Author: The Tim Ferriss Show

  • #781: David Whyte, Poet — Spacious Ease, Irish Koans, Writing in Delirium, and Revelations from a Yak Manger

    David Whyte (davidwhyte.com) is the author of twelve books of poetry and five books of prose, including his latest, Consolations II, which further explores what David calls “the conversational nature of reality.”

    Sponsors:

    GiveWell.org charity research and effective giving: https://givewell.org (If you’ve never used GiveWell to donate, you can have your donation matched up to one hundred dollars before the end of the year or as long as matching funds last. To claim your match, go to https://givewell.org and pick PODCAST and enter The Tim Ferriss Show at checkout.)

    Eight Sleep’s Pod 4 Ultra sleeping solution for dynamic cooling and heating: https://eightsleep.com/tim (save between $400 and $600 on the Pod 4 Ultra)

    AG1 all-in-one nutritional supplement: https://DrinkAG1.com/Tim (1-year supply of Vitamin D (and 5 free AG1 travel packs) with your first subscription purchase.)

    Timestamps:

    [00:00] Who is David Whyte?

    [06:25] Connecting with Henry Shukman.

    [10:32] Low times in the High Himalayas and a yak manger awakening.

    [15:17] The place from where David writes good poetry.

    [17:22] Invitational speech.

    [21:55] Catching up with the curve of one’s transformation.

    [27:58] A revolutionary moment reflecting on parameters and regret.

    [37:41] “Everything Is Waiting for You.”

    [40:54] The secret code to life and the agreed insanity of so-called adults.

    [46:47] Being found by the world in greater and greater ways.

    [48:52] Asking beautiful questions.

    [58:13] “Tan-y-Garth.”

    [01:02:09] Memorizing poetry.

    [01:08:28] “Zen.”

    [01:22:55] Courage.

    [01:24:15] How living in a trailer on the side of a Welsh mountain helped David develop as a writer.

    [01:31:14] Irish koans, French doors, and Tibetan bells.

    [01:38:30] Poetry as consolation.

    [01:42:03] The best place to hold a poem.

    [01:43:07] “Time.”

    [02:00:01] Writing and reading good poetry.

    [02:04:52] Parting thoughts.

    *

    For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.

    For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Showplease visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsors

    Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.

    For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.

    Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.

    Follow Tim:

    Twittertwitter.com/tferriss 

    Instagraminstagram.com/timferriss

    YouTubeyoutube.com/timferriss

    Facebookfacebook.com/timferriss 

    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferriss

    Past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry SeinfeldHugh JackmanDr. Jane GoodallLeBron JamesKevin HartDoris Kearns GoodwinJamie FoxxMatthew McConaugheyEsther PerelElizabeth GilbertTerry CrewsSiaYuval Noah HarariMalcolm GladwellMadeleine AlbrightCheryl StrayedJim CollinsMary Karr, Maria PopovaSam HarrisMichael PhelpsBob IgerEdward NortonArnold SchwarzeneggerNeil StraussKen BurnsMaria SharapovaMarc AndreessenNeil GaimanNeil de Grasse TysonJocko WillinkDaniel EkKelly SlaterDr. Peter AttiaSeth GodinHoward MarksDr. Brené BrownEric SchmidtMichael LewisJoe GebbiaMichael PollanDr. Jordan PetersonVince VaughnBrian KoppelmanRamit SethiDax ShepardTony RobbinsJim DethmerDan HarrisRay DalioNaval RavikantVitalik ButerinElizabeth LesserAmanda PalmerKatie HaunSir Richard BransonChuck PalahniukArianna HuffingtonReid HoffmanBill BurrWhitney CummingsRick RubinDr. Vivek MurthyDarren AronofskyMargaret AtwoodMark ZuckerbergPeter ThielDr. Gabor MatéAnne LamottSarah SilvermanDr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

  • #780: Cyan Banister — From Homeless and Broke to Top Angel Investor (Uber, SpaceX, and 100+ More)

    Cyan Banister (@cyantist) is a general partner at Long Journey Ventures, an early-stage venture capital firm focused on early and new investments. Cyan was an early investor in Uber, SpaceX, DeepMind, Flexport, and Affirm and has invested in more than 100 companies. Prior to that, she was at Founders Fund, a top-tier fund in San Francisco. Subscribe to Cyan’s Substack at uglyduckling.substack.com.

    Sponsors:

    Eight Sleep’s Pod 4 Ultra sleeping solution for dynamic cooling and heating: https://eightsleep.com/tim (save between $400 and $600 on the Pod 4 Ultra)

    AG1 all-in-one nutritional supplement: https://DrinkAG1.com/Tim (1-year supply of Vitamin D (and 5 free AG1 travel packs) with your first subscription purchase.)

    Wealthfront high-yield cash account: https://Wealthfront.com/Tim (Start earning 4.25% APY on your short-term cash until you’re ready to invest. And when new clients open an account today, you can get an extra fifty-dollar bonus with a deposit of five hundred dollars or more.) Terms apply. Tim Ferriss receives cash compensation from Wealthfront Brokerage, LLC for advertising and holds a non-controlling equity interest in the corporate parent of Wealthfront Brokerage. See full disclosures here.

    Timestamps:

    [00:00] Start 

    [06:16] Early life and education as a white minority on a Navajo reservation.

    [11:18] Strained family dynamics and a cycle of neglect.

    [18:20] The intervention of Officer Pratt and becoming a ward of the state at 15.

    [22:46] Crusty punk survival strategies and life on the streets.

    [32:02] The positive influence of Cyan’s “second” mother.

    [34:17] Crass, Chris Collins, and computers.

    [38:03] An unorthodox path to angel investment beginning with Uber.

    [48:13] Niantic/Pokemon GO.

    [56:27] How stalking Garrett Langley led to a Flock Security investment.

    [01:00:07] GameCrush, activist investors, and lessons learned.

    [01:07:00] Sales lessons from the street.

    [01:10:08] A mindful approach to questioning narratives.

    [01:15:35] The pre-OnlyFans story of Zivity.

    [01:24:44] Views on sex and relationships.

    [01:28:47] Magic glasses, esoteric rabbit holes, and rolling the dice.

    [01:44:02] How Aleister Crowley and Bill Murray paved a path to ex-atheism.

    [02:02:21] Cyan’s billboard.

    [02:04:41] Enduring a stroke and its aftermath.

    [02:08:31] Meditation, throat-singing, and philosophy.

    [02:17:50] The Boston spiritual experience and duck boat baptism.

    [02:40:53] A book in the works, the Ugly Duckling Substack, and parting thoughts.

    *

    For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.

    For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Showplease visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsors

    Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.

    For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.

    Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.

    Follow Tim:

    Twittertwitter.com/tferriss 

    Instagraminstagram.com/timferriss

    YouTubeyoutube.com/timferriss

    Facebookfacebook.com/timferriss 

    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferriss

    Past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry SeinfeldHugh JackmanDr. Jane GoodallLeBron JamesKevin HartDoris Kearns GoodwinJamie FoxxMatthew McConaugheyEsther PerelElizabeth GilbertTerry CrewsSiaYuval Noah HarariMalcolm GladwellMadeleine AlbrightCheryl StrayedJim CollinsMary Karr, Maria PopovaSam HarrisMichael PhelpsBob IgerEdward NortonArnold SchwarzeneggerNeil StraussKen BurnsMaria SharapovaMarc AndreessenNeil GaimanNeil de Grasse TysonJocko WillinkDaniel EkKelly SlaterDr. Peter AttiaSeth GodinHoward MarksDr. Brené BrownEric SchmidtMichael LewisJoe GebbiaMichael PollanDr. Jordan PetersonVince VaughnBrian KoppelmanRamit SethiDax ShepardTony RobbinsJim DethmerDan HarrisRay DalioNaval RavikantVitalik ButerinElizabeth LesserAmanda PalmerKatie HaunSir Richard BransonChuck PalahniukArianna HuffingtonReid HoffmanBill BurrWhitney CummingsRick RubinDr. Vivek MurthyDarren AronofskyMargaret AtwoodMark ZuckerbergPeter ThielDr. Gabor MatéAnne LamottSarah SilvermanDr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

  • #779: In Case You Missed It: October 2024 Recap of “The Tim Ferriss Show”

    This episode is brought to you by 5-Bullet Friday, my very own email newsletter.

    Welcome to another episode of The Tim Ferriss Show, where it is my job to deconstruct world-class performers to tease out the routines, habits, et cetera that you can apply to your own life. 

    This is a special inbetweenisode, which serves as a recap of the episodes from last month. It features a short clip from each conversation in one place so you can easily jump around to get a feel for the episode and guest.

    Based on your feedback, this format has been tweaked and improved since the first recap episode. For instance, listeners suggested that the bios for each guest can slow the momentum, so we moved all the bios to the end. 

    See it as a teaser. Something to whet your appetite. If you like what you hear, you can of course find the full episodes at tim.blog/podcast

    Please enjoy! 

    *

    This episode is brought to you by 5-Bullet Friday, my very own email newsletter that every Friday features five bullet points highlighting cool things I’ve found that week, including apps, books, documentaries, gadgets, albums, articles, TV shows, new hacks or tricks, and—of course—all sorts of weird stuff I’ve dug up from around the world.

    It’s free, it’s always going to be free, and you can subscribe now at tim.blog/friday.

    *

    Timestamps:

    Start: 00:00

    Jon Batiste: 03:18

    Dr. Bruce Greyson: 13:47

    Andrew Roberts: 21:54

    Tim Ferriss: 32:29

    Full episode titles:

    #775: Jon Batiste — The Quest for Originality, How to Get Unstuck, His Favorite Mantras, and Strategies for Living a Creative Life

    #774: Learnings from 1,000+ Near-Death Experiences — Dr. Bruce Greyson, University of Virginia 

    #773: Andrew Roberts on The Habits of Churchill, Lessons from Napoleon, and The Holy Fire Inside Great Leaders

    #771: Productivity Tactics – Two Approaches I Personally Use to Reset, Get Unstuck, and Focus on the Right Things

    *

    For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.

    For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Showplease visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsors

    Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.

    For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.

    Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.

    Follow Tim:

    Twittertwitter.com/tferriss 

    Instagraminstagram.com/timferriss

    YouTubeyoutube.com/timferriss

    Facebookfacebook.com/timferriss 

    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferriss

    Past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry SeinfeldHugh JackmanDr. Jane GoodallLeBron JamesKevin HartDoris Kearns GoodwinJamie FoxxMatthew McConaugheyEsther PerelElizabeth GilbertTerry CrewsSiaYuval Noah HarariMalcolm GladwellMadeleine AlbrightCheryl StrayedJim CollinsMary Karr, Maria PopovaSam HarrisMichael PhelpsBob IgerEdward NortonArnold SchwarzeneggerNeil StraussKen BurnsMaria SharapovaMarc AndreessenNeil GaimanNeil de Grasse TysonJocko WillinkDaniel EkKelly SlaterDr. Peter AttiaSeth GodinHoward MarksDr. Brené BrownEric SchmidtMichael LewisJoe GebbiaMichael PollanDr. Jordan PetersonVince VaughnBrian KoppelmanRamit SethiDax ShepardTony RobbinsJim DethmerDan HarrisRay DalioNaval RavikantVitalik ButerinElizabeth LesserAmanda PalmerKatie HaunSir Richard BransonChuck PalahniukArianna HuffingtonReid HoffmanBill BurrWhitney CummingsRick RubinDr. Vivek MurthyDarren AronofskyMargaret AtwoodMark ZuckerbergPeter ThielDr. Gabor MatéAnne LamottSarah SilvermanDr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

  • #778: Q&A with Tim — What’s Next for Me, Asking Better Questions, Career Reinvention in The Age of AI, Practices for Joy, Getting Unstuck, and More

    I answer questions on how I’ve changed my mind around parenthood, what’s next for me and how I am thinking about next steps, how I find joy, how to live with urgency, my advice for career reinvention in the age of AI, avoiding complacency, and much, much more.

    Sponsors:

    Ramp easy-to-use corporate cards, bill payments, accounting, and more: https://Ramp.com/Tim (Get $250 when you join Ramp)

    Helix Sleep premium mattresses: https://HelixSleep.com/Tim (25% off all mattress orders, plus two free pillows)

    AG1 all-in-one nutritional supplement: https://DrinkAG1.com/Tim (1-year supply of Vitamin D (and 5 free AG1 travel packs) with your first subscription purchase.)

    Timestamps:

    [00:00] Start 

    [05:09] Q&A format and ground rules.

    [05:35] My shift in perspective on parenting and fatherhood.

    [08:14] New creative directions: games, comics, animation.

    [10:30] Identity diversification.

    [18:01] Simple pleasures: outdoor activities, meditation, archery.

    [23:21] Using AI to keep questioning fresh and relevant.

    [27:12] Breaking through periods of feeling unsuccessful.

    [35:25] Exploring the fringes and growing personally over the past decade.

    [44:52] Longevity protocols and handling grief.

    [53:41] Coping with the loss of a pet.

    [55:00] Ecstatic creativity à la Rick Rubin and CØCKPUNCH.

    [01:03:37] Physiological awareness and self-regulation.

    [01:08:48] Finding career relevance in an AI-transformed landscape.

    [01:16:48] Parting thoughts.

    *

    For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.

    For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Showplease visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsors

    Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.

    For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.

    Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.

    Follow Tim:

    Twittertwitter.com/tferriss 

    Instagraminstagram.com/timferriss

    YouTubeyoutube.com/timferriss

    Facebookfacebook.com/timferriss 

    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferriss

    Past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry SeinfeldHugh JackmanDr. Jane GoodallLeBron JamesKevin HartDoris Kearns GoodwinJamie FoxxMatthew McConaugheyEsther PerelElizabeth GilbertTerry CrewsSiaYuval Noah HarariMalcolm GladwellMadeleine AlbrightCheryl StrayedJim CollinsMary Karr, Maria PopovaSam HarrisMichael PhelpsBob IgerEdward NortonArnold SchwarzeneggerNeil StraussKen BurnsMaria SharapovaMarc AndreessenNeil GaimanNeil de Grasse TysonJocko WillinkDaniel EkKelly SlaterDr. Peter AttiaSeth GodinHoward MarksDr. Brené BrownEric SchmidtMichael LewisJoe GebbiaMichael PollanDr. Jordan PetersonVince VaughnBrian KoppelmanRamit SethiDax ShepardTony RobbinsJim DethmerDan HarrisRay DalioNaval RavikantVitalik ButerinElizabeth LesserAmanda PalmerKatie HaunSir Richard BransonChuck PalahniukArianna HuffingtonReid HoffmanBill BurrWhitney CummingsRick RubinDr. Vivek MurthyDarren AronofskyMargaret AtwoodMark ZuckerbergPeter ThielDr. Gabor MatéAnne LamottSarah SilvermanDr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

  • #777: Derek Sivers, Philosopher-Entrepreneur — The Greatest Year of His Life

    AI transcript
    0:00:04 Well, hello boys and girls, ladies and germs. This is Tim Ferriss. Welcome to another episode of
    0:00:10 The Tim Ferriss Show. Thanks so much for tuning in. This time around, we have my good friend Derek
    0:00:16 Sivers back on the show. He’s one of my favorite humans. I call him often for advice. He is hilarious,
    0:00:24 and he will do his own introduction because I am incredibly lazy, or I was feeling playful and lazy
    0:00:30 in this conversation. He is a philosopher, programmer, musician, king of sorts. That’s how I
    0:00:35 would describe him. It is a very fun conversation. I really enjoyed it. And you can find Derek’s books,
    0:00:43 including his latest Useful Not True, which we discuss at his website, Sivers.com, or sive.rs,
    0:00:48 which is probably just about as confusing to people as Tim.blog. If you enjoy this episode,
    0:00:53 you should go back and listen to the 2015 conversation I did with Derek, the very first
    0:01:01 one, you can find that at tim.blog/DerekSivers, and many longtime listeners out of the nearly 800
    0:01:08 episodes I’ve done consider this their favorite or certainly one of their favorites. It is a
    0:01:14 barn burner of an episode. And now we’re going to get to it. First, just a quick word about the
    0:01:21 sponsors who make this podcast possible. I have been fascinated by the microbiome and probiotics,
    0:01:28 as well as prebiotics for decades, but products never quite live up to the hype. I’ve tried
    0:01:34 so many dozens, and there are a host of problems. Now things are starting to change. And that includes
    0:01:43 this episode’s sponsor, SEEDS DS01 Daily Symbiotic. Now, it turns out that this product, SEEDS DS01,
    0:01:48 was recommended to me many months ago by a PhD microbiologist. So I started using it well before
    0:01:54 their team ever reached out to me about sponsorship, which is kind of ideal because I used it unbitten,
    0:01:58 so to speak, came in fresh. Since then it has become a daily staple and one of the few supplements
    0:02:06 I travel with. I have it in a suitcase literally about 10 feet from me right now. It goes with me.
    0:02:12 I’ve always been very skeptical of most probiotics due to the lack of science behind them and the
    0:02:17 fact that many do not survive digestion to begin with. Many of them are shipped dead, DOA. But
    0:02:22 after incorporating two capsules of SEEDS DS01 into my morning routine, I have noticed improved
    0:02:28 digestion and improved overall health seem to be a bunch of different cascading effects.
    0:02:32 Based on some reports, I’m hoping it will also have an effect on my lipid profile, but that is
    0:02:38 definitely TBD. So why is SEEDS DS01 so effective? What makes it different? For one, it is a 2-in-1
    0:02:44 probiotic and prebiotic formulated with 24 clinically and scientifically studied strains
    0:02:49 that have systemic benefits in and beyond the gut. That’s all well and good, but if the probiotic
    0:02:53 strains don’t make it to the right place, in other words your colon, they’re not as effective. So
    0:02:58 SEED developed a proprietary capsule and capsule delivery system that survives digestion and
    0:03:04 delivers a precision release of the live and viable probiotics to the colon, which is exactly
    0:03:09 where you want them to go to do the work. I’ve been impressed with SEEDS dedication to science-backed
    0:03:14 engineering with completed gold standard trials that have been subjected to peer review and published
    0:03:19 in leading scientific journals. A standard you very rarely see from companies who develop
    0:03:23 supplements. If you’ve ever thought about probiotics but haven’t known where to start,
    0:03:27 this is my current vote for great gut health. You can start here, it costs less than $2 a day,
    0:03:34 that is the DS01. And now you can get 25% off your first month with code 25TIM, and that is
    0:03:44 25% off of your first month of SEEDS DS01 at seed.com/tim using code 25TIM all put together.
    0:03:50 That’s seed.com/tim, and if you forget it, you will see the coupon code on that page.
    0:04:00 One more time, seed.com/tim code 25TIM. Way back in the day, in 2010, I published a book called
    0:04:07 The Four Hour Body, which I probably started writing in 2008. And in that book, I recommended
    0:04:14 many, many, many things. First generation continuous glucose monitor, and cold exposure,
    0:04:19 and all sorts of things that have been tested by people from NASA and all over the place.
    0:04:25 And one thing in that book was athletic greens. I did not get paid to include it. I was using it.
    0:04:31 That’s how long I’ve been using what is now known as AG1. AG1 is my all-in-one nutritional
    0:04:37 insurance. And I just packed up, for instance, to go off the grid for a while. And the last thing
    0:04:42 I left out on my countertop to remember to take, I’m not making this up, I’m looking right in front
    0:04:49 of me, is travel packets of AG1. So rather than taking multiple pills or products to cover your
    0:04:54 mental clarity, gut health, immune, health, energy, and so on, you can support these areas
    0:04:58 through one daily scoop of AG1, which tastes great, even with water. I always just have it with
    0:05:02 water. I usually take it first thing in the morning, and it takes me less than two minutes
    0:05:06 in total. Honestly, it takes me less than a minute. I just put in a shaker bottle, shake it up, and
    0:05:12 I’m done. AG1 bolsters my digestion and nutrient absorption by including ingredients optimized
    0:05:18 to support a healthy gut in every scoop. AG1 in single-serve travel packs, which I mentioned
    0:05:23 earlier, also makes for the perfect travel companion. I’ll actually be going totally off the grid,
    0:05:28 but these things are incredibly, incredibly space-efficient. You could even put them in a book,
    0:05:33 frankly. I mean, they’re kind of like bookmarks. After consuming this product for more than a decade,
    0:05:38 I chose to invest in AG1 in 2021 as I trust their no-compromise approach to ingredient sourcing
    0:05:44 and appreciate their focus on continuously improving one formula. They go above and beyond by testing
    0:05:51 for 950 or so contaminants and impurities compared to the industry standard of 10. AG1 is also tested
    0:05:57 for heavy metals and 500 various pesticides and herbicides. I’ve started paying a lot of attention
    0:06:03 to pesticides. That’s a story for another time. To make sure you’re consuming only the good stuff,
    0:06:09 AG1 is also NSF certified for sport. That means if you’re an athlete, you can take it. The certification
    0:06:14 process is exhaustive and involves the testing and verification of each ingredient and every
    0:06:19 finished batch of AG1. So they take testing very seriously. There’s no better time than today to
    0:06:27 start a new healthy habit. And this is an easy one. Wake up, water in the shaker bottle, AG1, boom.
    0:06:32 And right now, every week of November, AG1 will be running a special Black Friday offer for a free
    0:06:38 gift with your first subscription, which is in addition to the Welcome Kit with 5 AG1 travel packs
    0:06:45 and a bottle of vitamin D3 plus K2. So make sure to check out drinkag1.com/tim to see what gift
    0:06:52 you can get this week. That’s drinkag1.com/tim to start your holiday season off on a healthier note
    0:07:21 while supplies last. For people who don’t know who Derek Sivers is,
    0:07:33 what is the brief overview of Derek? Oh, I have to do it, right? I was a musician for many years,
    0:07:40 and then I started selling my music online in 1997 when there was no PayPal and there was,
    0:07:45 you know, Amazon was just a bookstore. So I started a little thing called CD Baby just to sell
    0:07:49 my music, but then it grew and became the largest seller of independent music online. And I did
    0:07:54 that for 10 years until I got sick of it and sold it. And then I was a TED speaker for a few years
    0:07:59 and then kind of threw myself into that completely. And then Seth Godin asked me to write a book.
    0:08:03 So I wrote a book and then people really liked it. So now I’ve written five.
    0:08:10 Now I’m a dad in New Zealand thinking philosophically and living my life. How about that?
    0:08:15 I thought you did a great job. Thank you for that. You know, when I can’t find a
    0:08:19 virtual assistant to do work for me, I’ll ask my podcast guest to do my job.
    0:08:26 I will also add number one people if you enjoy this conversation, which I’m sure you will not
    0:08:30 to apply any pressure to Derek, but I always have so much fun. Go back and listen to the other
    0:08:35 conversations also because you’ll notice a few things. Number one, Derek has one of the most
    0:08:44 eclectic CVs imaginable. He’s worked in traveling circuses. He has played music at pig fairs. He
    0:08:51 has been an entrepreneur. He has certainly been a philosopher coder and many other things, but also,
    0:08:58 I would say, overarchingly crafted a life that is uniquely Derek’s and frequently
    0:09:06 tests assumptions and to, I suppose, bucket one of what we’re going to discuss today,
    0:09:14 changes his mind and finds himself zigging when he might have otherwise zagged or where other
    0:09:22 people are zagging. That is part of why I enjoy spending time with Derek, aside from the dashing
    0:09:29 good looks and wit and charm, of course. Let’s begin as we were brainstorming what we might chat
    0:09:34 about because we were hoping to catch up. I suggested a few things. We batted a number of
    0:09:41 things around, and we landed on things you’ve changed your mind about, things you’re fascinated by
    0:09:47 people you’re studying, not necessarily in that order. Let’s start with things you’ve changed
    0:09:54 your mind about or on. Where shall we begin? I’ve got five things for you. I’m starting small and
    0:10:02 getting big. Coffee. I’ve never liked coffee. Every time I tried coffee, I went, “I don’t know
    0:10:06 understand how you people like this.” And even when I’d be with somebody that knew I
    0:10:11 didn’t like coffee and we were out somewhere and they would go, “Oh my god, this is the best
    0:10:14 coffee I’ve ever had in my life here. I know you don’t like coffee, but if you’re ever going to
    0:10:20 try coffee, this is the one. Try a sip.” And I’d say, “Okay.” I’d try to get myself into this mindset.
    0:10:30 I’m going to like this. I just never liked it. So then I was in United Arab Emirates and I was
    0:10:37 the guest of this Emirati man that we will get to later. And he said, “It is Emirati custom. You
    0:10:41 must have the coffee.” And I went, “Oh, sorry. I don’t drink coffee. I just…” He said, “You must
    0:10:45 have the coffee.” I said, “No, really. I’ve never liked coffee in my life.” He goes, “My friend,
    0:10:51 you must have the… It is Emirati custom. You must have the coffee.” I went, “All right.”
    0:10:59 I took a sip. I’m like, “Oh my god.” I’m like, “This is really good.” He goes, “That is Emirati
    0:11:03 coffee.” I went, “No, you really… There’s something different about this.” He goes, “Yes,
    0:11:07 it’s Emirati coffee.” And I said, “Is that the one where they make it in the sand?” He said,
    0:11:12 “No, no, no. That’s Turkish.” He said, “This is Emirati coffee.” So knowing that we were talking
    0:11:16 today and I was going to mention coffee, I texted him. I said, “Hey, what was that coffee you…”
    0:11:21 Because he’d said, “There are only three places in Dubai that know how to make real Emirati coffee.”
    0:11:28 So he told me one, “Bateel, B-A-T-E-E-L. If you’re in Dubai and you want to try real
    0:11:34 Emirati coffee, apparently, according to this Emirati, try Bateel in Dubai for real Emirati
    0:11:40 coffee, I’ve changed my mind on coffee. I now like at least Emirati coffee.” Here’s one.
    0:11:47 Okay. Just for definition purposes. All right. You know, I’ll hold my follow-ups. There are going
    0:11:51 to be a couple of follow-ups including, “How do you define Emirati? Is that basically a Brahmin,
    0:11:55 the UAE?” Sorry, that’s what we call people from United Arab Emirates.
    0:12:00 All right. Everybody. “If you are of the lineage, if you were a citizen
    0:12:03 of United Arab Emirates, you’re referred to as Emirati.”
    0:12:08 What is the special technique or special ingredient that makes Emirati coffee so miraculous for you?
    0:12:13 “Hey listeners, if you find out what’s different about Emirati coffee, please let me know.”
    0:12:17 “I went back six months later, same thing. I tried Emirati coffee and I like it.”
    0:12:19 Severe social pressure.
    0:12:25 Maybe that’s the magic ingredient. Severe social pressure.
    0:12:28 It makes anything taste better.
    0:12:33 “You must have it and it will be disastrous if you don’t like it.”
    0:12:37 I don’t know what it is, but a surprise. Okay. Python. So I’m just going to include this because
    0:12:42 23 years ago, I learned the Ruby programming language and I became fluent in Ruby.
    0:12:49 And Ruby and Python are as similar as Portuguese and Spanish. But let’s say Ruby is
    0:12:53 Portuguese where Spanish became more and more and more popular.
    0:12:58 So when I first learned Ruby, it’s like Ruby and Python were kind of side by side.
    0:13:02 Ruby was a little more popular at the time. But then over the years, Python just took off
    0:13:06 and I refused to look at it. I was like, no, I chose Ruby. I speak Ruby.
    0:13:10 I don’t want to learn Python. It’s too similar. If I’m going to learn another language,
    0:13:12 it’s going to be Lisp or Haskell or something really different.
    0:13:17 I’m not going to learn Python. No. And so for years and years, I’ve been
    0:13:21 refusing and then just irrationally prejudiced against Python.
    0:13:26 When I was choosing a new language for a new project, I considered everything but Python.
    0:13:30 And then I realized I had left Python out because of my severe prejudice against it for no good
    0:13:36 reason. So I finally looked at the Python programming language and I went, oh my god,
    0:13:43 it’s beautiful. It’s great. Oh my god, it’s wonderful. So now I love Python.
    0:13:47 And that just felt amazing in my heart to be like, wow, this thing that I was prejudiced
    0:13:52 against for 20 years is actually wonderful. How cool. So coffee, Python, number two.
    0:13:59 Should I go on? Number three, let’s go on. Rats. Okay. Rats. I brought a prop.
    0:14:08 I want to make this a good show. For the first time ever, appearing are my little pet rats.
    0:14:12 Okay, if you see on YouTube. Oh, look at that. All right. So we have two rats on video. They’re
    0:14:19 sizable. Yeah. Yeah. Trunky monkeys. They are so cute and they’re so wonderful and they’re so
    0:14:23 affectionate. You can’t maybe tell because I’m holding them up like they owe me money right now,
    0:14:32 you know, but. So here’s the deal. Years ago, I used to kill rats. I hated rats so badly. I
    0:14:37 lived in a basement apartment in Boston that had rats in and around the apartment that would
    0:14:42 sometimes be blocking my entrance to my apartment as I would come home and I was tired. So I
    0:14:48 killed many rats with great vengeance. I hated rats. And then just a few months ago,
    0:14:53 my boy said, hey, dad, can we get a pet rat? I was like, and I just thought it was it was
    0:14:58 kidding. And he said a week later, he said, you know, that really kind of made me sad that you
    0:15:05 just shot down my idea of the pet rat. I said, wait, you were serious? He said, yeah. Oh, well,
    0:15:11 why would you want a nasty awful rat as a pet? He said, no, they’re not nasty and awful. Look,
    0:15:16 and he showed me some videos that rats are really sweet and they’re really wonderful. They’re smart.
    0:15:20 They’re trainable. You can train them to do little tricks and like pick things out and like go to a
    0:15:25 wallet and open it up and take money and bring it to you. And, you know, very useful in a crowd.
    0:15:30 The thieves’ guild. This is gonna be interesting. The little art frilled dodgers. So it’s like
    0:15:36 the difference between a wild rat and a pet rat is like the difference between a wild dog
    0:15:40 and a poodle. The pet rats are really sweet. So no matter what you think of wild rats,
    0:15:45 don’t discount or don’t hate on pet rats. They’re actually really wonderful and cuddly
    0:15:49 and they’re even clean. They use a litter box. They can control their
    0:15:54 bladder like a cat. They prefer to go in a litter box and so they’re really clean and wonderful.
    0:16:01 So, oh, and wait, the lifespan. Their lifespan is two to three years, which as a parent is really
    0:16:06 wonderful because when a kid says, I want a pet, you don’t always want like a 15-year commitment.
    0:16:10 You know, the kid’s gonna be away at college and you still got the pet that your kid wanted when
    0:16:15 they were eight, you know. So I like that the lifespan is two to three years, which is, you
    0:16:21 know, so rats are good pets. And so I love my little rats. We’ve just got these two boys.
    0:16:27 But even more than loving the rats, I love that I am now cuddling what I used to kill.
    0:16:33 Like that I now love what I used to hate. It’s so sweet. Like I cuddle them, but it’s like,
    0:16:38 God, I used to hate you. This is such a good feeling in my heart that I now love what I used
    0:16:42 to hate. And you’ll see this is the theme of my five things today. Ready for the next?
    0:16:46 What are the names of the two rats? Cricket and Clover. Cully Clover and
    0:16:50 Crazy Cricket Climber. Do they eat crickets? What do they eat?
    0:16:54 Actually, well, they do love Clover, but now they just kind of eat rat food from the store.
    0:16:59 They eat anything. It’s like when you’re making food and you’ve got little leftovers,
    0:17:03 you’ve got little bits and crusts or little things that you just give it to the rats and
    0:17:05 they usually love it. It’s great. I keep them in the kitchen.
    0:17:10 That’s perfect. That’s what some folks in South America do with
    0:17:13 guinea pigs, although the difference is they fatten up the guinea pigs on the table scraps
    0:17:18 and then they eat the guinea pigs. Probably not going to eat cricket and Clover, I imagine.
    0:17:22 I would eat cricket and Clover, but I do like that kind of hang out near the kitchen and give
    0:17:31 them the scraps. Okay. Number four, China. Number four, China. So in 2010, I went to Guilin, China,
    0:17:39 and then I went to Taipei, Taiwan. And at the time, China was rough. I was walking over rubble.
    0:17:45 The air was just choking me with its smoke and the sense of oil. And everything felt very third
    0:17:51 world, very rough. And I just thought, okay, that’s what China is. China, you know, developing
    0:17:57 economy. It’s just rough. And then you go to Taipei, Taiwan, and it just feels like
    0:18:03 the most refined first world, beautiful version. It’s like Japan, but with Chinese culture.
    0:18:09 And I thought, aha, someday I want to live in Taiwan because that’s the really nice part of
    0:18:17 China. So here we are 2024, 14 years later, I go to bring my kid on a school holiday to
    0:18:22 China for his first time. And I thought, well, we’ll start out rough by going to mainland China.
    0:18:28 And then we’ll move on to like the best of the best with the refined culture of Taiwan and Taipei.
    0:18:35 And it turned out to be the opposite. That China was wonderful. We went to Shanghai and it was like
    0:18:43 first world, amazing, refined, silent, because all the vehicles are electric now. So that was
    0:18:47 the very first thing I noticed as soon as I took the train from the airport. We got off in downtown
    0:18:53 Shanghai, I’m surrounded by a hundred vehicles, and I hear nothing. It’s just, that’s so nice.
    0:19:01 And I’m like, oh my God, what’s real, like 20 motorbikes went in front of my face, like right
    0:19:05 there, like, you know, three meters away. And I heard none of them. There was just the silent
    0:19:11 movement. I was like, oh, this is so nice. And the people were just so polite and cultured. And
    0:19:16 it was none of this like hacking and spitting that I associated with it before, like the shouting
    0:19:20 and the spitting, you know. Yeah, that’s good to hear. I remember the spitting from my visits.
    0:19:26 A lot of spitting. Yeah. And even just transactionally, you have to get Alipay or WeChat on your phone
    0:19:31 first before you go like attach it to your credit card. But then once you’re there, all transactions
    0:19:37 are just, everything is so easy. And they’re beautiful, like rental bikes everywhere, laid out
    0:19:42 in perfect color coded cues. You can just walk up to one and go and step on the bike and then
    0:19:46 just go where you want to go. And you drop it off, you go beep. And everything is just
    0:19:54 so civilized and wonderful. I was so it completely changed my mind about China. And then I don’t
    0:20:00 want to sound like I’m trashing Taiwan, but it was just interesting that by comparison,
    0:20:04 then I went to Taipei and I thought, whoa, if China is this nice, imagine how nice Taipei is
    0:20:10 going to be. And I got there and it was kind of like stinky and trashy. And they don’t take credit
    0:20:14 cards or they don’t have the apps. And so you have to pay cash everywhere. And I’m like,
    0:20:21 money and paper and coins. And I was like, wow, interesting. And so I met with a Taiwanese woman
    0:20:27 for lunch that I emailed with before. And she’s an investor that goes to mainland China often.
    0:20:33 And I mentioned something about this cautiously as like, I don’t want to trash your home. I didn’t
    0:20:38 say it like that. But I just cautiously said, hi, I noticed something. And she said, I’m glad you
    0:20:44 noticed. She said, I noticed this too. She said, I go to mainland China’s cities every six to 12
    0:20:50 months. And she said, I feel like Taiwan may be plateaued like 12 years ago, like we kind of hit
    0:20:56 first world status and then stayed there almost like Japan, you know, it’s like Japan used to feel
    0:21:01 futuristic. Now it feels kind of stuck in the 90s, you know, fax machines and stuff. And which is
    0:21:06 kind of cute in a way like, again, not to knock it, it’s just it feels like it, it got to a certain
    0:21:13 point. And then it said, okay, we’re happy here. And she said, every time I go to China, she said,
    0:21:19 there’s visible, noticeable improvements like every six months, she said it blows my mind that
    0:21:26 they just keep improving and keep pushing. So I read a book called China’s worldview by David
    0:21:33 Daokui Li that changed my perception of China’s government too. It’s really impressive. He’s a
    0:21:39 guy that in but not in China’s government. And so he kind of is trying to explain the mindset
    0:21:44 of China’s government to outsiders. And it’s a beautiful book I highly recommend if somebody
    0:21:50 wants to understand China better, China’s worldview. China’s worldview, just as a sidebar note,
    0:21:57 your mention of Japan, I love Japan. And I’ve spent time in mainland China and in Taipei. It’s
    0:22:01 time for me to get back to both of those. I’ve spent much more time in Japan. But when people
    0:22:06 are going to Japan for the first time, they’re like, I can’t wait to experience this futuristic
    0:22:14 view 30 years ahead. I typically say, look, especially if they’re going to stay there for a
    0:22:25 longer period of time, I say, you’re going to love it. And it is 30 to 40% Blade Runner and 60 to 70%
    0:22:33 DMV, just like feeling filling out paperwork and triplicates and fax machines. It’s going to drive
    0:22:37 you nuts if you actually try to live there on some levels, right? There’s so many beautiful
    0:22:42 things about it. But yes, it does have the feeling of having frozen in time, in a sense,
    0:22:49 as opposed to continued to inflect the way that it was. Perhaps some time ago,
    0:22:53 need to get back to the East, so to speak. It’s been a long time. All right, I think you have
    0:22:59 actually, because of this newfound love, I’m actually going to Shenzhen and Chengdu in a few
    0:23:05 weeks. Oh, wow. I just want to keep experiencing different Chinese cities. Are you going to do
    0:23:11 any factory tours or see manufacturing there? I’m just meeting with people. That’s kind of how
    0:23:15 I travel these days. I tend to go to a place and instead of just, instead of seeing the sites,
    0:23:18 I want to meet the people. So I’m meeting with people that I’ve emailed with over the years and
    0:23:23 just, I chose those two cities because I know a lot of people there. Great. Can I hear the
    0:23:27 report? So I think, I’m no mathematician, but maybe you have one more.
    0:23:41 Smartass. Okay, number five, Dubai. So this is my big one because when I lived in Singapore,
    0:23:43 Dubai would often come up. People would compare the two and they would tell me
    0:23:49 things about Dubai, about the shopping malls and the millionaire pandering and the Instagram
    0:23:57 hashtaggy. You look at me kind of crap. And Dubai was in my top 10 places I never want
    0:24:03 to go in my life. Fuck that place. It sounds awful. It sounds like everything I hate in one place,
    0:24:09 you couldn’t pay me to go there. But then I have to notice that feeling in myself. And this is
    0:24:13 going to be, we’ll get to like the theme when we’re done with this number five. But I had a
    0:24:18 flight from New Zealand to Europe that it changed planes in Dubai and I looked at that and I went,
    0:24:23 ugh, Dubai. And I was like, wait a second, what is this prejudice in me against Dubai?
    0:24:28 It’s like saying, I hate artichokes, but I’ve never tried artichokes, right? Like I hate Dubai,
    0:24:33 but I’ve never been to Dubai. Maybe I should go to Dubai. So instead of making it a three hour
    0:24:38 layover, I made it like a three or four day layover. I went, wow, okay, I’m going to Dubai for a few
    0:24:46 days. So I read a book called City of Gold, which was about the founding of Dubai and the
    0:24:50 creation of Dubai. And dude, it was so good. It is such a great book. Anybody listening to this,
    0:24:58 if you want a great read, read the book City of Gold about the history of Dubai. It is inspiring
    0:25:05 the wisdom and the foresight and the boldness it took to make that place happen. It was really
    0:25:09 just like a vision that saw its way through to the end against all odds, right? So super inspiring.
    0:25:15 Then somebody said, oh, you need to read Arabian sands by this man named Fessager.
    0:25:20 And that gets into like the Arab Bedou culture. It was written in the 1940s or 50s,
    0:25:27 kind of like a Lawrence of Arabia kind of guy, like from England, but went through the desert
    0:25:31 and kind of became one with the Bedou people and got to know the culture and wrote about it.
    0:25:37 So that was really inspiring. And then the United Arab Emirates itself, as I learned more about,
    0:25:42 so Dubai, you know, is a city and a region inside the United Arab Emirates. It’s one of the seven
    0:25:48 states, the Emirates in that country. So Sheikh Zayed, the guy that was really like the father of
    0:25:53 the nation, was a really great dude, kind of like when I moved to Singapore, and I learned more
    0:25:57 about Lee Kuan Yew and started to really admire the decisions he made. He became a bit of a role
    0:26:02 model, like learning about him like makes me want to be a better person. You know, I just noticed
    0:26:07 that it actually subtly influences my actions. And so when I’m in Singapore, I feel like a little
    0:26:13 bit infused with the role model, like I feel the presence of the role model of Lee Kuan Yew,
    0:26:19 and when I’m in UAE, I feel a little bit inspired by Sheikh Zayed because he was just such a great
    0:26:24 generous dude. And also, I think it’s interesting that Arab culture gets a really bad rap in the
    0:26:30 media, like Hollywood portrayal is usually some like white actor with brown makeup being stupid
    0:26:34 saying, you know, oh, I like this building, I’ll buy 10 of them, you know, I think I want a penguin
    0:26:41 colony in the desert, you know, make it happen. And they’re kind of portrayed as fools that are too
    0:26:46 rich. And so getting to know the culture felt like this is really interesting. I really had the
    0:26:52 wrong idea about this culture. Okay, so as I read these books, City of Golden Arabian Sands,
    0:26:57 I have a thing on my website where I always show what I’m reading, and I take notes from the books,
    0:27:04 and I put notes on my website. And a friend of mine that lives in Muscat, Oman, saw my reading
    0:27:08 list, and he said, what is your interest in this region? I’ve noticed you’re reading books about
    0:27:12 Middle East. And I told him, I just really interested in Arab culture. And he said,
    0:27:21 you must meet the man from Tamashii. I said, what? And he goes, go to tamashii.com, T-A-M-A-S-H-E-E.com.
    0:27:28 And he said, you will see a shoe store. His name is Mohammed Kazan. He designs sandals,
    0:27:34 but underneath the surface, he’s an educator of Arab culture. So the sandals are just like
    0:27:38 the storefront. It’s like the pirate shop in San Francisco. Oh, I haven’t heard this.
    0:27:44 There is a place in San Francisco, it’s on Valencia Street, and it is used for
    0:27:51 now educating kids, writing workshops, things like that. But because they couldn’t get it zoned,
    0:27:55 in San Francisco, they couldn’t get permission for what they actually wanted to do. They had to
    0:28:03 create a storefront and then do the teaching in the back. And so they created a pirate attire store,
    0:28:10 and all of the classrooms are in the back. So that was a bit of a digression, especially because I
    0:28:18 can’t even recall the proper name of the sort of writing outlet that is associated with this.
    0:28:26 But Tamashi, shoe store, sandal store on the front end, but it’s actually education in disguise.
    0:28:30 Yeah, well, at first I thought there was no connection. Then I realized that his
    0:28:38 sandal designs are actually kind of reflecting Arab traditions and culture through the design
    0:28:42 of the sandals. But it’s like his true passion are these cultural trips he does. So if you go to
    0:28:47 tamashi.com and you click on the menu, you can click cultural trips and then you’ll see. So
    0:28:54 my friend introduced me to this guy. So I met with him on my trip to Dubai. We meet by the creek,
    0:28:59 and he tells me that his grandfather built the first building in Dubai. That was his grandfather.
    0:29:03 That’s how young that city is. And he’s just like, yeah, right, basically right over there. There
    0:29:08 was a very first building in Dubai. My grandfather is the one that built it. So I said, can you explain
    0:29:13 to me something about Arab culture? And he said, well, wait, first you got to understand the culture
    0:29:19 of the people of the desert is very different than the people of the sea, the Arabian coast,
    0:29:23 and which is very different than the people of the hills. And I said, okay, well,
    0:29:26 where’s your family from? And he said, well, from the desert. But he said, but you know,
    0:29:32 two uncles got in a fight. And so kind of half the family moved off to Iraq for a while. And there
    0:29:38 was kind of like a split in the family. But then they kind of reunited in Abu Dhabi. And he said,
    0:29:44 but then Islam came along. And I said, wait, hold on, Islam, that was like the year 600. I said,
    0:29:49 have you been telling me your family history from 2000 years ago? And he goes, well, 1800 years
    0:29:55 ago. Yeah, I said, wait, how the fuck do you know your family history back 1800 years? He said, well,
    0:30:04 we keep good records. Whoa, imagine what that does to how you see your life. If you see yourself in
    0:30:10 this long lineage of 1800 years of recorded family history, like how that affects your dating and
    0:30:16 whatever choices on where to live. So Muhammad cousin, this guy is a badass. I love this guy.
    0:30:21 He’s such a wealth of information. And he communicates it so well. It really helps by the way
    0:30:25 that so he’s got a complete American accent. He went to college in Boston for six years,
    0:30:30 like got into finance, came back, worked in finance in Abu Dhabi, and then just said, no, my real
    0:30:36 passion is teaching the Arab cultural traditions that I think have gotten lost in our modern
    0:30:41 skyscrapers. So that’s why he made it his passion project. He could have made way more money in
    0:30:47 finance, but he has this tamashii.com sandal store and he teaches Arab culture. And I admire the
    0:30:51 hell out of this guy. That’s a really cool Easter egg. All right, so we’ll link to that in the show
    0:30:58 notes. And I also pulled up this word that was on the tip of my tongue McSweeney’s McSweeney’s.net.
    0:31:04 People can check it out. There’s some hilarious writing. The one that I most recently shared
    0:31:08 with someone after it was shared with me is Cormac McCarthy writes to the editor of the Santa
    0:31:14 Fe New Mexican by John Keenan. It’s only going to be funny for people who have read some of Cormac
    0:31:20 McCarthy like The Road or Blood Meridian. But there’s a lot of really good stuff. So that is
    0:31:28 the outlet. Also wanted to mention, because you mentioned Iraq, Iraqi music, traditional music
    0:31:34 is some of the most incredibly intricate music I’ve ever heard. Using a dulcimer or a hammer
    0:31:40 dulcimer, there are different instruments involved. Absolutely spectacular. A lot of that has been
    0:31:45 destroyed, unfortunately, culturally and various teachers and so on due to all of the
    0:31:51 goings on in Iraq over the last while. But what is the overarching lesson that you take
    0:31:58 from the five things you have changed your mind on? Are there kind of meta lessons that you take
    0:32:04 from this? Yeah, you can see the theme, which is like, I love my rats. But even more, it’s like,
    0:32:10 I love that I used to hate them. And now I don’t. And I could have gone on twice as long
    0:32:15 about Dubai, by the way, the place is amazing. It is this cultural melting pot that just warms my
    0:32:20 heart sitting on the second floor of the Dubai mall and watching the whole world go by just the
    0:32:26 Nigerians and the Saudis and the Russians and the Chinese and the British just all walking in
    0:32:32 through in the same place. And it’s so amazing. I just, I kind of want to live there. But as
    0:32:38 happy as it makes me, I get this extra happiness of going, wow, I used to hate this place without
    0:32:45 even knowing it. And I take a sip of this coffee and it’s like, wow, for my whole life, I’m 55,
    0:32:50 I hated coffee, the Python programming. But the secret has been held back from you. So now you
    0:32:58 have to go to Dubai to have the coffee that you’re like, right. The theme is that if you feel completely
    0:33:05 averse to something, get to know it better, that whatever you feel yourself leaning away from,
    0:33:12 try leaning into. If you hate opera, then go learn more about opera. And if you hate sports,
    0:33:16 well, then go learn more about sports. It’s usually just learning about something
    0:33:20 gives you an appreciation for this thing that you used to just dismiss.
    0:33:26 At the end of the year last year, I just thought, God, this has been, I think, maybe the greatest
    0:33:31 year of my life. I think this is the happiest I have ever been in my whole life. And I think the
    0:33:38 reason why was because I had five major things in one year that I used to hate that now I love.
    0:33:44 And God, this is the greatest joy. So major things. So the rats makes it into major things.
    0:33:49 I like this. Sure. I mean, you know, they’re my they’re my I’m not minimizing rats. Yeah,
    0:33:54 I’m not minimizing rats. But it’s, you know, even the coffee and even the Python,
    0:33:58 I’m doing something Python going, wow, I can’t believe I hated this for 20 years.
    0:34:05 Well, I suppose they’re major in the sense that to the degree you had a fixed position beforehand,
    0:34:13 these were kind of strong, fixed positions of dislike. So that turnaround is very interesting.
    0:34:21 Just a quick thanks to one of our sponsors, and we’ll be right back to the show.
    0:34:27 About three weeks ago, I found myself between 10 and 12,000 feet going over the continental divide
    0:34:31 carrying tons of weight, and I needed all the help I could get. And in those circumstances,
    0:34:38 I relied on momentous products every single day and every single night. Now, regular listeners
    0:34:42 probably know I’ve been taking momentous products consistently and testing them the entire spectrum
    0:34:47 of their products for a long while now. But you may not know that I recently collaborated with them
    0:34:52 to put together my top picks. I always aim for a strong body and sharp mind. Of course, you need
    0:34:56 both. And neither is possible without quality sleep. So I designed my performance stack to
    0:35:01 check all three boxes, creat pure creatine for muscular and cognitive support, whey protein
    0:35:06 isolate for muscle mass and recovery and magnesium three and eight for sleep. All momentous products
    0:35:11 are NSF and informed sports certified, which is professional athlete and Olympic level testing.
    0:35:16 So what’s on the label is exactly what you’re getting. Try it out for yourself and let me
    0:35:22 know what you think. Visit live momentous.com/tim and use Tim at checkout for 20% off of my
    0:35:30 performance stack. I’ll spell it out. It’s a long one live momentous.com/tim. Live momentous.com/tim
    0:35:40 for 20% off. Let me ask you this. Since in the case of the rats that was catalyzed by your son
    0:35:51 bringing up pet rats, Dubai, you had a layover that then prompted you to extend how long you
    0:35:57 stayed there. Python, I’m not sure exactly how that about face came to be, but having experienced
    0:36:02 the past year, you say to yourself, this is one of the greatest or maybe the greatest year of my life,
    0:36:10 high levels of happiness. I think it’s because I had these changes of mind. Are you farming for
    0:36:16 opportunities to change your mind proactively? Yeah. And if so, how are you doing that?
    0:36:21 I don’t have a systematic thing I can share and not that I’m not sharing it. I just don’t have
    0:36:29 it. But it just made me notice like now I just need to notice in myself when I’m
    0:36:33 irrationally averse to something. It can’t even be a thought process. Sometimes, okay,
    0:36:39 this is actually in my useful, not true book that just came out. This idea that was actually
    0:36:46 a little bit sparked by you where somebody dismisses everything a person says. It dismisses
    0:36:51 everything a public figure says because they don’t like something about that public figure,
    0:36:56 right? Like, oh, I don’t like the way he acts on social media. So fuck him. I’m not going to
    0:37:02 listen to a word he says. And that was inspired. I think I told you last time that the first time
    0:37:06 I encountered that was years and years ago when I saw somebody holding four hour work week.
    0:37:12 And I said, oh, wow, great book. And he goes, yeah, the guy’s full of himself. Here you want it.
    0:37:18 He’s like, he didn’t want to read the book because he saw one thing in there that made
    0:37:23 him think you were fully yourself. So that’s it. Fuck this whole thing. Fuck this 400 page book.
    0:37:26 There’s nothing in it for me because there’s something I don’t like about this guy.
    0:37:33 When I think about that, to me, that’s trying to think of people as either true or not true
    0:37:40 instead of useful or not useful. That’s judging the box, not judging the contents inside.
    0:37:44 And so I think there are many things in my life where I have judged the box like
    0:37:53 Python, no, you know, China, rough Dubai, fuck that place. Rats, coffee. Sorry, I just had to
    0:37:59 spit all five times. And all of those, I was judging the box. But if you learn a little bit
    0:38:04 more about it, then you get into the contents and you go, oh, actually, the contents are wonderful.
    0:38:09 It was just I was dismissing the package. He probably read the first edition where I had that
    0:38:14 whole chapter on my cock size that ended up being a little over the top. So I took it out for
    0:38:20 reprints. And then he put it into four hour body. It was a bit much. Yeah, then I ended up putting
    0:38:27 that as an appendix in the four hour body. So fair play on his part. I would actually
    0:38:37 build on that to say that I look to my close relationships, and I pause and question
    0:38:44 how I’m thinking about friendships. If in every case, there isn’t something substantial,
    0:38:49 I disagree with each of those friends on. Does that make sense? Yes. I love that.
    0:38:56 I really want friends where the differences of opinion bring us closer and make our
    0:39:02 friendships more valuable, not the other way around. Yes. If you and your friends agree on
    0:39:09 pretty much everything, I view that as symptomatic of a problem. Okay, I’m so glad you brought this
    0:39:19 up. Sometimes I wonder about your motivation for continuing these podcasts and how you keep up
    0:39:24 the enthusiasm for doing this for so long. And then I thought, God, wait, you must
    0:39:31 be immersing yourself in so many diverse world views that it made me think about the
    0:39:37 comparison to investing. I was in a situation recently, you’ve probably had this many times,
    0:39:42 and I think it’s maybe part of why you left California, where you catch yourself in a group
    0:39:47 of people and everybody agrees with everybody else. It’s like this group think, even if they’re
    0:39:52 all really smart, but damn it, they all basically agree. This sucks. And I thought about the benefits
    0:39:59 of diversification when it comes to investing, right? So anybody who learns like investing one
    0:40:07 to one learns about having a low correlation between your asset allocations. So your US stocks,
    0:40:14 international stocks, real estate commodities, bonds, gold, cash, some things risky, some things
    0:40:19 riskless. And the whole idea is they’re supposed to have a low correlation. So if one goes down,
    0:40:26 they won’t all go down. And I thought about that in terms of the thought portfolio
    0:40:33 in our head, any given person. So you say it with the friends you have around, but I assume,
    0:40:40 aren’t you then by knowing your friends so well, when you’re in a certain situation and you’re
    0:40:46 thinking about what to do, you don’t just have Tim’s thoughts, you also have this friend’s thoughts,
    0:40:50 and that’s friends thoughts. And it’s like, how would this friend of mine approach this?
    0:40:56 Do you do that actively? Oh, yeah, I definitely do. And I’ll give a real world example. And I don’t
    0:41:03 know if we want to get into the thick of it. But I was reading some of your writing before we hopped
    0:41:08 on the phone. And I was taking an ice bath also right before we got on the phone, which I know I
    0:41:15 am fonder of than you are. But I was sitting in the tub freezing my balls off. And there were certain
    0:41:23 statements and positions in the writing that got me all riled up. And I was sitting there getting
    0:41:36 riled up and thinking about my counter positions. And then I thought to myself, well, that’s interesting
    0:41:41 to observe these feelings coming up, these very strong feelings. Then I thought to myself,
    0:41:49 this is really good. This is good because the feelings are coming up in a strong way. And
    0:41:56 you’re not someone to shy away from a conversation about those things. And what a gift to be able to
    0:42:06 have civil disagreement with friends like what a fucking treasure that is. Because we don’t have a
    0:42:13 lot of models for civil disagreement, I would say, at least not in most media or online. It’s just
    0:42:21 not what sells. And I very much want friends who are going to call me on my bullshit or at least
    0:42:31 take counter positions and help me think through things. And I think that in your new book, for
    0:42:36 instance, there’s a very good job of discussing perspectives and perspective taking and how you
    0:42:44 can read many things differently from different viewpoints. And you want friends who can help you
    0:42:49 do that so that you don’t get trapped in your own thought loops. And furthermore, just on a very
    0:42:55 practical sense, you want to be able to speak truthfully to your friends and you want them to
    0:43:01 be able to do the same. And if you do that and you talk about a really wide breadth of things,
    0:43:07 if you never have conflict, one or both of you is probably being dishonest. And if you’re going to
    0:43:11 have some friction in the system, which you probably will if you’re really being honest,
    0:43:20 then you’re going to need to be good at conflict resolution or repair or talking about hard things.
    0:43:31 So that’s a very long stream of consciousness that I just let out. But if I look for friends
    0:43:39 who I can and will disagree with on things, then it becomes my dojo for life overall
    0:43:48 with people I really care for and love. And good God, what an amazing gift and advantage that is.
    0:43:55 So yes, I do that deliberately. And I invite people on the podcast who I suspect or know I
    0:43:59 will disagree with on a few different levels. And that gives me a chance to interrogate their
    0:44:05 thinking, but also interrogate my own thinking. Love it. I’ve noticed within myself that when I’m
    0:44:13 around people that I know agree with me, my inherent curiosity level drops a bit.
    0:44:19 And when I’m around people that I know don’t think like me, my curiosity peaks.
    0:44:27 So when I meet somebody that is like a scientist that is also Hindu, I’m like, oh,
    0:44:30 oh my God, I have so many questions for you. I was like, can you explain to me how this, okay,
    0:44:37 I’m filled with curiosity to meet somebody that grew up Hindu and still actively has the Hindu
    0:44:41 beliefs. I want to understand this better. I’ve read two books about Hinduism. I don’t get it
    0:44:45 still. I have so many questions for you. But if I’m around somebody that’s like me and like,
    0:44:52 how are you doing? What’s up? Yeah, me too. Cool. All right. So I think it’s a deliberate
    0:44:59 over waiting if we’re going to kind of use a back to like quantitative and investment metaphor.
    0:45:08 I have a whole lifetime of thinking my way. Now I want to overweight learning other ways of thinking.
    0:45:12 And to me, it’s just pure curiosity. There’s no debate. There’s no like, let’s work this
    0:45:17 out and get to the right answer. It’s just, no, please tell me this other way of looking at
    0:45:21 things. Tell me this other way of looking at your family history, 1800 years. Tell me this
    0:45:27 other way of looking at, I don’t know, spirituality, life after death, etc. Please. I’m so curious,
    0:45:34 because it reminds me that my way of looking at it is not the only way. I love dislodging
    0:45:42 my first impression. I think our first thought is an obstacle. And we have to get past it
    0:45:47 to realize there are other ways to look at the situation. Once you realize that you can get
    0:45:52 past your first way of looking at something, then you can do that like what do you call it systems
    0:45:57 to thinking, right? Thinking fast and slow, you can go, Oh, right. Okay, hold on. That was my first
    0:46:03 reaction. What are some other ways I could look at this? That’s what my whole useful not true book
    0:46:10 is about. Yeah, I remember also, this is, I think this was on the podcast in one of our earlier
    0:46:17 conversations. But I asked you, it was on the podcast, probably the first conversation. I asked
    0:46:24 you who the first person was you thought of when I gave the word successful. And your answer was
    0:46:29 along the lines of, Well, I think answer number one isn’t that interesting, because I might say
    0:46:36 Richard Branson, but really memory or Elon Musk. But if Richard Branson wanted a life of peace and
    0:46:43 tranquility and a slower pace, if that were his goal, then he’s utterly failing. So maybe that
    0:46:50 isn’t success. But perhaps overarchingly, I’ve used that twice now as an adverb, that’s pretty
    0:46:55 funny. I never use that word. But the question should be who’s the third person you think of
    0:46:59 when you hear the word successful? I am so impressed that you remember that.
    0:47:05 It’s a long time ago. Yeah. And that is an example of what you’re talking about,
    0:47:09 is getting past the first thought. I think the operative word there is thought, right? Because
    0:47:17 just to draw a distinction for me, I think paying attention to feeling, the first feeling can save
    0:47:24 you from a lot of pain in the short and the long term. In other words, along the lines of the gift
    0:47:30 of fear, Gavin DeBecca, etc. If your system says no, pay very close attention to that. But if you
    0:47:38 have a inbuilt story, I hate Dubai because A, B, and C, which is very different from,
    0:47:42 I don’t feel safe in this airport and I don’t know why. Those are two very different things.
    0:47:47 Very, yeah. Questioning that first story can pay a lot of incredible dividends.
    0:47:51 Dude, I love this subject so much. To me, it’s kind of like the key of life.
    0:47:58 So often the difference between success and failure is the mindset that leads you to take
    0:48:04 different actions. But if you just look at a situation and you say, that’s it, that’s what
    0:48:09 the situation is, I’m not talking about physical things. I mean, declaring something to be a dead
    0:48:16 end, declaring something to suck. These are all things of the mind. And nothing of the mind is
    0:48:20 necessarily true. Everything that’s just in the mind is just one perspective. Like physical
    0:48:26 things are true. Sure. There are some physical realities. The number of votes cast in an election
    0:48:33 is a physical reality that an alien or a computer could observe and agree. But all of these things
    0:48:38 of the mind were social creatures and we treat them like they are realities. Like, hey, that person
    0:48:43 wronged me. And that’s just a fact. It’s like, hmm, that’s not just a fact. That’s one way of
    0:48:48 looking at it. And you might be a lot happier and a lot more successful if you realize that that’s
    0:48:54 just one way of looking at it. It’s not true. It’s just a perspective. It’s just a thought.
    0:48:58 And there’s another way of seeing that. And that other way of seeing it might lead
    0:49:01 to actions that would be much more effective for you.
    0:49:08 Yeah, for sure. And I think your new book pairs well with Byron Heddy’s The Work,
    0:49:14 which focuses on a lot of what we’re discussing. And I was going to say,
    0:49:21 in addition to what we’ve already covered, that the content is different from the mindset. And
    0:49:28 what I mean by that is you have crafted a very path of Derek life for yourself. And you’ve made
    0:49:35 some very unorthodox decisions, some of which I think are frankly, sometimes cuckoo bananas.
    0:49:40 But thank you. You’re welcome. If I don’t agree, even if I wouldn’t replicate the decision,
    0:49:48 hearing you explain why you did it and how you navigated that, the lenses through which
    0:49:54 you view this scenario has allowed me to learn things that I can apply to totally different
    0:50:02 circumstances. And that’s really valuable. You might not make the same house as someone else,
    0:50:06 but learning how to use the carpentry tools that they use to build that house
    0:50:14 could actually really, really aid you in a lot of disparate scenarios. So that’s how I’ve also
    0:50:22 thought about it. I so often try to get people to devalue the example, but value the theme,
    0:50:26 the process, like you just said, that too many people focus on the example that you give them.
    0:50:32 It’s like, try to forget the example and look for the process. So thanks for saying that. I do that
    0:50:38 with everything. There’s a person that we could talk about here if you want later, but he’s a
    0:50:43 computer programmer, but he gets up and gives a talk about computer programming that I see the
    0:50:48 theme in what he’s talking about. I’m like, oh, okay, well, forget the code for a second. That’s a
    0:50:55 brilliant theme. And it’s fun to be able to do that. So let’s pause. This might be a good segue.
    0:51:04 Is that part of the next bucket of people you’re studying? Or things you’re fascinated by? Where
    0:51:10 would you like to go next? Because this might be a good segue. Yeah, it’s funny. You actually jumped
    0:51:16 to the last thing I was going to mention. You brought up this diversified portfolio of perspectives.
    0:51:20 So that was one of the things I wanted to talk about today. And you didn’t even know that.
    0:51:25 Oh, amazing. Look at that. I did not. That was great. Yeah, let’s talk. Okay, you asked me in
    0:51:32 advance. People I’m studying. So let’s do them in reverse order since we already brought up
    0:51:39 Rich Hickey. So R-I-C-H-H-I-C-K-E-Y. Wait a second before we switch to that. Have you ever met Brian
    0:51:49 Eno, the record producer? I have not met Brian Eno, but I have his oblique strategies part set.
    0:51:55 I was just reading about how he ended up coining the term ambient music in the hospital because he
    0:52:00 couldn’t get up and change the volume and ended up he ended up listening to very, very low volume
    0:52:05 music a friend had put on for him. So I’m fascinated by Brian Eno, but I’ve never met him.
    0:52:14 Brian Eno is one of these guys that his thought process is fascinating. I don’t love his music.
    0:52:18 I like his music. I don’t love it, but I love his thought process. By the way, if you go to the
    0:52:24 website musicthoughts.com, that’s my love letter to Brian Eno and John Cage and some of these music
    0:52:31 thinkers. I made that website in 1999 and it’s a collection of inspiring quotes from Brian Eno,
    0:52:35 John Cage and a bunch of other musicians. Musicthoughts.com. Yep, musicthoughts.com. It’s
    0:52:39 totally non-commercial. I’m not going to make it penny off of anybody looking at it, so I’m not
    0:52:46 trying to pitch it, but I’m just saying it’s a collection of Brian Eno’s philosophies on music
    0:52:51 and thoughts on music that I would read these quotes to inspire me as I was making music and
    0:52:57 kind of knock my thinking kind of like the oblique strategies cards to shift my thinking
    0:53:03 into something different. And so even just reading his interviews, one thing he said is his job as
    0:53:10 a record producer is to have strong opinions in the studio so that if he’s in there producing a
    0:53:16 record by you too and the guys are fighting about whether to have a guitar solo or not,
    0:53:20 whether it should be a loud guitar solo or a quiet guitar solo, he said, “Well, my job then
    0:53:25 would be to say, ‘Well, how about we have no guitar at all in this song?’ And the band members go,
    0:53:30 ‘What? Are you crazy? No, this song needs a guitar.’ No, Brian, we absolutely need guitar.’
    0:53:35 And he goes, “All right, happy I could help. By you disagreeing with me, I just helped you
    0:53:40 solidify your position, so that’s my job here.” So on the other hand, if you would have said,
    0:53:45 “Yeah, okay, no guitar, that’s a good idea. Great, glad I could help. I’m not saying my
    0:53:52 opinions are right. I’m just trying to help you respond.” I love that.
    0:53:58 You’re providing a foil. Yeah. Yeah, you’re providing a foil. That’s musicthoughts.com.
    0:54:02 Quick question on, was it John Cage you mentioned? Yeah.
    0:54:08 So I was first exposed to John Cage in a documentary, a friend of my name, Steve Jang,
    0:54:15 was involved with Namjoon Paik, Moon is the Oldest TV, which is about Namjoon Paik,
    0:54:21 this amazing pioneer in experimental art, performance art, many different media.
    0:54:26 And he was inspired by John Cage. Now, I know very little about John Cage, but I did get to see
    0:54:32 a segment of a performance that he did, which caused like 90% of the audience to leave.
    0:54:38 He was just like the most agonizingly uncomfortable, I would say, noise to listen to.
    0:54:44 That is my sole exposure to John Cage, but I’ve heard him invoked as this
    0:54:50 figurehead of great influence. And I’m basing my impression of him only on that,
    0:54:56 what I would just say is awful performance that I saw a part of in this documentary.
    0:55:01 How would you sell John Cage or why is he interesting?
    0:55:09 I’m no expert, but let’s just say he questioned things that hadn’t been questioned before.
    0:55:18 A lot of modern art, the kind where people look at it and go, what, that’s it? It’s a seesaw over
    0:55:23 the border between U.S. and Mexico. You call that art, I could do that. And it’s like, yeah,
    0:55:27 but you didn’t. Somebody looked at that border between U.S. and Mexico and said,
    0:55:31 I think we could put a seesaw over that. And in a way, that’s a beautiful statement.
    0:55:35 It’s not about the brushstrokes on canvas. It’s about the statement.
    0:55:42 So I think John Cage was doing that with music. He was questioning the core of what is this anyway.
    0:55:46 And so that’s why I think his most famous piece is called Four Minutes in 33 Seconds,
    0:55:51 which is just Four Minutes of 33 Seconds of Silence. The point was, hey, listen to the room
    0:55:56 around you for four minutes and 33 seconds. There are sounds going on here already. I mean,
    0:55:58 I think that was his point. Maybe he stayed mute on it. I don’t know.
    0:56:05 Okay. So is it fair to say that he’s interesting to you for the same reason that Brian in the
    0:56:11 producer capacity is interesting as a provocateur of sorts, like an instigator of new thinking?
    0:56:19 Yeah. I want to emulate his thought process, even if I don’t love his end results. Well,
    0:56:24 you said it first. That’s why I love that you beat me to this. It’s your friends. You may not
    0:56:30 want to live my life here with my, whatever, three glasses and two rats, but you like some of my
    0:56:38 thought process. People keep emailing me about that. Hey, I heard your podcast with Tim Ferriss.
    0:56:44 So three glasses. So let me explain that for people who don’t have the content. You should get
    0:56:48 a third rat just so you have the same number of rats that you have glasses. But when I visited
    0:56:51 you in New Zealand, I was like, Hey, do you mind if I have glass water? No, no, knock yourself out.
    0:56:56 We’re the glasses. Other in the cabinet. And I went and I saw three glasses, all of different,
    0:57:02 dramatically different sizes. And I was like, what happens if you have more than three people over
    0:57:06 here? Like, I’ll just buy some more glasses. I was like, well, actually, that kind of makes a certain
    0:57:10 elegant sense. So those are the three glasses. All right, you know what? On that note, do you want to
    0:57:15 hear? I am building my dream home right now. Can you imagine where this is going?
    0:57:21 Just 20 minutes north of Wellington, I bought a piece of land or I’m building my dream home.
    0:57:28 It is a four by eight meter rectangle with nothing inside. No toilet, no kitchen, no nothing. Because
    0:57:36 I thought every house I’ve lived in came with its default shit. And I adapted myself to its
    0:57:40 default shit. Like, well, that’s just where the bathroom is. That’s just the size of the living
    0:57:44 room. That’s just what it is. And I’ve always had to adapt myself. So I’ve never experienced
    0:57:54 the process of making the place adapt to me through practice, not in theory. So I thought,
    0:57:59 if I just start with a four by eight meter well insulated rectangle, then over time we’ll see
    0:58:07 what I need. Wait, did you say four by eight? Four by eight meters? Yeah. Is the whole house?
    0:58:14 Sorry, it’s actually two. So it’s a four by 12? Okay, got it. No, four by 14 meter rectangle,
    0:58:19 that’s the two bedroom place where I’ll sleep with my kid. And then next to it is a four by eight
    0:58:24 where I spend all of my waking hours. Okay, so it’s the sleeping house and the waking house.
    0:58:29 And my kid actually gets his own four by eight meter cube to experiment with. And the whole
    0:58:36 idea is to see what you need. So I’m starting with no bathroom, no kitchen. I’m just going to put a
    0:58:42 little induction hob outside and an outhouse. And then I’ll see if that’s okay with me. Or if I find
    0:58:48 through experience that I really want a bathroom inside, okay, well now I know from experience,
    0:58:53 not just because it’s the default setting. So I’m trying to start from scratch. And this is my
    0:59:00 dream house because of the process that it will allow me to have. Okay, so this is a very mundane
    0:59:04 question. But I’m curious, generally, if you’re going to have like a kitchen or a bathroom or
    0:59:13 something, you would have the piping or the power and so on put in a certain place. So as it stands,
    0:59:20 that is not the case. So you might have to do a fair amount of demo or deconstructing your house
    0:59:29 to add any of these things internally. I got this tip from Stuart Brand wrote a brilliant
    0:59:33 book that everyone should read. Anyone who’s smart that is called How Buildings Learned.
    0:59:38 How Buildings Learned by Stuart Brand, you should try to get the paper book because it’s
    0:59:43 just laid out in such a way that you kind of need the paper book. He goes through this analytical
    0:59:49 thing about buildings. And he said, “This is a reason why you should never hide your wires and
    0:59:54 pipes. Just keep the infrastructure on the outside so that it’s easier to change.” He has a beautiful
    1:00:00 line in there. It’s almost the opening point. He says, “All buildings are predictions and all
    1:00:09 predictions are wrong. So therefore, the less predictive you can make your building the better.”
    1:00:14 That’s why I’m just getting this rectangle. All pipes and wires will just be exposed to nothing
    1:00:18 buried so that I can quickly change them. I can always see where they are. I’m very much
    1:00:25 following Stuart Brand’s philosophy. Stuart Brand is a smart, fascinating man. Just a quick
    1:00:31 pitch for Stuart Brand. So I met Stuart through Kevin Kelly. Now, Kevin Kelly found an editor
    1:00:37 of Wired Magazine. Fascinating, genius, bizarre guy. Has an Amish beard, but he’s a technology
    1:00:43 futurist, built his own house by hand. Spends more time in China than probably anyone I know.
    1:00:49 He’s just an eclectic combination of all sorts of things. The title of my podcast with him way
    1:00:55 back in the day was “The Real World Most Interesting Man in the World” or something like that.
    1:01:01 In the midst of the conversation with Kevin, or maybe speaking offline, he said, “If you really
    1:01:05 want the person I consider to be the most interesting man in the world, it’s Stuart Brand.”
    1:01:12 It’s so… I had Stuart on the podcast a number of years ago, and boy, oh boy, you want to talk
    1:01:17 about a polymath. He’s something else. All right. So you’ve preserved the optionality
    1:01:23 with the possibility of putting things on the outside rather than on the inside in terms of
    1:01:31 support infrastructure. And how do you see yourself using a space with nothing inside?
    1:01:35 I don’t know. See, that would be a prediction. I’m trying to not predict. I’m just…
    1:01:39 I’m just going to show up. It’ll be ready in a few months, and then I’ll start living there,
    1:01:43 and we’ll see what happens. That’s all I know. Okay. Is it going to be totally empty,
    1:01:46 or are you going to have some desks at chair? I mean, are you going to have anything at all,
    1:01:51 or are you just going to sit on the floor and be like, what do I require at this moment?
    1:01:56 I’m bringing a mattress to start. And then over time, I’ll notice if I wish I had a desk here,
    1:02:02 then I’ll get a desk there. So I’ll add things as I feel that I really, really need them.
    1:02:07 Again, I highly recommend in How Buildings Learn, he kind of goes into this about, like,
    1:02:13 the best spaces are just rectangles, and the best places are ones that are easy to alter,
    1:02:16 so that if you suddenly decide, he talks about this MIT building,
    1:02:20 where people were just allowed to bash a hole in a wall because it wasn’t some beautifully
    1:02:24 architecturally designed masterpiece. It was something thrown together quickly in World War
    1:02:28 II, and people love that building because if they do need to bash a hole in the wall or run
    1:02:32 some wires through, they can just do it because it’s a trashy old building. And because of that,
    1:02:37 it’s such a creative space. The places that are award-winning are often the ones that are the most
    1:02:41 hated by their residents. They might win the award for the architect. That’s true. But because
    1:02:46 they’re award-winning, they’re inflexible. They’re sacred. I mean, talk to people who live in a
    1:02:53 Frank Lloyd Wright home now, and it’s like, you know, living in a masterpiece museum, and I can’t
    1:02:57 change a single screw or anything because it’s the way he wanted it. So practical recommendation,
    1:03:01 I would say if you’re going to be sitting on the floor a lot, if you’re not accustomed to doing
    1:03:06 that, just so you don’t end up with all sorts of orthopedic issues, I would start doing Turkish
    1:03:12 get-ups and getting accustomed to sitting on the floor and getting up a lot. I’ll probably get a
    1:03:17 good chair almost right away, but I just want to make sure that I really… So your body’s ready for
    1:03:23 the rectangle. All right, fascinating. Another example, I’ll let you be the first monkey shot
    1:03:28 into space on this particular type of home design. I can’t wait to learn so many things.
    1:03:33 You experiment with some things I don’t want to experiment with, and I’ll experiment
    1:03:37 with things that you don’t want to experiment with. I’ll renounce my US citizenship and let you
    1:03:43 know how it goes. I’ll build my dream home of a four by eight rectangle, let you know how it goes.
    1:03:47 Yeah, you got to divvy it up. I mean, the redundancy and experimentation is kind of,
    1:03:50 I don’t want to say pointless, but it’s more fun to have people doing different things.
    1:03:57 Other people, you are studying. All right. Or things you’re fascinated by. We can hop around,
    1:04:02 depends on where you want to go. I already started. Rich Hickey. Oh, that’s right. You mentioned him.
    1:04:06 I wrote him down because that was left dangling, and I was like, who is this Rich Hickey?
    1:04:12 So Rich Hickey is… He’s a programmer. He’s the inventor of a programming language called
    1:04:17 Clojure, C-L-O-J-U-R-E. He’s actually one of my number one picks for somebody
    1:04:21 that I would like to get on your show. Like, if we did a co-hosting kind of thing,
    1:04:27 and I were to get somebody on, actually, I already emailed him. He didn’t reply, but maybe,
    1:04:31 hey, if anybody knows Rich Hickey, and if he’s interested, nudge, nudge, nudge.
    1:04:39 He did a brilliant talk. If you search YouTube for either Simple versus Easy, or I think the
    1:04:45 name of the video on YouTube is called Simplicity Matters, here’s his point. And I actually jotted
    1:04:49 down these notes so I could try to bang out his point quickly, and then we’ll talk about it.
    1:04:54 And keep in mind, everything I’m about to say, he’s just talking about programming.
    1:05:00 He’s speaking to a room of programmers. He said, we mistake Simple and Easy. We think that Simple
    1:05:06 means Easy, and Easy means Simple. But he said there are two different things. The word complex,
    1:05:10 if you look at the definition, it’s actually, it comes from the word complex,
    1:05:16 which is to braid things together. So if something is complexed, it means it’s intertwined with other
    1:05:22 things. And so the adjective complex means that something is bound to other things.
    1:05:28 Whereas Simple comes from simplex, which means it is not bound to other things. It stands alone.
    1:05:36 Easy, the root of that means that something is near at hand. It’s something you already know how to do.
    1:05:44 It’s within your realm. So Easy and Hard are subjective, but Simple and Complex are very
    1:05:48 objective things that we can look at. Something is Simple, it stands alone, it’s complex if it’s
    1:05:55 bound to other things. And he said, here’s where it gets tricky, is that it can be very easy to make
    1:06:03 something very complex. So he says, you could just type gem install hairball. And with typing
    1:06:08 three words on a computer, you can install a massive framework, whether it’s Rubion Rails or
    1:06:14 WordPress. And if you start using that, well, wow, you are now complexed with a huge complicated
    1:06:20 system that you’re intertwined with. And so now everything I say after this, this is my take on
    1:06:29 his analysis. But it’s really easy in life to say, okay, yeah, let’s get married, or to have
    1:06:36 unprotected sex and get pregnant and have a baby. That’s easy. Adopt a dog, hiring people. You can
    1:06:40 have a problem and think, all right, well, I’ve got some money and I’m overwhelmed. I’m going to
    1:06:44 get a consultant to like hire 10 people. Okay, great. Now I’ve got 10 employees. Phew. That was
    1:06:52 easy to take some work off my plate. But your life is now objectively complex. You are complexed
    1:06:56 with these other people and their needs and their time schedules and their desires,
    1:07:04 handing off parts of your business to say, this is hard. I’m just going to hand off my billing
    1:07:10 or my something or my this or my scheduling to these apps or these subscription services.
    1:07:17 That was easy to just hand it off. But now your business is very complexed with these other
    1:07:28 services. So hence my rant on our last conversation over scotch at my house about tech independence.
    1:07:35 His point is it can be really hard to make something simple. It can be much harder to do
    1:07:41 something that is objectively simple, that stands alone, that isn’t dependent on other things. It
    1:07:48 can be harder to make that, but it’s ultimately usually a better choice because it’s more maintainable.
    1:07:54 It’s easier to change. It’s easier to stop and start. It’s simpler, even if it’s harder to make.
    1:08:01 So the point is in his thinking is to beware of the objective measure of complexity or
    1:08:06 beware of complexity, which can be objectively measured and aim for doing the simpler thing,
    1:08:12 even if it’s harder. In my take, I think you can make simple things easier just by learning more,
    1:08:18 say about the fundamentals of something instead of just adopting somebody else’s high-level solution.
    1:08:24 You can spend a little time learning about the core underneath it, about the fundamentals.
    1:08:29 Then you can forget norms. You could forget what others do, what others think.
    1:08:33 And you can just get to the real essence of what you need. I’m not just talking
    1:08:37 programming now, I’m just meaning in life. What would be an example of that?
    1:08:44 Okay, my four by eight house. Really, I just need a shelter where it’s temperature controlled,
    1:08:51 so it’s really well-insulated. I do need a mattress to sleep on, and I do need a place I can work.
    1:08:56 But to me, those are the… Oh, and I do need a little food. To me, these are the core things of a
    1:09:02 shelter. But even say with friendships, do I need to live in the same place with my friends? Well,
    1:09:09 not necessarily. My dear friends, my best friends are often far, far away. I don’t need to move to
    1:09:14 a place that has all my friends if I can reach them on the phone. I’m very often talking about
    1:09:19 just the thought process. I very often find myself asking, like, well, what’s the real outcome I’m
    1:09:24 after? What’s the real point of this? And once I figure that out, well, then what’s the most
    1:09:29 direct route to that outcome? Never mind what other people do, what the norms are.
    1:09:36 What do I think is the most direct route to that outcome? And then try to keep it simple along the
    1:09:42 way and be very wary of dependencies and entangling myself with other things. That’s my take.
    1:09:48 Could you give another example or two of how you implement that in your life?
    1:09:48 Sure.
    1:09:52 Or how you might? Because I know there are more examples.
    1:09:57 The next two might be less relatable, because it’s…
    1:10:00 It’s less relatable than the four by eight meter box.
    1:10:01 Because I know everybody wants to live in it.
    1:10:02 With nothing inside.
    1:10:10 So, I mean, well, first, here’s a good question to strip away some things. Ask yourself,
    1:10:17 would I still do this if nobody knew? There might be a lot of things in our actions that we do
    1:10:22 because we like the way it would look to others, because it would be impressive to others.
    1:10:27 That’s the first thing to just strip away when you’re beginning this thought process is like,
    1:10:32 if I were to never tell anybody and nobody were to ever know, would I still do this thing?
    1:10:34 Okay, well, then that might just be the decoration.
    1:10:40 Okay, so two examples. Programming wise, I’m constantly asking this
    1:10:47 when I’m building something. It’s just I need to get this calendar entry into this database
    1:10:51 with this time. Do I need a whole bunch of JavaScript?
    1:10:54 Do I need a bunch of CSS and things flying around?
    1:10:55 Do I need fading graphics?
    1:11:00 No, I just need this thing there.
    1:11:04 What’s the most direct way to get that calendar entry into that database?
    1:11:05 So that’s like a programming example.
    1:11:11 Writing wise, my last two books, How to Live and Useful Not True,
    1:11:16 I’m spending most of my time reducing.
    1:11:20 My rough draft, I always spew out everything I have to say on the subject.
    1:11:27 And then I spend 1000 hours every single word going, is that word necessary?
    1:11:30 Wait a second, is that whole sentence necessary?
    1:11:33 Wait, can the point still be communicated without that sentence?
    1:11:37 If it can, okay, let me try to get rid of that sentence and see if the point still comes across.
    1:11:40 Actually, does the point come across without this entire chapter?
    1:11:41 Oh my God, it still does.
    1:11:43 Therefore, I don’t need this chapter.
    1:11:48 One of the most useful things that happened recently is a few months ago,
    1:11:53 an organization in Australia paid me to come give a talk.
    1:11:56 And I said, what do you want me to talk about?
    1:11:56 They said anything.
    1:11:59 I said, how about my next book called Useful Not True?
    1:11:59 They said, sure.
    1:12:04 So it was a room of very successful, very effective people.
    1:12:08 And I had one hour on stage to communicate the whole idea of my next book.
    1:12:12 And at the time, the book was still in process.
    1:12:19 And that was so helpful because I noticed that there were a few things on stage,
    1:12:22 even though I had it in my notes, I skipped over it.
    1:12:24 And I thought, okay, well, actually, we don’t need to do that.
    1:12:25 Okay, let’s get to the next point.
    1:12:27 And so later when I was back home, I thought, wow,
    1:12:29 I just skipped over that whole point on stage.
    1:12:34 So why do I think it’s worth killing trees to print that point?
    1:12:35 Apparently it’s not.
    1:12:36 Cool.
    1:12:38 This is now the shortest book I’ve ever written.
    1:12:40 I’m very proud of that fact.
    1:12:44 I compressed this 400 pages down to, I think it’s 102 pages or something.
    1:12:48 So those are two examples where I’m constantly asking like,
    1:12:51 what’s the most direct way to just get rid of what I really want?
    1:12:56 Get the outcome, skipping the usual fanfare.
    1:13:04 How do you think about burst order simplicity versus complexity versus second order,
    1:13:07 third order, and planning?
    1:13:16 And the reason I’m asking that is you strike me as someone who prizes freedom, independence,
    1:13:20 simplicity, all very highly.
    1:13:28 But I imagine there could be cases where looking at the first decision and the first order effects,
    1:13:35 you might think, well, it’s much simpler for me to do X, to renounce my US citizenship,
    1:13:41 to build a box, to do everything myself instead of taking on these cloud services
    1:13:42 for accounting and so on.
    1:13:50 But there are levels of second, third order complexities that ultimately make it kind of
    1:13:55 net net more complex than doing the slightly more complex thing up front.
    1:13:56 Does that make sense?
    1:13:58 Almost.
    1:14:07 I guess I’m wondering how practically people might think about simplifying but not oversimplifying
    1:14:10 and then shooting yourself in the foot in the long term.
    1:14:12 Give you an example.
    1:14:19 I know people who have moved to Puerto Rico to trim taxes substantially.
    1:14:25 But in the process, they viewed that as the most direct route to reducing taxes.
    1:14:30 Therefore, they can do X, Y, and Z over time with more income or preserved capital gain,
    1:14:30 whatever it might be.
    1:14:38 However, in the process of doing that, they’ve created all of this lifestyle complexity and
    1:14:41 applied a lot of constraints to what they can or cannot do.
    1:14:50 The tax tail is wagging the dog and instead of money serving life, now life is serving money,
    1:14:56 and they’ve kind of put themselves in a topsy-turvy upside down situation.
    1:14:59 And if you were to look at it from first principles two years later, you’re like,
    1:15:01 “Wow, that was really bungled.”
    1:15:04 And that’s not true for everybody in Puerto Rico.
    1:15:05 I’m not trying to make it sound like that.
    1:15:10 But I have seen those types of examples where the thing that seemed simple and straightforward
    1:15:16 at the outset ended up producing a lot of ripple effects that produced not just complexity,
    1:15:18 but complexity that was hard to undo.
    1:15:21 Yeah, great example.
    1:15:25 So, yeah, how do you think about that kind of risk mitigation?
    1:15:29 By the way, my two little examples of that.
    1:15:32 A few years ago, Tony Robbins had a Money Master the Game book.
    1:15:36 I was like, “Oh, wow, Tony hasn’t put out a book in like 20 years.
    1:15:37 I wonder how this is going to be.”
    1:15:43 And in it, he’s giving these prescriptions for extremely complex like insurance things
    1:15:44 that you could set up.
    1:15:48 I was like, “Ooh, wow, that’s objectively complex.”
    1:15:53 And another example is in Neil Strauss’ book called Emergency.
    1:15:55 I’ll never forget this point.
    1:16:00 He said that he’s off at one of these nomad, sovereign individual,
    1:16:03 “I’m beholden to no country” kind of events.
    1:16:06 And he meets this guy that is bragging to him about his setup.
    1:16:09 He’s like, “I got my income coming here, but then all expenses go here,
    1:16:13 but then I’ve got a trust and this, but I’m the non-managing member of the trust,
    1:16:14 which is held by this and that.”
    1:16:18 And in the end, he’s going to save 30% taxes.
    1:16:25 And Neil said, “Wouldn’t it just be a lot easier or make a lot more sense to just work
    1:16:29 30% harder or like to just make 30% more money?”
    1:16:31 He said, “That’s a ton of work just to save 30%.”
    1:16:35 He said, “It’s not that much harder to just go make 30% more.”
    1:16:39 And dude, when I read that, I love that thought process.
    1:16:47 So I think that I know that your podcast and the Titans and all that is often about
    1:16:54 how do we use the wisdom of others to avoid making these mistakes ourselves.
    1:16:59 But some of these things maybe just have to…
    1:17:00 I don’t know.
    1:17:02 I think for some of these things, I’m willing to throw myself in and feel the pain
    1:17:03 to see if I’ve done it wrong.
    1:17:06 I know we’re improv-jazzing here, so let’s keep going.
    1:17:13 This thought just occurred to me because when I hear you talk about code and programming,
    1:17:20 I mean, there’s a poetry to it and there’s an economy to it that seems I’m not a programmer,
    1:17:21 but I do write.
    1:17:27 There seems to be something intrinsically rewarding to you about that presentation of elegance.
    1:17:34 And I’m wondering in the case of following Stuart Brand’s principles in building this box
    1:17:42 or doing certain things that seem to me optimized for freedom, independence,
    1:17:50 is there… even if it ends up face-planting, is there something that you find beautiful
    1:17:55 and redeeming just about taking the simple approach, even if the outcome is suboptimal?
    1:17:57 It’s related.
    1:18:01 It’s finding out, in fact, instead of just in theory.
    1:18:06 We can sit at home and wonder what it might be like to do such and such,
    1:18:09 but at some point you just got to throw yourself in and go try it.
    1:18:14 And if you try moving to Puerto Rico and you hate it, well, now you know.
    1:18:16 It was worth a try, maybe.
    1:18:20 And now you know, in fact, that doesn’t work for you.
    1:18:28 That’s maybe the how buildings learn idea is don’t predict that you will want to sink
    1:18:34 in that spot, put yourself into that spot first, live without a sink for a while,
    1:18:38 and eventually you’ll get a good feeling for where the sink needs to be, in fact, not in theory.
    1:18:49 And so I think I do this with my life, is I’m willing to mess up happily because I will know
    1:18:53 that then I found out, in fact, that that doesn’t work for me.
    1:18:58 And maybe this is coming from the core of the fact that I’m a really happy person.
    1:19:01 And so I feel that like my base level is up here.
    1:19:06 I can take some big knocks and I think a lot of the crazy should have done.
    1:19:10 I did marry somebody that I hardly knew after a few months because,
    1:19:12 fuck it, let’s see what happens.
    1:19:15 In fact, you and I have never talked about that directly.
    1:19:18 But do you know what the mindset I was in at the time?
    1:19:20 I had just sold my company.
    1:19:26 I had a ton of money and I felt like I need to change my trajectory
    1:19:31 because my first impulse after selling my company was literally the next day I set up
    1:19:33 my next company.
    1:19:34 And I thought, I’m going to move to Silicon Valley.
    1:19:36 I’m going to do this thing.
    1:19:37 I’m going to stay on the same trajectory.
    1:19:44 And I did that for a few months, but then I caught myself going, wait, I want a full life.
    1:19:45 I don’t want to stay on the same trajectory.
    1:19:46 I want to shake shit up.
    1:19:52 So I very deliberately did what we might call the George Costanza principle,
    1:19:54 which is do the opposite.
    1:19:57 Do the opposite of all of my impulses.
    1:20:00 Every time I felt yes, everything in me said yes.
    1:20:01 I would say no out loud.
    1:20:04 And everything in me says no.
    1:20:07 I say yes out loud as a way of deliberately shaking shit up.
    1:20:13 And so I was dating this woman for a few months and we had no great connection.
    1:20:18 And she said, oh, well, I can’t travel to California with you unless we get married.
    1:20:22 And everything in me says, oh, hell no, don’t do that.
    1:20:22 That’s stupid.
    1:20:23 I don’t want to marry this person.
    1:20:26 So I said, yes, let’s do that.
    1:20:28 And so we got married.
    1:20:32 And I kept doing that in every way.
    1:20:38 I deliberately fucked up my life and made a bunch of crazy fucking decisions.
    1:20:42 And some of them worked out great and some of them didn’t.
    1:20:43 And I’m so happy that I did that.
    1:20:47 Like in some ways I could say that that’s my biggest regret or biggest mistake.
    1:20:50 But in other ways, it was wonderful.
    1:20:53 It deliberately sent me on a different trajectory.
    1:20:55 And I’m glad I did it.
    1:20:56 That it definitely will.
    1:21:01 So for people who don’t have any of the connective tissue here to figure out
    1:21:06 how to orient themselves to this, people are going to want to know, right?
    1:21:07 Cliffhanger.
    1:21:09 So how did that turn out?
    1:21:10 Everything in me says no.
    1:21:12 So I said, yes, let’s get married.
    1:21:12 Let’s do that.
    1:21:14 The marriage is awful.
    1:21:16 No, that was terrible.
    1:21:19 And we knew it literally like days later.
    1:21:21 Like, oops, we made a big mistake.
    1:21:23 Yeah, that was instantly a big mistake.
    1:21:24 And that’s fine.
    1:21:31 Because we knew in fact then that it was a big mistake, not just in theory.
    1:21:35 I could have walked away from that going, oh, God, remember that woman that wanted
    1:21:36 me to marry her?
    1:21:38 And I said, no, God, I wonder what would have happened.
    1:21:40 Well, now I get to find out.
    1:21:41 Like, I did it.
    1:21:42 Now, hold on a second, though.
    1:21:44 I’m going to push on this a little bit.
    1:21:51 We could use this logic to be a reverse George Costanza for every decision we think is bad.
    1:21:53 We could turn around and say yes to, right?
    1:21:57 But as a life strategy, I don’t see you continuing that, right?
    1:22:02 So you don’t know for a fact that the awful idea would have been awful.
    1:22:06 But I mean, there has to be a point at which you think about self-preservation and
    1:22:08 time as a finite currency.
    1:22:11 So you’re like, well, when would you apply that versus when would you not apply it?
    1:22:14 Because you could apply it everywhere, indefinitely.
    1:22:19 But certain things are one-way doors and some are two-way doors, right?
    1:22:28 I mean, for instance, getting a pet rat will lower cost, more reversible, let’s just say,
    1:22:31 than maybe giving up your US citizenship, right?
    1:22:34 That is a little harder to control Z.
    1:22:36 Yeah, I cannot undo that.
    1:22:38 Yeah.
    1:22:43 So moving forward for you, having learned everything that you’ve learned, when do you
    1:22:48 play the George Costanza strategy versus not, right?
    1:22:53 Because there are lots of things we can’t know for a fact unless we make the right or
    1:22:54 the wrong or the good or the bad decision.
    1:22:56 But you can’t make all decisions.
    1:22:57 So what do you do?
    1:23:03 You know, long ago, when I said the hell yeah or no thing, and…
    1:23:06 It’s going to be in your gravestone.
    1:23:11 Hell yeah or here I am.
    1:23:13 Here he lays.
    1:23:20 So some people emailed me after that, after that was on your show and they said,
    1:23:22 “Hey, man, I like this hell yeah or no thing.
    1:23:23 I’m using it for everything.
    1:23:24 You know, I just got out of college.
    1:23:25 I’m getting a bunch of offers.
    1:23:28 I’m like, I’m not feeling hell yeah about any of them.
    1:23:31 You know, I’m dating and we’re just like, you know, I’m not hell yeah about any of you.”
    1:23:32 And I go, “Wait, wait, wait, wait, hold on.
    1:23:36 Everything does not become a nail because you’re holding this hammer.
    1:23:36 You don’t…
    1:23:41 This is a tool for a specific situation when you’re overwhelmed with options.
    1:23:44 You have to have the wisdom to know when to use this tool.
    1:23:46 You don’t use it on everything always.
    1:23:49 It’s the same thing with this going against your instincts.
    1:23:52 Of course, you don’t use it on everything always.
    1:24:00 But that was a specific time in my life when I wanted to deliberately change my trajectory.
    1:24:02 I wanted to go against my normal way of doing things
    1:24:07 and deliberately introduce some randomness and variety into my life.
    1:24:08 Right, it’s not your default.
    1:24:12 Right, but let’s look at, you know, I mentioned Dubai earlier.
    1:24:14 Everything in me said, “Fuck that place.”
    1:24:17 And then I caught myself feeling that.
    1:24:20 And I thought, “Okay, wait, hold on.
    1:24:23 This is a good time to use this tool.
    1:24:24 My impulse is saying no.
    1:24:26 I’m going to try saying yes.
    1:24:27 I’m going to go get to know this thing.”
    1:24:32 Because that sounds to me like that would be a learning, growing experience to try it.
    1:24:35 That’s a good example of integrating this into your life.
    1:24:41 But then say, like if maybe you do hit a situation where it’s like nothing is working out.
    1:24:43 You’ve been an idiot your whole life.
    1:24:44 You just got fired.
    1:24:47 You were just dumped by your romantic partner.
    1:24:48 You’re at skid row.
    1:24:53 Maybe it’s a really good time to go against all your natural impulses
    1:24:57 since it’s pretty clear that your defaults were set wrong.
    1:24:58 They’re not working.
    1:25:00 Yeah, they’re not working very well.
    1:25:03 Yeah, I like integrating it.
    1:25:08 Maybe it’s the question is like, “Is this going to be a learning, growing experience for me?”
    1:25:11 I like leaning into discomfort.
    1:25:12 Whatever scares you, go do it.
    1:25:16 All right, so I have quite a few follow-up questions.
    1:25:18 We can take them in many different directions.
    1:25:22 So we’ve covered Rich Hickey, Clojure, Knock Knock.
    1:25:26 We’ll see if anyone lets him know he appeared on the show.
    1:25:31 And I also want to ask you a question we can cut from the conversation if we need to.
    1:25:33 But since Dubai has come up repeatedly.
    1:25:34 That’s a great lead-in.
    1:25:35 I love that.
    1:25:38 This may be too risky for anybody’s ears, but here we go.
    1:25:40 Do taxes fit into this at all?
    1:25:44 Is this like people who move to Nashville or Austin,
    1:25:46 and they’re like, “Oh, the barbecue and the music.”
    1:25:51 And they will dance and dance and dance until you corner them with a broomstick.
    1:25:52 And then they’re like, “Yeah, okay, fine.
    1:25:54 Yeah, the taxes are all so it’s a thing.”
    1:25:58 Is Dubai one of those or no?
    1:25:59 Not at all.
    1:26:01 I mean, I had to ask myself that.
    1:26:04 That’s like one of those things.
    1:26:09 Okay, when you ask yourself, would I still be doing this thing if nobody knew about it?
    1:26:11 I got an email from Guy once.
    1:26:14 It was just like, “Hey, man, I want to travel the whole world.
    1:26:16 I’m going to visit every country in the world.
    1:26:18 Do you have any suggestions for me?”
    1:26:22 I said, “Yeah, don’t bring a camera and don’t tell anyone that you’re doing this.
    1:26:24 Is it still appealing to you now?”
    1:26:26 Yeah, probably not.
    1:26:32 Okay, so anytime, say Dubai, for example, I was like, “Whoa, this place is fascinating.
    1:26:34 Oh my God, I think I want to live here.”
    1:26:38 I was like, “Would I still live here if the taxes were like 50%?”
    1:26:41 I was like, “Yeah, that’s moot to me.
    1:26:45 I mean, look, I’m living in New Zealand where my income tax right now is 45%.
    1:26:49 I pay a ton of taxes, but it’s worth it to me.
    1:26:50 I love it here.
    1:26:51 I don’t care.”
    1:26:57 So that thing I mentioned in Neil Strauss’ book, Emergency, that sentence hit me hard.
    1:27:02 When I first sold CD Baby, that was 2008.
    1:27:04 There were some things I was thinking at the time.
    1:27:07 I was like, “Ooh, wow, I just got Mega Millions.
    1:27:09 How can I pay less taxes?”
    1:27:14 And it was literally like the month before or month after I sold CD Baby
    1:27:17 that I read that book, Emergency.
    1:27:19 And I saw that sentence and I went, “Whoa.”
    1:27:22 -Good timing. -That is a great point.
    1:27:25 Don’t jump through hoops to save taxes.
    1:27:27 Jump through a hoop to go make more money.
    1:27:29 That’s the growth choice anyway.
    1:27:34 That’s the thought process that leads you to make growing decisions, not shrinking decisions.
    1:27:39 So you’re about to sell or have just sold CD Baby.
    1:27:42 You form a new company the next day.
    1:27:47 You’re planning on moving to Silicon Valley and you see yourself moving on that track
    1:27:52 and you decide to throw a Costanza curveball in and mix things up.
    1:27:54 Why?
    1:28:00 Like, what was the fear or the hazard you’re trying to avoid by following that path?
    1:28:06 Was it doing something thoughtlessly and repeating what you’ve done before?
    1:28:07 That it wasn’t intentional?
    1:28:08 What was it?
    1:28:10 I want to live a full life.
    1:28:15 At the end of my life, I want to look back and go, “Wow, I did a bunch of different things.
    1:28:17 I tried a bunch of different ways of living.
    1:28:20 I followed this philosophy for a while.
    1:28:21 I followed that one.
    1:28:22 I tried this.
    1:28:23 I tried that.
    1:28:24 I lived here.
    1:28:25 I lived there.”
    1:28:28 That to me is my definition of a full life.
    1:28:38 But my previous book called “How to Live” was 27 conflicting philosophies and one weird answer.
    1:28:42 And the whole idea was that it’s 27 chapters.
    1:28:46 Each one disagrees with the rest, but each one has a strong opinion of saying,
    1:28:49 “Here’s how to live, live for the future.”
    1:28:53 Then the next one’s like, “Here’s how to live, live only for the present.”
    1:28:55 And the next one’s like, “Here’s how to live, leave a legacy.”
    1:28:58 And these are all valid ways of living.
    1:29:04 And my definition of a full life is I want to experience the different approaches to life.
    1:29:10 I want to have the diversified portfolio of thought and of experiences.
    1:29:11 So that was it.
    1:29:15 I just felt like if I was to create a new company the next day and move to Silicon Valley,
    1:29:17 I’d just be doing more of the same shit I’ve already done.
    1:29:18 Yeah, makes sense.
    1:29:20 Makes perfect sense.
    1:29:22 Who else do you have on your list of people you’re studying?
    1:29:24 All right.
    1:29:30 Tyler Cowan, just a few days ago, in an article on Bloomberg.com called,
    1:29:32 “Who was Bitcoin’s Satoshi?”
    1:29:36 So we still don’t know who is Satoshi, the inventor of Bitcoin.
    1:29:43 And there’s this law of headlines that if it ends in a question mark,
    1:29:44 the answer’s usually no.
    1:29:51 So when I first saw the headline, I thought that the answer was going to be,
    1:29:52 “It doesn’t matter.
    1:29:53 It doesn’t matter who Satoshi is.
    1:29:54 Forget it.”
    1:29:57 And oh my God, Tyler Cowan took it somewhere else.
    1:29:59 Even if you would have asked me, by the way,
    1:30:03 “Hey, Derek, I’m going to give you an hour alone in a room to think about one question.
    1:30:07 Does it matter who is Satoshi, the inventor of Bitcoin?”
    1:30:11 Even after an hour, I think my answer would have been, of course not.
    1:30:15 And I would have just sat there for an hour just going, “No, no, no.”
    1:30:18 Tyler Cowan took it the opposite way.
    1:30:25 I jotted down his points, but it’s a masterpiece in this kind of if-then-knock-on thinking.
    1:30:33 So he said, “Okay, if we find out that Satoshi is dead, that the inventor of Bitcoin is dead,
    1:30:38 then that’s a good thing because it means Bitcoin will be more safe
    1:30:41 because it won’t be open to future alteration.
    1:30:44 The person can’t tarnish the reputation of it.”
    1:30:48 You know, say like Elon Musk and Twitter, kind of like, you know,
    1:30:52 by continuing to be there, can tarnish the reputation of something.
    1:30:53 Sorry, I shouldn’t have gone there.
    1:30:57 Satoshi can’t come back and change the rules for the worst.
    1:31:02 And then he even said, “This is why all religions have dead founders,
    1:31:07 is because the founder can’t stay in and tarnish the reputation of the religion.”
    1:31:10 So I went, “Okay, good point.
    1:31:13 If Satoshi is dead, that is good for Bitcoin.
    1:31:15 It can stay as is and won’t get tarnished.
    1:31:16 Won’t get changed.”
    1:31:20 And he said, “So there’s a chance that Satoshi is an older guy
    1:31:26 from this previous movement around e-gold that was generally seen as like a failed project,
    1:31:29 that a bunch of people were into this idea of e-gold and it didn’t work out.
    1:31:36 If Satoshi is somebody from that group, then that means that even projects that look like
    1:31:39 they’ve failed can create great things.
    1:31:46 So we should maybe think more highly or be less dismissive of projects that seem to be failing,
    1:31:48 because who knows what they will lead to.
    1:31:52 He said, “There’s a chance that Satoshi is this person,” and I forget their name,
    1:31:58 but he said, “that would have been 21 years old and in grad school at the time of inventing Bitcoin.”
    1:32:03 He said, “If that’s true, that means we should raise our perception of what young,
    1:32:06 busy people can do, that they can do more than we realize.
    1:32:09 This guy while in grad school also invented Bitcoin.”
    1:32:15 And I said, “If Satoshi is still alive, that means,” oh, by the way,
    1:32:18 we should say for you, I assume people know, but maybe not,
    1:32:25 “that whoever is Satoshi has hundreds,” okay, let’s say at least tens of billions of dollars
    1:32:32 in Bitcoin, that all he’d have to do, whoever Satoshi is, would have to just take it.
    1:32:34 It’s already there in the account in the public record that we can see.
    1:32:38 So Satoshi is one of the richest people on earth, whoever Satoshi is.
    1:32:44 So he said, “If Satoshi is still living, that means that some people don’t want to be billionaires
    1:32:46 or just have incredible self-restraint.”
    1:32:51 Like maybe upon realizing what he created, he destroyed the key, destroyed the password,
    1:32:54 so that he could not take those billions of dollars.
    1:32:57 You know, to protect himself from that.
    1:33:00 There’s a chance that Satoshi is a pseudonym for a group of people.
    1:33:06 If that’s true, it means a group of people can keep secrets way better than we expected,
    1:33:12 which means that conspiracy theories are more likely to be true.
    1:33:14 About anything in general, about UFOs, about JFK or whatever.
    1:33:20 If this group of people is Satoshi and they could have hundreds of billions of dollars
    1:33:22 or tens of billions of dollars, but they are choosing not to
    1:33:25 and they are all keeping the secret, that’s amazing.
    1:33:29 And we should regard secrecy more higher than we can.
    1:33:31 So that’s the end of the bullet points.
    1:33:35 But I read this one little Bloomberg article and my jaw dropped.
    1:33:39 I went, “Oh my God, this is the kind of thinking I aspire to.
    1:33:42 That is some amazing lateral creative…”
    1:33:43 I don’t know.
    1:33:44 What kind of thinking do you call that?
    1:33:45 But that’s what I want to do more of.
    1:33:48 Love it.
    1:33:49 Yeah, Tyler’s incredible.
    1:33:51 I highly recommend people check him out.
    1:33:53 That’s a really good Tyler example.
    1:33:55 Cowan, C-O-W-E-N.
    1:33:57 Definitely recommend people check him out.
    1:33:59 Also, past podcast guest.
    1:34:00 Yeah, that was a great one.
    1:34:03 Previously to this, one of my favorite points of his
    1:34:08 is he said that restaurants are better in places of high income inequality.
    1:34:09 Why?
    1:34:15 Because these are places that have both rich customers and low paid staff.
    1:34:18 So somebody can afford to run a great restaurant
    1:34:20 because there are enough people that will pay
    1:34:21 because there are rich people around.
    1:34:24 But there are enough low income people
    1:34:26 that we can have a good amount of staff.
    1:34:30 He said that’s why the best restaurants are in places of high income inequality.
    1:34:32 Whoa, that’s again a brilliant connection.
    1:34:33 That’s interesting.
    1:34:37 I would also add to that that a lot of folks who want to dedicate themselves
    1:34:43 to a craft or an art are, depending on the industry,
    1:34:46 but frequently not going to be well paid for that.
    1:34:54 And so, let’s just call it volitionally poorly paid in some cases.
    1:34:59 And I’m thinking of, in this particular case, San Francisco and East Bay,
    1:35:02 where a lot of restaurants in San Francisco,
    1:35:03 a lot of restaurants in different places.
    1:35:06 But as the price of living went up in San Francisco,
    1:35:10 a lot of the best restaurateurs, meaning I should say chefs,
    1:35:12 a lot of the best chefs, a lot of the best line cooks,
    1:35:14 a lot of the best massage therapists,
    1:35:17 a lot of these people could no longer afford to be there,
    1:35:18 had to move to the East Bay.
    1:35:23 And I would say that led to a decline in the quality
    1:35:26 of all of the goods I just mentioned in services.
    1:35:30 So that would also make sense if you want access to the artists,
    1:35:34 they’re not going to be in the most expensive areas typically,
    1:35:36 unless it’s like a Jeff Koons or someone.
    1:35:37 I haven’t been to Pittsburgh lately,
    1:35:39 but I heard that that happened with some of the,
    1:35:43 a lot of the best chefs from New York City went to Pittsburgh.
    1:35:46 And that now Pittsburgh is hotter than you’d expect.
    1:35:49 I can see that. I can totally see it.
    1:35:52 All right, Tyler, anybody else on the list
    1:35:54 of people you’re learning from or people you’re studying?
    1:35:57 Those of my two, that Tyler, it’s because they’re specific things.
    1:35:58 I love it. All right.
    1:36:00 So I think we have one more category.
    1:36:05 We’ll see how many we get to, but I heard a sharp inhale.
    1:36:06 Where should we go?
    1:36:13 Okay, so inchword, inchword.com, I-N-C-H-W-O-R-D.com.
    1:36:16 This is actually a bit of a call out.
    1:36:21 I don’t usually do this, but I would like to hear from translators
    1:36:25 that if you’re a translator, contact me,
    1:36:26 because I’ve got a lot of paying work,
    1:36:32 because I’m really interested in the subject of translations
    1:36:34 that are always improving, well, not always,
    1:36:36 at a certain point you call it, maybe you call it a release.
    1:36:40 But you know, as a writer, the first time you write a sentence
    1:36:41 is not always the best.
    1:36:44 You improve it the second or third time,
    1:36:48 and at any given sentence we see in your books,
    1:36:52 that might be the fourth time you’ve improved that sentence,
    1:36:53 maybe over the course of months.
    1:36:55 There’s always room for improvement.
    1:36:57 When somebody makes a translation of one of your books,
    1:37:00 the incentives are a little off now,
    1:37:03 because the translator’s incentive,
    1:37:06 as long as they’re not translating the Bible or something,
    1:37:10 their incentive is mostly just get it done, good enough, get paid.
    1:37:12 The publisher’s incentive,
    1:37:14 the publisher who publishes the translation,
    1:37:18 their incentive is hire a translator
    1:37:22 that will make a good enough translation for a low enough price
    1:37:24 that we can get this out in the market now
    1:37:26 and make a profit selling it.
    1:37:31 But my incentive as the writer that sweated over these words
    1:37:35 for years and really crafted it almost like song lyrics,
    1:37:37 like I have a different incentive,
    1:37:40 if I’m going to have a translation of this book out in the world,
    1:37:44 I want it to be great and really, really great,
    1:37:46 which means my incentive is to work closely with the translator
    1:37:50 to make sure that what they’re doing is the best it can be
    1:37:53 and that it’s communicating what I intended.
    1:37:56 How do you do that in a language you don’t speak?
    1:37:58 I don’t know, that’s my question.
    1:38:00 So this is the, I don’t have the answer,
    1:38:03 but I’m fascinated with the problem.
    1:38:08 So so far, the best idea is what I’m putting at inchword.com,
    1:38:10 which is this idea of incremental improvement.
    1:38:11 Oh, so this is your website?
    1:38:13 Yeah, I made it.
    1:38:15 It’s my little passion.
    1:38:19 So it’s this idea where once I call up something done,
    1:38:21 whether it’s an article or a book,
    1:38:24 I put every sentence into its own entry in the database
    1:38:26 and then I pass it to a computer
    1:38:29 that does the first round of a bad translation.
    1:38:30 So now we have a starting point.
    1:38:33 So now if you’re the first translator to come through
    1:38:37 and translate the automatic translation into your language,
    1:38:41 let’s say that’s a low bar, that’s low hanging fruit.
    1:38:43 So let’s say that will pay 50 cents per sentence.
    1:38:46 But now if you’ve done one round of improvements
    1:38:48 over the computer translation,
    1:38:50 and now somebody else comes through and says,
    1:38:53 I can improve that further, that sentence,
    1:38:54 not the whole thing,
    1:38:56 that sentence I can improve that one.
    1:38:59 Now that’ll pay like a dollar per sentence if it’s an improved.
    1:39:03 And now say two different people have improved it twice.
    1:39:05 And now a third person looks at that
    1:39:07 and says, I know how to improve that better.
    1:39:09 Okay, well now you can make say two dollars per sentence
    1:39:11 to improve it better.
    1:39:13 The stakes are getting higher for improving it.
    1:39:18 There are incentives now to make it as good as can be.
    1:39:20 How do you know if it’s been improved?
    1:39:23 So yes, how do we know it’s a better translation?
    1:39:26 So then we have readers who, reviewers,
    1:39:26 readers, whatever you want to call them,
    1:39:31 that are paid a little something to just read through and judge.
    1:39:34 And at any given sentence where an improvement has been made,
    1:39:37 both sentences are shown in random order
    1:39:40 and they have to vote for which one they feel
    1:39:43 is the better sentence in that case.
    1:39:47 When a majority votes that sentence is better than it’s chosen,
    1:39:48 and that’s when the translator gets paid.
    1:39:52 So a translator can’t get money just for coming in and spewing crap.
    1:39:53 They only get paid when the readers believe
    1:39:55 that that was a better translation.
    1:39:57 Anyway, I’m not saying this is the final answer,
    1:39:58 but I think it’s a fascinating problem
    1:40:02 that I’m willing to spend money on
    1:40:04 because I’m incentivized to have the best translation
    1:40:05 of my works out there.
    1:40:07 That’s it.
    1:40:08 If they are a good translator,
    1:40:11 how do you incentivize them to go first,
    1:40:13 knowing that someone might come along
    1:40:16 and make substantially more money
    1:40:18 by doing the fourth or fifth iteration?
    1:40:21 Or is that not a problem?
    1:40:22 I don’t know.
    1:40:24 See, you just asked a great question.
    1:40:25 Thank you.
    1:40:29 You’re welcome.
    1:40:31 That question is kind of the answer.
    1:40:32 That’s a really good thing to ask.
    1:40:32 I don’t know.
    1:40:34 I mean, I know nothing about this.
    1:40:36 I’m not fluent in any other language,
    1:40:39 but you’ve probably seen this effect.
    1:40:41 Whenever you start to learn another language,
    1:40:45 doesn’t it make you look at your English more closely?
    1:40:46 Oh, 100%.
    1:40:47 That’s part of the fun.
    1:40:47 Yes.
    1:40:49 Makes you look at the whole world differently,
    1:40:53 depending on how divergent the language is
    1:40:54 from your native language.
    1:40:56 In this case, English for us.
    1:40:57 Oh, yeah.
    1:40:59 So, so, so interesting.
    1:41:00 I was just trying to help somebody
    1:41:03 with their approach to Japanese yesterday.
    1:41:04 And my first thought was,
    1:41:07 if you have three or four weeks,
    1:41:11 maybe you go to South Korea first
    1:41:14 and try to pick up Korean
    1:41:16 because the reading is so much easier.
    1:41:20 So perhaps you could learn the basics of Korean,
    1:41:23 which isn’t identical to Japanese,
    1:41:26 but the grammar is very, very, very, very similar.
    1:41:27 And then you go back to Japan
    1:41:30 with your newfound knowledge of the grammar
    1:41:32 without the handicap that slows you down
    1:41:35 of having to learn three writing systems, right?
    1:41:36 Kira ga na kata ga na nankan di.
    1:41:37 Interesting.
    1:41:40 And I don’t know if that’s a good approach,
    1:41:41 but it was the first time it had occurred to me.
    1:41:42 And I was like, huh,
    1:41:47 wonder if that actually would be helpful
    1:41:49 or kind of like Python and Ruby,
    1:41:51 would it just be confusing as fuck?
    1:41:52 Because now you’re like,
    1:41:54 learn Portuguese and Spanish at the same time
    1:41:55 and you just get scrambled.
    1:41:57 It’s possible that it would be the latter.
    1:41:59 Yeah, okay.
    1:42:00 Do you remember Benny Lewis?
    1:42:02 Fluent in three months, Benny Lewis?
    1:42:03 Sure.
    1:42:07 Yeah, the Irish polyglot, I think, was the nickname.
    1:42:11 Yeah, Benny recommends Esperanto
    1:42:12 for that same thing that you just said.
    1:42:15 He said, because of objectively,
    1:42:17 Esperanto is the easiest language to learn.
    1:42:20 That’s why it was invented in 1888.
    1:42:23 By Zamanoff to be easy to learn.
    1:42:27 Therefore, if you’ve never spoken a second language before,
    1:42:29 go learn some Esperanto first.
    1:42:31 Get used to having a conversation
    1:42:32 that’s not in your native tongue.
    1:42:33 Interesting.
    1:42:35 And then go learn your target language.
    1:42:38 Wonder if that’s too much of a lift.
    1:42:38 Have you done it?
    1:42:40 Well, I will report.
    1:42:41 I did it.
    1:42:43 I became fluent in Esperanto about six years ago
    1:42:46 on Benny’s advice and I regret it.
    1:42:54 It’s less useful than Klingon,
    1:42:56 at least in communicating with others, right?
    1:43:01 Actually, I think Esperanto is hippy Klingon.
    1:43:06 I went to the annual Esperanto conference in Seoul, Korea
    1:43:11 and it was a bunch of 60-year-olds in tie-dyes
    1:43:12 singing about world peace,
    1:43:15 kind of like Woodstock 1969,
    1:43:18 revisited and they’re all singing like,
    1:43:19 “Oh, the world would have perfect harmony
    1:43:22 if we all just followed the ways of Zamanoff
    1:43:23 and had the one-world language.”
    1:43:27 And even though I had spent six months learning this language,
    1:43:28 I got to the event and I went,
    1:43:31 “I don’t like you people.”
    1:43:36 I stopped on that day.
    1:43:38 I was like, “I don’t want to speak this language anymore.”
    1:43:42 Okay, but so talk about the Ruby Python.
    1:43:44 I never learned any Spanish my whole life,
    1:43:45 even when I grew up in America.
    1:43:48 I just thought, “No, Spanish is too similar to English.
    1:43:50 If I’m going to learn another language,
    1:43:53 I want it to be Chinese or Arabic or something very different.”
    1:43:54 So I never learned any Spanish,
    1:43:56 but just two months ago,
    1:43:58 I went to South America for my first time
    1:44:04 and so I spent like a month learning Pimsler Basic Spanish.
    1:44:08 And Tim was like, “Oh my God, this is a great language.
    1:44:09 This is amazing. This is fascinating.”
    1:44:10 It is.
    1:44:15 And also, it is so easy that I went, “Damn it, Benny.
    1:44:18 I shouldn’t have learned Esperanto for six months.
    1:44:20 I should have learned Spanish. It’s just as easy.”
    1:44:23 And it would have been more useful.
    1:44:25 Anyway, I like that you brought up the Korean thing.
    1:44:29 I think it is proven to be a good technique
    1:44:32 to do the easier language first to help you disconnect
    1:44:34 or like you say, to help you understand the grammar
    1:44:35 and then do the difficult one.
    1:44:37 But it does help, I guess,
    1:44:40 if it’s Korean or a language that people actually use.
    1:44:41 Not Esperanto.
    1:44:43 Yeah. Spanish is a great language.
    1:44:49 For people who are curious about Korean
    1:44:53 and just how brilliantly the writing system is designed,
    1:44:54 it’s a point of national pride.
    1:44:57 And it is not something that was out of the box.
    1:45:01 It was something that was developed long after
    1:45:06 Korea had first adopted Chinese writing,
    1:45:08 much like the Japanese.
    1:45:11 There is a cartoon online and it is something like
    1:45:14 how to learn to read Korean in 15 minutes
    1:45:16 or how to read Korean in 15 minutes.
    1:45:18 And it’s a comic book. You can find it.
    1:45:21 And literally, it might not be 15 minutes,
    1:45:23 but within two or three hours,
    1:45:24 you can learn Korean well enough
    1:45:26 that you can read anything in Korean.
    1:45:30 You will not understand a damn thing that you’re reading,
    1:45:34 but you will be able to sound out phonetically roughly,
    1:45:37 roughly what it is, which is great fun.
    1:45:42 And well enough that if you’re, as I was a few weeks ago,
    1:45:48 in an Uber and you see the Uber app is set to Korean,
    1:45:50 you could say thank you or have a nice day
    1:45:51 or how are you in Korean?
    1:45:53 And below that in the back, how did you know?
    1:45:54 And you’d be like, “Well, it’s Korean on the app.”
    1:45:55 “Oh my God.”
    1:45:57 If you want some cheap applause
    1:46:00 that’ll make somebody’s day, that’s an easy way to go.
    1:46:01 You know, it’s funny, it fits right in.
    1:46:02 You remember your whole like,
    1:46:05 “Hey, here’s how to learn how to spin a pen with your fingers?”
    1:46:08 Like, here’s some things you can learn in 15 minutes,
    1:46:13 like the old like Tim Ferriss 1.0 South by Southwest.
    1:46:14 Yeah, exactly.
    1:46:16 Speak Korean in 15 minutes.
    1:46:18 Also, courtesy of Japan for sure.
    1:46:21 This is what all the kids used to do in class,
    1:46:24 and now I have something that will endlessly distract
    1:46:28 and annoy everyone who sees it from an airplane or something.
    1:46:30 Thanks, Japan.
    1:46:31 Oh, all right.
    1:46:32 What else do you have?
    1:46:35 Derek, anything else in that top hat?
    1:46:36 I’ll just say this quickly.
    1:46:37 I love this little phrase.
    1:46:40 I realized when I was like digging into my incentives
    1:46:44 why I do things, I travel to inhabit philosophies.
    1:46:47 You can hear about life in Brazil or life in Japan,
    1:46:51 but it’s a different thing to be there in it.
    1:46:53 But I think there’s some philosophies,
    1:46:55 whether it’s stoicism or hedonism,
    1:46:58 that we can just do from a chair
    1:47:01 by just sitting and changing our thought process.
    1:47:07 But, you know, Brazilianism, Japanism, Arabianism,
    1:47:10 I don’t know, Parisianism, these are kind of like philosophies.
    1:47:12 The way that people live in places
    1:47:14 are kind of living philosophies.
    1:47:18 But I want to experience what it’s like
    1:47:20 because I want to think that way.
    1:47:21 So I would really like to go there,
    1:47:25 live as close as I can to being like a local,
    1:47:29 learn the language, live that life according to that way
    1:47:32 to inhabit, embody this way of living
    1:47:37 in order to feel the actual physical results,
    1:47:40 the actions of living that philosophy.
    1:47:42 And I thought, this is actually the reason I travel.
    1:47:45 It’s not to look at things or take pictures
    1:47:47 or post them to impress people.
    1:47:49 I travel to inhabit philosophies.
    1:47:51 I love that.
    1:47:54 What are you finding of the philosophy?
    1:47:59 What is the philosophy of the UAE or Dubai?
    1:48:00 Recognizing that the culture is very different,
    1:48:04 depending if they’re by the hills or the water or the desert.
    1:48:08 But how would you try to express that philosophy?
    1:48:11 Easy. Generosity.
    1:48:14 That’s the thing when I said that Sheikh Zayed, who founded it,
    1:48:17 Bedouin culture underneath it,
    1:48:21 and then say Emirati culture or Arabian Arab culture.
    1:48:25 Generosity is by far the number one.
    1:48:27 If you read this book, Arabian Sands,
    1:48:30 by Thatcher, he has all these stories of
    1:48:33 when he’d be out in the desert on the camels
    1:48:35 with his little crew of six guys,
    1:48:38 and they only have this much food left,
    1:48:40 like nothing, and their tummies are grumbling
    1:48:41 and they’re starving.
    1:48:42 It’s funny that I just said tummies.
    1:48:44 That was cute and dust.
    1:48:46 I just noted that for myself.
    1:48:49 Who wins my bedtime story, Dad?
    1:48:52 And also my little rats here.
    1:48:53 I love kissing your little tummies.
    1:48:56 Anyway, okay, so, but then if somebody would approach them,
    1:48:59 you know, like, oh, hello, my friend, whatever.
    1:49:01 He said, as soon as somebody approaches,
    1:49:03 that’s it, we’re not going to eat today,
    1:49:04 because this is the way.
    1:49:07 You give whatever you’ve got.
    1:49:08 So anybody, a stranger approaches,
    1:49:10 you say, hello, friend, come sit with us here.
    1:49:11 No, have some soup.
    1:49:12 Don’t worry, we’re not hungry.
    1:49:14 We’ve eaten enough.
    1:49:15 This is for you now.
    1:49:16 Come sit with us.
    1:49:19 When I went to Dubai that first time,
    1:49:22 somebody I had met once from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
    1:49:25 We met briefly in Oxford.
    1:49:27 He was the only person I knew that lived in the region.
    1:49:29 So I emailed him saying,
    1:49:31 hey man, I’m going to Dubai for my first time.
    1:49:32 Are you going to be around?
    1:49:33 And he said, my friend.
    1:49:35 He said, cancel your hotel reservation.
    1:49:36 He said, you’re going to stay at my home
    1:49:39 in the Burj Khalifa, the tallest building in the world.
    1:49:39 You’re going to stay.
    1:49:41 I have an apartment in the Burj Khalifa.
    1:49:42 Stay at my home.
    1:49:43 You’re my guest.
    1:49:44 I said, wow, that would be great.
    1:49:46 I said, it’ll be so good to see you again.
    1:49:48 And he said, no, no, I won’t be there.
    1:49:48 He said, I live in Riyadh,
    1:49:50 but my uncle will get you from the airport
    1:49:51 and just give you the keys.
    1:49:52 My home is your home, stay as long as you want.
    1:49:56 So I did. I stayed in the Burj Khalifa a few days.
    1:49:58 This generosity runs so deep.
    1:50:00 It’s hospitality, it’s generosity.
    1:50:04 And you understand why you’re in the harsh environment
    1:50:05 of the desert.
    1:50:07 Everybody’s living a harsh life.
    1:50:09 When you meet somebody that’s traveling and passing,
    1:50:11 it’s like, oh, come in, come in.
    1:50:12 Here, have some.
    1:50:13 Don’t even need to tell us your name
    1:50:15 or who you are or your tribe or nothing.
    1:50:17 Just come in, my guest.
    1:50:18 Please have whatever you want.
    1:50:19 My food.
    1:50:20 Take a bed.
    1:50:21 Stay as long as you want.
    1:50:25 And that’s so deep in the culture
    1:50:29 that yes, I would like to inhabit that philosophy.
    1:50:33 Now that I’ve been on the receiving end of that hospitality,
    1:50:38 part of me kind of wants to have a home near the Dubai airport
    1:50:40 and make that my main home base.
    1:50:43 And for whenever I’m not there and I’m traveling,
    1:50:46 to just open it up for any of my friends in the world.
    1:50:46 Like, please, you’re coming through.
    1:50:48 Please stay at my home.
    1:50:49 Like, I want to return that generosity.
    1:50:50 Is it going to be a six by eight foot?
    1:50:52 Thank you.
    1:50:54 God, Touche, come.
    1:50:56 Everything I have is yours.
    1:50:59 Wait, Derek, quick text.
    1:51:00 Where’s the bathroom?
    1:51:01 Oh, no, there’s no bathroom.
    1:51:02 Oh, no, my friend.
    1:51:06 Question whether you truly need it or not.
    1:51:09 You will find out.
    1:51:12 Let me know where you think the sink should be.
    1:51:14 I’ll be a bad Emirati.
    1:51:15 I’ll be fired.
    1:51:24 How is understanding that Dubai is an international city
    1:51:27 for a lot of different reasons you could get by
    1:51:29 on English almost certainly?
    1:51:30 How is your Arabic coming?
    1:51:32 Have you started tackling that?
    1:51:34 I haven’t spent more time in Dubai yet.
    1:51:36 I’m planning on going back very soon
    1:51:37 and getting to know more people
    1:51:38 and spending more time there.
    1:51:40 And considering it as a place I really might want to live.
    1:51:43 Because I’ve just noticed throughout my life,
    1:51:44 like I grew up in a suburb of Chicago,
    1:51:46 then I moved to downtown Boston,
    1:51:48 then I moved to New York City in the middle of it.
    1:51:52 And it was like, oh, yes, this multiculturalism,
    1:51:55 like this feels more like representative
    1:51:57 of the real world to me, right?
    1:51:59 And then like when I went back to my hometown
    1:52:02 in Hinsdale, Illinois, it’s like everybody’s white.
    1:52:03 This is weird.
    1:52:07 You know, it’s like I like places that are multicultural
    1:52:09 because it feels like I’m more in the real world, right?
    1:52:13 So I thought New York, like I’ve also lived in London.
    1:52:14 I moved to Singapore.
    1:52:15 I lived in Singapore for years.
    1:52:17 I thought I had been in the most multicultural places
    1:52:18 in the world.
    1:52:22 No, I looked up statistically New York, London, Singapore.
    1:52:26 They’re all about 35 or so, 30 to 35% foreign-born population.
    1:52:32 Dubai is like 90 plus percent foreign-born population.
    1:52:34 Everybody is from everywhere.
    1:52:38 And so when I got there, it was like anthropology jackpot.
    1:52:40 I was like, oh, this is amazing.
    1:52:41 Everybody’s from everywhere.
    1:52:43 I get into any taxi driver, you know, anybody.
    1:52:46 You can just ask anybody you see where you from
    1:52:48 and you’re going to get a different answer all the time.
    1:52:49 I’m from Cameroon.
    1:52:50 What are you doing here?
    1:52:51 I love languages.
    1:52:53 I said, okay, what does that mean?
    1:52:55 He said, well, I love languages.
    1:52:57 And I thought, where can I get paid to learn languages?
    1:52:59 I said, I’ll move to Dubai.
    1:53:02 I’ll drive a taxi and I can get paid to learn languages.
    1:53:03 I said, did it work?
    1:53:06 He said, my friend, I can speak eight languages now.
    1:53:08 I’ve been here 18 months.
    1:53:10 I can converse with people in eight languages.
    1:53:12 He said, everybody that gets into my taxi,
    1:53:14 I just talk with people all day long.
    1:53:17 He said, I speak Urdu, Hindi, Arabic.
    1:53:18 I think he grew up with French.
    1:53:20 He said, I’m speaking to you in English.
    1:53:22 He said, I couldn’t speak English 18 months ago.
    1:53:23 Now look at me.
    1:53:25 And he said, I’m getting paid to learn languages.
    1:53:26 This is amazing.
    1:53:27 And I turned to somebody else.
    1:53:28 I’m like, where are you from?
    1:53:30 She’s like, I’m from Nairobi.
    1:53:31 She had the most beautiful accent
    1:53:33 and we got into a long conversation about Nairobi.
    1:53:35 And I just thought, this is what I want.
    1:53:36 Like just by being in Dubai,
    1:53:38 the whole world comes through there
    1:53:40 and you meet so many people from all over the place.
    1:53:42 I thought, oh, God, this is what a beautiful place.
    1:53:45 Anyway, it’s like, there we are,
    1:53:47 living in the cantina in Star Wars.
    1:53:47 That’s fine.
    1:53:49 Dude, you said it first.
    1:53:50 That’s what I usually say.
    1:53:53 It’s like, Dubai is the bar in Star Wars.
    1:53:54 It’s the cantina.
    1:53:57 Everybody comes from all over the world to this spot
    1:53:59 to kind of do their shady dealings.
    1:54:02 But oh my God, if you’re an amateur anthropologist
    1:54:03 like me, it’s heaven.
    1:54:05 Well, I’m excited that you’re excited, man.
    1:54:06 It’s fun to see.
    1:54:09 And I hope to break some bread in person
    1:54:11 in the not too distant future.
    1:54:12 What’s fun?
    1:54:13 Always fun to hang out.
    1:54:14 Always great fun.
    1:54:18 Is there anything that you would like to say,
    1:54:20 anything you’d like to point people to,
    1:54:22 mention anything at all before we–
    1:54:24 Bring out the little buddies again from here.
    1:54:25 Hop off and land the plane.
    1:54:28 These guys have been sleeping by my feet
    1:54:29 the whole time we’ve been talking.
    1:54:30 Adorable.
    1:54:33 They’re really good little pets.
    1:54:36 They’re really, if you don’t wash your hands
    1:54:38 after you cook, then you just let them lick your fingers.
    1:54:39 Oh, he’s licking me right now.
    1:54:40 It’s really sweet the way they lick.
    1:54:42 They never, ever, ever bite.
    1:54:43 They’re very gentle.
    1:54:46 Well, unlike my hamsters I had when I was a kid,
    1:54:47 they were biters.
    1:54:48 Yes, same.
    1:54:48 I had gerbils.
    1:54:49 They were nasty.
    1:54:51 Anyway, I don’t know.
    1:54:52 Well, you know my usual call out.
    1:54:57 I really enjoy the people that I’ve met through your podcast.
    1:54:59 So, hey, anybody listen to this all the way through,
    1:55:02 I truly enjoy my email inbox.
    1:55:04 I spend about 90 minutes a day just answering emails,
    1:55:05 and I really like it.
    1:55:06 So, send me an email.
    1:55:07 Say hello.
    1:55:09 Introduce yourself, especially if you’re a translator,
    1:55:13 or if you live in Dubai, or you found anything here fascinating.
    1:55:14 All right.
    1:55:16 Do you want them to do the detective work
    1:55:17 of finding the email address?
    1:55:18 Is that the hurdle?
    1:55:19 Oh, sorry.
    1:55:19 Go to my website.
    1:55:21 Just go to sive.rs.
    1:55:23 There’s a big contact me here link.
    1:55:25 It’s easy detective work.
    1:55:27 Okay, sive.rs.
    1:55:30 That’s pretty low hurdle.
    1:55:33 If they can’t clear that, then they have other problems.
    1:55:35 All right, man.
    1:55:37 Well, thanks for taking the time.
    1:55:38 As always, really appreciate it.
    1:55:40 Sorry, I missed you in England.
    1:55:42 Yeah, next time.
    1:55:44 We’ll both get our knees repaired,
    1:55:46 and then we’ll meet up for another walk and talk.
    1:55:49 I might ask you some tips on meniscus stuff.
    1:55:52 Boy, yeah, we’ll talk about the knee repair.
    1:55:56 For everybody listening, go to tim.blog/podcast.
    1:55:58 I’ll link to everything we talked about,
    1:56:00 all the books, City of Gold, China’s worldview,
    1:56:05 all of these various things, the figures and places,
    1:56:06 musicians, and so on.
    1:56:09 Oh, I should say that useful not true
    1:56:10 is only through my website.
    1:56:11 It’s not at fuck Amazon.
    1:56:12 It’s not on Amazon.
    1:56:14 I put it on my website only.
    1:56:15 So don’t go to Amazon and look for it
    1:56:17 and email me and ask why it’s not there,
    1:56:18 because I don’t like them.
    1:56:19 So go to sive.com.
    1:56:25 All right, go to sive.com or sive.rs.
    1:56:26 I guess let’s go to the same place.
    1:56:30 And you can find all things about Derek.
    1:56:33 And until next time, be a bit kinder than is necessary,
    1:56:36 not just to others, but also to yourself.
    1:56:37 And thanks for tuning in.
    1:56:40 Hey, guys, this is Tim again.
    1:56:42 Just one more thing before you take off,
    1:56:44 and that is Five Bullet Friday.
    1:56:46 Would you enjoy getting a short email from me
    1:56:50 every Friday that provides a little fun before the weekend?
    1:56:51 Between one and a half and two million people
    1:56:53 subscribe to my free newsletter,
    1:56:56 my super short newsletter called Five Bullet Friday.
    1:56:58 Easy to sign up, easy to cancel.
    1:57:03 It is basically a half page that I send out every Friday
    1:57:05 to share the coolest things I’ve found or discovered
    1:57:07 or have started exploring over that week.
    1:57:09 It’s kind of like my diary of cool things.
    1:57:12 It often includes articles I’m reading, books I’m reading,
    1:57:17 albums perhaps, gadgets, gizmos, all sorts of tech tricks
    1:57:19 and so on that get sent to me by my friends,
    1:57:21 including a lot of podcasts.
    1:57:25 Guests and these strange esoteric things end up in my field,
    1:57:28 and then I test them, and then I share them with you.
    1:57:31 So if that sounds fun, again, it’s very short,
    1:57:34 a little tiny bite of goodness before you head off
    1:57:36 for the weekend, something to think about.
    1:57:37 If you’d like to try it out,
    1:57:39 just go to tim.blog/friday,
    1:57:43 type that into your browser, tim.blog/friday,
    1:57:46 drop in your email, and you’ll get the very next one.
    1:57:46 Thanks for listening.
    1:57:50 Way back in the day, in 2010,
    1:57:52 I published a book called The Four Hour Body,
    1:57:55 which I probably started writing in 2008.
    1:58:00 And in that book, I recommended many, many, many things.
    1:58:02 First generation continuous glucose monitor.
    1:58:07 And cold exposure, and all sorts of things
    1:58:09 that have been tested by people from NASA
    1:58:10 and all over the place.
    1:58:14 And one thing in that book was athletic greens.
    1:58:17 I did not get paid to include it, I was using it.
    1:58:21 That’s how long I’ve been using what is now known as AG1.
    1:58:24 AG1 is my all-in-one nutritional insurance,
    1:58:25 and I just packed up, for instance,
    1:58:27 to go off the grid for a while.
    1:58:30 And the last thing I left out on my countertop
    1:58:32 to remember to take, I’m not making this up,
    1:58:34 I’m looking right in front of me,
    1:58:37 is travel packets of AG1.
    1:58:40 So rather than taking multiple pills or products
    1:58:41 to cover your mental clarity,
    1:58:43 gut health, immune, and out of energy, and so on,
    1:58:47 you can sport these areas through one daily scoop of AG1,
    1:58:49 which tastes great, even with water.
    1:58:51 I always just have it with water.
    1:58:52 I usually take it first thing in the morning,
    1:58:54 and it takes me less than two minutes until,
    1:58:56 honestly, it takes me less than a minute.
    1:58:58 I just put in a shaker bottle, shake it up, and I’m done.
    1:59:02 AG1 bolsters my digestion and nutrient absorption
    1:59:04 by including ingredients optimized
    1:59:07 to support a healthy gut in every scoop.
    1:59:09 AG1 in a single-serve travel packs,
    1:59:11 which I mentioned earlier,
    1:59:13 also makes for the perfect travel opinion.
    1:59:15 I’ll actually be going totally off the grid,
    1:59:19 but these things are incredibly, incredibly space-efficient.
    1:59:20 You could even put them in a book, frankly.
    1:59:22 I mean, they’re kind of like bookmarks.
    1:59:25 After consuming this product for more than a decade,
    1:59:27 I chose to invest in AG1 in 2021
    1:59:29 as I trust their no-compromise approach
    1:59:31 to ingredients sourcing and appreciate their focus
    1:59:34 on continuously improving one formula.
    1:59:35 They go above and beyond
    1:59:38 by testing for 950 or so contaminants
    1:59:41 and impurities compared to the industry standard of 10.
    1:59:43 AG1 is also tested for heavy metals
    1:59:47 and 500 various pesticides and herbicides.
    1:59:50 I’ve started paying a lot of attention to pesticides.
    1:59:52 That’s a story for another time.
    1:59:55 To make sure you’re consuming only the good stuff.
    1:59:58 AG1 is also NSF-certified for sport.
    1:59:59 That means if you’re an athlete, you can take it.
    2:00:02 The certification process is exhaustive
    2:00:04 and involves the testing and verification
    2:00:07 of each ingredient and every finished batch of AG1.
    2:00:09 So they take testing very seriously.
    2:00:10 There’s no better time than today
    2:00:13 to start a new healthy habit.
    2:00:14 And this is an easy one.
    2:00:15 All right, wake up.
    2:00:16 Water in the shaker bottle.
    2:00:18 AG1, boom.
    2:00:20 And right now, every week of November,
    2:00:23 AG1 will be running a special Black Friday offer
    2:00:26 for a free gift with your first subscription,
    2:00:28 which is in addition to the Welcome Kit
    2:00:30 with five AG1 travel packs
    2:00:32 and a bottle of vitamin B3 plus K2.
    2:00:36 So make sure to check out drinkag1.com/tim
    2:00:38 to see what gift you can get this week.
    2:00:41 That’s drinkag1.com/tim
    2:00:42 to start your holiday season off
    2:00:45 on a healthier note while supplies last.
    2:00:49 I have been fascinated by the microbiome
    2:00:52 and probiotics as well as prebiotics for decades.
    2:00:55 But products never quite live up to the hype.
    2:01:00 I’ve tried so many dozens and there are a host of problems.
    2:01:02 Now, things are starting to change
    2:01:05 and that includes this episode’s sponsor,
    2:01:08 Seeds DS01 Daily Symbiotic.
    2:01:11 Now, it turns out that this product, Seeds DS01,
    2:01:13 was recommended to me many months ago
    2:01:15 by a PhD microbiologist.
    2:01:18 So I started using it well before their team
    2:01:20 ever reached out to me about sponsorship,
    2:01:22 which is kind of ideal because I used it unbitten,
    2:01:24 so to speak, came in fresh.
    2:01:26 Since then, it has become a daily staple
    2:01:28 and one of the few supplements I travel with.
    2:01:31 I have it in a suitcase literally
    2:01:34 about 10 feet from me right now.
    2:01:35 It goes with me.
    2:01:38 I’ve always been very skeptical of most probiotics
    2:01:40 due to the lack of science behind them
    2:01:42 and the fact that many do not survive digestion.
    2:01:45 To begin with, many of them are shipped dead, DOA.
    2:01:47 But after incorporating two capsules
    2:01:50 of Seeds DS01 into my morning routine,
    2:01:52 I have noticed improved digestion
    2:01:54 and improved overall health.
    2:01:56 Seeds seem to be a bunch of different cascading effects.
    2:01:57 Based on some reports,
    2:02:00 I’m hoping it will also have an effect on my lipid profile,
    2:02:02 but that is definitely TBD.
    2:02:04 So why is Seeds DS01 so effective?
    2:02:06 What makes it different?
    2:02:08 For one, it is a two-in-one probiotic
    2:02:11 and prebiotic formulated with 24 clinically
    2:02:12 and scientifically studied strains
    2:02:16 that have systemic benefits in and beyond the gut.
    2:02:16 That’s all well and good,
    2:02:19 but if the probiotic strains don’t make it to the right place,
    2:02:22 in other words, your colon, they’re not as effective.
    2:02:26 So Seed developed a proprietary capsule and capsule delivery system
    2:02:29 that survives digestion and delivers a precision release
    2:02:32 of the live and viable probiotics to the colon,
    2:02:35 which is exactly where you want them to go to do the work.
    2:02:37 I’ve been impressed with Seeds’ dedication
    2:02:38 to science-backed engineering
    2:02:40 with completed gold standard trials
    2:02:42 that have been subjected to peer review
    2:02:44 and published in leading scientific journals,
    2:02:47 a standard you very rarely see from companies
    2:02:48 who develop supplements.
    2:02:50 If you’ve ever thought about probiotics,
    2:02:51 but haven’t known where to start,
    2:02:53 this is my current vote for great gut health.
    2:02:54 You can start here.
    2:02:56 It costs less than $2 a day.
    2:02:57 That is the DS01.
    2:03:00 And now you can get 25% off your first month
    2:03:02 with code 25TIM.
    2:03:06 And that is 25% off of your first month of Seeds DS01
    2:03:12 at seed.com/tim using code 25TIM all put together.
    2:03:15 That’s seed.com/tim.
    2:03:16 And if you forget it,
    2:03:18 you will see the coupon code on that page.
    2:03:24 One more time, seed.com/tim code 25TIM.
    2:03:27 (upbeat music)
    2:03:37 [BLANK_AUDIO]

    Derek Sivers is an author of philosophy and entrepreneurship, known for his surprising, quotable insights and pithy, succinct writing style. Derek’s books (How to Live, Hell Yeah or No, Your Music and People, Anything You Want) and newest projects are at his website: sive.rs. His new book is Useful Not True.

    Sponsors:

    Seed’s DS-01® Daily Synbiotic broad spectrum 24-strain probiotic + prebiotichttps://Seed.com/Tim (Use code 25TIM for 25% off your first month’s supply)

    Momentous high-quality supplements: https://livemomentous.com/tim (code TIM for 20% off)

    AG1 all-in-one nutritional supplement: https://drinkag1.com/tim (1-year supply of Vitamin D (and 5 free AG1 travel packs) with your first subscription purchase.)

    *

    For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.

    For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Showplease visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsors

    Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.

    For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.

    Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.

    Follow Tim:

    Twittertwitter.com/tferriss 

    Instagraminstagram.com/timferriss

    YouTubeyoutube.com/timferriss

    Facebookfacebook.com/timferriss 

    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferriss

    Past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry SeinfeldHugh JackmanDr. Jane GoodallLeBron JamesKevin HartDoris Kearns GoodwinJamie FoxxMatthew McConaugheyEsther PerelElizabeth GilbertTerry CrewsSiaYuval Noah HarariMalcolm GladwellMadeleine AlbrightCheryl StrayedJim CollinsMary Karr, Maria PopovaSam HarrisMichael PhelpsBob IgerEdward NortonArnold SchwarzeneggerNeil StraussKen BurnsMaria SharapovaMarc AndreessenNeil GaimanNeil de Grasse TysonJocko WillinkDaniel EkKelly SlaterDr. Peter AttiaSeth GodinHoward MarksDr. Brené BrownEric SchmidtMichael LewisJoe GebbiaMichael PollanDr. Jordan PetersonVince VaughnBrian KoppelmanRamit SethiDax ShepardTony RobbinsJim DethmerDan HarrisRay DalioNaval RavikantVitalik ButerinElizabeth LesserAmanda PalmerKatie HaunSir Richard BransonChuck PalahniukArianna HuffingtonReid HoffmanBill BurrWhitney CummingsRick RubinDr. Vivek MurthyDarren AronofskyMargaret AtwoodMark ZuckerbergPeter ThielDr. Gabor MatéAnne LamottSarah SilvermanDr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

  • #776: Derren Brown — A Master Mentalist on Magic, Mind Reading, Ambition, Stoicism, Religion, and More

    AI transcript
    0:00:04 Hello, boys and girls, ladies and germs. This is Tim Ferriss. Welcome to another episode of
    0:00:09 The Tim Ferriss Show, where it is my job to deconstruct world-class performers from all
    0:00:13 different disciplines, from all different places around the world. My guest today is
    0:00:18 Darren Brown. What makes him tick? How does he do what he does? What does he do anyway?
    0:00:23 Darren Brown is a psychological illusionist who can predict, suggest, and even control
    0:00:28 human behavior. Some of his videos are absolutely bananas. You can go on YouTube,
    0:00:36 search Darren Brown, D-E-R-R-E-N, Darren Brown, paying people with blank money as an example.
    0:00:42 You can watch his TED Talk to see examples of mentalism. They will blow your mind. He started
    0:00:47 his TV career with shows such as Mind Control and Trick or Treat for Channel 4. That’s the UK’s
    0:00:53 equivalent of PBS. He has combined spectacular illusions with insights into how we see the world
    0:00:59 and those around us or expect to see them. Rather than guard the mystery behind his illusions and
    0:01:04 manipulations, he lays bare his techniques and demonstrates how the human mind works.
    0:01:09 A prolific creator and performer, Darren has appeared in blockbuster stage and television shows
    0:01:14 like, including the sold-out Broadway run of his one-man show Secret, his Olivier award-winning
    0:01:20 tour of Sven Galli, and his Netflix specials, which we will talk quite a bit about in this
    0:01:25 discussion because they are cuckoo bananas. They’re completely nuts. Darren is the author
    0:01:30 of multiple books, including Happy, Why More or Less, Everything is Absolutely Fine, and A Book of
    0:01:36 Secrets, Finding Comfort in a Complex World. His new tour, Only Human, materializes on stages
    0:01:43 across the UK beginning April of 2025. Very soon. You can find Darren on Instagram and X at
    0:01:49 Darren Brown, and you can find his work, his books, and his amazing artwork also at
    0:01:55 Darren Brown, that’s D-E-R-R-E-N, DarrenBrown.co.uk. We’re going to get right into the conversation,
    0:02:00 but first, just a few quick words about the sponsors who make this show possible.
    0:02:06 This episode is brought to you by Eight Sleep. I have been using Eight Sleep pod cover for years
    0:02:11 now. Why? Well, by simply adding it to your existing mattress on top like a fitted sheet,
    0:02:16 you can automatically cool down or warm up each side of your bed. Eight Sleep recently launched
    0:02:22 their newest generation of the pod, and I’m excited to test it out, Pod 4 Ultra. It cools,
    0:02:28 it heats, and now it elevates automatically, more on that in a second. First, Pod 4 Ultra can cool
    0:02:32 down each side of the bed as much as 20 degrees Fahrenheit below room temperature, keeping you
    0:02:37 and your partner cool, even in a heat wave. Or you can switch it up depending on which of you is
    0:02:42 heat sensitive. I am always more heat sensitive, pulling the sheets off, closing the windows,
    0:02:47 trying to crank the AC down. This solves all of that. Pod 4 Ultra also introduces an adjustable
    0:02:52 base that fits between your mattress and your bed frame and adds reading and sleeping positions for
    0:02:57 the best unwinding experience. And for those snore heavy nights, the pod can detect your snoring and
    0:03:02 automatically lift your head by a few degrees to improve airflow and stop you or your partner from
    0:03:06 snoring. Plus, with the Pod 4 Ultra, you can leave your wearables on the nightstand. You won’t need
    0:03:11 them because these types of metrics are integrated into the Pod 4 Ultra itself. They have imperceptible
    0:03:16 sensors, which track your sleep time, sleep bases, and HRV. Their heart rate tracking is just one
    0:03:24 example is at 99% accuracy. So get your best night’s sleep. Head to 8sleep.com/tim and use
    0:03:32 Code Tim to get $350 off of the Pod 4 Ultra. That’s 8sleep, all spelled out, 8sleep.com/tim
    0:03:39 and Code Tim TIM to get $350 off the Pod 4 Ultra. They currently ship to the United States, Canada,
    0:03:45 the United Kingdom, Europe, and Australia. I don’t know about you guys, but I’ve had the experience
    0:03:51 of traveling overseas and I try to access something, say a show on Amazon or elsewhere,
    0:03:57 and it says not available in your current location, something like that, or creepier still if you’re
    0:04:02 at home and this has happened to me. I search for something or I type in a URL incorrectly
    0:04:09 and then a screen for AT&T pops up and it says you might be searching for this. How about that?
    0:04:13 And it suggests an alternative and I think to myself, wait a second, my internet service
    0:04:20 provider is tracking my searches and what I’m typing into the browser. Yeah, I don’t love it.
    0:04:25 And a lot of you know I take privacy and security very seriously. That is why I’ve been using today’s
    0:04:31 episode sponsor ExpressVPN for several years now and I recommend you check it out. When you connect
    0:04:35 to a secure VPN server, your internet traffic goes through an encrypted tunnel that nobody can see
    0:04:41 into, including hackers, governments, people in Starbucks, your internet service provider, etc.
    0:04:46 And no, you’re not safe simply using incognito mode in your browser. This was something that
    0:04:50 I got wrong for a long time. Your activity might still be visible as in the example I gave to
    0:04:55 your internet service provider. Incognito mode also does not hide your IP address. Also with
    0:04:59 the example that I gave of you can’t access this kind of that content, wherever you happen to be,
    0:05:04 then you just set your server to a country where you can see it and all of a sudden voila,
    0:05:09 you can say log into your normal Amazon account is supposed to be enrouted to dot UK or whatever.
    0:05:15 And everything works. So ExpressVPN protects you and enables you because it encrypts and
    0:05:19 reroutes your network traffic through secure servers. So even though your traffic is still
    0:05:25 passing through your internet provider, now they can’t read it. ExpressVPN is so fast also doesn’t
    0:05:30 bog things down at all. I usually forget that I even have it on. I can stream high quality video with
    0:05:36 no lag or buffering, even on servers thousands of miles away. Gives me access to servers in 105
    0:05:42 countries around the world, which is very helpful, as I am constantly traveling and love to do so.
    0:05:47 It’s easy to use. You just choose a server location and tap one button to connect. You do not need to
    0:05:53 be technologically savvy. You don’t need to know anything about how it works. It’s just one click
    0:05:59 and it works on every device, phone, laptop, tablets, even TVs. ExpressVPN has really changed
    0:06:03 the way I use the internet. And I can’t recommend it highly enough. So check it out.
    0:06:09 Right now, you can go to expressvpn.com/tim and get three extra months for free when you sign up.
    0:06:18 Just go to expressvpn expresvpn.com/tim for an extra three free months of ExpressVPN. One more
    0:06:47 time, expressvpn.com/tim. I’m looking at your website right now,
    0:06:53 DarrenBrown.co.uk, for people who would like to check it out. And I’m just going to mention two
    0:07:00 quotes, which are in the now streaming on Netflix section here. And the first is under
    0:07:05 sacrifice. And the quote is, “Sacrifice is an utterly bizarre, ethically questionable, totally
    0:07:11 gripping must see.” That’s from paste. And then under the push, the quote is, “The most nightmarish
    0:07:16 and provocative piece of pop culture in TV history.” And that’s from the New Zealand Herald.
    0:07:26 Could you please explain, just in brief, these two specials and the premise of each?
    0:07:33 I started off doing mind reading TV shows back in 2000. And then as I sort of, I guess, I kind of
    0:07:38 in the world of being a magician, mind reader, sort of mentalist. And then over the years,
    0:07:42 they kind of, as I grew up, I guess, and wanted to do something I found more interesting with it,
    0:07:50 the shows became largely about people being put unwittingly through these kind of social
    0:07:56 experiments and slightly kind of Truman show kind of way, generally to come to a better place in
    0:08:00 themselves. Or generally, there was a good reason for them. Yeah, you do kind of have license in
    0:08:06 a way that you couldn’t in a clinical setting to stage things that are quite sort of dark. So in,
    0:08:10 to you mentioned there, so sacrifice was the last one I did. And the idea was to see whether
    0:08:19 a guy who was very anti immigration and big Trump supporter at the time that was all sort of kicking
    0:08:25 off and probably to a lot of people’s ears had kind of fairly racist views, whether he could be
    0:08:32 brought to a point where he would lay down his life for an illegal undocumented Mexican immigrant.
    0:08:37 So the whole show, and this is a sort of a kind of a format that I’ve used in different ways,
    0:08:42 is about layering in. Sometimes they don’t know they’re part of a TV show at all. He thought he
    0:08:46 was part of a documentary, thought we’d implanted a microchip in the back of his neck and were
    0:08:51 following, I’ve thought about this for a long time, following his sort of progress with that was
    0:08:58 actually that microchip thing was a big placebo. And it was a way of kind of getting a not a hypnotic
    0:09:02 response from him, but a kind of allowing suggestion to work well with him and getting into the point
    0:09:07 where I could layer in these triggers, and then set them off at a moment that we staged using
    0:09:11 lots of actors that you didn’t realize were actors whereby he would be given this sort of moral
    0:09:17 choice and would he do it would he lay down his life and lay down his life meaning take a bullet,
    0:09:23 take a bullet. So that’s sacrifice and then the push was another kind of life and death thing.
    0:09:30 It was to see whether could you make some saviours out loud and realize how ludicrous they are.
    0:09:33 Could you make somebody push someone off a building and kill them
    0:09:39 purely through social compliance. So it was a show about compliance. So again, you’ve got someone
    0:09:43 going through it that doesn’t realize they’re part of a TV show at all. This is completely hidden in
    0:09:50 terms of the filming and a whole load of actors and this really anxiety ridden hilarious kind of
    0:09:55 evening that they go through when they’re a guest at what they think is a big high stakes auction
    0:10:01 party and one of the guests. I would support the story in case anybody sees it, but I recommend
    0:10:05 people watch it. I’ve seen it. Thank you. Thank you. It’s yeah, these things have always interested
    0:10:10 me and generally it’s been about as I said kind of taking someone that by all reports needs to kind
    0:10:15 of step it up a little bit somewhere in the life and get them to that point. The biggest one I did
    0:10:20 was called apocalypse and it involved ending the world. A lot of these ideas come from frustrated
    0:10:24 writing sessions and we’re going around in circles and then one of us goes, ah, can’t we just
    0:10:29 an apocalypse? Can’t we just end the world and then somebody wakes up and it’s all zombies and
    0:10:33 they’ve got to find their way home and so we did that and part of the process of making the show
    0:10:39 is trying to stick to these original ideas and stick to the scale. So we had a meteor strike,
    0:10:44 we had to convince this guy that it was a meteor was going to land and so we hacked into his news
    0:10:48 feeds, his television, his family running it, his house is full of hidden cameras, doesn’t know we’re
    0:10:52 filming in his house for months. It’s like the game with Michael Douglas. Exactly. No, that is a
    0:10:57 big reference point for us. Yeah, it’s exactly that. So yeah, that’s been fun. It’s been a few years
    0:11:02 since I’ve done TV because I was out in, I do stage shows as well every year and I was out in
    0:11:07 doing a show on Broadway and then there was COVID and then I had a lot of theater projects going
    0:11:11 on. So I’ve taken a bit of a rest. So if I come back, it’ll be something different, I think. But
    0:11:17 yeah, that’s the general picture. You’re good at different and just to add a little bit of
    0:11:24 additional connective tissue for the push. And now I have not seen the push in a long time, but
    0:11:27 am I right that you make reference to, and I’m probably getting the pronunciation wrong here,
    0:11:34 but Sirhan Sirhan at the beginning of that, am I inventing that? No, that’s a different show.
    0:11:38 That’s a different show, which was another assassination as to whether you could take
    0:11:44 so Sirhan Sirhan who shot Bobby Kennedy, it was to see whether his claim, how he was set up by
    0:11:49 the CIA could actually work, whether you could do those things and set up those triggers. So we
    0:11:53 just followed basically his story and did it with somebody who had them assassinate. Could you
    0:11:59 replicate it? That’s Stephen Fry, again, who was in on it. Stephen Fry, just for those, we won’t
    0:12:03 get into his bio, but the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy audiobook, if you want to get a real
    0:12:09 taste of the brilliance of Stephen Fry, at least as a voice actor, highly, highly recommend.
    0:12:16 He’s a great man. Amazing. We’ll come back to some of the ethical questions around these social
    0:12:21 experiments. There are none. There are none. There are none. We’ll come back to that. But
    0:12:27 I wanted to rewind. So you mentioned, I guess around 2000 or so, if I’m getting the chronology
    0:12:36 right. I believe this is referring to mind control. Is that the right, Peg? How did that happen? And
    0:12:42 is it fair to say that that was the first kind of catalyzing event that set the stage for a lot
    0:12:48 of what came later? I’m wondering what ingredients went into that happening, whether serendipitous,
    0:12:55 engineered, or otherwise. So I studied law and German in Bristol, in England, and I lived there
    0:13:01 for many years afterwards. And I’d seen a hypnotist in my first year at university and just was so
    0:13:08 besotted with it. I learned how to do that. And by the time I graduated, I was the hypnotist guy at
    0:13:14 university. And I also started doing close-up magic as well. And then I sort of kind of made a living
    0:13:20 doing those things. And after sort of mid 90s, I wrote a book for magicians. And then that got me,
    0:13:24 which is kind of a whole, there’s a whole niche world of publishing there. So I got known to that
    0:13:31 community. So when a TV company here, who I guess we’re looking for a British answer to Blaine,
    0:13:37 David Blaine, who sort of shows a particularly hot new at the time, they spent a couple of years
    0:13:41 looking for somebody that could do mind reading, because there really wasn’t very much of it around.
    0:13:48 And that had become my thing. So I got a phone call and I went to London and met the
    0:13:52 two guys that ran the production company. One of them has since become my manager.
    0:13:57 And the other one is now my sort of, well, we’re all kind of co-producers in our own company.
    0:14:01 And I showed them a few things and they really liked it. And we put together this first
    0:14:07 show and it was a one hour special, yeah, in 2000. And I think it was the repeat of the show,
    0:14:11 actually did well. So the Channel 4 in the UK commissioned another one. And then it just
    0:14:15 sort of built from there. And then there’s been a couple of things I did. Three years into it,
    0:14:20 I did this Russian roulette on TV, like a live thing. And that got a lot of publicity. So it just
    0:14:25 kind of kept going. And then along the way, as I’ve sort of grown up, I’ve kind of tried to take
    0:14:33 it in new directions. But essentially, it was a mixture of a lot of background work. I was just
    0:14:37 doing it a lot. I just loved it. I just loved sort of spending my days dreaming up tricks and going
    0:14:42 out performing in the evening. And as I said, writing the book and just getting known to that
    0:14:46 world and then being offered the show. What was it that grabbed you in the beginning? I don’t know
    0:14:53 if it was Martin Taylor originally or someone else. But number one, why did you even see hypnotism
    0:15:00 on campus or while you’re at university? And then secondly, what about it
    0:15:04 attracted your attention enough? You’re a smart guy, you could do a lot of things. You already
    0:15:12 do a lot of things. What was it that pulled you in after or during that performance?
    0:15:16 Yeah, so Martin Taylor was the hypnotist that I saw. And I think it’s probably, I don’t know what
    0:15:24 it’s like in the States, but it’s a fairly popular student staple in terms of entertainment. And
    0:15:27 it was a really good show. I think sometimes they’re going to be spoiled by people being
    0:15:30 made to look like idiots. And this wasn’t like that. It was really fascinating. And it was in my
    0:15:39 first week, I was a great kind of attention seeker and just quite insecure. And I didn’t realize it
    0:15:44 consciously. But I think the idea of hypnotizing people, particularly, I mean, often there’s
    0:15:50 sort of people that respond to hypnosis, well, are the kind of very extrovert kind of jock
    0:15:55 types. And suddenly you’ve kind of got control over that, you know, which is the exact of the
    0:15:59 people that would have intimidated me so much and had done like through school. And I think
    0:16:04 something in that just made it so appealing. And I walked back, I was walking back with a
    0:16:08 friend of mine from that show. And I said, it’s what I’m going to do. I’m going to learn how
    0:16:12 to do this and do it. And I remember he said, oh, yeah, me too. And I knew that he didn’t mean it
    0:16:17 the same way I did. You mean he was going to be more of a tourist and you were like, no,
    0:16:22 no, no, I’m going to medical school for hypnotism. Yeah, really clicked into place. And of course,
    0:16:27 that was, you know, there were no YouTube videos or anything. So I was bought and stole books and
    0:16:30 anything I could find. And I kind of learned it the long way around. I think if you,
    0:16:35 there are probably shortcuts to learning hypnosis, but it helps you to learn it the long way around
    0:16:39 because you’re going to run into strange situations with it sometimes, which, you know,
    0:16:45 happens and still does. So what do you mean by strange situations or run into strange situations?
    0:16:53 Well, actually, so the state shows that I do don’t really have much overt hypnosis. And I’m using
    0:16:59 suggestion and subtle stuff with the audience all the time. So I’ve taught every year for 20 years
    0:17:05 or so apart from COVID. It’s a strange feature. I think of the last show I did showman, which is on
    0:17:12 Channel 4. So this is post COVID. And maybe it’s also the first show that the kind of younger,
    0:17:17 or that kind of Gen Z world was sort of an age limit, a bottom age limit on the shows.
    0:17:21 So it was the first time it sort of really started to be sort of populated, maybe as well, by
    0:17:26 that sort of generation, I don’t know, but there was a little bit of hypnosis in the show. I don’t
    0:17:32 really do hypnosis overtly, but it was to serve a bigger end. And yeah, for the first time,
    0:17:36 as these really odd reactions, much, much stronger than before. I’m used to sort of sometimes having
    0:17:41 to go out and speak to someone in the interval or after the show. There was a woman who I got a
    0:17:47 message in the interval that there was a woman with a head stuck to the table in the bar in the
    0:17:53 theater, which sounded odd because it’s not like nothing that I’d said or done to the audience would
    0:17:58 have, I could think would have made that happen. But nonetheless, people sometimes highly suggestible
    0:18:01 people, maybe it’s sort of she maybe she picked something up. Anyway, so I went out and spoke
    0:18:06 to her because she looked drunk. She’d sort of largely been ignored. And the rest of the audience
    0:18:10 has sort of found their way back into the theater by this point. So I could go up and talk to her
    0:18:19 on her own. And she was sort of furious and angry. Her head stuck to the table. It was a very odd
    0:18:24 situation, which has never happened in 20 years. There are lots of sort of things arose like this
    0:18:29 where I’m trying to kind of, because you know, your natural instinct is to then you find rapport
    0:18:32 with the person and you bring them to where you want them to be. It’s kind of straightforward
    0:18:38 stuff. But she was absolutely not having any of it. Didn’t want me to help her, was angry. And in
    0:18:42 the end, I had to say, because it was time to carry on with the show. Look, I’ve got to go,
    0:18:46 I’ve got to carry on with the show. And she’s like, yeah, you do that. You know, great. Well,
    0:18:52 I’ll see you afterwards. Yeah, yeah. And it got slightly argumentative. And then I went back to
    0:18:56 the rest of the half of the show, doing this show, knowing there’s a woman with her head stuck to
    0:19:00 the table upstairs thinking, why did I get slightly chippy with her? And she was, you know,
    0:19:05 she was fine at the end. But it’s just, it was an odd thing in the air that, and I think a lot of
    0:19:10 the strange reactions that, and this only has taken me 20 years to learn this, that when people do
    0:19:16 act oddly or seem to get in quotes, caught, you know, stuck in hypnosis, or it’s generally people
    0:19:21 having panic attacks, they’ve sort of, you know, hypnotists have said, okay, open your eyes to a
    0:19:25 big audience of people and you haven’t been able to open your eyes in the moment. And then you get
    0:19:32 into a kind of a recurring spiral. Yeah, exactly. And once I started saying, don’t do this, if you
    0:19:36 are prone to panic attacks, just sit this bit out or go outside of the theater, go outside of the
    0:19:40 auditorium for a bit. It stopped. But it’s, it’s a really interesting, have you had much to do
    0:19:44 with it? If you, you must have skirted around hypnosis a lot, even if you haven’t done it.
    0:19:50 I have. Yeah, I have. I’ve had at least one or two people on the show who have practiced hypnosis,
    0:19:58 that clinical hypnotist from Stanford on the show as well, and have a deep interest, but
    0:20:08 very little personal experience. Would you mind defining mentalism, cold reading, and then describing
    0:20:15 how you made the hop, if it is a hop from hypnosis to those things, or how you incorporated them?
    0:20:20 But what are they? Hypnosis, I think, is very difficult to define. And there are definitions
    0:20:26 of it, of course. But in terms of what’s actually happening and what’s going on, it’s always been,
    0:20:30 there are some people that have always said it’s a special state. And there are others that say,
    0:20:35 no, it’s just, it’s really just sort of behavior being motivated in a particular way. So for example,
    0:20:41 you know, you see somebody on stage being given an onion to eat and you’re told it’s the, it’s a
    0:20:45 delicious apple and you see them eating an onion. And it seems like, well, there must be in some
    0:20:50 special state to be able to comfortably eat an onion and not find it disgusting. And I was talking
    0:20:55 about this with my co-creator, one year, because we were talking about doing these sorts of things
    0:20:59 as part of the show. And he said, I bet you can just eat an onion anyway. And he went to my fridge,
    0:21:02 took out an onion, took out a big bite of it. And he said, yeah, look, that’s fine. I can eat the
    0:21:07 onion. It’s fine. Because his motivation was such that he was wanting to prove a point. And then,
    0:21:11 lo and behold, it’s actually all right if you’re motivated in the right way. Whereas if you’re
    0:21:16 eating an onion and going, oh, this is disgusting, then it’s going to be very different. So I veer
    0:21:22 more towards that sort of, it’s just something in motivation and behavior rather than a special
    0:21:27 state. But there are things that we’ve done, like putting people in an ice bath under hypnosis,
    0:21:32 having them not feel the pain that you’d find. Well, they’re not just faking it because you
    0:21:36 couldn’t just fake that. It’s not the same as that. There’s something else, some middle ground
    0:21:42 going on. That’s a tricky one. But also a great source of fascination for me. Mentalism is,
    0:21:48 well, it’s a sort of type of performance that it’s always has been a little niche.
    0:21:55 A magician that is obviously a magician doing a trick with a sort of mind reading theme as if
    0:21:59 that’s kind of mentalism. If somebody makes that they’re living, then they’re a mentalist.
    0:22:05 But also you could probably think of a stage medium or a psychic as also being a sort of
    0:22:12 mentalist. So it kind of covers the performing world of psychological or supernaturally kind of
    0:22:17 that world as opposed to the more obvious fodder of conjuring card tricks and soaring
    0:22:23 people in half and so on. It sort of had its heyday, I think, back in the turn of the 20th century.
    0:22:30 And a lot of the things I’ve drawn on really have come from that. It’s more popular nowadays.
    0:22:33 And the same way that when Blaine was very popular, a lot of magicians,
    0:22:37 Copperfield, David Copperfield brought in a wave of magicians doing that style of magic and
    0:22:42 Blaine did a similar thing with that style of magic. I think I’m probably responsible for the
    0:22:45 wave of mentalism. There’s more of that around now than there was before.
    0:22:49 And it’s sort of going to be defined by whatever people choose to do that I guess that call themselves
    0:22:56 mentalists. Because when I started in hypnosis, my skill base is a mix of sometimes it’s
    0:23:00 real stuff that looks like tricks and sometimes it’s tricks that looks like real stuff and it’s
    0:23:06 suggestion and it’s magicians techniques as well. So it’s kind of a mix of all of those things.
    0:23:11 And then cold reading, which is the other one you mentioned, is what distinguishes from hot
    0:23:18 reading. It’s the techniques used by generally fake psychics, but also the sort of thing you’d
    0:23:26 read in astrology columns and magazines and so on, where you make it sound like you have some
    0:23:30 clever insight into somebody. And you’re saying things that sound very specific to that person,
    0:23:35 but actually are things you’re just throwing out and you know that the person will pick up on the
    0:23:41 stuff that hits and matches their experience or sort of ignore all the other stuff that doesn’t.
    0:23:49 And there are any number of clever ways that people in that world use to make it seem like
    0:23:53 it really sounds like they’ve said something more specific than they have. So if you go and see a
    0:23:56 medium on stage, classically, they’ll say, “I’m getting a name,
    0:24:01 Jean.” And then you’ve got hands will go up. Now, that could be that somebody in the audience
    0:24:05 is called Jean. It could be, “Well, my sister died and she was called Jean.” Or it could be,
    0:24:10 “I know a Jean.” So that could be anything, but as soon as someone says, “Oh, I know a Jean.” Oh,
    0:24:16 well, this is for them. “Wow, how did you know? I had a friend called Jean.” Well, he didn’t.
    0:24:21 You provided that information, you know, and so on. So you’re generally saying stuff when it’s a
    0:24:25 conversation like that and people provide you some little thing back, which you then take credit
    0:24:32 for and this sort of conversation winds its way along. And if you’re not skeptical, it can seem
    0:24:39 convincing on a good day. Hot reading is when you’re using information that you’ve gleaned
    0:24:44 from a person. So very specific information that you’re just feeding. You’re feeding straight back.
    0:24:52 So a friend of mine was at a recording of a very famous TV medium in the States,
    0:24:55 a good few years back. And it was when this sort of thing was starting to become popular,
    0:24:59 it was, I think, probably the first big name doing that sort of thing. And he had a studio
    0:25:04 audience set up. And this friend of mine was sat in the audience, skeptical like I would be,
    0:25:08 but just there out of curiosity. So the guy comes out before they start filming.
    0:25:11 This is the TV personality who’s the medium.
    0:25:15 This is the medium. This is the medium comes out to talk to the audience before they start
    0:25:20 filming and says, “Obviously, the audience is full of believers, apart from people like my friend.”
    0:25:24 And says, “Anybody here hoping that someone’s going to come through for them?” So lots of
    0:25:28 hands go up. And he just goes around and talks to people and says, “Who have you lost? I’ve lost
    0:25:33 a son. Okay. And what happened? Well, this happened.” He drowned. And, okay, can you tell me his name?
    0:25:36 Do you remember what he was wearing on the day? Just so that if he comes through,
    0:25:40 I’ll know that it’s him. So he gets all this information and then the cameras start rolling.
    0:25:44 And he just goes out and feeds that straight back to the people. I’m getting a,
    0:25:48 this is a guy and this is a young boy. He was seven. He drowned. He’s wearing a red sweater.
    0:25:53 Does anybody take this? And of course, the woman in the audience is in tears and, you know,
    0:26:00 because she, so often with this thing, the reason why people don’t want to believe it’s fake is that
    0:26:05 the lie is so ugly that anybody would actually do that just to make themselves look good. And,
    0:26:10 you know, that it’s easier to believe it must be real, or at least maybe they believe it themselves,
    0:26:16 or they’re trying to do good, or that it’s just so often just kind of ugly. So that’s hot reading,
    0:26:20 or as cold reading as the, you have no information, but you’re good at making it sound like you do.
    0:26:22 Those are my definitions.
    0:26:26 If you were to do an online course training people to be more skeptical,
    0:26:31 how might you think about that? Would you have a signed reading of any type? Would you have them
    0:26:39 watch certain things? I’ve seen more and more, I think in like a foreboding burgeoning nihilism
    0:26:44 with a lot of worries around climate change and so on, people want something to grab onto.
    0:26:50 The Judeo-Christian religions in many places have faded away, no longer have the hold that
    0:26:56 they did, therefore not offering the guidance they once perhaps did. So at least in Austin,
    0:27:03 my pet theory is that people are looking for some sense of wonder at work and possibility,
    0:27:09 and then they start grasping onto QAnon, they start grasping onto whatever the latest and
    0:27:13 greatest kind of magical thinking might be. How might you train someone in the opposite direction?
    0:27:19 Well, first of all, I mean, that’s a very noble human urge. We all want to find meaning in our
    0:27:24 lives and so much of happiness and good stuff comes from that as a byproduct from that. And
    0:27:28 you find meaning in your life by finding something bigger than you and then just throwing yourself
    0:27:37 into that thing. So that’s okay. The human urge to transcend is important and worth honoring,
    0:27:41 but yes, of course it can misfire, but it also misfires when we attribute it to
    0:27:46 money and success and fame. If we think those things are going to make our lives transcendent
    0:27:50 or us happier, and again, there’s lots of ways in which it misfires. But yeah, we can also attach it
    0:27:58 to these sorts of structures provided by conspiracy theories and so on. I have over my years read
    0:28:02 through quite a lot of books on skepticism. So perhaps I’ve sort of just developed a kind of a
    0:28:07 way of thinking, but to me, the things that have sort of landed and stayed with me are first that
    0:28:14 humane idea of strong claims demand, strong evidence. So if somebody is making a positive
    0:28:23 claim about something that is unusual, this thing exists, whether it’s something supernatural or
    0:28:26 it’s up to them to come up with evidence for it. It’s not up to you to try and disprove it,
    0:28:30 because that’s always going to be a losing battle. So when people
    0:28:36 say, “Oh, this is true. Is it what I believe?” and you can’t disbelieve it, well, no, you can’t.
    0:28:40 And that’s fine. You don’t have to sort of rise to it. And I think a lot of the problem is once
    0:28:44 you start rising to it and it gets into a sort of heated thing, you’re arguing about stuff
    0:28:50 you don’t need to be arguing about. I’ve had a million people over the years say to me, as someone
    0:28:56 that’s often doing stuff that appears psychic and saying, “Look, this isn’t psychic.” Say,
    0:29:01 “Well, how do you explain this?” This psychic said this thing to me, a ghost that they saw
    0:29:08 or these experiences that people have. And particularly when it’s ghosts of loved ones
    0:29:14 and so on, all these experiences, they’re really meaningful to people. And I think there’s probably
    0:29:19 all sorts of other things going on. I lived in a house for a few years that was damp. Damp’s a
    0:29:23 funny thing. It creates a real feeling of death when it’s just not quite enough that you can
    0:29:28 identify as damp, but it’s enough that it just does something in the air. It took a long time
    0:29:33 for us to work out. It was damp, but it felt just like death. There was just something wrong,
    0:29:37 you know, that feeling of a room being wrong. There was vents that air would come in and the
    0:29:41 dogs would do that thing of barking at nothing, barking mid-air. It turned out it was smells
    0:29:47 coming up through vents. A friend of mine who works a lot in the sort of parapsychology world,
    0:29:50 Richard Wiseman, I don’t know if you’ve come across him, but he… He’s been on the podcast.
    0:29:55 I’m sure he has. He’s a brilliant, hilarious man, but he was talking about windows open at just the
    0:30:01 right amount of extractor fans and things. So you’ll have air passing into a room at a particular
    0:30:06 frequency where… And we all know about brown noise and white noise and things that can make
    0:30:11 parts of us vibrate and it makes us feel a bit sick. Well, there’s a particular frequency that
    0:30:16 will just make our eyeballs vibrate a bit. And what that means is we’ll see shapes and it will see
    0:30:21 like dark patches in the periphery of our vision. Now, you never know that. That’s not somebody being
    0:30:26 stupid or gullible if they’re seeing things like that. There’s all sorts of stuff that goes on. But
    0:30:31 ultimately, whatever is causing these things, these are powerful experiences for people and I…
    0:30:36 There’s something wrong with leaping on them and saying, “That’s wrong. That’s stupid,” because
    0:30:40 they really can mean a lot to people and particularly said, “If you’ve lost somebody and then feel that
    0:30:45 you’re having some connection with them afterwards.” So I think not rising to it and understanding
    0:30:51 these things as stories and experiences and what meaning that can have for a person. So I’m really
    0:30:54 taught… I guess I’m talking more about the sort of supernatural side of thing rather than
    0:30:59 conspiracies as such. But even, I suppose, with conspiracy theories, these are things that mean
    0:31:04 something. They’re giving this person something. I think there’s a bit of space around that that
    0:31:09 can be sat with rather than immediately leaping on them. Otherwise, it’s about the obvious things.
    0:31:16 Check your sources. And is this government that on the one hand you’re saying is totally ineffectual?
    0:31:24 Are they also clever enough to have created this enormously elaborate thing that you’re saying
    0:31:30 that they’ve done? It’s always going to be with us, and it points to that feeling of wonder and
    0:31:36 storytelling and how we latch onto a nice, neat story of cause and effect. And that’s exactly
    0:31:39 what I do for a living. I see value in all that stuff, but yeah, it can misfire.
    0:31:45 It’s something I think about a lot. I fund a lot of early-stage science, and I’ll just give people
    0:31:50 a couple of recommendations actually. This is, I think, pretty sure it’s fellow Brit. Ben Goldacre
    0:31:55 wrote a book called Bad Science, which I think is worth, should be required reading for every
    0:32:00 school child on some level, at least parts of it. Michael Sherman’s written a lot in the area.
    0:32:04 All right, I’ll check him out. There’s also, well, I think the best book I’ve seen on cold
    0:32:09 reading, and it might be very hard to get now, and it’s a book written for magicians. I have a
    0:32:13 load of sort of old pamphlets and strange old books on these things, but there’s one relatively
    0:32:20 modern for me at least, so written in the last 20 years, called the Full Facts Book of Cold Reading.
    0:32:25 It’s a great title. He may have written other books with the Full Facts Book of dot, dot, dot,
    0:32:32 but this is the Full Facts Book of Cold Reading by Ian Rowland, R-O-W-L-A-N-D. And I remember that
    0:32:37 when I was learning all this stuff, that was definitely a kind of, that was a really useful.
    0:32:42 It was certainly up to date at the time compared to the very sort of, you know, strange old antique
    0:32:47 things, because it’s such an old profession. It’s, you know, probably the second oldest
    0:32:52 profession around, you know, it goes right back to the Oracle of Delphi, you know, giving people
    0:32:57 information that you seemingly couldn’t know. So it’s a very old literature too.
    0:33:04 Just a quick thanks to one of our sponsors, and we’ll be right back to the show.
    0:33:10 If you’re doing any kind of B2B marketing, you know just how noisy the ad space can be.
    0:33:14 There’s a lot of noise. If your message isn’t targeted properly to the right audience,
    0:33:19 it just disappears into all of that noise, all that whitewash. With LinkedIn Ads, this episode
    0:33:25 sponsor, you can precisely reach the professionals who are most likely to find your ad relevant,
    0:33:30 targeting them by job title, industry, company, and much more. You can really fine tune.
    0:33:34 LinkedIn Ads allows you to build the right relationships, drive results, and reach your
    0:33:38 customers in a respectful environment, which is certainly not true for all of social media.
    0:33:44 You’ll have direct access to a billion members, 130 million decision makers, and 10 million C-level
    0:33:48 executives. So those are the people you can build relationships with using LinkedIn Ads.
    0:33:53 You’ll be able to drive results with targeting and measurement tools built specifically for B2B.
    0:33:58 In technology, LinkedIn generated two to five times higher return on ad spend than other social
    0:34:04 media platforms, and 79% of B2B content marketers said LinkedIn produces the best results for paid
    0:34:10 media. So start converting your B2B audience into high-quality leads today and get a $100
    0:34:16 credit on your next campaign. Just go to linkedin.com/tfs to claim your credit.
    0:34:21 That’s linkedin.com/tfs. Terms and conditions apply.
    0:34:30 I’m enjoying this conversation on a few levels, including a meta level, which is this conversation
    0:34:37 is going to be published directly before, directly after a musician who is devoutly religious.
    0:34:44 So we’re going to have a contrast of styles as it were. Is it true that you were Christian until
    0:34:48 reading the God Delusion? Is that an accurate statement? Not quite. No, I was very much a
    0:34:52 Christian when I grew up. I didn’t really have any Christian friends, apart from one or two,
    0:34:57 but didn’t have a Christian family or a Christian group. So it was relatively easy to sort of grow
    0:35:03 out of it really. How did you end up an island of Christianity in the beginning? Meaning you
    0:35:06 didn’t have Christian friends, you didn’t grow up in a Christian family, but you yourself were
    0:35:12 Christian. How did that happen? There was a teacher at my primary school, elementary school, who
    0:35:17 invited me to join her Bible class when I was five. I just didn’t know any, any difference.
    0:35:23 So I was inculcated quite young. And by the time I realized, oh, it’s not everybody that believes
    0:35:28 this. It was too late. And then I came out of it partly because I was doing magic and hypnosis
    0:35:37 and stuff at university and getting such a strong, angry reaction from fellow Christians. I started
    0:35:41 to say, oh, okay, this is just sort of fear of something that’s misunderstood. Okay. And I had
    0:35:47 them literally exorcising demons from me during the show, you know, at the back of the rave. It
    0:35:54 was extraordinary. That’s a little bit of extra flourish to the show. Yeah, added to the drama.
    0:36:01 And then soon after that, I had a good friend who was a psychic healer and did tarot readings and so
    0:36:07 on. And I was just looking at her, what to me struck me as a pretty circular belief system
    0:36:11 around it and thinking, I’m sure I’m doing the same. I must be just doing the same with Christianity,
    0:36:16 but it’s just a bit more, well, it’s less of a fringe thing. So it’s a little harder just to
    0:36:21 laugh at. So I tried to find some sort of intellectual base for it other than just what could just be
    0:36:26 a circular belief system. And never did. And magic gives you a very, it really drives a wedge
    0:36:31 into that thing of belief and skepticism. It always has been, it’s always been the magicians
    0:36:36 that are exposing the psychics and the frauds. Well, it gives you sort of the implicit,
    0:36:43 how could you explain this otherwise frame, I would have to imagine, very similar to good
    0:36:50 scientists in the sense that you’re as a magician, sort of deconstructing phenomena to ask,
    0:36:54 how did they do it? How could they do it? How might they have done it? How might you explain
    0:37:00 this, right? Which I imagine laypeople just don’t do as often, but you’re getting a lot of repetitions.
    0:37:04 There’s a terrific magician with the great name of Tommy Wonder. I don’t think it’s his real name.
    0:37:10 No longer with us. But he had this nice idea that you, the story of your trick gives you the
    0:37:14 highlights of the trick and that in between the highlights, there will be the shadows and the
    0:37:19 shadows is where you put your method. And what that means is that what you learn as a magician,
    0:37:25 and it’s a very hard thing to decode this if you’re not another magician, is you’re not hiding
    0:37:31 your methods in secret moves and so on. A lot of what you’re doing, you’re doing very openly
    0:37:36 in plain sight, but you’re doing it in those little moments of relaxation that are out of the
    0:37:42 story that people are going to follow later. And it’s a very hard thing because that’s such
    0:37:47 a human thing to sort of follow those cues. That doesn’t matter if you’re a scientist or what you
    0:37:52 are, you’re still going to do that. So you need the kind of familiarity with that. You need to
    0:37:59 instinctively watch and have the kind of emotional distance that allows you not to fall for the same
    0:38:05 rhythm. It took me a long time to realize this. We were doing a show on Broadway, I think, and it
    0:38:10 was the first show I’d done that was a compilation of the best bits from previous shows. So it meant
    0:38:14 that when we wrote it, it didn’t have the same heart and through line as the other shows had,
    0:38:17 because they were always written with that first. Didn’t have an arc in the same way.
    0:38:21 Yeah, exactly. But it needed one. And I was sort of trying to work out what that was
    0:38:28 in real time doing the show. And it struck me, especially because magic is such a childish
    0:38:32 thing, really. You’re just the quickest, most fraudulent route to impressing people,
    0:38:35 isn’t it? So it struck me that… There are a lot of those.
    0:38:41 What happens with the magic trick is that you are seeing something happen that is showing you
    0:38:45 that your understanding of reality isn’t right, that there’s something you’ve missed,
    0:38:50 that your story, as you put those highlighted moments together and form the narrative of
    0:38:57 what’s happened, cannot be the full picture. Something else has gone on. And it really stayed
    0:39:02 with me because in amongst that childish, sort of really quite infantile world of magic, there
    0:39:08 was this thing that’s like, well, that’s a really useful thing in life. That’s the nature
    0:39:13 of storytelling. We sit around these… It’s like the image of sitting over a campfire, right? So
    0:39:17 you’re not over a campfire, you’re uncomfortable, but across from a campfire from somebody. And
    0:39:22 you’re in a forest and it’s dark and you’re lit by this little fire and you’re telling a cozy story.
    0:39:27 That’s what stories are. They are cozy. And then outside of that is the darkness and the forest.
    0:39:31 And that’s where all the monsters are. And they’re all the things that are being excluded.
    0:39:35 That’s what Jung would call the shadow. It’s all the stuff you’re not including in your narrative.
    0:39:40 And all the stuff you push out of your personality, they’re talking about coming out late,
    0:39:46 the stuff you want to bury. It works at a societal level as well. The parts of society you don’t
    0:39:50 want to include in the narrative of who you are. These things will always come back and bite you
    0:39:56 because they gain a certain power in the shadows. The old fairy tale idea of the evil godmother
    0:40:00 banished from the christening who turns up, she gate crashes the christening and lays a curse
    0:40:07 on the infant. These ideas resonate because they mean something to us psychologically. The things
    0:40:13 we banish or it’ll be the hero that’s banished from the city and comes back at the end of the story
    0:40:19 with an army and defeats the bad king. These things will come back. So the point being that
    0:40:24 in amongst all of its nonsense, there was something about magic that does show us that the stories
    0:40:31 we’re telling were not including things that are important and gain a certain power if we don’t
    0:40:36 include them. It’s meant that over the years, particularly with my first for the TV, but also
    0:40:41 with the stage shows I think now in particular as I do more of those, that I like to make it about
    0:40:48 that or something. I like to do that. Something that’s important because how you do tricks
    0:40:52 isn’t important particularly and it’s entertaining and it’s a lovely vehicle, but
    0:40:55 there’s just something in it that I think tickles at a deeper experience.
    0:41:02 Let’s talk about not necessarily a shadow, but something you seemingly pushed away or excised
    0:41:06 for or compartmentalized at least for a period of time. You already mentioned it twice.
    0:41:14 Coming out in your 30s, could you describe if there was the moment, the conversation, the day,
    0:41:19 the realization that led you to then come out? Because there was not coming out,
    0:41:23 not coming out, then you came out, but presumably there was some type of catalyst for that. What
    0:41:31 happened? I think this is the lingering Christian thing didn’t help. The one Christian friend that
    0:41:39 I had had got involved with that sort of gay conversion thing which doesn’t work terribly
    0:41:44 well. Although I didn’t get very involved in that, it was in the air because he was experiencing it.
    0:41:49 So I think it just sort of kind of lingered and although I sort of didn’t really,
    0:41:53 wasn’t a believer anymore, it just kind of, I don’t know what it’s like now for people,
    0:41:57 I’m sure it’s very different, but you can sort of think it’s going to pass. There’s a lot of
    0:42:02 that or you sort of don’t really own it and it just got to the point. I thought this was just
    0:42:05 silly and I’ve just got into a relationship and I thought I was known in the UK and I
    0:42:10 thought I don’t want to be, I don’t want this to feel like it’s some secretive thing unnecessarily.
    0:42:17 So I just sort of did and because what you realize, whatever you come out about, whatever your
    0:42:22 thing is, how little people care. I mean, that’s, I expected, you know, the final scene of
    0:42:27 Dead Poets Society. I thought I walked out, walked out of my building the next day thinking I was
    0:42:30 going to get a round of applause from people on the street and of course no one cares of no interest
    0:42:36 to anybody. And I think the reason why it could be so liberating is not because you get to swing
    0:42:41 around with, you know, shopping bags in the street and live this flamboyant life. I think you just
    0:42:45 realize that these things aren’t important and if that isn’t important, if the big thing you’ve
    0:42:50 carried around for so long that felt so much shame about isn’t important and all the other stuff
    0:42:56 certainly isn’t. So I think that’s why it’s always good to when the time is right to do those
    0:43:03 things. I told my mum, actually I came out to my mum and I think the next day she had a stalker of
    0:43:09 mine, a woman turn up on her doorstep saying that I was her abusive husband. It was a very confusing
    0:43:18 week for my mum. It was a rough week for mum. You mentioned
    0:43:24 quite a while back finding something bigger than yourself and there’s a guardian piece I read this
    0:43:29 was just before you turned 50 that in the second half of life it’s important to find things that
    0:43:33 are bigger than yourself and finding meaning through losing yourself in those things. I’d like
    0:43:39 to ask about this because I know a number of, I won’t mention them by name, some would be recognizable
    0:43:44 but let’s just call them sort of ultra skeptics and it’s hard to say that this is causal but they
    0:43:50 aren’t necessarily the happiest people who seem to be the most fulfilled and there are exceptions
    0:43:54 of course. Now you might say that came first and then they found the skepticism, who knows. So I’m
    0:44:02 not saying one causes the other. In any case, without religion, without that type of mooring,
    0:44:10 not saying it’s necessary, but how have you found meaning? How have you found things bigger than
    0:44:17 yourself? What does that journey look like for you? I think I’ve done the thing of looking for
    0:44:25 other structures. So I kind of drifted out of Christianity around university time. So I was
    0:44:29 doing magic and hypnosis but not really. It didn’t feel very full time. I was kind of a little bit
    0:44:33 drifting but I was sort of earning enough to just sort of tick by and I remember thinking,
    0:44:40 “I don’t have any ambition here. I’m just enjoying this rhythm of life.” I remember quite consciously
    0:44:45 thinking, “I just want to be able to take a cross-section of my life at any point and is everything
    0:44:50 in this moment sort of roughly in the right place? Am I getting up when I want to and not
    0:44:55 having to do things I don’t want to and the things that felt important to me at 21?” And if they’re
    0:45:01 not, that’d be kind of easy to change. And that became a bit of a guiding principle. I’ve never
    0:45:06 had any, generally never had any ambition, didn’t try and get a TV show or anything like that.
    0:45:13 I’ve always just had that feeling of how are things feeling now and this is long before
    0:45:18 talk of mindfulness or anything like that. So that’s been a sort of a guiding principle. And
    0:45:25 years later though, I wrote this book “Happy” which was largely about stoicism and I realized as I was
    0:45:32 reading the Stoics that they were giving language to or Seneca I suppose I was reading first was
    0:45:38 giving language to a big part of that experience. Although it’s not, stoicism isn’t, as you know,
    0:45:43 it’s not really just about that. But that feeling that I had really resonated and in the way we
    0:45:47 often find things inspiring because they’re articulating something clearly that we half
    0:45:52 feel that haven’t really found language for. So I kind of found myself latching onto that.
    0:45:55 And I wrote “Happy” and I wrote “Happy” over three years because I was
    0:45:59 touring and I like to write while I’m touring. So it split up over three years and of course it
    0:46:03 meant at the end of the three years I had a different take on it. And then my feelings about
    0:46:08 about stoicism have sort of changed over the years. But I think often, you know, one we look for
    0:46:13 another structure, don’t we? So I’d left behind the sort of Christian world as a structure and I
    0:46:19 think it was appealing in the hypnosis, NLP, all of those things, they give a certain kind of
    0:46:24 structure to experience as well. And I think that’s probably a part of it. And as I’ve grown
    0:46:29 up and got older, what I was trying to articulate there was that the first half of life, I think,
    0:46:36 is very much about having this sort of dialogue with the world in terms of the world is telling you
    0:46:42 what you need in order to move forward or have a reputation or be liked or whatever. You’re kind
    0:46:47 of this axis of dialogue is very much with the world. And I think there’s a natural shift in
    0:46:53 the second half that actually is about having that dialogue more internally. I’m 53 now and I
    0:46:58 think there’s, you know, I’m sort of aware of that happening and my feelings of, you know,
    0:47:03 stoicism have shifted. I suppose that’s it. Like we all do, we find a thing because the
    0:47:06 experience of something bigger than yourself is how we find meaning.
    0:47:11 What do you or what have you historically struggled with? Is there anything that pops to
    0:47:19 mind? My mind immediately goes to the horror of dinner parties and high status people, which
    0:47:24 of course I come across a lot because I’m known a bit here and sometimes I get invited to things and
    0:47:30 I’m not very good at that. I guess I’m quite introverted. So unless somebody is really warm,
    0:47:35 I very quickly get into a thing of really not knowing what to say. I found myself at the
    0:47:42 Clintons for Thanksgiving one year. I mean, it’s incredibly, incredibly high status,
    0:47:47 isn’t it? I mean, they were wonderful at everything, but it was, you know, kind of
    0:47:55 that sort of thing I find very difficult. I generally don’t hang around other famous people
    0:47:59 here. I like the experience of people, you know, sometimes being on a bit of a pedestal and it’s
    0:48:04 different if you then meet them and they’re not perhaps a bit disappointing. It’s hard to go back
    0:48:09 to their work and appreciate it in the same way. Yeah, the heroes with clay feet situation, yeah.
    0:48:13 Yeah, totally. So I think that when you say where do I struggle, I think it’s
    0:48:19 what immediately comes to mind is sort of awkward, difficult things with people of high status.
    0:48:25 Maybe this is a dead end, but I’ll probe a little bit more. I’m curious also psychologically for
    0:48:31 yourself. When you are by yourself, does anything come to mind? And maybe this is
    0:48:37 me misreading, and if so, I’d love to know the origin. That’s one piece, right? For yourself,
    0:48:40 psychologically, is there anything that you struggle with or have struggled with?
    0:48:45 And then the follow up to that would be why write these books? You know, happy, why more or less,
    0:48:49 everything is absolutely fine. A book of secrets, finding comfort in a complex world,
    0:48:54 or doing the audible original right book camp for emotion, these types of things. Are those
    0:49:00 reflective of things that you have found challenging in the past? Or is that not the case?
    0:49:11 I think since writing Happy, that book, I have found the world of what it is to flourish,
    0:49:18 really interesting. And I’ve never felt it in the way, in that very, forgive me,
    0:49:23 with that American optimistic goal setting mode at all. I’m very much not about that.
    0:49:29 So that’s meant that it’s less simple and it’s more interesting to sort of navigate and is then,
    0:49:35 because I enjoy writing so much, probably more than anything. I’ve naturally been the sort of
    0:49:39 stuff that I’ve taken into my stage shows and very much wanted to write about as I go along.
    0:49:47 I guess I am a kind of reflective type. Life’s difficult. Life has this centripetal quality.
    0:49:53 It brings us to these difficult, central points. And when we’re there, and it’s interesting that
    0:49:58 the last show I did showman was about this, we wrote the show, I don’t know if anybody might see it,
    0:50:04 but certainly it was pre-COVID and I wanted to write the show with this thing at the heart of it,
    0:50:10 that life brings us to these difficult centers. And when we’re there, it feels lonely. We feel
    0:50:14 like we’ve failed, which is the big problem with the American optimistic goal setting model,
    0:50:17 that when things don’t go well, you’re supposed to, I guess you have to blame yourself because you
    0:50:22 didn’t set your goals well enough or believe in yourself well enough or whatever that strange,
    0:50:27 Protestant work ethic applied to life tells us we should feel. So the reality is that
    0:50:32 lonely, difficult central point is exactly the human experience is because we’re all
    0:50:38 brought to those points. It’s what we all share and the thing that makes us feel most isolated
    0:50:42 is the one thing that actually connects us the most. And interestingly, we’d sort of written
    0:50:47 this show and then lockdown happened and it just played out. The very thing that was physically
    0:50:57 isolating us was the one thing we were all sharing. And that, I think, is eternally valuable to me.
    0:51:03 And it’s the thing that, and I know is also that the answer to finding dinner parties with
    0:51:08 high status people difficult is that they’re the same. They’re probably hating as much of it as I
    0:51:14 am, that we’re all having these awkward experiences most of the time. And you shouldn’t compare your
    0:51:20 insights to other people’s outsides because they’re very different things. I find that a helpful
    0:51:26 thought. One of the issues with stoicism for me, I suppose, is that it’s another way of life being
    0:51:30 a bit of a fight. The thing I love most about it, actually reading Marcus Aurelius, he talks so much
    0:51:36 about retreating. And I love that. I love this very introverted aspect of reading Marcus that you
    0:51:41 don’t get so much from the teachers from Seneca and Epictetus that are very much telling you what
    0:51:46 to do all of it. I do love it all, but there is a bit of a constant fight at the heart of it. The
    0:51:53 images, the metaphors, they’re either military or they are, you’re a rock with waves lashing against
    0:51:57 you and you’ve got to be solid in the face of all this. And you are setting yourself up for a
    0:52:01 world that’s not going to live up to your standards. And I don’t know. I don’t know. Is that the way
    0:52:07 to live? There’s a German sociologist called Hartmut Rosa who’s got a terrific book. It’s not an easy
    0:52:12 read. It’s a beast of a thing called resonance. So have you come across this? Have you come across
    0:52:17 resonance? I’ve heard the total I haven’t read it. It’s a very different look at what might make a
    0:52:24 successful life. And rather than being about virtue and so on, it’s about a mode of relating to the
    0:52:30 world where it’s a level, I suppose a type of engagement. It’s not an emotional state. It’s
    0:52:35 not about feeling anything in particular, but it’s just about what it isn’t and how most of us live
    0:52:41 is we treat the world as a resource. So imagine if two artists and it’s an art competition,
    0:52:45 they’re told to go out and paint the best picture they can. And one of them goes home and does the
    0:52:49 best he can do and provides his picture. And the other one thinks, okay, all right, well,
    0:52:52 I want to do the best picture. So I better get a… Well, first of all, I need a really good studio
    0:52:57 space. So he finds a great studio space. And now I need the best possible easel and, okay, a proper
    0:53:03 good linen canvas. And he sources that and they’re going to get the best paints and the best brushes,
    0:53:11 the finest brushes and so on and so on. And then times up. And this is what we’re doing. Generally,
    0:53:16 we’re treating the world as a resource. But what’s happened is that the resources that are a means
    0:53:20 to an end, right? So we’re trying to be richer and more attractive and more this and more that.
    0:53:25 Those are only means to an end. They got a bit confused with the goals somewhere along the lines.
    0:53:30 And he’s suggesting a sort of rather more… He talks about like a tuning fork. Like, you know,
    0:53:33 you put one tuning fork next to another one and the other one starts to vibrate. And it’s just a
    0:53:38 different sort of relationship of resonance with the world as opposed to treating it as a resource
    0:53:42 and a number of other things that we do. And I’d rather like that. And I don’t think it’s
    0:53:48 incompatible with stursism at all. And the part of stursism I like the most. And I think that
    0:53:54 initially drew me to it is that life is difficult, you know, and you’ve got your, here’s your x-axis
    0:53:58 and your y-axis. And on the one axis, you’ve got all the things you want to achieve, your aims and
    0:54:02 your plans and the other axis is stuff that life is throwing back at you, what they used to call
    0:54:08 fortune. And we don’t really talk about that anymore, which is a shame. And we’re told,
    0:54:12 if you set your goals and believe in yourself correctly, that you can crank this line of life
    0:54:18 up. So it’s in line with this x-axis, in line with your goals and your aims. But the reality
    0:54:25 is we live this, an x equals y diagonal, a sort of a meandering line. And sometimes we’re on top.
    0:54:28 And sometimes we’re not, you know, we’ll have a great day and then life will throw something
    0:54:33 horrible our way. And it’s that. So how do you make your peace with this? And that image of that x
    0:54:39 equals y line is something that resonates throughout history. Schopenhauer spoke about it. Freud,
    0:54:43 he wasn’t trying to make that first talking therapy was never about making people happy.
    0:54:50 His goal was to restore a natural unhappiness, right? So the life is basically going to be
    0:54:54 unhappy a lot of the time. And you don’t want to be overly unhappy, but it’s just how you make
    0:54:58 your peace with the fact that life’s always going to be a bit dissatisfying. You’re always going to
    0:55:02 get caught between these poles. Michael, do you accept me high? I’m sure you know who wrote flow.
    0:55:09 Again, you’re caught between anxiety and boredom and the flow state between whether your skills or
    0:55:17 your challenges are going to win out. The same idea is so helpful. And that’s the stuff I love,
    0:55:22 because I think that’s a real antidote to the fetishizing of optimism and so on.
    0:55:28 I worked a lot with them. I’ve been around faith healers a lot. And the thing that really struck
    0:55:34 me, by faith healers, I mean the kind of the Christian evangelical type that it getting
    0:55:38 people up out of wheelchairs and so on. I recommend everybody watch Miracle, by the way.
    0:55:43 Nice stage show. Thank you. That was a fascinating show. I really enjoyed that.
    0:55:50 Thank you. Thank you. It was amazing to do every night. I was doing it for a room of
    0:55:55 non-believers. I didn’t know if it was going to work at all. But watching the people out there
    0:56:00 doing it, a recurring idea is that you throw your pills away. You don’t need your medicine.
    0:56:03 And if the disease comes back, it’s because you didn’t have enough faith,
    0:56:11 which is this perfect formula for absolving yourself of any responsibility as the healer.
    0:56:14 I’m putting all the blame on the person going through it. And there’s any number of horror
    0:56:19 stories, of course, of people that get caught up in that. And it’s exactly the same. You read
    0:56:27 something like The Secret, but is it Rhodoburn, Rondoburn? It’s telling us quite specifically,
    0:56:32 you send your wishes out to the universe. And if it doesn’t provide, it’s because you didn’t
    0:56:36 commit to it enough. You didn’t commit enough to that belief. It’s not the fault of the system,
    0:56:41 it’s your fault for not committing to it. And I think it trickles down into goal setting and
    0:56:48 all the rest of it. So I like this idea of life’s difficult and we all share that experience no
    0:56:55 matter where we are and what we’re doing in our own way. And actually, how do you sit comfortably
    0:56:59 and hopefully resonantly with a life that isn’t always going to give you what you want?
    0:57:04 All right. So I would like to come back to this word ambition. If somebody looks at your website,
    0:57:11 if I look at your Wikipedia page, I may describe you or be inclined to say this is an ambitious man,
    0:57:19 given the corpus of work. You have six or seven books, you have the Broadway shows,
    0:57:26 the theater, the one man shows, the television, the collaborations, it goes on and on and on.
    0:57:33 So what I would love to know is how you define ambition, because maybe I don’t want to end up
    0:57:37 arguing about God where we have different definitions of God, for instance. So maybe
    0:57:42 it’s just in the way that you define or think about ambition. But it strikes me that you are
    0:57:48 very active. And you mentioned painting a moment ago. People should go to your website just to
    0:57:55 see your painting as well. We may come back to that if we have time. How do you explain your
    0:58:00 productivity? Because if you were just sitting in your room trying to be receptive to the universe
    0:58:06 delivering you signals, you may just end up sitting in your room, right? So there is some
    0:58:11 proactivity involved, it would seem, in what you’re doing. How do you explain the level of
    0:58:16 productivity? What contributes to that if not ambition? Certainly isn’t ambition. And by
    0:58:24 ambition, I mean, I’ve never sought out something ahead in the timeline that I think would be
    0:58:32 good for me or productive or expand my reach or those things really send shivers through me.
    0:58:39 But I have a manager and I have co-producers and grown-ups, essentially, who do think about those
    0:58:45 things. And as time’s gone on, what I choose to do has become up to me, which is nice. And
    0:58:52 I won’t be blind to the, if something, you know, like, yes, it’s a good thing to do a show in New
    0:58:56 York, of course. But really, I’m thinking it would be very lovely to live out there for a bit and
    0:59:01 what an amazing experience that would be. But I wasn’t seeing it as a step to anything else. It
    0:59:06 just felt like, well, that would be an enjoyable thing to do. And, you know, the projects all take
    0:59:11 a long time. And there is a lot that’s come out of it. But I’m not running around frantically
    0:59:17 from one thing to another. They’re things that just take a chunk of time. And then normally,
    0:59:21 I’m just sort of obliged one way or another to get on to the next one. Because a year before,
    0:59:26 I said, I do it. And somewhere people would be making arrangements. And teams have been assembled.
    0:59:30 And I can’t, at the last minute, go, I just want to sit at home. But I have had a time of sitting
    0:59:36 at home the last year or so because I got a bit burnt out with it. And I’m very aware that I
    0:59:42 am really not my best if I’m not creatively engaged with something. So painting is very helpful
    0:59:46 for me because I can just do that. That’s like a week or two of just in a studio painting. And
    0:59:51 that’s lovely. Is that how long it takes you to do one of your pieces a week or two? Well,
    0:59:55 often sometimes a bit longer because I don’t get to give it a time I want. It strikes me as very
    1:00:00 fast. People should need to go to your website. Everybody go to the website. We’ll put some links
    1:00:05 in the show notes as well. But darrenbrown.co.uk, when you look at the artwork, you would,
    1:00:12 I mean, this could be another career for you. I mean, it’s, it is that developed. Very, very,
    1:00:16 very impressed. And I grew up in a family of artists and wanted to be a comic book
    1:00:22 pencil for 15 years myself. So I paid for some of my college expenses being an illustrator. And
    1:00:26 like, I cannot even come close to doing 10% of what you do with the portraits that you do. There’s
    1:00:33 no way. Oh, very kind. Well, I really, really very much enjoy it. And I, it’s a nice way of
    1:00:38 shutting yourself away and just throwing yourself into something for a big chunk of time, which I
    1:00:44 find helpful. So I think that’s probably part of it. But I really feel it’s mainly due to the other
    1:00:51 people I have around me who are more savvy with it. So what it sounds like, which is I’ve never
    1:00:56 discussed with someone is that it’s not that you live in a life devoid of ambition, but you
    1:01:02 have freed yourself from the need to be ambitious yourself, which is part and parcel of maybe
    1:01:09 side effects that come with it by having team members who are ambitious on your behalf in the
    1:01:15 sense of thinking about how certain options will create or open other doors. And so on. Is that a
    1:01:19 fair description? I think there is a fair description. I think that if there’s a recipe for
    1:01:26 success is talent plus energy. So you, you know, you develop your talent because if you’ve got no
    1:01:30 talent, and your energy is, you know, how you get it out into the world. And if you’ve got all the
    1:01:34 energy itself promotion, but no talent to back it up, it’s not going to be very helpful. And if
    1:01:38 you’ve got all the talent in the world, but no energy of getting it out there for people to see,
    1:01:44 that’s also not great. I’ve certainly never had any, any energy with it at all. So having a manager
    1:01:49 and people like that to do that side of it. And very early on, I realized I needed that. So
    1:01:55 I genuinely are not saying it with any overweening false modesty or anything. I just,
    1:02:02 my principle and even more so now that I’m older is what would be enjoyable in and of itself.
    1:02:07 I forget his name, but there’s a philosophy talks about the importance of this in midlife of these
    1:02:12 italic activities that things that just bring pleasure in and of themselves and aren’t constantly
    1:02:16 about the payoff at some point in the future. I think as we get older, those things are more
    1:02:22 important. But I’ve always had that and maybe I’ve never really had a proper job and it’s sort of
    1:02:29 easier to seems to be working out for you. All right. I’m touring next year in 2025 with a new
    1:02:34 show. And like all these things, we got a title, it’s called only human tickets on sale. People
    1:02:38 have my and I have no idea what the show is yet. We haven’t written a word of it. And I’ve kind of
    1:02:42 got used to this over the years. So, you know, we’re starting to kind of think about that now.
    1:02:48 Okay. It’s Louis. If you don’t know what the content is, how did you choose the name and a
    1:02:53 poster and everything? I know it’s, we’ve sort of got used to it now because this is the 11th
    1:02:58 show that I’ve done. And as soon as we say, okay, let’s do a show next year, my manager’s saying,
    1:03:02 right, well, the brochures will need, you know, the theater brochures programs will need
    1:03:08 an image and a title description. Yeah, or not even a description. They need an image and a name
    1:03:12 at the very least. But it’s a great example of, you know, how you give yourself a structure and
    1:03:18 then think within that. So all the show titles have kind of been a bit generic. And then we’ve
    1:03:23 found ways of making them work. A show of mystery and suspense, right? I mean, you have a lot of
    1:03:29 room, wiggle room with it. Totally. It is a little bit like that. And is it typically this way that,
    1:03:34 like you book it and then with the positive constraints, you figure it out. But how did you
    1:03:38 choose in this particular case, only human? This was going to be related to my next question is,
    1:03:43 how do you pick the next project? But let’s get specific on the only human. How did you pick this?
    1:03:48 It sounds like you’ve done this more than once, knowing that you will have to figure it out later.
    1:03:52 It’s absolute necessity. In the same way that you’ve booked the theaters, you have to come
    1:03:56 up with a show. And likewise, if you need a title for the brochures, we have to come up with the
    1:04:02 title. So Andrew and I just had an email exchange back and forth go, okay, and we send a bunch of
    1:04:08 things. And it’s going to be something about being human. And because I just know that’ll be the
    1:04:14 heart of it somewhere. And within a few emails back and forth, no one found that one, no one found
    1:04:20 only human offensive or to this or to that. You don’t seem to mind offensive. Are you steering
    1:04:26 away from controversial and offensive? No, well, yeah, but it’s also about not being too specific.
    1:04:30 You know, that’s the trouble with an offensive bold title is that you’re then going to
    1:04:36 get too specific. That’s the issue, right? That’s the issue. And then in terms of choosing
    1:04:42 the projects, well, I mean, it’s really it’s what I would like to do. And yeah,
    1:04:46 I want to know how you know that though, right? Because I, for instance, I’ll buy a little time.
    1:04:50 So my friend Kevin Kelly, he’s founding editor of Wired Magazine. He tries to give away all of his
    1:04:56 ideas. And if one idea keeps coming back to him and no one will do it, and he can’t seem to get
    1:05:02 rid of it, and he’s it’s floating around its head, then that’s how he chooses a lot of his projects,
    1:05:07 at least the new exploratory projects. In my case, you know, nonfiction books, let’s just say
    1:05:12 it’s a book I can’t find myself, I want to learn about it, I immerse myself. So it’s sort of a
    1:05:16 graduate degree for myself. And there’s there’s a bit more that goes into it. I test it with my
    1:05:21 audience using blog posts and podcasts and things. But you were saying you want to do. And this might
    1:05:25 sound like such a silly question. But how do you know that? Because there’s some people who
    1:05:31 describe a feeling, or maybe they’re kept up at night. But it’s an excitement, it’s not an anxiety,
    1:05:36 the tenor, the emotional tenors different. How do you feel your way into it? How do you know
    1:05:41 that you want to do it? Because my experience with people who have a lot of options as you would,
    1:05:47 you also have a lot of inbound, you have, sure, a wide menu, is that it’s not sorting good from
    1:05:53 bad ideas, you’re going to have lots of good ideas. And then you have to choose the better idea or the
    1:06:00 great idea or the good for you idea amongst many good ideas that you would actually like to do.
    1:06:06 So how do you pick? I think it really depends on what sort of project it is. Like for TV and stage,
    1:06:11 I’m always writing with other people. And I don’t give it any thought until the three of us are
    1:06:17 on Zoom or in a room talking. And then we’ve got a whole backlog of experience. There’s
    1:06:22 templates that are in place that we can dispose of or use again. Or, you know, we’ve kind of got a
    1:06:27 shorthand. For the format, you mean? The template? Yes. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. There’s a sort of,
    1:06:34 there’s a lot of pre-existing ways we found work, which I said we can often very consciously dispose
    1:06:40 with. But there’s something in place so you don’t feel completely at sea. I suppose it’s most difficult.
    1:06:43 So book writing, like the moment I’m trying to get my head around and writing another book.
    1:06:48 And that’s just me. And that is, that is more difficult. And that simple question of how do
    1:06:53 you know what you want? What do I really want? It is difficult. So the last book I wrote was a
    1:06:59 slightly off-grid book for magicians called Notes from a Fellow Traveler. And I wrote it on the road
    1:07:04 while I was touring because two reasons. Firstly, I felt that a book about touring and how to put a
    1:07:10 show together and the experience nightly of doing a show for large audiences and dealing with all
    1:07:16 the stuff that goes wrong and blah, blah, blah, would be of use to magicians that are just maybe
    1:07:20 starting out with putting a show together and all the really important stuff about performing,
    1:07:24 which just isn’t really written about too much in the magic world. So that was one reason.
    1:07:29 But also it would be really fun. I need to write during the days on tour, otherwise you’re just
    1:07:34 kicking around in somewhere that there may be nothing to do and what are you going to do for
    1:07:38 a week. So writing is really important. And that was a big part of it. And sometimes it’s that sort
    1:07:45 of thing, isn’t it? Sometimes I’ve always been, if I’m driven by anything, it’s thinking I should
    1:07:51 be doing better than whatever I’m doing. I always say if I can do something and I find it sort of
    1:07:59 easy, I just presume it’s a bit stupid. And I’m always sort of trying to do the next thing.
    1:08:04 But I particularly feel that with writing and I make it more difficult for myself probably
    1:08:08 than I need to. So the magic book was actually a really enjoyable, easy, I didn’t need to do
    1:08:12 loads of research and bring a suitcase of books around with me. It was actually a kind of this
    1:08:17 a really enjoyable, lovely thing. So now I’m trying to listen to that and I’m trying to let
    1:08:22 something settle into something that when you’ve got it just feels obvious. I will, of course,
    1:08:28 because those tend to be the best things, but there is no easy route. And with the TV shows,
    1:08:31 as I said, often the idea of, oh, can you make someone push someone off a building?
    1:08:37 Everyone at the party is an actor apart from one person. Could you, those come sometimes from just
    1:08:42 a frustration of just trying too hard and going down rabbit holes and running circles,
    1:08:46 trying to find something that is clever all by then just you go blah, can’t we just do this?
    1:08:52 And it feels obvious and a bit silly. And, oh, that’s it. That’s it. That’s exactly what it should
    1:09:00 be. So I think maybe recognizing that you know when you’ve got it when it because then it tingles,
    1:09:05 you know, it’s right because it resonates to use that word and it has this little buzz of it,
    1:09:13 buzz of excitement to it because it’s really hard to force it directly. But if it was, you wouldn’t
    1:09:20 be doing such good stuff if it was easy to find, I suppose. I will ask you because I have a prompt
    1:09:25 in front of me using forms of suggestion as self-defense. So I do want to hear a story about
    1:09:31 that. But before we get to it, since you mentioned the push, and I promised at the very beginning,
    1:09:37 I would touch on the ethics piece. So for people who have watched some of these or do a little
    1:09:44 homework, one might think as a viewer, knowing that you’re putting people through this process,
    1:09:51 we’re unbeknownst to them, ultimately, they’re being groomed and conditioned and set up to do
    1:10:00 something very extreme that people would end up with all sorts of complex PTSD and that the
    1:10:07 show itself could produce all sorts of capital T trauma for people involved. How do you respond to
    1:10:16 people? And? Do you respond to people with this concern? Well, so if you take, for example, take
    1:10:25 sacrifice then, which was the last one, that show, somebody’s going through a really like roller coaster
    1:10:29 series of things to get to a life and death situation where they think they’re going to be
    1:10:34 shot at the end of it and so on. So the first thing is when we write the show, and I’m writing
    1:10:39 these shows with a, we are at the show, but a lot of experience of making similar things.
    1:10:44 I’ve got very used to making sure this person is going to be just held in a place that is,
    1:10:49 they’re okay, and they’re going to be sort of safe in themselves. That’s like the first layer,
    1:10:54 the actual writing of the show. And at any point, bear in mind, if it’s a big hidden camera thing,
    1:11:00 I can just step in. If anything bad happened, I could simply step in. And also everything gets
    1:11:06 passed by is important. An independent psychological team. So we’ll have a psychologist on board who
    1:11:10 knows the show, knows exactly what’s going to happen, all the things that might potentially be
    1:11:14 triggering. You know, if someone’s lost someone, dears them in a car crash, we’re not going to
    1:11:19 want them witnessing a car crash, for example. You know, so that might not be obvious, might not
    1:11:27 know that. So everybody that applies or gets shortlisted will have this session with a psychologist
    1:11:31 that they’ll think everybody gets, but it may only be, you know, three or four people that
    1:11:34 get it by this point. But if we don’t want them to know they’ve been shortlisted, then they don’t.
    1:11:39 We’re also preserving this fiction for them as to what’s going on. But we’ll have that too.
    1:11:45 And then during the show itself, again, we’ve got that psychologist, we have other independent
    1:11:50 people that are with us in the truck, watching it play out any number of measures, where if anything
    1:11:55 is going a bit off track, or they see genuinely some line has been crossed, we can step in.
    1:12:00 And I’ll, if I get the chance, it depends on what the show is. But if I’ve been able to interact
    1:12:07 with the people before, then I can layer in language and triggers, which I can give to the
    1:12:11 actors, particularly if I’m talking to them through earpieces, to use, which I know will have
    1:12:18 an effect on the person that’s going through it to calm them or give them some resources.
    1:12:23 So I’m kind of using the hypnosis in a way that’s for that benefit to come back at a later point
    1:12:29 rather than me making them do stuff. Things like that are in place. Next, they go through the experience
    1:12:35 and they’ve always, and I’ve done this so much, and I’ve always loved it and taken a huge amount
    1:12:41 for it. No one’s ever like actually had a bad time or come out of it. However, it looks or feels
    1:12:46 like to the crew making the show, the other actors actually have often a far worse time
    1:12:49 because they’re making, you know, they’re feeling terrible putting somebody through something,
    1:12:52 because the guy or the girl that’s been through it’s always, always loved it.
    1:12:58 So going back to sacrifice, Phil does this whole thing, comes out the other end of the show.
    1:13:03 But there’s actually the trickier part then is, well, how do you now deal with this person who’s
    1:13:09 been through a hopefully life-changing or at least pivotal big thing in their lives?
    1:13:14 It’s now going to be a TV show that’s out there. That’s weird and that’s a sensitive thing.
    1:13:20 So I flew Phil over and he came and he watched the show in my house. He watched it three times.
    1:13:26 Once, he needed to see it first as a show with music, underscoring, close-ups, bits that were
    1:13:29 taken out that didn’t make it to the final cut that might have meant a huge amount to him and now
    1:13:33 he’s got to get his head right. Okay, that’s not part of the story because they didn’t really
    1:13:37 serve a purpose at the end of the day. And, you know, there’s a bit in the show where he doesn’t
    1:13:40 do something and it’s a bit like, “Ah, he’s not doing it. Is this going to work?”
    1:13:47 And he had to then get his head around, he’d let us down or that he’d failed and that’s a difficult
    1:13:52 thing. That’s a real thing for him. I watched it a second time with the other people that had done
    1:13:57 similar shows that I’d made. So the guy from the Apocalypse One with the Zombies and the guy from
    1:14:01 the Persian, they came. So now he felt like he had a little group of people that had been through a
    1:14:05 similar thing and shows because he was a fan of the show. So these are people that he knew. So that
    1:14:10 was a really helpful thing for him. And finally, bizarrely, we watched it. Do you know Martin Freeman,
    1:14:14 the actor you come across to me? The name rings a bell, but I can’t contour a face.
    1:14:19 Okay, famously Watson to Benedict Cumberbets, Sherlock, and all sorts of things. Certainly a
    1:14:24 big name here and Phil was a big fan of him. He was a big star in the Fargo. Oh yeah, of course.
    1:14:28 Of course. I just pulled up his photo. I know who Martin Freeman was. You got it. So we watched the
    1:14:33 show with Martin. That was the third time. So Phil could sort of, you know, hopefully feel proud
    1:14:38 of it. And by this time, after three meetings, I got used to it as a TV show. But then you’ve got
    1:14:43 what about when the show airs and it’s a controversial subject. So he might have a lot of
    1:14:48 backlash from people. And I remember the first show he did that was a tool like this. And when
    1:14:54 this was a bit of a learning curve for us, this guy that’s been through this extraordinary journey
    1:14:58 that meant so much to me, so excited the show’s going out. And this is back in the day when it’s
    1:15:02 just broadcast and everyone’s going to watch it at the same time. So he’s got Twitter open on his phone.
    1:15:07 And he’s just reading the nastiest things about himself. His girlfriend’s too pretty for him.
    1:15:12 If you should get his eyebrows sorted out, you’re just awful, awful stuff. And it was really miserable
    1:15:17 for him. So we got somebody out there to be with Phil in the States so they could be around
    1:15:22 during that time, which would be sensitive and weird that it suddenly goes out in the public domain.
    1:15:27 So it’s a long answer. But basically, there’s a huge amount that we do that doesn’t really form
    1:15:32 part of the drama of the show you’re watching because it’s a whole different story that has to
    1:15:38 preserve the fiction. What you’re seeing is absolutely the guy’s experience. But all this
    1:15:43 other stuff has to happen to make sure that it’s safe and does the job it’s supposed to do. It’s
    1:15:50 there for one reason, which is to give him a real proper, hopefully, important pivotal moment.
    1:15:55 You know, hell of a job, sir. As promised, suggestion is self-defense.
    1:16:01 Oh, that’s right. What does this mean? Do you have a story? You must have a story.
    1:16:05 Well, it was just it was an experience of it’s worth knowing this. Actually,
    1:16:11 I think we should all have this ready in our head. So I had spoken after doing hypnosis shows,
    1:16:16 I would sometimes do a Q&A afterwards and people would ask about both even hypnotize people without
    1:16:20 them knowing it and so on. And it always occurred to me that, you know, if you want to keep the
    1:16:23 seat next to you free on a train, you know, you don’t put your bag there because that’s what
    1:16:27 everybody does. And it’s just annoying. And then you want to ask the person to move their bag.
    1:16:32 Instead, pat the seat and nod and smile at people. No, no one’s going to sit next year, right?
    1:16:38 So I’d sort of spoken about this kind of stuff. And then I found myself in a sort of a real life
    1:16:44 situation. And I was walking from one magic convention to another. And I was before the TV
    1:16:50 or anything. I was sort of mid 20s. I was in a velvet three piece purple suit with the fob watch
    1:16:58 chain and long hair. And I mean, if anyone was going to get brutally murdered that night was me.
    1:17:04 And this very drunk, angry guy and his girlfriend are walking towards me. Just look, he’s disguised
    1:17:10 as looking for a fight. And because I’d sort of spoken about how to these slightly offkilled
    1:17:16 ways of dealing with these sorts of situations, the trick is to act in a way that it makes complete
    1:17:20 sense, but it’s utterly out of context. So the other person thinks they’ve missed something.
    1:17:23 You know, because if somebody comes up to you in the street and says,
    1:17:30 it’s not 20 minutes past five, your reaction wouldn’t be to go, yeah, I know it’s whatever
    1:17:34 you’re going to what I’m sorry, you know, like you’ve missed something. So he comes up to me,
    1:17:38 what the fuck are you looking at? Do you want to fight? Or whatever he was saying.
    1:17:44 And I said to him, the wall outside my house isn’t four foot high. And what you get, and I
    1:17:48 guess it’s a similar thing in martial arts of that adrenaline dump. He asked me to repeat
    1:17:53 first of all what I’d said. So I said the what it’s not four foot high. I lived in Spain for a
    1:17:56 bit. The walls were much higher. But if you look at them here, they’re tiny, they’re nothing.
    1:18:03 He sort of did this. He just essentially not exactly collapsed, but he just sat, he went,
    1:18:10 and he sat down on the pavement. His girlfriend walked off. I had in my mind what I was going
    1:18:13 to do. A girlfriend made the right choice. She’s like, I don’t want to do all the other of these
    1:18:20 people. My plan was, which I didn’t get to, my plan was to then give you give the person relief
    1:18:24 from the confusion. And this is where the sort of hypnotic element comes in. I was going to say to
    1:18:30 him, it’s okay, it doesn’t matter whether you’re left or your right foot is released first, but
    1:18:33 you’ll find within a couple of minutes you can walk and you can move and everything. And it’s
    1:18:36 it’s fine. It doesn’t matter if it takes a couple of minutes. So that was the plan, right, to leave
    1:18:42 him stuck to the pavement. But I didn’t get to go that far. He collapsed. And I ended up weirdly
    1:18:47 sitting down with him and saying, so what happened? What happened tonight? And his girlfriend had,
    1:18:50 she’d gotten a fight and she bottled somebody. I think it was something like that.
    1:18:55 Birds of a feather. Yeah. Yeah. So he went off. I then walked off to this other magic convention,
    1:18:59 told everybody. I was so excited. No one believed me because they thought it was just me making
    1:19:05 stuff up. But if there’s a takeaway there, it’s you have a song lyric or just something. It came
    1:19:10 out of a conversation with a friend who used to walk home from his art studio late at night. And
    1:19:15 there was always gang just like intimidating gangs standing around. He’d always like crossover and
    1:19:19 sometimes they’d shout things. And it was just horrible. I said, why don’t you cross over to
    1:19:24 their side and you know, say good evening as you walk past and you know, and he did and he never
    1:19:29 had any trouble because they just thought he was strange. So I think have something like that. If
    1:19:33 someone’s running at you with a knife, you know, it’s not going to help. But if you if you’re in
    1:19:40 that situation where people are being intimidating, it’s a very, I think a powerful route. It has to
    1:19:45 make sense, but just be out of context and just commit to it. Could you elaborate on the making
    1:19:50 sense, right? Because you could be like a boogity boo, dinosaurs times two. They need to feel they’ve
    1:19:55 missed something. So I had that phrase in my head that the wall outside my house isn’t full for high
    1:20:01 because I’ve spoken about this sort of thing with audiences after the show. So I had sort of without
    1:20:06 meaning to kind of rehearse it. So it just kind of came out. So I think having something like
    1:20:12 that, for some reason, the negative in it really helps because it’s like, it’s like they’ve said
    1:20:15 something that you’re responding to, but they haven’t said, you know, it just adds it adds something,
    1:20:21 it adds something to it. You know, I’m just imagining dating you and wondering like,
    1:20:28 what is he up to? Are you doing that thing? Are you doing exhausting? What are some benevolent
    1:20:37 applications of the techniques that you have acquired? What are some offstage applications?
    1:20:43 This would be an example. This would be a problem solving example. Where else can you apply these
    1:20:48 things? I really weirdly don’t use it in real life. Now, that’s the lesson of not trying to control
    1:20:54 things that are out of your control. It’s so the opposite of what this strange job is that I have.
    1:20:59 So I actually very much don’t. I mean, the thing I’m most aware of, which is not a new
    1:21:07 thing for anybody to hear, but in my mind ties in with the same sort of world is just the importance
    1:21:14 of being heard. So, you know, your partner, spouse, girlfriend, boyfriend comes home and
    1:21:21 has had a frustrating day and just wants to offload. And particularly, for some reason,
    1:21:26 if you’re a guy, let alone if you’re stoically drawn. But our natural thing is, of course,
    1:21:31 to offer solutions and so on. And you’re just doing the thing again of not letting the person be
    1:21:38 heard. And it’s so obvious. And I think I really don’t walk around in that Derren Brown mode,
    1:21:47 but I catch myself consciously just trying to be present and hear and listen and know that it’s
    1:21:50 because you know the moment you start offering solutions, they’re dismissed. There’s a million
    1:21:54 reasons why that isn’t appropriate, you know, so you very quickly get told if you do get it wrong.
    1:21:59 But I think that’s and it goes back to this thing of people’s stories of ghosts and psychics that
    1:22:05 told them amazing things just to be present with those things and not feel that it’s your job to
    1:22:11 step in and kind of morally correct them or in some way put them on a different path or even
    1:22:18 offer a solution to a puzzle that sometimes we just need to sit in these things and be heard
    1:22:22 because what we’re actually saying is something deeper than the specific
    1:22:29 problem of the thing that’s niggling us. I don’t really carry a lot of it around. Well,
    1:22:36 I’m in work mode. I’m full of that stuff. The power of presupposition is, I use it all the
    1:22:39 time in card tricks, you know, you say you’ve got a deck of cards at the beginning, they’re in a
    1:22:43 special order. So you can’t have the person shuffle them. But maybe there’s a point halfway
    1:22:46 through the trick where they can shuffle the cards. So at that point, I’d give them the
    1:22:51 cards to shuffle that I’d say, I’ll shuffle them again, but this time do it under the table.
    1:22:54 So now they’re taking the cards onto the table and somehow in doing that, they’ve accepted the
    1:22:59 word again and they’re shuffling it. And later when they describe the trick and they want the
    1:23:02 trick to sound as amazing as possible because they’ve been fooled by it and don’t want to look
    1:23:06 stupid, the amount of times they would say, well, I shuffled the deck at the beginning
    1:23:10 and you know, and they didn’t. And then the trick really is impossible because they couldn’t have
    1:23:14 shuffled it at the start. So the power of presupposition is really, you know,
    1:23:21 you can apply that to yourself, I guess, in your inner language as much as trying to
    1:23:29 influence others. But I just somehow don’t sit in that world in real life. I think it’s enough
    1:23:35 in life to try and find a way of gathering yourself afresh and then going out in the world
    1:23:39 and taking some responsibility, you know, amidst your mess. I think that’s enough. I don’t think
    1:23:44 self-esteem is that important. I certainly don’t think influencing others is that important. I
    1:23:50 think we’ve got enough to be getting on with. When I first started, I loved all that stuff and now
    1:23:55 it leaves me a little bit cold. I don’t think it’s about that. I think just how you make peace with
    1:24:00 life that’s not always going to go your way. That’s the project. That’s a successful life.
    1:24:06 You read a lot. You’ve written a lot. Are there any books in particular? And you can name at least
    1:24:13 two. So one could be of your own. But are there any books that you have gifted or recommended
    1:24:18 frequently to other people that come to mind? A big fan of Jonathan Haight who, if you haven’t
    1:24:23 had on this podcast, you should do his own. I have. He’s outstanding. Yeah, wonderful. Brilliant,
    1:24:29 brilliant guy. So I’ve just finished his book, The Anxious Generation, which is his last one.
    1:24:35 I’ll often find myself giving those to people. I like James Hollis as well a lot. I don’t know
    1:24:41 if you’ve had one. He’s a Jungian psychotherapist, psychoanalyst, I suppose. He writes a lot in that
    1:24:49 mode. Irvin Yalom, who is a wonderful writer and does that thing. Oliver Sacks, I think, started
    1:24:56 of writing little accounts of interesting cases. He’s a beautiful writer. Do you read fiction?
    1:25:02 No. No, I don’t. I don’t. And it’s missing. I think I should. And there’s probably a lot more
    1:25:06 truth to be found in reading fiction than in the nonfiction that I do. But I’m always drawn to it.
    1:25:11 And I always feel, because there’s always a book project somewhere in my mind, I always feel like
    1:25:16 I should be. As I become more aware of that thought, I sort of feel like I can now and read
    1:25:24 more fiction. If you were to read fiction, what type of fiction might you start with?
    1:25:27 Are there any kind of parameters or characteristics? Driven by that thing,
    1:25:30 if I should always be doing the thing that isn’t easy, I think it would be
    1:25:35 the only fiction I read more of that. So Dostoevsky and so on. It would be that. It would be the
    1:25:41 big, heavy classics, because that’s where I feel that’s where you should start. I’ve occasionally
    1:25:47 been given a novel by a friend, and I always find them very sort of forgetful. So I think probably
    1:25:52 the big European works, because that I didn’t feel I was. You want to learn how to ski, so
    1:25:55 like get dropped out of a helicopter at the top of K2, that type of approach.
    1:26:02 I love the Thomas Harris, the Hannibal Lecter series of books. I remember absolutely devouring
    1:26:04 those. And I was a big fan of Stephen King when I don’t know what any of this says about me.
    1:26:09 When I was younger. So I’ve definitely had that. And if you brought out another one in the Hannibal
    1:26:14 series, you might go. All right. You know, since you like difficult, I’ll just make one recommendation
    1:26:19 for a book that for nine out of 10 people, it’s a miss because it’s hard. It’s dense.
    1:26:26 It’s called Little Big. The alternate title is the Fairies Parliament by John Crowley,
    1:26:33 who is also a poet. And this book, Little Big,
    1:26:40 when it works, at least for me and for the one out of 10 that it might work for,
    1:26:49 has the most profound effect on time perception and time dilation. It feels like you go on a
    1:26:56 one to two week psychedelic experience on a the lower end of the mystical scale. But
    1:27:02 it is such a mind altering book in the way that it is written as almost a fever dream with multiple
    1:27:08 intertwining timelines and magical surrealism. If you’re looking for something hard that is also
    1:27:13 incredibly beautiful, and it’s this book I’ve never had an experience like this,
    1:27:18 you have to charge through the first 150 pages. If you put it down after 20 and pick it up a week
    1:27:24 later, it won’t make any sense. But if you get through it, you’ll be like that. It was an incredible
    1:27:30 book. Hopefully I want to recommend it to friends. And then two weeks later, if someone asks you what
    1:27:35 it was, you will not be able to describe what the book was about. It’s bizarre. So that will be
    1:27:39 just my my recommendation. Little Big by John Crowley.
    1:27:43 Thank you. I’ve made a note. I recently read a book I really enjoyed called
    1:27:50 Picnic comma lightning three words picnic comma lightning by Lawrence Scott. And I loved it.
    1:27:56 And I could not tell you what it was about at all. It’s nonfiction, but it’s I just adore it.
    1:28:00 Maybe that’s the sign of a good book on some level, being lost in it to the extent
    1:28:05 that you kept pieces back together in retrospect. If you had to give and I know you’ve given a great
    1:28:12 Ted talk, I recommend people check it out. Great bow tie also. But I recommend people check that out.
    1:28:16 If you had to give another Ted talk, but it had to be on something you are not known for. So it
    1:28:21 can’t be the magic, anything tangential to magic. Also, I’m going to take art off the table. Sadly,
    1:28:25 I’m going to take art off the table. What might you give a Ted talk on?
    1:28:32 I think this idea that we’re all joined up by how lonely it feels and things go wrong. This thing I
    1:28:36 said of life pulling us towards difficult places. I don’t say that because I’ve had a particularly
    1:28:42 difficult life. But I just think it’s just part of life. And it’s part of someone’s life is going
    1:28:48 well, it’s still a common thread. And I think that is not the mode that we’re encouraged to live in.
    1:28:52 It was very strange when I did that Ted talk and I really enjoyed it. But it was, I don’t
    1:28:56 say this with any disrespect to the Ted people at all. They were wonderful. But
    1:29:03 it was in Vancouver and you step out of that Ted building into some of the worst
    1:29:09 homelessness in the world. And it’s like Disney have staged the apocalypse. There was a bride
    1:29:15 covered in blood, pushing a trolley through fire. There were just things on fire. I mean,
    1:29:20 it was extraordinary, not quite on its doorstep, but like 10-15 minutes walk. And it was very old
    1:29:25 going out and finding a coffee in the middle of all that and then going back to the sort of
    1:29:29 Ted talk topics. It was a strange thing. So maybe partly for that reason. But I think the
    1:29:34 difficulty of life and how we sit well with that, I think that’s the perennial subject for me.
    1:29:39 I mean, we should make that happen. Yeah, in Vancouver, I presented a Ted
    1:29:46 any number of years ago, I can’t remember. And some of the worst opiate and opioid addiction
    1:29:53 in North America, for sure, in terms of density. Gabor Montes has done a lot of work there.
    1:29:58 All right, shifting topics a little bit. In the last handful of years, five years,
    1:30:04 I mean, somewhat of an arbitrary timeframe. But what new belief or behavior or habit would you say?
    1:30:09 It doesn’t have to be the most has improved your life the most. But are there any new
    1:30:13 beliefs, behaviors, habits that have meaningfully improved your life?
    1:30:22 Ways of looking at the world could be anything. Being confident to go with my instincts on
    1:30:27 particularly work related things historically. So these are big projects. I have these other
    1:30:31 people around me that are putting things together behind the scenes in terms of productions and
    1:30:37 meetings and pitching ideas and so on. And I get caught up with that. As I said, that productivity
    1:30:42 that you see isn’t driven by any sort of workaholic tendencies on my part. It’s just
    1:30:47 what I find myself swept up in. So of late. And it’s an odd thing to be saying, no, I don’t want
    1:30:53 to do this or being offered some private gig out somewhere and I say, I’m not going to enjoy that.
    1:30:55 Unless it’s the Clintons, then you can’t say no.
    1:31:03 That’s sort of good. I’ve been in my current relationship for 10 years and probably the last
    1:31:10 five years of that has settled better with me in terms of… They were very different. So
    1:31:16 I think I’m naturally disposed of a kind of a quite a stoic, placid thing. He’s very fiery.
    1:31:22 And I’ve sort of quite enjoying the sort of learning from that. It makes me a bit less of a
    1:31:26 people pleaser, I suppose. We’ve had lots of work done in the house for a long time and he’s
    1:31:30 very happy to start arguments with people that are doing that. And I’m just trying to keep everybody
    1:31:35 happy and making them coffee and trying to iron over any tension. And actually, sometimes a bit
    1:31:40 of conflict is important because it isn’t really about conflict. It’s about being able to have some
    1:31:46 faith in what you actually are and want to say and stand for. It’s not about conflict. You think
    1:31:50 it’s about conflict so you don’t do it, but it’s not. It’s just about having some faith in yourself.
    1:31:57 What caused that settling? Was it relating to it differently, that dynamic that you just described?
    1:32:02 So you have 10 years, like in the last five, you’ve settled into it in a different way.
    1:32:08 What has contributed to that? I think just time. I think it’s just slowly, slow process.
    1:32:22 My natural predisposition is kind of mental space. I’ve always sort of saw myself as probably
    1:32:28 being on my own with a dog. And even getting a second dog as a couple, having now a second dog,
    1:32:31 it felt, “Oh, no, no, it’s wrong. It should be.” I remember saying, “Let’s not get a second one.
    1:32:36 I like that it’s just me and my dog.” And my partner said, “What do you mean you? It’s us,
    1:32:39 and what do you mean? What are you talking about?” And I realized that was my image of myself was
    1:32:46 still kind of a bit single. That’s definitely a new mode for me. I am trying to work a little
    1:32:52 less, but I’ve also become very aware. When I wrote the happy book afterwards, I was going out and
    1:32:57 giving talks on happiness to promote the book a little bit. And because I had all this knowledge
    1:33:00 that I found really interesting and I wanted to do something with it and not just end it because
    1:33:05 I’d finished writing the book. And I was really unhappy. I was going out thinking, “I’m actually
    1:33:09 feeling a bit miserable and I don’t know why and I feel a bit of a hypocrite.” And I realized it was
    1:33:16 because I’d finished writing the book and I didn’t have that engagement in a big creative project.
    1:33:20 So those are important to me. And I think realizing that as well, I think, as we can
    1:33:25 hope for, has become more conscious of the things that we do find meaning, the things that we do need
    1:33:33 and having more of those. If you could put a message, quote, image, anything non-commercial
    1:33:38 on a billboard, meaning make it present for millions or billions of people.
    1:33:45 There’s a line or a verse of Rilke, the German romantic poet, which is
    1:33:53 something like, “Experience everything, the beauty and the terror, no feeling is final,
    1:33:59 just keep going.” Oh, I thought that was great. I’ll have a drop of Rilke. So yeah, maybe that.
    1:34:02 Or just if you want something snappy, I think gather yourself afresh,
    1:34:07 first of all, just to find ways of being able to do that. What we need in our life just to kind of
    1:34:11 get ourselves back together and step back out into the world, I think that’s having that and
    1:34:17 knowing what you need. That’s a big tick, isn’t it? Well, Darren, I could keep going,
    1:34:21 but I want to be respectful of your time and this has been a great wide-ranging conversation.
    1:34:26 My AirPods are starting to run out. They’re starting to. You can dipping out.
    1:34:33 So people can find you on social @darenbrown. We’ll link to everything on Instagram and
    1:34:41 on xdarenbrown, D-R-R-E-N, brown.co.uk. Is there anything else you’d like to say before we wind
    1:34:45 to a close, requests of my audience, things you’d like to point them to, anything at all?
    1:34:50 Just to recommend our hairdresser that we both share. Give them a shout out.
    1:34:58 Yes, we do share the same stylist and beard trimmer. It’s a good luck. It looks good on you.
    1:35:03 Thank you. Very you too. It was very good to finally make contact. Thank you so much for
    1:35:04 thank you for having me.
    1:35:07 My pleasure. My pleasure. And for everybody listening, we’ll link to everything in the
    1:35:13 show notes, tim.blog/podcast. And until next time, be just a little kinder that is necessary
    1:35:16 to others and also to yourself. Thanks for tuning in.
    1:35:23 Hey guys, this is Tim again, just one more thing before you take off and that is Five
    1:35:28 Bullet Friday. Would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday that provides a little
    1:35:33 fun before the weekend? Between one and a half and two million people subscribe to my free newsletter,
    1:35:39 my super short newsletter called Five Bullet Friday. Easy to sign up, easy to cancel. It is
    1:35:44 basically a half page that I send out every Friday to share the coolest things I’ve found
    1:35:48 or discovered or have started exploring over that week. It’s kind of like my diary of cool
    1:35:55 things. It often includes articles I’m reading, books I’m reading, albums perhaps, gadgets, gizmos,
    1:36:00 all sorts of tech tricks and so on that get sent to me by my friends, including a lot of podcast
    1:36:07 guests and these strange esoteric things end up in my field. And then I test them and then I
    1:36:13 share them with you. So if that sounds fun, again, it’s very short, a little tiny bite of goodness
    1:36:17 before you head off for the weekend, something to think about. If you’d like to try it out,
    1:36:24 just go to tim.blog/friday, type that into your browser, tim.blog/friday, drop in your email and
    1:36:29 you’ll get the very next one. Thanks for listening. I don’t know about you guys, but I’ve had the
    1:36:35 experience of traveling overseas and I try to access something, say a show on Amazon or elsewhere
    1:36:42 and it says not available in your current location, something like that, or creepier still if you’re
    1:36:48 at home and this has happened to me. I search for something or I type in a URL incorrectly and then
    1:36:54 a screen for AT&T pops up and it says you might be searching for this. How about that? And it
    1:36:59 suggests an alternative and I think to myself, wait a second, my internet service provider is
    1:37:06 tracking my searches and what I’m typing into the browser. Yeah, I don’t love it. And a lot of you
    1:37:11 know I take privacy and security very seriously. That is why I’ve been using today’s episode sponsor,
    1:37:16 ExpressVPN for several years now and I recommend you check it out. When you connect to a secure VPN
    1:37:20 server, your internet traffic goes through an encrypted tunnel that nobody can see into, including
    1:37:26 hackers, governments, people on Starbucks, your internet service provider, etc. And no,
    1:37:31 you’re not safe simply using incognito mode in your browser. This was something that I got wrong
    1:37:36 for a long time. Your activity might still be visible as in the example I gave to your internet
    1:37:41 service provider. Incognito mode also does not hide your IP address. Also with the example that I
    1:37:45 gave of you can’t access this kind of that content or whatever you happen to be, then you just set
    1:37:50 your server to a country where you can see it and all of a sudden voila, you can say log into your
    1:37:56 normal Amazon account is supposed to be enrouted to dot UK or whatever. And everything works. So
    1:38:01 ExpressVPN protects you and enables you because it encrypts and reroutes your network traffic
    1:38:05 through secure servers. So even though your traffic is still passing through your internet provider,
    1:38:11 now they can’t read it. ExpressVPN is so fast, also it doesn’t bog things down at all. I usually
    1:38:17 forget that I even have it on. I can stream high quality video, no lag or buffering, even on servers
    1:38:22 thousands of miles away. It gives me access to servers in 105 countries around the world. It’s
    1:38:28 very helpful as I am constantly traveling and love to do so. It’s easy to use. You just choose a
    1:38:33 server location and tap one button to connect. You do not need to be technologically savvy. You
    1:38:40 don’t need to know anything about how it works. It’s just one click and it works on every device,
    1:38:46 phone, laptop, tablets, even TVs. ExpressVPN has really changed the way I use the internet and I
    1:38:51 can’t recommend it highly enough. So check it out. Right now you can go to expressvpn.com/tim
    1:39:00 and get three extra months for free when you sign up. Just go to expressvpn.com/tim for an
    1:39:07 extra three free months of ExpressVPN. One more time expressvpn.com/tim. This episode is brought
    1:39:13 to you by Eight Sleep. I have been using Eight Sleep pod cover for years now. Why? Well, by simply
    1:39:18 adding it to your existing mattress on top like a fitted sheet, you can automatically cool down or
    1:39:23 warm up each side of your bed. Eight Sleep recently launched their newest generation of the pod and
    1:39:30 I’m excited to test it out, Pod 4 Ultra. It cools, it heats, and now it elevates automatically,
    1:39:35 more on that in a second. First, Pod 4 Ultra can cool down each side of the bed as much as 20
    1:39:40 degrees Fahrenheit below room temperature, giving you and your partner cool, even in a heat wave,
    1:39:45 or you can switch it up depending on which of you is heat sensitive. I am always more heat sensitive
    1:39:50 pulling the sheets off, closing the windows, trying to crank the AC down. This solves all of that.
    1:39:55 Pod 4 Ultra also introduces an adjustable base that fits between your mattress and your bed frame
    1:39:59 and adds reading and sleeping positions for the best unwinding experience. And for those
    1:40:04 snore heavy nights, the pod can detect your snoring and automatically lift your head by a few degrees
    1:40:10 to improve airflow and stop you or your partner from snoring. Plus, with Pod 4 Ultra, you can leave
    1:40:14 your wearables on the nightstand. You won’t need them because these types of mattress are integrated
    1:40:19 into the Pod 4 Ultra itself. They have imperceptible sensors which track your sleep time, sleep phases,
    1:40:26 and HRV. Their heart rate tracking is just one example is at 99% accuracy. So, get your best
    1:40:33 night’s sleep. Head to 8sleep.com/tim and use code TIM to get $350 off of the Pod 4 Ultra.
    1:40:42 That’s 8sleep, all spelled out, 8sleep.com/tim and code TIM to get $350 off the Pod 4 Ultra.
    1:40:49 They currently ship to the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Europe, and Australia.
    1:40:59 [BLANK_AUDIO]

