AI transcript
– Hey, whatcha doin’?
– Programming our thermostat to 17 degrees
when we’re out at work or asleep.
We’re taking control of our energy use this winter
with some easy energy saving tips I got from FortisBC.
– Ooh, conserve energy and save money?
Maybe to buy those matching winter jackets?
– Uh, no, we’re also getting
that whole matching outfit thing under control.
– Discover low and no cost energy saving tips
at fortisbc.com/energysavingtips.
– Matching track suits?
– Please know.
– Breaking news happens anywhere, anytime.
– Police have warned the protesters repeatedly, get back.
– CBC News brings the story to you live.
– Hundreds of wildfires are burning.
– Be the first to know what’s going on
and what that means for you and for Canada.
– This situation has changed very quickly.
– Helping make sense of the world when it matters most.
Stay in the know.
Download the free CBC News app
or visit cbcnews.ca.
– This week we have a special treat for you.
We’re sharing an episode from another podcast
that we think you’ll dig.
It’s an episode about happiness and how to find it
from one of our favorite podcasts, Stay Tuned with Preet,
hosted by former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara.
The episode aired over the holidays,
but it’s the kind of conversation we have here
on this show all year long.
And we thought you’d enjoy it,
so we wanted to share it with you.
– From CAFE and the Vox Media Podcast Network,
welcome to Stay Tuned.
I’m Preet Bharara.
– I think we, as laypeople, kind of get happiness wrong,
and I think that leads to lots of misconceptions.
I mean, I think we assume that happiness is about
positive emotion on all the time, right?
Often very high arousal positive emotion,
but that’s not really what we’re talking about.
(upbeat music)
That’s Dr. Laurie Santos.
She’s the Chandraka and Ranjan Tandon Professor of Psychology
and Head of Silamon College at Yale University.
She teaches Psychology and the Good Life,
a course on finding happiness and fulfillment
that quickly became the most popular class at Yale
in over 300 years.
Dr. Santos also hosts the podcast, The Happiness Lab,
and offers an online version of her Yale course
titled The Science of Well-Being.
We discuss what happiness really means
and how to achieve it,
why negative emotions are crucial to the equation,
how job crafting can bring purpose to any career,
the parenting paradox, and so much more.
That’s coming up.
Stay tuned.
(upbeat music)
– Support for the gray area comes from Delete Me.
Delete Me allows you to discover
and control your digital footprint,
letting you see where things like home addresses,
phone numbers, and even email addresses
are floating around on data broker sites.
And that means Delete Me could be the perfect holiday gift
for a loved one looking to help safeguard
their own life online.
Delete Me can help anyone monitor
and remove the personal info they don’t want on the internet.
Claire White, our colleague here at Vox,
tried Delete Me for herself and even gifted it to a friend.
This year I gave two of my friends a Delete Me subscription
and it’s been the perfect gift
’cause it’s something that will last beyond the season.
Delete Me will continue to remove their information
from online and it’s something I’ve been raving about
so I know that they’re gonna love it as well.
– This holiday season, you can give your loved ones
the gift of privacy and peace of mind with Delete Me.
Now at a special discount for our listeners.
Today you can get 20% off your Delete Me plan
when you go to joindeleteme.com/vox
and use promo code Vox at checkout.
The only way to get 20% off is to go to joindeleteme.com/vox
and enter code Vox at checkout.
That’s joindeleteme.com/voxcodevox.
Support for the gray area comes from Mint Mobile.
Let’s face it folks, a lot of those New Year’s resolutions
are already doomed.
That dream of doing a thousand pushups every day, nah.
That fad diet where you eat only green foods, not a chance.
But what if you can make a resolution
to save some cash this year?
If you switch to phone plan from Mint Mobile,
you can get half off their three month unlimited plan.
Resolution accomplished.
Mint Mobile is starting the New Year off
with some major savings,
offering any three month plan for just $15 a month.
You get unlimited talk and text, high speed data and more
delivered on the nation’s largest 5G network.
You can switch to Mint and new customers
can get half off an unlimited plan until February 2nd.
To get your new wireless plan for just $15 a month
and get the plan shipped to your door for free,
you can go to mintmobile.com/grayarea.
That’s mintmobile.com/grayarea.
$45 upfront payment required equivalent to $15 a month.
New customers on first three month plan only.
Speed slower above 40 gigabytes on unlimited plan,
additional taxes fees and restrictions apply.
See Mint Mobile for details.
Support for the gray area comes from green light.
You’ve probably been thinking a lot about 2025,
from the fun things like planning a family vacation,
to the less fun things like making another budget
for the year.
You might even be thinking about some of the important
life lessons you wanna teach your kids.
This year, you could make financial literacy
one of those lessons and have a great time doing it.
And with green light, it’s easier than ever.
Green light is a debit card and money app for families
that lets kids learn how to save,
invest and spend wisely.
Parents can keep an eye on kids spending and money habits.
Meanwhile, kids and teens build money confidence
and skills in a fun, accessible way, like with games.
My kids are a bit too young right now
for money conversations, games or not.
But I’ve got a colleague here at Vox
who uses it with his two boys and he loves it.
You can join millions of parents and kids
who use green light to navigate life together.
You can start your risk-free green light trial today
at greenlight.com/grayarea.
That’s greenlight.com/grayarea to get started.
Greenlight.com/grayarea.
(upbeat music)
– What does it take to be happy?
Happiness scientist Dr. Laurie Santos joins me to discuss.
Professor Laurie Santos, welcome to the show.
– Thanks so much for having me on.
– I’m very happy to have you on.
– I know.
– Did you see what I did there?
– Yeah, it was fun.
– So I have a lot of questions as I told you
before we hit the record button.
We’re coming to the end of the year.
Lots of people have issues that they care about
politically, socially or otherwise.
The holidays are a tough time for a lot of folks
because people have experienced loss.
We’ve had that in my family and a lot of families.
So there are things to deal with
and the future’s uncertain and there seems to be
a greater amount of worry and concern
and depression and loneliness.
So you are a perfect guest to have as our last episode
of the year that was 2024.
Could we start with an understanding of what we mean
or at least what you mean when you teach your class,
when you write about these issues?
What do you mean by happiness?
– Yeah, I’m glad we started there, I think,
’cause I think we as laypeople kind of get happiness wrong
and I think that leads to lots of misconceptions.
– Unhappiness.
– Yeah, lots of unhappiness.
I mean, I think we assume that happiness is about,
you know, positive emotion on all the time, right?
Often very high arousal positive emotion,
but that’s not really what we’re talking about.
I mean, the social scientist definition of happiness
is really kind of thinking about the happiness
that you experience in your life and with your life.
This is sort of definition I like.
So the happiness you experience in your life
is the set of positive emotions you have, right?
So it’s, you know, your sense of joy, your sense of laughter
and the ratio of those positive emotions
to negative emotions, things like anger, frustration,
sadness, being happy doesn’t necessarily mean
you get rid of all those negative emotions,
but it means ideally that ratio between the positive ones
and the not so positive ones is pretty decent.
So that’s kind of being happy in your life.
But being happy with your life
is how you think your life is going.
It’s your answer to the question,
all things considered, am I satisfied with my life?
And social scientists use this definition
because it kind of encompasses this,
what they often call the affective
and the cognitive parts of happiness.
So the kind of emotional parts of happiness,
how you feel in your life,
but also the cognitive parts,
how you think your life is going.
And the best case scenario is that we find strategies,
behaviors, mindset shifts and so on
that can boost both of those at the same time.
– I guess my question is how do they interact
with each other and don’t they overlap?
– They overlap a bunch, but I think it’s worth noting
that there are times in our life
and maybe people that we know
where we see those two parts of happiness dissociating, right?
I mean, I think, you know, maybe on the show
you’ve interacted with folks
who have every hedonic pleasure in their life,
you know, kind of getting positive emotion all the time,
but maybe they’re experiencing a lack of meaning
or don’t know what their life is about.
I think, you know, I’m often called upon to these events
with very rich people
where I sometimes see they’re kind of going through that,
like lots of hedonic pleasure,
but kind of a lack of meaning.
– So can you just for the record define
and then give examples of hedonic pleasure?
– Yes.
– We don’t say hedonic a lot on this podcast.
– Yeah, no, it’s true.
So hedonic pleasure is just kind of like, you know,
the hedonism kinds of things that you experience in life,
you know, so drinking the best wine,
you know, sleeping in the comfy things.
Hershey’s bar I think is strong.
I think people would quibble about whether
that’s the best hedonic pleasure chocolate, you know.
– It was what was available in the cafeteria.
– Yeah, so, but that’s, but yeah, exactly.
Like, you know, popping into a Hershey’s bar
is kind of experiencing that moment of hedonic pleasure.
Probably it will give you a little mini boost
of positive emotion.
But, you know, if that was it without a sense of purpose.
– It did, it worked for me prior to the show.
So explain something else so that we understand
what we’re measuring.
So if you ask me the question, and I’m very lucky
and I think I’m a generally happy person,
am I happy in my life?
I am, am I happy with my life?
I sure am.
There are moments that I’m unhappy.
– Yeah.
– So, you know, catch me on a day that things
are not going well or there’s something wrong
with my kids, I’m not happy.
But that’s not what you mean.
So when the question is asked, are you,
or are you not unhappy, over what time period?
Is it that day, like, what’s the snapshot value
versus overall, or how you felt last week?
How do you think about that?
– Yeah, researchers use different time horizons on that.
You know, how are you feeling in your life right now?
That could be literally right now.
You know, we’re having this conversation,
you just had that chocolate bar.
How are you feeling right now?
Often it’s done in the last week, you know,
self-report these positive emotions, right?
But the idea is that what we’re trying to get at
is a kind of on average, how are you feeling?
And I think that first one, how you’re feeling
in your life, that one tends reasonably, I think,
to move around a little bit more with the circumstances.
You know, you just had the chocolate bar,
you might be feeling a little happier in your life.
But hopefully the chocolate bar isn’t necessarily changing.
All things considered, how satisfied are you
with your life?
That one tends to be a little unstable.
– I mean, the problem is, so let’s say
I get on the scale tomorrow and I really didn’t need,
or in my higher order brain function,
didn’t need the 26 grams of carbs.
And let’s say, you know, I’m not happy
with the scale the next day, how should I think about
the fact that I had the chocolate bar the day before?
How do we think about delay gratification
and this relationship to happiness?
– Yeah, this is an important philosophical question, right?
And when we talk about maximizing happiness,
we have to ask the question,
in some ways, who’s happiness are we maximizing, right?
And I think we often think about the case
that you’re bringing up, right, which is, you know,
you today is eating this high carb chocolate bar
that might make you tomorrow kind of sad, right?
This is cases of what’s often called
sort of temporal discounting, right?
We discount us in the future
and we kind of give in to temptation now
and kind of–
– Yeah, ’cause that’s a different guy.
Tomorrow’s guy is a totally different guy.
– Tomorrow, Larry is a totally different.
But interestingly, happiness researchers
also talk about the other problem,
which is if it’s myopic
to kind of screw over your future self,
you can think of cases of what you might call hyperopia.
And by that, I mean, many of us have, you know,
that really nice bottle of wine
that’s been sitting on the shelf for that perfect day,
or, you know, those frequent flyer miles
that are adding up for the perfect time to take a vacation,
you know, or me, I think women have this,
there’s like these spa products,
I bought this nice bath bomb or this candle
that I’m gonna use on the perfect night when I have time.
And then the bottle of wine, the frequent flyer miles,
all these things kind of expire over time
’cause we haven’t gotten around to them.
And so I think for happiness,
we also have to worry about these cases of hyperopia too.
Are we really kind of, you know,
kind of messing up the happiness
that we could be experiencing now
because we’re so worried about the future
that we wind up not maximizing overall?
– Well, so that’s a very important question.
And I have a personal anecdote
in which what you just said resonates a lot.
I got married 25 years ago and we went to Italy
and we bought, could barely afford,
but we bought these nice bottles of red wine in Tuscany,
Granola de Montalcino,
one of the great wines on planet Earth.
And, you know, we had a bunch left over
and they sat in the wine fridge during the cellar
for years and years.
And then I happened to be in Italy this year
and I overheard someone at a wine tasting say,
you know, these Brunello’s are wonderful wines
are the great wines, they last about 30 years.
And the wines that we had bought 25 years ago
were themselves about five years old.
So I realized we had these bottles of wine
that we kept saving for some special day in the future.
So at the first opportunity,
we took a couple of bottles to good friends of ours
and opened them and, you know, one of the bottles was ruined.
So lesson learned, right?
– Yeah, I mean, that’s classic case of hyperapia,
but I think it happens in these, you know,
the wine bottles are the really salient examples
’cause it happens across decades.
But, you know, how often are we checking our email
or trying to squeeze one more work thing in
when we’re not taking time to like hang out with our kids
or talk with our spouse, right?
You know, if we sort of think back and our kid leaves home
and, you know, we think of those moments as precious
even though they don’t feel kind of precious now.
So I think in our kind of attempts to sort of,
well, I’ll get ahead for a future me,
we sometimes are screwing over present us
in a way that we forget,
but can really have a negative impact
on our overall happiness over time.
– Well, I guess in part it depends
just thinking about ambitious people
who want to succeed in their careers
or people who are in the gym and they want to get a,
you know, they want to build muscle
and they want to be better athletes
or whatever the case may be.
I don’t know that a lot of people experience happiness
when they’re on the weight machine, maybe they do
because they want to be happy in their life,
not just with their life to use your distinction.
And for some people, happiness in their life means
being able to win that competition in sports
or, you know, building muscle or being able to look better.
Or if you’re a professional, all that hard work and drudgery
and pulling the all nighter at the law firm
or whatever the case may be in your particular profession
in that dog eat dog world,
you might not be happy with your life at that moment,
but if it’s important to you
to achieve a particular thing in the future,
then how do you think about the unhappiness
with your life at that moment?
Is that actually the wrong way of looking at it
because you’re actually in that example
tending to your future self?
– Yeah, well, I think, you know,
there’s a real danger in putting our happiness
in this sort of one event that comes up in the future.
And I think this is something we all fall prey to, right?
I’ll be happy when, I’ll be happy when I make partner.
I’ll be happy when I get married.
For my Yale students, I’ll be happy
when I get into medical school
or get the perfect grade or something like that.
This has been christened by social scientists
as what’s called the arrival fallacy.
I’ll be happy when I get to this point.
But it turns out when social scientists
actually go out and study what happens
when you get that big accomplishment,
get into the perfect school.
And one famous case they studied,
academics, when they find out they got tenure,
which is a big thing for academics
when you find out you get tenure.
What you find is that the folks predicted
that that moment would make them feel super happy
and that the happiness they got
from achieving that sort of thing
would last for a really long time.
But what actually happens is that the happiness you get
from that big moment kind of isn’t as big as you thought.
It’s like a little bit of a let down.
And it doesn’t last for nearly as long.
I show my Yale students, you know,
a big moment for them that I think where they fall prey
to the arrival fallacy is when they find out
they get into Yale, right?
You know, so many of these students in high school
work so long and nowadays they put these little videos
on YouTube, you can find them where they click on the link
and find out they got into Yale and they scream
and their parents scream in these videos and so on.
And I show these little videos to my students in class
and they kind of let out a little sigh when they see them
because they remember that moment.
They remember the very next moment where they said,
yeah, now I’m just chasing the next carrier.
Okay, that now is Yale,
but now it’s like getting my Rhodes scholarship
or getting into medical school
or just the very next thing, right?
And so I think this can be a problem
when we’re chasing something, right?
If we’re getting no happiness out of the chase,
then it’s pretty miserable to be going after these things
that we predict are gonna feel great
and feel great for a really long time,
but they don’t wind up being as good as we expect.
– I wanna ask you about this question in a different way.
So I studied political theory in college
and we’re required to read Aristotle
’cause I’m sure that you are at Yale,
who said it’s better to be a human being dissatisfied
than a pig satisfied,
which I think maybe goes to your point
about hedonic pleasures and happiness.
How do you, given what you study and what you teach,
think about that quote from Aristotle?
– Yeah, well, I think on the one hand,
it’s actually really hard to ask a pig how happy they are.
So I think it’s like, you know,
I wish we could do the same surveys
and kind of level the play for you.
The human analog of a pig with lower order sensibilities,
et cetera, et cetera.
– Yeah, I mean, I think, you know,
what Aristotle made a distinction
between what we’ve been calling these hedonic pleasures,
you know, kind of the experience of positive emotion
in your life with what he famously called eudaimonia,
which is, you know, his word for the good life,
by which I think he meant, you know,
a life filled with purpose, a life filled with meaning,
and sometimes a good moral life, right?
And I think for human beings,
we’re really not going to feel that good about our life
and be satisfied with it,
unless we have a sense of meaning,
unless we have a sense of purpose.
But again, it winds up being reciprocal.
I think we predict, you know,
that delicious bottle of wine
will be the pleasure in my life.
And, you know, it is,
but so is doing really good in the world.
So is volunteering for a cause that you care about.
So is kind of, you know,
achieving something that you worked hard for.
So is helping someone that really is in need, right?
These kinds of moral goods wind up boosting
our sense of satisfaction with life,
our sense of purpose, eudaimonia,
but at the same time,
they’re sort of filled with much more positive emotion
than I think we wind up predicting.
– So do you distinguish between someone
who has low aspirations and low ambition
and can be happier with less
as compared to somebody who’s always striving
for the next thing?
Who’s living, can you make a judgment?
I’m thinking not.
About who’s living the better and happier life?
– Well, I think this is a spot where, you know,
other ancient thinkers kind of weighed in, right?
And if you go back to the Buddha, you know,
he thought that, you know,
one of the biggest causes of human suffering
was wanting, was craving,
was sort of just striving for the next thing.
So it’s not to say that striving is bad.
It’s just to say that that striving works best
if we can in some sense enjoy the journey along the way.
But when it’s really just gonna feel good
when we get to that next thing,
you know, just as we saw in the examples
we were giving before, that next thing
immediately comes a new caret that you’re going after, right?
We just don’t get as much satisfaction
out of arriving as we think.
And so it’s not to say that we should all, you know,
sit on our couches and eat bonbons, you know,
for our whole lives because I think that’s not
the path to eudaimonia either.
But we need to balance our striving
with a healthy respect for the journey.
This is something that Stanford social psychologists
have called the journey mindset, right?
Which is like, we gotta find the joys along the way.
And that really does seem to be the path to new life.
Now you’re not falling prey to the arrival fallacy
because the journey to that arrival moment
is also feeling pretty good.
– We’ll come back to the journey,
but here’s another study or poll that I see
from time to time that is utterly fascinating to me.
And it’s about the difference in that level
of happiness reported by couples who have children
and couples who don’t have children.
So I have children.
I will say as almost every parent I’ve ever met says
that they are the greatest source of joy
and happiness in my life.
I also say, as parents say,
if you have an unhappy child, you cannot be happy fully.
And I can’t imagine, I’m speaking for me,
being as happy as I am in my life
or even with my life with the absence of those kids.
And yet it’s always the case, it seems,
in the studies that I see that as self-reported,
couples who don’t have children are happier.
– Can you explain that and tell us what that means?
– Yeah, this is what’s been referred to
as sort of the parenting paradox, right?
This idea that kids really kind of give us
a sense of meeting, you know, if I asked, you know,
hey, are you satisfied with your life?
What are some things that make you satisfied with your life?
If you’re a parent, you’re gonna say probably my kids.
– Even though they also drive you baddie.
– But kids mess with the moment-to-moment happiness, right?
So this kind of gets, I think, you think of,
not even just being a regular parent,
but rewind to the point when you had a newborn.
I think that’s the biggest association, right?
You and your partner have just had a baby.
You know, with your life, you are feeling amazing.
You have this sense of meaning,
this new person that you love, it’s great.
But in your life, there’s the dirty diapers,
there’s the now not sleeping, there’s the colic,
or whatever it is, it just doesn’t feel good, right?
And so I think that the parenting paradox really
allows us to kind of zoom in
on these different two aspects of happiness, right?
That sometimes we need to sacrifice our moment-to-moment
happiness to find kind of, you know, more meaning.
That said, I think with parenting,
especially with the kind of new stresses of parenting,
we might have swung a little too far in that direction.
The current, as you and I are having this conversation,
Surgeon General Vivek Murthy recently just issued
a Surgeon General’s Public Health Advisory,
which is the kind of thing that Surgeon General’s
released about smoking or the opioid epidemic and so on.
And he released this about parental stress.
In other words, being a parent is in some sense
like a public health crisis
because parents are experiencing so much stress.
And so I think we need to kind of, as parents
and as like societies that support parents,
start thinking of, well, what can we do to help parents
get back to that moment-to-moment happiness?
Because again, there are methods we can use
to kind of do that a bit better.
Even though overall, parenting might be a little bit
of a hit on your hedonic pleasures
in your moment-to-moment happiness.
There are ways we can do it better.
There are ways, there are things we can do
to reduce parent stress.
– I’ll be right back with Dr. Laurie Santos after this.
– All signs seem to indicate that one week from today,
the United States will break from recent tradition
and have a peaceful transition of power.
Felt like a good time to assess Joe Biden’s presidency,
which his staff would have you believe
is one of the most consequential in American history, FDRS.
– I admire their loyalty to their boss,
but I think Biden is a pretty mid-tier mediocre president.
I don’t think he’s awful.
I don’t think he’s a horrible threat to freedom,
the way that you might hear on Truth Social.
The main way I would describe Joe Biden
is that he was an unusually weak president.
And he was, in many important moments,
loathe to decide when we really needed a president to decide.
And I think that that ultimately made him less effective
than he could have been in the moment.
– The good, the bad, and the Biden.
Vox’s Dylan Matthews is gonna help us assess
on Today Explained, Monday to Friday, wherever you listen.
– This week on Prof. G Markets,
we speak with Andrew Ross Sorkin,
editor-at-large of Dealbook at The New York Times
and co-anchor of CNBC’s Squawkbox.
We discuss the key economic trends
he’s watching for Trump’s second term,
the evolving landscape of the AI market,
and the rumors that China is considering
selling TikTok to Elon Musk.
– If China is prepared to sell to Elon Musk
and only to Elon Musk, what does that say
about the leverage and influence that China must think
that they have over Elon Musk
by dint of his factories and Tesla business
in the nation state that is China?
– You can find that conversation and many others
exclusively on the Prof. G Markets podcast.
– It seems to me that some amount of happiness
or satisfaction with your life
depends on your environment, right?
And if you get happiness from something
that’s within yourself or that relates to something
you can control, whether it’s your faith
or a hobby or a life of the mind
or a hedonic pleasure like a Hershey’s Bar
or a Cadbury Bar or whatever,
versus people who get satisfaction and enjoyment
and pleasure and happiness or whatever synonym
you want to use from their relationship
to other people or what other people think about them.
And I think from my own prior career of prosecuting people,
it always is astonishing to me,
and I talked about this a little bit
with Tina Brown on my last podcast,
that the people who seem to have everything in life,
good family, good education, good life,
riches beyond measure,
still are driven to commit crime,
to escalate themselves or elevate themselves
into the next tier in part
because they’re just not happy
having only $100 million and need to have a billion dollars.
