Category: Uncategorized

  • #46 – Corporate Universities, Hotel Experiences & New Credit Cards with Lance Armstrong

    Sam (@thesamparr) and Shaan (@shaanvp) are back talking news, trends, interesting products and businesses. Today Lance Armstrong (@lancearmstrong) happened to drop by to talk investing and celebrity life. Join our FB group: facebook.com/groups/ourfirstmillion. Topics for today: Brandless.com shutting down (2:58), Buying dying businesses (7:53), Hybrid VC’s (9:32), Launch of Ramp Capital (11:13), Corporate universities & online degrees (13:47), Lance Armstrong joins! (18:26), New beverage companies (21:07), Is investing boring? (22:47), Hotels offering more experiences (27:07), Are celebs on Cameo broke? (30:12) and Shaan’s last minute meeting idea (33:35). 

    See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

  • Vladimir Vapnik: Predicates, Invariants, and the Essence of Intelligence

    Vladimir Vapnik is the co-inventor of support vector machines, support vector clustering, VC theory, and many foundational ideas in statistical learning. He was born in the Soviet Union, worked at the Institute of Control Sciences in Moscow, then in the US, worked at AT&T, NEC Labs, Facebook AI Research, and now is a professor at Columbia University. His work has been cited over 200,000 times.

    This conversation is part of the Artificial Intelligence podcast. If you would like to get more information about this podcast go to https://lexfridman.com/ai or connect with @lexfridman on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Medium, or YouTube where you can watch the video versions of these conversations. If you enjoy the podcast, please rate it 5 stars on Apple Podcasts, follow on Spotify, or support it on Patreon.

    This episode is presented by Cash App. Download it (App Store, Google Play), use code “LexPodcast”. 

    Here’s the outline of the episode. On some podcast players you should be able to click the timestamp to jump to that time.

    00:00 – Introduction
    02:55 – Alan Turing: science and engineering of intelligence
    09:09 – What is a predicate?
    14:22 – Plato’s world of ideas and world of things
    21:06 – Strong and weak convergence
    28:37 – Deep learning and the essence of intelligence
    50:36 – Symbolic AI and logic-based systems
    54:31 – How hard is 2D image understanding?
    1:00:23 – Data
    1:06:39 – Language
    1:14:54 – Beautiful idea in statistical theory of learning
    1:19:28 – Intelligence and heuristics
    1:22:23 – Reasoning
    1:25:11 – Role of philosophy in learning theory
    1:31:40 – Music (speaking in Russian)
    1:35:08 – Mortality