    Derren Brown is a psychological illusionist who can predict, suggest, and even control human behavior.

    Sponsors:

    Eight Sleep’s Pod 4 Ultra sleeping solution for dynamic cooling and heating: https://eightsleep.com/tim (save $350 on the Pod 4 Ultra)

    LinkedIn Ads, the go-to tool for B2B marketers and advertisers who want to drive brand awareness and generate leads: LinkedIn.com/TFS ($100 LinkedIn ad credit)

    ExpressVPN high-speed, secure, and anonymous VPN servicehttps://www.expressvpn.com/tim (Get 3 extra months free with a 12-month plan)

    Timestamps:

    [00:00] Start

    [06:45] Sacrifice, The Push, and Apocalypse.

    [12:21] Derren’s transition from student to magician.

    [14:43] How Martin Taylor inspired Derren to pursue hypnosis.

    [16:42] Strange audience reactions to hypnosis.

    [20:00] Hypnosis, mentalism, and cold reading.

    [24:34] How a TV medium uses hot reading techniques.

    [26:22] How can someone learn to be a healthy skeptic?

    [34:24] How learning magic influenced Derren’s skepticism and faith.

    [40:57] Why did Derren wait until his 30s to come out?

    [43:18] Finding meaning.

    [47:06] High status struggles.

    [48:20] Making sense of the human experience.

    [56:59] Ambition and productivity.

    [01:02:25] The counterintuitive assembly of Derren’s creative projects.

    [01:09:17] Ensuring ethics and safety in TV social experiments.

    [01:15:50] Suggestion as self-defense.

    [01:20:27] Why Derren takes care not to abuse his superpowers in real life.

    [01:24:01] Recommended reading.

    [01:28:02] TED Talks in treacherous terrain.

    [01:29:53] A new belief or habit that has improved Derren’s life.

    [01:33:27] Derren’s billboard and parting thoughts.

    *

    For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.

    For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Showplease visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsors

    Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.

    For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.

    Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.

    Follow Tim:

    Twittertwitter.com/tferriss 

    Instagraminstagram.com/timferriss

    YouTubeyoutube.com/timferriss

    Facebookfacebook.com/timferriss 

    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferriss

    Past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry SeinfeldHugh JackmanDr. Jane GoodallLeBron JamesKevin HartDoris Kearns GoodwinJamie FoxxMatthew McConaugheyEsther PerelElizabeth GilbertTerry CrewsSiaYuval Noah HarariMalcolm GladwellMadeleine AlbrightCheryl StrayedJim CollinsMary Karr, Maria PopovaSam HarrisMichael PhelpsBob IgerEdward NortonArnold SchwarzeneggerNeil StraussKen BurnsMaria SharapovaMarc AndreessenNeil GaimanNeil de Grasse TysonJocko WillinkDaniel EkKelly SlaterDr. Peter AttiaSeth GodinHoward MarksDr. Brené BrownEric SchmidtMichael LewisJoe GebbiaMichael PollanDr. Jordan PetersonVince VaughnBrian KoppelmanRamit SethiDax ShepardTony RobbinsJim DethmerDan HarrisRay DalioNaval RavikantVitalik ButerinElizabeth LesserAmanda PalmerKatie HaunSir Richard BransonChuck PalahniukArianna HuffingtonReid HoffmanBill BurrWhitney CummingsRick RubinDr. Vivek MurthyDarren AronofskyMargaret AtwoodMark ZuckerbergPeter ThielDr. Gabor MatéAnne LamottSarah SilvermanDr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

  • #775: Jon Batiste — The Quest for Originality, How to Get Unstuck, His Favorite Mantras, and Strategies for Living a Creative Life