And I’ve seen various examples of that.
Is that just the old fashioned
keeping up with the Joneses thing?
Is it something more significant than that?
Does science tell us anything about how to deal with it?
– Yeah, so one of the misconceptions we have
about happiness is that it’s a lot
due to our circumstances, right?
How rich you are, whether you’re a good family,
this kind of stuff.
And there’s something there, right?
If you’re listening to this podcast right now
and you don’t have enough money to put food on your table
or keep a roof over your head,
if you’re a refugee from your country, right?
Obviously changing your circumstances
is probably going to materially affect the degree
to which you experience positive emotion
and the satisfaction that you get with your life for sure.
But for most of the people listening to this podcast
right now who aren’t in a dire traumatic situation,
turns out that changing your circumstances
is not really gonna affect your happiness
as much as we think.
You’d be much better off, for example,
just changing your internal state,
changing your mindset and your behavior and so on.
That said, it is the case that our surroundings
can influence our happiness a little,
at least a little bit.
And we know this from these kind of classic studies
of from the so-called world happiness report.
So this is a group that works with the Gallup poll
organization that’s been doing long-term surveys
of people’s happiness from over 200 countries
from around the world.
And what it tends to find is that there are some countries
that tend to be a lot happier than others.
So the Scandinavian countries are often quite high.
Usually it’s a sort of race between whether Denmark
or Norway or one of those countries is gonna win.
– They’re so annoying those countries.
– Well, one of the reasons they’re so–
– Those countries make me unhappy
because they make me feel bad about our happiness level.
– Well, it should make the folks in the US feel bad, right?
Because we in the US are a very rich country
in theory of circumstances for many people,
at least when you compare us to across the world,
they’re doing pretty great.
That said, we’re a very unequally wealthy country.
And it turns out that wealth doesn’t matter
for our happiness almost as much
as the inequality of our wealth.
If you’re an unequal, wealthy country,
everybody just kind of feels crappy.
And that kind of gets back to the point you made
about keeping up with the Joneses.
Turns out we don’t tend to objectively evaluate
our circumstances, like what our actual salary is,
how nice our house is, how attractive we are.
We tend to compare against other individuals.
So we don’t think in terms of these objective points
of like how well we’re doing,
we sort of compare ourself to some salient reference point.
And our brains are insidious.
They’re very good at finding reference points
that make us feel totally bad.
So if I ask you, what’s a good reference point
for a really good salary,
you’re probably gonna think of somebody like,
Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk,
you’re not gonna think about the refugee up the street
that can very little–
– Well, it’s different in different times of my life.
When I was 25, I thought that one salary
seemed very high to me.
And now I’m 56.
And in my peer group, that number is different.
– Mm-hmm.
And I think this is something even more insidious,
which is that we can change our own reference points, right?
Because we get used to whatever level we wind up at.
When you’re, back when I was a graduate student,
the idea of earning what a first year professor earned
was like, oh my gosh,
I would be able to like get a reasonable apartment
and do this stuff.
But then you get there and then it just becomes your salary.
You get bored with it.
You wanna jump up to the next level and the next level.
And that’s frustrating for a couple of reasons.
One, it’s like we just don’t appreciate
the good stuff we have, right?
So we take it for granted.
But it’s worse, it’s like,
if you get objectively better circumstances in life,
you wind up expecting those objectively amazing things.
You talked about this delicious wine
that you bought in Italy,
like when you just have that wine,
any other crappier wine you’re gonna taste after that
is just like ruined, you know?
I often joke that the people who are most miserable on play
and they’re the people who get to fly first class
all the time because it’s like they can’t,
there’s no, there’s not much way to go up from that, right?
You’re kind of at the top of the top.
And so once we get to the kind of best possible circumstances,
we wind up just getting used to that.
– So you better not fall.
– You better not fall. – You run,
it’s up, you better not fall.
You said something a minute ago,
it’s sort of interesting to me as we think
about how to order society, not to be too heavy about it,
but– – No, no.
– So I have a series of intro related questions
that just came to mind.
I think that was John Stuart Mill
who said that about the pig satisfied.
We’ll look it up, maybe it wasn’t Aristotle,
it might have been John Stuart Mill.
As you think about what the goal of ordered society is,
is it to make society productive
in whatever way that that is defined?
Is it to increase individual
and an average and overall happiness of the citizenry?
And if you think it’s some version of that second one,
when you say income inequality causes an excess
or a surplus of a happiness, well, what’s the reverse of that?
Some version of redistribution of wealth,
socialism, perhaps communism.
Do people in societies that more resemble the latter
have more happiness?
‘Cause that’s not what the Scandinavian countries are,
they’re capitalist countries that have huge safety nets.
So what does your research tell you about,
at least in respect to this dimension,
what works and what doesn’t work?
– Yeah, so I think to understand what works best,
it’s helpful to dig into specifically on wealth, say,
what’s going on in terms of people’s happiness.
I mentioned, if you’re listening to this podcast
and you don’t have enough money to put roof over your head
or food on the table, changing your circumstances,
and by that I meant getting more money
is gonna make you happy.
And there’s a famous paper
by the Nobel Prize winning economist, Danny Kahneman,
who sort of looked at this in around $2010,
he found that if you’re on the low end of the income spectrum,
then getting more money and getting higher salary
will make you happier.
But that kind of–
– And in fact, ’cause you mentioned it,
I don’t remember the figure off the top of my head.
At some salary level, I think,
didn’t he find that even tripling your salary
doesn’t increase your happiness?
– Exactly, and in $2010,
he found that this was around $75,000.
So you don’t take–
– Yeah, but not in Manhattan.
– Yeah, not in–
Well, it’s, you know, we can quibble every time
I bring up this number,
like one Manhattan that’s different
than like living in Iowa.
Like, what if you’re a single family called boy?
– In a standard, I don’t mean to fight the problems.
– But the point of Kahneman’s work is like,
there is some point at which it levels off.
And that point is probably not as high as we think.
You know, in 2020, ’24, 2025 dollars,
it’s probably around $110 maybe.
But the point is it’s not $100 million, right?
After, again, $2010, 75K,
which is what Danny originally studied,
doubling or tripling your income
doesn’t at all affect your stress levels.
It doesn’t reduce your stress levels or increase them.
It doesn’t make you experience more positive emotions.
Doesn’t have the effect we think, right?
But let’s get back to redistributing wealth.
What does that mean?
Well, that means, you know,
if I take some money away from the folks
who are earning 100 million, like,
they’re not gonna notice it.
It’s not gonna really negatively affect
their happiness at all.
But if you could get that money to somebody
who wasn’t, was earning less than $75,000 in $2010,
all of a sudden that would make them a lot happier.
And so I think we do get some hints
that redistribution of wealth might be really useful.
But another thing that we get,
and I think we learn this more
from the World Happiness Surveys
and like looking at Scandinavian countries,
is that what we really need out of wealth,
this sort of this support network, right?
This kind of safety, right?
So if we get sick, if we lose our job and so on,
we’ll kind of have something to take care of us.
One of the things that,
if you look at Scandinavian countries,
this is Denmark in particular,
many of them have these cultural sayings
about kind of not being better than somebody else.
The Danes have this idea of Jante’s law,
which I’m probably saying wrong ’cause I’m not Danish,
but Jante’s law is this idea that like,
you shouldn’t really like strive
to be better than somebody else.
You shouldn’t brag and say you’re better.
Like, we’re kind of just all equal.
And I think that that fits with kind of what’s happening
in terms of not just their wealth levels,
but their kind of status levels and so on, right?
Because everybody has a social safety net.
You know, if you, it doesn’t really pay to go off
and become like a super high powered lawyer,
’cause like probably pay in taxes enough
that you’re not gonna sort of see that same boost in wealth
as you would maybe in the US.