  • Tough Love, Global Diplomacy, and Lessons on Leadership

    AI transcript
    0:00:04 – Hi everyone, welcome to the A16Z podcast.
    0:00:07 In today’s episode, A16Z General Partner Katie Hahn
    0:00:10 interviews Susan Rice, the former National Security Advisor
    0:00:12 and U.S. Ambassador to the UN.
    0:00:15 She’s the author of a memoir, “Tough Love.”
    0:00:16 This is a candid talk
    0:00:18 in which Ambassador Rice discusses leadership,
    0:00:20 what it is, how to achieve it,
    0:00:22 and how to focus under the extreme pressure
    0:00:23 of global crisis.
    0:00:26 She also talks about U.S. foreign relations
    0:00:28 and what role the tech community can play.
    0:00:29 This conversation took place
    0:00:31 at our most recent innovation conference,
    0:00:33 the A16Z Summit.
    0:00:35 It was previously released on YouTube
    0:00:36 if you’d like to check it out there.
    0:00:40 (audience applauding)
    0:00:43 – Susan, it’s so great to see you again here in LA.
    0:00:45 And this time I get to share you with this audience,
    0:00:47 which I’m really excited about.
    0:00:49 You’ve had such an incredible life
    0:00:51 and you’ve been in so many rooms and situations
    0:00:54 that really very few of us, even in this rarefied room,
    0:00:57 will ever really get to experience.
    0:01:00 Aside from being Obama’s national security advisor
    0:01:03 and the ambassador, the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations,
    0:01:05 you were also the youngest assistant secretary
    0:01:07 of state in the Clinton administration.
    0:01:10 And you were a Rhodes Scholar.
    0:01:12 You have your doctorate from Oxford.
    0:01:14 And of course, all of these experiences
    0:01:16 meant that you had a front row seat
    0:01:19 to some pretty interesting situations,
    0:01:22 things like the Snowden Leaks, North Korea,
    0:01:25 negotiations with Iran,
    0:01:28 the war against ISIS, the Ukraine.
    0:01:31 And now you’re on the board of Netflix.
    0:01:32 You write for the New York Times
    0:01:35 and you’ve just published your memoir, “Tough Love.”
    0:01:37 So Susan, in “Tough Love,”
    0:01:40 you write that when you were in your younger years,
    0:01:43 when you were 32, people said about you
    0:01:46 that you were smart and dynamic and decisive.
    0:01:48 But they also said you were,
    0:01:52 and I quote, “Brash, demanding and impatient.”
    0:01:55 And I’m wondering if these traits are unbalanced.
    0:01:57 Do you think they were a bug or a feature
    0:01:59 as you rose through the ranks of the government?
    0:02:01 – Well, first of all, Katie,
    0:02:02 thank you so much for doing this.
    0:02:03 And good afternoon, everyone.
    0:02:05 It’s great to be with you.
    0:02:07 Thank you.
    0:02:14 I would say that I had a mix of qualities at age 32
    0:02:17 that were on the one hand feature and the other hand bug.
    0:02:22 On the feature side, I do think I had strong preparation.
    0:02:25 I was hungry, I was driving a team
    0:02:28 to a very particular set of outcomes.
    0:02:31 That was feature, but I was impatient.
    0:02:36 I was brash, and I think that I learned the hard way
    0:02:40 that I had to adjust some of those characteristics.
    0:02:42 They were more on the bug side
    0:02:47 and they were not well suited to the environment
    0:02:47 in which I was in.
    0:02:50 This was when I was a very young assistant secretary
    0:02:52 of state for African affairs.
    0:02:54 I’d started the job having worked
    0:02:56 at the White House previously.
    0:03:01 I was 32 years old and not only the youngest person
    0:03:06 by far among the people who worked with me and under me,
    0:03:09 but I was also the mother
    0:03:12 of a three-month-old breastfeeding son.
    0:03:15 And the combination of all of those things,
    0:03:18 plus my characteristics in the State Department,
    0:03:22 were, I think, off-putting to some.
    0:03:27 And I had a wonderful set of advisors and mentors,
    0:03:30 some of whom who took me to the woodshed
    0:03:33 and delivered a dose of tough love at a stage
    0:03:35 when it was very useful to me.
    0:03:36 – Yeah, and in particular,
    0:03:39 I know you write about several of those mentors in the book,
    0:03:41 but is there one that really exemplifies
    0:03:44 helping you overcome some of those,
    0:03:45 as you said, those characteristics
    0:03:48 that you’ve deemed were a bug?
    0:03:53 – Well, the most impactful experience was in 1998.
    0:03:57 I’d been in the job about a year.
    0:04:00 And 1998, none of you will recall,
    0:04:02 but I’ll remind you it was the year
    0:04:04 when not only on the African continent,
    0:04:08 we had wars break out between Ethiopia and Eritrea,
    0:04:13 huge war in the Congo, wars in West Africa as well.
    0:04:16 And over the summer in August,
    0:04:19 Al Qaeda attacked our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania
    0:04:24 and killed 12 Americans and over 200 Kenyans
    0:04:27 and left thousands wounded and our embassies destroyed.
    0:04:31 And so it was a really high pressure, high intensity time.
    0:04:35 And my approach to dealing with all of this
    0:04:38 was to keep focused on the mission,
    0:04:41 to drive through the pain,
    0:04:46 to just stay focused and push myself and the team
    0:04:48 as hard and as fast as we can
    0:04:50 to deal with all these simultaneous challenges.
    0:04:55 But just before Christmas, a colleague,
    0:04:56 a man named Howard Wolpe,
    0:04:59 who was a former member of Congress from Michigan
    0:05:01 and was working as a political appointee
    0:05:03 in the State Department,
    0:05:06 he took me out to lunch at a really crappy Chinese restaurant
    0:05:08 near the State Department.
    0:05:10 And I thought it was just gonna be a social occasion.
    0:05:13 And after a few bites, he came straight out
    0:05:17 and said, you know, Susan, you’re gonna fail in this job
    0:05:19 if you don’t change course.
    0:05:22 You’re smart, you’re committed, you know your brief,
    0:05:23 you’re hard charging,
    0:05:26 you’ve got the support of the Secretary of State
    0:05:27 and the President,
    0:05:32 but you are not being sufficiently deferential
    0:05:35 to sufficiently appreciative of the expertise
    0:05:38 of the senior people working with you.
    0:05:40 And you’re not bringing the team along,
    0:05:44 you’re not investing your team in the outcomes.
    0:05:47 You’re just driving relentlessly towards an outcome
    0:05:49 and you’re losing people.
    0:05:53 And if you don’t change course, you’re gonna fail.
    0:05:55 And I don’t wanna see you fail.
    0:05:57 And so we then had a conversation
    0:06:01 which was obviously pretty bracing for me,
    0:06:06 but I realized that he was doing this as a huge favor.
    0:06:08 He was doing this as somebody who cared.
    0:06:09 He could have basically said, you know,
    0:06:12 I don’t care if you fail, that’s not my problem.
    0:06:15 But he took me under his wing and gave me that advice
    0:06:17 which enabled me, I think,
    0:06:22 to be a far more patient, more inclusive,
    0:06:28 more collaborative leader and manager of teams
    0:06:30 than I had otherwise been.
    0:06:35 And that helped me soften some of those qualities
    0:06:37 that we described as a bug.
    0:06:39 And so that by the time I completed my tenure
    0:06:41 at the end of the Clinton administration,
    0:06:45 I think I really had learned and grown
    0:06:46 in ways that were very valuable.
    0:06:51 And I think I was able to leave behind a record of success
    0:06:53 without which I’m not sure I would be,
    0:06:55 have gone on to do the other things
    0:06:57 that I ended up doing in the Obama administration.
    0:06:59 – Well, one of the things that struck me
    0:07:01 in reading the book is you were so fortunate
    0:07:04 to have a number of mentors like that,
    0:07:05 including your own parents.
    0:07:06 And so I wanna take a step back
    0:07:08 and talk about your origin story
    0:07:10 because I’m sure a lot of people in this room
    0:07:12 are familiar with a lot of your accomplishments,
    0:07:15 but your parents were also really accomplished
    0:07:16 in their own right.
    0:07:19 I mean, your dad descended from slaves in South Carolina,
    0:07:22 went on to become a member of the Tuskegee Airmen.
    0:07:24 And then he went on also
    0:07:27 to become an economics professor at Cornell,
    0:07:30 eventually serving as governor of the Federal Reserve Bank
    0:07:33 and in several senior roles at Treasury and the World Bank.
    0:07:37 Your mom had a very different experience.
    0:07:40 She was the daughter of immigrants from Jamaica
    0:07:42 who settled in Maine,
    0:07:44 which explains your main connection.
    0:07:49 And she went on to Radcliffe, not only to Radcliffe,
    0:07:52 but also to become the student body president
    0:07:53 and then served on the boards
    0:07:57 of 11 different major public companies.
    0:07:59 Now, that seems, all of those things
    0:08:02 seem like really impressive accomplishments
    0:08:04 for any person at any time,
    0:08:08 but really rare, especially for a woman of color
    0:08:09 at that time.
    0:08:13 And so I’m just curious, what lessons did you take
    0:08:15 from these incredible parents you had?
    0:08:19 – Well, I really was blessed with two extraordinary parents
    0:08:23 who came, as Katie said, from extremely different backgrounds,
    0:08:25 but they had several things in common.
    0:08:27 They had a commitment to education,
    0:08:31 they had a commitment to service,
    0:08:36 and they had a sense that they had been blessed
    0:08:38 with the gifts of their parents and grandparents,
    0:08:41 and it was their responsibility to make the most of those,
    0:08:44 and the expectation for me and my brother
    0:08:45 was that we’d do the same.
    0:08:51 And as you said, their background’s very different,
    0:08:53 but on my father’s side,
    0:08:59 he grew up in really the most raw form of Jim Crow,
    0:09:05 and brutal segregation in South Carolina, born in 1920.
    0:09:08 And then, as you said, served at Tuskegee
    0:09:10 with the Tuskegee Airmen.
    0:09:14 And his challenge, as somebody whose parents
    0:09:18 and grandparents had both gone to college,
    0:09:21 his grandfather, my great grandfather, was a slave
    0:09:24 who ended up getting a college education
    0:09:28 after fighting in the Civil War on the side
    0:09:31 of the Union Army and founding a school in New Jersey
    0:09:34 that educated generations of African Americans.
    0:09:38 So there was a tradition on my father’s side
    0:09:43 of having the extraordinary opportunity to attend university,
    0:09:47 but in his experience, he was so freighted
    0:09:52 with the oppression of bigotry and segregation,
    0:09:54 and so resentful of having to serve
    0:09:58 in the segregated military in World War II
    0:10:03 and be expected to prove what to him was absolutely obvious,
    0:10:06 which was that African Americans could fly
    0:10:08 and fight as well as anybody.
    0:10:10 So he’d left trying to figure out
    0:10:15 how does an African American man in the 1940s,
    0:10:19 who had already gotten a college education,
    0:10:22 went on to get his PhD in economics at Berkeley,
    0:10:27 believe in himself when society is pushing him down.
    0:10:29 And my mom, from her perspective,
    0:10:30 a very different set of challenges,
    0:10:33 but again, the daughter of immigrants
    0:10:34 who came to this country with nothing,
    0:10:36 sent all their kids to college,
    0:10:42 and the expectation for her was also to excel and succeed.
    0:10:45 And what they taught me and my brother was, in essence,
    0:10:50 that we couldn’t let other people define us for us.
    0:10:53 We had to believe in ourselves and know our worth
    0:10:56 and not let others discount us.
    0:11:00 My father had an expression which was,
    0:11:04 if my being black is going to be a problem,
    0:11:08 it’s gonna be a problem for somebody else, not for me.
    0:11:11 In other words, what he understood was that bigotry
    0:11:15 is the function of somebody else’s insecurity.
    0:11:17 And even though there’s structural and institutional
    0:11:21 and legal impediments that he faced every step of the way,
    0:11:24 he did realize that he got to choose
    0:11:26 how he thought of himself.
    0:11:31 And if he let the bigot’s definition of him become his own,
    0:11:33 then the bigot would succeed and he would fail.
    0:11:36 He would not believe in his own capacity.
    0:11:41 And so what he and my mother taught me and my brother, John,
    0:11:46 is that we were worthy, we were capable,
    0:11:48 and we had to believe in ourselves.
    0:11:52 And we would inevitably encounter racism or sexism
    0:11:55 or ageism or whatever it might be.
    0:11:57 But the way to deal with that is,
    0:12:00 in essence, a psychological jujitsu,
    0:12:05 to let that be somebody else’s concern, not yours.
    0:12:09 And to try not to expend your precious mental energy
    0:12:11 doubting yourself.
    0:12:13 And that’s really hard to do,
    0:12:15 whether you’re a male or a female,
    0:12:17 a person of color or not.
    0:12:20 – Yeah, wow, so powerful.
    0:12:22 I’m wondering also, in addition to the lessons
    0:12:24 that you were taking from your parents,
    0:12:24 and you wrote about them,
    0:12:26 I encourage everyone who hasn’t read the book
    0:12:27 to go read for yourself,
    0:12:30 because they’re really a set of extraordinary things
    0:12:33 you took from both your mom and your dad
    0:12:34 and their extended family.
    0:12:36 I mean, you write a lot about some of the memories
    0:12:39 you had growing up, the summers in Maine.
    0:12:41 But I’m also curious in writing your book,
    0:12:43 if there are themes that you kind of discovered
    0:12:47 about yourself that help motivate you
    0:12:50 to become the kind of successful person that you became.
    0:12:54 – Well, writing the book was a real opportunity,
    0:12:58 a gift of a chance to reflect
    0:13:00 and to think back as to all of the things
    0:13:01 that influenced me,
    0:13:04 because frankly, I realized in writing this,
    0:13:06 that essentially from high school,
    0:13:09 until the day I left the Obama administration,
    0:13:12 I’d been going at almost full speed nonstop.
    0:13:17 And what I really realized
    0:13:20 is that the most formative experiences
    0:13:23 were the lessons I learned from my parents,
    0:13:28 and the real challenge I had coming through
    0:13:30 my parents’ divorce.
    0:13:32 You’ve heard how great my parents were,
    0:13:33 and they really were,
    0:13:35 but they absolutely had no business
    0:13:37 being married to each other.
    0:13:39 And there’s– – And you wrote about that a lot,
    0:13:41 and you talked about it. – I write a lot about it.
    0:13:42 I write a lot about it,
    0:13:45 because I realized that I can’t explain myself
    0:13:46 without explaining that experience.
    0:13:47 – Can you impact that a little,
    0:13:49 because I think that’s just really so interesting
    0:13:52 as you found yourself in some of these crisis situations
    0:13:54 later, mostly professionally,
    0:13:57 but also personally, explain that a little bit,
    0:14:00 how you think that your parents’ own relations
    0:14:02 with each other and then their eventual divorce
    0:14:04 kind of contributed to that.
    0:14:07 – Well, by the time I was about seven,
    0:14:12 they were fighting constantly, and sometimes violently,
    0:14:15 and it was really terrifying for me and my brother,
    0:14:18 who was two years younger than me.
    0:14:21 We’d be in bed at night trying to go to sleep,
    0:14:24 and I’d wake up to them screaming and yelling,
    0:14:29 and I was scared, frankly, that it could spin out of control.
    0:14:32 And so I would creep downstairs and spy on them,
    0:14:36 and try to figure out if this was gonna get out of control.
    0:14:40 And if I feared it might, I’d intervene,
    0:14:42 sometimes physically,
    0:14:48 but more often actually trying to talk them down
    0:14:51 and therefore listen to what they were arguing about,
    0:14:53 what were the, who was making what point
    0:14:57 and where reason lay at seven or eight.
    0:14:59 – So you’re doing diplomacy then, really.
    0:15:03 I mean, really a precursor to what came later,
    0:15:04 I guess, professionally.
    0:15:06 I had no idea, obviously, that any of that
    0:15:07 would have any relevance,
    0:15:12 but I did find myself trying to fire fight, in essence.
    0:15:20 And then when I was 10, they actually separated
    0:15:24 and then went through a very bitter and ugly divorce
    0:15:26 and a very public custody battle.
    0:15:29 And so really until I was 15,
    0:15:33 this thing dragged out in one shape or another.
    0:15:37 And I had to make a decision about
    0:15:41 whether I was gonna let it crush me
    0:15:44 or whether I was going to control what I could control
    0:15:48 and not try to be weighted down by what I couldn’t.
    0:15:49 I couldn’t control them
    0:15:51 and how they were dealing with each other,
    0:15:54 but I could control how I performed in school
    0:15:57 and whether I tried to repair my friendships
    0:15:58 which had suffered.
    0:16:01 And whether I was gonna be an athlete
    0:16:03 and a student leader and all this stuff.
    0:16:05 And what I learned from all of that
    0:16:08 is that I could take a hit and keep going.
    0:16:13 And it gave me a degree of confidence in my own resiliency
    0:16:17 that turns out, I think, in retrospect,
    0:16:19 to have been probably the most important,
    0:16:24 formative revelation that I had early on.
    0:16:28 And rather than feeling like, you know,
    0:16:29 this was the worst thing that ever could happen,
    0:16:30 which, of course, it wasn’t,
    0:16:34 but it was bad in my experience.
    0:16:36 I realized, wow, this was really bad,
    0:16:40 but I can still keep doing what I need to do.
    0:16:44 And I think that strength was something
    0:16:47 that I wouldn’t know I’d need down the road,
    0:16:48 but was incredibly valuable.
    0:16:50 – Well, we’ve talked before, you and I,
    0:16:52 about how you have an ability,
    0:16:54 I think you’d agree, to compartmentalize.
    0:16:55 – Yeah.
    0:16:59 – And that it served you well later professionally
    0:17:00 in times of crisis.
    0:17:02 – And by compartmentalize in this context,
    0:17:06 what I mean is, and as I had to do
    0:17:09 as national security advisor, for example,
    0:17:12 when there’s all this stuff going on,
    0:17:17 whether it’s your parents fighting or, you know,
    0:17:21 working on the most difficult problems and crises
    0:17:24 in the world when almost every major decision
    0:17:26 has life and death implications,
    0:17:31 I would found that I was able to do the work of the job
    0:17:34 and be focused and committed to that work
    0:17:39 without it affecting me in every day,
    0:17:43 all day emotionally and being debilitating.
    0:17:47 I feel, you know, if we’re working on a very difficult issue,
    0:17:50 I felt that weight, I felt that pain,
    0:17:55 but it didn’t become something that I could not cope with.
    0:17:59 It didn’t cripple my ability to focus
    0:18:01 and do the job functionally.
    0:18:04 And I think, you know, you have to have some measure
    0:18:06 of that wherever it comes from
    0:18:08 to work on those kinds of issues
    0:18:12 and not, you know, be crushed, for example,
    0:18:15 by the weight of the humanitarian crisis in Syria.
    0:18:17 – Well, and you’ve been in a number
    0:18:19 of those crisis situations, obviously,
    0:18:22 you just mentioned Syria, the humanitarian crisis.
    0:18:24 And I’m just wondering, you’re gonna tie it to this room,
    0:18:28 what best practices or philosophy
    0:18:31 do you bring to bear, Susan, in moments of real crisis?
    0:18:37 – Well, I think my way of approaching crisis is,
    0:18:39 first of all, to get super calm.
    0:18:41 The worst the situation is,
    0:18:46 the more I kinda just chill out and not freak out.
    0:18:51 – I mean, you wrote about the embassy bombings.
    0:18:54 – Yeah, the embassy bombings were an example.
    0:18:58 So, trying to stay calm, trying to gather the information,
    0:19:01 trying to focus on outcomes that we could control
    0:19:08 and not allow the overwhelming nature of the crisis
    0:19:14 to impede our ability to act rationally and effectively.
    0:19:19 So, in 1998, when the embassies were bombed
    0:19:24 in Kenya and Tanzania, my focus was on what can we do
    0:19:28 in the moment to be impactful and effective?
    0:19:31 We had to get search and rescue teams out
    0:19:34 in the shortest order to try to save people
    0:19:36 who were buried in the rubble.
    0:19:40 We had to get the FBI and the other investigative elements
    0:19:42 on the ground to gather the evidence
    0:19:45 so that we could find the perpetrators.
    0:19:48 We had to support the families of the victims
    0:19:50 with information and with comfort.
    0:19:54 We had to do all these things in the moment
    0:19:58 and so my emphasis was on what can we practically do
    0:20:03 immediately without falling apart and despairing
    0:20:06 and how also at the same time,
    0:20:07 and this is what I learned the hard way,