    AI transcript
    0:00:01 Hello, boys and girls, ladies and germs.
    0:00:05 This is Tim Ferriss and welcome to another episode of the Tim Ferriss show.
    0:00:07 This isn’t just any episode.
    0:00:11 This one turned out really, really special.
    0:00:17 And I really encourage everybody to listen to this once as audio only
    0:00:21 if you are listening to this without any video.
    0:00:27 But also go to youtube.com/timferriss to ours two S’s to see the video.
    0:00:33 We recorded this episode in the recording studio designed by Jimi Hendrix,
    0:00:40 where he slept the acoustics, the surroundings, everything is gorgeous.
    0:00:42 And my guest was in the flow.
    0:00:45 We happened to mesh really well together.
    0:00:49 And it’s one of those episodes that I will remember for many years.
    0:00:52 My guest, John Batiste, is a five time Grammy Award winning
    0:00:56 and Academy Award winning singer, songwriter and composer.
    0:01:01 I met him ages and ages ago back when he was a mere incredible,
    0:01:04 incredible musician, composer, et cetera.
    0:01:08 But I’ve been able to watch him become the marquee lights, John Batiste.
    0:01:10 And it has been a thrill to watch.
    0:01:11 We talk about it all.
    0:01:16 His eighth studio album, Beethoven Blues, is set for a November 15th release.
    0:01:21 When we are sitting in Jimi Hendrix’s studio, there are pianos, guitars,
    0:01:24 you name it, and we don’t just talk.
    0:01:28 We walk around and he uses music to answer some of my questions.
    0:01:29 It’s phenomenal.
    0:01:34 Beethoven Blues marks the first installment in his solo piano series,
    0:01:39 showcasing Batiste’s interpretation of Beethoven’s iconic works reimagined.
    0:01:40 And that is an understatement.
    0:01:45 You’re going to hear a lot of it in this episode towards the last 25 percent.
    0:01:47 So buckle up and stick around.
    0:01:51 Beethoven Blues follows Batiste’s studio album, World Music Radio,
    0:01:55 which received five Grammy nominations, including album of the year.
    0:01:59 As a composer, he scored Jason Reitman’s Saturday Night Now in theaters.
    0:02:03 The film depicts the chaotic 90 minutes before Saturday Night Live’s
    0:02:08 very first broadcast in 1975, underscored by Batiste’s blending
    0:02:10 of jazz, classical and contemporary elements.
    0:02:15 He composed and produced the music live on set, capturing the intensity
    0:02:17 of the show’s debut.
    0:02:20 He also appears in the film as Billy Preston, the show’s first musical
    0:02:23 guest, and certainly he has lived that out himself.
    0:02:27 Additionally, Batiste composed and performed music for the Disney Pixar
    0:02:31 film Soul, for which he won an Academy Award for Best Original Score
    0:02:34 alongside Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross.
    0:02:36 You can find him at JohnBatiste.com.
    0:02:43 That’s J-O-N-B-A-T-I-S-T-E dot com on Instagram and socials @JohnBatiste.
    0:02:46 And boy, oh, boy, I love this.
    0:02:49 I really think you guys are in for a treat.
    0:02:49 Stick around.
    0:02:51 Listen to the whole thing.
    0:02:55 Watch it a second time on video at youtube.com/TimFerris.
    0:02:59 So we’re going to get to the good stuff, but first, just a few words
    0:03:01 from those who make this podcast possible.
    0:03:05 The following quote is from one of the most legendary
    0:03:09 entrepreneurs and investors in Silicon Valley, and here it goes.
    0:03:13 This team executes at a level you rarely see even among the best
    0:03:14 technology companies.
    0:03:19 And quote, that is from Peter Thiel about today’s sponsor Ramp.
    0:03:22 I’ve been hearing about these guys everywhere and there are good reasons for it.
    0:03:26 Ramp is corporate card and spend management software designed to help you
    0:03:29 save time and put money back in your pocket.
    0:03:31 In fact, they’re already doing that across the board.
    0:03:37 Ramp has already saved more than 25,000 customers, including other podcast sponsors
    0:03:41 like Shopify and Aidsleep, more than 10 million hours and more than $1 billion
    0:03:44 through better financial management of their corporate spending.
    0:03:48 With Ramp, you’re able to issue cards to every employee with limits
    0:03:52 and restrictions and automate expense reporting, allowing you to close your
    0:03:54 books eight times faster on average.
    0:03:59 Your employees will no longer spend hours upon hours submitting expense reports.
    0:04:03 I mean, within companies, fast growing startups or otherwise, a lot of employees
    0:04:06 spend half their time, it seems, trying to get all this stuff together.
    0:04:08 No more. Ramp saves you time and money.
    0:04:13 You can get started, issue virtual and physical cards and start making payments
    0:04:18 in less than 15 minutes, whether you have five employees or 5,000 employees.
    0:04:20 They’ve streamlined everything.
    0:04:24 And businesses that use Ramp save an average of 5% in the first year.
    0:04:27 And now you can get $250 when you join Ramp.
    0:04:30 Just go to Ramp.com/Tim.
    0:04:31 All spelled out.
    0:04:36 That’s Ramp.com/Tim, R-A-M-P.com/Tim.
    0:04:40 Cards issued by Sutton Bank, member FDIC, terms and conditions apply.
    0:04:44 This episode is brought to you by 8Sleep.
    0:04:47 I have been using 8Sleep pod cover for years now.
    0:04:50 Why? Well, by simply adding it to your existing mattress on top, like a fitted
    0:04:55 sheet, you can automatically cool down or warm up each side of your bed.
    0:04:59 8Sleep recently launched their newest generation of the pod, and I’m excited
    0:05:01 to test it out, Pod 4 Ultra.
    0:05:05 It cools, it heats, and now it elevates automatically.
    0:05:06 More on that in a second.
    0:05:10 First, Pod 4 Ultra can cool down each side of the bed as much as 20 degrees
    0:05:15 Fahrenheit below room temperature, keeping you and your partner cool, even
    0:05:18 in a heat wave, or you can switch it up depending on which of you is heat sensitive.
    0:05:23 I am always more heat sensitive, pulling the sheets off, closing the windows,
    0:05:24 trying to crank the AC down.
    0:05:25 This solves all of that.
    0:05:29 Pod 4 Ultra also introduces an adjustable base that fits between your mattress
    0:05:33 and your bed frame and adds reading and sleeping positions for the best unwinding
    0:05:36 experience. And for those snore heavy nights, the pod can detect your
    0:05:40 snoring and automatically lift your head by a few degrees to improve air flow
    0:05:43 and stop you or your partner from snoring.
    0:05:46 Plus, with the Pod 4 Ultra, you can leave your wearables on the nightstand.
    0:05:49 You won’t need them because these types of metrics are integrated
    0:05:50 into the Pod 4 Ultra itself.
    0:05:55 They have imperceptible sensors which track your sleep time, sleep bases and HRV.
    0:06:00 Their heart rate tracking is just one example is at 99% accuracy.
    0:06:02 So get your best night’s sleep.
    0:06:08 Head to 8sleep.com/tim and use Code Tim to get $350 off of the Pod 4 Ultra.
    0:06:09 That’s 8sleep.
    0:06:17 All spelled out 8sleep.com/tim and Code Tim TIM to get $350 off the Pod 4 Ultra.
    0:06:22 They currently ship to the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Europe and Australia.
    0:06:28 At this altitude, I can run flat out for a half mile before my hands start shaking.
    0:06:30 Can I answer your personal question?
    0:06:32 No, I would have seen it in a perfect time.
    0:06:37 I’m a cybernetic organism living this year over a metal endoskeleton.
    0:06:51 The snow monkeys in Japan figured it out, so we’ve been doing it a long time.
    0:06:53 They just hang out in the hot springs.
    0:06:58 Did you ever go to a place in Japan, Okinawa?
    0:07:02 I’ve spent time there because I lived in Japan when I was younger.
    0:07:04 So I’ve been to Okinawa.
    0:07:07 I have, yeah, culturally, super different from the rest of Japan.
    0:07:07 It’s cool.
    0:07:09 I can’t wait to go.
    0:07:10 I wanted to ask you if you had been.
    0:07:17 I’d never been, but I’ve always wanted to just go there and like spend a long period of time, like months.
    0:07:18 Yeah.
    0:07:19 I feel like it could change you.
    0:07:25 I think it could in part because I asked everybody down there
    0:07:28 because the Okinawans have so many hundred plus.
    0:07:31 Yeah, senior citizens, they live a long time, or at least they used to.
    0:07:34 And I asked every person I met, what’s the secret?
    0:07:37 And they all had a different answer, which was pretty adorable.
    0:07:41 But the one constant was they were all active.
    0:07:43 I had a driver who was helping us out.
    0:07:44 He considered himself young.
    0:07:49 He was 85 and we would drive and he’d point to the retirement homes and he’d say,
    0:07:51 that’s where you go to die.
    0:07:52 That’s when you stop.
    0:07:55 He’s like, as soon as you sit on the couch and start watching TV, it’s over.
    0:08:00 And we would go to the farmer’s markets and you’d see people were at 98, 103,
    0:08:05 walking around shopping, tending garden, active, they’re still engaged.
    0:08:14 That’s absolutely incredible because all of those things you think of are mundane
    0:08:17 and that you are trying to get away from doing.
    0:08:18 Exactly.
    0:08:20 That’s what I’m trying to retire from.
    0:08:21 Yeah.
    0:08:26 Or I want to outsource that, which that almost becomes a way of life.
    0:08:27 It’s like a philosophy.
    0:08:28 Yeah, totally.
    0:08:33 I remember I was reading different books by Kurt Vonnegut.
    0:08:34 He was one of my favorite writers.
    0:08:35 Oh yeah, Kurt did.
    0:08:37 He had this, I think it was an essay.
    0:08:42 He was like, if people tell you the purpose of life is not to fart around, don’t believe them.
    0:08:44 He’s like, I go to the post office.
    0:08:45 I wait in line.
    0:08:46 Most people don’t want to do that.
    0:08:50 He’s like, but that’s the connective tissue, all those in between moments.
    0:08:55 And if you’re only celebrating the huge this, the huge that, the big events, I mean, you’re
    0:08:57 missing like 98% of your life.
    0:08:58 Oh man.
    0:08:59 Wow.
    0:09:04 There’s something about that I think about often.
    0:09:10 How do you maintain a flow state in waking life throughout the mundane?
    0:09:17 How do you embrace the mundane and find the muse in the mundane without having to go to
    0:09:18 some sacred place?
    0:09:19 Yeah, exactly.
    0:09:21 You have to take a time out.
    0:09:28 Like I have to go and plug into something else to connect versus just being connected.
    0:09:33 The muse in the mundane, how do you, how have you found that?
    0:09:36 Or how have you tried to find that?
    0:09:37 Mistakes.
    0:09:38 All right.
    0:09:39 Mistakes are amazing.
    0:09:40 Mistakes are brilliant.
    0:09:47 It’s a gift to go about your day and for something, either a mistake or something that you didn’t
    0:09:57 plan an interruption, some seeming calamity happening that allows for you to not only
    0:10:01 respond but to create.
    0:10:05 And then in that moment, you have the ability to discover something that’s much greater
    0:10:11 than anything that you could invent or devise because there’s something that happens with
    0:10:19 the synapses and the way that you respond to seeming calamity that brings you to your
    0:10:22 highest potential.
    0:10:26 So I have to ask you about something I read when I was doing research for this, which is
    0:10:31 always fun because I get to be like a creepy stalker online for people I know.
    0:10:35 Which otherwise would be very strange and uncomfortable for everybody.
    0:10:40 And I was reading this piece from The Guardian and I want to ask about introspection because
    0:10:43 you’re very reflective and I admire that.
    0:10:49 I mean, you seem to have cultivated self-awareness and a lot of what you do.
    0:10:53 In this Guardian piece, they said maybe that’s because he didn’t speak until he was 10 or
    0:10:55 something along those lines.
    0:11:00 Did you not speak for a lot of your, I guess, childhood given the framing that they put
    0:11:01 in the article?
    0:11:07 Man, you know what’s amazing is those years, I don’t have so many memories of those years
    0:11:08 either.
    0:11:09 And I don’t understand why.
    0:11:15 I’ve just started to excavate that more and more in the last year, just trying to figure
    0:11:20 out what was going on, what was the context.
    0:11:25 And for all intents and purposes, my life has truly been blessed.
    0:11:29 I’ve had such a great upbringing.
    0:11:37 But there was something about being born into the world that felt like I needed to observe
    0:11:38 before I participated.
    0:11:46 It felt like I needed to watch what was happening and synthesize what was happening.
    0:11:50 All the different perspectives, all the different personalities growing around a lot of colorful
    0:11:57 personalities, a lot of sounds and rhythms, a lot of life, life force energy and a lot
    0:11:58 of danger.
    0:12:07 So I think the aspect of being in all of that, meeting my natural state, my innate makeup,
    0:12:16 it was deep in introspection, something that I still have yet to put words to a fully understand
    0:12:24 in my early years, put me in a space where I was observing and gathering, observing and
    0:12:32 gathering, observing and gathering, and then eventually it became okay, let me emerge into
    0:12:34 a new era.
    0:12:38 Let me try to mold some things, and it started with music.
    0:12:40 Let me try to mold the world around me.
    0:12:45 Let me try to shift things and create things and influence things, dare I say.
    0:12:52 Let me try in little ways I would start, and then it extended far beyond music.
    0:12:54 What age would you say that was?
    0:12:55 Hard to pin down.
    0:12:57 Yeah, exactly.
    0:12:59 You already peeped it out, Tim.
    0:13:04 It’s like it’s around 14 or 15.
    0:13:10 It was music that allowed for me to have a opportunity to present myself.
    0:13:18 On stage you have to present yourself in a way that is amplifying aspects of what’s inside.
    0:13:24 And ultimately, you have a decision to make as a performer to decide how far between who
    0:13:32 you actually are and who you’ve created to project on the stage are you.
    0:13:35 How big is the jump, the discrepancy between those two?
    0:13:37 It’s a choice you make.
    0:13:41 How do you think about it, because I remember chatting with Andrew Zimmer and TV host does
    0:13:42 a lot of different things.
    0:13:46 And he said be very careful about, and I’m paraphrasing, but he’s like be very careful
    0:13:49 about who you are in episode one, season one.
    0:13:52 Because you could paint yourself into a corner where you have to be that guy now forever
    0:13:53 if it’s popular.
    0:13:56 How have you thought about that?
    0:14:01 I thought about it from first the perspective of how do I get to a point where all that’s
    0:14:08 within me, all these things that I feel, these ideas that I have, this vision becomes a reality.
    0:14:14 So that took so much stepping outside of my comfort zone, we call it throw yourself in
    0:14:15 the water.
    0:14:21 We do things like when I was in college, my band and I would go in the subway and we would
    0:14:22 play for people.
    0:14:23 We wouldn’t ask for money.
    0:14:24 We wouldn’t bust.
    0:14:30 We would just play concerts for people who weren’t expecting a concert to just get to
    0:14:37 the point where we were fearless about presenting art and also wanted to change the atmosphere
    0:14:42 in this community of a train station that has all these people from different walks
    0:14:45 of life now locked in the train together.
    0:14:51 So it’s a certain aspect of winning them over that we worked on.
    0:14:54 How do we create harmony in this scenario?
    0:14:59 And then that extended, now let’s go and strike up conversation with people that we don’t
    0:15:04 know and talk to them about things that they’re going through.
    0:15:08 And then let’s share some things that we don’t want to share that we’re going through.
    0:15:09 I have a big question for you.
    0:15:12 I think it’s really to all of this and I’ve wanted to ask you a lot and Molly’s getting
    0:15:14 excited and stretching over here.
    0:15:16 So I think it’s a good sign.
    0:15:24 So the question is about how to choose where you go on this quest of originality.
    0:15:30 It seems like that was part of your life pretty early, maybe 15, 16, 17.
    0:15:35 The phrase that keeps coming back is “quests for originality.”
    0:15:36 And of course, we’re all original.
    0:15:38 We’re all one of a kind.
    0:15:39 Yes.
    0:15:44 But in a saturated world and a busy world, with so many facets of ourselves, you can
    0:15:45 go in a million different directions.
    0:15:48 You have a lot of choices.
    0:15:54 So how have you chosen which pathways to explore, like interacting with these people on the
    0:15:59 subway, playing some of the instruments you’ve played that I know were not assigned to you
    0:16:00 at Juilliard?
    0:16:01 Yes.
    0:16:02 Yes.
    0:16:03 Yes.
    0:16:08 So how do you pick which aspects of yourself or which scent trails to explore?
    0:16:16 You have to understand what is it that’s yearning to be expressed within you.
    0:16:26 Even if you’re dreadfully afraid of it, you can have something within that seems so far
    0:16:35 away from the reality of your current state that it couldn’t possibly be for you in your
    0:16:37 mind.
    0:16:42 And every fiber of your being is telling you, “This isn’t what I should be pursuing.
    0:16:46 This isn’t who I am.”
    0:16:47 That’s the one right there.
    0:16:48 That one right there.
    0:16:50 The scary one.
    0:16:51 This isn’t who I am.
    0:16:52 It won’t go away.
    0:16:53 Yes.
    0:16:57 But it sticks with you and you start to say, “Oh, it’s not going away.”
    0:16:58 Could you give an example?
    0:17:01 Do any examples come to mind for you personally?
    0:17:09 Oh my gosh, well, performing for me, my first experiences with performing were traumatic
    0:17:11 at best.
    0:17:19 I mean, the level of performance anxiety that I still have is unbelievably paralyzing to
    0:17:26 the point that I’ve developed mantras in different ways of reaching for what’s inside
    0:17:32 and also just a greater sense of purpose and philosophy that really is a foundation that
    0:17:38 lifts me to the point of taking the stage and sharing it because it’s bigger than oneself,
    0:17:39 right?
    0:17:42 And did you feel that yearning to perform?
    0:17:43 Was it an image?
    0:17:44 Was it a feeling?
    0:17:45 Was that the yearning?
    0:17:46 That was part of it.
    0:17:51 I remember my first time on the talent show dancing, which is another aspect of it.
    0:17:58 Something that I was not naturally accustomed to doing besides just that family functions.
    0:18:01 And it wasn’t something that came natural to me.
    0:18:10 I was more of someone who was a spiritual mover versus the most precise dancer.
    0:18:13 But I went on a talent show with my best friend.
    0:18:19 We were in elementary school at the time and he was a very natural dancer and he convinced
    0:18:26 me to join him on the talent show stage in front of the entire school from K-8.
    0:18:32 The whole school, all the teachers, everybody just gathered in the auditorium.
    0:18:33 The music starts playing.
    0:18:45 It was like some sort of decrepit Michael Jackson beat, like Fisher Price that you did.
    0:18:52 It was going man and I get up there and I’m going and at this time what I knew was the
    0:18:54 running man, MC Hammer.
    0:18:55 I remember.
    0:18:56 You know that?
    0:18:57 Oh, of course.
    0:18:58 But the pants parachuted.
    0:18:59 Gotta be careful.
    0:19:00 Can’t ride any horses without that.
    0:19:01 Yeah.
    0:19:03 You can dance with them on.
    0:19:04 Yeah.
    0:19:06 They riding the horse with that.
    0:19:08 What kind of horse you got?
    0:19:11 You got to get away from that.
    0:19:14 I said, man, listen, let me try the running man.
    0:19:15 That didn’t work.
    0:19:16 Everything I turned to didn’t work.
    0:19:19 Okay, let me try to do the moonwalk.
    0:19:20 Keon just did it too.
    0:19:21 That didn’t work.
    0:19:29 It was a mix of cheers and laughter, both this sort of excitement by what he was doing from
    0:19:34 the audience and also this sort of what is wrong with this child to think that he could
    0:19:36 be up there.
    0:19:43 I was mortified and I remember leaving that scenario and thinking I would never, I had
    0:19:45 so many moments.
    0:19:49 That’s the thing that I remember most about performance early on.
    0:19:55 Every moment I tried to perform, I faced rejection and left thinking I don’t ever have to do
    0:19:56 that again.
    0:19:58 There’s nothing in that for me.
    0:20:03 Now, fast forward, I’m thinking about that dancing moment because it came back to me
    0:20:08 again a couple years ago when we were at the Grammys and we were rehearsal and I’m leading
    0:20:19 this performance with 30 dancers and there’s a moment where we all run, the tape is probably
    0:20:24 somewhere out there, but there’s a moment where we all run in place.
    0:20:30 We break the fold while we jump into the audience and we run from the stage and the vision,
    0:20:34 Jamel McWilliams and I, we were coming up with this vision of let’s just break through
    0:20:35 the screen.
    0:20:38 Let’s break through any pretense.
    0:20:46 Let’s build an energy with our collective here, this group of us that just permeates
    0:20:48 every soul watching.
    0:20:53 I remember even saying at some point on the stage, touch the screen, get a blessing.
    0:21:00 It was almost like Tony Robbins motivational speech meets Baptist church.
    0:21:05 We got to this point where the energy, it was fierce, just like a shaman, just moving
    0:21:06 the energy around.
    0:21:09 We got to this running move and that was the launch of it all.
    0:21:16 And I remembered thinking back to when I was that kid in second grade and I was almost
    0:21:19 booed off the stage if it wasn’t for Keon, right?
    0:21:25 And I’m doing this move at the Grammys and it’s happening in real time.
    0:21:30 There’s a collective life force energy that’s coming from it and that’s the thing that creating
    0:21:37 that moments like that moments long before that, whether it’s in the subway, just creating
    0:21:39 that energy was the call.
    0:21:45 That was what you were yearning for was creating the energy that type of electricity.
    0:21:47 It’s electricity.
    0:21:49 It’s community.
    0:21:51 It’s what the world could be.
    0:21:55 It’s an aspirational vision of, of us.
    0:22:02 I thought for a while, like, what is the field that I enter into to create this or to cultivate
    0:22:03 this?
    0:22:04 What is that space?
    0:22:10 And I didn’t have words for it for many years and it evolves over time and it requires performance.
    0:22:15 But it’s so much, I’ve never said I shared this, but I didn’t think, I mean, we already
    0:22:16 getting deep.
    0:22:17 So why not?
    0:22:18 So let’s go for it.
    0:22:26 My idea has led me to places that in recent times, I don’t know how much longer I will
    0:22:30 be performing or be a musician.
    0:22:31 Why is that?
    0:22:35 I’ve never said that, but it’s been coming up in the last, I mean, Sulayka and I have
    0:22:40 talked about it before just because we have that type of relationship of exploring and
    0:22:41 challenging each other.
    0:22:50 But the form of the vocation is shifting and the gift of music for me and its meaning
    0:22:54 in my life and its application within the vocation is also shifting.
    0:22:59 Do you know where it’s shifting to or do you just feel the tectonic plates shifting
    0:23:02 and you’re like, all right, let’s pause and pay attention.
    0:23:05 How are you experiencing that shift, that shifting?
    0:23:08 Man, it’s such an intuitive thing.
    0:23:12 It’s such a trust-based relationship.
    0:23:14 You don’t force it.
    0:23:16 You don’t force it.
    0:23:18 You can’t force it.
    0:23:21 It just tells you when it’s time.
    0:23:25 Is that a sensitivity that you think everybody has or do you think you have greater sensitivity
    0:23:31 to feel that and to sit with it, even though it might be uncomfortable to not have a compass
    0:23:34 pointing you in a certain direction?
    0:23:44 I think those early years coupled with now by my own volition, but when I was in college,
    0:23:49 there were times when they sent me for psychiatric evaluation.
    0:23:56 In those early years, there may be some root to your first question about why I wasn’t
    0:23:57 not speaking.
    0:24:03 There may be some root within the way that my psyche was formed.
    0:24:06 For me, also the superpower within that.
    0:24:13 That’s allowed for me to develop a relationship with presence and with being that allows for
    0:24:14 me to trust and have faith.
    0:24:21 Also, just the natural state of an artist is to have complete faith, unwavering faith
    0:24:26 in the ability for you to make this thing real that no one sees or can experience yet,
    0:24:28 but you.
    0:24:32 You have to do your best with words which fail to describe it.
    0:24:35 You have to communicate to collaborators to potentially join the ranks of building this
    0:24:36 thing.
    0:24:37 Yeah, I do.
    0:24:42 I think I want to turn this into a confessional on my part, so maybe for another time.
    0:24:44 No, no, go for it.
    0:24:46 Well, I do.
    0:24:51 There are experiences on the maybe far end of the spectrum, you have mystical experiences
    0:24:54 which by definition are ineffable.
    0:24:57 They translate very poorly to words.
    0:25:03 Then there are these felt senses and these evolved capabilities that also pre-day language,
    0:25:11 so it’s very difficult if not impossible to apply clean prose to describing them.
    0:25:15 To that extent, I do think I feel what you’re saying.
    0:25:20 I’m curious, as these things are taking shape in your body and your mind, these things you
    0:25:26 feel that are not yet externalized, how much of it is waiting and how much of it is tickling
    0:25:32 the muse for these original concepts or ideas or impulses?
    0:25:38 Are there ways that you help yourself to generate or be receptive to new directions and new
    0:25:39 ideas?
    0:25:46 You know, I was checking out Alfred Hitchcock the other night, Suspense.
    0:25:55 If you think about the device of suspense in cinema that he mastered and you experienced
    0:26:02 that through the things that he created, at least for me that was something that brought
    0:26:11 me back to an understanding of the muse, which is this idea that suspense is created when
    0:26:17 there are stakes and when you don’t know what’s going to happen on the other side.
    0:26:25 So you then have to put everything on the line that you believe in that motivates you,
    0:26:31 that powers you, you have to put it on the line in order to move toward whatever your
    0:26:38 desired outcome is in a limited amount of time and sometimes without enough intel or
    0:26:44 intellectual processing of the information to even know which direction you want to take
    0:26:45 it in.
    0:26:47 You just have the moment.
    0:26:59 So for me, I love to create these pockets of suspense, these pockets of pressurized creativity
    0:27:06 or pressurized experience that leads me to discovery, that it pushes me forward.
    0:27:11 And I think about things that are not music like cinema or there’s so many things that
    0:27:19 are not connected to the actual craft that I draw from much, much, much more than actually
    0:27:25 thinking about the inspiration of music and the fruit of the craft itself.
    0:27:32 So if we take a closer look at the stakes and the unknown, I’m wondering if I’m hearing
    0:27:34 you correctly because that was just a week ago.
    0:27:39 I had a conversation with a number of friends, having dinner, drinks, and I posed a question
    0:27:44 which was what do you do when you get stuck or you’re feeling stuck and you want to push
    0:27:47 yourself in a new direction?
    0:27:51 And there were a lot of different answers, but there was one common thread which was
    0:27:55 in effect, I need to book the theater so I write the play, a feeling of getting in over
    0:28:01 your head where you commit to something and then you figure out what that thing is going
    0:28:02 to be.
    0:28:06 But now you have something like on the schedule, people are involved, and then you’re in the
    0:28:08 dark, groping around, you kind of figure it out.
    0:28:14 I’m wondering if you apply some version of that in your own life, if that’s what, in
    0:28:21 a sense you mean by stakes and moving into the unknown or if it takes other forms.
    0:28:27 That was the gateway drug, but what happens for me at this point is the zoom out, and
    0:28:37 the zoom out is this perspective on all things, time, the perspective of your lineage, the
    0:28:44 understanding of your lifespan, all these things that require you to zoom out to really
    0:28:48 assess and feel in your marrow to grasp.
    0:28:56 And it makes those commitments feel minor to me, even if they’re attached to some monetary
    0:29:04 outcome or some consequence that is deemed dangerous by the way that we metrics on these
    0:29:12 things almost become so irrelevant to me that it requires me to have another motivation
    0:29:17 in order to really reach the thing that is most impactful and most resonant within.
    0:29:20 What kind of motivation motivates you these days?
    0:29:27 So when you have the zoom out, when I come back to the creative process, it almost has
    0:29:33 to be the opposite of what it used to be, which is let me put myself in a position, throw
    0:29:37 myself in the water and figure out how I’m going to evolve and do something.
    0:29:42 Then it eventually went to how do I bridge this into a whole another craft?
    0:29:43 How do I create?
    0:29:49 That’s why I love the idea of what we call genres, which are just silos that promote
    0:29:50 ignorance.
    0:29:52 That’s fun for me.
    0:29:53 That’s not based on a truth.
    0:29:59 So the zoom out helps you to assess all the truths, the laws.
    0:30:00 This is what is, right?
    0:30:07 And then the motivation has to come in the opposite way of force.
    0:30:11 It has to come almost like a dream comes to you in the night.
    0:30:18 You can’t do anything about your dreams per se, but feed the dream machine.
    0:30:24 You can’t generate the opportunity for you to have a certain dream.
    0:30:32 You can perhaps interact with your dream once it arrives and it’s so ephemeral.
    0:30:38 Even remembering your dreams oftentimes can be difficult depending on what space you are
    0:30:39 in your life.
    0:30:46 It makes everything that happens delicate and it makes everything that I commit to in
    0:30:50 some ways very tenuous when it comes to the mammoth mechanics of our industry.
    0:30:56 And I’m getting to a point, which is a part of the realization where perhaps there’s not
    0:31:02 a context within the industry and the mechanics therein that as they exist today, that I can
    0:31:08 find true inspiration from and that I can connect the dots of my, there’s a constellation
    0:31:15 of inspiration that crosses so many spectrums of society and I can’t access it if I play
    0:31:16 by these rules.
    0:31:17 Yeah.
    0:31:23 If you’re in the silo playing by the laws and quotation marks, right?
    0:31:24 Exactly.
    0:31:29 And the zoom out gives you such a perspective on that, that it makes you fiercely prepared
    0:31:35 for when the dream comes because then you’ll embrace it because it’s your top priority.
    0:31:39 It’s the chief motivation, but you can’t make it come.
    0:31:40 Yeah.
    0:31:42 But you’re primed to receive it when it shows up.
    0:31:43 You’re ready.
    0:31:48 So when I don’t have inspiration or I have a block, I do nothing.
    0:31:56 I live and it’s absolutely because of the deeper inspiration that I’m blessed to feel.
    0:31:58 I feel it’s been cultivated.
    0:32:02 I’m connected to it and I know it’s real.
    0:32:03 It doesn’t have to greet me every day.
    0:32:04 I know it’s there.
    0:32:05 Like an old friend.
    0:32:07 Not a lot of maintenance required.
    0:32:08 Yes.
    0:32:15 This requires you to be focused and be ready when it’s there.
    0:32:18 So let’s say the muse makes an appearance.
    0:32:25 You’re receptive and you’re not grasping, but your hands are ready to catch, right?
    0:32:29 And then you go into execution mode on whatever it might be or you start exploring.
    0:32:35 I want to come back to something you mentioned, which was the performance anxiety and the
    0:32:38 mantras and various things you used to ground you.
    0:32:42 What are the mantras that you have landed on?
    0:32:43 I haven’t shared all of them.
    0:32:49 I share some, two of them we share at the shows when we perform often.
    0:32:55 One is one that I thought of for children and I thought of for the child within me.
    0:32:57 And it’s I feel good.
    0:32:58 I feel free.
    0:33:03 I feel fine just being me and you go over and over and over and over.
    0:33:04 I feel good.
    0:33:05 I feel free.
    0:33:07 I feel fine just being me.
    0:33:08 Circular melody.
    0:33:12 I feel good today, oh so good today.
    0:33:13 I feel good.
    0:33:14 I feel free.
    0:33:16 I feel fine.
    0:33:20 One, two, three, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum.
    0:33:22 So everybody sings along automatically.
    0:33:23 I’ve seen it.
    0:33:29 I’ve seen it because I was in Moody Theater in Austin watching this just extend into the
    0:33:30 audience.
    0:33:31 Yes.
    0:33:32 It’s amazing to watch.
    0:33:34 It’s amazing to experience and participate in too.
    0:33:40 I was so, man, that was such a great feeling seeing you there.
    0:33:43 Just because I understand you get it on so many levels.
    0:33:47 You really understand it’s such a spiritual practice.
    0:33:54 It’s not so much about me showing up and playing instruments.
    0:33:58 Look at how great the band, look at the dance, look at the more and more, more and more.
    0:34:04 And it always has been, but more and more, how do we continue to refine this spiritual
    0:34:10 practice, this ritual of community, of sharing, of artistry, all of it?
    0:34:12 And what do we point it at?
    0:34:16 What do we focus this life force energy at next?
    0:34:22 So those mantras for me, if you don’t live it and it’s not a part of you, it’s not going
    0:34:24 to come out of the instrument.
    0:34:26 What we play is life.
    0:34:28 What we create is life.
    0:34:33 The quality of the human being, the quality of the vessel, even a broken vessel, which
    0:34:38 is oftentimes the most effective, the most relatable, the most universal.
    0:34:44 But there has to be that space in you that you’ve saved that is the sacred space.
    0:34:52 It doesn’t have to be, of course, there are great ways to cultivate physical world, sacred
    0:34:54 places and practices.
    0:35:00 So for me, those mantras and my prayers, in that sense of understanding how to always
    0:35:01 know if that’s there.
    0:35:05 And if it’s not there, it might be time to take six months a year, whatever I need to
    0:35:09 take off so that then I can know that it’s there.
    0:35:14 Right now, I’m in a period where it’s very strong.
    0:35:22 So it allows for me to be fearless, which is something that I haven’t felt that this strongly
    0:35:23 in a while.
    0:35:25 Yeah, gotta ride the wave, then.
    0:35:26 You know what I mean?
    0:35:30 Yeah, you got a paddle for the wave.
    0:35:31 Yeah.
    0:35:35 Just a quick thanks to one of our sponsors and we’ll be right back to the show.
    0:35:39 This episode is brought to you by AG1, the daily foundational nutritional supplement that
    0:35:41 supports whole body health.
    0:35:45 I do get asked a lot what I would take if I could only take one supplement.
    0:35:47 And the true answer is invariably AG1.
    0:35:50 It simply covers a ton of bases.
    0:35:54 I usually drink it in the mornings and frequently take their travel packs with me on the road.
    0:35:55 So what is AG1?
    0:36:01 AG1 is a science-driven formulation of vitamins, probiotics, and whole food-sourced nutrients.
    0:36:06 In a single scoop, AG1 gives you support for the brain, gut, and immune system.
    0:36:09 So take ownership of your health and try AG1 today.
    0:36:14 You will get a free one-year supply of vitamin D and five free AG1 travel packs with your
    0:36:16 first subscription purchase.
    0:36:22 To learn more check it out, go to drinkag1.com/tim.
    0:36:27 That’s drinkag1, the number one, drinkag1.com/tim.
    0:36:31 Last time, drinkag1.com/tim.
    0:36:35 Check it out.
    0:36:38 What other mantras can you share?
    0:36:40 Oh, man, this is deep.
    0:36:41 You going in.
    0:36:42 I’m going in.
    0:36:43 I’m going in.
    0:36:44 Scuba gear intact.
    0:36:45 Tim.
    0:36:46 Yeah.
    0:36:47 Yeah.
    0:36:48 You know.
    0:36:50 Because I believe in the power of mantras.
    0:36:51 Oh, you?
    0:36:52 I do.
    0:37:01 In meditation, in repetition, the ability to, in a sense, end up with the mind of no mind
    0:37:02 to cleanse the palate.
    0:37:07 I mean, there’s so many different ways you can use mantras also, which is why this is
    0:37:09 as deeply interesting to me.
    0:37:10 It can be a concentration practice.
    0:37:15 It can be sort of an erasing practice to regain some equilibrium.
    0:37:17 There’s so many different ways to use repetition.
    0:37:19 It could be drumming too.
    0:37:22 It doesn’t have to be, could be instrumental.
    0:37:30 There are so many different ways that you can enter unusual, uncommon states using repetition.
    0:37:33 So I’m very, very interested in this, which is why I’m asking.
    0:37:34 Yes, for sure.
    0:37:40 So two of the ones that I, not for stage, but just more for crisis that I go to is be
    0:37:43 still and know, which is from the Bible.
    0:37:45 Be still and know that I am God.
    0:37:54 It is this idea that I’ll give you a practice so be still and know that I am God.
    0:37:57 Be still and know that I am.
    0:38:05 Be still and know that I, be still and know that, be still and know, be still, be.
    0:38:11 Just this idea, I’ve sat with that and each phrase has a different meaning.
    0:38:20 Even be still and then breath or room tone, there’s messages in that, that space, there’s
    0:38:22 messages in the crevice.
    0:38:30 So I’ve done that and sat in that and it’s changed my entire perspective on a crisis
    0:38:37 or something that I felt perhaps I was wrong, but perhaps, you know, there’s so many opportunities
    0:38:46 for us in this life to transmute darkness into light or even darkness into perspective.
    0:38:50 Another one is, “Thy will be done,” which is one of surrender.
    0:38:56 Now, we believe there’s a divine power, there’s, however you name it, whatever your relationship
    0:39:03 to it is, we’ve, for the most part, had an experience, there’s something beyond explanation.
    0:39:09 The universe is carrying us in some way, “Thy will be done,” is trusting that there’s a
    0:39:12 divine logic to it all.
    0:39:16 When there’s nothing that you can do, “Thy will be done,” “Thy will be done,” “Thy will
    0:39:24 be done,” because the belief of this divine logic allows for you to understand that there’s
    0:39:29 a path and you are accounted for in that path.
    0:39:34 You are accounted for, there’s so much that is allowed for you to be, the culmination
    0:39:40 of so many things has led to you and there will never be another you, you the only one.
    0:39:46 That specificity alone is something that comes to me when I’m in that “Thy will be done.”
    0:39:52 It’s a revelation of so many other things, which is also allowing for the right thing
    0:39:58 to occur and for me to be accepting of it, versus for me to control it without knowledge
    0:40:01 of what the true right thing is.
    0:40:08 There’s so much that you have to cleanse yourself of from believing, from holding on to that’s
    0:40:13 not actually connected to the best outcome, but you can’t always know that, especially
    0:40:14 in crisis.
    0:40:15 It’s very hard to know.
    0:40:18 Many parables are always like, “This, this happened.
    0:40:19 Such good news.
    0:40:20 Maybe.”
    0:40:21 Right.
    0:40:22 “Such and such happened.
    0:40:23 This is terrible.
    0:40:24 Maybe.”
    0:40:28 It just depends on so many things outside of our sphere of knowledge that on so many levels
    0:40:29 can’t be known.
    0:40:34 When would you be inclined to say to yourself that last mantra?
    0:40:36 When would you apply that in your life?
    0:40:41 There’s so many things that happen to us with our health.
    0:40:43 I talk about Sulaika a lot.
    0:40:45 I love her as you know.
    0:40:46 She’s great.
    0:40:47 Yeah.
    0:40:48 Had her on the show.
    0:40:49 Yes.
    0:40:54 And I also borrow a lot of phrases from her, in particular, this idea of being between
    0:41:00 two kingdoms, this idea of the kingdom of the well, the kingdom of the sick.
    0:41:04 And we all exist in this in-between space.
    0:41:10 And we have a passport for both, which is something that she created this understanding
    0:41:15 of that through the way she lives through it, the way she gracefully moves through this
    0:41:22 time with such grace, with such power, with such clarity.
    0:41:24 I think about that.
    0:41:31 I think about how there’s a certain surrender that’s required of all of us in times when
    0:41:34 we deal with health challenges, whether it’s us or a loved one.
    0:41:39 And you find yourself in moments where there’s literally nothing that you can do to take
    0:41:45 away pain or to take away the unknown and the anxiety of waiting.
    0:41:50 So that’s an opportunity for a great amount of growth.
    0:41:57 That’s an opportunity for a lesson to be instilled in a way that almost nothing else that I can
    0:42:01 think of affords you the chance for.
    0:42:02 That will be done.
    0:42:03 That will be done.
    0:42:04 Yeah.
    0:42:06 This is a coach I worked with for a while.
    0:42:10 He used to say, “This is your pop quiz from the universe.”
    0:42:13 When something unexpected would pop up, he’d be like, “All right, all that meditation you’ve
    0:42:14 been doing.”
    0:42:15 Let’s see it.
    0:42:16 Let’s see it.
    0:42:17 Let’s see, bro.
    0:42:18 Come on, bro.
    0:42:19 You’ve been rehearsing.
    0:42:20 This is game time.
    0:42:21 Let’s see how it goes.
    0:42:22 Yeah.
    0:42:23 Yeah.
    0:42:27 Oh, Tim, you know what I’m saying when you’re in that moment.
    0:42:28 Yeah.
    0:42:32 I’ve had a lot of sympathy for watching you both go through that journey, and I can only
    0:42:33 imagine what it’s like.
    0:42:38 I have been, of course, and most people listening have been in a position where they feel powerless
    0:42:42 to help or they don’t know how to help a loved one.
    0:42:51 But I’ve had a lot of sympathy for a challenging road and also really been in awe of how much
    0:42:58 growth both of you have exhibited through the challenges and pain and so on.
    0:42:59 In any case, I just wanted to say that.
    0:43:00 Oh, man.
    0:43:09 It means a lot to hear that, and it feels so much of the time as odd as it may sound.
    0:43:16 It feels like a privilege to go through it together in the way that we have seen it.
    0:43:24 It’s shifted into almost the orientation of blessing, and that’s not to say that the
    0:43:28 difficulties are any easier, right?
    0:43:30 It doesn’t change the nature of hard things.
    0:43:32 They’re hard.
    0:43:36 But there’s something about life.
    0:43:37 There’s a truth.
    0:43:46 There’s something about going through the fire that is so required and something about suffering
    0:43:48 that is so essential.
    0:43:57 This idea that we’re meant to run from pain or run from difficult things and find the
    0:44:05 most leisurely and completely frictionless existence possible.
    0:44:06 It’s such a lie.
    0:44:13 It’s not just a lie because it’s not possible, but if it were possible, that would kill you
    0:44:14 the most.
    0:44:18 It would rob you in so many ways, which is, of course, easy for me to say, sitting in
    0:44:22 this comfortable chair right now, but in the midst of it, it’s sometimes hard to see it.
    0:44:28 At the same time, there was an astrophysicist, Jan 11, who was on the podcast some time ago,
    0:44:32 and I’m going to butcher this quote, but it’s more the concept for me that has really
    0:44:33 stuck.
    0:44:37 She said, “Something along the lines of, I used to look for the underlying path that
    0:44:40 would help me navigate around obstacles, and then I realized there is no underlying
    0:44:41 path.
    0:44:49 The obstacles are the path through which you discover yourself, through which you learn,
    0:44:50 through which you grow.”
    0:44:51 That is the path.
    0:44:52 That’s the path.
    0:44:53 Take those away.
    0:44:54 That’s it.
    0:44:59 Then you’re just a free-floating essence of comfort.
    0:45:01 That’s just not the human experience.
    0:45:02 Yay.
    0:45:04 Also, you’re talking about blessings.
    0:45:09 I could imagine, even an earlier version of me would say, “Oh, come on now.”
    0:45:13 I suppose it’s helpful, but maybe it’s delusional and it’s overly optimistic, but it’s deeper
    0:45:14 than that.
    0:45:22 I think that misses the mark because given a longer timeframe, given all the unknowns,
    0:45:23 it could be a blessing.
    0:45:27 It could be a curse, but you can’t know which it is over time, and it depends a lot on your
    0:45:30 perspective, so you might as well choose a blessing.
    0:45:36 That is the more enabling perspective, and since you can’t know, it’s a coin flip.
    0:45:41 Choose the side of the coin that is most enabling, it seems to me at least, in the abstract.
    0:45:43 It’s easy to say.
    0:45:44 Taxi runs over my foot.
    0:45:47 We’ll see how I do later today.
    0:45:52 It’s that, and it’s also, you only will know when you are there.
    0:45:54 You have to go there to know there.
    0:46:00 You will only know what it can be for you when you’re in the fire.
    0:46:05 Everybody can talk about what they would do when they are there.
    0:46:13 We can all say, “Man, if that would have happened to me, I would slay the dragon.”
    0:46:20 Whatever you think you would do, most often is not what you would do, and that’s not
    0:46:23 because you’re not who you think you are.
    0:46:27 It’s because there’s so many other factors you can’t know.
    0:46:32 For many things in my life that I think about, the things I’ve learned the most from are
    0:46:37 when I’ve embraced the discomfort and realized what I was made of through it.
    0:46:40 Let me just sit with that for a second.
    0:46:45 Do you have, and then we’re going to rewind the clock, and I want to go back to very young
    0:46:49 John with a question or two, but do you have any favorite failures?
    0:46:54 Now, I put failures in quotation marks because this is something that at the time seemed
    0:47:03 crushing or seemed awful that actually in some way set the stage for much bigger or better
    0:47:04 things later.
    0:47:11 Do you have any of those types of slips or rejections or failures that come to mind?
    0:47:12 Wow.
    0:47:15 I feel like my life is riddled with them.
    0:47:23 And I also feel like I move through them fairly quickly, not cavalier, but there’s a sense
    0:47:27 of understanding it now that I didn’t have then.
    0:47:28 Yeah.
    0:47:29 How do you move through them quickly?
    0:47:31 Why do you think that is?
    0:47:36 It’s because I know they’re for my own good, not that they’re all for my own good.
    0:47:41 I guess the reason is because I don’t actually believe that failure exists.
    0:47:45 It’s not that it’s necessarily for your own good, but failure doesn’t exist.
    0:47:49 It’s opportunity for you to take something from the experience.
    0:47:55 And even if the experience is reinforcing something that you already know, it’s reinforcing
    0:47:57 something that you already know.
    0:48:02 It’s an opportunity for you to see this experience, this thing that you wanted, this thing that
    0:48:06 maybe you hoped would work out, but didn’t work out.
    0:48:11 All of that adds to the fabric and the richness of your character and your experience and
    0:48:16 your knowledge base so that you, as I said, you go there to know that you’ve been there.
    0:48:18 I’ve traveled that road.
    0:48:19 I’ve played those notes.
    0:48:21 I know that piece.
    0:48:22 I sung that song.
    0:48:23 I own that.
    0:48:29 And there’s always on the other side of everything, the opportunity for transformation.
    0:48:36 Can you tell a story of any, I’m not going to use the word failure, growth opportunities
    0:48:42 that you encountered before you turned into John Batiste and kind of marquee lights, right?
    0:48:46 Because you’ve really popped in a huge way since I first met you ages ago in probably
    0:48:48 Utah or wherever we happened to be.
    0:48:55 I can’t remember initially where it was, but before that, can you tell the story of any
    0:49:01 incidents where things didn’t go your way and how you metabolized it?
    0:49:09 I grew up in between Canada, Louisiana, which is a very old school, Southern town, old country,
    0:49:15 railroad tracks running through the middle of it with canals, provincial, Southern town,
    0:49:16 just outside of New Orleans.
    0:49:20 New Orleans is another planet.
    0:49:25 And I grew up as a kid getting bullied for all types of things, man.
    0:49:29 When I was in school, I’d get bullied whether it was, “Are you okay?
    0:49:30 Are you with us?”
    0:49:33 Or, “Are you slow?”
    0:49:41 Your feet, your nose, your hair, all these aspects of self-esteem that were attacked.
    0:49:48 So then you go through life in the early years with no real understanding of what you have
    0:49:51 of value to offer the world, what you have to connect.
    0:49:57 So fast forward, you get to a point where you discover music, but it’s still something
    0:50:01 that amongst my family, I was the youngest and least talented.
    0:50:04 When I was growing up, I didn’t think that I would ever be a performer because there
    0:50:07 were 30 other people who had that covered.
    0:50:08 It wasn’t like–
    0:50:12 That’s just wild to try to paint a picture of that in my mind.
    0:50:14 That’s a lot of performers, yeah.
    0:50:15 People don’t get that.
    0:50:22 They think, “Oh, you were born with a tambourine in your hand and you came out singing.”
    0:50:23 This is not the case.
    0:50:25 There was a glorious awkwardness.
    0:50:29 That was a decade or more before I touched the instrument.
    0:50:34 I started at 11 years old, late bloomer, in the context of everybody around me.
    0:50:38 Now, there was so many bad gigs, bad performances.
    0:50:41 And I was known as the kid who would play expressionless.
    0:50:47 I would be playing and it would be all well and good, but my face would have no expression,
    0:50:48 none.
    0:50:50 It would be like I was shut off.
    0:50:55 So I get to the point where there’s a long period of hours and hours in the practice
    0:50:59 room and performances between 14 and 17.
    0:51:00 Where were you at the time still?
    0:51:01 In New Orleans.
    0:51:02 In New Orleans.
    0:51:06 Living in Kennet, going back and forth in New Orleans, performing at night, going to
    0:51:07 two schools at once.
    0:51:11 Just this idea that you had the art school in that evening, then in the morning you had
    0:51:13 an academic school.
    0:51:22 Still getting bullied, still also becoming somewhat of a young musical phenom, but not
    0:51:23 the best one.
    0:51:29 So there’s still not really like … You don’t really know where you fit or where it’s all
    0:51:30 gone.
    0:51:37 And was at that point, was piano the key to that phenom perception?
    0:51:38 It was the piano.
    0:51:40 That was the thing.
    0:51:47 That was something that I’d alternate between playing in clubs at 14, 15 years old that
    0:51:52 I wasn’t supposed to be in at night after going to school.
    0:51:58 And then I would also on the weekends be doing classical piano lessons and piano competitions.
    0:52:04 So alternate between those two realities and also going and really finding this sort of
    0:52:11 tribe, my peers, starting bands with first my cousins, Travis and Jamal, who are older
    0:52:13 and multi-instrumental and inspired me.
    0:52:20 Then Troy, Trombone Shorty, Andrews, who’s maybe at the time we met 11 or 12, he’d been
    0:52:23 playing for a decade and touring the world.
    0:52:27 So we start bands, we’re doing club shows, we’re doing all these things and constantly
    0:52:32 just presenting things that are experimental and pushing ourselves to do things that we’ve
    0:52:33 never done.
    0:52:42 I didn’t have a desire or a real push to go into music until I was maybe 17.
    0:52:45 And I moved to New York on my own in the first story of failure.
    0:52:46 Yeah.
    0:52:47 Pleasure for one sec.
    0:52:48 So okay.
    0:52:49 That’s a cliffhanger.
    0:52:50 So first story of failure.
    0:52:51 Yes.
    0:52:57 What did the conversation look like when you’re informing friends and family that you’re gonna
    0:52:58 move to New York?
    0:52:59 All right.
    0:53:00 What was the drive behind this?
    0:53:02 How did that go?
    0:53:04 And then we’re gonna get back to the cliffhanger.
    0:53:08 I felt like there was a great deal of support.
    0:53:15 My mother is a visionary when it comes to understanding what someone could be.
    0:53:22 She was the driving force of the piano being the instrument that I focused on at 11 versus
    0:53:24 several other things that were in the periphery.
    0:53:26 I could have chosen the drums.
    0:53:31 Just in brief, why did she think that was a clutch move?
    0:53:33 I don’t understand how she does it, but she does it.
    0:53:35 Or she just saw.
    0:53:36 That’s the thing.
    0:53:37 That’s a thing.
    0:53:38 You have a piano player inside of you.
    0:53:39 Yes.
    0:53:40 Yes.
    0:53:48 Even if she didn’t see that fully, she saw that the piano is the right direction for
    0:53:50 you to take in music.
    0:53:54 Because it’s the option that opens up the most options or is there more to it?
    0:53:56 I don’t know if she had a vision.
    0:54:03 She mentioned sometimes that there’s a sophistication to the piano that she was attracted to that
    0:54:10 felt like it was the instrument for someone who is going to apply all of their forces
    0:54:13 and all of their abilities.
    0:54:14 It’s the conductor’s instrument.
    0:54:16 It’s the maestro’s instrument.
    0:54:18 So I know that that was a part of her thinking.
    0:54:26 It’s the thing that’s going to allow for you to be as high-brow or as low-brow as you want.
    0:54:27 I think it was a smirk.
    0:54:36 It seems maybe self-evident to say, but very prescient, incredibly powerful, deeply directing.
    0:54:40 Because when I look at what you’re capable of doing, part of the reason it seems to me
    0:54:46 that you’re able to harness this broad spectrum of options is because you have that high-brow
    0:54:48 card to pull out.
    0:54:52 If people want to nitpick or they want to do this and this, you’re like, “All right.
    0:54:53 Let me just sit down for a second.”
    0:54:59 Then they’re like, “Okay, I take it back,” which buys you permission to do a really
    0:55:01 wide range of things.
    0:55:02 Yes.
    0:55:03 Yes.
    0:55:04 That is her thing.
    0:55:07 She’s very clairvoyant.
    0:55:09 It’s also a leadership quality she has.
    0:55:15 She was environmentalist before it was the in vogue thing to do for many years.
    0:55:20 She would, at a different time, not having been born in the South, a black woman like
    0:55:22 her would be a CEO of a company.
    0:55:25 It’s a different thing that she has.
    0:55:31 It’s significant to think about now in retrospect all the decisions that she made, which eventually
    0:55:38 led to me graduating high school a year early, moving to New York as a minor at 17.
    0:55:40 Her supporting that.
    0:55:45 My dad also supporting that as a musical mentor, my first musical mentor.
    0:55:49 He was the one who was like, “Okay, New York is what cats really play, bro.”
    0:55:56 In New Orleans, we play, and then there’s a legit thing with the cats in New York.
    0:56:00 They’re a little stiff, but you’ll learn a lot.
    0:56:03 He supported that too from a different angle, right?
    0:56:08 I went up there and he’s like, “If you can make it in there, you have a lot to come back
    0:56:09 with.
    0:56:12 The vision was never, ‘Oh, you’ll go there and stay.”
    0:56:13 Stay there.
    0:56:14 You did.
    0:56:15 I do, too.
    0:56:19 So, you were saying your first failure, so you get to New York.
    0:56:20 What happens?
    0:56:22 It’s a disaster.
    0:56:24 Man, listen.
    0:56:27 Molly’s like, “I’m listening.”
    0:56:28 You dig?
    0:56:36 I went to New York and within the first week, I’m in the subway traveling around and I
    0:56:38 pass out on the platform.
    0:56:39 Pass out on the platform?
    0:56:41 Yeah, as I’m out.
    0:56:43 I’m like, “What’s going on?
    0:56:44 What’s happening here?”
    0:56:45 This doesn’t happen a lot.
    0:56:46 You pay attention to this.
    0:56:48 Molly’s sitting right next to you.
    0:56:49 “Hello, Molly.”
    0:56:50 Hey.
    0:56:51 My external nervous system.
    0:56:52 Hey.
    0:56:53 So, you pass out on the platform?
    0:56:54 Yes.
    0:56:55 Yes.
    0:56:56 That sounds dangerous.
    0:56:57 Yeah, very dangerous.
    0:57:02 Luckily, there were some friends there who could catch me and take me to, which at this
    0:57:04 time, it was things Roosevelt, the ER.
    0:57:08 The one that’s right next to Lincoln Center, maybe near Fordham.
    0:57:09 We went there.
    0:57:10 I’m there.
    0:57:15 Oh, you’re exhausted and maybe you’re having some migraines or something.
    0:57:18 They give me Tylenol, tell me to go away.
    0:57:19 I’m having night sweats.
    0:57:25 I’m basically feeling this sharp pain in my lung and then I start to pass out again.
    0:57:27 I feel this intensity.
    0:57:32 Meanwhile, the second day that I was there, before all this happened, I’m in the dorms
    0:57:33 at Juilliard.
    0:57:34 I’m unpacking.
    0:57:35 I’m doing all the things.
    0:57:36 The bunk is up.
    0:57:43 I fall off the bunk and basically fracture rib, if not close to it, they do the x-ray.
    0:57:48 They’re like, “You got a lot happening, but now this is the wildest part.”
    0:57:50 I go back to the ER.
    0:57:56 They say you have walking pneumonia that you’ve had for two weeks.
    0:58:01 You have to stay here overnight over a few days while we give you the IV fluids and the
    0:58:03 antibiotics and all the things.
    0:58:07 I missed the orientation of the school year.
    0:58:10 I missed all the things that you get acclimated to.
    0:58:12 There’s nobody in New York.
    0:58:17 I have a second cousin who lives in Harlem who I get acquainted with and we become closer
    0:58:18 during this time.
    0:58:22 I remember thinking, “Am I supposed to be here from falling off the bunk?”
    0:58:24 I’m like, “No, I can’t miss this.”
    0:58:25 I go back.
    0:58:26 I’m just in there.
    0:58:27 Next thing, I’m fainting in the subway.
    0:58:28 “Oh, man.
    0:58:29 I’m just exhausted.
    0:58:30 I got to cool out.”
    0:58:34 I’m in the nights of sweat and something’s happening.
    0:58:36 That’s my lungs crying out.
    0:58:37 You’ve had pneumonia.
    0:58:40 You’ve been walking around with this.
    0:58:47 Between that being the first year of me being in New York, first time at Juilliard, first
    0:58:53 time being away from home, it completely felt like a crash and burn scenario.
    0:58:56 It’s time for you to get out of here.
    0:58:58 All the signs point to the exit.
    0:59:02 Things telling me at this time internally, as I’m sitting in the hospital, I remember
    0:59:03 those days.
    0:59:05 It was like three or four days I was there.
    0:59:12 I felt this sort of … As a kid, you’re like, “I don’t want to tell my parents, but
    0:59:15 I also don’t feel like I belong here.
    0:59:17 I need to get out of here.”
    0:59:25 It’s also this kind of … There was a dichotomy of coming from this very rich cultural heritage
    0:59:32 and this beautiful expression of excellence and pedagogy, but Juilliard being this European
    0:59:40 classical legitimizing entity that especially as a young black kid pushing the boundaries
    0:59:47 of what, generationally, my family has achieved and also musically eventually wanting to become
    0:59:53 a disruptor from inside of all of it and just in the most benevolent way, rip it all down
    0:59:56 and build it again in a different way.
    1:00:01 Knowing that that was somewhat of a motivation and then landing and sort of dead on arrival
    1:00:08 felt like it was ultimately the type of failure that it almost not only made me go home, but
    1:00:09 quit music.
    1:00:11 Just kind of just like, “This isn’t my profession.
    1:00:13 I can just go home.”
    1:00:17 I had a whole bunch of things I could have done other than this.
    1:00:21 You know, the sitting there by yourself thinking about, “Is this a message?”
    1:00:23 So what happened?
    1:00:24 You’re here?
    1:00:28 What resurrected the confidence or the direction?
    1:00:30 Just the inner knowing, man.
    1:00:31 You got to just know.
    1:00:32 All right.
    1:00:33 Hold on.
    1:00:34 Hold on.
    1:00:35 I don’t have a … I believe you.
    1:00:38 I believe you and I underscore it and you’re a sensitive guy.
    1:00:41 When I say sensitive, I mean your instrumentation is sensitive.
    1:00:46 You’re like a jewelry scale, not some scale at the sports club in New York that’s five
    1:00:47 pounds off.
    1:00:48 You’re down to the nanogram.
    1:00:50 So you have sensitive instrumentation.
    1:00:56 If you’re thinking to yourself, “Man, I really thought A, B, and C, here I am.
    1:01:01 I’ve had this 12 car pileup of disasters.
    1:01:02 Maybe I should just go home.”
    1:01:08 What did the little whisper say that started to tilt it back in the other direction towards
    1:01:09 that inner knowing?
    1:01:11 What was the feeling?
    1:01:12 That’s one question.
    1:01:15 If you want to take it a different angle, I would say, “Let’s say there’s a kid 10
    1:01:17 years from now.”
    1:01:19 I believe you.
    1:01:20 Very similar.
    1:01:21 Kenner, Louisiana.
    1:01:24 It’s at your yard and sends you a letter.
    1:01:26 All these things have happened.
    1:01:30 Different set of disasters because I really don’t know if this is for me.
    1:01:32 I could go back and do A, B, and C.
    1:01:37 So very similar situation and he’s like, “Maybe he has an inner knowing, but you don’t know.”
    1:01:38 What do you say to that kid?
    1:01:39 Would be another way.
    1:01:42 You can take it whichever direction makes sense.
    1:01:47 So youngster, take your time to find the prize.
    1:01:49 There’s no rush.
    1:01:50 Pace yourself.
    1:01:53 What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger is what they say.
    1:01:56 But until you experience it, that’s the only way.
    1:02:04 The texture that added to me immediately in retrospect is why I continue.
    1:02:14 The inner knowing that these experiences which are just a series of unfortunate things at
    1:02:22 an unfortunate time can be exacerbated in your mind and in your psyche, especially if
    1:02:23 you stew in it.
    1:02:31 So I think, and I will tell this to the youngster, that happening to you is the gift of your
    1:02:38 arrival because it allows for you to figure out upon entry how to process all of the
    1:02:43 discomfort that’s to come in different forms, in different ways.
    1:02:45 So pace yourself.
    1:02:47 Take your time.
    1:02:48 It’s your time.
    1:02:51 It doesn’t all have to happen right now.
    1:02:56 As I’m listening, you describe the gift of these unfortunate events because it’s preparing
    1:02:57 you for the discomfort to come.
    1:03:03 It makes me think of psychological and spiritual calluses to, “Oh, now you can do some real
    1:03:04 heavy lifting.”
    1:03:05 Yeah, yeah.
    1:03:06 Not you.
    1:03:07 Yeah.
    1:03:08 Yeah.
    1:03:09 Yeah.
    1:03:10 Yeah.
    1:03:11 That’s right.
    1:03:16 So the sensitivities I want to double click on again just for a second because personally,
    1:03:20 and I’ve seen this in friends, busy, busy, busy, go, go, go, 100 miles an hour, trying
    1:03:22 to do everything all at once.
    1:03:27 And that hasn’t been me forever, but there have been periods of time when I’m like that.
    1:03:36 And when I’m in that gear, I wouldn’t say that if someone were to ask me, “Do you feel
    1:03:40 a deep sense of inner knowing about where you’re going to be a year or two from now where
    1:03:41 you want to be?”
    1:03:42 I’d say, “No.”
    1:03:48 However, if I slowed down a bit, if I decluttered my mind a bit, not necessarily watching paint
    1:03:53 dry, but I create the space, whether it’s through meditating, whether it’s through exercise
    1:03:57 of a certain type, like I just did archery before I came here, which clears my mind really
    1:04:06 well, then the volume of the competing voices in my head has been lowered enough that I can
    1:04:07 hear things, right?
    1:04:12 And I’m wondering if you have ways to do that for yourself, or if the signal is just
    1:04:14 so strong, you don’t need to do that.
    1:04:18 But I mean, you have a lot of projects and commitments, and I’m sure you have a million
    1:04:20 opportunities presented to you.
    1:04:27 When things get noisy, how do you help yourself to hear the inner feelings and voice and so
    1:04:31 on so that it doesn’t get drowned out?
    1:04:39 Man, Tim, we have to own what’s been entrusted to us to own.
    1:04:50 We really have so much that is divinely bestowed upon us, and you wake up every day as a steward
    1:04:56 of it all, and then you get up and you have a choice, “Do I pick up my phone?
    1:05:02 Do I give my mainframe away to some other thoughts or ideas or visions or distraction
    1:05:04 if you want to even call it that?”
    1:05:07 It’s a choice, whatever.
    1:05:13 How did I set that intention prior to laying down the rest?
    1:05:16 What am I feeding into my psyche?
    1:05:18 What am I watching, the eye gate?
    1:05:20 What am I listening to?
    1:05:25 That’s why I make music a certain way, because I know that for some, that’s going to be a
    1:05:28 fueling prerequisite for them.
    1:05:31 It’s going to be there, fertile ground.
    1:05:34 Yeah, something powerful is going to emerge from that.
    1:05:41 For me, it’s like owning a car or you have this.
    1:05:45 You have this thing, it’s on lease, and to me, that’s it.
    1:05:51 I don’t try to hear, as I was saying before, it’s like a dream if it comes.
    1:05:59 I don’t rely on that to be the thing, and I have ways like for you, archery connects
    1:06:02 you or primes you to be connected.
    1:06:09 I’ve strayed away from the desire to have this mystical encounter at every turn in
    1:06:13 order to prove the existence of, be still and know.
    1:06:15 This is for funny how that’s come.
    1:06:23 When you evoke these mantras, I’m telling you, man, but that’s not a real thing.
    1:06:28 That’s not a real need for me to own what I’ve been given.
    1:06:34 To own what I’ve been given also, when it comes to how to be primed to hear and to
    1:06:42 receive the download, it’s found in the mundane things and also the basic things.
    1:06:43 Do you drink enough water?
    1:06:45 Do you get enough sleep?
    1:06:48 Do you feel your heart would love when you can?
    1:06:51 Do you feel your mind with good things?
    1:06:58 Not even just things that are of good report, of course, it’s great, but also information
    1:07:01 that will empower you with what you have.
    1:07:05 For me, I’ve studied music as an empowering force for what I have.
    1:07:09 I’ve studied many things, music being chief among them.
    1:07:12 That’s going to ignite me based on what I’ve been given.
    1:07:14 What ignites you?
    1:07:19 How do you surround yourself with all of that, and then, okay, we have a sense of that to
    1:07:21 some degree.
    1:07:23 We have a lot of experts in that to some level.
    1:07:29 The flip is, how do you cultivate giving it all the way, all the time?
    1:07:30 How do you give it?
    1:07:33 The measure of your greatness is the measure of your generosity.
    1:07:34 How do you give it?
    1:07:40 Now, this is sharing the thing that you have on lease, this thing you’ve been endowed with.
    1:07:44 It’s hard because you can cultivate portals of giving.
    1:07:46 You can donate.
    1:07:52 You can give your time, which is the highest level of giving in terms of intentionally
    1:07:56 giving of your time is the highest level that you can go.
    1:08:02 But can you give of your time and your resources and your energy in a way that’s not regulated
    1:08:06 by a portal or something that you set up in advance?
    1:08:09 Can you live in a posture of giving?
    1:08:13 Can you create a generous temple within?
    1:08:21 And can you walk through the world and live in a space where you’re unfettered and unbothered
    1:08:28 by the need, but also you’ve preserved, you’ve maintained the vessel so that you don’t completely
    1:08:31 rid yourself of your life force energy.
    1:08:34 You don’t want to be drained.
    1:08:38 There’s many things that can drain you and pull from you, and there’s darkness in the
    1:08:39 world.
    1:08:43 And then the discernment comes with this sort of awareness.
    1:08:48 And there’s spaces in time when I’m much, much more aligned with that.
    1:08:56 And it’s so clear in so many moments of the deepest, most lasting impact and inspiration
    1:09:00 have happened when I’m in that space, but it’s maintenance.
    1:09:04 It comes back to like, it’s so simple.
    1:09:06 It’s so simple.
    1:09:10 And we feel good when we do that because that’s how the machine was made.
    1:09:11 We have joy when we do that.
    1:09:13 We feel purpose when we do that.
    1:09:16 It’s like the machine was made a certain way.
    1:09:20 You take care of the machine that you have is going to function a certain way.
    1:09:23 Yeah, you got to do the maintenance.
    1:09:26 May not be sexy, but the machine needs maintenance.
    1:09:29 That thing needs, come on.
    1:09:31 Get it together.
    1:09:33 Come on, doctor.
    1:09:34 Just a few more questions.
    1:09:35 I’m having too much fun.
    1:09:40 I can go for six or four hours, but if you could put something metaphorically speaking
    1:09:46 on a billboard, right, so this isn’t an advertisement, it’s to get a message, feeling a quote, anything
    1:09:48 out to the world.
    1:09:52 Just pretend that hundreds of millions of people would see it, billions who knows.
    1:09:53 Could be anything.
    1:09:55 What might you put on that billboard?
    1:09:58 I don’t know if I would take that opportunity.
    1:09:59 Tell me why.
    1:10:01 I don’t feel called to do that.
    1:10:10 And I also don’t feel like we’re in a time where anything without context can be received
    1:10:11 purely.
    1:10:12 Tell me more about that.
    1:10:15 This is a thread that I think I’m also pulling onto my own way.
    1:10:19 So I want to hear more about what you mean by that.
    1:10:26 Everything is received now based upon the context that we have defined within different
    1:10:35 cultures and all of our culture of humanity and the stereotypes and the social cultural
    1:10:41 practices and all of the ways we relate to each other and exist.
    1:10:49 We have decided to go in the direction of believing that I can look at you or I can
    1:10:54 hear something, a snippet of you fragment.
    1:11:00 A fragment of Tim is all I need to understand.
    1:11:06 And whereas there’s a proliferation of data and we’re more connected now than we’ve ever
    1:11:12 been, but we’re more susceptible to deception as well.
    1:11:18 And we would rather express and connect in those ways in lieu of going deeper.
    1:11:26 And a billboard and media and all these expressions, which is why I love this because it allows
    1:11:27 for that.
    1:11:33 But all these other forms that we have propped up as primary separate us from depth.
    1:11:34 Yeah.
    1:11:38 It’s the surface level that doesn’t lead to the deeper levels.
    1:11:43 It prevents us from getting to the deeper levels in a sense.
    1:11:47 So you don’t want to traffic in that anymore in any way.
    1:11:53 The reason I started this podcast 10 plus years ago now was to be able to get into the
    1:11:59 deep water to have the space for that and to hopefully at the time I didn’t know, but
    1:12:06 attract a listenership who also felt a thirst for the subtleties that you can only touch
    1:12:12 upon and the holistic edges of a person or a topic that you can only get access to when
    1:12:16 you have the space, when you have time.
    1:12:20 So I resonate a lot with that.
    1:12:24 Sometimes things take multiple listens, multiple exposure.
    1:12:31 If you feel something from something, that’s your first signal, the emotional connection.
    1:12:35 Something even if you don’t understand why, something relates to something you experienced
    1:12:41 or something that you heard, you want your aspire to has been revealed as clues or tips
    1:12:43 or some vision, right?
    1:12:49 That’s how you know that there’s many, many, many more layers there for you.
    1:12:50 Yeah, totally.
    1:12:55 I was just thinking as you were saying that of this book that I’ve read so many times
    1:12:57 called Awareness by Anthony D’Amelo.
    1:13:01 I think the subtitle is the promises and perils of reality.
    1:13:04 In any case, really fun book, very short.
    1:13:11 And I’ve read it on Kindle, but I’ve also read it in paperback over and over again.
    1:13:16 And what strikes is each time I read it because I have one copy with highlights over time,
    1:13:21 I highlight different things whenever I go back because I am a different person in a
    1:13:27 different situation or a developing person in different circumstances with different
    1:13:30 feelings about things.
    1:13:36 And it’s just remarkable how each pass reads like a new book almost.
    1:13:42 This is the thing that I’ve been thinking about for years, this idea that as people,
    1:13:47 whether creative or not, but it applies to the creative, obviously.
    1:13:55 We only have two, maybe three ideas in life.
    1:14:07 We have two ideas that we are constantly refining, recreating, presenting, refining, recreating,
    1:14:13 presenting, and it’s your life’s idea set.
    1:14:20 Then, if that’s the case, how much, and I ask you this because I want to know if you
    1:14:25 made a list of the five books or the five things or five places, because I love your
    1:14:26 list.
    1:14:28 This inspired me.
    1:14:34 What are the five things that you know you could possess in this lifetime if you had to
    1:14:41 wipe everything else away and the only knowledge and the only inspiration, only experience,
    1:14:47 the only everything that you could draw from were of this five?
    1:14:53 Because I’m reaching a point where that’s almost something that I’m willing to live
    1:14:54 by.
    1:15:04 Instead of the pursuit of more knowledge, more understanding, more broad vision and connectivity,
    1:15:12 how do I go as deep as I can within a handful of things that are for me and leave the rest?
    1:15:13 Yeah.
    1:15:14 Which is a radical …
    1:15:15 Yeah.
    1:15:16 Yeah.
    1:15:21 So, for you, if you were to play that game, what are the five things?
    1:15:25 Maybe you should have a podcast, maybe that’s your next thing.
    1:15:26 Man.
    1:15:29 I will give it a shot and then I want to ask you the same thing because what’s a cool
    1:15:37 twist on the question is it’s not just books, documentaries, people, but experiences or
    1:15:42 beliefs that could be in the list, then it gets really interesting.
    1:15:43 It’s …
    1:15:44 Right?
    1:15:45 Yes.
    1:15:47 It gets interesting because you can’t outsource it.
    1:15:48 No.
    1:15:49 Now you have to own it.
    1:15:53 So, for me, I was thinking as you were talking, this is rough draft, right?
    1:15:54 Yeah.
    1:15:55 Of course.
    1:15:56 I totally get it.
    1:15:57 This is rough draft.
    1:15:58 It’s changing every other day.
    1:16:03 It might be a lot of red ink at some point, but what comes to mind for me was, number one,
    1:16:04 everything’s going to be okay.
    1:16:08 I think from a very young age, I’ve just been hyper-vigilant, had a lot of bad things happen
    1:16:09 to me as a kid.
    1:16:13 So, my system has always been oriented towards things are not okay and they’re not going
    1:16:14 to be okay.
    1:16:19 You have to be constantly scanning your environment, scanning people for threats, et cetera.
    1:16:22 So, number one would just be everything’s going to be okay.
    1:16:26 Number two would be, it’s all about relationships.
    1:16:28 The relationships are what matter, friends, family.
    1:16:29 That’s it.
    1:16:30 That’s it.
    1:16:34 And also your relationship with yourself, but honestly, I feel like I best develop myself
    1:16:35 in relationship.
    1:16:42 So, I pay attention to the question of, do I like the version of myself that I am when
    1:16:43 I’m with this person?
    1:16:46 So, the relationships being everything.
    1:16:50 Number three, this one, we could dig into it if we want, but I would say death isn’t
    1:16:52 the end, so don’t be afraid of it.
    1:16:57 That might require some explanation, but I would say, don’t spend your whole life afraid
    1:16:58 of death.
    1:17:01 That would be number three.
    1:17:03 That one, it got a lot of meat on the bone.
    1:17:06 Yeah, there’s a lot of meat on the bone there.
    1:17:13 And I would say, honestly, those are the top three that immediately come to mind.
    1:17:19 What I might say is for me personally, don’t be afraid of your sensitivity.
    1:17:20 It can be hard, but it’s a gift.
    1:17:24 The instrumentation, like my sight, my hearing, it’s all very, very, very sensitive.
    1:17:27 So being in a place like New York City can be completely overwhelming.
    1:17:30 Being at a dinner party with eight people can be really overwhelming.
    1:17:36 So interestingly, so I very rarely go to concerts, but when I attended your event, it resonated
    1:17:42 differently because it wasn’t unidirectional.
    1:17:48 It was not the stage on the stage or the performer on the stage inflicting sound on the audience.
    1:17:55 It was a collective experiment, and there was a lot of emergent participation and interaction
    1:17:59 which changed how my senses metabolized the whole thing, which is very interesting.
    1:18:00 Wow.
    1:18:06 So I didn’t feel any overwhelm at all at that event, but on a pure decibel level, it wasn’t
    1:18:07 overwhelming.
    1:18:08 But you’re in a concert, right?
    1:18:10 And it’s a cozy venue.
    1:18:12 You feel it.
    1:18:16 So I would probably talk to myself about the sensitivity because I’ve viewed it as a liability
    1:18:19 for a long time, but I think there are different ways to frame it.
    1:18:21 That’s what comes to mind for me.
    1:18:23 What about for you?
    1:18:24 Man.
    1:18:25 Wow.
    1:18:26 You mind?
    1:18:28 I could play my answer.
    1:18:29 Yeah.
    1:18:30 Let’s do that.
    1:18:36 Because it’s in abstract form, but rapidly approaching clarity.
    1:18:37 Let’s do it.
    1:18:38 Yeah.
    1:18:39 Absolutely.
    1:18:40 100%.
    1:18:41 Where are we going to do that?
    1:18:42 Over here?
    1:18:43 I mean, is that okay if we go?
    1:18:44 Yeah.
    1:18:45 We got the lav mics on.
    1:18:46 We can just wander over.
    1:18:47 Oh, we don’t need.
    1:18:48 Okay.
    1:18:49 Yeah.
    1:18:50 Yeah.
    1:18:51 Let’s give it a shot.
    1:18:52 I’m excited about this.
    1:19:09 Let’s see.
    1:19:10 So see.
    1:19:11 Oh.
    1:19:29 I do these concerts without, I call them streams.
    1:19:37 It’s like stream of consciousness, completely improvised, spontaneous composition.
    1:19:38 Right?
    1:19:40 Right at the piano.
    1:19:48 And without any sheet music or any preparation, I will play 90 minutes, two hours.
    1:19:58 And it really invites the audience to feel this wave, it’s akin to a collective chant.
    1:20:05 And we’re, we’re in spaces that we’re discovering together.
    1:20:11 So when I was saying, I wanted to answer at the piano, I was just going to stream for
    1:20:24 a minute.
    1:20:42 Okay., so we’re going to play 90 minutes.
    1:21:08 Okay., so we’re going to play 90 minutes.
    1:21:35 Okay., so we’re going to play 90 minutes.
    1:21:57 Okay, so we’re going to play 90 minutes.
    1:22:24 Thank you for that.
    1:22:25 Thank you.
    1:22:27 That’s beautiful, man.
    1:22:28 Beautiful to be with you.
    1:22:29 Yeah.
    1:22:30 Likewise.
    1:22:31 Yeah.
    1:22:32 I like your answer.
    1:22:33 Yeah.
    1:22:36 So what does that feel like to you, to do that?
    1:22:39 What is the felt sense?
    1:22:50 Feels like you are traveling, you’re moving, and your hand is telling you, this is what
    1:22:55 I want to play.
    1:23:03 And as you play it, you’re seeing all of the colors and you’re hearing the sound and it
    1:23:10 starts to tell you, I want to go here.
    1:23:22 And then it sometimes is telling you things that you don’t know, you’re not familiar,
    1:23:23 but it’s going to anyway.
    1:23:29 And that’s the biggest difference because it’s telling you something, you haven’t practiced,
    1:23:38 you don’t know if you can actually play, you don’t know if you actually will make it.
    1:23:41 Why do you think it takes you there?
    1:23:49 It’s the truest expression, the moment calls for what it calls for, and you can’t really
    1:23:54 dictate what the moment calls for based on your preparation.
    1:23:56 Yeah, or your preference.
    1:24:06 Your preference is, because it’s your preference is probably not true.
    1:24:10 Yeah, that makes sense to me.
    1:24:18 So it truly is music that is channeled from, it’s channeled to you for everyone in that
    1:24:25 moment never to happen again.
    1:24:31 Thank you so much.
    1:24:32 Wow.
    1:24:33 Yeah.
    1:24:34 Yes, sir.
    1:24:35 Yes, sir.
    1:24:36 You know.
    1:24:37 Yeah.
    1:24:39 So glad we did this.
    1:24:42 This is amazing, man, to have the piano here like this.
    1:24:43 Oh, it’s beautiful.
    1:24:44 I didn’t know you were going to have this.
    1:24:45 I never have you done that.
    1:24:48 I haven’t heard that before with the piano.
    1:24:55 The only time we ever had a piano make a guest appearance very different was 2000, and we
    1:25:07 got this right, 15, long time ago, I interviewed Jamie Fox at his house, and he got on the
    1:25:08 piano for a second.
    1:25:13 It was very short, but totally different context, totally different context.
    1:25:18 Because there’s the instrument, then there’s the vessel, then there’s the communication
    1:25:25 between the two, and that’s the one and only time that piano and my recollection has made
    1:25:33 an appearance in 750 episodes, so this is a first.
    1:25:37 Man, that’s amazing.
    1:25:42 Yeah, it’s incredible.
    1:25:46 I have to ask you, because number one, I’m excited about it, we can do it here, I don’t
    1:25:49 need to sit down, but Beethoven Blues.
    1:25:50 Oh, yeah!
    1:25:51 Beethoven Blues.
    1:25:52 Yeah!
    1:25:53 Yeah, the blues!
    1:25:54 I am excited about this.
    1:25:56 Yes, it’s going to be amazing to share.
    1:26:00 Especially after our conversation, even more so.
    1:26:01 Wow.
    1:26:02 Wow.
    1:26:04 And after spending a little more time hanging out, it’s been a minute.
    1:26:11 Because now I’m thinking about the music as something that I can ingest, something that
    1:26:18 I can let feed me inspire in the sense of breathing in.
    1:26:19 That’s right.
    1:26:22 So could you say a bit more about how that came to be?
    1:26:29 You know, the idea is something that I feel uniquely positioned to do is hearing Beethoven’s
    1:26:35 music and not just playing it as it says on the score, but being in conversation with
    1:26:37 Beethoven and extending his music.
    1:26:44 So as we talked about, you know, the idea of streams, this sort of spontaneous composition,
    1:26:53 if you were to take Beethoven’s music and exist within the music as if you were co-composing
    1:27:04 it with him and adding all these elements that many of which, all of which existed after
    1:27:06 his time on earth.
    1:27:19 So you have things like Flamenco music or gospel music, soul music, jazz music and blues primarily,
    1:27:31 which to me is the, not just musical innovation of the 20th century, but an innovation of
    1:27:35 human expression and spirituality.
    1:27:41 Could you say a little bit more about that because I listen to blues, but I want to understand
    1:27:43 why you feel that way about it.
    1:27:48 And it’s not that I disagree, but I want to understand the magnitude of what you’re
    1:27:49 saying.
    1:27:50 Yes, yes.
    1:27:53 Blues is a form of music.
    1:27:54 It’s also a form.
    1:27:56 It’s a 12 bar form.
    1:27:57 It’s a sound.
    1:27:59 It’s a style.
    1:28:01 It’s an inflection.
    1:28:04 You can sound like the blues without playing the blues.
    1:28:15 If you moan or you cry, the instrument wails.
    1:28:23 That idea is something that is about our existence in the human condition and the blues is an
    1:28:27 allegory for the human condition in sound.
    1:28:34 It’s a musical allegory that exists within the context of a cultural movement.
    1:28:39 So that’s something that has not happened and has existed before it had a name.
    1:28:48 So for you to find things like that in the world that are foundational to our existence
    1:28:54 and then to figure out how do I name them and identify them so then they can be shared
    1:29:02 and then furthermore, how do you create a whole system that not only becomes its own
    1:29:09 form of musical engagement, social, cultural engagement, their dances, their blues rituals,
    1:29:14 juke joints, stomps, boogie woogie, all this that we’ve grown accustomed to.
    1:29:22 Now I can also implement that into other spaces of music which becomes this democratic expression
    1:29:24 of humanity.
    1:29:30 So what I started to think about with the blues is there are forms of music that express
    1:29:38 that aspect of the human condition and that pathos but didn’t have all of the language
    1:29:45 that we have to acutely express it and also include the range of cultural diasporic reality
    1:29:48 that has existed since.
    1:29:58 So now we can take that and inject these other forms of music, these other expressions with
    1:30:04 something that’s so profound and so deep and so rooted, so human.
    1:30:11 It’s an opportunity of a lifetime for an artist and the blues provides that.
    1:30:13 Not a one other thing in the technical realm.
    1:30:16 The blues is simple and it’s complex.
    1:30:20 The blues is generally three chords but you don’t always have to be playing those three
    1:30:23 chords to be playing the blues.
    1:30:26 It’s spiritual but it’s also very much scientific.
    1:30:34 So if you take these five notes, that’s the pentatonic scale.
    1:30:35 That’s the sound of the blues.
    1:30:43 The pentatonic scale though, in this form, has existed in music since the beginning.
    1:30:49 Gregorian chants, indigenous folk music, music of drum circles in West Africa, in Ghana.
    1:30:52 All the different sounds of Appalachia.
    1:30:59 Modern music, you’ve heard the sound.
    1:31:04 You hear this sound in every culture since the beginning.
    1:31:13 Now if you add that note, that’s what we call the blues scale.
    1:31:17 The blues is in the sound of the pentatonic scale.
    1:31:22 That in and of itself has a perfect symmetry.
    1:31:33 The blue note is the expression that our early ancestors in this country created to add the
    1:31:38 sense of the American experience to this scale.
    1:31:40 It’s more than the scale.
    1:31:47 They added this to exemplify the specificity of America and the experience of American
    1:31:50 life.
    1:31:54 And all different ways you can play the blues, even without playing the scale, because the
    1:32:01 thing about the blues, inflection, is that if you can capture that blues inflection,
    1:32:03 you can find melodies that have the blues.
    1:32:07 You can find voices that have the blues.
    1:32:11 You can find rhythms that have the blues, mainly the shuffle rhythm, which is something
    1:32:18 that came from Africa and is the marriage of six, eight over two, a two beat and a three
    1:32:20 beat combined at the same time.
    1:32:23 And that evolved into the American shuffle rhythm.
    1:32:30 So all of these things are so interconnected and so sophisticated, so intricate.
    1:32:37 And the blues, after all that, you can sit on a porch or a ballroom or a juke joint and
    1:32:39 anybody can sing it.
    1:32:45 And it’s always two verses in an answer.
    1:32:46 The thrill is gone.
    1:32:49 The thrill is gone away.
    1:32:50 The thrill is gone.
    1:32:54 The thrill is gone away.
    1:32:55 Finish it for me.
    1:32:56 No, no, no.
    1:32:57 I’m just saying.
    1:32:58 Yeah, yeah.
    1:32:59 It’s simple.
    1:33:00 It was codified.
    1:33:01 Mm-hmm.
    1:33:06 Yeah, the architecture, like the basic undergirding sort of eye beams of the architecture are
    1:33:12 quite simple, but the way that it can be applied is just beyond counting, right?
    1:33:19 It’s the thing that existed in the air and the thing that we’ve all felt within.
    1:33:24 And it took this American experiment for it to emerge into a form.
    1:33:25 Yeah.
    1:33:26 That makes sense.
    1:33:31 And I mean, it’s a combination of, like, discovering fire, this thing that has always
    1:33:35 been there, that we now have a form for.
    1:33:40 And it’s also something very elemental that can be wielded in a million different ways.
    1:33:44 And as you have different cultural influences, you have different combinations of people,
    1:33:48 newer and newer and newer ways of applying it emerge.
    1:33:54 We’ve heard it in rock and roll baselines our whole life, the old.
    1:34:00 Just thinking about all of the ways that I’ve heard the blues before even really understanding
    1:34:02 that is so ubiquitous.
    1:34:03 You know what I mean?
    1:34:10 I’m thinking, we’re here in Jimmy Hendry’s studio.
    1:34:11 That’s the pentatonic scale.
    1:34:18 There’s just so much that you would, you can listen to so much and understand it.
    1:34:38 So when I took Beethoven, I was thinking, you know, if you put that on it.
    1:34:53 In the congo, one, two, three, one, two.
    1:35:19 So, you know what I mean?
    1:35:20 I do.
    1:35:33 I find the blues as a.
    1:35:37 My dad used to play that song on the piano when I was a kid.
    1:35:45 That specific segment just activated like ratatouille style, an Anton ego flashes back to being a
    1:35:46 kid.
    1:35:47 That was wild.
    1:35:48 It’s incredible what music does.
    1:35:54 And I’m not a musician, but it’s so igniting to use that word.
    1:35:59 It’s just an incredible key that unlocks.
    1:36:04 These songs too are so deeply connected to us.
    1:36:05 Beethoven wrote songs.
    1:36:08 We’re listening to these compositions, these melodies, themes, all these things we’ve heard
    1:36:11 for years and years over generations.
    1:36:17 So it ignites people’s love, not just for music, but brings them back to moments in their
    1:36:19 life, experiences in their life.
    1:36:25 And that’s what this album, this music is generally about the concept of Beethoven blues,
    1:36:31 but also about the humanity that it will bring people together, bring somebody back to the
    1:36:36 instrument who stepped away for many years, a kid to a growing up who maybe I don’t see
    1:36:44 myself in classical music, but now I see, oh, there’s a, I see something that was always
    1:36:47 there like the blues can bring it out.
    1:36:51 But it just hadn’t been presented to me in that way.
    1:36:57 And I mean, what comes to mind as an image for me also is you have these various tributaries
    1:37:03 of music that have in some ways separated out of mushroom using the right geological
    1:37:08 term here, but they’ve sort of separated and flowed out into different fingers.
    1:37:13 And what you seem to have done starting, maybe not starting, but certainly at Juilliard,
    1:37:18 especially afterwards, you’ve sort of brought these flows back together in a way that they
    1:37:24 can intermingle, which gives people permission to remix, to make something that is uniquely
    1:37:25 theirs.
    1:37:26 To live, baby.
    1:37:27 To live.
    1:37:28 That’s it.
    1:37:29 That’s it.
    1:37:30 That’s it.
    1:37:31 That’s it.
    1:37:32 That’s it.
    1:37:36 It’s not just the music, it’s not about the music.
    1:37:39 It’s about the music and more.
    1:37:44 Wow, he played that.
    1:37:51 I like doing this, these harmonies, like imagine if you, there’s a version on the album that
    1:37:58 goes for 20 minutes and it makes this into a, it’s this healing trance.
    1:37:59 It’s like a meditation.
    1:38:00 .
    1:38:02 .
    1:38:05 .
    1:38:09 .
    1:38:14 .
    1:38:19 .
    1:38:22 [inaudible]
    1:38:25 (soft piano music)
    1:38:28 (soft piano music)
    1:38:38 (soft piano music)
    1:38:44 (soft piano music)
    1:38:48 (soft piano music)
    1:38:53 (soft piano music)
    1:38:58 (soft piano music)
    1:39:03 (soft piano music)
    1:39:08 (soft piano music)
    1:39:10 (soft piano music)
    1:39:12 – I’m just gonna put this album on repeat
    1:39:14 and listen to it a thousand times.
    1:39:15 – Oh man.
    1:39:19 – I mean, 20 minutes of that, I mean,
    1:39:25 that feels like taking the hypotenuse to catharsis.
    1:39:30 – Yes.
    1:39:32 – That’s it. That’s the idea.
    1:39:34 – Yeah. Wow.
    1:39:38 I feel very privileged to even watch you do that.
    1:39:39 – Brother, thank you.
    1:39:43 I’m grateful for you building this space
    1:39:47 and allowing for folks to come in and share who they are
    1:39:49 and what they have to offer.
    1:39:53 And then it becoming this feedback loop of us all growing.
    1:39:54 – Yeah.
    1:39:57 – Of us all learning and growing together.
    1:39:58 That’s you, man.
    1:39:59 Thank you for that.
    1:40:00 – Thanks, brother.
    1:40:01 – That’s powerful stuff.
    1:40:02 – Thank you. I love doing it.
    1:40:04 How did this end up being a job?
    1:40:05 Crazy.
    1:40:06 – Hey, man.
    1:40:07 – Man.
    1:40:08 – Blessing of life, right?
    1:40:10 – JohnVatisse. JohnVatisse.com.
    1:40:12 Beethoven Blues. Go get it, everybody.
    1:40:15 – Hey, guys. This is Tim again.
    1:40:17 Just one more thing before you take off,
    1:40:19 and that is Five Bullet Friday.
    1:40:22 Would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday
    1:40:24 that provides a little fun before the weekend?
    1:40:27 Between one and a half and two million people subscribed
    1:40:28 to my free newsletter,
    1:40:31 my super short newsletter called Five Bullet Friday.
    1:40:33 Easy to sign up. Easy to cancel.
    1:40:37 It is basically a half page that I send out every Friday
    1:40:40 to share the coolest things I’ve found or discovered
    1:40:42 or have started exploring over that week.
    1:40:44 It’s kind of like my diary of cool things.
    1:40:46 It often includes articles I’m reading,
    1:40:50 books I’m reading, albums, perhaps, gadgets, gizmos,
    1:40:53 all sorts of tech tricks and so on that get sent to me
    1:40:56 by my friends, including a lot of podcasts, guests,
    1:41:00 and these strange esoteric things end up in my field,
    1:41:03 and then I test them, and then I share them with you.
    1:41:06 So if that sounds fun, again, it’s very short,
    1:41:09 a little tiny bite of goodness before you head off
    1:41:11 for the weekend, something to think about.
    1:41:14 If you’d like to try it out, just go to tim.vlog/friday,
    1:41:18 type that into your browser, tim.vlog/friday,
    1:41:20 drop in your email, and you’ll get the very next one.
    1:41:22 Thanks for listening.
    1:41:25 This episode is brought to you by Eight Sleep.
    1:41:28 I have been using Eight Sleep pod cover for years now.
    1:41:31 Why? Well, by simply adding it to your existing mattress
    1:41:33 on top like a fitted sheet,
    1:41:35 you can automatically cool down or warm up
    1:41:37 each side of your bed.
    1:41:39 Eight Sleep recently launched their newest generation
    1:41:41 of the pod, and I’m excited to test it out.
    1:41:43 Pod 4 Ultra.
    1:41:46 It cools, it heats, and now it elevates automatically.
    1:41:48 More on that in a second.
    1:41:51 First, Pod 4 Ultra can cool down each side of the bed
    1:41:54 as much as 20 degrees Fahrenheit below room temperature,
    1:41:57 keeping you and your partner cool, even in a heat wave.
    1:41:59 Or you can switch it up depending on which of you
    1:42:01 is heat-sensitive.
    1:42:03 I am always more heat-sensitive, pulling the sheets off,
    1:42:06 closing the windows, trying to crank the AC down.
    1:42:08 This solves all of that.
    1:42:10 Pod 4 Ultra also introduces an adjustable base
    1:42:12 that fits between your mattress and your bed frame
    1:42:14 and adds reading and sleeping positions
    1:42:16 for the best unwinding experience.
    1:42:18 And for those snore-heavy nights,
    1:42:20 the pod can detect your snoring and automatically lift
    1:42:22 your head by a few degrees to improve air flow
    1:42:24 and stop you or your partner from snoring.
    1:42:26 Plus, with Pod 4 Ultra,
    1:42:28 you can leave your wearables on the nightstand.
    1:42:30 You won’t need them, because these types of
    1:42:32 metrics are integrated into the Pod 4 Ultra itself.
    1:42:34 They have imperceptible sensors,
    1:42:37 which track your sleep time, sleep phases, and HRV.
    1:42:39 Their heart rate tracking is just one example
    1:42:41 is at 99% accuracy.
    1:42:43 So, get your best night’s sleep.
    1:42:45 Head to 8sleep.com/tim
    1:42:47 and use Code Tim to get $350
    1:42:49 off of the Pod 4 Ultra.
    1:42:51 That’s 8sleep, all spelled out,
    1:42:53 8sleep.com/tim
    1:42:55 and Code Tim, T-I-M,
    1:42:57 to get $350 off the Pod 4 Ultra.
    1:42:59 They currently ship to the United States,
    1:43:01 Canada, the United Kingdom, Europe,
    1:43:03 and Australia.
    1:43:05 The following quote is from
    1:43:07 one of the most legendary
    1:43:09 entrepreneurs and investors
    1:43:11 in Silicon Valley.
    1:43:13 And here it goes.
    1:43:15 This team executes at a level you rarely see
    1:43:17 even among the best technology companies.
    1:43:19 That is from Peter Thiel
    1:43:21 about today’s sponsor, Ramp.
    1:43:23 I’ve been hearing about these guys
    1:43:25 everywhere and there are good reasons for it.
    1:43:27 Ramp is corporate card
    1:43:29 and spend management software
    1:43:31 designed to help you save time
    1:43:33 and put money back in your pocket.
    1:43:35 I think they’re already doing that across the board.
    1:43:37 Ramp has already saved more than
    1:43:39 25,000 customers,
    1:43:41 including other podcast sponsors like
    1:43:43 Shopify and 8sleep, more than 10 million hours
    1:43:45 and more than $1 billion
    1:43:47 through better financial management
    1:43:49 of their corporate spending.
    1:43:51 With Ramp, you’re able to issue cards to every employee
    1:43:53 with limits and restrictions
    1:43:55 and automate expense reporting,
    1:43:57 allowing you to close your books 8 times
    1:43:59 faster on average.
    1:44:01 Your employees will no longer spend hours
    1:44:03 spending expense reports.
    1:44:05 I mean, within companies, fast growing startups
    1:44:07 or otherwise, a lot of employees spend
    1:44:09 half their time, it seems,
    1:44:11 trying to get all this stuff together.
    1:44:13 No more. Ramp saves you time and money.
    1:44:15 You can get started, issue virtual
    1:44:17 and physical cards, and start making payments
    1:44:19 in less than 15 minutes.
    1:44:21 Whether you have 5 employees or 5,000 employees,
    1:44:23 they’ve streamlined everything.
    1:44:25 And businesses that use Ramp
    1:44:27 save an average of 5% in the first year.
    1:44:29 And now you can get $250
    1:44:31 when you join Ramp.
    1:44:33 Just go to ramp.com/tmp.
    1:44:35 All spelled out, that’s Ramp.com/tmp,
    1:44:37 R-A-M-P.com/tmp.
    1:44:41 Cards issued by Sutton Bank, member FDIC.
    1:44:43 Terms and conditions apply.
    1:44:45 [Music]
    1:44:48 (upbeat music)
    1:44:58 [BLANK_AUDIO]

    Jon Batiste (@jonbatiste) is a five-time Grammy Award-winning and Academy Award-winning singer, songwriter, and composer. His eighth studio album, Beethoven Blues, is set for a November 15th release.

    Sponsors:

    Ramp easy-to-use corporate cards, bill payments, accounting, and more: https://ramp.com/tim (Get $250 when you join Ramp)

    AG1 all-in-one nutritional supplement: https://drinkag1.com/tim (1-year supply of Vitamin D (and 5 free AG1 travel packs) with your first subscription purchase.)

    Eight Sleep’s Pod 4 Ultra sleeping solution for dynamic cooling and heating: https://eightsleep.com/tim (save $350 on the Pod 4 Ultra)

    Timestamps:

    [00:00] Introduction 

    [06:46] Is the secret to long life embracing the mundane?

    [09:28] The gift of mistakes.

    [10:21] Why did Jon wait until he was 10 to speak?

    [12:51] How music and performance entered the picture.

    [13:36] An early exercise in winning over the room.

    [15:08] Choosing the personal facets that art expresses.

    [16:57] From a disappointing grade school performance to the Grammys.

    [21:44] Cultivating suspense and shifting modes of creative expression.

    [27:24] When perspective drives motivation more than stakes.

    [32:14] Spiritual practice and grounding mantras.

    [40:29] Surrender, acceptance, and growth through health challenges.

    [43:37] The fuzzy line between blessing and curse.

    [46:40] Growing up bullied as the “least talented” in a musical family.

    [52:50] Jon’s visionary mother guided him toward piano.

    [55:23] Parental support for Jon’s relocation to New York City.

    [56:15] Serious setbacks that almost made Jon quit Juilliard and music altogether.

    [01:00:37] Jon’s advice to a younger musician enduring a similar path of hardships.

    [01:03:11] How Jon owns what comes his way rather than allowing it to overwhelm him.

    [01:07:30] Cultivating generosity without being drained.

    [01:09:32] Jon’s billboard is invisible — but with deep posts.

    [01:11:47] My rough draft of five deep handfuls.

    [01:18:21] Jon’s answer in musical improv.

    [01:25:42] Jon’s upcoming album: Beethoven Blues (with bonus blues tutorial).

    [01:39:09] Taking the hypotenuse to catharsis and other Parting thoughts.

    *

    For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.

    For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Showplease visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsors

    Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.

    For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.

    Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.

    Follow Tim:

    Twittertwitter.com/tferriss 

    Instagraminstagram.com/timferriss

    YouTubeyoutube.com/timferriss

    Facebookfacebook.com/timferriss 

    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferriss

    Past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry SeinfeldHugh JackmanDr. Jane GoodallLeBron JamesKevin HartDoris Kearns GoodwinJamie FoxxMatthew McConaugheyEsther PerelElizabeth GilbertTerry CrewsSiaYuval Noah HarariMalcolm GladwellMadeleine AlbrightCheryl StrayedJim CollinsMary Karr, Maria PopovaSam HarrisMichael PhelpsBob IgerEdward NortonArnold SchwarzeneggerNeil StraussKen BurnsMaria SharapovaMarc AndreessenNeil GaimanNeil de Grasse TysonJocko WillinkDaniel EkKelly SlaterDr. Peter AttiaSeth GodinHoward MarksDr. Brené BrownEric SchmidtMichael LewisJoe GebbiaMichael PollanDr. Jordan PetersonVince VaughnBrian KoppelmanRamit SethiDax ShepardTony RobbinsJim DethmerDan HarrisRay DalioNaval RavikantVitalik ButerinElizabeth LesserAmanda PalmerKatie HaunSir Richard BransonChuck PalahniukArianna HuffingtonReid HoffmanBill BurrWhitney CummingsRick RubinDr. Vivek MurthyDarren AronofskyMargaret AtwoodMark ZuckerbergPeter ThielDr. Gabor MatéAnne LamottSarah SilvermanDr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

  • #774: Learnings from 1,000+ Near-Death Experiences — Dr. Bruce Greyson, University of Virginia