And so the assumption is that that makes the folks
who could have had this super high salary worse off,
but the data really suggests it might not work that way.
It might be imperceptible to those individuals.
– That’s not great for the standing of your country
in other ways and for GDP and for lots of other things.
And how does this translate to sports?
Are athletes, are competitive athletes more or less happy
than the average person given what you just said?
– Yeah, I mean, I think they experience a lot of pressure.
You know, they’re less great surveys, you know,
comparing exactly competitive athletes versus lay people.
But a lot of the competitive athletes you talk to,
like unless they’re kind of finding ways
to seek out a journey mindset and so on,
you know, pretty miserable, like, you know,
I can’t name names, but I’ve been called out
to do a lot of consulting with, you know,
competitive sports teams, you know,
some of the best folks that, you know,
I tell my dad and my brother and folks who are sports fans,
it’s like, oh my God, you talk to this person about happiness.
And I’m like, yeah, I did because despite what they’re making,
despite how amazing they’re doing,
how many championships they won,
they’re still feeling pretty miserable.
You know, that last championship came in
and all of a sudden they’re like, okay,
now there’s even more pressure for the next one, right?
And so these great circumstances,
these amazing successes kind of don’t make us
as happy as we think.
– Can I tell you a small thing
that has made me happy in this moment?
– Please, yeah.
– So that quote I mentioned about the pig dissatisfied
or the pig satisfied, I thought was Aristotle
and then I self-corrected sometime later
in St. John Stuart Mill.
The team has informed me that it’s actually John Stuart Mill.
– Amazing.
– So we didn’t have the mistake, persist,
in perpetuity in the podcast.
And that makes me a little bit happy.
Let me ask about athletics again for a moment
because there are very few in the world elite athletes
for who most be a ridiculous existence, right?
You can be Tom Brady, you can be LeBron James
and you can be the best, literally the best athlete
in your position and in your sport in the world
or that the world has ever seen
and then you lose a game and you’re very unhappy.
So that’s a certain kind of existence.
But there are a lot of people who are listening
who have kids who are in sports
and there’s a lot of debate among parenting communities
about how we should handle sports
and how competitive it should be.
My boys played Little League
and I remember there’s sometimes there are signs
at the park reminding folks, this is supposed to be fun.
– This is a game, parents.
– This is a game.
– It’s supposed to be fun, yeah.
– Leave your weapon at home, please do not attack the UMP.
How should we be thinking about sports
that are supposed to be fun and make you happy?
– Yeah, well, I think this is another spot
where we need to kind of get back to this journey mindset.
I mean, one of my favorite interviews that I did
from my own podcast, “The Happiness Lab”
was with the Olympic skater, Michelle Kwan,
who like I grew up admiring and people have heard her name.
Turns out she never won gold medal.
And I kind of asked her–
– Could have sworn she did.
– Yeah, exactly, you kind of just like update and assume.
But what she would say was that like, you know, that’s fine.
Like I actually didn’t, you know, I wanted to medal,
that’s why you’re there.
But the thing I most enjoyed was just like
being at the Olympics.
Like she talked about the day that she got to first like
lace up her skates and skate over the ice
with the Olympic rings.
‘Cause you know, those colored Olympic rings,
that symbol is like set in the ice.
And she just remembers what it looked like
sort of skating over the ice with those Olympic rings.
She remember what it felt like to be in this huge arena
and hear the cheers of fans and the kind of murmur
of just so many different languages and voices at once.
Like those are the things that she was enjoying.
And she got those, even though she didn’t get a chance
to get a medal, right?
And I think that’s what we need to get back to
for our kids in sports, right?
They’re learning, like, you know,
you’re having fun with your friends.
You’re just getting some exercise.
Moving our bodies is one of the easiest behaviors
we can engage in to feel a little bit better.
There’s evidence that a half hour of cardio exercise
is almost as effective as like a prescription
for anti-depression medication, right?
There’s like simply moving our bodies feels good.
– Wait a minute, how many milligrams is 15 minerals?
– I don’t know, I have to get down to it.
But no, like meta-analyses show
that like literally your psychiatrist could prescribe
moving your body to reduce depression, reduce anxiety.
It works just as well.
It’s just doesn’t make the pharmaceutical companies
as much money, but yeah.
Yeah, so these are all things that kids could be enjoying
in the moment as part of the journey playing sports.
But, you know, all too often,
I think we just get caught up in whatever that victory is,
whatever that arrival is at the end.
– Yeah, so talking about a little bit of an older set,
not kids, but people who are entering the job market
or changing jobs, it seems to me that the correct advice
is do a job that you like and that you love every day
as opposed to something that’s gonna get you
some future objective, right?
I mean, I think part of the reason that my friends
and colleagues at the U.S. Attorney’s Office
in the Southern District where I was for a lot of time,
I think now that I am thinking about these issues
in these terms, I never thought about these issues
in these terms before, right?
You’re doing your job and the job is
to make sure that you’re doing justice.
That the premium was not placed on getting the conviction,
although that’s gratifying and vindicating the rights
of a victim and getting, you know, proceeds back
to a victim who may have been, you know, robbed
of their money and their bank accounts, et cetera, et cetera.
But the joy and the satisfaction came from every day
doing the job and talking to witnesses
and appearing in court.
And so the level of, you know, as proof of this question,
I don’t know how many people appreciate this.
People who are in those prosecuting jobs,
particularly at really high performing offices
like my former office, are literally leaving
hundreds of thousands of dollars on the table.
I was able to persuade people to come back
from private practice.
And in private practice in New York,
we’re talking about millions of dollars
coming back to work for, you know,
a very good wage still in America,
but like $150,000.
The only reason you would do that, I think,
is if the job brought you great satisfaction.
And that, for that community, which is one of the reasons
I thought it was special,
that was more important than making money.
Do we need more jobs like that?
– Oh, I think definitely, or we need to find ways
to kind of bring the parts of the process
that we really enjoy to those jobs, right.
You know, because, you know,
if you’re a high powered lawyer in private practice
in New York, you might have the option
to switch to be a prosecutor
or maybe you have enough money to retire
and you know, I don’t know, become a glass blower
or something, not everybody has that privilege.
And so there’s an open question
if your job isn’t so flexible,
what are some ways you can bring the sense of values
and purpose to this job.
And here’s a spot where I really love the work
of my former colleague at Yale
who’s now at the University of Pennsylvania,
Amy Rezninsky.
She does a lot of work on this process
that she calls job crafting.
And the idea is that with job crafting,
you kind of sit down and you think,
what are my strengths, what are my values?
Maybe for these prosecutors who join,
who kind of lose some money,
but kind of take this new job,
what’s really like working with people
or I care about justice, right.
Like I want to, I really care about fairness
and I want to fight.
Maybe it’s bravery, right.
Like I got to push myself all the time,
you know, kind of like fight these big fights,
whatever it is, right.
We can come up with all these different kind
of strengths and values.
The idea of job crafting is you take
your normal job description
and you figure out a way to bring those values in,
no matter what it is.
And the reason I love Amy’s work
is that she studies job crafting.
Again, not in attorneys, not in podcasters.
She studies job crafting
in hospital janitorial staff workers, right.
So these are people who are washing people’s linen
and cleaning the floors when people get sick.
And she finds that between a quarter to a third of them
really report that their job is a calling.
You know, they have to get paid,
but they love their job and they would show up
even if they weren’t getting paid.
And those individuals tend to be the ones
that spontaneously job craft.
They’re like bringing their values in.
She tells these lovely stories.
One was a story of a janitorial staff worker
who worked in a chemotherapy ward.
And if you’re listening now
and you’ve had the unfortunate to have to get chemotherapy,
you know, often makes people sick.
So a big part of the sky’s job
was actually cleaning up vomit in the room.
But he said, well, that wasn’t my job.
My values are kind of social intelligence
and humor and empathy, right.