    0:20:11 became better at as I got more experiences,
    0:20:16 recognize that the people you are working with
    0:20:20 process these crises differently than you may
    0:20:23 and may need a different kind of support and approach.
    0:20:27 And so being a compassionate leader that recognizes
    0:20:29 that you need to provide space for people
    0:20:32 to work through their pain and cope with it
    0:20:36 while trying to keep them on the focus to be effective.
    0:20:40 That was where I was lacking at age 32
    0:20:44 and I hope by say 52, I’d gotten a little bit better at.
    0:20:45 – Yeah.
    0:20:47 Well, you know, look, you’ve clearly been
    0:20:51 in some really high pressure situations.
    0:20:54 And at the time you mentioned the embassy bombings,
    0:20:57 you know, you had Jake, your son,
    0:21:00 who was practically a newborn at that point, right?
    0:21:01 – He was a newborn.
    0:21:01 – He was a newborn, right?
    0:21:03 Well, so clearly you’ve been in these
    0:21:07 high pressure situations, but then you add marriage,
    0:21:09 you add kids and somehow you’re managing
    0:21:11 a really complicated life, Susan,
    0:21:13 and you’ve managed a really complicated life
    0:21:16 with a great deal of elegance as an outsider.
    0:21:17 – Thank you.
    0:21:18 – Looking in.
    0:21:20 And I’m wondering just as I think
    0:21:21 about all you’ve accomplished,
    0:21:23 and you have two kids we’ll talk about in a minute,
    0:21:26 and I think Ian is here in the audience, your husband.
    0:21:28 – My wonderful husband.
    0:21:30 – But what are, how are you hacking this?
    0:21:31 How have you done this?
    0:21:33 And what practical tips do you have
    0:21:34 for people in the audience?
    0:21:36 Because I’d sure love to hear them
    0:21:38 and I’m sure others would.
    0:21:41 How do you manage this really robust professional career
    0:21:45 and yet also a robust personal life?
    0:21:48 – Well, I don’t think anybody does it perfectly
    0:21:50 or to their own satisfaction.
    0:21:53 What I learned along the way is that there’s certain things,
    0:21:55 again, that you can control.
    0:21:58 And those are the ones you should focus on.
    0:22:03 So I really tried to take care of myself,
    0:22:06 to sleep as much as I reasonably could,
    0:22:10 to exercise as much as I reasonably could.
    0:22:14 And to prioritize time with family and friends
    0:22:16 because that was rejuvenative time.
    0:22:21 And gave me sort of the strength and the perspective
    0:22:25 to deal with the things I couldn’t control.
    0:22:27 Those were all critically important.
    0:22:30 And then I couldn’t have done it, frankly,
    0:22:34 without an extremely supportive and hands-on partner
    0:22:39 who was very much engaged in his own high pressure career
    0:22:43 as an executive producer at ABC News.
    0:22:47 But was hugely helpful with the kids,
    0:22:50 with my parents who were ailing at the time,
    0:22:51 and in supporting me.
    0:22:56 So I was blessed with all of those systems of support.
    0:23:02 But I think the main things that most of us
    0:23:06 can try to prioritize are taking care of our physical
    0:23:10 and mental health through basic things like sleeping
    0:23:13 and exercising, hopefully eating reasonably well.
    0:23:18 And cherishing that time with the people you love
    0:23:22 as what you need to keep giving you fuel.
    0:23:24 – That’s great practical advice.
    0:23:26 I mean, speaking of kids, you have two.
    0:23:27 – We have two.
    0:23:30 – Daughter Maris, who’s junior in high school.
    0:23:31 – Yes.
    0:23:34 – And then Jake, who’s a senior at Stanford.
    0:23:35 – Yes.
    0:23:36 – And everyone says this about their kids, Susan.
    0:23:40 Oh, there might, anyone who has more than one child
    0:23:42 says, oh, they’re so different from each other.
    0:23:46 But you kind of take things to a new extreme with your kids.
    0:23:47 Because–
    0:23:48 – They took us to an extreme.
    0:23:49 – They took you to an extreme.
    0:23:51 I mean, for those who aren’t familiar,
    0:23:55 I mean, your son Jake, here you are having served
    0:23:59 in the Clinton administration, in the Obama administration.
    0:24:02 And your son Jake is the president of,
    0:24:04 was president of the Stanford College Republicans?
    0:24:05 – Yes.
    0:24:08 – And then you have your daughter,
    0:24:10 and I wish we had a picture of them,
    0:24:11 but anyone can grab the book,
    0:24:14 and there’s pictures of them in the book.
    0:24:18 Maris, you describe us to the left of you and Ian.
    0:24:19 – Yes.
    0:24:20 – And yet the two of them are very close,
    0:24:22 and also close in age.
    0:24:24 And how did that happen?
    0:24:26 And tell us a little bit more about that.
    0:24:29 – Uh.
    0:24:32 (audience laughing)
    0:24:34 – I know you were trying to raise independent thinkers.
    0:24:38 – You know, we wonder sometimes what we fed them,
    0:24:43 and we really did try to teach them
    0:24:46 that they should think for themselves
    0:24:49 and have the courage of their convictions.
    0:24:53 And we tried to impress upon them our respect
    0:24:57 for their independence and individualism.
    0:24:59 And unfortunately, that’s what we got.
    0:25:00 (audience laughing)
    0:25:03 And we love them both.
    0:25:05 I mean, they’re both wonderful,
    0:25:07 bright, thoughtful, committed kids.
    0:25:09 And they’re not just different politically.
    0:25:11 I mean, they’re different temperamentally.
    0:25:13 They could not be more different.
    0:25:16 And sometimes you wonder, like, how’s that possible?
    0:25:19 Same household, same parents, same diet.
    0:25:22 – I mean, you took Jake with you campaigning.
    0:25:26 – Yeah, he used to be, he campaigned for me with me
    0:25:31 in 2008 for Obama in the snows of New Hampshire.
    0:25:35 And this was before he had this metamorphosis.
    0:25:38 – Very hosting speaking engagements at Stanford.
    0:25:39 – Yes.
    0:25:45 And he’s just, you know, he’s gone his own way politically,
    0:25:48 but not emotionally.
    0:25:52 He’s still very much my baby,
    0:25:57 and very much an integral part of our family.
    0:26:01 And so we have some robust debates,
    0:26:04 and sometimes at the dinner table, food will fly.
    0:26:06 (audience laughing)
    0:26:09 Mostly between the kids, I’d like to believe,
    0:26:12 but Ian is here, so I’m not gonna state that categorically.
    0:26:13 – Yeah, that’s great.
    0:26:17 – He knows better, but it’s all good.
    0:26:22 And I’ve learned a lot from having somebody so close to us
    0:26:27 who reflects and represents a very different perspective.
    0:26:30 And one that I think is really important
    0:26:33 for me to understand, but for all of us to understand,
    0:26:36 regardless of whether you’re on the right or the left,
    0:26:38 understanding, we’re in the middle more,
    0:26:40 like some of us wanna be,
    0:26:44 respecting opinions with which we differ,
    0:26:49 and being willing to engage them thoughtfully.
    0:26:51 – Yeah, well, it’s so great to see
    0:26:53 that you were able to raise such independent thinkers,
    0:26:56 in addition to doing everything else
    0:26:58 that you and Ian had going on.
    0:27:01 So hats off for that.
    0:27:03 And then also, you know, I was struck by,
    0:27:05 actually it’s such a coincidence
    0:27:07 that Shonda Rhimes is going to speak next,
    0:27:10 because Shonda Rhimes was one of the people
    0:27:12 who read your book first,
    0:27:15 and she said that reading your book was like a masterclass
    0:27:17 in how to be a powerful woman.
    0:27:19 I think reading your book was like a masterclass
    0:27:21 in how to be a powerful person.
    0:27:24 And many of us think that being a powerful woman
    0:27:26 equals being a career woman.
    0:27:29 But you know, Susan, you told a different story
    0:27:30 in your book.
    0:27:32 You talked not about just being a career woman.
    0:27:35 In fact, I think half of that book
    0:27:39 is about how to be a loving wife, a devoted mother,
    0:27:41 and also caring for your parents,
    0:27:43 both of them, when they were aging.
    0:27:45 And I know they’ve now both since passed.
    0:27:48 At the same time, you’re making these incredibly hard decisions
    0:27:51 and in the public eye, met with a great deal of scrutiny.
    0:27:53 You wrote about a great deal of scrutiny
    0:27:55 when your mom was watching you.
    0:27:59 You said obsessively on CNN during the Benghazi story.
    0:28:00 – Not watching me, but watching the news.
    0:28:01 – Watching the news.
    0:28:02 – Freaking out about me.
    0:28:03 – Right.
    0:28:06 And so amidst all that, you know,
    0:28:08 I wanna know, Susan, like what do you think
    0:28:12 takes to be a powerful woman or a powerful person?
    0:28:13 What are the traits?
    0:28:17 – I would say in the first instance,
    0:28:19 it requires confidence.
    0:28:23 It requires believing in your own self-worth.
    0:28:26 And that’s the huge gift I got from my parents.
    0:28:31 I think it requires integrity and strength
    0:28:33 and compassion, quite frankly.
    0:28:38 I think being powerful means not being hard.
    0:28:44 It means being, to the greatest extent possible,
    0:28:49 somebody who can lead and inspire and motivate others.
    0:28:54 And one of the things I learned as I grew
    0:28:58 from that young Brash assistant secretary
    0:29:03 was that the secret to having effective teams
    0:29:06 is that every member of the team feels valued
    0:29:11 and feels like they care and that they count.
    0:29:13 That you care about them and that they count.
    0:29:18 And so to me, that’s the secret sauce.
    0:29:23 It’s leading in a fashion that values the individuals
    0:29:27 and the human beings on the team.
    0:29:32 And the model, quite frankly, that President Obama set
    0:29:37 and that I and I think others tried to manifest
    0:29:42 was to give all of our colleagues the confidence
    0:29:45 to know that if and when they had to put
    0:29:48 their personal lives first because somebody was sick
    0:29:53 or their kid needed them for something important,
    0:29:56 that the team would fill in behind them
    0:29:59 and that we would manage collectively in their absence.
    0:30:02 Not none of us was indispensable,
    0:30:04 not when I was national security advisor, never.
    0:30:07 I had partners and deputies who could fill in
    0:30:11 and at the lowest levels, that was the way we tried
    0:30:12 to run our teams.
    0:30:15 If you had to go to do what was vitally important
    0:30:19 to you as a human being, then that was what was most important.