    AI transcript
    0:00:04 Hello, boys and girls, ladies and germs. This is Tim Ferriss. Welcome to another episode
    0:00:08 of The Tim Ferriss Show, where it is my job to interview world-class performers from all
    0:00:12 different disciplines to deconstruct how they do what they do. Now, in this case, I wouldn’t
    0:00:19 recommend replicating or attempting to replicate what some of the subjects’ patient’s case studies
    0:00:24 have experienced, which is namely dying and then being revived in some capacity. So don’t do that.
    0:00:30 But my guest today is Bruce Grayson M.D. He is the Chester F. Carlson Professor Emeritus of
    0:00:35 Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences and Director Emeritus of the Division of Perceptual
    0:00:39 Studies at the University of Virginia, where he has practiced and taught psychiatry and carried
    0:00:45 out research since 1995. He’s also a Distinguished Life Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association,
    0:00:50 and his most recent book is After a Doctor Explores What Near-Death Experiences Reveal
    0:00:56 About Life and Beyond. He has studied, documented more than a thousand near-death experiences,
    0:01:03 and what made him appealing to me as a guest with this incredibly unusual terrain is that he was
    0:01:09 raised with a secular, what we could call rational, materialist worldview. So with that
    0:01:15 introduction, I hope you enjoy this very wide-ranging and unusual conversation. But first, just a few
    0:01:22 words from the sponsors who make this possible. I have been fascinated by the microbiome and
    0:01:29 probiotics as well as prebiotics for decades, but products never quite live up to the hype. I’ve
    0:01:35 tried so many dozens and there are a host of problems. Now things are starting to change,
    0:01:43 and that includes this episode’s sponsor, SEEDS DS01 Daily Symbiotic. Now it turns out that this
    0:01:49 product, SEEDS DS01, was recommended to me many months ago by a PhD microbiologist, so I started
    0:01:54 using it well before their team ever reached out to me about sponsorship, which is kind of ideal,
    0:01:59 because I used it unbitten, so to speak, came in fresh. Since then, it has become a daily staple
    0:02:05 and one of the few supplements I travel with. I have it in a suitcase literally about 10 feet
    0:02:12 from me right now. It goes with me. I’ve always been very skeptical of most probiotics due to the
    0:02:16 lack of science behind them and the fact that many do not survive digestion to begin with. Many of
    0:02:23 them are shipped dead, DOA, but after incorporating two capsules of SEEDS DS01 into my morning routine,
    0:02:28 I have noticed improved digestion and improved overall health seem to be a bunch of different
    0:02:33 cascading effects. Based on some reports, I’m hoping it will also have an effect on my lipid
    0:02:39 profile, but that is definitely TBD. So why is SEEDS DS01 so effective? What makes it different?
    0:02:45 For one, it is a 2-in-1 probiotic and prebiotic formulated with 24 clinically and scientifically
    0:02:50 studied strains that have systemic benefits in and beyond the gut. That’s all well and good,
    0:02:54 but if the probiotic strains don’t make it to the right place, in other words, your colon,
    0:02:59 they’re not as effective. So SEEDS developed a proprietary capsule and capsule delivery system
    0:03:04 that survives digestion and delivers a precision release of the live and viable probiotics to
    0:03:09 the colon, which is exactly where you want them to go to do the work. I’ve been impressed with
    0:03:14 SEEDS dedication to science-backed engineering with completed gold standard trials that have
    0:03:18 been subjected to peer review and published in leading scientific journals. A standard you very
    0:03:23 rarely see from companies who develop supplements. If you’ve ever thought about probiotics, but
    0:03:27 haven’t known where to start, this is my current vote for great gut health. You can start here,
    0:03:33 it costs less than $2 a day. That is the DS01. And now you can get 25% off your first month with
    0:03:43 code 25 TIM. And that is 25% off of your first month of SEEDS DS01 at seed.com/tim using code
    0:03:50 25 TIM all put together. That’s seed.com/tim. And if you forget it, you will see the coupon
    0:03:59 code on that page. One more time, seed.com/tim code 25 TIM. As many of you know, for the last few
    0:04:05 years I’ve been sleeping on a midnight lux mattress from today’s sponsor, Helix Sleep. I also have
    0:04:10 one in the guest bedroom downstairs and feedback from friends has always been fantastic. Kind of
    0:04:14 over the top, to be honest. I mean, they frequently say it’s the best night of sleep they’ve had in
    0:04:19 ages. What kind of mattress is it? What do you do? What’s the magic juju? It’s something they comment
    0:04:25 on without any prompting from me whatsoever. I also recently had a chance to test the Helix Sunset
    0:04:30 Elite in a new guest bedroom, which I sometimes sleep in, and I picked it for its very soft but
    0:04:35 supportive feel to help with some lower back pain that I’ve had. The Sunset Elite delivers
    0:04:39 exceptional comfort while putting the right support in the right spots. It is made with five
    0:04:44 tailored foam layers, including a base layer with full perimeter zoned lumbar support,
    0:04:49 right where I need it, and middle layers with premium foam and microcoils that create a soft
    0:04:53 contouring feel, which also means if I feel like I want to sleep on my side, I can do that without
    0:04:58 worrying about other aches and pains I might create. And with a luxurious pillow top for pressure
    0:05:03 relief, I look forward to nestling into that bed every night that I use it. The best part, of course,
    0:05:09 is that it helps me wake up feeling fully rested with a back that feels supple instead of stiff,
    0:05:14 and that is the name of the game for me these days. Helix offers a 100-night sleep trial,
    0:05:20 fast, free shipping, and a 15-year warranty. So check it all out. Get 20% off of all mattress
    0:05:29 orders by going to helixsleep.com/tim. That’s helixsleep.com/tim for 20% off all mattress orders.
    0:05:58 Dr. Grayson, thank you for making the time today. It’s very nice to meet you.
    0:06:00 Thank you, Tom, to let it to be here with you today.
    0:06:05 So I thought we would start more or less at the beginning in terms of chronology of your life,
    0:06:11 and we’re not going to do an ABCD linear recap of your whole life because that would be an epic
    0:06:19 multi-day affair. But perhaps you could tell us as a setting of the table a bit about your childhood.
    0:06:26 How were you raised? What did the environment foster in terms of thinking in you frameworks for
    0:06:31 understanding the world, that type of thing? Sure, Tim. Well, I was raised in a scientific,
    0:06:35 non-religious household. My father was a chemist, and as far as she was concerned,
    0:06:40 what you see is what you get. There’s nothing beyond the physical. So that’s how I was raised.
    0:06:45 Being a scientist, he stimulated me. I desired to gather information,
    0:06:49 and I often participated in some of his experiments. He had a lab set up in his basement.
    0:06:55 He also taught me, though, that if you study things that we pretty much understand already,
    0:06:59 you can make little inroads here and there about fine points. If you really want to make some
    0:07:04 impact, easy to study things we don’t understand at all. And he gave me examples of that. So I
    0:07:10 grew up with that idea that I wanted to be a scientist and discover new data and try to
    0:07:18 figure out what’s going on with it. Did you have at that point an innate fear of death?
    0:07:24 These seem like some questions that might be important to touch upon before we get into the
    0:07:29 meat and potatoes of what we’ll dive into shortly. Was that inbuilt or experienced by you?
    0:07:35 Actually, the answer is no. I didn’t have any fear of death. We certainly had family relatives
    0:07:40 that died. And as far as I could tell, when you died, that’s the end. What’s to be afraid of there?
    0:07:41 Lights out.
    0:07:43 Lights out.
    0:07:51 What attracted you to psychiatry? What was your path to psychiatry from the experiments
    0:07:53 in the basement? What led you there?
    0:07:58 Well, when I went through medical school, I had no idea what I wanted to do. I kind of
    0:08:04 thought I’d be a family doctor. But I found that when I did my psychiatry rotations,
    0:08:09 there were so many more unanswered questions, so many things that we had no idea how to explain.
    0:08:13 Much more though, with the brain than with the kidneys or the heart or the lungs,
    0:08:18 I thought, this is where I need to go to look at what’s going on in the brain to have these
    0:08:21 thoughts and ideas and feelings. So I went in that direction.
    0:08:30 Were there any particular conditions that fascinated you? This is predating the NDE
    0:08:34 investigations. But were there any particular conditions?
    0:08:42 I found myself really drawn towards psychoses, people who had hallucinations and delusions
    0:08:47 and just didn’t think the way the rest of us do. Most of the things that psychiatrists deal with
    0:08:52 are common, everyday things like anxiety, depression, which everyone has to some extent.
    0:08:58 But I really was fascinated by the more extreme conditions, schizophrenia and manic depressiveness.
    0:09:02 People who just had totally different views of the world than I did.
    0:09:12 So I suppose this is as good a time as any to segue into some of the what many would consider,
    0:09:17 I think what most would consider stranger terrain, even beyond psychoses, although that’s
    0:09:25 a Pandora’s box we could certainly get into quite separately. And I suppose that the stain on the
    0:09:30 tie and the story surrounding that may make some sense to tell, would you mind sharing that with
    0:09:35 the audience? Sure. I went through college and med at the school with this strict materialistic
    0:09:41 mindset that the physical world is all there is. And in one of my first weeks as a psychiatric
    0:09:47 intern, I was asked to see a patient who was in the emergency room with an apparent overdose.
    0:09:52 I was in the cafeteria half of my dinner when this call came through. And being a green intern,
    0:09:57 I was startled by the beeper going off. I dropped my fork and spilled some spaghetti sauce on my tie.
    0:10:03 So again, being a new intern, I didn’t want to embarrass myself. So I put on a white lab coat
    0:10:08 and buttoned it up so you nobody could see it. And I went down to see the patient. And she was
    0:10:13 totally unconscious. I could not revive her. But there was a roommate who had brought her in,
    0:10:18 who was in another room about 50 yards down the hall. So I left the patient. There was a sitter
    0:10:23 there with her as it happens with all suicidal patients. And I went down to see the roommate.
    0:10:28 I spent about 20 minutes talking to the roommate, trying to understand what was going on with the
    0:10:33 patient. What stresses does she have? What drugs she might have taken for an overdose and so forth.
    0:10:40 It was a very hot Virginia late summer night, and I was starting to sweat in that room.
    0:10:44 There’s no air conditioning back in the 70s. So I unbuttoned my coat so I wouldn’t sweat so much,
    0:10:48 inadvertently exposing the stain on my tie. When I finished talking to the roommate,
    0:10:51 I stood up to leave and then saw that it was open. So I quickly buttoned it up again,
    0:10:57 said goodbye, and sent her on her way. Then I went back to see the patient. And she was still
    0:11:03 unconscious. I confirmed with the sitter who was with her that she had not awakened at all
    0:11:08 during the time I was gone. She was admitted to the intensive care unit because she did have some
    0:11:13 cardiac instability because of the overdose. And when I saw her the next morning, when she
    0:11:20 had awakened, she was just barely awake. I went into her room. I said, so-and-so, I’m Dr. Grayson
    0:11:26 from psychiatry. And she opened one eye and said, I know who you are. I’m in view from last night.
    0:11:31 And that just blew me away because I knew she was asleep at best and unconscious that it would
    0:11:36 worse. So I don’t know how she could have known that. So I said to her, and yeah, I’m surprised.
    0:11:42 I thought you were out cold when I saw you last night. Then she opened her eye again and said,
    0:11:45 not in my room. I saw you talking to Susan down the hall.
    0:11:51 That made no sense to me at all. She was lying there in the gurney. The only way she could have
    0:11:55 done that is if she had left her body and come down. And that made no sense. You are your body.
    0:11:59 How can you leave it? So I didn’t know what to do. I thought, is she pulling my leg? What’s
    0:12:04 going on here? She saw that I was confused. And then she started telling me about the conversation
    0:12:10 I had with her roommate, what questions I asked, what Susan’s answers were. And then finally said,
    0:12:15 and you had a red stain on your tie. That just blew me away. I didn’t know what to make of this.
    0:12:19 I was really getting flustered at this point. I thought, were the nurses somehow colluding with
    0:12:25 her to trick this poor intern? But no one knew about the stain except the roommate.
    0:12:32 So I realized that I was having trouble keeping my composure then. But my job was to deal with
    0:12:37 her mental status, not mine. So I pushed things into the back and just dealt with her about
    0:12:42 what made you take the overdose? What are you thinking about suicide now and so forth.
    0:12:48 I thought, well, I’ll think about this other stuff later on. So she was admitted to the psychiatric
    0:12:54 unit and I was a busy intern. I didn’t have time to think about this stuff. I didn’t dare tell
    0:12:59 anybody. They think I was crazy. So I pushed her on the side and just didn’t think about it for a
    0:13:04 while. But it was very, very emotionally upsetting to me to think this bizarre thing happened,
    0:13:10 but it can’t happen. It can’t have happened. There must be some other answer to it. It just sat
    0:13:15 there in the back of my mind for about five years until I was up now on the faculty at the
    0:13:21 University of Virginia. And we had a young intern join us, Raymond Moody, who wrote a book called
    0:13:26 Life After Life in which he gave us the term near death experiences and described what they were.
    0:13:30 I had never heard of this type of thing before. And when he described it to me,
    0:13:36 I realized that’s what this patient was talking about. She was talking about in a near death
    0:13:42 situation, leaving her body, seeing things accurately from another location. And I thought,
    0:13:47 well, I need to understand this. So I started collecting cases and it wasn’t hard to do.
    0:13:51 These are very, very common phenomena where nobody talks about them. But if you start
    0:13:55 asking patients who have been close to death, they will tell you about them.
    0:13:59 And here I am 50 years later still trying to understand them.
    0:14:03 Did you expect it was going to last five decades or did you think this was going to be a
    0:14:05 short project of collecting case studies?
    0:14:11 I assumed to him that in a couple of years, I have a simple physiological explanation for this.
    0:14:16 And that would make me satisfied and be the end of it. But the more I learned about them,
    0:14:22 the harder they seemed to understand. So I think I’m more comfortable with not knowing all the
    0:14:30 answers. So just a clarifying question on the case study of this particular woman who had overdosed,
    0:14:38 attempted suicide, was that, I guess, based on all you know now, or what people would consider
    0:14:45 a near death experience in NDE, or was it some close cousin? Because presumably she was not
    0:14:52 intubated and flatlined at the point that you were talking to her roommate. She was
    0:14:58 alive, but either comatose or sleep or otherwise cognitively offline.
    0:15:00 Right. How do you think about that?
    0:15:05 Well, they were measuring her heart function, her EKG, and her heart had not stopped.
    0:15:11 She was having erratic arrhythmias, erratic forms of her heart beat. So I don’t know
    0:15:15 how close to death she was. I mean, it’s always hard to tell how close to death someone is.
    0:15:20 Whether she had a real near death experience or not. I don’t know because I didn’t
    0:15:23 investigate it. At that time, I didn’t know anything about near death experience. I didn’t
    0:15:28 know what questions to ask. So I just wanted to get out of my life and push out of the way.
    0:15:34 So looking back on it, it’s certainly not proof of anything except how unnerving this was to me
    0:15:44 emotionally to have this happen. So I suppose that as part of sort of investigating the overall
    0:15:52 context for thinking about these things, it might be useful to talk about, this is I’m sure out of
    0:15:57 order in terms of the questions you might usually get asked, but the NDE scale and the reason I want
    0:16:02 to ask about the NDE scale that I believe you developed, maybe it was in collaboration with
    0:16:09 colleagues, is the high internal consistency. And maybe you can just describe these things,
    0:16:14 split half reliability, that one I’m actually not familiar with, and then test retest reliability,
    0:16:18 which is seemingly a critical component of this. And the reason I bring all this up,
    0:16:24 as the crow flies, doesn’t really need to fly hops, but 20 feet away, I have an encyclopedia
    0:16:31 Britannicus set that was bought by Richard Feynman when he was, I believe 42. And I’m going to butcher
    0:16:37 this paraphrase of a quote of his, but in effect, it is most important not to fool yourself and you’re
    0:16:42 the easiest person to fool, I believe is one of his quotes, right? Hence, we have the scientific
    0:16:46 method, the structured way of investigating and testing hypotheses. So, could you speak to the
    0:16:55 scale? And we’re going to get to other questions around the perhaps common criticisms or forms of
    0:17:00 skepticism, speaking to the biological underpinnings. But let’s talk about the scale first, because
    0:17:03 I’m sure a lot of people listening would think to themselves, well, number one,
    0:17:08 there have to be a lot of people who just make up stories, and they want to sell books, and they
    0:17:12 do this, this, and this, not in your case. I’m just saying those who’ve experienced or claimed
    0:17:19 to have experienced NDEs and seen X, Y, or Z. And then there are people who would love to misrepresent
    0:17:24 and become a messiah of this, that, and the other thing. So, how do you make sure you’re not fooling
    0:17:30 yourself or being fooled? Could you just perhaps describe the NDE scale or speak to that in whatever
    0:17:36 way makes sense to you? Well, back in the late 1970s, after people had read Raymond Mody’s book,
    0:17:43 several psychologists and physicians started getting interested in studying this phenomenon.
    0:17:47 So, we assembled a meeting at the University of Virginia with about two dozen of these people,
    0:17:54 the researchers, who wanted to study it and try to agree on how to do that. And it turned out that
    0:17:58 everybody had a different idea about what a near-death experience was. Depending on their
    0:18:05 background, some thought it was an out-of-body experience. Some thought it was a sense of
    0:18:10 feeling of bliss. Some thought it was a communion with God, all sorts of different interpretations
    0:18:15 people had. And they didn’t agree on what should be included as part of a near-death experience.
    0:18:21 So, I surveyed a large number of researchers who had published about this and asked them to give me
    0:18:26 a list of the most common features you see in a near-death experience.
    0:18:35 I had some 80 features, which is ridiculous. So, I took that list and I gave the list to a bunch
    0:18:41 of near-death experiencers and said, “Which ones of these do you think are really important in
    0:18:46 defining a near-death experience?” And they whittled it down a bit. And I took the whittle down
    0:18:50 list and gave it back to the researchers and said, “Which ones of these do you think are really
    0:18:55 important ones?” And they whittled it down again, back and forth between the researchers and the
    0:19:01 experiencers until I had a consistent list of 16 features that they all agreed were the important
    0:19:07 parts of a near-death experience. And they included changes in your thought processes,
    0:19:14 taking faster and clearer than ever before, having your past flash before you, straw feelings of
    0:19:21 emotions, usually joy and bliss and a sense of being unconditionally loved by a brilliant light.
    0:19:28 Not only, sometimes there’s fear also. So, we developed the scale of these 16 items. And if you
    0:19:34 use that for the standard of deciding which ones of these phenomena are near-death experiences,
    0:19:40 which ones are not, has been now translated into more than 20 different languages, has been used
    0:19:45 in thousands of studies around the world. There have been attempts to refine it, to improve it.
    0:19:49 There are things we know now that I didn’t know back then and people have tried to add things to
    0:19:53 it. But basically, all the additions don’t make much of a difference. You still identify the same
    0:19:58 experiences as being NDE’s with or without them. So, that’s where it was. That’s where the scale
    0:20:05 came from. Can you speak to some of the elements that might help you separate out, for lack of a
    0:20:11 better way to phrase it, true experiencers versus people who have false positives or who want to
    0:20:17 tell a story? Well, I actually published a paper about false positives where we had people who
    0:20:22 claimed to have a near-death experience but did not score very highly on that scale. And we wanted
    0:20:27 to look at why they think they have near-death experiences. And you were right when you said
    0:20:31 before that some people are making things up. Do they want the publicity? Do they want to be
    0:20:37 held as messiahs? That’s true. But I think there was a small minority of people who claimed to have
    0:20:43 near-death experiences. And they’re usually very easy to identify by what they do with the experience.
    0:20:48 If you immediately go on the talk circuit and talk to Tim Ferrish and other people like that and
    0:20:53 want to brag about how enlightened you are now, we say, “Well, let someone else study those. I’m
    0:20:59 going to deal with those.” But the majority of people who I think were false positives are people
    0:21:04 who had some less intense form of mental illness. If people are blatantly psychotic, we don’t include
    0:21:09 them in the studies. But there are people who have personality disorders who seem on the surface to
    0:21:16 be perfectly fine but have exaggerations of our traits that make them function differently in the
    0:21:23 world. And some do have this incredible need to get confirmation of what’s happening to them.
    0:21:28 They feel different and they don’t know why. So they hear about near-death experience of things
    0:21:31 and think, “Maybe that’s why I’m different. Maybe I had a near-death experience.”
    0:21:36 What we’re going to do in this conversation, and I’m just scratching my own edge from a curiosity
    0:21:41 perspective, but we’re going to bounce all over the place. I like to frame that as a feature,
    0:21:48 not a bug, but it’s going to be pretty non-linear. So I want to zoom in and out from the clinical,
    0:21:55 skeptical side to hopefully, and I think we’ll get to quite a few of these, but examples that could
    0:22:01 be corroborated in some fashion. And those may overlap with those that are described as out-of-body
    0:22:07 experiences. They might not, and we’ll probably come back to that term as well. But could you
    0:22:13 tell the story of the, tell me if this is enough of a cue, the red MGB?
    0:22:20 Many people in the near-death experience say that they encountered deceased loved ones in the
    0:22:26 experience. And that can easily be explained as wishful thinking, expectation. You think you’re
    0:22:31 dying, and you would love to see your grandmother once more, so she comes to you, and there’s no
    0:22:38 way to prove or disprove that. However, in some cases, the person having the near-death experience
    0:22:44 encounters someone who had died, but nobody yet knew they had died. So that can’t be dismissed as
    0:22:49 expectation and wishful thinking. This is not a new phenomenon. Plenty of the elder wrote about
    0:22:52 a case like this in the first century AD, but we’re hearing about a lot of them now.
    0:22:59 About 12 years ago, I wrote a paper that had 30 different cases from recent years. Jack was one
    0:23:05 of those. He had an experience, actually he was in South Africa back in the 70s, and he was a young
    0:23:10 technician at that time and had very serious pneumonia, and he would usually stop breathing,
    0:23:15 have to be resuscitated. So he was admitted to the hospital with a severe pneumonia. And he had
    0:23:21 one nurse who was constantly working with him as his primary nurse, a young pretty girl about his age.
    0:23:26 He flirted a lot with her where he could, and one day she told him she’s going to be taking a
    0:23:32 long weekend off, and there’d be other nurses substituting for her. So he wished her well,
    0:23:39 and she went off. And over the weekend while she was gone, he had another respiratory arrest where
    0:23:44 he couldn’t breathe. He had to be resuscitated, and during that time he had a near-death experience.
    0:23:51 And he told me that he was in this beautiful pastoral scene, and there out of the woods came
    0:23:56 his nurse Anita walking towards him. And he was stunned because he was in this different world,
    0:24:01 what’s she doing there? So he said, “What are you doing here?” And she said, “Jack,
    0:24:06 you can’t stay here with me. I want you to go back, and I want you to find my parents,
    0:24:10 and tell them that I love them very much, and I’m sorry I wrecked the red MGB.”
    0:24:14 He didn’t know what to make of that, but she turned around and went back into the woods,
    0:24:20 and then he woke up later in his hospital bed. Now he tells me that back in the 70s,
    0:24:24 there were very few MGBs in South Africa, and he had never seen one.
    0:24:28 When the first nurse came into his room, he started to tell her about his experience,
    0:24:33 and seeing his nurse Anita, she got very upset and ran out of the room.
    0:24:38 It turned out that she had taken the weekend off to celebrate her 21st birthday,
    0:24:44 and her parents had surprised her with a gift of a red MGB. She got very excited,
    0:24:50 hopped in the car and took off for a test drive, and crashed into a telephone pole and died instantly,
    0:24:56 just a few hours before his near-death experience. I don’t see any way he could have known or
    0:25:02 wanted or expected her to have an accident and die. It’s certainly no way he could have known
    0:25:07 how she died, and yet he did. And we’ve got lots of other cases like this. They’re called
    0:25:12 “Peek and Daryan” cases, based on a book that was published in the 1800s with cases like these,
    0:25:18 where people encounter deceased individuals who were not known to be dead. I don’t know how to
    0:25:25 explain those. Now, just to put my skeptics hat on, I could say, well, if I were Jack,
    0:25:30 was it Jack? Let’s just say it’s Jack. That would make one hell of a story if there wasn’t a third
    0:25:36 party to independently verify it with. Right. But there are other cases, and for people listening,
    0:25:42 we’re going to come back to some of the common questions, I would say, forms of discussion
    0:25:46 around these related to possible biological mechanisms or lack thereof. We’re going to come
    0:25:53 back to that in a second. But there are then cases that are seemingly characteristically quite different,
    0:25:59 and perhaps can be going to be curious to know if this has been done or not, but verified with
    0:26:08 third parties. And one that comes to mind that I’ve heard you discuss is related to the surgeon
    0:26:16 flapping like a bird. And I was hoping that you could give a description of that particular case
    0:26:24 study before we get to that. How many near-death experiences have you documented, studied, or
    0:26:30 otherwise read about, put into the archives yourself? How many instances would you say you
    0:26:35 have encountered in one way or another? I’ve got slightly more than a thousand in my database
    0:26:40 at the University of Virginia, where we have validated as much as we can that they were,
    0:26:44 in fact, close to death, and this is what happened to them. I’ve talked to many more people about
    0:26:47 their near-death experience that I haven’t included because I wasn’t confident that they
    0:26:51 really fit the criteria for being in the study. But it’s really much more common than you might
    0:26:56 think it was because people don’t talk about these things. You mentioned people wanting the
    0:27:02 publicity of this. That is actually maybe more true now, but back in the 70s and 80s, nobody
    0:27:08 wanted to talk about these things. If you talk about things, you got ridiculed, you got referred
    0:27:14 to a psychiatrist, you were called crazy, you were shunned by people you knew, both materialists
    0:27:19 and religious folks. They didn’t want to hear about these things. So people did not talk about
    0:27:26 these events. And what of this surgeon flapping like a bird? This was a fellow Al in his mid-50s
    0:27:35 who was a van driver. He was out on his rounds one day, and he had chest pain. He had to do enough
    0:27:40 to stop his rounds and drive to the emergency room. They did some evaluations and found that
    0:27:46 he had four arteries to his heart that were blocked. They rushed him to the emergency room for
    0:27:53 urgent quadruple bypass surgery. So he’s lying on the table, fully unconscious,
    0:27:58 the drapes over and so forth. And he tells me that in the middle of the operation,
    0:28:05 he rose up out of his body and looked down and saw the surgeons operating on. And he saw the chief
    0:28:11 surgeon who he hadn’t met before flapping his arms like he was trying to fly. And he demonstrated
    0:28:18 for me. At that point, I laughed. So I thought, this is obviously hallucination. Doctors don’t do
    0:28:22 that. But he insisted that I check with the doctor. He said, this really happened. Ask him.
    0:28:26 So he told me lots of other things about his new death experience, but that’s the one that
    0:28:34 I was able to verify. So I talked to a surgeon who actually had been trained in Japan. And he said,
    0:28:41 well, yes, I did do that. I have a habit of letting my assistants start the procedure
    0:28:44 while I put on my sterile gown and gloves and wash my hands and so forth.
    0:28:49 Then I go into the operating room and watch them for a while. Because I don’t want to risk
    0:28:53 touching anything with my sterile hands now. I point things out to them with my elbows.
    0:28:59 And he pointed things out just the way Al was saying he was trying to fly. I don’t know any
    0:29:04 other doctor that’s done that. I’ve been a doctor for more than 50 years now. I’ve never seen anyone
    0:29:10 do that. So it’s kind of an idiosyncratic thing. Is there any way Al could have seen that? Well,
    0:29:14 he was totally anesthetized. He had his heart was open. I don’t think there’s any way he could
    0:29:22 have seen that. And yet he did. Alright, so so many questions. And let’s start with the question of
    0:29:31 how rational materialist skeptics, and that’s not meant as a criticism of those people at all,
    0:29:37 might try to explain this. They might say it is a lack of oxygen or a diminishing amount of oxygen.
    0:29:43 It might be a cascade of neurotransmitters that are released when A, B, or C happens.
    0:29:47 It might be the introduction of drugs. I certainly know when I’ve had surgeries,
    0:29:52 never had versed or God knows what else introduced to my bloodstream. So very strange things happen.
    0:29:57 Although I haven’t experienced the type of thing you’re describing when I’ve been anesthetized.
    0:30:02 How do you respond to those? Or how do you think about those explanations?
    0:30:06 I’m sympathetic with them. I start out as a materialist skeptic.
    0:30:11 After 50 years, I’m still skeptical. But I’m no longer a materialist, I think.
    0:30:15 That’s it. That’s kind of a dead end when it comes to explaining near-death experiences.
    0:30:18 Another phenomenon like this. When I started out, I assumed, okay, we’ll look at
    0:30:26 things like heart rate, oxygen level, drugs given and so forth. And each thing we tried to study
    0:30:30 turned out not to explain anything. For example, the most obvious thing was the lack of oxygen,
    0:30:34 because no matter how you come close to death, that’s the last common denominator,
    0:30:39 you’re going to lose oxygen to the brain. When you actually study this, what you find is that
    0:30:45 people who have near-death experiences actually have a higher oxygen concentration
    0:30:48 than people in similar situations who don’t have a near-death experience.
    0:30:53 Could you say more about that? How do we know this? Or how do we surmise that?
    0:30:57 They don’t measure what’s going on in the brain, but they measure in the peripheral blood system
    0:30:58 how much oxygen is flowing through.
    0:31:01 With a pulse oximeter or something like that?
    0:31:01 Yes.
    0:31:02 In a hospital setting.
    0:31:02 Okay.
    0:31:06 They also can draw blood and measure it more directly than at the pulse oximeter.
    0:31:10 But what they find is that when they draw blood from people who are in a near-death situation,
    0:31:15 those who have a near-death experience have a higher oxygen level than those who don’t.
    0:31:19 So what that means is that lack of oxygen is not causing the experience.
    0:31:25 In fact, it seems to be inhibiting it in some way. And what that mean may be that many people
    0:31:30 have a near-death experience, but if you’re lacking oxygen, you can’t remember it later on.
    0:31:34 And then only if you have good enough oxygen do you remember it later on.
    0:31:37 So it may be related more to the memory of the experience than the experience itself.
    0:31:41 Likewise, with people given drugs as they’re approaching death,
    0:31:46 the more drugs you’re given, the less likely you are to report a near-death experience later.
    0:31:50 Now, there are some drugs that can mimic parts of a near-death experience.
    0:31:54 They’re not drugs that are given to dying patients, but things like ketamine,
    0:31:57 various psychedelic drugs, people using psilocybin now.
    0:32:02 And they can produce things that mimic, in some ways, some features of near-death experiences.
    0:32:05 They don’t produce the whole phenomenon. They don’t, for example,
    0:32:10 reliably have the blissful feelings, and they certainly don’t have the accurate
    0:32:14 out-of-body perceptions that many near-death experiences have.
    0:32:20 I should say that Jan Holden at the University of North Texas studied about 100 cases of people
    0:32:24 who claimed to be out of their bodies and seeing things. And what she found when she
    0:32:30 sought third-party corroboration was that in 92 of the 100, they were completely accurate.
    0:32:34 In six cases, they were partly accurate and partly inaccurate.
    0:32:41 Only one or two were completely wrong. So the vast majority were actually corroborated by other
    0:32:47 people. What are some other examples of hospital setting? And part of the reason I mention that
    0:32:54 specifically is that you have multiple credible witnesses in some cases, I would imagine.
    0:32:58 Which makes it interesting, because you could independently, at least in theory,
    0:33:06 verify, confirm various occurrences while a patient was sedated, suffering from cardiac arrest,
    0:33:12 or otherwise. What are some examples that come to mind that you think are the most
    0:33:18 defensible in those environments or otherwise, but where you have the ability to independently
    0:33:26 confirm or have denied X, Y, or Z that happen? The ones that come to mind are the ones where
    0:33:32 people see deceased individuals who no one in the way had died yet. I can give you more examples
    0:33:37 of that, and they’re often corroborated by other people. And also people who claim to leave their
    0:33:40 bodies and see things from an out-of-body perspective that they shouldn’t have known about.
    0:33:45 And we’re not talking about seeing things like “Oh, I saw the doctor in green scrubs,
    0:33:47 or I saw a dust on the lap.” Something you would expect.
    0:33:51 Talk about really unusual things like “The nurse had mismatched shoelaces,”
    0:33:55 you know, things that you wouldn’t expect, or “The doctor flapping his wings.”
    0:33:58 We have corroboration for a lot of these cases.
    0:34:03 What is the most fertile ground from a pathology perspective for near-death experiences? For
    0:34:09 instance, cardiac arrest. Are cardiologists those most likely to hear reports of NDEs?
    0:34:18 And then the secondary question is, does the manner of death influence the nature of the NDE
    0:34:22 reported? Let me take the second one first, because these are just ones to answer.
    0:34:26 The manner of death by and large does not affect whether you’re going to have any
    0:34:30 a death experience or what kind you’re going to have. Now, there are some exceptions to that.
    0:34:35 For example, if you are intoxicated at the time, you’re less likely to have an experience.
    0:34:39 And if you do have one, it’s going to be fuzzier and harder to remember.
    0:34:45 Most of the research has been done with cardiac arrest patients, and that’s done because,
    0:34:50 number one, you’ve got a large population of people who we can document were close to death.
    0:34:58 And number two, many of those people have no or very few complicating physiological problems
    0:35:03 with them. If you study people who were on dialysis, they got many other problems going on
    0:35:06 that can complicate what’s going on in the brain. But there were a lot of people who have a sudden
    0:35:11 cardiac arrest who are otherwise fairly healthy, so they’re kind of a clean population to work with.
    0:35:16 So for that reason, most of the research has been done with cardiac arrest patients,
    0:35:21 but the vast majority of people who spontaneously come to me and say, “Let me tell you about my
    0:35:27 experience,” did not have cardiac arrests. I say maybe 20 or 30% have had a cardiac arrest
    0:35:33 and a heart stop. A lot of them are accidents or injuries or so forth. We have a large
    0:35:36 collection of people who were injured in combat who have new death experiences.
    0:35:40 People who fell from great heights, this sort of thing. People who drowned.
    0:35:48 Just a quick thanks to one of our sponsors, and we’ll be right back to the show.
    0:35:54 This episode is brought to you by Wealthfront. There is a lot happening in the U.S. and global
    0:35:59 economies right now. A lot. That’s an understatement. Are we in a recession? Is it a bear market?
    0:36:04 What’s going to happen with inflation? So many questions, so few answers. I can’t tell the future.
    0:36:08 Nobody can, but I can tell you about a great place to earn more on your savings,
    0:36:13 and that’s Wealthfront. Wealthfront is an app that helps you save and invest your money. Right
    0:36:19 now, you can earn 4.5% APY. That’s the annual percentage yield with the Wealthfront cash account.
    0:36:25 That’s nearly 10 times the national average, according to fdic.gov. So why wait? Earn 4.5%
    0:36:31 on your cash today. Plus, it’s up to $8 million in FDIC insurance through partner banks. And when
    0:36:36 you open an account today, you’ll get an extra $50 bonus with a deposit of $500 or more. There are
    0:36:41 already more than a million people using Wealthfront to save more, earn more, and build long-term wealth.
    0:36:48 So why wait? Visit wealthfront.com/tim to get started. That’s wealthfront.com/tim.
    0:36:50 This was a paid endorsement by Wealthfront.
    0:37:06 Has the nature of reported NDEs changed over time, or does it vary widely across cultures? And the
    0:37:13 reason I ask is that, for instance, the observation of the placebo effect and how it manifests has
    0:37:17 changed quite a lot over time. There’s actually a great piece in Wired Magazine about this,
    0:37:26 depending on culture, depending on how widespread readings and reporting about the placebo effect
    0:37:32 is in terms of strengthening or decreasing the strength of placebo effect. And you see examples
    0:37:39 of this also in reports of, say, in some cases, alien abduction or UFO encounters, et cetera.
    0:37:44 And there’s sort of a homogenizing of the experience or reporting of it in some cases
    0:37:49 that one could attribute to mass media coverage discussions on podcasts and so on.
    0:37:54 So how does that apply or not apply to reports of NDEs?
    0:37:59 In terms of knowledge about near-death experience, whether it affects what you’d like to say,
    0:38:05 we’ve done some research looking at people who reported their near-death experiences to us
    0:38:12 before Raymond Moody published his book in 1975, when nobody knew what these things were.
    0:38:16 Working at the University of Virginia, I had access to the files of Ian Stevenson,
    0:38:21 who’d been there for many, many years collecting unusual phenomena. And he had maybe 50 of these
    0:38:26 cases. They weren’t called near-death experiences. Some were called deathbed visions. Some were
    0:38:32 called out-of-body experiences. Some were called apparitions. When you look at them, they were
    0:38:37 just like the near-death experiences we call today. So I collected 20 of those that we had
    0:38:44 enough information about and then matched them on age, sex, religious belief, so forth, with 20
    0:38:49 recent cases that I studied. We compared what phenomena they reported and what things they
    0:38:54 didn’t. And what we found is that before Moody told us what a near-death experience was like,
    0:38:58 when no one had heard of these things, people reported the same things they report now.
    0:39:04 So knowing about a near-death experience does not affect whether you’re going to have one or report
    0:39:10 it. Now, he also asked about culture, and that’s an interesting point, because most near-death
    0:39:14 experiences start by saying, “Well, there aren’t any words to describe it. There aren’t any words
    0:39:19 in this I can’t tell you about.” And I say, “Great, tell me about it.” They use metaphors,
    0:39:23 often will say, “Well, then I saw this god-like figure.” I’m saying, “God,” because I don’t know
    0:39:26 what else to call it, but it’s nothing that I was taught about in church. It was much different
    0:39:33 than that with this all-loving, all-knowing entity, whatever it was. And what you hear from people
    0:39:39 in different cultures is based on what cultural or religious metaphors they have available to them.
    0:39:48 For example, people in Christian cultures will say that they may have seen God or Jesus. People
    0:39:53 from Hindu and Buddhist countries don’t use those words. They may say they met a Yandu,
    0:39:59 the messenger from Rama, or they may say they just saw this white light. Also, the tunnel,
    0:40:04 you know, we have tunnels in the U.S. So when people say, “I went through this long,
    0:40:09 dark, enclosed space,” they will say, “Tunnel.” Well, people in third-world countries don’t use
    0:40:16 that word. They may talk about going into a well or into a cave. I interviewed one fellow who here
    0:40:22 was a truck driver who said, “Then I got sucked into this long tailpipe.” So whatever the metaphor
    0:40:26 comes readily to them is what they use to describe the phenomena. If you look at the
    0:40:32 actual phenomena they’re reporting, it’s the same all around the world. And in fact, we can find cases
    0:40:37 from back in ancient Egypt and Rome or in Greece that have the same phenomena we talk about today.
    0:40:41 But the metaphors they use to describe them are different from culture to culture.
    0:40:50 When you’re sitting at, say, dinner or you meet a scientist outside of your field of study
    0:40:56 who’s well-intentioned, they’re not coming at you in some type of malicious or cynical way.
    0:41:02 They’re genuinely curious because I think really good scientists are open-minded, but they also
    0:41:08 ask for proof or they look to demonstrate proof or disprove hypotheses. What are some of the…
    0:41:17 If you had to steal man against a non-materialist explanation for NDE’s, are there any,
    0:41:24 if you had to pick them, compelling ways to interrogate this experience from a materialist
    0:41:29 perspective? I myself as a skeptic and I tend to doubt everything I think as well as everything
    0:41:34 else that you think. I’m not happy with the lack of evidence we have for some of these things.
    0:41:37 I’m still looking for it. I went into this thinking there’s going to be a simple physiological
    0:41:43 explanation. We haven’t found it. It’s been 50 years and we haven’t found any explanation yet.
    0:41:47 That doesn’t mean we won’t. So we’re still looking. We have some technologies now that can
    0:41:53 study the brain in ways we didn’t have before. We have very sophisticated neuroimaging. We have
    0:41:59 much better computer algorithms for analyzing EEGs and we have a wider range of psychedelic
    0:42:05 drugs to use to try to replicate parts of the experience in some ways. There’s a lot going on
    0:42:13 in physiological research now that was not available 50 years ago and we may someday have
    0:42:18 a physiological answer to explain near-death experiences. But let me give you two questions.
    0:42:24 One is that if you find something that is always correlated with the near-death experience,
    0:42:29 brain wave activity or a chemical, that doesn’t mean it’s causing the experience.
    0:42:36 For example, right now, people are listening to us and there’s electrical activity in
    0:42:41 parts of their brain that process hearing. It always happens when they’re hearing us.
    0:42:45 This part of the brain always lights up. That doesn’t mean that electrical activity
    0:42:50 is causing our voices. It’s just a reflection of it. So when you find these physiological
    0:42:55 incompetence of a near-death experience, you’re finding perhaps the mechanism for it,
    0:43:01 but not the cause of it. The second question was that even though I’m a skeptic and part of
    0:43:06 me still wishes we could find a physiological explanation, I’m still looking. I need to remember
    0:43:13 that this is what has been called promissory materialism. We don’t have the answer yet,
    0:43:18 but we will someday. That’s a perfectly fine philosophical position. It is not a scientific
    0:43:22 position because it can never be disproven. You can always say, “Well, we haven’t got it yet,
    0:43:27 but we’ll get it in 50 years. We’ll get it in 100 years.” So you can never disprove it. So it’s not
    0:43:31 scientific. So saying that that’s a scientific way of dealing with things, promissory materialism
    0:43:35 is not the way to go. We need to deal with what we have right now and how we interpret what we
    0:43:40 have right now. And I think most people who study near-death experiences, whether they’re
    0:43:47 spiritualists or materialists or neurophysiologists or philosophers, they agree on the phenomena.
    0:43:52 They don’t agree on the interpretation of it, of what’s causing it and what its ultimate meaning is.
    0:43:58 I think that’s fine. That’s not where I am. I’m not a philosopher. I’m interested in the
    0:44:04 ultimate cause or the meaning of it. I’m actually a clinician. So what interests me most about
    0:44:10 near-death experiences is how they affect people’s lives and what people do with the experience.
    0:44:16 That’s the same regardless of what’s causing it, whether it’s a hallucination or a spiritual
    0:44:21 experience. It affects people in the same way. That’s, I think, what interests me most.
    0:44:29 We’ll probably come back to this, but I’ll just maybe as a teaser for folks. Please fact-check
    0:44:35 me if I get any of this wrong. But it seems like some of the common after-effects for those who
    0:44:43 experience NDEs are increased altruism, a feeling of connectedness. If they had a profession involving
    0:44:48 some degree of violence, for instance, not necessarily ill-intentioned, but law enforcement.
    0:44:55 If they were in the mafia, I know there’s a case of this, specifically. They’re no longer capable
    0:45:01 or willing to perform those jobs. Those who have attempted suicide and have the experience
    0:45:08 of an NDA counter-intuitively are less suicidal after the fact. So I’ll provide those as teasers,
    0:45:12 but just to scratch my own itch, I’m going to pick up on a thread from
    0:45:20 quite a few minutes ago where I was asking about possible differences in reported NDEs.
    0:45:25 Do children and adults report the same phenomenon, obviously, using different metaphor
    0:45:33 for trying to convey the ineffable, perhaps? Do they differ in any notable way?
    0:45:38 They don’t really differ. The one difference is that children don’t have the elaborate life
    0:45:46 review that most adults do. They also tend to have as many deceased relatives that they might
    0:45:52 encounter. They have some. But you’re more likely to hear from children encountering a deceased pet,
    0:45:58 a dog or a cat. But by and large, people who have studied children’s near-death experiences
    0:46:03 find the same phenomenon. They often have difficulty, even more than adults do, in putting
    0:46:09 into words. So they will often ask the children to draw what happened, and they produce artwork
    0:46:14 to explain the near-death experience. You’re mentioning new tooling, new equipment,
    0:46:20 and technological capabilities that we have, whether that be fMRI or some type of advanced
    0:46:28 brain imaging, the use of computers, algorithms, certainly AI at some point, if not already,
    0:46:38 to analyze EEG, KG data, and so on. How might you use something like brain imaging if you could
    0:46:43 design a study? Because presumably, if someone’s about to flatline, you’re not going to slide them
    0:46:49 into an fMRI machine because the clinicians would not be able to get to them. So would that mean
    0:46:57 you would be putting someone into, say, an fMRI and then doing your best to simulate an NDE with
    0:47:03 exogenous compounds such as psychedelics or otherwise? How might you use the brain imaging?
    0:47:09 Well, people have studied brain imaging with psychedelic drugs. We used to think that
    0:47:14 psychedelics work by stimulating the brain to hallucinate, and what these studies have shown
    0:47:21 is that the psychedelic trips that are associated with more elaborate mystical experiences
    0:47:26 are associated with less brain activity and less coordination among different parts of the brain,
    0:47:33 as if the brain is getting pushed out of the way by these drugs, allowing whatever it is to
    0:47:40 come in, all this mystical experience. People have tried to look at brain function during a
    0:47:46 cardiac arrest. It is not easy. Several papers have been published in leading neuroscience journals,
    0:47:52 claiming they have done this, but they have not done that. For example, once they was published of
    0:47:58 people who were comatose and on life support, and they said it was happening in the brain
    0:48:03 when they stopped the artificial ventilation. And what they found was that there was a change in the
    0:48:09 brain function when they did that. It was reported as an increase in gamma activity. It was actually
    0:48:16 not. All the brain waves were decreased when they stopped the ventilation, but the gamma waves were
    0:48:21 decreased less than the alpha, beta, and delta. So it looked like it was more, relatively speaking,
    0:48:27 of the gamma. It was actually less than it was before. But these people were not dead. They also
    0:48:34 reported heart function during this time. And when they were reporting these changes in brain waves,
    0:48:38 the people’s hearts were still beating. They were still having a normal sinus rhythm, normal,
    0:48:43 normal heartbeat. When the heart did stop, they didn’t continue doing the EEG. So you couldn’t
    0:48:48 continue to see what’s going on in the brain after they actually died. But they reported it as
    0:48:54 electromagnetic activity in the brain in dying patients. Well, they weren’t dying. The artificial
    0:48:59 aspiration was stopped, but their hearts were still beating. Similarly, there were other studies
    0:49:04 like this where they claimed to be reporting on dying patients. They really were not dying
    0:49:08 patients. They were people who were approaching death. There was a study done in Michigan where
    0:49:15 they sacrificed rats and measured what’s going on in the brains when they do that. And they reported
    0:49:21 a 30-second burst of activity after their hearts stopped. That’s what they said they found. It
    0:49:28 actually wasn’t a burst. If you look at the traces they gave you, it was a slight increase,
    0:49:32 but far less than the brains were showing before they sacrificed them. So it was a tiny
    0:49:38 blip. It wasn’t a surge, like they said it was. Furthermore, if they anesthetized the rats,
    0:49:43 they didn’t show this at all. Obviously, people have NDE’s Neurotethic Experiences under deep
    0:49:48 anesthesia. So that’s not the same phenomena. There were several other things that weren’t
    0:49:53 untypical of Neurotethic Experiences. For example, every single one of the rats they tested
    0:49:58 had this burst of activity. But if you ask people who come close to death, only about 10 or 20%
    0:50:02 have Neurotethic Experiences. And probably most significant, they didn’t bother to interview
    0:50:10 the rats to see what they were experiencing. I will mention one researcher who has actually
    0:50:17 measured EEG’s brainwaves during cardiac arrest. And this is Sam Parnia at NYU. But when you’re
    0:50:24 persisting somebody, you press on the heart, you compress the heart, heart compressions for a while,
    0:50:28 and then you stop and give them a break to see whether they spontaneously breathe or not. And
    0:50:33 then you continue it again. Or they’re shocking them with electricity. And then you stop and see
    0:50:38 what’s happened. And he measured the brainwaves during that period when they stopped, thinking,
    0:50:43 this is going to tell us what’s going on. Well, I’m not sure it is because it’s only for a few
    0:50:48 seconds that you’re stopping. And the body is still suffering from the shock of the electricity
    0:50:53 or the chest compressions. Furthermore, he reported some increase in several different
    0:50:59 wavelengths of brain activity in about half the patients. He also reported that there were some
    0:51:03 six patients who reported Neurotethic Experiences. And he said, well, obviously the
    0:51:09 increased brain activity is causing the Neurotethic Experiences. But if you look at his data,
    0:51:13 the six who had the Neurotethic Experiences did not have the increase in brainwaves.
    0:51:18 And those who had the Neurotethic Increasing Brainwaves did not report Neurotethic Experiences.
    0:51:20 So I’m not sure if we learned anything from that.
    0:51:27 All right. So I’m going to ask you to make some sort of theoretical
    0:51:33 leaps to answer the next few questions. But first, because I have to ask this,
    0:51:40 when people see or claim to have seen deceased relatives, how, and I don’t know if you have
    0:51:45 this level of granularity in the reports, how old are those deceased relatives? Are they
    0:51:51 last they saw them? Because presumably some of these people who died would have had a slow decline
    0:51:58 with neurodegenerative disease and so on. So do they appear much younger? Is there any
    0:52:04 pattern in the reports whatsoever in terms of the age that these people seem to be
    0:52:10 when they are observed? There was a pattern. But again, I need to follow back on the fact that
    0:52:14 most people say there aren’t any words to describe it. So when you ask them to describe what they
    0:52:20 saw, you’re describing what the brain interpreted of what they saw. And most people say that they
    0:52:25 saw the deceased loved one at the prime with their lives when they were young and healthy,
    0:52:32 not when they were dying. I have found some people say I didn’t really see a human figure.
    0:52:35 I just saw my grandmother. Well, how did you know it was your grandmother?
    0:52:41 I felt her vibrations. I knew it was her. It was had her essence. So they may have just seen this
    0:52:46 blob of light and knew that by the way it felt to them, this is grandma. There’s no way of
    0:52:51 validating this type of thing. It’s just their impression. All right, let me ask a sort of
    0:52:56 tactical, practical question and then we’ll get into the stranger stuff. Sure. If you had,
    0:52:59 let’s say there’s someone listening and they’re like, okay, I’m not sure I want my name on it,
    0:53:08 but as an anonymous donor, I’m willing to give Dr. Grayson some sum of money or maybe some secret
    0:53:13 agent at the NIH is like, you know what, I know it’ll liberate some funds. Right.
    0:53:19 What studies would you like to design and see done? I mean, they don’t need to be specifically
    0:53:24 related to NDEs, but if they are, I suppose that’d be more germane to the conversation.
    0:53:29 Any types of studies that you would love to see performed related to this?
    0:53:35 I can answer that from my personal perspective, which is not what I’d like to see the field do.
    0:53:39 Sure. What I’d like to see the field do is what they’re doing right now,
    0:53:43 looking at all of the different possibilities, looking at cross-cultural comparisons,
    0:53:46 looking at neurophysiological changes, all the types of things they’re doing now,
    0:53:51 looking at other phenomena that seem to mimic parts of the NDE like psychedelic drugs,
    0:53:54 but that’s not where I am right now. I’m nearing the end of my career.
    0:54:03 I’m falling back on, what does it all mean? For me, what that means is it has it affect people’s
    0:54:11 lives. I would like to see more research into the practical applications of new-death experiences.
    0:54:17 We’ve done some studies now with new-death experiences that say they needed help
    0:54:23 readjusting to a “normal life” after a new-death experience, and we’ve surveyed them about
    0:54:28 what did they need help with? What was so disturbing about the experience or its after-effects?
    0:54:34 What type of help did you seek? What type of help did you receive? What type of
    0:54:41 practitioner did you go to? Is a chiodrist, a doctor, a spiritual healer, a pastoral counselor?
    0:54:44 And what types of help were actually helpful and which ones were not helpful?
    0:54:48 And we’re finding some interesting findings from that. We’re also surveying physicians
    0:54:54 about their attitudes towards new-death experiences, and we posted the question,
    0:54:58 “If a patient comes to you and says, ‘I had this experience that I want to tell you about,’
    0:55:03 would you feel comfortable talking with them about it, and what are the barriers you feel
    0:55:10 to open up and talking about them?” And we had a list of some 25 possible barriers we thought might be
    0:55:15 things they said, and we were very pleased to find that almost none of them said,
    0:55:20 “I don’t think it’s worth talking about. It’s not important.” Or, “Is just a neurological
    0:55:24 artifact? Does it mean anything?” Or, “It’s just a type of psychosis.”
    0:55:31 By far, the most common response doctors gave was, “The barrier is I don’t know enough about
    0:55:36 the experience to talk to patients about it.” And the second most common was, “I don’t have time
    0:55:40 to talk about this with my patients. I’m just too busy.” Now, those are both things that we can
    0:55:45 correct. We can certainly give more training to physicians, and we can restructure the schedule
    0:55:52 so they do have time to talk to patients. What are the most, if any, reliable ways to simulate
    0:56:00 an NDE or NDE-like experience? And it makes me think back to a movie. It may not age well,
    0:56:06 but I enjoyed it at the time with Kiefer Sutherland 2000. No, it was prior to that 1990
    0:56:11 something called Flatliners. I believe there were medical students who would take turns putting
    0:56:18 themselves right to a brief period of death, and then they get into this arms race of competing
    0:56:22 with one another and pushing it further and further and further. But my understanding,
    0:56:28 based on some of what I’ve read, you do have familiarity with some of the psychedelic-related
    0:56:35 science is that these NDE’s seem to produce more what have been described as out-of-body
    0:56:41 experiences, perhaps more, I don’t want to say reliably, more frequently than psychedelic experiences.
    0:56:46 But are there any, we’ll come back to that point, but are there any ways to simulate it in such a
    0:56:53 way to make it more studiable, even if it’s not the exact phenomenon since I’m sure the IRB
    0:56:58 would have a tough time accepting temporarily killing patients or subjects that are recruited
    0:57:04 for a study? Is there anything that approximates it or any thoughts on how we might do that?
    0:57:10 Keeping in mind, and this is an imperfect example, but long ago, decades ago, psychedelics reviewed
    0:57:17 as psychotomimetics so they could be used as a tool for effectively eliciting a psychotic
    0:57:22 episode so it could be better studied. Now, that ends up not being quite right. But how would you
    0:57:29 think about approximating an NDE? I don’t think there’s a good way. I think the tool we have that
    0:57:36 comes closest to our certain psychedelic drugs in a very supportive environment. I don’t think
    0:57:41 people just taking drugs on their own can necessarily replicate a new death experience,
    0:57:46 but in a supportive environment in the lab with low lighting and good music and someone there to
    0:57:52 help you with it, you can replicate some of the features of a new death experience, not all of
    0:57:57 them. And you tend not to have all the after effects. And I think that’s understandable
    0:58:01 because if you have an experience under drugs, you can say, “Oh, that’s just the drugs. It wasn’t
    0:58:06 real.” Whereas if it happens spontaneously, it’s hard to dismiss. One of the issues with the drugs
    0:58:12 is that we can find out what’s going on in the brain when people are given these drugs.
    0:58:16 And that’s fine. But then you make the leap to saying, “Well, this is the same
    0:58:21 change in the brain that occurs during a new death experience.” That’s an assumption. We don’t
    0:58:27 have the evidence for that yet. It tells us how we might look for places in the brain,
    0:58:31 where we might look, and what types of changes. But that work hasn’t been done yet,
    0:58:38 so it’s all speculative. And certainly, the drug-induced experiences are not identical to
    0:58:43 new death experiences. Many new death experiences have tried drugs afterwards to try to replicate
    0:58:49 the experience. And they universally tell me it’s not the same thing. One person told me,
    0:58:55 “When I was on psilocybin, I saw heaven. When I was in my new death experience, I was in heaven.”
    0:59:00 That was what he explained it. But they had not to have the same after effects. And one question
    0:59:07 of that I will say is that the recent work done at Johns Hopkins with psilocybin has found a marked
    0:59:14 decrease in fear of death after a short experience with psilocybin. And it doesn’t follow, but at
    0:59:18 least a year after the experience, they still have that decreased fear of death and it’s very
    0:59:25 encouraging. Yeah, it’s surprisingly durable. It directly correlated with the strength of the
    0:59:33 mystical experience, which is measured using an assessment much like your scale for NDEs.
    0:59:42 What other characteristics seem to be hard to replicate with drugs or
    0:59:49 less frequent in occurrence? And perhaps this is an opportunity to speak to what exactly
    0:59:55 an out-of-body experience is, as you would define it. And I think we already gave perhaps
    0:59:59 an example of this with the wings flapping. But can you say more about that?
    1:00:04 It’s tricky to define an out-of-body experience. There’s a large body of evidence
    1:00:10 looking at people who have their temporal lobe or their brains stimulate electrically.
    1:00:13 And it is worth claiming they produce out-of-body experiences. They do not.
    1:00:17 They may produce a sense of not being aware of your body anymore,
    1:00:21 but they don’t produce a sense of leaving your body and being able to turn around and look at
    1:00:25 your body and seeing it from an out-of-body perspective. They often say that with the
    1:00:30 stimulation, you can see a double of yourself, but you’re seeing it from inside the body. You’re
    1:00:36 not outside the body. And the WC is static. It’s not moving around. Whereas people who have real
    1:00:41 out-of-body experiences talk about moving around the room, won’t get distant places.
    1:00:47 People who have out-of-body experiences sometimes can report things accurately. They can be
    1:00:51 corroborated later on. That doesn’t happen with stimulation of the temporal lobe.
    1:00:56 So they’ll have differences between these artifacts that are produced by temporal lobe
    1:01:01 stimulation and real out-of-body experiences. When you read some of the papers that have been
    1:01:07 published about temporal lobe stimulation, they say things like, “Well, my legs were getting
    1:01:11 shorter. I felt like I was falling off the gurney.” And they’re called these out-of-body
    1:01:16 experiences. They’re not. They’re somatic hallucinations, but they’re not out-of-body
    1:01:21 experiences. You can get out-of-body experiences with other types of mystical experience and with
    1:01:29 psychedelic drugs. Whether the same or not is kind of open to question right now. We don’t have
    1:01:35 examples of people having drug-induced out-of-body experiences having accurate perceptions of what’s
    1:01:41 going on around them. Whereas you do with near-death experiences. Now, that may be because we haven’t
    1:01:45 looked deep enough yet and we may find them. But this one, we don’t have that.
    1:01:51 I’ll share a strange experience and then we’ll get into the, as promised, to the listeners,
    1:01:58 some of the stranger stuff. But not that this is just a plain vanilla walk through the DSM.
    1:02:03 So, I have a fair amount of flight time with different psychedelic compounds. And the
    1:02:12 one time, I would say, I consistently experienced what you would describe or might describe as an
    1:02:20 out-of-body experience was in using, and I highly discourage anyone to use this, a terpenoid
    1:02:25 called salvanorinae, which is found in salvia divinorum, otherwise known as diviner sage,
    1:02:30 used by the Mazatecs in Mexico for centuries, probably millennia. And part of the reason I
    1:02:37 don’t recommend it, well, first of all, you can go on YouTube and just search salvia freakout and
    1:02:41 you’ll get lots of video footage for why you should probably steer clear of it. But it’s a
    1:02:50 as I recall a Kappa opioid agonist. And that is consuming an agonist of the Kappa opioid receptors
    1:02:56 typically is described as acutely dysphoric. So, what is dysphoria? Well, it’s the opposite
    1:03:00 of euphoria. It’s horrible, terrible, terrifying experience for most people. So, I don’t recommend
    1:03:05 using it. But these experiences are notable for two reasons. Number one, I had no expectancy,
    1:03:14 no, I didn’t know anyone who had consumed a purified salvanorinae. And secondly, I was
    1:03:21 observed by clinicians. And in one case was inside an fMRI machine. So, I could not see anything
    1:03:28 outside of the machine. But in both cases, the experience was effectively a flattened,
    1:03:34 abstract experience, devoid of time, space, a sense of self. Nonetheless, there was an observer,
    1:03:41 but incredibly bizarre experience even compared to, say, a psilocybin or an NDMT or something else.
    1:03:50 And in each instance, I had two experiences at some point, mid abstraction, I effectively
    1:03:56 had the view of a CCTV camera in the upper corner of each room. And I was able to see
    1:04:02 what all the scientists were doing, all the clinicians, and was able to corroborate those
    1:04:07 after the fact. Now, in the first instance, I was not in an fMRI machine. So, people might say,
    1:04:11 well, you could have had one eye open and you could have been watching. Now, I would challenge
    1:04:17 anyone in the depth of this experience to attempt to report anything visual with their eyes open.
    1:04:24 But the fact that I was literally strapped down inside an fMRI machine would preclude
    1:04:31 any ability, as we currently understand it, to use my eyes to see anything. And that raises
    1:04:37 some questions for me, because I do have a reasonably broad palette of experience with
    1:04:43 different molecules. But that was two for two. And I haven’t experienced that in anything else.
    1:04:48 This is slowly meandering into the stranger territory. So, it seems to be the case that
    1:04:57 certainly we can occasion very strange experiences with the ingestion or inhalation of different
    1:05:05 compounds. So, the brain has some role as a mediator of experience in the world.
    1:05:17 But then you seem to document in your experience these phenomena that seem to reflect a mind beyond
    1:05:21 brain for lack of a better descriptor. And I don’t want to put words in your mouth.
    1:05:28 How do you begin to even think about this? And is the brain, I suppose we could make an argument
    1:05:35 for this on a whole lot of levels, a reducing valve, as Aldous Huxley might put it, that is
    1:05:46 filtering for information that is optimized for survival and procreation. And when you do something
    1:05:51 that, I suppose, opens the aperture of that reducing valve, then suddenly you have these
    1:05:59 experiences. Is the brain acting like a receiver of some type? Now, the argument against that would
    1:06:06 be, well, if you damage the brain, you can observe all of these effects on perception and
    1:06:12 cognition and so on. How at this point, given all of your documentation, discussions with colleagues
    1:06:19 in and outside of this area of expertise, think about mind versus brain. With the understanding
    1:06:24 that there’s a lot more we don’t know than what we know. But how do you think about this?
    1:06:27 I was taught in college in medical school that the mind is what the brain does.
    1:06:32 And all our thoughts and feelings and perceptions are all created by the brain.
    1:06:38 And I cannot believe that anymore. I’ve seen people whose brains were either offline or
    1:06:43 severely impaired telling me they had the most elaborate experience they’ve ever had.
    1:06:48 So I’m inclined to think that the mind is something else and the brain kind of filters it,
    1:06:55 as you said. This is not a new idea. 2000 years ago, the Abakortes said this, that the brain is a
    1:07:01 messenger of the mind. And this is not surprising because we know that the brain has these filters.
    1:07:06 It’s the default boat network and the thermo cortical network. If people are listening to us now,
    1:07:09 they don’t really care what we look like. They want to hear what we’re saying.
    1:07:17 So their thermo cortical circuit tamps down the visual input and focuses on the auditory input.
    1:07:22 And likewise, we’re not hearing the train go by outside or the traffic outside because you’re
    1:07:26 focusing on this. And that’s your brain doing that. It’s filtering out what stimuli you’re
    1:07:30 going to pay attention to. And it starts even beyond the brain that our sense organs.
    1:07:36 You don’t see all the visual light that’s out there. You just see this small portion that is in
    1:07:41 our visual spectrum. We don’t see infrared and ultraviolet. And likewise, we only hear
    1:07:46 a small fraction of the frequencies of sound available. We don’t hear the sounds that dogs
    1:07:52 and bats hear or elephants and dolphins. So our brain and the associated sensory systems that we
    1:07:57 have with that filters out things that are not important to our survival. Now we think about
    1:08:02 the things that happen in near-death experience, seeing deceased loved ones leaving the body.
    1:08:06 That’s not essential for survival. You can get food and shelter in a mate and avoid predators
    1:08:11 without all that. So it makes sense that the brain would normally filter that stuff out
    1:08:16 and not pay attention to it. And if in a near-death experience or similar experiences,
    1:08:23 the brain is shutting down selectively so that that filtering mechanism is put on hold
    1:08:28 or being weakened, then you have access to this other consciousness. Now it raises the question
    1:08:33 of what is this other consciousness? Where is it? In a way, that’s a bogus question because
    1:08:39 if it’s a non-physical entity, how can I have a where? It can’t be any place. But I’m not a
    1:08:45 philosopher. I’m an empiricist. And when see people say to me, as many do, if you have this
    1:08:53 non-physical mind, how does it interact with the physical brain? I have no idea. On the other hand,
    1:08:59 if you take a materialistic perspective and say, how does the brain, the chemical and electrical
    1:09:07 changes in the brain create an abstract thought? We have no idea about that either. So whether you’re
    1:09:13 an empiricist, a materialist or not, we can’t explain how thoughts arise and how they get
    1:09:19 processed to us. What we do know is that all our experiences are filtered to us through the brain.
    1:09:23 You can have the most elaborate, mystical experience in the world. But to tell me about it,
    1:09:29 you have to be back in your body with words created by your brain and filtered through concepts that
    1:09:38 your brain puts on it. So obviously, the brain is evolved in perceiving and processing and relating
    1:09:41 the near-death experience. You can’t get around that. It doesn’t mean it’s creating it.
    1:09:47 And also, I just wanted to add, and I’ve heard you discuss this, just because something is currently
    1:09:53 unexplainable does not mean it is fundamentally unexplainable. If we look back at the history of
    1:09:59 science, and certainly, this will continue to be the case, we would laugh at some of the
    1:10:05 presuppositions of 200 years ago. And there’s no reason to think that 100, 200 years from now,
    1:10:10 certainly with the rate of technological change, maybe five, 10 years from now,
    1:10:16 almost with certainty, we will look back at many of the things we took to be true now and laugh at
    1:10:23 them similarly. And that in science, everything is provisional in a sense, right? It is until proven
    1:10:29 otherwise, which it almost inevitably is. At least there’s something that’s added to it. It would
    1:10:37 seem to me that studying this field, documenting these cases, doing your best to make sense
    1:10:46 of these things, is not without career cost. It would seem to me, and certainly this was the case
    1:10:51 with psychedelics, say, a few decades ago, to try to scientifically study psychedelics, putting
    1:10:57 aside all of the nightmares of logistics with dealing with the FDA and handling schedule one
    1:11:06 compounds and so on, to take that path was viewed as career suicide. And I don’t know if that’s a
    1:11:14 fair label to apply to your field of study with respect to NDE’s, but what have the cost been,
    1:11:22 if any, and why have you persisted despite those costs? It’s less of a problem now than it was
    1:11:29 back in the 1980s. When no one knew about these things, most academic centers assumed this was
    1:11:36 just a few crazy patients telling the stories and they weren’t worth investigating. And I was told
    1:11:42 in one university that if I continued to study these things, I would not get tenure. So I ended
    1:11:46 up leaving that place and go to a different university before I came up for tenure. I wasn’t
    1:11:51 willing to risk that. But I did now get tenure at two subsequent universities where it’s become more
    1:11:56 acceptable to study unusual phenomena as long as you’re doing it in a scientifically respectable
    1:12:01 way and publishing your material in mainstream medical journals. So I think it’s less of an
    1:12:08 issue now, but you still see a lot of, I wouldn’t say it’s professional suicide, but certainly
    1:12:14 professional barriers being raised to people who study these things. I think why people do it,
    1:12:18 partly because they’re intellectually curious about it. There’s a challenge here. I don’t
    1:12:24 understand it and I want to. And probably more importantly for me is these experiences have
    1:12:29 profound effects on the people who have them. As a psychiatrist, I want to understand that
    1:12:34 and help them deal with those effects if they need help with it. So I think it’s irresponsible to
    1:12:40 just ignore it and say it doesn’t exist. Let’s talk about some of your other interests,
    1:12:46 research interests. And I have a note here, genomic study of extraordinary twin communication.
    1:12:52 Could you elaborate on this? This actually was not my project originally. The Israeli psychologist
    1:12:58 Borough-Fishman contacted me and said, “I’ve got this great study I’d like to do. And I found a
    1:13:03 twin genomic database in England where they’ve got 15,000 pairs of twins and they have the entire
    1:13:11 genomic platform all laid out. So we can survey these twins they have, but they’ve had some type
    1:13:16 of communication when they’re at distant locations. You call it telepathy, you can call it extracensory,
    1:13:20 you can call it coincidental, but they have reliable communication with each other when
    1:13:26 they’re far away from each other. Can we find out from the genomic analysis what genes are
    1:13:30 associated with disability?” And I thought, “That sounds interesting.” It wasn’t something I would
    1:13:36 pick, but sure, I came to try that. So we did apply for a grant and we got the approval of the group
    1:13:41 in England. The study hasn’t actually started yet, but it makes me wonder about the genetics that goes
    1:13:47 into having a new death experience. Now we’ve been studying what’s going on in the brain,
    1:13:51 what’s going on in the heart, and lungs. We have to scratch the surface of what’s going on in your
    1:13:57 genes that they make you more likely to have a new death experience or a certain type of experience.
    1:14:03 Now we know that when their hearts stop, between 10 and 20 percent of people will have a new death
    1:14:06 experience. And we haven’t found any way of predicting who’s going to have one or not,
    1:14:11 but maybe the answer is in the genes. So I think it’s worth doing a genetic study of people who
    1:14:19 have new death experiences and those who don’t. I’ve had a handful of guests on this show who have
    1:14:27 identical twins and they have all maybe off the record, I think in some cases on the record
    1:14:34 in conversation, shared with me stories that certainly defy any current conventional explanation
    1:14:39 of communication with their twins. And it’s 100 percent at this point. And I’ve only had a handful
    1:14:47 of individuals with identical twins, but in several cases, these are scientists, these are
    1:14:54 people who are otherwise as kind of rational materialists as you could be, but they are not
    1:14:58 going to refute their own direct experience, continue direct experience with their identical
    1:15:02 twin. It does raise a lot of questions. And if we wanted to get really sci-fi, you think about
    1:15:08 genetic engineering, you think of CRISPR, you think of gene therapies. If we were to, in some
    1:15:15 capacity, determine which code is responsible, which light switches are responsible, would it
    1:15:20 be possible to increase someone’s ability to express those capabilities in the same way that we might
    1:15:30 say toy with myostatin inhibition or something like that to catalyze increased muscle growth
    1:15:37 in the sense that we might see in bully whippets or in Belgian blue cattle, as an example. It certainly
    1:15:42 seems like a study worth doing. Why not? I mean, worst case, you’d find no correlation.
    1:15:44 There’s a lot of ifs in that question. If we could do this, if we could do that.
    1:15:45 Lots of ifs.
    1:15:51 Lots of ifs. And frankly, I’m not encouraged by what I’ve seen so far with genetic engineering.
    1:15:56 When we can make tomatoes with a thick skin that can travel better across country,
    1:16:00 but they don’t have the flavor that a normal tomato does. So you’re always paying a price
    1:16:04 when you genetically modify something. You may gain something you’re looking for,
    1:16:09 but you may lose something else. When you try messing with human genes, you don’t know what
    1:16:14 you’re going to come up with. Oh, for sure. How much funding are you seeking for this particular
    1:16:20 twin communication study, the genomics study? That’s a small one, just $50,000 or so.
    1:16:27 And the role of science, that is very inexpensive. What other studies outside of NDEs would you like
    1:16:33 to see done? Are there any that are kind of shovel-ready, so to speak, or close to shovel-ready?
    1:16:38 We’ve mentioned people who claim to leave their bodies and see things accurately from an adipotic
    1:16:44 perspective. I would like to get a more controlled version of that. And people who tried that,
    1:16:49 Sampornia NYU has tried it a couple of times. I’ve done it try it once. There have been a total
    1:16:54 of six published studies of attempts to do this. And none of them have been successful. Usually,
    1:16:59 you’ll study things for a year or two and find no near-death experiences in your sample, or people
    1:17:04 who have an NDE but didn’t describe seeing things from an adipotic perspective. So there really
    1:17:09 hasn’t been any tests of this yet. A determined skeptic could say, “Well, that shows that it
    1:17:13 doesn’t really happen.” And that people who spontaneously have this experience and tell you
    1:17:18 about it are misinterpreting what’s happened to them or just making it up. And I would desperately
    1:17:23 like to find some objective way of measuring this, but we haven’t had that yet. So it would be nice to
    1:17:29 try to hone down that and then try to find a good way of studying this in a mess. The stuff
    1:17:34 that Sampornia has done, I was participating in one of his studies that had 2,000 patients in it
    1:17:39 from a variety of hospitals. And we found nothing in that room. So you need a huge study to do this.
    1:17:44 This was related to out-of-body experiences specifically. Yeah.
    1:17:50 Yeah. I think there’s a lot to be learned from the neurophysiological research that’s going on now.
    1:17:54 There’s a very active group at the University of Liege in Belgium that’s making headway with this.
    1:17:58 There are other people around the world who are studying it. There’s a group at University College
    1:18:02 in London, but I think we’re a long way from having an answer yet. We’re just starting this
    1:18:07 type of research. And it may be certainly not in my lifetime before we find a good answer.
    1:18:18 Is there a study design that you think would be a more intelligent way or a better way to approach
    1:18:25 controlled study or assessment of out-of-body experiences? And part of the reason I ask is that
    1:18:34 if you look back at, for instance, I could give a famous example, the amazing Randy who had this
    1:18:39 outstanding prize. I think it was a million dollars or a hundred thousand dollars for anyone
    1:18:45 who could demonstrate psi abilities or extrasensory perception or fill in the blank under controlled
    1:18:52 conditions. And to my knowledge, no one ever claimed that prize. Now, at the same time, if you
    1:18:59 look at a documentary like, for instance, I believe it’s called Project NIMM, which looked at the,
    1:19:03 in retrospect, ill-advised idea to try to raise a chimpanzee as you would a human child.
    1:19:12 The chimpanzee demonstrated all sorts of learning behaviors and so on that could not be replicated
    1:19:17 in the lab simply because the chimpanzee would shut down, would not demonstrate those behaviors
    1:19:24 in a laboratory setting. That doesn’t mean they didn’t exist. But there were challenges in studying
    1:19:31 it in a controlled environment. What is your best explanation? Again, understanding that
    1:19:37 for a lot of people, if you can’t verify it under double blind, placebo-controlled conditions
    1:19:42 or the equivalent in this setting, then it doesn’t exist. With extreme claims comes the
    1:19:48 requirement of extreme levels of proof. But how would you, based on everything that you’ve
    1:19:54 studied, colleagues you’ve spoken with, explain why it is so difficult to
    1:19:58 produce or replicate or study these things in controlled settings? Why is that?
    1:20:04 It’s essentially a spontaneous experience that does not happen under controlled conditions.
    1:20:08 When you put someone in a lab, they’re not the same as they were when they’re out on the street.
    1:20:14 And we’ve learned this with sleep studies. When you bring someone into the lab to have them to
    1:20:18 measure their brain waves during sleep, it takes their day or two usually to have them adapt to
    1:20:22 the situation before you can actually do it. You get something that’s at least a bit like
    1:20:26 what their normal sleep is. So I think you have to take that into account that people have these
    1:20:32 experiences out in the wild, so to speak. And it’s hard to tame it without clamping down on the
    1:20:36 controls to their brain that would shut it off, maybe. So I don’t know whether you can do that,
    1:20:40 whether you can have a really controlled search engine. We have this experience that you can
    1:20:46 certainly do it with mimics that mimic part of the experience. For example, with drugs or with
    1:20:52 brain stimulation that can mimic a part of it. And then, by implication, develop metaphors what
    1:20:57 might be going on in the brain during your death experience. It’s not the experience itself.
    1:21:04 What are some of the, for you personally, open questions that you would love to
    1:21:13 see answered for lights out onto the next adventure after death if there is a next adventure?
    1:21:20 What are some of the open questions in this field or in other fields that for you,
    1:21:24 you would most like to see answered? Are there any burning questions that come to mind?
    1:21:29 Well, the big question of questions is how their mind and brain interact. And
    1:21:35 that certainly, you get some hints of that from a near-death experience. But there are other phenomena
    1:21:42 that also address the mind and brain seeming to separate. And one of these is the term “lucidity
    1:21:48 phenomenon” where people who have had dementia for a while and cannot communicate or recognize family
    1:21:54 suddenly become completely lucid again and carry on coherent conversations
    1:21:59 and express appropriate emotions, and then they die. Usually within minutes or hours,
    1:22:05 and we don’t have any explanation for this. I have a few friends, not just one, few friends who’ve
    1:22:11 directly seen observe this phenomenon. And I do not have any way to explain that. If you believe
    1:22:17 the brain as filter mechanism, that could play a role in this. When the brain is shutting down
    1:22:24 in the last hours before death, it releases this filter that allows the consciousness to
    1:22:31 fully flourish. Now, a big problem with that is the person is still able to speak and communicate.
    1:22:36 So obviously, parts of the brain are still functioning just fine. So if you have this
    1:22:41 experience of heightened lucidity at death, how do you let people know that unless your brain is
    1:22:48 still functioning? It is a dilemma because we don’t have a medical explanation for how someone
    1:22:53 with a debilitating disease that is irreversible, like Alzheimer’s disease, can suddenly regain
    1:22:58 function again. There are speculative theories about this, but none of them really make a whole
    1:23:03 lot of sense and none of them have been corroborated by evidence. Now, there are other facets of some
    1:23:10 of the reported NDEs, past life review, as an example. You might also have, as I understand
    1:23:17 from listening to a number of your presentations, recall or re-experiencing an event through the
    1:23:23 perspective of someone other than yourself. When you consider all of these reports,
    1:23:32 how is that affected, if at all, how you think about time? And I ask that it might seem
    1:23:38 credibly broad, but I think most of us tend to think of time as this fundamental constant. But
    1:23:44 if you talk to the Carlo Revelli’s of the world from pronouncing his name correctly, if you start
    1:23:53 really digging under the hood, it’s difficult to automatically take that as a static known fact.
    1:24:00 And I’m wondering how you think about time, if these reports and your research and experiences
    1:24:06 have changed that at all. Most new-geth experiences say there was no time
    1:24:12 in this other realm, either that time stopped or just time ceased to exist.
    1:24:17 And when they say that, I reflect on what they’ve told me about the experience. I say, “Well,
    1:24:22 let you tell me that this happened, and then this happened, and then this happened.” But that
    1:24:27 applies all in your time. So how can there be no time if you’ve got things happening in sequence?
    1:24:33 And they just shrug and say, “Well, when I tell you about it now, in this body, in this world,
    1:24:39 it’s a paradox.” Over there, it wasn’t. Everything was happening all at once, and there wasn’t any
    1:24:44 linear flow. That’s just the way it is. I can understand that as an abstract concept. I can’t
    1:24:50 relate to it in my real life. I don’t know what that means to not have time, but so much of our
    1:24:55 life is controlled by it. What we think of as the linear passage of time. This is the pre-one
    1:25:02 this time thing, when you have some of these non-ordinary experiences. Let me ask about another,
    1:25:07 perhaps, non-ordinary experience. This is something I found in the footnotes of a footnote of a
    1:25:15 footnote. You may have some ability to explain this. Auditory hallucinations after NDEs. I only
    1:25:21 read the very top abstract in a PDF, so I did not dig into it. But what does this refer to?
    1:25:27 A psychiatrist in Colorado, Mitch Leaster, and I did this study. We surveyed a large sample of
    1:25:32 near-death experiences about what seemed to be hearing voices long after the near-death experience,
    1:25:38 and we also looked at schizophrenics who were hearing voices and compared the experience
    1:25:43 of those two groups. They were quite different. The near-death experiences who claimed to still
    1:25:50 be hearing voices almost universally said these were helpful guiding voices. They enjoyed hearing
    1:25:55 them, and they found them making their lives richer. They gave them some guidance, and they
    1:26:00 were reassuring to them. On the other hand, these schizophrenics almost universally said
    1:26:07 these are terrifying hallucinations. I wish I didn’t have them. They made my life much harder.
    1:26:11 I don’t like them at all. I wish that we just go away. It’s not experienced in the same way.
    1:26:18 Is it the same phenomenon? I don’t know. Among the people who reported the auditory hallucinations,
    1:26:27 was there any degree of overlap in terms of structural brain damage or otherwise,
    1:26:31 in the indie group? We don’t have the measures of brain function to answer that.
    1:26:38 To know, “I could keep going for many, many, many hours.” Let me ask you this,
    1:26:44 just as a way of branching out a little bit. In terms of researchers who, in your mind,
    1:26:53 demonstrate a compelling combination of both open-mindedness but rigorous skepticism,
    1:27:01 who would you not ask you to pick among favorites, but who are a few names that come to mind?
    1:27:06 Sam Parnia at NYU. How do you spell his last name?
    1:27:13 The A-R-N-I-A. Got it. There are retired physicians who are still involved in this field.
    1:27:21 Peter Fennec in England and Tim Van Lommel in the Netherlands. There’s a brilliant psychologist
    1:27:27 in New Zealand, Natasha Tassel-Madamua, who’s doing a lot of interesting research in this area.
    1:27:33 She is part Maori, and she’s doing work with cross-cultural comparison of Maori versus English
    1:27:38 near-death experiences. We’re also looking at a lot of the after-effects. There’s that large group
    1:27:41 at the age that I mentioned to you before that’s doing a lot of research into this.
    1:27:48 This is Belgium. Yeah. Many of them are quite confirmed materialists. That’s fine. They’re
    1:27:53 still doing good research. The head of that lab, though, Steve Loris, is much more open-minded.
    1:27:56 He still is a materialist, but he’s more open-minded about what these things might mean.
    1:28:00 And he’s certainly compassionate about how it affects the people who have these,
    1:28:03 which is probably more important to me than what they think is causing it.
    1:28:07 So there are a number of people around the world who are doing good research with this area.
    1:28:14 You have written a number of books and co-authored, co-edited others.
    1:28:20 One of them is Irreducible Mind Toward the Psychology for the 21st Century. What does
    1:28:28 the Irreducible Mind refer to? That basically means a mind that’s not reducible to chemical
    1:28:33 processes, electrical processes in the brain. It’s a mind that can be independent of the brain.
    1:28:39 And that book, without ever mentioning anything paranormal or parapsychological,
    1:28:46 goes through a series of phenomena in everyday life that point to mind and brain not being the
    1:28:51 same thing. And it does include near-death experiences and other experiences near-death.
    1:28:57 It includes exceptional genius. It includes psychosomatic phenomena, a variety of things
    1:29:03 that have occurred to perfectly normal people over the centuries. It had been well-documented and
    1:29:08 almost seemed to be compatible with either the brain creates all our thoughts and feelings.
    1:29:13 Which of your books, whether solely authored, co-authored, or co-edited,
    1:29:18 would you suggest people start with if they wanted to dive deeper?
    1:29:25 I would suggest my most recent book, After, because that’s really geared towards the average person,
    1:29:31 the layman. And it’s written in language that we’re talking about right now. I tried to minimize
    1:29:36 jargon, whereas the other books I’ve written are primarily for academicians, which are much
    1:29:40 harder to read, much denser, still excellent books, but not for the average person.
    1:29:45 And that is after subtitle, a doctor explores what near-death experiences reveal about life and
    1:29:51 beyond. All right, so that’s where people should start. Well, Dr. Grayson, this has been a very
    1:29:57 wide-ranging conversation. Is there anything that you would like to discuss, mention,
    1:30:00 or request you’d like to make in my audience, something you’d like to point them to,
    1:30:05 anything at all that I’d like to say before we start to wind to a close?
    1:30:09 I think that things I want people to know about near-death experiences are, number one,
    1:30:14 that they’re very common. About 5% of the general population, or one every 20 people,
    1:30:19 has had a near-death experience. And secondly, that they are not associated,
    1:30:25 anyway, with mental illness. People who are perfectly normal have these NDEs in abnormal
    1:30:31 situations, but can happen to anybody. And they’re that they lead to sometimes profound,
    1:30:37 long-lasting after-effects, both positive and negative, that never seem to go away over decades.
    1:30:42 People can find all things Bruce Grayson. It would seem at brucegrayson.com,
    1:30:50 if I’m not mistaken. So brucegrayson, g-r-e-y-s-o-n.com. And you have quite a few books to your credit,
    1:30:54 but the one to start with would be after subtitle, a doctor explores what near-death
    1:30:59 experiences reveal about life and beyond. Is there anything else?
    1:31:02 I think that’s it. You covered it pretty well, Tim.
    1:31:06 All right. Well, thank you very much for the time. And for everybody listening,
    1:31:12 we will link to everything that we discussed in the show notes as per usual at timdoplog/podcast.
    1:31:17 And you just search Bruce, probably, and he’ll pop right up. And as always, until next time,
    1:31:22 be just a bit kinder than is necessary, not only to others, but to yourself.
    1:31:28 And thank you for tuning in. Hey, guys, this is Tim again, just one more thing before you take
    1:31:33 off. And that is Five Bullet Friday. Would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday
    1:31:38 that provides a little fun before the weekend? Between one and a half and two million people
    1:31:43 subscribe to my free newsletter, my super short newsletter called Five Bullet Friday. Easy to
    1:31:49 sign up, easy to cancel. It is basically a half page that I send out every Friday to
    1:31:54 share the coolest things I’ve found or discovered or have started exploring over that week. It’s
    1:31:59 kind of like my diary of cool things. It often includes articles I’m reading, books I’m reading,
    1:32:05 albums, perhaps gadgets, gizmos, all sorts of tech tricks and so on that get sent to me
    1:32:11 by my friends, including a lot of podcast guests and these strange esoteric things end up in my
    1:32:17 field. And then I test them and then I share them with you. So if that sounds fun, again,
    1:32:21 it’s very short, a little tiny bite of goodness before you head off for the weekend,
    1:32:26 something to think about. If you’d like to try it out, just go to tim.vlog/friday,
    1:32:32 type that into your browser, tim.vlog/friday, drop in your email and you’ll get the very next one.
    1:32:38 Thanks for listening. As many of you know, for the last few years I’ve been sleeping on a midnight
    1:32:43 locks mattress from today’s sponsor, Helix Sleep. I also have one in the guest bedroom downstairs
    1:32:48 and feedback from friends has always been fantastic, kind of over the top, to be honest.
    1:32:52 I mean, they frequently say it’s the best night of sleep they’ve had in ages. What kind of mattresses
    1:32:56 and what do you do? What’s the magic juju? It’s something they comment on without any prompting
    1:33:02 for me whatsoever. I also recently had a chance to test the Helix Sunset Elite in a new guest
    1:33:08 bedroom, which I sometimes sleep in and I picked it for its very soft but supportive feel to help
    1:33:12 with some lower back pain that I’ve had. The Sunset Elite delivers exceptional comfort while
    1:33:17 putting the right support in the right spots. It’s made with five tailored foam layers, including a
    1:33:22 base layer with full perimeter zoned lumbar support right where I need it, and middle layers with
    1:33:28 premium foam and microcoils that create a soft contouring feel, which also means if I feel like
    1:33:31 I want to sleep on my side, I can do that without worrying about other aches and pains I might
    1:33:37 create. And with a luxurious pillow top for pressure relief, I look forward to nestling into that bed
    1:33:42 every night that I use it. The best part of course is that it helps me wake up feeling fully rested
    1:33:48 with a back that feels supple instead of stiff. That is the name of the game for me these days.
    1:33:54 Helix offers a 100 night sleep trial, fast free shipping and a 15 year warranty. So check it all
    1:34:03 out. Get 20% off of all mattress orders by going to helixsleep.com/tim. That’s helixsleep.com/tim
    1:34:10 for 20% off all mattress orders. I have been fascinated by the microbiome and probiotics,
    1:34:17 as well as prebiotics for decades, but products never quite live up to the hype. I’ve tried
    1:34:24 so many dozens and there are a host of problems. Now things are starting to change and that includes
    1:34:32 this episode’s sponsor Seeds DS01 Daily Symbiotic. Now it turns out that this product, Seeds DS01,
    1:34:38 was recommended to me many months ago by a PhD microbiologist. So I started using it well before
    1:34:43 their team ever reached out to me about sponsorship, which is kind of ideal because I used it unbitten,
    1:34:48 so to speak, came in fresh. Since then it has become a daily staple and one of the few supplements
    1:34:56 I travel with. I have it in a suitcase literally about 10 feet from me right now. It goes with me.
    1:35:01 I’ve always been very skeptical of most probiotics due to the lack of science behind them and the
    1:35:06 fact that many do not survive digestion to begin with. Many of them are shipped dead DOA. But after
    1:35:13 incorporating two capsules of Seeds DS01 into my morning routine, I have noticed improved digestion
    1:35:17 and improved overall health seem to be a bunch of different cascading effects.
    1:35:21 Based on some reports, I’m hoping it will also have an effect on my lipid profile, but that is
    1:35:28 definitely TBD. So why is Seeds DS01 so effective? What makes it different? For one, it is a two-in-one
    1:35:33 probiotic and prebiotic formulated with 24 clinically and scientifically studied strains
    1:35:38 that have systemic benefits in and beyond the gut. That’s all well and good, but if the probiotic
    1:35:43 strains don’t make it to the right place, in other words, your colon, they’re not as effective. So
    1:35:48 Seed developed a proprietary capsule and capsule delivery system that survives digestion and
    1:35:54 delivers a precision release of alive and viable probiotics to the colon, which is exactly where
    1:35:58 you want them to go to do the work. I’ve been impressed with Seeds dedication to science-backed
    1:36:03 engineering with completed gold standard trials that have been subjected to peer review and
    1:36:07 published in leading scientific journals, a standard you very rarely see from companies
    1:36:12 who develop supplements. If you’ve ever thought about probiotics but haven’t known where to start,
    1:36:16 this is my current vote for great gut health. You can start here, it costs less than $2 a day,
    1:36:24 that is the DS01. And now you can get 25% off your first month with code 25TIM and that is 25%
    1:36:34 off of your first month of Seeds DS01 at seed.com/tim using code 25TIM all put together. That’s
    1:36:40 seed.com/tim and if you forget it, you will see the coupon code on that page. One more time,
    1:36:50 seed.com/tim code 25TIM.

    Dr. Greyson’s research for the past half century has focused on the aftereffects and implications of near-death experiences and has resulted in more than 100 presentations to national and international scientific conferences, more than 150 publications in academic medical and psychological journals, 50 book chapters, and numerous research grants. He is a co-author After: A Doctor Explores What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about Life and Beyond.

    Sponsors:

    Seed’s DS-01® Daily Synbiotic broad spectrum 24-strain probiotic + prebiotic: https://Seed.com/Tim (Use code 25TIM for 25% off your first month’s supply)

    Helix Sleep premium mattresses: https://HelixSleep.com/Tim (20% off all mattress orders)

    Wealthfront high-yield cash account: https://Wealthfront.com/Tim (Start earning 4.50% APY on your short-term cash until you’re ready to invest. And when new clients open an account today, you can get an extra fifty-dollar bonus with a deposit of five hundred dollars or more.) Terms apply. Tim Ferriss receives cash compensation from Wealthfront Brokerage, LLC for advertising and holds a non-controlling equity interest in the corporate parent of Wealthfront Brokerage. See full disclosures here.

    *

    For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.

    For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Showplease visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsors

    Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.

    For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.

    Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.

    Follow Tim:

    Twittertwitter.com/tferriss 

    Instagraminstagram.com/timferriss

    YouTubeyoutube.com/timferriss

    Facebookfacebook.com/timferriss 

    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferriss

    Past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry SeinfeldHugh JackmanDr. Jane GoodallLeBron JamesKevin HartDoris Kearns GoodwinJamie FoxxMatthew McConaugheyEsther PerelElizabeth GilbertTerry CrewsSiaYuval Noah HarariMalcolm GladwellMadeleine AlbrightCheryl StrayedJim CollinsMary Karr, Maria PopovaSam HarrisMichael PhelpsBob IgerEdward NortonArnold SchwarzeneggerNeil StraussKen BurnsMaria SharapovaMarc AndreessenNeil GaimanNeil de Grasse TysonJocko WillinkDaniel EkKelly SlaterDr. Peter AttiaSeth GodinHoward MarksDr. Brené BrownEric SchmidtMichael LewisJoe GebbiaMichael PollanDr. Jordan PetersonVince VaughnBrian KoppelmanRamit SethiDax ShepardTony RobbinsJim DethmerDan HarrisRay DalioNaval RavikantVitalik ButerinElizabeth LesserAmanda PalmerKatie HaunSir Richard BransonChuck PalahniukArianna HuffingtonReid HoffmanBill BurrWhitney CummingsRick RubinDr. Vivek MurthyDarren AronofskyMargaret AtwoodMark ZuckerbergPeter ThielDr. Gabor MatéAnne LamottSarah SilvermanDr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

  • #773: Andrew Roberts on The Habits of Churchill, Lessons from Napoleon, and The Holy Fire Inside Great Leaders

    AI transcript
    0:00:04 Hello, boys and girls, ladies and germs. This is Tim Ferriss. Welcome to another episode of
    0:00:10 the Tim Ferriss Show, where it is my job to deconstruct world-class performers or deconstruct
    0:00:15 those who deconstruct world-class performers. In the case of today’s guest, who is Andrew Roberts.
    0:00:21 Andrew Roberts has written 20 books, which have been translated into 28 languages and have won
    0:00:27 13 literary prizes. These include Masters and Commanders, The Storm of War, a new history
    0:00:33 of the Second World War, Napoleon, A Life, Churchill, Walking with Destiny, George III,
    0:00:39 The Life and Rain of Britain’s Most Misunderstood Monarch, and most recently Conflict, The Evolution
    0:00:46 of Warfare from 1945 to Gaza, which he co-authored with General David Petraeus. Lord Roberts is a
    0:00:51 Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature and the Royal Historical Society, the Bonnie and Tom
    0:00:56 McCloskey Distinguished Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford, and a visiting professor
    0:01:02 at the Department of War Studies at King’s College London. He is also a member of the House
    0:01:09 of Lords. You can find all things Andrew at andrew-roberts.net online, and he is also on X,
    0:01:16 the artist formerly known as Twitter, at x.com/aroberts_andrew. And we’re going to get to the interview,
    0:01:21 but quickly, before that, just a few words about our sponsors who make this show possible.
    0:01:27 In the last handful of years, I’ve become very interested in environmental toxins, avoiding
    0:01:34 microplastics, and many other commonly found compounds all over the place. One place I looked
    0:01:40 is in the kitchen. Many people don’t realize just how toxic their cookware is or can be. A lot of
    0:01:46 nonstick pans, practically all of them, can release harmful forever chemicals, PFAS, in other
    0:01:52 words, spelled P-F-A-S, into your food, your home, and then, ultimately, that ends up in your body.
    0:01:57 Teflon is a prime example of this. It is still the forever chemical that most companies are using.
    0:02:03 So our place reached out to me as a potential sponsor, and the first thing I did was look at
    0:02:11 the reviews of their products and said, “Send me one,” and that is the Titanium Always Pan Pro.
    0:02:16 And the claim is that it’s the first nonstick pan with zero coating. So that means zero forever
    0:02:21 chemicals and durability that will last forever. I was very skeptical. I was very busy. So I said,
    0:02:26 “You know what? I want to test this thing quickly. It’s supposed to be nonstick. It’s supposed to
    0:02:30 be durable. I’m going to test it with two things. I’m going to test it with scrambled eggs in the
    0:02:36 morning because eggs are always a disaster in anything that isn’t nonstick with the toxic
    0:02:40 coating. And then I’m going to test it with a steak sear because I want to see how much it
    0:02:49 retains heat.” And it worked perfectly in both cases. And I was frankly astonished how well
    0:02:55 it worked. The Titanium Always Pan Pro has become my go-to pan in the kitchen. It replaces a lot of
    0:03:01 other things for searing, for eggs, for anything you can imagine. And the design is really clever.
    0:03:07 It does combine the best qualities of stainless steel, cast iron, and nonstick into one product.
    0:03:11 It’s tough enough to withstand the dishwasher, open flame, heavy-duty scrubbing. You can scrub the
    0:03:17 hell out of it. You can use metal utensils, which is great, without losing any of its nonstick properties.
    0:03:20 So stop cooking with toxic pans. If they’re nonstick and you don’t know,
    0:03:25 they probably contain something bad. Check out the Titanium Always Pan Pro. While you’re at it,
    0:03:29 you can look at their other high-performance offerings that are toxin-free, like the wonder
    0:03:34 of an air fryer, their griddle pan, and their Precision Engineer German steel knives.
    0:03:41 So go to fromourplace.com/tim and use my code TIM to get 10% off of the Titanium Always Pan Pro
    0:03:47 or anything else on the site. You can check out anything. More time, that’s fromourplace.com spelled
    0:03:56 out F-R-O-M-O-U-R. Fromourplace.com/tim and use code TIM at checkout for 10% off of everything
    0:04:01 on the site. Our place also offers a 100-day trial with free shipping and returns. So take a look.
    0:04:06 This episode is brought to you by Shopify. Shopify is the all-in-one
    0:04:11 commerce platform that powers millions of businesses worldwide, including me, including mine.
    0:04:15 What business you might ask? Well, one way I’ve scratched my own itch is by creating
    0:04:21 Cockpunch Coffee. It’s a long story. All proceeds on my end go to my foundation,
    0:04:25 SciSafe Foundation to fund research for mental health, etc. Anyway, Cockpunch Coffee. It’s
    0:04:29 delicious. The first coffee I’ve ever produced myself, I drink it every morning. Check it out.
    0:04:35 We use Shopify for the online storefront and my team raves about how simple and easy it is to use.
    0:04:39 It has everything we need and nothing we don’t. Whether you’re a garage entrepreneur or
    0:04:43 getting ready for your IPO, Shopify is the only tool you need to start,
    0:04:48 run and grow your business without the struggle. Shopify puts you in control of every sales channel.
    0:04:53 Doesn’t matter if you’re selling satin sheets from Shopify’s in-person POS system
    0:04:57 or offering organic olive oil on Shopify’s all-in-one e-commerce platform. However,
    0:05:01 you interact with your customers, you’re covered. Once you’ve reached your audience,
    0:05:06 Shopify has the internet’s best converting checkout to help you turn browsers into buyers.
    0:05:12 Shopify powers 10% of all e-commerce in the United States. Shopify is truly a global force as the
    0:05:17 e-commerce solution behind Allbirds, Rothy’s, Brooklyn and millions of other entrepreneurs
    0:05:23 of every size across more than 170 countries. Plus, Shopify’s award-winning help is there
    0:05:29 to support your success every step of the way if you have questions. This is possibility powered by
    0:05:35 Shopify. So check it out. Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at Shopify. That’s S-H-O-P-I-F-Y
    0:05:42 Shopify.com/Tim. Go to Shopify.com/Tim to take your business to the next level today.
    0:05:46 One more time, all lowercase Shopify.com/Tim.
    0:05:52 “At this altitude, I can run flat out for a half mile before my hands start shaking.”
    0:05:56 “Can I answer your personal question?” “No, I would have seen it in a bloodbath time.”
    0:06:02 “I’m a cyber-nerdic organism living this year over a method of endoskeleton.”
    0:06:12 Pleasure to meet you. Thank you for taking the time.
    0:06:15 Thanks so much, Tim, for having me on this show.
    0:06:19 I thought we would start with Cranley after your A-levels.
    0:06:20 Did you now?
    0:06:23 What happened? What on earth happened?
    0:06:27 That’s the way we’re going to make friends and get on with each other.
    0:06:29 Roll up the sleeves and just get into it.
    0:06:32 You’re going to mention the reason that I was expelled from school. Or at least,
    0:06:34 I’m going to mention the reason because you don’t know.
    0:06:35 I don’t know the reason.
    0:06:41 Absolutely good. Okay. I don’t think I’m the first person ever as a young man to get drunk
    0:06:44 and climb up buildings. Absolutely not.
    0:06:45 Thank you. Time-honored tradition, I know.
    0:06:48 Hallelujah that I’m not the only person this happened to.
    0:06:55 But quite understandably, the school chucked me out before I fell off one of them and they’d
    0:06:59 got blamed. It led to actually one of my wife’s most brilliant witticism.
    0:07:04 She’s a very funny woman with my wife and she said, “Yes, and all Andrew’s done since in life
    0:07:11 is to get drunk and social climb.” That is clever.
    0:07:12 It’s not bad, is it?
    0:07:14 All right. We might come back to that.
    0:07:18 It seems like also, maybe it’s hard for me to tell given the British school system,
    0:07:22 although I did go to St. Paul’s in New Hampshire where they do have the third,
    0:07:25 fourth, fifth, sixth form and so on. So that much, I know.
    0:07:29 But I think in the same piece where I found the crannily bit in doing the research,
    0:07:36 also found note that you’re approached as a possible candidate for MI6 a bit later on.
    0:07:38 No, that was when I was at Cambridge.
    0:07:38 Cambridge.
    0:07:43 Yes, absolutely. That’s the right time to be approached for MI6 is because Cambridge and MI6
    0:07:50 have had a long and fairly disastrous career, needless to say. All of the worst spies in the
    0:07:57 1930s, traitors of the 1930s, went to Cambridge. But yeah, it was a fascinating thing. I was
    0:08:02 just going down from university and somebody in my college, one of the dons there who’s still there
    0:08:07 actually, I don’t think of it, approached me and said, “How about it? Would you be interested in
    0:08:13 becoming a spy?” And so automatically, needless to say, you just think of yourself as James Bond
    0:08:17 immediately. That sort of dun-dun-dun-dun-dun-dun-dun-dun-dun-dun.
    0:08:18 The soundtrack kicks off.
    0:08:21 And the soundtrack in the back of your brain, you’re automatically there with your barretto
    0:08:27 and the beautiful women and all of that kind of thing. But I then had to actually do the process
    0:08:33 of where you need to join, which I did get through. And it was completely hilarious. I mean, it was,
    0:08:38 you couldn’t satirise it, basically. They asked you things like there were hundreds of questions
    0:08:42 and you had to answer them very, very quickly. And some of them were things you’d expect like,
    0:08:47 you know, what are the five longest rivers in the world kind of thing? Put them in order and all
    0:08:54 that. There were also things like place in order of social precedent, Prince Duke, Viscount,
    0:08:56 Marquis, Baronet.
    0:08:57 Oh, I’m out.
    0:08:58 Well, exactly.
    0:09:00 I would have thrown in Cookie Monster.
    0:09:00 I wouldn’t have gotten anywhere.
    0:09:05 You’re American. You’re allowed to. They’re not going to ask that in the CIA. But for some reason,
    0:09:11 in MI6 back, this was, I hasten to add, back in the sort of mid-1980s. That was one of the questions.
    0:09:17 What did the Don think made you a potential candidate?
    0:09:23 Well, that also was a little bit annoying, really, because he told me later about how he had been
    0:09:30 interviewed by MI6. And one of the things that he’d been asked is, “Is Andrew a kind person?”
    0:09:35 And this person said, “No, not really.” And he saw the person interviewing him
    0:09:38 put a tick in the margin next to the question.
    0:09:41 Wonder if that made you more or less desirable?
    0:09:43 Much more desirable, as far as they were concerned.
    0:09:51 I can answer that. Well, James Bond, you’re not a kind person, is he, really?
    0:09:56 No, no, no. We view them as disposable pleasures. Well, perhaps.
    0:10:02 So let’s see if we can take off the initial layers of the onion with respect to history.
    0:10:05 Christopher Perry. Mr. Christopher Perry. Who’s that?
    0:10:09 He was my first history teacher when I was at prep school.
    0:10:13 Which in the English version means when you’re sort of 10 to 13.
    0:10:19 He’s dead now, but he was a inspirational history master. He taught history in the way that I
    0:10:25 think it should be taught in a narrative way of explaining really, you know, what happened next
    0:10:30 and why. He believed in the great events, the great sort of wars and battles and things like that.
    0:10:36 And he was a kind man. He wouldn’t have made it into MI6.
    0:10:41 That he was a sort of old school history master of the best possible kind.
    0:10:48 What characterized that? You said narrative, but maybe would you be able to contrast the status
    0:10:53 quo as it goes in terms of teaching history and then how his style most differed from that?
    0:10:58 He taught it as the most exciting story you’re ever going to hear,
    0:11:03 basically, which has the extraordinary added advantage of being completely true.
    0:11:10 He sort of sit cross-legged on the table and give you the voice of Charles I and then the voice of
    0:11:15 Oliver Cromwell, you know, Elizabeth I and Mary Queen of Scots. He would entrance you
    0:11:21 with the excitement of the unfolding story. Every word of which would be true.
    0:11:26 It would have loads of dates in it. At the end of the term, each of the terms, the semester,
    0:11:33 you’d be tested on 300 dates and not a child in that class didn’t get at least 298 of them right.
    0:11:37 Extraordinary way of teaching. He did it entirely through inspiration,
    0:11:41 rather than through just sort of standing there on the blackboard, ordering people to
    0:11:47 remember what happened in 1356 or 1415. Did he have any theatre background?
    0:11:49 You’d have thought. You would have thought.
    0:11:53 Just sitting cross-legged on the desk is going to get a requisite
    0:11:56 minimal amount of attention from the students, which is brilliant.
    0:12:02 Automatically, of course, exactly. No, I mean, now I come to think of it, of course,
    0:12:08 he was overacting from day one, but he didn’t seem to be at the time, at least as far as the
    0:12:14 10-year-old Andrew Roberts was concerned. We have a sort of rental library behind us
    0:12:18 in this room that I’ve rented. And one of the books sitting over there, The Power Broker,
    0:12:23 does an amazing job of end-of-chapter cliffhangers. That’s, I think, Robert Carrow over there.
    0:12:28 And he managed to make Urban Development, essentially that book’s about Urban Development,
    0:12:32 isn’t it? And he managed to make that interesting. But you’ve got a few other ones. You’ve got a
    0:12:38 great friend of mine there, Neil Ferguson, writing about his book Colossus. You’ve got
    0:12:44 some pretty interesting people, a few people that I’ve met. And yeah, so you might have rented it,
    0:12:50 but it’s a pretty good bunch of books. It worked out. And it’s also quite surreal that
    0:12:55 Neil has featured here since he is, I’d say, partially responsible for his meeting in the
    0:12:58 first place. Yeah, he told me definitely to go on your show. He said, “Lays of people, watch it,
    0:13:02 and you’ve got a good sense of humor.” We’ll see. We’ll see about the sense of humor.
    0:13:04 We’ll see later. Yeah, the jury is out. The jury is out.
    0:13:11 I found in writing history, and I’m paraphrasing here, but I believe you’ve said before that
    0:13:20 you’re cautious around the words, perhaps maybe possibly, especially probably, could you explain
    0:13:24 why? Don’t use them. Don’t use them. They’re cheat words. What they’re saying to the reader is,
    0:13:29 “I haven’t worked hard enough on this. I don’t know. I’m going to just come up with some kind of
    0:13:34 theory here. Bear with me.” You shouldn’t do that. If the person’s paid $40 for your book,
    0:13:37 he or she is going to want to think you know what you’re talking about.
    0:13:46 So if something is a great story, and you’re not sure it’s true, but nonetheless, it’s funny,
    0:13:50 or it shines a light onto personality, or for some reason, there’s a great reason
    0:13:56 why you need to put it in the book. There are loads of ways that you can hint to the reader.
    0:14:02 You can say, “It is said that,” or, “The story is told that,” or, “Anecdotally,
    0:14:08 people stated that,” and that’s the signal to the reader. This is probably not true at all.
    0:14:11 Someone’s hedging the bet. Yeah, but it’s too good to leave out.
    0:14:17 But perhaps probably a maybe and so on. There you really are hedging your bets.
    0:14:20 And I think it breaks the bond of trust that you need to have with your reader.
    0:14:28 Would you mind speaking to the importance of steady nerves or self-control in crisis? It seems
    0:14:36 that that’s something that recurs. And the reason I’m asking about it is, this would be, I suppose,
    0:14:41 a sub-question. How much of it do you think is nature versus nurture also? But feel free to take
    0:14:48 that in any direction you like. Both Napoleon and Churchill were educated in war.
    0:14:54 You know, they both went to military colleges. So as their level of command grew, as they grew
    0:14:59 older, the sense of responsibilities they had, the number of men, essentially, that they were
    0:15:06 controlling increased exponentially. So they had the intellectual background.
    0:15:13 They had the training as well. And as young men in both cases, they thought a lot about war,
    0:15:20 about Julius Caesar and Alexander the Great and so on. They had a egotism to look at it in the
    0:15:26 negative way, but a self-confidence to look at it in a positive way that gave them the ability to
    0:15:33 take these shatteringly important decisions. So I think it’s much more nurture than the nature.
    0:15:39 And, you know, in both cases, as far as they were concerned, there was a sort of holy fire
    0:15:43 that they both had. There was a, not only in a religious sense, obviously, because neither of
    0:15:49 them were at all religious, but in a sort of deeper spiritual sense, a belief that what they were
    0:15:57 doing was so good and right and proper and had to be done that they were not kept up awake at night
    0:16:04 over even the death of friends. Death of friends that they were responsible for.
    0:16:08 They were responsible for. In the cases of Churchill and Napoleon, we could bring up other
    0:16:11 names, or I suppose when you’re doing the Royal Weir, you could bring up other names.
    0:16:18 Were there particular philosophers or writers that they found particularly instructive,
    0:16:23 who they leaned on in some sense, that they found solace in, were there particular minds?
    0:16:28 Well, certainly Churchill did because he was a huge reader. He was a massive
    0:16:33 autodidact. He never went to university. And so, therefore, when he was a young
    0:16:40 Subbleton in India in his early twenties, he sat down and read the great philosophers as well as
    0:16:49 writers. And he was particularly influenced by Gibbon and Macaulay, the two great 19th century
    0:16:55 historians, English historians, and that affected his writing style and, of course, later his
    0:17:01 oratorical style, but also his outlook on life, philosophical outlook on life.
    0:17:06 With regard to Napoleon, he was even more literary, really, because he also wrote short stories and
    0:17:15 books and so on. And so, he was very much affected by what he read again as a young man.
    0:17:22 And in both cases, it’s slightly, they were reading so much that it’s slightly cut them off
    0:17:30 from their contemporaries. And Napoleon didn’t have many friends when he was in his early twenties.
    0:17:37 And Churchill, when the other people were off sleeping in the midday heat of India,
    0:17:43 his colleagues and comrades, he’d be sitting there reading Chopin and Gibbon and Macaulay and so on.
    0:17:47 How did Gibbon and Macaulay inform his philosophical leanings?
    0:17:54 They made him into what was called, at the time, a wig. We don’t have them today,
    0:18:00 obviously, but they were, in modern sense, I suppose, liberal conservatives who believed in
    0:18:03 noblesse oblige in the importance. What is that? I’m sorry.
    0:18:10 Noblesse oblige. It’s almost a medieval concept where your duty, if you have privilege,
    0:18:17 is to work for the great good of the community to protect widows and orphans. It’s sort of like
    0:18:24 the nightly chivalric concept that you get from the Middle Ages. And they very much believed in
    0:18:29 that. And so did Churchill. Let me ask about Napoleon. So I know shockingly little about
    0:18:33 Napoleon. I’m embarrassed to admit, and I do want to ask more about Churchill as well. But
    0:18:38 you’ve described him as the prime exemplar of war leadership. Why do you say that?
    0:18:45 There are lots of military leaders who can do a lot of things, but he was the only one that I
    0:18:50 can think of who could do all of them. Of course, it helps if you’re winning. In the last three years
    0:18:58 of his military career, he was losing. But even then, even when he had far fewer troops, when he
    0:19:04 was retreating, when he was defending Paris in the 1814 campaign, for example, he was still able
    0:19:10 to win five victories in seven days. In the 1814 campaign, that’s two years after the retreat from
    0:19:17 Moscow. It’s quite extraordinary capacity. And he was able to win whether he was advancing or
    0:19:22 retreating, whether he was defending a town or attacking it, whether he was attacking on the
    0:19:28 right or left flank or sometimes straight through the center, as at Austerlitz. He had that capacity,
    0:19:35 that mind for military conquest, but also, of course, the greatness that was required
    0:19:41 completely to revolutionize French society. People think that the French Revolution revolutionized
    0:19:47 society. The clues in the name, as it were. But in fact, the long lasting things that actually
    0:19:55 dragged France into the 19th century were things like the Code Napoleon, which were not a revolutionary
    0:20:01 concept. They were a Napoleonic concept. This may seem like a lazy question, but since I’m
    0:20:07 operating from a deficit here with respect to knowledge of Napoleon, what do you think it was
    0:20:13 that allowed him to be a decathlete of war, as it were, being good at all of these different facets?
    0:20:19 And I think of how we might analyze different athletes and what allows them to exercise the
    0:20:24 capabilities we see, sort of breaking it down into its component parts. But how would you describe
    0:20:27 what enabled him to do that where others were unable?
    0:20:34 It was inspiration, but also perspiration. He really did put in the time, thinking about it
    0:20:41 and reading about it by it, I mean warfare. And of course, he’d been educated in it.
    0:20:49 He read the key books. There’s a guy called the Comte de Giver, who in 1772 wrote a book about
    0:20:58 strategy and tactics. And he, 30 years later, put these into operation. And so he was able to spot
    0:21:04 the sort of best of the best when it came to a modern thinking and to, or in this case, 30 year
    0:21:09 old thinking, in fact, that didn’t matter because the weapons of war hadn’t changed in the intervening
    0:21:18 period. And he was able to put those thoughts and ideas into practical use, the classic example
    0:21:21 being the core system. And when he- What was it called?
    0:21:32 It’s called the core system. It’s basically CORPS. And what he did with them was to create
    0:21:38 mini armies, essentially, which were able to march separately, but converge and concentrate
    0:21:44 for the battle. And so one of your core would engage the enemy, and then he would use the other
    0:21:50 cores to outmaneuver and envelop the enemy, sometimes double envelop the enemy. It was a
    0:21:56 brilliant concept. And actually, the allies didn’t start beating Napoleon until they had also adopted
    0:22:03 the core system. He was always at the cutting edge of thinking of the new concepts. And at the same
    0:22:12 time, he had very old fashioned views about how to excite the men. And he, I mean, victory, obviously,
    0:22:18 is the best thing when it comes to excite the men. Exactly. Nothing much works better than that.
    0:22:23 But as I say, he was still winning at the end of his career. But he had this belief that
    0:22:31 to appeal to the soul was the way to electrify the men. And so he was able to do that. And some
    0:22:35 people who he was against, Duke of Wellington, the British general, being the classic example,
    0:22:40 who won the Battle of Waterloo against him, it wasn’t interesting electrifying the soul of the
    0:22:46 men at all. He despised his ordinary soldiers. But nonetheless, you’re talking about Wellington?
    0:22:53 Duke of Wellington, he had some sort of choice negative remarks about his own soldiers. And he
    0:23:00 was a rather sort of stuffy aristocrat. But they loved him because he cared about how many of them
    0:23:06 died in battle. And he never lost the battle as well, which is a very useful thing in a commander
    0:23:12 needless to say. But he didn’t try. He didn’t go out. He would think it beneath him to go out and
    0:23:19 try to inspire the men. Whereas Napoleon, his choice of hats and his great coats and his way
    0:23:25 of taking off medals, his own medals and giving them to soldiers on the battlefield and his orders
    0:23:32 of the day, his proclamations before the Battle of the Pyramids in 1799, he said, 40 centuries look
    0:23:36 down upon you. And this is an extraordinary thing for a soldier, you know, in Egypt far away from
    0:23:43 home. He looks up at the pyramids and thinks, yeah, he’s placing the events of that day in the long
    0:23:49 historical parabola. And Churchill did that too, by the way, of course, to a great degree. In about
    0:23:56 10% of all of the speeches that Churchill gave in 1940, there’s some reference to history all the
    0:24:03 past. He too would summon up the idea that yes, Britain is on its own, Britain and the British
    0:24:07 Commonwealth are on their own. And this of course was in the period before America and Russia were
    0:24:13 in the war. But we’ve been in terrible straits before. Look at Sir Francis Drake, look at Admiral
    0:24:19 Nelson, and so on. And we came through those and won. He also brought up the First World War a lot.
    0:24:26 So yes, he too drew on history. And people knew that because he’d written history books and written
    0:24:31 biographies, including the biography of his great ancestor, the First Duke of Marlborough,
    0:24:36 he was with Wellington, the best soldier that Britain ever produced. People trusted his view
    0:24:42 of history. So instead of biographies, I’d like to ask about autobiography. It’s my impression
    0:24:48 that you recommend that young people read my early life. And that there are life lessons contained
    0:24:55 within it that perhaps might help young people. What types of good advice or life lessons
    0:25:00 can people expect to find in that book? Or does anything stand out to you?
    0:25:06 Oh, yes. Well, loads of them. I mean, resilience is the classic one. Although he doesn’t go in
    0:25:13 this book into criticising his parents, even between the lines, Churchill was tremendously
    0:25:19 resilient because his father despised him and his mother ignored him, essentially. But in the actual
    0:25:25 book itself, he talks about how wonderful it is to be young, 20 to 25, those are the years,
    0:25:30 he says people will forgive you for mistakes you make in that period. It’s not until you’re 30
    0:25:35 that people judge you on what you’ve achieved rather than your promise and so on. So it’s a,
    0:25:40 he writes about his time, his escape from prison, for example, which, let’s face it,
    0:25:46 there is no young man or woman who hasn’t at some stage dreamt about the idea of a successful
    0:25:51 prison escape. He took part in the last Great Cavalry Charge of the British Empire. And so he
    0:25:58 writes about what it’s like to charge in with Lancers in, he himself had a pistol in a Great
    0:26:04 Cavalry Charge. You know, these are, it’s just the most exciting book. And it draws you along
    0:26:11 with life lessons that are very good, I think, even for today at a time when you’re, frankly,
    0:26:14 unlikely to have to escape from prison or take part in a Cavalry Charge.
    0:26:19 Or it’ll just be very unsuccessful at attempting to escape prison.
    0:26:26 Modern lockdown. I can’t let this go. It’s sticking in my mind, the core strategy,
    0:26:30 I’m not sure strategy is the right modifier for that, but that Napoleon used, it seems like that
    0:26:37 was waiting to be used. But it took him to be in the position, of course, of Emperor France,
    0:26:42 whereby he could impose it. But equally, there are other things like the Code Napoleon that
    0:26:48 were not really waiting to be used. He had to sort of work them up into a body of laws that
    0:26:54 are completely revolutionized at France. Now, when he took the writing from 30 years prior
    0:27:01 and applied it, is it the position that enabled him to do it? Or did he think about risk differently
    0:27:05 than other people? And that is part of what allowed him to implement it.
    0:27:13 He’d taken huge risks. He was 26 years old. And according to the Churchill view of life,
    0:27:17 you can take risks when you’re 26 years old because people will forgive you. Actually,
    0:27:22 the French Revolution, government would not have forgiven Napoleon if he’d lost the army of Italy
    0:27:30 in 1796. But nonetheless, he was a huge risk taker. He would attack when normal generals would have
    0:27:35 fallen back. He was very lucky in that he was fighting, he was 26, he was fighting generals
    0:27:43 who were Austrian generals who were in their 70s. He used to hit the hinge of enemy forces. If you
    0:27:49 have in an Austrian Sardinian army, for example, he would hit the point between the Austrians and
    0:27:55 the Sardinians, pushing them both back along their own supply lines and so on. He used psychology,
    0:28:01 a great deal trying to get into the minds of the generals he was opposed to. He was a great
    0:28:07 chooser of lieutenants, of divisional commanders and people who he felt he could trust. Superb sense
    0:28:14 of timing as well in a battle. He was, as I say, the sort of exemplar of so many of the
    0:28:20 leadership tropes. Do you think he would have viewed his decisions from the outside that look
    0:28:27 risky as risky? If someone takes uncalculated risks over and over again, then you could call
    0:28:33 them reckless. But at least to face value, that’s not maybe the adjective I would use.
    0:28:38 They came off. This is the thing. In the Italian campaign, this first great campaign of his,
    0:28:48 he hardly lost a battle. He fought 20 and 119 of them. If you do that, even though you have taken
    0:28:53 risks, it’s a sort of force multiplier in a sense. You wind up thinking that they aren’t as risky.
    0:28:58 He did believe in luck, which was very important. He famously said that he wanted his marshals to
    0:29:04 be lucky. He would promote people if he thought they were lucky. That, of course, runs against
    0:29:11 everything that we 21st century rationalists can possibly believe in, but it worked for him.
    0:29:19 Yeah, it seems to have worked. Until it doesn’t. Until it doesn’t promote the unlucky guy.
    0:29:26 The decision in 1812 to march on Moscow was hugely risky and, of course, it didn’t pay off.
    0:29:29 Is it true that you have a signed letter from Albus Huxley?
    0:29:32 I do. All right. Now, Albus Huxley, I believe.
    0:29:34 Oh, so sweet English. Albus.
    0:29:40 You know, I’ve realized the longer I spend in England, I really need to, I think I should take
    0:29:45 TOEFL classes. Test of English is a foreign language. Need to brush up on the mother tongue,
    0:29:51 as it were. He died if I’m not wrong the year you were born. I think it was.
    0:29:54 Why do you have that letter? And what does the letter say?
    0:30:01 The letter actually was written from Los Angeles, where he was living in the 1950s. It was in 1959.
    0:30:06 Somebody just wrote to him asking for his autograph. Obviously, he also asked,
    0:30:10 “I don’t have the letter from the autograph hunter.” But he obviously asked for some
    0:30:18 sort of deep, meaningful thought. And the deep, meaningful thought that Huxley gave him.
    0:30:23 And I’m a huge admirer of Huxley, Eilish and Gaza, and obviously Brave New Worlds,
    0:30:28 and so on, wonderful works. And he said in this letter that men do not learn
    0:30:34 much from the lessons of history is one of the most important of all the lessons that history
    0:30:40 has to teach us. And that is so true, isn’t it? I mean, there’s not a book that I’ve written.
    0:30:43 I’ve written 20 books. There’s not a book that I’ve written when I haven’t looked
    0:30:49 across that frame letter in my study and thought, “Wow, that is just so perceptive.”
    0:30:55 So, I have a question about the subtitle of your biography on Churchill, which you believe
    0:31:00 is “Walking With Destiny.” You mentioned this holy fire, I think, is the term you used earlier.
    0:31:07 But do many of the leaders you’ve studied have this belief, and I may not be wording
    0:31:11 this the best way, but of being chosen by destiny in some fashion?
    0:31:21 The phrase comes from his remark in the last chapter of the last few pages of his war memoirs,
    0:31:24 the first volume of his war memoirs, “The Gathering Storm,” wonderful book.
    0:31:30 And he’s referring to the day that he became Prime Minister, the day he was appointed by
    0:31:35 the King as Prime Minister, which happened to be coincidentally, as it turned out, because Hitler
    0:31:40 didn’t know he was going to become Prime Minister, on the same day that Hitler invaded in the West,
    0:31:45 invaded Belgium and Luxembourg and Holland shortly afterwards, of course, to invade France.
    0:31:50 And he said, “I felt as if I were walking with destiny and that all my past life had been
    0:31:58 but a preparation for this hour and for this trial.” And he had a profound sense of personal
    0:32:04 destiny. Now, you and I might think as 21st-century rationalists that this is a bit sort of mad
    0:32:11 to think that you’re preordained to save, in this case, Britain and civilization. If you
    0:32:16 said that to me, that that was your belief about yourself, I would think that you were clinically
    0:32:23 insane. But enough things had happened to Churchill in his life. He had had so many close brushes
    0:32:29 with death that it’s not insane to think that. But it’s not by any means just… And Napoleon
    0:32:35 also felt that he had a star to guide him. And he had the luck that we spoke about earlier,
    0:32:42 but that luck, who was a woman in his case, was somebody he needed to woo and to try to seduce.
    0:32:49 And of course, in 1812, she turns her back on him and he speaks of her in that sense.
    0:32:55 Which is also a pretty insane way to look at life, isn’t it? But they were both, as I mentioned
    0:33:01 earlier, devotees of the ancients, of Caesar and Alexander the Great, both of whom also of course
    0:33:07 had this driving sense of personal destiny. And so it does exist in people.
    0:33:13 If you could, I’ll give you two options. Stand in, meaning take the place of one of the people you’ve
    0:33:20 studied in depth, or just simply witness them in a given moment or day or period in their lives.
    0:33:26 What might you choose? Well, first of all, I wouldn’t want to stand in their place at all.
    0:33:32 I know that I don’t have the intestinal fortitude of these extraordinary people,
    0:33:37 but it would be the day that I just mentioned. It would be the 10th of May, 1940, the day that
    0:33:43 Hitler’s invading the cabinet meets and recognizes that Neville Chamberlain is
    0:33:50 not the man to continue on the war now that it’s turned to the West. And the meetings that took
    0:33:57 place the previous day and that day, whereby Neville Chamberlain goes to the king and suggests
    0:34:02 Churchill. And the king wasn’t terribly excited about Churchill either because they’d fallen
    0:34:06 out over the abdication crisis and he thought Churchill was a bit of a loose cannon. But
    0:34:11 nonetheless, he’s willing to call Churchill. Churchill then goes to Buckingham Palace and
    0:34:17 becomes prime minister and comes back and starts to organize his government as the news is coming
    0:34:23 in of the German success and victories on the Western front. I mean, this is what a day,
    0:34:28 what a day in history that must have been. So if I could be a fly on the wall any day in history,
    0:34:35 that’s the day that I would choose. Can we just go back though to this concept of a sense of
    0:34:43 destiny because of course, it isn’t just great men as in good men, positive forces in history
    0:34:49 that has this. Adolf Hitler also had a sense of destiny when he was in providence and luck and
    0:34:55 being watched over by bigger forces and so on. When he survived his assassination attempt on the 20th
    0:35:02 of July 1944, when you remember Staufenberg moves the briefcase with a bomb in it to a point in the
    0:35:08 table that just shreds Hitler’s trousers when it goes off and doesn’t kill him. He also put it down
    0:35:14 to providence that he had been allowed to survive and therefore to stay in charge and the Fuhrer
    0:35:19 was going to save the Fatherland and the Reich. So it’s not something I don’t want your viewers
    0:35:25 and listeners to come away thinking that it’s a really good thing to think that you’re being
    0:35:30 watched over by a more powerful force who’s saving you to become the world-saving figure.
    0:35:38 You can cut a lot of different ways. I think of David Curesh and cult leaders and Jim Jones down
    0:35:43 in Ghana where he was. All of these fruits and crooks and corn men use it as well.
    0:35:50 Just a quick thanks to one of our sponsors and we’ll be right back to the show.
    0:35:55 This episode is brought to you by LinkedIn Jobs. When you’re hiring for your small business,
    0:36:00 you want to find quality professionals that are right for the role as soon as possible.
    0:36:04 That’s why you have to check out LinkedIn Jobs. LinkedIn Jobs has the tools to help find the
    0:36:10 right professionals for your team faster and for free. LinkedIn isn’t just a job board.
    0:36:14 LinkedIn helps you hire professionals you can’t find anywhere else,
    0:36:19 even those who aren’t actively searching for a new job but who might be open to the perfect role.
    0:36:24 In any given month, more than 70% of LinkedIn users don’t visit other job sites. So if you’re not
    0:36:31 looking on LinkedIn, if you’re not using LinkedIn, you are in the wrong place. More than 2.5 million
    0:36:36 small businesses use LinkedIn for hiring, with 86% getting a qualified candidate within 24 hours.
    0:36:41 LinkedIn knows that small business owners, leaders, execs are wearing so many hats,
    0:36:45 they’re stretched then. They might not have the time or resources to hire in any drawn out way.
    0:36:50 So LinkedIn is constantly finding ways to make the process easier. In fact, they just launched a
    0:36:56 feature that helps you write job descriptions, making the entire thing A to Z faster and much
    0:37:02 simpler. So hire professionals like a professional on LinkedIn. And now you can post your job for
    0:37:10 free at linkedin.com/tim. That’s linkedin.com/tim to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply.
    0:37:22 Are there any particular weaknesses or pathologies or failures that come to mind
    0:37:28 in, say, Churchill and Napoleon or others who helped to make them ultimately great in the
    0:37:32 ways that they were great? Oh, definitely. Definitely. The key thing is learning from mistakes,
    0:37:39 which not all politicians do, I need to scarcely point out. But Churchill certainly did. He made
    0:37:44 mistake after mistake. He got female suffrage wrong. The abdication crisis that I mentioned
    0:37:51 earlier, he joined the gold standard at the wrong time at the wrong level. The blackened hands in
    0:37:57 Ireland was a disaster. Primarily, of course, the Dardanelles crisis of 1915 to early 1916,
    0:38:04 where over 100,000 Allied troops were killed, wounded or captured. This was a series of mistakes.
    0:38:11 In every single one of them, he learned from those mistakes. How did he do that? Because
    0:38:15 there’s probably, I would think, maybe some method behind the madness. Maybe it’s just
    0:38:19 more self-awareness or reflection. But did he have a process for learning?
    0:38:25 He wasn’t hubristic. That was the key thing. I think it probably helps also, of course,
    0:38:31 to do is in the democratic system, unlike Napoleon or Hitler, whereby he was criticised
    0:38:35 the entire time in the House of Commons for all of those things, and he had to defend them,
    0:38:41 and therefore had to, in a logical and rational point. I mean, democracy worked very well at
    0:38:47 pricking the pomposity and hubris of people if it’s working properly. And Napoleon also learned
    0:38:53 from mistakes in his military career. And I don’t believe that the decision to march on Moscow itself
    0:39:01 was hubristic. I’m slightly aside from a lot of military historians about this. But just to
    0:39:08 explain, he’d beaten the Russians twice before. He had an army twice the size of the Russians.
    0:39:12 He knew perfectly well that the winter was going to come. He’d stayed too long in Moscow. But if
    0:39:18 he’d gone to Moscow and then come back again immediately, he would not have had the climactic
    0:39:24 disasters that overcame him with the blizzards in the October and November of 1812. And so
    0:39:31 you have this sense that, yes, it was a appalling strategic error, but it wasn’t done out of a
    0:39:37 drive because he thought he was a sort of demigod. That, I think, is a misunderstanding of his
    0:39:44 personality. So I’m going to ask something that Neil Ferguson of Colossus on the Shelf
    0:39:49 put in an email. I would ask Andrew about the diary he keeps, which is a source of intense
    0:39:54 anxiety. He’s obsessed with this. Okay, finish the rest of it. Which is a source of intense
    0:39:58 anxiety to all of his friends and even more to his enemies. Best wishes, Neil.
    0:40:05 Neil doesn’t care about any of that. He’s only cares about what I say about him. He is the friend
    0:40:13 who is obsessed with the diary. Yes, I keep a diary. For God’s sake, is it such a crime?
    0:40:21 We went on the skiing holiday this year and it’s all he talked about. He’s obsessed.
    0:40:25 Is it the forbidden fruit? What is the story here?
    0:40:30 I think he’s kicking himself that he didn’t keep on. You think of all these extraordinary
    0:40:37 people he meets. Every time I see him, he’s just been talking to President G or Bibi Netanyahu
    0:40:42 or President of America. And he doesn’t write down and keep it all in the diary. So I think
    0:40:49 there’s an element of envy going on here, frankly. But I find it very relaxing and calming
    0:40:56 to think that my life isn’t just going to be a complete waste of time.
    0:41:03 And one of the only ways that I can… I can see that. Thank you. Well, that’s kind of you. Thank you.
    0:41:11 One of the only ways that I can justify this concept that it’s all not just a sort of, you know,
    0:41:17 nihilistic sort of maelstrom. Boondoggle. Boondoggle, exactly. Is by writing books,
    0:41:22 obviously, which I hope will survive me, but also noting down what I’ve done in the day. But
    0:41:28 nihil is convinced that every time he says anything embarrassing or something, I’m going
    0:41:33 to be… You’re just loading the ammo into your diary. Exactly. And then when we’re sort of 80,
    0:41:42 he’s going to go to the bookshop, buy the diary, flick to Ferguson, Neil, and see sort of 40 entries,
    0:41:48 each of which is going to make his face go red at the following charges. Exactly. Which it’s not
    0:41:53 going to be like that at all. What he’s actually going to do is to immediately go to the diary and
    0:41:58 look up Ferguson, Neil. But see all the amusing, charming, intelligent remarks he’s made, the
    0:42:02 witchisms, you know, and all that kind of thing. And not just him, obviously, everybody I’ve ever
    0:42:09 met over the last 40 plus years. And how do you keep your diary? You’re on your metal now. You’re
    0:42:15 going to have to, I’m going to say, went on to be on best behavior. Exactly. What an idiot.
    0:42:22 Note to self, send chocolates to Andrew. Don’t forget his birthday.
    0:42:29 Now, there are many, many people who keep a diary. How do you keep your diary? Is it
    0:42:36 nightly exercise? Is it typed out as a pen, as a quill pen? You mustn’t do it nightly because,
    0:42:41 or at least you might be able to, but I drink. And so, I like drinking to it.
    0:42:46 Yeah. And so there’s nothing worse than trying to write. If you’ve been drinking also,
    0:42:51 writing down the witch-isms, sometimes there’s a bit of a problem, to the fact that I can’t
    0:42:56 read my writing that morning. But no, it has to be done pretty much the next morning. You can’t
    0:43:01 leave it for two weeks or so. Do you do it with what’s your frequency? I used to write it every
    0:43:06 day. I used to write it. Oh, no, but if nothing interesting has happened, then I won’t put anything
    0:43:14 down. Nothing to report. Yeah, no. It’s all like Louis XVI on the 14th of July, 1789,
    0:43:18 the day of the fall of the Bastille. All he writes is, “Rian, nothing.”
    0:43:25 So I hope I’m not going to be quite as moronic as that. It’s not really intended for publication,
    0:43:29 which is another thing that Neil doesn’t understand. He’s going to latch on to the really
    0:43:34 part of that sentence. He’s going to be like, “You see? You see?” Yeah. No, of course he is.
    0:43:38 But nonetheless, I do find it, well, you mentioned earlier about how many words I write. It’s never
    0:43:44 more than about 500 words maximum. And it picks the most interesting part of the day.
    0:43:49 And if somebody has said or done something interesting, I’ll stick it in.
    0:43:52 Do you do that before your book writing? Let’s say you’re on YouTube.
    0:43:54 Yes, first thing in the morning.
    0:43:57 All right. And is that just like pajama slippers and a cup of coffee or…?
    0:43:59 Yeah, so I see that. Yeah, all right, great. Exactly.
    0:44:07 And do you take…? This seems like such a ridiculous question, but how do you think about
    0:44:10 taking breaks when you’re writing? I mean, obviously, you might have a bathroom break or
    0:44:14 something like that. Do you build in breaks? Do you write the flow as long as you have it?
    0:44:16 What does it look like? The flow as long as you have it. Absolutely. Yeah,
    0:44:23 yeah, yeah. Because it might not come back if you deliberately have a break sometimes.
    0:44:30 And I’m slightly loath to admit this public, but unless sometimes, if you are really flowing,
    0:44:37 I can go without washing for three days. I can be in my dressing gown and slippers. My wife finds
    0:44:42 it extremely unhygienic and I’m not allowed to sleep in the same bed. But I will, if I’m running
    0:44:50 hard at a really difficult chapter and I need to keep my thoughts in order, I will not waste
    0:44:56 time doing anything. I’ll get some breakfast and so on, but that will just be a dash to the kitchen
    0:45:01 and back again. Because you’ve got to get… If something’s complicated, and there are lots of
    0:45:07 occasions, another classic as well, we go back to the 10th of May, 1940, that in my Churchill book,
    0:45:12 you have to get it right because every minute, not just every hour, every minute something is
    0:45:18 happening, they’re getting news from what the love father’s attacking and he’s then having to
    0:45:21 create his government. He then goes off to the House of Commons and so on.
    0:45:29 It’s just relentless. And unless you encapsulate in your mind successfully what is important
    0:45:34 about that day, you’ll never get it over to the reader. And if you’re constantly going off and
    0:45:38 going for a walk or going to the gym or showering or whatever, there’s a danger that you’re going
    0:45:45 to fall out of the rhythm of creativity. How do you think about that flow when you have the flow?
    0:45:49 I mean, there is… A hastened ride is never more than three days I’ve ever gone without a shower.
    0:45:54 I wouldn’t judge. I was just on a hiking trip. I went 10 days without showering,
    0:46:00 so I don’t judge. I won’t throw stones in my glasshouse. It’s only when I’m right in the book.
    0:46:06 I hastened to add that as well, God. I don’t want people to come up and show off their nose and go,
    0:46:12 “Hello, Andrew.” How do you think about that flow with writing? So there’s one reason not to interrupt
    0:46:19 the writing. If you have a hard task ahead of you and you have 47 balls in the air and if you drop
    0:46:23 them, you’re going to have to start the juggling process all over again. The boot up sequence
    0:46:32 takes a long time. How do you think about the flow of writing or that feeling that things are coming
    0:46:38 to you more easily or moving on to the page more easily? Sometimes it’s a very bad thing. Of course,
    0:46:44 Dr. Johnson did say when you have written your most brilliant purple paragraph,
    0:46:48 read it again and rip it up. Tell him more about that.
    0:46:52 Oh, yeah. Well, if you think that you’ve just written something completely brilliant,
    0:46:58 there’s a very good chance that it’s rubbish. It has to be somebody else. It has to be your
    0:47:04 publisher or some other person who can read it and have a completely objective eye,
    0:47:08 because there’s a very good chance that you’re hugging yourself with glee about something that
    0:47:12 actually you think sounds wonderful. But in fact, it’s complete. It’s complete.
    0:47:16 Be the name of my memoir, Hugging Yourself with Glee. I’ll write that down. Give you your
    0:47:22 customary 5%. That’s fine. If you had to choose, maybe you don’t want to choose from your darlings
    0:47:26 here, but if this question has an answer, you don’t even need to name them, but you keep a
    0:47:31 person in mind. If you had to choose one person to act as your proofreader for your work, to be
    0:47:36 that sanity check. He’s called Stuart Prophet. He’s the most brilliant publisher in London.
    0:47:41 He’s known by everybody to be the most brilliant. He’s also the most irritating,
    0:47:48 he, oh my God, for my Napoleon book. He’s going to listen to this, so I’m going to have to be as
    0:47:55 nice as possible. But he’s Professor Perfect is my nickname for it, because he’s a total professorial
    0:48:02 kind of figure. And for my Napoleon book, I remember a series of marginalia. And again,
    0:48:06 this is the thing where you think you’ve done something rather good. And he writes,
    0:48:10 well, one of the things he wrote in the moment, are you sure this joke is funny?
    0:48:16 Nothing more crushing than to have that. He also wrote…
    0:48:22 Strangely, he’s very British also. Exactly. Question mark, you know. And you read it again,
    0:48:30 you chortle to yourself, and you go, yes, it is funny. And you go, damn it. But he wrote,
    0:48:34 there were a whole series of them in the, well, we were talking earlier about the 1796 campaign
    0:48:41 of Napoleon. He said, how wide was the River Poe in 1796? There was another one, did Napoleon
    0:48:48 take Herodotus to Egypt? I don’t know, I’m going to have to find out, you know. He’s a genius,
    0:48:55 but also a very irritating person. Could you say more about what makes him so good?
    0:49:00 I’ll buy some time just by saying, if I can’t find a writer friend of mine, let’s just say,
    0:49:06 or an editor who can proofread my work, I’ll very often give, and I write a particular type of thing,
    0:49:11 but I would give my chapter, let’s just say, to a friend who’s a really good lawyer. And part
    0:49:17 of the reason for that is that they’re very good at trimming out excess. And if anything is ambiguous,
    0:49:22 they’re good. Or contradictory. Or contradictory. They’re very good at surgically excising that.
    0:49:26 What makes this particular gentleman, what was his name again, Stuart?
    0:49:32 Stuart Prophet. Great man. What makes Stuart so good at giving feedback?
    0:49:44 Does he see things differently? He’s a profoundly committed to history. He loves history. So he has
    0:49:50 a sort of higher purpose to try to flood the world with great history books, which is, as far as I’m
    0:49:53 concerned, the greatest purpose that you can have. I mean, he doesn’t get better than that.
    0:50:02 He has a very logical brain. He’s very good on syntax. So anything that doesn’t sound right
    0:50:09 in a sentence, he will point out. Sometimes to have sound right from a poetic perspective.
    0:50:16 If there’s a rhythm that isn’t right, or if something rhymes as well, sometimes you can
    0:50:21 use two words that have a rhyme in them, and he will cut that automatically because it just
    0:50:26 doesn’t feel right. Sit well with his sensibilities. Precisely. And mine, I hasten to add, because I very
    0:50:33 rarely actually disagree with him. I did on the joke, by the way. And whenever anybody tells me
    0:50:38 that that particular joke is funny, I forward it to him. I forward it to him. I ping the email
    0:50:46 straight on to Stuart. Of course I do. I’d be mad not to, wouldn’t I? But no, there’s a, I mean,
    0:50:50 and he’s been doing it for 40 years. And he’s at the top of his trade. So you would expect him to
    0:50:55 be really good, but boy is he. So those two examples you gave, the width of the river and
    0:51:03 Herodotus, why did he ask those two? Because he is always trying to put himself into the
    0:51:10 mind of the reader and wondering what the reader would be thinking. And he thought, rightly or
    0:51:14 wrongly in this case, that the reader would be interested in the width of the river and whether
    0:51:19 or not Herodotus went with him. But there are loads more examples like that. I will send him
    0:51:25 100 pages and he’ll send me back 100 pages of questions and criticisms and remarks. I almost
    0:51:30 sometimes think that I ought to put his name on the front cover of the book. He phoned me up,
    0:51:36 actually, about the Napoleon book. And the original of Napoleon just had a huge N on it
    0:51:42 and lots of Bs. And he phoned me up and he said, “I’ve got this idea for the front cover of the
    0:51:48 book. Your name isn’t going to be on it.” And he said, “And neither is Napoleon.” And I thought,
    0:51:54 over the phone, I thought, okay, he’s finally gone completely mad. Yeah, exactly. That’s right.
    0:51:58 Poor man. How long can he stay in his job if he’s going to come up with ideas?
    0:52:02 Hope he can fake it for a while. Yeah, exactly. But it can’t be long now.
    0:52:08 And it turned out to be a totally brilliant concept because if you see a gigantic N with Bs,
    0:52:13 you think of Napoleon. And that’s what… Bs as an absolute idiot.
    0:52:18 Bs, like honeybees. Honeybees, yeah. That was his symbol. It was a Napoleon symbol
    0:52:22 because they could sting but they could also give honey, you know, that was the idea.
    0:52:27 And it just captured people’s imagination and sold an awful lot of copies, which was really great.
    0:52:29 That’s sold half a million copies that book now. That’s incredible.
    0:52:33 That is incredible. Sounds like such a gift to have a steward. I need a steward.
    0:52:36 Yeah, everyone needs a steward. Everyone needs a steward. Don’t take mine.
    0:52:43 No, I don’t… I don’t… I think you might find… You might spend his entire
    0:52:47 first month on just the syntax errors in my first chapter.
    0:52:49 You do want to strangle him, by the way, because…
    0:52:52 This is the sign of a very good proofreader often.
    0:53:00 Why do you think it is that some historical figures take on these mythic proportions where
    0:53:08 some who have huge impacts seem to fall into obscurity over time? Are there particular characteristics?
    0:53:16 Is it self-made, in a sense, where people create that myth of themselves while they’re still alive?
    0:53:20 How do you think about that? I haven’t thought about that before. That’s a really good question.
    0:53:27 I think that it’s a bit like… There are some things that are very difficult to get over to people
    0:53:32 on the printed page. Charisma is one of them. Charm is another one. Sexy-ness.
    0:53:38 These are things that we all know from our own lives matter enormously. If somebody is charismatic,
    0:53:43 charming and sexy, you’re going to want to be interested in them, follow them much more than
    0:53:50 somebody who isn’t, and yet explaining how they are, any of those things, very famously hard to
    0:53:59 explain. I think the same is true with historical characters. How can it be that this unprepossessing,
    0:54:05 looking American president who happens to, with his strange beard but not moustache,
    0:54:12 who happens to be president at the time that the country is falling apart, manages to save
    0:54:16 the country through this terrible, see it through this terrible civil war and then is
    0:54:20 assassinated right at the end of the civil war? The story is so extraordinary, isn’t it?
    0:54:25 Yet to explain the Charisma and Charm, not sexiness, I don’t think, you know,
    0:54:30 Ram, Lincoln’s case, but many of your listeners or readers might disagree with me or none the
    0:54:38 less. Just imagining him popping up on a dating app. Which he swiped right to the left for Abe,
    0:54:43 Lincoln. Exactly. Might ride a fixed-gear bike, make expensive cappuccino. That’s kind of the
    0:54:51 hipster look. Anyway, I digress. It is difficult to explain how some people just grab the headlines
    0:54:57 and others don’t. I mean, of course, it does help to be a leader in a war. That’s true of Lincoln
    0:55:04 and Churchill and Napoleon and so on. The chance of coming a world historical figure if you are
    0:55:10 Prime Minister of Luxembourg in a time of peace is going to be much more difficult, of course.
    0:55:14 But, yeah, there doesn’t seem to be a hard and fast rule, does there?
    0:55:20 Hard and fast recipe. And I can follow. I’m just kidding. Well, don’t take us to war on the back
    0:55:26 if you’re wanting to be memorable. I don’t think I’m capable. Certainly not eager. Makes me think
    0:55:34 of, “What is the title of that poem? Ozymandias, Look Upon My Works in Despair.” I’ll leave that
    0:55:39 alone. I met a traveler from an antique land who said, “Two vast and chunkless legs of stone stand
    0:55:44 in the desert, and near them on the sand half shrunk and shattered visage lies, whose wrinkled
    0:55:50 lip and snare of coal command tells that its sculpture well those passions read, which yet
    0:55:56 survive. My name is Ozymandias. King of kings, look upon my works, almighty in despair. Nothing
    0:56:03 besides remains round that eternal wreck, long and bare, the lone and level sand stretch far away.”
    0:56:08 Hot damn. There you go, listeners. Can you point out to the listeners that
    0:56:13 you didn’t tell me that this was going to happen? I did not. I did not send a memo in advance.
    0:56:21 And I suppose the preface to that is that there are these ruins sticking out of the sands.
    0:56:26 They’re the feet. The feet, that’s right. The trunks of the legs. So there was obviously
    0:56:35 a huge, magnificent pyramid high, glorious statue to Ozymandias. And now there’s nothing.
    0:56:38 And it goes back to what I was saying earlier about not being remembered.
    0:56:43 Did you remember the… Now I’m going to, I feel like I’m cross examining, but asking too much.
    0:56:47 But who is the author of that poem? P.S. B. Shelly.
    0:56:55 I saw the one of, maybe the original, or certainly a first draft in Oxford,
    0:56:59 because I was going through a program at Wadham College and there’s an exhibit on right now,
    0:57:06 which is something like cut, paste, rewrite. And it shows the hand edited works of Mary Shelly,
    0:57:10 Frankenstein, and all these others. And I came across that.
    0:57:14 If anybody wants to see a first edition of Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein,
    0:57:21 it’s just gone on exhibition at the, I was there this morning, Lambeth Palace Library.
    0:57:27 There’s a thing called Her Book. It’s about early female writers. It’s a brilliant exhibition.
    0:57:33 And so if there’s anyone in London who’s interested in seeing that book, it’s there today.
    0:57:38 Beautiful. And if you’re near Oxford, Western Library has the exhibit that I was mentioning,
    0:57:43 a lot of gems, a lot of gems. You have some really fun old stuff in the UK, it turns out.
    0:57:48 I’m not going to take that personally. No, no, no, no. That’s a compliment.
    0:57:55 Yeah. Old in the US is like 1970, you know, it’s smaller. I thought you were talking about me.
    0:58:08 How do you think about legacy? Because I, along the lines of Anya the Ozymandias piece, I’m like,
    0:58:13 is it just sort of hubris to believe in the first place that that’s something worth aspiring to,
    0:58:18 having something last and stand the test of time? I mean, how do you personally think about this?
    0:58:20 Well, especially as someone who studies history.
    0:58:26 Yes. And I obviously do want people to read my books long after I’ve died.
    0:58:32 Now, I’m not going to know whether they are or not. So why on earth, it just seems so illogical to
    0:58:38 even think that, doesn’t it? That it should matter to me that anything happens the second
    0:58:46 after I’ve died. But I know that I do. And it is one of the drives for being a writer because words
    0:58:53 always live forever. And they’re virtually the only thing that does. Ozymandias’ statue
    0:58:57 is just two trunkless legs of stone. Whereas actually, his words, you know,
    0:59:02 look upon my works, he mighty in despair, that goes to the heart of the human condition.
    0:59:08 And Shelly’s poetry still survives in a way that Ozymandias’ statue doesn’t. So there is something
    0:59:16 about words that are immortal. And we’re all sort of grasping for immortality in one way or another.
    0:59:23 Oh, yeah. Same as true. Do you read fiction? Yes. Yes, I do. When I go on holiday, which is usually
    0:59:31 hiking, actually, with my wife, she loves going to places that involve mountains. And in order to
    0:59:38 get history completely out of my system for the two weeks or so that we’re hiking, I do read fiction.
    0:59:45 Sometimes if I want to completely clear my brain, I’ll have a detective novel. And I’ve chosen the
    0:59:50 most complicated of all of the detective novelists, a chap called Robert Goddard. Have you ever heard
    0:59:56 of Robert Goddard? I have not. So complicated to work out who done it or what groups of people
    1:00:04 done it. It’s very rarely just one person and why. And I try and make notes in the back of the book
    1:00:09 connecting each person to everybody else. And so by the end of it, it looks like one of those
    1:00:14 really complicated sort of management things. Oh, it’s like an order chart. Yeah, exactly. Exactly.
    1:00:20 With hundreds of people connecting to everybody else to try and work out who done it. And he
    1:00:27 always, always beats me. Yeah, that sounds fun. Yeah, I’ve been getting… But as far as sort of
    1:00:34 high culture writing is knowledge concerns, I will occasionally do that. I’m president of the
    1:00:40 Clifton Literary Festival. And so we have lots of novelists come to that. And so if you’ve got
    1:00:44 William Boyd or Salman Rushdie or somebody who you know you’re going to be bumping into at the
    1:00:49 festival, it’s always a good idea to read their latest novel. We had Robert Harris recently. And
    1:00:56 so that’s always well worth doing. And then there are a few writers like Michel Wellbeck who is
    1:01:01 just so great that you have to sort of read whatever he brings out.
    1:01:05 Is there… I don’t recognize the name. I’m embarrassed to say.
    1:01:11 He’s a French writer. It’s pronounced hella beck. And he’s a genius, a very controversial and
    1:01:17 quite unpopular in France. And the latest one I’m reading is where it features his own murder.
    1:01:23 It’s a great satire. It’s very, very funny.
    1:01:27 Is there a book you might suggest starting with or we’re going to start with one?
    1:01:33 The Map and the Territory. The Map and the Territory of Michel Wellbeck.
    1:01:40 The name starts H-E-L-L-E-B. And yeah, it’s a sort of satire on French
    1:01:44 intellectual customs and… I can see them loving that.
    1:01:45 It’s very funny. It’s very funny.
    1:01:47 Why is he controversial?
    1:01:49 Oh, because he’s been deeply politically incorrect as well.
    1:01:55 Oh, he just doesn’t care. He just doesn’t care what he writes.
    1:01:57 He’s a honey badger in that sense. Do you know what I mean?
    1:01:59 I do. I do. I do.
    1:02:02 He’s a literary honey badger as Wellbeck.
    1:02:07 Very honey badger. All right, so it’s being politically incorrect.
    1:02:14 How should we, in your mind, write about imperial history?
    1:02:21 We should try as far as possible to be genuinely objective.
    1:02:26 We shouldn’t take the assumption that all white people, whenever they went abroad,
    1:02:30 did so solely in order to rape, murder, massacre, and exploit.
    1:02:35 Because certainly in the latter parts, we were talking earlier about Winston Churchill
    1:02:41 and the Noblesse Ablige, the concept that it was part of your duty as a privileged person
    1:02:46 to try to make the world a better place for other less privileged people.
    1:02:51 And that was, especially in the last part of the British Empire,
    1:02:55 a driving force for a lot of people, especially, obviously, missionaries and Christians,
    1:03:02 but also other people, explorers and people who are involved in agriculture and so on.
    1:03:06 You know, they actually were not driven by rapacity and greed
    1:03:11 in the way that essentially the Marxist analysis of imperialism has made out.
    1:03:14 So be objective. Some of those people were like that.
    1:03:20 Undoubtedly, of course, they were, you know, especially some of the people in Southern Africa
    1:03:25 and elsewhere. But for a long period of the story of the British Empire,
    1:03:31 for much of that empire, it actually was a force for human good rather than evil.
    1:03:40 What do you see as the challenges moving forward for the capturing of history?
    1:03:44 And/or how do you see it changing as we move forward?
    1:03:50 I am quite worried about it in Britain because, first of all, fewer and fewer people seem to be
    1:03:54 taking it as a subject at a university level.
    1:03:57 Secondly, we have this thing, it’s nicknamed Henry to Hitler,
    1:04:03 where we jump from the Tudors to the Second World War, and we don’t do the very important
    1:04:09 intervening stages of the stewards, the Civil War, the Hanoverians, the loss of America,
    1:04:12 the really anything up to the outbreak of the First World War.
    1:04:18 And there’s so much of really important history in that period
    1:04:24 that we seem to jump from one to the next. There was a survey quite recently of British
    1:04:28 teenagers, quite a big survey, over a thousand of them. And 20% of them
    1:04:36 thought, like 23% of them, thought that the American War of Independence was won by Denzel
    1:04:40 Washington. You know, and the Americans get a bad round.
    1:04:42 Yeah, I know, I know, exactly.
    1:04:43 It’s not just us.
    1:04:48 And also, there were 20% of these kids, these are British school kids,
    1:04:52 who also thought that Winston Churchill was a fictional character.
    1:04:55 And that Sherlock Holmes and Eleanor Rigby were real people.
    1:05:02 So whatever’s going on in British history teaching, I think there’s still a lot to be desired.
    1:05:08 If you had never been able to write any books in that alternate reality,
    1:05:14 what have you personally, or what would you have gained personally from studying history?
    1:05:18 It’s a lot of things, isn’t it, history? It can be a bit of a quicksand.
    1:05:19 In what sense?
    1:05:27 Well, as soon as you think you understand a period, all it takes is one new set of
    1:05:34 papers or a new book written by somebody else, the friends especially, that can make you look
    1:05:40 again at the same period and completely change your mind about it. And that’s a little unnerving
    1:05:46 at the age of 61, I have to say. I’m just reading Ronald Hutton’s second volume of his life of
    1:05:53 Oliver Cromwell, which has just been published. And I’d always thought of Cromwell as somebody who
    1:06:02 had a set of principles that he moulded his times around in order to see through.
    1:06:08 And Ronald Hutton has completely exploded that thesis for me. And I realised that he was,
    1:06:14 like most politicians, just sort of grabbing the coattails of history and hanging on as much as he
    1:06:21 could. And yes, he was a good soldier and so on. But he was, in terms of his politics, he was
    1:06:25 constantly trying to create alliances, of course, like all politicians do,
    1:06:29 and when opportunities came, he grabbed them. But he was at the mercy of events much more than
    1:06:35 creating them. Whereas I had for years had the sort of image of Oliver Cromwell like that statue
    1:06:40 outside Parliament of this incredibly solid figure. He wasn’t like that at all.
    1:06:45 What are other things that attracted you to history?
    1:06:51 It wasn’t just Christopher Perry. My dad read history at Oxford. And he used to take me around
    1:06:57 castles. We go on holiday to Wales and see the great Edward the First Castles.
    1:07:03 And he would chat to on journeys we’d chat about history and what ifs, the counterfactuals and
    1:07:11 things like that. And so I grew up feeling very comfortable with it and recognising that it’s a
    1:07:18 beautiful and fascinating thing. Whereas I think sometimes some people can be not scared of history,
    1:07:24 but they can be put off history because they weren’t taught it very well at school, or they
    1:07:28 just thought it was a succession of dates, or they can’t see any relevance to their daily
    1:07:35 lives and so on. And I’ve never been one of those people. So if you were doing a presentation,
    1:07:43 could be anywhere, on why people, aside from conflating Denzel Washington with other historical
    1:07:52 figures, why they should read history or engage with history, what would the thrust of the
    1:07:58 presentation be? I suppose it does come back to that all this Huxley quotes about trying to learn
    1:08:05 some of the lessons. There’s a marvellous moment when in 1953, June 1953, at the time of the
    1:08:11 late Queen’s coronation, Winston Churchill is walking across Westminster Hall, this fabulous,
    1:08:17 great hall that was when it was built in the late 13th century, the largest room in Europe.
    1:08:22 And it’s fused with history. It’s where, of course, where Churchill himself was to be
    1:08:28 to Lion State, but also where the Monarchs Lion State, where Warren Hastings went on trial and
    1:08:34 Charles I went on trial and people like Mandela and Zelensky have given speeches and things like
    1:08:40 that. It’s compounded, Thomas Moore went on trial there, the Earl of Stratford. I just mentioned
    1:08:45 a whole load of people who were all decapitated actually, William Wallace as well, he was decapitated
    1:08:51 as well. And so you’ve got this sense of all of British history, it sums up in a room essentially.
    1:08:56 And a young American student stops Churchill and asks essentially for a piece of life advice.
    1:09:02 And Churchill replies, “Study history, study history, for therein lies all the secrets of
    1:09:08 statecraft.” And that would be one of the reasons that I would tell people, you know, that if you
    1:09:13 want to understand what’s going on in the world, you do have to look and see what has happened
    1:09:18 before. And there’s no person who doesn’t want to have a better understanding of what’s going on
    1:09:25 in the world or try to work out for themselves, the great forces in our planet today. So that I
    1:09:31 suppose would be the answer. That’s why I’ve chosen study history as my motto of my coat of arms,
    1:09:36 for example, and why I’ve got a podcast too, and I call it secrets of statecraft. I think that’s a
    1:09:43 sort of motivating factor. Secrets of statecraft, that is. It’s the Hoover Institution’s podcast,
    1:09:49 but it’s great fun to do. Must have Neil Ferguson on at some stage, and I can tease him about not
    1:09:57 keeping a diary. What is statecraft? I think I know, but I want it very often. I think I know
    1:10:03 something, and it is in fact not true at all. So it’s the ability to run a country. So you’ve got
    1:10:09 to juggle the diplomatic, the military, the economic, the cultural, all of these things,
    1:10:16 the religious, all of these things together to create the kind of country that you want it to be,
    1:10:21 and that is statecraft. And so it’s been going on as long as human history has, and always will.
    1:10:28 Looking forward, let’s see, you’ve studied many great figures from history. You’ve looked at these
    1:10:35 different chapters of your late king, your last king, George III. I wrote a biography of him
    1:10:40 a few years ago, which was great fun to do. Sorry, carry on. No, that’s all right. I was
    1:10:44 just going to ask you, looking forward, given how much you’ve reflected backwards,
    1:10:51 where do you think things are going for the UK and/or for the US? If you were a betting man,
    1:10:58 there’s a good chance it’s not a certainty, but if the dominoes continue to fall the way they’re
    1:11:06 falling, A, B, or C. I’m afraid I’m a bit of a pessimist. Yeah. Not so much for the United States,
    1:11:14 because you’re still such a rich and innovative country. But I’m wondering in Britain, whether
    1:11:19 or not, and history plays an important part of this, especially the way in which history is
    1:11:24 used politically, to wonder whether or not we still believe in ourselves,
    1:11:30 certainly in the way that we did when I was growing up. In 20, I’m going to try and get the
    1:11:40 statistics right. I think it’s 2015. As recent as 2015, maybe it’s 2010, 86% of people were proud
    1:11:48 of British history. That has now fallen down to 56%. And I’m sure that the reason for this is the
    1:11:55 sustained attack on the British Empire that we were discussing earlier, and people forgetting the
    1:12:01 part that we played in the abolition of slavery and concentrating just on the horrors and the
    1:12:08 monstrous things that happened. And therefore, if you’re not proud of your past, you’re not proud
    1:12:14 of your ancestors, you’re not proud of the things that they produced, and Britain has produced some
    1:12:21 pretty extraordinary and wonderful things for the world. Then it’s difficult to see why anyone
    1:12:27 would want to be proud of the future of the country as well. And so I’m pretty pessimistic.
    1:12:33 And when I feel pessimism for America, it’s for things like taking Thomas Jefferson’s statue
    1:12:40 down from the New York City Hall. It’s a form of cultural suicide. It strikes me not to
    1:12:46 admire the founders of your nation. And yes, of course, he owned slaves,
    1:12:51 but he also wrote a constitution that has survived for a quarter of a millennium.
    1:12:57 And he was brave enough, and Washington and all the others, brave enough to stand up against
    1:13:03 the most powerful empire in the world. These things, you deserve your statue, it seems to me.
    1:13:10 And if you go around pulling these things down, I think you’re breaking a kind of living link with
    1:13:16 the past that makes you a great country. And that’s certainly happening in this country as well.
    1:13:21 I mean, I’m a bit of a pessimist anyway, because I’m a Tory. And pessimism is an essential part
    1:13:28 of the Toryism. But not as big a pessimist I hasten to add as Neil Ferguson, who I like to say
    1:13:34 it’s never terribly difficult to tell the, it’s a quote from PG Woodhouse, never terribly difficult
    1:13:41 to tell the difference between a ray of sunshine and a Scotsman with a grievance. And Neil always
    1:13:46 tells you that it’s all doom and gloom and everything’s going to be utterly disastrous.
    1:13:51 I wonder whether or not he truly believes it, because he’s actually himself, a very, you know,
    1:13:56 upbeat and personally sort of positive individual who does lots of things that imply
    1:14:00 that actually he does think the world’s going to get better. But boy, oh boy.
    1:14:07 How do you personally, if you do, I mean, it seems like you examine or you have a fascination with
    1:14:15 counterfactuals, the what ifs, you read books that have the potential for upending long held
    1:14:22 theses, which can be uncomfortable, I would imagine. Do you have people around you or who you
    1:14:29 deliberately expose yourself to who offset perhaps some of your pessimistic tendencies with
    1:14:36 forms of optimism that they can defend? Yes, my wife is the classic example. She’s
    1:14:40 optimistic about the future. She’s in business. She’s a very successful business woman. So she
    1:14:46 actually sees a lot of the innovations that are taking place, the drugs that are coming online,
    1:14:52 that are saving lives and taking on defeating pain and so on, you know, she’s great at
    1:14:58 believing in the innate capacity of capitalism to reinvent itself in a positive way for more and
    1:15:03 more people than take people out of poverty and all of those positive things. It’s an invigorating
    1:15:10 thing to talk about the world with her, because it makes me much less sort of eore-like and
    1:15:20 furgoth sonness. I feel like any other inside scoop that people should know about Neil,
    1:15:29 what is his secret optimistic voice memos that he sends you, you can annotate, add to your diary.
    1:15:37 Please see audio reference 47. Andrew, this has been great fun. You have many books
    1:15:42 that people can read certainly and they’ll all be in the show notes, but is it most recent conflict?
    1:15:50 Yes, that’s a book I wrote with David Petraeus. And of course, him being a general who’s commanded
    1:15:57 armies of over 160,000 in both Iraq and Afghanistan has been so fascinating intellectually for me,
    1:16:01 because of course, I’m a military historian, I’ve never worn a uniform for one minute,
    1:16:06 so that was great. And the subtitle for folks just so they have that, The Evolution of Warfare
    1:16:16 from 1945 to Ukraine. Well, it’s now actually Gaza, the paper that takes us up to Gaza as well,
    1:16:21 about halfway through that campaign in Gaza. It was after the Russian invasion of Ukraine
    1:16:26 that I came up with the idea of writing the book and I got on to David, who I knew,
    1:16:32 and said, why don’t we write this as a military history? There are going to be lots of political
    1:16:38 histories about this, but just the military side of it and put it into the context of all the wars
    1:16:43 that have happened since 1945. So we go through not all of them, there are 400 of them, but all
    1:16:50 the key ones, you know, the 40 or so key ones that you’ve heard of and that show how war has
    1:16:55 evolved and developed. And sometimes it leaps forward and other times it goes into sort of
    1:17:00 side shows. But we went to the publishers and they quite unsteadily said, well, how are you
    1:17:04 going to divvy up the chapters? And I said, well, David’s going to write about all the
    1:17:11 countries he’s invaded. And I’ll, you know, fill in the rest. And he also did the Vietnam
    1:17:16 chapter as well, actually. And then we sent hundreds and maybe thousands of emails to one
    1:17:22 another over the course of the year or so that we were writing it. That’s very fast. It is fast.
    1:17:27 It is fast. But the thing was, well, because the situation in Ukraine was moving so quickly.
    1:17:32 And then the Gaza war broke out on the day of the publication of the hardback. So that was
    1:17:38 literally the 7th of October that we were bringing that out. So we then needed to get on with writing
    1:17:43 about that as well. And as you know, I tend to write quickly. And so does he. He’s a soldier
    1:17:50 scholar. He went to your old university. He was at Princeton doing a post-grad on military history.
    1:17:55 So he was very much able to keep sending back those emails.
    1:18:04 Yeah, I suppose he’s not lacking discipline would be my guess. What did you find were
    1:18:09 key ingredients to that successful collaboration? What made it work, especially with that type of
    1:18:15 pressure under deadline? Well, I think there was, I know there was mutual respect, which is very
    1:18:19 important. I’d never written a book with anybody before. And I was in the midst of doing that right
    1:18:23 now, which is probably the reason I’m asking. Yeah. No, well, it’s like nerve wracking,
    1:18:29 isn’t it? Because one can get very sort of preparatorial about one’s work. But that wasn’t
    1:18:36 the case with David, because the insights that he gave about what it was like to be a commander into
    1:18:43 wars at the absolute apex of command meant that he could then look back on wars like the Korean
    1:18:50 War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War to sort of place himself in the position of Matthew Ridgway,
    1:18:58 in Korea, for example. And that was so fascinating that I knew that there was nothing that I could
    1:19:05 add to that. I just knew that the combination of the soldier and the historian would produce
    1:19:12 something that was really intellectually stimulating for me. And that’s, in the end, life is a constant
    1:19:20 battle against boredom, isn’t it? It’s a constant rearguard action against not being stimulated.
    1:19:25 Do you think you will do more collaborations? How are you thinking about your writing moving
    1:19:30 forward? No, my next two books are just going to be written by me. I’ve got Napoleon and his
    1:19:37 marshals about how the emperor interacted with his marshals and how the marshals interacted with
    1:19:42 each other. They fortunately all hated each other, so that’s much easier for a historian to write
    1:19:47 something interesting. And hated each other in very imaginative ways. The greatest reality TV
    1:19:55 should have ever seen. Exactly. And then after that, I’m doing Disraeli. And he’s an extraordinary
    1:20:02 character who was a complete outsider as a Jew, of course. Didn’t go to one of the British public
    1:20:08 schools or Oxford and Cambridge or any university and through his own brilliance. And he was a
    1:20:14 novelist, of course, also his own wit. He wound up becoming the most powerful man in the world.
    1:20:19 Yeah, I look forward to reading that one. Good. Thank you. Let me back on the show in 2030,
    1:20:25 which is when it’s being published. I hope I’ll still be around. We’ll see. I’ve been here for a
    1:20:29 decade. We’ll see how it goes. Andrew, this has been great. I really appreciate you taking the
    1:20:34 time. People can find you. Correct me if I get any of this wrong. Andrew-roberts.net.
    1:20:38 Would that be the main website? That’s what I have here. Can’t remember, but yes, I hope so.
    1:20:42 Let’s just say that’s right. And if it’s not, I will put correct version and show notes.
    1:20:49 And then is Twitter or X as it stands now a good place for people to follow you as well?
    1:20:55 Yeah, that has things like my podcast and so on. Perfect. So that’s as I have it here,
    1:21:04 @aroberts_andrew. Is it good? Perfect. We’ll fact check off that. But we do have that. Is there
    1:21:09 anything else that you would like to add? Any requests of my audience? Anything at all that
    1:21:14 you’d like to mention? Just thank you so much, Tim, for being on the show. I’ve really enjoyed
    1:21:19 it. Yeah, thank you so much for taking the time. This has really been great. And for people who are
    1:21:25 listening, as always, you can find the show notes at tim.blog/podcast. We will include links to everything
    1:21:31 we discussed. And also, as always, until next time, just be a little kinder than is necessary
    1:21:35 to others, but also to yourself. Thanks for tuning in.
    1:21:42 Hey guys, this is Tim again, just one more thing before you take off. And that is Five Bullet Friday.
    1:21:46 Would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday that provides a little fun
    1:21:51 before the weekend? Between one and a half and two million people subscribed to my free newsletter,
    1:21:57 my super short newsletter called Five Bullet Friday. Easy to sign up, easy to cancel. It is
    1:22:02 basically a half page that I send out every Friday to share the coolest things I’ve found
    1:22:07 or discovered or have started exploring over that week. It’s kind of like my diary of cool things.
    1:22:13 It often includes articles I’m reading, books I’m reading, albums, perhaps, gadgets, gizmos,
    1:22:18 all sorts of tech tricks and so on that get sent to me by my friends, including a lot of podcast
    1:22:25 guests and these strange esoteric things end up in my field. And then I test them and then I
    1:22:31 share them with you. So if that sounds fun, again, it’s very short, a little tiny bite of goodness
    1:22:35 before you head off for the weekend, something to think about. If you’d like to try it out,
    1:22:42 just go to tim.vlog/friday. Type that into your browser, tim.vlog/friday. Drop in your email and
    1:22:48 you’ll get the very next one. Thanks for listening. This episode is brought to you by Shopify.
    1:22:53 Shopify is the all-in-one commerce platform that powers millions of businesses worldwide,
    1:22:57 including me, including mine. What business you might ask? Well, one way I’ve scratched my own
    1:23:03 itch is by creating Cockpunch Coffee. It’s a long story. All proceeds on my end go to my
    1:23:08 foundation, Saise Foundation, to fund research for mental health, etc. Anyway, Cockpunch Coffee,
    1:23:13 it’s delicious. The first coffee I’ve ever produced myself, I drink it every morning. Check it out.
    1:23:18 We use Shopify for the online storefront and my team raves about how simple and easy it is to use.
    1:23:23 It has everything we need and nothing we don’t. Whether you’re a garage entrepreneur or getting
    1:23:28 ready for your IPO, Shopify is the only tool you need to start, run and grow your business without
    1:23:32 the struggle. Shopify puts you in control of every sales channel. Doesn’t matter if you’re
    1:23:38 selling satin sheets from Shopify’s in-person POS system or offering organic olive oil on
    1:23:42 Shopify’s all-in-one e-commerce platform. However, you interact with your customers,
    1:23:46 you’re covered. And once you’ve reached your audience, Shopify has the internet’s best converting
    1:23:52 checkout to help you turn browsers into buyers. Shopify powers 10% of all e-commerce in the
    1:23:58 United States. And Shopify is truly a global force as the e-commerce solution behind Allbirds,
    1:24:03 Rothy’s, Brooklyn and millions of other entrepreneurs of every size across more than 170
    1:24:08 countries. Plus, Shopify’s award-winning help is there to support your success every step of the
    1:24:14 way if you have questions. This is Possibility Powered by Shopify. So check it out. Sign up for
    1:24:20 a $1 per month trial period at Shopify. That’s S-H-O-P-I-F-Y, Shopify.com/Tim.
    1:24:26 Go to Shopify.com/Tim to take your business to the next level today. One more time,
    1:24:33 all lowercase, Shopify.com/Tim. In the last handful of years, I’ve become very interested in
    1:24:40 environmental toxins, avoiding microplastics and many other commonly found compounds all over the
    1:24:46 place. One place I looked is in the kitchen. Many people don’t realize just how toxic their
    1:24:51 cookware is or can be. A lot of nonstick pans, practically all of them can release harmful
    1:24:57 forever chemicals. PFAS, in other words, spelled P-F-A-S, into your food, your home, and then
    1:25:03 ultimately that ends up in your body. Teflon is a prime example of this. It is still the forever
    1:25:09 chemical that most companies are using. So our place reached out to me as a potential sponsor.
    1:25:16 And the first thing I did was look at the reviews of their products and said, “Send me one.” And that
    1:25:22 is the Titanium Always Pan Pro. And the claim is that it’s the first nonstick pan with zero coating.
    1:25:28 So that means zero forever chemicals and durability that will last forever. I was very skeptical. I
    1:25:32 was very busy. So I said, “You know what? I want to test this thing quickly. It’s supposed to be
    1:25:36 nonstick. It’s supposed to be durable. I’m going to test it with two things. I’m going to test it with
    1:25:42 scrambled eggs in the morning because eggs are always a disaster in anything that isn’t
    1:25:48 nonstick with the toxic coating. And then I’m going to test it with a steak sear because I want to see
    1:25:57 how much it retains heat. And it worked perfectly in both cases. And I was frankly astonished how well
    1:26:03 it worked. The Titanium Always Pan Pro has become my go-to pan in the kitchen. It replaces a lot
    1:26:09 of other things for searing, for eggs, for anything you can imagine. And the design is really clever.
    1:26:15 It does combine the best qualities of stainless steel, cast iron, and nonstick into one product.
    1:26:19 It’s tough enough to withstand the dishwasher, open flame, heavy-duty scrubbing. You can scrub
    1:26:24 the hell out of it. You can use metal utensils, which is great without losing any of its nonstick
    1:26:28 properties. So stop cooking with toxic pans. If they’re nonstick and you don’t know,
    1:26:33 they probably contain something bad. Check out the Titanium Always Pan Pro. While you’re at it,
    1:26:37 you can look at their other high-performance offerings that are toxin-free, like the wonder
    1:26:42 of an air fryer, their griddle pan, and their precision-engineered German steel knives. So go
    1:26:49 to fromourplace.com/tim and use my code TIM to get 10% off of the Titanium Always Pan Pro or
    1:26:55 anything else on the site. You can check out anything. More time, that’s fromourplace.com,
    1:27:03 spelled out-f-r-o-m-o-u-r. Fromourplace.com/tim and use code TIM to check out for 10% off of
    1:27:08 everything on the site. Our place also offers a 100-day trial with free shipping and returns.
    1:27:11 So take a look.

    Andrew Roberts has written twenty books, which have been translated into twenty-eight languages and have won thirteen literary prizes. These include Napoleon: A Life, Churchill: Walking with Destiny, and most recently, Conflict: The Evolution of Warfare from 1945 to Gaza, which he co-authored with General David Petraeus.

    Sponsors:

    Our Place’s Titanium Always Pan® Pro using nonstick technology that’s coating-free and made without PFAS, otherwise known as “Forever Chemicals”: https://fromourplace.com/tim (10% off all products from Our Place using code TIM)

    Shopify global commerce platform, providing tools to start, grow, market, and manage a retail business: https://shopify.com/tim (one-dollar-per-month trial period)

    LinkedIn Jobs recruitment platform with 1B+ users: https://linkedin.com/tim (post your job for free)

    Timestamps:

    [00:00:00] Start

    [00:06:14] Expelled from Cranleigh school.

    [00:07:14] Why MI6 considered Andrew for recruitment.

    [00:09:56] The teacher who made history exciting to 10-year-old Andrew.

    [00:13:05] Words Andrew avoids when writing about history.

    [00:14:20] Are steady-nerved leaders naturally born or nurtured?

    [00:16:05] The thinkers who influenced Winston Churchill and his sense of noblesse oblige.

    [00:18:26] What made Napoleon Bonaparte the prime exemplar of war leadership?

    [00:24:37] Lessons from Winston Churchill’s autobiography, My Early Life.

    [00:26:22] Napoleon’s relationship with risk.

    [00:29:26] Andrew’s signed letter from Aldous Huxley.

    [00:30:49] When historical figures carry a sense of personal destiny.

    [00:33:07] The meeting Andrew wishes he could’ve witnessed as a fly on the wall.

    [00:34:30] When historical villains carry a sense of personal destiny.

    [00:37:14] What Churchill and Napoleon learned from their mistakes.

    [00:39:38] “Dear Diary…”

    [00:44:00] Maintaining creative flow during the writing process.

    [00:47:18] On working with brilliant publisher Stuart Proffitt (aka Professor Perfect).

    [00:52:53] Why are some significant figures immortalized while others go the way of Ozymandias?

    [00:57:59] Thoughts on personal legacy.

    [00:59:18] Fiction favorites.

    [01:02:05] Being objective about the history of imperialism.

    [01:03:31] The challenges of teaching and learning history today.

    [01:06:40] Why “Study history” is Andrew’s coat of arms motto.

    [01:10:22] What Andrew, as a history expert, sees for the future.

    [01:14:01] Counteracting natural pessimism.

    [01:15:34] What to expect from Andrew’s latest book Conflict (co-authored with David Petraeus).

    [01:19:21] Upcoming book projects.

    [01:20:26] Parting thoughts.

    *

    For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.

    For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Showplease visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsors

    Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.

    For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.

    Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.

    Follow Tim:

    Twittertwitter.com/tferriss 

    Instagraminstagram.com/timferriss

    YouTubeyoutube.com/timferriss

    Facebookfacebook.com/timferriss 

    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferriss

    Past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry SeinfeldHugh JackmanDr. Jane GoodallLeBron JamesKevin HartDoris Kearns GoodwinJamie FoxxMatthew McConaugheyEsther PerelElizabeth GilbertTerry CrewsSiaYuval Noah HarariMalcolm GladwellMadeleine AlbrightCheryl StrayedJim CollinsMary Karr, Maria PopovaSam HarrisMichael PhelpsBob IgerEdward NortonArnold SchwarzeneggerNeil StraussKen BurnsMaria SharapovaMarc AndreessenNeil GaimanNeil de Grasse TysonJocko WillinkDaniel EkKelly SlaterDr. Peter AttiaSeth GodinHoward MarksDr. Brené BrownEric SchmidtMichael LewisJoe GebbiaMichael PollanDr. Jordan PetersonVince VaughnBrian KoppelmanRamit SethiDax ShepardTony RobbinsJim DethmerDan HarrisRay DalioNaval RavikantVitalik ButerinElizabeth LesserAmanda PalmerKatie HaunSir Richard BransonChuck PalahniukArianna HuffingtonReid HoffmanBill BurrWhitney CummingsRick RubinDr. Vivek MurthyDarren AronofskyMargaret AtwoodMark ZuckerbergPeter ThielDr. Gabor MatéAnne LamottSarah SilvermanDr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

  • #772: In Case You Missed It: September 2024 Recap of “The Tim Ferriss Show”

    AI transcript
    0:00:05 This episode is brought to you by Five Bullet Friday, my very own email newsletter.
    0:00:09 It’s become one of the most popular email newsletters in the world with millions of subscribers,
    0:00:13 and it’s super, super simple. It does not clog up your inbox. Every Friday,
    0:00:18 I send out five bullet points, super short of the coolest things I’ve found that week,
    0:00:22 which sometimes includes apps, books, documentaries, supplements, gadgets,
    0:00:28 new self-experiments, hacks, tricks, and all sorts of weird stuff that I dig up from around the world.
    0:00:32 You guys, podcast listeners, and book readers have asked me for something short and action-packed
    0:00:37 for a very long time, because after all, the podcast, the books, they can be quite long.
    0:00:42 And that’s why I created Five Bullet Friday. It’s become one of my favorite things I do
    0:00:49 every week. It’s free. It’s always going to be free, and you can learn more at tim.blog/friday.
    0:00:55 That’s tim.blog/friday. I get asked a lot how I meet guests for the podcast, some of the most
    0:01:01 amazing people I’ve ever interacted with. And a little known fact, I’ve met probably 25% of them
    0:01:06 because they first subscribed to Five Bullet Friday, so you’ll be in good company. It’s a lot
    0:01:12 of fun. Five Bullet Friday is only available if you subscribe via email. I do not publish the content
    0:01:17 on the blog or anywhere else. Also, if I’m doing small in-person meetups, offering early access to
    0:01:22 startups, beta testing, special deals, or anything else that’s very limited, I share it first with
    0:01:29 Five Bullet Friday subscribers. So check it out, tim.blog/friday. If you listen to this podcast,
    0:01:36 very likely that you’d dig it a lot, and you can, of course, easily subscribe any time. So easy peasy.
    0:01:42 Again, that’s tim.blog/friday. And thanks for checking it out if the spirit moves you.
    0:02:10 Hello, boys and girls. This is Tim Ferriss. Welcome to another episode of the Tim Ferriss show.
    0:02:14 Where does my job to deconstruct world-class performers of all different types
    0:02:18 to tease out the routines, habits, and so on that you can apply to your own life?
    0:02:24 This is a special in-between episode, which serves as a recap of the episodes from the last month.
    0:02:29 Features a short clip from each conversation in one place, so you can jump around, get a feel for
    0:02:34 both the episode and the guest. And then you can always dig deeper by going to one of those episodes.
    0:02:38 View this episode as a buffet to wait your appetite. It’s a lot of fun. We had fun putting
    0:02:42 it together. And for the full list of the guests featured today, see the episode’s description,
    0:02:48 probably right below wherever you press play in your podcast app. Or, as usual, you can head
    0:02:57 to tim.blog/podcast and find all the details there. Please enjoy. First up, Elizabeth Gilbert,
    0:03:04 number one New York Times bestselling author of Eat, Pray, Love, Big Magic, and City of Girls,
    0:03:09 and the creative voice behind the Letters from Love with Elizabeth Gilbert newsletter.
    0:03:19 You can find Elizabeth on Instagram at Elizabeth_Gilbert_Writer, and you can find her
    0:03:28 sub-stack at Elizabeth Gilbert dot sub-stack dot com. And when I was in my going through my first
    0:03:39 divorce was 30 and the well laid out planned life that I had created very obediently,
    0:03:47 like I had done just what my culture had told me to do. I got married at 24 and worked hard and
    0:03:52 bought a house and made a plan to have a family. And then instead of having a family, I had a
    0:03:58 nervous breakdown, like quite literally, everybody was moving in this one direction and my entire
    0:04:05 intellectual, spiritual, and physical system collapsed, which I now know, I now see that
    0:04:10 as an act of God. I now see that there was sort of the dow, you know, that there was a force
    0:04:16 that was trying to communicate to me, this is not your path. I will kill you before I let you
    0:04:22 do this. I will kill you before I let you be a suburban housewife. I’m not allowing it. I will
    0:04:26 make you put you in so much physical pain that you’re going to have to notice that this is not
    0:04:34 the life for you. But I was also in so much shame of failure and letting people down and like,
    0:04:39 we just bought this house. I just felt like the biggest asshole in the world. I don’t know why
    0:04:44 I can’t just get in line and do this thing that everybody’s saying to do. Anyway, that marriage
    0:04:50 ended, and then I threw myself into another relationship and that ended, and I was like,
    0:04:55 I don’t know how to orchestrate my life at all. And nothing, here I am 30 years old and nothing
    0:04:59 is what I had planned it to be five years ago. And I was in the deepest depression of my life,
    0:05:05 and I didn’t have much of spiritual life at that point. But I remember waking up one night and
    0:05:11 just shame and getting an instruction. I mean, that’s the only way I can explain it. And I
    0:05:15 was comfortable with that language because I often have that happen in my creative life
    0:05:20 where I’m told what to do. This is what you’re going to focus on. Here’s what you need to do
    0:05:25 now. And I was given this instruction, and it came in as clearly as I’m talking to you, and it said,
    0:05:31 get up, get a notebook, and write to yourself the words that you most wish that somebody would
    0:05:35 say to you. Because there was a great loneliness that I was feeling too, as well as the shame.
    0:05:44 And that letter began, what that letter said was, I’ve got you, I’m with you. I’m not going
    0:05:51 anywhere. I love you exactly the way you are. You can’t fail at this. You can’t do this wrong.
    0:05:58 I don’t need anything from you. This is a huge thing to hear. I don’t need anything. Talk about
    0:06:04 no cherished outcome. I don’t need anything from you. You don’t have to improve. You don’t have to
    0:06:09 do life better. You don’t have to win. You don’t have to get out of this depression. You don’t
    0:06:17 have to ever uplift your spirits. You could end up living in a box under a bridge in a garbage bag,
    0:06:23 spitting at people. And I would love you just as much as I do now. The love that I have for you
    0:06:31 cannot be lost because it’s innate. It’s yours. I have no requirements for it. And if you need to
    0:06:36 stay up all night crying, I’ll be here with you. And if tomorrow you have a garbage day again,
    0:06:40 because you’ve been up all night crying, I’ll be there for that too. I’ll be here for every minute
    0:06:45 of it. Just ask me to come and I’ll be here with you. And the astonishing thing was that it,
    0:06:51 like even talking about it now, I can feel the impact that it has on my nervous system to hear
    0:06:57 those words, even in my own voice. And it was the first experience I’d ever had with unconditional
    0:07:03 love. I’d never heard anybody say like, “I don’t need you to be anything. You don’t have to do
    0:07:09 better.” This is fine. This is great. You on the bathroom floor and a pile of tears, it’s not. It’s
    0:07:15 great. It’s great. That’s fine. We love you just like that. And that’s so nourishing because it’s
    0:07:21 so the opposite of every message that I’ve ever heard. And so I started doing that practice,
    0:07:26 and it’s taken me through. I’ve had difficult times in the last 20 years, but I’ve never gone
    0:07:34 as low again as I went at that time because this is the net that catches me routinely before I can
    0:07:46 get that low. And that voice doesn’t change. Next up, another unpredictable and entertaining
    0:07:53 edition of The Random Show with technologist and serial entrepreneur Kevin Rose. You can find
    0:08:01 Kevin on Twitter and Instagram @KevinRose, and you can find his sub-stack at KevinRose.com.
    0:08:07 Like the one thing that struck me about today, and I just like, let’s have a little real talk
    0:08:12 for a second. Oh, wow. Oh, God. Coming to Jesus’ moment. There we go. But like, you went on this
    0:08:18 sabbatical, and yet you had to write a book. I didn’t have to write a book. Hold on. Hold on.
    0:08:25 Our mutual friend, who shall not be named, pointed this out as well, where it’s like,
    0:08:34 “Can you sit and just be you, or would that be too hard?” Okay, let’s do it. All right. So,
    0:08:44 yeah, this is good. Let’s get into the fucking chewy bits. So, I routinely every year spend
    0:08:50 at least a month off the grid, right? Like last October, I was gone. I was in, I was off the
    0:08:56 grid. Yeah, but you were doing shit. I was doing stuff, but here’s my question, right? And this
    0:09:02 was in our shared text thread. I basically said, “Okay, look, so the accusation is that Tim doesn’t
    0:09:07 know how to chill out.” I’m like, “Okay, fine. Let’s take that as true.” If Tim were to chill out,
    0:09:13 what does that look like on a daily and weekly basis? And one of my challenges was humans are
    0:09:18 built to be social. You have a family. Our mutual friend has a family. There’s an inbuilt
    0:09:27 social network in that family. I don’t have that, right? So my… I mean, you’re a brother to me,
    0:09:31 so you always have a family. Yeah, I appreciate that. And like on a day-to-day basis, when I wake
    0:09:36 up in the morning, like, you know, my hotel room, my house is empty, right? Yeah. So, I need to go
    0:09:41 externally. I need to travel outside of the confines of my house to find that human interaction.
    0:09:49 So the question is, like, okay, well, if you could write the script, what would Tim Ferris
    0:09:53 chilling out look like? I don’t know what that would look like. What would it look like? Oh,
    0:09:59 it’s very simple. All right. I got the best answer for you ever. Oh, boy. No script. That sounds
    0:10:02 like some fucking fortune cookie stuff that I can’t make sense of, though. What does that mean?
    0:10:08 I know you can’t make sense of it, but that’s the point. It’s no script. When have you done that?
    0:10:14 When I did my meditation retreats. No, but you had a schedule for each day.
    0:10:17 Sure, but like, I think– That was like an intensive–
    0:10:19 The silent retreat where you’re meditating in hours a day.
    0:10:24 Okay, I suffer from the same thing you do. I suffer from the same thing you do,
    0:10:27 and that is that we can’t– Like, there’s a reason we’re all friends, right?
    0:10:32 We’re all fucking border collies chewing on the couch. We can’t turn it off,
    0:10:37 you know? And it’s like, honestly, I think the healthiest thing, though, would be to wake up with
    0:10:45 no agenda for a month, with no friends for a month, with the fact that you just wake up saying,
    0:10:49 “What is today going to bring?” And that is damn fucking hard for people that are driven like you
    0:10:52 and me are. So I did that for almost a month last October.
    0:10:55 But do you do some psychedelics during that time and shit? Come on, you do some shit.
    0:11:01 Towards the end, but in that particular case, I mean, I’ll just say that I don’t think humans are
    0:11:09 built for isolation. And there is a fetishizing of self-sufficiency and independence in the U.S.
    0:11:15 that I think is unhealthy. It exists in other places, for sure. But if you look at our evolutionary
    0:11:20 biological– Like, our biological programming completely refutes that. To be exiled, to be
    0:11:26 excluded from the group is effectively– 100%. And I’m not arguing that, but I’m arguing it’s like,
    0:11:32 what if you couldn’t touch a pen or a computer for a month? They shoot arrows. Or bow.
    0:11:39 I mean, I do think, and I can’t remember the particular attribution of this. Man,
    0:11:46 I wish I could really remember it. Ron Jeremy? The hedgehog? No. It was someone else. But it was
    0:11:53 basically like, man finds leisure through the switching from one activity to another,
    0:11:59 like one compelling activity to another, something along those lines. And I wish I had the exact
    0:12:03 quote and the attribution, but I don’t. And this applies, obviously, cross-gender. But the point
    0:12:15 being that I’m not convinced that being idle is a fruitful goal to have. If you can’t sit with
    0:12:21 yourself for five minutes, that’s a problem, right? But different people have different
    0:12:26 constitutions. And for me, for instance, right, if you look at the four-hour work week, okay, so
    0:12:31 I get rid of, not get rid of, but I automate my whole business, blah, blah, blah. What do I do?
    0:12:37 I end up doing tangos, like six to eight hours a day. Right. But that was not done from a
    0:12:48 position of obligation or fear. It was done from a place of like enthusiasm and excitement and love.
    0:12:57 That’s different. And that, I think, is good medicine, right? So as long as I have the
    0:13:04 self-awareness to distinguish between something that is done from a place of fear or guilt
    0:13:11 or prestige, hunger or responsibility or some nebulous obligation versus the things that enliven
    0:13:17 me, I think being active is fine as long as I land in the latter category. Right? Like, for
    0:13:25 instance, like, I’m doing a lot of archery right now. And I fucking love it. Like, I am so fed by
    0:13:31 it. And I’m not saying I’m the world’s best, I certainly am not, but I just find it so meditative.
    0:13:38 And, but can I ask you one question? One of the things I’m really curious about is, like, Tim,
    0:13:46 like, I respect you so much because of how I’ve watched you dissect and, you know, assimilate,
    0:13:50 like, information like no other human I’ve ever seen on earth. And you are able to
    0:13:57 learn and pick up and go deep on any topic within a matter of minutes or hours or weeks,
    0:14:03 you know, like, you do that quite well. The one thing that is the rounding out of the holistic
    0:14:13 picture of Tim that I’m curious if you could ever tap into is the Tim that says, I can just be
    0:14:20 without having to go for those things or having to engage in that type of thinking, you know,
    0:14:27 that type of like pursuit, that type of analyzing, you know, I, Daria, my wife is, she’s a PhD in
    0:14:33 neuroscience. And, and I oftentimes get engaged in intense debates with her about this, where I’m
    0:14:42 just like, chill the fuck out. No, I’m just, Daria, don’t listen this far. So, but I’m just like,
    0:14:48 you know, I’m like, I’m like, I wish, I wish with all my friends balance. And I think that where
    0:14:56 our mutual friend was trying to get to is like, might you find, might you find a little bit more
    0:15:00 of that side of the house? Because you have the other in spades. Yeah, yeah. It’s a good question.
    0:15:04 I mean, I’ll sit with it. I think that balance can come in a lot of different forms. Right. So,
    0:15:10 the balance is time bound, right, in the sense that is it balanced on a daily basis? Is it on a
    0:15:15 weekly basis? Is it analyzing at the moment? No, hold on. Hold on. No, it’s not. It’s, it’s finding
    0:15:21 the right conceptual framework through us to think about it. And I don’t think that’s a mistake. I
    0:15:26 think it’s actually very helpful. Depends on how your mind works, right? For me, though, it’s like,
    0:15:31 if I’m super intense for a month, and I’m going 10 out of 10, and then I’m zero out of 10 for a
    0:15:39 month, like that equates to kind of a five, five, right? That’s, for me, a certain degree of balance,
    0:15:43 but it’s not, if you looked at it on the minute to minute, hour to hour, day to day,
    0:15:48 it would look very lopsided. I know a fantastic app that I would love to build for you,
    0:15:52 which would be like the Tim Tim random app. And like, you open it up every morning and it tells
    0:15:56 you what to do for a month. And it’d be like, today, it’s like, what the fuck is this? And
    0:16:01 you’d be like, oh, I have to buy a slip and slide and go down it 20 times. Like, just like,
    0:16:05 something where it’s just like throwing you completely out of your life. And you’re like,
    0:16:10 wow, I didn’t have to think about it. I didn’t have to overanalyze it. It’s just a fucking thing
    0:16:15 I’m going to do. Well, this is, this is part of the curse of the entrepreneur. But it’s also,
    0:16:19 but it’s all saying, like, 100%, you know, exactly what I’m talking about. We’ve talked about this,
    0:16:25 but also, but also at the same time, these are your mics. I know. But also at the same time,
    0:16:30 I will say that like, when you introduce another partner, it’s the dance that’s fucking hard,
    0:16:36 right? Because Daria is very much about like structure and shit where I’m just Daria and I
    0:16:41 are very similar. Very similar. Super similar. Yeah. Love you Daria. She’s you with hair. You’re
    0:16:49 the best. Yeah. But Kevin does nobody do it. She’s a better body. I mean, you look at my AI,
    0:16:57 her ass is bad. I’m sorry. Okay, thank you everyone for tuning in to the show.
    0:17:11 Good to see you, buddy. Next up, Jerry Colonna, co-founder and CEO of reboot.io,
    0:17:17 an executive coaching and leadership development firm, and the author of Reboot,
    0:17:23 Leadership and the Art of Growing Up, and Reunion, Leadership and the Longing to Belong.
    0:17:32 You can find Jerry on Twitter @JerryColonna. You know, if we go back in time to my mid-30s,
    0:17:40 when I was a Prince of New York and a former VC and totally fucked up as an individual,
    0:17:46 I was knee deep in the first decade. I’m now my fourth decade of psychoanalysis.
    0:17:59 And I had a very tough as nails, nice Jewish lady, psychoanalyst named Dr. Sayers. And what she taught
    0:18:08 me repeatedly, endlessly boxing my ears when she’d say this is, “How have you been complicit
    0:18:15 in creating these conditions you complain so much about?” And you have to picture it, right?
    0:18:21 I’m lying on the couch. There’s this, you know, old Jewish lady who’s 30 years older than me,
    0:18:29 who’s just basically had it with me complaining. And so the roots of the question are really
    0:18:38 a kind of an exasperation, not just from my analyst to me, but eventually with me about me.
    0:18:45 And it was really only by taking that question, “How have I been complicit in
    0:18:54 creating the conditions I say I don’t want?” That there was a massive unlock for me. Now,
    0:18:59 you asked about the misinterpretation. The first level of misinterpretation that people go through
    0:19:08 is that they assume I’m saying, “How have I been responsible?” And I am very, very particular.
    0:19:16 I get very, very angry when people misinterpret the word complicit for responsible. And it’s not
    0:19:22 because I want to let people off the hook, but quite the opposite. I want people to understand
    0:19:28 that they’ve been an accomplice. Here’s the thing, Tim, when we get into our mindset that says,
    0:19:35 “I am responsible for all the shit in my life,” we’re actually walking away from doing the hard
    0:19:41 work. Could you expand on that? Yeah, sure. Because guilt is a defense mechanism.
    0:19:46 Right. Because some people might say, “Well, that’s extreme ownership,” as I say. I’m responsible
    0:19:51 for all the shit. Exactly. That’s the beginning of the solution, but where do they take a wrong turn?
    0:19:58 So I like the kind of ownership. I like the word ownership. I don’t like the word responsibility.
    0:20:04 And the reason for that is because, and the reason I think it can be a defense mechanism,
    0:20:10 is because it can be an old structure. So many people that I encounter, myself included,
    0:20:18 spend our childhood pendulating between grandiosity and a sense of worthlessness.
    0:20:24 I’m either shit or I am the best. You got rid of that in your childhood? Man, good for you.
    0:20:33 Well, I got rid of it in my adulthood. This is the point. I got rid of it by actually
    0:20:40 asking the right questions of myself. If the word complicit is replaced with the words
    0:20:48 even extreme ownership, the danger is that I tip over into misunderstanding what actually has been
    0:20:56 going on, and I end up in this zone of being responsible for everything. And the truth is,
    0:21:02 it’s much more complex than that. I was just thinking that you’re referring to a pendulum,
    0:21:10 and that not taking any responsibility for anything is one example, sort of absolving
    0:21:16 yourself of the hard work. But I never thought of the opposite if you’re accepting that anything
    0:21:24 and everything bad that happens is your responsibility/fault. It puts you in a similar position,
    0:21:31 it seems. Exactly. The position it puts you in is unable to actually, with discernment,
    0:21:39 diagnose what’s really going on. And you know what? You don’t get to transform stuff
    0:21:46 if you don’t really know what’s going on. And so to understand what’s really happening for you,
    0:21:50 you have to understand what your role is and what it isn’t.
    0:21:57 So how do you walk, say, a client through answering that question well? How are you
    0:22:02 complicit in creating the conditions that you say you don’t want or the conditions of your
    0:22:08 lives in your lives that you say you don’t want? How do you walk them through their rough draft
    0:22:14 of trying to answer that? Okay, so the unlock on the question is the second half of the question
    0:22:21 which people skip. You say you don’t want. So give me an example from your own lifetime.
    0:22:25 What do you say you don’t want? Oh, man, how much time do we have?
    0:22:33 I have become better at this, so I’m not dodging the question, but I would say
    0:22:41 probably some form of busyness. I’ve got this and I’m over-scheduled and I’ve got this and that
    0:22:48 and the other thing that is imposing on what maybe I say I want, which is more locked out
    0:22:55 space for writing or making. Right. So you say, “Mr. Four-Hour Workweek,
    0:23:00 I don’t want to work more than four hours a week.” Nice turn. Nice turn. I think you said that to me.
    0:23:10 Right. So you say you want to be so efficient and so productive that you get everything done,
    0:23:18 that you want to get done, so that you have time to play, take care of yourself,
    0:23:24 wear breathe-right strips as you talk to you. Right. This is kind of thinking. Right. Okay.
    0:23:31 Just a quick sidebar. Breathe-right. This one’s on me. Next time, you’ve got to sponsor the podcast.
    0:23:38 I could recognize them because I’m a breathe-right user. I use them to sleep at night, so.
    0:23:41 Oh, my God.
    0:23:49 We were both like a lifetime supply, so feel free. Okay. So you say you don’t want to be so busy.
    0:23:55 Right. And you were asking, “How do I walk a client through to understand the role of
    0:24:03 complicity?” Right, in this regard. So how does it feel when you’re not busy?
    0:24:10 I would say, and I don’t want to steal your thunder here, but since I’m cheating with a cheat sheet,
    0:24:15 right, this is. It’s your show. So it’s your thunder.
    0:24:23 And action. So, segwaying to a compliment or maybe a necessary component of the first question,
    0:24:26 “How are you complicit in creating conditions that you don’t want?” Which is,
    0:24:31 “In what ways does that complicity serve you?” Okay. So to answer your question and that at the
    0:24:39 same time, I would say probably, and this is almost a certainty, looking back at some of the
    0:24:44 scariest depressive episodes in my life. It’s when I had a lot of empty space.
    0:24:53 And there’s an underlying fear. Even though I haven’t experienced anything close to that magnitude
    0:25:01 of desperation and darkness in a very long time, there is a fear that if I create a void,
    0:25:07 that is the voice that is the narrative that is going to come to dominate my thoughts. I would say
    0:25:16 that therefore, my complicity serves me by avoiding that. Right. And so, if you really want to
    0:25:24 transform, when will you be comfortable with the void? That’s a good question. And in my defense,
    0:25:31 Your Honor, I will say that I’m about to go off the grid for a week starting this Friday.
    0:25:37 So in a few days, I’ll be going completely off the grid, no phone, no nothing for a period of time.
    0:25:44 So I have injected these periods. But let’s get into the messy stuff for a second, since life is
    0:25:51 rarely as much of a randomized control trial as you would like. I’ve had an ongoing number of chats
    0:25:59 with friends and WhatsApp and different messaging platforms. And it’s been around taking breaks,
    0:26:07 creating space, chilling out. So a lot of these friends of mine have passed every hurdle and
    0:26:12 objective they could have had. And goalposts keep moving, right? They want to make a million and
    0:26:19 then it was 10 and then it was 20. And then once it gets indefensible, then it’s like,
    0:26:23 what’s your annual compounded growth rate? And this then turns into percentages because they
    0:26:29 can’t even with a straight face defend the rest of it. But what they claim to want and what
    0:26:38 they believe I need is to chill out, take a break, create all this space. My experience is as social
    0:26:45 animals, or at least as a person who benefits from social interaction, I do best around other
    0:26:53 people. I just do. And there are, it’s not 100%, but it’s not 0%. There’s a risk that I do return
    0:27:00 to some of those dark places or dark narratives. It’s not 0. So I struggle to answer the question
    0:27:05 of like, when can I allow space? Because I do it in small doses, sometimes larger doses. I took
    0:27:12 almost all of October last year off the grid. So perhaps you can help me to find my way to
    0:27:18 answering the question you posed. You know, look, Tim, I feel like Uncle Jerry and that we speak
    0:27:25 every few years, and every few years, my hell you’ve grown. I know you don’t feel that way
    0:27:31 because you’re in your body. But when we first started talking, which was years and years ago,
    0:27:37 this was a big struggle for you. This was a tremendous struggle. And there was a sense that
    0:27:43 you might miss out. There was a sense of like you being falling behind in some sort of weird little
    0:27:51 race, a race to the top. And I think the speed with which you’re able to go right to the fear of
    0:27:59 the void, what Blais Pascal identified when he said that all of man’s problems stem from their
    0:28:06 inability to sit alone in a room. I think you’ve got, like a lot of us, you’ve got a component of
    0:28:17 that. And I also want to say I’m watching you letting go of the need to turn that void time
    0:28:23 into productivity time, right? When I first started promoting the notion of sabbatical,
    0:28:27 which we’ve talked about in the past, I remember dealing with a client who would say, “Well,
    0:28:32 I’m going to learn Portuguese.” It’s like, “No, you’re not. You’re not going to learn Portuguese
    0:28:41 in four weeks. You’re going to learn to breathe without breathe-right strips. You’re just going
    0:28:48 to learn to enjoy yourself.” Now, what I hear you doing is learning to enjoy yourself,
    0:28:59 which is a really powerful skill. Yeah. Yeah, it’s going to be a lifelong project,
    0:29:04 which is okay. A lot of things are lifelong projects. That’s right. We got here because
    0:29:11 you were asking about that process, and this is the process, right? This is the process. So,
    0:29:18 for you, when you’re off the grid starting Friday, what will that experience be like for you?
    0:29:24 At what point might you be anxious, and at what point might you start to relax? Because
    0:29:32 are you going to be with friends this trip too? This particular example may not fit the exercise,
    0:29:38 but what I’ve done for the last handful of years is every year I do a past year review,
    0:29:44 rather than setting, let’s just say, blind, semi-uninformed, overly optimistic New Year’s
    0:29:48 resolutions. I look back at the past year and figure out what the highs and lows looked like
    0:29:55 if I were to do an 80/20 analysis. Places, people, activities, the most life-giving and the most
    0:30:03 life-draining, and then I schedule time as soon as possible in blocks of one week, two weeks,
    0:30:09 depending on availability, to spend time with energy and people doing energy and things, right?
    0:30:16 And this particular week off the grid is going to be Alpine Alcant, which I do once every two
    0:30:23 years or so, with Bo at probably between 10 and 12,000 feet for the most of it. It’s going to get
    0:30:29 cold. We’re going to be eating a lot of shitty freeze-dried fruit, hopefully a bunch of trout
    0:30:38 on route to finding elk. And I have just found that particular experience and the time dilation
    0:30:46 that it allows to feel like a month off or two months off, it is just so regenerative for me
    0:30:53 that it’s become a core piece of my annual planning, not necessarily a hunt, but that type of
    0:30:58 shared experience with a small, very small group of people. So that’s what that will look like.
    0:31:06 And I, in a sense, I don’t want to say I’m disallowing myself from feeling discomfort,
    0:31:11 because there’s going to be incredible discomfort physically. Sleep is probably not going to be
    0:31:20 fantastic. And we will be very, very, very active, but it’s not the same as doing a silent retreat
    0:31:29 and sitting there watching your monkey brain just contort itself for 16 hours a day.
    0:31:36 It’s the kind of retreat where like layers of your skin are stripped away because you’re so raw
    0:31:41 and rugged out in the world. And that’s just going to drop you into your body
    0:31:49 and drop you more and more into the land. And that’s a place of nourishment for you, for sure.
    0:32:00 Finally, a special podcast on what happens when Israelis and Palestinians drink ayahuasca
    0:32:06 together, featuring an episode from the new psychedelics-focused podcast Altered States,
    0:32:12 made possible in part by the theorist UC Berkeley Psychedelic Journalism Fellowship.
    0:32:19 You can find Altered States on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your favorite
    0:32:27 podcasts. Welcome to Altered States. I’m Ariel Zumaross. This week, we are traveling thousands
    0:32:33 of miles away from where I am in Oregon to the Middle East to hear about another kind of psychedelic
    0:32:39 experiment. This one involves ayahuasca. Producer Shayna Shealy brings us this story.
    0:32:46 So, Shayna, welcome. First off, I know some folks might be familiar with ayahuasca,
    0:32:51 but others have probably never heard of it. Tell me, what exactly is ayahuasca?
    0:32:58 Yeah, so ayahuasca, people typically drink it as a sort of tea, and it’s made out of a vine from
    0:33:04 South America, which is often brewed together with another plant. It’s a type of shrub. And that
    0:33:10 shrub contains something called DMT, or dimethyltryptamine. So what do we know about what ayahuasca
    0:33:16 does to the brain? So usually about 30 minutes after drinking it, some people start having these
    0:33:23 hallucinations. Others have out-of-body experiences or euphoric feelings. There’s often vomiting
    0:33:29 involved. For some people, there are visions. Researchers have found that ayahuasca can promote
    0:33:35 what’s called neuroplasticity, which is the brain’s ability to adapt and build new connections.
    0:33:40 In this case, increased adaptability is thought to be able to help people heal from traumatic
    0:33:49 experiences. A few years ago, you came across these peace activists who were using ayahuasca
    0:33:55 to heal, and eventually you started reporting on that story. So can you tell me more?
    0:34:00 So these activists are Israeli and Palestinian, and they gather to drink ayahuasca and attempt to
    0:34:06 heal trauma, both personal trauma and collective trauma. And I knew a bunch of them from previous
    0:34:12 reporting in the region, and I was really interested just in the links that these people went to to
    0:34:24 build empathy. And then October 7th happened. Suddenly, the work of healing was interrupted by
    0:34:31 this massive shockwave, and these activists sort of looked to the group and to one person in particular
    0:34:37 to help them navigate it all. That person was Palestinian peace and justice activist, Sammy
    0:34:44 Awad. And that’s why your story starts with Sammy in his home in late summer 2023.
    0:35:02 In Sammy Awad’s kitchen near the Palestinian city of Bethlehem,
    0:35:08 a small group of people are gathered around a table. A handful of Israelis, a woman from
    0:35:14 Brazil, one guy from Ramallah. They’re all sitting there around plates of eggs and zatar,
    0:35:20 watermelon, balls of cured labna and olive oil. They were laughing, eating breakfast.
    0:35:27 Sammy describes his home as sort of an oasis for Israeli and Palestinian activists from all over,
    0:35:32 it’s where they can be together and find refuge from the harsh reality of living under forced
    0:35:39 separation. Sammy’s home office is filled with hundreds of books on meditation,
    0:35:45 yoga, psychedelic medicine, healing. He’s in his 50s, and he’s been working in the world of
    0:35:55 peace building for over 25 years. Sammy’s peace work started when he was 12 years old. He was
    0:36:01 with his uncle, an influential nonviolent peace activist. They were planting trees on a Palestinian
    0:36:06 farmer’s land that was under threat of confiscation by Jewish settlers. I remember Mark was saying,
    0:36:11 no matter what happens, you’re here to plant trees. The group of activists was mixed,
    0:36:17 Palestinian and Israeli. They were hours into planting when a group of Israeli soldiers approached
    0:36:21 them. The soldier coming, pulling the tree out of the ground that I was planting and throwing it
    0:36:28 on some rocks. And in that moment, there was this split decision, what do I do? Because as a 12-year-old,
    0:36:35 you know, what options I could run away, I could hide, run to my uncle crying, you know, like a
    0:36:40 12-year-old, you know, I was like, you’re here to plant the trees. And I decided I’m going to go back
    0:36:47 and bring the tree and plant it. And I did that, that sense of feeling, wow, empowerment and losing the fear.
    0:36:55 That action changed my life. It made me actually want to commit my life to this work.
    0:36:59 The work of peace building through nonviolence.
    0:37:05 Days after Sammy went with his uncle to plant trees, he learned that the land had been confiscated
    0:37:12 by Israeli settlers, that all the trees they had planted were uprooted. Still, Sammy would go on
    0:37:17 to plant even more trees. By the time he was in his 20s, he was organizing boycotts and peace
    0:37:25 demonstrations, sometimes alongside Israeli peace activists. But his actions kept getting shut down.
    0:37:33 He was beaten, imprisoned, put on lockdown. And then, in 1993, came the Oslo Accords,
    0:37:37 a deal between Israeli and Palestinian leadership that was supposed to kick off a
    0:37:43 peace process in the region, including limited Palestinian self-governance in parts of the
    0:37:49 West Bank in Gaza Strip. Then President Bill Clinton served as a diplomatic broker.
    0:37:56 Let us today pay tribute to the leaders who had the courage to lead their people toward peace,
    0:38:03 away from the scars of battle, the wounds and the losses of the past toward a brighter tomorrow.
    0:38:10 The world today thanks Prime Minister Rabin, Foreign Minister Perez and Chairman Arafat.
    0:38:21 Sammy was optimistic. There was billions of dollars of funds coming to create and sustain
    0:38:27 that peace that was being created. And all of a sudden, you started seeing NGOs begin to emerge,
    0:38:33 begin to rise, money pumping in like crazy. He built his own organization, Holy Land Trust.
    0:38:40 It became well known for nonviolent activism trainings. But even with this tireless dedication
    0:38:45 to peace, the world around Sammy became more and more violent.
    0:38:51 Both sides committed to negotiating an end to the conflict and charting a path to Palestinian
    0:38:58 self-rule in the West Bank in Gaza. It triggered a violent backlash from religious extremists
    0:39:04 among both Israelis and Palestinians, including Hamas. We’re beginning to see this continuous
    0:39:10 loop of failures in the peace process. And in 1995, a right-wing Jewish extremist
    0:39:18 assassinated Israeli Prime Minister, Itzhak Rabin. This big plan towards peace began to unravel
    0:39:24 almost immediately. Over the next decade, there was the expansion of Israeli settlements in the
    0:39:30 West Bank. Deadly attacks in Israel and the Palestinian territories. During that time,
    0:39:34 we began to understand the need to heal collective trauma as part of peacemaking,
    0:39:37 as well, understanding how much the past influences us.
    0:39:45 It was 2007. Sammy was in his mid-30s and had begun to take an interest in reading up on trauma
    0:39:51 when he was invited to go on a pretty unconventional trip to the death camps of Auschwitz and Birkenau.
    0:39:57 He spent eight days there, sleeping at the camp, eating all his meals there.
    0:40:02 So we were there every day, doing our own ceremony and prayer and visuals,
    0:40:07 remembering the people that died. I had, like, lists of names of people that we were all given
    0:40:12 to recite continuously. So, like, eight hour meditations we were doing. I began to really see
    0:40:19 that, “Wow, this is something that is not an incident that just happened in the past. This is
    0:40:29 something that continues until this day.” Pre-COVID, around 40,000 Israeli students visited concentration
    0:40:35 camps as part of their school curriculum each year. The trips are sponsored by Israel’s Education
    0:40:41 Ministry, typically right before mandatory military service. While Sammy was there,
    0:40:47 he kept seeing school group after school group. “Israeli kids with Israeli flags wrapped around
    0:40:54 them, big flags and they’re walking in and singing. I heard Israeli teachers tell these kids the
    0:41:00 Holocaust is not over. As Jews, we are always threatened, we’re always attacked. Many people
    0:41:04 want to destroy us. And, of course, then it’s followed by, this is why we have to be strong,
    0:41:08 this is why we have to be resilient, this is why security above everything, and this is why we
    0:41:14 never trust anybody. What the hell is happening here? Like, how can you be even talking about peace
    0:41:22 with somebody when the foundation is we don’t trust them?” That night, Sammy slept in Birkenau
    0:41:28 in the barracks where children were imprisoned. He was there with a Jewish person from Israel
    0:41:36 and a Muslim person from Bosnia. “We just had candles and our very thick coats and sleeping bags
    0:41:43 and just remembering. I like being in that place where these children were there and were dying.”
    0:41:47 But also having these discussions about this issue of inherited trauma.
    0:41:54 I began to realize that this whole peace process that we were in, that I was in,
    0:42:02 that I was even supporting and advocating for, was embedded from a space of existential fear
    0:42:08 and threat. The Palestinians, we have a similar narrative that our existence is on the line. We
    0:42:12 need to do something about it. If we don’t do something about it, we will cease to be as a people.
    0:42:19 What happened to us is too shameful, too painful. We don’t talk about it.
    0:42:26 Sammy says a lot of Palestinians don’t really acknowledge the full scope of pain that their
    0:42:33 families have endured. Like the 1948 Nakba, when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were driven
    0:42:40 from their homes, are really any other traumatic events. We have a generation growing up not knowing
    0:42:45 what happened and listening to propaganda. And the propaganda is we are resilient, we are strong,
    0:42:50 we will return, we will defeat them. Not acknowledging, like, there is grief that needs to happen.
    0:42:54 There is pain that needs to be expressed to what happened to us as a people. There’s a healing.
    0:42:58 But to not address these issues makes us unhealthy in how we’re dealing with things.
    0:43:07 When he got back to Bethlehem, this is what Sammy wanted to focus on.
    0:43:14 Healing. To address the trauma that gets passed down from generation to generation.
    0:43:22 He read books on this intergenerational trauma. He studied the Rwandan genocide and the healing
    0:43:28 journey that followed. He also met with Israeli-studying trauma, including faculty at Hebrew Union
    0:43:34 College. They developed tools for Israelis and Palestinians to work through their pain together.
    0:43:40 At the same time, foreign governments were pouring billions of dollars into the region to advance
    0:43:47 these peaceful coexistence programs between Israelis and Palestinians. There were summer camps,
    0:43:52 organizations that raised up the voices of parents who had lost children, theater troops,
    0:44:00 art projects. And still, around two decades after Oslo, Sammy felt things were worse than ever.
    0:44:05 You see the wars in Gaza, you see settler violence towards Palestinians, you see how
    0:44:09 Palestinians are treating each other. What do all of this money, all of this investment,
    0:44:16 where is it all? All of this peace process is 25 years of negotiating. The reality is as messed up
    0:44:22 as it’s ever been. Things now are worse than any time before. All of the peace work, all of the money
    0:44:27 that was spent. And so for me, I was in this place, we need something new. We need something new.
    0:44:33 That’s when he got a phone call. It was from an Israeli couple around 2012.
    0:44:38 When they say we have a peace project that we want to involve you with.
    0:44:45 Sammy rolled his eyes. More Israelis who think they have the answers. He almost hung up.
    0:44:49 And the woman like started yelling at me. No, we have to come and we have to meet you.
    0:44:52 And it’s very important that don’t bring anybody and it’s just you.
    0:44:59 His interest was peaked. He went to meet them. I said, three things came to my mind.
    0:45:04 Other, this is some money laundering scheme, something to do with drugs or something to do
    0:45:10 with weird sex. And she just started laughing, laughing. I said, it has to do with the second one.
    0:45:13 And then the guy looked at me. He looked at me straight in the eyes and he said,
    0:45:19 have you done medicine before? He was talking about the psychedelic brew Ayahuasca.
    0:45:23 As a man explained his vision, all Sammy could think about were the dangers.
    0:45:27 Sammy says drugs are kind of taboo in Palestinian society.
    0:45:34 It’s not just illegal. It’s immoral. It’s legitimate. It goes against religion.
    0:45:40 It goes against social values. People who drink Ayahuasca have described emotional breakthroughs,
    0:45:47 conversations with anthropomorphic spirits, catharsis of traumatic events, and connections
    0:45:53 with ancestors. So even though Sammy was terrified, he thought it might be worth trying.
    0:45:59 He traveled through checkpoints into Israel to join the couple for an Ayahuasca ceremony.
    0:46:05 He downed a cup full of the sludgy tea and soon he was vomiting.
    0:46:12 And now here are the bios for all the guests.
    0:46:18 My guest today, one of my favorites, Elizabeth Gilbert. She is the number one New York Times
    0:46:24 bestselling author of Big Magic and Eat Pray Love, as well as several other international bestsellers.
    0:46:29 She has been a finalist for the National Book Award, the National Book Critics Circle Award,
    0:46:34 and the Penn Hemingway Award. Her latest novel, City of Girls, was named an instant New York Times
    0:46:40 bestseller, a rollicking, sexy tale of the New York City theater world during the 1940s.
    0:46:45 You can go to elizabethgilbert.substack.com to subscribe to Letters from Love with Elizabeth
    0:46:50 Gilbert. Her newsletter, which has more than 120,000 subscribers, you can find her
    0:46:54 on Instagram @elizabeth_gilbert_writer.
    0:47:05 This time we have a very special episode. This is always a listener favorite,
    0:47:09 a recording with my close friend Kevin Rose. Kevin Rose, for those who don’t know,
    0:47:15 at Kevin Rose, everywhere. He is indeed a world-class entrepreneur, serial founder,
    0:47:22 investor in the smallest of seed rounds up to the largest of companies. He is a full spectrum,
    0:47:29 full stack capitalist. I don’t know what the hell I’m saying. But we did this interview in person
    0:47:34 at his house in the format of The Random Show. And what we always do, and we’ve done this for
    0:47:41 10 years, I suppose now. We trade our latest discoveries, our latest findings, what our
    0:47:47 friends have sent to us. And I think it is one of our best. There’s tons of actionable takeaways,
    0:47:54 lots of laughing fits, and that might have something to do with the fact that Kevin invited
    0:47:59 his friend and bartender to serve us cocktails. We cover dozens of topics, new projects, what I’ve
    0:48:05 done on my recent sabbatical, Kevin’s latest findings and shenanigans, real vampire protocols.
    0:48:10 Apparently, that’s a thing. And much, much more. It even includes some incredibly bizarre footage
    0:48:18 of Kevin having his face assaulted by experimental technology. We videotaped that live together,
    0:48:24 and video is not at all required to enjoy this episode whatsoever. Audio is great.
    0:48:27 But for some extra hilarity, if you want to see that video I mentioned,
    0:48:33 and more, simply go to youtube.com/timferis, F-E-R-R-I-S-S.
    0:48:43 Sometimes I get not just a two for one, but a hundred for one when I interview someone
    0:48:50 who also helps world-class performers, in addition to being such themselves, to get past
    0:48:55 sticking points, to redefine themselves, to reinvent themselves, to chart new paths forward.
    0:49:00 And my guest today, Jerry Kelowna, is such a person. He is the CEO and co-founder of Reboot.io,
    0:49:05 an executive coaching and leadership development firm dedicated to the notion that better humans
    0:49:10 make better leaders. But prior to that, he was an operator in many different ways.
    0:49:14 Prior to being a coach, he was a partner with J.P. Morgan Partners, the private equity arm of J.P.
    0:49:21 Morgan Chase. He also led New York City-based Flatiron Partners, which he founded in 1996
    0:49:25 with partner Fred Wilson. Flatiron went on to become one of the nation’s most successful
    0:49:30 early-stage investment programs. At age 25, he was editor-in-chief of Information Week Magazine.
    0:49:35 He’s written a bunch of books. We’ll mention them at the end of the conversation. But one is Reboot.
    0:49:41 The other is Reunion, both highly recommended. You can find his company, Reboot, at Reboot.io,
    0:49:48 and Jerry on Twitter and Instagram @JerryKelowna, C-O-L-O-N-N-A. And he has been on the podcast
    0:49:54 twice before. He is a fan favorite. People always take a ton away from our conversations.
    0:50:00 And I recap some of my favorite aspects of those in this episode. And we cover a lot of ground.
    0:50:04 There are a lot of stories I’ve never heard. We have a lot of laughs,
    0:50:12 almost a few cries on my side. We dig into his toolkit. The questions that he uses with himself
    0:50:19 and with clients that I have adopted is some of my favorites. There is a lot to learn. And it was a
    0:50:25 hell of an enjoyable conversation. It was a walk and talk. And I have done this before where I am
    0:50:31 out in nature today. It is a beautiful bluebird sky day in the mountains and to sit in a dark room,
    0:50:38 staring at a screen seemed like an insult to nature, complete travesty, totally unnecessary. So I have
    0:50:43 high fidelity recording equipment. That is what I’m using right now. It is a headset. I am sitting
    0:50:51 10 feet from a beautiful river where I’m watching the eddies swirl around rocks. So why not? Get out
    0:50:55 and move. If you can listen to this while you’re moving, I encourage you to do so. Audio is a
    0:51:01 secondary activity. So if you can walk and talk or walk and listen while I’m walking and talking,
    0:51:05 all the better for you, me, everybody involved.
    0:51:14 For this episode, I am doing something very different. I’m actually featuring
    0:51:20 a special episode from a brand new podcast called Altered States. And I listened to a lot of podcasts.
    0:51:26 I test out a lot of podcasts. I found this one to be particularly impressive. It’s very well
    0:51:31 reported, very well researched, very well produced. Here’s the teaser for the episode that you’re
    0:51:37 about to hear. It’s not a long one, but it is a very nuanced one, a very powerful one. Quote,
    0:51:42 “For the last couple of years, producer Shayna Shealy has been following Israeli and Palestinian
    0:51:47 peace activists who have been coming together to drink the psychedelic brew ayahuasca in an effort
    0:51:52 to heal their collective intergenerational trauma. It seemed to be helping them when suddenly the
    0:51:58 region erupts into chaos and violence.” Shayna Shealy as background was a fellow from the Ferris
    0:52:03 UC Berkeley Psychedelic Journalism Fellowship. That’s how I actually heard about the podcast.
    0:52:09 And the fellowship offers $10,000 reporting grants per year to journalists reporting in-depth
    0:52:14 print and audio stories on the science, policy, business, and culture of this new era of psychedelics.
    0:52:19 It’s been going for a few years now, and a lot of amazing pieces have come out of it. The fellowship
    0:52:24 is supported by my foundation, the Saise Foundation. You can find that s-a-i-s-e-i,
    0:52:28 foundation.org, if you want to see what types of projects and grants and so on we’ve made.
    0:52:34 And it is made possible in collaboration with Michael Pollan, Mali Awalin, and others at UC
    0:52:40 Berkeley. So thanks to the entire team over there. Altered States, the podcast, looks at how people
    0:52:44 are taking psychedelics, who has access to them. They actually have an amazing episode where they
    0:52:49 walk through in real time, someone’s first experience with psilocybin, how they’re regulated,
    0:52:55 who stands to profit, and what these substances might offer us as individuals and as a society.
    0:53:00 It’s hosted by journalist Aril Dumras, and you can find it wherever you find your podcasts.
    0:53:05 Hey guys, this is Tim again, just one more thing before you take
    0:53:10 off, and that is Five Bullet Friday. Would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday
    0:53:15 that provides a little fun before the weekend? Between one and a half and two million people
    0:53:20 subscribe to my free newsletter, my super short newsletter called Five Bullet Friday.
    0:53:26 Easy to sign up, easy to cancel. It is basically a half page that I send out every Friday to share
    0:53:31 the coolest things I’ve found or discovered or have started exploring over that week. It’s kind
    0:53:36 of like my diary of cool things. It often includes articles I’m reading, books I’m reading, albums
    0:53:42 perhaps, gadgets, gizmos, all sorts of tech tricks and so on that get sent to me by my friends,
    0:53:48 including a lot of podcast guests and these strange esoteric things end up in my field.
    0:53:55 And then I test them and then I share them with you. So if that sounds fun, again, it’s very short,
    0:54:00 a little tiny bite of goodness before you head off for the weekend, something to think about.
    0:54:04 If you’d like to try it out, just go to tim.blog/friday, type that into your browser,
    0:54:15 tim.blog/friday, drop in your email and you’ll get the very next one. Thanks for listening.

    This episode is brought to you by 5-Bullet Friday, my very own email newsletter.

    Welcome to another episode of The Tim Ferriss Show, where it is my job to deconstruct world-class performers to tease out the routines, habits, et cetera that you can apply to your own life. 

    This is a special inbetweenisode, which serves as a recap of the episodes from last month. It features a short clip from each conversation in one place so you can easily jump around to get a feel for the episode and guest.

    Based on your feedback, this format has been tweaked and improved since the first recap episode. For instance, listeners suggested that the bios for each guest can slow the momentum, so we moved all the bios to the end. 

    See it as a teaser. Something to whet your appetite. If you like what you hear, you can of course find the full episodes at tim.blog/podcast

    Please enjoy! 

    *

    This episode is brought to you by 5-Bullet Friday, my very own email newsletter that every Friday features five bullet points highlighting cool things I’ve found that week, including apps, books, documentaries, gadgets, albums, articles, TV shows, new hacks or tricks, and—of course—all sorts of weird stuff I’ve dug up from around the world.

    It’s free, it’s always going to be free, and you can subscribe now at tim.blog/friday.

    *

    Timestamps:

    Start [00:00]

    Elizabeth Gilbert: [00:03:26]

    The Random Show with Kevin Rose: [00:08:03]

    Jerry Colonna: [00:17:29]

    Altered States: [00:32:21]

    Full episode titles:

    Elizabeth Gilbert — How to Set Strong Boundaries, Overcome Purpose Anxiety, and Find Your Deep Inner Voice (#770)

    The Random Show — Lessons from Tim’s Sabbatical, Alzheimer’s Breakthroughs, Kevin Tries a Medium, Fitness Tools and Protocols, Book Recommendations, and More (#766)

    Tim and Uncle Jerry Tackle Life, Big Questions, Business, Parenting, and Disco Duck (#767)

    What Happens When Israelis and Palestinians Drink Ayahuasca Together? (#768)

    *

    For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.

    For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Showplease visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsors

    Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.

    For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.

    Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.

    Follow Tim:

    Twittertwitter.com/tferriss 

    Instagraminstagram.com/timferriss

    YouTubeyoutube.com/timferriss

    Facebookfacebook.com/timferriss 

    LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferriss

    Past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry SeinfeldHugh JackmanDr. Jane GoodallLeBron JamesKevin HartDoris Kearns GoodwinJamie FoxxMatthew McConaugheyEsther PerelElizabeth GilbertTerry CrewsSiaYuval Noah HarariMalcolm GladwellMadeleine AlbrightCheryl StrayedJim CollinsMary Karr, Maria PopovaSam HarrisMichael PhelpsBob IgerEdward NortonArnold SchwarzeneggerNeil StraussKen BurnsMaria SharapovaMarc AndreessenNeil GaimanNeil de Grasse TysonJocko WillinkDaniel EkKelly SlaterDr. Peter AttiaSeth GodinHoward MarksDr. Brené BrownEric SchmidtMichael LewisJoe GebbiaMichael PollanDr. Jordan PetersonVince VaughnBrian KoppelmanRamit SethiDax ShepardTony RobbinsJim DethmerDan HarrisRay DalioNaval RavikantVitalik ButerinElizabeth LesserAmanda PalmerKatie HaunSir Richard BransonChuck PalahniukArianna HuffingtonReid HoffmanBill BurrWhitney CummingsRick RubinDr. Vivek MurthyDarren AronofskyMargaret AtwoodMark ZuckerbergPeter ThielDr. Gabor MatéAnne LamottSarah SilvermanDr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.