I wanted to make these patients laugh.
And so every time he had to go up and clean some vomit,
he would joke.
He’s like, oh, this looks like a big spill.
I’m going to get overtime and you know, you’re laughing.
He was like, the people laughed and like that was my job.
That’s why I show up at work every day, right.
And so I love Amy’s work because it shows
if you can get creative about job crafting
as a guy who cleans up vomit in a hospital,
like for most of the people listening right now,
you can get creative about your own job too.
The key is like figure out, you know,
what things get me going?
What do I really like?
And then ask the question,
how can I infuse more of that into what I do every day?
– You know, I want to talk about acts of kindness
because you talk about that as being important.
And I remember as a freshman in college,
the freshman or sophomore in college,
I took psych one from a giant in the field named Jerome Kagan.
– Oh yeah.
– And I remember, and he would bust all these myths
that, you know, we thought were true,
but psychology teaches us or not.
And one of those was when he said,
“If you want someone to like you, don’t do them a favor.
Ask them to do you a favor.”
Because, which is counterintuitive to say the least,
because the person who has done you a favor
is now invested in you,
which is related to this idea that you get,
you know, gratification and happiness
from doing kind things for other people.
Can you talk about that and why that happens?
– Yeah, I think this is a huge misconception
that we all kind of get culturally right now, right?
If you look at any kind of not so evidence-based article
on happiness, they talk a lot about self-care
or treat yourself, right?
I think intuitively we think that the path to happiness
is doing something nice for ourselves.
But just as you said from your, you know,
the class you took with Jerome Kagan
and probably like decades of work since then,
pretty much every study shows
that we get a boost in happiness.
– It’s not that many decades.
– One, two decades, two decades.
– No, it’s like three, it’s like three decades, it’s okay.
– No, but the key is like we get happiness
from doing nice stuff for other people.
One of my favorite studies on this was done
by the University of British Columbia psychologist,
Elizabeth Dunn.
She does a study where she walks up to subjects
on the street and just hands them 20 bucks.
But the key is that she tells you how to spend that 20 bucks.
She either says, by the end of the day,
spend this $20 on yourself,
do something nice to treat yourself,
or by the end of the day, spend this money
to do something nice for somebody else.
You could donate it to an unhoused person,
you could buy your friend a latte, whatever it is,
but just gotta be for somebody else.
And then she has people rate their happiness,
and then she has people rate their happiness again
at the end of the day once they’ve spent the money.
And she finds that, by and large,
people self-report being happier
when they’ve spent the money on other people.
That’s not what we predict,
but it’s sort of what the data show.
And that means that, as you’ve said,
we can do something nice for others,
merely by asking people for help.
I think this, you and I are having this conversation
kind of at the end of the year,
where a lot of us are thinking about charity and so on.
I think for some people, donating some money
is the thing to do,
but some people are feeling financially
kind of strapped right now and aren’t able to do that.
And I think the key is to remember
that sometimes by asking the people around you for help,
by being a little bit vulnerable,
you can give a gift to someone else too.
And so, something that I think we often forget
we can do for others,
but it’s really a way to let them feel competent,
let them feel like they’re doing something
to give them a little bit of a happiness boost.
– Why is it so counterintuitive though?
What do we not understand about human psychology
that that’s such a revelation to us?
– I mean, there’s so much that we get wrong about happiness.
I feel like this is one piece.
I mean, I think that this bias is part of a larger thing
we get wrong that folks like the University of Chicago’s Nick
Epley have christened under sociality.
We just like all over the place misunderstand
the big benefits that we get from other people.
Like we don’t realize that doing something nice
for others will feel good.
We don’t realize that chatting with a stranger
will boost our mood.
We don’t realize that, you know,
giving a simple compliment to a stranger,
expressing our gratitude, asking for help.
All of these things are like evidence-based
happiness boosters that make us feel really great
and make us feel more satisfied with our lives.
And so many of us are just leaving opportunities
to do that, you know, on the table all the time.
– It seems like such a win-win proposition
not to be corny about it like here’s the thing.
– It builds the pie.
It builds the happiness pie.
– That will make you happy.
And also it helps another person.
Why don’t we have more charity?
It makes you wonder, right?
– Yeah, why don’t we have more charity?
Why don’t we have just more conversations?
– It’s not a sacrifice.
– Exactly.
– The charity’s not a sacrifice.
And I think this is why I really love teaching students
about the science of this stuff
because it is true, our mind just has these
mistaken intuitions, right?
Like I’m the professor who teaches this stuff.
And I’ve seen the studies, I could quote the stats,
but like, you know, when push comes to shove
and I’m having a tough day and I’m gonna about to spend,
you know, five bucks on a nice latte for myself,
I’m not thinking, well, let me, you know,
gift the person behind me and line this latte.
That’s what will really boost my happiness, right?
I know the data and I still don’t have that intuition.
I can put it into practice, right?
Rationally knowing this stuff,
I’ve changed some of my behaviors around,
but my intuitions haven’t changed and that’s frustrating.
It’d be nice if the mind were more cooperative
and we could update all our intuitions,
but it doesn’t work out.
– By the way, the other intuition that he exploded,
which is relevant as I age is that you are more likely
to remember the name of your second grade teacher
than maybe professor you had in a prior year,
which to me as I talk about professor Kagan
is also true ’cause I remember his name
and now that I’ve done the math is like 35 years ago
and I can’t remember the names of people I met on Monday.
So that’s another one.
Can you talk about the importance of gratitude
and what that means?
Is it a muscle you exercise?
Is it a sentiment you have?
Is it passive?
Is it active?
And why does it matter?
– Yeah, yeah.
Well, I think one reason gratitude matters a lot
gets back to what we were talking about before
this idea that we just kind of get used to stuff, right?
That the good things in life just stop feeling as good
if you keep getting them over time.
Gratitude is powerful because it’s a way to hack that, right?
When you think like, you know,
I don’t know how to use the first class example,
like I’m sitting in first class,
I might not have sat in first class.
Look at these cool like little socks I get
or this extra room in my chair,
like I’m noticing that this feels really good, right?
That’s the power of gratitude.
Kind of shine this little attention spotlight
on what we have and we notice
that it didn’t have to be that way, right?
We don’t want to take this for granted
because it might not always be this way.
And that can really allow us to recognize
the good things in life and to notice sort of the blessings.
And really study after study just shows
the benefits of this stuff.
Not just for our happiness,
but for other things too.
– But what does that mean?
Does that mean that you,
so I’ll give you an example of my life.
So I have to actively practice gratitude
and I have a really good life
and I’ve had a really good life for a long time.
But I was annoyed by some things at work,
something didn’t go the right way,
or I was not as prepared as I might have been, whatever.
I was grumpy and cranky in my whole life, says to me,
what did you do again yesterday?
I said, what do you mean?
Like what did you do in the middle of the day yesterday
for work?
I said, I did a podcast interview.
I said, who did you interview again?
I said, Steven Van Zand,
a little Steven from the East Street Band,
who I love, along with Bruce Springsteen.
And they paid you to do that interview.
I said, yeah, okay, I’m gonna stop complaining now.
Is that what you have to do from time to time?
– Yeah, I mean, really one of the easiest interventions
is just to commit to scribbling down three to five things
that you notice that you’re grateful for every day, right?
So that can be something really cool.
Like I get to interview someone
from my favorite music band ever,
which maybe doesn’t apply to everyone.
But it can be simple things like my morning coffee,
my kid’s smile, you know, the way the tail wagged,
you know, there’s like a little bit sunny, right?
Like sometimes my gratitude,
things are just silly things like, you know,
I was in the shower and the light in my shower
sometimes creates this little prism and I noticed it.
And it’s just really colorful and it’s great, right?
I think sometimes gratitude feels like,
has to be this big thing.
Like I’m grateful for this really important thing in life.
But sometimes you can kind of reduce it
just to the like little positives, the delights.
I sometimes like to replace a gratitude practice
with what I like to call a delight practice
where you just notice, you know,
the cute, funny, beautiful,
awe-inspiring things in the world
and just make a note of like, that was delightful.
Sometimes that can feel a little bit lighter
than kind of going for gratitude.
But the key of a practice like this
where you notice it over time
is that you’re training your brain to focus on this stuff.
Another dumb feature of brains is that we tend to have
what’s called a negativity bias.
Those hassles in life, the fact that you had a bad day,
the grumpy stuff we notice all the time.
We don’t have to put any effort into it.
It’s not, doesn’t need to be intentional at all.
It just comes for free.
But the delights, the delights in life we gotta seek out.
And the key about making it a practice is, you know,
just like that exercise practices
we were talking about earlier,
you can kind of build up your reps
and train your attention muscle to notice the good stuff.
But it takes some intention and some energy.
– But sunrises and sunsets are free too.
– Yeah, for sure.
I mean, there’s all this stuff that’s free.
I recently just had COVID.
And I guess these new variants of COVID
are kind of like back to the like OG COVID
where a lot of folks are losing their sense of taste
and smell and that happened to me.
I completely lost my sense of taste and smell
for about six weeks.
– Oh goodness.
– And I hadn’t noticed how awesome having smell was like
at all, but as soon as I lost it, I was like, oh my God,
you know, once it started coming back, I’m like coffee,
like, you know, my partner, like my bed sheets,
my favorite soap, like just simple things.
– But how long does that last?
– You know, it lasts long if you go back to it, right?
I’ve started to actually make a practice
and ’cause I do my own little delight
and sort of gratitude practice,
I just kind of scribble in a note zap on my phone
and I have in big letters smell at the top.
And so every time I see that,
I sometimes go back to noticing of like,
oh, it’s actually cool that like,
I can smell the coffee right now or I’m kind of out.
And it was like a really rainy day today
where I am in New England and it was like,
just had that kind of crisp wet smell.
And I was like, this is a sensation I get, that’s cool.
And so the beauty of gratitude is it totally will go away
if you don’t intentionally practice it,
but gratitude can be something that kind of brings you back.
– How important are friendships to maintaining,
not just sanity, but happiness?
I think they’re very important, but you tell us.
– Yeah, they’re huge.
I mean, if I had to pick one thing you could do
to be happier, it would be to improve
and engage in social connection,
whether that’s with a really good friend, with a stranger.
And this is the kind of stuff that matters
not just for things like happiness, but for longevity too.
There’s some lovely work coming out of
Walderman’s lab at Harvard,
that’s been part of this sort of Harvard adult study
of development, right?
So they follow individual Harvard students
from way back in the day through their 80s.
And now they’re kind of continuing this longitudinal study,
studying, you know, not just those individuals,
but the kids of those individuals
and the grandkids of those individuals.
And one of the things that this really long-running,
huge study has found is that if you want the best predictor
of happiness in life, but also health later in life,
it really just seems to boil down
to your social connections.
They just matter much more than we think.
– In both ways, right?
So if you have a lot of connections
and a lot of friendships, you’re healthy.
And I guess it follows that the opposite is true,
but not always.
And people who don’t have friends
or connections to loved ones
are at the worst peril of depression and disease, right?
– Yeah, that’s right.
I mean, the Surgeon General likes to quote
that self-reported loneliness.
If you self-report on surveys, you feel very lonely.
That’s as bad as smoking 15 cigarettes a day.
It’s twice as bad as being obese for all kinds of things
like your existence of heart disease and inflammation
and just like chronic health problems,
like just not having social connection is that bad.
– Which age groups in America today are the happiest
and which are the least happy?
And I know it’s gonna be a disconcerting answer from you.
– No, no, it’s actually pretty good, I think for you.
So yeah, so historically, we thought of happiness
as sort of a U-shape function.
So the young folks tend to be really high in happiness.
Then you get to college, things go down,
your 30s things go down,
they hit a kind of nadir around 48, 49.
So I’m actually just turned 49.
So I’m starting to go back up on the curve.
And then things get better and better into old age,
which is again, not what we expect.
I think we expect the young side that kind of makes sense
that young people should be happier.
But we don’t see the kind of upswing
towards the end of life.
But the closer you get to death,
despite the health problems, despite the grief,
despite the kind of objectively bad stuff
that we know can happen later in life,
you actually wind up being happier.
I think the only caveat to that though
is that that U-shaped pattern has been flattened over time.
Older individuals have become less happy
than they were, say, 20 years ago.
And much more profoundly,
young people have become much, much more unhappy
than they were before.
– Right, no, well, that’s the thing that gives me pause.
That’s why I was making the remark that I made
because that’s sort of sad and upsetting.
– Super sad.
The time of life that you’re most supposed to be happy
are current young people who are experiencing.
– Oh my gosh, I think about my kids
who are happy and well-adjusted.
But they don’t know how happy they should be.
– Yeah, yeah, yeah.
– They have very good lives.
– And even if they’re feeling okay,
like their generation is not.
So right now, among college students,
over a 40% report being too depressed to function most days,
over 60% say that they feel very lonely most of the time.
Another over 60% report feeling very anxious,
one in 10 current college students
has seriously considered suicide in the last year, right?
Like it’s really an epidemic.
– So what do we do about that, Professor?
– Well, I think we try to teach people,
how to overcome their misconceptions
when it comes to what matters for happiness.
I think a lot of the misconceptions we’ve talked about,
pursuing money, pursuing these accolades at all costs, right?
Not investing in your social connection,
not investing in other positive emotions like gratitude,
or you’re sort of striving for everything,
not noticing what you have.
I think these are easy behavioral and mindset hacks
that we can all engage in to feel a little bit better.
I think our culture, especially for young people,
has pushed people away from that,
but I think there are things we can do
to get back towards that.
– Is there any correlation?
I’m not a particularly religious person,
but is there any correlation between the shrinkage
of the church in all the various religions
and the increase in unhappiness?
– For sure, yeah, I mean,
so the data on religion and happiness are interesting.
So individuals who engage in more religious practices
tend to be happier,
but it’s not the case that individuals
who have strong religious beliefs are necessarily happier.
What do I mean by that?
– Well, that’s super interesting.
– Yeah, so I think why it is is that
it’s not the beliefs that matter for your happiness,
it’s your behaviors, right?
So take an individual who’s really engaged
in religious practices.
They’re probably doing things like going to services
where they engage in social connection.
They might be participating in charity.
Maybe they’re saying prayers
where they experience a sense of mindfulness
and presence and gratitude.
Religious practices often involve
a lot of the same behaviors and mindsets
that we’ve just talked about
that seem to matter for happiness.
And that’s what seems to give you a boost.
And you have that not just kind of doing
those kind of practices on your own,
it’s sort of part of a really rich set of traditions
and beliefs that allow you to realize
the importance of that stuff.
And the key is that that’s true no matter,
pretty much no matter what religious practice
you’re engaged in.
All of them have these kind of features
that tend to improve social connection,
improve a sense of gratitude,
sort of talk really strongly about doing nice things
for others, make that a value.
All of these things are kind of true in religion.
And therefore I think engaging in religious practices
winds up making us happier.
– We may have sort of incidentally covered this.
You’ve talked a lot about the things
that make you happy in the act you can engage in.
They’ll increase your happiness.
What’s the opposite?
What are the things that you do or that happen
that make people the most unhappy?
– Well, I think it’s kind of investing in things
that are sort of the opposite of that.
So we’ve talked about the importance of engaging
in gratitude, kind of not falling prey
to these sort of comparison biases.
What’s the thing that you can do
that really brings up those comparison biases
and make you feel like you don’t have enough,
I think, hopping on social media for a lot of us, right?
Kind of seeing these negative comparisons writ large
kind of makes us feel terrible.
I think engaging with our technology
can also be an opportunity cost on social connection,
which is ironic, right?
I think these portable phones that are in all of our pockets
were initially designed at least in part to be used
as a phone to like literally connect with somebody else.
But how often have you not talked to someone in real life
because you’re staring at your phone
and noticing what’s going on on the other side of Reddit
or the other side of some political blog
and just like not talking to your spouse.
And so I think the things that cause an opportunity cost
of stuff like social connection, engaging in gratitude
and so on, those things wind up being a real hit
on our happiness that we often can’t see directly.
– Am I correct that listening to podcasts
dramatically increases happiness?
– For sure, and especially some podcasts.
– I can think of two.
I think of two in particular before I let you go.
And any advice for people entering the holiday season
who have reason to be sad and not happy?
– Yeah, well, I think, you know,
this gets to something we haven’t talked about yet,
which is negative emotions, right?
I think sometimes we think if you’re experiencing those,
it’s just bad, it’s just bad for happiness.
But, you know, as Aristotle and other great thinkers
would have said– – Are you sure it was Aristotle?
– I think it was Aristotle for sure.
– Or was it John Stuart Mill?
But as many, many thinkers have said,
your negative emotions are important.
Part of the equation, right?
You know, I think the correct way to think
about negative emotions is almost like
the alert signal on your car.
You know, if you’re driving down the street
and your engine light comes on or your tire light comes on,
that’s inconvenient, it might not be awesome.
But if you ignore that, you kind of do so at your peril.
I think if you’re, you know,
going through this holiday season
and you’re experiencing some grief,
that’s kind of like a tire light, right?
Like, there’s something you need to take some time
to feel sad about.
You might miss someone.
You might need to take some time
to think about those memories
and kind of engage with that.
If you’re going through this holiday season
and you’re feeling a little bit lonely,
that’s probably a really honest signal
that you need to reach out to somebody,
make a connection, call a friend, and so on.
A really big one, if you’re going through this holiday season
and you’re feeling overwhelmed, like you can’t even,
like there’s way too much on your plate,
that’s probably a really honest kind of engine light signal
that you need to take something off your plate,
that you need to give yourself a break,
that you need to find some space in your schedule.
And so I think if you’re experiencing negative emotions,
the right response is like, awesome.
Thank God I have that alert to tell me, you know,
what I need to do to make changes so I can feel better.
You know, it’s like if you’re,
the only worst thing than having your tire go out
is not having your tire light work
’cause then you just wouldn’t know
and then you find out on the highway somewhere.
And so thank your negative emotion system.
It’s really giving you useful information
that you can act on.
– Also very sound automotive advice.
– Also very sound automotive advice.
– So final question, I wanna go back to the definition.
This may be a dumb and too clever by half question,
but you know, we have been taught
that the opposite of love is not hate, right?
They say the opposite of love is indifference.
So my question is, what’s the opposite of happiness?
Is it actually sadness?
Or is it the absence of feeling or something else?
– Yeah, I think it’s not negative emotions, right?
Like I think happiness,
I always go back to sort of Aristotle’s definition
and really Aristotle’s definition.
– Okay, I’m gonna look up John Stuart Mill.
– His word, Eudaimaniia, right?
Like happiness is about living a good life.
And I think the opposite of Eudaimaniia
is feeling like something is off.
You’re feeling overwhelmed.
You’re not feeling like you have a sense of purpose.
You’re feeling kind of meh.
Like those kinds of signals
that you’re really not living up
to the good life that you could be.
And so by making some changes that research really shows
that you can get back to.
Aristotle’s definition of Eudaimaniia
and a kind of way of pursuing happiness
that’ll feel a lot better.
– Dr. Laurie Santos, thank you.
I made a list of simple things just to summarize.
Have gratitude for simple things,
engage in acts of kindness and get more friends.
We can all do that.
– That sounds pretty good.
– We can all do that, right?
– That sounds pretty good.
– Okay, thanks so much for your insight.
You should come back a lot because I feel better already.
– Amazing.
Thanks so much for having me on the show.
(upbeat music)
My conversation with Dr. Laurie Santos
continues for members of the Cafe Insider community.
In the bonus for insiders,
we discuss what we call the Keanu Reeves Doctrine
and mastering the art of letting things go.
– I think what he’s onto is something important, right?
Which is that all of us mess up every once in a while, right?
And it’s important to kind of give people some compassion.
– To try out the membership for just $1 for a month,
head to cafe.com/insider.
Again, that’s cafe.com/insider.
(upbeat music)
To end the show this week,
I’d like to reflect a little further
on the interview you just heard with Laurie Santos.
Dr. Santos described during our interview
something called the arrival of fallacy,
the mistaken belief that happiness waits for us
at some distant destination, a promotion,
a bigger house, a certain milestone.
But time and again,
research and life experience remind us
that happiness isn’t a place we arrive at,
it’s the journey itself.
Now that may sound corny,
it may sound like a cliche,
but that’s because it’s true.
She also spoke about the power of gratitude,
that when we stop to notice what we have,
we shine a light on the things
we might otherwise take for granted.
Again, cliche, sure, but that’s because it’s true
and we still don’t do it enough.
So as the year winds down,
maybe we can make time to savor the moments
that truly matter, the time spent with family,
the laughs shared with friends,
and the quiet ongoing journey of discovering ourselves.
This holiday season,
let’s try to give ourselves the gift of presence,
of slowing down long enough to appreciate the path.
And finally, from my conversation with Laurie Santos,
I think that surprised me the most
and has stuck with me the most
was the revelation supported by science
that helping other people
not only makes the person you’re helping happier,
but in fact, the person doing the helping happier.
Acts of kindness, even small ones,
are a path to your own happiness.
As Laurie pointed out,
there’s all this discussion in the happiness sector
about self-care and taking care of yourself
and worrying about your own body
and your own health and your own prosperity.
And that’s all good and important,
but the path to happiness also comes
from helping other people out.
Be good to yourself always,
but also be good to other people.
Science says that it’ll make you happier.
From all of us here at Stay Tuned with Preet,
we wish you peace, gratitude, good health,
and a renewed appreciation for the journey.
Happy holidays.
(gentle music)
(gentle music)
Well, that’s it for this episode of Stay Tuned.
Thanks again to my guest, Dr. Laurie Santos.
If you like what we do, rate and review the show
on Apple podcasts or wherever you listen.
Every positive review helps new listeners find the show.
Send me your questions about news, politics, and justice.
Tweet them to me @preetbarar with the hashtag #AskPreet.
You can also now reach me on threads,
or you can call and leave me a message at 669-247-7338.
That’s 669-24preet.
Or you can send an email to letters@cafe.com.
Stay Tuned is presented by CAFE
and the Vox Media Podcast Network.
The executive producer is Tamara Sepper.
The technical director is David Tadishor.
The deputy editor is Celine Rohrer.
The editorial producers are Noah Azalai and Jake Kaplan.
The associate producer is Claudia Hernandez.
And the CAFE team is Matthew Billy, Nat Weiner,
and Leanna Greenway.
Our music is by Andrew Dost.
I’m your host, Preet Bharara.
As always, Stay Tuned.
[BLANK_AUDIO]

What does it take to be happy? Professor of psychology Laurie Santos just might have the answer.

This week The Gray Area takes a break from its regular programming to bring you an episode of another podcast that we love.

In this episode of Stay Tuned With Preet, host Preet Bharara interviews Laurie Santos, a psychology professor at Yale University, about what we all can do to be happier. The two discuss how to maximize your happiness, how to bring meaning to your career, self-care vs. caring for others, and the barriers to happiness that parents face.

Host: Preet Bharara, host of Stay Tuned With Preet

Guest: Laurie Santos, professor of psychology at Yale University, and host of The Happiness Lab

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AI Engine Chatbot
AI Avatar
Hi! How can I help?