    0:30:22 Not least because you weren’t gonna be effective anyway,
    0:30:24 if you were stressing out about this,
    0:30:27 but also because it’s a way of saying we care about you
    0:30:31 and we value you as a human being and we got your back
    0:30:34 and we as a team can fill in behind you.
    0:30:40 And that I think is empowering to one’s team
    0:30:44 and one’s people, but it’s also in many ways
    0:30:47 the source of one’s own strength as a leader.
    0:30:50 – Speaking of being a leader and leadership,
    0:30:53 you have another, I mean, I’m curious what you think about
    0:30:56 then all of the traits you’re mentioning make me think,
    0:30:58 well, I would really like to work for that person.
    0:31:00 I really like them.
    0:31:03 And one of the favorite quotes that I have of yours,
    0:31:04 as you said, and I quote,
    0:31:08 “People who are so intent on being liked
    0:31:10 “may not have the fortitude to do the right thing
    0:31:11 “or the tough thing.”
    0:31:15 And so what advice would you give to leaders?
    0:31:18 A lot of leaders, including some in this room,
    0:31:19 really wanna be liked.
    0:31:22 – Well, I think, look, it’s always better
    0:31:25 to be liked than not be liked.
    0:31:26 Let’s be clear.
    0:31:30 But what I discovered at some stage was,
    0:31:32 at least for me, if I had to choose,
    0:31:34 if I couldn’t have both,
    0:31:38 I’d rather be respected than liked.
    0:31:41 And that was because I realized that sometimes,
    0:31:44 and this is sort of reflected in the quote you read,
    0:31:49 sometimes by being overly concerned about being nice,
    0:31:52 particularly women who sometimes that manifests
    0:31:54 as being deferential or asking for permission
    0:31:58 or affirmation, it’s not effective.
    0:32:01 And it is diminishing of your capacity
    0:32:05 to perform to your optimal level.
    0:32:07 And I realized that just by being me,
    0:32:09 by believing in myself,
    0:32:11 by being an African-American woman
    0:32:13 who really wasn’t asking for permission
    0:32:17 or affirmation in the circles in which I ran,
    0:32:19 some people weren’t gonna like that.
    0:32:21 – You said that you intimidated a lot of people
    0:32:23 most notably.
    0:32:25 – Some men, but I mean, I didn’t set out to do that,
    0:32:29 but I think, and I still don’t set out to do that,
    0:32:30 I’m just trying to be myself,
    0:32:33 but I’m not gonna be somebody I’m not
    0:32:35 to make somebody else more comfortable.
    0:32:36 – Well, I love that you’ve embraced
    0:32:37 those characteristics of yourself.
    0:32:41 – And that leads you to being not always liked.
    0:32:44 And if you’re so obsessed with being liked,
    0:32:48 I think it can lead you to be somebody you’re not.
    0:32:51 And as I said, better to be liked,
    0:32:54 I much prefer that,
    0:32:59 but not at the expense of being who I am.
    0:33:00 – Well, we’re gonna get to a,
    0:33:04 I wanna tell a story which I thought was fake news.
    0:33:06 And then I asked you about it and you said it was true.
    0:33:07 – It’s not fake news, it’s in the book.
    0:33:08 I don’t know where to go.
    0:33:12 – Well, I read it and I thought, oh, this is true.
    0:33:15 There’s a situation where at one time,
    0:33:17 you had to give the middle finger
    0:33:19 to Ambassador Richard Holbrook
    0:33:22 in front of a room full of ambassadors and diplomats.
    0:33:23 Can you tell us about that?
    0:33:27 – So we’re rewinding the tape again to this time.
    0:33:28 – To the brash days.
    0:33:31 – No, but this was not brash.
    0:33:36 This was implementing a philosophy
    0:33:41 that my father had beat into me from a very early age,
    0:33:45 which was don’t take crap off of anybody.
    0:33:47 If somebody is bullying you or dismissing you
    0:33:51 or discounting you, don’t let them get away with it.
    0:33:54 Now, I’d like to think that at 55,
    0:33:56 I might have found the words
    0:33:58 that would have been more appropriate,
    0:34:00 but words failed me in that moment
    0:34:04 and I ended up realizing that my hands had not failed me.
    0:34:11 But the back story is that I’m Assistant Secretary
    0:34:12 of State for African Affairs.
    0:34:15 I’m probably now 33 or 34.
    0:34:18 Ambassador Holbrook had been nominated
    0:34:20 to be the UN Ambassador,
    0:34:22 but not confirmed as confirmation
    0:34:24 had been held up for many months.
    0:34:27 And one day, I’m up on Capitol Hill
    0:34:29 meeting with members of Congress
    0:34:31 and my secretary calls.
    0:34:34 I remember those cell phones that were the size of bricks.
    0:34:37 That was what we were dealing with back in those days.
    0:34:40 And she says, Ambassador Holbrook is in your office
    0:34:43 and he wants to meet with you now.
    0:34:45 And I said, well, I’m sure you explained
    0:34:47 I’m on Capitol Hill meeting with members of Congress.
    0:34:49 I can’t just come back to meet with him now.
    0:34:51 Why don’t you schedule an appointment
    0:34:53 and we’ll figure it out.
    0:34:55 And she said, he’s not leaving.
    0:35:01 And I said, well, okay, then I’ll see him when I get back,
    0:35:02 but that’s gonna be a while
    0:35:04 and make sure you don’t take anything while I’m there.
    0:35:07 (audience laughs)
    0:35:09 So I come back about an hour and a half later
    0:35:12 and sure enough, he’s sitting in my office.
    0:35:15 Very comfortable on my couch.
    0:35:17 And I sit down and I introduced myself
    0:35:18 ’cause we’d never met.
    0:35:22 And I say, what’s so urgent
    0:35:27 that you had to be camped out here in my office?
    0:35:30 And the first words out of his mouth were,
    0:35:35 I dislike you already because you beat my record
    0:35:38 as the youngest regional assistant secretary of state.
    0:35:42 And our relationship went downhill from there.
    0:35:43 (audience laughs)
    0:35:48 And I realized, I was dealing with very talented,
    0:35:53 diplomat on the one hand, but a classic bully on the other.
    0:35:58 So now, maybe a year later, he’s UN ambassador.
    0:36:00 He’s established in the job.
    0:36:03 And he decides in the month that the United States
    0:36:05 is chairing the Security Council
    0:36:07 that he’s gonna make it the month of Africa.
    0:36:09 Africa already consumes a large share
    0:36:11 of the Security Council agenda.
    0:36:15 And that meant that we had to interact quite a bit.
    0:36:18 And he decided he was gonna have a summit meeting
    0:36:22 with the African heads of state from Central Africa.
    0:36:25 And he therefore summoned these heads of state.
    0:36:27 And of course, he was only an ambassador.
    0:36:28 So he had to have the secretary of state
    0:36:31 at least be the person to chair the meeting.
    0:36:35 And he summoned back the ambassadors who reported to me
    0:36:37 who were the ambassadors
    0:36:39 in each of these Central African countries.
    0:36:42 And he calls a meeting on a Sunday afternoon
    0:36:43 in his office in New York.
    0:36:48 And in the meeting are my maybe six or seven
    0:36:50 of the ambassadors who report to me,
    0:36:53 all of whom are 20 to 30 years my senior.
    0:36:58 All men, all white.
    0:37:02 And a handful of my staffers and Holbrook
    0:37:04 and a few of his team.
    0:37:07 And there’s a robust argument that we’re all engaged in
    0:37:10 about a real important policy issue.
    0:37:12 And at one stage after I’d listened to the debate,
    0:37:17 I weighed in with my own opinion, which differed from his.
    0:37:20 And he leans over this table where we’re all seated
    0:37:22 in a very cramped room.
    0:37:24 He’s a big guy with a hulking body.
    0:37:29 And he looks at me and he says, “Ah, I too remember
    0:37:33 when I was a young assistant secretary.”
    0:37:35 (laughing)
    0:37:36 And I was like–
    0:37:37 – And that’s where words failed you.
    0:37:38 – That’s where words failed me.
    0:37:44 And so I did exhibit my dismay with a gesture,
    0:37:49 which was displayed long enough for him to see it.
    0:37:54 And everybody else to see it and like freak out.
    0:37:57 Some with real relish and others with horror.
    0:38:00 And he just kept talking.
    0:38:03 And that meeting continued.
    0:38:05 It became a bit urban legend,
    0:38:08 but the end of the story is I realized
    0:38:11 that I had better discreetly step out of the meeting
    0:38:13 and call back to Washington.
    0:38:15 – To your boss, then, Madeline Albright.
    0:38:17 – To the secretary of state whom I called in,
    0:38:19 I said, “Madame Secretary, I’m calling to report
    0:38:21 that I’ve just given the finger
    0:38:24 to a member of President Clinton’s cabinet.”
    0:38:25 (laughing)
    0:38:28 She said, “Oh, tell me more.”
    0:38:30 (laughing)
    0:38:31 So I explained.
    0:38:33 And at the end she said words to the effect
    0:38:35 of “You go, girl.”
    0:38:38 (laughing and applauding)
    0:38:45 – Well, so fast forward from the brash,
    0:38:48 the brash woman that you once were, Susan.
    0:38:50 And I wanna go right into kind of one of the issues
    0:38:53 that consumed a lot of your time
    0:38:56 when you were working for President Obama was China.
    0:38:58 And now it seems like China’s taking
    0:38:59 even more of a center stage.
    0:39:01 Of course, a lot of people in this audience
    0:39:03 were talking a lot about tech and China
    0:39:07 and government and tech, or maybe not government and tech.
    0:39:10 And I wanna ask if you agree or disagree
    0:39:13 with a statement that I pulled.
    0:39:14 Actually, I won’t tell you who said this.
    0:39:16 I wanna see if you agree or disagree.
    0:39:19 That China poses one of the most severe
    0:39:22 intelligence collection threats to the United States
    0:39:24 and to U.S. businesses today.
    0:39:28 – Yes, agree, very strenuously.
    0:39:29 – And they’re doing it not with traditional
    0:39:34 spy craft anymore, but with putting actually agents
    0:39:37 in private companies and in graduate programs
    0:39:39 and universities in the U.S.
    0:39:43 Like, how should industry leaders in this room
    0:39:45 think about that and grapple with that?
    0:39:48 – Well, China is not only using human assets,
    0:39:53 as you just described, plants or moles.
    0:39:55 But they’re also using cyber tools, as we know,
    0:40:00 to steal intellectual property and exfiltrate data.
    0:40:04 I think that the most important thing
    0:40:07 that I would just share as a former National Security Advisor
    0:40:11 is this threat is deadly serious
    0:40:14 and it’s not getting any better.
    0:40:17 And China’s objective, quite plainly,
    0:40:21 is to compete and ultimately surpass us
    0:40:26 economically, geostrategically, technologically.
    0:40:29 And in fact, they’re explicitly stating it
    0:40:30 as their objective.
    0:40:33 And what they are doing to accomplish that
    0:40:37 is basically using any means at their potential disposal.
    0:40:41 And what we need to do as a nation,
    0:40:44 and I think it applies as much to the government
    0:40:46 as it does to the private sector,
    0:40:47 is to be witting of this threat
    0:40:51 and work really hard to prevent it.
    0:40:56 Recognizing that the most dangerous individuals
    0:41:00 are often the ones inside,
    0:41:02 as we in the United States government
    0:41:06 had learned the hard way many times with Snowden and others.
    0:41:10 That you really do need to take as seriously
    0:41:15 as you possibly can the hardening of your cyber security.
    0:41:21 That you also need to recognize that in your effort
    0:41:26 and work to get a foothold or expand your business in China,
    0:41:29 that as they ask you to do things
    0:41:32 that cause you to share information
    0:41:37 or provide the kinds of access or information that they seek,
    0:41:44 they’re doing it at our expense, geostrategically.
    0:41:47 And I think quite honestly,
    0:41:50 we really need a revolution of patriotism
    0:41:56 in business as well as in the tech sector,
    0:42:01 but as well as across the greater American public
    0:42:05 to recognize that we are unfortunately
    0:42:10 in a kind of Cold War type challenge.
    0:42:16 That’s not to say we have to treat China as an adversary.
    0:42:18 I actually don’t argue that,
    0:42:23 but we have to recognize that we are in a real competition
    0:42:28 that requires us to behave as if we’re in a competition,
    0:42:32 not as if everything is, you know, go along to get along.
    0:42:35 – And you coined that term today, didn’t you?
    0:42:37 The revolution of patriotism.
    0:42:39 And I asked if you’d ever said that before
    0:42:41 and you thought that the revolution of patriotism
    0:42:43 needs to happen in the tech community.
    0:42:45 – It needs to happen, including in the tech community.
    0:42:47 But not exclusively. – And how do we get that started?
    0:42:49 – And by the reason why we were talking
    0:42:54 about the tech community, just so people are understanding,
    0:42:59 given that we are in a era
    0:43:03 of arguably existential competition,
    0:43:09 we need to be matching to the extent we can,
    0:43:12 consistent with our democracy and our values,
    0:43:15 the strength of the Chinese model.
    0:43:16 The Chinese, as you all know,
    0:43:20 are using all elements of their capacity,
    0:43:25 government, the private sector, academia,
    0:43:29 in complete unison to advance their capacities,
    0:43:32 whether in biotech or AI or you name it.
    0:43:35 We’re not.
    0:43:39 We now have lost that historical triumvirate
    0:43:43 between the academy, the private sector and government
    0:43:48 that enabled us to compete against the Soviet Union.
    0:43:52 And there are all kinds of reasons why that’s broken down,
    0:43:57 but it’s the animosity between elements in the tech world
    0:44:04 towards government and arguably vice versa,
    0:44:08 that is in part preventing our capacity
    0:44:11 to concert our efforts consistent with our values
    0:44:14 and free enterprise and all of that stuff,
    0:44:17 that we need to be competitive.
    0:44:20 We’ve need to find ways to put that triumvirate
    0:44:22 in some form or fashion back together,
    0:44:27 not at the expense of our values,
    0:44:31 but in service of our strength and our competitiveness
    0:44:33 and ultimately our way of life.
    0:44:34 – Well, so there are a lot of leaders
    0:44:36 from the tech community in this room,
    0:44:37 and I’m just curious,
    0:44:39 how do you think we can get some of that collaboration
    0:44:42 going again practically?
    0:44:45 – Well, I don’t have all the answers to that,
    0:44:48 but I do think it needs to,
    0:44:53 it could be catalyzed by a sustained exchange
    0:44:57 that was institutionalized
    0:45:00 between the private sector and government.
    0:45:03 And we’ve got really smart, talented people in government.
    0:45:06 We’ve got even more smart, talented people
    0:45:08 in the private sector.
    0:45:10 And I think there’s,
    0:45:13 particularly among some in the employee base
    0:45:14 in the tech sector,
    0:45:17 a real suspicion of or hostility towards government
    0:45:21 and a perception that if you’re working on something
    0:45:24 that serves the US government
    0:45:27 and particularly might advantage us
    0:45:29 technologically or militarily,
    0:45:31 that somehow there’s something wrong with that.
    0:45:34 And that’s what I mean about a revolution in patriotism.
    0:45:36 We need to understand that actually,
    0:45:39 you know, we’re on the same team here.
    0:45:41 And by the way,
    0:45:43 to the extent that many companies
    0:45:46 are making compromises and accommodations
    0:45:49 to open the Chinese market
    0:45:51 and expand their foothold in the Chinese market,
    0:45:54 doing things that quite frankly in my judgment,
    0:45:57 advantage China in this competition,
    0:45:59 but then won’t be comfortable
    0:46:00 cooperating with the US government.
    0:46:03 I think we’ve got things kind of upside down.
    0:46:07 And so a partnership whereby,
    0:46:09 you know, for three, five years,
    0:46:13 you know, best in the brightest in both government
    0:46:16 and industry, you know,
    0:46:19 basically change places, trade places for a little while
    0:46:22 and learn to understand and respect the motives
    0:46:24 and the perspectives and the skills
    0:46:27 and the weaknesses of each,
    0:46:28 would be at least a starting point
    0:46:33 for trying to establish bridges
    0:46:38 and recognize that we are,
    0:46:41 just as we are in many other ways,
    0:46:44 you know, we have more that unites us than divides us.
    0:46:46 – Well, and I suppose you’re bringing,
    0:46:47 you’re on the board of Netflix.
    0:46:50 What kind of voice are you bringing to that boardroom
    0:46:53 and what some of the skills and experiences
    0:46:55 from your own past that you’re bringing to bear?
    0:46:57 Are you having these conversations?
    0:47:00 – Well, I think that the main thing that I bring
    0:47:02 is a deep knowledge and understanding
    0:47:05 about many, many different parts of the world
    0:47:06 and the international landscape
    0:47:09 to a company like Netflix that is increasingly
    0:47:13 growing globally and views its, you know,
    0:47:16 his path forward as being very much
    0:47:18 in the international realm.
    0:47:20 I have an understanding of, you know,
    0:47:23 of crisis management and how government works
    0:47:27 and how to make teams optimize their capacity
    0:47:31 to address crises under pressure,
    0:47:32 all of those sorts of things.
    0:47:35 And also an understanding of the security terrain,
    0:47:38 physical and cyber and otherwise.
    0:47:40 And a recognition that, you know,
    0:47:43 some of the things we’ve just talked about,
    0:47:47 which may not be necessarily front of mind
    0:47:52 far from Washington are actually some of the things
    0:47:55 that companies need to be increasingly mindful of.
    0:47:56 – We’ve covered so much.
    0:47:58 We’ve covered, you know, you’ve written a book,
    0:48:00 you serve on boards, you speak.
    0:48:04 You’re about to be an empty nester a year and a half.
    0:48:07 And I want to just wrap up by asking you, what’s next?
    0:48:08 What lies ahead?
    0:48:09 – We couldn’t just end this.
    0:48:12 – Well, tell me, tell the audience what you told me
    0:48:14 when I asked you this question before once.
    0:48:16 – I’ll, without the profanity?
    0:48:18 – Yeah, please. – Okay, no.
    0:48:21 I don’t know.
    0:48:23 You know, I love my freedom,
    0:48:26 which I now have having left government.
    0:48:28 And I’ve enjoyed very much the process of writing the book.
    0:48:30 And now going on book tour,
    0:48:33 and I love writing my columns with the New York Times.
    0:48:34 And I love serving on Netflix board.
    0:48:37 And I’m interested in continuing
    0:48:41 to participate in board service.
    0:48:45 But the fundamental question that I have to wrestle with
    0:48:48 is do I want to throw myself again,
    0:48:51 full time into any one intensive endeavor,
    0:48:55 whether that’s, you know, in the public sector,
    0:48:57 in the private sector, in the nonprofit world,
    0:49:00 or do I want to continue to have a combination of things,
    0:49:02 which some people call a portfolio,
    0:49:05 that allows me to maximize my freedom.
    0:49:07 And I love maximizing my freedom,
    0:49:10 but I do think I might wake up one day
    0:49:14 and be so grabbed by something that I’m passionate about,
    0:49:16 that I’m willing to jump back in
    0:49:18 and throw myself entirely into it.
    0:49:19 – When you told me today,
    0:49:21 you’re not running for Senate in 2020,
    0:49:24 but you told me that you weren’t ruling out for all time.
    0:49:27 – I’m not running for the Senate from Maine in 2020,
    0:49:30 which is something I’ve thought about for a period of time.
    0:49:37 And that’s mainly because we have this junior in high school
    0:49:41 who deserves to have her parents present
    0:49:45 and not be yanked out of one high school into another.
    0:49:50 But I haven’t given up the thought that I might serve again,
    0:49:52 whether in an elected capacity,
    0:49:53 and I don’t know at what level,
    0:49:56 or in an appointed capacity,
    0:50:00 but I’m also not planning on it and aiming for it.
    0:50:02 I feel very privileged to be able to say
    0:50:05 that I got to serve this country
    0:50:10 under two presidents that I had enormous respect for,
    0:50:14 and that’s the greatest privilege.
    0:50:19 And if that’s the last of my service,
    0:50:20 I’ll feel good about it,
    0:50:25 and I’ll be happy to try to take my talents elsewhere.
    0:50:29 Well, so to speak.
    0:50:31 – Well, Susan, it’s such a privilege to sit down with you,
    0:50:33 and I want to say thank you
    0:50:36 for your service to our country. – No, thank you, no, thank you.
    0:50:37 – On behalf of everyone in the room,
    0:50:39 and also for joining us here today,
    0:50:41 it’s been so great to get to chat with you
    0:50:42 and have this conversation. – Thank you, all.
    0:50:43 – So thank you so much. – Appreciate you.
    0:50:44 – Thank you so much.
    0:50:45 – It’s great to be here too.
    0:50:45 – Thank you.
    0:50:48 (applause)

    Susan shares how she learned to leverage the characteristics of her personality early in her career as assistant secretary of state [2:05]

    One of the important conversations Susan had with a mentor that changed the trajectory of her career [4:50]

    Her parent’s commitment to education, their personal backgrounds, and the legacies they created [8:10]

    The result of instilling self-belief into children and mastering “psychological jiu jitsu” [10:22]

    What the early lessons of family diplomacy taught her [14:00]

    The importance of strategic compartmentalization [16:48]

    How to approach crisis during high stakes situations [18:29]

    How to practice compassionate leadership while maintaining effectiveness [20:10]

    Hacking the concept of “work-life balance” [21:10]

    The required characteristics of powerful leaders [28:14]

    The hard things about leadership and the idea of being liked [31:20]

    The “middle finger story”/the time Susan stood up for herself in an important meeting [33:23]

    Susan talks about China’s intelligence collection in the US [39:45]

    A call for unity between the private, public, and academic sectors [42:54]

  • #45 – Drones Washing Windows, Airpod Guided Tours & Mario Kart VR with Furqan Rydhan

    Sam (@thesamparr) and Shaan (@shaanvp) are back talking news, trends, interesting products and businesses. Today we’re joined by Furqan Rydhan (@FurqanR) who is a tech badass. He was paid $120K as a 15 year old programmer during the Dot Com Boom, made a million dollar e-com biz at 17 and was an early employee at Applovin that was valued last at $2 billion. Remember Ramon’s soap opera blog that he sold for $9M in cash? He did that through the online business broker Quiet Light Brokerage. We’ve partnered up with them to give you guys a FREE 25-point checklist to see how sellable your online business is. To receive this free guide, visit quietlightbrokerage.com/myfirstmillion. Topics for today: Our Guest’s @FurqanR Background (00:36), Funny Story about Vungle’s Jack Smith and Lance Armstrong (07:12), The Process of Brainstorming Ideas (09:36), VR/AR Experiences (10:16), Opportunities in Reviving Stale Franchises and Company Turnarounds (17:07), iPad Whiteboard Meeting Idea (22:44), Reinventing the Phone Call through Airpods (27:51), Furquan’s House Hackathon Ideas (29:49), Serialized Story Apps like Hooked (37:09), Drone Washing Windows on Big Buildings (38:38), Money Printing Mobile Apps (44:44) and What Furqan learnt being Applovin (50:20). 

    See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

  • E47: The Solution To All Of Your Problems

    This week’s episode of The Diary of a CEO is all about breakdowns and problems and I delve into why only YOU have control over your thoughts. I discuss how we are obsessing over optimising our lives and the worrying increase in loneliness within the…

  • 374: Side Hustle Legal Q&A with Mariam Tsaturyan

    Are you operating online fully compliant with GDPR and CCPA regulations?

    Do you have the right type of liability insurance to cover you should the worst case happen?

    If you’re unsure about any of the legal stuff surrounding you, your business, or side hustle, it should be a lot clearer by the end of this episode.

    This is because Mariam Tsaturyan from FreelanceandMarketing.com has graciously agreed to do some legal listener Q&A for us in today’s show.

    She’s a licensed and practicing attorney, who helps bloggers and online business owners navigate the often-murky waters of legal regulations and compliance.

    Tune in as we tackle some of the big topics like entity selection, GDPR, and liability insurance. Then we’ll dive into some specific questions from the Side Hustle Nation FB group.

    Full Show Notes: Side Hustle Legal Q&A with Mariam Tsaturyan

  • #410: Ryan Holiday — Turning the Tables

    Ryan Holiday — Turning the Tables | Brought to you by LinkedIn Jobs and 99designs.

    Welcome to The Tim Ferriss Show! It is — usually — my job to sit down with world-class performers of all different types to tease out the habits, routines, favorite books, and so on that you can apply and test in your own life. This time we have a “turning the tables” episode. What does that mean? Well, I will not be the one doing the interviewing. Instead, I will be the one being interviewed by my friend, Ryan Holiday.

    So who is this Ryan fella?

    Ryan Holiday (TW/IG: @RyanHoliday) is one of the world’s foremost thinkers and writers on ancient philosophy and its place in modern life. He is a sought-after speaker and strategist and the author of many bestselling books, including The Obstacle Is the Way, Ego Is the Enemy, and The Daily Stoic. His books have been translated into more than 30 languages and have sold more than two million copies worldwide. He lives with his family outside of Austin, Texas. You can subscribe to receive his writing at RyanHoliday.net and DailyStoic.com. Ryan was also the fourth-ever guest on the podcast in the very beginning, and he has written multiple popular guest posts for my blog, which you can find at tim.blog.

    His latest book is Stillness Is the Key, which was an instant #1 New York Times bestseller and Wall Street Journal bestseller.

    I also recommend checking out the interview on YouTube, if you like, as I made sure to have video from multiple angles for this episode. Just go to youtube.com/timferriss.

    Please enjoy!

    This episode is brought to you by LinkedIn Jobs. Hiring can be hard, and it and be super expensive and painful if you get it wrong. Today, with more qualified candidates than ever — but also more noise than ever — employers need a hiring solution that helps them find the right people for their businesses. LinkedIn Jobs provides just that by screening candidates with the hard and soft skills you’re looking for so you can quickly find and hire the right person.

    LinkedIn can make sure your job post gets in front of people you want to hire — people with the skills, qualifications, and other insights that help LinkedIn paint a better picture of potential candidates. It’s no wonder great candidates are hired every eight seconds on LinkedIn. Find the right person meant for your business today with LinkedIn Jobs. You can pay what you want, and the first $50 is on LinkedIn. Just visit LinkedIn.com/Tim to get $50 off your first job post! Terms and conditions apply.

    This podcast is also brought to you by 99designs, the global creative platform that makes it easy for designers and clients to work together to create designs they love. Its creative process has become the go-to solution for businesses, agencies, and individuals, and I have used it for years to help with display advertising and illustrations and to rapid prototype the cover for The Tao of Seneca. Whether your business needs a logo, website design, business card, or anything you can imagine, check out 99designs.

    You can work with multiple designers at once to get a bunch of different ideas, or hire the perfect designer for your project based on their style and industry specialization. It’s simple to review concepts and leave feedback so you’ll end up with a design that you’re happy with. Click this link and get $20 off plus a $99 upgrade.

    ***

    If you enjoy the podcast, would you please consider leaving a short review on Apple Podcasts/iTunes? It takes less than 60 seconds, and it really makes a difference in helping to convince hard-to-get guests.

    For show notes and past guests, please visit tim.blog/podcast.

    Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (“5-Bullet Friday”) at tim.blog/friday.

    For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.

    Interested in sponsoring the podcast? Please fill out the form at tim.blog/sponsor.

    Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.

    Follow Tim:

    Twittertwitter.com/tferriss 

    Instagraminstagram.com/timferriss

    Facebookfacebook.com/timferriss 

    YouTubeyoutube.com/timferriss

    Past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, and many more.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

  • If God is dead, then … socialism?

    Hello! I’m Sean Illing, Vox’s interviews writer filling in for Ezra while he’s on book tour. My guest today is Martin Hägglund, a philosopher at Yale and the author of This Life: Secular Faith and Spiritual Freedom, which I consider to be one of the most ambitious and important books in the last several years.

    We begin by discussing what it means to live a free and purposeful life without regret or illusion. For Hägglund, this life is all we have. There is no heaven, no afterlife, no eternal beyond. We live and we die and that means that the most important question any of us can possibly ask is, “What should we do with our time?” 

    We end by talking about the limits of capitalism, namely why it doesn’t really allow us to own our time in the way we ought to. And thus why, for Hägglund, democratic socialism is the only political project that takes the human condition seriously. 

    This is an unusual conversation, but, I have to say, I loved it. I appreciate and admire Hägglund’s willingness to tackle the biggest questions any us can ever ask, and I think by the end of it you will, too.

    Book recommendations:

    Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the other animals by Christine Korsgaard

    On the Soul (De Anima) by Aristotle 

    Phenomenology of Spirit by G.W.F Hegel 

    Follow Sean Illing at Vox or on Twitter @seanilling

    New to the show? Want to listen to Ezra’s favorite episodes? Check out The Ezra Klein Show beginner’s guide.

    Ezra’s book is available at www.EzraKlein.com.

    The “Why We’re Polarized” tour continues, with events in Austin, Nashville, Chicago, and Greenville. Go to WhyWerePolarized.com for the full schedule!

    Want to contact the show? Reach out at ezrakleinshow@vox.com

    Credits:

    Guest host – Sean Illing

    Producer – Jeff Geld

    Researcher – Roge Karma

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • 405. Policymaking Is Not a Science (Yet)

    Why do so many promising solutions — in education, medicine, criminal justice, etc. — fail to scale up into great policy? And can a new breed of “implementation scientists” crack the code?

  • Official Trailer: The Prof G Pod With Scott Galloway

    Bestselling author, professor, and entrepreneur Scott Galloway combines business insight and analysis with provocative life and career advice.

    On Mondays, Prof G Markets breaks down what’s moving the capital markets, teaching the basics of financial literacy so you can build economic security.

    Wednesdays, during Office Hours, Scott answers your questions about business, career, and life.

    Thursdays, Scott has a conversation with a blue-flame thinker in the innovation economy.

    And Scott closes the week on Saturdays with his Webby Award–winning newsletter, No Mercy / No Malice, as read by actor and raconteur George Hahn.

    To resist is futile…

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices