a lot better,
    0:24:09 but the structure around risk capital in the US
    0:24:11 is absolutely phenomenal.
    0:24:16 In the US, companies that have a 10% chance of working out
    0:24:20 can raise $30 million seed rounds.
    0:24:21 Correct.
    0:24:22 Right, think about that.
    0:24:24 So people are willing to give a team
    0:24:26 that doesn’t even have a product yet,
    0:24:27 $30 million.
    0:24:31 And maybe it has a 1% chance of working.
    0:24:32 Right.
    0:24:35 But there’s so much capital that goes into technology
    0:24:38 and emerging companies that sort of on the whole,
    0:24:39 that system works, right?
    0:24:42 At least some people are more successful than others,
    0:24:45 but on a whole, that’s an incredible infrastructure
    0:24:46 that doesn’t exist in Europe.
    0:24:49 In Europe, you have an increasing amount of venture capital.
    0:24:50 But for example, when we started,
    0:24:53 we bootstrapped for almost six years.
    0:24:54 Yeah.
    0:24:55 With no funding.
    0:24:57 And part of that because there wasn’t
    0:25:00 enterprise-oriented venture capital infrastructure,
    0:25:02 and the few VCs that were there said,
    0:25:05 “Oh, early 20s, you’re too young to start a B2B business.”
    0:25:06 Thank you.
    0:25:09 And then we were fine bootstrapping,
    0:25:11 but that doesn’t work for every company.
    0:25:14 So I think that that is the primary reason.
    0:25:16 I think there are other reasons, obviously,
    0:25:19 you have a huge domestic market, so that helps.
    0:25:21 I think you have a very entrepreneurial culture,
    0:25:23 a very good culture on failure.
    0:25:26 But look, people talk about the entrepreneurial culture in the U.S.
    0:25:30 I mean, companies were started in Europe, right?
    0:25:33 BMW was started in Germany, right?
    0:25:35 There was an entrepreneur there that wasn’t afraid of failing.
    0:25:38 And it’s like, I think that the cultural differences
    0:25:41 are not the biggest deal.
    0:25:43 I think there’s tremendous amount of entrepreneurial history
    0:25:44 and heritage in Europe,
    0:25:47 and tremendous amount of great talent.
    0:25:50 You have a pretty strong education system.
    0:25:52 I think the top European schools are just as good
    0:25:54 as the top U.S. schools.
    0:25:57 I think, and you can actually say that in Europe,
    0:25:59 education is more affordable, more accessible for people.
    0:26:03 So I think that the infrastructure around education,
    0:26:05 the talent in Europe is actually quite phenomenal.
    0:26:08 Could certainly be improved a lot,
    0:26:09 but I think that’s not the primary reason.
    0:26:11 I think the primary reason is that
    0:26:15 the venture capital infrastructure is so much less developed.
    0:26:18 And for technology companies in particular,
    0:26:20 you need capital, right?
    0:26:21 It’s a capital-intensive business.
    0:26:24 Now with AIs even, in some ways, more capital-intensive.
    0:26:26 And I think that’s the biggest gap.
    0:26:28 And obviously, because we didn’t have that,
    0:26:34 you then have the issue that a lot of, you know,
    0:26:35 you are really behind.
    0:26:38 So for example, out of Salonis,
    0:26:40 you know, I get calls every month
    0:26:42 from former Salonis who is starting a company.
    0:26:46 I just actually put an angel check into one of them.
    0:26:48 And there’s great companies there, right?
    0:26:50 I know many of them will work out, right?
    0:26:54 But that obviously these successes feed the next successes.
    0:26:56 And because we didn’t have that as much of that,
    0:26:59 you know, the US gets further and further ahead.
    0:27:03 I am bullish on Europe from an entrepreneurial ecosystem
    0:27:04 because of the talent.
    0:27:06 Quality of life is very high.
    0:27:07 I think people want to live there.
    0:27:09 I think people from all over the world
    0:27:11 still a very attractive place.
    0:27:13 So I think Europe has a lot of opportunities.
    0:27:15 If Europe is able to use them,
    0:27:16 I think there’s a lot ahead.
    0:27:19 But I would say the capital infrastructure is the main gap.
    0:27:23 I feel like another way to say this is America’s rich.
    0:27:27 And the reason I bring that up is because
    0:27:30 those guys who are down to put in a $30 million check
    0:27:36 for a company that has maybe a one to five percent chance of success,
    0:27:38 I feel like the only guys who can do that
    0:27:42 are the mega mega billionaires or the mega funds
    0:27:45 who can make these bets.
    0:27:47 And I’m starting to think maybe it’s just
    0:27:50 we’re like a little too comfortable in America.
    0:27:52 I think America’s rich for sure.
    0:27:53 But Europe is actually also quite rich.
    0:27:57 So for example, in Germany, there’s a lot of wealth.
    0:28:01 But that wealth isn’t going into risk capital.
    0:28:01 Right.
    0:28:04 So for example, if you have a pension in the US,
    0:28:06 there’s a high likelihood that a portion of that
    0:28:08 goes into the top VC funds.
    0:28:11 If you ask like the top VC funds who are your investors,
    0:28:13 they will say it’s a pension fund.
    0:28:14 The teachers, yeah.
    0:28:14 Yeah, exactly.
    0:28:15 It teaches pension, right?
    0:28:16 Right.
    0:28:19 In Germany, that actually used to be forbidden.
    0:28:22 Pension funds couldn’t invest in risk capital.
    0:28:22 Right.
    0:28:24 Now they can like a very small percentage.
    0:28:28 I think there’s some changes, but it’s a whole different scale.
    0:28:32 So actually Europe historically was, you know,
    0:28:34 I think we’re falling behind more and more.
    0:28:36 But there’s a lot of wealth in Europe
    0:28:39 that could be directed towards risk asset classes that just hasn’t.
    0:28:42 There are two starts about Germany’s economy,
    0:28:43 which I find really interesting.
    0:28:45 And I think kind of illustrate your point.
    0:28:48 The first is public infrastructure spending,
    0:28:51 which is two and a half percent of GDP,
    0:28:53 which is one of the lowest rates in the world.
    0:28:56 And the second is the debt to GDP ratio, which is 60%,
    0:29:00 which is significantly lower than the rest of the G7,
    0:29:02 certainly way lower than the US.
    0:29:06 And I feel like that is a good illustration
    0:29:08 of where Germans heads are at,
    0:29:10 which is they’re very afraid of spending
    0:29:12 and also very afraid of debt.
    0:29:16 And it does paint this overall economic picture of like,
    0:29:19 they’re just not willing to take risks.
    0:29:22 And I feel like that’s sort of reflected in the VC environment,
    0:29:25 where it feels like the entire setup of the German economy is like,
    0:29:28 we’re afraid that something might break.
    0:29:30 So we want to play it really, really safe.
    0:29:33 We’re not going to go out and over leverage ourselves.
    0:29:36 And maybe we’re not going to go out
    0:29:39 and make bets on young companies that might not succeed.
    0:29:40 That’s what everybody says.
    0:29:41 I don’t know if I totally agree.
    0:29:45 I think when you think about the founder’s epoch in Europe
    0:29:48 and particularly Germany, there was a tremendous amount of risk taking.
    0:29:50 You look at Siemens, you look at BMW, you look at BSF.
    0:29:52 A lot of those companies actually got started
    0:29:55 within a reasonably short time window.
    0:30:02 So it’s not that like the cultural heritage is totally risk avoiding.
    0:30:05 Certainly there’s a different culture around risk,
    0:30:08 which starts not necessarily all bad, right?
    0:30:11 I mean, some of the good US companies, they took risks,
    0:30:15 but they were also built on solid principles of entrepreneurship.
    0:30:17 So I wouldn’t expect Germany to have been the leader
    0:30:19 in the early days of the crypto industry or something like that.
    0:30:20 That is certainly true.
    0:30:22 There’s a more conservative mindset.
    0:30:24 But if you think about deep technology,
    0:30:25 where you need to make long-term bets,
    0:30:28 you need to have an engineering-driven mindset,
    0:30:31 I think that Germany actually has a great heritage on that.
    0:30:33 And there is a lot of risk taking.
    0:30:38 I think that the system didn’t enable it.
    0:30:40 Like if you say, “Hey, we can’t invest any of our pensions
    0:30:41 in the venture capital.”
    0:30:43 How would you expect the venture capital industry to work?
    0:30:48 So it’s not that there’s like 80 something million people
    0:30:50 that are afraid to take risks.
    0:30:54 I think there’s a system that didn’t encourage people
    0:30:59 to invest money into ventures and technology ventures.
    0:31:03 And I think that is the primary challenge.
    0:31:05 I mean, SAP was bootstrapped too, right?
    0:31:06 And it’s been a long time ago.
    0:31:09 Obviously, that was a different time, right?
    0:31:10 Venture capital wasn’t the thing then.
    0:31:16 But still, I mean, that was the last German big technology company
    0:31:18 that went public and went on to be successful.
    0:31:22 And there hasn’t been any really big successes since.
    0:31:23 Yeah.
    0:31:26 It’s like SAP and then a bunch of core companies basically, right?
    0:31:27 Yeah, exactly.
    0:31:29 And I mean, the car companies got started way, way earlier, right?
    0:31:30 Right.
    0:31:34 So, you know, hopefully that changes.
    0:31:40 But I think the culture and attitude also has strength.
    0:31:41 I don’t think that’s the main reason.
    0:31:45 I think the system is to blame in other European countries too.
    0:31:48 I want to talk about how you built this company.
    0:31:50 So you started the company in 2011.
    0:31:53 As you mentioned, you spent the first five years bootstrapping.
    0:31:55 So you did not raise any outside funding.
    0:31:58 Briefly walk us through how you bootstrapped.
    0:32:02 And I’d love to know if you would do it again, given the choice.
    0:32:05 You know, it was a pretty intense period.
    0:32:10 Like you have to be pretty hardcore to which we had $12,500 when we started.
    0:32:16 You actually have to form a limited liability company in Germany
    0:32:17 to guarantee $25,000.
    0:32:20 So we had to promise another $12,500.
    0:32:21 But you only have to put up half of it.
    0:32:23 So the other half at that time–
    0:32:25 Is that the same in America?
    0:32:27 No, you can start with $1.
    0:32:28 They’ve changed the system in Germany.
    0:32:29 You can also start it with that.
    0:32:31 By the way, that’s another great example
    0:32:32 of what we were just talking about.
    0:32:33 Exactly, that’s fair.
    0:32:36 In the US, it’s like 500 bucks for the lawyers or whatever.
    0:32:40 And you’ve got a Delaware, Ingo, whatever you want.
    0:32:40 So you’re right.
    0:32:43 So we had $12,500.
    0:32:47 And we literally we slept in the car.
    0:32:52 We drove around in an old Opel that was my co-phoners.
    0:32:53 And we pitched clients.
    0:32:55 The good thing of it was it really enforced focus
    0:32:56 on the customer.
    0:33:01 Because if clients were willing to sign up for salons,
    0:33:04 we wouldn’t have any revenue to pay employees
    0:33:04 and build the business.
    0:33:06 We sent out handwritten letters to people
    0:33:10 because we figured out if they get a regular letter,
    0:33:11 the assistant throws it away.
    0:33:12 But if they get a handwritten letter,
    0:33:17 it could be the grandmother or husband or wife or whatever.
    0:33:19 So those letters actually got opened.
    0:33:22 And when you got a letter from us, it was a great gift
    0:33:23 because you got a voucher for free demo.
    0:33:25 How generous was that?
    0:33:28 So some people actually filled out the voucher
    0:33:30 and got a free demo from us.
    0:33:33 And we really, I think in the early days,
    0:33:36 just really focused on our customers, signing up customers
    0:33:39 and then continuously building and iterating on the product
    0:33:41 to make those customers happy and grow with us.
    0:33:43 And the good news is in our business,
    0:33:45 which is focused on enterprise,
    0:33:50 you can, if you lend 100 customers, that’s a lot, right?
    0:33:52 Whereas, and you get bigger contracts.
    0:33:54 So you can actually work in that mode.
    0:33:56 I think if you start a consumer business,
    0:33:58 so it’s very hard to bootstrap that.
    0:34:00 It’s been done, but it’s much, much harder, right?
    0:34:02 Because you don’t get these bigger contracts
    0:34:04 from your customers.
    0:34:06 And then in 2016, we decided,
    0:34:08 hey, we really want to take on the US market.
    0:34:11 It was actually, a lot of European companies,
    0:34:13 when they start in Germany and then go to France,
    0:34:14 and then they go to Spain,
    0:34:17 and then they go to wherever, UK or whatever.
    0:34:19 We said, well, if we’re going international,
    0:34:20 we’re going on to the US.
    0:34:23 Obviously, then we also went into other countries in Europe,
    0:34:24 but we said the first market,
    0:34:27 we’re really going to take on as the US market.
    0:34:30 So we went to the US and started the business here.
    0:34:33 And we figured out it might make sense
    0:34:35 to raise some venture funding to do that.
    0:34:38 So we raised venture funding partly for the funding
    0:34:39 and partly because of the network
    0:34:41 that we could get through those VCs.
    0:34:43 Yeah, I just want to go through the fundraising.
    0:34:46 So you raised 28 million in your first round in 2016,
    0:34:49 two years later, 50 million in your Series B,
    0:34:52 a year after that, 290 million,
    0:34:56 and then later you raised a billion in your Series D.
    0:34:59 So you’re kind of a prolific fundraiser at this point.
    0:35:03 Is there anything you’ve learned about fundraising?
    0:35:04 I mean, you’ve experienced both sides.
    0:35:07 I mean, you bootstrapped, you built the business,
    0:35:08 and then you went out there
    0:35:12 and you did the elevator pitch and raised a bunch of money.
    0:35:15 What are some of the learnings that you’ve taken away
    0:35:16 about fundraising?
    0:35:18 What makes a really good fundraiser?
    0:35:21 One thing that’s really important is to have alignment
    0:35:24 with your investors on what the journey looks like,
    0:35:26 what you want to do, find the right investors
    0:35:30 that are really not just excited about the business opportunity
    0:35:32 but also excited about the impact that you can create.
    0:35:34 We say we make processes work for people,
    0:35:36 for companies, and for the planet.
    0:35:38 And that’s a really important mission, right?
    0:35:40 I mean, I think I’m converting you
    0:35:43 into a process evangelist a little bit here, I hope so at least.
    0:35:45 And because you realize how important this is, right?
    0:35:47 It’s patients in the hospitals.
    0:35:48 It’s customer experience.
    0:35:50 It’s citizens and their services.
    0:35:52 It’s the work that people do every day.
    0:35:53 You get frustrated.
    0:35:54 Imagine how frustrated you would get
    0:35:57 if you were in a higher transactional environment.
    0:35:59 I get frustrated cooking breakfast in the morning.
    0:36:01 Exactly, you know, you get frustrated with processes.
    0:36:05 Imagine if you had to run a UPS logistics hub
    0:36:06 or something like that, right?
    0:36:08 I’ll stick to talking on a microphone, yeah.
    0:36:10 Exactly, but you know, it’s…
    0:36:12 So I think you want people excited about what you do
    0:36:15 and really bought into whatever your plan is for the future.
    0:36:17 And then I think you need to explain your story
    0:36:19 in a way that investors can adjust, right?
    0:36:21 So you need to talk to investors differently
    0:36:22 than you talk to customers.
    0:36:23 It’s a different audience.
    0:36:26 Then I think you need to also make sure
    0:36:29 that you bring your customer proof points, right?
    0:36:31 I think that investors are, first of all,
    0:36:32 they’re going to call your customers, right?
    0:36:34 So that’s clear.
    0:36:38 And then you need to really make sure that you have alignment
    0:36:41 and set, create the right setup.
    0:36:42 I think that’s extremely important.
    0:36:43 It’s not just about the money you raise.
    0:36:45 It’s a lot about the setup you create
    0:36:49 that allows you to really go and be successful afterwards.
    0:36:52 We’ll be right back.
    0:37:06 We’re back with First Time Founders.
    0:37:10 I love the way you say how it’s like, it’s a different audience.
    0:37:12 If the customers are one audience,
    0:37:14 the investors are another audience.
    0:37:19 And I feel like that encapsulates well
    0:37:22 how building a company is in a lot of ways like a performance.
    0:37:24 Like your job is to kind of put on,
    0:37:26 I mean, the handwritten letters,
    0:37:28 you’re going to put on a show for the customers
    0:37:32 and demonstrate, you know, I know what you like.
    0:37:35 You know, I know you want someone who’s taking care
    0:37:38 and taking the time out of their day to write this thing.
    0:37:43 And we need to know if you see being a CEO as that,
    0:37:46 because we talk a lot about that on our podcast.
    0:37:50 The way, you know, you’re presenting an image
    0:37:52 and you’ve got to spend a lot of time thinking,
    0:37:57 you know, what kind of story does the audience want to hear?
    0:38:00 Is that something you think about a lot?
    0:38:04 I used to think about it more than I do, actually.
    0:38:08 I think that the most important thing is that you’re authentic.
    0:38:10 And people really feel that.
    0:38:14 So I think you need to think about the impact you want to create
    0:38:18 and the type of change you want to drive and the mission you have.
    0:38:20 And then you need to obviously communicate that
    0:38:23 in a simple way that people can understand.
    0:38:26 So you can’t, you know, if you’re very technical,
    0:38:28 then often people have the tendency to be too technically certain.
    0:38:30 So you have to work on storytelling.
    0:38:30 Yeah.
    0:38:32 But I don’t think it’s a performance.
    0:38:35 I think it’s something that you’re really passionate about.
    0:38:38 And that you really believe in.
    0:38:41 And then, you know, as an actor,
    0:38:44 I don’t have to necessarily believe in, you know,
    0:38:46 if I’m a good actor, I can play any role, right?
    0:38:47 Right.
    0:38:52 But so in a way, it’s really a mission where you say,
    0:38:56 “Hey, I really have this belief and I’m going to gather
    0:38:59 more and more people with me on this journey.”
    0:39:01 And that’s why I think it’s so exciting about Salonis
    0:39:04 for customers that really embed Salonis into the operations.
    0:39:05 They get so much better.
    0:39:07 I talked about some of those examples.
    0:39:12 And they embrace this as a lifestyle, right?
    0:39:15 They suddenly don’t just think about their P&L statement.
    0:39:16 They think about their process health
    0:39:18 and how they can optimize their processes.
    0:39:21 How do these outcomes affect customers?
    0:39:23 How do these outcomes affect financial outcomes?
    0:39:25 How do these outcomes affect our employees?
    0:39:29 So it’s a, we are changing the way companies run and operate.
    0:39:33 And I think that the, you know, when you attract people,
    0:39:36 I mean a lot, a big part of the CEO is recruiting, right?
    0:39:38 You want to attract people that are aligned with that.
    0:39:44 You know, you want to attract missionaries, not mercenaries, okay?
    0:39:46 You want to attract people that are going to wake up in the morning
    0:39:48 and be passionate about this, right?
    0:39:50 So in a way, you evangelize, right?
    0:39:54 And I think as a startup founder, you’re always evangelizing.
    0:39:57 You’re always communicating and expanding,
    0:39:59 but you need to do it not to put on a show,
    0:40:01 but because of what’s in your heart,
    0:40:03 what you really believe, right?
    0:40:04 And what gets you excited.
    0:40:08 You also don’t do it from a purely financial perspective.
    0:40:10 Of course, financial is important
    0:40:12 and it’s important to make all your stakeholders successful,
    0:40:14 your investors, your employees, et cetera.
    0:40:16 But that’s not enough, right?
    0:40:17 You need to have a bigger mission that you really believe.
    0:40:19 And I think that otherwise you’re just not going to persevere.
    0:40:22 It’s very hard to start a company and to be successful.
    0:40:24 You’re not of a thousand companies that start.
    0:40:25 Maybe one is successful.
    0:40:27 I don’t know the exact numbers, but you know, it’s not, not a lot.
    0:40:31 And I think it’s not because the thousands were bad ideas.
    0:40:33 There’s probably a few hundred bad ideas,
    0:40:35 but there’s also a few hundred good ones.
    0:40:38 But it’s the perseverance you have, really sticking with it
    0:40:42 and waking up every day and doing it, right?
    0:40:45 And I think that starts with passion and belief.
    0:40:48 Yeah, it’s basically like who can last the longest
    0:40:49 at a certain point.
    0:40:52 I feel like if you’re only in it for the money,
    0:40:55 it’s just so much harder to wake up every morning
    0:40:56 and try really hard.
    0:40:59 I mean, maybe for some people that is just so motivating
    0:41:00 that it’s possible.
    0:41:01 Hundred percent.
    0:41:04 And I think also if that passion and impact is missing,
    0:41:08 I think people reflect too much about themselves, right?
    0:41:10 I’m going to get caught.
    0:41:14 Yeah, I’m going to get, you know, I’m going to do this or that.
    0:41:16 You know, I’m going to be on the newspaper or whatever.
    0:41:19 I think that’s usually not the right motivation, right?
    0:41:21 So I think, and again, it’s hard to be authentic
    0:41:23 if you don’t believe something people will find out.
    0:41:26 So I think that this vision orientation is very important
    0:41:28 when you start a company.
    0:41:32 You went from three employees to now 3,000 employees.
    0:41:36 You’ve gone through the whole scaling process.
    0:41:41 How did your management style change as the company grew?
    0:41:44 I think that’s one of the biggest challenges for founders.
    0:41:51 You have to basically change yourself completely at least three times.
    0:41:57 So when you start, you basically, you are in like block and tackling mode.
    0:42:02 You know, you know, every detail, you know, you have to have extreme attention to detail.
    0:42:05 You probably can’t afford very experienced people,
    0:42:08 but you also have a lot of control, right?
    0:42:11 And then you have to become a manager, right?
    0:42:12 So you have to manage people.
    0:42:13 You have to put team together.
    0:42:14 You have to think about an org charge.
    0:42:16 You have to, and that’s definitely a transformation.
    0:42:24 And then at some point you have to move from being a leader to being a leader of leaders
    0:42:26 and then ultimately to being an executive.
    0:42:31 And what that means is that you have to abstract from the details.
    0:42:36 You have to find a few very simple things you’re going to focus on.
    0:42:41 Like you can’t lead an organization of 3,000 people with details, right?
    0:42:45 You are like we in every year, we have three priorities or something that may fall, right?
    0:42:47 So it’s very, very simple.
    0:42:49 You need to communicate a lot.
    0:42:53 Again, from a standpoint of authenticity, but you have to communicate a lot.
    0:42:57 And you have to really create a team that is aligned with where you want to go.
    0:43:02 And then that team executes and they lead their leaders, right?
    0:43:05 And you have to really make sure that you empower an organization,
    0:43:08 that you are not just trying to manage every detail.
    0:43:12 Certainly, you know, if you, and there’s some CEOs that handle it differently,
    0:43:14 but certainly if you have a company that’s complex,
    0:43:17 I think if you have, you know, very few products,
    0:43:21 you might be able to like go into a lot of details sort of.
    0:43:24 But if you have like a complex platform, right?
    0:43:25 And you want to get broader and broader,
    0:43:27 you need to create a culture where people are empowered,
    0:43:30 where people can make their own decisions, where people can go fast.
    0:43:33 And I think that that is another transformation.
    0:43:36 So, you know, you have to really change yourself quite a bit,
    0:43:37 I think in that journey.
    0:43:39 And I think that’s why a lot of founders actually fail.
    0:43:43 I think that’s where I fail in terms of management is just delegating to people.
    0:43:45 I find it really hard to do.
    0:43:47 How did you manage that?
    0:43:49 Especially when you’re just starting out,
    0:43:51 like what was the point where you’re like,
    0:43:54 okay, I’m going to trust this gigantic process,
    0:43:58 even as the guy who obsesses over processes,
    0:43:59 I’m just going to give this to this person,
    0:44:01 and I’m going to delegate and I trust them to get it done.
    0:44:04 At some point, it gets so much that you have to learn.
    0:44:04 You can’t trust.
    0:44:07 You know, the thing is, I think this transformation,
    0:44:10 like if you can’t delegate, you’re not going to get very far, right?
    0:44:11 You need to delegate.
    0:44:16 The thing is, when you make this change from a leader to a leader of leaders,
    0:44:18 an executive, it’s a little different.
    0:44:22 Like before, you can run around at the office and you have a microphone like this one.
    0:44:23 And you say something in the microphone, it happens.
    0:44:26 Because everyone knows you have 300 people.
    0:44:28 Everyone knows you, people are still closed.
    0:44:30 And as a founder, you say, hey, we should build this product,
    0:44:30 or we should do this.
    0:44:32 And somehow it happens, right?
    0:44:33 So I called the founder microphone.
    0:44:35 Company gets bigger, you have more locations,
    0:44:36 more people, more senior people.
    0:44:40 You’re like, test, test.
    0:44:41 You know, this thing doesn’t work anymore.
    0:44:46 So then you have to think about org chart structures, leaders of leaders,
    0:44:48 you know, how to inspire people around simple priorities.
    0:44:51 And then you have to elevate yourself and just say, those details,
    0:44:54 I’m going to let my team handle them, I’m not going to get involved.
    0:44:56 You know, we have to have a failure culture.
    0:44:57 If people screw up, that’s fine, right?
    0:44:58 Obviously not too badly, please.
    0:45:02 But you know, it’s, and I think there’s, you know, some founders,
    0:45:05 they read these stories from Elon Musk and Steve Jobs,
    0:45:07 and you know, how they basically have Steve Jobs,
    0:45:10 like debugs, you know, a button on an iPhone or something like that.
    0:45:13 And I think, you know, when I talk to founders,
    0:45:15 I always say, be careful with that, right?
    0:45:18 Because first of all, likely you’re not Steve Jobs.
    0:45:21 I mean, he was like a once, you know, under generation type of genius.
    0:45:27 And then secondly, Apple, he was so good at product management and design
    0:45:31 and so visionary that he could create the most valuable company in the world,
    0:45:33 or one of the most valuable company in the world,
    0:45:36 with basically like a handful of products, right?
    0:45:40 You think about the ratio of like products to market cap for Apple.
    0:45:43 It’s extremely, right, very, very low.
    0:45:46 So most companies don’t work that way, right?
    0:45:49 So if you compare Steve Jobs management style to Jeff Bezos,
    0:45:54 I mean, Jeff Bezos, Amazon is like, he’s a systems thinker, right?
    0:45:58 He says, you know, I don’t actually work very hard.
    0:46:00 Like he’s basically, I work from nine to five, you know?
    0:46:04 But he created systems and people and accountable structures
    0:46:07 that were so good that people could make their own,
    0:46:10 and Amazon could be in all these businesses, right?
    0:46:15 So it’s a very different model of a company that has a very different needs,
    0:46:16 a very different leadership style.
    0:46:20 So if, you know, some founders, they run around like many Steve Jobs,
    0:46:22 and sometimes I’m a little bit, I’m like, be careful.
    0:46:24 That works for Steve Jobs because he was Steve Jobs,
    0:46:29 and because Apple created a business model around just having few products
    0:46:30 that are absolutely brilliant.
    0:46:32 I feel like we glorify these people.
    0:46:35 We glorify Steve Jobs, glorify Elon Musk.
    0:46:36 And I feel like there’s this founder culture,
    0:46:39 especially with the founder mode thing happening,
    0:46:44 where we glorify people who are kind of crazy, a little irrational,
    0:46:47 they shout at people, we need to do this.
    0:46:48 We can’t get it done in time.
    0:46:49 We’ll do it anyway.
    0:46:50 I don’t care.
    0:46:53 Just sort of like, bull in a china shop.
    0:46:56 But it’s like, I feel like we don’t respect or have enough time,
    0:47:00 or air time for all of the people that make that happen,
    0:47:03 who are like, actually very organized with their time,
    0:47:08 very calm, very rational, sort of the more Bezos types
    0:47:10 who actually build those systems and make it all possible.
    0:47:11 Yeah, I think exactly.
    0:47:15 I think that there’s different styles that work for different situations.
    0:47:17 I think when you talk about founder mode,
    0:47:19 of course as a founder, you need to be intense.
    0:47:21 If you’re not intense, you’re not going to start a company.
    0:47:23 Of course, you need to be very ambitious.
    0:47:29 Of course, you need to sometimes think against the crowd and set ambitious goals.
    0:47:32 Of course, you can’t accept mediocrity.
    0:47:34 So there are elements there that are very correct,
    0:47:38 but there’s other elements like this complete micro management mode.
    0:47:41 Again, Elon Musk, the bandwidth of the guys is incredible.
    0:47:42 We can agree.
    0:47:45 But his company is like, he really dives deep,
    0:47:47 and he builds these individual products that change the world.
    0:47:50 But that style doesn’t work for every company.
    0:47:53 I don’t think it would have worked for Amazon.
    0:47:54 Would it have worked for Solonis?
    0:47:54 Probably not.
    0:47:55 I don’t think so.
    0:48:00 So if Elon Musk was interested to give us a management coach,
    0:48:01 I wouldn’t mind.
    0:48:04 I’m just saying he doesn’t know what he’s doing.
    0:48:09 But my point is, I think that some founders run around like this, glorify this,
    0:48:13 applied blindly to their companies and think they are mini Steve Jobs and Elon Musk.
    0:48:14 And I don’t think that always works.
    0:48:19 So I think you need to really ideally collect some different viewpoints
    0:48:24 and then form your own independent principles first mindset of what style,
    0:48:25 what organizations will work for my company.
    0:48:29 And one of the things I talk about is people talk about product market fit.
    0:48:33 Someone once mentioned to me, you really need to think about product market people fit.
    0:48:35 And I was like, that’s interesting.
    0:48:38 So that’s actually a really good point, right?
    0:48:42 You have to create a people in an organization that fit your product and your market.
    0:48:43 Oh yeah.
    0:48:46 So I think that that also looks different for every company.
    0:48:48 I’m going to start to wrap us up here.
    0:48:52 And I’d like to hear more about processes in your personal life.
    0:48:58 Because you’ve built a company basically predicated on studying processes.
    0:49:02 So I’d just love to know what role do processes play in your personal life?
    0:49:04 Do you have any personal processes?
    0:49:08 Morning routine, workout routine, whatever it is.
    0:49:12 I have a workout routine that I follow three, four times a week.
    0:49:14 I’m pretty disciplined about that.
    0:49:19 But other than that, honestly, I’m not like too much of a process guy in my personal life.
    0:49:21 I try to leave that to the business.
    0:49:25 So what I hate is I hate to do, think about the same thing five times.
    0:49:29 So I’m a lazy guy, I’m a mathematician, mathematicians are lazy.
    0:49:34 So I try to think about, I don’t like to think about what I wear every day.
    0:49:38 So I have like 10 t-shirts and for most, for many occasions, that’s enough.
    0:49:39 That’s the process.
    0:49:45 But I wouldn’t say I’m like hugely process centric in my personal life.
    0:49:48 Well, I feel like wearing the same thing every day is pretty process centric.
    0:49:50 Well, it’s not every day.
    0:49:51 I always try to have a template.
    0:49:57 Yeah, I don’t go to the closet and think like, okay, what are we going to do today?
    0:50:00 I try to have like some structure there.
    0:50:06 But I’m also a wanderer, like I have a lot of different interests.
    0:50:09 Like every week looks different from a personal standpoint.
    0:50:12 So it’s not that I follow like the same playbook every day.
    0:50:18 I guess what I’m getting at is it feels like I have found in my personal life or just in my life
    0:50:24 that if I can figure out a way to automate something or do it so habitually
    0:50:29 that I no longer have to think about it and I can just go like kind of on automatic mode,
    0:50:30 it makes the rest of my life a lot easier.
    0:50:31 Oh yeah, I love that.
    0:50:36 I mean, I love that if something just works, you know, you have like, you know, you have this problem.
    0:50:38 I cook the same meal every week now.
    0:50:42 And like I’m just like, oh yeah, I just make like a bolognese.
    0:50:46 And I just like put in a giant pot and I’m like, okay, I’m just going to do this every week.
    0:50:50 And this way I can like just not think about this anymore.
    0:50:55 And I can just get on with the rest of my life back to me as a start at the Salonis lifestyle.
    0:50:58 And it gives you this feeling of like this sigh of relief right there.
    0:50:59 I didn’t have to think about that.
    0:51:00 Yeah, exactly.
    0:51:02 And you have free up some mental capacity for something else.
    0:51:09 You know, look, I think that then hopefully gives you some room for creativity and doing
    0:51:11 things that are not very process oriented.
    0:51:12 But yeah, I agree.
    0:51:14 I think it’s nice if things work.
    0:51:17 Thank you for taking the time.
    0:51:22 What would be your number one piece of advice to I would say entrepreneurs,
    0:51:25 but maybe let’s make it a little more open just anyone listening to this podcast.
    0:51:31 I think what’s really, really important is that you commit to your passions.
    0:51:39 You know, when I decided to study math, I had no idea, you know, what I wanted to do with it.
    0:51:43 You know, after my undergrad, I had, I wanted to study neuroscience.
    0:51:47 I had the opportunity to do Salonis and then was really passionate about that.
    0:51:48 So I jumped on it.
    0:51:52 I didn’t have any clarity whether this would work out or something like that.
    0:51:55 You know, I was really always glad looking back that I did it.
    0:51:59 Now I’m like, maybe neuroscience was a great area to get into, you know, with all the AI.
    0:52:00 But just kidding.
    0:52:08 But you know, I just think like when you love to do something, you are best at it.
    0:52:11 And you’ve got to try to find that and you’ve got to fight for that.
    0:52:16 I think obviously, you know, not every day is going to be, you know, the best here of your life.
    0:52:19 But I think that as a principle, that’s extremely important.
    0:52:22 And to your point, AI is going to hopefully help with that.
    0:52:28 This is going to unleash productivity for everybody that will be, can be distributed.
    0:52:33 But I think really, especially in your work life, finding something that you really enjoy,
    0:52:38 I think is incredibly important and something that people need to commit to.
    0:52:43 I think people are still too focused on what how will others perceive this, you know,
    0:52:48 what will be, what is the chess game of my next four career moves, you know, and that stuff.
    0:52:54 I think that following what you really believe and finding that and searching for that,
    0:52:57 I think ultimately leads to better outcomes.
    0:52:58 Alex, thank you.
    0:52:59 This was great.
    0:53:05 Alex Rinker is the co-founder and co-CEO of Solonus, a process mining and process intelligence company.
    0:53:07 This was wonderful.
    0:53:08 Thank you very much.
    0:53:09 Really excited.
    0:53:09 Awesome.
    0:53:15 Our producer is Claire Miller.
    0:53:17 Our associate producer is Alison Weiss.
    0:53:20 And our engineer is Benjamin Spencer.
    0:53:23 Thank you for listening to First Time Founders from the Vox Media Podcast Network.
    0:53:26 Tune in tomorrow for ProfG Markets.
    0:53:47 , you.
    0:53:50 (upbeat music)
    0:53:53 (upbeat music)

    Ed speaks with Alex Rinke, co-founder and co-CEO of Celonis, a process mining and intelligence company. They discuss how his management style evolved as the company scaled, the challenges facing Europe’s startup scene, and his advice for founders navigating the fundraising process.

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • No Mercy / No Malice: 2025 Predictions

    AI transcript
    0:00:06 -Hey, whatcha doin’? -Programming our thermostat to 17 degrees when we’re out at work or asleep.
    0:00:12 We’re taking control of our energy use this winter with some easy energy saving tips I got from Fortis, B.C.
    0:00:16 Ooh, conserve energy and save money? Maybe to buy those matching winter jackets?
    0:00:21 Uh, no. We’re also getting that whole matching outfit thing under control.
    0:00:27 Discover low and no-cost energy saving tips at fortisbc.com/energysavingtips.
    0:00:31 -Matching Jacksuits? -Please, no.
    0:00:33 This isn’t your Grandpa’s Finance podcast.
    0:00:37 It’s Vivian too, your rich BFF and host of the Net Worth & Chill podcast.
    0:00:42 This is money talk that’s actually fun, actually relatable and will actually make you money.
    0:00:45 I’m breaking down investments, side hustles and wealth strategies.
    0:00:49 No boring spreadsheets, just real talk that’ll have you leveling up your financial game.
    0:00:51 With amazing guests like Glenda Baker.
    0:00:54 There’s never been any house that I’ve sold in the last 32 years.
    0:00:57 It’s not worth more today than it was the day that I sold it.
    0:01:00 This is a money podcast that you’ll actually want to listen to.
    0:01:02 Follow Net Worth & Chill wherever you listen to podcasts.
    0:01:04 Your bank account will thank you later.
    0:01:09 I’m Scott Galloway, and this is No Mercy, No Malice.
    0:01:12 The best way to predict the future is to make it.
    0:01:17 2025 Predictions, as read by George Hahn.
    0:01:24 Predictions are a terrible business.
    0:01:29 If you get it right, the events leading up to the prediction render it less bold.
    0:01:36 If you get it wrong, you’ll be reminded of your gaffe 10,000 times a day, like on Twitter.
    0:01:41 The purpose isn’t really to be right, in fact, but to catalyze a conversation.
    0:01:44 Every year we make predictions.
    0:01:46 We start by holding ourselves accountable.
    0:01:52 To see a report card of our 2024 predictions, check out the written version of No Mercy,
    0:01:54 No Malice at ProfGalloway.com.
    0:02:00 For you listeners, here are our predictions for 2025.
    0:02:03 Prediction number one.
    0:02:06 Power couple, open video.
    0:02:14 Since the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, investors have added a staggering 8.2 trillion
    0:02:21 dollars to the market valuations of tech’s big six firms. Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta,
    0:02:22 Microsoft, and Nvidia.
    0:02:28 For context, the 2024 federal budget was $6.8 trillion.
    0:02:36 Companies that referenced AI during their earnings calls registered a 12% increase on
    0:02:42 average in performance compared to a 9% increase for those that didn’t mention it.
    0:02:47 The AI ecosystem is settling into three layers.
    0:02:51 Applications, like Duolingo, Netflix, and Tesla.
    0:02:56 AI models, like Anthropic, Gemini, and OpenAI.
    0:03:02 And infrastructure, like AWS, Google Cloud, or Nvidia.
    0:03:05 Two companies dominate.
    0:03:12 OpenAI has doubled its annualized revenue to $3.4 billion.
    0:03:14 In the past six months.
    0:03:21 And its ChatGPT accounts for 56% of premium LLM subscriptions.
    0:03:23 I.e. people pulling out their credit cards.
    0:03:31 Over the past 12 months, Nvidia has reported $96 billion in revenue.
    0:03:34 Four times its 2022 total.
    0:03:39 I look at peer reviewed research to evaluate whether a technology is enduring.
    0:03:47 Nvidia chips are cited in 19 times more research than those of its competitors combined.
    0:03:53 For two companies to dominate a technology this early is extraordinary.
    0:04:01 Prediction number two, the AI company of 2025, Meta.
    0:04:07 No business is better positioned to register progress in AI than Meta.
    0:04:13 Nine out of 10 internet users, excluding China, are active on Meta platforms.
    0:04:20 The company has access to more unique human language data, i.e. raw training data,
    0:04:24 than Google search, Reddit, Wikipedia, and X combined.
    0:04:32 In terms of compute, Meta has purchased more Nvidia Hopper GPUs, advanced AI hardware,
    0:04:40 than any US company other than Microsoft, giving it unmatched AI training and deployment capacity.
    0:04:47 Prediction number three, Palindrome, service as a software.
    0:04:52 So far, the benefits of AI have accrued to existing players.
    0:04:59 The next set of winners will be firms that capitalize on service as a software.
    0:05:06 i.e. taking human intensive services and putting a thick layer of AI on top to scale with less labor.
    0:05:12 This is a fancy way of saying there will be more consumer facing AI applications.
    0:05:18 The real cabbage, however, is in routinizing back office functions like accounting,
    0:05:21 compliance, customer service, etc.
    0:05:29 Prediction number four, technology of 2025, nuclear.
    0:05:33 AI’s choke point is energy.
    0:05:39 A chat GPT query demands 10 times the energy of a Google query.
    0:05:49 The majority of the 10 most valuable companies in 1980 and 2024 were, are, in energy and tech.
    0:05:57 However, the construction of acres of data centers and the energy investments needed to power them
    0:05:58 reflected deeper convergence.
    0:06:05 AI is accelerating big techs transformation from an industry that sells computers
    0:06:07 into an industry that sells compute.
    0:06:12 In a knowledge economy, compute is energy.
    0:06:19 Wind and solar are great, but they lack the scale and reliability of nuclear power.
    0:06:29 One nuclear reactor produces the equivalent of 800 wind turbines or 8.5 million solar panels.
    0:06:32 Nuclear is also carbon free.
    0:06:37 48% of the clean energy in the U.S. comes from nuclear.
    0:06:42 Nuclear power may be the worst managed brand in history.
    0:06:47 Every energy source has trade offs in emissions and externalities.
    0:06:51 I believe nuclear energy represents the best trade.
    0:06:58 If you gathered all the used nuclear fuel produced by the U.S. in the last 60 years,
    0:07:02 it would occupy only 10 yards of a football field.
    0:07:06 Note, do not go anywhere near that field.
    0:07:12 Prediction number five, get used to it, drones.
    0:07:21 Radar, jet engines, nuclear power, GPS, and blood banks were all developed during wartime.
    0:07:27 There’s something about war and the potential loss of a civilization that inspires creativity.
    0:07:35 At the outset of the war in Ukraine, Russia’s defense budget and standing army were 10 times
    0:07:38 and five times the size of Ukraine’s respectively.
    0:07:44 Drones are the premier technological innovation birthed by the conflict.
    0:07:51 Drones provide constant surveillance capabilities and enable precision strikes
    0:07:53 at a fraction of traditional costs.
    0:07:59 A successful drone strike can yield a 100,000% return.
    0:08:07 For example, $400 drones routinely destroy $4 million tanks.
    0:08:17 3D printing, AI, and micro cameras have converged to shape the latest David versus Goliath sequel.
    0:08:24 Using drones for last mile delivery of contracts and commuters, search and rescue missions,
    0:08:31 and monitoring and maintenance in manufacturing and agriculture should reap substantial gains.
    0:08:41 Prediction number six, Musk bids for Warner Brothers Discovery, CNN, or another iconic media firm.
    0:08:47 The Wall Street Journal reported that Elon is addicted to ketamine.
    0:08:54 I believe that’s the delivery mechanism, but the nicotine, where his real addiction resides,
    0:09:00 is attention. For 10% of his net worth, $44 billion for Twitter,
    0:09:05 he can impose himself on all of us nearly all the fucking time.
    0:09:11 Question, if he’s going to come undone, can he do it like the rest of us? In private?
    0:09:19 Anyway, Warner Brothers Discovery has a market cap of $26 billion plus debt.
    0:09:23 If the idea sounds outrageous, it isn’t.
    0:09:31 John Stanky, CEO of AT&T, put a condition on the sale of WBD that it had to be a
    0:09:37 single class of stock to get the greatest price and net the company a takeover premium.
    0:09:44 In the words of Gordon Gekko, WBD is breakable, i.e. it can be acquired.
    0:09:52 After his fallout with Trump and the public’s increasing fatigue, Jesus make it him just go away.
    0:09:56 Threatens to push him out of the spotlight,
    0:10:01 Elon will force himself back into the news cycle by again becoming the news.
    0:10:09 He could also buy MSNBC as unlike MSNBC, he does have a sense of humor.
    0:10:16 Prediction number seven, investment opportunity, emerging markets.
    0:10:23 The S&P 500 outperformed Vanguard’s all-world XUS index ETF
    0:10:32 plus 56% to plus 23% respectively from 2023 through 2024.
    0:10:38 Historically, when U.S. equities fall, emerging markets rise.
    0:10:46 These cycles typically last about a decade. I believe we’re overdue for a course correction.
    0:10:52 The U.S. stock market now makes up 50% of the total market cap globally.
    0:11:00 When stocks get this expensive, returns go down and capital looks for greater returns elsewhere.
    0:11:06 Since 1989, emerging markets have typically outperformed developed markets
    0:11:13 by 27% after a Fed rate cut. Demographics are destiny.
    0:11:19 The growth in working age populations favors India, Indonesia, and other developing nations.
    0:11:25 The share of institutional capital invested in the markets is at a cyclical low.
    0:11:34 A reversion to the mean would represent inflows of $910 billion to emerging markets.
    0:11:43 The X factor is Trump. He’s called for a 10% to 20% tariff on all imports
    0:11:51 and a 60% to 100% tariff on goods from China. I don’t believe he’ll follow through though,
    0:11:58 as tariff is Latin for tax. At the first hint of inflation, alarm bells will
    0:12:04 sound and the adults in the administration looking at the bond market will respond crisply
    0:12:10 and force the administration to slow their roll. And Republicans in Congress will find
    0:12:17 their backbones when they realize that 90% of the presents under the Christmas tree come from China
    0:12:21 and their dear leader is, post 2026, a lame duck.
    0:12:28 Prediction #8 Platform YouTube
    0:12:33 Netflix didn’t win the streaming wars. YouTube did.
    0:12:40 Last year, YouTube, which spends $0 on content (it shares revenue with creators instead of paying
    0:12:48 them), became the first streaming platform to reach 10% of all television viewing. 81% of
    0:12:56 GenAlpha viewers said they watched YouTube recently, compared to 62% who said they watched a subscription
    0:13:05 streaming service, and 44% who said they watched TikTok. In the US and UK, one-third of kids aged
    0:13:14 8 to 12 said YouTube was their number one career choice. Movistar didn’t even make the list.
    0:13:22 Also, YouTube is the number one podcast platform, adding a tailwind no other streamer has.
    0:13:30 If Alphabet were forced to spin off YouTube, the company would likely be worth half a trillion
    0:13:35 dollars, versus Netflix’s market cap of $350 billion.
    0:13:43 Prediction #9 Media Podcasts
    0:13:50 I’m talking my own book here, but I’ve been in the podcasting business for almost a decade,
    0:13:57 and this is the first time I’ve called it the media of the year. The only ad-supported medium
    0:14:06 growing as fast as meta, TikTok, Alphabet, and Reddit is podcasting. Of the estimated 3.2 million
    0:14:14 pods, 600,000 put out content each week, and I estimate only 600 are economically viable.
    0:14:23 This is a striking concentration of power, with the top 10 pods commanding 35% of the listenership.
    0:14:32 Kamala Harris would have needed to appear on CNN, Fox, and MSNBC three hours every night
    0:14:39 during prime time for two weeks to reach as many people as Donald Trump did going on Joe Rogan.
    0:14:45 Podcasts’ share of attention is well ahead of their share of ad revenue.
    0:14:52 This delta will close. Since the election, our pods have seen a 30% increase in revenue.
    0:15:00 My prediction is that pods’ ad revenue will grow by 20+% in 2025.
    0:15:07 Listenership will continue to grow as well, and the ARPU, like those of meta and Alphabet,
    0:15:13 will increase dramatically as advertisers discover this is where young, successful consumers have
    0:15:24 been hiding. Prediction number 10. IPO, Sheehan. Disclosure, I’m an investor.
    0:15:33 One-third of Gen Z consumers say they’re addicted to fast fashion. Traditional retailers release
    0:15:39 100 new styles a week. Fast fashion retailers put out 100 styles per day.
    0:15:49 Sheehan pushes out 7,000 styles per day. Its operations are remarkably asset-light,
    0:15:54 as Sheehan is an IP business that doesn’t own any factories, trucks, or stores.
    0:16:02 Instead, its software tracks activity on the site, sends orders to factories based on their
    0:16:09 ability to calibrate demand, and then puts in motion the transportation. Also, there are
    0:16:16 effectively no returns. The Achilles heel of any retail business. As the products are so cheap,
    0:16:21 people don’t go through the hassle of sending them back. Similar to other asset-light winners
    0:16:29 like Airbnb, NVIDIA, or Uber, Sheehan’s revenue per employee dwarfs that of the incumbents.
    0:16:40 Prediction number 11. Business trend, M&A. A historic amount of cash is on the sidelines.
    0:16:47 Since 2003, private equity’s dry powder, i.e. the committed capital not yet allocated,
    0:16:58 increased 8X to $4 trillion. Corporate cash holdings total $4.1 trillion. Context,
    0:17:08 U.S. GDP is around $27 trillion. The average closing time for U.S. deal makers in 2022
    0:17:19 was 161 days, a 14% increase since 2018. For deals exceeding $10 billion in value,
    0:17:28 closing times have surged by 66% to an average of 323 days. Over the past four years,
    0:17:34 Lena Kahn has been an aggressive antitrust enforcer, and the Biden administration has
    0:17:41 published 209 economically significant regulations, more than any president since Reagan.
    0:17:49 The lesson? Elections have consequences. Setting aside whatever grievances Trump
    0:17:54 may hold against specific tech and media companies, the perception is that his
    0:18:00 administration will likely be more friendly to M&A. Some predictions regarding who will be on top
    0:18:10 of some big transactions? Comcast, Uber, and, see above, Musk. Also, I believe someone will take
    0:18:19 Intel and/or Boeing private. Prediction number 12. Tech movement, banning phones.
    0:18:27 When we look back on this age, the thing we’ll regret most is letting our kids become addicts.
    0:18:33 The substance is social media. The delivery mechanism is the phone.
    0:18:45 On a typical day, a teen receives 237 notifications. One study found that 97% of kids
    0:18:51 use their phone during school hours for a median of about 43 minutes per day.
    0:18:59 Think about that. Basically, every teen in America misses 10% of school every day.
    0:19:06 Giving students unrestricted access to phones has been a great move, said no teacher ever.
    0:19:14 Banning them in school is a return to sanity. The good news, 18 states have passed laws
    0:19:19 restricting the use of phones in school, and roughly three-quarters of schools
    0:19:25 have policies restricting their use in the classroom. Better news? Our response,
    0:19:36 while slow, is bipartisan. Best news? Test scores have improved by 6% in schools that have banned phones.
    0:19:48 Prediction number 13. Chemical testosterone. Women are ascendant, something to celebrate,
    0:19:55 while young men are struggling. There has never been a cohort that’s fallen further
    0:20:04 faster than young men living in Western democracies. The percentage of young men aged 20 to 24,
    0:20:11 who are neither in school nor working, has tripled since 1980. Workforce participation
    0:20:19 among men has fallen below 90%, while median hourly wages are $3 less per hour adjusted for
    0:20:29 inflation than they were in 1970. This is deadly. Over the past 20 years, America’s incremental
    0:20:38 deaths of despair totaled 414,000, exceeding the 407,000 Americans killed in World War II.
    0:20:47 It’s also a mating crisis, as women traditionally mate horizontally and up socioeconomically,
    0:20:55 whereas men mate horizontally and down. When the pool of horizontal and up young men shrinks,
    0:21:01 there are fewer mating opportunities. And without the guardrails of a relationship,
    0:21:10 young men behave as if they have no guardrails. Families feel this. I believe the 2024 election
    0:21:15 was about struggling young people, especially struggling young men. If your son is in the
    0:21:21 basement vaping and playing video games, you don’t really care about trans rights or Ukraine,
    0:21:28 you just want change, i.e. chaos and disruption. The Trump campaign saw this and flew into the
    0:21:38 manisphere with coarse language, crypto, Rogan, UFC, and Hulk Hogan. Trump gained 15% with young men,
    0:21:46 the biggest pivot from Democrats to Republicans of any age group. Another big shift was among women
    0:21:55 aged 45 to 64. I believe those are the mothers of struggling young men. America elected President
    0:22:03 T. The T stands for testosterone. The election was supposed to be a referendum on women’s rights.
    0:22:17 It was instead a referendum on failing young men. Prediction number 14. 2025 will be a great year
    0:22:26 for you. How do I know this? A, I don’t. However, I do really hope your year is full of prosperity
    0:22:33 and time with loved ones. I’ve read that if you write down a goal, it’s 40% more likely to happen.
    0:22:40 And I’ve done this. See two sentences ago. So we have that going for us.
    0:22:56 Life is so rich.

    As read by George Hahn.

    2025 Predictions

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • No Mercy / No Malice: Think Slow

    As read by George Hahn.

    Think Slow

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • The Blue Flame Thinkers of 2024

    AI transcript
    0:00:03 Support for this show comes from Klaviyo.
    0:00:05 You’re building a business.
    0:00:07 Klaviyo helps you grow it.
    0:00:09 Klaviyo’s AI-powered marketing platform
    0:00:12 puts all your customer data plus email,
    0:00:15 SMS, and analytics in one place.
    0:00:17 With Klaviyo, Tind Fish Phenom Fish Wife
    0:00:21 delivers real-time personalized experiences
    0:00:23 that keeps their customers hooked.
    0:00:24 They’ve grown 70 times revenue
    0:00:26 in just four years with Klaviyo.
    0:00:28 Now that’s scale.
    0:00:33 Visit klaviyo.com to learn how brands like Fish Wife
    0:00:36 build smarter digital relationships with Klaviyo.
    0:00:43 This episode is brought to you by Secret.
    0:00:45 Secret deodorant gives you 72 hours
    0:00:47 of clinically proven odor protection,
    0:00:51 free of aluminum, parabens, dyes, talc, and baking soda.
    0:00:53 It’s made with pH-balancing minerals
    0:00:56 and crafted with skin-conditioning oils.
    0:00:59 So whether you’re going for a run or just running late,
    0:01:03 do what life throws your way and smell like you didn’t.
    0:01:05 Find Secret at your nearest Walmart
    0:01:07 or Shoppers Drug Mart today.
    0:01:14 Your team requested a ride, but this time, not from you.
    0:01:16 It’s through their Uberteam account.
    0:01:18 It’s an Uber account that allows your team
    0:01:20 to request a ride under your supervision
    0:01:23 with live trip tracking and highly rated drivers.
    0:01:25 Add your team to your Uber account today.
    0:01:28 (upbeat music)
    0:01:41 Welcome to the final Prop G episode of 2024.
    0:01:42 Can you believe that?
    0:01:44 2025, really?
    0:01:46 In today’s episode, we’re taking a look back
    0:01:47 at some of our favorite conversations
    0:01:48 throughout the past year.
    0:01:50 We’ve been fortunate enough to have some
    0:01:51 of the world’s leading experts
    0:01:53 on all sorts of interesting topics,
    0:01:55 including geopolitics, psychology, wellness,
    0:01:56 and tech.
    0:01:58 Let’s bust right into it.
    0:02:00 So, an immediate Buster Rundo.
    0:02:03 First up, we have a clip from Admiral James Stavridis,
    0:02:05 a retired four-star US naval officer.
    0:02:08 I’m a big fan of the admirals.
    0:02:10 And 2024 certainly won’t be the last time
    0:02:11 you’ll hear from him on this show.
    0:02:14 Back in February, we discussed the state of global affairs
    0:02:17 and what we can do about the fragmentation of the US.
    0:02:18 Let’s have a listen.
    0:02:23 We need to do more to incentivize and celebrate
    0:02:25 the idea of service.
    0:02:29 And by the way, this is not confined to the armed forces.
    0:02:32 There are a lot of ways to serve this country.
    0:02:35 And we need high-quality people who are diplomats,
    0:02:39 CIA officers, peace corps volunteers,
    0:02:43 Teach for America, Volunteer for America,
    0:02:46 our police, firefighters, EMT.
    0:02:49 There are a lot of ways to serve the country.
    0:02:53 I think we are underweight in incentivizing that
    0:02:56 with taxes, educational benefits.
    0:02:59 But above all, we are underweight these days
    0:03:03 in celebrating it, particularly the non-military.
    0:03:06 We do a reasonably good job these days
    0:03:08 with thank you for your service.
    0:03:10 We ought to broaden that whole concept
    0:03:15 and create more of an idea of what it means to be a citizen
    0:03:17 and what are the positive incentives
    0:03:18 that can come out of this.
    0:03:21 Business can help at this.
    0:03:23 Again, that was Admiral James DeVaritas,
    0:03:24 a frequent guest on the pod
    0:03:28 and one of the leading experts in geopolitics.
    0:03:30 Next up, we have a clip from Bradley Tusk,
    0:03:32 a venture capitalist, political strategist,
    0:03:33 philanthropist and writer.
    0:03:35 We discussed a number of topics,
    0:03:36 including the state of politics
    0:03:39 and why the public is fundamentally unhappy.
    0:03:43 – Look, I think that we may be entering a world
    0:03:48 of one term, presidents, governors, mayors,
    0:03:51 because the public is fundamentally unhappy, right?
    0:03:53 So a few things.
    0:03:56 One is social media, I would argue,
    0:03:58 is basically the unhappiness machine.
    0:03:59 It does two things.
    0:04:00 It forces you to compare your life
    0:04:02 to someone’s a fictional life.
    0:04:04 So you feel inadequate immediately
    0:04:06 and then it shows you everything bad happening
    0:04:08 everywhere in the world all at once,
    0:04:10 compounded by the views of a million idiots.
    0:04:12 So you feel bad about your own life,
    0:04:13 you feel bad about yourself.
    0:04:15 Then the next step is existential risk.
    0:04:16 So when you and I were kids,
    0:04:18 there was one major existential risk,
    0:04:19 which was nuclear war.
    0:04:20 That risk still remains.
    0:04:21 It’s probably worse right now
    0:04:23 because the proliferation of nukes is getting there
    0:04:25 and eventually Iran’s gonna have it.
    0:04:26 North Korea has it.
    0:04:29 But that you lay on top of that climate change,
    0:04:31 the risk of a real serious pandemic.
    0:04:34 I mean, COVID had a major impact,
    0:04:35 but while it’s highly transmissible,
    0:04:37 it wasn’t that lethal.
    0:04:39 But I am sure that a version of COVID
    0:04:42 that is much more lethal exists in a lab in China
    0:04:45 or the US or Russia or Israel or the UK or somewhere,
    0:04:47 or more likely all of them.
    0:04:48 And so the risk of any of those getting out.
    0:04:50 And then with AI, I’m a believer in AI,
    0:04:52 but none of us too early for any of us
    0:04:54 to really know yet what it’s gonna be.
    0:04:55 So the amount of existential risk
    0:04:57 has increased significantly.
    0:04:59 – That was Bradley Tusk,
    0:05:01 a former deputy governor of Illinois
    0:05:02 and campaign manager for Michael Bloomberg,
    0:05:04 among many other things.
    0:05:07 Next up, we have a clip from our good friend,
    0:05:09 Jonathan Haidt, colleague at NYU,
    0:05:11 who has taken the world by storm this year
    0:05:13 with his book, “The Anxious Generation,”
    0:05:15 how the great rewiring of childhood
    0:05:18 is causing an epidemic of mental illness.
    0:05:19 If you listen to this podcast,
    0:05:22 you know, I’m an enormous fan of Professor Haidt’s
    0:05:24 and his work surrounding the effects of social media
    0:05:26 on young people’s mental health.
    0:05:28 Here’s the clip.
    0:05:29 – The solutions that I propose
    0:05:31 are all things we can do together
    0:05:34 to liberate our kids from the social action problems.
    0:05:36 Very briefly, four steps, four norms.
    0:05:38 No smartphone before high school.
    0:05:39 Just give them a flip phone.
    0:05:41 The millennials were fine with flip phones.
    0:05:44 Two is no social media till 16.
    0:05:47 Social media is just not suitable for minors, frankly.
    0:05:49 It certainly isn’t suitable in early puberty.
    0:05:51 Let them get most of the way through puberty
    0:05:53 before you invite them to stick their head in a toilet bowl
    0:05:56 and flush every day forever and ever.
    0:05:58 Third norm is phone-free schools.
    0:06:02 The phone is the greatest distraction device ever invented.
    0:06:03 Kids text during class.
    0:06:05 They watch videos during class.
    0:06:06 They watch porn during class.
    0:06:10 It’s completely insane that there are schools in this country,
    0:06:12 namely most of them, almost all of them,
    0:06:14 that allow kids to keep their phones in their pockets
    0:06:15 during the day.
    0:06:16 And they just say, “Don’t take it out during class,”
    0:06:18 but they do take it out during class.
    0:06:21 And the fourth norm is far more free play,
    0:06:23 independence, and responsibility in the real world.
    0:06:24 This is the harder word
    0:06:26 because we have to overcome our own anxieties.
    0:06:28 But if we’re gonna take away the phones
    0:06:30 from, especially in middle school,
    0:06:33 if we’re gonna reduce their time on screens,
    0:06:34 we have to give them something to do.
    0:06:36 And the healthiest thing they can do
    0:06:40 is hang out, play with each other, unsupervised.
    0:06:43 Let them learn how to work out conflicts
    0:06:45 and choose activities.
    0:06:48 If we do those, I am confident that we would see
    0:06:50 these lines, these incredibly surging lines
    0:06:52 of anxiety and depression, they just go up, up, up.
    0:06:55 They never go down since 2012.
    0:06:57 If we do these four things, I’m pretty confident
    0:06:59 we’re gonna see those lines come down.
    0:07:01 We’re gonna actually reverse the mental health epidemic.
    0:07:05 – That was Total Gangster, Jonathan Haidt,
    0:07:08 a professor of ethical leadership and bestselling author.
    0:07:10 Moving along, we have a clip from another gangster.
    0:07:13 This one in geopolitics, one of our favorites,
    0:07:14 Fried Zakaria.
    0:07:16 We discussed with Farid his latest book,
    0:07:18 “Age of Revolutions, Progress and Backlash”
    0:07:20 from 1600 to the present,
    0:07:22 the effects of the industrial evolution
    0:07:24 and modern geopolitics as a whole.
    0:07:28 – The nature of the digital revolution,
    0:07:30 if we can just call it that for a moment,
    0:07:34 is that it has created a whole new economy
    0:07:38 and a whole new mental world for us.
    0:07:42 Mark Andreessen’s famous blog post where he talks
    0:07:44 about software eating the world.
    0:07:45 Gets it exactly right.
    0:07:49 The world used to be run, it was a world of atoms.
    0:07:52 And what happened is the digital revolution came
    0:07:54 and it created a world of bits and bytes
    0:07:57 that now control those atoms.
    0:07:59 So actually the internal combustion engine
    0:08:01 is kind of irrelevant now.
    0:08:04 What a car is becoming is software on wheels.
    0:08:06 And it’s the software that controls that.
    0:08:08 And now what’s going to happen is,
    0:08:11 you’re going to have AI that controls the software.
    0:08:13 And those things become paramount.
    0:08:15 And the point I’m trying to make in the book
    0:08:18 is not so much about the economic effect.
    0:08:21 It’s the sort of social and psychological consequences
    0:08:24 of these changes, which you know and care a lot about.
    0:08:27 It is mind-blowing in every way to think about that.
    0:08:30 You know, human beings have never had the power
    0:08:33 to multiply their minds
    0:08:35 the way that AI is going to be able to allow them to do.
    0:08:37 What does that do to our conceptions
    0:08:39 of who we are as human beings?
    0:08:42 – That was Fareed Zakaria, a close friend of the pod
    0:08:45 and host of CNN’s flagship international fair show,
    0:08:47 Fareed Zakaria GPS.
    0:08:49 Now let’s listen to a clip of our episode
    0:08:52 with Matthew Hussie, a leading dating expert
    0:08:53 and author of the book, Love Life.
    0:08:55 How to raise your standards, find your person
    0:08:57 and live happily no matter what.
    0:09:01 – For so many people I would argue universally
    0:09:05 whatever form it comes in, we are looking for love.
    0:09:09 We want that feeling of having a mate.
    0:09:12 We want that feeling of being attractive
    0:09:14 to the people we’re trying to attract.
    0:09:16 We want to feel fulfilled in our love lives.
    0:09:21 So that desire to find that becomes so,
    0:09:24 in some cases, anxiously driven,
    0:09:27 especially when time is running out
    0:09:28 or it feels like time is running out.
    0:09:31 That’s true from on a very literal level
    0:09:33 for everyone who’s looking for a family
    0:09:36 of their own biologically and for women more than men,
    0:09:40 although for men too, more than a lot of them realize.
    0:09:44 That fear of time running out amplifies this feeling of,
    0:09:46 God, I have this really important position
    0:09:47 that I want to fill in my life.
    0:09:52 I’m trying to fill the position of my life partner.
    0:09:55 And we get so obsessed with how important it is
    0:09:58 to fill that position that the moment we go on a date
    0:10:02 and we see even the faintest hope that this person
    0:10:06 could represent a candidate for that position.
    0:10:07 Which, by the way, Scott,
    0:10:11 normally is not based on any deeper character traits
    0:10:14 ’cause how many of people’s deeper character traits
    0:10:17 can we really ascertain on a one-hour first date?
    0:10:20 – Next up, we have Jesse Itzler,
    0:10:22 a serial entrepreneur, best-selling author,
    0:10:25 and part owner of The Atlantic Hawks,
    0:10:27 and ultra marathon runner.
    0:10:29 We had a great conversation about success,
    0:10:32 fitness, and maintaining balance.
    0:10:33 – I’ve been super lucky
    0:10:36 and probably way more lucky than good,
    0:10:38 but I’ve put myself in situations
    0:10:40 where I can attract that luck.
    0:10:42 I used to come home, Scott, from like,
    0:10:43 you know, when I walk into Marquis Gen,
    0:10:45 I’d be like, I got a sale last night.
    0:10:47 We had a bell, I would ring the bell.
    0:10:48 They’d be like, “What do you mean?
    0:10:51 “You had the bar, same bar I was at.”
    0:10:53 I’m like, “Yeah, but you left it 11 o’clock.”
    0:10:56 I stayed till two and I got the sale.
    0:10:59 Oh, you’re so lucky, the guy came, I was,
    0:11:02 I’m not lucky, I put myself in that situation.
    0:11:04 You know, luck doesn’t happen Sunday night
    0:11:07 watching the Kardashians on your couch.
    0:11:09 It happens when you put yourself in an environment
    0:11:13 where the universe can reward you for deep near,
    0:11:14 and then you have to be good at what you do
    0:11:16 and take advantage of it.
    0:11:20 So my 20s and 30s were built around
    0:11:23 putting myself in environments where I could get lucky.
    0:11:29 Next up is our conversation with Simon Sinek,
    0:11:32 a world-renowned author, motivational speaker and friend.
    0:11:35 He shares his wisdom surrounding leadership and mentorship.
    0:11:37 Here’s a clip.
    0:11:41 – I mean, first of all, I don’t believe leaders are the one.
    0:11:43 I think that some people have an education
    0:11:44 when they’re younger, they have a coach,
    0:11:46 they have a parent, they have a guardian,
    0:11:49 somebody in their life, a teacher who does something right.
    0:11:52 They model themselves after that person
    0:11:53 and they seem to learn it younger,
    0:11:55 or they have some trials and tribulations
    0:11:57 and they learn to overcome and rely on other people,
    0:11:58 whatever it is.
    0:12:00 But even some of the great leaders that we admire
    0:12:03 if you look back, whether it’s Steve Jobs or Mahatma Gandhi,
    0:12:06 like, you see that they were learning
    0:12:08 and they didn’t get it right a lot of the time,
    0:12:11 especially when they were younger, they learned those skills.
    0:12:14 Young people, for me fundamentally,
    0:12:15 the single best thing a young person can do
    0:12:18 is really learn to be a friend.
    0:12:22 – That was Simon Sinek, author of the books “Start With Why,”
    0:12:25 “The Infinite Game,” and “Find Your Why.”
    0:12:27 Up next, our conversation with Andrew Huberman.
    0:12:30 Andrew is the host of the Huberman Lab Podcast
    0:12:32 and a professor in the Department of Neurobiology
    0:12:33 at Stanford University.
    0:12:37 He shared his insights on all things physiological health.
    0:12:42 – Optimization is something that we have to think about
    0:12:43 on a day-to-day basis.
    0:12:47 So it is true, I did rounds of sauna and cold this morning.
    0:12:50 You know, I did, I got up really early,
    0:12:51 a friend came over, I haven’t seen a while ago,
    0:12:54 earlier than I would have liked and did sauna and cold.
    0:12:55 And I did train yesterday.
    0:12:58 But there are days, you know, I miss days, you know,
    0:13:01 and it happens and, you know, life.
    0:13:03 So I don’t want to give the impression
    0:13:07 that my entire life is geared around protocols
    0:13:08 to the point where I don’t do other things.
    0:13:10 I went out to dinner with friends last night,
    0:13:12 you know, I experienced stress in life,
    0:13:14 we could talk about that, like anyone else.
    0:13:19 So I would say this, figure out the minimum amount
    0:13:21 of alcohol that you’re happy to drink
    0:13:25 that makes you feel, you know, like you’re living life.
    0:13:27 So maybe that’s a drink a night, maybe that’s two weeks,
    0:13:30 maybe that’s stacking a few more toward the weekend,
    0:13:32 whatever’s gonna work there.
    0:13:34 And provided that your sleep is good,
    0:13:36 meaning that we know it’s gonna disrupt
    0:13:37 your sleep architecture somewhat,
    0:13:39 but provided that you don’t have
    0:13:41 excessive daytime sleepiness,
    0:13:44 provided that you are not getting an increased frequency
    0:13:47 of colds and flus, you’re accomplishing your work,
    0:13:49 I would say you’re doing great.
    0:13:52 Especially as you know, you’re visibly fit.
    0:13:55 If you can do the three cardio vascular training sessions
    0:13:57 and the two earth, this is the training sessions
    0:14:01 that I just described without, you know, dissolving
    0:14:04 into a pile of cells on the floor afterwards,
    0:14:07 you know, even when you’re doing a 85% intensity
    0:14:09 or let’s say 85% intensity of what you could do,
    0:14:11 you’re doing great, you’re doing great.
    0:14:14 – Fun fact, that was our most listened to episode
    0:14:16 of the year, obviously, at Huberman Lab
    0:14:18 is one of the 10 biggest podcasts in the world
    0:14:22 and Andrew is having a huge impact.
    0:14:24 Anyways, next up is a clip from our episode
    0:14:25 with Dr. Ayanna Elizabeth Johnson,
    0:14:28 a marine biologist, policy expert, writer,
    0:14:32 and co-founder of the non-profit Think Tank Urban Ocean Lab.
    0:14:36 – I personally don’t think any of this has to be political.
    0:14:41 Like, we all actually want a good future for our children
    0:14:45 and there’s polling that shows that the biggest motivator
    0:14:49 for people to act on climate is love for future generations.
    0:14:53 It’s actually not profit, which I found to be surprising.
    0:14:55 It’s not any number of other things.
    0:14:57 It really is like, I want to leave a better world
    0:14:59 for my children and the biggest thing
    0:15:02 that can convince conservative men
    0:15:06 to care more about climate change is their daughters
    0:15:09 saying, you’re setting our future on fire and I’m scared.
    0:15:12 And that sort of instinct to protect our daughters,
    0:15:15 our children kicks in in this way
    0:15:18 that’s actually beneficial for the planet.
    0:15:20 So there’s a lot of certainly like psychology
    0:15:24 and economics and politics and policy, et cetera,
    0:15:26 and culture all at play here.
    0:15:29 – That was Dr. Ayanna Elizabeth Johnson,
    0:15:31 author of the new book, What If We Get It Right?
    0:15:34 Visions of Climate Futures.
    0:15:35 Moving along, we have a clip from our interview
    0:15:38 with Rory Stewart, the former UK Secretary of State
    0:15:39 for International Development
    0:15:42 and co-host of The Rest Is Politics.
    0:15:46 Liberal democracies haven’t been delivering
    0:15:47 well enough for people.
    0:15:52 I mean, that for about 200 years from the early 1800s,
    0:15:55 it, we could tell a story where we convinced ourselves
    0:15:57 that democracies were naturally more prosperous
    0:15:59 and as people became more prosperous,
    0:16:01 they became more democratic.
    0:16:04 And partly because of the rise of China,
    0:16:06 but partly because the success
    0:16:07 of other authoritarian regimes.
    0:16:12 We’ve broken the link in which democracies
    0:16:13 are not necessarily delivering for people.
    0:16:15 And in certain years, it feels as though
    0:16:18 non-democratic states are delivering quite effectively.
    0:16:19 So that’s one problem.
    0:16:22 I think second, and that is a big problem
    0:16:25 because I think the reason why people buy into democracy
    0:16:28 is not only because they believe in human rights
    0:16:29 and liberal values, it’s also because
    0:16:31 it was making them wealthier.
    0:16:36 I think the second threat is, I’m afraid, social media.
    0:16:40 I think it’s not a coincidence that the rise
    0:16:42 of social media from 2003, four onwards
    0:16:46 and its explosion with the Arab Spring in 2010, 2011
    0:16:48 is part of the story of the rise of populism
    0:16:50 and the rise of authoritarianism
    0:16:52 because I think it, those are algorithms
    0:16:56 that drive people into polarized states.
    0:16:59 And I think they are, have been extremely bad
    0:17:02 for the key bits of democratic discourse
    0:17:06 in particular, compromise, meeting in the middle,
    0:17:08 explaining, having a shared frame of reference.
    0:17:13 – That was Rory Stewart and his thoughts on modern democracy.
    0:17:15 And last but not least, let’s have a listen
    0:17:17 to our episode with Angela Duckworth,
    0:17:19 a professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania
    0:17:22 and the author of The New York Times bestseller, GRIT,
    0:17:24 The Power of Passion and Perseverance.
    0:17:27 Angela shared the attributes of gritty people
    0:17:29 and tips for raising resilient children.
    0:17:33 – I think GRIT is forged in a crucible,
    0:17:36 half of which is challenge.
    0:17:37 I mean, what is challenge?
    0:17:39 Challenge is being asked to do something
    0:17:41 you cannot yet do, right?
    0:17:43 You know, 2,000 meters instead of 800,
    0:17:45 like whatever it is, right?
    0:17:46 I can’t do it.
    0:17:49 The challenges exceed my resources or my abilities.
    0:17:51 So I think that is half of it.
    0:17:52 But, you know, when Nietzsche said
    0:17:55 “What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger,”
    0:17:58 I mean, it does make you wonder, like, when you look around
    0:18:03 and it does actually kill or seriously wound a lot of people.
    0:18:06 And I think that’s because the other half of the crucible
    0:18:09 and you can agree or disagree with me
    0:18:11 is some kind of support.
    0:18:16 Like, where does that inner self-talk come from
    0:18:19 that says, you know, I’ll show you, right?
    0:18:21 Because I think if there was one phrase
    0:18:22 that I have heard over and over again
    0:18:25 in interviews of the grittiest people,
    0:18:29 it’s that when they describe confronting a major challenge,
    0:18:32 especially when they’re doubted, right?
    0:18:36 And someone else tells them, like, well, you can’t do this.
    0:18:40 You know, there is this rage, this, like, voice that says,
    0:18:41 I’ll show you.
    0:18:45 And my theory is that being in one challenging situation
    0:18:49 after another is not enough to give you the voice that says,
    0:18:50 I’ll show you.
    0:18:52 Somewhere, there has to be support.
    0:18:54 Somewhere, there has to be a–
    0:18:57 you know, like, I can’t remember Rocky’s coach,
    0:18:58 like the guy with the, you know, the–
    0:19:00 Burgess Meredith.
    0:19:01 Exactly.
    0:19:02 Right?
    0:19:04 Sailor, you know, like the beanie on.
    0:19:07 Like, I think I’ve seen it too often, you know,
    0:19:09 that people who are in challenging situations
    0:19:12 without support, you know, are not the ones to get up again,
    0:19:15 dust themselves off, like, learn something, you know,
    0:19:18 come back stronger than they were before.
    0:19:21 All right, that’s a wrap on 2024.
    0:19:25 Adios, Bente, Bente, Cuatro, 2024.
    0:19:27 Jesus Christ, really?
    0:19:27 It’s gone.
    0:19:30 A big thank you to–
    0:19:33 wait for it– you, our listeners,
    0:19:35 for a great year.
    0:19:39 This has been our best year ever on a number of dimensions.
    0:19:41 But also, it’s been a rewarding year on a lot of levels.
    0:19:43 A lot of nice people.
    0:19:44 We’re paying our people well.
    0:19:46 They’re doing well.
    0:19:47 We’re growing.
    0:19:49 Our people seem to appreciate our work.
    0:19:50 I feel as if we’re having an impact.
    0:19:52 I see people on the street, and they come up.
    0:19:55 They’re super nice, made a bunch of new friends
    0:19:56 because of the pod.
    0:19:59 Anyways, emotional, psychological, economic reward,
    0:20:01 having an impact, having purpose.
    0:20:03 And it’s because people give us a shot.
    0:20:04 People listen to us.
    0:20:06 People provide us with thoughtful, civil feedback.
    0:20:07 We get it wrong all the time.
    0:20:10 I get it wrong more often than all the time.
    0:20:12 And people are always generous with us.
    0:20:15 And it’s very much appreciate not only your listenership
    0:20:18 but your engagement and for the people who come up and say hi.
    0:20:21 A special shout out is just wonderful for me.
    0:20:22 It’s one of the nicest things that happens to me
    0:20:24 on a regular basis.
    0:20:25 Best to you and yours.
    0:20:26 Thank you so much.
    0:20:29 And here’s to a great 2024 and hoping for an even more
    0:20:31 prosperous and healthy 2025.
    0:20:34 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:20:38 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:20:41 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:20:44 (gentle music)
    0:20:54 [BLANK_AUDIO]

    We’re listening back to some of our favorite conversations from the past year.

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Prof G Markets: Ask Us Anything — Forgiveness, The Manosphere, Parasocial Relationships & More

    AI transcript
    0:00:04 Thumbtack presents the ins and outs of caring for your home.
    0:00:10 Out, procrastination, putting it off, kicking the can down the road.
    0:00:16 In, plans and guides that make it easy to get home projects done.
    0:00:21 Out, carpet in the bathroom, like why.
    0:00:26 In, knowing what to do, when to do it, and who to hire.
    0:00:29 Start caring for your home with confidence.
    0:00:32 Download Thumbtack today.
    0:00:36 Support for this show comes from Klaviyo.
    0:00:38 You’re building a business.
    0:00:40 Klaviyo helps you grow it.
    0:00:44 Klaviyo’s AI-powered marketing platform puts all your customer data
    0:00:48 plus email, SMS, and analytics in one place.
    0:00:54 With Klaviyo, Tindfish Phenom Fishwife delivers real-time, personalized experiences
    0:00:55 that keeps their customers hooked.
    0:00:59 They’ve grown 70 times revenue in just four years with Klaviyo.
    0:01:01 Now that’s scale.
    0:01:09 Visit klaviyo.com to learn how brands like Fishwife build smarter digital relationships with Klaviyo.
    0:01:17 Your team requested a ride, but this time, not from you.
    0:01:19 It’s through their Uber Teen account.
    0:01:23 It’s an Uber account that allows your team to request a ride under your supervision
    0:01:26 with live trip tracking and highly rated drivers.
    0:01:32 Add your team to your Uber account today.
    0:01:34 Today’s number, 22%.
    0:01:37 That’s how much Bible sales grew this year in contrast to the overall book market
    0:01:38 that barely grew one percent.
    0:01:41 True story, sometimes I masturbate while reading the Bible.
    0:01:44 I call it my “come to Jesus” moment.
    0:01:57 Welcome to PropG Markets.
    0:02:00 Today, oh wait, today we’re doing something different.
    0:02:01 What’s going on today, Ed?
    0:02:03 Today we’re doing an “Alls me anything” episode, Scott,
    0:02:06 and we’ve got our producer, Claire, back in the studio.
    0:02:11 And she’s going to be asking us some listener questions from Instagram and Reddit and YouTube.
    0:02:14 So thank you to everyone who sent in those questions.
    0:02:17 Claire, welcome back to the studio.
    0:02:18 Very nice to be here.
    0:02:19 Thank you.
    0:02:21 Scott, are you ready for your first question?
    0:02:22 Let on me.
    0:02:24 We haven’t seen these yet.
    0:02:25 All right.
    0:02:27 This was the most popular question on Reddit.
    0:02:33 The people are dying to know, how much did your birthday party cost?
    0:02:38 I think it cost about a quarter of a million dollars.
    0:02:40 Give us a breakdown.
    0:02:43 Well, we took over a hotel, the Five Farms.
    0:02:45 We reserved it two years before.
    0:02:49 I think that, the honest answer is I don’t really know.
    0:02:52 But I imagine that it was like 45 or 50 rooms.
    0:02:54 We had it for two nights.
    0:02:56 I don’t know, that was probably 100 grand.
    0:02:58 The food was probably another 50 or 70 grand.
    0:03:02 Plus things like axe throwing and kilt rental and all that shit.
    0:03:04 Yeah, I’d put it at a quarter of a million bucks.
    0:03:06 Do you think that was worth it?
    0:03:07 Good value?
    0:03:14 Oh, look, to have all your friends in one place and celebrate the passage of time as you sit around and wait for the ask answer.
    0:03:16 Always put it so elegantly.
    0:03:17 You know my approach to this.
    0:03:19 If you got it, spend it or give it away.
    0:03:27 I can’t think of a much better way to spend your money than bringing 95 of your friends together to celebrate me.
    0:03:31 So yeah, I don’t regret that at all.
    0:03:33 I thought it was a great way to spend money.
    0:03:35 All right, next question is related.
    0:03:39 Scott, you frequently reference the friendship crisis among men.
    0:03:46 What’s been the most effective friendship maintenance strategy you’ve used to maintain close friendships since childhood?
    0:03:49 Well, now it’s texting, just little things.
    0:03:52 But my go-to is I do a lot of guy’s trips.
    0:03:54 I do a lot of trips with friends.
    0:03:57 And now that I have money, I invite friends with me.
    0:04:00 And I literally share my calendar with everybody and say, let’s get together.
    0:04:02 And I take a ton of time.
    0:04:04 I didn’t vacation a lot when I was your age.
    0:04:10 So now I have a ton of– I purposely, whenever I accept a speaking gig, I stay a day.
    0:04:12 I get there a day early or stay a day late.
    0:04:16 And so it’s a place I want to be or I don’t do it unless it’s a lot of money.
    0:04:21 And I’ll try and find a friend who will come meet me or I’ll go somewhere and meet them.
    0:04:24 But I would say trips and texting.
    0:04:29 Next question. Where did your UK accent come from?
    0:04:31 Genuinely curious.
    0:04:32 Thank you.
    0:04:38 I think people are actually confused about this part of your life, including Scott.
    0:04:41 So let’s hear–
    0:04:42 Different.
    0:04:44 Scott just doesn’t care.
    0:04:46 Let’s hear your origin story.
    0:04:47 Where were you born?
    0:04:48 Where did you grow up?
    0:04:50 And where did the accent come from?
    0:04:53 Yeah, so I was born and raised in London.
    0:04:55 So that’s where the accent comes from.
    0:04:58 The weird part is that both my parents are American.
    0:05:05 And they came to London probably 30 years ago before I was born.
    0:05:06 They moved there for work.
    0:05:09 But they’re both originally from Atlanta, Georgia.
    0:05:12 So they have American accents.
    0:05:15 And then me and my sisters all have English accents.
    0:05:18 And so people ask me why that is.
    0:05:19 I don’t really know.
    0:05:22 I guess because I went to school from a really young age
    0:05:27 and I adopted the same accent as my friends at school.
    0:05:28 I would assume that’s it.
    0:05:35 But I left England when I was 14 to go to boarding school in America.
    0:05:37 And then I stayed in America for college.
    0:05:38 And now I’m here.
    0:05:40 Scott, any follow-up questions?
    0:05:41 I’m sorry, I wasn’t listening.
    0:05:45 I fell asleep about a minute ago.
    0:05:46 Well, let me get this.
    0:05:49 You have an English accent because you were raised in England.
    0:05:50 That’s right.
    0:05:52 I think the accent adds 10 perceived IQ points.
    0:05:54 Ed, what do you think, Claire?
    0:05:57 Well, we all already know that.
    0:06:00 I do think he’s putting it on a little bit.
    0:06:06 Didn’t your friends from home like kind of tease you
    0:06:08 when you started to get a bit of an American accent?
    0:06:09 They tease me right now.
    0:06:11 They think my accent right now is American.
    0:06:12 Really?
    0:06:14 They say I have an American twang.
    0:06:17 So when I go back home, I sound even more English.
    0:06:22 But yeah, look, it’s a hard life, people thinking that I’m a phony.
    0:06:23 But what can you do?
    0:06:27 My father has a really nice Scottish accent.
    0:06:30 And, you know, kind of the first time you observe nuance when you’re a kid,
    0:06:33 I remember thinking, why do people find my dad so fascinating?
    0:06:35 Like, what he’s saying is not that interesting.
    0:06:37 And I figured out it’s that accent.
    0:06:39 And Ed, I’m not kidding, you have–
    0:06:42 This reflects very poorly on me, just so we’re clear.
    0:06:44 You got to lean into every advantage.
    0:06:47 I lean into my, like, Brad put, like, good looks.
    0:06:52 You– Ed literally spit his coffee out.
    0:06:54 So I shouldn’t have laughed that hard.
    0:06:56 Spittake.
    0:06:58 I think you have a fantastic accent.
    0:07:01 Your accent is– I think it’s really strong.
    0:07:04 What’s interesting is my mom did really well in school,
    0:07:08 and she had what felt like a kind of a refined English accent,
    0:07:11 somewhat of yours, and some of her siblings
    0:07:14 who went to different schools have just an accent
    0:07:16 that’s not what I would call aspirational.
    0:07:18 Sometimes it’s a little bit hard to listen to.
    0:07:21 It’s just strange how– and it sets such a tone,
    0:07:24 and they’re all really bright, or I find them bright.
    0:07:29 It’s just so interesting how your perception of someone is obviously–
    0:07:32 supposedly guys, their perception of someone is very visual,
    0:07:35 and women, their perception of someone is based on their ears.
    0:07:40 And you immediately, with that accent, come off as very educated and interesting.
    0:07:43 It’s a great accent to have.
    0:07:45 I love this. Let’s keep going.
    0:07:48 Somehow this podcast wouldn’t be making any money if you were like,
    0:07:51 “Viva asks a question. Scott, any predictions?”
    0:07:54 It just wouldn’t work.
    0:07:56 Okay, I have a related question.
    0:08:01 Do you think you’d be more successful if you weren’t bald?
    0:08:03 Oh, no. It’s the opposite.
    0:08:07 When I was– believe it or not, my hair used to be my best feature.
    0:08:10 I thought it’s a low bar, but in graduate school, I had a ponytail.
    0:08:13 I wrote a skateboard to school, and I had a ponytail.
    0:08:15 And I started– I remember the exact moment.
    0:08:17 I remember reading my finance book and thinking,
    0:08:19 “I don’t remember underlining this.”
    0:08:22 I’m like, “Oh my God, those aren’t underlines. It’s my hair.”
    0:08:27 And my hair was like– my hair basically decided it was a fire on my head
    0:08:30 and needed to escape as quickly as possible.
    0:08:34 I went from having share-like hair to being yield-brinner
    0:08:36 and it felt like three weeks.
    0:08:40 And it was so distressing that I decided I was living in San Francisco.
    0:08:43 I think I was in my early 30s, maybe even younger.
    0:08:45 And I said, “I’m just going to shave it all off.”
    0:08:48 I had taken a vacation with my ex, and she said,
    0:08:50 “I’m so sick of you talking about this. Just shave it off.”
    0:08:54 And she bought a clipper, and she actually– she sat me down,
    0:08:58 and we had– we split a bottle of wine, and she shaved my head with a blade.
    0:09:02 It was actually a really, like, bonding, intimate, sort of erotic experience.
    0:09:06 Yeah, the bottle of wine was very interesting. I like that.
    0:09:10 It’s not a great idea to have your ex-wife with a blade in her hand after a bottle of wine, but–
    0:09:12 I’m pretty sure this is a James Bond scene.
    0:09:14 That’s right. With money penny.
    0:09:16 It’s also a porn scene.
    0:09:22 I went back to San Francisco, and I shaved my head sort of before it was cool,
    0:09:24 and I think it actually helped me raise money.
    0:09:33 I think kind of that sort of look and being a credentialed young man in your 30s
    0:09:35 who had some credibility in a graduate degree from Berkeley
    0:09:39 and kind of a background attack in 1990, San Francisco,
    0:09:41 meant you could raise a shit ton of money.
    0:09:43 And I think my haircut actually helped.
    0:09:48 I think my– one, it’s freed up– I think about time management a lot.
    0:09:51 I probably spend 10 minutes a day on my hair, so think about it.
    0:09:55 That’s approximately 25 hours a year that I get back.
    0:09:59 And also, I just like– I really enjoy it.
    0:10:03 Having ed-like hair or cler-like hair is the best.
    0:10:08 Having no hair is a close second because it’s efficient and easy.
    0:10:14 It’s the in-between that sucks because it represents a loss of youth, a loss of masculinity,
    0:10:16 and it’s devastating when it starts happening.
    0:10:18 It was really a source of stress for me.
    0:10:21 So, but wow, I wish I’d done it sooner.
    0:10:24 Shaving my head was just such a unlock for me.
    0:10:26 And I actually think it’s helped me professionally.
    0:10:29 Follow-up question for Ed, this one’s for me.
    0:10:32 If his dick was bigger, would he be more secure?
    0:10:34 Sorry.
    0:10:35 Claire, don’t ask that.
    0:10:37 That’s totally inappropriate.
    0:10:40 Jesus, that is totally inappropriate.
    0:10:42 I think you’ll like this question.
    0:10:43 Okay.
    0:10:46 Did you buzz your hair before or after you met Scott?
    0:10:47 Be honest.
    0:10:51 It was after I’d met him, it was before I started working for him.
    0:10:54 But I did it with my roommate in college.
    0:10:56 I see the comment in your question.
    0:10:58 “How am I copying Scott?”
    0:11:01 I think he wants to look like Daddy.
    0:11:02 That’s right.
    0:11:07 No, I did it with my roommate because we had just submitted our theses and we were like,
    0:11:10 “Fuck it, this would be kind of fun if we both just shaved our heads.”
    0:11:16 And then I found out that I really liked it for all the time management reasons that Scott described.
    0:11:19 And I also kind of just liked the way it looks.
    0:11:21 I just, I don’t know, I just really liked it.
    0:11:23 So I decided to keep it.
    0:11:27 And I don’t know, I think it works from a branding perspective for me and Scott.
    0:11:30 The fact that I look like Scott’s son a little bit, that’s what people say.
    0:11:32 I think that plays in our favor.
    0:11:34 You did it with your roommate after submitting your theses.
    0:11:37 Ed, there are easier ways to come out.
    0:11:40 We’re going to hear about that one.
    0:11:42 We’re going to hear about that one.
    0:11:49 I don’t think people know that you also had share like hair in college and you got it off.
    0:11:51 Yeah, really long curly hair.
    0:11:52 Really?
    0:11:53 Yeah.
    0:11:54 Look how dreamy Ed was.
    0:11:57 If I had Ed’s looks, I’d be prime minister by this point in my life.
    0:11:58 Look at him.
    0:12:00 Handsome, got the English accent.
    0:12:03 He’s making a good 30, 35K a year on a podcast.
    0:12:05 He’s a fucking player.
    0:12:06 Player.
    0:12:08 Player came to play.
    0:12:11 People are speculating about your salary on Reddit.
    0:12:12 Did you see that?
    0:12:13 Oh my gosh.
    0:12:16 How much did your birthday cost, bitch?
    0:12:19 Okay, let’s move on.
    0:12:25 Scott, this question was a response to the art of spending episode, which we put out recently.
    0:12:28 And it’s something I’ve wondered about as well.
    0:12:33 So you shared that your dad wasn’t generous to you and your mom.
    0:12:40 And you have also shared in other episodes that you help your dad financially in his old age.
    0:12:46 How did you get over the disappointment of him not being generous to you and find a way
    0:12:47 to be generous to him?
    0:12:49 It’s a really thoughtful question.
    0:12:53 And it goes to what has been one of the biggest unlocks in my life.
    0:12:57 And that is I used to approach relationships naturally.
    0:13:00 And I think most people do naturally as kind of a transaction.
    0:13:06 Am I getting as much out of this friendship as I’m giving in a romantic relationship?
    0:13:09 And my partner is good to me as I am to her.
    0:13:12 In a business relationship, am I getting as much from my business partner?
    0:13:14 Am I adding more value?
    0:13:17 If I am, then I should have more equity or more compensation.
    0:13:19 I was constantly keeping score.
    0:13:23 And it was a real recipe for disappointment and frustration and straining relationships
    0:13:30 because you’ll naturally inflate your own contribution of relationships and diminish other people’s.
    0:13:35 And what was an unlock for me, and I used to approach my relationship with my father that way.
    0:13:39 And that is I was a good son, but I would occasionally get upset.
    0:13:41 I remember not talking to my dad for a few months.
    0:13:44 We used to always, you know, we would talk every week because I thought, you know,
    0:13:48 I just went back to these ugly moments as a child and some of the things you referenced.
    0:13:51 And I would just get very resentful for him, even in my 30s and 40s.
    0:13:57 And somewhere in my early 40s, I decided the unlock is to decide what kind of friend,
    0:14:00 what kind of boyfriend, what kind of spouse, what kind of son you want to be.
    0:14:03 And then ignore what you’re getting back.
    0:14:06 And the reality is I wanted to be a generous, loving son.
    0:14:08 And that’s, so that’s how I started behaving.
    0:14:10 And I put the scorecard away.
    0:14:18 And also I forgave my father because I think the, the litmus test of any dad or the kind of evolutionary box
    0:14:22 you need to check is to be better to your son than your father was to you.
    0:14:26 And I found out later in life that my father had been physically abused by his father,
    0:14:30 that his, my grandfather used to come home drunk and physically abuse him.
    0:14:32 And my dad was not very sophisticated.
    0:14:36 He wasn’t a great dad, but he was much better to me than his father was to him.
    0:14:43 He tried and, you know, it just makes me feel good to feel like I am being a generous, loving son.
    0:14:45 And I think about this a lot.
    0:14:50 The key in relationships is not to have the bullshit transactional mentality I had or scorecard.
    0:14:54 The key is to achieve a surplus value in all your relationships.
    0:14:59 So if you’re being a better spouse, if you’re being a better daughter, then your mom was to you when you were a kid.
    0:15:02 That means you win. That means that you’re here for a reason.
    0:15:04 Here’s a question for both of you.
    0:15:18 How are you going to compete in the hemisphere without falling into the weird, conspiratorial, non-fact-based, self-help, contrarian trap that’s captured countless other bros?
    0:15:20 How do you not become Tate?
    0:15:22 Scott, we’ll start with you.
    0:15:27 What are your thoughts on how you and Ed can avoid that fate on Prophety Markets?
    0:15:30 Because you’re pushing it, Scott.
    0:15:43 We’re critical thinkers. We read. We are curious, but suspect the stuff and try to use information to learn as opposed to sanctify your beliefs.
    0:15:49 One of the things I love about this medium is I think people go to cable news to sanctify their religious and political views.
    0:15:57 I do think people come to podcasts with an open heart and one of the things I love about humor is that I think it softens the beach.
    0:16:05 I think if you can make someone laugh for a brief moment, you soften their gray matter and they’re more open to new ideas or new opinions, which might be dangerous.
    0:16:09 I don’t think I’m a likely candidate for falling into some sort of conspiracy.
    0:16:11 I do think I’m in a bit of a bubble.
    0:16:18 I read a lot of media that’s produced by urban liberals, which is the majority of media, and so it’s good for me to step out.
    0:16:24 I purposely read some stuff that’s a little bit more conservative to try and get a different viewpoint.
    0:16:33 And one of the things I really appreciate about you guys encouraged me to go on the podcast with Theo Vaughn is it just gave me a little bit of a different worldview.
    0:16:38 I remember thinking it’s like a zebra talking to a lion. We’re just such different people.
    0:16:44 Maybe I should be more worried, but I think we’re critical thinkers.
    0:16:50 Ed, what’s going to stop you from going red pill weird or I don’t know.
    0:16:55 I’m not worried about this at all just because that’s just not who we are.
    0:17:07 The idea of a podcast where you talk about eating red meat and escaping the matrix and getting into dropshipping, none of that stuff interests me.
    0:17:10 Or makes me think that that’s worth talking about.
    0:17:15 And our job is to figure out what actually interests us and what engages us.
    0:17:18 And it’s just none of that stuff is interesting to me.
    0:17:25 So I’m really not worried about devolving into a manosphere podcast personally.
    0:17:30 I mean, I think to Scott’s point, we need to be aware of any bubbles we might live in.
    0:17:39 And I think the solution to that is just a very, very broad media diet, trying to amass as many different opinions as possible.
    0:17:41 It’s very important that we have our finger on the pulse.
    0:17:47 But I think if we’re in danger of going any direction, it’s not red pill tape manosphere.
    0:17:50 And you do do your research, which goes into that.
    0:17:54 So one of the questions was what is your research process like.
    0:18:02 So before every podcast, about 24 hours before the podcast, we all meet as a team and we have a team of analysts and producers.
    0:18:07 And, you know, it’s about seven of us who get on this call and we talk about what we want to talk about.
    0:18:11 And then we decide with Scott, you know, this is going to be the stories.
    0:18:15 And then I spend the next 24 hours just obsessively researching all of those topics.
    0:18:17 I start with Google.
    0:18:19 I use AI as well.
    0:18:22 I use a finance tool called Rogo.
    0:18:24 I use chat GBT.
    0:18:31 I think if there’s anything I’ve learned about the research process from doing this podcast, it’s the most important thing.
    0:18:39 And I think this applies to all research is trying to figure out what is the so what of anything that you’re reading.
    0:18:44 And that’s kind of hard to do these days because there are just millions of different articles about all of these events.
    0:18:48 And they’re filled with really, really useless information.
    0:18:52 And that’s especially true in earnings reports and 10 Qs.
    0:18:59 You know, I’ll read like an entire 10 Q in preparation and I’ll learn maybe one thing from it.
    0:19:01 But that’s sort of what you have to do.
    0:19:03 To me, it’s all about synthesizing.
    0:19:07 OK, what is the why do I actually care about this?
    0:19:13 Like, what is the takeaway from this gigantic document that is filled with all these numbers and a lot of bullshit?
    0:19:19 What could affect my life or what could be interesting to someone else’s life?
    0:19:21 What is the so what here?
    0:19:29 And we’ve got to give a big shout out to Mia Silverio and Jessica Lang, too, who informed basically everything we do.
    0:19:35 There are researchers and they do a lot at this company, but they’re very focused on Prophety Market.
    0:19:37 So thank you to both of them.
    0:19:40 All right, here’s another for both of you.
    0:19:46 How are you guys doing with the parasocial relationships that you’re setting up with listeners?
    0:19:52 Does it feel hard to relate to strangers who are kind of also not strangers?
    0:19:56 And has it changed the way you approach your daily life?
    0:19:58 Scott, we’ll start with you.
    0:20:00 It’s one of the nicest things in my life.
    0:20:03 Like, everybody wants to be on a stage where people who don’t know you are applauding for you.
    0:20:07 And I try to remember that with my boys and my partner.
    0:20:20 I try to make sure that it’s not just always all about me that we find venues and ways to celebrate their achievements and put them on a stage in front of other people, you know, such that they get their own applause.
    0:20:31 But when people come up to me on the street and say, I like your work, one of the things I think such a shame is that these large language models aren’t crawling the real world.
    0:20:38 Because in general, what I find is online, there’s a lot of really awful, vile, aggressive course content.
    0:20:41 In person, my experience is that people are wonderful.
    0:20:47 And I don’t know if it’s because they think, oh, I might, you know, be friends with this person.
    0:20:48 I might have sex with them.
    0:20:49 I might get into a fight with them.
    0:21:02 There’s just a general guardrails that encourage you to be nice to people in what is the medium where the majority of our time in a modern society has been communicating that as in person.
    0:21:05 But when people come up to me and they’re always nice.
    0:21:07 And even when they disagree, they come and say, I didn’t like your take on this.
    0:21:09 We have a civil conversation.
    0:21:10 I love it.
    0:21:13 Occasionally, I’ll be in a rush and I don’t have time.
    0:21:26 The only part that’s hard is we’re now getting, or I’m getting 30 to 50 emails a day from people with really thoughtful questions who want to have a conversation, especially young men who want mentoring or just want to jump on the phone.
    0:21:27 And I just don’t have the time.
    0:21:29 That’s kind of disappointing and frustrating.
    0:21:34 But in terms of people coming up and being nice and impressed, I love it.
    0:21:35 I don’t.
    0:21:40 And when people complain about it, I mean, you don’t want to be famous for the wrong reasons.
    0:21:44 You don’t want to be Michael Cohen or I’ve always felt for Monica Lewinsky.
    0:21:47 I’ve always thought she would give anything just to have her anonymity back.
    0:21:52 She’s this really lovely, intelligent woman and she’s famous for the wrong reasons.
    0:21:58 And it’s what everyone thinks they think, you know, they immediately have an impression of her before they even get to know her.
    0:22:02 But to have people come up to you and be nice to you because they like your work.
    0:22:03 It’s wonderful.
    0:22:06 It’s just you inherit all of these friends.
    0:22:07 It’s validating.
    0:22:09 Yeah, I absolutely love it.
    0:22:16 And if I got sick of it, you know, remind me that all I need to do is go dark for a couple of months and I’ll give a flying fuck who I am.
    0:22:19 I don’t get, I don’t get anyone complaining about it.
    0:22:20 I love it.
    0:22:23 So Ed, this is a newer phenomenon for you.
    0:22:28 So how has it been to start getting recognized by people on the street?
    0:22:36 Very strange at first, but ultimately I land where Scott is where it’s just, I really enjoy it and I find it extremely rewarding.
    0:22:49 I feel like you couldn’t really ask for more in a job than for people to come up to you and recognize and affirm that they are enjoying your work.
    0:22:55 Like that’s just not something that a lot of people get to enjoy.
    0:22:59 And so, you know, to me, it’s like an affirmation that I’m doing my job right.
    0:23:09 I mean, I think the biggest fear in media, if you work in media, isn’t that people don’t take you seriously or they don’t like you.
    0:23:12 Like the biggest fear is like that no one’s listening to you.
    0:23:14 Like that’s the, that’s, that’s the concern.
    0:23:20 And so to have someone come up and say like, hey, like I heard what you said about this and it made me think about this.
    0:23:27 And it’s like, I couldn’t, I couldn’t ask for much more in terms of professional reward.
    0:23:30 So yeah, I land completely where Scott is.
    0:23:32 I really, I really like it.
    0:23:35 Here’s one that I’m going to take.
    0:23:40 This is kind of the only affirmation that I get from our listeners.
    0:23:43 It’s to do with the music.
    0:23:48 The most frequently asked question I get is about the music on the show.
    0:23:58 People want to know what is that cool Spanish song that plays before one of the podcasts and what’s the outro song used at the end of Prophetic Market.
    0:24:02 So the cool Spanish song is called 1977.
    0:24:05 It’s by Anna Tijoux.
    0:24:11 And the reason it’s the intro song is because Scott heard it on an episode of Breaking Bad.
    0:24:13 Is that right?
    0:24:14 I think so.
    0:24:17 That’s what, yeah, that’s, that’s the legend.
    0:24:18 That’s exactly right.
    0:24:21 And the outro song is called Lifetimes.
    0:24:28 I don’t know who sings it because she’s not credited, but the composers are Benedict Lambden and Nathaniel Pern.
    0:24:30 This is not a huge song.
    0:24:32 It has fewer than 2000 streams on YouTube.
    0:24:34 You can find it on Spotify too.
    0:24:43 But the music on this show is largely inspired by a trip that Ed, Caroline and Mia and I took to Tulum.
    0:24:49 In 2022, which Scott sent us on.
    0:24:57 And one night we were at this place called Tree House to this day, the best dinner I’ve ever had.
    0:25:05 And afterwards there were some DJs and we were dancing in the sand under the stars, under the palm trees.
    0:25:17 And they played Donna Summers, I Feel Love. And I just remember feeling a huge amount of gratitude for how much fun we got to have together.
    0:25:23 And so choosing the music for this show, I wanted to kind of capture that energy.
    0:25:28 And I wanted to find the song that captured Donna’s energy as well.
    0:25:36 This song is no Donna Summer, but I think it’s pretty close and it does make me happy to hear it every time I finish an episode.
    0:25:38 Because it reminds me of that night.
    0:25:43 Yeah, I can’t wait to get to the song at the end.
    0:25:45 I didn’t know that. That’s really nice.
    0:25:50 We’ll be right back.
    0:26:02 This episode is brought to you by Secret.
    0:26:10 Secret deodorant gives you 72 hours of clinically proven odor protection, free of aluminum, parabens, dyes, talc, and baking soda.
    0:26:15 It’s made with pH balancing minerals and crafted with skin conditioning oils.
    0:26:19 So whether you’re going for a run or just running late, do what life throws your way.
    0:26:21 And smell like you didn’t.
    0:26:28 Find Secret at your nearest Walmart or shopper’s drug mart today.
    0:26:31 Support for this show comes from Klaviyo.
    0:26:33 You’re building a business.
    0:26:35 Klaviyo helps you grow it.
    0:26:43 Klaviyo’s AI-powered marketing platform puts all your customer data plus email, SMS, and analytics in one place.
    0:26:51 With Klaviyo, Tindfish Phenom Fish Wife delivers real-time, personalized experiences that keeps their customers hooked.
    0:26:55 They’ve grown 70 times revenue in just four years with Klaviyo.
    0:26:57 Now that’s scale.
    0:27:05 Visit klavyo.com to learn how brands like Fish Wife build smarter digital relationships with Klaviyo.
    0:27:09 In 100 meters turn right.
    0:27:11 Actually no, turn left.
    0:27:14 There’s some awesome new breakfast wraps at McDonald’s.
    0:27:15 Really?
    0:27:21 Yeah, there’s the sausage bacon and egg, a crispy seasoned chicken one, a spicy end egg, worth the detour.
    0:27:22 They sound amazing.
    0:27:24 That they taste amazing too.
    0:27:26 Wish I had a mouth.
    0:27:30 Take your morning into a delicious new direction with McDonald’s new breakfast wraps.
    0:27:33 Add a small premium roast coffee for a dollar plus tax.
    0:27:35 At participating McDonald’s restaurants.
    0:27:37 Ba-da-ba-ba-ba.
    0:27:45 We’re back with Proficy Markets.
    0:27:47 Here’s one for both of you.
    0:27:54 Do you have tips on improving storytelling, taking classes, joining groups, anything?
    0:27:56 Ed, we’ll start with you.
    0:28:02 The best lesson on storytelling in my view came from the creators of South Park.
    0:28:05 The names of Trey Parker and Matt Stone.
    0:28:15 And they have a rule when they’re sort of storyboarding each episode and they’re sort of outlining the beats of the episode and it applies to all storytelling.
    0:28:26 And that is the words and then if those words appear between your beats, then you’ve screwed up.
    0:28:34 Like the idea of having a story where it’s like this happened and then this happened and then this happened and then this happened.
    0:28:35 That’s not a story.
    0:28:38 That’s just a sequence of things happening.
    0:28:49 So what you have to do and what they do is they replace and then with one of these two words, either therefore or but.
    0:28:55 So the difference then is, you know, you’ve got a story.
    0:29:02 This happened, therefore this happened, but this happened, therefore this happened.
    0:29:03 And that’s a story.
    0:29:11 And I think that’s a really useful rule in terms of sort of what I was saying before about trying to arrive to a point.
    0:29:14 And I think it applies to business news as well.
    0:29:23 Like the idea of me coming on this podcast and being like, you know, sales were down and then margins were up and then profits were up.
    0:29:26 That’s I don’t register anything from that.
    0:29:31 But sales were down, but margins were up, therefore profits were up.
    0:29:32 That’s different.
    0:29:34 That’s telling a story right there.
    0:29:43 And so I think if you’re trying to understand how can I convey my storytelling better, get rid of all the ands and get rid of all the thens and start using more butts.
    0:29:44 And therefore.
    0:29:46 Scott, any other storytelling tips?
    0:29:47 Some of it is just genetic.
    0:29:49 It’s like any other talent.
    0:29:51 I’ve always thought we’re talking about my dad.
    0:29:54 My dad could captivate a room and a really good twist of phrase.
    0:29:56 And I think I got some of that from him.
    0:30:01 So I was blessed with some, I don’t know.
    0:30:04 Or I’ve always been able to speak fairly well.
    0:30:06 Speak fairly well too.
    0:30:12 Anyways, but where it starts from me and maybe it’s different for other people is that I think to be a great storyteller.
    0:30:15 It’s really important or a good basis to be able to write well.
    0:30:17 The hardest thing I do is writing.
    0:30:21 And right now it’s Thursday and I got to get No Mercy No Mouse out tomorrow.
    0:30:28 It’s the hardest thing I do is writing books and No Mercy because the written word to do it well requires excellence.
    0:30:33 You know, we can fuck up or have fragments or not think through and just the kind of the banter and get through it.
    0:30:40 Ed used to work on No Mercy No Mouse and you got out of that as quickly as you could because it’s hard because it’s hard.
    0:30:45 So if you can write well, I think that’s the base for storytelling.
    0:30:53 So I committed to becoming a decent writer not a young age, but and then I would say the rest is a couple of the key components.
    0:30:59 Pick the medium you want to be a great storyteller and you want to be a great writer, great on Instagram, great visually, great with PowerPoint.
    0:31:01 There’s a lot of different mediums.
    0:31:06 And then put a metric on it and say I want to be in the top 1%.
    0:31:08 For me, I want to be a decathlete.
    0:31:14 I want to be the top 1% of speaking, of writing books, of writing newsletters, of podcasting.
    0:31:19 And I think if I can do that, I’ll be a decathlete in the world of storytelling.
    0:31:23 And I put specific metrics on it in terms of dollar volume or what I charge for speaking.
    0:31:37 And also, I have an unfair advantage in that is for 22 years, I sat in front of, stood in front of 60 to 300 people twice a week for, or four times a week for an hour and a half telling them a story and trying to engage them.
    0:31:42 And they were paying me/NYU a lot of money to listen to this story.
    0:31:46 And so they came with that real expectations.
    0:31:48 And that was just a tremendous training.
    0:31:58 So in this, this pitch to Netflix that we did for this original scripted series working on Rosamund Pike, who’s going to play the lead read a scene.
    0:32:04 And she’s just so captivating her voice, the way she puts herself in the character.
    0:32:07 I thought, God, that’s just such a gift.
    0:32:14 And you were just, I remember seeing the folks at Netflix, the creative execs on the line, I could just tell them like, oh, we’ve sold it, they’re going to buy it.
    0:32:16 They’ll pay anything for this thing.
    0:32:20 Because she just was the character and she was just so captivating, we’re just so drawn to her.
    0:32:22 And I thought, how much of that is learned?
    0:32:24 How much of it is genetic?
    0:32:30 But anyways, I’m blessed in that I get tons of practice over the last two plus decades.
    0:32:40 Also, as a consultant, I got a ton of experience in front of boards and CEOs trying to tell a story and then convince them to pay me a half a million dollars for another story in three months.
    0:32:55 Just to add on to that though, Scott, like I feel like what you do that is different from most professors and also was true in your consulting career is I feel like everything that you say you treat as though it is entertainment.
    0:33:03 Like I’ve had a lot of professors when I was at Princeton who they don’t think of it as a show and they don’t think of it as a story.
    0:33:08 It’s like, you know, here’s a series of facts and here’s what you need to know.
    0:33:12 And you got to read the textbook and then we’re going to have a quiz on it and that’s sort of how it goes.
    0:33:16 But I feel like and I don’t know if this is intentional or just natural from your end.
    0:33:27 But I also think of that story you told about when you were at L2 and you were presenting to some brand and first up was McKinsey and next up was L2.
    0:33:33 And the McKinsey presentation ended and you were like, wow, that was the most boring thing I’ve ever seen in my life.
    0:33:43 And that’s something that I have learned from you in my work is that I try to think in all of my work and I think it’s underrated in all aspects of life.
    0:33:48 Like is this actually interesting and entertaining?
    0:33:53 Like why would I put this giant research report together if it’s just going to bore you out of your mind?
    0:33:55 Who wants to read that?
    0:33:58 And I feel like you take that to another level.
    0:34:00 So follow up question for me.
    0:34:01 Do you agree with that?
    0:34:03 And is that intentional?
    0:34:17 Look, Alex Karp, Donald Trump, MassVote the Motoran, the best professor, the most highly rated professor is one best professor of 190 of us at NYU for seven out of the last eight years.
    0:34:19 They’re all entertainers.
    0:34:26 They take humor, they take storytelling and they use it to soften the beach such that the point they’re trying to get across.
    0:34:27 Everyone has screens.
    0:34:28 Everyone’s skeptical.
    0:34:30 People don’t trust each other.
    0:34:31 People get bored easily.
    0:34:32 They get distracted.
    0:34:34 So you need to soften the beach.
    0:34:37 And the way you soften the beach is you keep them engaged through entertainment.
    0:34:39 Now, some people are just so brilliant.
    0:34:43 You know, Yvall Harari, his stuff is just so factual.
    0:34:45 But even then it’s sort of a story.
    0:34:49 He’s a bit of a, yeah, entertainment.
    0:34:51 Think about the people who break through in the news.
    0:34:59 They just have a way of writing and they have metaphors and analogies and terms of phrase that just kind of surprise and delight you.
    0:35:01 I’ve always used humor.
    0:35:03 It goes back to when I was very young.
    0:35:05 I was not attractive.
    0:35:09 I was one of those kids that went through this crazy growth spurt.
    0:35:16 So I was sort of, by the time I was 13, 5, 10, 120 pounds and I had bad acne and I was very insecure.
    0:35:21 And my only means of establishing social capital was humor.
    0:35:28 And I’m going to date myself, but the only award I’ve ever received is I was voted most comical in Steve Martin in my school poll.
    0:35:29 That’s a good award.
    0:35:40 But I’ve always used humor and comedy as a means of trying to establish relationships and keep my students engaged and my clients sort of, I know that guy’s kind of interesting.
    0:35:45 I find that some of the greatest social commentators of our time soften the beach with humor or so.
    0:35:47 But they don’t teach that in school.
    0:35:54 I guess that’s what I find so interesting is that’s sort of been one of my big takeaways probably because we’re entertaining because we’re on a podcast.
    0:35:59 But like schools should teach that, you know, you should learn that in college.
    0:36:05 Like if you’re going to walk into a job interview, yeah, you want to know all of your facts and you want to make sure you get everything right.
    0:36:11 But the most important thing is that you offer the interviewer a good time.
    0:36:14 And the way you can do that is by being entertaining.
    0:36:17 Say things that sort of capture their imagination.
    0:36:19 Say things that aren’t boring.
    0:36:24 I feel like that’s such an underrated asset and we should be taught it more in schools.
    0:36:27 So I’m giving you your credit for teaching me that.
    0:36:32 The only pushback I would offer is that at the end of the day, you want to be yourself.
    0:36:34 And some people just aren’t funny.
    0:36:37 And when they try to be funny and they’re not, it just falls flat.
    0:36:41 I think of myself as funny and provocative and sometimes my shit falls flat.
    0:36:42 I just go too far and it just-
    0:36:44 No, it always lands.
    0:36:46 Cringe, right?
    0:36:55 But there are some professors and some communicators that are just so chock full of facts and so well rehearsed and so competent.
    0:36:58 You guys are too young to remember the show Welcome Back Cotter.
    0:37:03 But he was trying to help this fellow teacher and he was trying to convince her that she needs to be funny and she just couldn’t do it.
    0:37:04 That was just wasn’t her.
    0:37:09 So I would say early on, you just want to figure out what is my gift around storytelling?
    0:37:11 What are my mediums and then lean into those advantages?
    0:37:17 I think the question that people should be asking in all of their work is, is this something that I would want to consume?
    0:37:24 So I’m not saying like you have to be funny or you have to be, you know, really emotionally thoughtful.
    0:37:25 Do whatever you want to do.
    0:37:29 But ultimately the answer to, is this something that I would consume?
    0:37:31 Is this a story I would want to hear?
    0:37:33 Is this a report I would want to read?
    0:37:34 The answer must be yes.
    0:37:36 Another one for both of you.
    0:37:39 What should be your goal in your late 20s?
    0:37:40 I feel lost.
    0:37:43 I work in consulting, but I find it very unfulfilling.
    0:37:47 I feel like it’s time to make a drastic change, but I don’t know what.
    0:37:53 I don’t know if I’m built for a conventional career, but I’ve been on a conventional path my whole life.
    0:37:54 So it’s all I know.
    0:37:56 Ed, we’ll go to you first.
    0:37:59 Well, first off, I relate to that question.
    0:38:01 I felt that way during college.
    0:38:04 So I feel you.
    0:38:07 I can offer what I did to get out of that.
    0:38:09 Cause I no longer feel that way.
    0:38:11 I was trying to figure out what I wanted to do with my life.
    0:38:20 And this really worked for me, which is I just wrote up a list of people who I admire and whose lives I wanted to emulate in some way.
    0:38:24 And I think I’ve said this before, but Scott was on that list.
    0:38:31 And so what I would recommend is make that list of people and I would say do it within reason.
    0:38:35 Like don’t choose like Lionel Messi, like people whose lives you could actually live.
    0:38:37 Impressive, but not that impressive.
    0:38:39 Exactly.
    0:38:42 And go see if you can try to work for them.
    0:38:44 That’s what I did.
    0:38:47 See if you can figure out a way to get connected to them.
    0:38:49 Do it again in a reasonable way.
    0:38:56 Don’t be aggressive or obnoxious, but see if you can figure out a way to go work for those people.
    0:39:06 And if you can’t do that, I think the thing that you want to do is look at the list and think about what traits all of those people have in common.
    0:39:08 Like I think that it’s just, it’s very hard.
    0:39:10 This question of what do I want to do?
    0:39:14 We all ask it’s very hard to just visualize what you want.
    0:39:19 And it’s so much easier when we have examples of people that we can sort of go off of.
    0:39:23 Like it’s the same as like, you know, trying to draw a picture from scratch.
    0:39:32 Like it’s very hard to do, but if you have like the object in front of you, we have like a stencil, you can sort of work your way into that.
    0:39:34 And so for me, that was Scott.
    0:39:43 Like I don’t, I’m not trying to be Scott, but there are parts about Scott and what he’s done that I really like that I just think are great.
    0:39:49 And having that there and being able to sort of use it as like a tracing paper.
    0:39:53 You know, I’ll change this thing here and I’ll emulate this thing here.
    0:39:55 I just think that that’s a really useful way to do it.
    0:39:58 So make a list of people and start there.
    0:39:59 Scott.
    0:40:02 The first thing I’d want to say to this young man is to forgive yourself.
    0:40:08 And that is if you’re in your mid to late twenties and not entirely sure what you’re going to do professionally or with the rest of your life.
    0:40:10 That’s kind of exactly where you should be.
    0:40:14 And some people do grow up with a vision and they execute against that vision.
    0:40:16 Most successful people have not.
    0:40:19 When I was nine years old, I thought it was going to be a baseball player.
    0:40:24 I was the pitcher for the California State Junior League for, you know, nine year olds.
    0:40:27 And then I found out I wasn’t going to be an athlete.
    0:40:34 And then when I was 17 and a freshman at UCLA, I decided it was going to be a pediatrician and chemistry disavowed me of that notion.
    0:40:40 And then when I was 22, I thought it was going to be an investment banker because I landed a job at Morgan Stanley, which everybody wanted and I got.
    0:40:43 And then I found out I hated it and I wasn’t very good at it.
    0:40:52 And then when I was in business school, I thought that I might be, you know, go to work for a health care consultancy.
    0:40:59 And I turned down the offer and decided I wanted to be an entrepreneur and I started a strategy firm, which kind of didn’t make any sense.
    0:41:04 And then I decided I really wanted to teach, you know, at the age of 40, I kind of didn’t know what I wanted to do.
    0:41:06 I was teaching, but I wasn’t making enough money.
    0:41:09 I thought I was going to be rich because of red envelope and that didn’t work out.
    0:41:16 So I kind of woke up and I’m like, I’m teaching, making not nearly enough money to live in Manhattan and then to kind of reinvent myself in my early 40s.
    0:41:22 But don’t be too hot on yourself because the majority of people who tell you they know exactly what they want are lying to you and themselves.
    0:41:26 It’s if you’re in business school, it means you don’t know what you want to do.
    0:41:27 Otherwise you’d be doing it.
    0:41:29 The first essay is a lie.
    0:41:30 What do you want to do?
    0:41:34 And we all pretend I said I wanted to start an information system software company.
    0:41:36 I didn’t know what information systems is.
    0:41:39 If you’re smart and know what you want to do, you don’t need business school.
    0:41:41 Business school is for the elite and the aimless.
    0:41:44 And the majority of us throughout 20s are aimless.
    0:41:46 And that’s okay.
    0:41:47 You want to be workshopping.
    0:41:50 You want to be talking to people, trying new things.
    0:41:53 But along the way, you’re investing in relationships.
    0:41:54 You’re trying to save money.
    0:42:00 You’re trying to join platforms that will increase your credibility and your currency in the marketplace.
    0:42:08 And always be checking in with people who can give you a fairly sober view of your professional prospects and what to do.
    0:42:11 I hear, you know, this is boasting, but it’s true.
    0:42:18 I hear from some of the most impressive people in the world that are like partners making millions of dollars.
    0:42:20 They’re like, what should I do next?
    0:42:21 I don’t love this.
    0:42:22 This is what I want to do the rest.
    0:42:23 What should I do next?
    0:42:24 Should I teach?
    0:42:25 Should I start my own fund?
    0:42:28 It’s really hard to read the label from the inside of the bottle.
    0:42:33 Have other people talk to them transparently about what you like and don’t like so that they can give you their viewpoint.
    0:42:39 But as long as you’re one foot in front of the other and realize this young man is kind of where he should be right now.
    0:42:41 Okay, we’ll be right back. Stay with us.
    0:42:58 B.C. Liquor has your holidays covered with a curated selection of our holiday favorites, whether a gift or entertaining idea.
    0:43:01 Our expert staff can help you discover the perfect choice.
    0:43:03 Visit your nearest B.C. Liquor store today.
    0:43:05 Enjoy responsibly.
    0:43:08 This is an ad from BetterHelp.
    0:43:12 This holiday season, do something for a special person in your life.
    0:43:13 You.
    0:43:15 Give yourself the gift of better mental health.
    0:43:20 BetterHelp online therapy connects you with a qualified therapist via phone, video, or live chat.
    0:43:24 It’s convenient and affordable and can be done from the comfort of your own home.
    0:43:28 Having someone to talk to is truly a gift, especially during the holidays.
    0:43:32 Visit BetterHelp.com to learn more and save 10% off your first month.
    0:43:35 That’s BetterHelp, H-E-L-P, dot com.
    0:43:39 Support for this show comes from Clavio.
    0:43:41 You’re building a business.
    0:43:43 Clavio helps you grow it.
    0:43:50 Clavio’s AI-powered marketing platform puts all your customer data plus email, SMS, and analytics in one place.
    0:43:58 With Clavio, Tindfish Phenom Fishwife delivers real-time, personalized experiences that keeps their customers hooked.
    0:44:02 They’ve grown 70 times revenue in just four years with Clavio.
    0:44:04 Now that’s scale.
    0:44:12 Visit K-L-A-V-I-Y-O dot com to learn how brands like Fishwife build smarter digital relationships with Clavio.
    0:44:22 We’re back with Prof. G. Markets.
    0:44:24 Ed, this takes us to our next question.
    0:44:29 We’re going to begin to wrap up here, but what are your long-term professional goals?
    0:44:31 It’s Scott leaning in.
    0:44:39 So, I genuinely don’t think about the long-term that much.
    0:44:44 But, therefore, I’ve been waiting the whole pod to say that.
    0:44:53 I spend most of my time thinking about the short and medium term and what I want to do there.
    0:44:57 And what I want to do in the short and medium term is to make this podcast amazing.
    0:45:02 That’s my goal. I want this to be the best podcast in the world.
    0:45:04 I want it to be number one.
    0:45:06 I think it can be.
    0:45:10 I think what we have is honestly really good and pretty unique.
    0:45:18 And so that’s what I spend basically all of my career time doing is thinking about how can I make the podcast even better.
    0:45:26 My view is that if I do that, because I feel inspired by this right now, the long-term stuff is just going to figure itself out.
    0:45:29 I don’t know what this is going to exactly lead me to.
    0:45:31 And people are always asking, “What’s next?”
    0:45:33 I don’t really know what’s next.
    0:45:41 But I do know that if I really, really crush it with this and if we create an amazing podcast, whatever is next is going to be pretty good.
    0:45:43 So, that is sort of the way I think about it.
    0:45:51 If there’s things that I definitely want, I definitely want to be making a lot of money.
    0:45:55 That’s important to me. I don’t want to compromise on that.
    0:46:08 I think that I probably want to be economically independent at some point, where as in paying myself, I don’t think that’s anytime soon.
    0:46:12 But I don’t know why I want that, but I think that that is something I want.
    0:46:16 I feel like there’s something kind of empowering about that, the ability to pay yourself.
    0:46:19 But yeah, I don’t think about it.
    0:46:22 I really don’t think about the long-term too much right now.
    0:46:33 At the moment, while things are going well, I don’t see that much value in trying to be any one type of thing.
    0:46:36 I think things are going well and that’s what I’m supposed to be doing.
    0:46:38 Yeah, I’m 100% with you on that.
    0:46:40 Scott, do you have any reaction?
    0:46:46 If you’re in something that seems to be going fairly well, think, “How can I be in the top 1% if not the top 0.1%?”
    0:46:54 Already, there’s 600,000 podcasts. I think Prop G Markets right now or Prop G is a top 100 podcast.
    0:46:58 So we’re already in the top 0.6 or 0.06%.
    0:47:04 And excellence, artisanship, mastery of something will make you passionate about it.
    0:47:08 Being near the best or being really good at something makes you passionate about it.
    0:47:15 Because the accoutrements and the self-esteem and the rewards and the camaraderie from being great at something make you passionate about it.
    0:47:23 So if you’re fortunate to find something you’re really good at and could maybe be great, maybe in the top 1% in the world,
    0:47:31 as long as it’s not a vanity industry where you have to be in the top 0.1%, is, I think, a really good aim.
    0:47:33 My goals are different at this point.
    0:47:44 I want to be the most influential thought leader in the history of business such that I can shape a better, more democratic America that has more prosperity for more people.
    0:47:46 I’m very focused on struggling young men.
    0:47:52 And at the same time, I want to make a lot of money and I want to build a lot of economic security for other people around me.
    0:47:56 My goals are pretty big at this point.
    0:48:06 And then at the same time, deepen my relationships with the people who are close to me because I sacrifice that a lot trying to get some level of economic security.
    0:48:16 My very first conversation with you, Scott, where we spoke on the phone, which was a huge moment for me, but I think you said recently you don’t remember it.
    0:48:18 My very first conversation with you.
    0:48:21 At the end of the call, I asked you that question.
    0:48:23 I want to know what your long-term goals were.
    0:48:31 And you said that you wanted to be the most influential thought leader in the history of business or you want to be the governor of Florida.
    0:48:33 That was your answer.
    0:48:34 One of the two.
    0:48:35 What changed?
    0:48:41 I learned more about politics and also I realized I don’t really like people and it’s interesting.
    0:48:48 If you make any amount of money and you have name recognition, people will approach you about being a candidate for something.
    0:48:53 And what you realize is once you get past your narcissism, you can have a lot.
    0:48:58 I think at this point with such an intransigent government and so much gridlock.
    0:49:05 I mean, I think Ed at this point has as much influence on a lot of levels as a lot of congressmen or congresspeople, I should say.
    0:49:09 I think we can have a lot of influence from outside of the tent around issues.
    0:49:22 One of my things I’m working on is to try and pull together a group of podcasters who are moderate or center left or center right and start promoting each other’s pods and to start thinking about candidates that we want to promote.
    0:49:26 Because I feel as if the right has weaponized this medium very effectively.
    0:49:36 And I think we need our counter offensive against that and we need to build each other up and maybe put some infrastructure around videos and then start thinking about great candidates who are more moderate.
    0:49:41 But I actually think that in a weird way, we have more influence than many elected officials.
    0:49:42 All right.
    0:49:45 This final question is for you, Scott.
    0:49:50 It’s a two part question with a fascinating twist, which I absolutely love.
    0:49:52 I’ll start with the first part.
    0:49:58 My question relates to how Scott views his development and investment into Ed.
    0:50:06 Ed has developed a strong brand and authoritative position largely due to his position on ProfG Markets.
    0:50:10 He has been paid to speak at events where his views are valued.
    0:50:20 So question number one, did Scott consciously know he would be giving Ed a platform to develop a brand when he hired him and gave him the co-host role?
    0:50:30 Well, I would say the same thing to Ed that my best friend’s father said to me when I was at L2, this is someone who was really important to me, who was a real role model.
    0:50:44 A guy named Paul Fine, this like handsome guy who married my friend, Adam’s mother, and he was just this quiet, strong man who always had the most ridiculously cool cars as his career progressed from a 240Z to a Porsche 911 to a Ferrari.
    0:50:46 And I just really looked up to this guy.
    0:50:48 And it was a nice moment for me.
    0:50:57 He came to L2 and it was one of those days where clients were in the conference rooms and the place was just pumping and I would stop by a desk and I would say, what are you working on?
    0:51:02 And the analysts would show Paul, we were comparing Instagram engagement between Adidas and Nike.
    0:51:08 It was just something out of like a bad movie on what it’s like to work for a hip New York firm.
    0:51:10 And it was my firm.
    0:51:19 And we’re walking out and I could just tell the guy was so blown away and we got to the elevator and he turns to me and he’s like, I got to be honest, Scott, I didn’t see it.
    0:51:22 And that’s how I feel about Ed.
    0:51:27 When I hired Ed, the reason I hired Ed wasn’t because I was impressed.
    0:51:32 It was because I get fooled in interviews all the time and Joanna Colson, you got to hire this kid.
    0:51:37 He’s my son’s best friend and our good friend and he’s just such an impressive kid.
    0:51:39 That’s how I like to hire people.
    0:51:45 I don’t know if you remember this, Claire, but we tried out several people to be the co-host.
    0:51:47 Oh, I definitely remember.
    0:51:51 And I didn’t know that Ed was going to win and we were going to choose Ed.
    0:51:57 As a matter of fact, I think we had a bit of a bias against Ed because we thought two white guys talking to each other on a podcast.
    0:52:02 That’s just not, you know, that’s the definition of a podcast at this point.
    0:52:13 So Ed’s development and growth and the way the market loves him and the fact that he works so hard and he often times brings more insight to these topics than I do.
    0:52:18 Because quite frankly, he just works harder than I do on this stuff and he brings a fresher view.
    0:52:19 It’s super exciting.
    0:52:27 It’s nice to see, you’re going to see as you get older and you start managing people, these really wonderful paternal and maternal instincts come out.
    0:52:29 It’s really nice to see people succeed.
    0:52:37 It’s nice, A, you benefit from it yourself personally and professionally, but it’s nice to see young people doing well.
    0:52:40 It feels really, it feels really nice.
    0:52:46 So, and also as I think about, you know, I don’t know if you know, you know this, but I just turned 50.
    0:52:51 And I think in terms of building an enterprise and a succession plan, we have to build other voices.
    0:52:56 And so I’m really excited that Ed’s kind of developed his own brand.
    0:53:06 I’m trying to do the same thing with Jess over at Raging Moderates, but I am surprised and infinitely pleased at how well Ed is doing.
    0:53:08 It’s just a ton of fun to watch.
    0:53:11 And not only that, the team, it feels like the team is chilling.
    0:53:17 It feels like the show’s doing well, the production quality, the notes, you know, it just all feels very good.
    0:53:23 And you’re going to see, you’re both managing people now or starting to manage people.
    0:53:29 When they do really well, it’s very exciting, especially once you have recognized some of that success.
    0:53:36 It’s, yeah, like I said, it tickles these paternal and maternal sensors that feel really nice.
    0:53:37 All right.
    0:53:38 Very nice.
    0:53:41 So here’s the kicker, question number two.
    0:53:58 If Scott was not as financially secure as he is now, would he view that he would be owed any long-term revenue or royalty for Ed’s career due to the platform Scott has given him to launch his brand?
    0:54:00 No.
    0:54:05 It’s like, do I owe NYU money?
    0:54:10 NYU’s been a bigger platform for me than I’ve been for Ed or you, Claire.
    0:54:12 I don’t know about that.
    0:54:13 Go ahead.
    0:54:17 If I didn’t have a professor in front of my name, I think they just say that guy’s obnoxious.
    0:54:21 The way I summarize my career is I went to some friends’ birthdays party.
    0:54:24 All my friends from college were all turning 60 at the same time.
    0:54:26 So I’m going to all these birthday parties.
    0:54:28 And my friend, Mike Brookes, said the funniest thing.
    0:54:32 He said, can you believe Galloway gets paid to express all of his opinions?
    0:54:35 He’s like, back in college, we just called that annoying.
    0:54:38 He just wouldn’t shut the fuck up about everything.
    0:54:40 You had a view on everything.
    0:54:44 He’s like, what did you have like a view on back in college?
    0:54:46 Do you care about business?
    0:54:49 What hot takes were you coming up with as a college student?
    0:54:53 So my hot take in college was I was the only Democrat.
    0:54:55 They were all total Reagan’s sick of fans.
    0:54:58 And I was like, I had a Mondale sign in my fraternity room.
    0:55:00 And I’m pretty sure that was the only wind.
    0:55:02 That sounded annoying.
    0:55:05 And I was telling everyone why Mondale was our man.
    0:55:09 And I had a lot of views on everything as you can imagine.
    0:55:12 But my friends are like, we just called that annoying.
    0:55:14 And now he makes a bunch of money.
    0:55:19 So no, the platform will be loyal to each other.
    0:55:21 We’ll help each other out the rest of our careers.
    0:55:23 But no, no one knows me anything.
    0:55:25 Not at all.
    0:55:28 We’ve all the great thing about capitalism.
    0:55:31 The butcher and the baker don’t give each other bread and meat
    0:55:33 for ethical reasons.
    0:55:34 They do it because it benefits them.
    0:55:37 This is a relationship where we all benefit.
    0:55:40 And at some point you guys will go on to bigger things.
    0:55:44 And at some point I’ll go on to Aspen and the Ass Cancer.
    0:55:46 And we’ll all catch up.
    0:55:48 And we’ll all remember our days finally together.
    0:55:49 And that’s that.
    0:55:52 I really hope you don’t get Ass Cancer.
    0:55:55 Really, the amount of times it’s like you’re wishing for it.
    0:55:56 It’s crazy.
    0:55:58 He’s spoken it into existence.
    0:55:59 You’re right.
    0:56:00 I’m not going to get it.
    0:56:04 No, neither Ed nor Claire nor anyone here owes me anything.
    0:56:06 I hope we stay involved in each other’s lives
    0:56:07 because I find it rewarding.
    0:56:11 Some of my closer friends or people that I build companies with.
    0:56:14 But no, neither of you are going to owe me anything.
    0:56:15 All right.
    0:56:18 Well, the listener says kudos to Scott for an excellent hire
    0:56:21 and to give a young individual a platform to succeed.
    0:56:24 And congratulations to Ed for taking the opportunity
    0:56:26 and doing so well.
    0:56:27 That’s very nice.
    0:56:28 Thank you for saying that.
    0:56:29 And same to you, Claire.
    0:56:30 Oh, thank you.
    0:56:31 Appreciate it.
    0:56:33 Exactly.
    0:56:35 This episode was produced by Claire Miller
    0:56:37 and engineer by Benjamin Spencer.
    0:56:39 Our associate producer is Alison Weiss.
    0:56:41 Mia Silverio is our research lead.
    0:56:43 Jessica Lange is our research associate.
    0:56:44 Drew Bars is a technical director.
    0:56:47 And Catherine Dillon is our executive producer.
    0:56:49 Thank you for listening to ProfG Markets
    0:56:51 from the Vox Media Podcast Network.
    0:56:52 All year long,
    0:56:55 we’ll be back in the new year with our predictions for 2025,
    0:56:57 only on ProfG Markets.
    0:57:00 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:03 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:06 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:09 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:12 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:15 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:18 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:21 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:24 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:27 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:30 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:33 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:36 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:39 [MUSIC PLAYING]
    0:57:49 [BLANK_AUDIO]

    Follow Prof G Markets:

    Scott and Ed answer listener-submitted questions about everything from the origins of Ed’s accent to how they feel about parasocial relationships. They address why they look similar, talk about how to maintain friendships and give tips for improving storytelling. Plus, Ed discusses how he figured out his long-term goals and Scott reveals how much he paid for his birthday party. 

    Order “The Algebra of Wealth,” out now

    Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice

    Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:

    Follow Scott on Instagram

    Follow Ed on Instagram and X

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • No Mercy / No Malice: People Are The New Brands

    AI transcript
    0:00:03 Support for this show comes from Klaviyo.
    0:00:07 You’re building a business. Klaviyo helps you grow it.
    0:00:12 Klaviyo’s AI-powered marketing platform puts all your customer data plus email,
    0:00:15 SMS, and analytics in one place. With Klaviyo,
    0:00:21 Tindfish Phenom Fishwife delivers real-time, personalized experiences that keeps their
    0:00:26 customers hooked. They’ve grown 70 times revenue in just four years with Klaviyo.
    0:00:31 Now that’s scale. Visit klaviyo.com to learn how
    0:00:36 brands like Fishwife build smarter digital relationships with Klaviyo.
    0:00:46 Your team requested a ride, but this time, not from you. It’s through their Uber Teen account.
    0:00:50 It’s an Uber account that allows your team to request a ride under your supervision
    0:00:55 with live trip tracking and highly rated drivers. Add your team to your Uber account today.
    0:01:03 In 100 meters, turn right. Actually, no. Turn left.
    0:01:05 There’s some awesome new breakfast wraps at McDonald’s.
    0:01:06 Really?
    0:01:10 Yeah. There’s the sausage bacon and egg, a crispy seasoned chicken one.
    0:01:13 Mmm. A spicy end egg. Worth the detour.
    0:01:14 They sound amazing.
    0:01:15 Bet they taste amazing too.
    0:01:18 Wish I had a mouth.
    0:01:22 Take your morning into a delicious new direction with McDonald’s new breakfast wraps.
    0:01:25 Add a small premium roast coffee for a dollar plus tax.
    0:01:28 Add participating McDonald’s restaurants. Ba da ba ba ba.
    0:01:32 What sector boasts the strongest brands in the world?
    0:01:41 Tobacco? Universities? Tech companies? No, the strongest brands in the world are people.
    0:01:54 People are the new brands by Ed Elson as read by George Hahn.
    0:01:58 Scott’s away this week on a safari.
    0:02:03 I’m not sure what a ProfG safari looks like, but it likely involves
    0:02:08 tinted camps with fine china, zikapa, and remote NAD treatments.
    0:02:12 In his absence, I’m keeping the lights on.
    0:02:16 Yes, me, Ed Elson, Scott’s 25-year-old co-host on ProfG Markets.
    0:02:20 I get paid to make Scott appear younger and more relevant,
    0:02:22 i.e. keep him abreast of trends in business and tech,
    0:02:27 plus wardrobe advice. The guy dresses like an aging skateboarder.
    0:02:32 This week, I’m sharing my thoughts on a long-brewing trend that came to a head in 2024.
    0:02:40 It’s simple. America has fallen out of love with brands and in love with people.
    0:02:44 This is evident in every corner of American life,
    0:02:47 from politics and business to technology and media.
    0:02:50 People are the new brands.
    0:02:57 Some context. What I lack in age and wisdom I make up for in screen time.
    0:03:01 I spend almost seven hours scrolling the internet yesterday.
    0:03:05 Average for me, below average for my generation.
    0:03:10 I am a product of the greatest digital transformation in history,
    0:03:16 and the erosion of traditional brand value is happening downstream of this transformation.
    0:03:22 Scott concurs. Where our views differ, however, is that while he believes
    0:03:28 digitally enabled products and services have replaced brands, I believe people have.
    0:03:36 First, some numbers. Gen Z spends an average of 109 days per year looking at a screen.
    0:03:44 80% of our waking hours are spent consuming information, up from 40% in 1980.
    0:03:51 We see 208 ads per hour, 10 times more than our parents did at our age.
    0:03:57 As a result, we are more anxious, distracted, and depressed than any generation in history.
    0:04:01 We all know this, but do not comprehend it.
    0:04:05 Like frogs in boiling water, we’ve been slow cooked by screens.
    0:04:10 The most important number is 12%.
    0:04:18 That’s the share of Americans who say they have zero close friends, up from 3% in 1990.
    0:04:22 Meanwhile, half the country says they’re struggling with loneliness.
    0:04:26 These numbers took off when Apple put computers in our pockets,
    0:04:28 and they’ve been climbing ever since.
    0:04:35 There is an epidemic of loneliness in our country that extends far beyond the lives of Gen Z.
    0:04:42 We’ve underestimated its impact. Loneliness touches everything from the media we consume
    0:04:46 and the products we buy to the relationships we don’t form.
    0:04:53 When we reflect on the winners and losers in 2024, we will bucket them into two categories,
    0:04:57 those who capitalized on loneliness and those who didn’t.
    0:05:02 Moreover, we’ll realize that in this society of lonely people,
    0:05:07 we find a lot more to love in a person than a brand.
    0:05:15 Meta naturally insists the loneliness epidemic has nothing to do with social media.
    0:05:18 Common sense suggests otherwise.
    0:05:24 We now spend 70% less time with our friends than we did a decade ago.
    0:05:29 There is no question, the phone has replaced our friends.
    0:05:33 Research shows our bodies are not okay with this.
    0:05:38 Loneliness has a neurochemical impact similar to that of hunger,
    0:05:41 in that it activates the same parts of the brain.
    0:05:46 The longer we go without social interaction, the more we crave it.
    0:05:51 Interacting with other people is not a human desire, but a human need.
    0:05:56 For the past decade, we’ve starved ourselves of this essential nutrient.
    0:06:02 The implication is simple. Whether they know it or not,
    0:06:04 near everyone you know is craving a friend.
    0:06:09 The best visualization of this subconscious craving is the Internet,
    0:06:13 which has been overrun by billions of people in search of other people.
    0:06:20 TikTok is an endless stream, not of landscapes or products or experiences, but people.
    0:06:25 Same for YouTube, where the highest performing videos are those with thumbnails
    0:06:27 featuring a giant human face.
    0:06:31 Meanwhile on Instagram, pictures with human faces
    0:06:35 are 38% more likely to get a like than those without.
    0:06:39 The algorithm is the truest reflection of our cravings,
    0:06:42 and the algorithm has been very clear.
    0:06:45 We crave people most.
    0:06:52 For lonely people, however, simply seeing someone is not enough.
    0:06:56 What we really want is to know them, to understand them,
    0:07:00 to be familiar with the intimate details of their life and for them to understand us.
    0:07:03 In other words, we want a friend.
    0:07:09 Many have watched in confusion the extraordinary rise of online influencers,
    0:07:14 people who make millions posting videos of their daily coffee routine or workout regimen.
    0:07:18 Much of this can be explained by our chronic lack of friends.
    0:07:25 Research shows Gen Z views their favorite influencers in the same way they view their friends.
    0:07:30 We know what clothes they wear, what food they eat, and what brands they buy.
    0:07:34 This has radically transformed the retail economy,
    0:07:40 so much so that 40% of us now consult an influencer before we make a purchase.
    0:07:47 The technical term for this phenomenon is “parasocial relationship.”
    0:07:54 Per the Tech and Science Dictionary, “A relationship a person imagines having
    0:07:57 with another person whom they do not actually know.”
    0:08:04 Parasocial is mostly used in reference to Instagram and TikTok,
    0:08:06 but I believe our parasocial relationships affect everything.
    0:08:12 If I had to describe 2024 in one word, it would be parasocial.
    0:08:15 This is evident in my industry, podcasting.
    0:08:21 Joe Rogan has become more influential than the world’s largest news networks.
    0:08:28 His podcast gets three times more downloads than the average primetime viewership of CNN
    0:08:31 and MSNBC combined.
    0:08:37 Many have misdiagnosed this tectonic shift as a left versus right phenomenon,
    0:08:42 i.e. CNN is woke or liberal, Joe Rogan is anti-woke, conservative.
    0:08:47 In the context of loneliness, however, that’s a red herring.
    0:08:55 The key distinction between CNN and Joe Rogan is that one is a brand and the other is a person.
    0:09:03 This distinction is embedded in everything from the name, CNN versus Joe Rogan, to the logo,
    0:09:09 red letters versus a face, to the product, the news versus normal conversation.
    0:09:14 In a world of chronic loneliness, the person is more compelling.
    0:09:17 It’s no accident the name of our pod is Prof. G.
    0:09:26 One might argue that Abby Phillip is a person, but this neglects the intimate nature of podcasting
    0:09:31 as a medium. Abby Phillip reads off a teleprompter, wears makeup in a suit,
    0:09:34 and sits in a multi-million dollar production studio.
    0:09:40 Rogan wears a t-shirt and talks with his buddies in a room that looks like a converted garage.
    0:09:46 For millions of Americans, Rogan isn’t a newscaster or even a celebrity, he’s a friend.
    0:09:51 And you will find this dynamic at all the top podcasts in America.
    0:09:57 Side note, I surveyed 10 friends on their preference between Abby Phillip versus Joe Rogan,
    0:10:00 none of them knew who Abby Phillip was.
    0:10:06 Hollywood is suffering at the hands of the same trend.
    0:10:12 The 2024 Academy Award for Dumbest Purchase goes to Larry Ellison’s son David,
    0:10:17 who after getting caught up in a bidding war with the children of two other billionaires,
    0:10:20 spent $8 billion on Paramount Global.
    0:10:26 Every character in this transaction suffered from Hollywood derangement syndrome,
    0:10:30 believing the Paramount brand still holds any cultural currency.
    0:10:32 It doesn’t.
    0:10:37 Meanwhile, they didn’t comprehend that Hollywood is up against the same unbeatable
    0:10:40 enemy that cable news faces. People.
    0:10:48 The individual who’s levied the greatest damage in Hollywood
    0:10:53 is YouTuber MrBeast, whose portfolio includes hits like,
    0:10:59 “I survived seven days in an abandoned city and I built 100 houses and gave them away.”
    0:11:05 MrBeast has mastered the art of the parasocial relationship.
    0:11:09 Put simply, he’s a friend who gets up to interesting stuff.
    0:11:15 Last year, MrBeast racked up more than one billion hours of viewing time,
    0:11:18 more than any of the top shows on Netflix.
    0:11:23 He’s one of the millions of YouTubers swinging the pendulum of power away
    0:11:26 from brands and toward individual people.
    0:11:29 This trend has been well documented.
    0:11:32 Search the creator economy.
    0:11:39 But it was ratified this year when analysts valued YouTube at $455 billion.
    0:11:47 That’s 20% more valuable than Netflix and more than twice as valuable as Disney.
    0:11:51 Streaming or AI didn’t take down Hollywood.
    0:11:52 People did.
    0:11:58 As with podcasting, this presidential election was also less
    0:12:01 about left versus right than it was about people versus brands.
    0:12:06 No one understood this better than Donald Trump,
    0:12:11 who doubled down on his parasocial relationship with millions of Americans
    0:12:14 while actively disassociating from the Republican brand.
    0:12:18 It was the ultimate people over brand strategy.
    0:12:23 What drove this home for me was a leaked video of Trump
    0:12:26 watching the Democratic National Convention with his team.
    0:12:30 “Too many thank yous,” he says about Harris’ speech.
    0:12:32 “Is she crazy?”
    0:12:35 At first it looks like a watch party.
    0:12:36 Then the tone changes.
    0:12:39 “Get that out right away,” he orders.
    0:12:42 A staffer types out his exact words,
    0:12:45 then blasts them across social media channels.
    0:12:49 Throughout the rest of the speech, Trump live dictates his thoughts.
    0:12:55 She’s talking about how great San Francisco was before she destroyed it.
    0:12:57 With each thought, another tweet.
    0:12:59 “A lot of talk about childhood.
    0:13:01 We’ve got to get to the border.
    0:13:04 Inflation in crime.”
    0:13:07 “Say, Cindy’s out.
    0:13:10 The things of which she complains, the things of which she complains.”
    0:13:16 The team’s job is to publish anything and everything that pops up into his head.
    0:13:18 No edits or cuts, just the raw Trump.
    0:13:22 Call it narcissism or flooding the zone with shit,
    0:13:29 but what’s most striking is Trump’s determination to livestream his persona to his followers.
    0:13:33 He’s so determined, he hired someone to type out his thoughts.
    0:13:39 Think of the millions of lonely people watching that convention craving Trump’s live commentary,
    0:13:41 perhaps because they share his politics,
    0:13:45 but almost certainly because they want his friendship.
    0:13:52 Now compare this to the Harris strategy of carefully written speeches and manicured interviews.
    0:13:58 The Harris team managed its candidate the same way a corporation manages its brand.
    0:14:01 Every detail was consumer tested.
    0:14:03 Every message board approved.
    0:14:09 By November 5, it was clear that the candidate was not Kamala Harris, but the Democratic Party.
    0:14:14 She had become a brand, not a person, and the person won.
    0:14:19 The corporate world has started to wake up to the power of the person,
    0:14:22 but the movement was started years ago by Elon Musk.
    0:14:27 From the beginning, Musk knew he was Tesla’s greatest commercial.
    0:14:30 This is why the company never ran ads.
    0:14:37 Instead, like Trump, he plastered himself everywhere, at every conference and on every network.
    0:14:42 His tweeting frequency went from mildly obsessive to clinically insane.
    0:14:48 He quickly amassed nearly 200 million Twitter followers, then bought the platform.
    0:14:53 People wonder how Tesla commands evaluation premium 10 times greater than its peers
    0:14:57 while spending only four ad dollars per vehicle sold.
    0:15:00 The answer is Elon Musk.
    0:15:05 Other companies have picked up where Elon left off, most notably Metta.
    0:15:10 Metta’s worst rebrand happened three years ago when the company tried to wash away its sins
    0:15:13 by switching from Facebook to Metta.
    0:15:16 It didn’t work and brand trust tanked.
    0:15:23 Its best rebrand, however, came this year when Mark Zuckerberg went from awkward
    0:15:29 coat and tie wearing Senate hearing prop to gold chain donning T-Pain-loving Jiu Jitsu fighter.
    0:15:35 In addition to leaning into his personality, Zuckerberg has made himself more public.
    0:15:42 He posted 71 Instagrams this year, documenting everything from Taylor Swift concerts to UFC
    0:15:49 fights. In 2021, he posted just 29 times, mostly product announcements.
    0:15:55 The extent to which the Zuck has put himself on display this year is astounding,
    0:15:58 but more important, effective.
    0:16:06 Since the rebrand, Zuckerberg’s favorability score among what was once his most hostile cohort,
    0:16:15 18 to 34 year olds, has increased 73%. This is what it means to choose person over brand.
    0:16:24 Honorable mentions go to Spotify and Shopify. I’ve spoken before about the need for CEOs to
    0:16:30 ditch highly polished press releases and embrace TikTok instead. In line with my belief that
    0:16:36 people are greater than brands, TikToks show us who is running the company in a way press releases
    0:16:43 can’t. This is starting to happen. Spotify’s Q2 earnings update this year came in the form
    0:16:51 of a short selfie video filmed by CEO Daniel Ek. Shopify president Harley Finkelstein did the
    0:17:01 same. Memo to CEOs. This is the way to do it. Brands and logos and press releases do not resonate
    0:17:07 with us anymore. We are interested in your people, who they are, what they care about,
    0:17:15 and what they have to say, not your brand. The most overvalued firm in tech, Palantir,
    0:17:23 isn’t a tech company, but a CEO, Alex Karp masking as a public company. The premise of my
    0:17:29 argument is more important than the argument itself. We have become a society of lonely people
    0:17:36 and our loneliness is permeating everything we do. This is a harrowing truth and I’m grateful
    0:17:42 that Surgeon General Vivek Murthy has lent the issue the gravity it deserves by declaring it a
    0:17:50 national epidemic. I remind you that more than one in 10 Americans today have no close friends.
    0:18:01 Single person households now make up 29% of all households up from 13% in 1960. We are more socially
    0:18:06 isolated than ever before. These are important facts for businesses to know if they’re to
    0:18:12 understand their customers, but they’re also important facts in and of themselves.
    0:18:20 It’s the holidays, which means cheesy movies and trite truisms. I personally find myself
    0:18:26 increasingly confident that these movies and truisms are correct. This Christmas I’ll be
    0:18:31 watching It’s a Wonderful Life and I look forward to Clarence’s always timely reminder to George
    0:18:38 Bailey at the end of the film. Remember, no man is a failure who has friends.
    0:18:50 Happy holidays, Ed. Life is so rich.
    0:19:00 [BLANK_AUDIO]

    By Ed Elson, as read by George Hahn.

    People Are The New Brands

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • How Regret Motivates Us — with Daniel Pink

    AI transcript
    0:00:03 Support for property comes from Viori.
    0:00:05 Oh my God, true story.
    0:00:08 I am wearing totally coincidentally,
    0:00:09 guess what, Viori shorts.
    0:00:11 Viori’s high quality gym clothes
    0:00:14 are made to be versatile and stand the test of time.
    0:00:17 They sent me some to try out and here I am.
    0:00:20 For our listeners, Viori is offering 20% off
    0:00:23 your first purchase plus get free shipping
    0:00:26 on any U.S. orders over $75 in free returns.
    0:00:27 Get yourself some of the most comfortable
    0:00:30 and versatile clothing on the planet,
    0:00:35 Viori.com/PropG, that’s V-U-O-R-I.com/PropG.
    0:00:38 Exclusions apply, visit the website
    0:00:40 for full terms and conditions.
    0:00:48 – Hamburglar, why are you calling?
    0:00:49 – Rubble, rubble.
    0:00:52 – McDonald’s has a new biggest burger called Big Arch,
    0:00:55 made with two 100% Canadian beef patties,
    0:00:57 a new delicious sauce and all the McDonald’s flavors
    0:01:00 you love and, wait, you want me to help you get it?
    0:01:01 – Rubble.
    0:01:02 – Come on.
    0:01:05 Compared to beef burgers on McDonald’s current menu
    0:01:07 at participating restaurants in Canada.
    0:01:15 – Support for this show comes from Klaviyo.
    0:01:19 You’re building a business, Klaviyo helps you grow it.
    0:01:21 Klaviyo’s AI-powered marketing platform
    0:01:23 puts all your customer data plus email,
    0:01:26 SMS and analytics in one place.
    0:01:29 With Klaviyo, 10 fish phenom fish wife
    0:01:32 delivers real-time personalized experiences
    0:01:34 that keeps their customers hooked.
    0:01:37 They’ve grown 70 times revenue in just four years
    0:01:40 with Klaviyo, now that’s scale.
    0:01:44 Visit klaviyo.com to learn how brands like Fishwife
    0:01:47 build smarter digital relationships with Klaviyo.
    0:01:53 – Episode 329, 329 is the area
    0:01:56 of belonging to the Hudson Valley region of New York.
    0:02:00 In 1929, the Museum of Modern Art, MoMA,
    0:02:02 opened a New York City true story.
    0:02:04 I posed nude for my art class.
    0:02:06 Problem was, they didn’t ask me.
    0:02:11 – Go, go, go!
    0:02:14 (upbeat music)
    0:02:22 – Welcome to the 329th episode of the Prop G Pod,
    0:02:23 the Dugs on Vacation.
    0:02:26 That’s right, I’m in a field running.
    0:02:28 So in place of our regular schedule programming,
    0:02:30 we’re sharing a conversation with Daniel Pink,
    0:02:32 the author of various bestselling books,
    0:02:35 including The Power of Regret and When,
    0:02:37 as well as the number one New York Times bestseller,
    0:02:39 Drive, and To Sell Is Human.
    0:02:42 We discuss with Daniel Regret, human motivation,
    0:02:45 and his Washington Post column, Why Not?
    0:02:48 He’s a great storyteller, interesting concepts.
    0:02:50 It’s kind of, it’s like if Ted exploded
    0:02:53 or if Ted was personified, I think it’d be Daniel Pink.
    0:02:58 Anyways, with that, here’s our conversation with Daniel Pink.
    0:02:59 – So let’s press right into it.
    0:03:03 You wrote a book about regret, The Power of Regret.
    0:03:05 You said that the advice you give us
    0:03:08 to stay positive, look ahead, and never dwell on the past,
    0:03:10 which is harmful, why?
    0:03:13 – Because we have completely misunderstood
    0:03:15 this emotion of regret.
    0:03:16 We’ve been told, as you mentioned,
    0:03:19 that we should be positive all the time, never be negative,
    0:03:20 we should look forward, not back,
    0:03:22 and that’s bad advice, it goes against the science.
    0:03:24 It will, what the science tells us is that
    0:03:29 if we don’t ignore regrets, and don’t wallow in our regrets,
    0:03:32 but confront them, think about them, look them in the eye,
    0:03:33 it’s a transformative emotion.
    0:03:35 It helps us in a variety of ways.
    0:03:37 – Well, that makes sense.
    0:03:41 I don’t, my struggle is, I make mistakes every day,
    0:03:44 and I can’t forget myself, and I don’t know if that’s regret,
    0:03:47 but where does regret become unhealthy
    0:03:48 in a source of depression
    0:03:49 where you can never get out of the past?
    0:03:51 – Well, I mean, there’s a big difference,
    0:03:52 so when it’s a source of depression,
    0:03:53 that’s a medical issue.
    0:03:56 What I’m writing about here, I’m not a doctor,
    0:04:00 so I can’t opine on the medical dimensions of it.
    0:04:01 Essentially what we should be doing,
    0:04:03 and I think there is some relation,
    0:04:06 and how the scientific ways to deal with regret
    0:04:10 are actually very similar to cognitive behavior therapy,
    0:04:13 which is essentially not looking at your emotions
    0:04:17 as who you are, but as something that is going on,
    0:04:18 as something that is going on in your life,
    0:04:20 that is to examine them,
    0:04:22 and so when you’re talking about reckoning with regret,
    0:04:26 one of the first steps is something called self-compassion,
    0:04:29 and self-compassion is in some ways a triangulation
    0:04:32 between self-esteem and self-flagellation.
    0:04:35 We tend to believe that lacerating self-criticism
    0:04:38 is the way to get us to perform better,
    0:04:39 and there’s no evidence of that.
    0:04:41 There’s also very little evidence
    0:04:43 that kind of constantly patting yourself on the back
    0:04:44 and boosting your self-esteem is good.
    0:04:47 What seems to be good is the work that Kristin Neff
    0:04:49 has done at University of Texas on self-compassion,
    0:04:51 which is essentially treating yourself with kindness
    0:04:55 rather than contempt, recognizing that mistakes,
    0:04:57 setbacks, or regrets are part of life,
    0:04:59 and then using that as a stepstone
    0:05:01 to thinking about your regrets.
    0:05:04 One of the things we see in the research on self-compassion
    0:05:06 is that people have a very, many people,
    0:05:07 particularly high achieving people,
    0:05:09 have a very difficult, they talk to themselves
    0:05:11 in ways they would never talk to anybody else.
    0:05:14 So if I were probably to harness your self-talk, all right,
    0:05:17 we were to use those headphones you’re wearing now
    0:05:20 and create this magical thing that allows me
    0:05:22 to hear what you’re saying to yourself,
    0:05:24 especially in the face of a mistake.
    0:05:26 It would probably be brutal.
    0:05:27 It would probably be lacerating.
    0:05:29 It would probably be cruel.
    0:05:31 And chances are you wouldn’t say that to somebody else.
    0:05:33 And so what the research on self-compassion tells us
    0:05:35 is don’t treat yourself better than anybody else,
    0:05:37 but don’t treat yourself worse than anybody else
    0:05:39 because it’s not effective.
    0:05:41 – So all this just makes all sorts of sense, right?
    0:05:44 I’ve always said that one of my things,
    0:05:47 it’s like three of my last five new year’s resolutions
    0:05:49 have been to forgive myself.
    0:05:52 What is the actual cognitive behavior of the exercise
    0:05:54 is to get better than this?
    0:05:56 You logically, it is impossible rationally,
    0:05:58 logically not to agree with you.
    0:06:00 What are the actual behavioral modification techniques
    0:06:01 for getting there?
    0:06:02 – I’ll give you an example, okay?
    0:06:04 ‘Cause this goes to some of the other ways
    0:06:06 that we deal with regret.
    0:06:09 What seems to be a very effective technique
    0:06:11 on a whole range of things
    0:06:13 is what’s known as self-distancing.
    0:06:17 There’s a psychological phenomenon known as
    0:06:20 Solomon’s paradox, which is that we human beings
    0:06:21 are pretty good at solving problems,
    0:06:23 but we tend to stink at solving our own problems
    0:06:25 ’cause we’re too close to them.
    0:06:28 So a way to be more compassionate to yourself
    0:06:30 is to say what you would say to someone
    0:06:33 who is telling you what you’re telling yourself.
    0:06:35 So if you had a friend who was telling themselves,
    0:06:37 you’re an idiot, you’re an imposter,
    0:06:39 you don’t deserve to be here, you’re worthless.
    0:06:41 What would you say to that person?
    0:06:45 I mean, what would you say to that person?
    0:06:47 – You’d say for God’s sake, stop it
    0:06:51 and list off some positive metrics.
    0:06:53 – That’s the kind of thing they can say to yourself.
    0:06:55 There are other great self-distancing techniques.
    0:06:57 There’s one of the best decision-making
    0:07:01 self-distancing techniques is when you’re stuck on a decision
    0:07:04 is to ask yourself, what would I tell my best friend to do?
    0:07:08 That’s a great, very specific, practical tip.
    0:07:10 In a business setting, you can use
    0:07:11 the old Andy Grove technique,
    0:07:14 where he said when he faced a tough decision
    0:07:16 back when he was the CEO of Intel,
    0:07:19 he would ask himself, if I were replaced tomorrow,
    0:07:21 what would my successor do?
    0:07:22 And he almost always knew.
    0:07:25 And so the idea here in the research on self-distancing
    0:07:29 is that when we tackle our own problems, our own issues,
    0:07:31 we tend to look at them like scuba divers.
    0:07:33 And what we should be doing is looking at them
    0:07:36 like oceanographers, getting above them.
    0:07:37 And there are ways to do that.
    0:07:39 There’s research showing that actually
    0:07:41 you can improve your performance.
    0:07:43 If you want to talk about self-talk,
    0:07:46 you can improve your performance by talking to yourself
    0:07:49 in the second person or the third person.
    0:07:50 Instead of asking yourself, what should I do?
    0:07:51 Say, what should you do?
    0:07:53 Or better, what should Scott do?
    0:07:55 – In an effort to understand the difference between
    0:07:57 unproductive and productive regret,
    0:08:00 have you been able to reverse engineer,
    0:08:01 productive or unproductive regret
    0:08:04 of any sort of identity or experience, gender,
    0:08:07 the way you were raised, your approach to life?
    0:08:08 – Not really.
    0:08:11 I can answer that question in two different ways.
    0:08:12 Number one is that for this book,
    0:08:14 what I did is I did two things.
    0:08:17 I did the largest public opinion survey ever conducted
    0:08:19 on American attitudes about regret.
    0:08:23 Trying to identify whether there were demographic differences
    0:08:26 in how people experience regret or what they regretted.
    0:08:29 So looking at everything from race, from education level,
    0:08:32 even things like introversion, extraversion,
    0:08:34 belief in God, et cetera, et cetera.
    0:08:36 The one demographic difference that came out
    0:08:41 in this public opinion research had to do with age.
    0:08:45 And what it showed is that people in their 20s
    0:08:49 had about equal numbers of regrets of action and inaction.
    0:08:51 That is in the architecture of regret.
    0:08:52 You can regret something you did,
    0:08:54 you can regret something you didn’t do.
    0:08:56 People in their 20s had roughly equal numbers
    0:08:58 of regrets of action and inaction.
    0:09:02 But as people age, the inaction regrets take over.
    0:09:06 When you get to be in your 40s, certainly 50s, 60s, 70s,
    0:09:08 inaction regrets, outnumber action regrets
    0:09:10 by three and a half, four to one.
    0:09:13 So that’s a big difference in the content
    0:09:15 of what people regret.
    0:09:16 But when you look at things like,
    0:09:18 do men and women have different regrets?
    0:09:21 There’s some evidence, there’s modest evidence
    0:09:22 showing some differences.
    0:09:25 In my research, I saw a tiny little bit,
    0:09:26 not that much on race.
    0:09:28 A little bit on education level.
    0:09:33 I found that people with large amounts of formal education
    0:09:35 actually had more career regrets
    0:09:37 than people with less formal education,
    0:09:39 which sort of is superficially surprising,
    0:09:41 but perfectly understandable
    0:09:43 because if you have more education,
    0:09:44 you have more opportunities,
    0:09:46 which means you have more opportunities foregone.
    0:09:48 And so the demographic differences
    0:09:51 in what people regret were not massive.
    0:09:54 Now, I also did a piece of qualitative research
    0:09:56 where we collected regrets from 26,000 people
    0:09:58 around the world.
    0:10:00 And there I found that around the world,
    0:10:03 people seem to have the same four core regrets.
    0:10:07 They go deeper than simply a regret about a career,
    0:10:09 a regret about romance, a regret about health,
    0:10:11 a regret about finance,
    0:10:15 go deeper than those surface domains of life.
    0:10:16 – Are these the four you’re talking about in your book,
    0:10:18 “Foundation, Boldness, Moral, and Connection?”
    0:10:19 Can you say more about those?
    0:10:20 – Sure, sure.
    0:10:23 So again, we have this pretty remarkable database
    0:10:27 of regrets from 134 countries.
    0:10:30 The survey was up in Chinese, it was up in Spanish,
    0:10:31 and obviously it was up in English.
    0:10:34 And the four regrets that people around the world
    0:10:37 seem to have are exactly, as you say, foundation regrets.
    0:10:40 Small decisions people make early in life
    0:10:42 that accumulate to terrible consequences later in life.
    0:10:46 I spent too much and saved too little, and now I’m broke.
    0:10:47 I didn’t exercise or eat right,
    0:10:49 and now I’m profoundly out of shape.
    0:10:51 So that’s a foundation regret.
    0:10:54 Boldness regret is a very big category of regret.
    0:10:56 You’re at a juncture in your life and you have two choices.
    0:10:59 You can play it safe, or you can take the chance.
    0:11:03 And overwhelmingly, when people don’t take the chance,
    0:11:04 they regret it.
    0:11:04 Now, that’s not true for everybody.
    0:11:06 There are plenty of people who take a chance
    0:11:08 and it goes south on them and they regret it.
    0:11:12 But they are massively outnumbered
    0:11:14 by people who didn’t take the chance.
    0:11:16 And again, what’s interesting here
    0:11:18 is that it doesn’t matter the domain.
    0:11:20 So I have hundreds of people who regret
    0:11:22 not asking somebody out on a date.
    0:11:24 Hundreds of people who regret not traveling,
    0:11:26 not starting a business, not doing something
    0:11:28 that required a little bit more boldness
    0:11:31 than they were willing to offer up at the time.
    0:11:34 Third category, moral regrets.
    0:11:35 Another time when you have a choice.
    0:11:38 I can take the low road, I can take the high road.
    0:11:40 I can do the right thing, I can do the wrong thing.
    0:11:43 And overwhelmingly, most people most of the time
    0:11:46 regret doing the wrong thing.
    0:11:49 Because most people are decent
    0:11:50 and most people want to be decent
    0:11:53 and most people feel crappy when they’re not decent.
    0:11:54 And the final one are connection regrets
    0:11:56 which are about relationships
    0:11:57 and not only romantic relationships
    0:12:01 but the full spectrum of relationships in our lives.
    0:12:04 So you’ve got a relationship that was intact
    0:12:05 or should have been intact.
    0:12:06 Say with a friend or with a sibling
    0:12:10 or with a parent or whoever and it comes apart.
    0:12:13 And in many cases, the way these relationships come apart
    0:12:16 is unexciting and undramatic.
    0:12:18 They just kind of drift apart.
    0:12:20 Somebody wants to reach out.
    0:12:23 They don’t because they think it’s gonna be awkward
    0:12:26 and they think the other side’s not gonna care.
    0:12:27 So it drifts apart even more.
    0:12:29 And so those are the four regrets.
    0:12:31 Foundation regrets have only had done the work.
    0:12:33 Boldness regrets have only had taken the chance.
    0:12:36 Moral regrets have only had done the right thing.
    0:12:38 And connection regrets, if only had reached out.
    0:12:41 And it’s remarkable consistency all over the world
    0:12:44 in the way people talk about these regrets
    0:12:46 these regrets and the content of their regrets.
    0:12:48 – I love this type of research.
    0:12:49 In addition to yours, I read a lot of
    0:12:51 what my colleague at NYU, Adam Alter,
    0:12:54 has written about palliative care and end of life.
    0:12:55 And it foots to everything you’re saying.
    0:12:58 The only thing we haven’t talked about
    0:12:59 and it’s sort of a mix of all of them
    0:13:03 or an alchemy of all of them is that people,
    0:13:05 the number one regret I’ve read
    0:13:07 is that people wish they’d been less hard on themselves.
    0:13:09 They’d wish they’d forgiven themselves.
    0:13:11 And that is one of my favorite sayings
    0:13:13 that’s gotten me through a lot of hard times
    0:13:15 is nothing is ever as good or as bad as it seems.
    0:13:17 And that when you look back on your life,
    0:13:20 you won’t be as upset about the thing that happened to you.
    0:13:22 You’ll be upset about how you responded to it.
    0:13:23 Your thoughts?
    0:13:25 – I think that’s generally right.
    0:13:28 I mean, that is essentially the underlying philosophy
    0:13:31 of the underlying theory of cognitive behavior therapy,
    0:13:32 which is basically how you respond to it.
    0:13:36 It’s also essentially an element of stoic philosophy,
    0:13:39 which has become incredibly popular now.
    0:13:42 And so, I mean, the other thing, I mean, also, you know,
    0:13:44 I think what’s interesting about these regrets
    0:13:47 is interviewing people about their regrets
    0:13:50 is that when people tell you what they regret the most,
    0:13:51 they’re telling you what they value the most.
    0:13:54 And so, what we know from these four regrets
    0:13:56 is that people value stability.
    0:13:58 They value growth and learning
    0:14:00 and not wasting their time on the planet.
    0:14:02 They value goodness and they value love.
    0:14:04 And I think that’s very consistent
    0:14:07 with some of the other research we know
    0:14:10 on that we have on human flourishing,
    0:14:12 part of which tells us that ultimately
    0:14:17 at the end of our lives, what’s gonna matter to us
    0:14:20 is did we have people in our lives who loved us
    0:14:21 and did we love other people?
    0:14:23 Period, full stop.
    0:14:24 I mean, if you look at the research,
    0:14:26 if you look at the grant study at Harvard,
    0:14:30 this lengthy, multi-decade, longitudinal study
    0:14:33 of human flourishing, that’s what it shows.
    0:14:35 And I think what’s interesting about this research
    0:14:39 on regret and in general is also to your point, Scott,
    0:14:42 is most decisions we make in a given day
    0:14:45 don’t really matter all that much.
    0:14:46 And I think this is why it’s important
    0:14:48 to think about our regrets.
    0:14:50 You probably made a hundred decisions yesterday
    0:14:53 and it’s today and you don’t remember most of them.
    0:14:56 But there are decisions and indecisions that you made,
    0:14:58 that we made, human beings made,
    0:15:02 each of us a year ago, five years ago, 10 years ago,
    0:15:04 20 years ago, that not only do we remember them
    0:15:07 when we don’t remember most decisions we made yesterday,
    0:15:09 not only to remember a decision or indecision
    0:15:12 from 20 years ago, but it bugs us.
    0:15:13 That’s a very strong signal.
    0:15:14 That’s telling us something.
    0:15:15 And so we have a choice.
    0:15:17 We can either plug our ears and say,
    0:15:19 nope, I’m gonna be positive all the time.
    0:15:22 Or we can say, oh my God, I’m the worst person in the world
    0:15:23 and let it topple us.
    0:15:25 Or we can say, huh, that’s interesting.
    0:15:27 That’s a pretty strong signal.
    0:15:28 Let me listen to this signal.
    0:15:30 Let me use it as data.
    0:15:32 And when we do that, there’s a lot of evidence
    0:15:33 showing that regret can help us
    0:15:35 on a whole range of different things.
    0:15:37 It can help us become better negotiators,
    0:15:40 better problem solvers, avoid cognitive biases,
    0:15:43 strategize better, find more meaning in life.
    0:15:46 We’ll be right back.
    0:15:51 Support for PropT comes from Mint Mobile.
    0:15:52 You might feel like paying a ton of money
    0:15:54 for your phone plan every month.
    0:15:56 It’s just an inevitable part of life,
    0:15:58 like fender benders and bad haircuts,
    0:16:01 but there’s actually nothing inevitable about it.
    0:16:03 Mint Mobile may have a way
    0:16:04 around that painful monthly bill.
    0:16:07 Right now, when you purchase a new three-month phone plan
    0:16:10 with Mint Mobile, you’ll pay just $15 a month.
    0:16:13 That’s it, no strings attached, no sneaky fine print,
    0:16:15 just a great deal.
    0:16:17 All Mint Mobile plans come with high-speed data
    0:16:18 and unlimited talk and text delivered
    0:16:20 on the nation’s largest 5G network.
    0:16:24 You can even keep your phone, your contacts, and your number.
    0:16:25 You can get this new customer offer
    0:16:27 and a three-month premium wireless plan
    0:16:28 for just 15 bucks a month
    0:16:31 by going to mintmobile.com/profg.
    0:16:33 That’s mintmobile.com/profg.
    0:16:35 You can cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month
    0:16:38 at mintmobile.com/profg.
    0:16:39 $45 upfront payment required,
    0:16:41 equivalent to $15 a month.
    0:16:42 New customers on first three-month plan
    0:16:45 only speed slower, above 40 gigabytes on unlimited plan.
    0:16:46 Additional taxes, fees, and restrictions apply.
    0:16:49 See Mint Mobile for details.
    0:16:54 Support for ProfG comes from Masterclass.
    0:16:57 All right, I need all the procrastinators to listen up.
    0:16:59 Are you still looking for the perfect holiday gift
    0:17:00 for that loved one who’s hard to shop for?
    0:17:02 Here’s an idea and bonus.
    0:17:04 It requires no gift wrapping.
    0:17:06 A Masterclass subscription.
    0:17:09 Masterclass is the streaming platform
    0:17:10 that brings invaluable insights
    0:17:12 from the world’s greatest mind straight to you.
    0:17:14 According to Masterclass, 88% of members
    0:17:17 say they feel it has made a positive impact on their lives.
    0:17:18 That means that this gift has the potential
    0:17:21 to last a lifetime, plus there’s no risk.
    0:17:24 Every new membership comes with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
    0:17:26 Personally, I’d recommend, I love watching
    0:17:29 or hearing from Martha Stewart and Bob Iger.
    0:17:30 I’m interested in business
    0:17:32 and I’m interested in Martha Stewart’s story.
    0:17:33 Masterclass always has great offers
    0:17:36 during the holidays, sometimes up to as much as 50% off.
    0:17:40 Head over to masterclass.com/propg for the current offer.
    0:17:44 That’s up to 50% off at masterclass.com/propg.
    0:17:47 Masterclass.com/propg.
    0:17:54 (bell rings)
    0:17:56 – Hamburglar, why are you calling?
    0:17:57 – Rubble, rubble.
    0:18:00 – McDonald’s has a new biggest burger called Big Arch,
    0:18:03 made with two 100% Canadian beef patties,
    0:18:04 a new delicious sauce,
    0:18:06 and all the McDonald’s flavors you love,
    0:18:08 and wait, you want me to help you get it?
    0:18:09 – Rubble.
    0:18:10 – Come on.
    0:18:13 Compared to beef burgers on McDonald’s current menu
    0:18:15 at participating restaurants in Canada.
    0:18:22 – I think of you as the motivation guy.
    0:18:24 I first came across your work.
    0:18:26 I was excited that you were great to come on the pod
    0:18:29 ’cause I remember literally 10 or 15 years ago,
    0:18:33 I stumbled upon this video where you used an animation
    0:18:36 to kind of brilliantly and succinctly,
    0:18:39 I’m sure you know the video, it went everywhere.
    0:18:42 And I feel like that was sort of an inflection point for you.
    0:18:45 You became kind of owned motivation.
    0:18:47 Your book drive the surprising truth
    0:18:49 about what motivates us.
    0:18:51 I loved the way you broke it down,
    0:18:54 autonomy, mastery, and purpose.
    0:18:56 Can you say more about those three pillars
    0:18:58 of the motivation stool?
    0:19:01 – Sure, I mean, what we know about especially motivation
    0:19:05 at work is that we sort of have this head fake going on.
    0:19:07 We think that a certain kind of reward,
    0:19:09 what I call if then rewards,
    0:19:11 are the secret to effective motivation.
    0:19:12 If you do this, then you get that.
    0:19:14 If you do this, then you get that.
    0:19:16 And we have now 60 years of research showing us
    0:19:20 that if then rewards are pretty good for simple tasks
    0:19:21 with short time horizons,
    0:19:24 but not that effective for complex tasks with long horizons.
    0:19:26 And that for complex tasks with long horizons,
    0:19:28 what we wanna do in the workplace especially
    0:19:29 is pay people well.
    0:19:32 And then as you say, offer them those three things.
    0:19:34 Autonomy, mastery, and purpose.
    0:19:37 So autonomy is, do you have some control
    0:19:39 over what you do, how you do it,
    0:19:41 when you do it, where you do it?
    0:19:42 The mastery is, are you getting better
    0:19:43 at something that matters?
    0:19:46 Are you making progress in something meaningful?
    0:19:48 And purpose is, do you know why you’re doing it?
    0:19:50 Are you making a difference in the world?
    0:19:53 Are you making a contribution in your own little terrain?
    0:19:54 And those are the things
    0:19:57 that actually lead to enduring motivation.
    0:20:00 These if-then rewards are like,
    0:20:02 it’s like, you can keep shoveling coal into the furnace,
    0:20:04 but it burns up pretty quickly.
    0:20:07 And but these, if these autonomy, mastery, and purpose,
    0:20:11 which form sort of the trifecta of intrinsic motivation,
    0:20:15 lead to enduring high performance.
    0:20:18 – And what are the enemies of motivation?
    0:20:20 I was default to the word now.
    0:20:21 You wanna write a book, just start.
    0:20:23 So many people come up to me.
    0:20:25 I wanna start a podcast.
    0:20:25 I wanna write a book.
    0:20:27 I’m like, okay, start.
    0:20:30 Other than that, I don’t know what advice to give you.
    0:20:32 What are the killers of motivation?
    0:20:34 – Well, I mean, there are all kinds
    0:20:35 of killers of motivation.
    0:20:37 I mean, part of what it, part of it is,
    0:20:40 I mean, what you’re talking about in a way is procrastination,
    0:20:43 which is a problem of emotional regulation.
    0:20:46 They sort of have this in co-ed desire to write a book,
    0:20:48 but they don’t wanna deal with the discomfort
    0:20:50 of sitting down and writing the first sentence,
    0:20:52 because that’s really painful.
    0:20:54 And so I actually think that your advice
    0:20:56 to just start is right.
    0:20:58 I think what you wanna do is you wanna try to change,
    0:21:00 you wanna offer people some scaffolding
    0:21:01 and some structuring on that.
    0:21:06 So if you wanna write a book and is set out
    0:21:09 in your calendar today, 15 minutes to start writing,
    0:21:11 and then do 15 minutes tomorrow,
    0:21:14 and then do 15 in your calendar, 15 minutes the next day,
    0:21:15 and then expand that.
    0:21:18 And over and over and over, that’s how you write books.
    0:21:19 I mean, I’ve written seven books.
    0:21:21 You think if I were to have waited
    0:21:25 until I was inspired to start writing,
    0:21:26 I wouldn’t have written a word.
    0:21:29 I’ve written, I was able to, I’m able to write books
    0:21:30 because I care about what I’m writing,
    0:21:34 but also because I show up in my office at 8.30
    0:21:35 and write and do my job.
    0:21:38 And then I do it the next day, and the next day,
    0:21:38 and the next day.
    0:21:40 And I do it even on the days
    0:21:41 that I don’t feel like doing it.
    0:21:43 I do it on the days,
    0:21:44 especially on the days that I don’t feel like doing it.
    0:21:47 It’s like the famous Julius Irving quotation.
    0:21:50 It’s like being a professional is doing what you love to do
    0:21:52 even on the days you don’t feel like doing it.
    0:21:53 – Let’s talk about that.
    0:21:54 What is your process?
    0:21:56 It sounds like you go into an office,
    0:21:58 but when you’re writing a book,
    0:22:00 that’s kind of, I think what you’re known for,
    0:22:02 what’s your process?
    0:22:03 You’ve written seven books.
    0:22:06 How do you, is there, could you offer anyone some structure
    0:22:08 around how you get these things done?
    0:22:11 – I look at writing books like a blue collar job.
    0:22:13 I think of it as being a bricklayer.
    0:22:16 And so what I do in terms of the actual execution
    0:22:21 of the book is I’m talking to you from my garage office.
    0:22:23 I live 22 steps in that direction.
    0:22:24 I’m in Washington DC.
    0:22:26 This is my garage office, all right?
    0:22:30 Pinking World Headquarters is a converted one car garage.
    0:22:32 And at 830 in the morning when I’m writing a book,
    0:22:35 I come into this office and I give myself a word count.
    0:22:38 It varies depending on where I am in the process,
    0:22:41 but I’ll give myself a word count, 600 words, 700 words.
    0:22:43 I don’t bring my phone with me in the office.
    0:22:45 I don’t open up my email.
    0:22:47 I don’t watch ESPN highlights.
    0:22:50 I don’t do anything until I hit that number.
    0:22:52 And then when I hit that number,
    0:22:54 I’m liberated to do other stuff.
    0:22:56 But nothing until I hit that number.
    0:22:58 Some days I hit that number at 1030, 11.
    0:23:00 Other days I don’t hit it ’til late in the afternoon
    0:23:02 and those are crappy days.
    0:23:04 But I don’t do anything until I hit that number.
    0:23:06 And then I do it the next day.
    0:23:09 And then I do it the next day.
    0:23:12 So if you wanna have process, it’s not anything exalted.
    0:23:14 It’s not like I sit in the corner over here
    0:23:15 with a smoking jacket on,
    0:23:19 listening for God to dictate sentences to me.
    0:23:24 No, I show up in my workspace and I do my work.
    0:23:27 – Your dad, my understanding is two daughters and a son.
    0:23:30 What is your work on motivation and regret?
    0:23:33 How does that change your approach to parenting?
    0:23:36 – You know, I think I’m a pretty autonomy supportive parent
    0:23:39 to use that kind of technical language.
    0:23:41 So I try to support my kids autonomy.
    0:23:45 So not be too directive about what they have to do.
    0:23:49 Now, the underlying fact here is that,
    0:23:51 I mean, we have 50 years of evidence
    0:23:53 that the effect of parenting on kids,
    0:23:55 especially their intellect and their personality
    0:23:57 is very small.
    0:24:01 So, you know, the unhappy fact of genetic research
    0:24:06 for many parents is that identical twins raised apart
    0:24:11 are more similar in intelligence and in personality
    0:24:14 than fraternal twins raised together.
    0:24:17 So, you know, arguably the most important things
    0:24:19 that a parent gives a kid, in my view,
    0:24:24 especially in America, are genes and a zip code.
    0:24:25 If you look at the work of Raj Chetty,
    0:24:27 the most important thing a parent gives a kid
    0:24:28 are genes and a zip code.
    0:24:31 Now, again, when we’re talking only about their outcome,
    0:24:34 I mean, you know, I gave my kids genes
    0:24:36 and I gave my kids a zip code,
    0:24:37 but more important than anything else,
    0:24:39 I love them more than anything in the world.
    0:24:40 And whether that has an effect on their outcome,
    0:24:44 I don’t know, but, you know, it’s what parents do.
    0:24:46 But I think a lot of parents are mistaken
    0:24:50 about how much control, how much effect they have
    0:24:53 over who their kids become.
    0:24:54 – And what about being a good partner?
    0:24:56 What about being a good husband?
    0:24:57 – When it comes to regret,
    0:24:59 I think it’s really important to talk to your partner
    0:25:02 or even your kids about your own regrets.
    0:25:05 That is, a lot of times people sit with their regrets.
    0:25:07 They think that somehow they’re the only one
    0:25:10 who doesn’t have, who has those regrets.
    0:25:13 And we have ample evidence showing
    0:25:14 that writing about your regret
    0:25:17 or talking about your regret, it can be quite effective
    0:25:19 because it’s an unburdening, it’s a sense-making.
    0:25:21 And the other mistake that we make,
    0:25:23 this is true not only with our kids and with our partners,
    0:25:26 but out there in the world is that we mistakenly believe
    0:25:29 that when we talk about our mistakes or our scrubs
    0:25:32 or our setbacks, that people will think less of us.
    0:25:34 When in fact, we have some good evidence
    0:25:36 that people think more of us,
    0:25:37 that they admire our candor, they admire our courage.
    0:25:39 So I think one thing you can do with partners
    0:25:41 and with kids is talk about your regret,
    0:25:42 but not in a self-ladulating way.
    0:25:45 Talk, you know, say, here’s something I regret.
    0:25:46 Here’s what I learned from
    0:25:47 and here’s what I’m gonna do about it.
    0:25:48 And that’s a good way to normalize it
    0:25:50 and it’s a good way to treat regret
    0:25:54 as facts, as information, as signal, as data.
    0:25:55 That’s really the key.
    0:25:57 – We have a lot of young people to listen to the pod.
    0:26:00 And I look at, you know, I look at your life
    0:26:03 and it strikes me doing something really cool,
    0:26:06 really interesting, you make a good living.
    0:26:08 Can you provide any advice around
    0:26:10 in terms of your lived experience
    0:26:12 when you were a younger man?
    0:26:14 What did you do well?
    0:26:15 What did you not do well?
    0:26:17 If for someone out there who thinks
    0:26:19 I wanna be a great storyteller
    0:26:20 and make a really good living at it.
    0:26:22 I wanna be Daniel Bank.
    0:26:26 Like, what advice would you give to someone
    0:26:27 maybe avoiding some of the mistakes
    0:26:28 or maybe getting there?
    0:26:29 Although you’ve gotten there pretty quickly.
    0:26:31 What advice would you have for someone who says
    0:26:33 I wanna be the next Daniel Bank?
    0:26:36 – I would say get a better goal than that for starters.
    0:26:40 Because that is, I don’t know, that is a terrible goal.
    0:26:42 Being another Scott Gallagher,
    0:26:45 being another ex as a terrible, awful goal.
    0:26:47 I would say that with a degree of harshness.
    0:26:49 I would say, you don’t wanna be the next blank,
    0:26:50 you wanna be the first you.
    0:26:53 Beyond that, you know, among the things that I’ve,
    0:26:54 some of the things that I did right
    0:26:57 and some of the things that I did wrong.
    0:26:59 Among the things that I did right
    0:27:03 were that at a certain point, young in my life,
    0:27:04 relatively young in my life,
    0:27:08 I kind of stopped caring about what people thought about me.
    0:27:09 And I felt that earlier in my life,
    0:27:12 I was fairly concerned about what people thought about.
    0:27:12 Did they think I was cool?
    0:27:13 Did they think I was smart?
    0:27:15 Did they think I was accomplished and so forth?
    0:27:19 And then I came to this startling revelation
    0:27:20 about what people thought about me.
    0:27:23 And that was, they weren’t thinking about me.
    0:27:24 Nobody was thinking about me
    0:27:26 ’cause everybody’s thinking about themselves.
    0:27:28 And so, that was like a great liberating moment.
    0:27:29 So don’t think too much.
    0:27:31 Don’t think, don’t care about what other people think.
    0:27:33 That’s the most important thing.
    0:27:36 I’m, you know, the rest of it, I think is pretty standard.
    0:27:38 It’s like, you know, if you outwork people
    0:27:41 and you take more shots on goal than people,
    0:27:44 than most people, you’re gonna be all right.
    0:27:47 I mean, if you don’t care what people think,
    0:27:48 you outwork them, other people,
    0:27:52 and you take more shots on goal, you’re gonna be all right.
    0:27:54 I mean, I can’t tell you how exactly it’s gonna happen,
    0:27:56 but it’s gonna be all right.
    0:27:58 The other thing that I would tell people is,
    0:28:02 forget about planning in any kind of detailed way.
    0:28:05 One of the things that I suggest that young people do
    0:28:07 is that they find, it’s Scott Galloway,
    0:28:09 they find someone who’s doing something cool,
    0:28:11 you know, someone in their 50s or whatever,
    0:28:12 who’s doing something cool,
    0:28:14 who’s doing something interesting.
    0:28:17 Oh my God, that’d be so great to have a pilot.
    0:28:18 Oh, it’d be so great to do that.
    0:28:19 And I say, talk to that person
    0:28:22 and ask them how they got there.
    0:28:26 And I say, I guarantee you that 49 out of 50
    0:28:28 interesting accomplished people
    0:28:29 answer the question like this.
    0:28:32 It’s a long story.
    0:28:35 Because it was failure, it was circuitous,
    0:28:37 it was unplanned, there was serendipity,
    0:28:40 there was good luck, there was bad luck.
    0:28:44 And so, you know, if you, again, outwork,
    0:28:46 take more shots on goal, don’t care what people think,
    0:28:51 be generous, do great work, you’re gonna be fine, truly.
    0:28:52 I mean, you really are.
    0:28:54 I mean, it’s easy, you know, it’s easy to say
    0:28:57 from the vantage point of someone who was 60 years old,
    0:28:59 but it’s true.
    0:29:02 The one thing that I didn’t do well, Scott,
    0:29:06 I think I relied too heavily on myself throughout my life,
    0:29:07 especially professionally.
    0:29:09 And I never, like if someone says, who’s your mentor?
    0:29:12 I said, I don’t have a fricking mentor.
    0:29:15 I never had a great, I never had like a mentor.
    0:29:17 I know, not because like people weren’t kind
    0:29:20 and generous to me, it’s because I was sort of too arrogant
    0:29:22 to think that I needed something like that.
    0:29:24 And so, one of the things that I could have done
    0:29:28 a better job on is finding mentors,
    0:29:31 seeking advice from a wide range of people,
    0:29:34 doing a better job of working through other people
    0:29:36 rather than simply do everything on my own.
    0:29:38 That’s one thing that I could get better at
    0:29:40 in the next chapter of my life.
    0:29:43 – We’ll be right back.
    0:29:56 – Your team requested a ride, but this time, not from you.
    0:29:58 It’s through their Uber team account.
    0:30:00 It’s an Uber account that allows your team
    0:30:02 to request a ride under your supervision
    0:30:05 with live trip tracking and highly rated drivers.
    0:30:07 Add your team to your Uber account today.
    0:30:13 – Support for PropG comes from NetSuite.
    0:30:16 Running a business means dealing with a lot of unknowns.
    0:30:17 Is the market up or down?
    0:30:18 Are interest rates climbing?
    0:30:20 What about inflation?
    0:30:22 That’s why so many businesses turned to NetSuite
    0:30:23 by Oracle to stay ahead,
    0:30:26 with tools for real-time insights and forecasting.
    0:30:28 NetSuite helps nearly 40,000 companies
    0:30:31 stay ready for whatever the future may bring.
    0:30:33 NetSuite combines accounting, financial management,
    0:30:36 inventory, HR, and more into one simple platform,
    0:30:38 offering a single source of truth.
    0:30:40 They say you can get real-time insights and data
    0:30:41 you can use to make the right decisions
    0:30:43 faster than ever before.
    0:30:45 And with its scalable cloud infrastructure,
    0:30:47 NetSuite supports your growth at every stage
    0:30:49 from startup to global enterprise.
    0:30:53 So as your business assesses how AI impacts their bottom line,
    0:30:54 you can get ahead of the curve
    0:30:55 and stay focused on what’s coming next
    0:30:57 with NetSuite by Oracle.
    0:31:00 Speaking of AI, you can download the CFO’s Guide to AI
    0:31:04 and Machine Learning at netsuite.com/prof.
    0:31:07 The guide is free to you at netsuite.com/prof,
    0:31:10 netsuite.com/prof.
    0:31:15 Support for PropG comes from Hydro.
    0:31:17 If you have a fitness fanatic in your life,
    0:31:20 you might be struggling to find a great gift for them, sure.
    0:31:21 You could grab some dumbbells,
    0:31:23 but they’re probably already absolutely ripped.
    0:31:25 And more than likely, they’re also set on protein powder
    0:31:27 for the next decade.
    0:31:28 But what if there was something out there
    0:31:30 that could supercharge their workouts,
    0:31:33 delivering full body fitness they won’t get anywhere else?
    0:31:35 Meet the Hydro Rower.
    0:31:39 In just 20 minutes, the Hydro Rower can hit 86% of your muscles,
    0:31:41 making it the ultimate total body workout.
    0:31:43 It combines strength training with cardio
    0:31:45 and does it without the high-impact force
    0:31:46 that can lead to injuries.
    0:31:49 I think rowing is arguably the best exercise in the world.
    0:31:51 I don’t think there’s any more efficient way
    0:31:54 to literally get kind of cooked and have a great workout
    0:31:57 in, gosh, 10 minutes, 20 minutes max.
    0:31:59 And the Hydro experience kind of mimics
    0:32:02 the actual experience of pulling an oar through water.
    0:32:03 You can give the gift of a full body workout
    0:32:05 off in the comfort of home with Hydro.
    0:32:08 Head over to hydro.com and use code PropG
    0:32:12 to save up to $475 off your Hydro.
    0:32:16 That’s H-Y-D-R-O-W.com.
    0:32:20 Code PropG to save up to $475.
    0:32:22 Hydro.com code PropG.
    0:32:28 You’re part of a year-long project
    0:32:32 with the Washington Post opinion section called Why Not?
    0:32:37 I want to talk about some of the ideas that your readers
    0:32:39 responded especially strongly to.
    0:32:42 The idea of paying teachers $100,000 a year,
    0:32:46 you said that left turns and the busiest intersections
    0:32:47 should be banned.
    0:32:49 And in another column, you pose the question
    0:32:51 or you suggested that on your birthday
    0:32:53 you should give other people presents.
    0:32:56 So pick any or all of them and say more.
    0:32:58 So the column, as you mentioned, is called Why Not?
    0:33:01 We take ideas that seem to be out of the realm of possibility
    0:33:02 and say, well, why not?
    0:33:06 So let’s pay teachers a minimum salary of $100,000 a year.
    0:33:07 We’re losing too many good teachers.
    0:33:09 Teachers are not respected enough.
    0:33:12 So let’s put our money where our mouth is and actually
    0:33:15 pay teachers a minimum salary of $100,000 a year.
    0:33:18 I got an amazing amount of love and amazing amount of hate
    0:33:21 from that column, which is a good sign.
    0:33:22 People saying this is the greatest idea ever.
    0:33:25 Other people saying, what are you talking about?
    0:33:26 No teacher is worth that amount of money.
    0:33:27 So that’s one.
    0:33:31 The best idea, in my view, is banning left turns
    0:33:33 in the busiest intersections in the busiest cities.
    0:33:35 And this seems nutty.
    0:33:39 But there’s a guy at Penn State, an engineer at Penn State.
    0:33:41 He’s done huge numbers of papers on this.
    0:33:43 And essentially, in the busiest intersections–
    0:33:45 first of all, in the busiest intersections,
    0:33:48 the busiest cities, we have incredible numbers
    0:33:49 of collisions.
    0:33:52 And actually, a shocking number of deaths and injuries
    0:33:56 in those particular places, it also
    0:34:02 contributes massively to pollution and climate change.
    0:34:04 And so if we just ban left turns,
    0:34:08 even if it requires some people to make three right turns,
    0:34:10 what the evidence shows is that everybody gets
    0:34:12 to where they’re going faster.
    0:34:14 Because instead of accumulating these–
    0:34:16 you’re stuck behind some– I live in Washington, right?
    0:34:18 I’m driving up Wisconsin Avenue.
    0:34:20 And there’s some schmo in front of me who’s turning left.
    0:34:22 And I’m stuck waiting behind him as he
    0:34:25 turns left onto Albemarle or wherever, all right?
    0:34:28 But if you eliminate that all the way through,
    0:34:30 people will get where they’re going faster.
    0:34:31 The math on this is inexorable.
    0:34:35 And also, we know that UPS, in its tracking software,
    0:34:38 generally requires its drivers to make three rights
    0:34:40 rather than one left because it saves massively
    0:34:41 on time and on fuel.
    0:34:43 And then there’s giving presents on your birthday rather
    0:34:46 than receiving presents on your birthday.
    0:34:48 I think it’s a nice tradition.
    0:34:50 I did it on my 60th birthday basically
    0:34:55 as a way to bomb my existential crisis attorney, 60.
    0:34:58 And so what I did is I found 90-something people in my life
    0:35:00 who I was grateful for.
    0:35:03 And I created these custom pencils
    0:35:05 because I love pencils, as you can see.
    0:35:07 See, I’m holding a pencil right here.
    0:35:11 And I gave people these set of three pink pencils
    0:35:13 with a note telling them that I valued them in my life.
    0:35:15 And I was glad to have them in my life.
    0:35:17 It was a cool, meaningful thing to do.
    0:35:22 And I sort of skated past the existential dread of that day.
    0:35:23 I like that.
    0:35:24 I just drank a lot.
    0:35:28 So they’re not mutually exclusive.
    0:35:30 There you go.
    0:35:32 Here’s a pencil as a drink stirrer.
    0:35:37 You’ve been in the media game mostly through books for a while.
    0:35:39 I’m curious, how do you see–
    0:35:41 how is the changing of the shifting media landscape?
    0:35:43 You’re technically a creator.
    0:35:46 I don’t know your presence on social media.
    0:35:49 How has the changing media landscape
    0:35:52 been good or bad for Daniel Pink?
    0:35:55 And how are you adapting what you do based on changes
    0:35:57 in the media landscape?
    0:35:57 You know what?
    0:35:58 It’s a great question, Scott.
    0:36:01 And whether it’s good or bad for me, I don’t know.
    0:36:05 I mean, it’s harder to contend with because what you have
    0:36:07 is you have this kind of perfect storm here,
    0:36:10 where the barriers to– forgive the cliche.
    0:36:12 But what you have is the barriers to entry
    0:36:14 are essentially zero to create stuff.
    0:36:19 And then the shelves on which the stuff sits are infinite.
    0:36:21 And then you have something, a device,
    0:36:23 that allows you access to all that stuff.
    0:36:26 And you carry it on your person all waking hours.
    0:36:28 That’s a big, fricking, deal.
    0:36:31 And that’s very different from when I was–
    0:36:34 when I started out 25 years ago.
    0:36:37 And so for me, I’m trying to–
    0:36:40 I spend very little time on social media.
    0:36:42 I spend very little– I just don’t like it.
    0:36:43 I don’t find it interesting.
    0:36:47 But I think that things like podcasts are extraordinary.
    0:36:51 When I promoted my first book, I did a radio satellite tour.
    0:36:56 When I promoted my last book, I did 138 podcast interviews.
    0:36:59 That’s a different media landscape.
    0:37:02 I think that video and TV is actually really, really
    0:37:03 interesting right now.
    0:37:09 So if I were to– I did a television show on a cable network
    0:37:12 eight or nine years ago, I don’t think I’d do that again.
    0:37:15 If I were to create a new television show,
    0:37:17 I would go straight to YouTube.
    0:37:18 And I think that that is–
    0:37:21 I think that’s super interesting.
    0:37:23 And so is it good for me?
    0:37:24 Is it bad for me?
    0:37:24 I don’t know.
    0:37:26 But it is for me.
    0:37:27 And so you have to deal.
    0:37:29 But it’s been a big change, I have to say.
    0:37:32 And I also think that books have changed, Scott.
    0:37:36 I think that books are not–
    0:37:38 I’m a writer.
    0:37:41 So my muscle memory, my instinct, when I have an idea,
    0:37:43 is to write a book.
    0:37:46 And I am actually trying to check that impulse,
    0:37:50 because that might not be the best vessel, the best expression
    0:37:52 of that set of ideas, that set of arguments,
    0:37:53 a set of stories.
    0:37:55 It might be something in another medium.
    0:37:56 So that’s how– it’s some of the ways
    0:38:00 that I’m trying to adapt to this new media landscape.
    0:38:02 Daniel Pink is the author of various bestselling books
    0:38:05 on a range of topics, including “Human Motivation,”
    0:38:07 “The Science of Timing,” and “Creativity.”
    0:38:10 His books include the “New York Times” bestsellers,
    0:38:12 “Power of Regret,” “A Whole New Mind,”
    0:38:15 and “When,” as well as the number one “New York Times”
    0:38:17 bestseller, “Drive.”
    0:38:19 And “To Sell Is Human.”
    0:38:22 He currently has a column with The Washington Post called
    0:38:22 “Why Not?”
    0:38:25 He joins us from– you’re in DC, is that right, Daniel?
    0:38:26 Yes, sir.
    0:38:28 So this was such a nice moment for me,
    0:38:32 because I remember seeing your video and thinking,
    0:38:33 I want to be like that guy.
    0:38:37 I just want to do cool work that inspires people.
    0:38:38 But you’re doing it now, man.
    0:38:42 Well, I know, but you and others were a big part of that.
    0:38:45 I just very much appreciate your work.
    0:38:47 And it’s had an impact on me.
    0:38:50 It’s really, quite frankly, it gave me a lot of motivation,
    0:38:51 because it was inspiring.
    0:38:53 So keep on trucking, my brother.
    0:38:54 You’re doing a great job.
    0:39:00 This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez and Caroline
    0:39:01 Shagren.
    0:39:03 Drew Burroughs is our technical director.
    0:39:04 Thank you for listening to “The Property Pod” from the Box
    0:39:05 Media Podcast Network.
    0:39:09 We will catch you on Saturday for “No Mercenome Alice,”
    0:39:10 as read by George Hahn.
    0:39:13 And please follow our Prop G Markets pod,
    0:39:15 wherever you get your pods for new episodes
    0:39:17 every Monday and Thursday.
    translate-vi content
    translate-zh content

    Daniel Pink, the author of five New York Times bestselling books including Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us and To Sell is Human: The Surprising Truth About Moving Others, joins Scott to discuss regret, human motivation, and his Washington Post column, “Why Not?”

    Follow Dan, @DanielPink.

    Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice

    Buy “The Algebra of Wealth,” out now.

    Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Airbnb’s Role in America’s Housing Crisis, How To Be a Successful Entrepreneur, and Spending Money in Your Twenties

    AI transcript
    0:00:03 Support for this show comes from Klaviyo.
    0:00:05 You’re building a business.
    0:00:07 Klaviyo helps you grow it.
    0:00:09 Klaviyo’s AI-powered marketing platform
    0:00:12 puts all your customer data plus email,
    0:00:15 SMS, and analytics in one place.
    0:00:17 With Klaviyo, Tind Fish Phenom Fish Wife
    0:00:21 delivers real-time personalized experiences
    0:00:23 that keeps their customers hooked.
    0:00:24 They’ve grown 70 times revenue
    0:00:26 in just four years with Klaviyo.
    0:00:28 Now that’s scale.
    0:00:31 Visit klaviyo.com
    0:00:33 to learn how brands like Fish Wife
    0:00:36 build smarter digital relationships with Klaviyo.
    0:00:42 – Thumbtack presents the ins and outs
    0:00:44 of caring for your home.
    0:00:47 Out, indecision, overthinking,
    0:00:50 second-guessing every choice you make.
    0:00:54 In, plans and guides that make it easy
    0:00:56 to get home projects done.
    0:01:01 Out, beige on beige on beige.
    0:01:05 In, knowing what to do, when to do it,
    0:01:06 and who to hire.
    0:01:09 Start caring for your home with confidence.
    0:01:11 Download Thumbtack today.
    0:01:15 – In 100 meters, turn right.
    0:01:17 Actually, no, turn left.
    0:01:19 There’s some awesome new breakfast wraps at McDonald’s.
    0:01:20 – Really?
    0:01:22 – Yeah, there’s the sausage bacon and egg,
    0:01:24 a crispy seasoned chicken one.
    0:01:26 – Mmm, a spicy end egg, worth the detour.
    0:01:28 – They sound amazing.
    0:01:29 – That they taste amazing too.
    0:01:30 (sighs)
    0:01:32 Wish I had a mouth.
    0:01:34 Take your morning into a delicious new direction
    0:01:36 with McDonald’s new breakfast wraps.
    0:01:39 Add a small premium roast coffee for a dollar plus tax.
    0:01:41 At participating McDonald’s restaurants.
    0:01:42 Ba-da-ba-ba-ba.
    0:01:46 – Welcome to the Propgy Pod’s Office Hours.
    0:01:48 This is the part of the show where we answer questions
    0:01:49 about business, big tech, entrepreneurship,
    0:01:50 and whatever else is on your mind.
    0:01:52 If you’d like to submit a question,
    0:01:55 please email a voice recording to officehours@propgmedia.com.
    0:01:59 Again, that’s officehours@propgmedia.com.
    0:02:00 Question number one.
    0:02:02 – Hi, Prof.
    0:02:03 A few weeks back,
    0:02:06 you discussed the housing crisis facing this country.
    0:02:08 You discussed a number of factors,
    0:02:10 but I did not hear you mention the impact
    0:02:15 of the sharing economy, such as Airbnb and VRBO.
    0:02:17 I live in Nashville, Tennessee,
    0:02:20 which has seen a confluence of two events.
    0:02:25 A post pandemic or post COVID population rise
    0:02:28 from residents of high tax states,
    0:02:29 such as New York and California,
    0:02:32 moving to a very low tax state here in Tennessee.
    0:02:35 And additionally, we’ve also risen
    0:02:38 as a very popular vacation destination.
    0:02:41 Both of these have contributed to our building boom,
    0:02:42 which we’re seeing here.
    0:02:44 We have a number of apartments
    0:02:46 and a number of housing units being built,
    0:02:49 but many of those are built and owned
    0:02:53 for the sole purpose of being short-term rentals.
    0:02:56 As a result, we have seen our housing prices soar.
    0:03:01 What impact are you seeing the home sharing economy
    0:03:03 have on the rest of the country?
    0:03:05 Is it similar to what we’re seeing here in Tennessee
    0:03:07 or are we just an anomaly?
    0:03:08 Thanks so much for your show.
    0:03:10 Always appreciate it.
    0:03:11 – A really thoughtful question.
    0:03:14 So disclosure, I’m a shareholder in Airbnb.
    0:03:16 There’s just no getting around it.
    0:03:18 This is an issue.
    0:03:20 Cities across the U.S., including New York and Santa Monica
    0:03:22 are cracking down on short-term rental platforms,
    0:03:25 specifically Airbnb and VRBO.
    0:03:26 So let’s look at the numbers.
    0:03:28 U.S. short-term rental market in 2023
    0:03:32 was $64 billion in revenue up from $39 billion in 2019.
    0:03:36 Vacation rental listings in the U.S. over $2.4 million
    0:03:39 and more than 785,000 hosts.
    0:03:41 And the estimated U.S. housing shortage
    0:03:44 is at least 2 million homes.
    0:03:46 Economists are divided on whether implementing bans
    0:03:48 on short-term rentals helped solve
    0:03:49 the housing affordability crisis.
    0:03:51 A 2019 Harvard Business Review study found
    0:03:55 that a 1% increase in Airbnb listings
    0:03:59 led to just a small 0.01% rise in rental prices.
    0:04:03 Airbnb’s response, short-term rentals bring money to cities
    0:04:05 through rental fees and visitor spending.
    0:04:06 They also say that most of their listings
    0:04:08 are outside typical tourist areas
    0:04:09 supporting neighborhoods that usually
    0:04:11 don’t benefit from tourism.
    0:04:12 That’s a fair point.
    0:04:14 I would say there’s contradictory forces here.
    0:04:16 The first is there’s just no getting around it.
    0:04:18 If people start taking stock that would ordinarily
    0:04:22 be used for long-term rentals and converting it
    0:04:25 to short-term rentals, then local residents
    0:04:29 see their rent or the rent on their rent go up.
    0:04:30 That makes sense.
    0:04:32 That, I see, is a transfer of wealth
    0:04:36 from residents to tourists who are looking to not–
    0:04:39 who don’t want to stay at some Joey Bagadona’s hotel
    0:04:43 in Midtown for $600 a night so they can rent a cute studio
    0:04:48 or one bedroom for $300 in Chelsea or Soho or Flatiron.
    0:04:49 So they benefit.
    0:04:53 It’s an economic arbitrage or economic transfer
    0:04:55 from residents to tourists, if you will,
    0:04:58 or from long-term renters to short-term renters.
    0:05:03 Now, to Airbnb’s point, this should create economic activity.
    0:05:06 If you reduce the friction of coming to a city
    0:05:08 and getting more people spending money and more people coming
    0:05:12 to different metros, it should create economic growth.
    0:05:15 The key is– and the hotel’s had a good point–
    0:05:17 that Airbnb should pay paying a certain amount of tax
    0:05:18 or the same tax.
    0:05:22 And then is that money being reinvested in new housing stock?
    0:05:26 The biggest problem we have in the US around housing
    0:05:27 is that we just don’t have enough supply.
    0:05:29 It’s obviously not a demand problem.
    0:05:31 It’s that it has become so difficult.
    0:05:34 I think the primary culprit around increasing
    0:05:37 rents and unaffordability around housing
    0:05:39 is, essentially, we have taken housing permits
    0:05:40 out of the hands of civic officials
    0:05:43 and put it into the hands of homeowners.
    0:05:45 What do I mean by that?
    0:05:47 If you want to build, you have to get through the local
    0:05:50 Architectural Review Board, the city planning commission.
    0:05:51 And unfortunately, these commissions
    0:05:55 are filled with current homeowners who always
    0:05:57 find reasons not to increase the housing stock.
    0:05:58 Why?
    0:06:00 Because the incentives are to limit the housing stock,
    0:06:03 such that the value of the assets they already own,
    0:06:05 their homes, increases in value.
    0:06:06 So they will listen to someone.
    0:06:08 I bought a piece of land in Florida
    0:06:09 when we were planning on developing it.
    0:06:11 And a woman showed up to the review meeting in Florida.
    0:06:15 It’s actually quite developer-friendly and said,
    0:06:17 I want a study done, or I don’t want them to develop over there
    0:06:21 because I walk my dog on that piece of property.
    0:06:24 OK, so that’s trespassing.
    0:06:26 I mean, they just delayed it another month
    0:06:30 because a woman liked to walk her dog on my land.
    0:06:33 We need economic incentives and tax rates.
    0:06:35 We need to basically weaponize the private sector
    0:06:37 and provide some sort of economic incentive
    0:06:38 to get them building again.
    0:06:40 I think this is really the problem.
    0:06:41 I don’t think it’s short-term rentals.
    0:06:42 I think they add to it.
    0:06:45 But I think taxing them and putting in place
    0:06:48 some restrictions might make sense.
    0:06:50 I’m not even sure you want to put in place restrictions.
    0:06:52 I think you just– what you want to do
    0:06:56 is let their freak flag and their capitalist flag grow.
    0:06:58 Let them do a bunch of innovation around current assets.
    0:07:01 Also, there’s a certain private property element here.
    0:07:03 And that is, if I own my place, I
    0:07:05 should be able to do pretty much whatever the fuck I want with it.
    0:07:07 The real issue here is a supply problem.
    0:07:09 We need the government to weigh in with tax subsidies
    0:07:12 and economic incentives such that builders rev up those engines.
    0:07:15 And also, we probably need some sort of regulation
    0:07:19 that makes it more difficult for civic officials
    0:07:20 that are crammed with current homeowners
    0:07:24 to weaponize the scarcity culture that we have engaged in.
    0:07:26 If I already own stocks, I’m going to create monopolies
    0:07:28 such that those stocks go up and up and up.
    0:07:30 If I already own a home, I’m going
    0:07:32 to make it harder for someone else to own a home.
    0:07:35 If I already have a degree from UCLA,
    0:07:38 because I got in with a 76% admissions rate,
    0:07:41 I like that it’s a nine because that makes the value of my degree go up.
    0:07:45 We have moved from a egalitarian society investing
    0:07:49 an opportunity to a scarcity rejectionist bullshit culture
    0:07:51 that’s about the hunger games where once I get mine,
    0:07:52 I want to make it harder for you to get yours.
    0:07:54 And housing is ground zero for that.
    0:07:56 Thanks so much for the question.
    0:07:58 Question number two.
    0:07:58 Hi, Scott.
    0:08:01 This is Cameron from Orlando, Florida.
    0:08:03 I’ve been doing relatively well in my career thus far
    0:08:07 and have been able to save and invest a substantial amount of money.
    0:08:10 I’m considering starting my own business within the next few years
    0:08:15 and was hoping you could help identify and give advice for avoiding
    0:08:19 some early pitfalls that young entrepreneurs tend to fall into.
    0:08:21 Thank you and love the show.
    0:08:22 Thanks so much, Cameron.
    0:08:23 Well, I have a lot of experience here
    0:08:25 because I’ve started a lot of companies that have failed.
    0:08:27 I’ve started some that have been successful.
    0:08:28 And the wonderful thing about America
    0:08:30 is you only need a couple successes.
    0:08:33 And if it does really well, you’re set for the rest of your life.
    0:08:35 OK, so greatness is in the agency of others.
    0:08:38 I’ve typically, until the last 10 years of my life,
    0:08:40 I had the credibility and I thought the skill to start businesses on my own.
    0:08:41 I always had a partner.
    0:08:44 I started my first business.
    0:08:46 My first business was a video rental business when I was 24.
    0:08:48 I partnered with my friend, Lee Lotus.
    0:08:50 My next business was profit brand strategy.
    0:08:54 I partnered with my business school classmate, Ian Chaplin.
    0:08:57 I typically started businesses with other people.
    0:09:00 So one, I think it’s more fun to build something with someone else
    0:09:02 and when you’re young, you want to round out your skills
    0:09:04 with someone else who has the skills you don’t have.
    0:09:07 And that’s the key, finding a partner with different skills
    0:09:08 and also being generous with each other.
    0:09:13 Nothing blows, nothing snatches defeat from the jobs of victory more
    0:09:16 than when you aren’t generous and don’t get along with your partner.
    0:09:19 It can just fuck up a company that has everything going for it.
    0:09:22 Whenever I see a good company flying apart of the seams,
    0:09:25 I know that it’s the partner’s not getting along.
    0:09:27 The first thing you got to do is find really talented people,
    0:09:29 give them a piece of the business,
    0:09:31 paint a vision for why you think it’s going to be successful,
    0:09:34 treat them well, identify the few key players in your company,
    0:09:37 your small business and nail their feet to the ground,
    0:09:39 say, “I’m going to give you 10% of this company.”
    0:09:42 My first hire, I hired students when I started L2.
    0:09:46 And my first hire, full-time hire, was a woman named Maureen Mullen.
    0:09:48 I paid Maureen $15 an hour.
    0:09:50 She had her consulting offer rescinded.
    0:09:53 This was 2008 or 2009.
    0:09:55 I started her, I think, at $15 or $20 an hour.
    0:09:57 She was so good, I said, “Look,
    0:10:00 I don’t have the money to pay you a market-competitive salary,
    0:10:01 but I’m going to give you 10% of the company.”
    0:10:05 Fast forward seven years later, we sold for $158 million.
    0:10:07 So things worked out for her.
    0:10:10 But you want to identify a core group of people and a partner,
    0:10:10 I think, early on.
    0:10:13 That’s everything, too.
    0:10:15 Revenues make a business, not expenses.
    0:10:18 I still make this mistake when I started business.
    0:10:20 I think, “Oh, I’ve got to rent an office space.
    0:10:22 I need to hire a bunch of people.
    0:10:24 I need to have nice furniture.
    0:10:26 I need to do some advertising.”
    0:10:27 Fuck that.
    0:10:28 Business is about revenues.
    0:10:30 Now, I’ve always been in services business,
    0:10:31 so don’t take a lot of capital.
    0:10:33 But don’t fall under the illusion
    0:10:36 that just because you can raise a lot of money or cheap capital,
    0:10:38 that spending it makes a business, it doesn’t.
    0:10:40 Sure, there are some businesses specifically in tech
    0:10:43 where you do need to make investments,
    0:10:46 but I’m pretty sure that every investment I made in 2021
    0:10:47 is underwater or gone to zero.
    0:10:49 Why? There was so much capital available
    0:10:51 that a wallpapered over shitty ideas
    0:10:53 and people spent too much money.
    0:10:55 What is the number one?
    0:10:59 The number one indicator of my nine businesses’ success?
    0:11:00 Was it the idea? No.
    0:11:02 I don’t know if one idea was better than the other.
    0:11:03 Was it the people?
    0:11:05 I had good people in almost all my businesses.
    0:11:06 It was the following.
    0:11:10 Did I start it during an economic boom
    0:11:12 or coming out of a recession?
    0:11:18 The companies I started at the tail end of a boom, 99, 2007,
    0:11:19 almost always failed.
    0:11:20 Everything’s expensive.
    0:11:21 People are expensive.
    0:11:23 Mediocre people cost a ton of money.
    0:11:26 Some lame systems engineer comes into your office barefoot
    0:11:30 and demands a 30% increase in salary every two months.
    0:11:31 When I started companies,
    0:11:34 when I started Profit in 1992 out of business school,
    0:11:36 we were coming out of a recession.
    0:11:40 When I started L2, it was 2009, 2010,
    0:11:41 we were coming out of the great financial recession.
    0:11:43 Those are great times to start a business.
    0:11:45 So you want to find good people.
    0:11:47 You want to make sure you don’t overspend.
    0:11:50 I think you want to over serve those first few clients.
    0:11:52 I think you need to be sort of mentally
    0:11:53 and physically resilient.
    0:11:55 I think your relationship needs to be in a good place.
    0:11:58 I think you have to work exceptionally, exceptionally
    0:12:01 hard, fair isn’t a productive word.
    0:12:04 Also, I think you need a kitchen cabinet immediately
    0:12:05 to advise you around stuff.
    0:12:08 Also, I hate to say this, you have to be ruthless
    0:12:12 when it comes to your first 10, 20, 30 employees.
    0:12:13 Everybody has to be adding value.
    0:12:14 You don’t have time to manage.
    0:12:15 You don’t have time to figure out roles.
    0:12:18 You don’t have time to put people on performance plans.
    0:12:19 People got to show up.
    0:12:21 They’ve got to be in it.
    0:12:23 I mean, they got to come to play.
    0:12:25 But all of these are really, it comes down to people,
    0:12:28 good judgment and make sure you attract a lot of people
    0:12:30 around you, greatnesses in the agency of others.
    0:12:32 Good luck and thanks for the question.
    0:12:35 We have one quick break before our final question.
    0:12:36 Stay with us.
    0:12:42 Support for Prop G comes from Quince.
    0:12:45 The holidays are fully upon us, don’t we know it?
    0:12:48 And if you haven’t crossed off by gifts
    0:12:49 from your to-do list yet,
    0:12:51 the panic might be starting to set in.
    0:12:53 Before you fully freak out and buy everyone gift cards,
    0:12:56 take a breath, slow down and consider Quince.
    0:12:58 Quince makes it easy to treat everyone in your life
    0:13:00 with some luxury quality clothing
    0:13:03 at frankly ridiculously affordable prices.
    0:13:05 Pieces like their iconic Mongolian cashmere sweaters
    0:13:09 which started just $50 are guaranteed crowd blazers.
    0:13:11 They’re warm, stylish and best of all affordable.
    0:13:14 In fact, all of Quince’s luxury items
    0:13:16 are priced 50 to 80% less than similar brands.
    0:13:19 Plus Quince says they only work with factories
    0:13:22 that use safe ethical and responsible manufacturing practices.
    0:13:25 A few of our producers got to try out some Quince
    0:13:28 and they love them, especially their sage green sheets
    0:13:30 and said the Turkish towels are the softest towels
    0:13:31 they’ve ever used.
    0:13:32 They’re the softest.
    0:13:35 Anyways, gift luxury this holiday season
    0:13:37 without the luxury price tag.
    0:13:40 Go to quince.com/propg for 365 day returns
    0:13:43 plus free shipping on your order.
    0:13:46 That’s Q-U-I-N-C-E.com/propg
    0:13:49 to get free shipping and 365 day returns.
    0:13:51 Quince.com/propg.
    0:13:57 Support for PropG comes from Vanta.
    0:13:59 If you’re a startup founder finding product market fit
    0:14:01 is probably your number one priority.
    0:14:03 But to land bigger customers,
    0:14:05 you also need security compliance
    0:14:09 and obtaining your SOC2 ISO 2701 certification
    0:14:11 can take a valuable time and energy
    0:14:13 pulling you away from building and shipping.
    0:14:15 That’s where Vanta comes in.
    0:14:17 Vanta is the all-in-one compliance solution
    0:14:19 helping startups like yours get audit ready
    0:14:21 and build a strong security foundation
    0:14:23 quickly and painlessly.
    0:14:25 Vanta automates the manual security tasks
    0:14:27 that slow you down, helping you streamline your audit.
    0:14:30 And the platform connects you with trusted VC SOEs
    0:14:31 to build your program auditors,
    0:14:33 to get you through audits quickly
    0:14:36 and a marketplace for essentials like pen testing.
    0:14:38 So whether you’re closing your first deal
    0:14:41 or gearing up for growth, Vanta makes compliance easy.
    0:14:42 You can join over 8,000 companies,
    0:14:45 including many Y Combinator and Techstar startups
    0:14:47 who trust Vanta.
    0:14:49 If you want to simplify compliance and get $1,000 off,
    0:14:53 you can visit vanta.com/profg.
    0:14:57 That’s vaanta.com/profg.
    0:15:03 Support for ProfG comes from Grammarly.
    0:15:06 With AI becoming integrated in our work processes,
    0:15:08 the name of the game is now Efficiency.
    0:15:10 It’s why Grammarly delivers
    0:15:11 a consistent communication experience
    0:15:13 across all your organization’s ecosystem.
    0:15:15 So roadblocks work and unblock best of all,
    0:15:17 and only takes days to implement.
    0:15:18 No IT overhead required.
    0:15:22 So you can unify your team and see results right away.
    0:15:24 Grammarly unifies your team’s voice across platforms
    0:15:27 by seamlessly working across more than 500,000 web
    0:15:28 and desktop apps.
    0:15:30 And when every word your team writes is clear,
    0:15:34 concise and on-brand, everything gets better and faster.
    0:15:37 Grammarly reports that teams who use their technology
    0:15:40 spend 52% less time writing sales emails.
    0:15:42 We here at ProfG were able to try out Grammarly.
    0:15:44 And as I’ve said before,
    0:15:46 it helps unify or create a more consistent voice
    0:15:47 and makes this more efficient,
    0:15:50 especially writing business emails.
    0:15:53 Join 70,000 teams and 30 million people
    0:15:54 who trust Grammarly to work faster everywhere
    0:15:55 they communicate.
    0:15:58 Go to Grammarly.com/enterprise to learn more.
    0:16:01 Grammarly, enterprise ready AI.
    0:16:07 – Welcome back, question number three.
    0:16:10 – Hi ProfG, this is Alex from Germany.
    0:16:12 First off, thank you for the amazing work you do
    0:16:13 on the podcast.
    0:16:15 I wanted to share a bit about my current situation
    0:16:17 to get your perspective.
    0:16:18 I’m 23 years old, a student
    0:16:20 and still living at home with my mom.
    0:16:23 Next year, I’ll be spending six months in Hong Kong
    0:16:25 as part of my studies.
    0:16:27 Earlier this year, my father passed away unexpectedly
    0:16:30 and left me an inheritance of about 1.5 million euros,
    0:16:32 primarily in real estate.
    0:16:34 I also have 100K outside of that,
    0:16:37 80K in stocks and 20K in cash.
    0:16:40 Additionally, I had already saved 40K myself
    0:16:42 by living way below my means,
    0:16:44 working a lot and saving as much as possible.
    0:16:46 Even with this financial cushion,
    0:16:49 I’ve become even more frugal.
    0:16:50 My goal is to achieve financial independence
    0:16:53 by my mid-30s and that’s why I’m so much focused
    0:16:56 on investing and keeping my expenses low.
    0:16:59 But lately, I’ve started to question
    0:17:02 if this mindset is still healthy given my current situation.
    0:17:04 Should I loosen it up a little bit
    0:17:06 and allow myself to enjoy life more
    0:17:08 or is this level of discipline necessary
    0:17:10 to achieve the freedom I’m aiming for?
    0:17:12 With the new financial resources I have,
    0:17:14 I could afford to travel more
    0:17:16 or enjoy similar experiences,
    0:17:19 but I’m unsure if that aligns with my future goals.
    0:17:21 I would really appreciate your thoughts on this.
    0:17:22 Thanks again for listening
    0:17:25 and all the incredible content you share.
    0:17:27 – So first off, I’m really sorry about your dad, man.
    0:17:31 I mean, that’s just, even if you think
    0:17:33 you’re ready for it, you’re not.
    0:17:35 And also, I think it’s great you’re living with your mom.
    0:17:37 I moved back in with my mom.
    0:17:38 She and I were very close
    0:17:40 and I would imagine that you guys need each other right now.
    0:17:42 She probably needs you more than vice versa,
    0:17:44 but I think it’s really nice that you’re living with her.
    0:17:48 Boss, you’ve got your shit throw together right now.
    0:17:51 You’re 23 and granted, it was an inheritance,
    0:17:53 but a million and a half euros.
    0:17:56 You’ve already saved 100,000 euros.
    0:17:59 You have 80 in stock and 20 in cash.
    0:18:02 You’re so far ahead, both because of your good fortune
    0:18:04 and your father’s and your mother’s hard work
    0:18:08 and your approach that you’re really blessed.
    0:18:11 This is kind of the mother of all good things.
    0:18:14 I would say with a base, here’s the thing.
    0:18:16 I’m gonna encourage you to loosen up
    0:18:19 the spicket a little bit and have some fun,
    0:18:21 whether that’s going to, fuck, I don’t know,
    0:18:24 abyss with some friends or a music festival.
    0:18:27 I don’t, you know, take five, 10,
    0:18:31 maybe even 15 grand a year additional.
    0:18:34 And you know, really kind of enjoy your 20s a little bit
    0:18:36 because you’re blessed.
    0:18:40 I mean, the reality is with a million and a half euros
    0:18:42 in real estate, you’re not bulletproof,
    0:18:47 but if that grows at four or 6% a year in value
    0:18:49 from the age of 23, you’re gonna be wealthy.
    0:18:52 So I think that given the situation you’re in,
    0:18:55 to open it up a little bit and take, like I said,
    0:18:59 another 10, 15, 20,000 euros and be really smart about it,
    0:19:02 but do one, two, three really cool trips a year.
    0:19:06 I would do it on experiences.
    0:19:08 It’s weird to say this, I’m usually telling people
    0:19:10 to bring their horns in in terms of spending,
    0:19:11 but I would say at the age of 23,
    0:19:13 of course, take your mom on a trip,
    0:19:15 take your mom on a cruise or something,
    0:19:17 you know, live a little bit, let her live a little bit.
    0:19:20 All she wants to do probably is hang out with you.
    0:19:22 But yeah, a couple trips a year with some buddies,
    0:19:25 have some fun, really enjoy what it means to be 23
    0:19:28 and as remarkably blessed as you are economically.
    0:19:30 Yeah, I say open it up a little, push it out a little bit,
    0:19:33 a little bit of splash in the cash,
    0:19:36 a little bit of fling in the bling, Alex, my friend.
    0:19:39 Anyways, man, again, let me finish where I’m started.
    0:19:41 I’m sorry about your dad,
    0:19:43 but you’re obviously on a lot of other levels,
    0:19:46 especially economically, really blessed.
    0:19:48 Thanks so much for the question.
    0:19:49 That’s all for this episode.
    0:19:50 If you’d like to submit a question,
    0:19:52 please email a voice recording
    0:19:54 to officehours@propertymedia.com.
    0:19:57 Again, that’s officehours@propertymedia.com.
    0:20:00 (upbeat music)
    0:20:08 This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez
    0:20:09 and Caroline Shagren.
    0:20:11 Drew Burroughs is our technical director.
    0:20:12 Thank you for listening to the Prop G Pod
    0:20:14 from the Box Media Podcast Network.
    0:20:17 We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy, No Malice,
    0:20:18 as read by George Hahn.
    0:20:21 And please follow our Prop G Markets Pod
    0:20:23 wherever you get your pods for new episodes
    0:20:25 every Monday and Thursday.
    0:20:35 [BLANK_AUDIO]
    Vietnamese translation content goes here.

    Scott discusses the impact of home-sharing companies, including Airbnb and Vrbo, on the housing affordability crisis. He then gives advice to entrepreneurs and wraps up with his thoughts on how to balance being frugal while also enjoying life in your 20s. 

    Music: https://www.davidcuttermusic.com / @dcuttermusic

    Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice

    Buy “The Algebra of Wealth,” out now.

    Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Are Men Okay?

    AI transcript
    🕒
    vi
    0:00:03 (upbeat music)
    0:00:05 When you think of the most iconic logo in the world,
    0:00:06 which brand comes to mind?
    0:00:08 For me, it’s probably Nike.
    0:00:10 Their former CMO Greg Hoffman knew exactly
    Vietnamese translation content goes here.

    In place of Raging Moderates, we’re sharing an episode of The Gray Area featuring the Dawg.

    Host Sean Illing gets personal when he asks professor and podcast host Scott Galloway: What’s going on with men? There’s a growing body of evidence that men are falling behind in education, the labor market, and other areas. And when you look at the numbers on drug overdoses and deaths by suicide, it’s pretty bleak.

    Sean and Scott — both of whom are raising sons — talk about the struggles men are facing today, how parents can navigate the current moment, and the chall

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Prof G Markets: Google’s Quantum Breakthrough & The World Cup Goes to Saudi Arabia

    AI transcript
    🌐
    0:00:04 Support for ProfG comes from BetterHelp. Whether you’re wrapping yourself up in a great blanket
    0:00:08 or just sitting by the fire with your favorite book, it’s always worth it to take a moment to
    0:00:13 pause and get cozy. Therapy can help you find comfort and ease no matter the season. BetterHelp
    0:00:17 is the largest online therapy provider in the world, connecting you to qualified professionals
    0:00:22 via phone, video, or message chat. Find comfort this December with BetterHelp. You can visit
    0:00:30 BetterHelp.com/PROPHG today to get 10% off your first month. That’s BetterHelp.com/PROPHG.
    0:00:39 Thumbtack presents the ins and outs of caring for your home. Out, uncertainty, self-doubt,
    0:00:45 stressing about not knowing where to start. In, plans and guides that make it easy to get home
    0:00:55 projects done. Out, word art. Sorry, live laugh lovers. In, knowing what to do, when to do it,
    0:01:02 and who to hire. Start caring for your home with confidence. Download Thumbtack today.
    0:01:10 This episode is brought to you by Secret. Secret deodorant gives you 72 hours of clinically
    0:01:17 proven odor protection, free of aluminum, parabens, dyes, talc, and baking soda. It’s made with pH
    0:01:23 balancing minerals and crafted with skin conditioning oils. So whether you’re going for a run or just
    0:01:29 running late, do what life throws your way and smell like you didn’t. Find Secret at your nearest
    0:01:38 Walmart or Shoppers Drug Mart today. Today is number $400 billion. That’s Elon Musk’s record
    0:01:44 high net worth as of last week. Power corrupts and absolute power absolutely corrupts. This is
    0:01:51 terrible for society and will cause real damage to economies, justice, and democracy around the world.
    0:02:07 Welcome to Prop G Markets. Today, we’re discussing Google’s quantum breakthrough
    0:02:11 and Saudi Arabia’s World Cup. But first, here with, oh wait, banter.
    0:02:15 You can introduce me and then we can do banter. You don’t have to.
    0:02:20 Like anyone doesn’t know you? I’m so sick of everyone comes up to me. He’s like, tell Ed,
    0:02:25 we said hello. If it’s anyone young, they’re like, I love that Ed Elson. Yeah, I know. Yeah,
    0:02:29 he’s great. Love to hear that. He’s great. What are you doing, Ed? Where are you? What’s going on?
    0:02:36 I’m in New York and I’m just sort of reeling from that $400 billion net worth start. I don’t know
    0:02:43 if you realize this, but since Trump was elected, since November 5th, Elon’s net worth has increased
    0:02:50 by 66% and he’s added $4 billion to his net worth every day. Yeah, and I was excited about getting
    0:02:58 Zip Recruiter as a sponsor last week. Oh, God. And here I am selling like chewable erectile
    0:03:06 dysfunction drugs. Seriously. Oh, wait, they’re going to spend $1,100 on first-time founders.
    0:03:13 Sure, I’ll meet with them. Oh, God. It’s a good life. Oh, wait, I’m headed to Riyadh. Let’s talk
    0:03:18 about that. Let’s bring this back to me. I’m headed to Riyadh on one on Tuesday. Have you ever
    0:03:22 been to Riyadh? You haven’t been to Riyadh, right? No, no. You’re welcome to take me with you.
    0:03:28 Yeah, if you were much more interesting and I liked you more, we’d absolutely be rolling together.
    0:03:34 That’s not fair. I think you’re both interesting and likeable, but I’ve been to Dubai a bunch of
    0:03:38 times. Only been to Riyadh once and I was only there for a conference. I’m curious. I’m taking
    0:03:43 a little bit extra time and I’m going to check it out. I’m fascinated by the kingdom right now.
    0:03:47 Well, we’ll be discussing that more because we’ve got Saudi Arabia on our docket here.
    0:03:50 But let’s start off with our weekly review of market vitals.
    0:04:02 The S&P 500 declined. The dollar gained. Bitcoin hit another record
    0:04:05 and the yield on 10-year treasuries increased, shifting to the headlines.
    0:04:10 A federal judge has blocked grocery store Kroger’s acquisition of Albertson’s.
    0:04:15 The judge sided with the FTC, agreeing that the $25 billion deal would hurt consumers
    0:04:20 and limit competition. Following the judge’s ruling, Albertson’s terminated the deal
    0:04:25 and filed a lawsuit against Kroger, alleging the company didn’t do enough to secure regulatory
    0:04:31 approval. Warner Brothers’ discovery is splitting into two units, one for its streaming and studio
    0:04:37 business and another for its linear TV networks. The move paves the way for a potential spin-off
    0:04:42 or sale of its TV business and the stock popped more than 14% on the news.
    0:04:48 And finally, Eli Lilly will begin testing its GLP1 drug Zep bound next year as a treatment
    0:04:56 for drug and alcohol addiction. Eli Lilly CEO Dave Ricks described GLP1 drugs as anti-hedonics,
    0:05:03 saying they can help reduce the desire cycle. Scott, your thoughts starting with Kroger’s
    0:05:10 acquisition of Albertson’s, which was set to be one of the biggest M&A deals in history, called off.
    0:05:16 So my gut was that this was populist bullshit and I love antitrust. I love black and mergers.
    0:05:21 I’m an even bigger fan of breakups. But my fear was when you look at Albertson’s or Kroger,
    0:05:27 it’s not like these guys are lighting up the business world. This is specifically their
    0:05:32 existential threat is Amazon. I feel like this is not a great business. It’s low margin. It’s
    0:05:37 difficult. I think there’s still quite a bit of competition here. This is populist bullshit
    0:05:45 because just as diapers and gas prices kind of weigh on people’s sort of view of the world,
    0:05:48 like if gas prices go up, they get angry at the administration and if diapers are more expensive,
    0:05:56 they think, oh, this store is a ripoff. Grocery prices have become a very strong indicator for
    0:06:01 how the majority of the public feels about inflation and the administration. And so I
    0:06:08 thought it was sort of an easy target to say, no, grocery prices need to stay low. But South Dakota
    0:06:14 State University found that supermarket mergers can actually decrease prices for customers due
    0:06:19 to economies of scale. Albertson’s decreased 4% on the news, Kroger increased 5% after announcing
    0:06:24 would abandon the merger and restart stock buybacks. That’s because typically the person on top who
    0:06:29 makes the acquisition overpays only one in three acquisitions work. But I think, I don’t know,
    0:06:36 I think that the real threat is Amazon and having more formidable competitors to Amazon
    0:06:43 would create a healthier ecosystem. Yeah, I’m a little torn on this. I think the really interesting
    0:06:51 thing here is you mentioned that they’re kind of the smaller players in the market. And you’ve got
    0:06:57 Amazon and you’ve got Walmart who are crushing them. And this was Kroger and Albertson’s argument.
    0:07:02 Their argument was that this was basically the only way to compete with all the online retailers,
    0:07:06 especially Amazon. And I think they probably thought that that would work with the FTC because
    0:07:13 they know that the FTC has been going after Amazon anyway. But the FTC’s response was,
    0:07:18 okay, well, you say you want to compete with the online retailers, but you’re actually not
    0:07:23 an online retailer. You are a supermarket. And those are two very different things.
    0:07:29 And what’s interesting is that this is ultimately what the decision came down to. It was an argument
    0:07:36 over what the definition of a supermarket actually is. And the judge made her opinion very
    0:07:42 clear. And the first line of the conclusion was, quote, supermarkets are distinct from other grocery
    0:07:48 retailers. So in other words, she’s saying, you know, unlike your framing, where you guys are
    0:07:53 these little fish in this big, big pond of retail, we believe that you are in fact the
    0:08:00 big fish in the little pond of supermarkets and supermarkets and big retail are two different
    0:08:07 things. And therefore, to team up like this would be unfair. And I’ve been kind of back and
    0:08:14 forth on this because it’s really about framing. It’s like, are they dominating the supermarket
    0:08:20 business? Or are they struggling in the retail business? And that’s really what this came down
    0:08:26 to. So I’m not sure I have an opinion yet, but I do find it interesting that all of this comes
    0:08:32 down to a dispute over definitions. So I think that that argument holds water if the framing is
    0:08:38 that they’re not really competing against Amazon, they’re competing against other grocery supermarkets.
    0:08:42 But even if you say, okay, take Amazon out of the competitive set,
    0:08:49 the biggest grocery supermarket in my mind is Walmart. Right. And by the way, just the way
    0:08:54 they, their name for Walmart, it’s very interesting, they called Walmart a large format store.
    0:08:59 Whatever we call it, Walmart’s biggest category is groceries. There are still a large number of
    0:09:04 Walmart customers that primarily go there just for groceries. So call it what you want. It’s the
    0:09:11 largest grocery provider or retailer in the nation. They have a 25% share of the grocery market and
    0:09:17 combined, this company had the merger gone through or been approved would have had 11%. So okay, fine,
    0:09:20 we’re not competing against Amazon, but you’re going to tell us we’re not competing against
    0:09:27 Walmart. And Walmart with that scale, based on the most recent earnings call, is kicking the
    0:09:34 shit out of Target, much less Kroger’s and Albertson’s. And so their case is that Kroger, people,
    0:09:37 people don’t think of Walmart for groceries. They only go to this separate,
    0:09:42 this separate category of which you’re dominant players. I just don’t buy that. I think a lot
    0:09:47 of people, if Kroger’s- Plus Amazon owns Whole Foods. There you go. It’s the other side of this,
    0:09:52 too. I think if people think, oh, Walmart has the lowest prices because of their scale and
    0:09:58 their technology, I’m going to buy my groceries from Walmart and not from Kroger’s or Albertson.
    0:10:04 So based on the fact, I think they had eight and 3% market share and Walmart,
    0:10:12 distinctive Amazon has 25%. And it feels like a pretty robust sector. Let me put it this way.
    0:10:17 I think Doug McMillan is really happy to see a Walmart. He’s like, oh, God, we’re going to
    0:10:21 roll over these guys. They don’t have the capital to make the types of investments we can in
    0:10:28 technology. They don’t have the scale to turn the screws on all of our suppliers like we do.
    0:10:32 So I think they got it wrong here. I wonder if actually this one should have gone through.
    0:10:37 Yeah. I could imagine a world like 10 years from now where Walmart and Amazon absolutely
    0:10:43 dominate the supermarket and grocery business. Prices are high and we’ll look back at this
    0:10:47 moment and be like, damn, we really fucked up there. We could have prevented this. I think
    0:10:52 that’s very possible. One final note though, Wall Street never thought this was going to
    0:10:59 go through from the very beginning. So this deal was pricing Albertson’s at $34 a share.
    0:11:03 The stock’s been hovering at around $18 a share basically throughout the,
    0:11:09 from when they announced the deal to today, it’s been trading at a discount. So it is
    0:11:13 interesting that Wall Street from the get go was like, this is not going to go through.
    0:11:22 Let’s move on to Warner Brothers Discovery. This is sort of downstream of your prediction about
    0:11:28 how we’re going to see a lot of spins in the media business, specifically cable assets will be spun
    0:11:37 off to capture more value. This is a little different though, because unlike Comcast who
    0:11:40 did exactly what you said in your prediction last month, where they spun out their cable
    0:11:46 assets and do a new company, this is just a restructuring. So the cable assets are going
    0:11:50 to have their own operating division. The streaming assets are going to have their own
    0:11:55 operating division, but there’s no spin here. At least there’s no spin yet. It’s still one company.
    0:12:01 So my question for you is, what does this actually mean for shareholders? Should we be
    0:12:08 expecting a spin? And if not, does this sort of relabeling into different categories actually do
    0:12:14 much to the company? This is a preview. This is making it, he’s setting the table for a spin.
    0:12:20 And that is he’s creating distinct operating units such that the spin will be more elegant and easy.
    0:12:24 And the fact that the stock is up 15% now today is basically the market saying,
    0:12:31 oh, you’re flirting with a spin will come on over here. This means the spin, in my opinion,
    0:12:37 is going to happen. I don’t know if the spin will take some most or all the debt, but they will
    0:12:41 probably, I mean, what you have with the cable business is highly profitable businesses that
    0:12:47 can probably support a lot of debt because they’re cashflow generative. And this will free up a pure
    0:12:53 play around Warner and HBO, which will trade at a much higher stock price. And my two stock picks
    0:12:59 or my three stock picks for 2024 were Alphabet because I thought they had more IP and that it
    0:13:06 would be Revenge or the Empire Strikes Back around AI. And then Warner Brothers Discovery and Disney
    0:13:12 had been oversold. Part of the thing getting in the way of the spin, I believe, was their capital
    0:13:17 structure is a bit of a straight jacket. What do I mean by that? They have really good debt. They
    0:13:23 have a ton of debt, but it’s that it’s long maturity. It doesn’t come due for a while and it’s an
    0:13:28 exceptionally low interest rate. And I wonder if they spin, if it accelerates, all of the bond
    0:13:33 holders here want out of this debt. They’re making no money. They’re getting two or three or four
    0:13:37 percent. Warner Brothers loves this debt because even though they have a lot, it’s on really friendly
    0:13:43 terms. And I wonder if the thing that gets in the way of the spin is that it might accelerate the
    0:13:48 bond payments or that they might not be able to just transfer debt. I think that’s the key question
    0:13:54 here. But from a shareholder perspective, based on what the market said today, this is Zasloff
    0:14:02 pridding up the company for a spin and saying they will be distinct. It will be easy. The operations
    0:14:09 will break out the revenues and all this. And we’ll have our cool kid, hot girl, growth,
    0:14:16 streaming and Warner Brothers division, and we’ll have the ugly stepchild that still brings home
    0:14:24 money, but is not very popular. That will be these cable assets. This is a good move. Comcast led the
    0:14:30 way. What’ll be interesting is I wonder if he’s sending a signal to Comcast, speak now or forever,
    0:14:35 hold your peace. Because once they spin, it becomes harder for Comcast’s new co, whatever they’re
    0:14:42 calling it, to acquire it. I wouldn’t be surprised if at some point, Brian Roberts calls David Zasloff
    0:14:51 and says, “We should talk. Should our cable assets join together into one?” Because MSNBC
    0:14:57 and CNN having the same backend, same newsroom or similar newsroom, that just makes all sorts of
    0:15:03 sense to me. And I’ll also just point out the fact that this happened now, as you mentioned, one of
    0:15:10 your stock picks was Warner Brothers Discovery. You were saved by the bell because WBD was in the
    0:15:14 red throughout most of the year. And I know people were saying that, oh, Scott, we got it wrong.
    0:15:21 It’s now in the green. It’s up 7% year today. Not huge, but in the green. So I’m going to call it
    0:15:24 away for now. Yeah, but I’m going to perform the market. I’m going to perform the market, though,
    0:15:30 right? We still got two weeks. Where’s those blue chewables? Anyways. And finally, our third
    0:15:39 headline here, Eli Lilly testing GLP-1 drugs for alcohol addiction and drug addiction and tobacco
    0:15:46 addiction. I love this new term here from the CEO, anti-hedonics. This is exactly what you’ve been
    0:15:54 talking about for a long time. I even saw some data saying that people on Osempic reduced their
    0:16:02 drinking by 60%. Diage, the alcohol guys. Oh my God. These stocks, in my opinion, are going to get
    0:16:07 absolutely hammered. We could see alcohol really taken on the chin. Your thoughts on this news.
    0:16:13 These things are scaffolding on our instincts. They just update our instincts to the institutional
    0:16:17 production that our instincts haven’t caught up to. What is an addiction? Addiction is when you
    0:16:21 continue to do something despite it having a negative impact on your life, your health.
    0:16:28 And this basically tells your brain somehow calibrates it to say, no, you can stop eating now
    0:16:34 or no, you don’t need to stay on TikTok for another 11 hours. This is enough. All of a sudden,
    0:16:38 I’m looking at these stocks and going to say, okay, if they’re up 30% or 40%, is it still
    0:16:42 an opportunity to get in? Because if they’re not only treating obesity, but they’re
    0:16:47 treating alcoholism, they’re treating social media addiction, they’re treating porn addictions.
    0:16:54 I mean, I think you’re just going to see gambling addiction. Anyway, I’m very excited about this.
    0:16:58 Yeah. Our thoughts on what this would do to addiction were based mostly on surveys,
    0:17:04 but there is a study out now from Loyola University and it found that people with
    0:17:10 opioid or alcohol use disorder who take GLP-1s have a 40% lower rate of opioid overdose
    0:17:16 and a 50% lower rate of alcohol intoxication. So the peer-reviewed research is now coming.
    0:17:21 What’s happened to the alcohol industry, though, is just fascinating. Here are some stats.
    0:17:27 In the past year, Boston beer has fallen 9%. AB and Bev, which owns Corona and Miklo Baltra,
    0:17:35 it’s fallen 15%. Brown Foreman, which owns Jack Daniel, has fallen 20%. So the entire alcohol
    0:17:41 industry is, I mean, I’m not going to say it’s in free fall, but it feels like it’s approaching
    0:17:46 free fall. I think what we should keep tabs on is what is going to happen to all of these alcohol
    0:17:52 stocks when that anti-hedonic study from Eli Lilly is released. And when we start to see
    0:17:58 just a flood of more peer-reviewed research that says, very conclusively, this is reducing
    0:18:03 people’s use of alcohol. There’s just crazy stats. Something like 1% of alcohol drinkers are
    0:18:09 responsible for 30% or 40% of all alcohol consumption. There’s a decent percentage of,
    0:18:16 I mean, it’s just, it’s staggering. There’s a small number of people that drink like 27 beers a day.
    0:18:23 And the alcohol industry is really kind of driven not by social drinkers, but by alcoholics. And
    0:18:30 that’s not a great stat to talk about. But if you think about who’s going to get GLP1 first,
    0:18:35 it’s the person whose doctor said, if you keep drinking, you’re going to die. And when you take
    0:18:45 out those rabid alcoholics, the drinks industrial complex, if it loses the 1% of the alcoholics,
    0:18:52 its business is going to be off 20 or 30%, which, which spells restructuring, massive layoffs.
    0:18:56 I mean, that’s, that’s going to be a meltdown. And I don’t think that’s happened yet because my
    0:19:04 sense of GLP1 drugs is that right now GLP1 is for ladies of lunch and wealthy people who want to
    0:19:09 lose that last 10 or 15 pounds. Over time you’d like to think, and I think this will happen, it’ll,
    0:19:14 it’ll absorb into the communities that really need it. Some of the lower income communities that
    0:19:22 suffer from really damaging obesity. And that’s when the food industrial complex and the drinks
    0:19:28 market really start to feel, you know, the, the, the boot on their neck. And I think that’s going
    0:19:34 to happen over the next 12 or 24 months. But you could see when you see some stores like a Walmart
    0:19:41 that cater to a middle and lower income consumer report that alcohol sales are off 6%, year on
    0:19:47 year or 8% or 11%, you’re going to see those companies decline. Those companies are about to
    0:19:53 become the next cable assets. And that is they’re still going to be great businesses. They’re high
    0:19:59 margin. They’ll cut costs, but you’re going to see consolidation. This is the new cable.
    0:20:04 Yeah. What you say about alcoholics there, I think is so true of food too. Like the food,
    0:20:09 the food industry relies on foodaholics. And there was this earnings call last week
    0:20:16 that I found pretty amazing from the JM Smucker company. And this is the company that makes
    0:20:22 Twinkies and Ding Dongs and Uncrustables. It makes like all of the most heinous snacks in America.
    0:20:28 And the analysts were asking the CEO, this guy, Mark Smucker, about this stuff. They were asking
    0:20:33 him about the threat of GLP One drugs. They were also asking about the political threat of RFK
    0:20:38 Jr. and his crusade on processed foods. And the response from the CEO was just amazing. He said,
    0:20:45 quote, “As it relates to anything in the political domain, we believe very strongly that snacking
    0:20:52 continues. Consumers are going to continue to look for a way to reward themselves at different times
    0:20:58 throughout the day.” So he’s just like, do whatever you want. Come up with whatever drugs
    0:21:05 you want. You can talk shit about Twinkies and Ding Dongs all day, but we are a country of fat
    0:21:11 people and we are going to continue to capitalize on that, which I just thought was kind of incredibly
    0:21:17 honest from him. Each year, maybe it’s every other year, I speak to the folks at ABMBEP.
    0:21:21 They’re super smart. It’s a great company. They do a great job. They’ve made good acquisitions.
    0:21:26 They have a portfolio of amazing brands. And my message this year is kind of be like,
    0:21:30 you’re fucked and then you’re fucked even worse because not only do you have GLP One,
    0:21:34 but I can’t believe these companies keep paying you to just walk into that boardrooms and tell
    0:21:39 them they’re fucked. Oh, dude, they love it. They’re like S&M fetish. They have an S&M fetish.
    0:21:44 I show up and go, you’re fucked. And they’re like, hit me again. That guy really does it.
    0:21:50 You kidding? Well, but think about it. They’re surrounded by sycophants. It’s like, oh,
    0:21:54 you’re a genius. This is amazing. And then someone comes in and goes, I think you’re fucked. And
    0:21:58 this is why. And they’re like, they’re shocked. And they think, okay, maybe we should have that guy
    0:22:07 back because none of these ass kisses are keeping it real. But the reason they’re doubly fucked is
    0:22:13 one of my big consumer observations hanging out with the young people, the young ins, is whenever
    0:22:19 I go to these summits or these conferences or Coachella or everywhere, I’m like, no one’s drinking.
    0:22:27 What’s going on here? They’re all high, but they’re not drinking. And I even look at my alcohol
    0:22:33 consumption. I love alcohol. I’m a better version of me, a little bit fucked up. One of the reasons
    0:22:39 I work out is so I can drink. But as I’ve gotten older, I realize, okay, I need to reduce my alcohol
    0:22:43 content. So I do this thing where I take five milligrams. If I’m going out for a big night,
    0:22:46 I’m only just started doing this. Daddy’s going to want to have a little rhythm,
    0:22:51 be charming, be the charming Scott, not like get angry and upset and go home early.
    0:22:58 I take a five milligram edible and I’ll have one or two drinks as opposed to six to eight drinks.
    0:23:02 And I got to think there’s a lot of people thinking the same way. And then I go to these
    0:23:08 conferences with young people and they got their mix of MDMA and 2C and they’ve got eyedroppers and
    0:23:14 they’re doing all this weird shit and drinking, you know, mushroom and fuse muffins and shit. And
    0:23:18 I just couldn’t get over it. And I think I told you the story when I went on summit at sea and
    0:23:22 they take over an entire Virgin cruise ship. I went up to the barn and I said, can I have
    0:23:28 a makers and ginger? And he said, finally, someone drinking and young people, I mean,
    0:23:32 not only the future, but they’re kind of the aspirational target. Other people look to
    0:23:39 young people for cues. So I think the drinks industry is the next cable network meltdown.
    0:23:44 We’ll be right back after the break with a look at Google’s breakthrough in quantum.
    0:23:49 If you’re enjoying the show so far, be sure to give Prof. G Market to follow
    0:23:50 wherever you get your podcasts.
    0:24:05 Support for Prof. G Markets comes from Funrise. Artificial intelligence is poised to be one of
    0:24:10 the biggest wealth creation events in history. Some experts expect AI to add more than $15 trillion
    0:24:15 to the global economy by 2030. Unfortunately, your portfolio probably doesn’t own the biggest
    0:24:19 names in AI. That’s because most of the AI revolution is largely being built and funded
    0:24:23 in private markets. That means the vast majority of AI startups are going to be back and owned by
    0:24:29 venture capitalists, not public investors. That’s why the launch of the Fundrise Innovation Fund
    0:24:33 last year was such a watershed moment for the investment industry. The Innovation Fund pairs
    0:24:38 $100 million plus venture portfolio of some of the biggest names in AI with one of the lowest
    0:24:43 investment minimums the venture industry has ever seen. AI is already changing the world,
    0:24:47 but this time you can get in early with the Fundrise Innovation Fund. Get in early at
    0:24:51 fundrise.com/markets. Carefully consider the investment material before investing,
    0:24:55 including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. This and other information can be
    0:25:01 found at the Innovation Fund’s prospectus at fundrise.com/innovation. This is a paid advertisement.
    0:25:12 Amazon Q Business is the new generative AI assistant from AWS because many tasks can
    0:25:20 make business slow, like wading through the mud. Luckily, there’s a faster, easier,
    0:25:25 less messy choice. Amazon Q can securely understand your business data and use that
    0:25:30 knowledge to streamline tasks. Now you can summarize quarterly results or do complex
    0:25:40 analyses at no time. Q got this. Learn what Amazon Q Business can do for you at aws.com/learnmore.
    0:25:44 That’s aws.com/learnmore.
    0:25:53 Your team requested a ride, but this time not from you. It’s through their Uber team account.
    0:25:58 It’s an Uber account that allows your team to request a ride under your supervision with live
    0:26:02 trip tracking and highly-rated drivers. Add your team to your Uber account today.
    0:26:16 We’re back with Prof2Markets. Google has unveiled a new quantum chip called Willow,
    0:26:22 which outperforms the world’s most advanced supercomputers. In just five minutes, Willow
    0:26:27 can solve a problem that would take a supercomputer 10 septillion years to solve.
    0:26:30 That’s longer than the estimated age of the universe.
    0:26:35 While some scientists have hailed this as one of the decade’s biggest breakthroughs,
    0:26:41 the chip currently has no practical applications. Scott, we’re going to get your thoughts, but I
    0:26:48 kind of just want to start here with a breakdown on what is quantum computing. It’s a little confusing,
    0:26:56 but just bear with me. The key difference between quantum computing and regular computing is in how
    0:27:02 they process information. A regular computer processes information using binary code,
    0:27:07 so it’s a zero or a one, and these ones and zeros are known as bits. I think people know that.
    0:27:14 A quantum computer, on the other hand, processes information not with bits, but with qubits.
    0:27:20 The funny thing about qubits is that they can be a zero and a one at the same time.
    0:27:25 This is obviously very confusing and strange, but I think the best analogy to think of this
    0:27:29 is to think of it like a coin flip. Imagine you flip a coin.
    0:27:36 A classical computer can only tell you whether it’s heads or tails once the coin has landed,
    0:27:41 but with a quantum computer, it will analyze the coin as it’s being flipped,
    0:27:47 and while it’s flipping, it will calculate the probability of it being heads or tails,
    0:27:52 or in the case of computing, a one or a zero. It’s fundamentally a different way of analyzing
    0:27:57 information, and that’s the key technical difference you need to know about what quantum computing
    0:28:03 actually is. Okay, enough with the nerd talk. Let’s just talk about the practical implications
    0:28:11 of quantum computing. There are three important traits in my view. The first is that these
    0:28:16 quantum computers are exponentially more powerful than classical computers, and that is
    0:28:23 not hyperbole. As you increase the number of qubits, the compute power of a quantum computer
    0:28:27 increases at an exponential rate. That is not true of classical computers,
    0:28:33 so they’re extremely powerful. Two, and this is really important, is that they make a ton of errors,
    0:28:39 and this has been the biggest problem in the field, because it turns out that as that quantum
    0:28:45 computer tries to figure out if the coin’s going to land heads or tails, it very often gets it wrong,
    0:28:49 which screws up the entire computation, and that’s a huge problem which leads me to the
    0:28:55 third important trait, which is it’s highly impractical. Not only in the sense that it gets
    0:29:00 things wrong, but it’s also just designed for these drastically complex questions,
    0:29:04 as you could probably tell at this point, that just don’t really have a place in our world right now.
    0:29:11 Now, the reason this Google announcement is a big deal is because they’ve supposedly solved
    0:29:17 for the second trait that I mentioned, which is it makes a lot of errors. With the Willow chip,
    0:29:22 this new chip they’ve come out with, the more qubits you add to the computation,
    0:29:26 the more accurate the computation gets. In other words, in addition to being crazy,
    0:29:33 crazy powerful, this computer, unlike other quantum computers, also gets things right,
    0:29:38 and that’s the most important difference. That’s why this is actually a really big deal,
    0:29:43 the fact that they have come out with this. We will get to what this might mean for Google’s
    0:29:49 business, but I’ll just stop there in my review of what is quantum computing. Maybe you have
    0:29:54 some reactions. What’s interesting is the market seems to love it. I think because they thought
    0:30:01 this would help supercharge their internal efforts and also that it sort of signals that
    0:30:07 alphabets still has … I’ve always said alphabets, the greatest concentration of IQ in history,
    0:30:15 since maybe NASA in the ’60s or ’70s. This is sort of them saying, “We still got it,” and the market
    0:30:21 seems to like it even though they’re not entirely sure what the applications are. One of the interesting
    0:30:27 notes here is someone says, “This is more shot across IBM’s bow than it is across Nvidia’s bow,
    0:30:34 but this seems to be a signal.” I would argue this is more of a branding event for Alphabet.
    0:30:40 No one’s been able to say which business will this impact. Alphabet has amazing IP and this
    0:30:46 should help across their entire ecosystem, but I still don’t understand what are the consumer
    0:30:52 applications that launch with this, and how is that going to result in additional earnings?
    0:30:57 There are some business use cases that Google hasn’t really talked about,
    0:31:01 but the analysts and the people who are interested in this stuff are talking about,
    0:31:05 and I can just go through a few of them that I think could be really important.
    0:31:14 One is healthcare. Unlike a classical computer, these quantum computers can simulate
    0:31:22 molecular development at mass scale. In theory, they could revolutionize the pharmaceutical
    0:31:27 industry. At least that is what is being said about quantum computers. It’s something that
    0:31:31 classical computers are not good at. The second one, this is the one I find most interesting,
    0:31:41 is encryption. This could massively affect Bitcoin, because cryptography is predicated
    0:31:47 on binary code. That’s how the Bitcoin mining system works, and that’s what makes it so impenetrable.
    0:31:55 With a quantum computer, you could essentially break any encryption system in the world,
    0:32:03 including Bitcoin. Now, to be fair, to mine all the Bitcoin in the world today, you’d need a
    0:32:10 quantum computer with a capacity of 13 million qubits. The Willow chip has a qubit capacity of
    0:32:17 only 105, so we’re not there yet, but theoretically, we could get there. That is also why we saw a dip
    0:32:22 in the price of Bitcoin the day this was announced. I think a lot of people in the Bitcoin world
    0:32:28 went, “Holy shit, what if this thing could crack into the Bitcoin network in a day?”
    0:32:35 It can’t yet, but at some point, it could. I hate to say it. I would enjoy that. I know
    0:32:39 that’s an awful thing to say. I would enjoy it, too. If all Bitcoin became hackable,
    0:32:45 why does that make me happy? Why does that make me happy? Oh, gosh. I think those are my two
    0:32:53 most interesting use cases. My takeaway here, this could be a really big deal,
    0:32:59 but major emphasis on could, because it’s not totally clear to anyone what the timeline on this
    0:33:04 is. We hear about a lot of powerful technologies out there that could revolutionize industries.
    0:33:10 We don’t know when it’ll happen or what it’ll look like. My prediction downstream of that is that I
    0:33:15 think quantum is going to become the new corporate buzzword. I think it’s going to become the new
    0:33:21 vehicle to make these very, very big promises that could pan out, but similar to crypto and
    0:33:27 similar to AI, you’re not accountable to delivering actual results, because it’s so far off in the
    0:33:33 future. This, to me, is like a CFO’s dream. If you can just build a little quantum research
    0:33:38 lab in your company, you don’t even need to generate revenue from it, you will likely
    0:33:42 drastically increase your multiple overnight, and it does not need to be reflected in your
    0:33:47 financial results. My takeaway from this, I think this is real. I think this is cool,
    0:33:53 but I predict a huge hurricane of corporate bullshit that is going to come rolling in hard,
    0:33:56 and I think the name of that hurricane will be quantum.
    0:33:59 I don’t know if you knew this, but here at PropG, we raised $7 billion two years ago,
    0:34:03 and we’ve been experimenting with quantum computing, and it’s really starting to pay off.
    0:34:08 Actually, you’re not a real person. Actually, it’ll be AI. Look, I did what I always do. I turned
    0:34:12 to AI, and I said, “Give me the difference between AI and quantum computing,” and they said, “Okay,
    0:34:18 AI is the simulation of human intelligence and machines that can learn, reason, and make decisions.”
    0:34:23 Example applications, image recognition, natural language processing, autonomous vehicles,
    0:34:30 and recommendation systems. Quantum computing leverages the principles of quantum mechanics,
    0:34:37 including superposition and entanglement to perform calculations much faster than classical
    0:34:42 computers for certain problems. Example applications, cryptography, optimization problems,
    0:34:50 material science simulations, and drug discovery. So, yeah, there you go, and they use this word,
    0:34:59 cubits all over again. More importantly, how do people invest around this? I heard,
    0:35:04 we saw we had in the notes, Rosetti computing. They make chips for quantum computing, much like
    0:35:11 NVIDIA builds chips for AI, started by an IBM quantum scientist. That stock is up sevenfold this
    0:35:16 year. Another quantum computing bet is INQ is pursuing a different type of quantum computing
    0:35:20 than Google, one that could potentially be better for precise measurements in fields,
    0:35:26 including aerospace and defense. INQ is already monetizing quantum, secured a $55 million dollar
    0:35:30 contract with the United States Air Force Research Lab this year, and offers quantum computing through
    0:35:36 Google Cloud, AWS, and Azure. Revenues have increased 90% this year. The stock is up 150%
    0:35:46 year to date. So, this feels pretty cutting edge, but I love what you’ve said, that there’s going
    0:35:55 to be now quantum washing. But also, I wonder if these guys, as much as their stock has been up,
    0:36:00 I wonder if these quantum computing sectors are going to register anything resembling
    0:36:07 the kind of AI, Lollapalooza, in terms of value here. We’ll be right back with a look at the
    0:36:12 World Cup in Saudi Arabia. If you’re enjoying the show so far, hit follow and leave us a review on
    0:36:28 Prof2Mockets. In 100 meters turn right. Actually no, turn left. There’s some awesome new breakfast
    0:36:34 wraps at McDonald’s. Really? Yeah. There’s a sausage bacon and egg, a crispy seasoned chicken one,
    0:36:39 mmm, a spicy end egg, worth the detour. They sound amazing. That they taste amazing too.
    0:36:45 Wish I had a mouth. Take your morning into a delicious new direction with McDonald’s new
    0:36:51 breakfast wraps. Add a small premium roast coffee for a dollar plus tax at participating McDonald’s
    0:37:02 restaurants. Ba-da-ba-ba-ba. Wolves and dogs are pretty closely related. They actually share 99.9%
    0:37:10 of their genetics. But even when they’re just a few months old, even when they’re raised by
    0:37:15 human scientists, wolves are pretty different from dogs. They start biting you in the ears when
    0:37:20 you’re lying down. If you don’t sit up fast enough and you hear this wonderful noises with little
    0:37:27 and then they chomp you in the ear and you’re like, oh. And when they grow up, these differences get
    0:37:36 even bigger. Dogs are our friends. Wolves are hunters. If I had a sore shoulder, I wouldn’t go
    0:37:41 in with the adult wolves, even if I’d raised them because it could trigger their hunting behavior.
    0:37:47 This week on Unexplainable, how did we get the nice, friendly dogs we know and love today
    0:37:52 from wolves? Follow Unexplainable wherever you listen for new episodes every Wednesday.
    0:38:00 On Wednesday of last week, a man was shot in the United States, but this was not your average
    0:38:06 shooting. Almost immediately, people were celebrating his death and not just the people you’d expect,
    0:38:13 there were moms on Facebook making jokes about it. There were several of those horny copypasta text
    0:38:19 messages circulating around. There was a United Healthcare Shooter Lookalike contest over the
    0:38:27 weekend in Manhattan. At least one person got a tattoo of the suspect. On Monday, Luigi Mangione
    0:38:34 got arrested and then things really got nuts. He went from a few dozen Twitter followers to 300,000
    0:38:41 overnight. People were thirsting for his six-pack. Luigi Mangione is brat. The McDonald’s, where he
    0:38:46 was arrested, has been review-bombed. People are saying there are rats behind the counter. People
    0:38:51 are saying Popeye’s employees would have helped him get rid of the gun. Someone’s got some explaining
    0:38:56 to do, and it’s us. It’s Today Explained. Every weekday, never on the weekends.
    0:39:09 We’re back with Prof. G. Markets. Saudi Arabia will host the 2034 World Cup, marking a key step
    0:39:14 in the country’s plan to establish itself as a global leader in sports. Through its sovereign
    0:39:18 wealth fund, the country has invested billions in a range of sports, including golf, boxing,
    0:39:24 e-sports, and Formula One. The fund is also close to finalizing a $1.5 billion deal
    0:39:31 for a 6% stake in the PGA Tour. Finally, we can stop talking about quantum computing,
    0:39:37 Scott, and get back to what we’re really good at, which is football. We’ve talked a lot about
    0:39:42 Saudi Arabia on this podcast. It’s expanding influence in the sports world. Your reactions to
    0:39:48 Saudi Arabia, I’m not sure anyone thought this wouldn’t happen, but Saudi Arabia is officially
    0:39:53 the host of the 2034 World Cup. Well, first off, there are a few organizations
    0:40:00 that have this veneer of credibility that are more corrupt than these international sports
    0:40:04 organizations because they operate in this sort of Nether-Netherland, the International Olympic
    0:40:09 Committee, and FIFA really takes the crown. If you were going to have countries bid,
    0:40:17 you would want to avoid some sort of conflict? Well, no. FIFA announced a $400 million sponsorship
    0:40:23 deal with Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia’s national oil company, the most profitable firm in the
    0:40:33 world, earlier this year. My guess is that was kind of a down payment. The rest of the world
    0:40:40 said, okay, when you show up and you’re bidding on a piece of art and Bill Gates shows up and says,
    0:40:43 “Oh, it’s my dream to own this piece of art.” You might as well go home.
    0:40:50 This is what’s happened here. I think this may be the first time that there was only one nation
    0:40:57 bidding. I think every other nation that was thinking about bidding thought, we’re not going
    0:41:01 to pull 1,100 people together and former governors and get everyone Jonesed up to put
    0:41:08 together the ultimate bid and then host you first class. The FIFA corrupt committee that comes over
    0:41:12 and they get all these great dinners and they’ve said, “No, we’re just not going to bid.”
    0:41:18 And also, realistically, it’s worth more to the kingdom than any other country in the world,
    0:41:24 because these are coming out events. This is a way of highlighting where for real you should come
    0:41:31 here. I remember the Olympics when it was the opening ceremonies in Barcelona, and I had never
    0:41:36 heard anything about Spain or Barcelona. And then they had this brand new beautiful stadium,
    0:41:40 and they had this runner, the lighting in the Olympic torch, and it was this ridiculously
    0:41:46 hot guy wearing no shirt, and he’s running and he stops outside of the stadium, and you see this
    0:41:54 amazing stadium, and the guy picks up a fucking bow and arrow, and then he pulls it back and you see
    0:42:02 his unbelievably ripped torso, and then he looks at the camera and then he nods and he detenses the
    0:42:07 bow and arrow, and he puts the arrow down, and he inflames it, and then he pulls it back,
    0:42:15 and he pulls the thing back for dramatic effect, like it’s about to snap, and he fires the thing,
    0:42:23 and this fucking flaming arrow flies from outside of the stadium over the top of the stadium
    0:42:32 into like this six foot semi-circle of incendiary, lights it, and then it runs up to the Olympic
    0:42:40 flame, torches it, and I’m like, I’m going to fucking Barcelona. I mean, it was just so amazing,
    0:42:46 and then most recently the Paris Olympics have brought kind of new riz to Paris. I remember
    0:42:50 watching some of the sports and at the Olympics and thinking, it’s time for me to get back to Paris.
    0:42:57 Those people just, they just understand style and grace and romance. These are coming out parties.
    0:43:04 I don’t think, I would bet 97% of the world’s population hadn’t heard of Qatar until the World Cup,
    0:43:10 so Saudi Arabia has all of these immense projects coming online. They want to transition to a
    0:43:17 knowledge-based economy, educational institutions, tourism services, and this will be their way of
    0:43:24 bringing the wealthiest people in the world and the eyeballs of the rest of the world to the
    0:43:30 kingdom, and that’s worth a lot of money to them, and it wasn’t, everybody knows about the United
    0:43:36 States. Most people know about Germany, so while they might be willing to spend 10, 20, 30 billion,
    0:43:40 I mean, I gotta think, if Qatar spent a quarter of a trillion dollars or 250 billion, I wouldn’t
    0:43:44 be surprised that the kingdom spends half a trillion dollars on these games. All I know is
    0:43:51 we are going at, and it’s going to be amazing. It’s going to be amazing, and I’m betting on,
    0:43:54 I think Team England is finally going to have their deal here.
    0:43:56 It’s definitely going to happen. Cole Paul, not at home.
    0:43:57 It’s coming home.
    0:43:58 It’s going to come home.
    0:43:59 It’s coming home.
    0:44:05 What you’re describing there is, I mean, you said being on the world stage like that is worth a lot
    0:44:10 of money to them. I think this is the interesting question here. It’s like, what is this worth?
    0:44:16 Is it worth it to do this? If you look at the actual ROI, the return on investment
    0:44:21 of these global sports tournaments, there’s a study from the University of Lausanne,
    0:44:27 which looked at every Olympic Games and every World Cup between the years 1964 and 2018
    0:44:34 to answer that question. What they found is that 95% of the time, you lose money. The average ROI
    0:44:40 for the Olympics and for the World Cup was negative 38%. There were only three competitions
    0:44:46 in history that turned out to be profitable, and those were the 1984 LA Olympics, the 2010 Vancouver
    0:44:51 Winter Olympics, and the 2018 Russia World Cup, and every other tournament lost money.
    0:44:58 Now, to be fair, this is only focusing on the revenues that can be directly attributed to the
    0:45:02 tournament. It’s the ticket sales and the broadcasting rights and the sponsorships, etc.
    0:45:06 What it doesn’t measure is what you’re talking about, which is the soft power,
    0:45:11 the idea that you’re seeing these countries, and then maybe you want to go there and you want to
    0:45:18 spend some money there. I don’t know what it is. My question to you is on soft power, because
    0:45:26 I’m naturally a little skeptical of soft power because of the fact that it is so hard to measure,
    0:45:33 and I get the feeling that we get a little carried away with the glitz and the glamour and the fame of
    0:45:42 it all. My question to you is how does being on the world stage actually translate into legitimate
    0:45:48 economic activity and long-term GDP growth? I get the sense that you believe this is actually a
    0:45:53 very good idea economically for Saudi Arabia. Oh, it’s enormous. The last time I was in Riyadh,
    0:45:58 what I noticed was they put on a lunch and invited me, and they had all these entrepreneurs, and I
    0:46:05 thought I’m going to meet all these Saudis. I did meet some domestic entrepreneurs, a bunch of kids
    0:46:11 who had gone to US schools and then come back to Saudi. What I was shocked by, I met hundreds of
    0:46:17 entrepreneurs who were like, “Yeah, I started a specialized glass company, glass that goes on
    0:46:24 components and iPhones in Seoul, and I moved here,” because I thought the quality of life would be
    0:46:28 better, and basically the kingdom guaranteed me that they would buy everything I could produce.
    0:46:37 I met all these entrepreneurs from Germany. The bottom line is money and growth are a flame,
    0:46:43 and human capital, especially young human capital, is a moth. What you said about soft power is that
    0:46:50 companies that demand specific attribution oftentimes just shouldn’t be in the business
    0:46:55 of brand building, because the thing about brand building is that Philip Morris was never really
    0:47:02 able to directly, they knew that convincing people that if they smoked marble reds, that they could
    0:47:08 relate to and were more like a man with a deeply chiseled jaw, riding an apple loose,
    0:47:17 but they could never reverse engineer a specific billboard to 95 point gross margins on a pack
    0:47:23 of cigarettes that people were paying $4 for that cost $0.20 to produce. Brand building,
    0:47:29 quite frankly, is a little bit about taking a leap of faith, believing that if the intangible
    0:47:35 association surrounding a product, a service, or even a nation will create more awareness,
    0:47:41 more trial, because you can bet MBS looks at Dubai and what they’ve built there and says,
    0:47:46 “Fuck, how did we let that happen? We’re a bigger economy. We have more money.”
    0:47:52 I’m pretty sure that the mandate he’s given to his ministers of infrastructure or development is
    0:47:59 like, “I want Dubai to seem like a fucking cow town after we’re done. I want everyone coming
    0:48:05 here.” The good news about the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is they have what feels like infinite
    0:48:09 capital right now. The bad news is it’s running out in 30 or 40 or 50 years, and they’re smart,
    0:48:16 they know it. They’re like, “We need to transition from a fossil fuels-based economy
    0:48:21 to a services tourism-based economy.” That’s the bad news. We need to do it. The good news is
    0:48:28 you have a blank check to get it done, but branding is all about taking a leap of faith
    0:48:34 on these intangible emotions. All bet the year after the World Cup, you’re going to see tens of
    0:48:40 thousands of small and big businesses, and the key to all this, the secret sauce, human capital,
    0:48:48 go, “Honey, would you be willing to move to Riyadh?” and people go for the first time,
    0:48:54 “Yeah.” At the bottom, when you’re worth billions of dollars spending money on whatever it is,
    0:48:59 a finely tailored suit, it doesn’t mean anything. Even if that finely tailored suit is 10,000 bucks
    0:49:05 and no one would pay for that, it doesn’t matter. They have the money. What they need is to transition
    0:49:13 their economy. This is probably going to be a good investment, distinct of how much it costs.
    0:49:19 I think the distinction there is I agree with you when you have a lot of money. It’s not a big
    0:49:25 deal to buy a $10,000 suit, but it would be a little crazy to buy a million-dollar suit,
    0:49:28 and we have no idea how much they’re going to spend on this thing.
    0:49:38 If you look at how much Qatar spent, they spent $220 billion. I would bet that Saudi Arabia’s going
    0:49:45 to spend way more than that. I think the way you frame it there is totally accurate. It’s like
    0:49:52 they know that this is immediately going to be in the red from an expenses perspective,
    0:49:58 but they’re looking at the long-term payoff and the long-term benefits. Let’s say they spend
    0:50:02 like a quarter of a trillion dollars on this. I think they’ll spend more, but let’s say they spend
    0:50:09 that much. That is a quarter of a trillion-dollar billboard, essentially. Basically, it’s a giant
    0:50:19 ad. I think the question is, is that ad worth it? I feel pretty somewhat convinced that it might pay
    0:50:23 off, that it might be worth it based on your analysis there, but I think the key takeaway for
    0:50:32 me is this is no more than an ad. No more than an ad? That’s everything. That’s awareness,
    0:50:39 unearned margin. Let me just go back to brand building. I don’t know what Russia spent on the
    0:50:45 World Cup, dramatically less than $220 billion, but I went to games in Moscow and St. Petersburg.
    0:50:49 I remember thinking St. Petersburg was arguably one of the most beautiful cities I’d ever been to,
    0:50:54 walked around, there’d be squares where old people were dancing, and I just had such a positive
    0:51:01 impression of Russia and specifically St. Petersburg. Now, them incarcerating Americans on
    0:51:07 trumped-up charges, that’s sort of like, okay, I’m not going back to Russia for a while.
    0:51:11 That sort of ruins the ad, exactly. These actions on a political stage
    0:51:16 can wipe out a quarter of a trillion dollars in branding.
    0:51:20 Yeah. Well, let’s just take a moment to talk about the controversies around this,
    0:51:24 because that’s important to the brand here, too. I mean, if people think that this was
    0:51:30 rigged, as many people do, or they think that Saudi Arabia is an unethical country,
    0:51:33 that’s important to this conversation, too. But I’m just going to start with this
    0:51:38 bid evaluation report from FIFA that they released, which I just found so funny.
    0:51:45 It’s this report where they assess all of the viability of all the possible host nations.
    0:51:53 So, first off, they gave Saudi Arabia the highest viability score ever, which is hilarious.
    0:52:00 They said that from a commercial standpoint, the bid is, quote, “very good.” But my favorite
    0:52:07 was their evaluation of the human rights risk, which they determined was, quote, “medium,”
    0:52:10 which is also hilarious.
    0:52:14 Human rights risk of the games or human rights risk of KSA?
    0:52:16 Of the World Cup, of them hosting the World Cup.
    0:52:17 The medium?
    0:52:24 Human rights risk, medium. That was their analysis. But they ultimately landed on the greatest score
    0:52:27 ever given in the FIFA bid evaluation report.
    0:52:29 Yeah, it’s called money, the greatest score.
    0:52:30 Exactly.
    0:52:39 I’ll go. 100% I’ll go. I can’t wait. I literally can’t wait. And also, I actually quite like
    0:52:40 the kingdom and think they’re doing good things.
    0:52:48 But people hear your views on Saudi Arabia, and they get upset when you defend them.
    0:52:52 And the reason they, I mean, the things that people focus on, there’s one,
    0:52:57 the killing of Jamal Khashoggi. We’ve talked about that. There’s migrant worker conditions.
    0:53:02 I would argue that that’s in basically any country.
    0:53:04 But you’re leaving out treatment of women.
    0:53:07 Yeah. There’s discrimination of women, which they are improving on.
    0:53:13 But still not great. But then there’s also the discrimination against gays,
    0:53:15 which they are definitely not improving on.
    0:53:21 So the penalty for homosexuality in Saudi Arabia today is still, in some cases, death.
    0:53:29 And in combination with the fact that a lot of people think this voting system was rigged,
    0:53:34 which it probably was, they were the only bidder, I think a lot of people are saying,
    0:53:42 there’s foul play here. What I would say, I think we all agree there is foul play here,
    0:53:49 in some sense. The question is, how bad is it? Like, how bad are the human rights abuses,
    0:53:54 and how bad is the corruption? And is it bad enough that we will start to see
    0:54:00 mass boycotting of this World Cup? Because on this podcast, we’re not going to evaluate
    0:54:03 the ethics of things. We’re going to evaluate the economics of things.
    0:54:07 And so what I’m interested in, and I’d like to get your view, is do you think
    0:54:15 the human rights stuff and the corruption stuff is bad to the point that people are actually
    0:54:19 not going to go to this thing, and they’re not going to watch it? Or is this another one of
    0:54:23 those situations where we talk about it a lot online? Maybe we see some protests,
    0:54:26 but at the end of the day, everyone shows up and everyone makes money.
    0:54:36 Oh, entirely the latter. And also, this stuff’s important, and public pressure and international
    0:54:45 pressure is important. And I worry one of the things I don’t like about the most recent election,
    0:54:50 I have trouble waving my finger in anyone’s face around women’s rights right now.
    0:54:56 We’re the only nation that’s taken away a women’s right. Typically, every other nation in the world
    0:55:02 when they grant women rights, they get to hold on to them. And the kingdom right now, in my opinion,
    0:55:06 is reforming faster than any nation in the world. And every six months,
    0:55:13 MBS rolls out new reforms. Women in the kingdom used to need the permission of their husbands to
    0:55:18 travel. They’ve done away with that. They couldn’t drive. They can now drive. That may not sound
    0:55:22 like a big deal, but I’m looking at the slope of things. In addition, I want to be clear,
    0:55:28 I think they murdered Khashoggi. The question is, all right, they did it. I think they paid a huge
    0:55:34 price for it. Does that mean we’re never going to do business with them again? And let me go even
    0:55:38 further. I think there’s less antisemitism in the kingdom right now than there are pockets in the
    0:55:44 United States. I think the kingdom is probably going to normalize relations with Israel. This
    0:55:49 is a complicated issue. I don’t want to pretend to have moral clarity around this. The question is,
    0:55:54 do I think people are going to go and corporations are going to headquarter there?
    0:56:00 Absolutely. This will be the most successful World Cup in history. Because at the end of the day,
    0:56:04 Ed, and this isn’t the way the world should be, the way the world is, money wins.
    0:56:11 And they’ll put on an amazing show and they will clean up their act or they will try to. And also,
    0:56:15 it begs a bigger point, are human rights going to be better or worse
    0:56:22 if the World Cup is in the kingdom? I would argue they’re going to be better. I would argue when
    0:56:30 they are on a global stage that they have more motivation and incentive to improve, to continue
    0:56:36 to improve and head in the right direction. I’m more around engagement than sitting and waving
    0:56:44 your finger as a 15-year-old in Mississippi who’s raped, doesn’t have access to terminate a pregnancy.
    0:56:48 We have gotten so far afield here, Ed. Let’s go back to talking about quants. Cubits.
    0:56:53 Cubits. Yeah, I think just to summarize what you’re saying there, it’s like
    0:56:59 they are trending in the right direction. You cannot argue that. They definitely are on the
    0:57:05 right trajectory when it comes to human rights. Are they doing that for ethical reasons? Probably
    0:57:10 not. But I think they’ve looked at the rest of the world and they’ve seen that, generally speaking,
    0:57:15 a nation that has strong human rights laws and that treats its people fairly,
    0:57:20 generally speaking, those countries get rich. I think that’s pretty much the play here.
    0:57:27 100%. Okay, we want to participate in this economy. We’re going to go lean into human rights,
    0:57:33 not because we necessarily want to for our people. I genuinely think that. I think we’re
    0:57:38 going to do it because it’s going to make us some good money. That’s worth it. I think that’s what’s
    0:57:43 going to happen here. Let’s take a look at the weekend. We’ll hear the Fed’s interest rate decision
    0:57:48 for December and we’ll also see earnings from Nike and FedEx. Scott, do you have any predictions?
    0:57:52 Well, my prediction is that Metta’s next earnings call, which isn’t until February,
    0:58:01 is going to be just blow away again expectations because that notion that if you put a frog in
    0:58:06 a boiling water, jumps out. If you put a frog in water and then turn the heat up, it doesn’t know
    0:58:13 it’s being boiled to death. I don’t think we realize just how bad the rage has become in the
    0:58:20 United States. As someone, I only spend probably two weeks every two months there. It’s like when
    0:58:25 you come home, Ed, and you haven’t seen your kids for a while, and this was one of the most
    0:58:28 rattling things that happened to me when I used to go on business trips for two or three weeks,
    0:58:33 I could notice, I would always poke my head in and when they’re sleeping and a couple of times,
    0:58:38 I’m like, “Oh my God, he’s grown.” That would rattle me that I was spending too much time on
    0:58:42 the road, whereas when I’m with them every day, I don’t perceive them growing because it’s incremental.
    0:58:47 The interrupted cadence of living in London and only being in the US
    0:58:52 once every couple of months, I have noticed a dramatic increase in what I’ll call
    0:59:00 community rage or public rage. Everyone is pissed off. Everyone is dissatisfied with each other,
    0:59:10 with policies, with government, with the world. I think that is the primary signal for profitability
    0:59:15 at Metta because Metta has figured out that it’s not sex itself in the world of marketing,
    0:59:23 it’s rage. The amount of rage that has been fomented and monetized by Metta has hit a new
    0:59:29 high, I believe, around the election. The proxy or the litmus test or a decent
    0:59:36 blood pressure test for rage in the US is the profitability of Metta and it is fucking off
    0:59:41 the charts right now in their largest market in the US, which I believe means they are going to
    0:59:47 report a just staggering quarter in their next earnings call in February. My prediction,
    0:59:54 another massive beat from Metta based on the fact they have figured out a way to not only
    1:00:01 incent but monetize rage at discord and polarization in the United States, which is at record levels.
    1:00:07 This episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our associate
    1:00:10 producer is Alison Weiss, Mia Silverio is our research lead, Jessica Lange is our research
    1:00:16 associate, Drew Burris is our technical director, and Catherine Dillon is our executive producer.
    1:00:20 Thank you for listening to ProfG Markets from the Vox Media Podcast Network. Join us on Thursday
    1:00:24 for our conversation with Morgan Housel only on ProfG Markets.
    1:00:54 Lifetimes. You help me in kind reunion as the world turns. And the dark flies.
    1:01:00 And love, love, love, love.
    1:01:10 [BLANK_AUDIO]
    0:00:04 Support for ProfG comes from BetterHelp. Whether you’re wrapping yourself up in a great blanket
    0:00:08 or just sitting by the fire with your favorite book, it’s always worth it to take a moment to
    0:00:13 pause and get cozy. Therapy can help you find comfort and ease no matter the season. BetterHelp
    0:00:17 is the largest online therapy provider in the world, connecting you to qualified professionals
    0:00:22 via phone, video, or message chat. Find comfort this December with BetterHelp. You can visit
    0:00:30 BetterHelp.com/PROPHG today to get 10% off your first month. That’s BetterHelp.com/PROPHG.
    0:00:39 Thumbtack presents the ins and outs of caring for your home. Out, uncertainty, self-doubt,
    0:00:45 stressing about not knowing where to start. In, plans and guides that make it easy to get home
    0:00:55 projects done. Out, word art. Sorry, live laugh lovers. In, knowing what to do, when to do it,
    0:01:02 and who to hire. Start caring for your home with confidence. Download Thumbtack today.
    0:01:10 This episode is brought to you by Secret. Secret deodorant gives you 72 hours of clinically
    0:01:17 proven odor protection, free of aluminum, parabens, dyes, talc, and baking soda. It’s made with pH
    0:01:23 balancing minerals and crafted with skin conditioning oils. So whether you’re going for a run or just
    0:01:29 running late, do what life throws your way and smell like you didn’t. Find Secret at your nearest
    0:01:38 Walmart or Shoppers Drug Mart today. Today is number $400 billion. That’s Elon Musk’s record
    0:01:44 high net worth as of last week. Power corrupts and absolute power absolutely corrupts. This is
    0:01:51 terrible for society and will cause real damage to economies, justice, and democracy around the world.
    0:02:07 Welcome to Prop G Markets. Today, we’re discussing Google’s quantum breakthrough
    0:02:11 and Saudi Arabia’s World Cup. But first, here with, oh wait, banter.
    0:02:15 You can introduce me and then we can do banter. You don’t have to.
    0:02:20 Like anyone doesn’t know you? I’m so sick of everyone comes up to me. He’s like, tell Ed,
    0:02:25 we said hello. If it’s anyone young, they’re like, I love that Ed Elson. Yeah, I know. Yeah,
    0:02:29 he’s great. Love to hear that. He’s great. What are you doing, Ed? Where are you? What’s going on?
    0:02:36 I’m in New York and I’m just sort of reeling from that $400 billion net worth start. I don’t know
    0:02:43 if you realize this, but since Trump was elected, since November 5th, Elon’s net worth has increased
    0:02:50 by 66% and he’s added $4 billion to his net worth every day. Yeah, and I was excited about getting
    0:02:58 Zip Recruiter as a sponsor last week. Oh, God. And here I am selling like chewable erectile
    0:03:06 dysfunction drugs. Seriously. Oh, wait, they’re going to spend $1,100 on first-time founders.
    0:03:13 Sure, I’ll meet with them. Oh, God. It’s a good life. Oh, wait, I’m headed to Riyadh. Let’s talk
    0:03:18 about that. Let’s bring this back to me. I’m headed to Riyadh on one on Tuesday. Have you ever
    0:03:22 been to Riyadh? You haven’t been to Riyadh, right? No, no. You’re welcome to take me with you.
    0:03:28 Yeah, if you were much more interesting and I liked you more, we’d absolutely be rolling together.
    0:03:34 That’s not fair. I think you’re both interesting and likeable, but I’ve been to Dubai a bunch of
    0:03:38 times. Only been to Riyadh once and I was only there for a conference. I’m curious. I’m taking
    0:03:43 a little bit extra time and I’m going to check it out. I’m fascinated by the kingdom right now.
    0:03:47 Well, we’ll be discussing that more because we’ve got Saudi Arabia on our docket here.
    0:03:50 But let’s start off with our weekly review of market vitals.
    0:04:02 The S&P 500 declined. The dollar gained. Bitcoin hit another record
    0:04:05 and the yield on 10-year treasuries increased, shifting to the headlines.
    0:04:10 A federal judge has blocked grocery store Kroger’s acquisition of Albertson’s.
    0:04:15 The judge sided with the FTC, agreeing that the $25 billion deal would hurt consumers
    0:04:20 and limit competition. Following the judge’s ruling, Albertson’s terminated the deal
    0:04:25 and filed a lawsuit against Kroger, alleging the company didn’t do enough to secure regulatory
    0:04:31 approval. Warner Brothers’ discovery is splitting into two units, one for its streaming and studio
    0:04:37 business and another for its linear TV networks. The move paves the way for a potential spin-off
    0:04:42 or sale of its TV business and the stock popped more than 14% on the news.
    0:04:48 And finally, Eli Lilly will begin testing its GLP1 drug Zep bound next year as a treatment
    0:04:56 for drug and alcohol addiction. Eli Lilly CEO Dave Ricks described GLP1 drugs as anti-hedonics,
    0:05:03 saying they can help reduce the desire cycle. Scott, your thoughts starting with Kroger’s
    0:05:10 acquisition of Albertson’s, which was set to be one of the biggest M&A deals in history, called off.
    0:05:16 So my gut was that this was populist bullshit and I love antitrust. I love black and mergers.
    0:05:21 I’m an even bigger fan of breakups. But my fear was when you look at Albertson’s or Kroger,
    0:05:27 it’s not like these guys are lighting up the business world. This is specifically their
    0:05:32 existential threat is Amazon. I feel like this is not a great business. It’s low margin. It’s
    0:05:37 difficult. I think there’s still quite a bit of competition here. This is populist bullshit
    0:05:45 because just as diapers and gas prices kind of weigh on people’s sort of view of the world,
    0:05:48 like if gas prices go up, they get angry at the administration and if diapers are more expensive,
    0:05:56 they think, oh, this store is a ripoff. Grocery prices have become a very strong indicator for
    0:06:01 how the majority of the public feels about inflation and the administration. And so I
    0:06:08 thought it was sort of an easy target to say, no, grocery prices need to stay low. But South Dakota
    0:06:14 State University found that supermarket mergers can actually decrease prices for customers due
    0:06:19 to economies of scale. Albertson’s decreased 4% on the news, Kroger increased 5% after announcing
    0:06:24 would abandon the merger and restart stock buybacks. That’s because typically the person on top who
    0:06:29 makes the acquisition overpays only one in three acquisitions work. But I think, I don’t know,
    0:06:36 I think that the real threat is Amazon and having more formidable competitors to Amazon
    0:06:43 would create a healthier ecosystem. Yeah, I’m a little torn on this. I think the really interesting
    0:06:51 thing here is you mentioned that they’re kind of the smaller players in the market. And you’ve got
    0:06:57 Amazon and you’ve got Walmart who are crushing them. And this was Kroger and Albertson’s argument.
    0:07:02 Their argument was that this was basically the only way to compete with all the online retailers,
    0:07:06 especially Amazon. And I think they probably thought that that would work with the FTC because
    0:07:13 they know that the FTC has been going after Amazon anyway. But the FTC’s response was,
    0:07:18 okay, well, you say you want to compete with the online retailers, but you’re actually not
    0:07:23 an online retailer. You are a supermarket. And those are two very different things.
    0:07:29 And what’s interesting is that this is ultimately what the decision came down to. It was an argument
    0:07:36 over what the definition of a supermarket actually is. And the judge made her opinion very
    0:07:42 clear. And the first line of the conclusion was, quote, supermarkets are distinct from other grocery
    0:07:48 retailers. So in other words, she’s saying, you know, unlike your framing, where you guys are
    0:07:53 these little fish in this big, big pond of retail, we believe that you are in fact the
    0:08:00 big fish in the little pond of supermarkets and supermarkets and big retail are two different
    0:08:07 things. And therefore, to team up like this would be unfair. And I’ve been kind of back and
    0:08:14 forth on this because it’s really about framing. It’s like, are they dominating the supermarket
    0:08:20 business? Or are they struggling in the retail business? And that’s really what this came down
    0:08:26 to. So I’m not sure I have an opinion yet, but I do find it interesting that all of this comes
    0:08:32 down to a dispute over definitions. So I think that that argument holds water if the framing is
    0:08:38 that they’re not really competing against Amazon, they’re competing against other grocery supermarkets.
    0:08:42 But even if you say, okay, take Amazon out of the competitive set,
    0:08:49 the biggest grocery supermarket in my mind is Walmart. Right. And by the way, just the way
    0:08:54 they, their name for Walmart, it’s very interesting, they called Walmart a large format store.
    0:08:59 Whatever we call it, Walmart’s biggest category is groceries. There are still a large number of
    0:09:04 Walmart customers that primarily go there just for groceries. So call it what you want. It’s the
    0:09:11 largest grocery provider or retailer in the nation. They have a 25% share of the grocery market and
    0:09:17 combined, this company had the merger gone through or been approved would have had 11%. So okay, fine,
    0:09:20 we’re not competing against Amazon, but you’re going to tell us we’re not competing against
    0:09:27 Walmart. And Walmart with that scale, based on the most recent earnings call, is kicking the
    0:09:34 shit out of Target, much less Kroger’s and Albertson’s. And so their case is that Kroger, people,
    0:09:37 people don’t think of Walmart for groceries. They only go to this separate,
    0:09:42 this separate category of which you’re dominant players. I just don’t buy that. I think a lot
    0:09:47 of people, if Kroger’s- Plus Amazon owns Whole Foods. There you go. It’s the other side of this,
    0:09:52 too. I think if people think, oh, Walmart has the lowest prices because of their scale and
    0:09:58 their technology, I’m going to buy my groceries from Walmart and not from Kroger’s or Albertson.
    0:10:04 So based on the fact, I think they had eight and 3% market share and Walmart,
    0:10:12 distinctive Amazon has 25%. And it feels like a pretty robust sector. Let me put it this way.
    0:10:17 I think Doug McMillan is really happy to see a Walmart. He’s like, oh, God, we’re going to
    0:10:21 roll over these guys. They don’t have the capital to make the types of investments we can in
    0:10:28 technology. They don’t have the scale to turn the screws on all of our suppliers like we do.
    0:10:32 So I think they got it wrong here. I wonder if actually this one should have gone through.
    0:10:37 Yeah. I could imagine a world like 10 years from now where Walmart and Amazon absolutely
    0:10:43 dominate the supermarket and grocery business. Prices are high and we’ll look back at this
    0:10:47 moment and be like, damn, we really fucked up there. We could have prevented this. I think
    0:10:52 that’s very possible. One final note though, Wall Street never thought this was going to
    0:10:59 go through from the very beginning. So this deal was pricing Albertson’s at $34 a share.
    0:11:03 The stock’s been hovering at around $18 a share basically throughout the,
    0:11:09 from when they announced the deal to today, it’s been trading at a discount. So it is
    0:11:13 interesting that Wall Street from the get go was like, this is not going to go through.
    0:11:22 Let’s move on to Warner Brothers Discovery. This is sort of downstream of your prediction about
    0:11:28 how we’re going to see a lot of spins in the media business, specifically cable assets will be spun
    0:11:37 off to capture more value. This is a little different though, because unlike Comcast who
    0:11:40 did exactly what you said in your prediction last month, where they spun out their cable
    0:11:46 assets and do a new company, this is just a restructuring. So the cable assets are going
    0:11:50 to have their own operating division. The streaming assets are going to have their own
    0:11:55 operating division, but there’s no spin here. At least there’s no spin yet. It’s still one company.
    0:12:01 So my question for you is, what does this actually mean for shareholders? Should we be
    0:12:08 expecting a spin? And if not, does this sort of relabeling into different categories actually do
    0:12:14 much to the company? This is a preview. This is making it, he’s setting the table for a spin.
    0:12:20 And that is he’s creating distinct operating units such that the spin will be more elegant and easy.
    0:12:24 And the fact that the stock is up 15% now today is basically the market saying,
    0:12:31 oh, you’re flirting with a spin will come on over here. This means the spin, in my opinion,
    0:12:37 is going to happen. I don’t know if the spin will take some most or all the debt, but they will
    0:12:41 probably, I mean, what you have with the cable business is highly profitable businesses that
    0:12:47 can probably support a lot of debt because they’re cashflow generative. And this will free up a pure
    0:12:53 play around Warner and HBO, which will trade at a much higher stock price. And my two stock picks
    0:12:59 or my three stock picks for 2024 were Alphabet because I thought they had more IP and that it
    0:13:06 would be Revenge or the Empire Strikes Back around AI. And then Warner Brothers Discovery and Disney
    0:13:12 had been oversold. Part of the thing getting in the way of the spin, I believe, was their capital
    0:13:17 structure is a bit of a straight jacket. What do I mean by that? They have really good debt. They
    0:13:23 have a ton of debt, but it’s that it’s long maturity. It doesn’t come due for a while and it’s an
    0:13:28 exceptionally low interest rate. And I wonder if they spin, if it accelerates, all of the bond
    0:13:33 holders here want out of this debt. They’re making no money. They’re getting two or three or four
    0:13:37 percent. Warner Brothers loves this debt because even though they have a lot, it’s on really friendly
    0:13:43 terms. And I wonder if the thing that gets in the way of the spin is that it might accelerate the
    0:13:48 bond payments or that they might not be able to just transfer debt. I think that’s the key question
    0:13:54 here. But from a shareholder perspective, based on what the market said today, this is Zasloff
    0:14:02 pridding up the company for a spin and saying they will be distinct. It will be easy. The operations
    0:14:09 will break out the revenues and all this. And we’ll have our cool kid, hot girl, growth,
    0:14:16 streaming and Warner Brothers division, and we’ll have the ugly stepchild that still brings home
    0:14:24 money, but is not very popular. That will be these cable assets. This is a good move. Comcast led the
    0:14:30 way. What’ll be interesting is I wonder if he’s sending a signal to Comcast, speak now or forever,
    0:14:35 hold your peace. Because once they spin, it becomes harder for Comcast’s new co, whatever they’re
    0:14:42 calling it, to acquire it. I wouldn’t be surprised if at some point, Brian Roberts calls David Zasloff
    0:14:51 and says, “We should talk. Should our cable assets join together into one?” Because MSNBC
    0:14:57 and CNN having the same backend, same newsroom or similar newsroom, that just makes all sorts of
    0:15:03 sense to me. And I’ll also just point out the fact that this happened now, as you mentioned, one of
    0:15:10 your stock picks was Warner Brothers Discovery. You were saved by the bell because WBD was in the
    0:15:14 red throughout most of the year. And I know people were saying that, oh, Scott, we got it wrong.
    0:15:21 It’s now in the green. It’s up 7% year today. Not huge, but in the green. So I’m going to call it
    0:15:24 away for now. Yeah, but I’m going to perform the market. I’m going to perform the market, though,
    0:15:30 right? We still got two weeks. Where’s those blue chewables? Anyways. And finally, our third
    0:15:39 headline here, Eli Lilly testing GLP-1 drugs for alcohol addiction and drug addiction and tobacco
    0:15:46 addiction. I love this new term here from the CEO, anti-hedonics. This is exactly what you’ve been
    0:15:54 talking about for a long time. I even saw some data saying that people on Osempic reduced their
    0:16:02 drinking by 60%. Diage, the alcohol guys. Oh my God. These stocks, in my opinion, are going to get
    0:16:07 absolutely hammered. We could see alcohol really taken on the chin. Your thoughts on this news.
    0:16:13 These things are scaffolding on our instincts. They just update our instincts to the institutional
    0:16:17 production that our instincts haven’t caught up to. What is an addiction? Addiction is when you
    0:16:21 continue to do something despite it having a negative impact on your life, your health.
    0:16:28 And this basically tells your brain somehow calibrates it to say, no, you can stop eating now
    0:16:34 or no, you don’t need to stay on TikTok for another 11 hours. This is enough. All of a sudden,
    0:16:38 I’m looking at these stocks and going to say, okay, if they’re up 30% or 40%, is it still
    0:16:42 an opportunity to get in? Because if they’re not only treating obesity, but they’re
    0:16:47 treating alcoholism, they’re treating social media addiction, they’re treating porn addictions.
    0:16:54 I mean, I think you’re just going to see gambling addiction. Anyway, I’m very excited about this.
    0:16:58 Yeah. Our thoughts on what this would do to addiction were based mostly on surveys,
    0:17:04 but there is a study out now from Loyola University and it found that people with
    0:17:10 opioid or alcohol use disorder who take GLP-1s have a 40% lower rate of opioid overdose
    0:17:16 and a 50% lower rate of alcohol intoxication. So the peer-reviewed research is now coming.
    0:17:21 What’s happened to the alcohol industry, though, is just fascinating. Here are some stats.
    0:17:27 In the past year, Boston beer has fallen 9%. AB and Bev, which owns Corona and Miklo Baltra,
    0:17:35 it’s fallen 15%. Brown Foreman, which owns Jack Daniel, has fallen 20%. So the entire alcohol
    0:17:41 industry is, I mean, I’m not going to say it’s in free fall, but it feels like it’s approaching
    0:17:46 free fall. I think what we should keep tabs on is what is going to happen to all of these alcohol
    0:17:52 stocks when that anti-hedonic study from Eli Lilly is released. And when we start to see
    0:17:58 just a flood of more peer-reviewed research that says, very conclusively, this is reducing
    0:18:03 people’s use of alcohol. There’s just crazy stats. Something like 1% of alcohol drinkers are
    0:18:09 responsible for 30% or 40% of all alcohol consumption. There’s a decent percentage of,
    0:18:16 I mean, it’s just, it’s staggering. There’s a small number of people that drink like 27 beers a day.
    0:18:23 And the alcohol industry is really kind of driven not by social drinkers, but by alcoholics. And
    0:18:30 that’s not a great stat to talk about. But if you think about who’s going to get GLP1 first,
    0:18:35 it’s the person whose doctor said, if you keep drinking, you’re going to die. And when you take
    0:18:45 out those rabid alcoholics, the drinks industrial complex, if it loses the 1% of the alcoholics,
    0:18:52 its business is going to be off 20 or 30%, which, which spells restructuring, massive layoffs.
    0:18:56 I mean, that’s, that’s going to be a meltdown. And I don’t think that’s happened yet because my
    0:19:04 sense of GLP1 drugs is that right now GLP1 is for ladies of lunch and wealthy people who want to
    0:19:09 lose that last 10 or 15 pounds. Over time you’d like to think, and I think this will happen, it’ll,
    0:19:14 it’ll absorb into the communities that really need it. Some of the lower income communities that
    0:19:22 suffer from really damaging obesity. And that’s when the food industrial complex and the drinks
    0:19:28 market really start to feel, you know, the, the, the boot on their neck. And I think that’s going
    0:19:34 to happen over the next 12 or 24 months. But you could see when you see some stores like a Walmart
    0:19:41 that cater to a middle and lower income consumer report that alcohol sales are off 6%, year on
    0:19:47 year or 8% or 11%, you’re going to see those companies decline. Those companies are about to
    0:19:53 become the next cable assets. And that is they’re still going to be great businesses. They’re high
    0:19:59 margin. They’ll cut costs, but you’re going to see consolidation. This is the new cable.
    0:20:04 Yeah. What you say about alcoholics there, I think is so true of food too. Like the food,
    0:20:09 the food industry relies on foodaholics. And there was this earnings call last week
    0:20:16 that I found pretty amazing from the JM Smucker company. And this is the company that makes
    0:20:22 Twinkies and Ding Dongs and Uncrustables. It makes like all of the most heinous snacks in America.
    0:20:28 And the analysts were asking the CEO, this guy, Mark Smucker, about this stuff. They were asking
    0:20:33 him about the threat of GLP One drugs. They were also asking about the political threat of RFK
    0:20:38 Jr. and his crusade on processed foods. And the response from the CEO was just amazing. He said,
    0:20:45 quote, “As it relates to anything in the political domain, we believe very strongly that snacking
    0:20:52 continues. Consumers are going to continue to look for a way to reward themselves at different times
    0:20:58 throughout the day.” So he’s just like, do whatever you want. Come up with whatever drugs
    0:21:05 you want. You can talk shit about Twinkies and Ding Dongs all day, but we are a country of fat
    0:21:11 people and we are going to continue to capitalize on that, which I just thought was kind of incredibly
    0:21:17 honest from him. Each year, maybe it’s every other year, I speak to the folks at ABMBEP.
    0:21:21 They’re super smart. It’s a great company. They do a great job. They’ve made good acquisitions.
    0:21:26 They have a portfolio of amazing brands. And my message this year is kind of be like,
    0:21:30 you’re fucked and then you’re fucked even worse because not only do you have GLP One,
    0:21:34 but I can’t believe these companies keep paying you to just walk into that boardrooms and tell
    0:21:39 them they’re fucked. Oh, dude, they love it. They’re like S&M fetish. They have an S&M fetish.
    0:21:44 I show up and go, you’re fucked. And they’re like, hit me again. That guy really does it.
    0:21:50 You kidding? Well, but think about it. They’re surrounded by sycophants. It’s like, oh,
    0:21:54 you’re a genius. This is amazing. And then someone comes in and goes, I think you’re fucked. And
    0:21:58 this is why. And they’re like, they’re shocked. And they think, okay, maybe we should have that guy
    0:22:07 back because none of these ass kisses are keeping it real. But the reason they’re doubly fucked is
    0:22:13 one of my big consumer observations hanging out with the young people, the young ins, is whenever
    0:22:19 I go to these summits or these conferences or Coachella or everywhere, I’m like, no one’s drinking.
    0:22:27 What’s going on here? They’re all high, but they’re not drinking. And I even look at my alcohol
    0:22:33 consumption. I love alcohol. I’m a better version of me, a little bit fucked up. One of the reasons
    0:22:39 I work out is so I can drink. But as I’ve gotten older, I realize, okay, I need to reduce my alcohol
    0:22:43 content. So I do this thing where I take five milligrams. If I’m going out for a big night,
    0:22:46 I’m only just started doing this. Daddy’s going to want to have a little rhythm,
    0:22:51 be charming, be the charming Scott, not like get angry and upset and go home early.
    0:22:58 I take a five milligram edible and I’ll have one or two drinks as opposed to six to eight drinks.
    0:23:02 And I got to think there’s a lot of people thinking the same way. And then I go to these
    0:23:08 conferences with young people and they got their mix of MDMA and 2C and they’ve got eyedroppers and
    0:23:14 they’re doing all this weird shit and drinking, you know, mushroom and fuse muffins and shit. And
    0:23:18 I just couldn’t get over it. And I think I told you the story when I went on summit at sea and
    0:23:22 they take over an entire Virgin cruise ship. I went up to the barn and I said, can I have
    0:23:28 a makers and ginger? And he said, finally, someone drinking and young people, I mean,
    0:23:32 not only the future, but they’re kind of the aspirational target. Other people look to
    0:23:39 young people for cues. So I think the drinks industry is the next cable network meltdown.
    0:23:44 We’ll be right back after the break with a look at Google’s breakthrough in quantum.
    0:23:49 If you’re enjoying the show so far, be sure to give Prof. G Market to follow
    0:23:50 wherever you get your podcasts.
    0:24:05 Support for Prof. G Markets comes from Funrise. Artificial intelligence is poised to be one of
    0:24:10 the biggest wealth creation events in history. Some experts expect AI to add more than $15 trillion
    0:24:15 to the global economy by 2030. Unfortunately, your portfolio probably doesn’t own the biggest
    0:24:19 names in AI. That’s because most of the AI revolution is largely being built and funded
    0:24:23 in private markets. That means the vast majority of AI startups are going to be back and owned by
    0:24:29 venture capitalists, not public investors. That’s why the launch of the Fundrise Innovation Fund
    0:24:33 last year was such a watershed moment for the investment industry. The Innovation Fund pairs
    0:24:38 $100 million plus venture portfolio of some of the biggest names in AI with one of the lowest
    0:24:43 investment minimums the venture industry has ever seen. AI is already changing the world,
    0:24:47 but this time you can get in early with the Fundrise Innovation Fund. Get in early at
    0:24:51 fundrise.com/markets. Carefully consider the investment material before investing,
    0:24:55 including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. This and other information can be
    0:25:01 found at the Innovation Fund’s prospectus at fundrise.com/innovation. This is a paid advertisement.
    0:25:12 Amazon Q Business is the new generative AI assistant from AWS because many tasks can
    0:25:20 make business slow, like wading through the mud. Luckily, there’s a faster, easier,
    0:25:25 less messy choice. Amazon Q can securely understand your business data and use that
    0:25:30 knowledge to streamline tasks. Now you can summarize quarterly results or do complex
    0:25:40 analyses at no time. Q got this. Learn what Amazon Q Business can do for you at aws.com/learnmore.
    0:25:44 That’s aws.com/learnmore.
    0:25:53 Your team requested a ride, but this time not from you. It’s through their Uber team account.
    0:25:58 It’s an Uber account that allows your team to request a ride under your supervision with live
    0:26:02 trip tracking and highly-rated drivers. Add your team to your Uber account today.
    0:26:16 We’re back with Prof2Markets. Google has unveiled a new quantum chip called Willow,
    0:26:22 which outperforms the world’s most advanced supercomputers. In just five minutes, Willow
    0:26:27 can solve a problem that would take a supercomputer 10 septillion years to solve.
    0:26:30 That’s longer than the estimated age of the universe.
    0:26:35 While some scientists have hailed this as one of the decade’s biggest breakthroughs,
    0:26:41 the chip currently has no practical applications. Scott, we’re going to get your thoughts, but I
    0:26:48 kind of just want to start here with a breakdown on what is quantum computing. It’s a little confusing,
    0:26:56 but just bear with me. The key difference between quantum computing and regular computing is in how
    0:27:02 they process information. A regular computer processes information using binary code,
    0:27:07 so it’s a zero or a one, and these ones and zeros are known as bits. I think people know that.
    0:27:14 A quantum computer, on the other hand, processes information not with bits, but with qubits.
    0:27:20 The funny thing about qubits is that they can be a zero and a one at the same time.
    0:27:25 This is obviously very confusing and strange, but I think the best analogy to think of this
    0:27:29 is to think of it like a coin flip. Imagine you flip a coin.
    0:27:36 A classical computer can only tell you whether it’s heads or tails once the coin has landed,
    0:27:41 but with a quantum computer, it will analyze the coin as it’s being flipped,
    0:27:47 and while it’s flipping, it will calculate the probability of it being heads or tails,
    0:27:52 or in the case of computing, a one or a zero. It’s fundamentally a different way of analyzing
    0:27:57 information, and that’s the key technical difference you need to know about what quantum computing
    0:28:03 actually is. Okay, enough with the nerd talk. Let’s just talk about the practical implications
    0:28:11 of quantum computing. There are three important traits in my view. The first is that these
    0:28:16 quantum computers are exponentially more powerful than classical computers, and that is
    0:28:23 not hyperbole. As you increase the number of qubits, the compute power of a quantum computer
    0:28:27 increases at an exponential rate. That is not true of classical computers,
    0:28:33 so they’re extremely powerful. Two, and this is really important, is that they make a ton of errors,
    0:28:39 and this has been the biggest problem in the field, because it turns out that as that quantum
    0:28:45 computer tries to figure out if the coin’s going to land heads or tails, it very often gets it wrong,
    0:28:49 which screws up the entire computation, and that’s a huge problem which leads me to the
    0:28:55 third important trait, which is it’s highly impractical. Not only in the sense that it gets
    0:29:00 things wrong, but it’s also just designed for these drastically complex questions,
    0:29:04 as you could probably tell at this point, that just don’t really have a place in our world right now.
    0:29:11 Now, the reason this Google announcement is a big deal is because they’ve supposedly solved
    0:29:17 for the second trait that I mentioned, which is it makes a lot of errors. With the Willow chip,
    0:29:22 this new chip they’ve come out with, the more qubits you add to the computation,
    0:29:26 the more accurate the computation gets. In other words, in addition to being crazy,
    0:29:33 crazy powerful, this computer, unlike other quantum computers, also gets things right,
    0:29:38 and that’s the most important difference. That’s why this is actually a really big deal,
    0:29:43 the fact that they have come out with this. We will get to what this might mean for Google’s
    0:29:49 business, but I’ll just stop there in my review of what is quantum computing. Maybe you have
    0:29:54 some reactions. What’s interesting is the market seems to love it. I think because they thought
    0:30:01 this would help supercharge their internal efforts and also that it sort of signals that
    0:30:07 alphabets still has … I’ve always said alphabets, the greatest concentration of IQ in history,
    0:30:15 since maybe NASA in the ’60s or ’70s. This is sort of them saying, “We still got it,” and the market
    0:30:21 seems to like it even though they’re not entirely sure what the applications are. One of the interesting
    0:30:27 notes here is someone says, “This is more shot across IBM’s bow than it is across Nvidia’s bow,
    0:30:34 but this seems to be a signal.” I would argue this is more of a branding event for Alphabet.
    0:30:40 No one’s been able to say which business will this impact. Alphabet has amazing IP and this
    0:30:46 should help across their entire ecosystem, but I still don’t understand what are the consumer
    0:30:52 applications that launch with this, and how is that going to result in additional earnings?
    0:30:57 There are some business use cases that Google hasn’t really talked about,
    0:31:01 but the analysts and the people who are interested in this stuff are talking about,
    0:31:05 and I can just go through a few of them that I think could be really important.
    0:31:14 One is healthcare. Unlike a classical computer, these quantum computers can simulate
    0:31:22 molecular development at mass scale. In theory, they could revolutionize the pharmaceutical
    0:31:27 industry. At least that is what is being said about quantum computers. It’s something that
    0:31:31 classical computers are not good at. The second one, this is the one I find most interesting,
    0:31:41 is encryption. This could massively affect Bitcoin, because cryptography is predicated
    0:31:47 on binary code. That’s how the Bitcoin mining system works, and that’s what makes it so impenetrable.
    0:31:55 With a quantum computer, you could essentially break any encryption system in the world,
    0:32:03 including Bitcoin. Now, to be fair, to mine all the Bitcoin in the world today, you’d need a
    0:32:10 quantum computer with a capacity of 13 million qubits. The Willow chip has a qubit capacity of
    0:32:17 only 105, so we’re not there yet, but theoretically, we could get there. That is also why we saw a dip
    0:32:22 in the price of Bitcoin the day this was announced. I think a lot of people in the Bitcoin world
    0:32:28 went, “Holy shit, what if this thing could crack into the Bitcoin network in a day?”
    0:32:35 It can’t yet, but at some point, it could. I hate to say it. I would enjoy that. I know
    0:32:39 that’s an awful thing to say. I would enjoy it, too. If all Bitcoin became hackable,
    0:32:45 why does that make me happy? Why does that make me happy? Oh, gosh. I think those are my two
    0:32:53 most interesting use cases. My takeaway here, this could be a really big deal,
    0:32:59 but major emphasis on could, because it’s not totally clear to anyone what the timeline on this
    0:33:04 is. We hear about a lot of powerful technologies out there that could revolutionize industries.
    0:33:10 We don’t know when it’ll happen or what it’ll look like. My prediction downstream of that is that I
    0:33:15 think quantum is going to become the new corporate buzzword. I think it’s going to become the new
    0:33:21 vehicle to make these very, very big promises that could pan out, but similar to crypto and
    0:33:27 similar to AI, you’re not accountable to delivering actual results, because it’s so far off in the
    0:33:33 future. This, to me, is like a CFO’s dream. If you can just build a little quantum research
    0:33:38 lab in your company, you don’t even need to generate revenue from it, you will likely
    0:33:42 drastically increase your multiple overnight, and it does not need to be reflected in your
    0:33:47 financial results. My takeaway from this, I think this is real. I think this is cool,
    0:33:53 but I predict a huge hurricane of corporate bullshit that is going to come rolling in hard,
    0:33:56 and I think the name of that hurricane will be quantum.
    0:33:59 I don’t know if you knew this, but here at PropG, we raised $7 billion two years ago,
    0:34:03 and we’ve been experimenting with quantum computing, and it’s really starting to pay off.
    0:34:08 Actually, you’re not a real person. Actually, it’ll be AI. Look, I did what I always do. I turned
    0:34:12 to AI, and I said, “Give me the difference between AI and quantum computing,” and they said, “Okay,
    0:34:18 AI is the simulation of human intelligence and machines that can learn, reason, and make decisions.”
    0:34:23 Example applications, image recognition, natural language processing, autonomous vehicles,
    0:34:30 and recommendation systems. Quantum computing leverages the principles of quantum mechanics,
    0:34:37 including superposition and entanglement to perform calculations much faster than classical
    0:34:42 computers for certain problems. Example applications, cryptography, optimization problems,
    0:34:50 material science simulations, and drug discovery. So, yeah, there you go, and they use this word,
    0:34:59 cubits all over again. More importantly, how do people invest around this? I heard,
    0:35:04 we saw we had in the notes, Rosetti computing. They make chips for quantum computing, much like
    0:35:11 NVIDIA builds chips for AI, started by an IBM quantum scientist. That stock is up sevenfold this
    0:35:16 year. Another quantum computing bet is INQ is pursuing a different type of quantum computing
    0:35:20 than Google, one that could potentially be better for precise measurements in fields,
    0:35:26 including aerospace and defense. INQ is already monetizing quantum, secured a $55 million dollar
    0:35:30 contract with the United States Air Force Research Lab this year, and offers quantum computing through
    0:35:36 Google Cloud, AWS, and Azure. Revenues have increased 90% this year. The stock is up 150%
    0:35:46 year to date. So, this feels pretty cutting edge, but I love what you’ve said, that there’s going
    0:35:55 to be now quantum washing. But also, I wonder if these guys, as much as their stock has been up,
    0:36:00 I wonder if these quantum computing sectors are going to register anything resembling
    0:36:07 the kind of AI, Lollapalooza, in terms of value here. We’ll be right back with a look at the
    0:36:12 World Cup in Saudi Arabia. If you’re enjoying the show so far, hit follow and leave us a review on
    0:36:28 Prof2Mockets. In 100 meters turn right. Actually no, turn left. There’s some awesome new breakfast
    0:36:34 wraps at McDonald’s. Really? Yeah. There’s a sausage bacon and egg, a crispy seasoned chicken one,
    0:36:39 mmm, a spicy end egg, worth the detour. They sound amazing. That they taste amazing too.
    0:36:45 Wish I had a mouth. Take your morning into a delicious new direction with McDonald’s new
    0:36:51 breakfast wraps. Add a small premium roast coffee for a dollar plus tax at participating McDonald’s
    0:37:02 restaurants. Ba-da-ba-ba-ba. Wolves and dogs are pretty closely related. They actually share 99.9%
    0:37:10 of their genetics. But even when they’re just a few months old, even when they’re raised by
    0:37:15 human scientists, wolves are pretty different from dogs. They start biting you in the ears when
    0:37:20 you’re lying down. If you don’t sit up fast enough and you hear this wonderful noises with little
    0:37:27 and then they chomp you in the ear and you’re like, oh. And when they grow up, these differences get
    0:37:36 even bigger. Dogs are our friends. Wolves are hunters. If I had a sore shoulder, I wouldn’t go
    0:37:41 in with the adult wolves, even if I’d raised them because it could trigger their hunting behavior.
    0:37:47 This week on Unexplainable, how did we get the nice, friendly dogs we know and love today
    0:37:52 from wolves? Follow Unexplainable wherever you listen for new episodes every Wednesday.
    0:38:00 On Wednesday of last week, a man was shot in the United States, but this was not your average
    0:38:06 shooting. Almost immediately, people were celebrating his death and not just the people you’d expect,
    0:38:13 there were moms on Facebook making jokes about it. There were several of those horny copypasta text
    0:38:19 messages circulating around. There was a United Healthcare Shooter Lookalike contest over the
    0:38:27 weekend in Manhattan. At least one person got a tattoo of the suspect. On Monday, Luigi Mangione
    0:38:34 got arrested and then things really got nuts. He went from a few dozen Twitter followers to 300,000
    0:38:41 overnight. People were thirsting for his six-pack. Luigi Mangione is brat. The McDonald’s, where he
    0:38:46 was arrested, has been review-bombed. People are saying there are rats behind the counter. People
    0:38:51 are saying Popeye’s employees would have helped him get rid of the gun. Someone’s got some explaining
    0:38:56 to do, and it’s us. It’s Today Explained. Every weekday, never on the weekends.
    0:39:09 We’re back with Prof. G. Markets. Saudi Arabia will host the 2034 World Cup, marking a key step
    0:39:14 in the country’s plan to establish itself as a global leader in sports. Through its sovereign
    0:39:18 wealth fund, the country has invested billions in a range of sports, including golf, boxing,
    0:39:24 e-sports, and Formula One. The fund is also close to finalizing a $1.5 billion deal
    0:39:31 for a 6% stake in the PGA Tour. Finally, we can stop talking about quantum computing,
    0:39:37 Scott, and get back to what we’re really good at, which is football. We’ve talked a lot about
    0:39:42 Saudi Arabia on this podcast. It’s expanding influence in the sports world. Your reactions to
    0:39:48 Saudi Arabia, I’m not sure anyone thought this wouldn’t happen, but Saudi Arabia is officially
    0:39:53 the host of the 2034 World Cup. Well, first off, there are a few organizations
    0:40:00 that have this veneer of credibility that are more corrupt than these international sports
    0:40:04 organizations because they operate in this sort of Nether-Netherland, the International Olympic
    0:40:09 Committee, and FIFA really takes the crown. If you were going to have countries bid,
    0:40:17 you would want to avoid some sort of conflict? Well, no. FIFA announced a $400 million sponsorship
    0:40:23 deal with Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia’s national oil company, the most profitable firm in the
    0:40:33 world, earlier this year. My guess is that was kind of a down payment. The rest of the world
    0:40:40 said, okay, when you show up and you’re bidding on a piece of art and Bill Gates shows up and says,
    0:40:43 “Oh, it’s my dream to own this piece of art.” You might as well go home.
    0:40:50 This is what’s happened here. I think this may be the first time that there was only one nation
    0:40:57 bidding. I think every other nation that was thinking about bidding thought, we’re not going
    0:41:01 to pull 1,100 people together and former governors and get everyone Jonesed up to put
    0:41:08 together the ultimate bid and then host you first class. The FIFA corrupt committee that comes over
    0:41:12 and they get all these great dinners and they’ve said, “No, we’re just not going to bid.”
    0:41:18 And also, realistically, it’s worth more to the kingdom than any other country in the world,
    0:41:24 because these are coming out events. This is a way of highlighting where for real you should come
    0:41:31 here. I remember the Olympics when it was the opening ceremonies in Barcelona, and I had never
    0:41:36 heard anything about Spain or Barcelona. And then they had this brand new beautiful stadium,
    0:41:40 and they had this runner, the lighting in the Olympic torch, and it was this ridiculously
    0:41:46 hot guy wearing no shirt, and he’s running and he stops outside of the stadium, and you see this
    0:41:54 amazing stadium, and the guy picks up a fucking bow and arrow, and then he pulls it back and you see
    0:42:02 his unbelievably ripped torso, and then he looks at the camera and then he nods and he detenses the
    0:42:07 bow and arrow, and he puts the arrow down, and he inflames it, and then he pulls it back,
    0:42:15 and he pulls the thing back for dramatic effect, like it’s about to snap, and he fires the thing,
    0:42:23 and this fucking flaming arrow flies from outside of the stadium over the top of the stadium
    0:42:32 into like this six foot semi-circle of incendiary, lights it, and then it runs up to the Olympic
    0:42:40 flame, torches it, and I’m like, I’m going to fucking Barcelona. I mean, it was just so amazing,
    0:42:46 and then most recently the Paris Olympics have brought kind of new riz to Paris. I remember
    0:42:50 watching some of the sports and at the Olympics and thinking, it’s time for me to get back to Paris.
    0:42:57 Those people just, they just understand style and grace and romance. These are coming out parties.
    0:43:04 I don’t think, I would bet 97% of the world’s population hadn’t heard of Qatar until the World Cup,
    0:43:10 so Saudi Arabia has all of these immense projects coming online. They want to transition to a
    0:43:17 knowledge-based economy, educational institutions, tourism services, and this will be their way of
    0:43:24 bringing the wealthiest people in the world and the eyeballs of the rest of the world to the
    0:43:30 kingdom, and that’s worth a lot of money to them, and it wasn’t, everybody knows about the United
    0:43:36 States. Most people know about Germany, so while they might be willing to spend 10, 20, 30 billion,
    0:43:40 I mean, I gotta think, if Qatar spent a quarter of a trillion dollars or 250 billion, I wouldn’t
    0:43:44 be surprised that the kingdom spends half a trillion dollars on these games. All I know is
    0:43:51 we are going at, and it’s going to be amazing. It’s going to be amazing, and I’m betting on,
    0:43:54 I think Team England is finally going to have their deal here.
    0:43:56 It’s definitely going to happen. Cole Paul, not at home.
    0:43:57 It’s coming home.
    0:43:58 It’s going to come home.
    0:43:59 It’s coming home.
    0:44:05 What you’re describing there is, I mean, you said being on the world stage like that is worth a lot
    0:44:10 of money to them. I think this is the interesting question here. It’s like, what is this worth?
    0:44:16 Is it worth it to do this? If you look at the actual ROI, the return on investment
    0:44:21 of these global sports tournaments, there’s a study from the University of Lausanne,
    0:44:27 which looked at every Olympic Games and every World Cup between the years 1964 and 2018
    0:44:34 to answer that question. What they found is that 95% of the time, you lose money. The average ROI
    0:44:40 for the Olympics and for the World Cup was negative 38%. There were only three competitions
    0:44:46 in history that turned out to be profitable, and those were the 1984 LA Olympics, the 2010 Vancouver
    0:44:51 Winter Olympics, and the 2018 Russia World Cup, and every other tournament lost money.
    0:44:58 Now, to be fair, this is only focusing on the revenues that can be directly attributed to the
    0:45:02 tournament. It’s the ticket sales and the broadcasting rights and the sponsorships, etc.
    0:45:06 What it doesn’t measure is what you’re talking about, which is the soft power,
    0:45:11 the idea that you’re seeing these countries, and then maybe you want to go there and you want to
    0:45:18 spend some money there. I don’t know what it is. My question to you is on soft power, because
    0:45:26 I’m naturally a little skeptical of soft power because of the fact that it is so hard to measure,
    0:45:33 and I get the feeling that we get a little carried away with the glitz and the glamour and the fame of
    0:45:42 it all. My question to you is how does being on the world stage actually translate into legitimate
    0:45:48 economic activity and long-term GDP growth? I get the sense that you believe this is actually a
    0:45:53 very good idea economically for Saudi Arabia. Oh, it’s enormous. The last time I was in Riyadh,
    0:45:58 what I noticed was they put on a lunch and invited me, and they had all these entrepreneurs, and I
    0:46:05 thought I’m going to meet all these Saudis. I did meet some domestic entrepreneurs, a bunch of kids
    0:46:11 who had gone to US schools and then come back to Saudi. What I was shocked by, I met hundreds of
    0:46:17 entrepreneurs who were like, “Yeah, I started a specialized glass company, glass that goes on
    0:46:24 components and iPhones in Seoul, and I moved here,” because I thought the quality of life would be
    0:46:28 better, and basically the kingdom guaranteed me that they would buy everything I could produce.
    0:46:37 I met all these entrepreneurs from Germany. The bottom line is money and growth are a flame,
    0:46:43 and human capital, especially young human capital, is a moth. What you said about soft power is that
    0:46:50 companies that demand specific attribution oftentimes just shouldn’t be in the business
    0:46:55 of brand building, because the thing about brand building is that Philip Morris was never really
    0:47:02 able to directly, they knew that convincing people that if they smoked marble reds, that they could
    0:47:08 relate to and were more like a man with a deeply chiseled jaw, riding an apple loose,
    0:47:17 but they could never reverse engineer a specific billboard to 95 point gross margins on a pack
    0:47:23 of cigarettes that people were paying $4 for that cost $0.20 to produce. Brand building,
    0:47:29 quite frankly, is a little bit about taking a leap of faith, believing that if the intangible
    0:47:35 association surrounding a product, a service, or even a nation will create more awareness,
    0:47:41 more trial, because you can bet MBS looks at Dubai and what they’ve built there and says,
    0:47:46 “Fuck, how did we let that happen? We’re a bigger economy. We have more money.”
    0:47:52 I’m pretty sure that the mandate he’s given to his ministers of infrastructure or development is
    0:47:59 like, “I want Dubai to seem like a fucking cow town after we’re done. I want everyone coming
    0:48:05 here.” The good news about the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is they have what feels like infinite
    0:48:09 capital right now. The bad news is it’s running out in 30 or 40 or 50 years, and they’re smart,
    0:48:16 they know it. They’re like, “We need to transition from a fossil fuels-based economy
    0:48:21 to a services tourism-based economy.” That’s the bad news. We need to do it. The good news is
    0:48:28 you have a blank check to get it done, but branding is all about taking a leap of faith
    0:48:34 on these intangible emotions. All bet the year after the World Cup, you’re going to see tens of
    0:48:40 thousands of small and big businesses, and the key to all this, the secret sauce, human capital,
    0:48:48 go, “Honey, would you be willing to move to Riyadh?” and people go for the first time,
    0:48:54 “Yeah.” At the bottom, when you’re worth billions of dollars spending money on whatever it is,
    0:48:59 a finely tailored suit, it doesn’t mean anything. Even if that finely tailored suit is 10,000 bucks
    0:49:05 and no one would pay for that, it doesn’t matter. They have the money. What they need is to transition
    0:49:13 their economy. This is probably going to be a good investment, distinct of how much it costs.
    0:49:19 I think the distinction there is I agree with you when you have a lot of money. It’s not a big
    0:49:25 deal to buy a $10,000 suit, but it would be a little crazy to buy a million-dollar suit,
    0:49:28 and we have no idea how much they’re going to spend on this thing.
    0:49:38 If you look at how much Qatar spent, they spent $220 billion. I would bet that Saudi Arabia’s going
    0:49:45 to spend way more than that. I think the way you frame it there is totally accurate. It’s like
    0:49:52 they know that this is immediately going to be in the red from an expenses perspective,
    0:49:58 but they’re looking at the long-term payoff and the long-term benefits. Let’s say they spend
    0:50:02 like a quarter of a trillion dollars on this. I think they’ll spend more, but let’s say they spend
    0:50:09 that much. That is a quarter of a trillion-dollar billboard, essentially. Basically, it’s a giant
    0:50:19 ad. I think the question is, is that ad worth it? I feel pretty somewhat convinced that it might pay
    0:50:23 off, that it might be worth it based on your analysis there, but I think the key takeaway for
    0:50:32 me is this is no more than an ad. No more than an ad? That’s everything. That’s awareness,
    0:50:39 unearned margin. Let me just go back to brand building. I don’t know what Russia spent on the
    0:50:45 World Cup, dramatically less than $220 billion, but I went to games in Moscow and St. Petersburg.
    0:50:49 I remember thinking St. Petersburg was arguably one of the most beautiful cities I’d ever been to,
    0:50:54 walked around, there’d be squares where old people were dancing, and I just had such a positive
    0:51:01 impression of Russia and specifically St. Petersburg. Now, them incarcerating Americans on
    0:51:07 trumped-up charges, that’s sort of like, okay, I’m not going back to Russia for a while.
    0:51:11 That sort of ruins the ad, exactly. These actions on a political stage
    0:51:16 can wipe out a quarter of a trillion dollars in branding.
    0:51:20 Yeah. Well, let’s just take a moment to talk about the controversies around this,
    0:51:24 because that’s important to the brand here, too. I mean, if people think that this was
    0:51:30 rigged, as many people do, or they think that Saudi Arabia is an unethical country,
    0:51:33 that’s important to this conversation, too. But I’m just going to start with this
    0:51:38 bid evaluation report from FIFA that they released, which I just found so funny.
    0:51:45 It’s this report where they assess all of the viability of all the possible host nations.
    0:51:53 So, first off, they gave Saudi Arabia the highest viability score ever, which is hilarious.
    0:52:00 They said that from a commercial standpoint, the bid is, quote, “very good.” But my favorite
    0:52:07 was their evaluation of the human rights risk, which they determined was, quote, “medium,”
    0:52:10 which is also hilarious.
    0:52:14 Human rights risk of the games or human rights risk of KSA?
    0:52:16 Of the World Cup, of them hosting the World Cup.
    0:52:17 The medium?
    0:52:24 Human rights risk, medium. That was their analysis. But they ultimately landed on the greatest score
    0:52:27 ever given in the FIFA bid evaluation report.
    0:52:29 Yeah, it’s called money, the greatest score.
    0:52:30 Exactly.
    0:52:39 I’ll go. 100% I’ll go. I can’t wait. I literally can’t wait. And also, I actually quite like
    0:52:40 the kingdom and think they’re doing good things.
    0:52:48 But people hear your views on Saudi Arabia, and they get upset when you defend them.
    0:52:52 And the reason they, I mean, the things that people focus on, there’s one,
    0:52:57 the killing of Jamal Khashoggi. We’ve talked about that. There’s migrant worker conditions.
    0:53:02 I would argue that that’s in basically any country.
    0:53:04 But you’re leaving out treatment of women.
    0:53:07 Yeah. There’s discrimination of women, which they are improving on.
    0:53:13 But still not great. But then there’s also the discrimination against gays,
    0:53:15 which they are definitely not improving on.
    0:53:21 So the penalty for homosexuality in Saudi Arabia today is still, in some cases, death.
    0:53:29 And in combination with the fact that a lot of people think this voting system was rigged,
    0:53:34 which it probably was, they were the only bidder, I think a lot of people are saying,
    0:53:42 there’s foul play here. What I would say, I think we all agree there is foul play here,
    0:53:49 in some sense. The question is, how bad is it? Like, how bad are the human rights abuses,
    0:53:54 and how bad is the corruption? And is it bad enough that we will start to see
    0:54:00 mass boycotting of this World Cup? Because on this podcast, we’re not going to evaluate
    0:54:03 the ethics of things. We’re going to evaluate the economics of things.
    0:54:07 And so what I’m interested in, and I’d like to get your view, is do you think
    0:54:15 the human rights stuff and the corruption stuff is bad to the point that people are actually
    0:54:19 not going to go to this thing, and they’re not going to watch it? Or is this another one of
    0:54:23 those situations where we talk about it a lot online? Maybe we see some protests,
    0:54:26 but at the end of the day, everyone shows up and everyone makes money.
    0:54:36 Oh, entirely the latter. And also, this stuff’s important, and public pressure and international
    0:54:45 pressure is important. And I worry one of the things I don’t like about the most recent election,
    0:54:50 I have trouble waving my finger in anyone’s face around women’s rights right now.
    0:54:56 We’re the only nation that’s taken away a women’s right. Typically, every other nation in the world
    0:55:02 when they grant women rights, they get to hold on to them. And the kingdom right now, in my opinion,
    0:55:06 is reforming faster than any nation in the world. And every six months,
    0:55:13 MBS rolls out new reforms. Women in the kingdom used to need the permission of their husbands to
    0:55:18 travel. They’ve done away with that. They couldn’t drive. They can now drive. That may not sound
    0:55:22 like a big deal, but I’m looking at the slope of things. In addition, I want to be clear,
    0:55:28 I think they murdered Khashoggi. The question is, all right, they did it. I think they paid a huge
    0:55:34 price for it. Does that mean we’re never going to do business with them again? And let me go even
    0:55:38 further. I think there’s less antisemitism in the kingdom right now than there are pockets in the
    0:55:44 United States. I think the kingdom is probably going to normalize relations with Israel. This
    0:55:49 is a complicated issue. I don’t want to pretend to have moral clarity around this. The question is,
    0:55:54 do I think people are going to go and corporations are going to headquarter there?
    0:56:00 Absolutely. This will be the most successful World Cup in history. Because at the end of the day,
    0:56:04 Ed, and this isn’t the way the world should be, the way the world is, money wins.
    0:56:11 And they’ll put on an amazing show and they will clean up their act or they will try to. And also,
    0:56:15 it begs a bigger point, are human rights going to be better or worse
    0:56:22 if the World Cup is in the kingdom? I would argue they’re going to be better. I would argue when
    0:56:30 they are on a global stage that they have more motivation and incentive to improve, to continue
    0:56:36 to improve and head in the right direction. I’m more around engagement than sitting and waving
    0:56:44 your finger as a 15-year-old in Mississippi who’s raped, doesn’t have access to terminate a pregnancy.
    0:56:48 We have gotten so far afield here, Ed. Let’s go back to talking about quants. Cubits.
    0:56:53 Cubits. Yeah, I think just to summarize what you’re saying there, it’s like
    0:56:59 they are trending in the right direction. You cannot argue that. They definitely are on the
    0:57:05 right trajectory when it comes to human rights. Are they doing that for ethical reasons? Probably
    0:57:10 not. But I think they’ve looked at the rest of the world and they’ve seen that, generally speaking,
    0:57:15 a nation that has strong human rights laws and that treats its people fairly,
    0:57:20 generally speaking, those countries get rich. I think that’s pretty much the play here.
    0:57:27 100%. Okay, we want to participate in this economy. We’re going to go lean into human rights,
    0:57:33 not because we necessarily want to for our people. I genuinely think that. I think we’re
    0:57:38 going to do it because it’s going to make us some good money. That’s worth it. I think that’s what’s
    0:57:43 going to happen here. Let’s take a look at the weekend. We’ll hear the Fed’s interest rate decision
    0:57:48 for December and we’ll also see earnings from Nike and FedEx. Scott, do you have any predictions?
    0:57:52 Well, my prediction is that Metta’s next earnings call, which isn’t until February,
    0:58:01 is going to be just blow away again expectations because that notion that if you put a frog in
    0:58:06 a boiling water, jumps out. If you put a frog in water and then turn the heat up, it doesn’t know
    0:58:13 it’s being boiled to death. I don’t think we realize just how bad the rage has become in the
    0:58:20 United States. As someone, I only spend probably two weeks every two months there. It’s like when
    0:58:25 you come home, Ed, and you haven’t seen your kids for a while, and this was one of the most
    0:58:28 rattling things that happened to me when I used to go on business trips for two or three weeks,
    0:58:33 I could notice, I would always poke my head in and when they’re sleeping and a couple of times,
    0:58:38 I’m like, “Oh my God, he’s grown.” That would rattle me that I was spending too much time on
    0:58:42 the road, whereas when I’m with them every day, I don’t perceive them growing because it’s incremental.
    0:58:47 The interrupted cadence of living in London and only being in the US
    0:58:52 once every couple of months, I have noticed a dramatic increase in what I’ll call
    0:59:00 community rage or public rage. Everyone is pissed off. Everyone is dissatisfied with each other,
    0:59:10 with policies, with government, with the world. I think that is the primary signal for profitability
    0:59:15 at Metta because Metta has figured out that it’s not sex itself in the world of marketing,
    0:59:23 it’s rage. The amount of rage that has been fomented and monetized by Metta has hit a new
    0:59:29 high, I believe, around the election. The proxy or the litmus test or a decent
    0:59:36 blood pressure test for rage in the US is the profitability of Metta and it is fucking off
    0:59:41 the charts right now in their largest market in the US, which I believe means they are going to
    0:59:47 report a just staggering quarter in their next earnings call in February. My prediction,
    0:59:54 another massive beat from Metta based on the fact they have figured out a way to not only
    1:00:01 incent but monetize rage at discord and polarization in the United States, which is at record levels.
    1:00:07 This episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our associate
    1:00:10 producer is Alison Weiss, Mia Silverio is our research lead, Jessica Lange is our research
    1:00:16 associate, Drew Burris is our technical director, and Catherine Dillon is our executive producer.
    1:00:20 Thank you for listening to ProfG Markets from the Vox Media Podcast Network. Join us on Thursday
    1:00:24 for our conversation with Morgan Housel only on ProfG Markets.
    1:00:54 Lifetimes. You help me in kind reunion as the world turns. And the dark flies.
    1:01:00 And love, love, love, love.
    1:01:10 [BLANK_AUDIO]
    2

    Follow Prof G Markets:

    Scott and Ed open the show by discussing why a federal judge blocked Kroger’s acquisition of Albertsons, Warner Bros. Discovery’s decision to restructure its business, and Eli Lilly’s plans to test its GLP-1 drug as a treatment for addiction. Then Ed breaks down Google’s innovation in quantum computing, outlining its potential business use cases. Scott explains why the market is responding positively—even as the broader implications remain unclear. Finally, they discuss Saudi Arabia’s successful bid to host the 2034 World Cup and debate whether it’s a smart long-term investment for the country.

    Order “The Algebra of Wealth,” out now

    Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice

    Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:

    Follow Scott on Instagram

    Follow Ed on Instagram and X

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices